Vol. 277, Issue 3, H1069-H1080, September 1999
2-Adrenoceptor-mediated
presynaptic inhibition in bulbospinal neurons of rostral
ventrolateral medulla
Abdallah
Hayar and
Patrice G.
Guyenet
Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville,
Virginia 22908
 |
ABSTRACT |
The rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM)
controls sympathetic tone via excitatory bulbospinal neurons. It is
also the main target of
2-adrenoceptor
(
2-AR) agonists used for
treatment of hypertension. In this study, we examined the synaptic
mechanisms by which
2-AR
agonists may inhibit the activity of RVLM bulbospinal neurons. We
recorded selectively from RVLM bulbospinal neurons in brain stem slices
of neonate rats (P5-P21) using the patch-clamp technique (holding
potential
70 mV).
2-ARs
were activated by norepinephrine (NE, 30 µM) in the presence of the
1-adrenoceptor blocker
prazosin. NE induced modest outward currents (5-28 pA) in 70% of
the cells that were blocked by barium and by the
2-AR antagonist
2-methoxyidazoxan. The magnitude of this current was not correlated
with the tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity of the neurons. Mono-
and oligosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) or
monosynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) were evoked by
focal electrical stimulation. In all cells, NE decreased the amplitude
of the evoked EPSCs in the absence or presence of barium (49 and 70%)
and decreased the amplitude of the evoked IPSCs (64 and
59%). The effect of NE on EPSC amplitude was blocked by
2-methoxyidazoxan. Focal stimulation produced a 1- to 2-s EPSC
afterdischarge (probably due to activation of interneurons) that was
53% inhibited by NE. In the presence of tetrodotoxin, NE decreased the
frequency of miniature EPSCs by 74%. In short,
2-AR stimulation produces weak
postsynaptic responses in RVLM bulbospinal neurons and powerful
presynaptic inhibition of both glutamatergic and GABAergic inputs. Thus
the inhibition of RVL bulbospinal neurons by
2-AR agonists in vivo results
from a combination of postsynaptic inhibition, disfacilitation, and disinhibition.
presympathetic neurons; C1 cells; norepinephrine; evoked
postsynaptic currents; whole cell recordings
 |
INTRODUCTION |
DRUGS with
2-adrenoceptor
(
2-AR) agonist properties such
as clonidine are effective for treating moderate to severe forms of
hypertension (30). There is general agreement that a major site of action of these drugs is the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) (31, for review see Refs. 8 and 32), but their precise site of
action within this structure remains unknown. The RVLM harbors
bulbospinal neurons that send a monosynaptic excitatory projection
(presympathetic neurons) to sympathetic preganglionic neurons (6, 27).
These neurons are active in vivo and receive convergent excitatory and
inhibitory inputs from multiple sources (9). Because some of these
cells are inhibited by iontophoretic application of
2-AR agonists in vivo,
postsynaptic inhibition of RVLM presympathetic neurons probably
contributes to the sympatholytic action of these substances (1). In
support of this interpretation,
2-AR agonists activate an
inwardly rectifying potassium current in many RVLM bulbospinal neurons
in vitro (18), and the presympathetic neurons that have a
catecholaminergic phenotype (C1 cells) express
2A-ARs as shown by
immunocytochemical studies (10). However, postsynaptic inhibition alone
seems unlikely to account for the inhibition of RVLM presympathetic
neurons caused by systemic administration of clonidine and related
drugs. One reason is that only 50% of these cells are noticeably
inhibited by iontophoretic application of
2-AR agonists in vivo (1).
Additionally, these agents produce a small potassium current (mean 12 pA) in vitro and only in about two-thirds of the cells (18). Finally,
2-AR agonists also inhibit calcium currents in the C1 cells of RVLM, which could conceivably lead
to an increase in their excitability (20) by decreasing the amplitude
of the spike after hyperpolarization as has been reported in caudal
raphe neurons (2).
These discrepancies prompted us to test the hypothesis that a
presynaptic modulation of transmitter release in RVLM could also
contribute to the inhibition of presympathetic neurons and thus
contribute to the hypotensive actions of
2-AR agonists. This hypothesis
is supported by the findings that activation of presynaptic
2-ARs can inhibit glutamate
transmission elsewhere in the brain stem, for example, in the spinal
trigeminal nucleus (39) and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (4).
In the present study, we used a retrograde marker injected into the
thoracic spinal cord in combination with the patch-clamp technique to
record selectively from identified bulbospinal RVLM neurons in slices.
Neurons were recorded exclusively from a narrow region of the medulla
from which spinal projections target selectively the spinal laminae
involved in autonomic regulation (33, 34). As in our previous work
(18), we further characterized whether the recorded neurons could be
classified as catecholaminergic C1 neurons using immunostaining for
tyrosine hydroxylase. Our aim was to investigate whether norepinephrine
(NE) modulates synaptic inputs to these cells. We found that NE
activates presynaptic
2-ARs,
leading to a large reduction in excitatory synaptic transmission. Unexpectedly, GABAergic neurotransmission was reduced as well by NE,
indicating that
2-AR activation
in the RVLM produces both disfacilitation and disinhibition of
bulbospinal RVLM neurons.
Some of these results have appeared in preliminary form (12).
 |
METHODS |
Slice preparation. Sprague-Dawley rat
pups (2-3 days old) were anesthetized by hypothermia, and a
suspension of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-tagged microbeads
(0.3-0.5 µl; Lumafluor) was injected bilaterally into the upper
thoracic spinal cord to retrogradely label presympathetic bulbospinal
RVLM neurons. The injection site was not restricted to the
intermediolateral cell column because of the small size of the spinal
cord. However, RVLM neurons that are retrogradely labeled from the
thoracic spinal cord are known to innervate selectively the autonomic
cell column (33, 34).
One to eighteen days later, the rats (5-21 days old) were deeply
anesthetized by either hypothermia (<7 days old) or halothane (>7
days old). The rats were decapitated, and their brain stems were
blocked and immersed in sucrose-artificial cerebrospinal fluid
(sucrose-aCSF) equilibrated with 95%
O2-5%
CO2 (pH = 7.38). The sucrose-aCSF
had the following composition (in mM): 26 NaHCO3, 1 NaH2PO4,
3 KCl, 5 MgSO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 10 glucose, and 248 sucrose.
Coronal slices (200 µm thick) were cut with a Microslicer (Ted Pella,
Redding, CA). The optimally located slices were then incubated until
used at room temperature (22°C) in lactic acid-aCSF equilibrated
with 95% O2-5%
CO2 (composition in mM: 124 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4,
2 MgSO4, 2 CaCl2, 10 glucose, and 4.5 lactic
acid). For recording, a single slice containing the RVLM was placed in
a recording chamber on an upright epifluorescent microscope (Olympus
BH-2). The selected slices (one or two per brain) were identified under
a ×10 objective by their characteristic pattern of retrograde
labeling (18). In this chamber, the slice was continuously superfused
at the rate of 1.5 ml/min with normal aCSF equilibrated with 95%
O2-5%
CO2, and all recordings were made
at 30-31°C. To prevent precipitation, the aCSF was altered in
experiments using barium by eliminating phosphate and sulfate ions (2 mM MgSO4 was replaced with 2 mM
MgCl2 and 1.25 mM
NaH2PO4 was replaced with 1.25 mM NaCl).
Electrophysiological recordings.
Neurons containing microbeads were identified under epifluorescence
illumination and viewed with a water-immersion ×40 objective
using a closed-circuit television camera. We used the "blow and
seal" method (35) for the patch-clamp recordings. Positive pressure
was continuously applied to the patch pipette, which was advanced under
visual control toward neurons in which microbeads were detected. Once
the pipette touched the membrane of the selected neuron, the pressure
was immediately released and slight negative pressure was applied to
establish a high resistance seal. The membrane was then ruptured by
further suction to record in the whole cell configuration.
Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries with an
inner filament (1.5-mm OD, Clark, UK) on a pipette puller (Sutter P87)
and were filled with a solution of the following composition (in mM):
114 K-gluconate, 17.5 KCl, 4 NaCl, 4 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 0.2 EGTA, 3 Mg2ATP, 0.3 Na2GTP, and 0.02% Lucifer Yellow (Molecular Probes). Osmolarity was adjusted to 270 mosM and pH to 7.3. The pipette tips were coated with Sylgard, and their resistance was
4-7 M
. Whole cell current (fast-clamp mode)- and voltage-clamp recordings were made with an Axopatch-200B amplifier. Liquid junction potential was 9-10 mV, and all reported voltage measurements have been corrected for these potentials. No series resistance compensation was performed.
Electrical stimulation was performed using two tungsten wires, Teflon
coated except at their tips (50 µm in diameter, A-M Systems, Everett,
WA). They were positioned 100 µm apart and were placed on the surface
of the slice 300-400 µm dorsal to the recorded neurons. The
stimulation voltage was set at the minimum necessary to induce a
maximal evoked postsynaptic current (PSC; potential: 30-50 V,
duration: 100-200 µs, frequency: 0.2-0.5 Hz).
Tyrosine hydroxylase immunostaining.
After recording was completed, images of the recorded neurons (labeled
with Lucifer Yellow) were stored on videotape or digitized using a
video card (Snappy video snapshot, Play, Rancho Cordova, CA) and stored
in the computer hard disk using JPEG format. This procedure was useful
to confirm the identity of the recorded neurons after histological
processing, in particular, when recordings were performed from several
neurons in the same slice. The slices were fixed in freshly prepared
4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Immunostaining for tyrosine-hydroxylase (TH) was done using an avidin-biotin-based reaction [mouse anti-TH monoclonal antiserum from Chemicon
(1:750), biotinylated goat anti-mouse antiserum from Vector (1:150),
and streptavidin-conjugated Cy-3 from Jackson (1:1,000)]. The
neurons that displayed detectable TH immunoreactivity were considered catecholaminergic. They were assumed to be C1 adrenergic cells, because
in double-labeling studies of the RVLM region nearly all bulbospinal
TH-immunoreactive cells are also phenylethanolamine N-methyl transferase immunoreactive
(41). We preferred to use TH rather than phenylethanolamine
N-methyl transferase
immunostaining to identify C1 cells, because our TH antibody provided a
more reliable and intense staining than was possible with
phenylethanolamine N-methyl
transferase antibodies available at the time of the study.
Reagents. Drugs and solutions of
different ionic content were applied to the slice by switching the
perfusion with a three-way electronic valve system. Strychnine HCl, NE
bitartrate, l-phenylephrine HCl,
isoproterenol HCl, prazosin, and 2-methoxyidazoxan (2-MOI) were from
Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Endomorphin-1, gabazine (SR-95531), 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), tetrodotoxin (TTX), desipramine HCl,
5-bromo-N-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-6-quinoxalinamine (UK 14304), and dl-baclofen were from
Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA).
Data analysis. During experiments,
analog signals were low-pass filtered at 2 kHz (Axopatch 200B),
digitized at 48 kHz (Vetter, A. R. Vetter, Rebersburg, PA), and stored
on a videotape for later analysis. Off-line, selected recordings of
spontaneous PSCs were collected through a Digidata-1200A Interface and
digitized at 4-5 kHz using the Fetchex module of pCLAMP6 software
(Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA).
For frequency analysis of events in long stretches of data (15-20
min), we used the Fetchan module of pCLAMP6. Event detection was based
on the first derivative of the signal after appropriate filtering
(100-500 Hz). The threshold criteria (events should exceed an
amplitude set between 1.5 and 3 pA/s, for at least 0.5-1 ms in
duration) were adjusted to guarantee that no false events would be
identified as confirmed by visual inspection for each analysis. These
conservative criteria necessitated that a small percentage of probably
true events were rejected. The detected events were subsequently
grouped and binned (10-70 s) using the Pstat module of pCLAMP6.
The presynaptic effects of substances were calculated as changes in the
frequency of TTX-resistant PSCs by comparing the baseline frequency of
PSCs with the mean frequency of events between the fourth and the sixth
minute following the drug application. To determine the drug effect on
PSCs evoked by focal electrical stimulation, we averaged 8-20
consecutive evoked synaptic currents 1 min before and 4 min after drug
application. For detection of the peak calculation of the amplitude of
the evoked PSCs and averaging consecutive evoked PSCs, we used the on-line detection and statistics now available in the Windows version
of pCLAMP7 software. The decay time constant of the evoked PSCs was
determined by fitting a single exponential from peak to baseline using
Origin 4.1 program (Microcal Software, Northampton, MA). Further
statistics, plots, and histograms were also performed using Origin 4.1. Data are expressed throughout the text as means ± SE and were
analyzed statistically using the paired or unpaired t-test unless otherwise stated. In all
cases, significance was accepted if P < 0.05.
 |
RESULTS |
Recordings were made exclusively from RVLM bulbospinal neurons
(n = 63) identified in the slice by
the presence of FITC microbeads in their soma and by their distinctive
location in relation to the tip of the inferior olive, the caudal end
of the facial motor nucleus, and the base of the medulla (for full
anatomic details, see Ref. 18). These neurons were either
immunoreactive for TH or intermingled with the lateral group of
TH-immunoreactive neurons that project to the spinal cord. Their
membrane properties have been studied in detail elsewhere (17, 18) at
room temperature. In our conditions (31°C), most of the cells
(~70%) were tonically firing at rest (3-4 Hz). The action
potentials of 25 randomly selected neurons had an overshoot of 33.1 ± 1.2 mV, an amplitude of 77.3 ± 1.4 mV (range 67-94 mV),
and a duration of 2.5 ± 0.1 ms (range 1.6-4.7 ms) calculated
at the threshold for spike generation (
44.3 ± 0.7 mV). The input resistance measured between
70 and
80 mV
was 619 ± 31 M
(range 340-970 M
). All neurons were first recorded in current-clamp mode to assess their viability (action potential overshoot > 20 mV), and after a 5-min stabilization period,
the neurons were voltage clamped at a potential of
70 mV
(holding current of
20 to
80 pA).
Adequate visualization of the neurons was essential to record
selectively from bulbospinal RVLM neurons. The patch recordings in this
study were made using the "blow and seal" technique (see METHODS) described in detail by
Sakmann and Stuart (35). Because of the relatively low density of
neurons in the reticular formation and because of the extensive
myelinization that occurs in brain stem slices from animals older than
10 days, it was difficult to visualize bulbospinal neurons, which were
obscured by the dark myelin sheath that prevented adequate cleaning of
the cell surface and the establishment of a tight seal with the patch
pipette. However, it was important to verify that our results could be reproduced in at least some neurons taken from mature rats because of
possible developmental changes in adrenergic pharmacology. It was also
important to compare our results with those obtained using blind
intracellular techniques in which NE has been tested on RVLM neurons
sampled at random. However, to increase productivity, most of the
recorded neurons in this study were made in slices taken from neonatal
rat
(P5-P12).
Because no qualitative difference was found in the response to
2-AR activation in neurons
taken from older animals
(P12-P21;
n = 12), the results were pooled.
2-AR-mediated
postsynaptic effect.
The postsynaptic response of RVLM bulbospinal neurons to bath-applied
substances was evaluated in voltage-clamp recordings at a holding
potential of
70 mV (Fig.
1A).
In the absence of adrenoceptor antagonists, we found that the
-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol (10 µM,
n = 6) produced no detectable effect
on membrane current, whereas the
1-adrenoceptor agonist
phenylephrine (10 µM, n = 11)
produced a small inward current (2-3 pA) in only 2 of 11 cells
tested. Subsequently, we incubated the slices with the
1-adrenoceptor blocker prazosin (1 µM) 5-10 min
before and during all experiments in which NE was tested.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Postsynaptic effects of norepinephrine (NE) in rostral ventrolateral
medulla (RVLM) bulbospinal neurons. A:
mean amplitude of current produced by NE; comparison with adrenoceptor
agonists phenylephrine and isoproterenol and µ-opioid receptor
agonist endomorphin-1 (bars indicate means ± SE;
n = number of neurons tested). Outward
current produced by NE was blocked by specific
2-adrenoceptor
( 2-AR) antagonist
2-methoxyidazoxan (2-MOI) and by barium.
B: distribution histogram of amplitude
of response to NE in all RVLM bulbospinal neurons tested, including the
tyrosine-hydroxylase (TH)-immunoreactive neurons. Prazosin (1 µM) was
present in the bath in all experiments except those in which
phenylephrine was tested. This also applies for all subsequent figures.
* Significantly different from NE treatment group (Kruskal-Wallis
1-way analysis of variance on ranks, followed by Dunn's test).
Significantly different from NE treatment group
(Mann-Whitney rank sum test).
|
|
NE (30 µM, 4 min application) produced a small outward current in 16 of 23 (70%) neurons tested (11 ± 2.1 pA, range 5-28 pA). In
the remaining seven neurons, the effect of NE was absent or nondetectable (<5 pA). In three cells that responded to a first application of NE with 10-25 pA, the
2-AR antagonist 2-MOI (3 µM) blocked the response to a second application of NE (see Fig. 6A). Moreover, the first application
of NE produced no change in the membrane current in the presence of
2-MOI in five other cells. The magnitude of the outward current
produced by NE was compared with that induced by the µ-opiate
receptor agonist endomorphin-1 (3 µM, Ref. 44). On average, the
amplitude of the outward current produced by endomorphin-1 (29 ± 5.7 pA, n = 19) was 2.6 times larger
than that produced by NE (Fig.
1A). However, the coefficient of
variation (SD/mean) of the response to NE and endormorphin-1 was close
to 1 because of the large variability in the sensitivity of individual
RVLM bulbospinal neurons to either substance.
In several neurons that responded weakly or not at all to NE (<5 pA),
application of endomorphin-1 (3 µM,
n = 4) or the
GABAB-receptor agonist baclofen
(10 µM, n = 3) induced an outward
current of 15-55 pA. Thus in these cells the absence of response
to NE was not due to the lack of inwardly rectifying potassium
channels. We also tested whether the outward current induced by
2-AR stimulation is sensitive
to barium as is the case for GABAB
(18) and µ-opiate receptors in these cells (11). As expected, NE did
not produce a detectable outward current in the presence of barium (300 µM, n = 10). Moreover,
application of barium alone produced a small inward current (2-15
pA), suggesting that a barium-sensitive potassium current is open at
rest. Finally, we found that the magnitude of the response to NE was
not increased when it was reapplied in the presence of the
noradrenergic uptake blocker desipramine (10 µM,
n = 2), suggesting that
2-ARs are fully activated at the concentration of 30 µM.
Neurons tested for NE were processed for immunocytochemical detection
of the catecholamine-synthesizing enzyme TH. The amplitude of the NE
response of TH-immunoreactive neurons was variable with no apparent
correlation between the TH immunoreactivity and the
2-AR agonist sensitivity of the
neurons (Fig. 1B). This suggests that C1 RVLM bulbospinal neurons could not be distinguished from presumed non-C1 neurons by their postsynaptic sensitivity to NE. Moreover, because NE produced a similar degree of inhibition of synaptic transmission in all RVLM bulbospinal neurons, neurons were not
further subdivided according to their chemical phenotype.
Effects of NE on evoked excitatory postsynaptic
currents. Excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs)
evoked by focal electrical stimulation (~350 µm dorsal to the
recording site) were isolated in the presence of the glycine receptor
antagonist strychnine (10 µM) and the
GABAA-receptor antagonist gabazine
(SR-95531, 3 µM, Ref. 25). We used a stimulation intensity that was
just sufficient to induce the largest evoked EPSCs. Application of gabazine and strychnine reduced the amplitude of the control evoked postsynaptic current in 14 of 22 cells by a mean of 28 ± 4%,
indicating that the release of GABA and glycine mediated a relatively
small fraction of the evoked postsynaptic current. In the remaining 6 cells, there was no significant change or a slight increase in the
amplitude of the control evoked PSCs (<5%). In 12 of 22 cells, two
or more peaks could be distinguished in the evoked EPSCs. In 6 of these
12 neurons, two peaks could still be observed after averaging 8-15
evoked EPSCs, and they were separated by 1.7 to 3 ms (Fig.
2B). The
first peak was probably monosynaptic because it always occurred with a
constant latency after the stimulation artifact. The second peak had a
variable latency, suggesting that it involved a disynaptic pathway. The
evoked EPSCs had a mean maximal amplitude of 66 ± 7 pA (range
21-127 pA, n = 22) and a decay
time constant of 5.9 ± 0.3 ms (n = 22, range 3.1-8.1 ms) determined by a single exponential fit.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
NE reduces amplitude of evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs)
via 2-ARs. Evoked EPSCs were
isolated in presence of gabazine (3 µM) and strychnine (10 µM).
Each trace is average of 12-15 consecutive evoked EPSCs [holding
potential (HP) = 70 mV]. A: NE
reversibly decreased amplitude of an evoked EPSC showing 2 peaks. In
this neuron (postnatal 10 days), NE induces an outward current shown by
upward shift of evoked EPSCs with respect to the baseline holding
current (dotted line). B:
superimposition of 3 traces shown in
A. Note that latency of first peak was
not changed by NE, whereas second peak was delayed. Effects of NE were
reversible on washout. C: amplitude of
evoked EPSC was not changed by NE after application of
2-AR antagonist 2-MOI (3 µM)
in another neuron. D: effect of NE on
EPSCs amplitude in absence (n = 9) and
in presence of 2-MOI (n = 5).
* P < 0.001, NS, not
significant (P = 0.27).
|
|
Application of NE (30 µM, 4 min) reversibly reduced the amplitude of
the evoked EPSCs in all cells tested by a mean of 49 ± 3%
(n = 9, range 38-64%). Figure
2A shows an example of the effect of
NE on an evoked EPSC that exhibited two peaks. As shown in the
superimposed traces (Fig. 2B), NE
did not change the latency of the first peak (presumed monosynaptic
current), whereas the second peak was delayed during application of NE.
A small rundown in the amplitude of the evoked EPSCs was often observed
during the course of such experiments (20-25% reduction after 30 min). Therefore, to compare the effect of repeated applications of NE, the inhibition was calculated relative to a baseline adjusted for the
rundown by extrapolation. With the use of this correction factor, the
reduction caused by two applications of NE, 15-20 min apart, was
the same (first NE challenge 51 ± 6.8% reduction, second NE
challenge 47 ± 3.8% reduction,
n = 3). In another set of
experiments, we determined in five cells the effect of the first
application of NE in slices treated with 2-MOI (3 µM) for 5-10
min (Fig. 2B). In these five cells,
NE produced no significant effect on the amplitude of evoked EPSCs (97 ± 2% of control, Fig. 2C),
indicating that the suppression of the evoked EPSCs by NE was due to
2-AR activation.
Additional experiments were done in the presence of barium (300 µM)
to block inwardly rectifying potassium currents and thus to eliminate
any change in conductance due to activation of postsynaptic
2-ARs. We chose to perfuse the
slice with barium instead of recording the neurons with cesium
electrodes, because the latter procedure failed to completely block
opioidactivated potassium current at negative potentials (43).
The reduction in the amplitude of evoked EPSCs by NE persisted in the
presence of barium (70 ± 8% reduction with NE,
n = 3, Fig.
3). Thus the reduction in excitatory synaptic transmission by
2-ARs
does not involve a barium-sensitive inwardly rectifying potassium
current either pre- or postsynaptically.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Presynaptic inhibition by NE in presence of barium (postnatal 6 days,
HP = 70 mV). Each trace represents 10 averaged evoked
postsynaptic currents (PSCs) obtained from 1 neuron in different
conditions. Evoked EPSCs were isolated in presence of gabazine (3 µM)
and strychnine (10 µM), which reduced amplitude of control evoked
PSCs. Addition of barium (300 µM) further decreased amplitude of
evoked EPSCs. Application of NE (30 µM, 4 min) reversibly reduced
amplitude of evoked EPSCs without changing holding current (dotted
line). Barium was present during application of NE and during its
washout.
|
|
Effects of NE on evoked inhibitory postsynaptic
currents. Inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs)
evoked by focal electrical stimulation were isolated in the presence of
CNQX (10 µM). At the holding potential of
70 mV, the IPSCs
were recorded as inward currents (Fig. 4),
because the calculated equilibrium potential for the chloride ions was
38 mV in our recording conditions. As indicated in the preceding
section, the excitatory component of the evoked PSCs predominates
because their amplitude was only modestly reduced by antagonists of
glycine and GABA receptors. In a previous study, we have shown that the
spontaneous IPSCs in RVLM bulbospinal neurons have a relatively longer
decay time constant (mean = 19.6 ms) compared with that of spontaneous
EPSCs (mean = 4.7 ms, Ref. 12). Therefore, cells in which the evoked PSCs had a decay time constant of >9 ms in control conditions were
suspected to receive a significant inhibitory input and were selected
for isolating IPSCs. In these cells, application of CNQX reduced the
amplitude of the control evoked PSCs by 35 ± 6%
(n = 11) and increased their decay
time constant by 33 ± 9%. The decrease in the amplitude was
probably due to a significant contribution of non-NMDA receptors to the
control evoked PSCs. Alternatively, a component of the IPSC could be
dependent on excitation of inhibitory neurons or terminals. The mean
amplitude of the evoked IPSCs was 72.8 ± 15.5 pA (range 29-178
ms), and their decay time constant was 19.3 ± 2.1 ms (range
10.9-39.4 ms), which was about three times longer than that of the
evoked EPSCs (see above). Unlike the evoked EPSCs, the evoked IPSCs
always consisted of a single peak (Fig. 4), suggesting that they
resulted from stimulation of a monosynaptic inhibitory input to RVLM
bulbospinal neurons.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Reduction of amplitude of evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents
(IPSCs) by NE (30 µM). Evoked IPSCs were isolated in presence of
6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX, 10 µM). Each trace is
average of 8-12 consecutive PSCs.
A: perfusion with CNQX decreased
amplitude and increased decay time constant of control PSC. Addition of
NE decreased amplitude of evoked IPSC without changing its decay time
constant. Decay phase of PSC in each trace was fitted with a single
exponential (thin curves superimposed on each trace). Note that NE also
produced an outward current as indicated by upward shift in baseline of
the evoked IPSC (dotted line). B: in
presence of CNQX, application of barium (300 µM) induced a small
inward current and increased amplitude of evoked IPSC. Addition of NE
still in presence of barium reversibly decreased amplitude of evoked
IPSC without changing holding current (dotted line). Evoked IPSC
partially recovered on wash of NE and was blocked by addition of
gabazine. Recordings in A and
B are from 2 different neurons
(postnatal 7 and 6 days, respectively, HP = 70 mV).
|
|
NE (30 µM) reduced the amplitude of the evoked IPSCs in all cells
tested (n = 9, 3 cells in control
medium and 6 cells in presence of 300 µM barium). In the absence of
barium, the amplitude of the evoked EPSCs was reduced by 64 ± 7%
(n = 3) by application of NE, whereas
the decay time constant was not significantly changed (Fig.
4A). Barium (300 µM) always
increased the frequency of spontaneous IPSCs. The inhibitory effect of
NE on the amplitude of the evoked IPSCs persisted in the presence of
barium (59 ± 19% reduction, from 74 ± 46 pA in control to 25 ± 11 pA in NE, n = 6;
P < 0.05), indicating that
barium-sensitive potassium channels are not involved in the reduction
of IPSCs by NE (Fig. 4B). Although
barium slightly increased the decay time constant of the evoked IPSCs
in some cells, this change was not significant in the six cells tested (from 17.6 ± 3.4 ms in control to 22.3 ± 7.4 ms in
barium, P = 0.11). A small increase in
the amplitude of IPSC occurred in some cases after barium application
(Fig. 4B); however, this was not a
consistent finding. On average, there was a slight decrease in the
amplitude of IPSCs after barium treatment, but this change did not
reach statistical significance (from 91 ± 19 pA in control to 74 ± 21 pA in barium, n = 6, P = 0.19). In the presence
of barium, NE did not significantly change the decay time constant of
the evoked IPSCs (22.3 ± 7.4 ms in control, 20.8 ± 7.8 ms in NE, n = 6, P = 0.44). A small rundown of the
amplitude of the evoked IPSCs was also noted during the course of the
experiments (see also Ref. 3).
The evoked IPSCs were almost completely abolished (95-100%
reduction in amplitude) by additional application of gabazine (3 µM)
in six of seven cells tested (Fig.
4B). In the remaining cell, the
amplitude of the evoked IPSCs was reduced by 70% by gabazine and
abolished by further application of strychnine (10 µM). This indicates that GABA rather than glycine made the greatest contribution to the evoked IPSCs in bulbospinal RVLM neurons.
NE effects on spontaneous EPSCs and
IPSCs. Spontaneous EPSCs were isolated by incubation
with gabazine (3 µM) and strychnine (10 µM). We have previously
shown that in RVLM bulbospinal neurons almost all spontaneously
occurring PSCs are TTX resistant and have low frequency (12). Rarely
(n = 3), we were able to observe spontaneous EPSCs having relatively large amplitude (25-90 pA) and
occurring at regular intervals. These EPSCs may be caused by the action
potential-dependent release of neurotransmitter from an active interneuron.
The low baseline EPSC frequency (1-3 Hz) could be raised
considerably (4-15 Hz) by focal electrical stimulation at low
frequency (0.25 Hz, Fig.
5A). The
EPSCs that were elicited after single electrical stimulation, hence
called "EPSC afterdischarge," lasted 1-3 s after each
stimulus (Fig. 5B). Using this
paradigm, we found that NE (30 µM) significantly reduced the
frequency of EPSCs (6.9 ± 1.9 Hz in control) in all cells tested by
an average of 53 ± 3% (n = 6, range 43-62%, P < 0.05, Fig.
6A). NE
decreased both the baseline EPSC frequency and the EPSC afterdischarge
(Fig. 6B). No detectable change in
the frequency of EPSCs was observed when NE was applied in the presence
of 2-MOI (3 µM, n = 3, Fig. 6A).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Long-lasting EPSCs after discharge evoked by focal electrical
stimulation. Single electrical stimuli were delivered at 4-s intervals
(arrows) in presence of gabazine (3 µM) and strychnine (10 µM).
A: recording from a neuron showing
EPSC activity before and during stimulation paradigm. Note low
frequency of events in control (before arrows) and additional EPSCs
that appeared and increased in number after many stimuli had been
delivered. B: traces (top)
are 2 representative 8-s sweeps in which electrical stimulation
(arrows) induced a burst of EPSCs that lasted 1-2 s. Histogram
(bottom) shows number of events
detected (bin = 100 ms) in 15 similar consecutive traces. Note that
increase in frequency of spontaneous EPSCs occurred for a period of 2 s
after each stimulus. Recordings in A
and B are from 2 different neurons
(both postnatal 6 days, HP = 70 mV).
|
|

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effects of NE on spontaneous EPSCs isolated in presence of gabazine (3 µM) and strychnine (10 µM). A,
top: recording from a bulbospinal
neuron (postnatal 21 days) in absence of tetrodotoxin (TTX). Electrical
stimulation was performed at intervals of 4 s (same protocol as in Fig.
5). Regular upward deflections correspond to stimulation artifacts.
Downward deflections represent evoked EPSCs and EPSC afterdischarge.
Bottom: frequency histogram of EPSCs
(bin = 10 s) from same recording. NE induced an outward current and
decreased frequency of spontaneous EPSCs. All effects of NE were
blocked by perfusion with 2-AR
antagonist 2-MOI. B: histograms
showing number of EPSCs (bin = 100 ms) detected in 30 consecutive
episodes, 4 s each, triggered by electrical stimulation before
(left) and during
(right) application of NE. Note that
NE decreased frequency of all EPSCs, including those that were induced
by electrical stimulation. A and
B are from 2 different neurons (HP = 70 mV).
|
|
To determine whether the
2-AR-mediated inhibition of
EPSCs occurs at least in part at the level of the synaptic terminals that contact the bulbospinal neurons, we tested the effect of NE on
miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs) recorded in the presence of TTX (1 µM) to
block action potential-dependent synaptic currents. In five neurons,
the frequency of mEPSCs (mean 2.7 ± 0.3 Hz in control) was reduced
by 74 ± 3% (range 62-84%, P < 0.001) after application of NE (Fig.
7A).
In three other neurons, the prototypical
2-AR agonist UK-14304 (10 µM)
also reduced the frequency of mEPSCs by 82 ± 6%. In four cells,
the reduction of mEPSC frequency by these two
2-AR agonists occurred even in
the absence of detectable outward current (<3 pA, Fig.
7B).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Decrease of miniature PSC frequency by
2-AR agonists. Miniature EPSCs
(mEPSCs) were isolated in presence of TTX (1 µM), gabazine (3 µM), and strychnine (10 µM), and mIPSCs were isolated in
presence of TTX (1 µM) and CNQX (10 µM). Each panel
(A-C)
shows a current trace (top) and
corresponding frequency histogram of mEPSCs
(bottom).
A: NE (30 µM) induced a small
outward current and a decrease in mEPSC frequency.
B: in this cell, selective
2-AR agonist UK-14304 decreased
mEPSC frequency without producing an outward current.
C: NE (30 µM) induced a small
outward current and a decrease in mIPSC frequency. Recordings in all
panels are from 3 different neurons (postnatal 6-10 days, HP = 70 mV).
|
|
We also tested the effect of NE on the frequency of spontaneous IPSCs
in nine cells incubated in CNQX (10 µM). In the absence of TTX, NE
decreased the frequency of spontaneous IPSCs in all four cells tested
by 76 ± 4% (from 3 ± 0.5 Hz to 0.7 ± 0.2 Hz, range
67-95%, P < 0.05). In one
neuron, NE almost completely eliminated the IPSCs. In this cell, the
IPSCs occurred at regular intervals, and they probably reflected the
firing of an inhibitory interneuron. In the presence of TTX, the
miniature IPSCs were low in frequency (<0.5 Hz), and their frequency
was not stable over extended periods of recording. Therefore, it was
not possible to determine whether NE could produce any change in the
frequency of mIPSCs in three of five cells tested. Nevertheless, a
reversible decrease in the frequency of mIPSCs could be reliably
observed in the remaining two cells (Fig.
7C), suggesting that the reduction
in inhibitory synaptic transmission could occur at the level of
presynaptic terminals.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The major new findings of this study are presented in a hypothetical
model (Fig. 8). In brief, NE inhibits
bulbospinal RVLM neurons by activating
2-ARs postsynaptically and
2-ARs located presynaptically
on glutamatergic terminals. Moreover, contrary to our expectations,
2-ARs are also present on at
least some of the GABAergic input to these cells. The decrease of
synaptic transmission elicited by NE is not sensitive to barium,
indicating that different mechanisms of action are involved in the pre-
and postsynaptic effects of NE.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Presumed location of presynaptic and postsynaptic
2-ARs in RVLM. About 70% of
RVLM bulbospinal neurons have postsynaptic
2-ARs that are coupled to a
potassium conductance. Input to these cells is predominantly excitatory
and originates in part from local excitatory interneurons. NE inhibits
release of excitatory amino acids (EAA) by activating
2-ARs located on presynaptic
terminals and possibly also on soma of local excitatory neurons.
Finally, RVLM bulbospinal neurons receive an inhibitory input that is
predominantly GABAergic and subject to inhibition by
2-AR agonists.
|
|
2-AR-mediated
postsynaptic effects.
The mean outward current induced by NE (30 µM) in RVLM
bulbospinal neurons was small (11 pA) compared with that caused by the
µ-opioid receptor agonist endomorphin-1 (3 µM, 29 pA). This is in
agreement with a previous study showing that the
2-AR agonist
-methyl-norepinephrine (30 µM) produced a small and variable outward current (12 pA) in these cells at a holding potential of
50 to
60 mV (18). These results are also consistent with the finding that a large fraction of RVLM bulbospinal neurons recorded
in vivo in the adult rat are insensitive to iontophoretic application
of
2-AR agonists (1).
The outward current produced by NE in bulbospinal RVLM neurons was
blocked by the selective
2-AR
antagonist 2-MOI (28), confirming that NE produced its effect by
activating
2-ARs (18). In the
present study, neither the
1-adrenoceptor agonist
phenylephrine nor the
-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol produced a
significant effect on membrane current. This is in contrast to previous
studies showing that
1- (13)
and
-adrenergic agonists (29, 38) frequently produce excitatory
effects in randomly sampled RVLM neurons of adult rats. However, the
spinal projection of RVLM is a small percentage of the total neurons
(~200 per side in the rat, Ref. 34). Thus it is unlikely that many
bulbospinal neurons could be recorded in RVLM by random sampling. Our
results suggest that the bulbospinal neurons have an adrenergic
pharmacology distinct from that of other RVLM neurons. Alternatively,
because most of our neurons were recorded in the neonatal rat, it is
possible that
1- and
-adrenoceptors might be functional only at a later developmental stage.
In a previous study, the outward current produced by
2-AR activation in RVLM
bulbospinal neurons was shown to be inwardly rectifying and to be
predominantly carried by potassium ions (18). In the present study, we
found that this current is sensitive to barium as is the case for locus
coeruleus (5) and A5 noradrenergic neurons (16). It is unlikely that
the responses of RVLM neurons to NE were small due to dialysis of
intracellular messengers by the pipette solution, because it has been
shown that coupling from
2-ARs
to potassium channels is maintained in excised membrane patches (37).
In addition, we found that many neurons responded vigorously to
activation of GABAB or µ-opioid
receptors after failing to respond to 30 µM NE. It is also unlikely
that the absence of effect of NE on the holding current was due to a
lack of functional
2-ARs,
because
2-AR agonists inhibit
calcium currents in almost all RVLM bulbospinal neurons (20). In sum,
these results indicate that the coupling of
2-ARs to potassium channels
varies between cells possibly because of differential expression of G
protein subunits.
The magnitude of the outward current produced by
2-AR activation was variable in
both TH- and non-TH-immunoreactive neurons (Fig. 1). This is in
contrast to the A5 region where catecholaminergic neurons were found to
be much more uniformly responsive to
2-AR activation than other
noncatecholaminergic neurons (15). Previous in vitro studies have also
failed to find consistent differences between the electrophysiological
and pharmacological properties of C1 and non-C1 bulbospinal neurons
(16-18, 23). Although the magnitude of the current induced by
2-AR activation is not
correlated with the cell phenotype, this current is sufficient, when
present, to eliminate the spontaneous discharge of most RVLM
bulbospinal neurons in vitro (18).
Properties of EPSCs and IPSCs. Most
RVLM bulbospinal neurons have a spontaneous activity in vitro that
appears to result from their intrinsic properties (17, 18). Yet, their
discharge in vivo is regulated by both excitatory and inhibitory
synaptic activity as shown by intracellular recordings (22). Consistent with our previous study on spontaneous PSCs (11), we found that glutamate and GABA are the major contributors to the PSCs evoked by
focal electrical stimulation. Indeed, both the spontaneous and evoked
PSCs were usually eliminated by a combination of CNQX and gabazine,
which block non-NMDA and GABAA
receptors, respectively. The average decay time constant of the evoked
IPSCs (19.3 ms) was about three times longer than that of the evoked
EPSCs (5.9 ms). These kinetic properties are consistent with our
previous study on spontaneous miniature PSCs in which the average decay time constant was found to be 4.7 and 19.6 ms for mEPSCs and mIPSCs, respectively. The kinetic differences between EPSCs and IPSCs probably
reflect differences in the properties of non-NMDA and GABAA channels such as
conductance, rate of desensitization, or kinetics of reuptake and
degradation of glutamate and GABA.
So far, two main findings suggest that the synaptic input to RVLM
bulbospinal neurons is predominantly excitatory. First, antagonists of
GABAA and glycine receptors have
only small effects on the amplitude of evoked PSCs (this study).
Second, mEPSCs are usually three to four times more frequent than
mIPSCs (11). However, IPSCs may have a strong impact on the
excitability of the cells because of their relatively longer decay time constant.
The spontaneous PSCs in RVLM bulbospinal neurons have usually low
frequency (<4 Hz), and the vast majority are TTX resistant (11). This
suggests that antecedent neurons are either silent at rest or they are
active, but their afferent terminals have been severed by the
thin-slice procedure. The existence of silent glutamatergic
interneurons in RVLM is suggested by two lines of evidence. First,
focal electrical stimulation could evoke polysynaptic EPSCs in many
RVLM bulbospinal neurons as suggested by the presence of more than one
peak in the evoked EPSCs (Fig. 2). Second, in most cases, single
electrical stimulation at 0.25 Hz caused a long-lasting EPSC
afterdischarge following the evoked EPSCs (Fig. 5). Therefore, under
conditions of blockade of fast inhibitory synaptic transmission,
electrical stimulation raises the excitability of excitatory
interneurons and favors the occurrence of action potential-dependent
EPSCs on RVLM neurons.
2-AR-mediated presynaptic
inhibition.
Our results indicate that NE reduces glutamatergic transmission to RVLM
bulbospinal neurons in a manner similar to that found in some brain
stem neurons (4, 39). NE exerts this inhibitory effect in two ways
(Fig. 8). The first mechanism involves a decrease of glutamate release
from terminals directly synapsing on RVLM bulbospinal neurons. This is
suggested strongly by the decrease in the frequency of TTX-resistant
mEPSCs and by the decrease in amplitude of the evoked EPSCs, in
particular, the first constant latency peak, which is probably due to a
monosynaptic contact. The second mechanism may involve a reduction of
the excitability of antecedent presynaptic excitatory interneurons via
activation of somatic
2-ARs.
This is supported by the finding that NE decreases the frequency of the
presumed action potential-dependent EPSCs that are activated by
electrical stimulation (Fig. 6). It is also supported by the finding
that NE delays the occurrence of the second, presumably polysynaptic,
peak of the evoked EPSCs (Fig. 2). Taken together, these results
suggest that NE can exert a powerful inhibitory effect on RVLM
bulbospinal neurons by suppressing the activity of the local excitatory
network. The suppression of excitatory synaptic transmission by NE is
due to
2-AR activation, because
this effect was blocked by the selective
2-AR antagonist 2-MOI.
Our data also indicate that NE reduces inhibitory synaptic transmission
to bulbospinal RVLM neurons via a presynaptic action (Figs. 4 and
7C). The IPSCs evoked by focal
electrical stimulation in the presence of CNQX were most likely due to
monosynaptic stimulation of GABAergic terminals, because they consisted
of a fixed latency single peak and they were blocked by additional
application of gabazine. To our knowledge, this is the first report of
a direct presynaptic modulation of GABAergic transmission by NE in the brain. For instance, in olfactory bulb (40) and the hippocampus (7), NE
induces disinhibitory actions indirectly by reducing excitation of
inhibitory interneurons.
It is unlikely that the effects of NE on synaptic transmission are due
to postsynaptic mechanisms for two reasons. First, NE reduced the
amplitude of the evoked EPSCs and IPSCs without changing their decay
time constant, suggesting that the properties of postsynaptic glutamate
and GABAA receptors were not
affected by
2-AR activation.
Second, the reduction in synaptic transmission by NE persisted in the
presence of barium, which blocks the small postsynaptic conductance
change due to activation of the inwardly rectifying potassium current.
Hence, most of the inhibition of the synaptic currents by NE is due to
presynaptic mechanisms.
The effect of
2-AR stimulation
on synaptic transmission probably occurs in part via inhibition of
voltage-dependent calcium channels that are located on the nerve
terminals. However, our preliminary results indicate that additional
mechanisms must be involved, because a decrease in the frequency of
mEPSCs by NE could still be obtained in the presence of cadmium (200 µM), which blocks all known voltage-dependent calcium channels. One
possible mechanism could be the inhibition of cAMP production via
2-ARs (42).
Physiological implications. Recent
gene substitution experiments (D79N
2-AR mutant mouse) have
suggested that
2A-adrenoceptor activation mediates the hypotensive effect of imidazoline-related drugs
(clonidine, moxonidine, rilmenidine) (24, 45).
2A-Adrenoceptors are most
likely responsible for the effects of NE observed in the
present study, because the inhibitory actions of NE were obtained in
the presence of prazosin (1 µM), which blocks
1-adrenoceptors and antagonizes
much of the effects of NE on
2B- and
2C-adrenoceptors (14). In
addition, the presence of the
2A-receptor subtype has been
identified in the bulbospinal C1 cells (10).
The present study confirms that the postsynaptic inhibition of C1 and
other bulbospinal RVLM neurons by
2-AR agonists is variable,
generally weak, and even lacking in some cells (18). This mechanism
involves the opening of a barium-sensitive potassium current. In
contrast,
2-ARs cause a
consistent and robust presynaptic inhibition of EPSCs. In combination,
these two inhibitory mechanisms probably account for the bulk of the
powerful sympathoinhibition produced by centrally acting
antihypertensive agents in RVLM (8). However, NE does not produce
purely inhibitory effects on bulbospinal RVLM neurons, because it also
reduces the strength of at least some of the GABAergic inputs to these
cells. This result is not totally unexpected because
2-AR-mediated disinhibition of
RVLM sympathoexcitatory presympathetic neurons was suggested by a
recent in vivo study in which hypertension was produced by
microinjection of clonidine into the caudal ventrolateral medulla, an
area that provides tonic GABAergic inhibition to RVLM (36). Moreover, activation of other receptors like µ-opioid and
GABAB receptors was also shown to
attenuate both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in the
RVLM (11, 21). Because
2-AR
agonists produce profound inhibition of sympathetic outflow when
microinjected in the RVLM (reviewed by Ref. 32), disfacilitation of
RVLM presympathetic neurons by
2-AR agonists must greatly
outweigh disinhibition. This interpretation is consistent with the
suggestion that most of the ongoing discharge of these neurons in vivo
may result from fast excitatory postsynaptic potentials (26).
In conclusion, presynaptic
2-ARs in the RVLM are probable
targets of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs related to clonidine in addition to the previously described postsynaptic
2-ARs (reviewed in Ref. 8).
This conclusion is congruent with recent electron microscopic evidence
that
2-AR immunoreactivity in
RVLM is found predominantly on noncatecholaminergic axons and axon
terminals (26). The
2-AR-mediated presynaptic
inhibition of glutamate release would be especially effective in
reducing the activity of the putative sympathoexcitatory neurons when
their discharge derives from excitatory synaptic inputs rather than
intrinsic membrane properties.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute Grant HL-28785 (to P. G. Guyenet).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. Guyenet, Box
448 HSC, Dept. of Pharmacology, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
22908 (E-Mail: pgg{at}virginia.edu).
Received 10 February 1999; accepted in final form 13 April 1999.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Allen, A., M.,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
2-Adrenoceptor-mediated inhibition of bulbospinal barosensitive cells of rat rostral medulla.
Am. J. Physiol.
265 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 34):
R1065-R1075,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.
Bayliss, D. A.,
Y. W. Li,
and
E. M. Talley.
Effects of serotonin on caudal raphe neurons: inhibition of N- and P/Q-type calcium channels and the afterhyperpolarization.
J. Neurophysiol.
77:
1362-1374,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3.
Bennett, B. D.,
J. R. Huguenard,
and
D. A. Prince.
Adrenergic modulation of GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition in rat sensorimotor cortex.
J. Neurophysiol.
79:
937-946,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4.
Bertolino, M. S.,
Vicini,
R. Gillis,
and
A. Travagli.
Presynaptic
2-adrenoceptors inhibit excitatory synaptic transmission in rat brain stem.
Am. J. Physiol.
272 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 35):
G654-G661,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5.
Chium, T. H.,
M. J. Chen,
Y. R. Yang,
J. J. Yang,
and
F. I. Tang.
Action of dexmedetomidine on rat locus coeruleus neurones: intracellular recording in vitro.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
285:
261-268,
1995[Medline].
6.
Deuchards, S. A.,
S. F. Morrison,
and
M. P. Gilbey.
Medullary-evoked EPSPs in neonatal rat sympathetic preganglionic neurones in vitro.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
487:
453-463,
1995.
7.
Doze, V. A.,
G. A. Cohen,
and
D. V. Madison.
Synaptic localization of adrenergic disinhibition in the rat hippocampus.
Neuron
6:
889-900,
1991[Medline].
8.
Guyenet, P. G.
Is the hypotensive effect of clonidine and related drugs due to imidazoline binding sites?
Am. J. Physiol.
273 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 42):
R1580-R1584,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9.
Guyenet, P. G.,
N. Koshiya,
D. Huangfu,
S. C. Baraban,
R. L. Stornetta,
and
Y. W. Li.
Role of medulla oblongata in generation of sympathetic and vagal outflows.
Prog. Brain Res.
107:
127-144,
1996[Medline].
10.
Guyenet, P. G.,
R. L. Stornetta,
T. Riley,
F. R. Norton,
D. L. Rosin,
and
K. R. Lynch.
2A-Adrenergic receptors are present in lower brainstem catecholaminergic and serotonergic neurons innervating spinal cord.
Brain Res.
638:
285-294,
1994[Medline].
11.
Hayar, A.,
and
P. Guyenet.
Pre- and postsynaptic inhibitory actions of methionine-enkephalin on identified bulbospinal neurons of the rat rostral ventrolateral medulla.
J. Neurophysiol.
80:
2003-2014,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12.
Hayar, A.,
and
P. Guyenet.
Presynaptic effects mediated by
2-adrenoceptors (
2-AR) in the rat rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVL) in vitro.
Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.
24:
372,
1998.
13.
Hayar, A.,
P. Feltz,
and
P. Piguet.
Adrenergic responses in silent and putative inhibitory pacemaker-like neurons of the rat rostral ventrolateral medulla in vitro.
Neuroscience
77:
199-217,
1997[Medline].
14.
Hieble, J. P.,
and
R. R. Ruffolo, Jr.
Subclassification and nomenclature of
1- and
2-adrenoceptors.
Prog. Drug Res.
47:
81-130,
1996[Medline].
15.
Huangfu, D.,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
2-Adrenergic autoreceptors in A5 and A6 neurons of neonate rats.
Am. J. Physiol.
273 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 42):
H2290-H2295,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16.
Huangfu, D.,
M. Schreihofer,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
Effect of cholinergic agonists on bulbospinal C1 neurons in rats.
Am. J. Physiol.
272 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 41):
R249-R258,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Kangrga, I. M.,
and
A. D. Loewy.
Whole-cell recordings from visualized C1 adrenergic bulbospinal neurons: ionic mechanisms underlying vasomotor tone.
Brain Res.
670:
215-232,
1995[Medline].
18.
Li, Y. W.,
D. A. Bayliss,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
C1 neurons of neonatal rats: intrinsic beating properties and
2-adrenergic receptors.
Am. J. Physiol.
269 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 38):
R1356-R1369,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19.
Li, Y. W.,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
Activation of GABAB receptors increases a potassium conductance in rat bulbospinal neurons of the C1 area.
Am. J. Physiol.
271 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 40):
R1304-R1310,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20.
Li, Y. W.,
P. G. Guyenet,
and
D. A. Bayliss.
Voltage-dependent calcium currents in bulbospinal neurons of neonatal rat rostral ventrolateral medulla: modulation by
2-adrenergic receptors.
J. Neurophysiol.
79:
583-594,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21.
Lin, H. H.,
and
N. J. Dun.
Post- and presynaptic GABA(B) receptor activation in neonatal rat rostral ventrolateral medulla neurons in vitro.
Neuroscience
86:
211-220,
1998[Medline].
22.
Lipski, J.,
R. Kanjhan,
B. Kruszewska,
and
W. Rong.
Properties of presympathetic neurones in the rostral ventrolateral medulla in the rat: an intracellular study "in vivo."
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
490:
729-744,
1996.
23.
Lipski, J.,
Y. Kawai,
J. Qi,
A. Comer,
and
J. Win.
Whole cell patch-clamp study of putative vasomotor neurons isolated from the rostral ventrolateral medulla.
Am. J. Physiol.
274 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 43):
R1099-R1110,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24.
MacMillan, L. B.,
L. Hein,
M. S. Smith,
M. T. Piascik,
and
L. E. Limbird.
Central hypotensive effects of the
2a-adrenergic receptor subtype.
Science
273:
801-803,
1996[Abstract].
25.
Mienville, J. M.,
and
S. Vicini.
A pyridazinyl derivative of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), SR 95531, is a potent antagonist of Cl
channel opening regulated by GABAA receptors.
Neuropharmacology
26:
779-783,
1987[Medline].
26.
Milner, T. A.,
D. L. Rosin,
A. Lee,
and
S. A. Aicher.
2A-Adrenergic receptors are primarily presynaptic heteroreceptors in the C1 area of the rat rostral ventrolateral medulla.
Brain Res.
821:
200-211,
1999[Medline].
27.
Morrison, S. F.,
J. Callaway,
T. A. Milner,
and
D. J. Reis.
Rostral ventrolateral medulla: a source of the glutamatergic innervation of the sympathetic intermediolateral nucleus.
Brain Res.
562:
126-135,
1991[Medline].
28.
O'Rourke, M. F.,
H. S. Blaxall,
L. J. Iversen,
and
D. B. Bylund.
Characterization of [3H]RX821002 binding to
2-adrenergic receptor subtypes.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
268:
1362-1367,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29.
Piguet, P.,
and
R. Schlichter.
Lability of the pacemaker activity in the rat rostro-ventrolateral medulla: effects of noradrenaline.
Brain Res.
796:
1-12,
1998[Medline].
30.
Prichard, B. N.,
C. W. Owens,
and
B. R. Graham.
Pharmacology and clinical use of moxonidine, a new centrally acting sympatholytic antihypertensive agent.
J. Hum. Hypertens.
11:
S29-S45,
1997.
31.
Punnen, S.,
R. Urbanski,
A. J. Krieger,
and
H. N. Sapru.
Ventrolateral medullary pressor area: site of hypotensive action of clonidine.
Brain Res.
422:
336-346,
1987[Medline].
32.
Reis, D. J.
Neurons and receptors in the rostroventrolateral medulla mediating the antihypertensive actions of drugs acting at imidazoline receptors.
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
27:
S11-S18,
1996.
33.
Ross, C. A.,
D. A. Ruggiero,
T. H. Joh,
D. H. Park,
and
D. J. Reis.
Rostral ventrolateral medulla: selective projections to the thoracic autonomic cell column from the region containing C1 adrenaline neurons.
J. Comp. Neurol.
228:
168-185,
1984[Medline].
34.
Ruggiero, D. A.,
S. L. Cravo,
E. Golanov,
R. Gomez,
M. Anwar,
and
D. J. Reis.
Adrenergic and non-adrenergic spinal projections of a cardiovascular-active pressor area of medulla oblongata: quantitative topographic analysis.
Brain Res.
663:
107-120,
1994[Medline].
35.
Sakmann, B.,
and
G. Stuart.
Patch-pipette recordings from the soma, dendrites, and axon of neurons in brain slices.
In: Single-Channel Recording, edited by B. Sakmann,
and E. Neher. New York: Plenum, 1995, p. 199-211.
36.
Sesoko, S.,
H. Muratani,
M. Yamazato,
H. Teruya,
S. Takishita,
and
K. Fukiyama.
Contribution of
2-adrenoceptors in caudal ventrolateral medulla to cardiovascular regulation in rat.
Am. J. Physiol.
274 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 43):
R1119-R1124,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
37.
Shen, K. Z.,
R. A. North,
and
A. Surprenant.
Potassium channels opened by noradrenaline and other transmitters in excised membrane patches of guinea-pig submucosal neurones.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
445:
581-599,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
38.
Sun, M. K.,
and
P. G. Guyenet.
Excitation of rostral medullary pacemaker neurons with putative sympathoexcitatory function by cyclic AMP and
-adrenoceptor agonists "in vitro."
Brain Res.
511:
30-40,
1990[Medline].
39.
Travagli, R. A.,
and
J. T. Williams.
Endogenous monoamines inhibit glutamate transmission in the spinal trigeminal nucleus of the guinea-pig.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
491:
177-185,
1996[Medline].
40.
Trombley, P. Q.
Noradrenergic modulation of synaptic transmission between olfactory bulb neurons in culture: implications to olfactory learning.
Brain Res. Bull.
35:
473-484,
1994[Medline].
41.
Tucker, D. C.,
C. B. Saper,
D. A. Ruggiero,
and
D. J. Reis.
Organization of central adrenergic pathways. I. Relationships of ventrolateral medullary projections to the hypothalamus and spinal cord.
J. Comp. Neurol.
259:
591-603,
1987[Medline].
42.
Uhlen, S.,
and
J. E. Wikberg.
Inhibition of cyclic AMP production by
2-adrenoceptor stimulation in the guinea-pig spinal cord slices.
Pharmacol. Toxicol.
63:
178-182,
1988[Medline].
43.
Vaughan, C. W.,
and
M. J. Christie.
Presynaptic inhibitory action of opioids on synaptic transmission in the rat periaqueductal grey in vitro.
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
498:
463-472,
1997.
44.
Zadina, J. E.,
L. Hackler,
L. J. Ge,
and
A. J. Kastin.
A potent and selective endogenous agonist for the µ-opiate receptor.
Nature
386:
499-502,
1997[Medline].
45.
Zhu, Q. -M.,
S. J. Maclennan,
J. D. Lesnick,
J. R. Jasper,
R. M. Eglen,
and
D. R. Blue, Jr.
2A-Adrenoceptors, not I1-imidazoline receptors, mediate the hypotensive effects of rilmenidine and moxonidine: in vitro and in vivo studies (Abstract).
FASEB J.
12:
A455,
1998.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 277(3):H1069-H1080
0002-9513/99 $5.00
Copyright © 1999 the American Physiological Society