AJP - Heart AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 274: H1308-H1314, 1998;
0363-6135/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laflamme, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laflamme, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, P. L.
Vol. 274, Issue 4, H1308-H1314, April 1998

Do beta 2-adrenergic receptors modulate Ca2+ in adult rat ventricular myocytes?

Michael A. Laflamme and Peter L. Becker

Department of Physiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

We examined the role of beta 2-adrenergic receptors (ARs) in modulating calcium homeostasis in rat ventricular myocytes. Zinterol (10 µM), an agonist with a 25-fold greater affinity for beta 2-ARs over beta 1-ARs, modestly enhanced L-type calcium current (ICa) magnitude by ~30% and modestly accelerated the rate of Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]) decline (~35%) but had little effect on the magnitude of the [Ca2+] transient (a nonsignificant 6% increase). However, 1 µM of the highly selective beta 1-AR antagonist CGP-20712A completely blocked the ICa increase induced by 10 µM zinterol. Pretreatment of cells with pertussis toxin (PTX) did not alter ICa enhancement by 10 µM zinterol, although it did abolish the ability of acetylcholine to block the forskolin-induced enhancement of ICa. Zinterol (10 µM) approximately doubled adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation, although one-half of this increase was blocked by CGP-20712A. In contrast, 1 µM of the nonselective beta -agonist isoproterenol increased cAMP production 15-fold. Thus we found no evidence that activation of beta 2-ARs modulates calcium homeostasis in rat ventricular myocytes, even after treatment with PTX.

zinterol; CGP-20712A; calcium homeostasis; adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

ALTHOUGH THE ORIGINAL Lands classification of beta -adrenergic receptors (ARs) attributed the regulation of cardiac function to the beta 1-AR (21, 22), physiological and radioligand binding studies have since indicated that functional beta 1- and beta 2-ARs coexist in mammalian heart (2). In human myocardium, beta 2-ARs are thought to represent a significant fraction of the total myocardial pool of beta -ARs, but in other species the contribution of this subtype remains highly controversial. Particularly in tissue such as rodent heart, in which the fraction of beta 2-ARs may be comparatively small, methodological considerations can greatly complicate the interpretation of radioligand binding studies. Contamination with nonmyocyte cells and the selection of ligands with inappropriate subtype selectivity can both skew the apparent distribution.

Interest in understanding the potential role of the cardiac beta 2-AR in species other than humans is not purely academic; suggestions of signaling responses unique to individual beta -AR subtypes have relied heavily on work in model systems, including rodent heart. Indeed, although both receptor subtypes are generally thought to share a common signal transduction scheme linked to a rise in intracellular adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP), some important differences have been noted in their respective ability to activate downstream responses. For instance, in dog and human myocardial tissue, the beta 1-AR-mediated increase in cAMP has been shown to be much more tightly linked to contractility changes than that mediated by beta 2-ARs (17, 30). Although such discrepancies have often been attributed to differential compartmentalization of cAMP accumulated by each subtype, various investigators have also invoked the possible involvement of novel cAMP-independent mechanisms particular to one subtype or another. In isolated rat ventricular myocytes, Xiao et al. (28) asserted that application of the beta 2-AR agonist zinterol causes robust inotropic changes that are further potentiated when inhibition by a coactivated pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G protein is masked. No such potentiation by PTX treatment was observed with norepinephrine (NE), an agonist with a higher selectivity for beta 1-ARs than beta 2-ARs. In earlier work (29), these investigators had reported important differences in the cellular response to subtype-selective stimulation; in particular, a paradoxical absence of lusitropic changes with beta 2-AR stimulation. If indeed present, a novel inhibitory signal transduction arm activated by beta 2-ARs, but not beta 1-ARs, might account for such discrepancies.

Intrigued by these reports, we initially intended to further elucidate the mechanisms by which beta 2-ARs apparently target different Ca2+ homeostatic pathways in isolated rat ventricular myocytes. However, this effort was frustrated by our inability to detect any beta 2-AR-mediated effect. We found that application of the beta 2-AR agonist zinterol had only minimal effects on the Ca2+ current and intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) dynamics compared with the effects of the nonselective beta -AR agonist isoproterenol (Iso). Moreover, even this action was effectively blocked by the addition of the beta 1-AR antagonist CGP-20712A. We also found no evidence for the involvement of a PTX-sensitive inhibitory pathway in beta 2-AR signaling. Finally, although we could detect a small cAMP rise likely mediated by beta 2-ARs, it was more than an order of magnitude smaller than the cAMP rise induced by the nonselective beta -AR agonist Iso. Thus we found no evidence that beta 2-ARs exert a physiologically relevant action on Ca2+ homeostasis in rat ventricular myocytes.

    METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Ventricular cardiomyocyte isolation. For electrophysiological and [Ca2+]i studies, ventricular myocytes were isolated from 150- to 250-g Sprague-Dawley rats by an enzymatic dispersion method previously described (11, 25). For cAMP assays, this protocol was modified slightly. After digestion, the tissue was placed in 1 mM Ca2+-Tyrode and gently triturated with a wide-bore pipette. Suspended cells were filtered and then allowed two gravity-sedimentation steps (15-20 min each) to separate the denser rod-shaped myocytes from hypercontracted myocytes, other cell types, and debris. All procedures performed on animals were in accordance with institutional guidelines.

Standard extracellular and intracellular solutions. For cardiomyocyte isolation and cAMP assays, a modified Tyrode solution A [in mM: 135.0 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 1.0 MgCl2, 0.33 NaH2PO4, 10.0 N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), and 10.0 glucose] was prepared with a variety of different [Ca2+] by the addition of CaCl2. For electrophysiological experiments, cells were placed in an extracellular solution B (in mM: 140.0 NaCl, 5.0 KCl, 1.0 CaCl2, 1.0 MgCl2, 0.33 NaH2PO4, 10.0 HEPES, 3.0 CsCl, 5.0 tetraethylammonium chloride, 3.0 4-aminopyridine, and 10.0 glucose) intended to block potassium conductances. Intracellular solutions were also composed to reduce contaminating potassium currents as well as Ca2+ current rundown. For those experiments involving Ca2+ imaging, the pipette contained intracellular solution A (in mM: 25.0 CsCl, 10.0 NaCl, 120.0 Cs-aspartate, 3.0 Mg-ATP) with 150 µM K5-fura 2. For those experiments in which [Ca2+] measurements were not made, intracellular solution B [in mM: 25.0 CsCl, 95.0 Cs-aspartate, 5.0 Mg-ATP, 0.4 GTP, 10.0 ethylene glycol-bis(beta -aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid, 5.0 tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris)2-phosphocreatine, 5.0 pyruvic acid, 2.0, Na3-fructose-1,6-diphosphate, 1.0 NaH2PO4, and 0.5 K-ADP] was used in the pipette.

Fluorescent [Ca2+]i measurements. Fura 2 fluorescence was measured with a high-temporal-resolution microfluorimeter described previously (11, 20). Briefly, the excitation light from a xenon lamp source was rapidly alternated (~110 Hz) between 340 and 380 nm, and the fluorescence emission light (510-550 nm) was quantified with a photomultiplier tube-photon counter interfaced to an IBM-compatible computer. The custom control and data acquisition software stored fluorescence data for each wavelength once per cycle. Raw 340- and 380-nm fluorescence counts were corrected for background, and autofluorescence was measured before the membrane patch was ruptured. The 340/380 excitation fluorescence ratio was used as an index of the cytosolic [Ca2+].

Electrophysiological recording. Cells were patch-clamped in the ruptured-patch whole cell configuration (12) with Corning 7052 borosilicate glass electrodes (2-3 MOmega ) filled with one of the pipette solutions described in Standard extracellular and intracellular solutions. During experimental protocols, cells were maintained in extracellular solution B at room temperature (~22°C). Voltage clamp was achieved with an AxoPatch 1D or AxoClamp 2A amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). The fast sodium current was inactivated by holding the cell at a resting potential of -40 mV. The inward calcium current was activated by repeated 300-ms depolarizations from -40 to +10 mV (0.5 Hz). Consistent with reported characteristics for this current, it could be eliminated by application of nifedipine or by lowering the extracellular [Ca2+] to micromolar levels (not shown). When fura 2 fluorescence was measured simultaneously, membrane current was sampled at 330 Hz (3× acquisition rate of fluorescence). At all other times, membrane current was sampled at 666 Hz.

A fairly rapid perfusion system was constructed to ensure prompt exchange of drug solutions and thereby minimize the dual complications of agonist-dependent desensitization and current rundown. The cell chamber (Warner Instruments) had a gravity-fed inflow line and an outflow line attached to a vacuum so as to maintain a near-constant fluid level (~180-µl volume). A custom-made quartz micromanifold (ALA Scientific Instruments) with a 200-µm-diameter tip opening could be positioned via a micromanipulator to direct flow onto an individual cardiomyocyte. Attached to six manually controlled drug lines, the micromanifold allowed multiple agonist/antagonist concentrations to be delivered with a switching time of <1 s.

cAMP measurements. After sedimentation, aliquots of cardiomyocytes were placed in separate tubes containing extracellular solution A and 1 mM Ca2+ at room temperature. If cells were to be treated with any receptor antagonist, it was added at this time. After 5 min, the phosphodiesterase inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX; 0.5 mM) was added to each tube. After an additional 5-min incubation, the agonist regimen (if any) was added for the final 5-min incubation. Subsequently, cells were pelleted (<500 revolutions/min) and the buffer was rapidly removed. Cold ethanol (65% vol/vol) was added to stop the reaction. Cells were rigorously vortexed and centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min. The pellet from each tube was collected and solubilized in sodium dodecyl sulfate buffer (10% wt/vol in Tris-buffered saline) for subsequent protein determination with the bicinchoninic acid procedure (Pierce). The supernatant fraction was dried under warm nitrogen (50°C) in borosilicate glass tubes and then stored at -20°C for subsequent cAMP determination. After serial dilution, the quantity of cAMP in each tube was measured with an enzyme immunoassay system (Biotrak/Amersham). The resultant product of the cAMP-linked peroxidase reaction was read at 450 nm on a 96-well microtiter plate spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad). The assay proved to be reasonably robust over a range of 25-3,200 fmol/well.

Reagents. CGP-20712A was kindly donated by Ciba-Geigy (Summit, NJ), and zinterol was kindly provided by Dr. Kenneth Minneman. Fura 2 was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). All other reagents and chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Statistics. Values are reported as means ± SE. Statistical significance was determined by the Student's t-test.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Zinterol has only modest effects on calcium homeostasis. Recent reports have suggested that activation of beta 2-ARs can have significant inotropic effects in isolated rat ventricular myocytes (6, 29) without eliciting accompanying lusitropic effects (29). To better resolve these effects, we compared the acute effects of the beta 2-AR agonist zinterol on ICa and [Ca2+]i to those elicited by application of the nonselective beta -AR agonist Iso. Myocytes were voltage-clamped at -40 mV and dialyzed with a pipette solution containing the calcium indicator fura 2 (intracellular solution A). ICa was activated by depolarization to +10 mV, and the resultant [Ca2+]i transient was recorded for examination of its amplitude and kinetics.

Superfusion with 1 µM Iso enhanced the ICa by 85 ± 30% (n = 4 cells) and increased the [Ca2+]i transient amplitude (as indexed by the fura 2 fluorescence ratio) by 28 ± 17%. The ICa inactivation time constant (tau 63; measured as the time to decay to 63% of its peak value) was also shortened somewhat, from 36 ± 5 to 29 ± 6 ms. Iso also had a pronounced lusitropic effect: the time it took the fura 2 fluorescent ratio to fall from 75% to 25% of peak was reduced 63 ± 4% from control. A representative experiment depicting these effects is shown in Fig. 1.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Isoproterenol (Iso; 1 µM) substantially enhanced L-type calcium current (ICa), intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) transient amplitude (as indexed by fura 2 340 nm/380 nm fluorescence ratio), and rate of [Ca2+]i decline. Calcium currents were elicited by a 300-ms depolarization to +10 mV from a holding potential of -40 mV. A: representative current traces before and during isoproterenol application. B: corresponding 340/380 fluorescence ratio.

In contrast, we found only comparatively minor responses to application of 10 µM zinterol, a concentration that Xiao and Lakatta (29) found had near-maximal inotropic action (Fig. 2). The ICa magnitude was increased by only 27 ± 6%, a number in agreement with that reported by Cerbai et al. (6) under similar conditions but substantially lower than the ~100% increase reported by Xiao and Lakatta (29). We also observed a slight acceleration of the ICa inactivation rate with 10 µM zinterol (tau 63 declined from 38 ± 5 to 33 ± 6 ms), not the dramatic slowing of inactivation observed by Xiao and Lakatta (29). Furthermore, we observed no appreciable change in the amplitude of the fura 2 fluorescent transient (+6 ± 12%, n = 5 cells). We also observed a slight lusitropic action. The time required for the fluorescence ratio to fall from 75% to 25% of peak was reduced 33 ± 6% from control. Thus zinterol seemed to be altering Ca2+ uptake as well as the ICa, albeit only modestly.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Zinterol (Zint; 10 µM) modestly enhanced L-type ICa and rate of [Ca2+]i decline but had no appreciable effect on [Ca2+]i transient amplitude. Calcium currents were elicited by depolarization as described in Fig. 1. A: representative current traces before and during Zint application. B: corresponding 340/380 fluorescence ratio measurements.

