|
|
||||||||
2-adrenergic receptors
modulate Ca2+ in adult rat
ventricular myocytes?
Department of Physiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We examined the role of
2-adrenergic receptors (ARs) in
modulating calcium homeostasis in rat ventricular myocytes. Zinterol (10 µM), an agonist with a 25-fold greater affinity for
2-ARs over
1-ARs, modestly enhanced L-type
calcium current
(ICa) magnitude by ~30% and modestly accelerated the rate of
Ca2+ concentration
([Ca2+]) decline
(~35%) but had little effect on the magnitude of the [Ca2+] transient (a
nonsignificant 6% increase). However, 1 µM of the highly selective
1-AR antagonist CGP-20712A
completely blocked the
ICa increase
induced by 10 µM zinterol. Pretreatment of cells with pertussis toxin
(PTX) did not alter
ICa enhancement
by 10 µM zinterol, although it did abolish the ability of
acetylcholine to block the forskolin-induced enhancement of
ICa. Zinterol (10 µM) approximately doubled adenosine 3',5'-cyclic
monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation, although one-half of this increase
was blocked by CGP-20712A. In contrast, 1 µM of the nonselective
-agonist isoproterenol increased cAMP production 15-fold. Thus we
found no evidence that activation of
2-ARs modulates calcium
homeostasis in rat ventricular myocytes, even after treatment with PTX.
zinterol; CGP-20712A; calcium homeostasis; adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ALTHOUGH THE ORIGINAL Lands classification
of
-adrenergic receptors (ARs) attributed the regulation
of cardiac function to the
1-AR
(21, 22), physiological and radioligand binding studies have since
indicated that functional
1-
and
2-ARs coexist in mammalian
heart (2). In human myocardium,
2-ARs are thought to represent
a significant fraction of the total myocardial pool of
-ARs, but in
other species the contribution of this subtype remains highly
controversial. Particularly in tissue such as rodent heart, in which
the fraction of
2-ARs may be
comparatively small, methodological considerations can greatly
complicate the interpretation of radioligand binding studies.
Contamination with nonmyocyte cells and the selection of ligands with
inappropriate subtype selectivity can both skew the apparent
distribution.
Interest in understanding the potential role of the cardiac
2-AR in species other than
humans is not purely academic; suggestions of signaling responses
unique to individual
-AR subtypes have relied heavily on work in
model systems, including rodent heart. Indeed, although both receptor
subtypes are generally thought to share a common signal transduction
scheme linked to a rise in intracellular adenosine
3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP), some important
differences have been noted in their respective ability to activate
downstream responses. For instance, in dog and human myocardial tissue,
the
1-AR-mediated increase in
cAMP has been shown to be much more tightly linked to contractility changes than that mediated by
2-ARs (17, 30). Although such discrepancies have often been attributed to differential
compartmentalization of cAMP accumulated by each subtype, various
investigators have also invoked the possible involvement of novel
cAMP-independent mechanisms particular to one subtype or another. In
isolated rat ventricular myocytes, Xiao et al. (28) asserted that
application of the
2-AR agonist
zinterol causes robust inotropic changes that are further potentiated
when inhibition by a coactivated pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G
protein is masked. No such potentiation by PTX treatment was observed
with norepinephrine (NE), an agonist with a higher selectivity for
1-ARs than
2-ARs. In earlier work (29),
these investigators had reported important differences in the cellular
response to subtype-selective stimulation; in particular, a paradoxical
absence of lusitropic changes with
2-AR stimulation. If indeed
present, a novel inhibitory signal transduction arm activated by
2-ARs, but not
1-ARs, might account for such discrepancies.
