|
|
||||||||
1 Vegetative Physiologie, Zentrum Physiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, and 2 Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, D-30623 Hannover, Germany
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To clarify the controversial question of cell-specific distribution of carbonic anhydrase (CA) in the heart, endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes were isolated from porcine and human hearts and were characterized with cell-specific markers. CA activity was found in the microsomal fraction of both cell types. It was shown by Triton X-114 phase separation that both cell types possess a membrane-bound form of CA. These CAs share the same mechanism of membrane-anchoring via glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI), which excludes identity with transmembrane isoforms CA IX or CA XII. Western blotting analysis of human microsomes with anti-human CA IV antibodies revealed a marked difference in immunoreactivity. Endothelial CA activity resulted in 11-fold stronger CA IV bands compared with identical amounts of myocytic CA activity, indicating that cardiac endothelium and cardiomyocytes possess immunologically distinct forms of CA. We conclude that in human hearts CA IV is associated with the endothelium, whereas most of the CA in myocytes is not identical with one of the known CA isozymes. This suggests that cardiomyocytic CA is a novel isozyme.
carbonic anhydrase activity; membrane-bound isozyme; porcine heart; human heart
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CARBONIC ANHYDRASE (CA) catalyzes the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide. At least nine enzymatically active mammalian CA isozymes have been identified (32, 36), differing in, e.g., kinetic parameters, inhibitor binding, tissue distribution, and subcellular localization. The presence of CA in heart muscle is well established (34). The aim of this work was to provide the basis for an effort to understand the function of CA in the heart by determining the identity and localization of the isozymes that contribute to cardiac CA activity. Some aspects of the subcellular localization of CA in the heart are already known and exhibit some contrast to other striated muscles: Heart muscle lacks any form of cytosolic CA but possesses high levels of membrane-bound CA activity, as demonstrated in membrane fractions from rabbit hearts by Geers et al. (9). Bruns and Gros (2) subfractionated membranes of bovine hearts and found CA activity enriched predominantly in the sarcolemmal fraction. However, the distribution of cardiac CA among the different cell types of the heart remains unclear. In both above-mentioned investigations, tissue homogenates were used, and detected activities were attributed to cardiomyocytes, which represent ~80% of the mass of the myocardium (25). But because cardiac CA is membrane bound, cell-surface relations are important rather than mass relations. According to Piper (25), the surface area of nonmyocytes may exceed the myocytic surface area. Additionally, sarcolemmal membranes prepared by commonly used procedures were shown to be enriched in endothelial cell markers (29, 35), indicating that the measured CA activity must not necessarily be attributed to myocytes or myocytes alone.
Further investigations designed to clarify the cellular origin of cardiac CA activity chose histochemical or immunohistochemical approaches but led to contradictory results: Bruns and Gros (2) examined cryosections from left ventricles of rabbits with the fluorescent CA inhibitor dansylsulfonamide (DNSA). CA-positive staining occurred at the borders of the myocytes and at some intramyocytic structures. CA activity was therefore attributed to the sarcolemma and sarcoplasmic reticulum of the myocytes. On the other hand, immunohistochemical studies at the light microscopic level by Sender et al. (31) indicated that cardiac CA is located exclusively in endothelial cells, because anti-human lung CA IV antibodies detected only capillaries in human ventricular cryosections. In contrast, immunoelectron microscopic investigations by Sender et al. (30) demonstrated reactivity with anti-CA IV at endothelial as well as cardiomyocytic membranes. Application of the Hansson technique (11) to ferret heart sections by Vandenberg et al. (37) demonstrated CA activity at both endothelial cell membranes and myocytic sarcolemmal membranes. Thus the histochemical studies could not clarify unequivocally if cardiac CA is located in endothelial cells, in cardiomyocytes, or in both cell types. One possible explanation for the apparent inconsistencies seemed to be the existence of more than one membrane-bound CA isoform in the heart muscle.
In 1982 Whitney and Briggle (38) purified for the first time a membrane-bound form of CA from bovine lungs. It was termed CA IV and has long been thought to represent the only membrane-bound CA isozyme. It had an apparent molecular mass of 52 kDa on SDS gel electrophoresis, containing at least 20% carbohydrate. The human CA IV isozyme was purified in 1990 by Zhu and Sly (42) from human lungs. Its molecular mass of 35 kDa on SDS electrophoresis is the lowest among mammalian CA IV isozymes because it is the only nonglycosylated CA IV (15, 42). The cDNA of human CA IV was cloned and characterized (20), and the 9.5-kb gene was mapped to chromosome 17q (19). From the nascent precursor, the NH2-terminal signal peptide is cleaved off in the endoplasmic reticulum, as well as the COOH-terminal hydrophobic domain, which is replaced by a preassembled glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (21), which accounts for CA IV localization on the cell surface (18). Another difference that distinguishes CA IV from all known soluble CA isoforms is its unique property of being stable in 1-5% SDS solutions due to two disulfide linkages that stabilize the conformation of the NH2-terminal domain (33, 42).
Recently two additional membrane-bound CAs have been identified and termed CA IX (22, 23, 27) and CA XII (36). Both CA IX and XII are catalytically active, have overexpression in certain cancers in common, and, in contrast to CA IV, are attached to the membrane via transmembrane peptide sequences and are thus integral membrane proteins.
This study is addressed to the controversial question of cell-specific distribution of CA in the heart and intends to ascertain whether one or more isoforms contribute to membrane-bound cardiac CA activity. In contrast to histochemical approaches, we wanted to investigate the cell-specific CA distribution by direct determination of CA activity in isolated cardiac endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes. Additionally, the cardiac CAs of endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes were to be characterized in some more detail to answer the question of whether CA IV is the only CA isoenzyme or if there is another CA isoform contributing to cardiac CA activity.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. Collagenase type IV and BSA V were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Modified Eagle's medium nonessential amino acids (100×) and basal medium Eagle's amino acids (100×) and 10-kDa Protein Ladder were obtained from Life Technologies (Eggenstein). Nitrocellulose membrane (Porablot NCL, 0.45 µm pore size) was a product of Macherey & Nagel (Düren, Germany). Polyclonal rabbit anti-human von Willebrand factor (vWF) antibody was purchased from DAKO (Glostrup, Denmark). Monoclonal IgG1 mouse anti-human endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) antibody and human aortic endothelial lysate were bought from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked sheep anti-mouse Ig antibody, HRP-linked donkey anti-rabbit Ig antibody, and the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system were acquired from Amersham Life Science (Arlington Heights, IL). HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody was purchased from Sigma. Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) from Bacillus cereus was from Sigma. Enzymatic Deglycosylation Kit and Deglycosylation Enhancement Kit were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). All other chemicals were purchased either from Sigma, Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), or Serva (Heidelberg, Germany).
Cell separation. Cardiomyoctyes and cardiac endothelial cells
were isolated from freshly explanted human and porcine heart ventricles. Human ventricles were obtained from transplant recipients (age: 54-60 yr, male, ischemic heart disease). Pigs (2-5 mo
of age) were anesthetized with thiopental sodium (15 mg/kg iv), and supplemental doses were given to maintain a sufficient level of anesthesia. After administration of heparin sodium (500 U/kg iv), hearts were rapidly excised and placed immediately in ice-cold oxygenated cardioplegic solution. These experiments had been approved by the local authority. The cell isolation procedure was that modified
after Jacobson et al. (13). A main branch of the left coronary artery
was perfused for 5-10 min at a rate of 27 ml/min with
Ca2+-free buffer A containing 60 mM NaCl, 16 mM
KCl, 3.25 mM MgSO4, 1.2 mM KH2PO4,
11 mM glucose, 80 mM mannitol, 5 mM pyruvate, 10 mM taurine, 5 µM
adenosine, 50 µM EGTA, 20 mM HEPES, 10 mM NaHCO3, 1 ml/100 ml amino acids, 1 mg/ml BSA, and 150 IU/l insulin, equilibrated with 95% O2-5% CO2 to pH 7.3-7.4 at
37°C. Enzymatic digestion was then initiated by perfusion with
buffer B containing 118 mM NaCl, 4.8 mM KCl, 1.2 mM
MgSO4, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 11 mM
glucose, 5 mM pyruvate, 5 µM adenosine, 20 mM HEPES, 10 mM
NaHCO3, 1 ml/100 ml amino acids, 1 mg/ml BSA, 150 IU/l
insulin, and 100 mg collagenase type IV per 250 ml of buffer in the
case of porcine tissue, and 250 mg of collagenase per 250 ml in the
case of human tissue. Ca2+ was added gradually over several
minutes to a final concentration of 250 µM. Perfusion conditions were
the same as with buffer A. Cell disaggregation was monitored by
light microscopy of samples aspirated from a cut edge of ventricle
tissue. Digestion required 30 min (young pig hearts) up to 60 min
(fibrotic human ventricles). Subsequently, the softened tissue was
abraded with a scalpel, and the cells were further disaggregated while
being immersed for another 15 min in buffer B supplemented
with 2% BSA at 37°C, whirled up by a stream of gas (95%
O2-5% CO2). The cell suspension was then
filtered through a nylon filter with a 300-µm mesh to remove tissue
debris and nondissociated cells. Sedimentation by low-speed
centrifugation (30 g) was used to separate cardiomyocytes from
the lighter endothelial cells and fine tissue debris (26). Repeated
centrifugation at 30 g for 3 min in collagenase-free buffer
C containing 20 mg/ml BSA and 20 mM NaHCO3 saturated
with 95% O2-5% CO2 at 4°C (pH
7.3-7.4), otherwise identical to buffer B, yielded cell
suspensions enriched in either cardiomyocytes (contained in the pellet)
or endothelial cells (in the supernatant). The latter were finally
sedimented at 250 g for 10 min. Morphology and purity were
controlled with phase-contrast microscopy. Cells were stored at
80°C.
Protein determination. Protein was determined after precipitation with trichloroacetic acid using the Lowry method (Sigma procedure P 5656).
Cell-specific markers. Characterization of cell homogenates with endothelial cell-specific markers was done by Western blotting with antibodies against eNOS for porcine cells or antibodies against von Willebrand factor (vWF) for human cells, respectively. A lane with 10-kDa Protein Ladder served as molecular mass marker in each gel run.
eNOS. Porcine homogenate proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE, using a 7% polyacrylamide separating gel and a 5% stacking gel, and then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using a semidry blotting system at 0.8 mA/cm2 for 2 h. The nonspecific binding was blocked with 10% nonfat dry milk in PBS and 0.025% Tween 20. For immunostaining the anti-eNOS antibody was used at 1:250 dilution, detected with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:10,000 dilution), and visualized using the ECL system according to manufacturer's recommendations (Amersham Life Science). Specificity controls for the antibody included application of nonimmune sera and reaction with aortic endothelial cell lysate.
vWF. Human cells were analyzed for vWF as described for eNOS detection. Because of the high molecular mass of vWF (>200 kDa), we used a 5.5% separating gel and a 3.5% stacking gel and extended the blotting duration to 3 h at 0.8 mA/cm2.
Myosin heavy chain-1
. As a cardiomyocyte marker
we determined myosin heavy chain-1
(MHC-1
) per homogenate protein
with an electrophoretic technique designed to distinguish between MHC isoforms as described by Kubis and Gros (14). This SDS-PAGE achieves a
high resolution in the molecular mass range of interest (ca. 220 kDa)
using a slab gel with a 3.5% stacking (pH 6.8) and a 6.6% separating
gel (pH 8.8) followed by a second 6.6% stacking (pH 6.8) with a second
8.8% separating gel (pH 8.8). The four gel sections contain increasing
glycerol concentrations (0%, 4.8%, 14.7%, and 30.6% glycerol,
respectively). A marker lane with a myosin extract of human
cardiomyocytes was present in each gel run. Gels were silver stained
according to Heukeshoven and Dernick (12).
