|
|
||||||||
Franz Volhard Clinic and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Virchow Klinikum, Humboldt University of Berlin, 13122 Berlin, Germany
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The (mRen2)27 transgenic rat [TGR(mRen2)27] is said to have low plasma levels of active renin. We used a direct radioimmunoassay (RIA) for mouse submaxillary renin, as well as an indirect enzyme-kinetic assay based on the generation of angiotensin I with modification of the pH optimum, to measure rat and mouse plasma renin activity (PRA), plasma renin concentration (PRC), and plasma prorenin in TGR before and after lisinopril. The relationship between rat PRC and %rat kidney extract was steepest at pH 6.0 and flat at pH 8.5, whereas the relationship between mouse PRC and purified mouse renin was steepest at pH 8.5 and flat at pH 6.0. Mouse PRC was highly correlated with direct RIA measurements (r = 0.93). PRA before lisinopril was little influenced by pH, whereas the increase with lisinopril was greatest at pH 6.5. PRC before lisinopril was fourfold higher at pH 8.5 compared with that at pH 6.0. Lisinopril increased both PRC values but reversed the pH dependency. Prorenin was fourfold higher at pH 8.5 compared with that at pH 6.0 and decreased slightly with lisinopril. Renal renin concentration was higher at pH 6.0 than at pH 8.5. With lisinopril, renal renin concentration increased at both pH values. Mouse PRC was not changed by lisinopril. Ribonuclease protection assay showed both rat and mouse renin gene expression in the kidney, which increased with lisinopril. Thus TGR have circulating active rat and mouse renin and prorenin. The notion that TGR are a "low renin" model should be revised.
renin gene expression; kidney; hypertension
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE TRANSGENIC (mRen2)27 rat [TGR(mRen2)27] was the first successful transgenic hypertensive rat model (20). The animals harbor the mouse salivary gland renin gene (mRen2) and develop severe hypertension; homozygous rats do not survive untreated. Initial reports indicated that the circulating active plasma renin was low, prorenin levels were elevated, and the transgene was expressed in various tissues, including the brain and the adrenal gland. Initially, expression of the transgene in the kidney was found to be minimal (2, 10, 22). Thus the circulating renin-angiotensin system and the kidneys did not appear to play an immediate role in the hypertension, and attention was focused elsewhere, including the brain and the adrenal gland. In TGR, only one gene differs between affected and nonaffected rats, so this model is truly a monogenic form of hypertension. The gene product is capable of converting rat renin substrate. However, the putative hypertensinogenic mechanisms in TGR are incompletely understood. No clear-cut increase in sympathetic tone has been described in these rats, so the mediation of centrally induced hypertension was not obvious (22). Moreover, although a high dose (100 mg/kg) of dexamethasone lowered blood pressure in TGR (8), the drug did so while simultaneously increasing plasma aldosterone values. Also confusing is the finding that active plasma renin activity in TGR was said to be low rather than elevated. Finally, the remarkable effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and angiotensin (ANG) II-receptor blockade in TGR underscored the likely involvement of ANG II (3, 7, 9, 12, 20). These disparate results caused us to redirect our attention to the renin-angiotensin system in TGR. To that end, we have developed new methods to measure mouse renin in TGR directly.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals.
Male, heterozygous TGR(mRen2)27 and male nontransgenic Sprague-Dawley rats (age: 10-12 wk) were used for experiments unless otherwise noted. Rats were kept under standard breeding conditions at our animal facility. A standard chow (Altromin 2000) containing 0.2% NaCl was given, and free access to tap water was allowed. All experiments were done according to guidelines of The American Physiological Society after approval by local institutional boards.Experimental Protocols
Eight TGR were treated for 14 days with the ACE inhibitor lisinopril (10 mg/l drinking water), and eight control TGR were not treated. Blood pressure was measured by tail-cuff plethysmography (short ether anesthesia) before and at the end of experiments. Blood samples (0.6 ml) were obtained 2 days apart by jugular venous puncture after surgical exposure (ketamine/xylazine anesthesia, 15 and 5 mg/100 g body wt ip, respectively). Blood was placed into prechilled tubes (4°C) and anticoagulated with Na2-EDTA at a final concentration of 6.25 × 10
6 mol/l. Blood samples
were centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C to separate plasma. Aliquots of
plasma were shock frozen using liquid nitrogen and stored at
70°C. Rats were killed with an overdose of intraperitoneal ketamine. Kidneys and adrenal glands were removed rapidly, frozen in
liquid nitrogen, and stored at
70°C for analysis of renin content and renin gene expression. Plasma samples were thawed only once
before determination of plasma renin-angiotensin system components.
Validation of Renin Measurement Techniques
Direct radioimmunoassay for mouse renin. A polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse submaxillary gland renin antibody (RSMS/Pa) was supplied by J. Ménard. The antibody detects total Ren-2 mouse renin protein, but, because of its polyclonal nature, the antibody cannot differentiate between active renin and prorenin. Purified submaxillary mouse renin was prepared as described (19). Purity of the preparation was >80%. Protein concentrations were determined according to Lowry et al. (13). Iodinated submaxillary mouse renin was custom made by BioTeZ, (Berlin, Germany) according to published techniques (15). Specific activity of the tracer was 6 MBq/mg renin.
A liquid-phase competition radioimmunoassay (RIA) was established (6). Polystyrene RIA tubes (75 × 10 mm; Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany) and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) buffer [Tris · HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1.0 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA)] were used. Diluted antibody (200 µl) was incubated overnight at room temperature, together with 200 µl of radioactive tracer (6 × 105 Bq in Tris buffer) and 100 µl of assay buffer containing various amounts of unlabeled mouse renin. Separation of bound from free tracer was performed with 100 µl of 10 mg/ml bovine serum
-globulins (no. G-5009, Sigma, St. Louis,
MO) added to the tubes for 30 min. Polyethylene glycol [20%
(wt/wt) in water; 1 ml] was then added to precipitate
antibody-bound tracer. The tubes were then centrifuged at 5,000 revolutions/min (CS-6R, Beckman Instruments) at 4°C for 20 min, and
supernatant was removed. The radioactivity of the precipitate (bound
radioactivity) was measured with a gamma counter.
The binding characteristics of the antibody were tested at final
antibody concentrations from 1:12,500 to 1:125,000 and in the presence
or absence of 3 ng unlabeled mouse renin per assay tube. Parallel
incubations were also performed at different tracer concentrations of 3 × 105 and 12 × 105 Bq. A standard curve was then
established at 1:70,000 final antibody dilution and with increasing
amounts of from 0 to 10 ng purified mouse renin in the assay. In a
separate assay, rat plasma obtained 48 h after bilateral nephrectomy
(BNX plasma) was tested as an alternative dilution medium of mouse
renin. The specificity of the assay to detect mouse renin and not rat
renin was finally tested with an aqueous extract (1:2 and 1:10) from
homogenized rat kidneys that was used to dilute mouse renin. The
homogenate was prepared with Tris buffer (1:10 wt/wt) and was
centrifuged at 20,000 g for 2 h to
separate detritus before use. Percentages of bound radioactivity with
total radioactivity were calculated. Nonspecific binding of the tracer
as measured in the absence of antibody was subtracted from measured
radioactivity. Displacement of tracer by unlabeled mouse renin was
expressed as a percentage of control values (no renin added, 100%).
Enzyme kinetic assay techniques. Rat renin and mouse renin display different pH optima for the cleavage of rat angiotensinogen in vitro (16, 17). We speculated that this fact might provide a valid basis for enzyme-kinetic determinations of mouse and rat plasma renin concentrations (PRC) simultaneously present in the same plasma sample. We used assays based on the enzymatic release of ANG I from angiotensinogen (4, 5, 16). To provide excess angiotensinogen during enzyme-kinetic incubations, BMX plasma was added to the assays (no residual renin activity; ~4 nmol/ml angiotensinogen). Under these conditions, the amount of ANG I released during enzyme-kinetic incubation should be a linear function of the amount of renin present in the assay. ANG I was measured by direct radioimmunoassay (5, 16).
We tested the validity of our enzyme-kinetic assay with linear dilutions of rat and mouse renin. The capacity of the assay to differentiate the two renins by changing pH was tested at three pH levels. Purified mouse renin was diluted with 0.1 mol/l Tris · HCl buffer (pH 7.4; BSA, 1 mg/ml) to give decreasing concentrations from 30 to 0 ng/ml. Semipurified rat renin from rat kidney extract was prediluted 1:300 and tested at linear dilutions from 100 to 0%. Twenty-five microliters of each renin concentration were incubated together with 150 µl BNX plasma and 130 µl of pH-adjusted assay buffer and 5 µl phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; 25 mg/ml ethanol) at 37°C for 1 h. Buffers used for incubation were 0.2 mol/l K2/Na2-phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) or 0.2 mol/l Tris · HCl (pH 7.4 and 8.5) each containing 30 mmol/l Na2-EDTA and 2 g/l BSA. The accuracy of the pH was checked at 37°C with an appropriate pH electrode. Mouse renin concentrations were also measured in parallel by direct RIA. Angiotensinogen was measured by enzyme-kinetic cleavage with an excess of mouse submaxillary gland renin as described earlier (4). The angiotensinogen concentration was expressed as micrograms of ANG I per milliliter.Plasma and Kidney Renin in TGR
We determined TGR PRC before and after treatment and in control animals at pH 6.0 and 8.5 as described. Plasma renin activity (PRA) was determined with 100 µl plasma incubated together with 95 µl buffer and 5 µl PMSF at 37°C for 1 h. Determinations of PRA were at three pH levels (6.0, 7.4, and 8.5). Plasma prorenin concentrations were determined after trypsination, a procedure that cleaves the pro-fragment of prorenin and thus activates the enzyme. Plasma (50 µl) was first treated with 20 µl of 10 mg/ml bovine trypsin (200 IU/mg; Worthington no. 3744) at 1:400 N HCl dilution at 4°C for 1 h. The reaction was stopped by addition of 40 ml of 30 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor (Serva no. 37328) equivalent to about two units of inhibitor per unit of trypsin. Prorenin concentration was defined as the difference between PRC before and after trypsination. Mouse PRC was also measured by direct RIA using triplicate determinations at two concentrations.TGR kidneys were rapidly thawed, and kidney extracts were prepared as described. The extract was prediluted 1:500 and immediately assayed for tissue renin concentration at pH 6.0 and 8.5. Concentrations per gram of tissue were obtained by multiplication with a factor of four.
Ribonuclease Protection Assay
Total RNA was purified from snap-frozen kidneys and adrenal glands using a standard lithium chloride/urea precipitation technique (1). Messenger RNA specific for rat and mouse renin and
-actin as the
internal control were detected by ribonuclease (RNase) protection assay
using an Ambion RPA III kit (Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany) (12).
The exposure time using a FujiX BAS 2000 imaging system was 36 h.
Ratios of measured radioactivity with
-actin were calculated.
Interstrain Comparisons
We measured PRA (at pH 7.4) and angiotensinogen in TGR, Brown Norway rats, Sprague-Dawley rats, and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) as an additional control. All rats were male and between 8 and 10 wk of age. Blood was obtained from jugular vein puncture after anesthesia (see Experimental Protocols).Statistics
Calculated values are means ± SD. Differences were tested by paired and unpaired Student's t-test as appropriate. StatView statistics software was used on a Macintosh personal computer. The interstrain comparisons were conducted by analysis of variance and post hoc tests using the same program.| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The characteristics of our direct RIA for submaxillary gland renin are shown in Fig. 1. Radioactive tracer was effectively bound by the antibody (Fig. 1A). As antibody concentrations decreased, the amount of bound tracer decreased in parallel. Addition of unlabeled renin significantly displaced tracer from antibody, and the effect was significantly different from that with a nonspecific background. Variations in the amount of tracer did not change these characteristics (data not shown). Sensitivity and specificity of the assay standard curve are shown in Fig. 1B. Twenty percent of antibody-bound tracer was displaced by 0.25 ng unlabeled renin/tube, and 50% was displaced by 1.3 ng renin/tube. The presence of rat plasma or rat renin in the assay did not influence the standard curve, documenting the reliability and the specificity of the assay for mouse renin.
|
The results from our enzyme-kinetic determinations of mouse and rat
renin concentration are shown in Fig. 1,
C and
D. Linear relationships with expected
values (r = 0.97, P < 0.005) were found in all
instances. The slopes were significantly influenced by pH level. For
rat renin, the slope was highest at pH 6.0 and almost negligible at pH
8.5 (<5% of the value at pH 6.0). Mouse renin produced an inverse
relationship, with the highest values at pH 8.5. At pH 6.0, the slope
was only ~35% of this value. Mouse renin concentrations as
determined by enzyme-kinetic assay correlated linearly with direct RIA
determinations (r = 0.93, P < 0.005). The conversion factors
for our assay were 42.0 ng ANG
I · ml
1 · h
1
per nanogram of mouse renin at pH 8.5 and 23.1 and 15.3 ng ANG I · ml
1 · h
1
at pH 7.4 and 6.0, respectively. We conclude that determination of
renin concentration at pH 8.5 (RC8.5) is approximately
representative for mouse renin concentration, whereas rat renin
concentration equals RC6.0
(0.35 × RC8.5), where
RC6.0 is the renin concentration determined at pH 6.0.
We next studied PRA and PRC as well as prorenin concentrations at different pH levels in TGR plasma and kidneys before and after treatment with lisinopril or vehicle (control) (Fig. 2). Before the experiment, TGR in the control and treatment groups were not significantly different in terms of PRC and blood pressure values. Lisinopril treatment significantly lowered blood pressure in TGR from 205 ± 14 to 128 ± 9 mmHg. Control TGR did not show significant changes in their PRC and blood pressure values during the experiment (data not shown).
|
Figure 2A shows PRA at pH 6.0, 7.4, and 8.5 in untreated TGR. PRA continuously increased with pH. With lisinopril, PRA significantly increased only at pH 6.0; there was no significant change at pH 8.5. Figure 2B shows PRC at pH 6.0 and 8.5 both before and after lisinopril. In untreated rats PRC was greater at pH 8.5 than at pH 6.0. With treatment, PRC determinations at both values increased but were quantitatively different. There was a massive rise in PRC at pH 6.0. In terms of specific renin concentrations, mouse PRC increased by a factor of 1.3, whereas rat PRC increased by a factor of ~10. Both increases were significant as determined by paired t-test (P < 0.05). Figure 2C shows prorenin determinations at pH 6.0 and 8.5 before and after lisinopril. Plasma prorenin was almost exclusively mouse prorenin. Rat prorenin was below the detection level of the assay. Lisinopril treatment did not significantly influence prorenin concentrations. Figure 2D shows kidney tissue renin concentration under these conditions. Control renin determinations were slightly different at the two pH values; at pH 6.0 the values were higher. With lisinopril treatment, kidney rat renin concentrations increased markedly by a factor of 5. Mouse renin concentration increased by only a factor of 2. Figure 2E shows determinations of transgenic mouse renin by direct RIA. Transgenic PRC were ~20-30 ng/ml. There was no influence by lisinopril treatment. Rat angiotensinogen decreased from 0.89 ± 0.17 to 0.67 ± 0.2, whereas values remained unchanged in control TGR.
Results from our RNase protection assay in kidneys and adrenal glands are shown in Fig. 3. Mouse and rat renin mRNA were both detectable in kidneys from untreated control TGR (Fig. 3A). There was an increase in mouse and rat renin gene expression by a factor of 2-3 and 10, respectively, with lisinopril treatment. In the adrenal gland only mouse renin mRNA expression was detectable (Fig. 3B). No significant change occurred with lisinopril treatment.
|
As an additional control, we measured PRA and angiotensinogen (n = 8 for all groups) in TGR(mRen-2)27, Brown Norway rats, Sprague-Dawley rats, and SHR. These data are shown in Table 1. We found that PRA in TGR was significantly higher than that in the other strains. Furthermore, angiotensinogen levels were significantly lower in TGR compared with those in Brown Norway rats and SHR.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We established a direct RIA for mouse Ren-2 renin for determinations of plasma and tissue renin concentrations in TGR(mRen2)27. Furthermore, we developed indirect enzyme-kinetic assay techniques based on the generation of ANG I to specifically determine mouse and rat PRC. Differences in the pH optimum were used. To allow comparison, we standardized our mouse renin enzyme-kinetic assay for absolute renin concentrations as measured by direct RIA. Our data clearly demonstrate that most, if not all, active renin in TGR plasma is of transgenic origin. Treatment with an ACE inhibitor increased the concentrations of both rat and mouse renins in plasma and kidneys. In contrast, transgene expression in the adrenal glands did not change significantly. These results suggest that short-term changes in active renin concentrations are under the physiological control of the kidney and, at least in part, are dependent on ANG II-related feedback mechanisms. In the kidney and plasma, both endogenous and transgenic active renin behave similarly but with quantitatively different effects. Our results stress the importance of the pH value during enzyme-kinetic determinations of renin, which may lead to misinterpretations of the activity and dynamics of the plasma renin-angiotensin system in TGR.
Previous authors have suggested that the renin in TGR plasma is predominantly mouse renin. The first evidence was reported by Yamaguchi et al. (30), who found that renin activity in TGR plasma and tissue could not be inhibited by a monoclonal antibody directed against rat renin. These preliminary observations were confirmed with an inhibitory antibody directed against mouse renin (23). Véniant et al. (29) used a semiquantitative enzyme-kinetic assay based on the different pH optima of mouse and rat renin to study the dynamics of the TGR plasma renin-angiotensin system during postnatal development. They demonstrated that mouse plasma renin increases, whereas rat renin decreases during TGR postnatal development, and they showed a correlation between plasma mouse renin concentrations and blood pressure. Tokita et al. (27) suggested that enhanced kinetics of mouse renin with rat angiotensinogen may play a role in causing TGR hypertension. Publications (3, 7, 11, 21, 30) concerning the renin-angiotensin system in TGR have traditionally relied on enzyme-kinetic assays to measure plasma renin. The renin concentrations as measured in these assays were expressed as the amount of ANG I generated in the presence of excess substrate, assuming a linear relationship between the amount of ANG I generated and the actual renin concentrations in the sample. Various incubation protocols were used, and the results from TGR and Sprague-Dawley rats were compared. However, comparing such indirect measurements is dependent on the assumption that the kinetics of mouse renin and rat renin acting on rat angiotensinogen are the same. This assumption is not the case, because mouse renin has an ~60-fold higher catalytic efficiency for cleaving rat angiotensinogen than for cleaving rat renin (24).
To address these problems, we developed a new, direct, and competitive RIA for mouse renin. Ours is not the first such assay (14, 15, 18, 26). We relied on a new immunoassay with a polyclonal anti-mouse submaxillary gland renin (anti-mouse Ren-2) antibody. We demonstrated specific and concentration-dependent binding of radioactively (125I) labeled renin tracer to the anti-mouse renin antibody and its specific displacement in the presence of unlabeled renin in our assay. Antibody dilutions were sufficiently high for an efficient RIA. Nonspecific binding of radioactivity was not negligible and was probably a consequence of our relatively simple methods for separating bound from unbound tracer. However, specific binding was significantly greater, allowing us to obtain a reliable and reproducible standard curve. The sensitivity of this mouse renin assay was ~300 pg renin/tube with a sufficient upper limit spanning about one order of magnitude.
We then established enzyme-kinetic assays to differentiate mouse from rat renin concentrations based on their respective pH optima. The pH characteristics for rat and mouse renin in our enzyme-kinetic assays were similar to those described earlier (16, 17). The assays produced linear relationships with values predicted from renin dilutions or with mouse renin concentrations as measured by direct RIA. Rat renin was almost inactive at pH 8.5, which allowed us to measure the concentrations and dynamics of mouse and rat renin in TGR. The concentrations of total transgenic protein in TGR plasma were similar when measured by direct RIA and enzyme-kinetic assay. Active mouse renin concentrations were in the range of 0.5-1.0 ng/ml, equivalent to ~14-28 fmol/ml. This value was higher than that predicted by others from theoretical considerations, namely, 1-2 fmol/ml (28). We cannot exclude the possibility that some transgenic prorenin was activated during freezing and thawing of the plasma samples. However, determinations of mouse PRC were in the expected range.
In a similar experiment, Tokita et al. (27) used an anti-Ren-2 mouse renin antibody, albeit at different pH characteristics of TGR plasma, to study TGR plasma renin before and after treatment with an ACE inhibitor. They suggested that mouse renin is the main circulating species, whereas, after ACE-inhibitor treatment, rat renin appeared to be the main circulating renin species. Renal renin was found to be mainly rat renin. With our assays, we were able to comment more precisely and specifically on plasma and renal renin and their respective dynamics. In our experiment, lisinopril treatment massively increased rat PRC, whereas mouse PRC increased only slightly. In the kidney both renin species were detected, whereas both tissue renin concentrations and mRNA expression levels paralleled rat and mouse PRC before and after lisinopril treatment. The mouse renin in the kidneys appeared relatively insensitive to the negative feedback control exerted by ANG II compared with rat renin. The adrenal gland has previously been shown (25) to be a major source of transgenic plasma prorenin circulating at relatively high concentrations. Our results confirm these observations. We noted a slight decrease in transgenic prorenin with lisinopril treatment. However, this phenomenon could have resulted from a biochemically incomplete activation of prorenin by trypsin before the renin assay. Furthermore, the transgene expression in the adrenals did not change with lisinopril treatment. Such changes have been seen only at very high ACE inhibitor doses (11). Because we were interested in mRNA studies, we were not able to measure tissue renin concentrations in adrenal glands. We conclude from our data that, in TGR, the short-term regulation of active plasma renin by the kidney is still intact while both renin species participate in this regulation. However, this feature can only be observed during pharmacological blockade of an overactive negative feedback mechanism exerted by locally generated or plasma-derived ANG II. The source of this excess ANG II could be either the presence of transgenic mouse renin in the kidney or the secretion of mouse renin or generation of ANG II by extrarenal tissues. In this context, absolute concentrations of renin in plasma do not reflect the complexity of the situation.
As an additional control, we measured PRA and angiotensinogen values in TGR and three other strains, namely, Brown Norway rats, Sprague-Dawley rats, and SHR. We found that PRA values in TGR were significantly higher than in the other three strains, whereas angiotensinogen values were significantly lower than in Brown Norway rats and SHR. The PRA results concur with those reported by Campbell et al. (7), although they did not take the precaution of considering the confounding variables of pH and differences in cleavage efficiency rates of the two renins harbored by TGR. We can explain the lower angiotensinogen levels in TGR on the basis of angiotensinogen consumption. We did not measure ANG II levels in our rats because such measurements have already been reported by Campbell et al. (7). The investigators found that plasma ANG II and ANG I levels in TGR were fourfold higher than in controls. Their findings are in accord with the high renin values we report.
Our assays were designed to monitor the dynamics of both mouse and rat PRC values in TGR. Lowering the pH to 5.0 or 4.5 could possibly further increase the specificity of our rat renin assay. However, at extreme pH levels renin and angiotensinogen could become unstable. The decrease in cleavable angiotensinogen with lisinopril treatment in TGR is related to a known phenomenon occurring at very high PRC. Because PRA at physiological pH indicates the overall activity of the plasma renin-angiotensin system, namely, the actual capacity of plasma to generate ANG I, PRA measurements are valid to monitor the TGR renin-angiotensin system during pharmacological interventions. Conclusions about PRC values necessitate a differential approach. Otherwise, any comparison between Sprague-Dawley rats and TGR will not be valid. Because both renin species respond differentially to pharmacological stimulation, dose-response curves involving renin-dependent effects will become complex. The direct assay we describe will help in further research on these issues. In any event, earlier views on active PRC in TGR, as well as the notion of the TGR as a "low" active renin model with little if any renal renin transgene expression, should be revised.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by a grant-in-aid from Hoffmann-LaRoche (Basel, Switzerland).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: F. C. Luft, Franz Volhard Clinic, Wiltberg Strasse 50, 13122 Berlin, Germany.
Received 3 September 1997; accepted in final form 9 January 1998.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Auffray, C.,
and
F. Rougeon.
Purification of mouse immunoglobulin heavy-chain messenger RNAs from total myeloma tumor RNA.
Eur. J. Biochem.
107:
303-314,
1980[Medline].
2.
Bachmann, S.,
J. Peters,
E. Engler,
D. Ganten,
and
J. Mullins.
Transgenic rats carrying the mouse renin gene
morphological characterization of a low-renin hypertension model.
Kidney Int.
41:
24-36,
1992[Medline].
3.
Bader, M.,
Y. Zhao,
M. Sander,
M. A. Lee,
J. Bachmann,
M. Böhm,
B. Djavidani,
J. Peters,
J. J. Mullins,
and
D. Ganten.
Role of tissue renin in the pathophysiology of hypertension in TGR(mREN2)27 rats.
Hypertension
19:
681-686,
1992
4.
Bohlender, J.,
J. Ménard,
F. C. Luft,
and
D. Ganten.
Effects of human renin in rats transgenic for human angiotensinogen.
Hypertension
29:
1031-1038,
1997
5.
Bohlender, J.,
J. Ménard,
J. Wagner,
F. C. Luft,
and
D. Ganten.
Human renin-dependent hypertension in rats transgenic for human angiotensinogen.
Hypertension
27:
535-540,
1996
6.
Bouhnik, J.,
J. Clauser,
P. Gardes,
P. Corvol,
and
J. Ménard.
Direct radioimmunoassay of rat angiotensinogen and its application to rats in various endocrine states.
Clin. Sci.
62:
355-360,
1982[Medline].
7.
Campbell, D. J.,
P. Rong,
A. Kladis,
B. Rees,
D. Ganten,
and
S. Skinner.
Angiotensin and bradykinin peptides in the TGR(mRen-2)27 rat.
Hypertension
25:
1014-1020,
1995
8.
Djavidani, B.,
M. Sander,
R. Kreutz,
K. Zeh,
M. Bader,
S. H. Mellon,
P. Vecsei,
J. Peters,
and
D. Ganten.
Chronic dexamethasone treatment suppresses hypertension development in the transgenic rat TGR27.
J. Hypertens.
13:
637-645,
1995[Medline].
9.
Gross, V.,
A. Lippoldt,
W. Schneider,
and
F. C. Luft.
Effect of captopril and AT1 receptor blockade on pressure natriuresis and diuresis in transgenic (mRen2)27 rats.
Hypertension
26:
471-479,
1995
10.
Langheinrich, M.,
M. A. Lee,
M. Böhm,
Y. M. Pinto,
D. Ganten,
and
M. Paul.
The hypertensive Ren-2 transgenic rat TGR (mREN2)27 in hypertension research. Characteristics and functional aspects.
Am. J. Hypertens.
9:
506-512,
1996[Medline].
11.
Lee, M. A.,
M. Böhm,
S. Kim,
S. Bachmann,
J. Bachmann,
M. Bader,
and
D. Ganten.
Differential gene expression of renin and angiotensinogen in the TGR(mREN-2)27 transgenic rat.
Hypertension
25:
570-580,
1995
12.
Lippoldt, A.,
V. Gross,
J. Bohlender,
U. Ganten,
and
F. C. Luft.
Life-long angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, pressure natriuresis, and renin angiotensin system gene expression in transgenic (mRen-2)27 rats.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
7:
2119-2129,
1996[Abstract].
13.
Lowry, O. H.,
N. J. Rosebrough,
A. L. Farr,
and
R. J. Randall.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J. Biol. Chem.
193:
265-275,
1951
14.
Lykkegard, S.
Purification and characterization of rabbit anti-mouse renin specific Fab fragments.
Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand. Sect. C Immunol.
87:
91-97,
1979.
15.
Malling, C.,
and
K. Poulsen.
A direct radioimmunoassay for plasma renin in mice and its evaluation.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
491:
532-541,
1977[Medline].
16.
Ménard, J.,
and
K. J. Catt.
Measurement of renin activity, concentration and substrate in rat plasma by radioimmunoassay of angiotensin.
J. Endocrinol.
90:
422-430,
1972.
17.
Michelakis, A. M.,
S. Cohen,
J. Taylor,
K. Murakami,
and
T. Inagami.
Studies on the characterization of pure submaxillary gland renin.
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
147:
118-121,
1974[Medline].
18.
Michelakis, A. M.,
H. Yoshida,
J. Menzie,
K. Murakami,
and
T. A. Inagami.
Radioimmunoassay for the direct measurement of renin in mice and its application to submaxillary gland and kidney studies.
Endocrinology
94:
1101-1105,
1974
19.
Misono, K. S.,
L. A. Holladay,
K. Murakami,
K. Korumizu,
and
T. A. Inagami.
Rapid and large sale purification and characterization of renin from mouse submaxillary gland.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
217:
574-581,
1982[Medline].
20.
Mullins, J. J.,
J. Peters,
and
D. Ganten.
Fulminant hypertension in transgenic rats harbouring the mouse Ren-2 gene.
Nature
344:
541-544,
1990[Medline].
21.
Ohta, K.,
S. Kim,
H. Wanibushi,
D. Ganten,
and
H. Iwao.
Contribution of local renin-angiotensin system to cardiac hypertrophy, phenotypic modulation, and remodeling in TGR(mRen2)27 transgenic rats.
Circulation
94:
785-791,
1996
22.
Paul, M.,
J. Wagner,
S. Hoffmann,
H. Urata,
and
D. Ganten.
Transgenic rats: new experimental models for the study of candidate genes in hypertension.
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
50:
811-829,
1994.
23.
Peters, J.,
K. Münter,
M. Bader,
E. Hackenthal,
J. J. Mullins,
and
D. Ganten.
Increased adrenal renin in transgenic hypertensive rats TGR(mREN2)27, and its regulation by cAMP, angiotensin II and calcium.
J. Clin. Invest.
91:
742-747,
1993.
24.
Poulsen, K.,
and
J. Jacobsen.
Is angiotensinogen a renin inhibitor and not the substrate for renin?
J. Hypertens.
4:
65-69,
1986[Medline].
25.
Sander, M.,
M. Bader,
B. Djavidani,
C. Maser-Gluth,
P. Vecsei,
J. Mullins,
D. Ganten,
and
J. Peters.
The role of the adrenal gland in hypertensive transgenic rat TGR(mREN2)27.
Endocrinology
131:
807-814,
1992
26.
Suzuki, F.,
S. Yamashita,
M. Ito,
Y. Nagata,
and
Y. Nakamura.
Ren-2 as well as Ren-1 renin exists in the kidney and plasma of a two-renin gene mouse.
Agric. Biol. Chem.
9:
2407-2412,
1990.
27.
Tokita, Y.,
R. Franco-Saenz,
and
P. Mulrow.
Reversal of the suppressed kidney renin level in the hypertensive transgenic rat TGR(mRen-2)27 by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition.
Am. J. Hypertens.
8:
1031-1039,
1995[Medline].
28.
Tokita, Y.,
R. Franco-Saenz,
E. M. Reimann,
and
P. J. Mulrow.
Hypertension in the transgenic rat TGR(mRen-2)27 may be due to enhanced kinetics of the reaction between mouse renin and rat angiotensinogen.
Hypertension
23:
422-427,
1994
29.
Véniant, M.,
C. E. Whitworth,
J. Ménard,
M. G. F. Sharp,
M.-F. Gonzales,
P. Bruneval,
and
J. J. Mullins.
Developmental studies demonstrate age-dependent elevation of renin activity in TGR(mRen2)27 rats.
Am. J. Hypertens.
8:
1167-1176,
1995[Medline].
30.
Yamaguchi, T.,
Y. Tokita,
R. Franco-Saenz,
P. J. Mulrow,
J. Peters,
and
D. Ganten.
Zonal distribution and regulation of adrenal renin in a transgenic model of hypertension in the rat.
Endocrinology
131:
1955-1962,
1992
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Chappell, L. M. Yamaleyeva, and B. M. Westwood Estrogen and salt sensitivity in the female mRen(2).Lewis rat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): R1557 - R1563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schmitz, M. Gotthardt, S. Hinderlich, J.-R. Leheste, V. Gross, H. Vorum, E. I. Christensen, F. C. Luft, S. Takahashi, and T. E. Willnow Normal Blood Pressure and Plasma Renin Activity in Mice Lacking the Renin-binding Protein, a Cellular Renin Inhibitor J. Biol. Chem., May 12, 2000; 275(20): 15357 - 15362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Meneton, I. Ichikawa, T. Inagami, and J. Schnermann Renal physiology of the mouse Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2000; 278(3): F339 - F351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rong, J. L. Wilkinson-Berka, and S. L. Skinner Potassium control of extrarenal renin secretion in transgenic (mRen-2)27 and normal rats Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 1999; 277(4): E631 - E638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rong, J. L. Wilkinson-Berka, and S. L. Skinner Renin in thymus, gut, hindlimb, and adrenal of (mRen-2)27 and normal rats: secretion and content studies Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 1999; 277(4): E639 - E646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |