|
|
||||||||
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The frequency of baroreceptor volleys to the central nervous system can influence the fidelity of baroreceptor signal transmission and thus may affect baroreflex regulation of blood pressure. We examined 1) the extent to which frequency-dependent depression of aortic baroreceptor signals was initiated at the first central synapse between primary baroreceptor fibers and second-order nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) neurons; 2) whether the pattern of baroreceptor input influenced the depression; and 3) the potential relevance to baroreflex sympathoinhibition. In urethan-anesthetized rats, NTS action potential responses of neurons classified as second or higher order and averaged lumbar sympathetic nerve activity responses were simultaneously measured during 100 aortic depressor nerve stimuli delivered in constant or phasic patterns (0.8-48 Hz). Frequency-dependent depression was initiated at second-order neurons, with NTS responses decreasing to a 72% response rate at 48 Hz; the depression was greater at higher-order neurons; responses decreased to a 30% response rate. The depression was slightly but significantly greater with phasic inputs. Curve fitting suggested that synaptic depression may limit baroreflex sympathoinhibition. Thus frequency limits on baroreceptor inputs at NTS synapses may affect baroreflex function.
synaptic transmission; in vivo; cardiovascular; aortic depressor nerve; lumbar sympathetic nerve
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
WITHIN THE CENTRAL NETWORK of the baroreflex pathway, baroreceptor information is integrated to regulate arterial blood pressure on a moment-to-moment basis. Much of the integration occurs in the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS), where the baroreceptor signals are first processed (27). One aspect of the processing is that the frequency or timing of the baroreceptor inputs can influence the fidelity of synaptic transmission (12, 15, 17, 18, 23, 26). Seller and Illert (26) were the first to show that with increasing, yet physiologically relevant frequencies of carotid sinus nerve (CSN) input, there was a frequency-dependent depression of the postsynaptic responses; the amplitude of the evoked NTS potentials decayed by 50% with repetitive CSN stimulation at 10 Hz. Time-dependent depression, in which only two stimuli are applied, has also been observed for carotid nerve signal processing in the NTS. When a conditioning stimulus was followed by a test stimulus, as the interval separating the two was shortened, the NTS response to the test stimulus began to fail (12, 17, 23). In addition to such in vivo observations, studies performed in brain stem slices containing the NTS and primary autonomic afferent fibers in the solitary tract have also documented both frequency- and time-dependent synaptic depression (1, 5, 6, 13, 19, 28). Of particular relevance to the present work are the findings by Scheuer and colleagues (23) of time-dependent depression specifically of aortic baroreceptor signal transmission in vivo. We have recently demonstrated that with a repetitive barrage of aortic baroreceptor afferent signals to the NTS, there is also a frequency-dependent depression of signal transmission. When trains of 100 stimuli were delivered to the aortic depressor nerve (ADN) at increasing frequencies, the NTS action potential response rates decreased (15), similar to the amplitudes of carotid nerve-evoked synaptic potentials reported by Seller and Illert (26).
There remain, however, a number of questions about frequency-dependent depression of aortic baroreceptor signal transmission which, if answered, could provide new insight into the physiological relevance of this form of synaptic depression in baroreceptor afferent signaling and ultimately in baroreflex function. For example, what is the extent to which the synaptic depression occurs at the first central synapse? Do second-order NTS neurons serve simply as relayers of primary baroreceptor signals to more distal synapses for signal processing or does the processing begin at the first CNS synapse? Time-dependent depression of aortic baroreceptor signal transmission was shown to occur largely at distal synapses (23); however, the extent to which frequency-dependent depression occurs at second- or higher-order baroreceptor neurons is not known (15).
Most information on synaptic depression in the NTS in the intact animal has been obtained with constant frequency-repetitive stimulation or paired stimulus paradigms. However, many baroreceptor fibers provide a phasic input to the NTS synchronous with the systolic phase of the cardiac cycle rather than a constant input (7, 24, 25). Moreover, some, though not all, studies of reflex function suggest that phasic input patterns are more effective than fixed patterns in evoking baroreflex responses (7, 10, 11, 20). So, whether the pattern of baroreceptor inputs influences the extent of frequency-dependent depression of baroreceptor signal transmission in the NTS is unknown.
Finally, whether there is any impact of frequency-dependent depression of baroreceptor signal transmission on baroreflex function is not clear. Seller and Illert (26) suggested that the frequency limitation for carotid sinus input to the NTS was manifest in baroreflex control of blood pressure, with maximal decreases in blood pressure occurring at 20-30 Hz CSN stimulation. Frequency limits on baroreflex function have also been reported in humans, although at higher frequencies (80 Hz) than reported earlier (3). Others (10, 11) have shown that maximal reflex responses are maintained at high stimulation frequencies, suggesting that frequency limits on signal transmission in the NTS are not conveyed to the reflex output. However, whether the maximal baroreflex responses would have been even larger in the absence of frequency limits in the NTS is unknown. Moreover, there are no studies in which NTS neuronal activity and reflex output have been simultaneously measured in real time during increasing frequencies of baroreceptor volleys.
The purpose of this study was to answer three questions: 1) Is frequency-dependent depression of aortic signal transmission initiated at the first central synapse? 2) Does whether the ADN afferent volleys arrive in a phasic pattern (to mimic systolic input) or a constant pattern influence the extent of the depression? 3) Does the frequency-dependent depression in the NTS have any influence on the sympathetic component of baroreflex output? To answer these questions, we simultaneously measured NTS action potential responses of neurons classified as second or higher order and averaged lumbar sympathetic nerve activity (LSNA) responses during 100 ADN stimuli delivered in constant or phasic patterns at increasing frequencies. Using curve-fitting analysis, we predicted what impact frequency-dependent synaptic depression in the NTS might have on baroreflex-mediated sympathoinhibition.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental protocols followed in the work were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and in accordance with Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
General animal preparation. Experiments were performed in male Sprague-Dawley rats, which were anesthetized with an initial injection of urethan (1.3 g/kg ip). Each rat was placed on a servo-controlled water blanket, and body temperature was monitored via a rectal temperature probe and maintained within 37 ± 1°C. The endotracheal tube was attached to the ventilator, and the rat was ventilated with oxygen-enriched air at 40-48 breaths/min. The ventilator rate was adjusted to maintain blood gases within normal limits. The expiratory line of the ventilator was placed under 1-2 cmH2O to prevent atelectasis. A catheter was advanced through the femoral artery for measuring arterial blood pressure and withdrawing blood for blood gases and through the femoral vein for administering fluids and drugs. The electrocardiogram (ECG) was measured with surface electrodes. The ADN was approached via a cervical lateral incision, placed on a bipolar silver hook electrode, covered with a mixture of petroleum jelly and mineral oil, and connected to a stimulus isolation unit. The lumbar sympathetic nerve trunk was accessed between L3 and L5 by a ventral abdominal approach. The nerve was placed on a bipolar silver hook electrode and covered with silicone gel (Wacker Sil-Gel 604) to isolate the electrode from the surrounding tissue and to ensure contact of the nerve and electrode.
The rats were placed in a stereotaxic frame and suspended by a thoracic vertebral clamp. An occipital craniotomy was performed. The caudal portion of the fourth ventricle was exposed by removing the dura and arachnoid membranes and then covered with warm mineral oil. At the start of the NTS recording period, the rats were paralyzed with gallamine (3 mg/kg iv). Anesthesia was maintained by administration of pentobarbital sodium (6.5 mg/kg iv) as needed. Before neuromuscular blockade, adequacy of anesthesia was determined every half-hour by pinching the hindlimb paw and monitoring for hindlimb flinch or withdrawal or observing a sudden fluctuation of mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) (>5 mmHg) or heart rate (HR) (>10%). During neuromuscular blockade, adequacy of anesthesia was tested every half-hour by determining whether there was a spontaneous or paw pinch-evoked fluctuation or increase (>5 mmHg) in MABP or increase (>10%) in HR.
Extracellular recordings of single-unit NTS activity were made using single-barrel glass pipettes filled with 2% Pontamine blue dye in 0.5 M sodium acetate. To search for ADN-activated neurons, the electrode was stereotaxically positioned on the dorsal surface of the brain stem over the NTS and lowered slowly as the ADN was stimulated at 0.6 Hz. Recordings were made on either side of the NTS but always ipsilateral to the ADN stimulated. From previous experience in searching for ADN-responsive neurons in the NTS (2, 8, 15), we limited the search to the region of the NTS extending in the rostrocaudal plane from 1.3 mm rostral to the level calamus scriptorius and from 0.2 to 1.4 mm lateral to midline. This region corresponds to the intermediate and caudal NTS where cardiovascular and respiratory afferent fiber terminals are concentrated (16). NTS single unit activity was fed via high-impedance source followers to second stage amplifiers and filtered between 0.3 and 3 kHz. LSNA signals were fed via a high-impedance source follower to a second stage amplifier and filtered between 10 and 3,000 Hz. For measuring ADN-evoked changes in averaged LSNA, the nerve activity was rectified and averaged using a stimulus-triggered averaging program (RC Electronics). Both raw and averaged LSNA were monitored during the experiment to assure viability and maximal depression in response to ADN stimulation. Single NTS unit activity, LSNA, arterial blood pressure, and ECG activity were fed in parallel to a thermal chart recorder, audiomonitor, and a digital tape recorder with a sampling rate of 11 kHz per channel for off-line analyses using RC Electronics.
NTS recording sites were marked by passing current (10 µA for 7 s every 14 s for 15 min, electrode negative) through the recording electrode to deposit the Pontamine dye. At the end of an experiment, the brain stem was removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 10% sucrose. The brain stems were cut in 40-µm coronal sections, and the recording sites were verified histologically.
