|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Medicine and 3 Renal Division, St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A8; and 2 Department of Pathology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1X8
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) is primarily
attributable to constitutive expression of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene. Although a more comprehensive understanding of
transcriptional regulation of eNOS is emerging with respect to in vitro
regulatory pathways, their relevance in vivo warrants assessment. In
this regard, promoter-reporter insertional transgenic murine lines were
created containing 5,200 bp of the native murine eNOS promoter
directing transcription of nuclear-localized
-galactosidase. Examination of
-galactosidase expression in heart, lung, kidney, liver, spleen, and brain of adult mice demonstrated robust signal in
large and medium-sized blood vessels. Small arterioles, capillaries, and venules of the microvasculature were notably negative, with the
exception of the vasa recta of the medullary circulation of the kidney,
which was strongly positive. Only in the brain was the reporter
expressed in non-endothelial cell types, such as the CA1 region of the
hippocampus. Epithelial cells of the bronchi, bronchioles, and alveoli
were scored as negative, as was renal tubular epithelium. Cardiac
myocytes, skeletal muscle, and smooth muscle of both vascular and
nonvascular sources failed to demonstrate
-galactosidase staining.
Expression was uniform across multiple founders and was not
significantly affected by genomic integration site. These transgenic
eNOS promoter-reporter lines will be a valuable resource for ongoing
studies addressing the regulated expression of eNOS in vivo in both
health and disease.
atherosclerosis; endothelium; hypertension; gene regulation
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE ROLE of endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) in the regulation of vascular tone and organ blood flow is well established. Although three isoforms of the human nitric oxide synthase (NOS) gene family are known to exist (11, 34, 73), it is the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene that accounts for the synthesis and release of bioactive endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) (34, 42, 45, 72). eNOS is a peripheral membrane protein that, after N-myristoylation and palmitoylation (5), is localized to plasmalemmal caveolae of vascular endothelium (62). Increases in cytosolic free calcium concentration facilitate NADPH-dependent electron flux through eNOS dimers, resulting in the five-electron oxidation of L-arginine to L-citrulline and synthesis of NO (33, 37).
Earlier studies from this laboratory and others have described the isolation and characterization of complementary and genomic clones for eNOS. The eNOS gene is present as a single copy in the haploid human genome and is localized to 7q35-36 (38, 39, 47, 54) and chromosome 5 in the mouse (17). The nucleotide and amino acid sequence of the murine eNOS cDNA corresponds to an open reading frame (ORF) of 1,202 amino acids, and sequence comparison has revealed 94% and 93% amino acid identity with human and bovine sequences, respectively (16). The human gene contains 26 exons and encodes a 4,052-nucleotide (nt) mRNA (38, 39). Although a canonical TATAA motif is not present, a single major transcription initiation site was identified 22 nt upstream of the translational start site using primer extension, S1 nuclease protection, and 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (38). Two tightly clustered regulatory domains have been identified in the proximal promoter of the human eNOS gene. In endothelial cells, nucleoprotein complexes containing Ets family members, Sp1, variants of Sp3, MAZ, and YY1 form on these regions (30, 81). The murine eNOS promoter has recently been cloned, and cross-species comparisons have revealed a high degree of homology (70), suggesting that mechanisms active in the regulation of eNOS expression may also be conserved. The markedly restricted expression of eNOS contrasts with the broad distribution of the neuronal (nNOS) and inducible (iNOS) isoforms (11, 34, 44, 72, 73). However, as is the case with nearly all cell-restricted transcripts, some exceptions regarding eNOS transcription have been noted. Constitutive expression of the mRNA and protein for eNOS have been documented in the syncytiotrophoblast of human placental villi (8), the neuronal cells of the CA1 region (12, 29), human platelets (6, 41, 56), and, arguably, cardiac myocytes (3, 4, 25, 60, 74, 76).
The preponderance of what is known regarding expression of the eNOS
gene has been derived from in vitro studies. Some murine models have
been developed that have augmented our understanding of eNOS gene
regulation in the in vivo setting. Murine models of targeted homologous
replacement and germline inactivation of the various NOS isoforms have
been described (26-28, 36, 63, 66, 69). Homozygous
(
/
) null mutants of eNOS have exhibited elevated systemic
vascular resistance and displayed abnormalities of vascular remodeling
and coagulation (27, 55, 63). Mice also have exhibited pulmonary
hypertension, perhaps resulting from an increase in total pulmonary
resistance (69). nNOS(
/
) mice are also viable, are
capable of reproducing, and evidence neuroprotection in models of
ischemia-reperfusion of the central nervous system. Hypertrophy
of the gastric pyloric sphincter is a prominent anatomic feature (26).
Null mutants for the iNOS isoform are less able to combat systemic
bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. iNOS(
/
) mice are
protected, in part, from lipopolysaccharide-induced hemodynamic
collapse (36). It has been suggested that single NOS knockouts may be
partially compensated by changes in functional activity of other
isoforms. Interbreeding among the varied NOS-deficient mice will
provide interesting information regarding the biological roles of NO,
especially during development. In contrast to loss-of-function models,
recent studies have sought to define the consequences of overexpression
of eNOS. For example, an insertional murine transgene in which the
murine preproendothelin-1 promoter directed bovine eNOS in a murine
model has been reported. Overexpression of eNOS by this promoter, which
is known to induce transcription in the endothelium of both large
vessels and the microvasculature as well as ectopically in vascular
smooth muscle cells, evoked hypotension and attenuation of NO-elicited
vasorelaxation in vivo (49). Recently Guillot et al. (20)
described a line of transgenic mice containing 1.6 kb of the
5'-flanking region of the human eNOS promoter. Transgene
expression occurred in micro- and macrovascular endothelial cells of
the heart and in the blood vessels of the brain and skeletal muscle. In
the coronary arteries the transgene was expressed only in a
subpopulation of endothelial cells. For larger blood vessels, such as
the aorta, the pattern of expression was not uniform in that the X-Gal
reaction product was present in clusters of endothelial cells along the
longitudinal axis of blood flow and in the regions around the ostia of
aortic tributaries. Expression was absent in the vascular beds of the liver, kidney, and spleen, and only one of the founder mice showed detectable
-galactosidase (LacZ) activity in a larger blood vessel of the lung. The authors concluded that this region of the
promoter conferred eNOS expression by responding to vascular
bed-specific pathways (20).
To examine the in vivo relevance of in vitro studies of the eNOS
promoter, we have developed lines of transgenic mice carrying an
insertional promoter-reporter transgene. Here we report the expression
profile of transgenic murine lines (eNOSpromnlsLacZ) hemizygous for a transgene (
5,200/+28 Mu
eNOSnlsLacZ) where the
-galactosidase (LacZ) reporter
gene is under the transcriptional control of substantive portions of
the native murine eNOS promoter. On the basis of previous in vitro
studies (30, 39) and the high degree of cross-species homology (70), we
postulated that this portion of the 5'-flanking region of the
eNOS gene conferred the normal, restricted pattern of eNOS expression
observed in vivo. In this model the expression of endogenous eNOS
transcripts, and hence NO production, has not been disrupted. Findings
reported here in adult mice suggest that the expression profile of the eNOSpromnlsLacZ transgenic lines mirrors the constitutive
expression pattern of eNOS in vivo.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmid construction.
A murine genomic eNOS clone was isolated from a Sau 3A
partial-digest sublibrary prepared from a P1 bacteriophage clone
isolated from a diploid Mus musculus cv129 genomic library
(70). Eighteen hundred base pairs of the proximal promoter have been
previously characterized (GenBank accession no. AF091262) (70). An
antisense oligonucleotide (5'-GAG TCC CGG GTT GCC CAA GCC AGC TGA
C-3') was used to generate a NgoM I-Sma I
amplicon for the proximal promoter in which a 3'-Sma I
site was created within exon 1 at +28 nt, numbered with respect to
transcription, and the eNOS ATG site was mutated to prevent translation
initiation. A 5,200-bp region of the murine eNOS promoter, which
included 5,200 bp of the 5'-flanking region and 28 bp of the
5'-untranslated region (UTR), was isolated as a Sac I and
Sma I fragment and subcloned into the 5'-Sma I
site of the vector pLacC upstream of the LacZ ORF (gift of R. Palmiter, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA). A 2,035-bp fragment containing
the SV40 large T nuclear localization signal (5'-GGG CCC AAG AAG
AAA CGC AAA GTG GGG AG-3') was excised with Sac I and
then subcloned into the Sac I site directly upstream of the
5'-end of the LacZ ORF. The LacZ ORF included a
eukaryotic translation initiation signal. A 516-bp Hind III
fragment representing the 3'-UTR and 3'-flanking genomic
regions of the human
1-globin gene was incorporated at
the 3'-end of the LacZ ORF to ensure proper RNA
processing (43, 46). This
5,200/+28 Mu eNOSnlsLacZ
construct has been previously demonstrated to have functional
promoter activity in transient transfection analyses of cultured
endothelial cells (70).
Generation of transgenic mice.
The construct
5,200/+28 Mu eNOSnlsLacZ was
linearized by Not I-Hind III digestion (8.7 kb) to
remove vector sequences and purified by preparative gel electrophoresis
(0.7% Sea Plaque, FMC Products, Rockland, ME). Recovery and
purification of DNA was achieved through
-agarase digestion (New
England Biolabs). DNA was resuspended in microinjection buffer (10 mM
Tris · HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1 mM EDTA) and purified by
CsCl2 preparative gradient ultracentrifugation in the
absence of ethidium bromide (Beckman L8-70M, 70.1 Ti rotor, 49 K,
22°C). Aliquots were sequentially extracted from the cushion and
subjected to analytic 0.7% agarose gel electrophoresis. Aliquots
containing DNA were subsequently dialyzed extensively in microinjection
buffer at 4°C. Founder mice were generated by pronuclear injection
of the
5,200/+28 Mu eNOSnlsLacZ DNA construct into
C57BL × SJL F2 hybrid mouse eggs (National Institute of Child
Health and Human Development Transgenic Mouse Development Facility,
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, GA) using standard
approaches (59). Founder transgenic
5,200/+28 Mu
eNOSnlsLacZ mice were bred, housed, and monitored in
accordance with standards set by the Canadian Animal Care Committee at
the Ontario Cancer Institute Transgenic Facility (Toronto, ON, Canada).
Hemizygous matings were accomplished by breeding founders with negative
littermates. F1 progeny were screened for the presence of the transgene
at the time of weaning (3-4 wk). Tail genomic DNA was extracted by
proteinase K digestion (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany),
followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and isopropanol
precipitation. Genomic DNA samples were subjected to Southern
blot analysis using an [
-32P]dCTP-labeled,
nick-translated (Amersham Life Sciences, Amersham, UK) fragment (1.1 kb) from the LacZ ORF. Results were quantitated using a
Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager (Sunnyvale, CA) and ImageQuant
software version 1.1 for Macintosh (Molecular Dynamics), as reported
previously (15).
-Galactosidase staining.
Organs (heart, lung, kidney, liver, spleen, and brain) from sexually
mature hemizygous female F1 mice (age 7-11 wk) were excised, briefly rinsed in PBS, and then immersed in fixative solution (0.2%
glutaraldehyde, 2% formaldehyde, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, and 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.3). Microdissected organs were cut at
3.0-mm intervals to optimize fixation (4-6 h, 22°C ).
Thereafter, fixed organs were briefly rinsed in PBS, blotted, and
immersed in an aqueous X-Gal solution (Boehringer Mannheim; 1 mg/ml, 16 h, 22°C, pH 7.3, under light-protected conditions). Tissues were subsequently cryosectioned (5-7 µm) and counterstained with
neutral red (Sigma-Aldrich) as previously described (32, 58).
Expression of
-galactosidase was assessed by multiple independent
blinded observers.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Insertional transgene:
5,200/+28 Mu
eNOSnlsLacZ.
Functional analyses of the human eNOS gene have defined important
regulatory regions in the in vitro setting (30, 81). The
promoter-reporter transgene
5,200/+28 Mu
eNOSnlsLacZ, numbered with respect to the transcription
start site, contained 5,200 bp of the murine eNOS promoter directing
expression of the LacZ gene. An SV40 nuclear localization
signal was incorporated into the
-galactosidase ORF to optimize
histological staining and to demarcate any false positive
background LacZ staining. To abet efficient processing of
transcripts and produce a stable mRNA species, 516 nt of the human
1-globin 3'-UTR and 3'-flanking genomic
regions (43) were added downstream of the LacZ ORF (Fig. 1). For these studies it was elected not to
use native eNOS 3'-UTR and 3'-flanking genomic sequences
given the evolving understanding that eNOS mRNA species are rapidly
degraded in such models of endothelial activation as cytokine
treatment, hypoxia, and entry into the cell cycle (13, 40, 80). It
appears that cis-RNA elements within the 3'-UTR of the
eNOS mRNA are operative in this regulated expression (38). Murine eNOS
5'-flanking regions (
5,200/+28) have previously been
demonstrated to have functional promoter activity in transient
transfection analyses of cultured endothelial cells. A 12.3-fold
increase in activity was observed compared with activity of a
promoterless construct, thereby confirming the competence of
5,200/+28 Mu eNOSnlsLacZ to yield enzymatically active
-galactosidase (70).
|
/
) mice are morphologically normal, except for
occasional limb-reduction deficits (18). Three founders capable of
germline transmission were procured containing 1 (eNOSpromnlsLacZ[1]), 5 (eNOSpromnlsLacZ[5]), or 10 (eNOSpromnlsLacZ[10]) tandem copies of the
transgene. Hemizygous F1 progeny used for organ harvesting were
generated by mating founders with negative littermates. The
5,200/+28 Mu eNOSnlsLacZ transgene was
transmitted in a codominant Mendelian fashion as expected
for single autosomal integration sites.
Histology.
To examine the tissue distribution of
5,200/+28 Mu
eNOSnlsLacZ expression, organs from multiple
hemizygous F1 progeny of founders
(eNOSpromnlsLacZ[1],
eNOSpromnlsLacZ[10], and
eNOSpromnlsLacZ[5]) were stained in toto with
X-Gal. Organs were cryosectioned and counterstained with neutral red.
Given the well-known sexual dimorphism observed in the expression of
endothelium-derived NO, this body of work focused on expression
patterns observed in sexually mature females. LacZ staining was
absent in corresponding organs of transgene negative littermates (data
not shown, n = 3). Representative tissues from transgenic mice
are depicted in Fig. 2. The
nuclear localization signal allowed LacZ staining of
endothelial cells to be clearly distinguishable. We and others have
previously reported that eNOS mRNA expression in humans appeared to be
confined to larger arteries, with little or no expression detected in
small arterioles, as assessed with in situ hybridization (75).
Consistent with these prior studies, the following tissues derived from
all the transgenic lines showed consistent staining of the endothelium:
the aorta (Fig. 2a) and the coronary (Fig. 2, b and
c), pulmonary (Fig. 2e), hepatic (Fig. 2f),
renal (Fig. 2h), cerebral (Fig. 2i), splenic (not
shown), and meningeal arteries (not shown). In all tissues small veins
and venules were negative. Staining for the presence of
-galactosidase was also notably absent in the microvasculature of
the heart (Fig. 2c), lung (Fig. 2d), liver (Fig.
2f), spleen (data not shown), and brain (Fig. 2, j-l).
|
5,200/+28 Mu eNOSnlsLacZ was observed in the
vasa recta of the medullary circulation of the kidney for all
transgenic lines (Figs. 2g and 3B). Finally, although
we have previously noted the presence of eNOS mRNA in vasa vasorum in
human blood vessels, the present study was unable to comment on
expression given the paucity of vasa vasorum in murine blood vessels
(77).
|
-Galactosidase activity was seen consistently in neuronal layers
2-4 of the cerebral cortex, and occasionally in layer 6, across
all founders (Fig. 2l). In the brain, glial cells and
endothelial cells of the microvasculature did not demonstrate
-galactosidase activity.
Compared with other reports of eNOS expression, our study failed to
demonstrate
-galactosidase activity in cardiac myocytes as well as
vascular and nonvascular smooth muscle. Similarly, we did not detect
-galactosidase activity in bone marrow cell populations. The
epithelia of the kidney (Fig. 2, g and h, and Fig. 3,
A and B) and those of the alveolus, trachea, bronchi, and bronchioles (Fig. 2, d and e) showed no expression
of
5,200/+28 Mu eNOSnlsLacZ, at least as detected by
staining with X-Gal.
In contrast to some of the other reported examples of endothelial
promoter-reporter transgenic mice, this study found that the cell
specificity of the expression profiles of
-galactosidase activity
were identical across multiple (n = 3) members from three independent founders in all tissues examined. These data imply that
transcription of the
5,200/+28 Mu eNOSnlsLacZ
promoter-reporter was minimally influenced by the site of integration
into the mouse genome. Scoring by multiple independent observers failed
to define any clear relationship between copy number and patterns of
-galactosidase staining. Expression of the reporter was robust even
at the single-copy level.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies of constitutively expressed endothelial genes have examined the in vivo expression patterns of insertional promoter-reporter transgenic models to define the molecular basis of endothelium-restricted expression. Important issues have arisen from such studies: the relatedness of the reporter expression pattern to that of the native transcript, the reproducibility of findings across different founder lines, and the influence of the local tissue microenvironment on transgene expression (9, 22, 24, 71). For example, transgenic LacZ reporter mice containing ~2,200 bp of human von Willebrand factor (vWF) 5'-flanking regions and portions of the first exon and intron demonstrated that vWF transgene expression may be regulated by organ-specific transcriptional pathways, given that this expression pattern did not mirror the known broad endothelial distribution of the native vWF mRNA transcript (1, 2). Studies of human (5,000 bp) and murine (735 bp) Tie 1 promoter-LacZ reporter expression documented endothelial cell-restricted expression in large vessels and in the microvasculature of some, but not all, organs of adult mice. Expression of the reporter did not correspond to the expected adult expression pattern of the native Tie 1 mRNA (31). Early studies with the murine Tie 2 gene revealed that 7,200 bp of 5'-flanking regions were insufficient to emulate endogenous Tie 2 expression beyond stages of early vasculogenesis in transgenic mice (59). Subsequent Tie 2 promoter-reporter construct transgenic mice defined an endothelium-specific enhancer in the first intron of the murine gene that was critically important for both the endothelial cell specificity of Tie 2 expression in vivo (58) and the reproducibility of findings across independent founders. Nonetheless, the strong expression observed in the adult vascular endothelium of these mice was somewhat unanticipated because Tie 2 expression is downregulated in quiescent endothelium (57). It appears that the validity of utilizing the Tie 1 and Tie 2 genes to direct transgene expression in the adult setting is confounded by transcriptional pathways that are highly regulated during development and invoked in "response-to-injury" disease processes.
The important conclusions from the current work can therefore be compared and contrasted with those from prior studies that addressed the in vivo expression profile of endothelial-restricted promoter-reporters. All progeny of the eNOSpromnlsLacZ lines consistently showed expression of the transgene in the large and medium-sized blood vessels of the heart, lung, kidney, liver, spleen, and brain. Moreover, eNOSpromnlsLacZ transgenic mice recapitulated the constitutive expression pattern of eNOS in endothelial cells uniformly across founders. Small vessel expression was not detected with the methods used, except in the vasa recta of the kidney. Taken together, the 5'-flanking genomic region of murine eNOS, placed upstream of nlsLacZ, functioned as a promoter in vivo and recapitulated the reported expression profiles of eNOS mRNA in vivo (33, 38, 75), even at the single-copy level.
Non-endothelial cell expression was observed in regions of the brain that were known to express eNOS in vivo: select neurons of the cerebral cortex, the CA1 neurons of the hippocampus, and the Purkinje neuronal cell layer of the cerebellum. There is evidence that neurons of the cerebellum utilize NO to communicate (14), and eNOS mRNA transcripts have been noted in the cerebellum and cerebrum (60). The distinct expression pattern of eNOS throughout the CA1 neuronal population of the hippocampus and its role in synaptic plasticity and/or long-term potentiation have previously been reviewed (12, 29). Our transgenic model also documents transcription of the eNOS promoter in the Purkinje cell layer of the cerebellum. Perhaps, as occurs in the hippocampus, the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum generate NO from eNOS and this is biologically relevant.
Prior work has sought to define a role for endogenous (3, 61) or
eNOS-derived (21) NO in cardiac myocyte functioning. Northern blot,
RT-PCR analyses, and in situ hybridization have shown the presence of
eNOS transcripts in cardiac myocytes in vitro and in vivo (4, 60). In
contrast, others have found no or very low levels of eNOS mRNA (25) and
immunoreactive protein (49). The
5,200/+28 Mu
eNOSnlsLacZ expression pattern showed complete absence
of LacZ staining in cardiac myocytes under baseline conditions
in adult mice. Whether this insertional promoter-reporter fails to be
expressed in cardiac myocytes because important transcription control
regions are lacking on the genomic fragment utilized (
5,200/+28) is not clear. An alternative explanation would be that transcription of
the eNOS gene in cardiac myocytes is a response-to-injury phenomenon of
diseased cardiac tissue. Also, we did not detect
-galactosidase activity in bone marrow platelet precursors. Future studies are necessary to dissect these issues further.
Human eNOS promoter-reporter transgenic mice that incorporate 1,600 bp of 5'-flanking regions of the human eNOS gene coupled to LacZ have very recently been described (20). The results of that study are revealing in comparison with findings in the current work. Expression of LacZ was observed in endothelial cells corresponding to the aorta and major blood vessels of the heart and brain. However, large vessels were not positive in the liver, kidney, or spleen. Also notable is the lack of congruency across founders. For example, some of the founders exhibited expression in major vessels of the lung, whereas others did not. Non-endothelial cell expression was also noted in the brain of one founder. This suggested to these authors that integration site-specific expression was being observed and that local microenvironment effects might be relevant to the observed expression pattern of the transgene. Curiously, epicardial arteries showed expression of the transgene in only a subpopulation of endothelial cells, and staining in the aorta was described as patchy. It is also noteworthy that the microvasculature of the heart, brain, and skeletal muscle was positive in this model but not in the current work. The authors concluded that the eNOS promoter fragment used to develop their transgenic mice included DNA elements conferring vascular bed-specific expression and that elements outside this region may be responsible for expression in other tissues (20). The commonalities and differences of these two models will allow the details of cell-specific expression to be addressed in future studies. In this respect it should be noted that the current study used larger fragments of the promoter (5,200 vs. 1,600 bp) and that murine genomic sequences were used in the transgenic model. With these two studies as background, it is now possible to dissect out specific cis-regulatory elements involved in 1) transcriptional control differences between one endothelial cell type and another and 2) chromatin integration site-independent expression of endothelium-restricted genes. It can, however, be fairly argued that the expression profile of the murine eNOSpromnlsLacZ transgenic mice more faithfully reproduces the predicted expression pattern of the native eNOS gene.
Vascular resistance determines the overall blood flow and, for a given
perfusion pressure, is dependent on vessel number, size, and
arrangement as well as the passive and active factors that alter their
diameters (52). Control of vascular resistance is complex and
heterogeneous, because it is altered by physiological and
pharmacological factors. Indeed, the region of the murine blood vessel
tree that imparts the greatest overall effects on vascular resistance
is not firmly established. Clearly, NO (EDRF) is a significant
regulator of blood flow in resistance arteries (19), and
eNOS(
/
) mice are hypertensive with increases observed in
total peripheral resistance (27, 63). However, robust endogenous expression of eNOS mRNA and protein in humans appears to be
predominantly restricted to large blood vessels (75). Similarly, the
vascular profile of
5,200/+28 Mu eNOSnlsLacZ
transgene expression was most prominent in large and medium-sized blood
vessels. In comparison, expression of the reporter was notably
diminished in small blood vessels. We posit that eNOS-derived NO from
large or medium-sized vessels of an organ is especially noteworthy with
respect to vascular resistance within that organ. Clearly, the
microvasculature may, under certain biological scenarios such as
development or during disease states, express appreciable levels of
eNOS mRNA transcripts. It is less clear whether functional NO effects
on resistance vessels can be solely ascribed to NO that is produced
locally. It has been postulated that NO can be produced by the
endothelium of larger blood vessels and then subsequently transported
to the resistance vessels in the microvasculature complexed on
circulatory proteins or within red blood cells, perhaps as
S-nitrosothiols (65, 67). Clearly, this cannot be the sole
mechanism of microvasculature NO action because paracrine EDRF pathways
have been demonstrated in both isolated microvascular preparations and
perfused organs in which blood was not the perfusate. Also, this work
does not argue that physiologically important amounts of NO are not
derived from the microvascular endothelium in organs, such as the
heart. The biological activity of endothelium-derived NO is critically dependent on the local environment. For instance, amounts of NO necessary for physiological activation of soluble guanylate cyclase in
neighboring vascular smooth muscle cells or pericytes may be much lower
in vessels with a small radius or a limited number of contractile
vascular smooth muscle cell layers. Future studies are necessary to
examine the hypothesis that under normal conditions the biological
activity of NO in the microvasculature may also prominently
reflect synthesis and release of NO by proximal large and medium-sized
vessels within solid organs, rather than synthesis solely at the level
of the microvasculature per se.