Blockade of beta 1-adrenergic receptors prevents enhancement of ICa by zinterol. Although zinterol is known to be selective for beta 2- over beta 1-ARs, all experiments to this point have employed particularly high concentrations of this agonist. The published affinity of zinterol for beta 2-ARs is ~40 nM; its affinity for beta 1-ARs is ~1,000 nM (24). Hence, although 10 µM zinterol has been shown to be necessary to elicit a maximal response (29), this concentration of agonist would be expected to result in full occupancy at both receptor subtypes. Because the rat heart has a large beta 1-AR reserve, where full activation of only a few percent of the receptor pool may be sufficient to produce a full functional response (3), an appropriate subtype-selective antagonist should be used. We therefore examined the ability of 10 µM zinterol to alter the ICa in the presence of 1 µM CGP-20712A, a highly selective beta 1-AR antagonist with an affinity of ~3 nM for that subtype (23). This concentration of CGP-20712A should block virtually all beta 1-ARs even if, as has been reported by Kitagawa et al. (18), there exists a subpopulation of beta 1-ARs with a reduced (~20 nM) affinity for CGP-20712A. On the other hand, blockade of beta 2-ARs at this concentration should not be a concern, because the affinity of CGP-20712A at that subtype has been reported to be only ~5-10 µM (18, 23).

Exposure of cells to 1 µM CGP-20712A resulted in a reduction of 12 ± 3% in the basal magnitude of the ICa, an effect noted by others (6) that might be consistent with this drug acting as a negative antagonist (26). More importantly, when cells were then treated with 10 µM zinterol in the continued presence of CGP-20712A, no further change in the magnitude of the ICa was observed (-4 ± 6%, n = 5; see Fig. 3 for a representative example). This observation that the zinterol-mediated enhancement of ICa was sensitive to CGP-20712A differs from results under similar conditions reported (but not shown) by Cerbai et al. (6).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Zint (10 µM) had no appreciable effect on ICa after preincubation with 1 µM CGP-20712A (CGP). In this representative example, a myocyte was repetitively depolarized to elicit L-type ICa while bathing solution was rapidly switched from control to drug-containing solutions. A: changes in magnitude of resulting ICa with time; individual points reflect box average of 5 current traces. B: contains representative currents elicited at times a-c indicated in A.

PTX pretreatment does not potentiate enhancement of calcium curent by zinterol. Recently, Xiao et al. (28) proposed that stimulation of beta 2-ARs activates a novel signal transduction cascade involving a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein, an effect not mediated by beta 1-AR activation. If so, the small effect of zinterol in our preparation, and its complete sensitivity to CGP-20712A, might be accounted for if this inhibitory pathway was more active in our cell preparation. Because our previous experiments had indicated the enhancement of the ICa to be the most evident inotropic action of zinterol, we investigated whether pretreatment of cells with PTX would unmask a distinct beta 2-AR mediated action on this current. Myocytes were exposed to PTX (7.5 µg/ml) for at least 2.5 h at 37°C. However, when these cells were challenged with 10 µM zinterol, no potentiation of the response was observed (Fig. 4). In four cells, zinterol increased the magnitude of the ICa by 27 ± 3%, an effect virtually identical to that previously observed in non-PTX-treated cells. In contrast, PTX treatment did abolish muscarinic receptor-mediated effects. Figure 5A shows that, as expected, the enhancement of ICa by 1 µM forskolin in an untreated cell could be eliminated with the subsequent addition of 10 µM acetylcholine. However, as shown in Fig. 5B, in an otherwise identical cell treated with PTX, the attenuation by acetylcholine was abolished. Thus the failure of PTX to potentiate the enhancement of the ICa by zinterol cannot be explained by postulating that our PTX-treatment protocol was ineffective.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Responsiveness to 10 µM Zint was not enhanced by pretreatment with pertussis toxin (PTX). In this representative example, a myocyte was repetitively depolarized to elicit L-type ICa while bathing solution was rapidly switched from control to a Zint-containing solution. A: changes in magnitude of ICa with time; individual points reflect box average of 5 current traces. B: representative currents elicited at times a and b indicated in A.

Intracellular cAMP concentration responses to zinterol with and without beta 1-AR blockade. Although the application of 10 µM zinterol produced modest electrophysiological and [Ca2+]i transient changes in rat cardiomyocytes, these responses were prevented by the beta 1-AR antagonist CGP-20712A. At this point, therefore, it seemed reasonable to ask whether functional beta 2-ARs were even expressed in these cells. We chose to further examine this issue using the change in total cellular cAMP accumulation as a more proximal measure of responsiveness. Recent reports have disagreed as to what degree of intracellular cAMP concentration elevation in rat ventricular myocytes is elicited by beta 2-AR activation. For instance, although Kitagawa et al. (18) could not detect any increase in cAMP production with beta 2-AR stimulation, Kuznetsov et al. (19) found that, even with blockade of beta 1-ARs with 100 nM CGP-20712A, a modest, presumably beta 2-AR-mediated rise occurred (to ~2-fold over control) with 100 nM zinterol. Xiao et al. (27) also observed an ~50% increase in cAMP accumulation at 100 nM zinterol (a concentration at which beta 1-AR binding should be less than ~10%) and as much as a 70% increase at 10 µM zinterol.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   PTX treatment was sufficient to remove Gi-coupled signal transduction pathways. Success in ablating Gi was tested by examining ability of acetylcholine to attenuate forskolin-stimulation of ICa. A: individual ICa traces in a normal myocyte while in control (C) solution, 1 µM forskolin (F), and 1 µM forskolin with 10 µM acetylcholine (F + A). B: corresponding responses to these drugs in a myocyte pretreated with PTX.

Figure 6 contrasts our measurements of cAMP accumulation during a 5-min exposure to 10 µM zinterol, 1 µM CGP-20712A, zinterol with CGP-20712A, 1 µM NE, or 1 µM Iso, all in the presence of 0.5 mM IBMX. In the presence only of IBMX (control condition), cAMP accumulation averaged 8.9 ± 2.0 pmol/mg protein. Zinterol (10 µM) alone nearly doubled cAMP accumulation relative to control. CCP-20712A alone resulted in a slight drop (although not statistically significant) in cAMP production, again consistent with this agent acting as a negative antagonist (26). Importantly, however, in the presence of CGP-20712A, the rise in cAMP mediated by zinterol was reduced by about one-half, indicating that the zinterol-stimulated cAMP rise was likely mediated by both beta 1- and beta 2-ARs. With regard to basal and 10 µM zinterol-stimulated cAMP estimates, our data are quantitatively similar to those reported by both Kuznetsov et al. (19) and Xiao et al. (27), suggesting that differences we have noted in terms of other parameters cannot be explained on the basis of a lack of cAMP responsiveness in our preparation. In contrast, both NE and Iso were much more effective than 10 µM zinterol in elevating cAMP levels (by factors of ~3 and 15, respectively).

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Although radioligand binding studies have long suggested the presence of a heterogeneous population of beta -ARs in whole rat myocardium (see Ref. 24), Buxton and Brunton (4) found only a homogeneous beta 1-AR population in enzymatically isolated rat ventricular myocytes. Later, using markers for endothelial and myocyte plasmalemma, Freissmuth et al. (9) extended this work to conclude that most of the beta 2-ARs of rat and guinea pig heart were localized to the coronary vessels. Unfortunately, the possibility of a small pool of beta 2-ARs below the limit of detection (perhaps <10%) could not be totally eliminated in the latter two studies because of the unavailability of sufficiently subtype-selective ligands. A more recent study by Kitagawa et al. (18) employed better pharmacological tools, in particular, the beta 1-AR antagonist CGP-20712A, which is at least 1,000× more selective for beta 1-ARs than for beta 2-ARs. They concluded that beta 2-ARs could not be detected on rat ventricular myocytes, either by quantitative radioligand binding or by cAMP assay. These conclusions are in disagreement with other recent reports (6, 7, 19; CGP-20712A was used in Refs. 6 and 19) that estimated beta 2-ARs to comprise 8-20% of the total beta -AR population of isolated rat myocytes. We note that, although all of these studies used enzymatically dispersed cardiomyocytes, Kitagawa et al. (18) performed density gradient centrifugation after cell isolation to remove nonmyocyte cells, a more effective selection procedure than the more commonly employed gravity sedimentation procedure.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Comparison of cAMP accumulation over control in myocytes exposed to various beta -adrenergic receptor ligands: 10 µM Zint, beta 1-AR antagonist CGP, Zint + CGP, 1 µM Iso, or 1 µM norepinephrine (NE). Each value is mean ± SE of n experiments. Difference from control (*) or CGP (dagger ) statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Although we obviously cannot resolve the issue of whether beta 2-ARs are present in isolated rat ventricular sarcolemma, our findings are not consistent with the presence of physiologically relevant beta 2-ARs capable of modulating [Ca2+]i homeostasis. In contrast to results with the nonselective beta -AR agonist Iso, we found that the application of 10 µM zinterol, a concentration that should bind to >99% of all beta 2-ARs, induced only a minimal enhancement of the ICa and left the [Ca2+]i transient amplitude essentially unaffected. Furthermore, we observed no potentiation of the zinterol-mediated effect on the ICa after treatment with PTX, leading us to conclude that there was no coactivation of a Gi- or Go-linked inhibitory signal transduction pathway by zinterol via any receptor type. It should be noted that this failure of PTX to potentiate the ICa response to zinterol is somewhat surprising, even if the agonist was not directly activating a Gi-linked pathway. Indeed, other investigators (14) have noted some potentiation in the enhancement of the ICa by Iso, an effect generally attributed to inhibition of tonically active Gi and not to direct activation of PTX-sensitive G proteins by beta -ARs. Perhaps the basal response to zinterol is just too small to permit any appreciable potentiation on removal of tonic inhibition by Gi. Finally and most significantly, we found the very modest ICa modulation by zinterol to be entirely sensitive to CGP-20712A, demonstrating that the cellular responses we observed were in fact mediated by the beta 1-AR subtype. Indeed, our own conclusions are entirely consistent with the "classical" view of adrenergic pharmacology in which the beta 2-AR plays, at best, only a minimal direct role in the regulation of cardiac contractility.

As noted previously, zinterol can bind to beta 1-ARs, although with a 25-fold lower affinity than for beta 2-ARs (24). Additionally, numerous studies have also indicated that zinterol (as well as many other agents classified as beta 2-AR agonists) can activate cardiac beta 1-ARs, albeit less strongly than full beta 1-AR agonists. The earliest such report was by Freyss-Beguin et al. (10). These investigators examined the stimulation of intrinsic beating rate and cAMP production in cultured rat heart cells with a battery of presumptively beta 2-AR- selective agonists, including zinterol, and found that their dose-response relations corresponded better with expectations for activation of the beta 1-AR than the beta 2-AR subtype. More recently, Kuznetsov et al. (19) concluded that high concentrations of zinterol were capable of accumulating cAMP in adult rat cardiomyocytes through both subtypes. A number of investigators have also reached a similar conclusion regarding the ability of zinterol to act as an agonist at beta 1-ARs in other systems (13, 15, 16).

In the presence of 10 µM zinterol, the concentration used by Xiao and Lakatta (29), Cerbai et al. (6), Kuznetsov et al. (19), and ourselves, essentially every beta 1- and beta 2-AR should be occupied by the agonist. Especially given the very large beta 1-AR-receptor reserve in rat myocardium, one might reasonably expect at least a component of the response to this agonist to be mediated by the beta 1-AR subtype. Indeed, it is hard not to notice that the dose-response relation for zinterol enhancement of rat cardiomyocyte twitch amplitude reported by Xiao and Lakatta (Fig. 2 of Ref. 29) closely matches its predicted binding to beta 1-ARs rather than to beta 2-ARs. It is therefore perplexing that these investigators reported that the enhancement of twitch and [Ca2+]i amplitude elicited by 10 µM zinterol were completely resistant to antagonism by 300 nM CGP-20712A. We are at a loss to explain this observation, given that the zinterol-mediated response in our hands was entirely sensitive to 1 µM CGP-20712A, a concentration of the antagonist that should reduce occupancy of beta 1-ARs by zinterol to <3% although leaving >99% of beta 2-ARs still bound to zinterol.

Although we did find that a component of the zinterol-mediated cAMP increase was not CGP-20712A sensitive, this observation should be kept in perspective. The 10 µM zinterol-stimulated cAMP accumulation was more than 1 order of magnitude smaller than that stimulated by 1 µM Iso, a finding that confirms quantitatively similar observations by Kuznetsov et al. (19). Thus, even allowing for a beta 2 component of the Iso response, we are confident in concluding that beta 1-ARs are clearly much more effective than beta 2-ARs receptors in stimulating cAMP production. In contrast, Xiao et al. (27) concluded that these two receptor subtypes were equally effective in raising total cAMP levels (by ~50-70%) on the basis of a comparison of the response to zinterol with that to NE, which they asserted was acting almost exclusively via beta 1-ARs. In part, the difference between their results and ours with respect to both the absolute magnitude of the cAMP change and the magnitude of the beta -AR subtype differential can be accounted for by differences in technique, particularly our use of a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (0.5 mM IBMX). However, an additional key difference was the method of beta 1-AR activation, in particular, the assumption by Xiao et al. (27) that NE was a pure beta 1-AR agonist. Although NE has a higher affinity for beta 1- than beta 2-ARs, it also activates alpha -ARs. It has previously been shown that the cAMP response to NE in rat heart is substantially attenuated by its coactivation of alpha 1-ARs (1, 5).

Therefore, although we did observe a modest CGP-20712A-resistant cAMP elevation to zinterol, we conclude that this extremely small effect was simply insufficient to mediate any significant effect on Ca2+ homeostasis. Indeed, we were unable to identify a specifically beta 2-AR-mediated enhancement of any [Ca2+]i homeostatic mechanism, either in control or PTX-treated cardiomyocytes. Hence, although other investigators have established that activation of myocyte beta 2-ARs does affect contractility by altering [Ca2+] dynamics in humans (8), we cannot confirm that this subtype plays a similar role in rat ventricular myocytes.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank H. Bindu Vanapalli, Linda Hereford, and Dr. Xiaoqing Guo for technical assistance and Dr. Kenneth Minneman for helpful advice. The work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the American Heart Association, Georgia Affiliate (P. L. Becker).

    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: P. L. Becker, Dept. of Physiology, Emory Univ. School of Medicine, 1648 Pierce Dr., Atlanta, GA 30322.

Received 24 October 1997; accepted in final form 23 December 1997.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Bode, D. C., and L. L. Brunton. Post-receptor modulation of the effects of cyclic AMP in isolated cardiac myocytes. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 82: 13-18, 1988[Medline].

2.   Brodde, O. E. beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors in the human heart: properties, function, and alterations in chronic heart failure. Pharmacol. Rev. 43: 203-242, 1991[Medline].

3.   Brown, L., N. M. Deighton, S. Bals, W. Sohlmann, H. R. Zerkowski, M. C. Michel, and O. E. Brodde. Spare receptors for beta-adrenoceptor-mediated positive inotropic effects of catecholamines in the human heart. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 19: 222-232, 1992[Medline].

4.   Buxton, I. L. O., and L. L. Brunton. Direct analysis of beta -adrenergic receptor subtypes on intact adult ventricular myocytes of the rat. Circ. Res. 56: 126-132, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Buxton, I. L. O., and L. L. Brunton. alpha -Adrenergic receptors in rat ventricular myocytes: characteristics and linkage to cAMP metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. 251 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 20): H307-H313, 1986.

6.   Cerbai, E., L. Guerra, K. Varani, M. Barbieri, P. A. Borea, and A. Mugelli. beta -Adrenoceptor subtypes in young and old rat ventricular myocytes: a combined patch-clamp and binding study. Br. J. Pharmacol. 116: 1835-1842, 1995[Medline].

7.   Cui, Y., Y.-T. Shen, B. Kalthof, M. Iwase, N. Saito, M. Uechi, S. F. Vatner, and D. E. Vatner. Identification and fuctional role of beta -adrenergic subtypes in primate and rodent: in vivo versus isolated myocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 28: 1307-1317, 1996[Medline].

8.   Del Monte, F., A. J. Kaumann, P. A. Poole-Wilson, D. G. Wynne, J. Pepper, and S. E. Harding. Coexistence of functioning beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors in single myocytes from human ventricle. Circulation 88: 854-863, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Freissmuth, M., V. Hausleithner, S. Nees, M. Bock, and W. Schutz. Cardiac ventricular beta 2-adrenoceptors in guinea-pigs and rats are localized on the coronary endothelium. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 334: 56-62, 1986[Medline].

10.   Freyss-Beguin, M., G. Griffaton, P. Lechat, D. Picken, M. C. Quennedey, B. Rouot, and J. Schwartz. Comparison of the chronotropic effect and the cyclic AMP accumulation induced by beta 2-agonists in rat heart cell culture. Br. J. Pharmacol. 78: 717-723, 1983[Medline].

11.   Guo, X., M. A. Laflamme, and P. L. Becker. Cyclic ADP-ribose does not regulate sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release in intact cardiac myocytes. Circ. Res. 79: 147-151, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Hamill, O. P., A. Marty, E. Neher, B. Sakmann, and F. J. Sigworth. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recordings from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch. 391: 85-100, 1981[Medline].

13.   Heindel, J. J., A. Steinberger, and S. J. Strada. Identification and characterization of a beta-1 adrenergic receptor in the rat Sertoli cell. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 22: 349-358, 1981[Medline].

14.   Hescheler, J., M. Kameyama, and W. Trautwein. On the mechanism of muscarinic inhibition of the cardiac Ca current. Pflügers Arch. 407: 182-189, 1986[Medline].

15.   Hool, L. C., and R. D. Harvey. Role of beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors in regulation of Cl- and Ca2+ channels in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Am. J. Physiol. 273 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 42): H1669-H1676, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Juberg, E. N., K. P. Minneman, and P. W. Abel. Beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor binding and functional response in right and left atria of rat heart. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 330: 193-202, 1985[Medline].

17.   Kaumann, A. J., and H. Lemoine. beta 2-Adrenoceptor-mediated positive inotropic effect of adrenaline in human ventricular myocardium. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 335: 403-411, 1987[Medline].

18.   Kitagawa, Y., S. Adachi-Akahane, and T. Nagao. Determination of beta -adrenoceptor subtype in ventricular myocytes by use of highly selective beta -antagonists. Br. J. Pharmacol. 116: 1635-1643, 1995[Medline].

19.   Kuznetsov, V., E. Pak, R. B. Robinson, and S. F. Steinberg. beta 2-adrenergic receptor actions in neonatal and adult rat ventricular myocytes. Circ. Res. 76: 40-52, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Laflamme, M. A., and P. L. Becker. Ca2+-induced current oscillations in rabbit ventricular myocytes. Circ. Res. 78: 707-716, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Lands, A. M., A. Arnold, J. P. McAuliff, F. P. Luduena, and P. E. Brown, Jr. Differentiation of receptor systems activated by sympathomimetic amines. Nature 214: 597-598, 1967[Medline].

22.   Lands, A. M., F. P. Luedena, and H. J. Buzzo. Differentiation of receptors responsive to isopreterenol. Life Sci. 6: 2241-2249, 1967[Medline].

23.   Marullo, S., L. J. Emorine, A. D. Strosberg, and C. Delavier-Kluthko. Selective ligands to beta 1, beta 2 or chimeric beta 1/beta 2-adrenergic receptors involves multiple subsites. EMBO J. 9: 1471-1476, 1990[Medline].

24.   Minneman, K. P., A. Hedberg, and P. B. Molinoff. Comparison of beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes in mammalian tissues. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 211: 502-508, 1979[Free Full Text].

25.   Mitra, R., and M. Morad. A uniform enzymatic method for dissociation of myocytes from hearts and stomachs of vertebrates. Am. J. Physiol. 249 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 18): H1056-H1060, 1985.

26.   Samama, P., G. Pei, T. Costa, S. Cotecchia, and R. J. Lefkowitz. Negative antagonists promote an inactive conformation of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 45: 390-394, 1994[Abstract].

27.   Xiao, R. P., C. Hohl, R. Altschuld, L. Jones, B. Livingston, B. Ziman, B. Tantini, and E. G. Lakatta. beta 2-Adrenergic receptor-stimulated increase in cAMP in rat heart cells is not coupled to changes in Ca2+ dynamics, contractility, or phospholamban phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 19151-19156, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Xiao, R. P., X. Ji, and E. G. Lakatta. Functional coupling of the beta 2-adrenoceptor to a pertussis toxin-sensitive G-protein in cardiac myocytes. Mol. Pharmacol. 47: 322-329, 1995[Abstract].

29.   Xiao, R. P., and E. G. Lakatta. Beta 1-adrenoceptor stimulation and beta 2-adrenoceptor stimulation differ in their effects on contraction, cytosolic Ca2+, and Ca2+ current in single rat ventricular cells. Circ. Res. 73: 286-300, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30.   Yanagisawa, T., K. Ishii, H. Hashimoto, and N. Taira. Differential coupling to positive inotropic responses of cyclic AMP produced by stimulation of beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 13: 64-75, 1989[Medline].


AJP Heart Circ Physiol 274(4):H1308-H1314
0363-6135/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. P. Collis, S. Srivastava, W. A. Coetzee, and M. Artman
beta2-Adrenergic receptor agonists stimulate L-type calcium current independent of PKA in newborn rabbit ventricular myocytes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2826 - H2835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. F. Steinberg
The Cellular Actions of {beta}-Adrenergic Receptor Agonists : Looking Beyond cAMP
Circ. Res., December 8, 2000; 87(12): 1079 - 1082.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. J. Kamp and J. W. Hell
Regulation of Cardiac L-Type Calcium Channels by Protein Kinase A and Protein Kinase C
Circ. Res., December 8, 2000; 87(12): 1095 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Z. Nagykaldi, D. Kem, R. Lazzara, and B. Szabo
Conditioning of beta 1-adrenoceptor effect via beta 2-subtype on L-type Ca2+ current in canine ventricular myocytes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): H1329 - H1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. K. Ranu, J. C. W. Mak, P. J. Barnes, and S. E. Harding
Gi-dependent suppression of beta 1-adrenoceptor effects in ventricular myocytes from NE-treated guinea pigs
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2000; 278(6): H1807 - H1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
O.-E. Brodde and M. C. Michel
Adrenergic and Muscarinic Receptors in the Human Heart
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 1999; 51(4): 651 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. F. Steinberg
The Molecular Basis for Distinct {beta}-Adrenergic Receptor Subtype Actions in Cardiomyocytes
Circ. Res., November 26, 1999; 85(11): 1101 - 1111.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laflamme, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laflamme, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, P. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online