Vol. 277, Issue 2, H499-H507, August 1999
Interaction of angiotensin II and the insulin-like growth
factor system in vascular smooth muscle cells
Thomas
Gustafsson1,
Peter
Andersson1,
Yun
Chen1,
Jan Olof
Magnusson2, and
Hans J.
Arnqvist2
Departments of 1 Biomedicine
and Surgery and 2 Medicine and
Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, S-581
85 Linköping, Sweden
 |
ABSTRACT |
We studied the effects and interactions of ANG
II and the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system in cultured rat
aortic smooth muscle cells. ANG II (1 µM) and IGF-I (10 nM)
stimulated both DNA and protein synthesis. The effects of the two
peptides in combination were additive or more than additive. The
AT1 receptor antagonist losartan
(10 and 100 µM) blocked their synergistic effect on DNA synthesis.
IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 inhibited the effect of IGF-I but not
that of ANG II on DNA synthesis. IGF-I stimulated gene expression of
IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4. ANG II decreased IGF-I, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-4
transcripts but increased the IGF-I receptor transcript. IGF-I and ANG
II in combination had similar effects on gene expression as ANG II
alone. The IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 peptides could be detected in the
conditioned medium. Our results show that ANG II and IGF-I have
synergistic effects on vascular smooth muscle cells and that they
interact in several ways.
growth; gene expression; insulin-like growth factor binding
protein; losartan
 |
INTRODUCTION |
INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR (IGF)-I is an
-helical
polypeptide that has high structural homology with proinsulin (11).
Circulating IGF-I is considered to be produced mainly in the liver, but
IGF-I is also produced locally in most cell types. IGF-I acts both as a
hormone and as an autocrine/paracrine growth factor. Vascular smooth
muscle cells (VSMC) express and secrete IGF-I (6, 13, 17), which exerts
its effect through activation of the type I IGF receptor (2). The gene
expression of IGF-I as well as IGF-I peptide is increased in
experimentally induced smooth muscle hypertrophy (1, 9, 16), and both
IGF-I mRNA as well as IGF-I receptor mRNA levels are increased in
balloon injury-induced proliferation of VSMC (5). In vitro, IGF-I is a
weak mitogen for VSMC (2).
In circulation and in the tissues, the availability of IGF-I is
regulated by six different but related IGF binding proteins (IGFBP).
VSMC are known to secrete IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4, which are able to
modulate IGF action at the cellular level, mainly by regulating its
availability to the IGF-I receptor (8, 10, 21). The gene expression of
IGFBP-2 and -4 is regulated during the development of smooth muscle
hypertrophy (9). Selected transgenic overexpression of IGF-I in mouse
aortic smooth muscle has recently been shown to cause hyperplasia of
aortic smooth muscle cells and to increase the wet weight of the aorta
(33). Targeted overexpression of IGFBP-4 in mouse aortic smooth muscle resulted in hypoplasia and decreased wet weight of the aorta (34).
IGF-I interacts with other growth factors and enhances in vitro the
effects of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB, basic fibroblast
growth factor (bFGF), and epidermal growth factor on DNA synthesis in
VSMC (31, 36). ANG II, which influences peripheral vasoconstriction,
aldosterone secretion, and electrolyte balance, is also involved in
VSMC hypertrophy and growth (30). ANG II has been reported to interact
with bFGF, transforming growth factor-
, and IGF-I (12, 20). Because
both IGF-I and ANG II are involved in smooth muscle hypertrophy, we
wanted to evaluate their possible interaction on trophic processes. The
effects of IGF-I and ANG II and their interaction on DNA and protein
synthesis in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells were studied. We
also examined whether ANG II and IGF-I regulate gene expression of
IGF-I, IGF-I receptor, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-4.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Isolation and culture of VSMC.
Rat aortic smooth muscle cells were isolated and cultured according to
a modified method of Nilsson et al. (28). Male Sprague-Dawley rats
(8-10 wk old; ALAB, Stockholm, Sweden) weighing ~200-250 g
were used. The aorta was cut into small pieces, which were digested for
1 h at 37°C in 0.1% collagenase in Ham's F-12 medium, containing 10% newborn calf serum, 0.05 mg/ml ascorbic acid, 2 µg/ml Fungizone, and 0.01 mg/ml gentamicin. The pieces of the aorta were then
transferred into fresh collagenase/Ham's F-12 medium and incubated for
another 20 h. The cell suspension was filtered through a nylon filter (pore size, 48 µm; Schweizerische Seidengaze Fabrik, Zurich,
Switzerland), washed in Ham's F-12 medium, and then plated in
culturing flasks in Ham's F-12 medium. The cells were cultured at a
temperature of 37°C, humidity of 85%, and at a
CO2 concentration of 5% in air.