Protocols. The ADN was initially stimulated with constant current 0.5-ms pulses delivered at 20 Hz to determine the threshold current to produce a depressor response. For screening the NTS for ADN-activated neurons, the ADN was continuously stimulated at 0.6 Hz (0.5-ms pulses) with currents of at least three times the depressor threshold current as the recording electrode was lowered slowly through the nucleus. Once a neuron was isolated, we used the minimal ADN current that evoked NTS action potentials at a ~100% response rate at a stimulation frequency of 0.8 Hz. That current averaged 458 ± 352 µA. The same current was used to determine the onset latency and variability of the onset latency of the evoked responses and the action potential response rate at all frequencies. Viability of the ADN was tested throughout the experiment by stimulating at 20 Hz with currents at three times the depressor threshold and establishing that there was a decrease in arterial blood pressure. Each neuron was tested with two ADN stimuli separated by 5 ms; if it discharged an action potential to each of the two stimuli, it was classified as monosynaptically activated (19, 23). Trains of 100 ADN stimuli were delivered at frequencies of 0.8, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 Hz in a constant pattern. Frequencies were applied in random order. Each train of stimuli was separated by a 1-min interval. In 13 rats, we transected both vagi to determine whether vagal inputs affected the extent of the frequency-dependent depression of ADN signals; in 5 of those rats we also transected both ADN (peripheral to the stimulating electrode). There was no difference in the extent of the frequency-dependent depression in neurons studied with the ADN and vagi intact (n = 34) or with the vagi cut (n = 10) or with both ADN and vagi cut (n = 5), therefore the data were combined.
Because baroreceptor fibers can provide a pulse phasic input to NTS
neurons synchronous with the systolic phase of the cardiac cycle (7,
24, 25), we compared frequency-dependent depression for
phasic versus constant input patterns at the same mean frequencies. One
hundred ADN stimuli were delivered in both phasic and constant patterns
at mean frequencies of 12, 24, and 48 Hz. Phasic stimuli were delivered
in cycles that corresponded to the R-R interval in the rat to mimic
bursts of aortic baroreceptor activity (14). On the basis of a rat HR
of 360 beats/min, the R-R interval averages 167 ms, with systole
occurring within one-third of the interval (~56 ms, indicated by
shaded area in Fig. 1). Thus, for a mean input frequency of 12, 24, or 48 Hz, the phasic input consisted of 2, 4, or 8 stimuli, respectively, applied in 56 ms (systole) every 167 ms
(Fig. 1). The corresponding peak frequencies were 36, 72, or 144 Hz,
respectively.
|
To compare the magnitude of the NTS action potential response rate and the averaged LSNA response in the same trials using the same frequencies, we used the ADN stimuli as triggers to simultaneously generate peristimulus time histograms of evoked NTS action potentials and averaged decreases in LSNA.
Data analysis. The number of action potentials evoked by ADN stimuli at each frequency was counted from peristimulus time histograms that were constructed from the 100 stimuli in each train (RC Electronics). The onset latency of the evoked responses and the variability of the onset latency were also determined from peristimulus time histograms. The onset latency and variability of the onset latency of NTS responses were compared in neurons classified as second- versus higher-order neurons using unpaired t-tests. To determine the response rate of the NTS neurons at each frequency, the number of action potentials evoked was expressed as a percentage of the 100 stimuli delivered. The effect of neuron order on the frequency-dependent response rate of the NTS neurons was analyzed with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with frequency as a within-subject effect and neuron order as a between-subject effect. The effect of pattern on the frequency-dependent responses was analyzed with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with frequency as one within-subject effect and pattern as the other within-subject effect.
To examine the time course for the frequency-dependent decrease in NTS neuron responsiveness for each successive stimulus in the train of 100 stimuli, we counted the number of evoked action potentials and expressed that number as a percentage of the number of stimuli. The percentages were plotted for each successive stimulus at each frequency of ADN stimulation for both second- and higher-order neurons.
To determine the extent to which frequency-dependent depression in the NTS may affect the reflex decrease in LSNA for higher-order neurons showing at least a 15% synaptic depression for which we had simultaneous LSNA recordings, we multiplied each ADN input frequency by the average response rate (percent) of the NTS neuron at that frequency and designated the product as the NTS output frequency. We then fit the decrease in LSNA to the NTS output frequencies for each animal. From the curve fitting, we predicted the decrease in LSNA in the absence of frequency-dependent depression. We compared the predicted decrease in LSNA in the absence of frequency-dependent depression in the NTS with the actual decrease in LSNA measured with the frequency-dependent depression by using a two-way ANOVA with frequency as one within-subject effect and presence or absence of frequency-dependent depression as the other within-subject effect.
The peak amplitude and peak latency of the decreases in LSNA were determined by stimulus-triggered averages, constructed from the 100 stimuli in each train (RC Electronics). Each decrease in LSNA was expressed as a percentage of baseline activity immediately preceding the stimulus. The maximum depression and time constant for the frequency-dependent decreases in LSNA as a function of NTS output frequencies were determined by curve fitting. Data are expressed as means ± SE, unless otherwise indicated. Significance was claimed at P < 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results were obtained in 29 rats. At the commencement of recording
the mean arterial PO2 was 197 ± 77 mmHg, PCO2 was 37.2 ± 5.9 mmHg, and pH was
7.41 ± 0.01 (means ± SD). Twenty-two recording sites (14 of
second-order neurons and 8 of higher-order neurons) were histologically
confirmed and were located in the intermediate NTS, where baroreceptor
neurons are concentrated (16). All but three recordings were medial to
the solitary tract. An example and the composite of the recording sites
are shown in Fig. 2.
|
Frequency-dependent depression in NTS baroreceptor neurons. An
example of frequency-dependent synaptic transmission in a second-order aortic baroreceptor neuron is shown in Fig.
3. As shown in Fig. 3A, 100 ADN
stimuli evoked action potential responses in a cell that met the
criteria for a second-order neuron (discharged an action potential to
two ADN stimuli separated by 5 ms, inset in Fig. 3A).
The impulse activity had a cardiac rhythm as indicated by the R
wave-triggered histogram of unit activity (Fig. 3B) and increased when arterial blood pressure was increased with 0.5 µg/kg
iv phenylephrine (Fig. 3C). Frequency-dependent depression of
the action potential response rate is shown in Fig. 3D.
|
The group data showing frequency-dependent depression in second- and
higher-order aortic baroreceptor neurons are shown in Fig.
4. Frequency-dependent depression occurred
in second-order neurons and to a greater extent in higher-order neurons
(two-way ANOVA; P < 0.0001, frequency; P < 0.0001, neuron order; no interaction). Fifteen of twenty-two second-order
neurons and 28 of 30 higher-order neurons displayed at least a 15%
decrease in the synaptic response at the highest frequency. All neurons
were included in the analysis. Neurons that met the criteria for
second-order had a mean onset latency of 6.7 ± 2.2 ms, significantly
shorter than that of the higher-order neurons (20.8 ± 2.5 ms;
P = 0.0004). In addition, the variability of the response onset
was significantly shorter in the second- versus higher-order neurons
(2.0 ± 0.5 ms vs. 14.0 ± 1.9 ms, respectively; P = 0.0001). Fourteen (6 second- and 8 higher-order) of the 52 neurons
displayed a detectable cardiac rhythm; however, it is possible that
with higher blood pressures, more neurons would have exhibited a
pulse-phasic firing pattern (27). Seven (4 second- and 3 higher-order)
of 8 neurons tested were excited by increases in blood pressure induced
by intravenous phenylephrine injections.
|
The time course of the frequency-dependent depression during successive
stimuli at each frequency is shown for second- and higher-order neurons
in Fig. 5. For second-order neurons, the synaptic depression at ADN input frequencies of 24 and 48 Hz did not
commence until ~10 stimuli were applied and required about 40 stimuli
to reach the maximum steady-state depression. For the higher-order
neurons, starting at 6 Hz, the depression commenced after as few as two
stimuli and required ~20 stimuli to reach the maximum steady state.
|
NTS and LSNA frequency-dependent responses. The
frequency-dependent responses of NTS neurons and peak fall in averaged
LSNA measured simultaneously are shown in Fig.
6 (n = 14). Figure 6A illustrates successive NTS action potentials, and the accompanying decrease in LSNA averaged over 100 ADN stimuli delivered at 0.8 Hz. The
peak latency of the decrease in averaged LSNA was 174 ms; the mean peak
latency for all LSNA responses was 163 ± 25 ms (means ± SD). The
group data are shown in Fig. 6B. The NTS neurons (Fig.
6B, top) displayed the characteristic
frequency-dependent depression (one-way repeated measures ANOVA,
P < 0.0001). The amplitude of the decrease in averaged LSNA,
expressed as a percentage of the baseline (Fig. 6B,
bottom), was greater with the increasing frequencies of ADN
stimulation (one-way repeated measures ANOVA, P < 0.0001).
|
The potential influence of frequency-dependent depression in the NTS on
the reflex sympathoinhibition is shown in Fig.
7. The data are from seven animals with
simultaneous recordings of LSNA and of higher-order NTS neuron activity
(to approximate NTS output). Shown in Fig. 7A, the measured
decrease in averaged LSNA for each animal was plotted as a function of
the calculated NTS output frequencies corresponding to ADN input
frequencies of 0.8, 6, 12, 24, and 48 Hz. For each animal the decrease
in LSNA was best fit to the NTS output frequencies with a single
exponential. From the curve fitting for each animal, we determined the
predicted decrease in LSNA if there was no frequency-dependent
depression in the NTS; that is, when the NTS output frequency matched
the ADN input frequency. Figure 7B shows 1) the
measured decrease in averaged LSNA as a function of the ADN
input frequency with the actual frequency-dependent depression observed
in the NTS, and 2) the predicted decrease in averaged LSNA in
the absence of frequency-dependent depression (when the NTS output
frequency matched the ADN input frequency). The predicted decrease in
LSNA in the absence of frequency-dependent depression was significantly greater than the measured decrease with frequency-dependent depression (two-way ANOVA; P = 0.0487, frequency; P = 0.000001, predicted vs. actual decrease in LSNA; no interaction).
|
Effect of ADN input pattern on frequency-dependent depression in
NTS and of LSNA. Synaptic responses in second-order neurons displayed a slightly but statistically significantly greater depression when ADN stimuli were delivered in a phasic compared with a constant pattern at the same mean frequency (Fig. 8,
top traces; n = 18; two-way ANOVA; P = 0.002, frequency; P = 0.012, pattern; no interaction). This was also
the case with higher-order neurons (Fig. 8, bottom traces; n = 22; two-way ANOVA; P = 0.00001, frequency; P = 0.004, pattern; no interaction). In 14 experiments (n = 7 with
second-order neurons and n = 7 higher-order neurons) we
determined whether the pattern affected the simultaneously measured
decrease in averaged LSNA. The marginally greater frequency-dependent
depression in the NTS with a phasic input with the same mean frequency
as the fixed input was not apparent in the reflex-mediated
sympathoinhibition. The frequency-dependent decrease in LSNA was not
different with constant or phasic inputs (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.005, frequency; P = 0.22, pattern; no interaction).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The major findings of this study are that: 1) aortic baroreceptor signal transmission measured in the NTS in the whole animal is initiated at the first central synapse between the primary baroreceptor fibers and second-order neurons but is considerably more robust at more distal synapses; 2) calculations based on the simultaneous measurement of NTS and sympathetic output responses during increasing frequencies of ADN stimulation suggest that frequency-dependent depression of signal transmission in the NTS may modestly limit baroreflex-mediated sympathoinhibition; and 3) phasic patterns of aortic baroreceptor volleys, set to mimic systolic inputs, are marginally more effective in eliciting frequency-dependent synaptic depression than constant patterns at the same mean frequencies but appear not to influence the sympathetic component of the reflex output.
The finding that frequency-dependent depression occurred at second-order neurons suggests that these neurons, rather than simply following primary baroreceptor inputs, have some signal conditioning capacity. These results confirm our previous observations of frequency-dependent depression at second-order neurons in the rabbit (15). Interestingly, Scheuer and colleagues (23) found that time-dependent depression of aortic baroreceptor signal transmission, observed when a conditioning and test stimulus were applied, whereas a consistent feature in higher-order neurons, did not generally occur in second-order neurons (23). The time course of the frequency-dependent depression in the current study reinforces the finding of Scheuer and co-workers (23) that with only two stimuli, there is no appreciable synaptic depression at second-order neurons (Fig. 5). In the present study, in general, the frequency-dependent depression at the second-order neurons did not begin until at least 10 volleys were delivered and required about 40 volleys for the maximum steady-state depression. By contrast at the higher-order neurons, the depression not only occurred with lower ADN input frequencies, but beginning with 6 Hz, the depression commenced with as few as two stimuli and required 20 stimuli to reach the steady-state depression (Fig. 5). These observations suggest that frequency-dependent depression requires a critical number of afferent volleys. This was also the case with our previous study in rabbit, wherein about 30 ADN stimuli were required to elicit the depression (15). The ADN stimulation frequencies associated with the frequency-dependent depression were within the physiological range of baroreceptor afferent activity; myelinated aortic baroreceptor activity increases to 40 Hz with arterial blood pressure increases of 13 mmHg and to 80 Hz with blood pressure increases of 28 mmHg (4).
The presumptive nature of the criteria for classifying neurons as second-order must be considered when interpreting the results of this study. Miles (19) emphasized the importance of establishing criteria beyond short-onset latency for distinguishing the activation of second- from higher-order neurons in describing frequency-dependent depression in the NTS. He used two criteria for presuming a cell was monosynaptically activated: 1) the ability to follow two stimuli separated by 5 ms, and 2) an onset variability of <0.5 ms for solitary tract-evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs). The first criterion has been validated in vivo, insofar as NTS neurons identified independently as second-order (by anterograde tracing of the vagus nerve) reliably met the criterion of following two stimuli separated by 5 ms; however, the minimum latency variability was found to be a less reliable criterion (22). In the present study we relied on the first criterion; however, for cells that followed the two stimuli, the onset variability for the evoked response was 2.0 ± 0.5 ms, considerably less that that for neurons classified as higher order (14.3 ± 2.1 ms) and consistent with the presumption of a tighter onset variability of monosynaptically evoked responses. The variability was higher than that accepted by Miles (19) in vitro but similar to that reported by Scheuer et al. (23) for ADN-evoked action potentials in vivo (4 ± 1 ms). The method of measuring the postsynaptic responses may explain differences in onset variability; for example, EPSP onsets may vary less than the rate of rise of EPSPs initiating the action potentials. Thus estimates of latency variability that rely on action potential onsets may exceed those made by relying on EPSP or excitatory postsynaptic current onsets. The greater variability observed in vivo may also be explained by ongoing synaptic inputs originating from neurons outside the confines of the slice, which can have a fluctuating influence on the rate of rise of the EPSP and hence the appearance of the action potential. One other issue that may complicate the use of these criteria, particularly when measuring either EPSPs or action potentials, is the presence of extensive dendritic spines. To the extent that greater dendritic spine densities result in greater dendritic filtering, under conditions in which the membrane potential is not voltage-clamped, the dendritic filtering (21) might allow for a higher variability in the response latency and perhaps a failure to follow the twin stimuli, resulting in an erroneous classification of a second-order neuron as higher-order. Despite these considerations, the current findings are consistent with previous findings of frequency-dependent synaptic depression at second-order neurons in the NTS in rabbits (15) and in an in vitro NTS slice preparation (9). In the in vitro study, neurons met both presumptive criteria for classification as second order and were studied under voltage-clamp conditions, eliminating the confounding influences of postsynaptic changes in voltage-dependent ion channels and dendritic filtering.
The frequency-dependent depression of baroreceptor transmission was more robust in higher-order than in second-order neurons. At 48 Hz, the response rate was down approximately to 72% in second- and 30% in higher-order neurons. These findings confirm a trend suspected in our earlier study in the rabbit. In addition, in both studies the synaptic depression occurred in a larger proportion of higher-order than second-order neurons, occurring in 93% of higher-order compared with 68% in second-order neurons in this study and in 76% of higher-order compared with 64% in second-order neurons in the previous study in rabbit (15). These in vivo data, also in agreement with the in vitro voltage-clamping study (9), suggest that sequential NTS neurons in the baroreceptor afferent pathway may successively filter high frequency inputs before the signals are conveyed to distal synapses outside the NTS. The observation that at least some second-order neurons do not display frequency-dependent depression raises the possibility that some neurons in the baroreceptor afferent pathway are coded to safeguard signal transmission regardless of the frequency or number of afferent volleys.
The frequency limits in the NTS may simply serve as a low-pass filter, allowing incoming baroreceptor signals with a wide dynamic range (and hence less subject to noise) to be converted to signals having a smaller dynamic range (and hence more easily modulated by other inputs) within the NTS. If, however, the frequency-dependent depression is not counterbalanced by further processing at distal synapses outside the NTS, then these events in the NTS may influence the extent of baroreflex function. In this study, based on the curve-fitting data, there was a predicted diminution of the baroreflex-mediated sympathoinhibition of 34% by the presence of frequency-dependent synaptic depression in the NTS (Fig. 7). The data raise the possibility that beyond simply filtering incoming baroreceptor signals, the frequency limits may curb the magnitude of reflex-mediated sympathoinhibition, perhaps damping excessive fluctuations in blood pressure.
Many baroreceptor fibers provide a pulse-phasic input to the NTS (7, 24, 25). In that regard, phasic patterns of CSN stimulation have been shown to be more effective than constant patterns in evoking baroreflex responses (7, 20), although, this has not be uniformly observed (10, 11). The present findings suggest that when comparing the mean input frequencies, a phasic pattern of baroreceptor volleys only marginally increases the extent of the frequency-dependent synaptic depression of baroreceptor signals and appears to have no significant effect on the sympathetic reflex output. On the other hand, a comparison of the peak instantaneous rather than the mean frequency of afferent volleys in the burst with the same fixed frequency suggests the opposite at least at one frequency. Given that we studied constant input frequencies up to 48 Hz by curve fitting the data, we could predict the extent of depression with an ADN input of 36 Hz, the peak frequency of the phasic input delivered with a mean frequency of 12 Hz. A comparison of the two patterns at the same peak frequency of 36 Hz showed no difference in the extent of synaptic depression at the second-order neurons (P > 0.05, paired t-test). However, for the higher-order neurons, the phasic input resulted in a greater depression (51 ± 10.8% from the phasic compared with 38.07 ± 0.9% from the constant input; P = 0.003, paired t-test). Ultimately, however, despite these two different statistical outcomes, the pattern of afferent input to the NTS, at least under these experimental conditions, did not affect the extent of the reflex sympathoinhibition, suggesting that the differences in synaptic depression in the NTS based on input pattern may not be important in the reflex output.
Whereas the phasic pattern of stimulation mimics systolic input, electrical stimulation, nonetheless, causes a synchronous firing of the afferent fibers that is not observed with the natural stimulus. So whereas the approach provides the advantages of reproducibly delivering and manipulating the patterns of stimuli, the nature and magnitude of the frequency-dependent depression of baroreceptor input in response to natural stimuli has yet to be determined. Still, the widespread observation of frequency or time depression of synaptic transmission in the NTS, both in the whole animal and in vitro (1, 5, 6, 13, 19, 28), suggests that the phenomenon may be physiologically important in modulating synaptic transmission of many autonomic signals conveyed to the NTS.
In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that when the same number of aortic baroreceptor afferent volleys arrive at second-order neurons in the NTS with increasing frequencies, synaptic events limit the frequencies of signals transmitted. These limits may not only serve to optimize synaptic transmission at proximal synapses in the baroreceptor afferent pathway but may also limit the magnitude of baroreflex sympathoinhibition, perhaps smoothing excessive fluctuations in baroreflex changes in arterial blood pressure.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Judy Stewart.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-52165 and HL-60560.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. C. Bonham, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Univ. of California at Davis, TB 172, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616 (E-mail:acbonham{at}ucdavis.edu).
Received 4 June 1999; accepted in final form 8 September 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Andresen, M. C.,
and
M. Yang.
Dynamics of sensory afferent synaptic transmission in aortic baroreceptor regions of nucleus tractus solitarius.
J. Neurophysiol.
74:
1518-1528,
1995
2.
Bonham, A. C.,
and
E. M. Hasser.
Area postrema and aortic or vagal afferents converge to excite neurons in nucleus tractus solitarius.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
264:
H1674-H1685,
1993
3.
Borst, C.,
J. M. Karemaker,
A. J. Dunning,
L. N. Bouman,
and
J. E. Wagner.
Frequency limitation in the human baroreceptor reflex.
J. Auton. Nerv. Syst.
9:
381-397,
1983[Web of Science][Medline].
4.
Brown, A. M.,
W. R. Saum,
and
S. Yasui.
Baroreceptor dynamics and their relationship to afferent fiber type and hypertension.
Circ. Res.
42:
694-702,
1978
5.
Champagnat, J.,
M. Denavit-Saubié,
K. Grant,
and
K. F. Shen.
Organization of synaptic transmission in the mammalian solitary complex, studied in vitro.
J. Physiol.
381:
551-573,
1986
6.
Champagnat, J.,
G. R. Siggins,
L. Y. Koda,
and
M. Denavit-Saubié.
Synaptic responses of neurons of the nucleus tractus solitarius in vitro.
Brain Res.
325:
49-56,
1985[Web of Science][Medline].
7.
Chapleau, M. W.,
G. Hajduczok,
and
F. M. Abboud.
Pulsatile activation of baroreceptors causes central facilitation of baroreflex.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
256:
H1735-H1741,
1989
8.
Chen, C.-Y.,
and
A. C. Bonham.
Non-NMDA and NMDA receptors transmit area postrema input to aortic baroreceptor neurons in nucleus tractus solitarius.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
275:
H1695-H1706,
1998
9.
Chen, C.-Y.,
J. M. Horowitz,
and
A. C. Bonham.
A presynaptic mechanism contributes to depression of autonomic signal transmission in NTS.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
277:
H1350-H1360,
1999
10.
Douglas, W. W.,
J. M. Ritchie,
and
W. Schaumann.
A study of the effect of the pattern of electrical stimulation of the aortic nerve on the reflex depressor responses.
J. Physiol.
133:
232-242,
1956.
11.
Fan, W.,
P. J. Reynolds,
and
M. C. Andresen.
Baroreflex frequency-response characteristics to aortic depressor and carotid sinus nerve stimulation in rats.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
271:
H2218-H2227,
1996
12.
Felder, R. B.,
and
C. M. Heesch.
Interactions in nucleus tractus solitarius between right and left carotid sinus nerves.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
253:
H1127-H1135,
1987
13.
Kansagara, A. G.,
J. M. Horowitz,
and
A. C. Bonham.
Neurons in nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) displaying frequency-dependent depression of solitary tract (ST)-evoked responses sustain two patterns of spiking after the stimulation period (Abstract).
FASEB J.
12:
A61,
1998.
14.
Krieger, E. M.,
and
R. F. Marseillan.
Aortic depressor fibers in the rat: an electrophysiological study.
Am. J. Physiol.
205:
771-774,
1963.
15.
Liu, Z.,
C. Chen,
and
A. C. Bonham.
Metabotropic glutamate receptors depress vagal and aortic baroreceptor signal transmission in the nucleus of the solitary tract.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
275:
H1682-H1694,
1998
16.
Loewy, A. D.
Central autonomic pathways.
In: Central Regulation of Autonomic Functions, edited by A. D. Loewy,
and K. M. Spyer. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, p. 88-103.
17.
Mifflin, S. W.,
and
R. B. Felder.
An intracellular study of time-dependent cardiovascular afferent interactions in nucleus tractus solitarius.
J. Neurophysiol.
59:
1798-1813,
1988
18.
Mifflin, S. W.,
and
R. B. Felder.
Synaptic mechanisms regulating cardiovascular afferent inputs to solitary tract nucleus.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
259:
H653-H661,
1990
19.
Miles, R.
Frequency dependence of synaptic transmission in nucleus of the solitary tract in vitro.
J. Neurophysiol.
55:
1076-1090,
1986
20.
Richter, D. W.,
W. Keck,
and
H. Seller.
The course of inhibition of sympathetic activity during various patterns of carotid sinus nerve stimulation.
Pflügers Arch.
317:
110-123,
1970[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Rose, G. J.,
and
S. J. Call.
Evidence for the role of dendritic spines in the temporal filtering properties of neurons: The decoding problem and beyond.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:
9662-9665,
1992
22.
Scheuer, D. A., and S. Mifflin. Identification of
nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) neurons receiving monosynaptic
inputs from the vagus nerve (Abstract). FASEB J. 1-3617: 350, 1998.
23.
Scheuer, D. A.,
J. Zhang,
G. M. Toney,
and
S. W. Mifflin.
Temporal processing of aortic nerve evoked activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract.
J. Neurophysiol.
76:
3750-3757,
1996
24.
Seagard, J. L.,
L. A. Gallenberg,
F. A. Hopp,
and
C. Dean.
Acute resetting in two functionally different types of carotid baroreceptors.
Circ. Res.
70:
559-565,
1992
25.
Seagard, J. L.,
F. A. Hopp,
H. A. Drummond,
and
D. M. Van Wynsberghe.
Selective contribution of two types of carotid sinus baroreceptors to the control of blood pressure.
Circ. Res.
72:
1011-1022,
1993
26.
Seller, H.,
and
M. Illert.
The localization of the first synapse in the carotid sinus baroreceptor reflex pathway and its alteration of the afferent input.
Pflügers Arch.
306:
1-19,
1968.
27.
Spyer, K. M.
Neural organization of the barorecepter reflex.
Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol.
88:
24-124,
1981[Medline].
28.
Zhou, Z.,
J. Champagnat,
and
C.-S. Poon.
Phasic and long-term depression in brainstem nucleus tractus solitarius neurons: differing roles of AMPA receptor desensitization.
J. Neurosci.
17:
5349-5356,
1997
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-i. Sekizawa, A. G. Bechtold, R. C. Tham, and A. C. Bonham A Novel Postsynaptic Group II Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Role in Modulating Baroreceptor Signal Transmission J. Neurosci., September 23, 2009; 29(38): 11807 - 11816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yamamoto, T. Kawada, A. Kamiya, H. Takaki, T. Shishido, K. Sunagawa, and M. Sugimachi Muscle mechanoreflex augments arterial baroreflex-mediated dynamic sympathetic response to carotid sinus pressure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): H1081 - H1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-i. Sekizawa and A. C. Bonham Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors on Second-Order Baroreceptor Neurons Are Tonically Activated and Induce a Na+-Ca2+ Exchange Current J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 882 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Haxhiu, P. Kc, C. T. Moore, S. S. Acquah, C. G. Wilson, S. I. Zaidi, V. J. Massari, and D. G. Ferguson Brain stem excitatory and inhibitory signaling pathways regulating bronchoconstrictive responses J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 1961 - 1982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Y. Chen and A. C. Bonham Glutamate suppresses GABA release via presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors at baroreceptor neurones in rats J. Physiol., January 15, 2005; 562(2): 535 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takano and F. Kato Inspiration-Promoting Vagal Reflex in Anaesthetized Rabbits after Rostral Dorsolateral Pons Lesions J. Physiol., August 1, 2003; 550(3): 973 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Young, F. L. Eldridge, and C.-S. Poon Integration-differentiation and gating of carotid afferent traffic that shapes the respiratory pattern J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2003; 94(3): 1213 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Kline, K. N. Takacs, E. Ficker, and D. L. Kunze Dopamine Modulates Synaptic Transmission in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2736 - 2744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Y. Chen, P. A. Munch, A. W. Quail, and A. C. Bonham Postexercise hypotension in conscious SHR is attenuated by blockade of substance P receptors in NTS Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2002; 283(5): H1856 - H1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Mifflin What Does the Brain Know About Blood Pressure? Physiology, December 1, 2001; 16(6): 266 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pamidimukkala and M. Hay Frequency dependence of endocytosis in aortic baroreceptor neurons and role of group III mGluRs Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2001; 281(1): H387 - H395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kawada, T. Shishido, M. Inagaki, T. Tatewaki, C. Zheng, Y. Yanagiya, M. Sugimachi, and K. Sunagawa Differential dynamic baroreflex regulation of cardiac and renal sympathetic nerve activities Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2001; 280(4): H1581 - H1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kawada, C. Zheng, Y. Yanagiya, K. Uemura, T. Miyamoto, M. Inagaki, T. Shishido, M. Sugimachi, and K. Sunagawa High-cut characteristics of the baroreflex neural arc preserve baroreflex gain against pulsatile pressure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): H1149 - H1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |