AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 275: H1993-H1999, 1998;
0363-6135/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yajima, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yajima, A.
Vol. 275, Issue 6, H1993-H1999, December 1998

Time-frequency analysis of fetal heartbeat fluctuation using wavelet transform

Yoshitaka Kimura, Kunihiro Okamura, Takanori Watanabe, Nobuo Yaegashi, Shigeki Uehara, and Akira Yajima

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryomachi, Aobaku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

We examined whether the nonlinear control mechanism of the fetal autonomic nervous system would change in various fetal states. Eight thousand or more fetal heartbeats were detected from normal, hypoxemic, and acidemic fetuses. Fetal heart Doppler-signal intervals were determined in a high-precision autocorrelation method, and a time series of fetal heart rate fluctuation was obtained. The distribution of the amplitude of temporal fluctuation in the low-frequency component of fetal heart rate frequency was studied using a method of time-frequency analysis called wavelet transform. Spline 4 was used as the mother wavelet function. A gamma distribution was observed from 17 wk of gestation onward. The value of the parameter nu  of this gamma distribution was ~1.6 and remained constant regardless of the gestational age or the time of day. The value of nu  decreased significantly to 0.77 when the fetus developed acidemia and was 1.51 in hypoxemia and 1.54 in a normal condition. This study elucidates a nonlinear structure of the time series of heart rate fluctuation of the gamma distribution in the human fetus. This technique may provide a new quantitative index of fetal monitoring to diagnose fetal acidemia.

gamma distribution; fetal monitoring; fetal acidosis

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

EVER SINCE Akselrod et al. (1) performed frequency analysis on the fluctuation of electrocardiogram (ECG) R-R intervals in dogs using fast-Fourier transform (FFT) and pointed out the relation between the activities of the autonomic nervous system and the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) peaks of the frequency domains, frequency analysis of heart rate fluctuation has been performed widely (6). In the fetal field as well, studies of heart rate fluctuation based on frequency analysis have been carried out, and applications to fetal distress have been attempted (7, 8, 10, 11). However, its effectiveness has not been recognized because the fetal heartbeat may behave in a nonlinear manner (2). Fetal heart rate fluctuations do not show a long-term stationarity in the resting or the active state; they show stationarity only for a short period. In our study, stationarity was not observed for >300 beats (2-3 min). Therefore, FFT is not suitable because various fetal states would then be included. Through these studies, the possible temporal fluctuation of LF and HF peaks gradually came to be pointed out, and their changes followed a transition from one status to another, e.g., rest, movement, etc. Their changes during sleep or their relation to the circadian rhythm began to be studied. How are the LF and HF peaks, and thus the LF and HF components including them, controlled? The first report on this issue was made by Ivanov et al. (9) in their thesis published in 1996. They used a method of time-frequency analysis called a wavelet transform on ECG R-R fluctuation in adults to study the structure of temporal fluctuation of the HF component. According to their report, all the amplitude distributions of the temporal fluctuation of the HF component in normal cases are almost perfectly identical to one another and present a gamma distribution regardless of the case. They also state that the structure of distribution during sleep fluctuates in cases of sleep apnea and that a gamma distribution is also presented in the other frequency domains. Their results suggest that, for healthy individuals, there may be a common structure in heartbeat control during nighttime hours as well as during daytime hours. In the present study, we paid attention to the LF component of the fetal heart rate frequency. We studied its temporal fluctuation using wavelet transform and statistical distribution structure analysis of the amplitude to examine whether the structure of a temporal fluctuation similar to that in adults could be observed in fetuses and to determine when the particular distribution structure would be observed and when it would collapse from the fetal period onward. We also examined whether the study of such fluctuation would be helpful in clinical diagnosis of fetal hypoxemia or acidemia, since any current diagnostic methods including fetal heart rate monitoring are not reliable enough in clinical settings.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Forty normal pregnant women who came to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Tohoku University Hospital for clinical checkup at 17 to 40 wk of gestation were included in the study, with consent, to investigate the changes with the advance of gestational age. Another series of studies was designed to investigate the change by fetal state. In 17 cases in which the umbilical blood PO2 level was found to be <20 mmHg, 10 cases with pH >= 7.2 were grouped together as a hypoxemia group, and the remaining 7 cases with pH <7.2 were grouped as an acidemia group. The umbilical blood PO2 was determined in blood prenatally collected by funipuncture under ultrasonic guide through the maternal abdominal wall (fetal blood sampling) in 14 cases with written informed consent or in the umbilical blood obtained in an elective cesarean section in 3 cases. No significant difference was observed in the mean gestational age of the fetus between the hypoxemia and the acidemia groups (Table 1). The normal control group for matched gestational age included elective cesarean section cases under various indications for which umbilical cord blood gas values turned out normal.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Gestation age of the fetuses and blood gas findings in the hypoxemia and acidemia groups

Data collection. Data were collected between 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM in the normal group. In three cases in the normal group, data were collected on a 24-h basis. In the hypoxemia and acidemia groups, data were collected at times as close to blood collection times as possible.

A 1.15-MHz ultrasonic transducer (Ultrasonic Transducer 5700, Corometrics) was attached to the maternal abdominal wall with the mother in a semisupine position at rest. Eight thousand (~60 min) or more fetal heartbeats were detected with uterine activity being monitored with a tocotransducer. Fetal heart Doppler-signal intervals were determined by high-precision autocorrelation based on the method by Divon et al. (5), and a time series of fetal heart rate fluctuation was obtained. This time series was input to a microcomputer (PC-9801 NS/A, NEC) either directly or off-line.

Method of analysis. The flow chart of the analysis is shown in Fig. 1. A time series of 8,000 or more heartbeats was included in the study.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Flow chart of analysis by wavelet transform in low-frequency (LF) domain. A: ultrasound Doppler signals reflected from moving fetal heart valves. B: time series of beat-to-beat intervals resampled 0.3 s from original beat-to-beat intervals (T1, T2, T3, ..., Tn) obtained by a high-precision autocorrelation method from A. C: spline 4 wavelet used in this study. D: variation of class 32 (C32), corresponding to LF domain at ~0.1 Hz, is extracted by spline 4 wavelet. Using this process, we obtain the time series of variation of the LF domain, which is presumptively displayed in E. P, power; t, time.

Preprocessing for noise exclusion. The mean value of the immediately preceding 10 data points (~4 s) was computed and was called the expected mean (M). We defined an interbeat interval larger than 1.5M as a "hole" and an interval shorter than 0.5M as a "short interbeat interval." Subsequent processing was continued when overall noise was confirmed to be <5%. Any hole was interpolated by the integer-multiplied M value(s). Short interbeat intervals were simply removed. All the other noise components were rejected. Resampling of the interpolated signal time series was performed every 0.3 s in a Berger method.

Wavelet transform. Wavelet transform is generally defined, as in the following equation, as the inner product of the input signal s(t) and the wavelet function group ga,b(t) obtained by dilating and shifting the function g(t) (the mother wavelet function), locally present in the temporal region and the frequency domain, by the scaling parameter a and the shift parameter b
<IT>S</IT>(<IT>a</IT>, <IT>b</IT>) = ⟨<IT>g</IT><SUB><IT>a</IT>,<IT>b</IT></SUB>(<IT>t</IT>)‖<IT>s</IT>(<IT>t</IT>)⟩
where
<IT>g</IT><SUB><IT>a</IT>,<IT>b</IT></SUB>(<IT>t</IT>) = <IT>g</IT>[(<IT>t</IT>/<IT>a</IT>) − <IT>b</IT>)]/<RAD><RCD><IT>a</IT></RCD></RAD>
Spline 4 was used as the mother wavelet function (3). Spline 4 is a family of well-localized and smooth functions, such as a localized sine wave. This wavelet function has one of the best possible simultaneous concentration properties in both the time domain and the frequency domain (13).

Here, the scaling parameter a provides a frequency band to be extracted. The larger the scaling parameter a, the higher the frequency it represents. In the discrete wavelet transform a = 2-n, we assumed a to be 1/32. Consequently, the extracted frequency band centers around 1/(32 × 0.3) = 0.104 Hz, corresponding to a low-frequency domain in which 0.3 s was the resampling interval. The shift parameter b, which signifies the passage of time, is a nonnegative integral value.

A time series expressed as S(a,b), where b = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ..., is called a class 1/a of s(t). Thus what we determined was class 32.

Multiple resolution analysis was used, and a decomposition sequence was approximated with a tap number of 41 (3). Class 32 was then determined by down sampling one by one alternately. Thus the abscissas represented a time base divided into 0.3 × 32 = 9.6-s intervals.

The tertiary moving average of the absolute value of S(1/32,b) was defined as
<LIM><OP>∑</OP><LL><IT>i</IT>=1</LL><UL>3</UL></LIM> ‖<IT>S</IT>(1/32, <IT>b</IT><SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB>)‖/3
and used as a time series representing the amplitude of this class (Fig. 2A).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A: time series of amplitude of C32. X0 indicates value of C32 amplitude at peak value of smoothed frequency distribution in B. B: histogram of amplitude of C32. Maximum value on ordinate was regarded as 100. Length from 0 to maximum value of amplitude of C32 was equally divided into 100 segments. Abscissas represent frequency distribution. The distribution thus obtained was smoothed using a low-pass filter with a band edge of 0.1pi . N% is the value at peak of frequency distribution, corresponding to X0.

Plotting amplitude distribution graphs. The whole range from zero to the maximum value of the time series of the amplitude of class 32 derived above was equally divided into 100 segments, and the frequency distribution of the points in each segments was determined. The maximum value was taken within the time frame of observation. Thus the ordinate of the distribution in Fig. 2B represents the percent amplitude with the maximum value in the time series corresponding to 100%. The distribution thus obtained was smoothed using a low-pass filter with a band edge of 0.1pi . N% was defined as the percent value at the maximum peak of the frequency distribution (Fig. 2B). The standardized mode of amplitude (or simply "mode" hereinafter) was defined as a concrete value X0 that corresponded to N% in the frequency distribution. The mode was also expressed as the product of the maximum value in the time series of amplitude and the most frequent percent value (N%; Fig. 2A).

The frequency distribution was normalized to a unit area. This is a probability distribution (Fig. 3A). When the ordinate was rescaled by the maximum value of the probability distribution (Pmax), the histogram distribution represented relative frequency with a peak value of 1.0. The gamma distribution was most suitably calculated by applying N%, with nu  = (ln N- 1 and b = nu /N, as
<IT>P</IT>(<IT>x</IT>) = <FR><NU><IT>b</IT><SUP>&ngr;+1</SUP></NU><DE>&Ggr;(&ngr; + 1)</DE></FR> <IT>x</IT><SUP>&ngr;</SUP><IT>e</IT><SUP>−<IT>bx</IT></SUP>
where Gamma (nu  + 1) is the gamma function (Fig. 3B).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Measured values and gamma distribution in 1 case. A: frequency distributions were normalized to a unit area, and probability distributions [P(x)] were obtained. Maximum value of probability distribution is Pmax; percent value at peak is N%. In this case, Pmax = 0.028. Abscissa of distribution represents %amplitude with maximum value in the time series corresponding to 100%. B: bullet  represent measured values and solid line represents gamma distribution. Ordinate is the value of probability distribution of C32 multiplied by 1/Pmax. Gamma distribution in this case was calculated as P(x) = [(b2.48x1.48)/(2.48Gamma )]e-bx, (x = 1, 2, 3, ...), where N = 12, nu = (ln N- 1 = 1.48, and b = nu /N =0.124. C: abscissa x was rescaled by 1/Pmax. u triple-bond  x · Pmax Fitness of data to gamma distribution became better than in B. The x2 value is 10.2, whereas in B it is 14.0.

When the abscissa was rescaled by 1/Pmax and the distributions were normalized to a unit area, the fitness of the data to the gamma distribution was examined (Fig. 3C).

Surrogate data set for analysis. To test the nonlinearity of the variation of the low-frequency domain in fetal heartbeat variation, we performed parallel analysis on surrogate data obtained by Fourier transforming the original time series of fetal heartbeat variation, preserving the amplitude of the Fourier transform but randomizing the phase, and performing an inverse Fourier transform. The wavelet transform was performed on the surrogate time-series data obtained by the inverse Fourier transform, and the distribution of class 32 was examined as in the original fetal heartbeat time series and compared with the distribution from the original time series.

Statistical processing. Pearson's test was used to test goodness of fit of the distribution function. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test the significance of the difference among the parameters obtained, and the t-test was used for the other statistics.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The mode increased with the gestational age of the fetus. In the gestational age ranging from 26 to 34 wk, the mode in normal cases was 0.365 ± 0.04. In the hypoxemia cases it reduced to 0.268 ± 0.027, and in the acidemia cases it further reduced to 0.110 ± 0.028. These differences were significant with a significance level of 0.05 (Fig. 4).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   A: changes in most frequent amplitude segment value (mode) in C32 with advance of gestation age. Value increased significantly with gestation age; n = no. of cases. * P < 0.05. B: changes in mode for each fetal status group between 26 and 34 wk of gestation. Hypoxemia or acidemia was determined from fetal blood gas value obtained by funipuncture under ultrasound guidance. Normal control included cases of elective cesarean section with normal umbilical blood gas values. * P < 0.05.

The distribution of class 32 in all the normal cases significantly fit a gamma distribution for which nu  = (ln N- 1 and b nu /N, with a significance level of 0.05.

The mean nu  values among 17 and 20, 21 and 25, and 26 and 40 wk of gestation were 1.61, 1.67, and 1.54, respectively, and no significant difference was observed among these groups (Table 2). The distribution of class 32 in all cases of the hypoxemia group fit the above gamma distribution with a significance level of 0.05. The mean nu  value was 1.513, which was not significantly different from that in the normal group at >= 26 wk of gestation. Five cases in the acidemia group fit this gamma distribution significantly, whereas the other two did not. The mean nu  calculated from the above equation was 0.766, which was significantly different from that of the normal group and the hypoxemia group (Table 3).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Changes in nu  with the advance of gestational age

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Changes in nu  for each fetal status group

Figure 5 shows the distribution plots obtained approximately every 6 h in the morning, in the daytime, toward the evening, and at night in one fetus. As shown in Fig. 5, the nu  values were all similar. These distribution plots were so indistinguishable from one another statistically that they could be regarded as identical. The same was true of the other two cases.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Gamma distribution of frequency distribution of C32 obtained approximately every 6 h in morning (A), during daytime (B), toward evening (C), and at night (D) in 1 fetus. Distributions were superimposed and displayed in E. Value of nu  remained almost constant.

Both the original and surrogate signals have identical power spectra. The distribution of class 32 on the surrogate signals resulted in a Rayleigh distribution, whereas that on the original time series fits a stable gamma distribution (Fig. 6).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   A: original beat-to-beat time series (top), time series of C32 extracted by spline 4 wavelet (middle), and frequency distribution of C32 amplitude variations after wavelet transform of original signals (bottom). Theoretical gamma distribution, shown by solid line (bottom), agrees with distribution of wavelet transform of original signals. Data and theoretical function curve dipped linearly. B: surrogate beat-to-beat signals constructed by an inverse Fourier transform after phase randomization (top), wavelet transform of surrogate signal (middle), and frequency distribution of C32 amplitude variations after wavelet transform of surrogate signals (bottom). Theoretical Rayleigh distribution, shown by solid line (bottom), agrees with wavelet transform of surrogate signal with randomized phases. Data and theoretical function curve dipped in a curve of second order.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Data were based on fetal heart Doppler signal intervals. The Doppler signal intervals were determined in a high-precision autocorrelation method with a time constant of 1.0-1.5 by sampling raw signals at 1,000 Hz and producing an envelope at 14 Hz. This corresponds to the application of a low-pass filter to the time series with a cutoff frequency of ~0.6 Hz. The precision at 0.1 Hz and its vicinity examined in the present study is thus ensured. In fact, the fetal ECG R-R intervals determined in an autoregression method correlate well with the integral value of this region (r = 0.994). This supports the validity of the precision of the present study (12).

The structure of the gamma distribution was found to exist from 17 wk of gestation onward. Its parameter nu  remained constant regardless of individual, observation time period, or gestational age of the fetus.

With the application of the spline 4 wavelet to the surrogate signals, the distribution of class 32 in these signals, corresponding to the frequency domain of 0.1 Hz, did not show a gamma distribution but did show a Rayleigh distribution. Our surrogate data clearly indicated that there is a phase correlation in the fetal heartbeat time series. The presence of these correlations is related to the nonlinear underlying dynamics in the fetus.

The fact that the gamma distribution was observed not only in adults but also in the fetuses in the early gestation stage indicates that this is a very fundamental characteristic of the circulation control mechanism of a living body. Because the gamma distribution can be derived only from a nonlinear relation, the nonlinear structure of the circulation control mechanism is considered to play an essential role in a living body. The gamma distribution satisfies the generalized homogeneous functional equation P(lambda alpha x,lambda beta b) = lambda P(x,b), where alpha  = -1, beta  = 1, and lambda  is a scale factor. The fact that the parameter nu  remains constant at ~1.6, independent of the number of weeks of gestation, indicates that the most frequent percent value N is ~14%. This relation, in which the maximum spatial amplitude determines the temporal mode, seems to provide a principle that ensures the temporal universality of this parameter.

Class 32 corresponds to the frequency domain of 0.1 Hz. It is known that in fetal heart rate fluctuation, as well as in adult heart rate fluctuation, the LF component can be defined as a frequency domain centering around the peak near 0.1 Hz and is thought to be controlled by the autonomic nervous system, mainly by the sympathetic nervous system (10). Therefore, the fluctuation in class 32 is thought to represent the fluctuation of the fetal autonomic nervous system, in which the sympathetic nervous system plays a main part. On the other hand, the gamma distribution has a distribution structure comprising nu  logarithmic sums of irregular processes. This seems to be related to the fact that a stimulus and a sensation are logarithmically related to each other. In other words, this is probably because nu  stimuli from the center accumulate in an effector and then appear as class 32 fluctuation. The temporal universality of this parameter will be attributable to the fact that the amount of maximum excitation achievable at a time and the amount of accumulation of stimuli to which an effector is responsive in a steady state are fixed as thresholds of the effector in the control mechanism of a living body. The above relation is found to have changed in the acidemia group, probably because the relation between the stimuli from the center and the circulation control mechanism has undergone a change in serious fetal distress. Two possible causes of this are 1) the circulation control mechanism attempts to cope with the worst situation by lowering the thresholds to the stimuli from the center compromised in fetal distress, compared with those in a steady state, or 2) simply organic changes, that is, whereas small fluctuations that are the manifestation of the uncontrolled effector itself ordinarily appear as the mode, large maximum amplitude values sometimes appear via another control mechanism that copes with an emergency. The significance of nu  not being an integer is unknown. However, this is presumably because the stimuli from the center and the circulation control mechanism are nonstationary in nature.

The mode in class 32 increased noticeably with the gestational age of the fetus concerned in the normal group; it decreased significantly with the seriousness of distress in the fetal distress group ranging from 26 to 34 wk of gestation. Currently available fetal distress monitors are limited in application during these early weeks of gestation. Because fetal distress at these early weeks of gestation has come to be associated with neonatal brain dysfunction, the mode is expected to play an important part clinically as well.

The analysis of heart rate fluctuation using wavelet transform is thought to be useful in chaos analysis, fractal structure analysis, and other nonlinear characteristic analyses of a time series (4). Other means of time-frequency analysis include short-time Fourier transform (STFT) and Wigner distribution. In comparison, wavelet transform excels in time resolution and fractal structure analysis. It is inferior to STFT in frequency resolution, which shows, however, that it is superior in time resolution. Because of the relativity of the frequency window and the time-base window, the product of these two measures is constant. In addition, wavelet transform assumes the enlargement and/or reduction of the mother wavelet function. As such, it is more suited for the analysis of a nonstationary structure than the Wigner distribution, which assumes double autocorrelation, or STFT, which requires multiplication by a certain window. In the thesis mentioned earlier, Ivanov et al. (9) studied class 8 in light of temporal changes of respiratory fluctuation (HF) for its amplitude distribution. They used a Gaussian function as a mother wavelet and Hilbert transform to determine the amplitude of the class. Although the precision of transform is greatly influenced by the appropriateness of a mother wavelet function to the object to be analyzed, no general algorithm is available to determine which mother wavelet function is the most appropriate to a particular time series. The complex modulated Gaussian function is often used in analyzing wavelet transform, and spline 4 is often used in discrete wavelet transform, as in the present study, because they have a relatively short operation sequence, resembling a localized trigonometric function in form, and they have a smaller analysis window for temporal frequency. Hilbert transform was not used to determine the amplitude in the present study. In the data sampling from the fetus suffering from asphyxia, Hilbert transform was unsuitable when a long sampling time was not allowed. It was mostly limited to a time shorter than 1 h. Determining the tertiary moving average of the absolute value, as in the present study, corresponds to determining the effective value of an alternating current in the theory of alternating current circuitry.

Compared with the method of Ivanov et al. (9), in which the maximum value of the distribution was used for standardization, our expression is fundamentally based on the representation by the percent amplitude with respect to the maximum amplitude of the class. This representation provides an easier means of understanding in a physiological sense and facilitates determination of the distribution parameter. Therefore, the equation used to determine nu  from the most frequent percent value N was obtained quite simply from an equation expressing the value of the apex in the gamma distribution.

In the present study, we succeeded in elucidating in detail the nonstationary structure of the time series of heart rate fluctuation of the gamma distribution. Thus there is now a possibility that a nonlinear structure between the stimuli from the nervous center and the circulation control mechanism will be elucidated in detail. Because it is suggested that this structure will change if a human fetus should develop acidemia, clinical application of these findings and further elucidation of the nonstationary structure of fetal heart rate fluctuation are expected in the future.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was partly supported by a research grant from the Ministry of Education of Japan.

    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests: K. Okamura, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku Univ. School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryomachi, Aobaku, Sandai 980-8574, Japan.

Received 24 November 1997; accepted in final form 17 August 1998.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1.   Akselrod, S., D. Gordon, D. C. Sannon, A. C. Bager, and R. J. Cohen. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 213: 220-222, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Chaffin, D. G., C. C. Goldberg, and K. L. Reed. The dimension of chaos in the fetal heart rate. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 165: 1425-1429, 1991[Medline].

3.   Chui, K. C. An introduction to wavelets. In: Wavelet Analysis and Its Applications. Boston: Academic, 1992.

4.   Crowe, J. A., N. M. Gibson, M. S. Woolfson, and M. G. Somekh. Wavelet transform as a potential tool for ECG analysis and compression. J. Biomed. Eng. 14: 286-272, 1992.

5.   Divon, M. Y., F. P. Torres, S. Y. Yeh, and R. H. Paul. Autocorrelation techniques in fetal monitoring. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 151: 2-6, 1985[Medline].

6.   Divon, M. Y., H. Winkler, S. Y. Yeh, L. D. Platt, O. Langer, and I. R. Merkatz. Diminished respiratory sinus arrhythmia in the asphyxiated term infants. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 155: 1263-1266, 1986[Medline].

7.   Divon, M. Y., S. Y. Yeha, E. Z. Zimmer, L. D. Platt, E. Paldi, and R. H. Paul. Respiratory sinus arrythmia in the human fetus. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 151: 425-428, 1985[Medline].

8.  Ferrazzi, E., G. Pardi, P. L. Setti, M. Rodolifi, S. Civardi, and S. Cerutti. Power spectral analysis of the heart rate of the human fetus at 26 and 36 weeks of gestation. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 10, Suppl. B: 57-60, 1989.

9.   Ivanov, P. C., M. G. Rosenblum, C. K. Peng, J. Mietuse, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger. Scaling behaviour of heartbeat intervals obtained by wavelet-based time-series analysis. Nature 383: 323-327, 1996[Medline].

10.   Karin, J., M. Hirsch, and S. Akselrod. An estimate of fetal autonomic state by spectral analysis of fetal heart rate fluctuations. Pediatr. Res. 34: 134-138, 1993[Medline].

11.   Kimura, Y., K. Okamura, T. Watanabe, J. Murotsuki, T. Suzuki, M. Yano, and A. Yajima. Power spectral analysis for autonomic influences in heart rate and blood pressure variability in fetal lambs. Am. J. Physiol. 271 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 40): H1333-H1339, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Kimura, Y., K. Okamura, and A. Yajima. Spectral analysis of beat-to-beat intervals of the fetal heart obtained by Doppler ultrasound. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 41: 5-9, 1996[Medline].

13.   Mallat, S. G. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 11: 674-693, 1989.


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 275(6):H1993-H1999
0002-9513/98 $5.00 Copyright © 1998 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. David, M. Hirsch, J. Karin, E. Toledo, and S. Akselrod
An estimate of fetal autonomic state by time-frequency analysis of fetal heart rate variability
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 1057 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. Barbieri, E. C. Matten, A. A. Alabi, and E. N. Brown
A point-process model of human heartbeat intervals: new definitions of heart rate and heart rate variability
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H424 - H435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Koshino, Y. Kimura, Y. Kameyama, T. Takahashi, T. Yasui, H. Chisaka, J. Sugawara, and K. Okamura
Fractal and periodic heart rate dynamics in fetal sheep: comparison of conventional and new measures based on fractal analysis
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2003; 284(5): H1858 - H1864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. Toledo, O. Gurevitz, H. Hod, M. Eldar, and S. Akselrod
Wavelet analysis of instantaneous heart rate: a study of autonomic control during thrombolysis
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): R1079 - R1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yajima, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yajima, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online