The medium was changed twice a week, and the cells were harvested using
a solution of trypsin (0.25%) and EDTA (0.02%). The cells were
characterized as smooth muscle cells by morphological criteria and with
an antibody that recognizes a unique epitope of
-smooth muscle actin
(32). Cells from the 2nd to the 10th passage were used, and all
experiments were performed on near-confluent cells.
[3H]thymidine incorporation
into DNA.
DNA synthesis was measured as
[3H]thymidine
incorporation into DNA according to a modified method of Nilsson and
Thyberg (29). Briefly, the VSMC were counted in a Bürker chamber
and then seeded out in equal numbers in 24-well plates. The cells were
grown to near-confluence and were then starved in serum-free F-12
medium for 24 h. The culture medium was then changed to fresh
serum-free F-12 medium with the addition of
[3H]thymidine (1 µCi/ml), and the cells were incubated for 24 h in the presence or
absence of different additions as given in the text. Triplicate wells
were used for the different conditions. The VSMC were washed with F-12
medium, and DNA was precipitated with ice-cold 5% TCA. The cells were
treated with 0.1 M KOH, and 500 µl of the solution (1 ml) were
removed to scintillation vials for the subsequent measuring of
radioactivity in a liquid scintillation counter.
[3H]leucine incorporation
into protein.
Protein synthesis was studied by measuring incorporation of
[3H]leucine into
protein. The cells were serum starved for 24 h and then incubated with
or without peptides for 18 h.
[3H]leucine was then
pulsed in a final concentration of 1 µCi/ml, and the incubation was
continued for another 90 min. The cells were then washed with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.9 M EDTA (pH 7.4) and then with
5% TCA. A solution containing 5% SDS, 20 mM
Na2CO3,
and 2 mM EDTA was used for dissolving the cells. The plate was
swirled, and 500 µl of the solution (1 ml) were removed to
scintillation vials.
Measurement of mRNA and DNA.
Near-confluent cells, cultured in Petri dishes, were deprived of serum
for 24 h and then incubated with or without polypeptides at indicated
concentrations for 6 or 24 h. The cells were then harvested in SET
buffer (1% SDS, 20 mM Tris, and 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) and homogenized
with a Polytron. Proteinase K was added, and the samples were extracted
with phenol and chloroform according to the method of Durnam and
Palmiter (15). Total nucleic acids were precipitated in 95% ethanol.
The DNA content was measured as described by Labarca and Paigen (24).
The mRNA levels for IGF-I, IGF-I receptor, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-4 were
analyzed with a solution hybridization assay using
35S-UTP-labeled RNA probes. The
probe for IGF-I was synthesized from 153 bp of cDNA from exon 3 in the
mouse. This probe could detect all the IGF-I transcripts. Because the
mouse sequence is 92% homologous to the corresponding rat sequence, it
could be used for detection in the rat. The IGF-I receptor probe
contained 265 bases, complementary to a part of the
5'-untranslated region, to a sequence coding for the signal
peptide and 53 amino acids of the
-subunit. The IGFBP-2 probe
consisted of 397 bases complementary to exons 2 and 3 and part of exon
4 of the IGFBP-2 gene. The probe for IGFBP-4 consisted of 444 bases of
a rat cDNA clone. The probes were synthesized as described by Melton et
al. (27). The samples were hybridized with each probe for 18 h at
70°C. The hybridization solution contained a total volume of 40 µl: 0.6 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris, 4 mM EDTA, 0.75 mM dithiothreitol, 25%
formamide, and 0.1% SDS. At least 10,000 cpm
35S-UTP-labeled probe was used per
hybridization. RNases were then added, and the double-stranded RNA was
precipitated in 6 M TCA. The hybrids were collected on filter, and the
radioactivity was counted in a liquid scintillation counter. In each
assay, a standard curve was included. The curve was created by
hybridizing known amounts of in vitro-synthesized standard (sense) RNA
with the probe (antisense).
Immunodetection of IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 in conditioned medium.
Near-confluent VSMC grown in Petri dishes were starved in serum-free
F-12 medium for 24 h. After the cells were stimulated with IGF-I, ANG
II, or IGF-I in combination with ANG II for 24 h, the conditioned
medium (5 ml) was collected. EDTA in a final concentration of 5 mM was
added to prevent protein degradation. Fifty microliters of 0.1% BSA
and 5 ml of 10% TCA were added to precipitate the protein. The samples
were incubated at 4°C overnight and were then centrifuged at
11,000 rpm at 4°C for 30 min. The pellet was washed twice with
95% ethanol and was then dissolved in 250 µl of electrode buffer.
Forty microliters of the sample were mixed with 20 µl of sample
buffer and then applied on 15% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were then
transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane for 1 h (200 mA) with transfer buffer (15 mM Tris, 120 mM glycine, and 5% methanol,
pH 8.3). The sheets were saturated with 0.2% polyvinyl alcohol
dissolved in Tris-buffered saline (TBS-Tween, 0.2%), pH 7.6 (overnight), and incubated for 1 h with polyclonal antibodies
(1:3,000) raised against rat IGFBP-2 or IGFBP-4. After washing six
times (5 min each) with TBS-Tween, a donkey anti-mouse IgG horseradish
peroxidase-labeled antibody (1:3,000) was added for 1 h. After washing
(6 times, 5 min), the detection was visualized by enhanced
chemiluminescence (ECL) analysis with the Amersham ECL system
(Amersham) using ECL Hyperfilms for exposure.
Chemicals.
Proteinase K was from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
35S-UTP,
[3H]thymidine, and
[3H]leucine were from
Amersham International, and the chemicals for antisense (probe) and
sense (standard) synthesis were from Promega (Madison, WI). RNase A,
RNase T1, and herring sperm DNA were obtained from Boehringer
(Mannheim, Germany). Phenol was from Fischer Scientific (Fair Lawn,
NJ), trypsin was from Difco Labs (Detroit, MI), and ANG II and
collagenase type I were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). IGFBP-1 was a gift
from Dr. Mats Lake (KabiGen, Sweden). Scintillation liquid (Ultima
Gold) was obtained from Packard Instruments (Meriden, CT). The
monoclonal antibody against
-smooth muscle actin was from Sigma
Immunochemicals (La Jolla, CA). Chemicals and solutions for cell
culture were received from GIBCO BRL Life Technologies (Täby,
Sweden). Polyclonal antibodies to IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 were from Austral
Biologicals, and the PVDF membrane was from Du Pont. Recombinant human
IGF-I was a kind gift from Dr. A. Skottner, KabiPharmacia Peptide
Hormones (Stockholm, Sweden).
Statistics.
Values are given as means ± SE. Statistical comparisons were made
by Student's t-test, and if more than
two groups were compared, ANOVA and Scheffé's method were used.
A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
 |
RESULTS |
Effects on DNA and protein synthesis.
Both IGF-I and ANG II dose-dependently stimulated
[3H]thymidine
incorporation into the VSMC up to concentrations of
10
8 and
10
6 M, respectively (Fig.
1, A
and B). When added in combination, IGF-I (10
8 M) and ANG II
(10
6 M) had additive or
more than additive effects on DNA synthesis (Figs.
2A and
3, A and
B), and they also had additive
effects on protein synthesis (Fig.
2B).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Dose response for insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I)-stimulated DNA
synthesis (A) and for ANG
II-stimulated DNA synthesis (B) in
cultures of rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Values represent
percentage of control values. A:
near-confluent cell cultures were exposed to IGF-I
(10 8 to
10 12 M) for 24 h, and
[3H]thymidine
incorporation was determined. B:
near-confluent cell cultures were exposed to ANG II
(10 6 to
10 10 M), and
[3H]thymidine
incorporation was determined. Values are given as means ± SE
(n = 3), and samples were measured in
triplicate.
|
|



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of IGF-I- and ANG II-induced DNA and protein synthesis. Bars
represent percent control values. A:
near-confluent cell cultures were incubated in F-12 medium for 24 h in
presence of
[3H]thymidine, with or
without IGF-I (10 8 M), ANG
II (10 6 M), or their
combination and in presence or absence of 10 or 100 µM losartan
(Los). B: near-confluent cell cultures
were incubated in F-12 medium for 18 h and were exposed to IGF-I
(10 8 M), ANG II
(10 6 M), or their
combination and in presence or absence of 10 or 100 µM losartan.
[3H]leucine was
pulsed, and cells were incubated for another 90 min.
C: effect of insulin-like growth
factor binding protein (IGFBP)-1 (500 µg/ml) on IGF-I
(10 8 M)- and ANG II
(10 6 M)-induced DNA
synthesis. Values are given as means ± SE. Statistical comparison
was made according to Scheffé's method.
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 compared
with control.
|
|


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Dose-response curves for IGF-I- and ANG II-stimulated DNA
synthesis. Values represent percent control values.
A: in top curve, near-confluent cell
cultures were incubated in F-12 medium for 24 h in presence of
[3H]thymidine, with
ANG II at a fixed concentration
(10 6 M) and IGF-I at
indicated concentrations
(10 8 to
10 12 M). Bottom curve is
same as in Fig. 1A.
B: in top curve, near-confluent cell
cultures were incubated in F-12 medium for 24 h in presence of
[3H]thymidine, with
IGF-I at a fixed concentration
(10 8 M) and ANG II at
indicated concentrations
(10 6 to
10 10 M). Bottom curve is
same as in Fig. 1B. Values are given
as means ± SE (n = 3), and samples
were measured in triplicate.
|
|
Because ANG II is known to mediate the majority of its biological
effects through activation of the ANG II type 1 (AT1) receptor (26), which is
the predominant ANG II receptor in VSMC (25), the
AT1 receptor antagonist losartan
was tested. The effect of ANG II on DNA and protein synthesis was
totally blocked by the addition of 10 or 100 µM losartan. In
addition, 100 µM losartan inhibited the synergistic effect of IGF-I
and ANG II on DNA synthesis and also inhibited the effect on protein
synthesis, although not significantly (Fig. 2,
A and
B). Losartan did not significantly alter the effect of IGF-I on DNA or protein synthesis (Fig. 2, A and
B), and losartan alone did not have
any effect on the parameters studied (data not shown).
We used IGFBP-1 as a blocking agent of IGF-I. IGFBP-1 (500 ng/ml)
inhibited the IGF-I-induced thymidine incorporation (Fig. 2C). To see whether ANG II needs
endogenous IGF-I for inducing DNA synthesis, as previously proposed
(12), IGFBP-1 was added together with ANG II. IGFBP-1 (500 ng/ml) did
not alter the effect by ANG II (Fig.
2C) and did not alone have any
effect on thymidine incorporation (data not shown).
To further investigate the interaction of IGF-I and ANG II on DNA
synthesis, the peptides were added in combination with one peptide's concentration fixed and the other concentration varied. IGF-I was fixed at 10
8 M
and ANG II at 10
6 M. Dose-response curves for IGF-I and ANG II alone were included in the
figures for comparison. As shown in Fig. 3,
A and
B, the synergistic action of IGF-I and
ANG II appeared at an IGF-I concentration of
10
11 to
10
10 M, when ANG II was
kept constant and at an ANG II concentration of
10
8 to
10
7 M, when IGF-I was kept
constant, i.e., at about the same concentrations at which the peptides
added alone induced DNA synthesis.
Gene expression of IGF-I, IGF-I receptor, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-4.
IGF-I did not have any effect on IGF-I mRNA levels in VSMC. ANG II
tended to induce a decrease of IGF-I mRNA after 6 h of incubation, and
this effect was significant after 24 h. As shown in Fig.
4A,
IGF-I and ANG II in combination tended to have similar effects on the
IGF-I mRNA level as ANG II alone, i.e., inhibitory actions.




View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Gene expression of IGF-I, IGF-I receptor, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-4 in rat
aortic smooth muscle cells. Near-confluent rat vascular smooth muscle
cells were incubated in presence or absence of IGF-I
(10 8 M), ANG II
(10 6 M), and IGF-I + ANG II
for 6 and 24 h. mRNA levels were determined by solution hybridization.
A: IGF-I peptide mRNA
(n = 4).
B: IGF-I receptor mRNA
(n = 3).
C: IGFBP-2 mRNA
(n = 4).
D: IGFBP-4 mRNA
(n = 4). Samples were analyzed in
triplicate. Values are given as means ± SE. Statistical comparison
was made according to Scheffé's method.
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 compared with
control.
|
|
IGF-I receptor mRNA levels in the VSMC were not affected by IGF-I
stimulation. ANG II as well as IGF-I and ANG II added in combination
caused an increase of the IGF-I receptor mRNA already after 6 h.
This effect was sustained for up to 24 h (Fig.
4B).
The basal levels of IGFBP-2 mRNA were increased by IGF-I stimulation
after 6 h of incubation, and this effect was sustained for up to 24 h.
ANG II decreased IGFBP-2 mRNA when incubated for 24 h, and there was a
tendency of a decrease already after 6 h of incubation. The combination
of IGF-I and ANG II stimulated IGFBP-2 mRNA after 6 h, an effect which
was turned into a significant inhibition after 24 h (Fig.
4C).
As for IGFBP-2 mRNA, IGF-I also stimulated IGFBP-4 mRNA levels after
6 and 24 h of incubation, whereas the effect of ANG II was
inhibitory already after 6 h and sustained in the 24-h incubation. IGF-I and ANG II in combination had similar inhibitory actions on
IGFBP-4 mRNA as ANG II alone (Fig.
4D).
Analysis of endogenous IGFBP-2 and -4 in the conditioned medium by
SDS-PAGE and immunoblot.
The IGFBP-2 band was determined to be ~35 kDa, and an immunoreactive
band, probably a proteolytic fragment of IGFBP-2, was detected at 25 kDa after 24-h incubation (Fig.
5A).
Neither IGF-I, ANG II, nor the peptides added in combination
significantly altered the IGFBP-2 band or the 25-kDa band as determined
by optical density measurements (Table 1).


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
IGFBP-2 (A) and IGFBP-4
(B) levels in conditioned medium.
Near-confluent rat vascular smooth muscle cells were stimulated with
IGF-I (10 8 M), ANG II
(10 6 M), or IGF-I and ANG
II in combination. After 24 h, conditioned medium was collected,
concentrated, and subjected to Western immunoblot analysis.
Representative data are shown (n = 3).
Intensity measurements (optical densitometric units) for respective
blots are shown in Table 1. Human recombinant IGFBP-2 (hrIGFBP-2) and
IGFBP-4 (hrIGFBP-4) were used as controls.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1.
Summary of the Western immunoblot data of IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4,
evaluated by optical density measurements
|
|
IGFBP-4 was detected at ~26 kDa, and an immunoreactive band was
detected at 16 kDa (probably a proteolytic fragment) after 24 h of
incubation (Fig. 5B). Neither of the
peptides nor the peptides in combination caused any significant changes
of the IGFBP-4 band intensity compared with control. IGF-I increased the amounts of the 16-kDa immunoreactive band, whereas ANG II or IGF-I
and ANG II in combination had no effect (Table 1).
 |
DISCUSSION |
The present investigation shows additive effects of ANG II and IGF-I on
DNA and protein synthesis in VSMC. ANG II increased the gene expression
of IGF-I receptor and decreased that of IGF-I, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-4,
whereas IGF-I increased the gene expression of IGFBP-2 and -4. This
indicates different actions of ANG II and IGF-I in VSMC as well as a
complex interaction of ANG II and the IGF system.
IGF-I stimulated DNA synthesis in VSMC with a dose-response curve
similar to previous reports (7, 10, 19). ANG II also stimulated DNA
synthesis in a dose-dependent manner, in accordance with some reports
(12, 14), whereas others have found that ANG II fails to elicit any
stimulation on DNA synthesis (3, 23). This variation in the growth
response to ANG II could be due to different culture conditions: cell
density, aging, and many other factors. IGF-I and ANG II were also
found to stimulate leucine incorporation. IGF-I in nanomolar
concentrations has been reported to stimulate protein synthesis in
intact bovine arteries (4), and ANG II has been found to cause
dose-dependent stimulation of protein synthesis in cultured rat VSMC
(3).
There is evidence that both IGF-I and ANG II are involved in the
development of smooth muscle hypertrophy/hyperplasia (2, 30, 33), but
to our knowledge, their interaction on these processes has not been
studied. We found that IGF-I
(10
8 M) and ANG II
(10
6 M) added together had
synergistic effects on DNA as well as on protein synthesis. This
suggests that they stimulate smooth muscle cell growth largely by
separate mechanisms. It has been reported that insulin can enhance the
effect of ANG II (100 nM) on DNA synthesis in rat VSMC at high insulin
concentrations (10
7 to
10
5 M) (22). Insulin
receptors are few or absent in VSMC, and at high concentrations,
insulin may act through IGF-I receptors (2). The dose-response curve
obtained for the IGF-I effects in the present study suggests that its
effect was elicited through the IGF-I receptor. By the addition of the
AT1 receptor antagonist losartan,
we were able to block the ANG II effect as well as the synergistic
effect of IGF-I and ANG II in combination on DNA synthesis, whereas
losartan did not alter the effect of IGF-I. Losartan also tended to
block the synergistic effects on protein synthesis, although there was
no significance. These results indicate that the growth-promoting
effects are mediated through IGF-I and
AT1 receptors.
To further study the interaction and the synergistic effects of IGF-I
and ANG II, we created dose-response curves where one peptide's
concentration was fixed at a high concentration while the concentration
of the other peptide was varied. Our results indicate that the
synergistic effect appears at doses at which the peptides alone induce
DNA synthesis.
We have previously shown that exogenous IGFBP-1, -2, and -4 have
inhibitory effects on IGF-I action (18). In that study, IGFBP-1 was
shown to be the most potent inhibitor of IGF-I-induced DNA synthesis in
VSMC. Because it has been reported that endogenous IGF-I is critical
for ANG II-induced DNA synthesis in VSMC (12), we designed an
experiment in which we used IGFBP-1 as a blocking agent of secreted
IGF-I. IGFBP-1 (500 ng/ml) significantly decreased the
exogenous IGF-I effect on DNA synthesis, whereas it did not alter the
effect of ANG II. These results suggest that autocrine IGF-I is not
needed for ANG II-stimulated growth, since IGFBP-1 showed no inhibitory
effect on ANG II action. The results are in line with the concept that
IGF-I and ANG II act through activation of different signal mechanisms.
We further investigated how IGF-I
(10
8 M) and ANG II
(10
6 M) regulate gene
expression of IGF-I, IGF-I receptor, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-4 in VSMC.
Treating the cells with ANG II or ANG II and IGF-I in combination did
rapidly cause an increase in the IGF-I receptor mRNA level. In
agreement with these findings, Ververis et al. (35) have reported an
increase of the IGF-I receptor number in the plasma membrane of rat
VSMC, when treated with ANG II. An increase of the IGF-I receptor level
may therefore be of importance for inducing a potentiation of the
effects of IGF-I by ANG II. ANG II also induced a pronounced
downregulation of IGF-I mRNA after 24 h of stimulation, in contrast to
the increase reported by Delafontaine and Lou (12). A decrease in IGF-I
mRNA has also been shown to be caused by bFGF and PDGF-BB in VSMC (6, 17).
In this study, we found that IGF-I stimulation increases IGFBP-2 and
IGFBP-4 mRNA levels, whereas ANG II decreases their mRNA levels in
VSMC. According to Cohick et al. (10), IGF-I treatment affected neither
IGFBP-2 nor IGFBP-4 mRNA levels in porcine VSMC. Giannella-Neto et al.
(17) reported that PDGF-BB increased gene expression of IGFBP-4 in rat
VSMC. The increase in IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 mRNA when treating the cells
with high IGF-I concentrations could indicate an induction of these
IGFBP to protect the cells from IGF-I overstimulation.
Both IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 could be detected in the conditioned medium.
In addition, we further detected one immunoreactive band each for the
IGFBP. These bands may be proteolytic fragments of the IGFBP. We were
not able to detect any significant changes in intensity of the main
band when treating the cells with IGF-I or ANG II, as determined by
optical density measurements (Table 1). Cohick et al. (10) showed that
IGF-I did not regulate IGFBP-2 secretion but decreased the IGFBP-4
amount present in the conditioned medium from porcine VSMC.
Giannella-Neto et al. (17) showed that PDGF isoforms did not
significantly alter release of the IGFBP-2 but evoked a five- to
sixfold increase in the IGFBP-4 amounts in the conditioned medium from
rat VSMC. In the present study, IGF-I stimulated the formation of the
IGFBP-4 fragment without altering the intensity of the main band,
indicating an increase in the metabolic processing of IGFBP-4.
IGF-I-dependent degradation of endogenous IGFBP-4 has previously been
reported in VSMC (10, 21). An active metabolic processing of the IGFBP can be significant for its regulatory role. Taken together, IGF-I and
ANG II markedly regulate the mRNA for IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 in VSMC, and
both these peptides can be detected in conditioned medium. At least for
IGFBP-4, an increase in a proteolytic fragment was detected.
In conclusion, our study shows that there is a close interaction of ANG
II and the IGF system in vascular smooth muscle cells. As it appears,
IGF-I and ANG II act largely through separate signaling mechanisms and
have synergistic trophic effects. Endogenous IGF-I is not critical for
eliciting the effect of ANG II. However, our data suggest that ANG II
may enhance the IGF-I effect by upregulating the IGF-I receptor mRNA level.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
Financial support was obtained from Swedish Medical Research
Council Grant 19x-4952, the Swedish Diabetes Association, and Novo
Nordisk Foundation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. Gustafsson,
Dept. of Biomedicine and Surgery, Div. of Cell Biology, Faculty of
Health Sciences, Linköping University, S-581 85 Linköping,
Sweden (E-mail: ThoGu{at}mcb.liu.se).
Received 19 August 1998; accepted in final form 30 March 1999.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Anwar, A.,
and
P. Delafontaine.
Hypertension increases insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 mRNA levels in rat aorta.
Hypertension
24:
679-685,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.
Arnqvist, H. J.,
K. E. Bornfeldt,
Y. Chen,
and
T. Lindstrom.
The insulin-like growth factor system in vascular smooth muscle: interaction with insulin and growth factors.
Metab. Clin. Exp.
44:
58-66,
1995.
3.
Berk, B. C.,
V. Vekshtein,
H. M. Gordon,
and
T. Tsuda.
Angiotensin II-stimulated protein synthesis in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells.
Hypertension
13:
305-314,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4.
Bornfeldt, K. E.,
and
H. J. Arnqvist.
Effect of insulin-like growth factor-I on metabolism in bovine mesenteric arteries.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
131:
563-568,
1987[Medline].
5.
Bornfeldt, K. E.,
H. J. Arnqvist,
and
L. Capron.
In vivo proliferation of rat vascular smooth muscle in relation to diabetes mellitus insulin-like growth factor I and insulin.
Diabetologia
35:
104-108,
1992[Medline].
6.
Bornfeldt, K. E.,
H. J. Arnqvist,
and
G. Norstedt.
Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-I gene expression by growth factors in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells.
J. Endocrinol.
125:
381-386,
1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.
Bornfeldt, K. E.,
R. A. Gidlof,
A. Wasteson,
M. Lake,
A. Skottner,
and
H. J. Arnqvist.
Binding and biological effects of insulin, insulin analogues and insulin-like growth factors in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Comparison of maximal growth promoting activities.
Diabetologia
34:
307-313,
1991[Medline].
8.
Bourner, M. J.,
W. H. Busby, Jr.,
N. R. Siegel,
G. G. Krivi,
R. H. McCusker,
and
D. R. Clemmons.
Cloning and sequence determination of bovine insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2, IGFBP-2: comparison of its structural and functional properties with IGFBP-1.
J. Cell. Biochem.
48:
215-226,
1992[Medline].
9.
Chen, Y.,
K. E. Bornfeldt,
A. Arner,
E. Jennische,
U. Malmqvist,
B. Uvelius,
and
H. J. Arnqvist.
Increase in insulin-like growth factor I in hypertrophying smooth muscle.
Am. J. Physiol.
266 (Endocrinol. Metab. 29):
E224-E229,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
Cohick, W. S.,
A. Gockerman,
and
D. R. Clemmons.
Vascular smooth muscle cells synthesize two forms of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins which are regulated differently by the insulin-like growth factors.
J. Cell. Physiol.
157:
52-60,
1993[Medline].
11.
Daughaday, W. H.,
and
P. Rotwein.
Insulin-like growth factors I and II. Peptide, messenger ribonucleic acid and gene structures, serum, and tissue concentrations.
Endocr. Rev.
10:
68-91,
1989[Medline].
12.
Delafontaine, P.,
and
H. Lou.
Angiotensin II regulates insulin-like growth factor I gene expression in vascular smooth muscle cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:
16866-16870,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13.
Delafontaine, P.,
H. Lou,
and
R. W. Alexander.
Regulation of insulin-like growth factor I messenger RNA levels in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Hypertension
18:
742-747,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.
Dubey, R. K.,
A. Roy,
and
H. W. Overbeck.
Culture of renal arteriolar smooth muscle cells. Mitogenic responses to angiotensin II.
Circ. Res.
71:
1143-1152,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15.
Durnam, D. M.,
and
R. D. Palmiter.
A practical approach for quantitating specific mRNAs by solution hybridization.
Anal. Biochem.
131:
385-393,
1983[Medline].
16.
Fath, K. A.,
R. W. Alexander,
and
P. Delafontaine.
Abdominal coarctation increases insulin-like growth factor I mRNA levels in rat aorta.
Circ. Res.
72:
271-277,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Giannella-Neto, D.,
A. Kamyar,
B. Sharifi,
C. J. Pirola,
J. Kupfer,
R. G. Rosenfeld,
J. S. Forrester,
and
J. A. Fagin.
Platelet-derived growth factor isoforms decrease insulin-like growth factor I gene expression in rat vascular smooth muscle cells and selectively stimulate the biosynthesis of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4.
Circ. Res.
71:
646-656,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.
Gustafsson, T., P. Andersson, and H. J. Arnqvist.
Different inhibitory actions of IGFBP-1, -2 and -4 on IGF-I
effects in vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Endocrinol. In press.
19.
Hwang, D. L.,
L. J. Latus,
and
A. Lev-Ran.
Effects of platelet-contained growth factors (PDGF, EGF, IGF-I, and TGF-beta) on DNA synthesis in porcine aortic smooth muscle cells in culture.
Exp. Cell Res.
200:
358-360,
1992[Medline].
20.
Itoh, H.,
M. Mukoyama,
R. E. Pratt,
G. H. Gibbons,
and
V. J. Dzau.
Multiple autocrine growth factors modulate vascular smooth muscle cell growth response to angiotensin II.
J. Clin. Invest.
91:
2268-2274,
1993.
21.
Kamyar, A.,
C. J. Pirola,
H. M. Wang,
B. Sharifi,
S. Mohan,
J. S. Forrester,
and
J. A. Fagin.
Expression and insulin-like growth factor-dependent proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-4 are regulated by cell confluence in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Circ. Res.
74:
576-585,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22.
Ko, Y.,
A. Sachinidis,
A. J. Wieczorek,
M. Appenheimer,
R. Dusing,
and
H. Vetter.
Insulin enhances angiotensin II induced DNA synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells of the rat.
Clin. Investig.
71:
379-382,
1993[Medline].
23.
Ko, Y.,
H. Stiebler,
G. Nickenig,
A. J. Wieczorek,
H. Vetter,
and
A. Sachinidis.
Synergistic action of angiotensin II, insulin-like growth factor-I, and transforming growth factor-beta on platelet-derived growth factor-BB, basic fibroblastic growth factor, and epidermal growth factor-induced DNA synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Am. J. Hypertens.
6:
496-499,
1993[Medline].
24.
Labarca, C.,
and
K. Paigen.
A simple, rapid, and sensitive DNA assay procedure.
Anal. Biochem.
102:
344-352,
1980[Medline].
25.
Leduc, I.,
and
S. Meloche.
Angiotensin II stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of the focal adhesion-associated protein paxillin in aortic smooth muscle cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:
4401-4404,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26.
Martin, M. M.,
C. R. White,
H. Li,
P. J. Miller,
and
T. S. Elton.
A functional comparison of the rat type-1 angiotensin II receptors (AT1AR and AT1BR).
Regul. Pept.
60:
135-147,
1995[Medline].
27.
Melton, D. A.,
P. A. Krieg,
M. R. Rebagliati,
T. Maniatis,
K. Zinn,
and
M. R. Green.
Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter.
Nucleic Acids Res.
12:
7035-7056,
1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28.
Nilsson, J.,
T. Ksiazek,
C. H. Heldin,
and
J. Thyberg.
Demonstration of stimulatory effects of platelet-derived growth factor on cultivated rat arterial smooth muscle cells. Differences between cells from young and adult animals.
Exp. Cell Res.
145:
231-237,
1983[Medline].
29.
Nilsson, J.,
and
J. Thyberg.
Fine structure of arterial smooth muscle cells cultured in the presence of whole blood serum or plasma-derived serum.
Cell Tissue Res.
223:
87-99,
1982[Medline].
30.
Owens, G. K.
Determinants of angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy versus hyperplasia in vascular smooth muscle.
Drug Dev. Res.
29:
83-87,
1993.
31.
Pfeifle, B.,
H. Boeder,
and
H. Ditschuneit.
Interaction of receptors for insulin-like growth factor I, platelet-derived growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor in rat aortic cells.
Endocrinology
120:
2251-2258,
1987[Abstract].
32.
Skalli, O.,
P. Ropraz,
A. Trzeciak,
G. Benzonana,
D. Gillessen,
and
G. Gabbiani.
A monoclonal antibody against alpha-smooth muscle actin: a new probe for smooth muscle differentiation.
J. Cell Biol.
103:
2787-2796,
1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33.
Wang, J.,
W. Niu,
Y. Nikiforov,
S. Naito,
S. Chernausek,
D. Witte,
D. LeRoith,
A. Strauch,
and
J. A. Fagin.
Targeted overexpression of IGF-I evokes distinct patterns of organ remodeling in smooth muscle cell tissue beds of transgenic mice.
J. Clin. Invest.
100:
1425-1439,
1997[Medline].
34.
Wang, J.,
W. Niu,
D. P. Witte,
S. D. Chernausek,
Y. E. Nikiforov,
T. L. Clemens,
B. Sharifi,
A. R. Strauch,
and
J. A. Fagin.
Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) in smooth muscle cells of transgenic mice through a smooth muscle alpha-actin-IGFBP-4 fusion gene induces smooth muscle hypoplasia.
Endocrinology
139:
2605-2614,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
35.
Ververis, J. J.,
L. Ku,
and
P. Delafontaine.
Regulation of insulin-like growth factor I receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells by growth factors and phorbol esters.
Circ. Res.
72:
1285-1292,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36.
Yamamoto, M.,
and
K. Yamamoto.
Growth regulation in primary culture of rabbit arterial smooth muscle cells by platelet-derived growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-I, and epidermal growth factor.
Exp. Cell Res.
212:
62-68,
1994[Medline].
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 277(2):H499-H507
0002-9513/99 $5.00
Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society