Intrigued by these reports, we initially intended to further elucidate
the mechanisms by which
2-ARs
apparently target different Ca2+
homeostatic pathways in isolated rat ventricular myocytes. However, this effort was frustrated by our inability to detect any
2-AR-mediated effect. We found
that application of the
2-AR
agonist zinterol had only minimal effects on the
Ca2+ current and intracellular
Ca2+ concentration
([Ca2+]i)
dynamics compared with the effects of the nonselective
-AR agonist
isoproterenol (Iso). Moreover, even this action was
effectively blocked by the addition of the
1-AR antagonist CGP-20712A. We also found no evidence for the involvement of a PTX-sensitive inhibitory pathway in
2-AR
signaling. Finally, although we could detect a small cAMP rise likely
mediated by
2-ARs, it was more than an order of magnitude smaller than the cAMP rise induced by the
nonselective
-AR agonist Iso. Thus we found no evidence that
2-ARs exert a physiologically
relevant action on Ca2+
homeostasis in rat ventricular myocytes.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ventricular cardiomyocyte isolation. For electrophysiological and [Ca2+]i studies, ventricular myocytes were isolated from 150- to 250-g Sprague-Dawley rats by an enzymatic dispersion method previously described (11, 25). For cAMP assays, this protocol was modified slightly. After digestion, the tissue was placed in 1 mM Ca2+-Tyrode and gently triturated with a wide-bore pipette. Suspended cells were filtered and then allowed two gravity-sedimentation steps (15-20 min each) to separate the denser rod-shaped myocytes from hypercontracted myocytes, other cell types, and debris. All procedures performed on animals were in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Standard extracellular and intracellular solutions.
For cardiomyocyte isolation and cAMP assays, a modified Tyrode
solution
A [in mM: 135.0 NaCl, 5.4 KCl,
1.0 MgCl2, 0.33 NaH2PO4, 10.0 N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic
acid (HEPES), and 10.0 glucose] was prepared with a variety of
different [Ca2+] by
the addition of CaCl2. For
electrophysiological experiments, cells were placed in an extracellular
solution
B (in mM: 140.0 NaCl, 5.0 KCl, 1.0 CaCl2, 1.0 MgCl2, 0.33 NaH2PO4,
10.0 HEPES, 3.0 CsCl, 5.0 tetraethylammonium chloride, 3.0 4-aminopyridine, and 10.0 glucose) intended to block potassium
conductances. Intracellular solutions were also composed
to reduce contaminating potassium currents as well as
Ca2+ current rundown. For those
experiments involving Ca2+
imaging, the pipette contained intracellular
solution
A (in mM: 25.0 CsCl, 10.0 NaCl, 120.0 Cs-aspartate, 3.0 Mg-ATP) with 150 µM
K5-fura 2. For those experiments
in which [Ca2+]
measurements were not made, intracellular
solution
B [in mM: 25.0 CsCl, 95.0 Cs-aspartate, 5.0 Mg-ATP, 0.4 GTP, 10.0 ethylene glycol-bis(
-aminoethyl
ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic
acid, 5.0 tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane
(Tris)2-phosphocreatine, 5.0 pyruvic acid, 2.0, Na3-fructose-1,6-diphosphate, 1.0 NaH2PO4,
and 0.5 K-ADP] was used in the pipette.
Fluorescent [Ca2+]i measurements. Fura 2 fluorescence was measured with a high-temporal-resolution microfluorimeter described previously (11, 20). Briefly, the excitation light from a xenon lamp source was rapidly alternated (~110 Hz) between 340 and 380 nm, and the fluorescence emission light (510-550 nm) was quantified with a photomultiplier tube-photon counter interfaced to an IBM-compatible computer. The custom control and data acquisition software stored fluorescence data for each wavelength once per cycle. Raw 340- and 380-nm fluorescence counts were corrected for background, and autofluorescence was measured before the membrane patch was ruptured. The 340/380 excitation fluorescence ratio was used as an index of the cytosolic [Ca2+].
Electrophysiological recording.
Cells were patch-clamped in the ruptured-patch whole cell configuration
(12) with Corning 7052 borosilicate glass electrodes (2-3 M
)
filled with one of the pipette solutions described in Standard extracellular and intracellular
solutions. During experimental protocols, cells were
maintained in extracellular solution B
at room temperature (~22°C). Voltage clamp was achieved with an
AxoPatch 1D or AxoClamp 2A amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City,
CA). The fast sodium current was inactivated by holding the cell at a
resting potential of
40 mV. The inward calcium current was activated by repeated 300-ms depolarizations from
40 to +10 mV (0.5 Hz). Consistent with reported characteristics for this current, it
could be eliminated by application of nifedipine or by lowering the
extracellular [Ca2+]
to micromolar levels (not shown). When fura 2 fluorescence was measured
simultaneously, membrane current was sampled at 330 Hz (3×
acquisition rate of fluorescence). At all other times, membrane current
was sampled at 666 Hz.
cAMP measurements.
After sedimentation, aliquots of cardiomyocytes were placed in separate
tubes containing extracellular
solution
A and 1 mM Ca2+ at room temperature. If cells
were to be treated with any receptor antagonist, it was added at this
time. After 5 min, the phosphodiesterase inhibitor
3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX; 0.5 mM) was added to each tube.
After an additional 5-min incubation, the agonist regimen (if any) was
added for the final 5-min incubation. Subsequently, cells were pelleted
(<500 revolutions/min) and the buffer was rapidly removed. Cold
ethanol (65% vol/vol) was added to stop the reaction. Cells were
rigorously vortexed and centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min. The pellet
from each tube was collected and solubilized in sodium dodecyl sulfate
buffer (10% wt/vol in Tris-buffered saline) for subsequent protein
determination with the bicinchoninic acid procedure
(Pierce). The supernatant fraction was dried under warm
nitrogen (50°C) in borosilicate glass tubes and then stored at
20°C for subsequent cAMP determination. After serial
dilution, the quantity of cAMP in each tube was measured with an enzyme immunoassay system (Biotrak/Amersham). The resultant product of the
cAMP-linked peroxidase reaction was read at 450 nm on a 96-well microtiter plate spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad). The assay proved to be
reasonably robust over a range of 25-3,200 fmol/well.
Reagents. CGP-20712A was kindly donated by Ciba-Geigy (Summit, NJ), and zinterol was kindly provided by Dr. Kenneth Minneman. Fura 2 was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). All other reagents and chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Statistics. Values are reported as means ± SE. Statistical significance was determined by the Student's t-test.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Zinterol has only modest effects on calcium homeostasis.
Recent reports have suggested that activation of
2-ARs can have significant
inotropic effects in isolated rat ventricular myocytes (6, 29) without
eliciting accompanying lusitropic effects (29). To better resolve these
effects, we compared the acute effects of the
2-AR agonist zinterol on
ICa and
[Ca2+]i
to those elicited by application of the nonselective
-AR agonist Iso. Myocytes were voltage-clamped at
40 mV and dialyzed with a
pipette solution containing the calcium indicator fura 2 (intracellular solution
A).
ICa was activated
by depolarization to +10 mV, and the resultant
[Ca2+]i
transient was recorded for examination of its amplitude and kinetics.
63; measured as
the time to decay to 63% of its peak value) was also shortened somewhat, from 36 ± 5 to 29 ± 6 ms. Iso also had a pronounced lusitropic effect: the time it took the fura 2 fluorescent ratio to
fall from 75% to 25% of peak was reduced 63 ± 4% from control. A
representative experiment depicting these effects is shown in Fig.
1.
|
63
declined from 38 ± 5 to 33 ± 6 ms), not the dramatic
slowing of inactivation observed by Xiao and Lakatta (29). Furthermore,
we observed no appreciable change in the amplitude of the fura 2 fluorescent transient (+6 ± 12%,
n = 5 cells). We also observed a
slight lusitropic action. The time required for the fluorescence ratio
to fall from 75% to 25% of peak was reduced 33 ± 6% from
control. Thus zinterol seemed to be altering
Ca2+ uptake as well as the
ICa, albeit only
modestly.
|
Blockade of
1-adrenergic
receptors prevents enhancement of
ICa by zinterol.
Although zinterol is known to be selective for
2- over
1-ARs, all experiments to this
point have employed particularly high concentrations of this agonist.
The published affinity of zinterol for
2-ARs is ~40 nM; its affinity
for
1-ARs is ~1,000 nM (24). Hence, although 10 µM zinterol has been shown to be necessary to
elicit a maximal response (29), this concentration of agonist would be
expected to result in full occupancy at both receptor subtypes. Because
the rat heart has a large
1-AR
reserve, where full activation of only a few percent of the receptor
pool may be sufficient to produce a full functional response (3), an appropriate subtype-selective antagonist should be used. We therefore examined the ability of 10 µM zinterol to alter the
ICa in the presence of 1 µM CGP-20712A, a highly selective
1-AR antagonist with an
affinity of ~3 nM for that subtype (23). This concentration of
CGP-20712A should block virtually all
1-ARs even if, as has been
reported by Kitagawa et al. (18), there exists a subpopulation of
1-ARs with a reduced (~20 nM)
affinity for CGP-20712A. On the other hand, blockade of
2-ARs at this concentration
should not be a concern, because the affinity of CGP-20712A at that
subtype has been reported to be only ~5-10 µM (18, 23).
4 ± 6%, n = 5; see Fig.
3 for a representative example). This
observation that the zinterol-mediated enhancement of
ICa was sensitive
to CGP-20712A differs from results under similar conditions reported
(but not shown) by Cerbai et al. (6).
|
PTX pretreatment does not potentiate enhancement of calcium curent
by zinterol.
Recently, Xiao et al. (28) proposed that stimulation of
2-ARs activates a novel signal
transduction cascade involving a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein,
an effect not mediated by
1-AR
activation. If so, the small effect of zinterol in our preparation, and
its complete sensitivity to CGP-20712A, might be accounted for if this
inhibitory pathway was more active in our cell preparation. Because our
previous experiments had indicated the enhancement of the
ICa to be the
most evident inotropic action of zinterol, we investigated whether
pretreatment of cells with PTX would unmask a distinct
2-AR mediated action on this
current. Myocytes were exposed to PTX (7.5 µg/ml) for at least 2.5 h
at 37°C. However, when these cells were challenged with 10 µM
zinterol, no potentiation of the response was observed (Fig.
4). In four cells, zinterol increased the
magnitude of the
ICa by 27 ± 3%, an effect virtually identical to that previously observed in
non-PTX-treated cells. In contrast, PTX treatment did abolish
muscarinic receptor-mediated effects. Figure
5A shows that, as
expected, the enhancement of ICa by 1 µM
forskolin in an untreated cell could be eliminated with the subsequent
addition of 10 µM acetylcholine. However, as shown in Fig.
5B, in an otherwise identical cell
treated with PTX, the attenuation by acetylcholine was abolished. Thus
the failure of PTX to potentiate the enhancement of the
ICa by zinterol cannot be explained by postulating that our PTX-treatment protocol was
ineffective.
|
Intracellular cAMP concentration responses to zinterol with and
without
1-AR blockade.
Although the application of 10 µM zinterol produced modest
electrophysiological and
[Ca2+]i
transient changes in rat cardiomyocytes, these responses were prevented
by the
1-AR antagonist
CGP-20712A. At this point, therefore, it seemed reasonable to ask
whether functional
2-ARs were
even expressed in these cells. We chose to further examine this issue using the change in total cellular cAMP accumulation as a more proximal
measure of responsiveness. Recent reports have disagreed as to what
degree of intracellular cAMP concentration elevation in rat ventricular
myocytes is elicited by
2-AR
activation. For instance, although Kitagawa et al. (18) could not
detect any increase in cAMP production with
2-AR stimulation, Kuznetsov et
al. (19) found that, even with blockade of
1-ARs with 100 nM CGP-20712A, a
modest, presumably
2-AR-mediated rise occurred (to
~2-fold over control) with 100 nM zinterol. Xiao et al. (27) also
observed an ~50% increase in cAMP accumulation at 100 nM zinterol (a
concentration at which
1-AR
binding should be less than ~10%) and as much as a 70% increase at
10 µM zinterol.
|
1- and
2-ARs. With regard to basal and
10 µM zinterol-stimulated cAMP estimates, our data are quantitatively
similar to those reported by both Kuznetsov et al. (19) and Xiao et al.
(27), suggesting that differences we have noted in terms of other
parameters cannot be explained on the basis of a lack of cAMP
responsiveness in our preparation. In contrast, both NE and Iso were
much more effective than 10 µM zinterol in elevating cAMP levels (by
factors of ~3 and 15, respectively).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although radioligand binding studies have long suggested the presence
of a heterogeneous population of
-ARs in whole rat myocardium (see
Ref. 24), Buxton and Brunton (4) found only a homogeneous
1-AR population in
enzymatically isolated rat ventricular myocytes. Later, using markers
for endothelial and myocyte plasmalemma, Freissmuth et al. (9) extended
this work to conclude that most of the
2-ARs of rat and guinea pig
heart were localized to the coronary vessels. Unfortunately, the
possibility of a small pool of
2-ARs below the limit of
detection (perhaps <10%) could not be totally eliminated in the
latter two studies because of the unavailability of sufficiently
subtype-selective ligands. A more recent study by Kitagawa
et al. (18) employed better pharmacological tools, in particular, the
1-AR antagonist CGP-20712A,
which is at least 1,000× more selective for
1-ARs than for
2-ARs. They concluded that
2-ARs could not be detected on
rat ventricular myocytes, either by quantitative radioligand binding or
by cAMP assay. These conclusions are in disagreement with other recent reports (6, 7, 19; CGP-20712A was used in Refs. 6 and 19) that
estimated
2-ARs to comprise
8-20% of the total
-AR population of isolated rat myocytes. We
note that, although all of these studies used enzymatically dispersed
cardiomyocytes, Kitagawa et al. (18) performed density gradient
centrifugation after cell isolation to remove nonmyocyte cells, a more
effective selection procedure than the more commonly employed gravity
sedimentation procedure.
|
Although we obviously cannot resolve the issue of whether
2-ARs are present in isolated
rat ventricular sarcolemma, our findings are not consistent with the
presence of physiologically relevant
2-ARs capable of modulating
[Ca2+]i
homeostasis. In contrast to results with the nonselective
-AR agonist Iso, we found that the application of 10 µM zinterol, a
concentration that should bind to >99% of all
2-ARs, induced only a minimal
enhancement of the
ICa and left the
[Ca2+]i
transient amplitude essentially unaffected. Furthermore, we observed no
potentiation of the zinterol-mediated effect on the ICa after
treatment with PTX, leading us to conclude that there was no
coactivation of a Gi- or
Go-linked inhibitory signal
transduction pathway by zinterol via any receptor type. It should be
noted that this failure of PTX to potentiate the
ICa response to
zinterol is somewhat surprising, even if the agonist was not directly
activating a Gi-linked pathway.
Indeed, other investigators (14) have noted some potentiation in the
enhancement of the
ICa by Iso, an
effect generally attributed to inhibition of tonically active
Gi and not to direct activation of
PTX-sensitive G proteins by
-ARs. Perhaps the basal response to
zinterol is just too small to permit any appreciable potentiation on
removal of tonic inhibition by Gi.
Finally and most significantly, we found the very modest
ICa modulation by
zinterol to be entirely sensitive to CGP-20712A, demonstrating that the
cellular responses we observed were in fact mediated by the
1-AR subtype. Indeed, our own
conclusions are entirely consistent with the "classical" view of
adrenergic pharmacology in which the
2-AR plays, at best, only a
minimal direct role in the regulation of cardiac contractility.
As noted previously, zinterol can bind to
1-ARs, although with a 25-fold
lower affinity than for
2-ARs
(24). Additionally, numerous studies have also indicated that zinterol
(as well as many other agents classified as
2-AR agonists) can activate
cardiac
1-ARs, albeit less
strongly than full
1-AR
agonists. The earliest such report was by Freyss-Beguin et al. (10).
These investigators examined the stimulation of intrinsic beating rate
and cAMP production in cultured rat heart cells with a battery of
presumptively
2-AR- selective
agonists, including zinterol, and found that their dose-response relations corresponded better with expectations for activation of the
1-AR than the
2-AR subtype. More recently,
Kuznetsov et al. (19) concluded that high concentrations of zinterol
were capable of accumulating cAMP in adult rat cardiomyocytes through both subtypes. A number of investigators have also reached a similar conclusion regarding the ability of zinterol to act as an agonist at
1-ARs in other systems (13, 15,
16).
In the presence of 10 µM zinterol, the concentration used by Xiao and
Lakatta (29), Cerbai et al. (6), Kuznetsov et al. (19), and ourselves,
essentially every
1- and
2-AR should be occupied by the
agonist. Especially given the very large
1-AR-receptor reserve in rat
myocardium, one might reasonably expect at least a component of the
response to this agonist to be mediated by the
1-AR subtype. Indeed, it is
hard not to notice that the dose-response relation for zinterol
enhancement of rat cardiomyocyte twitch amplitude reported by Xiao and
Lakatta (Fig. 2 of Ref. 29) closely matches its predicted binding to
1-ARs rather than to
2-ARs. It is therefore
perplexing that these investigators reported that the enhancement of
twitch and
[Ca2+]i
amplitude elicited by 10 µM zinterol were completely resistant to
antagonism by 300 nM CGP-20712A. We are at a loss to explain this
observation, given that the zinterol-mediated response in our hands was
entirely sensitive to 1 µM CGP-20712A, a concentration of the
antagonist that should reduce occupancy of
1-ARs by zinterol to <3%
although leaving >99% of
2-ARs still bound to zinterol.
Although we did find that a component of the zinterol-mediated cAMP
increase was not CGP-20712A sensitive, this observation should be kept
in perspective. The 10 µM zinterol-stimulated cAMP accumulation was
more than 1 order of magnitude smaller than that stimulated by 1 µM
Iso, a finding that confirms quantitatively similar observations by
Kuznetsov et al. (19). Thus, even allowing for a
2 component of the Iso
response, we are confident in concluding that
1-ARs are clearly much more
effective than
2-ARs receptors in stimulating cAMP production. In contrast, Xiao et al. (27) concluded
that these two receptor subtypes were equally effective in raising
total cAMP levels (by ~50-70%) on the basis of a comparison of
the response to zinterol with that to NE, which they asserted was
acting almost exclusively via
1-ARs. In part, the difference between their results and ours with respect to both the absolute magnitude of the cAMP change and the magnitude of the
-AR subtype differential can be accounted for by differences in technique, particularly our use of a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (0.5 mM IBMX).
However, an additional key difference was the method of
1-AR activation, in particular,
the assumption by Xiao et al. (27) that NE was a pure
1-AR agonist. Although NE has a
higher affinity for
1- than
2-ARs, it also activates
-ARs. It has previously been shown that the cAMP response to NE in
rat heart is substantially attenuated by its coactivation of
1-ARs (1, 5).
Therefore, although we did observe a modest CGP-20712A-resistant cAMP
elevation to zinterol, we conclude that this extremely small effect was
simply insufficient to mediate any significant effect on
Ca2+ homeostasis. Indeed, we were
unable to identify a specifically
2-AR-mediated enhancement of
any
[Ca2+]i
homeostatic mechanism, either in control or PTX-treated cardiomyocytes. Hence, although other investigators have established that activation of
myocyte
2-ARs does affect
contractility by altering
[Ca2+] dynamics in
humans (8), we cannot confirm that this subtype plays a similar role in
rat ventricular myocytes.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank H. Bindu Vanapalli, Linda Hereford, and Dr. Xiaoqing Guo for technical assistance and Dr. Kenneth Minneman for helpful advice. The work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the American Heart Association, Georgia Affiliate (P. L. Becker).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: P. L. Becker, Dept. of Physiology, Emory Univ. School of Medicine, 1648 Pierce Dr., Atlanta, GA 30322.
Received 24 October 1997; accepted in final form 23 December 1997.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bode, D. C.,
and
L. L. Brunton.
Post-receptor modulation of the effects of cyclic AMP in isolated cardiac myocytes.
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
82:
13-18,
1988[Medline].
2.
Brodde, O. E.
1- and
2-adrenoceptors in the human heart: properties, function, and alterations in chronic heart failure.
Pharmacol. Rev.
43:
203-242,
1991[Medline].
3.
Brown, L.,
N. M. Deighton,
S. Bals,
W. Sohlmann,
H. R. Zerkowski,
M. C. Michel,
and
O. E. Brodde.
Spare receptors for beta-adrenoceptor-mediated positive inotropic effects of catecholamines in the human heart.
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
19:
222-232,
1992[Medline].
4.
Buxton, I. L. O.,
and
L. L. Brunton.
Direct analysis of
-adrenergic receptor subtypes on intact adult ventricular myocytes of the rat.
Circ. Res.
56:
126-132,
1985
5.
Buxton, I. L. O.,
and
L. L. Brunton.
-Adrenergic receptors in rat ventricular myocytes: characteristics and linkage to cAMP metabolism.
Am. J. Physiol.
251 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 20):
H307-H313,
1986.
6.
Cerbai, E.,
L. Guerra,
K. Varani,
M. Barbieri,
P. A. Borea,
and
A. Mugelli.
-Adrenoceptor subtypes in young and old rat ventricular myocytes: a combined patch-clamp and binding study.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
116:
1835-1842,
1995[Medline].
7.
Cui, Y.,
Y.-T. Shen,
B. Kalthof,
M. Iwase,
N. Saito,
M. Uechi,
S. F. Vatner,
and
D. E. Vatner.
Identification and fuctional role of
-adrenergic subtypes in primate and rodent: in vivo versus isolated myocytes.
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
28:
1307-1317,
1996[Medline].
8.
Del Monte, F.,
A. J. Kaumann,
P. A. Poole-Wilson,
D. G. Wynne,
J. Pepper,
and
S. E. Harding.
Coexistence of functioning
1- and
2-adrenoceptors in single myocytes from human ventricle.
Circulation
88:
854-863,
1993
9.
Freissmuth, M.,
V. Hausleithner,
S. Nees,
M. Bock,
and
W. Schutz.
Cardiac ventricular
2-adrenoceptors in guinea-pigs and rats are localized on the coronary endothelium.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol.
334:
56-62,
1986[Medline].
10.
Freyss-Beguin, M.,
G. Griffaton,
P. Lechat,
D. Picken,
M. C. Quennedey,
B. Rouot,
and
J. Schwartz.
Comparison of the chronotropic effect and the cyclic AMP accumulation induced by
2-agonists in rat heart cell culture.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
78:
717-723,
1983[Medline].
11.
Guo, X.,
M. A. Laflamme,
and
P. L. Becker.
Cyclic ADP-ribose does not regulate sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release in intact cardiac myocytes.
Circ. Res.
79:
147-151,
1996
12.
Hamill, O. P.,
A. Marty,
E. Neher,
B. Sakmann,
and
F. J. Sigworth.
Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recordings from cells and cell-free membrane patches.
Pflügers Arch.
391:
85-100,
1981[Medline].
13.
Heindel, J. J.,
A. Steinberger,
and
S. J. Strada.
Identification and characterization of a beta-1 adrenergic receptor in the rat Sertoli cell.
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
22:
349-358,
1981[Medline].
14.
Hescheler, J.,
M. Kameyama,
and
W. Trautwein.
On the mechanism of muscarinic inhibition of the cardiac Ca current.
Pflügers Arch.
407:
182-189,
1986[Medline].
15.
Hool, L. C.,
and
R. D. Harvey.
Role of
1- and
2-adrenergic receptors in regulation of Cl
and Ca2+ channels in guinea pig ventricular myocytes.
Am. J. Physiol.
273 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 42):
H1669-H1676,
1997
16.
Juberg, E. N.,
K. P. Minneman,
and
P. W. Abel.
Beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor binding and functional response in right and left atria of rat heart.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol.
330:
193-202,
1985[Medline].
17.
Kaumann, A. J.,
and
H. Lemoine.
2-Adrenoceptor-mediated positive inotropic effect of adrenaline in human ventricular myocardium.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol.
335:
403-411,
1987[Medline].
18.
Kitagawa, Y.,
S. Adachi-Akahane,
and
T. Nagao.
Determination of
-adrenoceptor subtype in ventricular myocytes by use of highly selective
-antagonists.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
116:
1635-1643,
1995[Medline].
19.
Kuznetsov, V.,
E. Pak,
R. B. Robinson,
and
S. F. Steinberg.
2-adrenergic receptor actions in neonatal and adult rat ventricular myocytes.
Circ. Res.
76:
40-52,
1995
20.
Laflamme, M. A.,
and
P. L. Becker.
Ca2+-induced current oscillations in rabbit ventricular myocytes.
Circ. Res.
78:
707-716,
1996
21.
Lands, A. M.,
A. Arnold,
J. P. McAuliff,
F. P. Luduena,
and
P. E. Brown, Jr.
Differentiation of receptor systems activated by sympathomimetic amines.
Nature
214:
597-598,
1967[Medline].
22.
Lands, A. M.,
F. P. Luedena,
and
H. J. Buzzo.
Differentiation of receptors responsive to isopreterenol.
Life Sci.
6:
2241-2249,
1967[Medline].
23.
Marullo, S.,
L. J. Emorine,
A. D. Strosberg,
and
C. Delavier-Kluthko.
Selective ligands to
1,
2 or chimeric
1/
2-adrenergic receptors involves multiple subsites.
EMBO J.
9:
1471-1476,
1990[Medline].
24.
Minneman, K. P.,
A. Hedberg,
and
P. B. Molinoff.
Comparison of beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes in mammalian tissues.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
211:
502-508,
1979
25.
Mitra, R.,
and
M. Morad.
A uniform enzymatic method for dissociation of myocytes from hearts and stomachs of vertebrates.
Am. J. Physiol.
249 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 18):
H1056-H1060,
1985.
26.
Samama, P.,
G. Pei,
T. Costa,
S. Cotecchia,
and
R. J. Lefkowitz.
Negative antagonists promote an inactive conformation of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor.
Mol. Pharmacol.
45:
390-394,
1994[Abstract].
27.
Xiao, R. P.,
C. Hohl,
R. Altschuld,
L. Jones,
B. Livingston,
B. Ziman,
B. Tantini,
and
E. G. Lakatta.
2-Adrenergic receptor-stimulated increase in cAMP in rat heart cells is not coupled to changes in Ca2+ dynamics, contractility, or phospholamban phosphorylation.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:
19151-19156,
1994
28.
Xiao, R. P.,
X. Ji,
and
E. G. Lakatta.
Functional coupling of the
2-adrenoceptor to a pertussis toxin-sensitive G-protein in cardiac myocytes.
Mol. Pharmacol.
47:
322-329,
1995[Abstract].
29.
Xiao, R. P.,
and
E. G. Lakatta.
Beta 1-adrenoceptor stimulation and beta 2-adrenoceptor stimulation differ in their effects on contraction, cytosolic Ca2+, and Ca2+ current in single rat ventricular cells.
Circ. Res.
73:
286-300,
1993
30.
Yanagisawa, T.,
K. Ishii,
H. Hashimoto,
and
N. Taira.
Differential coupling to positive inotropic responses of cyclic AMP produced by stimulation of
1- and
2-adrenergic receptors.
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
13:
64-75,
1989[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. P. Collis, S. Srivastava, W. A. Coetzee, and M. Artman beta2-Adrenergic receptor agonists stimulate L-type calcium current independent of PKA in newborn rabbit ventricular myocytes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2826 - H2835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Steinberg The Cellular Actions of {beta}-Adrenergic Receptor Agonists : Looking Beyond cAMP Circ. Res., December 8, 2000; 87(12): 1079 - 1082. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Kamp and J. W. Hell Regulation of Cardiac L-Type Calcium Channels by Protein Kinase A and Protein Kinase C Circ. Res., December 8, 2000; 87(12): 1095 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Nagykaldi, D. Kem, R. Lazzara, and B. Szabo Conditioning of beta 1-adrenoceptor effect via beta 2-subtype on L-type Ca2+ current in canine ventricular myocytes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): H1329 - H1337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Ranu, J. C. W. Mak, P. J. Barnes, and S. E. Harding Gi-dependent suppression of beta 1-adrenoceptor effects in ventricular myocytes from NE-treated guinea pigs Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2000; 278(6): H1807 - H1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O.-E. Brodde and M. C. Michel Adrenergic and Muscarinic Receptors in the Human Heart Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 1999; 51(4): 651 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Steinberg The Molecular Basis for Distinct {beta}-Adrenergic Receptor Subtype Actions in Cardiomyocytes Circ. Res., November 26, 1999; 85(11): 1101 - 1111. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |