|
|
||||||||
Departments of Anesthesia and Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our goal was to test directly whether the vasoconstrictor action of naloxone during hypovolemic hypotension is centrally mediated. In eight chronically instrumented rabbits, progressive central hypovolemia and fall in cardiac output (CO) were produced by gradually inflating a cuff on the thoracic vena cava. Central hypovolemia was then sustained for 8 min by holding CO constant. In the main experiment (n = 4), each rabbit was studied eight times over 4 experimental days. Saline or naloxone treatment commenced 10 min before progressive hypovolemia (early treatment) or 2 min after the onset of sustained hypovolemia (late treatment), given by intravenous infusion or into the fourth ventricle (V4). With saline treatment, there was spontaneous recovery of systemic vasoconstriction and arterial pressure during sustained hypovolemia. Late treatment with naloxone (4 mg/kg iv; 4-37 µg/kg V4) accelerated and exaggerated these changes. Thus, under conditions of constant CO and central blood volume, the vasodilatation of the decompensatory phase of acute hypovolemia is not sustained, and intravenous naloxone's vasoconstrictor action is via a brain stem mechanism.
baroreceptor reflex; decompensatory phase; fourth ventricle; hemorrhage; progressive central hypovolemia; sustained central hypovolemia; central nervous system
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IN CONSCIOUS MAMMALS, the hemodynamic response to acute, progressive reduction in central blood volume is biphasic (18). At first, there is progressive, baroreflex-mediated, systemic vasoconstriction that maintains blood pressure at near-normal levels (phase I). Then, if central blood volume and cardiac output (CO) reach critically low levels, sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction suddenly fails and blood pressure plummets (phase II).
It has been repeatedly demonstrated in conscious rats and rabbits that naloxone, a nonspecific opioid- receptor antagonist, restores blood pressure if administered intravenously in large doses during phase II (18). In conscious rabbits, this pressor action is associated with restoration of renal sympathetic postganglionic activity (7, 15, 21). This suggests, but does not prove, that the site of this action of intravenous naloxone is the central nervous system (CNS). It has been reported that n-methylnaloxone (naloxone methobromide) failed to restore blood pressure (8) or renal sympathetic nerve activity (21) when given intravenously to conscious rabbits during phase II of hemorrhage in doses equivalent to effective doses of naloxone. Both sets of authors argued that since n-methylnaloxone does not cross the blood-brain barrier, the sympathoexcitatory and pressor action of naloxone must be exerted within the CNS (8, 21).
However, although the blood-brain barrier is resistant to the passage
of quaternary compounds in general and those of naloxone in particular,
there are distinct limitations to using the quaternary n-methylnaloxone to distinguish
central from peripheral actions of the tertiary compound naloxone. In
rat brain in vitro, n-methylnaloxone has only 4-8% of the affinity of naloxone for opioid receptors (2). It should therefore not be assumed that naloxone and
n-methylnaloxone are equipotent as
antagonists at opioid receptors in the brain stem and in particular at
the
1-opioid receptors, which
are prime candidates for the trigger to phase II of acute hypovolemia
in rabbits (12, 18). Moreover, the weak affinity of
n-methylnaloxone for opioid receptors
cannot be overcome by using very large doses, since these cause
ganglionic blockade (2).
We have previously shown that intravenous naloxone given prophylactically prevents the occurrence of the hypotensive phase II of acute central hypovolemia by an action within the brain stem (5). We now address the question of where it acts to reverse phase II. We have compared the hemodynamic effects of injecting naloxone intravenously with those of injecting it into the fourth ventricle during phase II of acute, central hypovolemia.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For the main experiments, four female New Zealand White rabbits, weighing 1.96-3.06 kg (mean 2.58) and obtained from the colony at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute for Medical Research, were used. For the preliminary experiments, four other female rabbits from the same source, weighing 2.15-2.73 kg (mean 2.38), were used. The experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Royal Melbourne Hospital.