Marker quantification. All specific marker bands were scanned, and their optical densities were quantified (OD · mm2/mg protein) using the Image Master System of Pharmacia-Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden). The marker signal of each of the two cell types isolated from one heart (endothelial cell vs. cardiomyocyte) was expressed in percentage of the total signal obtained as a sum of signals from both cell types, i.e., 100% is defined as the sum of marker band densities (OD · mm2 per 1 µg of endothelial cell protein + OD · mm2 per 1 µg of cardiomyocyte protein) obtained from the same heart under identical electrophoretic and staining conditions.
Preparation of microsomes. Microsomes were prepared to enrich
membrane-bound CA. Cell suspensions were homogenized in ice-cold 5 mM
histidine, pH 7.5 with an Ultra-Turrax (Janke und Kunkel, Staufen,
Germany) for 5 times 10 s on ice-water and then
centrifuged 1 h at 105,000 g (TFT 70.38 Rotor, TGA-50
Ultracentrifuge, Kontron Instruments, Munich, Germany). The pellet was
homogenized (12 times 15 s on ice) in 250 mM succrose
and 10 mM histidine, pH 7.5, and was centrifuged at 11,000 g
for 30 min. The pellet was discarded. The supernatant was centrifuged
at 103,000 g for 1 h. The supernatant, which
contained soluble proteins, was discarded. The pellet (microsomal
membranes) was resuspended in 5 mM histidine, pH 7.5, and resedimented
at 103,000 g for 1 h. The final pellet (washed microsomal
membranes) was diluted (1:4 to 1:10 wt/vol) with 5 mM histidine, pH
7.5, and stored at
80°C.
Determination of CA activity. CA activity was measured in
washed microsomal membranes using Maren's modified micromethod (3, 17). The principle idea is to determine the time required for reacidification following the addition of alkaline barbital buffer to a
CO2-saturated assay volume. Because CO2
hydration is accelerated in the presence of CA activity, the time
needed to reach the point when the pH indicator phenol red changes its
color from red back to yellow is reduced by the enzyme. CA activity
(A) is defined using the uncatalyzed reaction time
t0 (absence of CA) and the catalyzed reaction time
t
|
Triton X-114 phase separation. Triton X-114 phase separation was used to partition proteins according to hydrophobicity (1, 8). A mixture of 100 µl of microsomal membranes and 100 µl of 2.2% (wt/vol) Triton X-114 in 300 mM NaCl and 20 mM Tris · HCl (pH 7.4, 4°C) was incubated at 31°C for 4 min and centrifuged at 2,000 g for 3 min. The supernatant was mixed with 100 µl of 4.5% (wt/vol) Triton X-114 in 150 mM NaCl and 10 mM Tris · HCl (pH 7.4, 4°C). After 4 min of incubation at 31°C, the centrifugation step was repeated. The final supernatant (termed water phase) and the combined pellets (termed Triton phase) were assayed for their amount of CA activity (U · ml). The amount of CA activity is the sample volume multiplied by the number of CA units (a value proportional to CA concentration). The distribution of activity in the different phases was expressed in percentage of the total amount of CA activity.
PI-PLC treatment. Membrane linkage of endothelial and myocytic
CA was analyzed comparing the release of CA from the membrane by
PI-PLC. One-hundred microliters of washed microsomal membranes (130-390 µg of protein) were suspended in 105 µl of 100 mM
Tris-SO4 buffer, pH 7.5, containing 0.1% deoxycholate and
575 mU PI-PLC. Controls were suspended in the same buffer without
PI-PLC. After incubation at 37°C for 1.5 h with rotation at 500 min
1 on a thermomixer (model 5436, Eppendorf, Germany), the samples were centrifuged at 100,000 g
for 50 min. The supernatant and the resuspended pellet were assayed for
their respective amount of CA activity as described above. The soluble
CA in the supernatant and the membrane-bound CA in the pellet were
expressed in percentage of the total amount of CA activity in both the
pellet and supernatant.
CA IV immunoblotting. Immunoblotting of human microsomes with anti-CA IV antibodies was performed to compare the immunoreactivity of endothelial versus myocytic CA isozymes. Microsomal samples from endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, containing equal quantities of CA activity, were separated by SDS-PAGE (using a 15% polyacrylamide separating gel and a 5% stacking gel), followed by electroblotting of proteins. The immunostaining was done as described above for the determination of cell-type markers using a 1:1,000 dilution of rabbit antiserum against human lung CA IV as the first antibody and a 1:5,000 dilution of the second antibody. Specificity controls included application of nonimmune sera and reaction with recombinant human CA IV antigen. (Antibody and antigen were generously provided by Dr. W. S. Sly, St. Louis, MO.)
Deglycosylation. We tested the effect of deglycosylation on molecular weight and immunoreactivity of CA before immunoblotting of human heart microsomes with anti-human CA IV antibodies. Identical CA activity amounts from endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes were deglycosylated using the Enzymatic Deglycosylation Kit and the Deglycosylation Enhancement Kit (170-6508, Bio-Rad) following the denaturing deglycosylation protocol provided with the latter. The provided enzymes, PNGaseF, O-glycosidase DS, NANase II, GALase III, and HEXase I enzymatically cleave all N- and most O-linked oligosaccharides from glycoproteins. Blotting and detection procedure were as described for CA IV immunoblotting. Successful deglycosylation was monitored by a shift in molecular weight of the control glycoprotein bovine fetuin, visualized by staining of a duplicate filter for proteins with india ink (10, data not shown).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Characterization of cell preparations. Judged by light
microscopy, separation of cell types yielded two clearly distinct cell suspensions enriched in either cardiomyocytes or endothelial cells. Figure 1 shows phase-contrast microscopy of
the cell preparations obtained from a human left ventricle. It shows
the typical cell distribution after cell isolation and separation. The
endothelial cell preparation contained endothelial cells among other
small cells and some small or fragmented myocytes. Occasional
contaminating red blood cells were found exclusively in the endothelial
cell fraction. The cardiomyocyte preparation consisted of large
myocytes of variable shape and usually showed negligible contamination by other cells.
|
Characterization with endothelial cell-specific markers. The distribution of endothelial cells among endothelial cell and cardiomyocyte preparations, respectively, was confirmed by the distribution of established endothelial cell markers that were quantified by immunoblotting. The antibody against vWF regularly detected vWF antigen in freshly isolated human heart endothelial cells. Porcine heart endothelial cells were positive for eNOS antigen. To be independent of variable antigen expression or antigen loss during the isolation procedure (16, 24), we standardized the marker signal: 100% was defined as the sum of marker band densities in gels loaded with material from endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, respectively, obtained from the same heart under the same electrophoretic and staining conditions (OD · mm2 per 1 µg of endothelial cell protein + OD · mm2 per 1 µg of cardiomyocyte protein).
The specific endothelial cell marker distribution is shown (Table
1) to be similar for all hearts
investigated: when equal amounts of porcine homogenate protein were
compared, eNOS was found to be present by >90%, in one case by 80%,
in the endothelial cell preparation. In the case of human hearts, vWF
was found to be present by at least 90% in the endothelial cell
preparation. This marker distribution confirms that endothelial cell
preparations were strongly enriched in endothelial cells. On the other
hand, all cardiomyocyte preparations were very low in endothelial cell marker, indicating that cardiomyocytes were well purified and almost
free of endothelial cell contamination.
|
Characterization with cardiomyocyte-specific marker. The
distribution of the specific cardiomyocyte marker MHC-1
was not equally uniform (Table 1). Comparing identical amounts of human homogenate protein, it has been found that MHC-1
is present by at
least 80% in the cardiomyotye preparation. In the case of porcine hearts, MHC-1
is present by 52-87% in cardiomyocytes and is
always higher, and in most cases markedly higher, than in endothelial cell preparations.
The marker determinations confirmed successful cell separation especially for human hearts. In porcine hearts cardiomyocyte preparations are well purified and show little contamination with endothelial cells, whereas endothelial cell preparations show a varying degree of contamination with cardiomyocyte fragments.
CA activity in endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes. Provided
that only one cell type contains CA activity, one would expect that CA
activity distribution would resemble the distribution of the marker for
the respective cell type. Figure 2 shows
the specific CA activity
(U · ml · mg
protein
1) measured in microsomes as a
function of enrichment in endothelial cells, expressed in percentage of
specific endothelial cell marker signal (eNOS and vWF, respectively,
data from Table 1). As shown by the filled triangles in Fig. 2, the
specific CA activity in two human endothelial cell preparations with a
high percentage of endothelial cell marker is slightly but not
significantly above the specific CA activity of the corresponding
cardiomyocyte preparations with a low percentage of endothelial cell
marker. In the four porcine hearts studied, specific CA
activity is spread over a wide range, and there is clearly no
correlation between specific endothelial cell signal and average
specific CA activity.
|
Figure 3 shows the specific CA activity
(U · ml · mg
protein
1) in microsomes as a
function of cardiomyocyte enrichment, expressed as percentage of
the total specific cardiomyocyte marker signal (MHC-1
, data from
Table 1). In human heart cells, specific CA activity is slightly higher
in the two endothelial cell preparations with a low percentage of
cardiomyocyte marker than in the corresponding cardiomyocyte
preparations. Again in porcine cells there is clearly no correlation
between specific CA activity and the presence of cardiomyocytes. The
cause of the rather large interindividual variation of CA activities in
the porcine data seen in Figs. 2 and 3 is not clear; part of it may be
due to age-related developmental differences in the group of pigs
studied.
|
In summary, specific CA activity does not correlate with the presence of either endothelial cells or cardiomyocytes, but is, although highly variable in its absolute value, on average present at similar magnitude in both cell types. This is not compatible with only one cell type containing CA activity. Therefore, we conclude that both cardiac endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes possess CA activity.
Endothelial and myocytic CA is membrane bound. In Triton X-114 phase separation, proteins are distributed according to their relative hydrophobicity. We subjected microsomes from porcine and human cardiac endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes to Triton X-114 phase separation to analyze the distribution of their CA activity between membranes and cytosol (1). As a control we used membrane-free red blood cell lysate from rats, which is known to contain soluble CA only.
As shown in Fig. 4 the phase distribution
of CA activity was the same for both species and for both cardiac
endothelial as well as myocytic CA activity: CA partitions into the
Triton phase by >90%. In contrast, the activity of CA in red blood
cells was found mainly in the water phase, as expected for cytosolic
enzymes. It may be noted that partitioning of ~10% of soluble CA
into the Triton phase is expected in these experiments. The data
indicate that cardiac endothelial as well as myocytic CAs represent
membrane proteins.
|
Anchoring mechanism of membrane-bound CA from endothelial cells and
cardiomyocytes is a GPI linkage. When microsomal membranes from
human cardiomyocytes were treated with PI-PLC, 75% of the membrane-bound CA was released into the supernatant as shown in Fig.
5. This degree of release is comparable to
the 78% release of CA from endothelial cell membranes of human hearts.
The CA activity of control membranes without PI-PLC treatment was found mainly in the pellet (cardiomyocytes: 83%/endothelial cells: 95%) as
expected.
|
The experiments performed with membranes from porcine heart cells show comparable results: 67% of myocytic and 73% of endothelial CA activity are released by PI-PLC treatment. Thus the membrane anchoring of CA in both investigated cell types and both species is sensitive to PI-PLC of Bacillus cereus, indicating the same mechanism of anchoring to the membrane via GPI.
Different immunoreactivity toward anti-CA IV antibodies. To compare the immunoreactivity of endothelial and myocytic CA, we subjected identical amounts of CA activity to immunoblotting. No difference in resulting CA bands should be apparent, provided that both cell types contain the same CA isozyme.
Figure 6 shows immunoblotting of human heart microsomes
with anti-human CA IV antibodies. Identical CA activity amounts from endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes were applied to the gel. Antiserum
raised to human lung CA IV reacted strongly with a protein of ~32 kDa
from endothelial microsomes. Activity of 0.12 U · ml endothelial CA resulted in CA IV bands of 11.9 OD · mm2 (±2.0 SD). The same CA
activity of 0.12 U · ml from myocytes resulted in
faint CA IV bands of 1.1 OD · mm2
(±0.47 SD). (Exposure time of X-ray film to luminescence was 30 s.)
This means that endothelial CA produces 11-fold stronger CA IV bands
compared with equal activity of myocytic CA. This result was confirmed
with three different heart preparations, all shown in Fig. 6. These
marked differences in immunoreactivity indicate that human cardiac
endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes possess different CA isozymes.
|
Deglycosylation. To determine whether the difference in
immunoreactivity reflects differences in the protein structure or is
based on differences in glycosylation pattern only, we tested the
effect of deglycosylation before immunoblotting of human heart microsomes with anti-human CA IV antibodies (Fig. 7).
Identical CA activity amounts from endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes were subjected to the deglycosylation assay. Subsequent CA IV immunoblotting showed an unchanged marked 9- to 11-fold difference between intense CA IV bands from endothelial CA activity and weak bands
from myocytic CA activity (exposure time of X-ray film to luminescence
was 60 s). This indicates that the difference in immunoreactivity of
endothelial CA and myocytic CA isozymes does not originate from
different patterns of glycosylation.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell-specific distribution of CA in the heart. The question of the cell-specific distribution of CA in the heart arose from the apparently inconsistent histochemical and immunohistochemical results (2, 31, 37). We propose that membrane-bound cardiac CA activity is located in both cardiac endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, because we found comparable specific CA activity in microsomes from both cell types (Figs. 2 and 3). It may be noted that the specific CA activity of "endothelial cells" represents results from a mixture of vascular cells. The exact cell composition is not known, but it seems reasonable to assume that they represent an average of all coronary microvascular cells with endothelial cells constituting the majority, followed by a few pericytes (in myocardium, ~10% of capillary endothelial cells) and even fewer smooth muscle cells (26). In addition to the numerical predominance of endothelial cells, we feel justified in neglecting other small cells, because there is as yet no hint at a CA in these cells in the literature, whereas the localization of CA in capillary endothelial cells is well established by immunohistochemistry (30, 31), demonstrating CA IV in cardiac endothelial cells in the rat and the human heart at the light and electron microscopic level. Therefore, it appeared justified to choose established endothelial cell markers to quantify contamination of cardiomyocytes, because the endothelial cell is then the most probable source of CA contamination in cardiomyocyte preparations.
The marker characterization employed in our study has clearly established the separation of endothelial cells from cardiomyocytes (Table 1). The cardiomyocyte preparations especially show negligible endothelial cell contamination. The results of the present marker determinations did not suggest a need to aim at more extensive purification by using primary culture with the risk of influencing CA expression and reducing cell yield. We have shown that cell suspensions of clearly distinct cell composition, after undergoing the same microsome preparation procedure, show identical specific CA activities not correlated with the presence of one cell type. This is not compatible with localization of CA in only one cell type and clearly indicates that both endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes contribute to the membrane-bound CA activity in the heart. A localization of cardiac CA in endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes is in line with the results of Vandenberg et al. (37), who demonstrated with the Hansson technique that CA is located at the sarcolemma of cardiomyocytes and at the plasmalemma of capillary endothelial cells in ferret hearts. At variance with this evidence are the results of histochemical localization using the fluorescent CA inhibitor DNSA in rabbit ventricular sections, which appeared to show CA in myocytes only (2). The failure of DNSA to stain capillaries might be due to different affinities of endothelial cell CA and cardiomyocyte CA for DNSA, or it may be caused by the presence of erythrocytes in the capillaries because hemoglobin quenches the CA-DNSA emission light (6).
The fact that our CA activity measurements as well as the CA activity-based Hansson technique demonstrated CA in cardiomyocytes (both methods do not discriminate between different isozymes), whereas immunohistochemistry with a specific antibody against CA IV failed to detect CA in cardiomyocytes in cryosections of human hearts (31), leads to the question of whether the CA activity in cardiomyocytes represents a CA isozyme different from the endothelial one. Therefore, we aimed at characterizing the myocytic isozyme in comparison with the endothelial form.
CA in endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes is membrane-associated via GPI anchors. Our results with Triton X-114 phase separation (Fig. 4) show a clear difference in the detergent-binding properties between soluble CA from erythrocytes and the investigated CA isozymes from heart cell microsomes. CA isozymes from both cardiac cell types partition by >90% into the Triton phase, which proves their lipophilic nature. Thus we conclude that endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes from porcine as well as human hearts possess membrane-bound forms of CA. As mentioned above, there are presently three known membrane-bound CA isoforms, the GPI-anchored CA IV with a wide tissue distribution and the transmembrane proteins CA IX and XII, which are expressed in tumors and have a rather limited distribution in normal tissues.
The results from treatment with bacterial PI-PLC demonstrate that endothelial and myocytic CAs from both species are membrane linked via GPI. Figure 5 demonstrates sensitivity to PI-PLC treatment, which released at least two-thirds of the CA activity into the supernatant. Endothelial CA IV is known to be membrane linked via GPI (21, 28, 42). The amount of cardiomyocytic CA released by PI-PLC is comparable to the release of endothelial CA, indicating that both CAs share the same mechanism of GPI-membrane anchoring. The less probable alternative explanation for a release by GPI-phospholipases is interaction with GPI-linked proteins (18). However, the present results are not compatible with either of the membrane-bound CAs in the heart being a transmembrane protein, and therefore they exclude that myocytic CA represents transmembrane CA IX or XII.
Novel CA isozyme in human cardiomyocytes. To investigate whether CA IV, the only known GPI-anchored CA to date, is responsible for myocytic CA activity, we analyzed its immunoreactivity with anti-human CA IV antibodies by immunoblotting. The specifity of the antibody used has been well established, and it has often been shown to detect human CA IV in Western blots (20, 31, 42).
Our results (Fig. 6) reveal that the majority of myocytic CA activity is not CA IV because it failed to react to an extent comparable to that seen with identical amounts of endothelial CA IV activity. Thus CA activity in human cardiomyocytes must predominantly originate from a different and as yet unknown GPI-anchored CA isozyme possessing weak or no immunoreactivity toward anti-CA IV antibodies. Our results confirm that CA IV is associated with cardiac endothelial cells, as indicated by an intense CA IV band in the immunoblot. In contrast, myocytic CA activity resulted in very weak CA IV bands, which were approximately 11 times weaker than those obtained with identical amounts of endothelial CA activity.
Deglycosylation did not change the very weak immunoreactivity of the myocytic isozyme nor the strong immunoreactivity of the endothelial isozyme toward anti-CA IV antibodies (Fig. 7). In the case that the myocytic isozyme was a CA IV protein, modified by oligosaccharide chains, deglycosylation might be expected to have led to an equalization of immunoreactivities of CA from endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, because it would remove oligosaccharides that previously might have reduced the accessibility of antigenic sites to the antibodies. The possibility that the myocytic isozyme is a glycosylated CA IV was excluded by the results of the deglycosylation experiment, showing neither a detectable change in staining intensity nor in apparent molecular weight. They support that CA in cardiomyocytes differs in protein structure from the endothelial CA IV. The speculation that a putative myocytic CA IV selectively looses immunoreactivity, e.g., because of different exposure to digestion enzymes, is very unlikely. Several other features like enzyme activity, resistance to SDS, and GPI anchoring all have been shown to be preserved. Thus the results from CA IV Western blotting seem to provide evidence for a novel CA isozyme in human cardiomyocytes.
Our findings explain the contradictory results of immunocytochemical studies, because CA IV immunostaining of cryosections detected only endothelial CA IV and thus stained only capillaries (31). In contrast, all isozymes take part in the chemical reaction of the Hansson technique (11, 37), which therefore is indeed expected to also visualize the activity of the new myocytic CA isozyme. Wolfensberger et al. (41) reported a similar phenomenon in human retinal pigment epithelial cells: in immunocytochemistry with anti-CA IV antibodies, positive staining was restricted to the apical membranes, whereas the Hansson technique detected CA activity at apical and basolateral membranes of these cells. The latter may be interpreted to represent a non-CA IV membrane-bound CA.
A controversial discussion regarding the molecular mass of CA IV led to the assumption that there might be more than one GPI-anchored CA isozyme. In 1984 Wistrand (39) found human renal CA IV to have a high molecular mass of 68 kDa by SDS gel electrophoresis, but Wistrand and Knuuttila (40) later reported its molecular mass to be 34.4 kDa from SDS electrophoresis and 36.7 kDa from amino acid analysis. Carter et al. (4) detected a single immunostained band at 55 kDa in a range of fetal human tissues. Wolfensberger et al. (41) found in human retinal pigment epithelium a 55-kDa "native" CA IV on SDS-PAGE, which was reduced to 35 kDa in the presence of 0.1% Triton X-100.
Controversial reports in the literature regarding the molecular mass of CA IV and its cellular localization may be interpreted as hints at the existence of more than one membrane-bound CA isozyme. This study provides experimental support for CA activity in cardiomyocytes and confirms by immunoblotting and other methods that most of this CA activity likely does not represent CA IV, CA IX, or CA XII. Our data rather suggest the presence of an as yet unknown CA isozyme, membrane-associated via GPI, in human cardiomyocytes.
Two GPI-anchored CA isozymes in cardiomyocytes In the present Western blots of myocyte microsomes, there is a weak CA IV band. This raises the question whether cardiomyocytes contain only the non-CA IV CA isozyme or if there is CA IV present in addition. There are three possible interpretations of the weak band obtained from myocytic CA activity: 1) it might be due to a weak cross reactivity of the non-CA IV myocytic CA isozyme with anti-CA IV antibodies, 2) the low percentage of vWF found in human cardiomyocyte preparations might suggest that it is contamination by endothelial cell membranes that contribute some CA IV to cardiomyocyte preparations, and 3) human cardiomyocytes may contain two membrane-bound CA isozymes, a small amount of CA IV responsible for the CA IV band and a larger amount of a non-CA IV isozyme contributing the bulk of CA activity.
The first and latter interpretations are in line with recent immunohistochemical studies of Sender et al. (30). They demonstrated for the first time CA IV at the myocytes' sarcolemma in human and rat heart muscle. However, detection was positive only in semithin and ultrathin sections (30, 31). In cryosections the anti-CA IV antibody failed to detect sarcolemmal CA, whereas it reacted strongly with capillaries. This discrepancy was interpreted as a problem of accessibility and density of the antigenic sites. In situ hybridization histochemistry detected CA IV encoding mRNA in human heart cryosections, demonstrating CA IV expression in endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes of human hearts. However, cross reaction with a proposed novel non-CA IV membrane-bound CA isozyme cannot be excluded, because a high percentage of homology on the mRNA level is possible. Furthermore, the results of Sender et al. (30) did not allow any quantitative comparison of CA IV expression in endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, and therefore, they are not incompatible with our finding that myocytic CA originates predominantly from a non-CA IV membrane-bound isozyme.
Although the immunocytochemical evidence for CA IV in cardiomyocytes is not unequivocal, taken together with the results of in situ hybridization, it appears possible that cardiomyocytes contain two CA isozymes, with the non-CA IV isozyme contributing by far the majority of activity. The functional significance of this second GPI-anchored CA isozyme and a possible role distinct from that of CA IV remains to be investigated.
Functional role of endothelial CA IV. We detected CA activity in vascular cells and confirmed with immunoblotting that this activity corresponds to CA IV. In situ hybridization confirmed CA IV mRNA expression in cardiac endothelial cells (30). All mentioned histochemical studies agreed in attributing endothelial CA to the luminal membrane of endothelial cells. An additional localization at the external capillary membrane was suggested from results with immunocytochemistry on semithin sections (30) and with the Hansson technique (37).
As demonstrated by Forster and Crandall (7) extracellular, endothelial
CA IV with an orientation toward the capillary lumen acts by
accelerating CO2 hydration in the plasma and prevents a
disequilibrium of H+ concentration between red blood cells
and plasma to develop during capillary transit. Forster and Crandall
(7) have shown that in this way endothelial CA IV accelerates and
enhances CO2 uptake by the blood during capillary transit.
Such a role is also supported by the three-dimensional structure of CA
IV recently analyzed by Stams et al. (33): The active site of the
protein is located away from the membrane, opposite to the GPI-membrane
anchor, and this position is stabilized by interaction of the
COOH-terminal electropositive surface potential and negatively charged
membrane phospholipids. The CA IV on the external capillary surface
might contribute to interstitial buffering, where the
CO2-HCO
3 system is the
main buffer system for H+ leaving tissue cells.
Functional role of CAs in cardiomyocytes. Cardiomyocytes
contain GPI-anchored CA, which provides CA activity directly on the external surface of these cells. Surface pH measurements with microelectrodes on superfused Purkinje strands and papillary muscles by
DeHemptinne et al. (5) demonstrated the functional presence of CA on
the cell surfaces and its functional consequences. CA inhibition was
shown to magnify the amplitude of surface pH transients that follow
step changes in extracellular propionate concentration. This indicates
a function of extracellular sarcolemmal CA in attenuating interstitial
pH transients by making the
CO2-HCO
3 buffer system
rapidly available as a H+ source or sink.
In reperfusion experiments after ischemia in ferret hearts the initial rate of intracellular pH recovery is slowed by CA inhibitors, as measured by a shift of 2-deoxy-D-glucose 6-phosphate with 31P NMR spectroscopy by Vandenberg et al. (37). Slowing of intracellular pH recovery was accompanied by slower recovery of left ventricular diastolic pressure. This inhibitory effect was obtained with both membrane-impermeable and -permeable inhibitors, which suggests that it is caused by inhibition of an extracellular CA. This may indicate that interstitial and/or intracapillary H+ buffering is important for recovery of intracellular pH after ischemia of the heart, although the precise mechanism remains to be understood.
It may be noted that recent experiments in our laboratory (P. Wetzel, S. Papadopoulos, and G. Gros, unpublished observations) suggest that the extracellular CA of myocytes may be essential for the transport of important substrates across the sarcolemmal membrane.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are indebted to W. S. Sly (St. Louis, MO) for generous gifts of anti-human CAIV and recombinant human CA IV antigen. We are grateful to the following members of the Hannover Medical School, Germany: A. Haverich and T. Wahlers (Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery) for providing the explanted human hearts, Dr. A. Bader (Institut für Allgemeine Pharmakologie) and Dr. K. Otto (Zentrales Tierlaboratorium) for providing the opportunity to obtain pig hearts during their experiments, and Werner Zingel for excellent technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: H.-P. Kubis, Vegetative Physiologie, 4220, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, D-30623 Hannover, Germany (E-mail: Kubis.HansP{at}MH-Hannover.de)
Received 30 July 1999; accepted in final form 19 October 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bordier, C.
Phase separation of integral membrane proteins in Triton X-114 solution.
J Biol Chem
256:
1604-1607,
1981
2.
Bruns, W,
and
Gros G.
Membrane-bound carbonic anhydrase in the heart.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
262:
H577-H584,
1992
3.
Bruns, W,
and
Gros G.
Modified micromethod for assay of carbonic anhydraseactivity.
In: The Carbonic Anhydrases: Cellular Physiology and Molecular Genetics, edited by Dodgson SJ,
Tashian RE,
Gros G,
and Carter ND.. New York: Plenum, 1991, p. 127-131.
4.
Carter, ND,
Fryer A,
Grant AG,
Hume R,
Strange RG,
and
Wistrand PJ.
Membrane specific carbonic anhydrase (CA IV) expression in human tissues.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1026:
113-116,
1990[Medline].
5.
DeHemptinne, A,
Marrannes R,
and
Vanheel B.
Surface pH and the control of intracellular pH in cardiac and skeletal muscle.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
65:
970-977,
1986.
6.
Dermietzel, R,
Liebstein A,
Siffert W,
Zamboglou N,
and
Gros G.
A fast screening method for histochemical localization of carbonic anhydrase.
J Histochem Cytochem
33:
93-98,
1985[Abstract].
7.
Forster, RE,
and
Crandall ED.
Time course of exchanges between red cells and extracellular fluid during CO2 uptake.
J Appl Physiol
38:
710-718,
1975
8.
Ganong, R,
and
Delmore B.
Phase separation temperature of mixtures of Triton X-114 JP and Triton X-45: application to protein separation.
Anal Biochem
193:
35-37,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
9.
Geers, C,
Krüger D,
Siffert W,
Schmid A,
Bruns W,
and
Gros G.
Carbonic anhydrase in skeletal and cardiac muscle from rabbit and rat.
Biochem J
282:
165-171,
1992.
10.
Hancock, K,
and
Tsang VCW
India ink staining of proteins on nitrocellulose paper.
Anal Biochem
133:
157-162,
1983[Web of Science][Medline].
11.
Hansson, HPJ
Histochemical demonstration of carbonic anhydrase activity.
Histochemie
11:
112-128,
1967[Web of Science][Medline].
12.
Heukeshoven, J,
and
Dernick R.
Simplified method for silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels and the mechanism of silver staining.
Electrophoresis
6:
103-112,
1985[Web of Science].
13.
Jacobson, SL,
Altschuld RA,
and
Hohl CM.
Muscle cell cultures from human heart.
In: Cell Culture Techniques in Heart and Vessel Research, edited by Piper HM.. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1990, p. 75-98.
14.
Kubis, H-P,
and
Gros G.
A rapid electrophoretic method for separating rabbit skeletal muscle myosin heavy chains at high resolution.
Electrophoresis
18:
64-66,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Lindskog, S.
Structure and mechanism of carbonic anhydrase.
Pharmacol Ther
74:
1-20,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
16.
Lu, J-L,
Schmiege LM,
Kuo L,
and
Liao JC.
Downregulation of endothelial constitutive nitric oxide sythase expression by lipopolysaccharide.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
225:
1-5,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
17.
Maren, TH.
A simplified micromethod for the determination of carbonic anhydrase and its inhibitors.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
130:
26-29,
1960
18.
Nosjean, O,
Briolay A,
and
Roux B.
Mammalian GPI proteins: sorting, membrane residence and function.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1331:
153-186,
1997[Medline].
19.
Okuyama, T,
Batanian JR,
and
Sly WS.
Genomic organisation and localization of gene for human carbonic anhydrase IV to chromosome 17q.
Genomics
16:
678-684,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
20.
Okuyama, T,
Sato S,
Zhu XL,
Waheed A,
and
Sly WS.
Human carbonic anhydrase IV: cDNA cloning, sequence comparison, and expression in COS cell membranes.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:
1315-1319,
1992
21.
Okuyama, T,
Waheed A,
Kusumoto W,
Zhu XL,
and
Sly WS.
Carbonic anhydrase IV: Role of removal of C-terminal domain in glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol anchoring and realization of enzyme activity.
Arch Biochem Biophys
320:
315-322,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
22.
Opavský, R,
Pastoreková S,
Zelník V,
Gibadulinova A,
Stanbridge EJ,
Zavada J,
Kettmann R,
and
Pastorek J.
Human MN/CA9 gene, a novel member of the carboanhydrase family: structure and exon to protein domain relationships.
Genomics
33:
480-487,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
23.
Pastoreková, S,
Parkkila S,
Parkkila A-K,
Opavský R,
Zelník V,
Saarnio J,
and
Pastorek J.
Carbonik anhydrase IX, MN/CA IX: analysis of stomach complementary cDNA sequence and expression in human and rat alimentary tract.
Gastroenterology
112:
398-408,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Pinsky, DJ,
Naka Y,
Liao H,
Oz MC,
Wagner DD,
Mayadas TN,
Johnson RC,
Hynes RO,
Heath M,
Lawson CA,
and
Stern DM.
Hypoxia-induced exocytosis of endothelial cell Weibel-Palade bodies.
J Clin Invest
97:
493-500,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
25.
Piper, HM.
Isolierte adulte Herzmuskelzellen als Myokardmodell. Eigenschaften und Anwendungen. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme, 1985, p. 5-9.
26.
Piper, HM,
Spahr R,
Mertens S,
Krützfeld A,
and
Watanabe H.
Microvascular endothelial cells from heart.
In: Cell Culture Techniques in Heart and Vessel Research, edited by Piper HM.. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1990, p. 158-177.
27.
Saarnio, J,
Parkkila S,
Parkkila A-K,
Waheed A,
Casey MC,
Zhou XY,
Pastoreková S,
Pastorek J,
Karttunen T,
Haukipuro K,
Kairaluoma MI,
and
Sly WS.
Immunohistochemistry of carbonic anhydrase isozyme IX. (MN/CA IX) in human gut reveals polarized expression in the epithelial cells with the highest proliferative capacity.
J Histochem Cytochem
46:
497-504,
1998
28.
Sato, S,
Zhu XL,
and
Sly WS.
Carbonic anhydrase isozymes IV and II in urinary membranes from carbonic anhydrase II-deficient patients.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
87:
6073-6076,
1990
29.
Schrader, J,
and
Londos C.
Is there a highly purified cardiac sarcolemma preparation?
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol.
322, Suppl.:
R14,
1983.
30.
Sender, S,
Decker B,
Fenske CD,
Sly WS,
Carter ND,
and
Gros G.
Localization of carbonic anhydrase IV in rat and human heart muscle.
J Histochem Cytochem
46:
855-861,
1998
31.
Sender S, Gros G, Waheed A, and Sly WS. Carbonic anhydrase
IV in rat and human heart, an immunohistochemical approach (Abstract).
Proc. Int. Congr. Physiol. Sci. 32nd Glasgow 1993, p. 200.
32.
Sly, WS,
and
Hu PY.
Human carbonic anhydrases and carbonic anhydrase deficiencies.
Annu Rev Biochem
64:
375-401,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
33.
Stams, T,
Nair SK,
Okuyama T,
Waheed A,
Sly WS,
and
Christianson DW.
Crystal structure of the secretory form of membrane-associated human carbonic anhydrase IV at 2.8-Å resolution.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
13589-13594,
1996
34.
Swenson, ER.
Carbonic anhydrase and the heart.
Cardiologia
42:
453-462,
1997[Medline].
35.
Tomlins, B,
Harding SE,
Kirby MS,
Poole-Wilson PA,
and
Williams AJ.
Contamination of cardiac sarcolemmal preparation with endothelial plasma membrane.
Biochim Biophys Acta
856:
137-143,
1986[Medline].
36.
Türeci, Ö,
Sahin U,
Vollmar E,
Siemer S,
Göttert E,
Seitz G,
Parkkila A-K,
Shah GN,
Grubb JH,
Pfreundschuh M,
and
Sly WS.
Human carbonic anhydrase XII: cDNA cloning, expression, and chromosomal localization of a carbonic anhydrase gene that is overexpressed in some renal cell cancers.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
95:
7608-7613,
1998
37.
Vandenberg, JI,
Carter ND,
Bethell HWL,
Nogradi A,
Ridderstrale Y,
Metcalfe JC,
and
Grace AA.
Carbonic anhydrase and cardiac pH regulation.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
271:
C1838-C1846,
1996
38.
Whitney PL and Briggle TV. Membrane-associated carbonic
anhydrase purified from bovine lung. J Biol Chem:
12056-12059, 1982.
39.
Wistrand, PJ.
Properties of membrane-bound carbonic anhydrase.
Ann NY Acad Sci
429:
195-206,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
40.
Wistrand, PJ,
and
Knuuttila K-G.
Renal membrane-bound carbonic anhydrase. Purification and properties.
Kidney Int
35:
851-859,
1989[Web of Science][Medline].
41.
Wolfensberger, TJ,
Mahieu I,
Jarvis-Evans J,
Boulton M,
Carter ND,
Nogradi A,
Hollande E,
and
Bird AC.
Membrane-bound carbonic anhydrase in human retinal pigment epithelium.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
35:
3401-3407,
1994
42.
Zhu, XL,
and
Sly WS.
Carbonic anhydrase IV from human lung. Purification, characterisation, and comparison with membrane carbonic anhydrase from human kidney.
J Biol Chem
265:
8795-8801,
1990
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |