|
|
||||||||
Department of Physiology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23501
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To separate the
role of ANG II from pressure in hypertrophy of the vascular wall in
one-kidney, one-clip (1K1C) hypertension, experimental and
sham-operated rats were given the AT1-receptor antagonist
losartan (20 mg · kg
1 · day
1)
or tap water for 14 days. Mean arterial pressure was elevated in both
experimental groups compared with controls. Rats were anesthetized with
pentobarbital sodium, and the thoracic aorta and carotid, small
mesenteric, and external spermatic arteries were harvested and embedded
in paraffin. Tissue sections were used for morphological analysis,
immunohistochemistry for 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and
platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA, stereological measurements,
and in situ hybridization with a 35S-labeled riboprobe for
PDGF-A mRNA. Elevated cross-sectional areas of thoracic, carotid, and
small mesenteric artery in 1K1C rats were not reduced by losartan. The
internal diameter of the external spermatic artery and microvascular
density of the cremaster muscle were reduced in 1K1C rats. The number
of BrdU-positive nuclei per cross section did not differ between 1K1C
and control arteries. PDGF-A mRNA was elevated in the arterial walls of
1K1C rats compared with controls and was hardly changed by losartan. PDGF-A protein stained strongly in the media of 1K1C arteries and was
not inhibited by losartan; it appeared in the adventitia of all aortas
and carotid arteries. These observations demonstrate that effects of
ANG II mediated through the AT1 receptor are not necessary
for hypertrophy of the vascular wall during 1K1C hypertension or
expression of PDGF-A.
one-kidney, one-clip hypertension; losartan; arterial pressure; angiotensin; platelet-derived growth factor
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DURING THE COURSE of hypertension, individual arteries adapt to mechanical and hormonal stresses through alterations in medial thickness and/or internal and external diameters, depending on the size and function of the particular blood vessel. The larger arteries increase wall cross-sectional area with the development of outward hypertrophy (30, 45). The smaller arterioles undergo a decrease in lumen size without an increase in wall area and/or rarefaction, the reduction in number of functional vessels (16, 31, 38). Lumen reduction in the absence of hypertrophy is termed "inward, eutrophic remodeling." Both ANG II and pressure have been implicated as stimuli for the vascular changes associated with hypertension (4, 9, 18, 30, 45). ANG II is a hypertrophic (18) as well as hyperplastic stimulus (47) of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and has been shown to induce platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-A chain expression (28). Recently, we have shown that vascular hypertrophy following chronic infusion of ANG II was entirely prevented when the blood pressure was kept from rising by the simultaneous administration of minoxidil (34). Pressure, like ANG II, is also a hypertrophic stimulus (20, 30) and is correlated with PDGF-A chain expression (6).
Additional studies have implicated ANG II as a mediator of angiogenesis in the microcirculation (17). However, contrary to the effects of ANG II, pressure elevations induce a reduction in the number of vessels rather than an increase (16, 35, 38). As a result of the effect of ANG II on blood pressure, it is often difficult to characterize its direct and indirect effects on the vascular changes associated with hypertension.
In vivo studies that provide evidence that ANG II acts as a growth factor through a non-pressor mechanism include those using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. A non-depressor dose of captopril during renal hypertension significantly attenuated the medial-intimal area of the abdominal aorta, suggesting a non-pressor mechanism for ANG II (45). However, the use of converting enzyme inhibitors (CEI) as a tool to determine the role of ANG II in hypertrophy is confounded by the accumulation of bradykinin, whose products have antiproliferative effects in vascular smooth muscle (8). These effects were revealed by studies utilizing the bradykinin receptor antagonist icatibant in combination with CEI therapy. Icatibant blocked the attenuation of growth in myocardial mass during CEI therapy, suggesting that CEI is not an effective means for evaluating the role of ANG II alone on vascular growth (23). Therefore, experiments using CEI to assess the direct effects of ANG II on vascular hypertrophy are not conclusive.
ANG II receptors are divided into two distinct categories, type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2). For the most part, the known functions of ANG II are linked to the AT1 receptor, the predominant receptor in adult vascular smooth muscle and kidney (42). The AT2 receptor is dominant in the rat aorta during embryonic stages of development, but this is reversed 8 wk after parturition, when the dominant ANG II aortic receptor becomes the AT1 subtype (35). AT1 receptors are thought to mediate the growth-promoting effect of ANG II, whereas the AT2 receptor may have antiproliferative properties on cultured endothelial cells (41) and microvessels of the rat cremaster muscle (11). In addition, the AT2 receptors have been shown to mediate vasodilation of afferent arterioles in the kidney (7). The receptor antagonist losartan, specific for the AT1-receptor subtype, allows for evaluation of ANG II-induced alterations in the absence of bradykinin accumulation.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of ANG II, through the AT1 receptor, on the vascular changes associated with renal hypertension. This was accomplished through the administration of the AT1-receptor inhibitor losartan to the one-kidney, one-clip (1K1C) hypertensive rat, a model in which ANG II, possibly of vascular origin, is reputed to contribute to vascular hypertrophy (50). We then evaluated alterations including arterial hypertrophy, modifications in PDGF-A expression, and microvascular rarefaction, which are typically encountered during hypertension.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Treatment groups.
Male Wistar rats (162-242 g body wt) were randomly divided into
four groups: uninephrectomized control [one-kidney, no-clip (1KNC), n = 10]; uninephrectomized control with losartan
(1KNC-Los, n = 9); 1K1C hypertension (1K1C, n = 8); and
1K1C hypertension with losartan (1K1C-Los, n = 9). 1KNC-Los and
1K1C-Los groups were given losartan fresh in their drinking water at a
concentration of 120 mg/l, beginning 1 day before surgery and
continuing until the end of the experiment. On the basis of average
daily fluid consumption and preliminary studies, this concentration of
losartan results in a dose of ~20
mg · kg
1 · day
1.
Systolic blood pressures. To assess the development of hypertension, indirect systolic tail-cuff blood pressures were routinely obtained with a Narco Bio-Systems Electro-Sphygmomanometer (Houston, TX) after the rats were warmed at 35°C for 5 min. The mean of three measurements was recorded from each rat during trial periods before surgery and then every other day until the end of the experiment. 1K1C rats whose blood pressure was not elevated >150 mmHg by day 8 were eliminated from the study (n = 1).
Tissue preparation.
After 14 days of treatment, the animals were anesthetized with
pentobarbital sodium (60 mg/kg). The tail artery was cannulated (PE-10)
for measurement of mean blood pressure, and heparin [0.1 ml/100 g
(1,000 units/ml)] was injected intra-arterially. To confirm ANG
II blockade, 25 ng/kg ANG II (Sigma) dissolved in 0.9% saline were
slowly injected through a jugular cannula (PE-10) and the change in
pressure was recorded. Before euthanasia, the right cremaster muscle
was dissected and excess fascia removed. Two circular sections, 0.9 mm
in diameter, were removed and placed in 0.25% buffered Formalin and
stored at 4°C for future staining with Griffonia simplicifolia
I lectin (Sigma). The chest was opened, and the inferior vena cava
was cut to allow free flow of venous return. The animal was then
perfused through the aorta from a catheter inserted in the apex of the
left ventricle with a vasodilator solution of
10
4 M sodium nitroprusside,
10
4 M papaverine, and
10
4 M verapamil in 0.9% saline until
cleared of blood. The animal was then perfused at 60 mmHg with 10%
buffered Formalin for 5-10 min.
Morphological analysis. Sections (4 µm) of the paraffin-embedded tissues were stained with toluidine blue to visualize the intima-media of the blood vessel. A video-based image system with edge-tracking software (JAVA, Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA) was used to measure internal and external circumferences from which internal diameter and intimal-medial area were calculated.
Stereological measurements. The procedures for microvascular density measurements were adapted from Hansen-Smith et al. (14). Two circular sections, 0.9 mm in diameter, were removed from the right cremaster muscle, and excess fascia was removed. Sections were rinsed in saline and immersion-fixed in 0.25% Formalin for 1-7 days at 4°C. The basement membranes of microvessels were then stained by immersing the tissue in 10 µg/ml rhodamine-labeled Griffonia simplicifolia I lectin (Sigma) for 3 h and immediately rinsing with saline. This was followed by 10- and 30-min saline rinses. Tissues were blotted dry and mounted on slides utilizing S/P AccuMount 280 Mounting Medium (VWR Scientific, Bridgeport, NJ). With the use of an Olympus BH-2 series microscope and a rhodamine filter, stereological measurements were performed using a 10 × 10 eyepiece grid to count the capillary intersections at ×300 magnification. Each grid square was 55 µm wide with respect to the microcirculation. Two slides of each muscle were studied, and three fields from each slide were randomly selected and counted. The results of the six fields were averaged to give a single microvascular density value for each muscle.
Immunohistochemistry for BrdU. Incorporation of BrdU in the nuclei, a marker for DNA replication during the infusion period, was visualized using a previously published protocol (34). Sections from paraffin-embedded tissues were deparaffinized, rehydrated, blocked for endogenous peroxidases, treated with 2 N HCl for 30 min to denature DNA, enzymatically pretreated with trypsin, and then incubated with 5% normal goat serum. The sections were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-BrdU (diluted 1:400), and negative controls incubated with 5% normal goat serum were processed in parallel. All slides were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody IgG (diluted 1:500), stained with a Vectastain Elite avidin-biotin complex (ABC) kit, and incubated with 0.1% diaminobenzene solution. To confirm that all the animals received BrdU, the kidneys from each animal were tested for BrdU. Rats with negative kidneys were eliminated from analysis (n = 3).
Immunohistochemistry for PDGF-A. Sections of aorta and carotid arteries were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded ethanols. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation in 3% hydrogen peroxide in cold methanol, and nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation in 5% normal goat serum in PBS, supplemented with 1% BSA. The sections were then incubated with a polyclonal rabbit anti-human PDGF-AA antibody (Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA) that recognizes both human and rat (22, 37) PDGF-A chain (in the form of both AA and AB dimers) and demonstrates <10% reactivity with PDGF-BB. The primary antibody was used at a 1:75 dilution in 1% BSA-PBS overnight, at 4°C, in a humid chamber. After successive washings in PBS and BSA-PBS between each incubation, the slides were reacted with biotinylated secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:500 dilution; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), the ABC-Elite avidin reagent (Vector Laboratories), and, finally, with the Immuno Pure Metal Enhanced DAB Substrate kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL) as the chromogen. The sections were counterstained with Gill's hematoxylin, dehydrated, and coverslipped. In control experiments, the primary antibody was replaced with blocking solution (5% normal goat serum and 1% BSA). No immunostaining was observed under this condition.
In situ hybridization and quantification.
Expression of PDGF-A mRNA was determined by a previously published (34)
in situ hybridization technique based on the method of Wilcox (48).
Paraffin sections of arteries were mounted on Superfrost/Plus slides.
35S-labeled sense and antisense riboprobes for PDGF-A chain
were transcribed from a 368-bp restriction fragment of the cDNA
inserted into the polycloning site of pBluescript SK(+). Briefly,
slides were deparaffinized by two washes in xylene. The vessels were then rehydrated in graded alcohol and washed with 0.5× sodium citrate-sodium chloride (SSC). Vessels were then treated with proteinase K at room temperature, washed three times with PBS, and
fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at 4°C. Slides were then
washed three times with PBS. The vessel sections were then covered with
200 µl of prehybridization solution (10% dextran sulfate, 1×
Denhardt solution, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, 0.3 M NaCl, 50% formamide,
0.5 mg/ml yeast tRNA, and 10 mM dithiothreitol) and incubated for 3 h
at 38-42°C in a humidified chamber. Slides were then covered
with 100 µl of hybridization solution (prehybridization solution
containing 107 counts/min of probe per ml) and incubated
overnight at 55°C in a humidified chamber. Slides were then washed
with 2× SSC containing 1 mM EDTA and 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol
and treated with ribonuclease A (30 µg/ml) for 30 min at room
temperature. Slides were then washed with 2× SSC containing 1 mM
EDTA and 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol four times for 30 min, followed by
washing with 0.5× SSC. Finally, the vessel sections were
dehydrated in graded alcohol solutions and air-dried.
Materials. The cDNA for rat PDGF-A was obtained from Tucker Collins at Brigham & Women's Hospital (Boston, MA). Radiolabeled cytidine triphosphate was obtained from Du Pont (Boston, MA). Losartan was a gift from Ron D. Smith at DuPont Merck Research and Development (Wilmington, DE). All other chemicals or biochemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO), Fischer Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA), GIBCO BRL (Gaithersburg, MD), or Promega (Madison, WI).
Statistics. Results are expressed as means ± SE. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA, and the null hypothesis was rejected at P < 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1K1C-Los animals ingested 20.8 ± 0.8 mg · kg
1 · day
1
of losartan, whereas 1KNC-Los animals ingested 17.8 ± 0.7 mg · kg
1 · day
1.
Tail systolic blood pressures were significantly elevated in both 1K1C
and 1K1C-Los animals (Fig. 1) above those
of the 1KNC and 1KNC-Los groups beginning 4 days after surgery (day
0) and continuing for the duration of the study. There were
significant differences between the 1K1C and 1K1C-Los groups on day
6 and day 12 of the study, but because these differences
reversed direction, they have little physiological significance.
Losartan lowered the systolic blood pressure in 1KNC-Los rats from
day 8 through day 12 compared with the 1KNC group.
|
Mean arterial blood pressures measured through an indwelling catheter
in the tail artery were significantly elevated in clipped animals
(1K1C, 151.3 ± 9.1 mmHg; 1K1C-Los, 149.7 ± 12.9 mmHg) compared with
the uninephrectomized control groups (1KNC, 112.3 ± 6.3 mmHg;
1KNC-Los, 102.8 ± 6.9 mmHg). Injection of 25 ng/kg ANG II in the
losartan-treated animals produced a blunted pressor response (1K1C-Los,
0.5 ± 0.8 mmHg; 1KNC-Los,
3.67 ± 1.6 mmHg) compared
with groups given tap water (1K1C, 28.5 ± 6.7 mmHg; 1KNC, 36.5 ± 9.3 mmHg). Body weights of all four groups were similar (P > 0.05).
Cross-sectional wall area was significantly elevated in the thoracic
aorta, carotid artery, and small mesenteric artery of the 1K1C animals,
and these results were not affected by treatment with losartan (Fig.
2). The 1KNC-Los animals had a significant decrease in cross-sectional wall area in the thoracic aorta and carotid
artery compared with the 1KNC animals. There were no significant differences in cross-sectional wall area of the external spermatic artery. The internal diameter of the aorta of 1K1C-Los animals was
significantly greater than that of the aorta of 1KNC-Los animals (Fig.
3); otherwise, there were no differences
among the groups in the internal diameter of the aorta and carotid and
small mesenteric arteries. The internal diameter of the external
spermatic artery was significantly reduced in the 1K1C animals compared
with the 1KNC and 1KNC-Los animals.
|
|
Staining for BrdU was low in the carotid and small mesenteric arteries of all the groups (P > 0.05). The only significant difference was between the positively stained nuclei in the thoracic aorta of 1K1C-Los (1.6 ± 0.4 nuclei) and 1KNC-Los (0.2 ± 0.1 nuclei) groups, values that were not different from those of the 1K1C (0.5 ± 0.2 nuclei) and 1KNC (1 ± 0.3 nuclei) groups. There was no positively staining tissue in the external spermatic arteries in any of the four groups. All kidneys with the exception of those from three animals had positively staining nuclei in the renal tubules, confirming BrdU delivery through injection. Arteries from the three negative animals were excluded from BrdU analysis.
Staining with Griffonia simplicifolia I lectin, which binds to
the basal membrane of the microvessels, showed that 1K1C hypertension reduced capillary density by ~22% compared with both
uninephrectomized controls (Fig. 4).
Density in 1K1C-Los animals was intermediate and not significantly
different from any of the other values.
|
Representative phosphorimages of thoracic aortas from a 1K1C rat
hybridized to a sense and an antisense 35S-labeled
riboprobe for PDGF-A mRNA are shown in Fig.
5. Expression of PDGF-A mRNA was
significantly elevated in the thoracic aorta of both the 1K1C and
1K1C-Los groups compared with the 1KNC group (Fig.
6). In the carotid artery, PDGF-A mRNA
expression was significantly elevated in 1K1C and 1K1C-Los groups
compared with both control groups. Expression of PDGF-A mRNA was
significantly elevated in the small mesenteric arteries of the 1K1C
animals compared with both control groups, and treatment with losartan
blunted the response.
|
|
As shown in Figs. 7 and
8, the mRNA for PDGF-A was translated into
higher protein levels in the media of the 1K1C aorta and carotid
arteries, and losartan did not prevent this expression. Aortas and
carotid arteries of both 1K1C and 1KNC showed positive staining for
PDGF-A in the adventitia, but this was very faint in the mesenteric
arteries.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The renin-independent 1K1C hypertensive rat (27) was used in this study because the effects of ANG II can be inhibited without changing arterial pressure in this model. Thus the effects of elevated blood pressure on vascular remodeling were left intact while the possible contribution of ANG II through the AT1 receptor was blocked by the administration of losartan. Renal artery stenosis induced a significant rise in blood pressure beginning 4 days after surgery and continuing for the duration of the study (Fig. 1). Treatment with losartan did not prevent the rise in blood pressure. AT1 receptor blockade was confirmed in the losartan-treated groups by the lack of pressor response to a bolus injection of ANG II. Therefore, this experimental model allowed for the separation of the effects of ANG II, through the AT1 receptor, and elevated arterial pressure.
Cross-sectional wall area in the thoracic aorta and carotid and small mesenteric arteries was significantly increased in 1K1C hypertensive rats (Fig. 2). This increase was not affected by treatment with losartan, implying that pressure rather than ANG II is the major contributor to arterial hypertrophy in this particular model of hypertension. There is considerable evidence that pressure is capable of eliciting the structural changes associated with hypertension. Experiments on aortic coarctation demonstrated an increase in cross-sectional wall area in only the hypertensive region of the animal (21, 30). In addition, elevated blood pressure is correlated with increased wall-to-lumen ratio in mesenteric arteries of sodium-loaded spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) during CEI therapy, implying that pressure is the stimulus for these vascular alterations (15). Interestingly, the 1KNC-Los group in the present study demonstrated a significant decrease in cross-sectional wall area in the thoracic aorta and carotid artery compared with the 1KNC group. This may be attributable to the difference in systolic blood pressure between the two groups for almost one-half of the duration of the study.
Corroborating evidence for pressure as a stimulus for arterial hypertrophy was obtained in chronic ligation experiments, in which protecting the vascular bed from elevated pressure in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats and SHR resulted in a medial thickness unchanged from that of normotensive controls (13). Similar ligation experiments in the SHR by Bund et al. (4) and Folkow et al. (9) produced the same results. There are, however, experiments suggesting that ANG II contributes to arterial hypertrophy through a non-pressor mechanism. CEI treatment in 1K1C hypertension resulted in a significant decrease in aortic wall area without a decrease in arterial pressure (45). As stated earlier, however, these results were confounded by the potentiation of bradykinin during CEI. Another study, utilizing ANG II receptor antagonism in SHR, demonstrated a significantly decreased media-to-lumen ratio in the small mesenteric artery (43). This decreased ratio, however, was accompanied by a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure that correlated with the arterial morphological changes, implicating pressure as a mediator of the response. Together with these published results, the present study provides convincing evidence that regulation of arterial hypertrophy in renal hypertensive animals during AT1 receptor blockade is mediated by elevated blood pressure.
The external spermatic artery, also known as the first-order arteriole of the cremaster muscle, did not hypertrophy in the hypertensive animals, regardless of drug treatment. Yet there was a significant decrease in the internal diameter of this artery in the 1K1C group (Fig. 3). In hypertension, this characteristic structural change, known as inward, eutrophic remodeling, occurs in vessels <150 µm in diameter (16, 38). Pressure has been implicated as the major stimulus for this remodeling because of its failure to take place in cremaster arterioles of rats subjected to aortic coarctation (40), in which only the upper body is hypertensive. Recent experiments from our laboratory have shown that a pressure stimulus activates protooncogenes in isolated resistance arteries (1) and that the gene expression correlates with wall stress rather than cellular stretch (2). The lack of hypertrophy in the smaller arteries during hypertension may be explained by the law of Laplace, in which wall stress is directly proportional to the product of pressure and radius and inversely proportional to wall thickness. The increase in tone of these vessels during the initiation (24) and development of renal hypertension (36) will decrease the radius and oppose any increase in wall stress. The large arteries, which have little tone, control their wall stress by the increase in wall thickness. Thus pressure can be the stimulus for both hypertrophic and eutrophic remodeling. The two different forms of remodeling cannot be explained as easily by ANG II or any other circulating growth factor.
Typically, the mechanism of increased cross-sectional wall area in the larger arteries is through VSMC hypertrophy with or without polyploidy (20, 33). The results of this study demonstrate little or no staining for BrdU in all of the carotid and small mesenteric arteries, implying that the increased cross-sectional wall area in clipped animals was indeed caused by cellular hypertrophy. There was a small but physiologically insignificant increase in BrdU incorporation in the aortic VSMC of the losartan-treated controls compared with the 1K1C-Los group, but there was no difference between the untreated controls and either hypertensive group. Thus cellular hypertrophy also accounts for the increase in aortic wall thickness.
Although pressure is thought to mediate this response, several lines of evidence suggest that ANG II is also a plausible factor in the hypertrophy of VSMC. Application of the hormone to VSMCs (10) and intact aortic rings induces an increase in protein content but not DNA synthesis (18). In addition, CEI treatment of SHR and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats reduces polyploidy of aortic VSMCs beyond that expected from the decrease in pressure (32). However, the present results showing a lack of any effect of AT1 blockade in the hypertensive arteries suggest that pressure mediated the hypertrophic response of the VSMC.
The results for microvascular density (Fig. 4) show the typical rarefaction in the 1K1C group and an attenuation of rarefaction by treatment with losartan. At present, there are two hypotheses to explain microvascular rarefaction during hypertension. One hypothesis suggests that microvascular density is controlled by the balance of AT1 and AT2 receptors, with the AT1 subtype promoting microvascular growth and the AT2 subtype inhibiting growth (26). Feeding rats a high-salt diet produces microvascular rarefaction that can be prevented by infusion of small doses of ANG II (17). AT2 receptor stimulation has been shown to inhibit the growth of cultured coronary endothelial cells (41), and if this occurred in vivo, it could inhibit the growth of capillaries. AT2 receptor activation also leads to apoptosis under certain conditions (5), and this could be a mechanism for microvascular rarefaction. If this hypothesis were correct, blockade of the AT1 receptors in the present experiment would leave the AT2 receptors free to maximize the amount of rarefaction. In addition, the concentration of ANG II may be greatly elevated during treatment with losartan, which increases plasma renin activity more than eightfold in 1K1C rats (unpublished observations, n = 3). Because losartan attenuated the amount of rarefaction rather than increasing it, this hypothesis is not consistent with the data unless some other factor is postulated, such as downregulation of AT2 receptors when losartan is given.
The other hypothesis to account for microvascular rarefaction is that it is a chronic autoregulatory mechanism to control blood flow through changes in vascular density. Hypertension is the opposite of a reduction in perfusion pressure that has been shown to increase the growth of microvessels (44). In support of this hypothesis are the data showing increased arteriolar tone and an increased number of closed arterioles, or functional rarefaction, preceding the development of structural rarefaction in this 1K1C model of hypertension (16) as well as the SHR (35). Vasoconstriction by ANG II is mediated through the AT1 receptor, and it is consistent with the autoregulatory hypothesis that AT1 receptor inhibition would decrease arteriolar tone and reduce functional and then structural rarefaction (Fig. 4).
Another finding in this study is the significant increase in PDGF-A expression in the wall of the hypertrophied aorta and carotid and small mesenteric arteries that, with the exception of the small mesenteric arteries, was unaffected by losartan (Fig. 6). As is the case for hypertrophy itself, PDGF-A expression can be attributed to elevated pressure or stimulation of the VSMCs by hormonal factors including ANG II. Previous work from this laboratory showed that PDGF-A expression and vascular wall hypertrophy both correlate with blood pressure in the 1K1C hypertensive rat (6). Decreasing blood pressure by different antihypertensive agents in the SHR also produced a decrease in PDGF-A expression and aortic hypertrophy, both of which correlated with the change in blood pressure (29). These results from two different models of hypertension suggest that pressure mediates PDGF-A expression in the arterial VSMCs. Cyclic stretch of VSMCs grown on fibronectin elicits PDGF-A synthesis (49), showing that the response occurs independently of neural or hormonal influence.
ANG II, nonetheless, is also implicated as a stimulus for PDGF-A expression in cell culture (28) as well as in vivo by ANG II infusion (12, 39, 46). Our own recent work has shown that the hypertrophic response is mediated by the elevation in blood pressure when ANG II is kept within physiological levels (34). Collectively, these results suggest that the increase in PDGF-A expression is mediated by pressure.
Previous studies in our laboratory demonstrated that PDGF-A chain but not -B chain was elevated in the aortic wall in 1K1C hypertension (6). There are significant differences between the proliferative effects of the dimeric chains on VSMCs; PDGF-BB and -AB promote DNA synthesis (25), whereas PDGF-AA is a weak mitogen (19). In cell culture, PDGF-BB and -AB chains induce DNA synthesis in a concentration-dependent manner in both WKY and SHR VSMCs, whereas a larger concentration of PDGF-AA chains weakly induced proliferation only in SHR VSMCs (3). Therefore, it is suggested that the increased expression of each respective PDGF chain, depending on its mitogenic properties, may be a predictor of whether or not the smooth muscle cell undergoes a proliferative response. The present study demonstrates a significant increase in PDGF-A expression and vascular hypertrophy without accompanying DNA synthesis. These results, combined with evidence from previous studies, are consistent with the hypothesis that pressure-induced changes in vascular hypertrophy are mediated in part by an increase in PDGF-A expression.
In summary, the results of these studies indicate, first, that ANG II, acting through the AT1 receptor, is not necessary for vascular hypertrophy in 1K1C hypertension, implying that pressure is the mediator of this response. Second, AT1 receptor inhibition does not decrease capillary density in contradistinction to the hypothesis that AT1 receptors stimulate microvascular growth and AT2 receptors inhibit it. Third, the results suggest that PDGF-A expression appears to be related primarily to elevated pressure rather than AT1 receptor stimulation.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Merck & Co., Inc., for the supply of losartan used in these experiments.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL-36551 and HL-54810.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. L. Prewitt, Dept. of Physiology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, PO Box 1980, Norfolk, VA 23501 (E-mail: rlp{at}borg.evms.edu).
Received 26 March 1999; accepted in final form 11 August 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Allen, S. P.,
H. M. Liang,
M. A. Hill,
and
R. L. Prewitt.
Elevated pressure stimulates protooncogene expression in isolated mesenteric arteries.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
271:
H1517-H1523,
1996
2.
Allen, S. P.,
S. S. Wade,
and
R. L. Prewitt.
Myogenic tone attenuates pressure-induced gene expression in isolated small arteries.
Hypertension
30:
203-208,
1997
3.
Bobik, A.,
S. Grinpukel,
P. J. Little,
A. Grooms,
and
G. Jackman.
Angiotensin II and noradrenaline increase PDGF-BB receptors and potentiate PDGF-BB stimulated DNA synthesis in vascular smooth muscle.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
166:
580-588,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
4.
Bund, S. J.,
K. P. West,
and
A. M. Heagerty.
Effects of protection from pressure on resistance artery morphology and reactivity in spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats.
Circ. Res.
68:
1230-1240,
1991
5.
Dimmeler, S.,
V. Rippmann,
U. Weiland,
J. Haendeler,
and
A. M. Zeiher.
Angiotensin II induces apoptosis of human endothelial cells. Protective effect of nitric oxide.
Circ. Res.
81:
970-976,
1997
6.
Dobrian, A.,
S. S. Wade,
and
R. L. Prewitt.
PDGF-A expression correlates with blood pressure and remodeling in 1K1C hypertensive rat arteries.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
276:
H2159-H2167,
1999
7.
Endo, Y.,
S. Arima,
H. Yaoita,
K. Tsunoda,
K. Omata,
and
S. Ito.
Vasodilation mediated by angiotensin II type 2 receptor is impaired in afferent arterioles of young spontaneously hypertensive rats.
J. Vasc. Res.
35:
421-427,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Farhy, R. D.,
K. L. Ho,
O. A. Carretero,
and
A. G. Scicli.
Kinins mediate the antiproliferative effect of ramipril in rat carotid artery.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
182:
283-288,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
9.
Folkow, B.,
M. Gurevich,
M. Hallback,
Y. Lundgren,
and
L. Weiss.
The hemodynamic consequences of regional hypotension in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats.
Acta Physiol. Scand.
83:
532-541,
1971[Web of Science][Medline].
10.
Geisterfer, A. A.,
M. J. Peach,
and
G. K. Owens.
Angiotensin II induces hypertrophy, not hyperplasia, of cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells.
Circ. Res.
62:
749-756,
1988
11.
Greene, A. S.
Life and death in the microcirculation: a role for angiotensin II.
Microcirculation
5:
101-107,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
12.
Griffin, S. A.,
W. C. Brown,
F. MacPherson,
J. C. McGrath,
V. G. Wilson,
N. Korsgaard,
M. J. Mulvany,
and
A. F. Lever.
Angiotensin II causes vascular hypertrophy in part by a non-pressor mechanism.
Hypertension
17:
626-635,
1991
13.
Hansen, T. R.,
and
D. F. Bohr.
Hypertension, transmural pressure, and vascular smooth muscle response in rats.
Circ. Res.
36:
590-598,
1975
14.
Hansen-Smith, F. M.,
L. Watson,
D. Y. Lu,
and
I. Goldstein.
Griffonia simplicifolia I: fluorescent tracer for microcirculatory vessels in nonperfused thin muscles and sectioned muscle.
Microvasc. Res.
36:
199-215,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Harrap, S. B.,
G. A. Mitchell,
D. J. Casley,
C. Mirakian,
and
A. E. Doyle.
Angiotensin II, sodium, and cardiovascular hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Hypertension
21:
50-55,
1993
16.
Hashimoto, H.,
R. L. Prewitt,
and
C. W. Efaw.
Alterations in the microvasculature of one-kidney, one-clip hypertensive rats.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
253:
H933-H940,
1987
17.
Hernandez, I.,
A. W. Cowley, Jr.,
J. H. Lombard,
and
A. S. Greene.
Salt intake and angiotensin II alter microvessel density in the cremaster muscle of normal rats.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
263:
H664-H667,
1992
18.
Holycross, B. J.,
M. J. Peach,
and
G. K. Owens.
Angiotensin II stimulates increased protein synthesis, not increased DNA synthesis, in intact rat aortic segments, in vitro.
J. Vasc. Res.
30:
80-86,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Inui, H.,
T. Kondo,
and
T. Inagami.
Platelet-derived growth factor AA homodimer stimulates protein synthesis rather than DNA synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats but not from normotensive rats.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
188:
524-530,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
20.
Korsgaard, N.,
and
M. J. Mulvany.
Cellular hypertrophy in mesenteric resistance vessels from renal hypertensive rats.
Hypertension
12:
162-167,
1988
21.
MacIver, D. H.,
N. K. Green,
M. D. Gammage,
H. Durkin,
A. S. Izzard,
J. A. Franklyn,
and
A. M. Heagerty.
Effect of experimental hypertension on phosphoinositide hydrolysis and proto-oncogene expression in cardiovascular tissues.
J. Vasc. Res.
30:
13-22,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
22.
Majesky, M. W.,
M. A. Reidy,
D. F. Bowen-Pope,
C. E. Hart,
J. N. Wilcox,
and
S. M. Schwartz.
PDGF ligand and receptor gene expression during repair of arterial injury.
J. Cell. Biol.
111:
2149-2158,
1990
23.
McDonald, K. M.,
J. Mock,
A. D'Aloia,
T. Parrish,
K. Hauer,
G. Francis,
A. Stillman,
and
J. N. Cohn.
Bradykinin antagonism inhibits the antigrowth effect of converting enzyme inhibition in the dog myocardium after discrete transmural myocardial necrosis.
Circulation
91:
2043-2048,
1995
24.
Meininger, G. A.,
V. M. Lubrano,
and
H. J. Granger.
Hemodynamic and microvascular responses in the hindquarters during the development of renal hypertension in rats. Evidence for the involvement of an autoregulatory component.
Circ. Res.
55:
609-622,
1984
25.
Morishita, R.,
G. H. Gibbons,
K. E. Ellison,
W. Lee,
L. Zhang,
H. Yu,
Y. Kaneda,
T. Ogihara,
and
V. J. Dzau.
Evidence for direct local effect of angiotensin in vascular hypertrophy. In vivo gene transfer of angiotensin converting enzyme.
J. Clin. Invest.
94:
978-984,
1994.
26.
Munzenmaier, D. H.,
and
A. S. Greene.
Opposing actions of angiotensin II on microvascular growth and arterial blood pressure.
Hypertension
27:
760-765,
1996
27.
Murphy, W. R.,
T. G. Coleman,
T. L. Smith,
and
K. A. Stanek.
Effects of graded renal artery constriction on blood pressure, renal artery pressure, and plasma renin activity in Goldblatt hypertension.
Hypertension
6:
68-74,
1984
28.
Naftilan, A. J.,
R. E. Pratt,
and
V. J. Dzau.
Induction of platelet-derived growth factor A-chain and c-myc gene expressions by angiotensin II in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells.
J. Clin. Invest.
83:
1419-1424,
1989.
29.
Negoro, N.,
Y. Kanayama,
M. Haraguchi,
N. Umetani,
M. Nishimura,
Y. Konishi,
J. Iwai,
M. Okamura,
T. Inoue,
and
T. Takeda.
Blood pressure regulates platelet-derived growth factor A-chain gene expression in vascular smooth muscle cells in vivo. An autocrine mechanism promoting hypertensive vascular hypertrophy.
J. Clin. Invest.
95:
1140-1150,
1995.
30.
Ollerenshaw, J. D.,
A. M. Heagerty,
K. P. West,
and
J. D. Swales.
The effects of coarctation hypertension upon vascular inositol phospholipid hydrolysis in Wistar rats.
J. Hypertens.
6:
733-738,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
31.
Ono, Z.,
R. L. Prewitt,
and
D. L. Stacy.
Arteriolar changes in developing and chronic stages of two-kidney, one clip hypertension.
Hypertension
14:
36-43,
1989
32.
Owens, G. K.
Influence of blood pressure on development of aortic medial smooth muscle hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Hypertension
9:
178-187,
1987
33.
Owens, G. K.,
and
S. M. Schwartz.
Vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy and hyperploidy in the Goldblatt hypertensive rat.
Circ. Res.
53:
491-501,
1983
34.
Parker, S. B.,
S. S. Wade,
and
R. L. Prewitt.
Pressure mediates angiotensin II-induced arterial hypertrophy and PDGF-A expression.
Hypertension
32:
452-458,
1998
35.
Prewitt, R. L.,
I. I. Chen,
and
R. Dowell.
Development of microvascular rarefaction in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
243:
H243-H251,
1982.
36.
Prewitt, R. L.,
I. I. Chen,
and
R. F. Dowell.
Microvascular alterations in the one-kidney, one-clip renal hypertensive rat.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
246:
H728-H732,
1984.
37.
Shehata, M.,
A. el Nahas,
E. Barkworth,
G. H. Cope,
and
A. T. Raftery.
Increased platelet-derived growth factor in the kidneys of cyclosporin-treated rats.
Kidney Int.
46:
726-732,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
38.
Short, D. S.,
and
A. D. Thompson.
The arteries of the small intestine in systemic hypertension.
J. Pathol. Bacteriol.
78:
321-334,
1959.
39.
Simon, G.,
G. Illyes,
and
B. Csiky.
Structural vascular changes in hypertension: role of angiotensin II, dietary sodium supplementation, blood pressure, and time.
Hypertension
32:
654-660,
1998
40.
Stacy, D. L.,
and
R. L. Prewitt.
Attenuated microvascular alterations in coarctation hypertension.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
256:
H213-H221,
1989
41.
Stoll, M.,
S. Meffert,
U. Stroth,
and
T. Unger.
Growth or antigrowth: angiotensin and the endothelium.
J. Hypertens.
13:
1529-1534,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
42.
Timmermans, P. B.,
P. C. Wong,
A. T. Chiu,
W. F. Herblin,
P. Benfield,
D. J. Carini,
R. J. Lee,
R. R. Wexler,
J. A. Saye,
and
R. D. Smith.
Angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists.
Pharmacol. Rev.
45:
205-251,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
43.
Tofovic, S. P.,
A. S. Pong,
and
E. K. Jackson.
Effects of angiotensin subtype 1 and subtype 2 receptor antagonists in normotensive versus hypertensive rats.
Hypertension
18:
774-782,
1991
44.
Unthank, J. L.,
J. C. Nixon,
and
J. M. Lash.
Early adaptations in collateral and microvascular resistances after ligation of the rat femoral artery.
J. Appl. Physiol.
79:
73-82,
1995
45.
Wang, D. H.,
and
R. L. Prewitt.
Captopril reduces aortic and microvascular growth in hypertensive and normotensive rats.
Hypertension
15:
68-77,
1990
46.
Wang, D. H.,
R. L. Prewitt,
and
S. J. Beebe.
Regulation of PDGF-A: a possible mechanism for angiotensin II-induced vascular growth.
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
269:
H356-H364,
1995
47.
Weber, H.,
D. S. Taylor,
and
C. J. Molloy.
Angiotensin II induces delayed mitogenesis and cellular proliferation in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Correlation with the expression of specific endogenous growth factors and reversal by suramin.
J. Clin. Invest.
93:
788-798,
1994.
48.
Wilcox, J. N.
Fundamental principles of in situ hybridization.
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
41:
1725-1733,
1993[Abstract].
49.
Wilson, E.,
Q. Mai,
K. Sudhir,
R. H. Weiss,
and
H. E. Ives.
Mechanical strain induces growth of vascular smooth muscle cells via autocrine action of PDGF.
J. Cell. Biol.
123:
741-747,
1993
50.
Yu, H.,
H. Rakugi,
J. Higaki,
R. Morishita,
H. Mikami,
and
T. Ogihara.
The role of activated vascular angiotensin II generation in vascular hypertrophy in one-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats.
J. Hypertens.
11:
1347-1355,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. A. Martinez-Lemus, M. A. Hill, and G. A. Meininger The Plastic Nature of the Vascular Wall: A Continuum of Remodeling Events Contributing to Control of Arteriolar Diameter and Structure Physiology, February 1, 2009; 24(1): 45 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Dobrian, S. D. Schriver, and R. L. Prewitt Role of Angiotensin II and Free Radicals in Blood Pressure Regulation in a Rat Model of Renal Hypertension Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 361 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |