AJP - Heart AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H2076-H2084, 1999;
0363-6135/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lasley, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mentzer, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lasley, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mentzer, R. M., Jr.
Vol. 276, Issue 6, H2076-H2084, June 1999

Species-dependent hemodynamic effects of adenosine A3-receptor agonists IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA

Robert D. Lasley, Prakash Narayan, M. Salik Jahania, Elizabeth L. Partin, Kathleen R. Kraft, and Robert M. Mentzer Jr.

Department of Surgery and Vascular Biology Research Group, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky 40536


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The purpose of this study was to compare the hemodynamic effects of the adenosine A3-receptor agonists N6-(3-iodobenzyl)-9-[5-(methylcarbamoyl)-beta -D-ribofuranosyl]adenine (IB-MECA) and 2-chloro-N6-(3-iodobenzyl)-9-[5-(methylcarbamoyl)-beta -D-ribofuranosyl]adenine (Cl-IB-MECA) in isolated rat and rabbit hearts and in the intact, open-chest pig. Isolated hearts perfused with Krebs-Henseleit buffer at a constant pressure (70 mmHg) were treated with 50 nM of either IB-MECA or Cl-IB-MECA. Neither IB-MECA nor Cl-IB-MECA altered ventricular function or heart rate in the isolated rat and rabbit hearts, and neither agent altered coronary flow in the rabbit. However, 2 min of IB-MECA treatment in the isolated rat heart increased coronary flow by 25%, an effect that did not exhibit tachyphylaxis. The IB-MECA-induced coronary dilation was only partially attenuated by the adenosine A3-receptor antagonist MRS-1191 (50 nM). IB-MECA-induced coronary dilation was completely blocked by the adenosine A2a-receptor antagonist 7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine (Sch-58261, 50 nM). Cl-IB-MECA (50 nM) did not increase coronary flow in the rat, but 100 nM did increase flow by 18%. In pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized pigs IB-MECA (5 µg/kg iv) decreased systemic blood pressure and increased pulmonary artery pressure, effects that did exhibit tachyphylaxis. These results illustrate that adenosine A3-receptor agonists produce species-dependent effects, which in the rat heart appear to be caused by adenosine A2a-receptor activation.

isolated heart; rat; rabbit; in vivo pig; coronary flow; blood pressure


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

FOR MANY YEARS IT WAS generally acknowledged that two adenosine-receptor subtypes (A1 and A2) were present in the mammalian myocardium. In 1992, however, Zhou et al. (31) cloned a new adenosine-receptor subtype, which they termed the A3 receptor, that was resistant to blockade by alkylxanthine-type adenosine-receptor antagonists. Subsequently, sheep and human adenosine A3 receptors were cloned (14, 22). Concurrent with these molecular studies, Fozard and Carruthers (6) reported that the hemodynamic effects of the adenosine analog N6-[2-(4-aminophenyl)ethyl]adenosine (APNEA) in the rat were not blocked by the adenosine- receptor blocker 8-(p-sulfophenyl)-theophylline (8-SPT).

All three of the initial cloning studies indicated only very weak expression of the adenosine A3 receptor in rat, sheep, and human hearts compared with other tissues (14, 22, 31). To date there have been no studies on cardiac adenosine A3-receptor density or on the physiological role that this receptor plays in normal mammalian ventricular myocardium. There have, however, been several studies in rabbit myocardium (3, 10, 27) and rabbit (1) and chick ventricular myocytes (25) indicating that the adenosine A3 receptor may play a role in the cardioprotective effects of adenosine. These studies have used the relatively new, selective adenosine A3 agonists N6-(3-iodobenzyl)-9-[5-(methylcarbamoyl)-beta -D-ribofuranosyl]adenine (IB-MECA) and 2-chloro-N6-(3-iodobenzyl)-9-[5-(methylcarbamoyl)-beta -D-ribofuranosyl]adenine (Cl-IB-MECA). It has been reported that IB-MECA has a very high affinity for both cloned rat (1 nM, Ref. 7) and rabbit A3 receptors (2 nM, Ref. 9), and Cl-IB-MECA has an even higher affinity (~0.3 nM) for the rat A3 receptor (13).

Although these agonists are relatively selective for A3 receptors at low doses, these agents are typically used at higher doses in intact cells, in which their functional selectivity for specific adenosine-receptor subtypes has yet to be determined. For example, doses of IB-MECA (30 nM) used in myocardial ischemia studies in the rabbit bind to cloned rabbit adenosine A1 receptors (9). In addition to species differences in cloned adenosine A3-receptor sensitivity to blockade by xanthine antagonists, there also appear to be species differences in the functional role of A3 receptors. In the rat, adenosine-induced mast cell degranulation appears to be mediated by the A3 receptor (6, 8, 20, 29), whereas in the dog, mast cell degranulation is thought to be the result of A2b-receptor activation (2). In terms of effects in the cardiovascular system, administration of APNEA, IB-MECA, and Cl-IB-MECA each increases plasma histamine levels and decreases systemic blood pressure (6, 8, 20, 29); however, IB-MECA had no such effect (3) in the only study to date in rabbit. There have been no studies on the effects of these adenosine A3-receptor agonists in intact animals larger than the rabbit. Although isolated rabbit heart studies report no effects of IB-MECA on ventricular function or coronary flow in the normal heart (10, 27), there have been no studies with these agents in the rat heart. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the hemodynamic effects of IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA in nonischemic, isolated perfused rat and rabbit hearts and in an in situ porcine preparation.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

All animals in this study received humane care according to the guidelines set forth by the National Society for Medical Research and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the National Academy of Sciences and also by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 86-23, Revised 1996). In addition, animals were used in accordance with the guidelines of the University of Kentucky Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Isolated perfused heart preparation. Experiments were conducted on male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-350 g) and New Zealand White rabbits of either sex (2-2.5 kg). Rats and rabbits were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (70 mg/kg ip), and they were then administered heparin (500 U/kg iv). The hearts were rapidly excised and immediately placed into ice-cold Krebs-Henseleit buffer to produce cardiac arrest. After cannulation of the aorta, hearts were perfused at a constant pressure of 70 mmHg with Krebs-Henseleit buffer composed of (in mM) 118 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 1.2 MgSO4, 1.2 KH2PO4, 1.5 CaCl2, 25.0 NaHCO3, and 11.0 glucose, 10 µM EDTA, and 1 µM ascorbic acid. The perfusate was maintained at 37°C in a constant temperature reservoir and was bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2 resulting in pH 7.35-7.40, PCO2 36-40 mmHg, and PO2 560-620 mmHg. Myocardial temperature was maintained at 37°C by partially submersing the heart into a water-jacketed chamber filled with Krebs buffer draining from the pulmonary artery.

Left ventricular developed pressure was measured with a fluid-filled latex balloon connected via a polyethylene catheter to a pressure transducer (model P23 XL, Gould, Cleveland, OH). The balloon was inserted into the left ventricle after the mitral valve was cut and was inflated to yield end-diastolic pressures of 5 and 10 mmHg in rat and rabbit hearts, respectively. After we established that neither IB-MECA nor Cl-IB-MECA had any effect on heart rate, hearts in subsequent studies were paced at 300 (rat) and 200 (rabbit) beats/min via electrodes placed on the right ventricle. Coronary perfusion pressure was measured with a fluid-filled catheter attached to a side port of the aortic cannula. Coronary flow rate was determined with an in-line flow probe (Carolina Medical Electronics, King, NC). All experimental data were recorded on a WindowGraf 900 chart recorder (Gould).

In situ pig preparation. Domestic pigs of either sex weighing 22-27 kg were premedicated with ketamine (30 mg/kg im) and anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (20 mg/kg iv). Anesthesia was maintained with pentobarbital sodium (1.5-2 mg/kg iv) every 15 min. A tracheostomy was performed, and the animals were mechanically ventilated with a mixture of room air and 100% O2. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, and percent oxygen in the inspired air were adjusted to maintain normal arterial blood gas and pH values. Core body temperature was monitored with an esophageal temperature probe and maintained at 37.0-37.5°C with a heating pad. The left femoral artery was cannulated to obtain samples for arterial blood gas analysis and for monitoring blood pressure. The left femoral vein was cannulated for the infusion of fluids and anesthesia. Lactated Ringer solution was administered via an ear vein or femoral vein at 5-7 ml · kg-1 · min-1 after an initial bolus of 300-400 ml.

The anterior chest wall was removed, the pericardium was incised, and the heart was suspended in a pericardial cradle. A micromanometer (Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) for monitoring left ventricular pressure (LVP) was inserted through the apex of the heart into the left ventricle. Changes in LVP with respect to time (dP/dt) were determined by differentiation of LVP. A 1- to 2-cm segment of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was dissected free of connective tissue. An ultrasonic flow probe (Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY) was placed on the distal portion of this LAD segment for measuring coronary blood flow (CBF).

Ventricular function. Regional ventricular function was assessed by myocardial segment shortening. Piezoelectric segment shortening crystals (Crystal Biotech, Houston, TX) were placed in the LAD perfused bed to measure regional segment shortening via sonomicrometry. Crystals were placed in the midmyocardium (~4-6 mm from the epicardium) between 5 and 15 mm apart and aligned such that the intercrystal axis was parallel to the direction of myocardial fiber shortening. End diastole was defined as the onset of +dP/dt, and end systole was defined as 20 ms before peak -dP/dt. Systolic shortening was defined as end-diastolic length (EDL) - end-systolic length (ESL), and percent segment shortening (%SS) was calculated as (EDL - ESL/EDL) × 100. All hemodynamic and sonomicrometric signals were fed through a 32-bit analog-to-digital converter directly into an online data acquisition computer with customized software (Coyote Bay Instruments, Manchester, NH). These signals were continuously displayed on a computer monitor.

Isolated heart protocols. Rabbit and rat hearts (n >=  5 except where noted) were allowed a 20-min equilibration period after placement of the left ventricular balloon before any intervention. Separate groups of isolated rabbit hearts were submitted to 2-min infusions of 50 nM IB-MECA and 50 nM Cl-IB-MECA. Isolated perfused rat hearts were studied in the following groups: 1) multiple IB-MECA infusions; 2) multiple infusions of the adenosine A2a-receptor agonist 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenylethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxyamidoadenosine (CGS-21680); 3) IB-MECA + the adenosine A3-receptor antagonist 3-ethyl-5-benzyl-2-methyl-6-phenyl-4-phenylethynyl-1,4-(±)-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate (MRS-1191); 4) CGS-21680 + MRS-1191 (n = 3); 5) IB-MECA + the selective adenosine A2a-receptor antagonist 7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1, 5-c]pyrimidine (Sch-58261); and 6) CGS-21680 + Sch-58261.

Hearts in groups 1 and 2 were submitted to three 2-min infusions of IB-MECA (50 nM) and CGS-21680 (5 nM), respectively, with a 12- to 15-min washout period between each exposure. In groups 3 and 4, after recovery from the first 2-min IB-MECA/CGS-21680 infusion, hearts were treated for 5 min with MRS-1191 (50 nM) before the second IB-MECA/CGS-21680 exposure (in the presence of MRS-1191). The protocols for groups 5 and 6 were similar to groups 3 and 4 with the exception that after the first IB-MECA/CGS-21680 infusion, hearts were treated with the adenosine A2a-receptor antagonist Sch-58261 (50 nM). Groups 5 and 6 followed the same protocol as in groups 2 and 4, with the substitution of Sch-58261 for MRS-1191. Additional rats were treated with either 50 or 100 nM of Cl-IB-MECA.

In situ protocols. Animals were allowed a period of 30 min for recovery and stabilization after all instrumentation was completed before the experimental protocol was initiated. Six pigs received IB-MECA treatment. The first pig was administered two doses of IB-MECA (12.5 µg/kg). The first treatment was a slow infusion (over 5 min) into the left atrium followed by a 20-min recovery period before a second treatment was administered intravenously. The subsequent five pigs were given two intravenous boluses (5 µg/kg). Three additional pigs were treated with Cl-IB-MECA; one pig was treated with 10 µg/kg iv, and the other two pigs were treated with 25 µg/kg iv.

Drugs and chemicals. IB-MECA, 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC), MRS-1191, and CGS-21680 were obtained from Research Biochemicals International (RBI, Natick, MA). Sch-58261 was a gift from Schering-Plough Research Institute (Milan, Italy). Cl-IB-MECA was provided by RBI as part of the Chemical Synthesis Program of the National Institute of Mental Health (contract N0IMH-30003). With the exception of CGS-21680 that was dissolved in distilled water (with heating), all drugs were solubilized in DMSO. IB-MECA, Cl-IB-MECA, CGS-21680, MRS-1191, and Sch-58261 were all made as 1 mM stock solutions. The concentration of the vehicle (DMSO) that the hearts were exposed to (0.01%) had no effect on coronary flow or ventricular function.

Data analysis. Results are means ± SE. The effects of adenosine agonists and antagonists on coronary flow are expressed as absolute values and as a percentage of change from immediate pretreatment values. For the isolated heart studies differences within groups were determined by repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Dunnett's t-test for comparison to baseline values or Newman-Keuls multiple- comparison test. IB-MECA results in the pig were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA and Dunnett's t-test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolated heart experiments. The results of the initial studies with IB-MECA (50 nM) in isolated rat and rabbit hearts are shown in Fig. 1. In isolated rabbit hearts, IB-MECA exerted no effect on coronary flow, but in rat hearts IB-MECA increased coronary flow from 13.3 ± 0.9 to 16.5 ± 0.8 ml/min, a 25% increase, which rapidly returned to control values at the end of the infusion. In neither rabbit nor rat myocardium did IB-MECA have any effect on heart rate or LVDP, and LVDP values remained stable throughout all of the experimental protocols (data not shown). The next series of experiments was performed to determine whether the IB-MECA-induced increase in coronary flow exhibited tachyphylaxis, an effect known to occur with repeated adenosine A3-receptor activation (17, 29). Figure 2A illustrates that the effects of multiple IB-MECA infusions in the same heart are reversible and reproducible. The three 2-min IB-MECA infusions increased coronary flow 25 ± 5, 24 ± 3, and 20 ± 3%, respectively. These results are qualitatively similar to those produced by the adenosine A2a-receptor agonist CGS-21680 in another group of hearts (Fig. 2B). Although the magnitude of the CGS-21680-induced coronary flow increase was much greater (73 ± 12, 83 ± 14, and 70 ± 16% increases in the 3 exposures), similar reversible and reproducible effects were observed.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effects of adenosine A3-receptor agonist IB-MECA (IBM) on coronary flow (CF) in isolated rat and rabbit hearts. IBM (50 nM) was infused for 2 min in hearts perfused at 70 mmHg. * P < 0.05 vs. baseline (base) CF values.




View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Reproducibility and reversibility of adenosine A3-receptor agonist IBM (A) and adenosine A2a-receptor agonist CGS-21680 (B) effects on CF in isolated rat hearts. IBM (50 nM) and CGS-21680 (5 nM) were infused for 2 min followed by a 12- to 15-min wash before the next exposure. * P < 0.05 vs. base and wash CF values.

The next series of experiments tested whether the IB-MECA flow increase in the rat heart could be attributed to A3-receptor activation. The effect of the adenosine A3-receptor antagonist MRS-1191 on the IB-MECA-induced increases in coronary flow is illustrated in Fig. 3. The initial infusion of IB-MECA (50 nM) increased coronary flow from 13.6 ± 0.6 to 18.4 ± 0.8 ml/min, a 35 ± 3% increase, and coronary flow returned to 13.5 ± 0.5 ml/min after washout. Treatment with MRS-1191 alone did not significantly alter coronary flow (12.8 ± 0.5 ml/min), but MRS-1191 only partially reduced the coronary vasodilation associated with IB-MECA treatment. In the presence of MRS-1191, coronary flow increased to 15.8 ± 0.8 ml/min, a 23 ± 2% increase, which was significantly lower (33 ± 6% lower) than that produced by IB-MECA alone (P < 0.05). In three additional hearts, the effect of MRS-1191 on adenosine A2a receptor-mediated coronary dilation was tested. Treatment with CGS-21680 alone increased coronary flow 48 ± 13%, and in the presence of MRS-1191 coronary flow increased 41 ± 11%. Although the CGS-21680 increase in flow in the presence of MRS-1191 was 13 ± 5% lower than with CGS-21680 alone, this effect was not statistically significant.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of the adenosine A3-receptor antagonist MRS-1191 (MRS) on IBM-induced increase in CF in isolated rat hearts. Hearts were treated with IBM (50 nM) as described for Figs. 1 and 2. Subsequent to the first IBM and wash period, hearts were pretreated for 5 min with MRS (50 nM) before second IB-MECA exposure in the continued presence of MRS-1191. * P< 0.05 vs. base, # P < 0.05 vs. MRS CF value.

Because the effects of IB-MECA were only marginally reduced in the presence of the A3-receptor blocker, we tested whether the IB-MECA dilation could be blocked by adenosine A2-receptor antagonists. Preliminary experiments (n = 4) were performed with IB-MECA in the absence and presence of the adenosine A2-receptor antagonist CSC (1 µM). IB-MECA increased coronary flow 36 ± 4%, and this effect was completely blocked in the presence of CSC (2 ± 2%). Subsequent studies were performed with the more selective adenosine A2a-receptor antagonist Sch-58261. These results are shown in Fig. 4A. The initial IB-MECA exposure increased coronary flow from 16.2 ± 1.2 to 21.3 ± 1.3 ml/min, a 32 ± 6% increase. During washout coronary flow returned to 16.2 ± 1.5 ml/min. The administration of Sch-58261 had no significant effect on coronary flow (14.6 ± 1.4 ml/min), but it completely blocked the ability of IB-MECA to increase coronary flow (14.3 ± 1.2 ml/min). After the washout of both IB-MECA and Sch-58261, coronary flow was 15.2 ± 1.6 ml/min.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effects of adenosine A2a-receptor antagonist Sch-58261 on IB-MECA (A) and CGS-21680 (B) CF increases. Hearts were first treated with IBM or CGS-21680 as previously described. After a 12- to 15-min washout, hearts were pretreated with Sch-58261 (SCH, 50 nM) for 5 min before second exposure to IBM or CGS-21680. * P < 0.05 vs. base, # P < 0.05 vs. immediate wash CF value.

Similar studies were performed with CGS-21680 and Sch-58261, to establish that Sch-58261 was capable of blocking adenosine A2a receptor-mediated increases in coronary flow in this preparation. In the absence of Sch-58261, CGS-21680 increased coronary flow 55 ± 9% (from 14.0 ± 0.7 to 21.6 ± 1.0 ml/min), and coronary flow returned to 14.0 ± 0.9 ml/min after washout of CGS-21680. Subsequent infusion of Sch-58261 decreased coronary flow to 11.0 ± 1.0 ml/min (P < 0.05 vs. washout). As in the case of IB-MECA, Sch-58261 completely blocked the ability of CGS-21680 to increase coronary flow (11.4 ± 1.0 ml/min).

Because the pretreatment protocol with MRS-1191 reduced IB-MECA coronary dilation by 33%, whereas Sch-58261 completely blocked this flow increase, we performed one final protocol to distinguish the effects of these two antagonists. Hearts were first treated with IB-MECA (50 nM) for 2 min, after which the combination of either IB-MECA + MRS-1191 or IB-MECA + Sch-58261 was infused for an additional 5 min. Representative data from one experiment in each group are illustrated in Fig. 5. As shown in Fig. 5A, IB-MECA initially increased coronary flow by 44%, and after 5 min of IB-MECA + MRS-1191 coinfusion, coronary flow was elevated by 52%. The contrasting effects of Sch-58261 are illustrated in Fig. 5B. IB-MECA increased coronary flow 36%, but after treatment for 5 min with Sch-58261 coronary flow was only elevated 13%.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Representative experiments illustrating the antagonism of IB-MECA (IBM, 50 nM)-induced CF increases by MRS-1191 (A) and Sch-58261 (B). In contrast to the protocols used in Figs. 3 and 4, rat hearts in this protocol were first exposed to IB-MECA for 2 min then treated with a combination of IB-MECA + MRS-1191 (MRS, 50 nM) or SCH (50 nM).

Although IB-MECA is a relatively selective adenosine A3-receptor agonist, the analog Cl-IB-MECA is thought to be more selective for the A3 receptor. Similar to the results obtained with IB-MECA, 50 nM Cl-IB-MECA did not alter coronary flow in isolated rabbit hearts (baseline coronary flow = 36.5 ± 3.6 ml/min; 50 nM Cl-IB-MECA, coronary flow = 36.9 ± 3.4 ml/min). In the rat heart, 50 nM Cl-IB-MECA also did not alter coronary flow (Fig. 6), but 100 nM Cl-IB-MECA increased coronary flow from 11.2 ± 0.9 to 13.2 ± 1.0 ml/min, an 18 ± 3% increase (P < 0.05). Coronary flow rapidly returned to 11.4 ± 1.0 ml/min during washout. In an additional three rat hearts Cl-IB-MECA increased coronary flow by 20 ± 3%, but in the presence of 50 nM Sch-58261 flow increased by only 1 ± 0.5%.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of adenosine A3-receptor agonist Cl-IB-MECA on CF in isolated perfused rat hearts. Left, effect of 50 nM Cl-IB-MECA; right, effect of 100 nM Cl-IB-MECA. * P < 0.05 vs. base.

In situ pig experiments. Two of the four pigs treated with IB-MECA died within the first 1-3 min of the intravenous bolus. In the remaining four pigs IB-MECA decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) from 90 ± 8 to 60 ± 6 mmHg (P < 0.05). Approximately 10 min later MAP recovered to 81 ± 6 mmHg. A subsequent treatment with the same dose of IB-MECA only marginally decreased MAP (73 ± 5 mmHg). Exposure to IB-MECA was associated with parallel decreases in LVDP, LV +dP/dt, and segment shortening. Baseline heart rates were 110 ± 11 beats/min and only exhibited a nonsignificant increase in the first 10 min after IB-MECA (134 ± 5 beats/min). Coronary blood flow decreased from 24.8 ± 1.4 to 5.8 ± 1.4 ml/min in the initial minute after IB-MECA infusion, and recovered completely within 10 min to 26.2 ± 4.9 ml/min. The second IB-MECA treatment had no significant effect on LAD blood flow (19.8 ± 1.6 to 14.3 ± 2.9 ml/min). The first IB-MECA infusion was accompanied by observable increases in right ventricular volume, and in the final two pigs pulmonary artery pressure was monitored. In these two animals mean pulmonary pressure increased from 14 and 10 mmHg to 43 and 33 mmHg, respectively, within 2-3 min after exposure to IB-MECA.

The effects of Cl-IB-MECA were then tested in three additional pigs. In the first experiment a total of 10 µg/kg Cl-IB-MECA was administered in three separate boluses over a period of ~15 min. No effects were observed until 5 min after the total dose had been delivered, when mean pulmonary artery pressure increased from 12 to 25 mmHg. Two subsequent pigs were treated with a single bolus of 25 µg/kg and exhibited responses similar to those observed with IB-MECA. Five minutes after treatment, MAP decreased from 87 and 99 mmHg to 48 and 24 mmHg, respectively, without a significant decrease in heart rate. Ten minutes after the Cl-IB-MECA bolus, MAP recovered to 89 and 114 mmHg, respectively.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The results of the present study indicate that the adenosine A3-receptor agonist IB-MECA, at a concentration as low as 50 nM, produces a 30% increase in coronary flow in the isolated rat heart. This effect did not exhibit tachyphylaxis and was only partially blunted by the adenosine A3-receptor antagonist MRS-1191 (50 nM). In fact the IB-MECA-induced coronary vasodilatation was completely blocked by the adenosine A2a-receptor blocker Sch-58261 (50 nM). The same concentration of Cl-IB-MECA did not alter coronary flow in the rat heart, but doubling the dose to 100 nM produced ~15% increase in coronary flow, a flow increase that was blocked by Sch-58261. Neither IB-MECA nor Cl-IB-MECA altered flow in the rabbit heart, and in neither species did either agonist alter ventricular function or heart rate. In the pig, both IB-MECA (5 µg/kg) and Cl-IB-MECA (25 µg/kg) transiently decreased systemic blood pressure and increased pulmonary artery pressure. These results indicate that the adenosine A3-receptor agonists IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA can exert species-dependent effects in the cardiovascular system. In the normal rat heart these effects appear to be caused primarily by A2a-receptor activation.

On the basis of both pharmacological and molecular biology studies, there is significant evidence of the existence of the adenosine A3 receptor. Cloning studies indicate that whereas the A3-receptor message is present in the heart, it is expressed at levels generally much lower than in tissues such as the lung, testes, and brain (14, 22, 31). However, neither cardiac adenosine A3-receptor density nor the physiological effects of A3-receptor activation have been determined. Studies of A3-receptor agonist effects in the rat have been limited to the systemic effects of APNEA, IB-MECA, and Cl-IB-MECA, all of which produce histamine release and profound hypotension, presumably caused by activation of mast cell adenosine A3 receptors (6, 8, 20, 29). In contrast to the results observed in rats, in the only study in the intact rabbit, IB-MECA did not exert any systemic effect and did not increase histamine levels (3). These differences in A3-receptor agonist effects in the rat and rabbit could be the result of species differences in the adenosine-receptor subtype, which promotes mast cell degranulation. This hypothesis is supported by work of Auchampach et al. (2), which reports that canine mast cell degranulation is induced not by the adenosine A3 receptor but by the A2b receptor. The lack of studies in the rat heart, in intact animals larger than rats and rabbits, and in the above-noted species differences provided the basis for this study.

The results of the present study confirm the apparent species difference between rat and rabbit myocardium in terms of their responses to IB-MECA. In the isolated rat heart, IB-MECA (50 nM) produced a ~30% increase in coronary flow, whereas the same dose had no effect in the isolated rabbit heart. Preliminary studies indicated that 10 nM IB-MECA increased coronary flow in the rat by 10% (data not shown). The A3-receptor agonist Cl-IB-MECA (50 nM) had no effect on coronary flow in the rat, but doubling the concentration to 100 nM was also associated with coronary vasodilation. Because adenosine A3-receptor activation in the intact rat is associated with mast cell-induced histamine release and peripheral vascular dilatation (6, 8, 20, 29), and because histamine is a coronary dilator in the rat (27), the simplest explanation for the present findings in the rat heart is that IB-MECA is activating the adenosine A3 receptor on resident cardiac mast cells promoting degranulation and the release of histamine. The lack of effect of IB-MECA on coronary flow in the rabbit could be caused by the aforementioned differences in adenosine-receptor subtype involvement in mast cells. Alternatively, histamine can produce coronary constriction in the rabbit (21), and the net effect of histamine is determined by the contributions of H1 and H2 histamine receptors, which may have opposing effects (5, 21, 30).

Three observations in our data, however, argue against a role for adenosine A3-receptor activation in the IB-MECA/Cl-IB-MECA-induced increases in coronary flow in the rat. First, the coronary flow increase with IB-MECA showed no evidence of tachyphylaxis or desensitization, a characteristic of adenosine A3-receptor activation (17, 29). In the multiple-exposure group, IB-MECA produced flow increases of 25 ± 5, 24 ± 3, and 20 ± 3%, respectively. It is possible that the 2-min exposure was too short to promote tachyphylaxis, but Palmer et al. (17) reported that the cloned rat adenosine A3 receptor exhibited a rapid phosphorylation and functional desensitization with a half-time of <1 min. Second, Cl-IB-MECA, reported to be more selective for the A3 receptor than IB-MECA (13), did not produce coronary dilation in the rat heart at a concentration of 50 nM but did increase coronary flow (approximately one-half that of flow produced by 50 nM IB-MECA) at 100 nM. Because both of these agents have been reported to bind to cloned adenosine A3 receptors at doses <10 nM (7, 9, 13), doses of 50-100 nM may not be selective for rat cardiac adenosine A3 receptors.

The most compelling evidence that the IB-MECA-induced coronary dilation was not the result of A3-receptor activation is based on the results obtained with the adenosine-receptor antagonists MRS-1191 and Sch-58261. In the pretreatment protocol, the adenosine A3 receptor antagonist MRS-1191 reduced the IB-MECA coronary flow increases by only 30%. When IB-MECA was infused first, the subsequent infusion of MRS-1191 did not antagonize coronary vasodilation (Fig. 5). MRS-1191, a relatively new A3-receptor antagonist, is a 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative with a inhibitor constant (Ki) value of 31 nM for human adenosine A3 receptors, and it has been reported to be 1,000-fold selective for cloned human A3 versus rat A1 and A2a receptors (11). The Ki value of this antagonist for the cloned rat A3 receptor has been reported to be 1.42 µM (12), but even at this dose it would be expected to have little effect on rat A2a receptors (Ki > 100 µM) (11). Although there have been few studies with this agent, MRS-1191 at the dose used in the present study blocked Cl-IB-MECA-induced cardioprotection in cultured chick ventricular myocytes without significantly altering the protective effects of the adenosine A1-receptor agonist 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (24).

In contrast to these results with MRS-1191, two adenosine A2- receptor antagonists, CSC and Sch-58261, completely blocked the increase in coronary flow associated with IB-MECA. Additionally, Sch-58261 blocked the coronary flow increase associated with 100 nM Cl-IB-MECA. Sch-58261 is a relatively new and selective adenosine A2a-receptor antagonist (4, 15, 32). The ability of Sch-58261 to block adenosine A2a receptor-mediated coronary dilation in the present study was verified by showing that Sch-58261 completely blocked the CGS-21680-induced increase in coronary flow. In contrast to the very limited studies with MRS-1191, there have been several studies that demonstrate the ability of Sch-58261 to block adenosine- and adenosine A2a agonist-induced vasodilatation in vivo (15) and in vitro (4, 32). Belardinelli et al. (4) reported that Sch-58261 blocked adenosine-induced decreases in coronary perfusion pressure in the constant flow-perfused isolated guinea pig heart with an IC50 of 6.8 ± 0.6 nM. The same authors reported that this antagonist also potently blocked the coronary effects of the adenosine A2a agonist CGS-21680 without altering adenosine A1 agonist prolongation of the S-H interval. Zocchi et al. (32) reported that Sch-58261 did not bind to adenosine A3 receptors at concentrations up to 1 µM. These results strongly suggest that IB-MECA-induced coronary dilation in the rat is mediated via adenosine A2a-receptor activation.

Although both IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA produced coronary dilation in the rat heart, neither agent at the doses used in the present study altered coronary flow in the rabbit heart. There are two possible explanations for this difference. First, as mentioned previously there appear to be species differences in adenosine-receptor subtype mediation of mast cell degranulation (2, 3, 6, 8, 20, 29) and possible species differences in histamine effects on the coronary vasculature (5, 21, 28, 30). Alternatively, because the IB-MECA flow increase was completely blocked by the adenosine A2a-receptor antagonist Sch-58261, it is possible that the rabbit heart has a higher threshold for adenosine A2a-receptor activation. This could be caused by differences in rat and rabbit adenosine A2a receptors, receptor density, or efficiency of receptor coupling to intracellular signal transduction pathways. Shryock et al. (24) recently reported that the guinea pig heart had a high adenosine A2a-receptor reserve based in part on the observation that CGS-21680 produced a half-maximal increase in coronary conductance with only 1.3% occupation of adenosine A2a receptors. Although we did not perform complete dose-response curves with CGS-21680 in either species, the rat heart did show much greater dilation with 5 nM CGS-21680 (~50% increase in coronary flow) than did the rabbit heart (8 ± 4% in 3 hearts). Even at a 10-fold higher dose (50 nM), CGS-21680-induced dilation in the rabbit (30 ± 5%, n = 3) was less than that observed with 5 nM CG-21680 in the rat heart. It is thus possible that the rabbit heart has a lower adenosine A2a-receptor reserve for coronary dilation than rat and guinea pig myocardium.

Although our observation that IB-MECA produced coronary dilation in the rat is the first such report in cardiac tissue, there are other reports of IB-MECA effects on the vasculature. Prentice et al. (18, 19) reported that IB-MECA relaxed isolated rat aortas and mesenteric arteries, respectively. In their latter study (19) they concluded that this effect of IB-MECA was not caused by A3-receptor activation based on pharmacological criteria. They also could not block this relaxation with the adenosine A2a-receptor antagonist 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]-triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5] triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol (ZM-241385). These findings contrast with our present results in which IB-MECA coronary dilation in the rat was blocked completely by the A2a-receptor antagonist Sch-58261. Although our findings were unexpected, they are not completely without precedent. Shearman and Weaver (23) reported that the A3-receptor radioligand 125I-labeled AB-MECA primarily labeled A1 and A2a adenosine receptors in the rat brain striatum, an observation they attributed to the low expression of adenosine A3 receptors combined with the fact that 125I-labeled AB-MECA has been reported to have an affinity as low as 25 nM for recombinant canine A2a adenosine receptors (16). Results similar to our present findings were reported by Sullivan and Linden (26), who observed that IB-MECA inhibition of tumor necrosis factor release in human monocytes was mediated by the adenosine A2a, not the A3, receptor.

The present intact open-chest pig studies are the first reports, to our knowledge, on IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA effects in an intact animal preparation other than the rat or rabbit. Our results are essentially identical to those observed in the rat administered with APNEA, IB-MECA, and Cl-IB-MECA (6, 8, 20, 29). We observed a rapid decrease in arterial blood pressure that normalized within 10 min and only a slight nonsignificant increase in heart rate. Two pigs died within the first minute of the IB-MECA bolus. Consistent with reports of rapid desensitization of the adenosine A3 receptor (17), we observed a much smaller hemodynamic effect in the pig with a second IB-MECA infusion. An observation that was visible in all animals receiving IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA was a large increase in right ventricular volume concurrent with the decrease in systemic blood pressure. In two pigs treated with IB-MECA and one pig with Cl-IB-MECA, we measured an increase in pulmonary artery pressure. Because histamine has been reported to increase pulmonary pressure and decrease systemic pressure (5, 30), these observations are consistent with reports of adenosine A3 receptor-mediated activation of mast cells resulting in degranulation and histamine release.

Although the effects of both agonists in the pig were consistent with adenosine A3-receptor activation, there are two points that must be mentioned. First, the IB-MECA hemodynamic effects were produced with a 5 µg/kg dose, but a 10 µg/kg Cl-IB-MECA dose exerted no effect, and the hemodynamic effects that were elicited by Cl-IB-MECA were associated with a 25 µg/kg dose. If this effect were mediated by A3-receptor activation, one would expect that the more selective Cl-IB-MECA would also be more, not less, potent in evoking these responses. Thus the dose-dependent effects of these agents in the intact pig were similar to those in the isolated rat heart, where coronary dilation was only observed with a higher concentration of Cl-IB-MECA. A second important point is that in two separate pigs neither the mast cell inhibitor sodium cromolyn nor the histamine H1-receptor blocker diphenhydramine blocked the effects of IB-MECA (data not shown). We used the same dose of cromolyn (20 mg/kg) that Hannon et al. (8) used to block APNEA-induced hypotension in the rat. The effect of the histamine blocker diphenhydramine (30 mg/kg) was difficult to assess because administration of this agent alone produced profound hemodynamic effects, similar to those produced by IB-MECA, which were not completely reversible. Histamine exerts its effects via two distinct-receptor subtypes (H1 and H2) the expressions may be of which may be species and tissue specific. Cooper et al. (5) reported that in the pig histamine produced dose-dependent effects with lower doses eliciting systemic hypotension and pulmonary hypertension, most likely via histamine H1-receptor activation. It must also be pointed out that mast cell degranulation likely results in the release of other vasoactive agents, such as thromboxanes and ATP.

In summary, the results of this study indicate that the adenosine A3-receptor agonists IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA exert species-dependent effects. Although neither agent exerted effects in the rabbit heart, both agonists produced coronary vasodilation in the rat heart. In addition, this dilatory effect was minimally altered by the A3-receptor antagonist MRS-1191 but was completely blocked by the adenosine A2a-receptor antagonist Sch-58261. In the intact pig IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA both produced profound, but reversible, systemic hypotension and pulmonary hypertension. The results of this study indicate that although these agents have been reported to be protective in the ischemic-reperfused rabbit heart (10, 27), further studies on the exact role of cardiac adenosine A3 receptors need to be performed in additional species and intact animal preparations.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Luiz Belardinelli, John Shryock, and Joel Linden for their helpful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-34579 (to R. M. Mentzer) and a National American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid (to R. D. Lasley).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. D. Lasley, Dept. of Surgery, Univ. of Kentucky College of Medicine, MN273 Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536-0084 (E-mail address: rlasley{at}pop.uky.edu).

Received 8 October 1998; accepted in final form 5 February 1999.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Armstrong, S., and C. E. Ganote. Adenosine receptor specificity in preconditioning of isolated rabbit cardiomyocytes: evidence of A3 receptor involvement. Cardiovasc. Res. 28: 1049-1056, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Auchampach, J. A., X. Jin, T. C. Wan, G. H. Caughey, and J. Linden. Canine mast cell adenosine receptors: cloning and expression of the A3 receptor and evidence that degranulation is mediated by the A2B receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 52: 846-860, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Auchampach, J. A., A. Rizvi, Y. Qiu, X. L. Tang, C. Maldonado, S. Teschner, and R. Bolli. Selective activation of A3 adenosine receptors with N6-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide protects against myocardial stunning and infarction without hemodynamic changes in conscious rabbits. Circ. Res. 80: 800-809, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Belardinelli, L., J. C. Shryock, S. Snowdy, Y. Zhang, A. Monopoli, G. Lozza, E. Ongini, R. A. Olsson, and D. M. Dennis. The A2A adenosine receptor mediates coronary vasodilation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 284: 1066-1073, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Cooper, D. J., R. R. Schellenberg, and K. R. Walley. Different effects of histamine H1 and H2 stimulation on left ventricular contractility in pigs. Am. J. Physiol. 269 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 38): H959-H964, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Fozard, J. R., and A. M. Carruthers. Adenosine A3 receptors mediate hypotension in the angiotensin II-supported circulation of the pithed rat. Br. J. Pharmacol. 109: 3-5, 1993[Medline].

7.   Gallo-Rodriguez, C., X. D. Ji, N. Melman, B. D. Siegman, L. H. Sanders, J. Orlina, B. Fischer, Q. Pu, M. E. Olah, P. J. van Galen, G. L. Stiles, and K. A. Jacobson. Structure-activity relationships of N6-benzyladenosine-5'-uronamides as A3-selective adenosine agonists. J. Med. Chem. 37: 636-646, 1994[Medline].

8.   Hannon, J. P., H. J. Pfannkuche, and J. R. Fozard. A role for mast cells in adenosine A3 receptor-mediated hypotension in the rat. Br. J. Pharmacol. 115: 945-952, 1995[Medline].

9.   Hill, R. J., J. J. Oleynek, C. F. Hoth, M. A. Kiron, W. Weng, R. T. Wester, W. R. Tracey, D. R. Knight, R. A. Buchholz, and S. P. Kennedy. Cloning, expression and pharmacological characterization of rabbit adenosine A1 and A3 receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 280: 122-128, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Hill, R. J., J. J. Oleynek, W. Magee, D. R. Knight, and W. R. Tracey. Relative importance of adenosine A1 and A3 receptors in mediating physiological or pharmacological protection from ischemic myocardial injury in the rabbit heart. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 30: 579-585, 1998[Medline].

11.   Jacobson, K. A. Adenosine A3 receptors: novel ligands, and paradoxical effects. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 19: 184-191, 1998[Medline].

12.   Jiang, J., A. M. van Rhee, L. Chang, A. Patchornik, X. D. Ji, P. Evans, N. Melman, and K. A. Jacobson. Structure-activity relationships of 4-(phenylethynyl)-6-phenyl-1,4-dihydropyridines as highly selective A3 adenosine receptor antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 40: 2596-2608, 1997[Medline].

13.   Kim, H. O., X. D. Ji, S. M. Siddiqi, M. E. Olah, G. L. Stiles, and K. A. Jacobson. 2-Substitution of N6-benzyladenosine-5'-uronamides enhances selectivity for A3 adenosine receptors. J. Med. Chem. 37: 3614-3621, 1994[Medline].

14.   Linden, J., H. E. Taylor, A. S. Robeva, A. L. Tucker, J. H. Stehle, S. A. Rivkees, J. S. Fink, and S. M. Reppert. Molecular cloning and functional expression of a sheep A3 adenosine receptor with widespread tissue distribution. Mol. Pharmacol. 44: 524-532, 1993[Abstract].

15.   Monopoli, A., C. Casati, G. Lozza, A. Forlani, and E. Ongini. Cardiovascular pharmacology of the A2A adenosine receptor antagonist, SCH 58261, in the rat. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 285: 9-15, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Olah, M. E., C. Gallo-Rodriguez, K. A. Jacobson, and G. L. Stiles. 125I-4-aminobenzyl-5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine, a high affinity radioligand for the rat A3 adenosine receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 45: 978-982, 1994[Abstract].

17.   Palmer, T. M., J. L. Benovic, and G. L. Stiles. Agonist-dependent phosphorylation and desensitization of the rat A3 adenosine receptor. Evidence for a G-protein-coupled receptor kinase- mediated mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 29607-29613, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Prentice, D. J., and S. M. Hourani. Activation of multiple sites by adenosine analogues in the rat isolated aorta. Br. J. Pharmacol. 118: 1509-1517, 1996[Medline].

19.   Prentice, D. J., S. L. Payne, and S. M. Hourani. Activation of two sites by adenosine receptor agonists to cause relaxation in rat isolated mesenteric artery. Br. J. Pharmacol. 122: 1509-1515, 1997[Medline].

20.   Reeves, J. J., C. A. Jones, M. J. Sheehan, C. J. Vardey, and C. J. Whelan. Adenosine A3 receptors promote degranulation of rat mast cells both in vitro and in vivo. Inflamm. Res. 46: 180-184, 1997[Medline].

21.   Sakai, K. Role of histamine H1- and H2-receptors in the cardiovascular system of the rabbit. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2: 607-617, 1980[Medline].

22.   Salvatore, C. A., M. A. Jacobson, H. E. Taylor, J. Linden, and R. G. Johnson. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human A3 adenosine receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 10365-10369, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Shearman, L. P., and D. R. Weaver. [125I]4-aminobenzyl-5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine (125I)AB-MECA labels multiple adenosine receptor subtypes in rat brain. Brain Res. 745: 10-20, 1997[Medline].

24.   Shryock, J. C., S. Snowdy, P. G. Baraldi, B. Cacciari, G. Spalluto, A. Monopoli, E. Ongini, S. P. Baker, and L. Belardinelli. A2A-adenosine receptor reserve for coronary vasodilation. Circulation 98: 711-718, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   Stambaugh, K., K. A. Jacobson, J. L. Jiang, and B. T. Liang. A novel cardioprotective function of adenosine A1 and A3 receptors during prolonged simulated ischemia. Am. J. Physiol. 273 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 42): H501-H505, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.  Sullivan, G. W., and J. Linden. The role of A2A adenosine receptors in inflammation. Drug Dev. Res. In press.

27.   Tracey, W. R., W. Magee, H. Masamune, S. P. Kennedy, D. R. Knight, R. A. Buchholz, and R. J. Hill. Selective adenosine A3 receptor stimulation reduces ischemic myocardial injury in the rabbit heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 33: 410-415, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Valen, G., T. Skjelbakken, and J. Vaage. The effects of exogenous histamine in isolated rat hearts. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 146: 55-61, 1995[Medline].

29.   Van Schaick, E. A., K. A. Jacobson, H. O. Kim, A. P. Ijzerman, and M. Danhof. Hemodynamic effects and histamine release elicited by the selective adenosine A3 receptor agonist 2-Cl-IBMECA in conscious rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 308: 311-314, 1996[Medline].

30.   Woods, J. R., Jr., C. R. Brinkman, A. Dandavino, K. Murayama, and N. S. Assali. Action of histamine and H1 and H2 blockers on the cardiopulmonary circulation. Am. J. Physiol. 232 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 1): H73-H78, 1977.

31.   Zhou, Q. Y., C. Li, M. E. Olah, R. A. Johnson, G. L. Stiles, and O. Civelli. Molecular cloning and characterization of an adenosine receptor: the A3 adenosine receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 7432-7436, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

32.   Zocchi, C., E. Ongini, A. Conti, A. Monopoli, A. Negretti, P. G. Baraldi, and S. Dionisotti. The non-xanthine heterocyclic compound SCH 58261 is a new potent and selective A2a adenosine receptor antagonist. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 276: 398-404, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276(6):H2076-H2084
0002-9513/99 $5.00 Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. L. Maddock, M. M. Mocanu, and D. M. Yellon
Adenosine A3 receptor activation protects the myocardium from reperfusion/reoxygenation injury
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): H1307 - H1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. A. H. Talukder, R. R. Morrison, M. A. Jacobson, K. A. Jacobson, C. Ledent, and S. J. Mustafa
Targeted deletion of adenosine A3 receptors augments adenosine-induced coronary flow in isolated mouse heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): H2183 - H2189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. P. Headrick, R. Lasley, E. Kilpatrick, P. Narayan, and R. Mentzer Jr.
Apparent Activation of Cardiovascular A1 Adenosine Receptors by A3 Agonists
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282 (2): H793 - H796.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. A. H. Talukder, R. R. Morrison, and S. J. Mustafa
Comparison of the vascular effects of adenosine in isolated mouse heart and aorta
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): H49 - H57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. L. Kilpatrick, P. Narayan, R. M. Mentzer Jr., and R. D. Lasley
Adenosine A3 agonist cardioprotection in isolated rat and rabbit hearts is blocked by the A1 antagonist DPCPX
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): H847 - H853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. A. H. Talukder, R. R. Morrison, M. A. Jacobson, K. A. Jacobson, C. Ledent, and S. J. Mustafa
Targeted deletion of adenosine A3 receptors augments adenosine-induced coronary flow in isolated mouse heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): H2183 - H2189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lasley, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mentzer, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lasley, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mentzer, R. M., Jr.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online