Vol. 276, Issue 6, H2204-H2214, June 1999
Hemodynamic model for analysis of Doppler ultrasound indexes
of umbilical blood flow
Ayala
Kleiner-Assaf1,
Ariel J.
Jaffa2, and
David
Elad1
1 Department of Biomedical
Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
69978; 2 Ultrasound Unit in
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv
Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239; and Sackler Faculty of
Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
 |
ABSTRACT |
A hemodynamic
model for pulsatile fluid flow in a pressurized thin-walled elastic
tube was applied for the computation of volumetric blood flow and
velocity profiles for a given set of system parameters at any selected
location along the umbilical artery. The velocity profiles over one
heart cycle provide the fetal blood flow velocity waveforms (FVW) from
which the usual Doppler indexes (DI) can be derived. The model was used
for a comprehensive investigation of the correlation between DI and system parameters that reflect the anatomy and physiology of umbilical blood flow. The simulations showed that the radial location of the
Doppler measurement is insignificant for the calculated DI, whereas the
axial site is important. The analysis showed that decreasing the
diameter or increasing the length of the umbilical artery reduces fetal
mean blood flow rate and increases the DI. Increasing blood viscosity
tends to induce similar patterns, whereas decreasing arterial
compliance or increasing blood density decreases the DI with little
effect on blood flow rate. Fetal heart rate has a minor effect on both
DI and fetal blood flow rate. This study provides insight into the
dependence of DI on the anatomic and physiological characteristics of
umbilical blood flow.
flow velocity waveform; fetal blood flow; pulsatility index; resistance index
 |
INTRODUCTION |
OBSTETRIC DOPPLER
ultrasonography is commonly used for evaluation of the flow velocity
waveform (FVW) from fetal and maternal blood vessels (16). These
waveforms are used to calculate Doppler indexes (DI) such as the
systolic-to-diastolic ratio (S/D), the pulsatility index (PI), and the
resistance index (RI) (see APPENDIX A). Because the fetus is completely dependent on the
supply of oxygen and nutrients from the placenta, noninvasive
examination of blood flow through the umbilical circulation is very
important for assessment of fetal well-being. Because the DI provide
empirical information on peripheral resistance to umbilical
circulation, they are widely used for clinical diagnosis of high-risk
pregnancies such as pregnancy-induced hypertension and of complications
as seen in fetal intrauterine growth restriction (28, 29).
Direct noninvasive measurements of fetal blood flow through the
umbilical arteries were conducted with modified ultrasonographic probes
that combine the Doppler and B-mode techniques and allow for
simultaneous measurement of local blood velocity and vessel diameter
(7-9, 11, 12, 24, 30). These methods are not routinely used
clinically because the arteries are subjected to pulsatile flow that
continuously changes their diameter, rendering the measured data
inaccurate and nonreproducible and thereby limited in
diagnostic value (13).
The existing computational studies for analysis of the relationship
between DI and fetal blood flow rate are based on lumped-parameter models of electrical elements for simulations of the umbilical and
placental arteries (25, 26). These models are analogous electrical
circuits of resistors and capacitors that represent the umbilical
arteries, the first radial branches, and the placental villous tree.
They were used to examine the effect of different physiological
variables on the PI. Similar electric networks were also used to study
the correlation between normal and pathological placental blood flow
and the DI (14, 27). Recently, hemodynamic models were developed to
study uteroplacental and fetomaternal blood flow for comparison with
Doppler velocity waveforms (18, 23). However, the correlation between
the measured values of DI and umbilical blood flow as well as their
dependence on anatomic and physiological parameters (e.g., pressure
gradients or arterial geometry and wall properties) have not been
satisfactorily studied with a distributed physical model.
The rapidly expanding utilization of ultrasonography in prenatal care
for clinical diagnosis of complications in pregnancy has led to the
need for more in-depth and sophisticated analysis of the interpretation
of Doppler measurements. In this work, we used a mathematical model for
pulsatile flow of a viscous fluid in an inflated tube to study the
dependence of DI on anatomic and physiological parameters and their
correlation with umbilical blood flow.
 |
METHODS |
Description of model.
The umbilical cord and the arteries along its axis are very coiled at
parturition. However, in vivo images taken during gestation with optic
fibers (19) revealed a fairly uncoiled cord with longitudinal
curvatures much larger than its diameter during the first 5-6 mo.
During the last 2-3 mo of gestation the umbilical cord became
coiled as a result of increased fetal movements. Accordingly, it is
reasonable to assume that a first-order physical model of umbilical blood flow will adequately simulate the umbilical artery between the umbilicus and the placenta by a finite elastic cylinder with thin walls (Fig. 1). The tube is able
to undergo local deformations in both longitudinal
(z) and circumferential (
)
directions.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Umbilical blood flow model. Pu,
pressure at umbilicus insert; Pp,
pressure at placental insert; r,
radial direction; z, longitudinal
direction; L, length.
|
|
Blood flow in the umbilical artery is assumed to be an axisymmetric
pulsatile flow of an incompressible Newtonian liquid and is modeled by
superposition of a small time-dependent component and a component of
steady flow. The steady flow component is driven by a linear pressure
gradient between the umbilicus and the placenta and is modeled as a
steady laminar flow in an elastic tube (10). The unsteady component is
modeled as wave propagation through a viscous, incompressible fluid
contained in a pressurized elastic tube (4). As in previous works (3,
15, 17), this approach was taken to ensure a mean blood flow over the
whole cardiac cycle. The oscillating solutions were obtained by
linearization of the governing equations (as explained in
APPENDIX B), and thus summation of
the steady and unsteady components is justified.
Steady flow in an elastic tube.
The steady component of the flow through an elastic tube is assumed to
be laminar (parabolic distribution) and to have a local resistance as
in Poiseuille's flow (10). The radius of the elastic tube
R0(z)
changes with the tube mean internal pressure
P0(z), which varies along the z axis.
Accordingly, the pressure-flow relationship can be described in a way
similar to laminar flow by
|
(1)
|
where
Qs is the steady volumetric flow
rate and µ is the fluid viscosity.
The stresses within the tube wall that are caused by the mean internal
pressure are given by
|
(2)
|
where
T
,
Tzz, and
Trr are the internal
stresses in the circumferential, longitudinal, and radial directions,
respectively, and h is the tube wall
thickness. The circumferential strain
(

)for a linear material
is given by
|
(3)
|
where
R00 is the tube
radius in its unstressed state (P0 = 0). The constitutive equation for an isotropic elastic material provides the strain-stress relationship
|
(4)
|
where
E is Young's modulus and
is
Poisson's ratio.
Equations 2-4 can be manipulated
to give an expression for
R0(z)
in terms of
P0(z),
the tube geometry, and material properties. Substitution in
Eq. 1 and integration between the
umbilicus and the placenta yields
|
(5)
|
where
P0,P and
P0,U are the mean arterial
pressures in the placenta and the umbilicus, respectively, and
L is the tube length.
The steady area-averaged velocity at any axial location
z is given by
|
(6)
|
and
the steady parabolic velocity profile is
|
(7)
|
where
Wmax = 2
is the
maximal velocity at the center line
(r = 0).
Pulsatile flow in an elastic tube.
The unsteady component of the pulsatile flow is assumed to be induced
by propagation of small waves in a pressurized elastic tube. The
mathematical approach is based on the classic model for the
fluid-structure interaction problem, which describes the dynamic
equilibrium between the fluid and the thin tube wall (4, 31, 32). The
dynamic equilibrium is expressed by the hydrodynamic equations
(Navier-Stokes) for the incompressible fluid flow and the equations of
motion for an elastic tube, which are coupled together by the boundary
conditions (BC) at the fluid-wall interface. The motion of the liquid
is described in a fixed laboratory coordinate system, and the dynamic
equilibrium of a tube element in its deformed state is expressed in a
Lagrangian (material) coordinate system, which is attached to the
surface of the tube (Fig. 2).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Mechanics of arterial wall. A:
axisymmetric wall deformation. B:
element of tube wall under biaxial loading.
R0, elastic tube
radius; , ,
, fixed system coordinates;
,
, , Lagrangian
coordinates; T, internal stress.
|
|
A brief summary of the mathematical formulation is given in
APPENDIX B. Following Atabek and Lew
(4), the first-order approximations for the fluid velocity radial
(u1) and axial
(w1) components
and the pressure (p1) as a
function of time (t) and space
(r,
z) are given by
|
(8)
|
|
(9)
|
|
(10)
|
where
|
(11)
|
Here,
,
c is the wave speed,
= 2
FHR/60
is the angular frequency, FHR is the fetal heart rate,
is the
Womersley number,
A1 is the input
pressure amplitude,
J0 and
J1 are Bessel
functions of the first kind,
F and
T are
blood and wall densities, and
R0 is the
undisturbed radius of the tube. The dimensionless
variables m, x, k, 
,
and F10 are used to simplify the formulation of Eqs.
8-10.
The instantaneous unsteady volumetric flow rate is calculated by
integration of the longitudinal velocity over
r, hence
|
(12)
|
Umbilical blood flow.
The complete description of blood flow in the umbilical artery is
obtained by adding the unsteady component (Eq. 9) to the steady component (Eq. 7). Thus the longitudinal velocity in the umbilical
artery as a function of axial and radial location is given
by
|
(13)
|
The time-dependent umbilical blood flow rate at a given
point z between the umbilicus and the
placenta is
|
(14)
|
The umbilical cord normally consists of two umbilical arteries.
Accordingly, the mean umbilical flow rate at a given point z in one period is
|
(15)
|
where
T is the time of one heartbeat.
Computational technique.
The longitudinal blood velocity (W)
at any location within the umbilical artery was computed from
Eq. 13 for a given set of independent
system parameters and an assumed pressure waveform within the tube.
Following Womersley (31, 32), we assumed a harmonic wave for the
oscillatory component of the pressure (see Eq. B15), which is given in Eq. 10 for the first harmonic that represents the
heart rate. A more realistic blood pressure wave is composed of
k harmonics and can be described
by the following Fourier series
|
(16)
|
where
An is a complex
number and is given by an amplitude
(Mn) and phase shift
(
n)
|
(17)
|
In
the absence of data from direct measurement of the pressure waveform in
umbilical arteries of humans or experimental animals, we used here the
first six harmonics listed in Table 1,
which were derived from pressure measurements in the pulmonary artery of a dog (5). This choice may be justified by the fact that the
pulmonary arterial pressure of the fetus is the same as its systemic
arterial pressure (20), and the systolic and diastolic values of this
waveform are similar to those of umbilical blood pressure (70 and 45 mmHg, respectively).
The variation of the velocity with time at any fixed location within
the tube yields the FVW for this location. The envelope FVW that is
usually measured by commercial Doppler systems is obtained from the
maximal axial velocity in the vessel's cross section at each time
step. The DI were computed from the FVW according to
Eqs. A1-A3. The system parameters
that specify the geometry and material properties of the umbilical
artery and those of blood characteristics and pressure are detailed in
Table 2. The reference values were taken
from the literature to describe an averaged normal umbilical artery. A
range of values was chosen to study the contribution of selected
anatomic and physiological factors to umbilical blood flow and the
corresponding DI. Variations of a single parameter were carried out
while the rest of the parameters were kept at the reference values.
 |
RESULTS |
The model directly provided the axial velocity at any given time and
location within the tube for a specified anatomic and physiological
variable of umbilical blood flow, and this allowed the derivation of
FVW at selected measurement locations. Figure 3 depicts envelope FVW for a normal sample
and shows the reference parameters together with the variations for
extreme values (Table 2) of the system parameters. The DI for the
reference set of parameters at the umbilicus end
(z = 0) were PI = 1.00, RI = 0.62, and
S/D = 2.62, and the mean umbilical blood flow
(Qmean) was 92 ml/min.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Variation of flow velocity waveforms (FVW) at fetal site
(z = 0) with anatomic and
physiological parameters. Thick curve is FVW for reference values
(Table 2) that represent normal umbilical blood flow.
W, velocity;
t, time;
d, diameter;
E, Young's modulus;
h, wall thickness;
R0, tube radius;
, blood density; µ, blood viscosity;
Pmax, peak input pressure;
P0,P, mean arterial pressure at
placental insert; P0,U, mean
arterial pressure at umbilical insert.
|
|
The present model enabled the analysis of the dependence of DI on the
location of Doppler ultrasound measurements. Accordingly, the DI were
evaluated from FVW computed for the set of reference parameters at 10 different radial locations (r* = r/R0 = 0-0.9) on the fetal umbilicus. Similarly, the DI were also
computed at 11 equally spaced locations
(z* = z/L = 0-1.0) along the umbilical artery (from umbilicus to placenta).
The results are shown in Fig. 4. The DI are
almost independent of radial location for most of the cross section,
whereas pulsatility decreased (up to 50%) toward the placenta.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Spatial variation of Doppler indexes (DI).
Left: radial variation at
z = 0. Right: axial variation for indexes
extracted from envelope FVW. , pulsatility index (PI); ,
resistance index (RI); , systolic-to-diastolic ratio (S/D);
r* and z*, radial and axial
locations within tube, respectively.
|
|
The role of arterial anatomy in the determination of DI was examined by
computing FVW for a range of arterial diameters
(d = 1.0-4.4 mm), lengths
(L = 20-150 cm), wall thicknesses
(h/R0 = 0.05-0.25), and elastic moduli
(E = 1-8 × 105 Pa). The computed DI for
arterial diameter and length are shown in Fig.
5 as are the corresponding
Qmean. The vertical lines
(indicated by "Ref") represent the results for the reference
values given in Table 2. Generally, the DI decreased as the artery
diameter increased or its length decreased.
Qmean increased with increases in
the arterial diameter and decreased as the arterial length increased.
In an artery with increased wall thickness the DI decreased, but
Qmean was almost unaffected (Fig.
6). The role of increasing Young's modulus
(E) of the artery is mechanically
equivalent to that of thickening its wall thickness; thus the
variability of DI and Qmean is
similar to that of wall thickness (Fig. 6).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Variability of DI and mean umbilical blood flow rate
(Qmean) with
d and
L of umbilical artery. , PI; ,
RI; , S/D; Ref, results for reference values given in Table
2.
|
|
The contribution of blood properties to the pattern of DI and the
corresponding blood flow rate was investigated by varying blood density
(
= 500-2,150 kg/m3) and
viscosity (µ = 0.01-0.08 Poise). The results are depicted in
Fig. 7 and show that DI decreased as blood
density increased or viscosity decreased. The mean blood flow rate was
independent of blood density but decreased as blood viscosity
increased.
The influence of physiological parameters was studied by varying blood
pressure and FHR. Figure 8 shows that FHR
had no effect on either DI or the mean blood flow rate. To examine the
contribution of peak input pressure (steady
unsteady), we
varied the reference value of Pmax
by multiplying the fundamental harmonic of the unsteady pressure to
yield a range of values around the reference value (Pmax = 52-96 mmHg) with
negligible changes in the mean arterial pressure (55-54 mmHg). The
resulting DI increased with Pmax,
whereas Qmean was almost
unaffected (Fig. 8).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Variability of DI and Qmean with
fetal heart rate (FHR) and Pmax
(umbilicus). , PI; , RI; , S/D; bpm, beats/min.
|
|
Variation of the mean arterial pressure at the placental insert
(P0,P) in the range of 5-45
mmHg with maintenance of the mean arterial pressure at the umbilicus
insert (P0,U) constant at 50 mmHg is shown in Fig. 9. As downstream
pressure increased, Qmean decreased and the DI increased. Variation of
P0,U in the range of 15-75
mmHg while P0,P was held constant
at 10 mmHg resulted in peak pressures of 25-85 mmHg. The
corresponding DI decreased as P0,U
increased, whereas Qmean increased
(Fig. 9). Another simulation was conducted by changing
P0,U and
P0,P in such a way that the ratio
P0,P/P0,U = 0.5 was kept constant. This yielded results that are similar to the
simulations with P0,P held
constant at 10 mmHg (Fig. 9).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Variability of DI and Qmean with
mean driving pressures P0,U,
P0,P, and both
P0,U and
P0,P while their ratio is held
constant. , PI; , RI; , S/D.
|
|
The large volume of computed values of DI and
Qmean for a range of selected
anatomic and physiological parameters (Table 2) allowed investigation
of the correlation between the blood flow rate and the DI. For this
purpose we plotted Qmean versus
each of the DI for six system parameters that were found to affect the
measured DI (Fig. 10). The diameter of
the umbilical artery was found to be the most influential parameter,
whereas peak umbilicus pressure had the least effect.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Relationships between Qmean and DI
for different anatomic and physiological parameters. Extreme values of
each parameter are marked.
|
|
The FVW is strongly dependent on the spectral content of the input
pressure wave. Attempts were made to simulate an abnormal FVW with a
postsystolic notch, a condition that is known to be representative of
high-resistance circulation and to have good correlation to poor
obstetrical outcome (22). For this purpose, the second and fourth
harmonics were multiplied by 2 and the third harmonic by 3. The
resulting pressure wave and FVW at three locations along the artery in
comparison with the corresponding waves in normal conditions are shown
in Fig. 11. It can be seen that the postsystolic notch depth becomes smaller at locations closer to the
placenta. The DI for the dicrotic notch condition measured at
z = 0 (umbilicus) were PI = 1.34, RI = 0.8, and S/D = 4.88, values that are very close to those in normal
conditions.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Normal versus pathological (postsystolic notch) FVW for simulated
Doppler measurements at 3 sites along umbilical artery.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A mathematical model of blood flow in the umbilical artery was used to
examine the variability of DI with respect to anatomic and
physiological parameters that dictate fetal blood flow. Knowing the
blood flow field at any axial and radial location of the umbilical artery provided the FVW and enabled a detailed investigation of the
spatial variability of DI. In addition, a direct correlation between
the estimated DI and umbilical blood flow rate could be obtained from
the model.
Measurement site.
Medical ultrasound machines including Doppler instruments usually
measure the envelope FVW for calculations of DI. In this study, we
investigated the variability of DI that were derived at different
radial locations (Fig. 4) and from the envelope FVW. The difference
between DI calculated at different radial locations (but away from the
arterial wall) are relatively small and may be of the order of
magnitude of the system resolution. The DI calculated from the envelope
FVW were almost identical to those measured at the FVW from the
centerline. Hence, the exact radial site of measurement does not affect
the accuracy of the obtained DI. On the other hand, the longitudinal
site of Doppler measurements greatly affects the FVW and, as a result,
the DI as well (Fig. 4). Accordingly, it is useful to conduct
measurements at a defined location to ensure reproducibility and
provide data that can be used for comparison. Because only the
umbilicus (the fetal side) and the placental insert of the umbilical
artery can be identified with certainty, it is now largely recommended
to measure DI of the umbilical artery on the placental site (1).
Anatomic factors.
The diameter and the length of the umbilical artery have a strong
effect on the estimated DI. The results showed that either long
umbilical arteries or small diameters yielded increased values of DI
(Fig. 5), which can be explained by the increased resistance to blood
flow as one would expect in a steady laminar flow according to
Poiseuille law. The prediction of DI for small-diameter arteries can be
related to pathologies and abnormalities such as arterial occlusions or
the presence of a single artery. Pernoll (21) reported that 14% of
infants with a single umbilical artery will die perinatally and >50%
of them will have structural defects. The decrease of DI as the
gestational age increases toward the end of pregnancy (2) may be
explained by the increase of the umbilical artery diameter.
The length of the umbilical cord at term is determined by the amount of
amniotic fluid present during the first and second trimesters and by
the fetal movement. If oligohydramnios (reduced amount of amniotic
fluid), amniotic bands, or limitation of fetal motion occur for any
reason, the umbilical cord will not develop to an average length (21).
A too-short cord may cause premature separation of the placenta,
especially during parturition. A long umbilical cord can twist around
the fetus and create problems such as cord compression and true knot of
the cord, which disturb blood flow and in extreme cases may completely
block blood flow. The model predicted low flow velocities for long
umbilical arteries but did not take into account complications such as
cord compression, although the influences on the flow are similar in
both cases. The suspicion of there being a short umbilical cord cannot
be used to explain the related pathological situation because the variation of the resistance to flow is monotonic with length changes, and thus measurements in umbilical arteries with short lengths yield
low values of DI.
Figure 6 shows that blood flow is nearly independent of wall elasticity
whereas DI may change within a discernible range. The wall properties
of arteries as well as their thicknesses change with age, and their
elasticity usually decreases with time. However, the umbilical arteries
are free of degenerative vascular diseases (25), and thus it is
reasonable to assume that any such changes in their wall properties and
the corresponding expected DI will be insignificant.
Blood properties.
Variation in blood viscosity induces changes in the expected DI similar
to those induced by changing arterial length because both have a
similar contribution to the resistance to blood flow (the denominator
of Poiseuille's law for laminar flow). Increasing blood viscosity
increases the DI (Fig. 7); however, extreme changes in blood viscosity
occur very rarely. For example, in abnormal conditions such as marked
anemia or Rh isoimmunization, blood viscosity may decrease and, as a
result, smaller values of DI are to be expected. On the other hand, the
density of blood has very little effect on blood flow rate but induces
changes in the expected DI (Fig. 7) like those for different diameters
of the artery (Fig. 5) because it appears in the expressions for the pulsatile component of blood velocity (Eqs.
8 and 9).
Blood pressure.
The influence of blood pressure was examined from different aspects
because the umbilical arterial pressure was assumed to be composed of
an oscillating component superimposed on a constant pressure level that
decreases along the artery toward the placenta. Examination of the
effect of maximal blood pressure at the fetal end of the umbilical
artery (umbilicus) was conducted by variation of the fundamental
harmonic of the unsteady component with negligible changes in mean
blood pressure and blood flow rate (Fig. 8). Figure 8 also shows that
FHR does not affect blood flow rate and the DI. A similar result was
also obtained in other models that used a sinusoidal function for the
pressure wave rather than a realistic signal (26). Nevertheless, DI
measured from the umbilical artery tend to decrease slightly with FHR
over the normal clinical range (26).
A different perspective was studied by changing the level of mean blood
pressure at the ends of the umbilical artery. First, we changed the
mean pressure either at the umbilicus
(P0,U) or at the placenta
(P0,P), which yielded
considerable variations in the blood flow rate and the DI (Fig. 9)
because of the steady pressure drop along the artery. We then changed
the mean pressure simultaneously in the umbilicus and the placenta
sites of the umbilical artery in such a way that
P0,P/P0,U = 0.5 was held constant. These changes also induced alternations in
blood flow rates and the DI, but within a much smaller range (Fig. 9)
because the absolute values of blood pressure gradient are smaller than
in cases where P0,P is held fixed
with increasing values of P0,U.
Abnormal waveforms.
In clinical practice, the shape of the FVW is also examined for cases
with the absence of end-diastolic flow or the presence of a
postsystolic notch. In this study, we simulated irregular FVW by
changing the spectral content of the input pressure wave. In
particular, we were interested in simulations of a postsystolic notch
on the FVW, which usually reflects a high distal resistance to
umbilical blood flow even in cases with normal DI. For this purpose, we
conducted simulations of cases in which we changed the magnitude of
some harmonics (either separately or in combinations) and found that
increasing the ratio between the second harmonic and the first harmonic
generates a postsystolic notch on the FVW. The values of DI from the
FVW with the notch were similar to normal values except for S/D.
Moreover, we conducted simulations with this abnormal FVW and varied
the diameter of the umbilical artery (as shown for normal FVW in Fig.
5) and obtained the same variability of the DI as with normal FVW.
In conclusion, a hemodynamic model of pulsatile blood flow in the
umbilical artery was used to study the contribution of anatomic and
physiological parameters on the variability of DI and their correlation
with fetal blood flow rate. The simulated FVW allowed analysis of the
sensitivity of DI to the site of Doppler measurements, which revealed
that the DI are insensitive to the radial adjustment of the ultrasound
beam as long as it is far away from the walls. However, the axial
location is significant to the computed values of the DI, which
supports the recommendations to measure DI at defined points (e.g.,
placental insert), a technique that allows reproducibility and
comparison among data. This study also provided an insight into the
dependence of DI on the anatomic and physiological characteristics of
umbilical blood flow. The results showed that the values of DI vary
linearly with arterial length, mean arterial pressure at the placental
insert, blood viscosity, and maximal pressure in the umbilicus, whereas
they vary inversely with arterial diameter, arterial thickness, module
of elasticity, blood density, and mean arterial pressure in the
umbilicus. The Doppler indexes as well as fetal blood flow rate are
practically independent of FHR. Additional investigation is required to
explore the cases that show changes in the values of DI while umbilical
blood flow remains unaffected.
 |
APPENDIX A |
Calculation of Doppler Indexes
The Doppler indexes are dimensionless indexes defined by the extreme
and mean velocities
(Wmin,
Wmax,
Wmean) of the
FVW. The Pourcelot's resistance index (RI), the systolic-to-diastolic
ratio (S/D), and the pulsatility index (PI) are given by (16)
|
(A1)
|
|
(A2)
|
|
(A3)
|
 |
APPENDIX B |
Wave Propagation in a Fluid-Filled Elastic Tube
Equilibrium equations for fluid.
The conservation of continuity and momentum for axisymmetric,
incompressible viscous fluid flow without body forces are given in
polar coordinates
(r, z)
by
|
(B1)
|
|
(B2)
|
|
(B3)
|
where
F and
are the fluid density
and kinematic viscosity, respectively.
Equations of motion of tube.
The tube wall is thin compared with its diameter and is assumed to
behave like a thin membranic shell. Accordingly, bending moments and
shear stresses are negligible, and tensile stresses are uniformly
distributed across its thickness. Because the problem is axisymmetric,
any element of the tube is loaded only in the principal directions
(
,
) and undergoes
displacements
and
in
and
directions, respectively
(Fig. 2). The longitudinal (
) and
circumferential (
)
equilibrium equations are (4)
|
(B4)
|
|
(B5)
|
where
R is the tube radius. The external
loads Fex,t
and Fex,n
are composed of inertia forces and the liquid forces at the fluid-wall
interface and are given by
|
(B6)
|
|
(B7)
|
where Frr,
Fzz, and
Frz are components of the stress
tensor for Newtonian
fluid
|
(B8)
|
Tube constitutive law.
The stress components T
and
Tt are related to the displacement
components
and
by the expressions (4)
|
(B9)
|
|
(B10)
|
Boundary conditions.
At the interface between fluid and the tube inner surface, the fluid
particles and the wall are always in contact. Thus
|
(B11)
|
|
(B12)
|
The component of the fluid velocity perpendicular to the wall must be
equal to the normal velocity of the inner surface of the tube. Because
r = R(z,t)
is the inner surface of the tube, this condition can be written as
|
(B13a)
|
Differentiation
of Eq. B13a gives
|
(B13b)
|
Here
w and
u must be calculated at the wall.
Solution of governing equations.
The problem wave propagation in the fluid-filled tube is governed by
Eqs. B1-B12, which constitute a
set of nonlinear equations. In cases in which the wavelength is much
larger than the tube radius, the set of equations can be linearized
without losing any significant component in the results. Accordingly,
the dependent parameters are expanded into power series of the
following form
|
(B14)
|
In
addition, it is assumed that
u1,
w1,
p1,
1 and
1 are harmonic waves, and thus
|
(B15)
|
where
(r)
is the amplitude and independent of r
for
1 and
1. Mathematical manipulation of
the set of linearized equations yields the first-order approximation
for u1,
w1, and p1 (Eqs.
8-10).
 |
&nbs |