Major surgical procedures. These have previously been described in detail (12). They were done under halothane anesthesia after induction with thiopental sodium (25 mg/kg iv) and endotracheal intubation. In all rabbits, an inflatable cuff was placed around the thoracic inferior vena cava (caval cuff). Two to three weeks later, an ultrasonic transit-time flow probe (type 6S, Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY) was placed extrapericardially around the ascending aorta. In the four rabbits used in the main experiment, 2 wk later a 0.3-mm-OD polyvinyl chloride tube (SV10, Dural Plastics, Sydney, Australia) was introduced through the atlanto-occipital membrane so that its tip lay in the fourth ventricle (V4 catheter). The tubes leading to the cuff and V4 catheter and the connecting plug of the flow probe were buried subcutaneously on the rabbit's back. In all rabbits, the first study was done 2-3 wk after the last major surgical procedure, when the rabbits were well and gaining weight.
Minor procedures in preparation for experiments. These were done under local anesthesia with 0.5% lidocaine hydrochloride. The connecting plug for the flow probe and the ends of the tubes were retrieved. A catheter was advanced through a central ear artery to the root of the ear to measure arterial pressure and for blood sampling. Another catheter was inserted into a marginal ear vein through which to infuse drugs. The rabbit was placed in a 15 × 40 × 18 cm box fitted with a wire-mesh lid 90 min before the beginning of the experiment.
Hemodynamic variables. Arterial pressure was measured by connecting a transducer (model P23 XL, Viggo-Spectramed), placed at heart level 50 mm above the floor of the rabbit's box, to the ear artery catheter. The flow probe was connected to a flowmeter (model T206, Transonic Systems) to measure ascending aortic flow (CO). Heart rate (HR) was measured by a tachometer that was actuated by the flow pulse. Signals were amplified and recorded on a Grass polygraph (model 7) and sent to an IBM-PC for analog-to-digital conversion. This provided 10-s mean values for the primary variables mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg), CO (ml/min), and HR (beats/min) and for the derived variables cardiac index (CI = CO/kg body wt) and systemic vascular conductance index (SVCI = CI/MAP × 100, expressed as units).
Acute central hypovolemia. The caval cuff was gradually inflated with saline delivered by a micrometer-driven syringe, so that CI fell at a constant percentage of its baseline level per minute (progressive hypovolemia) (10). Across all rabbits, this rate was 8.6 ± 0.2%/min. When CI had fallen to 31% of its baseline level or MAP to 40 mmHg, whichever occurred first, CI was then maintained constant for a further 8 min (sustained hypovolemia). The caval cuff was then deflated.
Arterial blood gases. In the main experiment, these were measured to control the confounding effects of hypoxia (1). Arterial PO2 (PaO2) and PCO2 (PaCO2) were measured on 0.6-ml arterial blood samples (Radiometer ABL4 acid-base analyzer, Copenhagen, Denmark), taken 2 min after the caval cuff was deflated.
Drugs. l-Naloxone hydrochloride (Sigma) was dissolved in sterile saline (154 mM NaCl). It was further diluted in saline to loading volumes of 2 ml for intravenous administration and 15 µl for V4 administration. Intravenous naloxone and saline were given as a 2-ml bolus over 1 min and then infused at 0.1 ml/min. V4 naloxone and saline were given as a 15-µl bolus over 1 min and then infused at 0.75 µl/min. On the basis of a preliminary experiment (see below), an intravenous bolus dose of naloxone of 4 mg/kg was used in the main experiment for all rabbits. The V4 bolus dose was determined beforehand for each rabbit as the smallest dose that produced bradycardia, since we have found that this dose consistently prevents the occurrence of phase II (unpublished observations). The V4 bolus doses used were 4, 5, 15, and 37 µg/kg.
Protocol for main experiment (n = 4). The goal was to measure the hemodynamic changes during progressive acute central hypovolemia and during the subsequent 8-min period of sustained hypovolemia under two different treatment regimens (Fig. 1). In the early-treatment regimen, the treatments commenced 10 min before and continued throughout the periods of progressive and sustained central hypovolemia. In the late-treatment regimen, the treatments commenced 2 min after the 8-min period of sustained hypovolemia began and continued until the caval cuff was deflated. In both regimens, the four different treatments were intravenous saline, V4 saline, intravenous naloxone, and V4 naloxone. The following factors were randomized within a balanced experimental design: 1) the route of drug administration (iv or V4); 2) the order of drug administration (saline or naloxone); and 3) the timing of drug administration (early or late treatment). To achieve this, each rabbit was studied eight times. Two studies were done on each of 4 experimental days at an interval of 3 h. The interval between experiments was 3-5 days.
|
Protocol for preliminary experiment (n = 4). The goal was 1) to establish that the changes in SVCI and MAP during 8 min of sustained hypovolemia were reproducible and 2) to determine the minimal intravenous dose of naloxone that would correct the low MAP and high SVCI during sustained hypovolemia. Four studies were done on the same day in each rabbit at intervals of 90 min. Sustained hypovolemia was established as described above. After 2 min, intravenous saline or naloxone was given in a loading volume of 2 ml, followed by infusion at 0.1 ml/min. The loading doses in the four studies were given in ascending order. They were 0 (saline), 40 µg/kg, 400 µg/kg, and 4 mg/kg.
Analysis of results. Phases I and II of the hemodynamic response to progressive hypovolemia were distinguished by the point at which SVCI ceased falling and rose abruptly. The rates of change of MAP and SVCI per minute during phase I were estimated by ordinary least-squares linear regression analysis, and the effects of treatments and routes were evaluated by conventional two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
The levels of the hemodynamic variables were recorded as 60-s averages at four points in each study (Fig. 1) and are given as between-rabbit means ± SE: 1) baseline, immediately preceding the commencement of saline or naloxone pretreatment, 10 min before progressive hypovolemia; 2) immediately preceding caval cuff inflation (onset of progressive hypovolemia); 3) after 2 min of sustained hypovolemia, immediately before treatment with saline or naloxone; and 4) after 8 min of sustained hypovolemia. The effects of treatments and routes on these levels were evaluated by two-way ANOVA. The profiles of MAP, SVCI, and CI across successive 60-s time intervals during sustained hypovolemia were compared by the treatment × time and route × time interactions in repeated-measures ANOVA with the Greenhouse-Geisser correction for serial autocorrelation (9). These interactions tested the null hypothesis of parallelism over time with respect to treatment or route. Trends of MAP and SVCI over time during sustained hypovolemia with early or late saline treatment were also tested by repeated-measures ANOVA. Trends were tested by the main effect of time and differential effects of intravenous or V4 route by the route × time interaction. The statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package Systat 5.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preliminary experiment. CI was held constant at 51 ± 2% of its baseline level for 8 min. After 2 min, following injection of saline or naloxone (40-400 µg/kg iv), there was a steady fall in SVCI and rise in MAP (Fig. 2). In every rabbit, naloxone (4 mg/kg iv) caused an abrupt and exaggerated fall in SVCI and rise in MAP.
|
Main experiment: general.
The protocol was completed for all four rabbits. The pretreatment
baseline levels of the hemodynamic variables across all eight studies
were as follows: CI, 200 ± 5 ml · kg
1 · min
1;
MAP, 75 ± 1 mmHg; SVCI, 269 ± 7 U; and HR, 220 ± 6 beats/min. Across all eight studies,
PaO2 and
PaCO2 were,
respectively, 104 ± 2 and 34 ± 1 mmHg. There were no carryover
effects between studies on a given experimental day or between
experimental days on the baseline levels of the hemodynamic variables
or blood gases (P
0.19 always).
Early-treatment regimen.
The treatments began 10 min before the commencement of caval cuff
inflation (progressive central hypovolemia) and continued for the
remainder of the study. Pretreatment with saline (iv or V4) or naloxone (4 mg/kg iv) had
no effect on the hemodynamic variables
(P
0.15 always). However,
V4 naloxone (4-37 µg/kg) caused CI and SVCI to fall by 17 ± 2 and 33 ± 4%,
respectively (P
0.02 always), and
there was an inconsistent rise in MAP by 25 ± 7%
(P = 0.06). During progressive
hypovolemia and saline infusion (iv or
V4), the hemodynamic response
was biphasic (Fig. 3). In phase I, SVCI
fell progressively, MAP fell by only 12 ± 1 mmHg, and HR rose (not
shown). When CI had fallen to 65 ± 2% of its baseline level, phase
II commenced. SVCI rose suddenly, and MAP fell steeply to reach 35 ± 1 mmHg. Treatment with V4
naloxone always prevented the occurrence of phase II during the 8-min
period of progressive hypovolemia. During treatment with intravenous naloxone, in two rabbits, phase II had not occurred within 8 min, although CI had fallen to 33 ± 3% of baseline, and in the other two its onset was delayed until CI had fallen to 50 ± 5% of
baseline. During phase I, the fall of SVCI and MAP over time was linear (Fig. 3). There was no consistent effect of treatment (saline or
naloxone) or route (iv or V4) on
the rates of change of MAP or SVCI (P
0.23 always). Two minutes into the eight-minute period of sustained
hypovolemia and during saline treatment (iv or
V4, respectively), CI was 57 ± 3 and 52 ± 5%, SVCI 109 ± 13 and 115 ± 16%, and
MAP 55 ± 6 and 53 ± 4% of their baseline levels. During saline
treatment, over the ensuing 6 min during which CI was held constant,
SVCI fell progressively to a level similar to that at the end of phase
I, and MAP progressively rose (P
0.02 always), regardless of the route of saline infusion
(P
0.64 always; Figs. 3 and
4). After early treatment with naloxone (iv
or V4), 2 min into the period of
sustained hypovolemia, CI was much lower than after the early saline
treatments because of the delay or abolition of phase II. CI was,
respectively, 39 ± 3 and 38 ± 2%, SVCI 44 ± 6 and 47 ± 4%, and MAP 89 ± 5 and 81 ± 7% of their baseline levels. Over
the ensuing 6 min during which CI was held constant and regardless of
the route of naloxone administration, SVCI remained lower than after
saline treatment and MAP higher (Figs. 3 and 4).
|
|
Late-treatment regimen.
During progressive hypovolemia, the hemodynamic changes resembled
closely those in the regimen of early treatment with saline (iv or
V4; Fig.
5). Specifically, phase II commenced when
CI had fallen to 65 ± 2% of its baseline level. With saline
treatment, during the 8-min period of sustained hypovolemia when CI was
held constant, there was a progressive fall in SVCI and rise in MAP (P
0.01 always), regardless of the
route of saline infusion (P
0.40 always; Figs. 5 and 6), in a pattern
similar to that in the early-treatment regimen (Figs. 3 and 4) and
preliminary experiment (Fig. 2). After naloxone treatment (iv or
V4), there was an abrupt fall in
SVCI to a level below that reached during phase I and a rise in MAP to
greater than the baseline level (Figs. 5 and 6). The effect of naloxone
treatment was independent of route of administration, but the dose of
V4 naloxone was 108- to 1,000-fold
less than that of intravenous naloxone.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have made two main findings in these experiments. First, when cardiac output fell to a level that induced the hypotensive, vasodilator phase II and was then maintained constant at this low level for 8 min, there was spontaneous recovery of systemic vasoconstriction and arterial pressure in saline-treated rabbits (Figs. 2, 4, and 6). Second, this recovery was accelerated and exaggerated by administering naloxone, whether intravenously or into the fourth cerebral ventricle, confirming that this action of naloxone occurs within the brain stem (Figs. 2 and 6).
Using simulated rather than true hemorrhage enabled us to study each rabbit's response up to twice a day and eight times over 2 wk to complete a balanced, within-rabbit experimental design. The caval cuff technique for simulating hemorrhage evokes hemodynamic and neurohumoral responses that closely resemble those of actual hemorrhage (10). It has the advantage that it can be repeated with reproducible hemodynamic effects several times in one day and over several days (10, 12). The caval cuff technique also allowed us to maintain cardiac output at a constant, low level during a period of sustained hypotension (Figs. 4 and 6), thus controlling the effects on cardiac output of the fluid transfer from the extravascular to intravascular compartments that occur after acute hemorrhage. There was no evidence that arterial hypoxia was a potential confounding variable (1).
In both the preliminary (Fig. 2) and main (Figs. 4 and 6) experiments, during the 8-min period of sustained hypovolemia and with saline treatment, there was a progressive recovery of systemic vasoconstriction and a progressive rise of blood pressure. It has been a consistent finding in conscious rabbits that, over a 5-min period after hypotensive hemorrhage, there is a steady rise in arterial pressure (7, 16, 17, 19, 21). However, in all except one of these studies, the possibility could not be excluded that a progressive increase in cardiac output, due to fluid shift from the extravascular to intravascular compartments, contributed to the rise in arterial pressure. The exception is the report by Schadt and colleagues (19), in which the modest recovery of arterial pressure could be attributed to a rise in systemic and regional vascular resistances. In our experiment, cardiac output was held constant; therefore the rise in arterial pressure was due entirely to systemic vasoconstriction (Figs. 4 and 6). It seems unlikely that this recovery was due to return of sympathetic vasoconstrictor drive, since two different groups of investigators have shown that, during the first 5 min after hypotensive hemorrhage, there was minimal, if any, increase in renal sympathetic nerve activity (7, 21). If only because of this, it seems unlikely that the signal to the brain which abolishes the arterial baroreflex and triggers phase II, whatever its origins (13), becomes attenuated or less effective over a matter of minutes. In a variety of mammals, including humans, vasoconstrictor hormones such as angiotensin II and especially arginine vasopressin are known to be released in the hypotensive phase of hemorrhage or acute central hypovolemia (18). There is direct evidence that both hormones contribute importantly to the recovery of arterial pressure after hypotensive hemorrhage in conscious rabbits (16, 17). For obvious reasons, it has not been possible to observe human volunteers whose central blood volume has been reduced by venesection, foot-down tilting, or lower body negative pressure for >1-2 min after they have entered the hypotensive phase II. Yet the hypotension of patients in "shock" from acute blood loss is usually attended by tachycardia and evidence of intense systemic vasoconstriction. Because these patients are usually observed >5-8 min after the onset of hypotension, the relative importance of recovery of sympathetic vasoconstrictor drive and the release of adrenal epinephrine, arginine vasopressin, and angiotensin II remains a matter for speculation.
In the early-treatment regimens of our experiment, the action of naloxone in preventing or delaying the onset of phase II merely confirm previous findings (5). Also the 108- to 1,000-fold smaller effective dose by the fourth ventricular route compared with intravenous route is very similar to the 90- to 900-fold difference previously reported (5).
In the late-treatment regimens of our experiment, when intravenous
naloxone was given during the period of sustained hypovolemia, it
rapidly restored blood pressure to prehypotensive levels by restoring
systemic vasoconstriction (Figs. 2, 4, and 6). This is similar to the
pressor and sympathoexcitatory effects of naloxone that have been
demonstrated in conscious rabbits after true hemorrhage (7, 11, 16, 17,
19, 21). Our new finding is that fourth ventricular naloxone, in a dose
that given intravenously is without effect (Fig. 2), is as effective in
restoring systemic vasoconstriction and arterial pressure as
intravenous naloxone in a dose 108-1,000 times greater (Fig. 6).
We have previously shown that the prophylactic effect of naloxone
referred to above is probably due to an action at
1-opioid receptors in the brain stem (6, 12). When dye is infused into the fourth ventricle according
to the naloxone infusion regimen employed in this experiment, there is
staining of the pons, medulla, cerebellar vermis, and first cervical
segment of the spinal cord (4). However, the precise site or sites of
action of fourth ventricular naloxone have not been established.
-Receptors have been identified in the nucleus tractus solitarii
(NTS) (14), which is close to the tip of our fourth ventricular
catheter. However, the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM), in which
the principal cardiovascular sympathetic premotor neurons are located
(2, 20), is an equally likely candidate. Immunoreactive enkephalin
terminals with synaptic contacts have been described in the RVLM, some
at least belonging to neurons located in the NTS, and microinjection of
enkephalin analogs into the RVLM results in hypotension and bradycardia
that are prevented or reversed by naloxone (2, 20). However, it remains
to be demonstrated that the effects of microinjection of opioid
agonists into the RVLM are prevented by
-opioid-receptor antagonists.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work could not have been completed without the exceptional technical assistance of Linda Cornthwaite.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists.
Address for reprint requests: A. F. Van Leeuwen, Cardiovascular Research Lab., University of Melbourne Dept. of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia.
Received 6 August 1997; accepted in final form 17 December 1997.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Blake, D. W.,
R. G. Evans,
J. Ludbrook,
and
O. U. Petring.
Interactions between the circulatory effects of central hypovolemia and arterial hypoxia in conscious rabbits.
Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol.
21:
383-396,
1994[Medline].
2.
Brown, D. R.,
and
L. I. Goldberg.
The use of quaternary narcotic antagonists in opiate research.
Neuropharmacology
24:
181-191,
1985[Medline].
3.
Dampney, R. A. L.
Functional organization of central pathways regulating the cardiovascular system.
Physiol. Rev.
74:
323-364,
1994
4.
Evans, R. G.,
V. Kapoor,
and
J. Ludbrook.
A CNS serotonergic mechanism in acute central hypovolemia in conscious rabbits?
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
19:
1009-1017,
1992[Medline].
5.
Evans, R. G.,
J. Ludbrook,
and
S. J. Potocnik.
Intracisternal naloxone and cardiac nerve blockade prevent vasodilatation during simulated haemorrhage in awake rabbits.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
409:
1-14,
1989
6.
Evans, R. G.,
J. Ludbrook,
and
A. F. Van Leeuwen.
Role of central opiate receptor sub-types in the circulatory responses of awake rabbits to graded caval occlusions.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
419:
15-31,
1989
7.
Hasser, E. M.,
and
J. C. Schadt.
Sympathoinhibition and its reversal by naloxone during hemorrhage.
Am. J. Physiol.
262 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 31):
R444-R451,
1992
8.
Jang, W.,
J. C. Schadt,
and
R. Gaddis.
Peripheral opioidergic mechanisms do not mediate naloxone's pressor effect in the conscious rabbit.
Circ. Shock
39:
121-127,
1993[Medline].
9.
Ludbrook, J.
Repeated measurements and multiple comparisons in cardiovascular research.
Cardiovasc. Res.
28:
303-311,
1994
10.
Ludbrook, J.,
S. J. Potocnik,
and
R. L. Woods.
Simulation of acute haemorrhage in unaesthetized rabbits.
Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol.
15:
575-584,
1988[Medline].
11.
Ludbrook, J.,
and
P. C. Rutter.
Effect of naloxone on haemodynamic responses to acute blood loss in unanaesthetized rabbits.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
400:
1-15,
1988
12.
Ludbrook, J.,
and
S. Ventura.
The decompensatory phase of acute hypovolaemia in rabbits involves a central
1-opioid receptor.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
252:
113-116,
1994[Medline].
13.
Ludbrook, J.,
and
S. Ventura.
Roles of carotid baroreceptor and cardiac afferents in the hemodynamic responses to acute central hypovolemia.
Am. J. Physiol.
270 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 39):
H1538-H1548,
1996
14.
May, C. N.,
M. R. Dashwood,
C. J. Whitehead,
and
C. J. Mathias.
Differential cardiovascular and respiratory responses to central administration of selective opioid agonists in conscious rabbits: correlation with receptor distribution.
Br. J. Pharmacol.
98:
903-913,
1989[Medline].
15.
Morita, H.,
Y. Motochigawa,
N. Uemura,
H. Hosomi,
and
S. F. Vatner.
Opiate receptor-mediated decrease in renal nerve activity during hypotensive hemorrhage in conscious rabbits.
Circ. Res.
63:
165-172,
1988
16.
Schadt, J. C.,
and
R. R. Gaddis.
Renin-angiotensin system and opioids during acute hemorrhage in conscious rabbits.
Am. J. Physiol.
258 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 27):
R543-R551,
1990
17.
Schadt, J. C.,
and
E. M. Hasser.
Interaction of vasopressin and opioids during rapid hemorrhage in conscious rabbits.
Am. J. Physiol.
260 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 29):
R373-R381,
1991
18.
Schadt, J. C.,
and
J. Ludbrook.
Hemodynamic and neurohumoral responses to acute hypovolemia in conscious mammals.
Am. J. Physiol.
260 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 29):
H305-H318,
1991
19.
Schadt, J. C.,
M. D. McKown,
D. P. McKown,
and
D. Franklin.
Hemodynamic effects of hemorrhage and subsequent naloxone treatment in conscious rabbits.
Am. J. Physiol.
247 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 16):
R497-R505,
1984.
20.
Sun, M.-K.
Pharmacology of reticulospinal vasomotor neurons in cardiovascular regulation.
Pharmacol. Rev.
48:
465-494,
1996[Medline].
21.
Yamashita, Y.,
K. Nagamachi,
H. Morita,
Y. Nishida,
S. Tanaka,
H. Maeta,
and
H. Hosomi.
Intravenously-injected naloxone reverses the decrease in renal sympathetic nerve activity seen during hypotensive hemorrhage in conscious rabbits by acting through central mechanisms.
J. Auton. Nerv. Syst.
57:
57-62,
1996[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Frithiof and M. Rundgren Activation of central opioid receptors determines the timing of hypotension during acute hemorrhage-induced hypovolemia in conscious sheep Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): R987 - R996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |