AJP - Heart Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 274: H1729-H1741, 1998;
0363-6135/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lodi, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ursino, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lodi, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ursino, M.
Vol. 274, Issue 5, H1729-H1741, May 1998

Modeling cerebral autoregulation and CO2 reactivity in patients with severe head injury

Carlo Alberto Lodi1, Aram Ter Minassian2, Laurent Beydon2, and Mauro Ursino1

1 Department of Electronics, Computer Science and Systems, University of Bologna, I-40136 Bologna, Italy; and 2 Surgical Intensive Care Unit and Department of Neurosurgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, 94010 Creteil, France

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The mathematical model presented in a previous work is used to simulate the time pattern of intracranial pressure (ICP) and of blood velocity in the middle cerebral artery (VMCA) in response to maneuvers simultaneously affecting mean systemic arterial pressure (SAP) and end-tidal CO2 pressure. In the first stage of this study, a sensitivity analysis was performed to clarify the role of some important model parameters [cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) outflow resistance, intracranial elastance coefficient, autoregulation gain, and the position of the regulation curve] during CO2 alteration maneuvers performed at different SAP levels. The results suggest that the dynamic "ICP-VMCA" relationship obtained during changes in CO2 pressure may contain important information on the main factors affecting intracranial dynamics. In the second stage, the model was applied to the reproduction of real ICP and velocity tracings in neurosurgical patients. Ten distinct tracings, taken from six patients during CO2 changes at different mean SAP levels, were reproduced. Best fitting between model and clinical curves was achieved by minimizing a least-squares criterion function and adjusting certain parameters that characterize CSF circulation, intracranial compliance, and the strength of the regulation mechanisms. A satisfactory reproduction was achieved in all cases, with parameter numerical values in the ranges reported in clinical literature. It is concluded that the model may be used to give reliable estimations of the main factors affecting intracranial dynamics in individual patients, starting from routine measurements performed in neurosurgical intensive care units.

intracranial pressure; cerebral blood flow; cerebral blood volume; cerebrovascular control mechanisms

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

SEVERAL QUANTITIES are monitored today in neurosurgical intensive care units to assess the status of patients with severe brain diseases and decide on a proper management. Among others, the time pattern of blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and the time pattern of intracranial pressure (ICP) may contain important information on several aspects of intracranial dynamics, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation, craniospinal compliance, cerebral hemodynamics, and the status of cerebrovascular regulatory mechanisms (10, 13, 21, 23, 28, 35).

Analysis of these data, however, is complicated considerably by the existence of strong nonlinear interactions among intracranial factors. It is generally accepted that ICP is not only affected by CSF circulation and the elasticity of the craniospinal system but also by acute blood volume changes occurring within the cranial space (7, 27). Cerebral blood volume (CBV) changes are modulated in turn by autoregulation and the reactivity of cerebral vessels to CO2 tension. Furthermore, the superimposition of autoregulation and CO2 reactivity occurs in a nonlinear fashion so that the performance of one mechanism depends crucially on the activity of the other.

Understanding the complexity of the relationships between intracranial quantities is essential in both physiological investigation, to reach a deeper understanding of how control mechanisms work to ensure cerebral blood flow (CBF) homeostasis, and clinical practice. In fact, changing the level of arterial pressure and arterial CO2 pressure (PaCO2) is thought to provide useful information in the diagnosis and treatment of neurosurgical patients (1, 13, 23, 35). In a previous, related paper (32) we developed a mathematical model of intracranial dynamics aimed at clarifying the interactions among ICP, CBF, blood velocity changes, and cerebrovascular regulation. The model in question incorporates the intracranial pressure-volume relationship, CSF circulation, the biomechanics of large and small cerebral arteries, a collapsing venous vascular bed, and the active response of the pial vasculature to autoregulation and CO2 pressure changes. Using a single basal set of parameters, we were able to simulate various experimental results taken from the physiological literature with a fair measure of success.

A more extensive model validation is now required. In the previous study (32), a comparison between simulation results and physiological data was performed in steady-state conditions by waiting until ICP and vessel caliber had reached a constant equilibrium level following arterial pressure and/or PaCO2 perturbations. However, testing the predictive capability of the model also is extremely important in dynamic conditions, in which all quantities are varying simultaneously. Several meaningful intracranial events, in fact (such as acute ICP changes, ICP wave generation, and paradoxical responses), become clearly visible only when the system is perturbed from its equilibrium state. To estimate parameters in a dynamic system, moreover, the analysis of transient phenomena generally provides more useful information than analysis of the static regimen (5).

In following up on these ideas, this second study extends the results of its predecessor (32) by including two important new aspects: 1) investigation of the model response in dynamic conditions (i.e., far removed from equilibrium) during perturbations that alter mean systemic arterial pressure (SAP) and blood CO2 tension, by performing a sensitivity analysis on the parameters believed to exhibit greater changes in pathological subjects, and 2) validation of the model, based on a comparison between the dynamic time patterns of ICP and MCA velocity (VMCA) generated by computer simulations and real tracings measured in patients with severe head injury. Moreover, through best fitting of model results to in vivo results, we sought to estimate the main parameters of intracranial dynamics in individual patients. Different combinations of SAP and PaCO2 are involved in this step as well. The results are then used to assess the main mechanisms affecting ICP and CBF in different conditions of physiological relevance.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

A thorough description of the model is presented in a previous, related work (32) in which all details on mathematical equations and parameter numerical values can be found. A qualitative sketch of the model's structure is shown in Fig. 1.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Qualitative diagram describing main physiological factors included in model. Intracranial compliance is inversely related to intracranial pressure (ICP). Middle cerebral artery (MCA) is assumed to behave passively, hence its radius depends on transmural pressure [arterial pressure minus ICP (Pa - Pic)]. Autoregulation operates in small and large pial arteries by way of two distinct mechanisms, one sensitive to perfusion pressure changes [arterial pressure minus cerebral venous pressure (Pa - Pv)] and another to cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes. Furthermore, large and small pial arteries alike are sensitive to CO2 pressure in arterial blood (PaCO2). The terminal portion of the cerebral venous vascular bed collapses according to difference between ICP and sinus venous pressure (Pic - Pvs). Finally, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) production at cerebral capillaries depends on difference between capillary pressure and ICP (Pc - Pic), whereas CSF outflow depends on difference between ICP and sinus venous pressure (Pic - Pvs). VMCA, MCA velocity.

Sensitivity Analysis

To understand the impact that alterations in some important intracranial factors may have on the time pattern of ICP, we performed a sensitivity analysis on a few model parameters in dynamic conditions. Parameters were selected according to two main criteria. First, we focused our attention on intracranial factors that may exhibit large variations among pathological subjects and that are believed to be clinically relevant. Second, we considered parameters that, according to our previous experience, have greater impact on ICP during volume perturbation maneuvers (30). The parameters analyzed concern the autoregulation gains, the CSF outflow resistance, the intracranial elastance coefficient, and the initial position of the working point on the static smooth muscle relationship.

The sensitivities of VMCA and ICP to changes in these parameters were tested using various combinations of mean SAP and PaCO2. For each set of parameters, we performed a preliminary simulation during hypocapnia (PaCO2 = 25 mmHg) and waited until the model settled at its steady-state equilibrium level. Hypocapnia was chosen to establish the baseline because neurosurgical patients are often continuously hyperventilated to reduce ICP (8, 13, 24). Starting from the equilibrium condition, we increased PaCO2 linearly from 25 to 35 mmHg (normocapnia) over a 20-min period. Finally, PaCO2 was lowered abruptly back to its initial level (see Fig. 2). For each set of parameters, the same maneuver was performed during normotension (mean SAP = 100 mmHg), hypotension (mean SAP = 65 mmHg), and hypertension (mean SAP = 135 mmHg) to study the interaction between autoregulation and CO2 response. These arterial pressure levels are representative of three different points in the autoregulation region, that is, the central range and the ranges close to the lower and upper autoregulation limits (25).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Time pattern of PaCO2 used to perform sensitivity analysis. During the maneuver, which lasts for 20 min, PaCO2 increases linearly from 25 to 35 mmHg.

All simulations were performed by means of the software package SIMNON (SIMNON/PCW for Microsoft Windows, version 2.01, SSPA Maritime Consulting, Göteborg, Sweden) using the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method with adjustable step size to numerically integrate the set of differential equations (26).

Model Identification

The model described in our previous paper (32) was used to reproduce the time pattern of ICP and VMCA in six neurosurgical patients during maneuvers that alter both PaCO2 and mean SAP. In four patients we examined two tracings, obtained on different days after head injury, whereas a single tracing was examined in the remaining two patients. A total of 10 distinct tracings was thus simulated, each having a duration ranging between 20 and 90 min.

Patients. We studied six patients with severe head injuries (Glasgow coma scale <8; mean age 29 yr) typified by closed multifocal contusions or diffuse axonal injuries within the first few days after head trauma. After the removal of large epidural or subdural hematomas, if present, patients were put into intensive care and positioned supine with their heads elevated 30° above the horizontal plane. Patients were sedated (midazolam and fentanyl) and paralyzed (vecuronium) at the time of the measurement. SAP (radial catheter), ICP (ventricular catheter), and end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) were monitored continuously. Jugular venous O2 saturation (SjO2) was continuously monitored via a fiber-optic catheter (Opticath 5.5 Fr, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) inserted retrogradely up to the jugular bulb of the dominant jugular vein. Moderate hyperventilation was induced to obtain a PaCO2 between 30 and 35 mmHg. According to the routine management protocol of our establishment, if cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was <80 mmHg and either ICP was >20 mmHg or SjO2 was >= 55%, norepinephrine was continuously infused after optimization of blood volume. In such cases, CPP was stabilized between 80 and 100 mmHg to normalize ICP and SjO2. If CPP was compromised between 65 and 80 mmHg but with ICP <20 mmHg and SjO2 >55%, no therapeutic action was initiated. Second-range therapies included bolus mannitol infusion and/or hyperventilation under SjO2 control. None of our patients had received mannitol in the 6 h preceding the study. Before the study, when a steady-state hemodynamic condition was achieved, all patients underwent transcranial Doppler measurement (TCD; Angiodyn DMS, France) of both middle cerebral arteries (2). Patients with VMCA >100 cm/s at the basal state were excluded from this study because they might possibly present heterogeneous autoregulation and CO2 reactivity in the two hemispheres due to either hyperemia or posttraumatic vasospasm. The TCD transducer was then fixed to a head holder, and VMCA was monitored continuously through the temporal window of the more severely injured hemisphere. The spectral outline of MCA Doppler time recording, SAP, ICP, and PETCO2 signals were sampled (analog-to-digital converter, National Instruments, Houston, TX) with a personal computer and stored for off-line analysis.

We performed CO2 challenges at different levels of SAP. After 30 min in a steady basal state condition, patients were gradually hyperventilated until VMCA no longer fell, suggesting that maximal vasoconstriction was achieved. During hyperventilation SjO2 was not allowed to drop below 50%. A short period of hypoventilation was then allowed up to a PETCO2 of ~40 mmHg or less if the ICP increased above 35 mmHg. Ventilation was then adjusted to achieve the same PETCO2 obtained at the basal state. In a second session we kept PETCO2 constant and modulated norepinephrine perfusion to generate variations in SAP. When a new steady level of SAP was achieved, a second CO2 challenge was performed.

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee, and informed consent of each patient's next of kin was duly obtained. The clinical status of all patients analyzed, including initial Glasgow coma scale and type of injury, is reported in Table 1.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Clinical status of patients

Parameter estimation. Estimation of model parameters was carried out by adopting an automatic procedure. Starting from an initial guess, we modified certain model parameters iteratively by a numerical algorithm to minimize a cost function of the difference between model and in vivo results. Because statistical information on the measurement errors was not available, we adopted a weighted least-squares cost function [F(Theta )] (5)
F(&THgr;) = <IT>W</IT><SUB>ICP</SUB> ⋅ <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT>=1</LL><UL><IT>N</IT></UL></LIM>
⋅ {P<SUP>(s)</SUP><SUB>ic</SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>) − P<SUP>(m)</SUP><SUB>ic</SUB>[<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>, P<SUB>a</SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>), P<SC>et</SC><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>), &THgr;]}<SUP>2</SUP> + <IT>W</IT><SUB><IT>V</IT><SUB>MCA</SUB></SUB> (1)
⋅ <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT>=1</LL><UL><IT>N</IT></UL></LIM>{<IT>V</IT><SUP>(s)</SUP><SUB>MCA</SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>) − <IT>V</IT><SUP>(m)</SUP><SUB>MCA</SUB>[<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>, P<SUB>a</SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>), P<SC>et</SC><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>), &THgr;]}<SUP>2</SUP>
where P(s)ic and V(s)MCA represent the in vivo ICP and VMCA values at the time instant ti, P(m)ic and V(m)MCA are the corresponding model predictions at the same instant, Pa and PETCO2 are systemic arterial pressure and end-tidal CO2 tension (to be used as inputs for the model), N is the number of available data points, WICP and WVMCA are weighting factors, and Theta  = [theta 1theta 2 ... theta p]T is a vector of model parameters to be identified through the minimization algorithm. Throughout this work, superscript T denotes vector or matrix transpose. The weighting factors were chosen so that, at the end of the minimization procedure, the two terms in the right-hand member of Eq. 1 would have comparable values.

The values of the parameters warranting a local minimum for the cost function (<A><AC>&THgr;</AC><AC>˜</AC></A>) are deemed to characterize the patient's intracranial dynamics.

Once a final least-squares parameter estimate was achieved, an approximate value for the covariance matrix of the estimates [V(<A><AC>&THgr;</AC><AC>˜</AC></A>)] was computed by means of the following equation
<IT>V</IT>(<A><AC>&THgr;</AC><AC>˜</AC></A>) = (<IT>S</IT><SUP>T</SUP><IT>WS</IT>)<SUP>−1</SUP>(<IT>S</IT><SUP>T</SUP><IT>WUWS</IT>)(<IT>S</IT><SUP>T</SUP><IT>WS</IT>)<SUP>−1</SUP>
where S(<A><AC>&THgr;</AC><AC>˜</AC></A>) is the 2N × p sensitivity matrix that contains the derivatives of model outputs at the instants of observation ti, computed with respect to each of the p estimated parameters; W is the 2N × 2N diagonal matrix of weights, written as
<IT>W</IT> = diag (<IT>W</IT><SUB>ICP</SUB>, … , <IT>W</IT><SUB>ICP</SUB>, <IT>W</IT><SUB><IT>V</IT><SUB>MCA</SUB></SUB>, … , <IT>W</IT><SUB><IT>V</IT><SUB>MCA</SUB></SUB>)
and U is a 2N × 2N diagonal matrix that contains estimates of the error variance for the two outputs, written as
<IT>U</IT> = diag (&sfgr;<SUP>2</SUP><SUB>ICP</SUB>, … , &sfgr;<SUP>2</SUP><SUB>ICP</SUB>, &sfgr;<SUP>2</SUP><SUB>V<SUB>MCA</SUB></SUB>, … , &sfgr;<SUP>2</SUP><SUB><IT>V</IT><SUB>MCA</SUB></SUB>)
where the variance of the ICP measurements is estimated as follows
&sfgr;<SUP>2</SUP><SUB>ICP</SUB> = <FR><NU><IT>W</IT><SUB>ICP</SUB></NU><DE><IT>N</IT> − <IT>p</IT>/2</DE></FR> ⋅ <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT>=1</LL><UL><IT>N</IT></UL></LIM> {P<SUP>(s)</SUP><SUB>ic</SUB>(<IT>t</IT><SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB>) − P<SUP>(m)</SUP><SUB>ic</SUB>[<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>, P<SUB>a</SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>), P<SC>et</SC><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>), &THgr;]}<SUP>2</SUP>
and the variance of the VMCA measurements is
&sfgr;<SUP>2</SUP><SUB><IT>V</IT><SUB>MCA</SUB></SUB> = <FR><NU><IT>W</IT><SUB><IT>V</IT><SUB>MCA</SUB></SUB></NU><DE><IT>N</IT> − <IT>p</IT>/2</DE></FR> 
⋅ <LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i-=1</IT></LL><UL><IT>N</IT></UL></LIM> {<IT>V</IT><SUP>(s)</SUP><SUB>MCA</SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>) − <IT>V</IT><SUP>(m)</SUP><SUB>MCA</SUB>[<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>, P<SUB>a</SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>), P<SC>et</SC><SUB>CO<SUB>2</SUB></SUB>(<IT>t<SUB>i</SUB></IT>), &THgr;]}<SUP>2</SUP>
The sensitivity matrix, S(<A><AC>&THgr;</AC><AC>˜</AC></A>), was computed using a forward approximation for the derivatives.

Finally, starting from knowledge of the covariance matrix, we evaluated the accuracy of the estimation of the ith parameter (<A><AC>&thgr;</AC><AC>˜</AC></A>i) by computing the coefficient of variation of the estimate (CVi%)
<IT>CV<SUB>i</SUB></IT>% = <FR><NU><RAD><RCD><IT>v</IT><SUB>ii</SUB>(<A><AC>&THgr;</AC><AC>˜</AC></A>)</RCD></RAD></NU><DE><A><AC>&thgr;</AC><AC>˜</AC></A><SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB></DE></FR> ⋅ 100
where vii(<A><AC>&THgr;</AC><AC>˜</AC></A>) denotes the ith diagonal element of the covariance matrix, that is, the variance of the estimate.

All the previous computations (minimization algorithm, evaluation of the sensitivity matrix, and computation of the coefficient of variation for the estimates) were performed on MS-DOS 486 personal computers using the software package ADAPT II (11), obtained free of charge from the University of Southern California (Los Angeles, CA).

Of course, the model contains too many parameters for all of them to be estimated individually on the basis of clinical measurements. Hence, a subset must be chosen to compose the p × 1 parameter vector Theta . To this end, we assumed that the most significant patient differences concern the intracranial compliance, the status of CSF circulation, and the characteristics of cerebrovascular control mechanisms (both autoregulation and CO2 reactivity). Hence, the following model parameters were estimated individually: the elastance coefficient (kE); the CSF outflow resistance (Ro); the autoregulation gain in both large and small pial arteries (Gaut,1 and Gaut,2, respectively); the gain of the CO2 reactivity in both large and small pial arteries (GCO2,1 and GCO2,2, respectively); and the time constant of the CO2 response (tau CO2), assumed equal for both pial segments. In contrast, the autoregulation time constants were not modified with respect to their normal values, because they are small compared with the dynamics of the maneuvers.

In this study, the measured quantity used as input for the model represents end-tidal CO2, not CO2 pressure in the cerebral arterial blood. Therefore, allowance must be made for various delay sources when considering CO2 reactivity, namely the transit time for blood passing from the lung to the brain, the time over which PaCO2 alters pH in the perivascular space, and, finally, the time required for the vessels to react following a change in pH. With regard to the first of these, in particular, Wilson et al. (34) report a time lag from lung to brain ranging between 10 and 17 s. To take this into account, the basal value of the time constant tau CO2 has been increased from 20 (32) to 40 s in this study.

However, we found that additional factors may vary among subjects and should be assessed to achieve a better reproduction of clinical data. First, the percent changes in vessel caliber that provide a given adjustment of cerebrovascular resistance may produce different effects on ICP, depending on the volume of blood contained in the pial arteriolar compartment under normal conditions. This has been taken into account by estimating the coefficient KV,2 for the small pial arteries, defined in Eq. 16A of the previous, related paper (32).

Second, the normal working point in the smooth muscle static sigmoidal relationship may vary from one subject to the next because of various factors, such as changes in metabolism, adaptation to the CO2 level in blood, or the presence of vasospasm in a large, conducting intracranial artery, which induces a vasodilation in the microcirculation (17). To take this possibility into account, we included the parameter PaCO2 n among the estimated quantities. Changing this parameter has the same effect as shifting the normal working point upward and downward along the static sigmoidal relationship.

Finally, a last parameter in the model that changes from one subject to the next is the normal value of inner radius in the MCA (rMCA n). It is worth noting that this parameter represents only a "scaling factor" between VMCA and CBF, the value of which does not affect intracranial dynamics but is used only to achieve the appropriate initial level for the velocity signal.

A list of the model parameters used in the estimation procedure, with their values in basal conditions, is shown in Table 2.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Basal values of estimated model parameters

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Sensitivity Analysis

As described in MATERIALS AND METHODS, when performing the sensitivity analysis we simulated the time pattern of ICP and VMCA in response to a ramp increase in PaCO2 from 25 to 35 mmHg (Fig. 2). Figures 3-5 show the results obtained by changing the autoregulation gain, the CSF outflow resistance, and the intracranial elastance coefficient, respectively. Figures 3A, 4A, and 5A show the time patterns of ICP obtained with different parameter values at each mean SAP level adopted. Figures 3B, 4B, and 5B show the dynamic relationships between ICP and VMCA. This curve has been chosen because it can provide information on both quantities that have to be controlled in clinical practice and for which the relationship is expected to be nonlinear.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Sensitivity analysis of role of autoregulation gain. Time pattern of ICP (A) and nonlinear dynamic relationship linking ICP to VMCA (B) were computed with model during CO2 alteration maneuvers (from hypocapnia to normocapnia) at different levels of mean systemic arterial pressure (SAP). CO2 maneuver is shown in Fig. 2. Simulated patients were characterized by a moderate increase in CSF outflow resistance (Ro/Ro 0 = 5, where subscript 0 indicates basal value); a moderate decrease in craniospinal elasticity, i.e., an increase in elastance coefficient (kE/kE 0 = 1.3); and different values of autoregulation gain for small pial arteries [Gaut,2/Gaut,2 0 = 0.25 (dashed line), Gaut,2/Gaut,2 0 = 0.75 (dotted line), Gaut,2/Gaut,2 0 = 1 (continuous bold line), Gaut,2/Gaut,2 0 = 1.25 (dot-dashed line), and Gaut,2/Gaut,2 0 = 1.5 (continuous fine line)].

Autoregulation gain. Figure 3 shows the effect of the autoregulation gain in the small pial arteries on the ICP and VMCA time patterns. Five different values for the gain have been used (see legend, Fig. 3), ranging from depressed autoregulation to increased autoregulation above normal. In each simulation, the intracranial elastance coefficient and the CSF outflow resistance were moderately increased compared with their basal values (kE/kE 0 = 1.3, Ro/Ro 0 = 5) to describe a pathological subject.

Results show that the higher the autoregulation gain, the greater the impact of the CO2 maneuver on ICP. However, the interaction between autoregulation and CO2 reactivity is significantly nonlinear, depending as it does on the level of mean SAP set during the maneuver. If mean SAP is high, close to the autoregulation upper limit, the vessels are in a condition of vasoconstriction, and so the increase in PaCO2 has only a minor effect on CBV and ICP. In contrast, when mean SAP is low and approaching the autoregulation lower limit, the arterioles exhibit the maximal vasodilation capacity. In this situation, changing CO2 from hypocapnia to normocapnia may evoke a disproportionate rise in ICP, especially when autoregulation is very efficient, which could be an indication of unstable intracranial dynamics.

The dynamic relationships between ICP and VMCA shown in Fig. 3B provide interesting information on the actual capacity of the cerebrovascular bed to regulate blood flow. We can observe that this relationship is approximately linear (i.e., velocity and ICP increase in parallel), with a fairly constant slope until an inflection point is reached (in Fig. 3 the inflection point is located at a CPP of congruent 35-40 mmHg, with VMCA congruent 60 cm/s). This represents the attainment of maximal blood flow. In fact, blood velocity does not increase further after the inflection point and may even decrease, notwithstanding a persistent CO2 rise. It is worth noting, however, that the inflection point does not correspond with maximal vasodilation. In fact, ICP continues to increase, denoting that arterioles are still dilating and CBV is rising. In this condition vasodilation may have a detrimental effect on velocity and CBF, because it might trigger a "vasodilatory cascade" leading to a disproportionate ICP rise and intracranial instability (27, 29).

CSF outflow resistance. The role of the CSF outflow resistance on the ICP and VMCA time patterns during CO2 changes is presented in Fig. 4. In all these simulations we used the same value for the intracranial elastance coefficient as in Fig. 3, but we used a normal autoregulation gain.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Sensitivity analysis of role of CSF outflow resistance. Time pattern of ICP (A) and nonlinear dynamic relationship linking ICP to VMCA (B) were computed with model during CO2 alteration maneuvers (from hypocapnia to normocapnia) at different levels of mean SAP. CO2 maneuver is shown in Fig. 2. Simulated patients were characterized by normal autoregulation gains (Gaut,1/Gaut,1 0 = 1; Gaut,2/Gaut,2 0 = 1), a moderate decrease in craniospinal elasticity, i.e., an increase in elastance coefficient (kE/kE 0 = 1.3), and different values of CSF outflow resistance [Ro/Ro 0 = 1 (continuous bold line), Ro/Ro 0 = 2.5 (dashed line), Ro/Ro 0 = 5 (dotted line), Ro/Ro 0 = 7.5 (dot-dashed line), and Ro/Ro 0 = 10 (continuous fine line)].

From Fig. 4A we can see that, with CO2 increasing, ICP rises more rapidly when CSF outflow is impaired than when CSF outflow is normal. This is simply a consequence of the different position of the working point on the intracranial pressure-volume relationship. In fact, higher values of Ro reflect a higher initial level of ICP. Of course, higher ICP signifies low intracranial compliance, so the same CBV change can induce a greater change in ICP. Also, in this case instability occurs during arterial hypotension, when the antagonism between cerebral vasodilation and ICP rise is maximal.

The same kinds of behavior can be observed looking at the dynamic ICP-VMCA relationships plotted in Fig. 4B. By increasing Ro, the curve is shifted upward and made just slightly steeper. At the higher values of Ro, the ICP-VMCA relationship presents a characteristic inflection point at which maximal velocity is reached. Beyond this point, the CO2-induced decrease in cerebrovascular resistance is counteracted by the decrease in CPP due to the abrupt increase in ICP. It is worth noting that, during arterial hypotension, instability leads to a condition of maximal vasodilation, after which ICP exhibits a progressive slow decrease due to CSF outflow. Because of the improvement in CPP, VMCA increases.

Intracranial elastance coefficient. Figure 5 shows the time pattern of ICP and the dynamic "ICP-VMCA" relationship during PaCO2 changes at different values of the parameter kE (the range of values extends from kE/ kE 0 = 0.5, which means good intracranial compliance, to kE/kE 0 = 2, which represents a very rigid craniospi- nal system with seriously reduced compliance). The simulations were performed with the assumption of a moderate increase in CSF outflow resistance (Ro/Ro 0 = 5, the same value as in Fig. 3) but with a normal autoregulation gain. It should be noted that an increase in kE is reflected in a more rapid ICP rise during the maneuver (Fig. 5A), hence also in a steeper ICP-VMCA curve (Fig. 5B). In extreme conditions (i.e., rigid craniospinal compartment with arterial hypotension), ICP rises uncontrolled, with VMCA deteriorating. The main difference between these curves and those of Fig. 4 is that, conversely to the situation with changes in Ro, changes in kE have no effect on the initial equilibrium point.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Sensitivity analysis of role of intracranial elastance coefficient. Time pattern of ICP (A) and nonlinear dynamic relationship linking ICP to VMCA (B) were computed with model during CO2 alteration maneuvers (from hypocapnia to normocapnia) at different levels of mean SAP. CO2 maneuver is shown in Fig. 2. Simulated patients were characterized by normal autoregulation gains (Gaut,1/Gaut,1 0 = 1; Gaut,2/Gaut,2 0 = 1), a moderate increase in CSF outflow resistance (Ro/Ro 0 = 5), and different values of intracranial elastance coefficient [kE/kE 0 = 0.5 (dashed line), kE/kE 0 = 1 (continuous bold line), kE/kE 0 = 1.3 (dotted line), kE/kE 0 = 1.5 (dot-dashed line), and kE/kE 0 = 2 (continuous fine line)].

Model Identification

In this section, some examples of best fitting to real clinical tracings are presented. The values of the estimated parameters obtained with the automatic fitting procedure are shown in Table 3 together with the coefficients of variation of the estimates. To emphasize the deviation of intracranial dynamics with respect to a hypothetical normal condition, all the parameters except PaCO2 n and rMCA n (MCA radius at normal transmural pressure) are normalized to their basal values. It can be seen that in all cases the coefficients of variations are low, suggesting that the accuracy of the estimates is good.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Values of estimated parameters obtained with automatic fitting procedure

Figure 6 shows the results concerning tracing 1 of patient 2. The quantities varied artificially during the clinical observation (PETCO2 and SAP, which have been used as inputs to the model) are plotted in Fig. 6A, whereas Fig. 6B shows the comparison between monitored and simulated outputs, i.e., ICP and VMCA. The model proves able to reproduce both clinical tracings quite well. The subject starts from a condition of hypocapnia. After some minutes, a CO2 maneuver is performed, consisting of a initial mild hyperventilation that further decreases CO2 pressure; the CO2 level is then gradually increased by lowering the ventilator rate. SAP remains at a nearly constant low value during this maneuver. It can be seen that, with PETCO2 decreasing, vasoconstriction occurs and ICP and VMCA diminish; the subsequent rise in CO2 causes an increase in CBV, with a consequent rise in ICP. VMCA increases rapidly as well, rising to a maximal value, after which it remains substantially constant or even falls, despite the continuing upward trend in CO2 and ICP values.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Best fitting between model simulation and clinical data in tracing 1 of patient 2. A: measured quantities used as inputs for model [top: mean SAP; bottom: end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2)]. A CO2 maneuver, consisting of passage from hypocapnia to normocapnia and back to hypocapnia, was performed at constant mean SAP. B: time pattern of VMCA (top) and ICP (bottom) measured in patient (continuous fine line with open circle ) and simulated with model using parameters listed in Table 3 (continuous bold line). C: dynamic relationship linking ICP to VMCA during CO2 maneuver delimited between arrows in A (open circle , clinical data; continuous bold line, model results).

In Fig. 6C, the dynamic relationship between ICP and VMCA is plotted with regard to the CO2 maneuver delimited by the arrows in Fig. 6A (from minimal to maximal value of PETCO2). The pattern is very similar to those discussed in the sensitivity analysis section. The initial portion of the curve is covered as long as the cerebrovascular dilation, caused by the CO2 rise, is able to increase velocity; thereafter, velocity increases more slowly because of the antagonism between cerebral vasodilation and ICP rise. After an inflection point, vasodilation causes only a rise in ICP, which is accompanied by deteriorating VMCA.

Figure 7 deals with patient 3. For each of the two tracings, a quite similar CO2 maneuver is performed at two different SAP levels. In tracing 1 (Fig. 7, A and B), an arterial hypotension is produced, maintaining PETCO2 at a normocapnic level. Observing the subsequent ICP rise, we can infer that an active vasodilation occurs, which is still not sufficient to prevent the accompanying fall in blood velocity. The time pattern of the following CO2 maneuver is analogous to that of the previous patient. After the attainment of an upper limit of PETCO2 (inflection point), blood velocity increases no further and a steeping in ICP is observed, suggesting the existence of a vasodilatory cascade.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Best fitting between model simulations and clinical data in both tracings of patient 3. A and C: measured quantities of mean SAP (top) and PETCO2 (bottom) used as inputs for model. B and D: time pattern of VMCA (top) and ICP (bottom) measured in patient (continuous fine line with open circle ) and simulated with model using parameters listed in Table 3 (continuous bold line). A and B relate to CO2 maneuvers performed during hypotension (tracing 1), whereas C and D relate to CO2 changes during hypertension (tracing 2). E: dynamic relationships linking ICP to VMCA during CO2 maneuvers delimited between arrows in A and C during hypotension (tracing 1: bullet , clinical data; continuous bold line, model results) and hypertension (tracing 2: open circle , clinical data; continuous bold line, model results), respectively.

In tracing 2 (Fig. 7, C and D), the change in PETCO2 is brought about in a condition of arterial hypertension. It can be observed in this case that an increase in CO2 is accompanied by a parallel, monotonic increase in both ICP and VMCA. The comparison between the ICP-VMCA curves of the two tracings, shown in Fig. 7E, allows analysis of the effect of CPP on CO2 maneuvers. During hypotension (tracing 1), a condition of maximal velocity is attained at a somewhat lower ICP level. With the assumption of a mean arterial pressure of ~80 mmHg, the inflection point is located at a CPP of 80 - 25 = 55 mmHg. In case of hypertension (tracing 2), the ICP-VMCA relationship is shifted to the right and an inflection point is not attained, because CPP is significantly higher than in tracing 1. If we suppose that the general intracranial status is much the same in the patient, as inferred by the fair similarity between the model parameters in the two tracings (see Table 3, patient 3), we would find the inflection point at an ICP level of ~65 mmHg, with SAP ~120 mmHg.

The last example, referring to patient 6, is reported in Fig. 8. This tracing is a severe test for the model. The period of observation, in fact, is considerably long and contains four consecutive maneuvers, two involving PETCO2 and two involving SAP (Fig. 8A). The simulated data seem to reproduce the main dynamic events with sufficient adequacy (Fig. 8B). The only significant discrepancy concerns the pattern of VMCA, which, after the first reduction in mean SAP, appears to be better autoregulated in the model than in the clinical tracing. With regard to the first CO2 maneuver, executed during arterial hypotension, both ICP and VMCA hardly increase despite the CO2 rise, denoting a condition of maximal vasodilation. Accordingly, the dynamic relationship depicted in Fig. 8C shows the presence of an inflection point; however, ICP stabilizes above inflection, notwithstanding a continuing rise in PETCO2, confirming that CBV cannot increase further. In fact, the sum of the responses to hypotension and to hypercapnia brings the pial vasculature to its maximal vasodilation state.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Best fitting between model simulation and clinical data in patient 6. A: measured quantities of mean SAP (top) and PETCO2 (bottom) used as inputs for model. B: time pattern of VMCA (top) and ICP (bottom) measured in patient (continuous fine line with open circle ) and simulated with model using parameters listed in Table 3 (continuous bold line). CO2 maneuvers were performed during both hypotension and hypertension. C: dynamic relationships linking ICP to VMCA during CO2 maneuvers delimited between arrows in A. Maneuver 1 was performed during hypotension (bullet , clinical data; continuous bold line, model results), and maneuver 2 was performed during hypertension (open circle , clinical data; continuous bold line, model results).

The subsequent maneuver consists of a sudden elevation in arterial pressure. The initial, passive response of the cerebrovascular bed is evident, reflected in the increase of both VMCA and ICP, and then, when the regulatory action is triggered, CBV is actively reduced and ICP diminishes with the further rise in SAP. The behavior of the system during the following CO2 change is similar to that reported in tracing 2 of patient 3 (see Fig. 7, C and D). Given the high value of CPP, VMCA and ICP rise together as long as hypoventilation continues, as indicated in Fig. 8, B and C.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In the present study, we investigated the relationships among ICP, CBV, CSF circulation, and the action of cerebrovascular regulatory mechanisms in dynamic conditions during maneuvers that alter PaCO2 and mean SAP. The main objective was to elucidate the complex links between ICP and the action of cerebrovascular regulatory mechanisms and to gain a quantitative understanding of how these relationships may actually affect intracranial dynamics and CBF in neurosurgical subjects.

The idea that cerebrovascular regulation and ICP changes are strictly related is not new and has been the subject of several reports in previous years. Among others, Lundberg (21) first ascribed the occurrence of ICP waves to active changes in CBV occurring within the cranial cavity. Rosner and Becker (27) formulated a qualitative model, named the vasodilatory cascade, to explain how autoregulation may induce disproportionate ICP changes. Bouma et al. (7) and Gray and Rosner (16) observed that acute arterial hypotension may induce an ICP increase, which can differ widely from one subject to the next.

In a previous, recent study (30), we used a similar but simpler model of intracranial dynamics to analyze the ICP time pattern in patients with head injury during bolus injection or withdrawal maneuvers, the so-called PVI tests. The main finding of the study was that, in more than one-half of the examined patients, ICP exhibited a "paradoxical response" to the maneuver, that is, a delayed increase after the end of the injection period and a delayed decrease after the end of the withdrawal period. The model was able to explain these responses quite well, attributing them to active CBV changes induced by the maneuver. The study in question (30) dealt only with autoregulation, however, and the examined ICP tracings lasted for a few minutes, which is a time consistent with autoregulation dynamics following bolus perturbations.

The present study significantly extends and improves the former in two major areas: 1) we included the effect of CO2 tension on cerebral hemodynamics, and 2) we examined the response to long-lasting perturbations. As reported by various authors (8, 10, 13, 28, 35), CO2 reactivity is well correlated with neurological condition and clinical outcome; thus studying the cerebrovascular response to a CO2 perturbation has a great clinical importance. Moreover, the clinical tracings examined here are of between 20- and 90-min duration and therefore are representative of a much longer dynamic than those analyzed with PVI tests.

The study was divided into two distinct parts, one devoted to a sensitivity analysis of the main model parameters and another to best fitting of real clinical tracings.

Sensitivity Analysis

A major conclusion arising from the simulation results of Figs. 3-5 is that the effect of cerebrovascular regulation on ICP may differ widely in a number of subjects on the basis of several intracranial parameters, chiefly the intracranial elastance coefficient (kE), the status of CSF circulation (summarized in the model through the parameter Ro), and the strength of autoregulation. The most notable result, however, concerns the strong dependence of ICP on the status of the pial arteriolar vascular bed. If the pial arterioles are initially vasoconstricted, CBV changes turn out to be quite small, and so ICP is only moderately affected by cerebrovascular regulation. In contrast, in conditions when the pial arterioles are already slightly dilated (such as during moderate hypotension), even a modest CO2 change may evoke a disproportionate ICP rise that, in pathological subjects, could be accompanied by a temporary fall in VMCA. Our conclusion is that when the arteriolar vascular bed approaches its maximum vasodilatory capacity, intracranial dynamics may risk instability as a consequence of the massive CBV increase.

Taken together, all these results emphasize that an identical maneuver may have different effects on the time patterns of intracranial quantities, depending not only on the specific individual parameters but also on the result of previous maneuvers or perturbations that may have affected the pial vasculature.

In this study we used the dynamic curve linking ICP to VMCA obtained during PaCO2 changes to summarize the status of cerebral hemodynamics and its relationship to ICP dynamics. The advantage of using this curve is that its modifications can be correlated easily with changes in certain important intracranial parameters. In particular, the sensitivity analysis suggests that the relationship is quite linear in the central regulatory range and that its slope is strongly affected by the intracranial elastance coefficient. Moreover, a decrease in CSF outflow may induce an upward shift of the entire relationship. When the pial arteriolar vascular bed approaches maximal vasodilation, the ICP-VMCA relationship exhibits an inflection point: ICP rises, whereas velocity remains constant or even decreases. In this condition, CBV changes are large and may trigger a vasodilatory cascade, leading to disproportionate ICP changes, whereas velocity and CBF cannot be further improved. The suggestion therefore is that the patient's intracranial dynamics should be kept far from this inflection point to avoid possible ischemia and intracranial instability. In particular, our simulations confirm the result of a previous study (14), according to which CPP should always be maintained >70-80 mmHg to keep the cerebral vasculature at a comfortable distance from its critical zone.

Fitting of Model Results to In Vivo Tracings

In a second stage of this study, we verified whether the kinds of behavior predicted by the model can actually be observed in real neurosurgical patients. To this end, best fitting between model and in vivo curves was attempted during maneuvers designed to alter CO2 tension in blood gradually and at different mean SAP levels. We feel able to affirm that model validation is satisfactorily achieved if four major requirements are simultaneously fulfilled: 1) the model can reproduce the clinical tracings reasonably well by modifying only a few parameters with a clear physiological and clinical meaning, 2) the estimated parameter values lie in the range reported in existing literature on pathological subjects, 3) the coefficients of variations of the estimates are low, and 4) the ICP-VMCA relationships observed in patients replicate the same kinds of behavior anticipated on the basis of the model's sensitivity analysis.

All these requisites have been addressed quite satisfactorily in the study. In particular, the clinical tracings show precisely the chain of events anticipated by the model at different arterial pressure levels. Increasing PETCO2 from hypocapnia to normocapnia evokes an increase in ICP and a parallel increase in VMCA, whereas hyperventilation decreases ICP and leads to a fall in velocity. During arterial hypotension, the ICP increase may become dramatic. Accordingly, the pattern of ICP versus VMCA is significantly affected by the level of mean SAP; falling pressure generally results in a shift of the curve to the left and in the appearance of an inflection point, after which velocity falls (Figs. 7 and 8).

In all the cases examined, the in vivo time pattern of ICP and VMCA could be reproduced quite well with the model by adjusting a few parameters that characterize intracranial elasticity, CSF outflow, and cerebrovascular reactivity (both autoregulation and CO2 response). In most cases, moreover, the values of estimated parameters agree with those expected on the basis of the present pathophysiological knowledge.

In most of the tracings examined, the value of CSF outflow resistance was significantly increased with respect to normal. This finding suggests that an impairment in CSF circulation is probably one of the main causes of intracranial hypertension in neurosurgical patients. The values found in this study (ranging between 9.83 and 92.2 mmHg · min · ml-1) are almost similar to those measured by various authors in patients with hydrocephalus, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or severe brain injury [52-100 mmHg · min · ml-1 (18), 11.5-85 mmHg · min · ml-1 (20), 6.66-111.11 mmHg · min · ml-1 (6), or 29-100 mmHg · min · ml-1 (15)].

The estimated values of the intracranial elastance coefficient are likewise in substantial agreement with those reported in the clinical literature. The values reported in Table 3 encompass a broad range of pathophysiological levels, including cases with very low intracranial elastance coefficient, i.e., good intracranial storage capacity (kE = 0.03 ml-1 in patient 6); cases with a mild increase in kE; and cases with greatly increased elastance, denoting a strong pathological reduction in craniospinal capacity (kE = 0.28 ml-1 in patient 5). According to various authors (4, 12), typical values of kE range between 0.05 and 0.15 ml-1, albeit values as high as 0.3-0.4 ml-1 are not infrequent in neurosurgical subjects.

Another interesting aspect emerging from the analysis of Table 3 is that, in most cases, the autoregulation gains are lower than the basal values set previously (32). More exactly, although in a few tracings the estimated autoregulation gains indicate that autoregulation is reasonably well maintained, in other tracings autoregulation at the small pial artery level is close to zero (tracing 1 in patients 4 and 5) or autoregulation is significantly attenuated in both the proximal vessels and arterioles (tracing 1 in patient 3). This result confirms the observation of a former study (30), in which the autoregulation gain was estimated during PVI tests in 20 patients with head injury, and suggests that poor autoregulation is probably a frequent occurrence in severe head injury (9, 10, 13, 24).

The values of gain in CO2 reactivity exhibit the highest variability among the estimated parameters. This wide variability in CO2 gain may depend on both an intrinsic variability among subjects and a model limitation. In particular, in Table 3 we can observe the existence of a positive correlation between the values of the CO2 gain and the mean arterial pressure level set during the maneuver. This result emphasizes that hypotension attenuates the CBF response to CO2, as observed by other authors (3, 19). When building the model, we attempted to take this phenomenon into account, assuming that severe ischemia almost completely inhibits CO2 response in large and small pial vessels [see Figs. 4 and 9 in our previous, related paper (32)]. The data in Table 3 suggest that this aspect of the model must be refined in future studies and that a more direct relationship between arterial pressure and CO2 gains should be devised.

A further important parameter in the model, for which the value has to be individually estimated to reach a satisfactory fitting, is the initial working point on the smooth muscle sigmoidal characteristic. To move the working point (which is equivalent to shifting the sigmoidal relationship left or right), we individually estimated the parameter PaCO2 n. The basal value for this parameter was set at 40 mmHg in the previous paper (32), with the assumption that, in normocapnia, smooth muscle works at the central point of the sigmoidal relationship. Looking at the corresponding column in Table 3, however, we can see that, in all the tracings examined, the estimated value of PaCO2 n is significantly lower, ranging between 19 and 38 mmHg. This result suggests that only at reduced PaCO2 does smooth muscle work at the central point of the sigmoidal relationship, where the regulatory capacity is maximal. There are various possible justifications for this finding. First, the patients are ordinarily maintained in a status of moderate hypocapnia to limit intracranial hypertension. Hence, the value of PaCO2 n found by the algorithm may simply reflect adaptation to the low CO2 set by artificial ventilation (22). In support of this idea, we may observe that the value of PaCO2 n estimated by the algorithm is always close to the initial PETCO2 pressure set in the patient by artificial ventilation. An alternative explanation can be found in the works by Aaslid et al. (1) and Newell et al. (23), who measured velocity using the TCD technique during transient decreases in SAP and observed that the autoregulation strength in both healthy volunteers and patients with head injury increases when PaCO2 is lowered from 37 to 28 mmHg. This result suggests that autoregulation works better during hypocapnia (24).

Naturally, despite the encouraging results obtained, this study also raises important questions that merit future study. First, the model shows some difficulties in fitting very long tracings, involving multiple maneuvers that exhibit simultaneous changes in SAP and PaCO2 (see Fig. 8). Of course, this difficulty may simply be a consequence of the nonstationary nature of long-lasting signals, i.e., the set of parameters might change during an observation period as long as 1-2 h. During such a long period, moreover, patient behavior may be affected by other long-term mechanisms (such as changes in osmotic pressure or in metabolism) not included in the present model. Finally, as mentioned above, we also feel that the nonlinear relationship between CO2 reactivity and mean SAP deserves future improvements to achieve a better fitting in respect of multiple maneuvers.

Finally, one possible objection is that the model appears somewhat complex, with an excessive number of parameters. Indeed, the aim of this work is to provide a fairly comprehensive overview of the main factors involved in cerebrovascular control and intracranial dynamics, without dwelling on the problem of structural identifiability and model reduction. In future studies, it may become necessary to simplify the model and to group different mechanisms into simplified equations if the emphasis is to be on clinical practice rather than on physiological investigation. With this in mind, we recently developed a drastically simplified model of ICP dynamics designed especially to favor parameter identification at the patient's bedside (31, 33). The inclusion of CO2 reactivity in that model, following the indications of the present study, could be of future clinical value in assisting the quantitative diagnosis and treatment of neurosurgical patients.

    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: M. Ursino, Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informatica e Sistemistica, Viale Risorgimento 2, I-40136 Bologna, Italy.

Received 31 July 1997; accepted in final form 28 January 1998.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Aaslid, R., K.-F. Lindegaard, W. Sorteberg, and H. Nornes. Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in humans. Stroke 20: 45-52, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Aaslid, R., T.-M. Markwalder, and H. Nornes. Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries. J. Neurosurg. 57: 769-774, 1982[Medline].

3.   Artru, A. A., and P. S. Colley. Cerebral blood flow responses to hypocapnia during hypotension. Stroke 15: 878-883, 1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Avezaat, C. J. J., and J. H. M. van Eijndhoven. The role of the pulsatile pressure variations in intracranial pressure monitoring. Neurosurg. Rev. 9: 113-120, 1986[Medline].

5.   Bard, Y. Nonlinear Parameter Estimation. Orlando, FL: Academic, 1974.

6.   Borgesen, S. E., M. Albeck, F. Gjerris, M. Czonsnyka, and P. Laniewski. Computerized infusion test compared with conventional lumbo-ventricular perfusion for measurement of resistance to CSF outflow. In: Intracranial Pressure VIII, edited by C. J. J. Avezaat, J. H. M. van Eijndhoven, A. I. R. Maas, and J. T. J. Tans. Berlin: Springer, 1993, p. 744-748.

7.   Bouma, G. J., J. P. Muizelaar, K. Bandoh, and A. Marmarou. Blood pressure and intracranial pressure-volume dynamics in severe head injury: relationship with cerebral blood flow. J. Neurosurg. 77: 15-19, 1992[Medline].

8.   Cold, G. E. Measurements of CO2 reactivity and barbiturate reactivity in patients with severe head injury. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 98: 153-163, 1989[Medline].

9.   Cold, G. E., and F. T. Jensen. Cerebral autoregulation in unconscious patients with brain injury. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 22: 270-280, 1978[Medline].

10.   Daffertshofer, M., and M. Hennerici. Cerebrovascular regulation and vasoneural coupling. J. Clin. Ultrasound 23: 125-138, 1995[Medline].

11.   D'Argenio, D. Z., and A. Schumitzky. ADAPT II User's Guide: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Systems Analysis Software. Los Angeles, CA: Biomedical Simulations Resource, 1997.

12.   Delwel, E. J., D. A. de Jong, and C. J. J. Avezaat. The relative prognostic value of CSF outflow resistance measurement in shunting for normal pressure hydrocephalus. In: Intracranial Pressure VIII, edited by C. J. J. Avezaat, J. H. M. van Eijndhoven, A. I. R. Maas, and J. T. J. Tans. Berlin: Springer, 1993, p. 816-820.

13.   Enevoldsen, E. M., and F. T. Jensen. Autoregulation and CO2 responses of cerebral blood flow in patients with acute severe head injury. J. Neurosurg. 48: 689-703, 1978[Medline].

14.   Giulioni, M., and M. Ursino. Impact of cerebral perfusion pressure and autoregulation on intracranial dynamics: a modeling study. Neurosurgery 39: 1005-1015, 1996[Medline].

15.   Gjerris, F., S. E. Borgesen, P. S. Sorensen, F. Boesen, K. Schmidt, A. Harmsen, and J. Lester. Resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow and intracranial pressure in patients with hydrocephalus after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 88: 79-86, 1987[Medline].

16.   Gray, W. J., and M. J. Rosner. Pressure-volume index as a function of cerebral perfusion pressure. Part 1: the effects of cerebral perfusion pressure changes and anesthesia. J. Neurosurg. 67: 369-376, 1987[Medline].

17.   Grubb, R. L., Jr., M. E. Raichle, J. O. Eichling, and M. H. Gado. Effects of subarachnoid hemorrhage on cerebral blood volume, blood flow, and oxygen utilization in humans. J. Neurosurg. 46: 446-453, 1977[Medline].

18.   Hansen, K., F. Gjerris, and P. S. Sorensen. Absence of hydrocephalus in spite of impaired cerebrospinal fluid absorption and severe intracranial hypertension. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 86: 93-97, 1987[Medline].

19.   Harper, A. M., and H. I. Glass. Effect of alterations in the arterial carbon dioxide tension on the blood flow through the cerebral cortex at normal and low arterial blood pressure. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 28: 449-452, 1965.

20.   Kosteljanetz, M. CSF dynamics in patients with subarachnoid and/or intraventricular hemorrhage. J. Neurosurg. 60: 940-946, 1984[Medline].

21.   Lundberg, N. Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 36: 1-193, 1960.

22.   Muizelaar, J. P., H. G. Van Der Poel, Z. Li, H. A. Kontos, and J. E. Levasseur. Pial arteriolar vessel diameter and CO2 reactivity during prolonged hyperventilation in the rabbit. J. Neurosurg. 69: 923-927, 1988[Medline].

23.   Newell, D. W., J. P. Weber, R. Watson, R. Aaslid, and H. R. Winn. Effect of transient moderate hyperventilation on dynamic cerebral autoregulation after severe head injury. Neurosurgery 39: 35-44, 1996[Medline].

24.   Paulson, O. B., J. Olesen, and M. S. Christensen. Restoration of autoregulation of cerebral blood flow by hypocapnia. Neurology 22: 286-293, 1972[Free Full Text].

25.   Paulson, O. B., S. Strandgaard, and L. Edvinsson. Cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovasc. Brain Metab. Rev. 2: 161-192, 1990[Medline].

26.   Press, W. H., B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

27.   Rosner, M. J., and D. P. Becker. Cerebral perfusion pressure: link between intracranial pressure and systemic circulation. In: Cerebral Blood Flow: Physiological and Clinical Aspects, edited by J. H. Wood. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987, p. 425-448.

28.   Tenjin, H., T. Yamaki, Y. Nakagawa, T. Kuboyama, T. Ebisu, N. Kobori, S. Ueda, and N. Mizukawa. Impairment of CO2 reactivity in severe head injury patients: an investigation using thermal diffusion method. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 104: 121-125, 1990[Medline].

29.   Ursino, M., and P. Di Giammarco. A mathematical model of the relationship between cerebral blood volume and intracranial pressure changes: the generation of plateau waves. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 19: 15-42, 1991[Medline].

30.   Ursino, M., M. Iezzi, and N. Stocchetti. Intracranial pressure dynamics in patients with acute brain damage: a critical analysis with the aid of a mathematical model. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42: 529-540, 1995[Medline].

31.   Ursino, M., and C. A. Lodi. A simple mathematical model of the interaction between intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamics. J. Appl. Physiol. 82: 1256-1269, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

32.   Ursino, M., and C. A. Lodi. Interaction among autoregulation, CO2 reactivity, and intracranial pressure: a mathematical model. Am. J. Physiol. 274 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 43): H1715-H1728, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33.   Ursino, M., C. A. Lodi, S. Rossi, and N. Stocchetti. Intracranial pressure dynamics in patients with acute brain damage. J. Appl. Physiol. 82: 1270-1282, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

34.   Wilson, D. A., R. J. Traystman, and C. E. Rapela. Transient analysis of the canine cerebrovascular response to carbon dioxide. Circ. Res. 56: 596-605, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

35.   Yoshihara, M., K. Bandoh, and A. Marmarou. Cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity assessed by intracranial pressure dynamics in severely head injured patients. J. Neurosurg. 82: 386-393, 1995[Medline].


AJP Heart Circ Physiol 274(5):H1729-H1741
0363-6135/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. J. Van Lieshout, W. Wieling, J. M. Karemaker, and N. H. Secher
Syncope, cerebral perfusion, and oxygenation
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2003; 94(3): 833 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Sato, M. Tachibana, T. Numata, T. Nishino, and A. Konno
Differences in the dynamic cerebrovascular response between stepwise up tilt and down tilt in humans
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): H774 - H783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Ursino, A. Ter Minassian, C. A. Lodi, and L. Beydon
Cerebral hemodynamics during arterial and CO2 pressure changes: in vivo prediction by a mathematical model
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): H2439 - H2455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Ursino and C. A. Lodi
Interaction among autoregulation, CO2 reactivity, and intracranial pressure: a mathematical model
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 1998; 274(5): H1715 - H1728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lodi, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ursino, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lodi, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ursino, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online