|
|
||||||||
The following is an abstract of the article discussed in the subsequent letter:
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
Hardt, Stefan E., Armin Just, Raffi Bekeredjian, Wolfgang
Kübler, Hartmut R. Kirchheim, and Helmut F. Kuecherer.
Aortic pressure-diameter relationship assessed by intravascular
ultrasound: experimental validation in dogs. Am J Physiol
Heart Circ Physiol 278: H1407, 2000.
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has emerged as an
important diagnostic method for evaluating vessel diameter and vessel
wall motion. To evaluate the validity of IVUS in assessing changes in
the pressure-diameter relationship we compared measurements of
abdominal aortic diameters derived from IVUS with those simultaneously obtained at the same site using implanted sonomicrometers in five chronically instrumented conscious dogs and in seven acutely
instrumented anesthetized dogs. Five hundred eighty beats were analyzed
to obtain peak systolic and end-diastolic diameters and to calculate aortic compliance at different blood pressure levels induced either by
an aortic pneumatic cuff or by intravenous injections of nitroglycerin or norepinephrine. IVUS agreed closely with sonomicrometer measurements at different blood pressure levels. However, IVUS slightly but significantly underestimated aortic diameters by 0.6 ± 0.7 mm for
systolic diameters (P < 0.001) and by 0.7 ± 0.6 mm for
diastolic diameters (P < 0.001) compared with the
sonomicrometer measurements. We conclude that IVUS is a feasible and
reliable method to measure dynamic changes in aortic dimensions and has
the potential to provide ready access to assess aortic compliance in humans.
| |
LETTER |
|---|
Definition of arterial compliance
To the editor: In the March 1999 issue of The American Journal of Physiology, Hardt et al. (1) presented an elegant experimental study on the validation of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in assessing changes in the pressure-diameter relationship in the aorta of dogs. They compared measurements of abdominal aortic diameters derived from IVUS with those obtained at the same site using implanted sonomicrometers. They then calculated the "arterial compliance as the ratio of systolic to diastolic amplitude of the diameter to the amplitude of the pressure" (1). The unit used to express "compliance" is micrometers per millimeter of mercury (µm/mmHg).The classic definition by Spencer and Denison (3) of compliance (C) is
the change in arterial blood volume (
V) due to a given change in
arterial blood pressure (
P), i.e., C =
V/
P. This definition is
still accepted (and therefore, C is expressed in µm3/mmHg
or m3/kPa).
In clinical practice, cross-sectional compliance (CC) is utilized,
assuming that there is no significant axial vessel movement due to
pulse pressure, and therefore vessel volume changes are mostly due to
changes in vessel diameter. CC is defined (2) as the ratio between
variations in arterial cross-sectional area (
A) and blood
pressure (
P), i.e., CC =
A/
P (expressed in
µm2/mmHg or m2/kPa).
The definition of compliance introduced by Hardt and coauthors (1) is quite different from both the classic one (3) and the definition utilized in clinical practice (2). At this point it would be important for Hardt et al. to clarify their new definition, because in their paper no comments were made on either the physiological or clinical arguments.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
1.
Hardt, E,
Just A,
Bekeredjian R,
Kubler W,
Kirchheim H,
and
Kuecherer F.
Aortic pressure-diameter relationship assessed by intravascular ultrasound: experimental validation in dogs.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
276:
H1078-H1085,
1999
2.
Reneman, RS,
van Merode T,
Hick P,
Muytjens AM,
and
Hoeks AP.
Age-related changes in carotid artery wall properties in men.
Ultrasound Med Biol
12:
465-471,
1986[ISI][Medline].
3.
Spencer, MP,
and
Denison AB, Jr.
Pulsatile blood flow in the vascular system.
In: Handbook of Physiology. Circulation. Washington, DC: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1963, vol. II, chapt. 25, p. 842.
|
Piergiorgio Tozzi, Antonio Corno, Service de Chirurgie Cardiovasculaire Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland | |||||
|
Daniel Hayoz, Division de Médecine Vasculaire Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |