|
|
||||||||
Departments of 1 Medicine (Cardiology), 2 Neurology, and 3 Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, and the 4 Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, California 94110
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We recently discovered that regular alcohol
consumption reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury to the same
degree as ischemic preconditioning in guinea pig hearts. Ischemic
preconditioning, like this cardioprotective effect of alcohol, is
mediated by adenosine signaling in guinea pigs. In rats, ischemic
preconditioning may be mediated predominantly by
1-adrenergic signaling. To be
certain that this protective effect of alcohol is a general biological response, we searched for alcohol's cardioprotection in rat and identified a potential signaling mechanism. Hearts isolated from alcohol-fed guinea pigs and rats were subjected to
ischemia-reperfusion. Hearts from alcohol-fed animals showed
greater recovery of left ventricular developed pressure than controls
(guinea pigs, 46 vs. 29%; rats, 50 vs. 31%) and decreased myocyte
necrosis assessed by creatine kinase release (guinea pigs, 204 ± 42 vs. 440 ± 70 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1; rats 158 ± 13 vs. 328 ± 31 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1). Adenosine
receptor blockade
[8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline] abolished alcohol's protection in guinea pig but not rat hearts. By
contrast,
1-adrenergic blockade
(prazosin) abolished alcohol's protection in rat but not guinea pig
hearts. We conclude that regular alcohol consumption reduces
ischemia-reperfusion injury and is mediated by species-specific
signaling mechanisms. A major goal of cardiovascular research is to
find a pharmacologically induced chronic state of preconditioning.
Understanding the mechanisms of alcohol's cardioprotection against
ischemia-reperfusion injury may aid in reaching this goal.
ethanol; preconditioning; adenosine;
1-adrenergic receptor; 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline; prazosin
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
WE RECENTLY FOUND that regular alcohol consumption over
3-12 wk reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury to the same
degree as ischemic preconditioning in guinea pig hearts (22).
Furthermore, this cardioprotective effect of alcohol requires adenosine
A1 receptor activation (22).
Attenuation of ischemia-reperfusion injury with regular alcohol
consumption could lead to improved myocardial recovery and survival
after myocardial infarction (MI). This is consistent with recent
clinical evidence that suggests that alcohol drinkers are more likely
to survive after MI than abstainers (11, 27, 39). Ischemic
preconditioning, like alcohol's cardioprotective effect, requires
adenosine receptor activation in many species, including guinea pigs
and humans (3, 8, 12, 19, 20, 38). In contrast, conflicting data
suggest that
1-adrenergic, and
not adenosinergic, signaling is most important in mediating protection
in the rat heart (4, 5, 14, 15, 18). To be certain that this
cardioprotective effect of alcohol is a general biological response and
not unique to guinea pigs, in this study we searched for a similar
response in the rat. We also compared the signaling mechanisms that
mediate alcohol's protective effect against
ischemia-reperfusion injury in guinea pig and rat.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal diet.
Male Hartley guinea pigs (275-300 g) and Sprague-Dawley rats
(225-250 g) were divided into two groups: a chronic alcohol group (alcohol) and an age-matched control group (control). All animals were
fed solid food (guinea pigs: Lab Diet, PMI Feeds; rats: Purina Rat
Chow) and water ad libitum. Guinea pigs were started with 2.5% ethanol
(vol/vol) in their water to acclimate the animals to drinking alcohol.
This was increased to 5% during the second week, 10% during the third
week, and 20% thereafter for 13 wk. Rats initially received 5%
ethanol. This was increased to 10% during the second week, 20% during
the third week, 30% during the fourth week, and 36% thereafter for
~16 wk. Differences in final dosages of ethanol between species were
based on the fact that rats metabolize alcohol faster than guinea pigs
(9, 41). Alcohol dehydrogenase activity in guinea pigs (2.94 µmol · g
liver
1 · min
1)
is 58% of that in rats (5.05 µmol · g
liver
1 · min
1)
(9, 41). Similarly, in vivo alcohol elimination rates are 2.59 µmol · g
liver
1 · min
1
in guinea pigs and 3.32 µmol · g
liver
1 · min
1
in rats (9, 41).
Isolated heart perfusion and measurement of function. Animals were heparinized (1,000 U ip) and anesthetized (60 mg/kg ip pentobarbital for guinea pigs and 1-2 mg/10 g ip ketamine for rats). Hearts were excised and arrested in cold isosmotic saline containing 20 mmol/l KCl. Isolated hearts were cannulated via the aorta and perfused at an initial perfusion pressure of 70 mmHg on a nonrecirculating Langendorff perfusion apparatus, using a Krebs-Henseleit perfusate (mmol/l): 123 NaCl, 6.0 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 20.0 NaHCO3, 1.2 MgSO4, 1.2 KH2PO4, 11.0 glucose, 0.5 EDTA, and 20 U/l insulin. The perfusate was continuously bubbled using 95% O2-5% CO2 and maintained at 37°C. After the sinoatrial node was removed, hearts from guinea pigs were paced at 240 beats/min using two platinum-tipped electrodes connected to a Grass Instruments SD-5 stimulus generator (Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA). Hearts from rats were paced at 300 beats/min.
Left ventricular (LV) developed pressure [LVDP = LV systolic pressure
LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP)] was measured
using a 2-Fr, high-fidelity micromanometer (Millar Instruments,
Houston, TX) passed into a compliant latex balloon. The balloon was
connected to a Y adapter, one end of which was used to advance the
micromanometer to the latex balloon. The other end of the Y adapter was
used to fill the balloon with bubble-free water to set the LVEDP at 10-12 mmHg. The balloon was inserted through the left atrium into the LV. LV pressure was recorded on a Gould series 8000 chart recorder
(Gould Electronics, Hayward, CA). Coronary flow was measured by an
in-line flowmeter (Gilmont Instruments, Barrington, IL). Coronary
perfusion pressure was measured by placing a T connection immediately
above the aortic cannulation, which was attached via rigid polyethylene
tubing to a Trantec pressure transducer (American Edwards Laboratories,
Irvine, CA) placed at the level of the heart.
Creatine kinase release. Creatine kinase release during postischemic reperfusion was measured with a commercially available kit (47-10, Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). Coronary effluent samples were collected every 3 min beginning with initiation of reperfusion for a total of 18 min. Only 7% of the total creatine kinase released was present in the final 3-min sample, suggesting that the majority of creatine kinase had been released by 18 min of reperfusion. Values were corrected for both dry heart weight and coronary flow rates and are expressed in units per milliliter per gram dry weight.
Experimental protocol. To eliminate a direct effect of alcohol on hearts, we withdrew ethanol from the drinking water 14-18 h before the animal was killed. Hearts were isolated and perfused as described above (n = 8 alcohol, n = 8 control in both species). After a 20-min equilibration period, baseline measurements of LVDP and coronary flow were made. Hearts were then subjected to 45 min of no-flow ischemia, followed by 48 min of reperfusion. Forty-five minutes of ischemia were chosen to guarantee some degree of irreversible myocyte injury (necrosis or infarction). During ischemia, hearts were maintained at 37°C by enclosure in a water-jacketed air chamber. Warmed perfusate kept in the lower part of the chamber saturated the air with humidity and prevented cooling of hearts by evaporation. On reperfusion, hemodynamic measurements were repeated every 6 min for a total of 48 min. Hearts were then cleaned of atria and great vessels and dried for 24 h at 80°C. Dried hearts were weighed.
Experiments were also carried out in the presence of the adenosine receptor antagonist 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline (SPT; 10 µM; Sigma Chemical) added to the perfusate 10 min before ischemia (n = 8 alcohol, n = 8 control in both species). Baseline LVDP and coronary flow were measured before and after addition of SPT. This dose of SPT completely abolished the 12% increase of coronary flow associated with infusion of adenosine (10 nM) into the perfusate in a separate group of rat hearts (n = 7; 37.8 ± 0.8 vs. 42.3 ± 0.8 ml/min; P < 0.002). To determine whether another signaling mechanism might be responsible for mediating this cardioprotective effect of alcohol, we subjected an additional group of rat hearts (n = 10 alcohol; n = 10 control) to ischemia-reperfusion after exposure to the
1-adrenergic receptor
antagonist prazosin (0.3 µM; Sigma Chemical). After equilibration,
hearts were perfused for 5 min with buffer containing prazosin,
followed by 5 min of perfusion with prazosin-free buffer before
ischemia. Longer infusions of prazosin resulted in LVDP
depression, which might confound the results, as depressed LVDP might
itself be cardioprotective against ischemia-reperfusion. Baseline LVDP and coronary flow were measured before and after prazosin
treatment to confirm that hemodynamics were not changed. A similar
prazosin infusion protocol has already been shown to inhibit ischemic
preconditioning in rat hearts (15).
To determine whether
1-adrenergic signaling might
also play a role in alcohol's cardioprotection in guinea pig hearts,
we subjected a group of hearts from guinea pigs consuming 2.5% ethanol in their drinking water (n = 8 alcohol; n = 8 control) to
ischemia-reperfusion after they were exposed to prazosin (0.3 µM). This group of animals drinking a more moderate amount of alcohol
also allowed us to rule out a malnutrition cause for this protective
effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury. After
equilibration, hearts were perfused for 5 min with buffer containing
prazosin, followed by 5 min of perfusion with prazosin-free buffer
before ischemia. Baseline LVDP and coronary flow were measured
before and after prazosin treatment.
To exclude the possibility that protection was due to withdrawal, we
carried out ischemia-reperfusion experiments on hearts from
rats consuming alcohol until they were killed. Serum alcohol levels
were drawn on the death of each animal
(n = 7).
The investigation conforms with the Guide for the Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No.
85-23, revised 1985).
Statistical analysis. All data are expressed as means ± SE. Comparisons between groups were made using repeated-measures ANOVA with multiple grouping factors. If differences were observed, a Tukey post hoc test was used to confirm the significance of differences between groups. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baseline LVDP, coronary flow, and coronary perfusion pressure were similar in hearts from controls and alcohol-treated guinea pigs and rats (Tables 1 and 2, respectively). Figure 1 shows LVDP over the course of the ischemia-reperfusion protocol for alcohol and control hearts. In guinea pigs, LVDP recovered to 46% of preischemic levels in alcohol hearts at 48 min of reperfusion compared with 29% in controls. Similarly, in rats, LVDP recovered to 50% in alcohol hearts compared with 31% in controls. LVEDP, an index of myocyte contracture, did not rise as much during reperfusion in alcohol hearts as in control hearts in both species (Tables 1 and 2). These data show that chronic alcohol improves contractile recovery and reduces myocyte contracture (irreversible myocyte injury) during postischemic reperfusion. In contrast, there were no changes in coronary flow or coronary perfusion pressure during reperfusion of hearts from alcohol-treated animals (Tables 1 and 2). This suggests that alcohol's cardioprotection does not involve vasodilation.
|
|
|
Creatine kinase release during postischemic reperfusion was measured as
an index of myocyte necrosis (or at least loss of membrane integrity).
As shown in Fig. 2, creatine kinase release from alcohol
hearts was substantially less than from control hearts in both species
(204 ± 42 vs. 440 ± 70 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1 for guinea pigs,
157 ± 12 vs. 328 ± 31 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1 for rats;
P < 0.05). This suggests that
regular alcohol consumption protects against myocyte necrosis after
prolonged ischemia and reperfusion.
|
To determine whether this protective effect of regular alcohol
consumption might be due to withdrawal, we carried out additional experiments on hearts from rats consuming alcohol until they were killed. The mean serum ethanol obtained at death was 64 ± 22 mg/dl (range 8-166 mg/dl). These levels are similar to literature values for rats and guinea pigs drinking doses of alcohol comparable to those
in the present study (2, 6, 34, 35, 37). LVDP recovered to 50% of
preischemic levels at 48 min of reperfusion (LVDP = 111 ± 10 mmHg
preischemia; 56 ± 6 mmHg at 48 min of reperfusion). The
rise of LV diastolic pressure during postischemic reperfusion was also
similar to the increase in hearts from rats withdrawn from alcohol
14-18 h before they were killed (24 ± 5 mmHg at 48 min of
reperfusion). Creatine kinase release was also similar whether the
animals were drinking alcohol until death (173 ± 10 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1) or withdrawn
from alcohol 14-18 h before death. These data suggest that
alcohol's cardioprotective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury is not related to alcohol withdrawal.
The body weight of alcohol-treated animals was smaller than that of
age-matched controls (694 ± 20 vs. 524 ± 20 g for guinea pigs,
453 ± 10 vs. 330 ± 12 g for rats). Previous studies have shown
that this lower weight in animal models of moderate-to-heavy alcohol
exposure is due to decreased skeletal muscle mass, as seen in
long-standing heavy drinkers (29, 40). A solid food diet with 36%
alcohol in the drinking water does not result in vitamin or nutritional
deficiencies (32). Dry heart weight-to-body weight ratios did not show
evidence for cardiac hypertrophy in alcohol-treated animals (guinea pig
3.52 ± 0.14 × 10
4; rat 5.19 ± 0.17 × 10
4) compared with
controls (guinea pig 4.05 ± 0.08 × 10
4; rat 5.16 × 10
4). Nevertheless, to
rule out that alcohol's cardioprotective effect was due to the stress
of malnutrition, we studied an additional group of hearts
from guinea pigs given a more moderate amount of alcohol in their
drinking water (2.5%). Body weights were similar between alcohol-fed
(745 ± 16 g) and age-matched control animals (773 ± 19 g).
Signaling mechanisms of alcohol's cardioprotective effect. Ischemia-reperfusion experiments were also carried out in the presence or absence of the adenosine receptor antagonist SPT. Baseline LVDP, coronary flow, and coronary perfusion pressure were unchanged by SPT in both guinea pig and rat hearts (Tables 1 and 2).
In guinea pigs, SPT abolished alcohol's cardioprotective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury. There was no longer improved LVDP recovery in hearts from alcohol-treated guinea pigs compared with controls (Table 1 and Fig. 1A). Furthermore, LVDP recovery was identical to that of control hearts not treated with SPT. LV diastolic pressure increased similarly in alcohol and control hearts treated with SPT, again identical to that of control hearts not treated with SPT (Table 1). Creatine kinase release was also similar in hearts from alcohol-treated (475 ± 60 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1) and control (446 ± 74 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1) guinea pigs
treated with SPT (Fig. 2A). These
data show that adenosine receptor blockade abolishes alcohol's
protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury in guinea
pig hearts.
In rats, however, SPT had no effect on alcohol's cardioprotection
against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Contractile recovery was
similar in hearts from alcohol-treated rats in the presence and absence
of SPT (Fig. 1B and Table 2). Creatine
kinase release was also similar in the presence (97 ± 12 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1) and absence (157 ± 12 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1) of SPT (Fig.
2B). To confirm that this dose of
SPT blocked adenosine receptors in rat hearts, we gave seven additional
hearts adenosine boluses in the presence and absence of SPT. Adenosine
(10 mM) consistently produced a 12% increase in coronary flow that was completely blocked by SPT. These data suggest that adenosine receptor blockade by SPT was effective but did not prevent alcohol's
cardioprotective effect in rat hearts.
On the basis of these findings, we next searched for evidence that
1-adrenergic receptors are
involved in alcohol's protective effect against
ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat hearts, possibly like
ischemic preconditioning. Ischemia-reperfusion experiments were
repeated with rat hearts in the presence or absence of the
1-adrenergic receptor
antagonist prazosin. Baseline LVDP, coronary flow, and coronary
perfusion pressure were unchanged by treatment with 0.3 µM prazosin
(Table 3). However, prazosin abolished the alcohol's cardioprotective effect. LVDP and LV diastolic pressure recovered similarly in hearts treated with prazosin from
alcohol-treated and control rats (Table 3). Creatine kinase release was
also similar (alcohol-treated rats 343 ± 32 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1; control rats 333 ± 47 U · ml
1 · g
dry wt
1) with prazosin
treatment. These data indicate that in rats
1-adrenergic receptor blockade
prevents alcohol's protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury.
|
1-adrenergic signaling plays a
role in alcohol's protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury in guinea pig hearts. The second
purpose was to rule out a contribution to alcohol's protective effect from the potential stress of malnutrition associated with heavy alcohol
consumption. Therefore, this group was only exposed to 2.5% ethanol in
their drinking water. Just like at heavier levels of alcohol
consumption, hearts from animals consuming 2.5% alcohol demonstrated
improved contractile recovery and decreased creatine kinase release
compared with control hearts (Table 4).
These experiments were performed after treatment with 0.3 µM
prazosin.
1-Adrenergic blockade
had no effect on alcohol's protective effect (Table 4).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The major new finding of this study is that regular alcohol consumption
protects against cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury through
species-specific signaling mechanisms. Alcohol's protective effect
against ischemia-reperfusion injury was demonstrated in both
guinea pig and rat hearts, suggesting a general biological response.
Adenosine receptor blockade abolished alcohol's protection against
ischemia-reperfusion injury in guinea pig hearts
[previously shown by us at shorter durations of alcohol exposure
(22)]. In rats, adenosine receptor antagonism had no effect,
whereas
1-adrenergic receptor
blockade attenuated alcohol's cardioprotection. Conversely,
1-adrenergic receptor blockade
had no effect on alcohol's protective effect against
ischemia-reperfusion injury in guinea pig hearts. Therefore,
the protective effect of regular alcohol consumption against
ischemia-reperfusion injury, like that of ischemic
preconditioning, may be mediated through signaling mechanisms that are
specific for different species.
Ischemic preconditioning (i.e., brief episodes of ischemia and
reperfusion before prolonged ischemia) is an experimental
intervention that reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury (3, 12,
18-20, 38). Ischemic preconditioning has been documented in many
species, including human myocardium (3, 4, 8, 12, 18-20, 38). Despite the finding of a general biological response to ischemic preconditioning, species-specific signaling appears to mediate protection. In most species, including guinea pigs and humans, ischemic
preconditioning requires activation of adenosine receptors at the time
of ischemia to effect protection (3, 8, 12, 19, 20, 38). In
rat, there are conflicting data regarding the role of adenosine
signaling in ischemic preconditioning. Whereas some studies find no
role for adenosine in ischemic preconditioning (5, 18), another recent
study does (14). Others have found
1-adrenergic signaling to be
important in protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in
rat hearts (4, 15), although there are also conflicting data (5, 24).
Our findings suggest that at the time of ischemia, alcohol's protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury is mediated through species-specific mechanisms, analogous to ischemic preconditioning. However, in contrast to ischemic preconditioning, alcohol's cardioprotective effect appears sustained with regular consumption. We previously showed in time-dose studies that 6 wk of moderate alcohol consumption were necessary to induce protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury [full protection was seen at 3 wk with higher alcohol levels (22)]. Furthermore, protection was still present at 12 wk of regular alcohol consumption (22). In contrast, ischemic preconditioning's protection disappears after 3-4 days of continued preconditioning with 5-min occlusive episodes before prolonged ischemia and reperfusion (7). Thus, although activation of alcohol's or ischemic preconditioning's cardioprotection may be mediated by similar mechanisms at the time of ischemia, regular alcohol consumption may induce more lasting responses that produce sustained protection that are not induced with ischemic preconditioning. These may include changes in gene expression and/or sustained activation of preconditioning factors with regular alcohol consumption. For example, sustained activation of protein kinases [e.g., protein kinase C (PKC) or protein kinase A translocation to activation sites (23)] or increased production of antioxidants or heat shock proteins may potentiate the effects of protective signaling at the time of ischemia. Thus alcohol's cardioprotective effect may be analogous more to preconditioning's second window of protection (28, 30) than to protection seen within minutes of ischemic preconditioning. Inhibition of PKC has been shown to abolish preconditioning's second window of protection (31). We recently found that inhibiting PKC activity abolishes alcohol's cardioprotective effect as well (21). Studies are under way to determine how regular alcohol consumption induces long-term protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Acute alcohol exposure has been shown by several investigators to transiently increase adenosine (10, 26) and norepinephrine (1, 16) levels. Episodic, as opposed to continuous, activation of adenosinergic and adrenergic signaling with intermittent drinking could induce hypersensitization (rather than desensitization with continuous stimulation) of these signaling pathways, leading to augmented protective responses to ischemia-reperfusion. Supporting this theory, hypersensitivity of cAMP production via adenosine A1 receptors with chronic alcohol exposure has been demonstrated in hepatocytes (25). It remains to be determined whether chronic, intermittent exposure to alcohol (i.e., drinking once or more a day) alters the number or activity of these receptors, leading to a cardioprotective state.
It should be noted that LVDP recovery during postischemic reperfusion
was greater in prazosin-treated hearts from alcohol-fed rats than
hearts from control rats (Tables 2 and 3), suggesting some degree of
protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury despite the
presence of prazosin. However, LVDP recovery was still significantly
reduced in the presence of prazosin compared with LVDP recovery in
hearts from alcohol-fed rats in the absence of prazosin, suggesting a
role for
1-adrenergic signaling
in mediating alcohol's cardioprotective effect. Several possibilities
may account for the greater LVDP recovery in the presence of prazosin
compared with control. First, cardioprotection may be mediated by
multiple signaling pathways in rat hearts (with a common pathway
merging at, e.g., PKC activation). Thus
1-adrenergic blockade might
only partially inhibit alcohol's cardioprotective effect against
ischemia-reperfusion injury. Second, prazosin may have been
underdosed, leading to a partial protective effect. Third, there may
have been attenuation of simultaneous detrimental effects of increased
catecholamines during ischemia with adrenergic blockade.
Nevertheless,
1-adrenergic blockade did significantly reduce contractile recovery and increase creatine kinase release in hearts from rats chronically consuming alcohol compared with hearts not exposed to prazosin. This suggests that
1-adrenergic signaling
does play an important role in alcohol's protective effect against
ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat hearts.
Another issue worth noting is the difference between our finding of a
lack of importance of adenosine signaling in mediating alcohol's
protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat hearts
and the recent data of Headrick (14) demonstrating the requirement of
adenosine receptors in the protective effect of ischemic
preconditioning in rat hearts. Headrick used a much higher dose of the
adenosine receptor antagonist SPT, suggesting we may have underdosed
SPT in our experiments on rat hearts. Thus we cannot completely rule
out a role for adenosine signaling in alcohol's cardioprotective
effect. Interestingly, in the data presented by Headrick, the
protective effect of ischemic preconditioning does not appear to be
completely abolished by high-dose SPT, similar to the partial
attenuation of alcohol's cardioprotection with
1-adrenergic blockade in our
experiments on rat hearts. This suggests a role of both signal pathways
in protecting rat hearts, where
1-adrenergic signaling
predominates. This is in contrast to the situation in guinea pig
hearts, in which adenosine signaling predominates in mediating
alcohol's cardioprotective effect against ischemia-reperfusion
injury.
A major goal of cardiovascular research is to find a pharmacologically induced chronic state of preconditioning. A clue to achieving this goal may lie in this sustained protective effect of regular alcohol consumption against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Recent evidence suggests that regular alcohol consumption, in addition to decreasing the incidence of MI (13, 17, 33, 36), may also improve survival after MI (11, 27, 39). For example, an analysis of 14,407 subjects followed for more than 20 years in the National Institutes of Health Alcohol Epidemiological Data System (11) showed that regular drinkers are more likely to survive MI than abstainers. However, the mechanisms underlying alcohol's benefit on survival after MI are not known. Reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury, especially in this era of emergent reperfusion therapies, improves myocardial recovery and survival. We recently found that 3-12 wk of moderate to heavy alcohol consumption reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury to the same degree as the acute effect of ischemic preconditioning in guinea pig hearts (22). In the present study, we demonstrate that alcohol's cardioprotective effect is present whether animals consumed alcohol until they were killed or did not drink for 14-18 h before death. This suggests that regular alcohol consumption induces long-term protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury, which is sustained for at least 18 h after alcohol exposure. Our hope is that further studies to understand how alcohol's cardioprotective effect is produced may aid in the development of therapies to produce a chronic preconditioning state in patients at risk for MI.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by funds from National Institutes of Health Grants KO8-02883 and RO1-AA-11135 (to V. M. Figueredo) and RO1-HL-54890 (to S. A. Camacho); American Heart Association (AHA), California Affiliate, Grant-in-Aid 94-211 (to V. M. Figueredo) and AHA National Grant-in-Aid 94-6930 (to S. A. Camacho); and a grant from the Alcoholic Beverage Medical Research Foundation (to V. M. Figueredo).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: V. M. Figueredo, Div. of Cardiology, Rm. 5G1, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA 94110.
Received 21 October 1997; accepted in final form 23 March 1998.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Abe, H.,
Y. Kawano,
S. Kojima,
T. Ashida,
M. Kuramochi,
H. Matsuoka,
and
T. Omae.
Biphasic effects of repeated alcohol intake on 24-hour blood pressure in hypertensive patients.
Circulation
89:
2626-2633,
1994
2.
Andersson, B. S.,
J. Rajs,
M. Sundberg,
P. Sotonyi,
and
B. Lind.
Effect of moderate ethanol intake on the heart: biochemical and morphological studies with isolated cardiomyocytes from rats fed a low-protein diet.
J. Stud. Alcohol
56:
147-155,
1995[Medline].
3.
Armstrong, S.,
and
C. E. Ganote.
Adenosine receptor specificity in preconditioning of isolated rabbit cardiomyocytes: evidence of A3 receptor involvement.
Cardiovasc. Res.
28:
1049-1056,
1994
4.
Banerjee, A.,
C. Locke-Winter,
K. B. Rogers,
M. B. Mitchell,
E. C. Brew,
C. B. Cairns,
D. D. Bensard,
and
A. H. Harken.
Preconditioning against myocardial dysfunction after ischemia and reperfusion by an
1-adrenergic mechanism.
Circ. Res.
73:
656-670,
1993
5.
Bugge, E.,
and
K. Ytrehus.
Ischaemic preconditioning is protein kinase C dependent but not through stimulation of
-adrenergic or adenosine receptors in the isolated rat heart.
Cardiovasc. Res.
29:
401-406,
1995[Medline].
6.
Capasso, J. M.,
P. Li,
G. Guideri,
A. Malhotra,
R. Cortese,
and
P. Anversa.
Myocardial mechanical, biochemical, and structural alterations induced by chronic ethanol ingestion in rats.
Circ. Res.
71:
346-356,
1992
7.
Cohen, M. V.,
X. M. Yang,
and
J. M. Downey.
Conscious rabbits become tolerant to multiple episodes of ischemic preconditioning.
Circ. Res.
74:
998-1004,
1994
8.
Cordeiro, J. M.,
G. R. Ferrier,
and
S. E. Howlett.
Effects of adenosine in simulated ischemia and reperfusion in guinea pig ventricular myocytes.
Am. J. Physiol.
269 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 38):
H121-H129,
1995
9.
Crow, K. E.,
N. W. Cornell,
and
R. L. Veech.
The role of alcohol dehydrogenase in governing rates of ethanol metabolism in rats.
In: Alcohol and Aldehyde Metabolizing Systems, edited by R. G. Thurman,
J. R. Williamson,
H. R. Drott,
and B. Chance. New York: Academic, 1977, p. 335-342.
10.
Diamond, I.,
and
A. S. Gordon.
The role of adenosine in mediating cellular and molecular responses to ethanol.
In: Toward a Molecular Basis of Alcohol Use and Abuse, edited by B. Jansson,
H. Jornvall,
U. Rydberg,
L. Terenius,
and B. L. Vallee. Basel: Birkhauser, 1994, p. 175-183.
11.
Dufour, M. C.,
M. F. Caces,
C. C. Whitmore,
and
E. Z. Hanna.
Alcohol consumption and death from acute myocardial infarction in a national longitudinal cohort (Abstract).
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
20:
97A,
1996.
12.
Forman, M. B.,
C. E. Velasco,
and
E. K. Jackson.
Adenosine attenuates reperfusion injury following regional myocardial ischaemia.
Cardiovasc. Res.
27:
9-17,
1993
13.
Fuchs, C. S.,
M. J. Stampfer,
G. A. Colditz,
E. L. Giovannucci,
J. E. Manson,
I. Kawachi,
D. J. Hunter,
S. E. Hankinson,
C. H. Hennekens,
B. Rosner,
F. E. Speizer,
and
W. C. Willet.
Alcohol consumption and mortality among women.
N. Engl. J. Med.
332:
1245-1250,
1995
14.
Headrick, J. P.
Ischemia preconditioning: bioenergetic and metabolic changes and the role of endogenous adenosine.
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
28:
1227-1240,
1996[Medline].
15.
Hu, K.,
and
S. Nattel.
Mechanisms of ischemic preconditioning in rat hearts. Involvement of
1B-adrenoceptors, pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins, and protein kinase C.
Circulation
92:
2259-2265,
1995
16.
Kawano, Y.,
H. Abe,
S. Kojima,
T. Ashida,
K. Yoshida,
M. Imanishi,
H. Yoshimi,
G. Kimura,
M. Kuramochi,
and
T. Omae.
Acute depressor effect of alcohol in patients with essential hypertension.
Hypertension
20:
219-226,
1992
17.
Klatsky, A. L.,
M. A. Armstrong,
and
G. D. Friedman.
Risk of cardiovascular mortality in alcohol drinkers, ex-drinkers and nondrinkers.
Am. J. Cardiol.
66:
1237-1242,
1990[Medline].
18.
Li, Y.,
and
R. A. Kloner.
The cardioprotective effects of ischemic "preconditioning" are not mediated by adenosine receptors in rat hearts.
Circulation
87:
1642-1648,
1993
19.
Liu, G. S.,
S. C. Richards,
R. A. Olsson,
K. Mullane,
R. S. Walsh,
and
J. M. Downey.
Evidence that the adenosine A3 receptor may mediate the protection afforded by preconditioning in the isolated rabbit heart.
Cardiovasc. Res.
28:
1057-1061,
1994
20.
Liu, G. S.,
J. Thornton,
D. M. Van Winkle,
A. W. Stanley,
R. A. Olsson,
and
J. M. Downey.
Protection against infarction afforded by preconditioning is mediated by A1 adenosine receptors in rabbit heart.
Circulation
84:
350-356,
1991
21.
Miyamae, M.,
S. A. Camacho,
H. Z. Zhou,
M. W. Weiner,
and
V. M. Figueredo.
Regular ethanol consumption protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by activation of protein kinase C (Abstract).
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
29:
11A,
1997.
22.
Miyamae, M.,
I. Diamond,
M. W. Weiner,
S. A. Camacho,
and
V. M. Figueredo.
Regular alcohol consumption mimics cardiac preconditioning by protecting against ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:
3235-3239,
1997
23.
Mochly-Rosen, D.
Localization of protein kinases by anchoring proteins: a theme in signal transduction.
Science
268:
247-251,
1995
24.
Moolman, J. A.,
S. Genade,
E. Tromp,
and
A. Lochner.
No evidence for mediation of ischemic preconditioning by
1-adrenergic signal transduction pathway or protein kinase C in the isolated rat heart.
Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther.
10:
125-136,
1996[Medline].
25.
Nagy, L. E.,
and
S. E. F. DeSilva.
Adenosine A1 receptors mediate chronic ethanol-induced increases in receptor-stimulated cyclic AMP in cultured hepatocytes.
Biochem. J.
304:
205-210,
1994.
26.
Nagy, L. E.,
I. Diamond,
D. J. Casso,
C. Franklin,
and
A. S. Gordon.
Ethanol increases extracellular adenosine by inhibiting adenosine uptake via the nucleoside transporter.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:
1946-1951,
1990
27.
Nakamura, Y.,
C. Kawai,
M. Kinoshita,
and
A. J. Moss for the Multicenter Study of Myocardial Ischemia Research Group.
Moderate ethanol intake and outcome after an acute coronary event (Abstract).
Circulation
92:
I-708,
1995.
28.
Parratt, J. R.
Possibilities for the pharmacological exploitation of ischaemic preconditioning.
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
27:
991-1000,
1995[Medline].
29.
Preedy, V. R.,
T. J. Peters,
V. B. Patel,
and
J. P. Miell.
Chronic alcoholic myopathy: transcription and translational alterations.
FASEB J.
8:
1146-1151,
1994[Abstract].
30.
Przyklenk, K.,
and
R. A. Kloner.
Preconditioning: a balanced perspective.
Br. Heart J.
74:
575-577,
1995
31.
Qui, Y., X.-L. Tang, A. Rizvi, S. Manchikalapudi, C. Maldonado,
S. Teschner, and R. Bolli. Protein kinase C mediates late
preconditioning against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits
(Abstract). Circulation 94, Suppl. I: I-184, 1996.
32.
Regan, T. J.,
M. I. Khan,
P. O. Ettinger,
B. Haider,
M. M. Lyons,
and
H. A. Oldewurtel.
Myocardial function and lipid metabolism in the chronic alcoholic animal.
J. Clin. Invest.
54:
740-752,
1974.
33.
Rimm, E. B.,
E. L. Giovannucci,
W. C. Willett,
G. A. Colditz,
A. Ascherio,
B. Rosner,
and
M. J. Stampfer.
Prospective study of alcohol consumption and risk of coronary disease in men.
Lancet
338:
464-468,
1991[Medline].
34.
Schreiber, S. S.,
F. Reff,
C. D. Evans,
M. A. Rothschild,
and
M. Oratz.
Prolonged feeding of ethanol to the young growing guinea pig. 3. Effect on the synthesis of the myocardial contractile proteins.
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
10:
531-534,
1986[Medline].
35.
Schultheiss, H.-P.,
M. Spiegel,
and
H. D. Bolte.
The effects of chronic ethanol treatment on oligomycin sensitive ATPase activity in the guinea pig heart.
Basic Res. Cardiol.
80:
548-555,
1985[Medline].
36.
Stampfer, M. J.,
G. A. Colditz,
W. C. Willett,
F. E. Speizer,
and
C. H. Hennekens.
A prospective study of moderate alcohol consumption and the risk of coronary disease and stroke in women.
N. Engl. J. Med.
319:
267-273,
1988[Abstract].
37.
Tepper, D.,
J. M. Capasso,
and
E. H. Sonnenblick.
Excitation-contraction coupling in rat myocardium: alterations with long term ethanol consumption.
Cardiovasc. Res.
20:
369-374,
1986[Medline].
38.
Walker, D. M.,
J. M. Walker,
W. B. Pugsley,
C. W. Pattison,
and
D. M. Yellon.
Preconditioning in isolated superfused human muscle.
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
27:
1349-1357,
1995[Medline].
39.
Wannamethee, G.,
P. H. Whincup,
A. G. Shaper,
M. Walker,
and
P. W. MacFarlane.
Factors determining case fatality in myocardial infarction "who dies in a heart attack"?
Br. Heart J.
74:
324-331,
1995
40.
Wassif, W. S.,
V. R. Preedy,
B. Summers,
P. Duane,
N. Leigh,
and
T. J. Peters.
The relationship between muscle fibre atrophy factor, plasma carnosinase activities and muscle RNA and protein composition in chronic alcoholic myopathy.
Alcohol Alcohol.
28:
325-331,
1993
41.
Zahlten, R. N.,
M. E. Nejtek,
and
J. C. Jacobson.
Ethanol metabolism in guinea pig: in vivo ethanol elimination, alcohol dehydrogenase distribution, and subcellular localization of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase in liver.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
207:
371-379,
1981[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Miyamae, S. Sugioka, and V. M. Figueredo Additive Cardioprotection by Ethanol and Sevoflurane: Are Sarcolemmal KATP Channels Also Involved? Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1926 - 1927. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yamaguchi, C. Dayton, T. Shigematsu, P. Carter, T. Yoshikawa, D. C. Gute, and R. J. Korthuis Preconditioning with ethanol prevents postischemic leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesive interactions Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): H1019 - H1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Z. Zhou, J. S. Karliner, and M. O. Gray Moderate alcohol consumption induces sustained cardiac protection by activating PKC-epsilon and Akt Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): H165 - H174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Han, S. Miura, Y. Akiba, H. Higuchi, S. Kato, H. Suzuki, H. Yokoyama, and H. Ishii Chronic ethanol consumption exacerbates microcirculatory damage in rat mesentery after reperfusion Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): G939 - G948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Pagel, W. G. Toller, E. R. Gross, M. Gare, J. R. Kersten, and D. C. Warltier KATP channels mediate the beneficial effects of chronic ethanol ingestion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): H2574 - H2579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |