Microsphere experiments are useful in measuring regional
organ perfusion as well as heterogeneity of blood flow within organs and correlation of perfusion between organ pieces at different time
points. A 400 microspheres/piece "rule" is often used in planning
experiments or to determine whether experiments are valid. This rule is
based on the statement that 400 microspheres must lodge in a region for
95% confidence that the observed flow in the region is within 10% of
the true flow. The 400 microspheres precision rule, however, only
applies to measurements of perfusion to a single region or organ piece.
Examples, simulations, and an animal experiment were carried out to
show that good precision for measurements of heterogeneity and
correlation can be obtained from many experiments with <400
microspheres/piece. Furthermore, methods were developed and tested for
correcting the observed heterogeneity and correlation to remove the
Poisson "noise" due to discrete microsphere measurements. The
animal experiment shows adjusted values of heterogeneity and
correlation that are in close agreement for measurements made with many
or few microspheres/piece. Simulations demonstrate that the adjusted
values are accurate for a variety of experiments with far fewer than
400 microspheres/piece. Thus the 400 microspheres rule does not apply
to many experiments. A "rule of thumb" is that experiments with a
total of at least 15,000 microspheres, for all pieces combined, are
very likely to yield accurate estimates of heterogeneity. Experiments
with a total of at least 25,000 microspheres are very likely to yield accurate estimates of correlation coefficients.
organ perfusion; heterogeneity; correlation; modeling; statistics; Poisson noise
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE MICROSPHERE METHOD introduced by Rudolf and Heymann
(10) has become the gold standard for measuring regional organ blood flow. When microspheres are used to measure regional organ perfusion, a
commonly held tenet is that at least 400 microspheres must lodge in
each region of interest. This stipulation is derived from theoretical and experimental work of Buckberg and coworkers (2), in which they
concluded that for 95% confidence that observed flow to a region is
within 10% of the true flow, at least 384 microspheres must lodge
within the organ sample. A subsequent study (9) reported that fewer
microspheres are needed in each piece if the reference blood sample
contains adequate numbers of microspheres, but this study is rarely
cited. Regardless of the experimental goals, many investigators have
interpreted Buckberg's guideline to mean that if an organ sample has
<400 microspheres, the observed blood flow is so unreliable that the
sample should be excluded from the analysis. Others consider results to
be unreliable for an entire experiment if some or all of the pieces
have <400 microspheres. If the experimental objectives are to examine
blood flow rates to individual pieces of an organ, then the
400-microsphere rule is helpful. However, if investigators are
interested in general descriptors of blood flow distribution, such as
means, slopes (flow gradient over a spatial distance), coefficients of
variation, and correlation coefficients, many fewer microspheres per
region are required.
A second incentive for clarifying the 400 microsphere per piece rule is
the recent introduction of histological methods that permit blood flow
distributions to be determined from direct counting of colored and
fluorescent microspheres at the microscopic level (3, 8). Higher
resolution and smaller regions of interest result in many fewer
microspheres being counted in each region of interest. Methods for
smaller regions of interest are well suited to experiments with smaller
animals, such as transgenic mice. Because the number of microspheres in
an organ sample can be modeled by the Poisson distribution, the random
variations, or "noise" component, can be estimated and equations
for heterogeneity or other statistics can be mathematically corrected
for noise. In this paper, we present experimental evidence in support
of the Poisson assumption. The methodological or Poisson noise
component of measurements becomes increasingly important in experiments in which the number of microspheres distributed to organ regions is
small. We now present the theory and derivations of the formulas needed
to correct measures of flow heterogeneity and correlations between
flows for Poisson noise. We also present computer simulations to
demonstrate the utility of these formulas. Finally, we present the
results of an animal experiment that uses <400 microspheres per
sample piece yet yields reliable estimates of heterogeneity and correlation.
The hypothetical example presented in Table
1 motivates the methods developed later and
shows that some firm conclusions can be made even when all sample
pieces have <400 microspheres. The first column shows
the expected number of microspheres for each of 10 pieces based on the
true flow to each piece, and the next two columns show
"observations" on these pieces, generated by random sampling from
the Poisson distribution with the expected number of microspheres for
each piece. As predicted from Buckberg's work, the percent error for
some pieces is unacceptably high. However, it should be noted that when
the mean and heterogeneity (coefficient of variation) are calculated
for these three columns, they are very similar, differing by <2% out
of 58%. Note also that the correlation between the two observations,
r = 0.985, is close to 1.0, which is
the correlation that would be observed in the absence of any random
variation (the correlation of column 1 with itself). Thus the experimental observations are very
similar to the "truth" (column
1), even though not one of the pieces has an expected
value or an observed value >400 microspheres. As a further example,
it seems clear from the data in experiment
1 that the piece with 6 microspheres and the piece with
101 microspheres represent very different flows. This is formally
confirmed by a
2 test (1 degree
of freedom), which yields P < 0.0001. Thus one can conclude with a great deal of confidence that there is a different flow to these two pieces, even though both pieces have many fewer than
400 observed microspheres. A number of other differences in observed
microsphere counts between pairs of pieces in Table 1 are also
statistically significant. The table also includes adjusted values for
the coefficient of variation (CV) and correlation, using the methods
developed later in this paper. In each case, the adjusted values are
closer to the true values than the values based on observed results.
The adjustments are quite minor.
We show that quite good estimates of heterogeneity and correlations can
be calculated even when many regions (pieces) have relatively low
microsphere counts. Furthermore, heterogeneity and correlation can also
be adjusted to take account of the Poisson noise.
 |
METHODS |
Theory
For any given piece or region, there is a certain probability that a
microsphere will lodge in the region at the time of injection. If
microspheres act independently, every microsphere has the same probability of reaching a specified region. The expected number of
microspheres reaching a region will be
N × p, where
N is the number of microspheres
injected and p is the proportion of
total flow to the organ, which perfuses the region. Thus
p is also the expected proportion of
microspheres captured by the specified region. Because
N is large and
p is small, the distribution of n, the number of microspheres actually
reaching the region, can be well approximated by the Poisson
distribution (12). Previous studies have attempted to correct for
Poisson noise using the total microsphere count for the entire organ
(5, 7), but the methodology presented here is more realistic and
precise in its use of microsphere data for individual pieces of an organ.
Notation.
We use the subscript "true" to indicate the unobservable true
value of a quantity, e.g., CVtrue
represents the coefficient of variation of true flow, measured without
error. We use the subscript "obs" to denote a quantity calculated
by conventional formulas from the observed data from an experiment or
from randomly simulated data that are intended to mimic observed data
from a real experiment. We use the subscripts or notation "adj,"
"adjusted," or "corrected" to indicate an estimate, based
on the equations developed in this paper, that attempts to remove the
effect of random error due to Poisson noise. We also use the hat symbol "
" to indicate
these adjusted estimates. Thus
true = CVadj is an estimate of the true
CV. Similarly, rtrue is the true unobservable
correlation, robs is the observed correlation,
and both radj and
true are estimates of the true
correlation incorporating the adjustments described in this paper.
Adjusting estimates of heterogeneity for noise.
When heterogeneity is expressed as the CV, then, with the use of the
observed number of microspheres per piece
(Xi for
piece i), the observed CV is calculated as
|
(1)
|
where
S is the standard deviation of
Xi (calculated
with N, number of pieces, in
denominator) and
is the
mean of Xi.
Random errors will tend to cancel in the denominator when the mean is
taken across all pieces, but the numerator, the standard deviation,
will be inflated when Poisson variation is added to the true variation
in flow.
The Poisson noise can be adjusted "out" of the CV estimate by
using a relatively simple equation that is derived in
APPENDIX 1.
Equation 2 provides an estimate of the
true CV
|
(2)
|
where
N is the number of pieces in the
analysis. We note that if the computation leads to the square root of a
negative number, the CV should be set to zero and this value indicates
small heterogeneity.
If N and
are large,
this formula simplifies to
|
(3)
|
Because
the distribution of microspheres is Poisson, it can be shown that
CV2noise, the contribution of Poisson noise variance to the overall CV, can be written as
CV2noise = 1/
.
Equation 3 is then equivalent to that
proposed by Iversen et al. (7), which is
CV2true = CV2obs
CV2noise.
Adjusting estimates of correlation for noise.
Pearson's correlation (r) measures
the tendency of flows to vary together (e.g., before and after an
experimental change, or time
1 vs.
time
2, etc.). The Pearson correlation
robs is
calculated from the observed data, pairs of values
(Xi,
Yi) for
N pieces, as
|
(4)
|
The
value of robs is
a biased estimate of the true correlation,
rtrue, because of
the inflation of the denominator of robs by Poisson noise,
an effect noted earlier for the CV. As was true for the CV, the Poisson
noise can also be adjusted out of the correlation using an equation
that is derived in APPENDIX 2. The estimate that corrects for Poisson noise is
|
(5)
|
where
SX and
SY are the population standard
deviations for the X and
Y observations, respectively. If this formula leads to a number >1, the correlation estimate should be set
to 1.
Using Eqs. 2 and 5, an investigator can derive
estimates of the true CV and true correlation for an experiment. The
resulting values of
true and
true,
however, estimate heterogeneity and correlation of true absolute flow
or true relative flow. It is important in using Eqs.
2 and 5 that
microsphere counts be used in calculation of all means and standard
deviations. Absolute blood flow or relative blood flow should not be
used in the calculations.
Simulation Tests
The applicability and robustness of the derived formulas,
Eqs. 2 and 5, were explored through computer
simulations of organ blood flow and microsphere injections. Organ blood
flow distributions were generated with the fractal model of van Beek et
al. (11). This model produces heterogeneous flows that are skewed to
the right (toward higher flows), similar to experimental observations of perfusion distributions to myocardium (11), lung (4), and skeletal
muscle (6). The details of the construction of simulated organs can
be found in APPENDIX 3.
Single and paired flows for true organs.
"True" organs were generated by specifying the perfusion
heterogeneity and the number of pieces in the manner described in APPENDIX 3, and paired true
sets of piece flows were generated with specified correlations,
representing paired observations on pieces. Every generated true organ,
then, had a paired value of
(Xtrue,
Ytrue) for each
piece. A variety of true organs were generated by varying the nominal
perfusion heterogeneity (CV = 25, 50, 100%), the nominal correlation
(r =
0.7,
0.3, 0.0, 0.3, 0.7, 0.98), and the number of pieces
(N = 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256). Because
of the numerical procedures used in generating true organs, the CVs and
correlations can differ slightly from the specified target values. The
true CV values for generated organs ranged from 24.8 to 100.2%, and
the true correlations ranged from
0.742 to 0.995.
Simulation of observed organs.
The microsphere data for simulated observed organs were generated by
randomly drawing from the Poisson distribution to yield an observed
value or pair of values for each piece. The Poisson distribution used
for each piece had an expected value of
Xtrue (or
Ytrue). The
overall noise level of an experiment was specified by the expected
number of microspheres per piece, which varied across 14 levels: 3, 6, 12, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1,600, 3,200, 6,400, 12,800, and 25,600 microspheres. For each combination of perfusion heterogeneity, number
of pieces, number of microspheres/piece, and correlation, we generated
observed organs and paired organs with the same mean number of
microspheres/piece. Altogether, 1,512 combinations of these parameters
were used to test the CV correction (Eq. 2) and the correlation coefficient
(Eq. 5). We simulated 500 observed
organs per combination. For each of the 500 simulations, the value of
CVobs was corrected to
true using
Eq. 2 and the value of
robs was
corrected to
true using
Eq. 5. For each set of 500, we
calculated the mean, variance, and standard deviation of
CVobs,
true,
robs, and
true.
Experimental Protocol
We carried out an animal experiment to illustrate the use of our
adjusted estimates with biological data. We also wanted to demonstrate
that relatively small numbers of microspheres per sample piece could
still yield quite accurate estimates of the CV and correlations.
The study was approved by the University of Washington Animal Care
Committee. A single 3-kg New Zealand White rabbit was chemically restrained with intramuscular ketamine, anesthetized with thiopental, and allowed to breathe spontaneously. An internal jugular
catheter was placed. Fifteen-micrometer-diameter microspheres with four different radiolabels (153Gd,
113Sn,
103Ru, and
95Nb; NEN) were used to determine
regional pulmonary blood flow. Radioactivity per microsphere for each
radiolabel was determined by visually counting microspheres on filters
and then determining the radioactive counts from each filter. The
numbers of microspheres injected were intentionally chosen to provide
large numbers of gadolinium and tin with small numbers of ruthenium and
niobium. The microspheres were sonicated, vortexed, mixed in a single
syringe, and then injected via the internal jugular catheter over 30 s. The animal was killed by anesthetic overdose, and the lungs were removed, air dried inflated, and diced into 100 pieces. Each piece was
placed in an individual scintillation vial, and the radioactivity of
each radionuclide was determined in a scintillation counter (Packard
Minaxi gamma counting system, model 5550). Each sample was read for 20 min or until sufficient counts were obtained to provide a counting
error <0.5% for each radionuclide. The radioactive counts for each
radionuclide in each piece were corrected for spillover using a matrix
inversion method and were also corrected for background and decay. The
numbers of each microsphere in each piece were calculated from
radioactive counts and the measured value of radioactive
counts/microsphere.
 |
RESULTS |
Experimental Results
Our data consist of 100 pieces of lung, each with 4 radioactive
microsphere measurements (153Gd,
113Sn,
103Ru, and
95Nb). On average, there are 1,599 153Gd, 880 113Sn, 131 103Ru, and 80 95Nb microspheres per organ piece.
We examine the CVs and correlations in these data, as well as our
assumption that the noise can be modeled by a Poisson distribution.
Table 2 shows the conventional observed CV
for each microsphere measurement computed from Eq. 1, as well as the adjusted CV computed from
Eq. 2. With these data, our adjustment
changes the CV only slightly. The adjusted CV values for all four
measurements show extremely good agreement, differing by
0.008. The
observed values of CV are all also quite similar (differing by
0.01)
even though two of the injections have quite low mean counts of
microspheres/piece (103Ru and
95Nb), well below 400 microspheres/piece.
Table 3 shows the Pearson correlation
between each pair of microsphere measurements; for each correlation, we
show both the conventional observed value computed from
Eq. 4 and the adjusted value computed
from Eq. 5. The true correlation in
the absence of all noise should be 1, because the measurements are made
at the same time on the same pieces. The correction brings each
correlation closer to the true value of 1.0; however, all correlations
are very similar and very close to 1.0, even though some are based on
low microsphere counts (103Ru and
95Nb). Figure
1 shows the strong correlation between
103Ru- and
95Nb-based microsphere counts,
with little scatter around the least-squares line. The observed
correlations differ from 1.0 by
0.03, and the adjusted correlations
differ from 1.0 by
0.006. Clearly, Poisson noise has had little
influence on these correlations.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Scatterplot of microspheres per piece based on
103Ru and
95Nb.
N, no. of pieces; CV, coefficient of
variation; R, Pearson correlation.
|
|
A further examination of the microsphere counts provides evidence in
favor of the Poisson noise assumption. True Poisson noise has a piece
variance equal to the piece mean. To check this assumption, we
estimated the variance and mean for each piece. We regressed each of
the low signal measurements (103Ru
and 95Nb) on the sum of the other
three measurements with a zero-intercept model. For each piece the
squared residual from the regression model is an estimate of the piece
variance; this can be compared with the regression-fitted expected
microsphere count for the same piece, which is an estimate of the true
piece mean. (A single outlier in the entire data set was excluded from
the analysis of 103Ru because its residual was >4
standard deviations from the regression line.) In a second analysis, we
regressed the estimated piece variance on the estimated mean. We found
that the regression slope of variance versus mean was close to 1.0, the
value expected if the microsphere counts follow the Poisson
distribution (Table 4). This supports (but
does not prove) the assumption of Poisson noise. The increment in slope
above 1.0 is most likely caused by variation not related to the
distribution of microspheres. Such variation would include random
variation in radioactive counting and laboratory error.
Definitively showing that the Poisson distribution fits microsphere
count data would require an experiment that is currently impossible.
One would have to carry out a large number of simultaneous microsphere
injections, each with a unique radioisotope or other tag, and then
compare the resulting microsphere count distribution to the Poisson
distribution. Constraints on tagging microspheres and on body burden
render this experiment impossible with current technology.
Simulation Tests
When the number of microspheres in an experiment is large, the
unadjusted CV and correlation differ little from the true CV and
correlation and either can be used. However, as the number of
microspheres in an experiment is reduced, the adjusted CV and correlation are approximately unbiased and are accurate for much smaller numbers of microspheres than the unadjusted values, as shown by
the simulation results below.
We initially illustrate the simulation results with some examples and
then present the overall results. The relative performance of the
observed and adjusted CV are displayed for four true organs in Fig.
2, which shows simulation results for small
(CV = 25%) and large (CV = 100%) heterogeneity and for small
(n = 16) and large
(n = 256) numbers of pieces. Note in
all plots that the mean
true (noted as
"corrected") is closer to the true CV for considerably smaller
numbers of microspheres than the mean
CVobs (noted as "observed").
Also note that both CVtrue and
CVobs are quite close to the true
CV, with rather small standard deviations, for a number of the points
(observed organs) <400 microspheres/piece. Also, in the top panels of
Fig. 2, where the true CV is larger than in the bottom panels,
CVobs diverges less rapidly from
the true CV as microspheres/piece decreases. The larger true CV (the "signal") is much more prominent than the Poisson error (the
"noise"), and the noise has relatively less influence.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Examples of observed and corrected CV based on simulation for 16 (A and
C) or 256 (B and
D) pieces. True CV = 99.8 (A), 100.1 (B), 24.9 (C), and 25.2 (D). Each point represents mean of
500 simulated values. Vertical lines at
bottom of each plot represent standard
deviations.
|
|
Although the observed CV of organ perfusion is dependent on the number
of pieces into which the organ is dissected (1), these simulations show
that unbiased estimates of the observed perfusion heterogeneity can be
obtained from an organ with as few as 16 pieces and an average of only
4 microspheres per piece by using Eq. 2 for
true. The primary
consequence of using such small numbers of organ pieces and
microspheres is a large variance in the estimate of heterogeneity and
hence a loss of confidence in the observation from a single experiment.
Because the corrected estimates are unbiased, observed CV values
averaged over a number of experiments will produce quite accurate
estimates of the true CV.
The simulation results for correlations show features similar to those
for the CV. Figure 3 illustrates
performance for low (true r = 0.27-0.34) and strong (true r = 0.98-0.99) correlations and for many
(n = 256) and few
(n = 16) pieces. The CV for all of the
simulations in these figures is ~50%. Again, both
robs (noted as
"observed") and
true
(noted as "corrected") are close to
rtrue, with small
standard deviations for a number of the points below 400 microspheres/piece. The mean
true stays
closer to the true r than
robs for much
smaller numbers of microspheres per piece. Also,
robs diverges
from the true correlation much more rapidly with decreasing
microspheres/piece when the correlation is large.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Examples of observed and corrected correlation
(r) based on simulation for 16 (A and
C) or 256 (B and
D) pieces. True
r = 0.983 (A), 0.994 (B), 0.346 (C) and 0.268 (D). Each point represents mean of
500 simulated values. Vertical lines at
bottom of each plot represent standard
deviations.
|
|
These examples illustrate that the observed CVs and correlations can be
quite accurate for many experiments with <400 microspheres/piece and
that use of corrected CVs and correlations extends accurate results
into experiments with considerably smaller numbers of microspheres/piece.
We can summarize the accuracy of the corrected and uncorrected CV and
correlation estimates using two key measures: bias (systematic error,
e.g., expected value of CVobs
CVtrue) and root mean
square error [RMSE = (bias2 + variance)1/2]. The RMSE
incorporates both bias and variability. A small value of RMSE ensures
that both bias and variability are small and that the estimated
quantity is accurate. For completeness, we also present results on the
standard deviation of the CV and of the correlation. The standard
deviation is a concept of precision (not accuracy), but good precision
is not helpful if bias is large.
Table 5, based on the simulations, shows
the minimum size of experiments, expressed as the total number of
microspheres in the organ, that yielded an estimated bias, standard
deviation, and RMSE at or less than the amount shown, for all sets of
simulation parameters (number of pieces,
CVtrue, and
rtrue). The
1,512 simulated experiments used to construct the table were described
in Simulation Tests and include a wide
range of numbers of pieces, true CV, microspheres per piece, and
correlation. The corrected estimates have a clear
advantage in bias and RMSE; the uncorrected estimates require many more
microspheres to obtain levels of bias comparable to those of the
uncorrected estimates. For example, to have a quite accurate estimate
of the CV, as indicated by an RMSE of
2%, at least 25,260 microspheres are needed (all pieces combined) when the conventional
CVobs is used. However, if
CVtrue is used, only 12,803 microspheres are needed, about one-half as many. In an experiment
involving correlations, the conventional
robs would require >400,000 microspheres and
true would
require ~100,000 microspheres to yield very good accuracy with a
small RMSE of 0.02. The standard deviation results are about the same
for both corrected and uncorrected estimates. Thus the smaller values
of RMSE for the corrected estimates compared with the conventional observed estimates are primarily caused by the smaller values of bias
for the corrected estimates.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 5.
Minimum number of microspheres (organ total) that yield bias, SD, or
RMSE <1, 2, and 5% for CV estimates and <0.01, 0.02, and
0.05 for correlation estimates
|
|
The blank cells in Table 5 indicate that there were some parameter sets
for which the standard deviation or RMSE never reached the minimum
level indicated in the table. The maximum number of microspheres (organ
total) in the simulations was 6,553,600; using more microspheres would
provide lower levels of bias, standard deviation, and RMSE, even in the
extreme cases.
Effect on Experimental Design
We developed approximate equations for the variance of
true and
true that
can be used in planning the number of microspheres to be used in
experiments to achieve a specified level of accuracy. The exact
variance of
true and
true
cannot be written in closed form, and the asymptotic variances are
extremely complex. Thus we fit approximate models for these variances
using linear regression with the observed variances as dependent
variables and combinations of powers, products, and other functions of
simulation parameters (number of pieces, heterogeneity, microspheres
per piece, correlation) as independent variables. All of the
simulations were pooled for this modeling.
The fitted models for the variance of
true, expressed as a
percentage (Eq. 6), and the variance
of
true
(Eq. 7) can be used to estimate the
precision of an experiment. The model for the variance of
true fit well for
experiments with at least 1,500 total microspheres, yielding
R2 = 0.89. We
obtained R2 = 0.61 from the model for the variance of
rtrue for
experiments with at least 3,300 total microspheres
|
(6)
|
In
Eq. 6, Total is the total number of
microspheres in the entire organ. The Total value in an organ is the
number of pieces in the organ, N,
times the average number of microspheres per organ piece,
. The
variance of CVtrue will,
therefore, be approximately the same for two experiments, one with 10 pieces and an average of 800 microspheres/piece and a second with 100 pieces and an average of 80 microspheres/piece
|
(7)
|
In
Eq. 7, CV is expressed as a percentage
and Total is the total number of microspheres in the entire organ for
each injection (the same for X or
Y). If the number of microspheres
differs between the X and
Y injections, then setting Total to
the minimum of X and Y
would yield a conservatively large variance of
true.
To illustrate the use of the variance equations, if we consider an
experiment with N = 200 pieces, an
average of 200 microspheres/piece for each of the two separate
microsphere injections, and CVtrue = 50% for both of our paired measurements, then the estimated standard
error (SE) of
true
(square root of the variance) would be 0.62%, and the estimated SE of
true would
be 0.017. This would lead to approximate 95% confidence intervals of
±1.2% for the adjusted CV estimate and ±0.033 for the adjusted
correlation estimate. This clearly indicates quite small uncertainty in
the estimates and, overall, a very accurate experiment.
Now consider an example with N = 100 pieces, an average of only 50 microspheres/piece for each of the two
separate microsphere injections, and true heterogeneity
(CVtrue = 50%) for both paired measurements. In this case, the estimated SE of
true is 1.75%, and
the estimated SE of
true is
0.048. This leads to approximate 95% confidence intervals of
±3.4% for the corrected CV estimate and ±0.094 for the
corrected correlation estimate. Although the variability here is larger
than the previous example, it is still small enough to be useful if
there is a large effect or if a rough estimate is sufficient. Note that
Eqs. 6 and 7 should be used only for planning
experiments and not for estimation of actual standard deviations for
completed experiments.
We can use Eqs. 6 and 7 to come up with a "rule of
thumb" for the number of microspheres needed to provide estimates of
the CV and correlation that are relatively free of Poisson noise and are reasonably precise. Although it may be somewhat arbitrary, let us
consider that a relatively small amount of Poisson noise is acceptable
if we are 95% confident that an estimated CV is within ±2% of the
true value. These 95% confidence bounds imply a standard error of the
CV of ~1% and a variance of
(1%)2 = 1.0. Using this value for
the variance in Eq. 6 and solving for
Total, we get 15,330 or, rounded, 15,000 microspheres needed to provide
95% confidence of good precision of the CV. Note that this estimate is
independent of the number of pieces.
We can provide a similar rule of thumb for the correlation coefficient.
Correlations range from
1.0 to +1.0. Let us consider that
Poisson noise is acceptable if we are 95% confident that the estimated
correlation coefficient is within ±0.05 of the true value. These
95% confidence bounds imply a standard error of 0.025 and a variance
of (0.025)2 = 0.000625. We can use
Eq. 7 for a "worst case"
scenario by setting each CV = 10%. This CV would imply an
extraordinarily small level of variability for a biological system, a
level that would rarely be encountered in practice, and thus, a highly
conservative numerical choice. Solving Eq. 7 for Total then yields Total = 24,481, which is
rounded up to an easily remembered value of 25,000. Again, this
estimate is independent of the number of pieces.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The 400 microsphere rule for ±10% precision of flow to a single
region or piece is certainly a useful and important guideline for
investigators for whom that is the single goal. We have shown both
experimentally and by simulation that experiments that use <400
microspheres/piece can yield valid and accurate estimates of
heterogeneity and of correlation after adjustment using
Eqs. 2,
3, and
5. Often, adjustments are so small
that no correction will be needed for heterogeneity and correlation
estimates. This methodology can be extended to include other types of
microsphere analyses as well, such as regression slopes expressing the
gradient in flow versus distance within an organ. When measurements of slope, heterogeneity, or correlation are made for several animals, hypotheses about this sample of statistics can be made using a single
sample t-test comparing the mean
heterogeneity, mean correlation, or mean slope to a specified value,
such as zero. If a statistic, such as
true, is unbiased for
each animal, then the mean for the collection of animals is unbiased.
Naturally, the use of more microspheres per animal will increase the
precision of the statistic within each animal and allow a greater power
to detect effects in the collection of animals. However, if a
statistically significant result is obtained for a mean (e.g., mean CV)
from experiments involving several animals with small numbers of
microspheres, then the hypothesis test, the
P-value, and the confidence intervals are all valid, regardless of the number of microspheres per piece.
The driving force behind precision and bias is the magnitude of Poisson
noise in relation to the size of the effect being considered. Thus, if
true heterogeneity is large, Poisson noise may be relatively
unimportant. If correlations are very strong, they are likely to be
quite evident, even without correction. Correction will usually give a
more precise estimate of heterogeneity and correlation.
A rule of thumb for the number of microspheres to use in an experiment
is 15,000 if an accurate coefficient of variation is of interest and
25,000 if the correlation coefficient is of interest. An accurate
correlation coefficient requires more microspheres (almost twice as
many) than the number required for the CV, because two sets of
microspheres are involved.
Our methodology does not need to take account of reference flows.
Reference flow microspheres play no role when heterogeneity and
correlation are being estimated using the methods developed in this
article or when microspheres are individually counted with histological
methods. Reference flows also play no role when the mean flow or mean
normalized flow to pieces is adjusted to a fixed value, such as 1.0, that is used for all animals in an experiment. Reference flows will be
important, however, when the absolute flow (e.g., ml/min) to a region
is of interest. In this case, the methods developed by Buckberg et al.
(2) and Nose et al. (9) can be used to achieve a satisfactory level of precision.
In conclusion, measurements of heterogeneity and correlation can be
corrected for Poisson noise. The 400 microspheres/piece rule does not
apply to many analyses. At least 15,000 microspheres (total) should be
used for accurate estimates of heterogeneity and at least 25,000 microspheres for accurate estimates of correlation coefficients.