Our failure to document microvasculature
-galactosidase expression
is not a technical limitation of this approach. A notable example of
small vessel expression is the portal system of the kidney,
specifically the vasa recta (Fig. 3). Expression of
5,200/+28 Mu eNOSnlsLacZ in portal vessels was
unique to the kidney. In comparison, the sinusoids of the hepatic
portal system did not exhibit any LacZ staining. Mice from all
founders demonstrated strong expression of the transgene deep within
the medulla. Unique biological properties are now ascribed to this
portal vascular bed. In contrast to the cortical circulation of the
kidney, the medullary circulation is not autoregulated under normal
conditions. Because a major contribution of this vascular bed is the
reabsorption of marked amounts of water and solute produced via
ultrafiltration within the glomerulus, the blood flow out of this
vascular network is greater than the blood flow entering. Moreover,
under conditions of antidiuresis the environment of the renal papilla
is a very harsh environment for cells because it is characterized by
marked gradients in the concentrations of O2 and urea.
Indeed, the appropriate functioning of the countercurrent
multiplication system presents a unique environment in the body,
especially for trafficking red blood cells. The vasa recta of the
medullary circulation are an integral component of this tissue. For
instance, aquaporin-1 (AQP1) is a member of a family of
water-transporting proteins that is highly enriched in endothelial
cells of the vasa recta (50), and a role for vasa recta expression of
AQP1 in creation of a hypertonic medullary interstitium by
countercurrent multiplication has been argued (35). UT3 (UT II) is a
urea transport protein that is also enriched in endothelial cells of
the descending vasa recta (53, 78) and is perhaps also important for
the formation of a high urea concentration in the medullary
interstitium (79). Why is eNOS enriched in the vasa recta? Diffusive
loss of O2 in the vasa recta is a feature of the
countercurrent distribution of blood flow in the descending and
ascending vasa recta (64), and hypoxia has been shown to suppress
eNOS-derived NO production through transcriptional and
posttranscriptional mechanisms (40). Therefore, the transcriptional and
posttranscriptional processes that regulate eNOS in this tissue may of
necessity be unique. Perhaps NO is also lost from the descending vasa
recta by the countercurrent exchange process, as has been postulated
for vasoactive peptides in this unique microvascular network (51). When
oxygen binds to the heme irons of Hb, it promotes binding
of NO to cysteine-
93, thereby forming S-nitrosohemoglobin
(SNO) in the R (oxygenated) structural conformation.
Deoxygenation of SNO is followed by an allosteric transition to the
T (deoxygenated) structural conformation state, which releases
NO. Through an evolutionary conserved process, Hb is able to sense
physiological oxygen gradients in tissues and, via SNO, to elicit
increases in blood flow to address oxygen requirements (23, 68). This
modeling of Hb and NO interactions was suggested to be important to the
transit of NO from central to peripheral vascular networks. It could be
argued that allosteric modifications of Hb that induce release of NO in
peripheral tissues from SNO may not be present in the medullary
environment, hence the need for local synthesis of NO. Our finding of
strong expression of the eNOS reporter in vasa recta seems, on one
hand, paradoxical given the prevailing view that medullary blood flow
exhibits limited autoregulatory control, restricted primarily to the
influence of the extracellular fluid status of the animal. On the other hand, robust expression of the eNOS reporter in vasa recta provides new
insights into the biological control of renal interstitial fluid
pressure, a major regulator of the pressure-natriuresis response (10).
In summary, the findings in the current work demonstrate that murine
eNOS genomic regions spanning
5,200 to +28 nt direct expression of a reporter construct in a fashion that
recapitulates the known expression profile of eNOS mRNA and protein.
Future studies incorporating the eNOSpromnlsLacZ strain of
mice into other in vivo models of cardiovascular gene regulation will
undoubtedly contribute information pertinent to our understanding of
the interplay of gene regulation and NO production among the various
NOS isoforms and other endothelium-specific genes. This expression
cassette represents a novel and powerful tool with which exogenous
genes may be reproducibly expressed in large and medium-sized blood vessels (e.g., green fluorescent protein, Cre recombinase, and Tet
activator/repressor). It will also be of interest to utilize these
reporter transgenic lines to examine expression of eNOS in
models of injury and disease relevant to cardiovascular biology, particularly those characterized by perturbations of NO production and
vascular reactivity [i.e., hypertension, atherosclerosis, and
septic shock (7, 45, 48)].
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We extend sincere thanks to W. Khoo, L. Morikawa, and Drs. C. Morshead and D. van der Kooy for advice.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
P. A. Marsden and M. J. Phillips are supported by Grant GR-13298 from the Medical Research Council of Canada (MRC). P. A. Marsden holds a Career Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC). S. A. Tai is a recipient of a MRC of Canada/Canadian Hypertension Society Fellowship. Y. Wang is a recipient of a MRC of Canada Centennial Fellowship. G. B. Robb is a recipient of a MRC/HSFC Doctoral Research Award.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. A. Marsden, Rm. 7358, Medical Sciences Bldg., Univ. of Toronto, 1 Kings College Circle, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A8 (E-mail: p.marsden{at}utoronto.ca).
Received 1 June 1999; accepted in final form 13 October 1999.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Aird, WC,
Edelberg JM,
Welier-Guettler H,
Simmons WW,
Smith TW,
and
Rosenberg RD.
Vascular bed-specific expression of an endothelial cell gene is programmed by the tissue microenvironment.
J Cell Biol
138:
1117-1124,
1997
2.
Aird, WC,
Jahroudi N,
Welier-Guettler H,
Rayburn HB,
and
Rosenberg RD.
Human von Willebrand factor gene sequences target expression to a subpopulation of endothelial cells in mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:
4567-4571,
1995
3.
Balligand, JL,
Kelly RA,
Marsden PA,
Smith TW,
and
Michel T.
Control of cardiac muscle cell function by an endogenous nitric oxide signalling system.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:
347-351,
1993
4.
Balligand, JL,
Kobzik L,
Han X,
Kaye DM,
Belhassen L,
O'Hara DS,
Kelly RA,
Smith TW,
and
Michel T.
Nitric oxide-dependent parasympathetic signalling is due to activation of the constitutive endothelial (type III) nitric oxide synthase in cardiac myocytes.
J Biol Chem
270:
14582-14586,
1995
5.
Belhassen, L,
Feron O,
Kaye DM,
Michel T,
and
Kelly RA.
Regulation by cAMP of post-translational processing and subcellular targeting of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (type 3) in cardiac myocytes.
J Biol Chem
272:
11198-11204,
1997
6.
Chen, LY,
and
Mehta JL.
Further evidence of the presence of constitutive and inducible nitric oxide synthase isoforms in human platelets.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
27:
154-158,
1996[ISI][Medline].
7.
Christopherson, KS,
and
Bredt DS.
Nitric oxide in excitable tissues: physiological roles and disease.
J Clin Invest
100:
2424-2429,
1997[ISI][Medline].
8.
Conrad, KP,
Vill M,
McGuire PG,
Dail WG,
and
Davis AK.
Expression of nitric oxide synthase by syncytiotrophoblast in human placental villi.
FASEB J
7:
1269-1276,
1993[Abstract].
9.
Cowan, PJ,
Tsang D,
Pedic CM,
Abbott LR,
Shinkel TA,
d'Apice AJF,
and
Pearse MJ.
The human ICAM-2 promoter is endothelial cell-specific in vitro and in vivo and contains critical Sp1 and GATA binding sites.
J Biol Chem
273:
11737-11744,
1998
10.
Cowley, AW.
Role of the renal medulla in volume and arterial pressure regulation.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
273:
R1-R15,
1997
11.
Dawson, TM,
Dawson VL,
and
Snyder SH.
A novel neuronal messenger molecule in brain: the free radical nitric oxide.
Ann Neurol
32:
297-311,
1992[ISI][Medline].
12.
Dinerman, JL,
Dawson TM,
Schell MJ,
Snowman A,
and
Snyder SH.
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase localized to hippocampal pyramidal cells: implications for synaptic plasticity.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
4214-4218,
1994
13.
Flowers, MA,
Wang Y,
Stewart RJ,
Patel B,
and
Marsden PA.
Reciprocal regulation of endothelin-1 and endothelial constitutive NOS in proliferating endothelial cells.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
269:
H1988-H1997,
1995
14.
Garthwaite, J.
Glutamate, nitric oxide and cell-cell signalling in the nervous system.
Trends Neurosci
14:
60-67,
1991[ISI][Medline].
15.
Gasca, S,
Hill DP,
Klingensmith J,
and
Rossant J.
Characterization of a gene trap insertion into a novel gene, cordon bleu, expressed in axial structures of the gastrulating mouse embryo.
Dev Genet
17:
141-154,
1995[ISI][Medline].
16.
Gnanapandithen, K,
Chen Z,
Kau CL,
Gorczynski RM,
and
Marsden PA.
Cloning and characterization of murine endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1308:
103-106,
1996[Medline].
17.
Gregg, AR,
Lee CG,
Herman GE,
and
O'Brien WE.
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (Nos3) maps to the proximal region of mouse chromosome 5.
Mamm Genome
6:
152,
1995[ISI][Medline].
18.
Gregg, AR,
Schauer A,
Shi O,
Liu Z,
Lee CG,
and
O'Brien WE.
Limb reduction defects in endothelial nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
275:
H2319-H2324,
1998
19.
Griffith, TM,
and
Edwards DH.
EDRF in intact vascular networks.
Blood Vessels
27:
230-237,
1990[ISI][Medline].
20.
Guillot, PV,
Guan J,
Liu L,
Kuivenhoven JA,
Rosenberg RD,
Sessa WC,
and
Aird WC.
A vascular bed-specific pathway regulates cardiac expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase.
J Clin Invest
10:
799-805,
1999.
21.
Han, X,
Kobzik L,
Balligand J-L,
Kelly RA,
and
Smith TW.
Nitric oxide synthase (NOS3)-mediated cholinergic modulation of Ca2+ current in adult rabbit atrioventricular nodal cells.
Circ Res
78:
998-1008,
1996
22.
Harats, D,
Kurihara H,
Belloni P,
Oakley H,
Ziober A,
Ackley D,
Cain G,
Kurihara Y,
Lawn R,
and
Sigal E.
Targeting gene expression to the vascular wall in transgenic mice using the murine preproendothelin-1 promoter.
J Clin Invest
95:
1335-1344,
1995.
23.
Hausladen, A,
Gow AJ,
and
Stamler JS.
Nitrosative stress: metabolic pathway involving the flavohemoglobin.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
95:
14100-14105,
1998
24.
Healy, AM,
Rayburn HB,
Rosenberg RD,
and
Weiler H.
Absence of the blood-clotting regulator thrombomodulin causes embryonic lethality in mice before development of a functional cardiovascular system.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:
850-854,
1995
25.
Hom, GJ,
Grant SK,
Wolfe G,
Bach TJ,
MacIntyre DE,
and
Hutchinson NI.
Lipopolysaccharide-induced hypotension and vascular hyporeactivity in the rat: tissue analysis of nitric oxide synthase mRNA and protein expression in the presence and absence of dexamethasone, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine or indomethacin.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
272:
452-459,
1995
26.
Huang, PL,
Dawson T,
Bredt DS,
Snyder SH,
and
Fishman MC.
Targeted disruption of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene.
Cell
75:
1273-1286,
1993[ISI][Medline].
27.
Huang, PL,
Huang Z,
Mashimo H,
Bloch KD,
Moskowitz MA,
Bevan JA,
and
Fishman MC.
Hypertension in mice lacking the gene for endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene.
Nature
377:
239-242,
1995[Medline].
28.
Irikura, K,
Huang PL,
Ma J,
Lee WS,
Dalkara T,
Fishman MC,
Dawson TM,
Snyder SH,
and
Moskowitz MA.
Cerebrovascular alterations in mice lacking neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene expression.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92:
6823-6827,
1995
29.
Kantor, DB,
Lanzrein M,
Stary SJ,
Sandoval GM,
Smith WB,
Davidson N,
and
Schuman EM.
A role for endothelial NO synthase in LTP revealed by adenovirus-mediated inhibition and rescue.
Science
274:
1744-1748,
1996
30.
Karantzoulis-Fegaras, F,
Antoniou H,
Lai SL,
Kulkarni G,
D'Abreo C,
Wong GKT,
Miller TL,
Chan Y,
Atkins J,
Wang Y,
and
Marsden PA.
Characterization of the human endothelial nitric oxide synthase promoter.
J Biol Chem
274:
3076-3093,
1999
31.
Korhonen, J,
Lahtinen I,
Halmekytö U,
Alhonen L,
Jänne J,
Dumont D,
and
Alitalo K.
Endothelial-specific gene expression directed by the tie gene promoter in vivo.
Blood
86:
1828-1835,
1995
32.
Kurihara, Y,
Kurihara H,
Suzuki H,
Kodama T,
Maemura K,
Nagai R,
Oda H,
Kuwaki T,
Cao WH,
Kamada N,
Jishage K,
Ouchi Y,
Azuma S,
Toyoda Y,
Ishikawa T,
Kumada M,
and
Yazaki Y.
Elevated blood pressure and craniofacial abnormalities in mice deficient in endothelin-1.
Nature
368:
703-710,
1994[Medline].
33.
Lamas, S,
Marsden PA,
Li GK,
Tempst P,
and
Michel T.
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase: molecular cloning and characterization of a distinct constitutive enzyme isoform.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:
6348-6352,
1992
34.
Lowenstein, CJ,
Dinerman JL,
and
Snyder SH.
Nitric oxide: a physiologic messenger.
Ann Intern Med
120:
227-237,
1994
35.
Ma, T,
Yang B,
Gillespie A,
Carlson EJ,
Epstein CJ,
and
Verkman AS.
Severely impaired urinary concentrating ability in transgenic mice lacking aquaporin-1 channels.
J Biol Chem
273:
4296-4299,
1997
36.
MacMicking, JD, NC,
Hom G,
Chartrain N,
Fletcher DS,
Trumbauer M,
Stevens K,
Xie QW,
Sokol K,
and
Hutchinson N.
Altered response to bacterial infection and endotoxic shock in mice lacking inducible nitric oxide synthase.
Cell
81:
641-650,
1995[ISI][Medline].
37.
Marletta, M.
Nitric oxide synthases: aspects concerning structure and catalysis.
Cell
78:
927-930,
1994[ISI][Medline].
38.
Marsden, PA,
Heng HH,
Scherer SW,
Stewart RJ,
Hall AV,
Shi XM,
Tsui LC,
and
Shappert KT.
Structure and chromosomal localization of the human endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene.
J Biol Chem
268:
17478-17488,
1993
39.
Marsden, PA,
Shappert KT,
Chen KS,
Flowers M,
Sundell CL,
Wilcox JL,
Lamas S,
and
Michel T.
Molecular cloning and characterization of human endothelial nitric oxide synthase.
FEBS Lett
307:
287-293,
1992[ISI][Medline].
40.
McQuillan, LP,
Leung GK,
Marsden PA,
Kostyk SK,
and
Kourembanas S.
Hypoxia inhibits expression of eNOS via transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
267:
H1921-H1927,
1994
41.
Mehta, JL,
Chen LY,
Kone BC,
Mehta P,
and
Turner P.
Identification of constitutive and inducible forms of nitric oxide synthase in human platelets.
J Lab Clin Med
125:
370-377,
1995[ISI][Medline].
42.
Michel, T,
and
Feron O.
Nitric oxide synthases: which, where, how, and why?
J Clin Invest
100:
2146-2152,
1997[ISI][Medline].
43.
Michelson, AM,
and
Orkin SH.
The 3' untranslated regions of the duplicated human alpha-globin genes are unexpectedly divergent.
Cell
22:
371-377,
1980[ISI][Medline].
44.
Moncada, S,
and
Higgs A.
The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway.
N Engl J Med
329:
2002-2012,
1993
45.
Moncada, S,
Palmer RMJ,
and
Higgs EA.
Nitric Oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology.
Pharmacol Rev
43:
109-142,
1991[ISI][Medline].
46.
Morales, J,
Russell JE,
and
Liebhaber SA.
Destabilization of human alpha globin mRNA by translation anti-termination is controlled during erythroid differentiation and is paralleled by phase shortening of the poly(A) tail.
J Biol Chem
272:
6607-6613,
1997
47.
Nadaud, S,
Bonnardeaux A,
Lathrop M,
and
Soubrier F.
Gene structure, polymorphism and mapping of the human endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
198:
1027-1033,
1994[ISI][Medline].
48.
Nathan, C.
Inducible nitric oxide synthase: what difference does it make?
J Clin Invest
100:
2417-2423,
1997[ISI][Medline].
49.
Ohashi, Y,
Kawashima S,
Hirata K,
Yamashita T,
Ishida T,
Inoue N,
Sakoda T,
Kurihara H,
Yazaki Y,
and
Yokoyama M.
Hypotension and reduced nitric oxide-elicited vasorelaxation in transgenic mice overexpressing endothelial nitric oxide synthase.
J Clin Invest
102:
2061-2071,
1998[ISI][Medline].
50.
Pallone, TL,
Kishore BK,
Nielson S,
Agre P,
and
Knepper MA.
Evidence that aquaporin-1 mediates NaCl-induced water flux across descending vasa recta.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
272:
F587-F596,
1997
51.
Pallone, TL,
Silldorff EP,
and
Turner MR.
Intrarenal blood flow: microvascular anatomy and the regulation of medullary perfusion.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
25:
383-392,
1998[ISI][Medline].
52.
Pries, AR,
Secomb TW,
and
Gaehtgens P.
Biophysical aspects of blood flow in the microvasculature.
Cardiovasc Res
32:
654-667,
1996[ISI][Medline].
53.
Promeneur, D,
Rousselet G,
Bankir L,
Bailly P,
Cartron J-P,
Ripoche P,
and
Trinh-Trang-Tran MM.
Evidence for distinct vascular and tubular urea transporters in the rat kidney.
J Am Soc Nephrol
7:
852-860,
1996[Abstract].
54.
Robinson, L,
Weremowicz S,
Morton C,
and
Michel T.
Isolation and chromosomal localization of the human endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) gene.
Genomics
19:
350-357,
1994[ISI][Medline].
55.
Rudic, RD,
Shesely EG,
Maeda N,
Smithies O,
Segal SS,
and
Sessa WC.
Direct evidence for the importance of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in vascular remodeling.
J Clin Invest
101:
731-736,
1998[ISI][Medline].
56.
Sase, K,
and
Michel T.
Expression of constitutive endothelial nitric oxide synthase in human blood platelets.
Life Sci
57:
2049-2055,
1995[ISI][Medline].
57.
Sato, TN,
Qin Y,
Kozak CA,
and
Audus KL.
Tie-1 and Tie-2 define another class of putative receptor tyrosine kinase genes expressed in early embryonic vascular system.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
90:
9355-9358,
1993
58.
Schlaeger, TM,
Bartunkova S,
Lawitts JL,
Teichmann G,
Risau W,
Deutsch U,
and
Sato T.
Uniform vascular-endothelial-cell-specific gene expression in both embryonic and adult mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
3058-3063,
1997
59.
Schlaeger, TM,
Qin Y,
Fujiwara Y,
Magram J,
and
Sato TM.
Vascular endothelial cell lineage-specific promoter in transgenic mice.
Development
121:
1089-1098,
1995[Abstract].
60.
Seki, T,
Hagiwara H,
Naruse K,
Kadowaki M,
Kashiwagi M,
Demura H,
Hirose S,
and
Naruse M.
In situ identification of messenger RNA of endothelial type nitric oxide synthase in rat cardiac myocytes.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
218:
601-605,
1996[ISI][Medline].
61.
Shah, AM,
Prendergast BD,
Grocott-Mason R,
Lewis MJ,
and
Paulus WJ.
The influence of endothelium derived nitric oxide on myocardial contractile function.
Int J Cardiol
50:
225-231,
1995[ISI][Medline].
62.
Shaul, P,
Smart E,
Robinson L,
German Z,
Yuhanna I,
Ying Y,
Anderson R,
and
Michel T.
Acylation targets endothelial nitric-oxide synthase to plasmalemmal caveolae.
J Biol Chem
271:
6518-6522,
1996
63.
Shesley, EG,
Maeda N,
Kim HS,
Desai KM,
Krege JH,
Laubach VE,
Sherman PA,
Sessa WC,
and
Smithies O.
Elevated blood pressures in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
13176-13181,
1996
64.
Silldorff, EP,
Kreisberg MS,
and
Pallone TL.
Adenosine modulates vasomotor tone in outer medullary descending vasa recta of the rat.
J Clin Invest
98:
18-23,
1996[ISI][Medline].
65.
Simon, DI,
Mullins ME,
Jia L,
Gaston B,
Singel DJ,
and
Stamler JS.
Polynitrosylated proteins: characterization, bioactivity, and functional consequences.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
4736-4741,
1996
66.
Son, H,
Hawkins RD,
Martin K,
Kiebler M,
Huang PL,
Fishman MC,
and
Kandel ER.
Long-term potentiation is reduced in mice that are doubly mutant in endothelial and neuronal nitric oxide synthase.
Cell
87:
1015-1023,
1996[ISI][Medline].
67.
Stamler, JS,
Jaraki O,
Osborne J,
Simon DI,
Keaney J,
Vita J,
Singel D,
Valeri CR,
and
Loscalzo J.
Nitric oxide circulates in mammalian plasma primarily as an S-nitroso adduct of serum albumin.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89:
7674-7677,
1992
68.
Stamler, JS,
Jia L,
Eu JP,
McMahon TJ,
Demchenko IT,
Bonaventura J,
Gernert K,
and
Piantadosi CA.
Blood flow regulation by S-nitrosohemoglobin in the physiological oxygen gradient.
Science
276:
2034-2037,
1997
69.
Steudal, W,
Ichinose F,
Huang PL,
Hurford WE,
Jones C,
Bevan JA,
Fishman MC,
and
Zapol WM.
Pulmonary vasoconstriction and hypertension in mice with targeted disruption of the endothelial nitric oxide (NOS3) gene.
Circ Res
81:
34-41,
1997
70.
Teichert, AM,
Karantzoulis-Fegaras F,
Yang W,
Mawji IM,
Bei X,
Gnanapandithen K,
and
Marsden PA.
Characterization of the murine endothelial nitric oxide synthase promoter.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1443:
352-357,
1998[Medline].
71.
Vernet, SGM,
Laurent M,
Dejana E,
Dalmon J,
and
Huber P.
The vascular endothelial-cadherin promoter directs endothelial-specific expression in transgenic mice.
Blood
93:
184-192,
1999
72.
Wang, Y,
and
Marsden PA.
Nitric oxide synthases: biochemical and molecular regulation.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens
4:
12-22,
1995[Medline].
73.
Wang, Y,
and
Marsden PA.
Nitric oxide synthases: gene structure and regulation.
Adv Pharmacol
34:
71-90,
1995.
74.
Wei, C,
Jiang S,
Lust JA,
Daly RC,
and
McGregor CG.
Genetic expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in human atrial myocardium.
Mayo Clin Proc
71:
346-350,
1996[ISI][Medline].
75.
Wilcox, JN,
Subramanian RR,
Sundell CL,
Tracey WR,
Pollock JS,
Harrison DG,
and
Marsden PA.
Expression of multiple isoforms of nitric oxide synthase in normal and atherosclerotic vessels.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
17:
2479-2488,
1997
76.
Wildhirt, SM,
Dudek RR,
Suzuki H,
Pinto V,
Narayan KS,
and
Bing RJ.
Immunohistochemistry in the identification of nitric oxide synthase isoenzymes in myocardial infarction.
Cardiovasc Res
29:
526-531,
1995[ISI][Medline].
77.
Wolinsky, H,
and
Glagov S.
Comparison of abdominal and thoracic aortic medial structure in mammals. Deviation of man from the usual patterns.
Circ Res
25:
677-686,
1969
78.
Xu, Y,
Olives B,
Bailly P,
Fischer E,
Ripoche P,
Ronco P,
Cartron J-P,
and
Rondeau E.
Endothelial cells of the kidney vasa recta express the urea transporter HUT11.
Kidney Int
51:
138-146,
1996.
79.
Yang, B,
and
Verkman AS.
Urea transporter UT3 functions as an efficient water channel.
J Biol Chem
273:
9369-9372,
1998
80.
Yoshizumi, M,
Perrella MA,
Burnett JC,
and
Lee ME.
Tumour necrosis factor downregulates an endothelial nitric oxide synthase mRNA by shortening its half-life.
Circ Res
73:
205-209,
1993[Abstract].
81.
Zhang, R,
Min W,
and
Sessa WC.
Functional analysis of the human endothelial nitric oxide synthase promoter. Sp1 and GATA factors are necessary for basal transcription in endothelial cells.
J Biol Chem
270:
15320-15326,
1995
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. C. Matouk and P. A. Marsden Epigenetic Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Gene Expression Circ. Res., April 25, 2008; 102(8): 873 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Won, S.-N. Zhu, M. Chen, A.-M. Teichert, J. E. Fish, C. C. Matouk, M. Bonert, M. Ojha, P. A. Marsden, and M. I. Cybulsky Relative Reduction of Endothelial Nitric-Oxide Synthase Expression and Transcription in Atherosclerosis-Prone Regions of the Mouse Aorta and in an in Vitro Model of Disturbed Flow Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 171(5): 1691 - 1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Mazer, F. Briet, K. R. Blight, D. J. Stewart, M. Robb, Z. Wang, A. M. Harrington, W. Mak, X. Li, and G. M.T. Hare Increased cerebral and renal endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene expression after cardiopulmonary bypass in the rat J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2007; 133(1): 13 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Tai, G. B. Robb, and P. A. Marsden Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase: A New Paradigm for Gene Regulation in the Injured Blood Vessel Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2004; 24(3): 405 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||