AJP - Heart AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 274: H679-H683, 1998;
0363-6135/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (55)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franco, F.
Right arrow Articles by Shohet, R. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franco, F.
Right arrow Articles by Shohet, R. V.
Vol. 274, Issue 2, H679-H683, February 1998

Magnetic resonance imaging accurately estimates LV mass in a transgenic mouse model of cardiac hypertrophy

Fatima Franco1, Susan K. Dubois2, Ronald M. Peshock1,2, and Ralph V. Shohet2

Departments of 1 Radiology and 2 Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Transgenic mice with a dysfunctional guanylyl cyclase A gene (GCA -/-) are unable to transduce the signals from atrial naturetic peptide and develop hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to assess cardiac hypertrophy in these animals, using wild-type siblings as controls. Anesthetized mice were studied by gated multislice, multiphase cine MRI at 1.5 T. Simpson's rule was used to estimate left ventricle (LV) mass and volumes from short-axis images. Correlation between LV mass evaluated by MRI and at necropsy was excellent, with LVnecropsy = 1.04 × LVMRI + 4.69 mg (r2 = 0.95). By MRI, GCA -/- LV mass was significantly different when compared with isogenic controls [GCA -/-, 226 ± 43 mg (n = 14) vs. controls, 156 ± 14 mg (n = 10); P < 0.0001]. LV volumes and ejection fraction in the two groups were not significantly different. MRI provides an accurate means for the noninvasive assessment of murine cardiac phenotype and may be useful in following the effects of genetic modification.

myocardial hypertrophy; transgenic models; left ventricular mass

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY is both an adaptive mechanism and a pathological result of many cardiac diseases. Animal models of pressure overload have been developed to study this process. These include surgical manipulation (constriction of the aorta), renal ablation (by excision or drugs), and intravascular volume expansion with high-salt diets (6). These approaches suffer from an inherent dissimilarity to human hypertension that is chronic, usually gradual in onset, and appears to have a large genetic component. Genetic models of hypertension in rodents are available; however, the specific genetic abnormalities have rarely been identified (9).

In contrast, transgenic models of hypertension provide the capacity to analyze the effects of specific genes of interest in a model that may more closely resemble the human disease. One limitation of transgenic analysis is the need to analyze hemodynamics and end-organ pathophysiology in a 30-g animal with a 200-mg heart. The assessment of hypertrophy in mice traditionally has relied on necropsy, increasing the numbers of animals required and preventing serial or functional studies. More recently, echocardiography using high-frequency transducers has proven to be useful in estimating LV mass in mice (4, 12). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a three-dimensional approach, independent of geometric assumptions, has proven in numerous previous studies to be an accurate technique to quantify left ventricular (LV) mass and function (14). We have extended previous work on cardiac MRI in small animals to the evaluation of LV mass and function in the mouse. We have applied this method to transgenic mice with a deletion of the guanylyl cyclase A (GCA) gene, which produces sustained hypertension, and evaluated the development of cardiac hypertrophy in this model.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Animal Protocol

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Animal Experimentation at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas. The transgenic mouse model was produced as previously described (11). Twenty-four mice, weighing 25-44 g, were studied, including 14 transgenic (GCA -/-) and 10 isogenic controls (GCA +/+) with ages between 3 and 16 mo. Animals were weighed before MRI and anesthetized with serial intraperitoneal injections of Avertin (2.5% tribromoethanol and 0.8% 2-methyl-2-butanol in water; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and were allowed to breathe spontaneously. After the scan, the mice were killed, and the heart was dissected and weighed. To test interstudy reproducibility, three additional mice were scanned twice on the same day and again the following day.

MRI Technique

MRI was performed using a 1.5-T Philips Gyroscan NT whole body imaging system (Philips Medical Systems, Sheldon, CT). The mouse was positioned supine, head up on a plastic petri dish, and electrocardiograph leads were attached to both front paws and one hindpaw. A standard endorectal surface coil (4 × 8 cm) was placed under the animal and used for imaging. All MRI scans used prospective electrocardiogram gating. Heart rates were 350-550 beats/min.

Multislice, multiphase cine MRI was performed. Each study included a scout, coronal plane long axis of the left ventricle and a set of short-axis acquisitions. Multiframe, short-axis gradient-echo sequences were used to measure LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) and end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and estimate LV mass. Four or five slices perpendicular to the long axis were obtained for each heart spanning apex to base. The slice thickness was 1.6 mm with a 0.2-mm gap between slices. The matrix was 256 × 256, with a field of view of 50 mm (yielding voxel sizes of 0.19 × 0.19 × 1.6 mm), flip angle of 30°, repetition time of 39 ms, and echo time of 14 ms.

The pulse sequence was set for a heart rate of 250/min with five cardiac phases and a temporal resolution of 39 ms. Depending on the heart rate and R-R interval length, a trigger delay was introduced. Thus end-diastolic and end-systolic images were captured over two contiguous cardiac cycles. The frame with the largest chamber dimensions was used as end diastole for mass and volume measurements, and the image with the smallest chamber volume was taken as the systolic image.

Data Analysis

Image analysis. For LV mass determination, the epicardial and endocardial border of each slice was identified during diastole and traced by hand. The LV wall volume was calculated as follows
LV wall volume 
= <LIM><OP>∑</OP><UL>all slices</UL></LIM> (epicardial area − endocardial area) 
× (distance between slice centers)
where the distance between slice center equals slice thickness plus slice gap.

Myocardial mass was estimated by multiplying the LV wall volume obtained with Simpson's rule by the specific gravity of the myocardium, 1.05 g/cm3. Systolic images were also analyzed, and similar determinations of LVEDV and LVESV permitted calculation of stroke volume (SV = LVEDV - LVESV) and ejection fraction (EF = SV/LVEDV). To determine interobserver and intraobserver variability, the MRI data were analyzed by two independent observers (F. Franco and R. V. Shohet) and twice by a single observer (F. Franco). MRIs were stored on optical disks for subsequent recall and analysis.

Necropsy analysis. The animals were killed with ether and cervical dislocation, and the ventricles were dissected free of atria, fat, and large blood vessels. During initial experiments, the weight of the right ventricular free wall was found to be <10% of the total ventricular weight. Because variation in right ventricle mass contributed only marginally to total ventricular mass and the dissection of the free wall was prone to error, we included the right ventricle in all necropsy mass determinations.

Statistics

Data are expressed as means ± SD. LV mass and EF from transgenic (GCA -/-) and control mice were assessed for differences using the Student's t-test. Least-squares linear regression was used to relate the MRI estimate of LV mass to necropsy mass. Analysis of the difference of the measurements with MRI and necropsy was performed according to the technique of Bland and Altman (2). LV mass index was plotted vs. age for each group, and the slopes of the regression line were compared and tested for differences using the t-test as described by Zar (22). Interobserver and intraobserver differences were calculated as the difference between the two observations divided by the mean of the observations and were expressed as percentages. Interstudy variability was calculated as the difference between two determinations divided by the mean of the two determinations and was expressed as a percentage.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Each MRI study had an average duration of 60 min. In one early study, images were inadequate for analysis because of motion artifact. One animal died from presumed anesthetic complications during the scan. Figure 1 shows short-axis views in diastole and systole in control and transgenic mice. Correlation between LV mass evaluated by MRI and at necropsy was excellent, with LVnecropsy = 1.04 × LVMRI + 4.69 mg (r2 = 0.95) (see Fig. 2). Bland-Altman analysis (Fig. 3) demonstrated good agreement between MRI and necropsy determinations.


View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Magnetic resonance images obtained in control and transgenic mice of similar age (8 mo) and body weight (42 g). Diastolic and systolic images from a guanylyl cyclase A (GCA) +/+ mouse are shown in A and B, respectively. Diastolic and systolic images from a GCA -/- mouse are shown similarly in C and D, respectively. There is evidence of increased wall thickness in GCA -/- images.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Linear regression analysis of left ventricular (LV) mass estimated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and LV mass measured at necropsy.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Scatter plots showing mean LV mass by necropsy and MRI (horizontal axes) and difference between necropsy and MRI measurements (vertical axes). Mean difference (solid line) ± 2SD (dashed lines) is shown. There is a good agreement between MRI and necropsy measurements. MRI measurements are slightly and consistently lower than necropsy measurements.

The most likely explanation for the slightly greater mass of hearts at necropsy is our inclusion of right ventricular free wall, which was not dissected away from the LV. There was excellent reproducibility of magnetic resonance measurements with low intraobserver (3 ± 1%) and interobserver (7 ± 6%) variability. The interstudy variability for quantification of LV mass, LVEDV, and LVESV was 1 ± 0.5, 7 ± 4.3, and 3 ± 1.7%, respectively.

LV mass obtained with MRI was significantly greater in transgenic (GCA -/-) mice than in isogenic controls [GCA -/-, 226 ± 43 mg (n = 14) vs. controls, 156 ± 14 mg (n = 10); P < 0.0001]. The LV mass index (LVMI) was determined in each animal [LVMI (mg/g) = LV mass determined by MRI (mg)/body weight (g)]. Figure 4 demonstrates the time course for development of cardiac hypertrophy in GCA -/- mice as determined by MRI. The regression equation for the 14 GCA -/- mice is
LVMI<SUB>GCA−/−</SUB> = 5.47 + 0.137 × time (mo)
Thus, for each month of age, the LVMI increases by 0.137 mg · g body wt-1 · mo-1. The regression equation for the 10 GCA +/+ mice is
LVMI<SUB>GCA+/+</SUB> = 4.5 + 0.0032 × time (mo)
For this group, the increase in LVMI is much less, only 0.0032 mg · g body wt-1 · mo-1. The t-test performed to compare the two coefficients was not significant (P = 0.252). However, there is a trend present that could reach significance with a larger sample size.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   LV mass index by MRI vs. age for all mice examined in this study. Regression lines for LV mass index vs. age for each group are indicated by solid lines and are further described in text.

LV volumes and EF were calculated for each mouse (Table 1). There were no significant differences between the two groups in LVEDV, LVESV, SV, or EF.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   MRI determination of LV mass and volumes in GCA knockout and in control mice

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The results of this study indicate that 1) MRI provides an accurate means for the noninvasive estimate of myocardial mass in the intact mouse; 2) MRI can noninvasively detect differences in myocardial mass between wild-type mice and siblings lacking the GCA gene; 3) GCA -/- mice have increased myocardial mass as compared with GCA +/+ mice, with no significant differences in LV volumes or ejection fraction; and 4) GCA -/- mice demonstrate a trend toward increasing myocardial mass with age.

Over the last decade, transgenic manipulation of the mouse has allowed dramatic progress in our understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms of disease. Unfortunately, the application of these techniques to cardiovascular biology has been limited by the difficulty of evaluating cardiac phenotype in an animal with a heart rate of 450 beats/min and LV mass of <200 mg.

Echocardiography has been used extensively in studies of cardiac mass in humans (3) and large animal models (10, 13, 16). In the mouse, with the use of high-frequency transducers (7.5 and 9.0 MHz) (4, 12, 19), there was a good correlation between echocardiographic estimation of LV mass and LV mass at autopsy. Also, echocardiography has been used to evaluate ventricular function in transgenic mice (5). Previous studies performed in rodents to assess LV mass used geometric assumptions to estimate mass (4, 12, 13), and such assumptions may not be valid in hearts with segmental wall motion abnormalities or nonhomogeneous distributions of LV hypertrophy (4).

MRI has also been used extensively in the evaluation of ventricular mass in human (7, 8) and large animal models (16, 20, 23). An important feature of MRI in these studies has been the lack of assumptions regarding LV shape. Application of MRI methods to small animal models has been limited. Rose et al. (15) imaged mouse hearts using high-field magnets (7 and 9.4 T); however, no quantification or functional studies were performed. Recently, Siri et al. (18) performed gated MRI and M-mode echocardiography in normal and hypertrophied murine hearts. Again, imaging was performed at 9.4 T, and LV mass was estimated using a truncated ellipsoid model. LV mass was estimated more accurately by MRI than echocardiography in this study. Our study is the first to perform imaging using a conventional imaging system at 1.5 T, which would facilitate broad application of this method. In addition, we used Simpson's rule to calculate LV mass and volumes, which is not based on geometric assumptions and has been shown to be the most accurate method in other animal models (21).

The MRI assessment of the mouse heart has several limitations. First, the typical anesthetized mouse heart rate is ~450 beats/min, with a typical duration of systole of ~50 ms. Given the temporal resolution of 39 ms used in this study, a trigger delay must be used to ensure that images are obtained at both end diastole and end systole for the assessment of function. If higher temporal resolution becomes available, this will remove the need for multiple scans to determine the appropriate trigger delays. Second, the scan protocol was designed to obtain high spatial resolution and adequate temporal resolution for a moving object with an average epicardial volume of ~300 µl. The LV long axis, measuring 7-10 mm, was spanned with five 1.6-mm slices with a 0.2-mm gap to minimize total scan time. For comparison, determination of myocardial mass in humans using MRI typically uses eight to ten 1-cm-thick slices to span an LV long axis of 8-10 cm. Thus a relatively limited number of slices was used in our study, raising the possibility of partial volume effects. However, the excellent correlation with necropsy results suggests that the effect on the assessment of LV mass in the mouse is limited. Third, the right ventricle was not routinely dissected when necropsy measurements were done. However, the free wall of the RV constitutes substantially <10% of the total ventricular weight, and even a large variation in its mass would have had a negligible effect on the total measurement. MRI cardiac mass measurements were consistently smaller than necropsy, which may be a result of the dissection technique used. Fourth, our determinations of intracavitary volumes and derived stroke volume were slightly larger than a previous invasive study (1), and an invasive validation of LV volumes was not performed. The average body weight of the mice used in our study was higher (35 g) than in the invasive study (25-30 g), which may explain the larger LV volumes. Finally, the requirement for anesthesia limits the evaluation of cardiac function in many animal models; peripheral vasodilation, effects on central sympathetic output, and the direct chronotropic effect of some anesthetics may all modify ventricular function. In addition, no reference measure of function was made using another method, which would be required to validate the assessment of LV function.

The principal value of this study is the demonstration of an accurate, noninvasive, and widely available approach to the assessment of LV mass in transgenic mouse models. In addition, MRI permits the acquisition of functional data only available in vivo; however, further work needs to be done to validate the MRI method against an independent method for assessing function. The ability to assess hypertrophy and function will be valuable in defining the effects of genetic and pharmacological modifications on the heart, especially in longitudinal studies. Also, transgenic technology allows the combination of multiple interacting genetic modifications through simple breeding experiments. For example, mutations conferring an atherosclerotic or diabetic phenotype could be incorporated into the GCA -/- hypertensive mice, allowing study of a combination of cardiovascular insults commonly found in human patients. Moreover, as inducible and tissue-specific transgenic technologies progress, one can envisage sequential addition of cardiac manipulations, even more closely mimicking the evolution of heart disease in the human population. As cardiac evaluation of the mouse becomes easier, the general utility of this genetically modifiable, inexpensive model system should facilitate rapid progress in our understanding of mechanisms of disease and response to therapy.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that MRI can accurately and noninvasively determine LV mass in both wild-type mice and transgenic mouse models that develop LV hypertrophy. In addition, this technique permits repeated, longitudinal evaluation of cardiac function in mice. It is well suited to evaluate the cardiac effects of genetic and pharmacological modifications over time.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

During the time of this study, F. Franco was supported in part by a grant from Luso-American Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. Additional support was provided by a grant-in-aid from the American Heart Association.

    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: R. V. Shohet, Div. of Cardiology, Dept. of Internal Medicine, NB 11.200, Univ. of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 6000 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-8573.

Received 8 July 1997; accepted in final form 17 October 1997.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Barbee, R. W., B. D. Perry, R. N. Ré, and J. P. Murgo. Microsphere and dilution techniques for the determination of blood flows and volumes in conscious mice. Am. J. Physiol. 263 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 32): R728-R733, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307-310, 1986[Medline].

3.   Devereux, R. B., D. R. Alonso, E. M. Lutas, G. J. Gottlieb, E. Campo, I. Sachs, and N. Reichek. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy. Comparison to necropsy findings. Am. J. Cardiol. 57: 450-458, 1986[Medline].

4.   Gardin, J. M., F. M. Siri, J. G. Edwards, and L. A. Leinwand. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular mass and systolic function in mice. Circ. Res. 76: 907-914, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Hoit, B. D., S. F. Khoury, E. G. Kranias, N. Ball, and R. A. Walsh. In vivo echocardiographic detection of enhanced left ventricular function in gene-targeted mice with phospholamban deficiency. Circ. Res. 77: 632-637, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Johns, C., I. Gavras, D. E. Handy, A. Salomao, and H. Gavras. Models of experimental hypertension in mice. Hypertension 28: 1064-1069, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Katz, J., M. C. Milliken, J. Stray-Gundersen, L. M. Buja, R. W. Parkey, J. H. Mitchell, and R. M. Peshock. Estimation of human myocardial mass with MR imaging. Radiology 169: 495-498, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Keller, A. M., R. M. Peshock, C. R. Malloy, L. M. Buja, R. Nunnally, R. W. Parkey, and J. T. Willerson. In vivo measurement of myocardial mass using nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 8: 113-117, 1986[Abstract].

9.   Kurtz, T. W. Genetic models of hypertension. Lancet 344: 167-168, 1994[Medline].

10.   Litwin, S. E., S. E. Katz, J. P. Morgan, and P. S. Douglas. Serial echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular geometry and function after large myocardial infarction in the rat. Circulation 89: 345-354, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Lopez, M. J., S. K. F. Wong, I. Kishimoto, S. Dubois, V. Mach, J. Friesen, D. L. Garbers, and A. Beuve. Salt-resistant hypertension in mice lacking the guanylyl cyclase-A receptor for atrial natriuretic peptide. Nature 378: 65-68, 1995[Medline].

12.   Manning, W. J., J. Y. Wei, S. E. Katz, S. E. Litwin, and P. S. Douglas. In vivo assessment of LV mass in mice using high-frequency cardiac ultrasound: necropsy validation. Am. J. Physiol. 266 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 35): H1672-H1675, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Pawlush, D. G., R. L. Moore, T. I. Musch, and J. Davidson. Echocardiographic evaluation of size, function, and mass of normal and hypertrophied rat ventricles. J. Appl. Physiol. 74: 2598-2605, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Peshock, R. M., D. L. Willet, D. E. Sayad, W. G. Hundley, M. C. Chwialkowski, G. D. Clarke, and R. W. Parkey. Quantitative MR imaging of the heart. MRI Clinics 4: 287-305, 1996.

15.   Rose, S. E., S. J. Wilson, F. O. Zelaya, S. Crozier, and D. M. Doddrell. High resolution high field rodent cardiac imaging with flow enhancement suppression. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12: 1183-1190, 1994[Medline].

16.   Rudin, M., B. Pedersen, K. Umemura, and W. Zierhut. Determination of rat heart morphology and function in vivo in two models of cardiac hypertrophy by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Basic Res. Cardiol. 86: 165-174, 1991[Medline].

17.   Simone, G., D. C. Wallerson, M. Volpe, and R. B. Devereux. Echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular mass and volume in normotensive and hypertensive rats: necropsy validation. Am. J. Hypertens. 3: 688-696, 1990[Medline].

18.   Siri, F. M., L. A. Jelicks, L. A. Leinwand, and J. M. Gardin. Gated magnetic resonance imaging of normal and hypertrophied murine hearts. Am. J. Physiol. 272 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 41): H2394-H2402, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Tanaka, N., N. Dalton, L. Mao, H. A. Rockman, K. L. Peterson, K. R. Gottshall, J. J. Hunter, K. R. Chien, and J. Ross, Jr. Transthoracic echocardiography in models of cardiac disease in the mouse. Circulation 94: 1109-1117, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Wang, J. Z., R. S. Mezrich, P. Scholz, A. Als, and F. Douglas. MRI evaluation of left ventricular hypertrophy in a canine model of aortic stenosis. Invest. Radiol. 25: 783-788, 1990[Medline].

21.   Wyatt, H. L., M. K. Heng, S. Meerbaum, J. D. Hestenes, J. M. Cobo, R. M. Davison, and E. Corday. Cross-sectional echocardiography. Analysis of mathematical models for quantifying mass of the left ventricle in dogs. Circulation 60: 1104-1113, 1979[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Zar, J. H. Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1974.

23.   Zierhut, W., M. Rudin, E. Robertson, H. G. Zerwes, D. Novosel, J. P. Evenou, R. Stirnimann, and R. P. Hof. Time course of spirapril-induced structural and functional changes after myocardial infarction in rats followed with magnetic resonance imaging. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 21: 937-946, 1993[Medline].


AJP Heart Circ Physiol 274(2):H679-H683
0363-6135/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Reyes, M. E. Steinhelper, J. A. Alvarez, D. Escobedo, J. Pearce, J. W. Valvano, B. H. Pollock, C.-L. Wei, A. Kottam, D. Altman, et al.
Impact of physiological variables and genetic background on myocardial frequency-resistivity relations in the intact beating murine heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1659 - H1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
X. Yi, R. Bekeredjian, N. J. DeFilippis, Z. Siddiquee, E. Fernandez, and R. V. Shohet
Transcriptional analysis of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): H1098 - H1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Engel, R. Peshock, R. C. Armstong, N. Sivasubramanian, and D. L. Mann
Cardiac myocyte apoptosis provokes adverse cardiac remodeling in transgenic mice with targeted TNF overexpression
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1303 - H1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
K. A. Collins, C. E. Korcarz, and R. M. Lang
Use of echocardiography for the phenotypic assessment of genetically altered mice
Physiol Genomics, May 13, 2003; 13(3): 227 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. A. Collins, C. E. Korcarz, S. G. Shroff, J. E. Bednarz, R. C. Fentzke, H. Lin, J. M. Leiden, and R. M. Lang
Accuracy of echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular mass in mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): H1954 - H1962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. G. Weiss
Imaging the Murine Cardiovascular System With Magnetic Resonance
Circ. Res., March 30, 2001; 88(6): 550 - 551.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
V. P. Chacko, F. Aresta, S. M. Chacko, and R. G. Weiss
MRI/MRS assessment of in vivo murine cardiac metabolism, morphology, and function at physiological heart rates
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): H2218 - H2224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
K. A. Lucas, G. M. Pitari, S. Kazerounian, I. Ruiz-Stewart, J. Park, S. Schulz, K. P. Chepenik, and S. A. Waldman
Guanylyl Cyclases and Signaling by Cyclic GMP
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2000; 52(3): 375 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. E. Henson, S. K. Song, J. S. Pastorek, J. J. H. Ackerman, and C. H. Lorenz
Left ventricular torsion is equal in mice and humans
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2000; 278(4): H1117 - H1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (55)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franco, F.
Right arrow Articles by Shohet, R. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franco, F.
Right arrow Articles by Shohet, R. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online