|
|
||||||||
1-Integrin and PI 3-kinase regulate
RhoA-dependent activation of skeletal
-actin promoter in
myoblasts
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RhoA GTPase, a regulator of
actin cytoskeleton, is also involved in regulating c-fos gene
expression through its effect on serum response factor (SRF)
transcriptional activity. We have also shown that RhoA plays a critical
role in myogenesis and regulates expression of SRF-dependent muscle
genes, including skeletal
-actin. In the present study, we examined
whether the RhoA signaling pathway cross talks with other myogenic
signaling pathways to modulate skeletal
-actin promoter activity in
myoblasts. We found that extracellular matrix proteins and the
1-integrin stimulated RhoA-dependent activation of the
-actin promoter. The muscle-specific isoform
1D
selectively activated the
-actin promoter in concert with RhoA but
inhibited the c-fos promoter. In addition, focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase were required for
full activation of the
-actin promoter by RhoA. Expression of a
dominant negative mutant of FAK, application of wortmannin to cultured
myoblasts, or expression of a dominant negative mutant of PI 3-kinase
inhibited
-actin promoter activity induced by RhoA. These results
suggest that RhoA,
1-integrin, FAK, and PI 3-kinase
serve together as an important signaling network in regulating muscle
gene expression.
RhoA signaling;
1D-integrin; focal adhesion
kinase
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE SMALL GTPase RhoA is involved in many actin-based
cellular processes including cell adhesion, cytokinesis, stress fiber formation, and smooth muscle contractility (reviewed in Refs. 14 and
37). RhoA also modulates transcriptional activity of serum response
factor (SRF), a homodimeric MADS box-containing protein (17). SRF has
been shown to be required for expression of the skeletal and cardiac
-actin genes and smooth muscle
- and
-actin genes, which are
among the earliest markers for mesoderm-derived skeletal, cardiac, and
smooth muscle differentiation (4, 8, 28). We have previously shown that
RhoA activates skeletal
-actin transcription in
C2C12 myoblasts through SRF and that stable
expression of a dominant negative mutant of RhoA reduces terminal
differentiation, in part, through its effect on SRF activity (40). A
recent report has also shown that inhibition of Rho family proteins by
the GDP dissociation inhibitor RhoGDI suppresses myogenesis in
C2C12 myoblasts (34).
One way to investigate the mechanisms by which RhoA is involved in
myogenesis is to determine whether RhoA interacts with signal pathways
previously shown to be important in muscle differentiation. RhoA has
been shown to function both upstream and downstream of integrins in the
context of focal adhesion formation and stress fiber assembly (reviewed
in Ref. 5). All integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane receptors
consisting of an
-subunit associated with a
-subunit and
mediating association between extracellular matrix (ECM) and
cytoskeleton elements. Experimental evidence for the importance of
integrin interaction with ECM proteins during muscle differentiation
was elucidated in fibronectin null mice, which are defective in forming
somites (10). Myotube formation and myogenic differentiation were also
blocked in myoblast cultures treated with antibodies to integrins (25).
In addition, mice lacking focal adhesion kinase (FAK), an important
mediator of integrin signaling, displayed a general defect in mesoderm
formation, a phenotype similar to that observed in
fibronectin-deficient mice (18). Moreover, levels of expression of
several
1-integrins such as
4
1,
5
1, and
7
1 and their isoforms such as
7A,
7B,
1A, and
1D are developmentally regulated in skeletal muscle and
heart (reviewed in Ref. 13), suggesting that integrin switches may be
involved in myogenesis and heart development. In contrast to the common
1A-isoform that is widely expressed and prominent in
prefusion myoblasts, the
1D-isoform is restricted to
skeletal muscle and heart and becomes the major isoform in these
tissues (3, 38), suggesting that it may have an important function in
these tissues.
Another potential signaling pathway interacting with RhoA during muscle differentiation is signaling through phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase. Recent studies have shown that PI 3-kinase plays an important role in muscle differentiation and is required for insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-induced muscle differentiation (19-21). In addition, integrin-mediated signaling pathways also activate PI 3-kinase that is translocated to the cytoskeleton, which involves specific interactions of p85 subunit with actin filament and FAK (12). Moreover, PI 3-kinase functions downstream of RhoA in platelet and Swiss 3T3 cells (22, 42).
We examined whether
1-integrin-, FAK-, and PI
3-kinase-mediated myogenic signaling pathways cross talk with the RhoA
signaling pathway to regulate SRF-dependent muscle gene expression such as skeletal
-actin promoter activity. In the present study, we found
that ECM proteins and the
1-integrin affect
RhoA-dependent activation of the skeletal
-actin in myoblasts.
Interestingly, the muscle-specific
1D-integrin
potentiates RhoA-dependent activation of the skeletal
-actin
promoter and inhibits RhoA-dependent activation of the c-fos
promoter, suggesting that RhoA regulates these two SRF-dependent
promoter activities through different signaling pathways. Moreover, FAK
and PI 3-kinase are required for RhoA-dependent activation of the
-actin promoter. A dominant negative mutant of FAK
[FAK-related non-kinase (FRNK)] inhibits activation of the
-actin promoter by RhoA. Both wortmannin and a dominant negative mutant of PI 3-kinase (
p85) inhibit
-actin promoter activity induced by RhoA. In addition, RhoA increases PI 3-kinase activity associated with exogenous p85 subunit. These results suggest that RhoA,
1-integrin, FAK, and PI 3-kinase serve together as an
important signaling network in regulating muscle-specific gene expression.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmid constructs.
The reporter plasmid SK-luc contains the avian skeletal
-actin
promoter from
398 to +25 bp linked to the firefly luciferase reporter gene (24). The reporter plasmid c-fos-SRE-luc contains the c-fos serum response element (SRE) region (
318 to
291 bp) (24). The expression plasmids pCGN-RhoA and
pCGN-V14-RhoA were constructed as previously described (40). The cDNA
constructs for full-length avian FAK and the truncated COOH-terminal
FAK (FRNK) were cloned into the pCMV-Myc vector and were kindly
provided by Dr. J. Thomas Parsons (31). The expression plasmids
pCMVIL2R, pCMVIL2R
5, and pCMVIL2R
1 containing the human
interleukin-2 receptor extracellular and transmembrane domains in
combination with the intracellular domain for either
5-
or
1-integrin were kindly provided by Drs. Susan
LaFlamme and Kenneth Yamada (23). The full-length cDNA constructs for
human
1A- and
1D-integrins cloned into
the pECE vector were the kind gift of Dr. Alexey Belkin (3). The
expression plasmids SR
-p85 and SR
-
p85, containing the wild
type (p85) and the mutant bovine p85
-subunit lacking the binding
site for the p110 catalytic subunit of PI 3-kinase (
p85),
respectively, were kindly provided by Dr. Masato Kasuga (15).
Tissue culture, plasmid DNA transfection, and reporter gene assays.
C2C12 mouse myoblasts (27) were maintained in
DMEM (GIBCO-BRL) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were plated
at a density of 3 × 105 cells in 60-mm tissue culture
plates and were transfected after 24 h. Cells were transfected with
~1 µg of total plasmid DNA containing the indicated reporter
plasmid (0.1 µg of SK-luc or c-fos-SRE-luc) with expression
plasmids and balanced with parental expression vector. Transfections
were performed using lipofectamine (GIBCO-BRL) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Cells were placed in DMEM with 10% FBS
and harvested 48 h posttransfection. Luciferase activity and protein
content were measured as previously described (24). Luciferase activity
was normalized to the total protein, and data were expressed as
luciferase activity normalized to baseline reporter gene. All
experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated three to five
times. For experiments evaluating effects of ECM proteins on skeletal
-actin promoter activity, plates were coated overnight with rat tail
collagen, fibronectin (20 µg/ml), and poly-L-lysine (10 µg/ml) and then blocked with 2% BSA for 2 h before plating. For
experiments evaluating PI 3-kinase activity, cells were placed in
medium with or without wortmannin (1 µM) and harvested 48 h
posttransfection. The medium was replaced every 8 h because of the
instability of wortmannin.
Protein expression analysis.
Expression levels of cDNA expression plasmids were examined by Western
blot analysis. Myoblasts on 60-mm plates were transiently transfected
with 2 µg of each expression plasmid using lipofectamine. After 48 h,
the cells were solubilized with lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1%
Triton X-100, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml
pepstatin, and 50 µg/ml antipain) for 30 min with shaking at 4°C.
Cell lysates were then cleared by centrifugation. In the detection of
Myc-tagged FAK and FRNK, whole cell protein extracts (50 µg) were run
on an 8% SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to Immobilon membrane (Millipore), and probed with anti-Myc monoclonal antibody (Oncogene). In the detection of HA-tagged p85 or
p85, cell extracts (200 µg) were incubated with anti-HA monoclonal antibody (2 µg/ml) at 4°C for 1 h. Immunoprecipitates were then collected on protein A/G-Sepharose (Santa Cruz), washed three times with lysis buffer, and separated on an
8% SDS-PAGE gel. The blots were then probed with polyclonal anti-p85
antibodies (Upstate Biotechnology). Enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham) was used as the detection system.
PI 3-kinase assay.
HA-tagged p85 was immunoprecipitated from cell extracts of transiently
transfected myoblasts as described above. PI 3-kinase activity was
assayed by TLC as described previously (41). Briefly, immunoprecipitates were incubated with 50 µl of reaction buffer containing PI (20 µg), 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 µM ATP, and
[
-32P]ATP (10 µCi) for 15 min with
constant agitation at 37°C. The reaction was terminated by the
addition of 20 µl of 6 N HCl, and lipids were extracted by the
addition of 160 µl of CHCl3-CH3OH (1:1) and
separated by TLC in
CHCl3-CH3OH-H2O-NH4OH
(60:47:11.3:2). The TLC plate was dried and autoradiographed, and
radioactivity of 32P-labeled PI 3-phosphate spots was
determined by PhosphorImaging analysis (Molecular Dynamics).
Statistics. Data are expressed as means ± SE, relative to values for parallel cultures of control vector-transfected cells. Student's t-test was used for data comparison, with a significance level of P < 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ECM proteins regulate activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter by RhoA.
We have shown that V14-RhoA, a constitutively active RhoA mutant,
activates skeletal
-actin promoter up to seven times the basal
level, whereas N19-RhoA, a dominant negative mutant, represses the
basal level (control vector-transfected cells) up to 40% in a
dose-dependent manner in myoblasts (40). We have shown that activation
of the skeletal
-actin promoter by RhoA depends on an intact SRE and
a functional SRF (40). To investigate the possible interactions between
integrin and RhoA signaling pathways during muscle differentiation, we
first examined the role of integrin-independent (poly-L-lysine) and -dependent (collagen and fibronectin)
cell adhesion on skeletal
-actin promoter activity in concert with RhoA. As shown in Fig. 1, activation of the
skeletal
-actin promoter by V14-RhoA was significantly increased in
myoblasts attached to collagen (P = 0.046) or fibronectin
(P = 0.007) but was decreased in cells attached to
poly-L-lysine compared with myoblasts plated on uncoated
dishes. These results indicate that certain ECM proteins may potentiate
RhoA-mediated activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter.
|
Disruption of
1-integrin signaling
inhibits skeletal
-actin promoter activity stimulated
by RhoA.
Collagen and fibronectin interact with the
1-subfamily
of integrins that have been shown to play a critical role in muscle differentiation (10, 25). We examined whether
1-integrin signaling mediates RhoA-dependent activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter. A chimeric protein (IL2R-
1) composed of the extracellular and transmembrane domains of interleukin-2 receptor and the cytoplasmic domain of
1A-integrin was used to disrupt
1-integrin signaling (Fig.
2A) (23). A similar construct
(IL2R-
5) containing the cytoplasmic domain of
5-integrin and the expression vector served as controls.
Our results show that IL2R-
1 significantly reduced the activity of
the promoter in V14-RhoA-transfected cells (P = 0.027) with no
effect on the basal activity of the promoter (P = 0.382). The
noninteractive IL2R-
5 control had no significant effect on the
activity of the promoter in both V14-RhoA-transfected (P = 0.338) and control vector-transfected cells (P = 0.171) (Fig. 2B). Thus results of this experiment indicate that disruption of
1-integrin-mediated signaling interferes with
RhoA-dependent activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter in
myoblasts.
|
Muscle-specific
1D-isoform potentiates
activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter by RhoA.
The
1A- and
1D-integrin isoforms are very
similar and differ by only 13 amino acids in their cytoplasmic tail (3,
38). We examined whether these two integrin isoforms have different regulatory roles in skeletal
-actin promoter activity. Expression of
either of these integrins alone in myoblasts did not result in
increased activity of the skeletal
-actin promoter. Coexpression of
1D-integrin, but not
1A-integrin, with
V14-RhoA significantly increased RhoA-dependent activation of the
SK-luc reporter plasmid (P = 0.034) (Fig.
3A), indicating a selective role in
mediating RhoA signaling in regulating skeletal
-actin gene
expression. It is worth noting that exogenous expression of
1A-integrin had no effect on the activation of the
skeletal
-actin promoter by RhoA, whereas a dominant negative
1A-isoform inhibited this activation. These results
suggest that the endogenous level of
1A-integrin is not
a limiting factor for activation of the
-actin promoter by RhoA in
myoblasts.
|
-actin
and c-fos-SRE promoters in myoblasts (40). Interestingly, in
contrast to its stimulatory effect on skeletal
-actin promoter activation by RhoA,
1D-integrin inhibited activation of
c-fos-SRE by RhoA (P = 0.004) (Fig. 3B),
indicating that RhoA regulates these two SRF-dependent promoter
activities through different means.
FAK is required for skeletal
-actin promoter
activity.
We next examined whether FAK, an important downstream mediator of
integrin signaling, would also be a mediator of RhoA signaling in
skeletal
-actin promoter activation. A truncated mutant of FAK, FRNK
(Fig. 4A), which contains the
COOH-terminal domain of FAK without the kinase domain, was previously
shown (31) to act as a negative inhibitor. Expression of FRNK alone
reduced basal level of the skeletal
-actin promoter activity
(P = 0.025). It also reduced activation of the
-actin
promoter by V14-RhoA (P = 0.029) and coactivation by V14-RhoA
and
1D-integrin (P = 0.026) (Fig. 4B),
indicating that FAK may be required for efficient activation of the
-actin promoter. However, expression of exogenous FAK did not
significantly stimulate the
-actin promoter in V14-RhoA-transfected (P = 0.427) and control vector-transfected cells (P = 0.469), perhaps indicating that the level of endogenous FAK might not be a limiting factor for the activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter under these conditions. Expression of exogenous FAK and FRNK
was confirmed by Western analysis (Fig. 4C).
|
PI 3-kinase is required for skeletal
-actin promoter
activity.
PI 3-kinase is another potential mediator of RhoA signaling in
myogenesis. Two approaches were taken to determine whether PI 3-kinase
is required for RhoA-mediated activation of the skeletal
-actin
promoter. First, wortmannin was added to muscle cultures to inhibit PI
3-kinase activity (36). Second, PI 3-kinase activity was inhibited by
expression of cotransfected plasmid expressing a dominant negative
mutant of the p85 subunit (
p85) that lacks the binding site for the
p110 catalytic subunit (15).
-actin promoter. Another chemical inhibitor of PI 3-kinase,
LY-294002, also was found to inhibit activation of the actin promoter
by RhoA (data not shown). Because wortmannin may not be PI 3-kinase
specific, we then evaluated the effect of
p85, a dominant negative
PI 3-kinase mutant, on skeletal
-actin promoter activation (Fig.
6A). The expression plasmid
SR
-
p85 was transfected into C2C12
myoblasts, and its effects were compared with the empty vector SR
and the expression plasmid SR
-p85 encoding the wild- type p85 (Fig.
6B). Expression of
p85 reduced the basal activity of
skeletal
-actin promoter (P = 0.028) and the activity
stimulated by V14-RhoA (P = 0.021), whereas the wild-type p85
had no significant effect on the promoter activity under these
conditions (P = 0.125 or 0.345, respectively). Expression of
these recombinant proteins was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig.
6C). These observations are consistent with the results
obtained with wortmannin, indicating that PI 3-kinase may mediate
RhoA-dependent activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter.
|
|
-actin promoter, we examined whether
V14-RhoA increased PI 3-kinase activity in myoblasts. HA epitope-tagged
p85 or
p85 was expressed with or without V14-RhoA in myoblasts.
These exogenous proteins were then immunoprecipitated with anti-HA
antibody, which does not affect catalytic activity of
immunoprecipitated PI 3-kinase, and assayed for lipid kinase activity,
which was normalized to the p85 content in the immunocomplex determined
by Western blot analysis (Fig. 7A).
The activity of PI 3-kinase activity associated with the wild- type p85
was significantly increased in the presence of V14-RhoA (P = 0.015, n = 3), whereas that associated with
p85 was not
affected (Fig. 7B). One possible mechanism by which RhoA
increases PI 3-kinase activity is to increase its association with FAK.
However, by Western blot analysis, we found only a minor portion of the
endogenous p85 subunit of PI 3-kinase associated with FAK (<10%),
and this interaction was not increased by V14-RhoA. Similarly, PI
3-kinase activity coimmunoprecipitated with FAK was not increased by
V14-RhoA. These observations suggest that PI 3-kinase might not be
immediately downstream of FAK in regulating RhoA-dependent activation
of the skeletal
-actin promoter.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Integrin-mediated signaling regulates RhoA-dependent activation of
the skeletal
-actin promoter.
We examined whether RhoA interacts with signaling pathways involved in
muscle differentiation. The integrin-mediated signaling pathway was of
particular interest because considerable amounts of evidence support a
critical role for integrin-mediated signals in muscle differentiation,
and functional interactions between RhoA and integrin signaling
pathways have been extensively investigated in focal adhesion formation
and stress fiber assembly. We showed several lines of evidence for
functional interactions between RhoA and integrin-mediated signals in
regulating muscle gene expression: 1) extracellular matrix
proteins such as collagen and fibronectin enhanced RhoA-dependent
activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter; 2) a dominant
negative mutant of
1-integrin reduced activation of the
-actin by RhoA; and 3) the muscle-specific
1-integrin
1D-isoform was found to
enhance RhoA-dependent activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter
while repressing c-fos promoter activity.
1A-isoform, which is widely
expressed, the
1D-isoform is restricted to skeletal
muscle and heart and is the major isoform in these tissues, suggesting
that it may have an important function in these tissues. Expression of
1D-isoform in C2C12 myoblasts
represses myoblast replication, suggesting that
1D-isoform may play a role in myoblast withdrawal from
the cell cycle (2). However, mice lacking the
1D-isoform (having only
1A-isoform) form normal mature muscle
without obvious histological or ultrastructural abnormality (1). Our
observation that
1D-isoform increased RhoA-dependent
activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter, whereas
1A-isform was ineffectual, indicates selective
functional interaction between RhoA and this muscle-specific isoform in
regulating muscle-specific gene expression. Our finding that
1D-isoform inhibits activation of c-fos-SRE by
RhoA indicates that RhoA may act through at least two different
pathways to regulate skeletal
-actin and c-fos promoters.
FAK is required for efficient activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter.
FAK is an important downstream signaling molecule of integrins, because
it has been found to be the most prominent of the tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in cells responding to integrin activation (reviewed in Ref. 5). Functional interactions between RhoA
and FAK have been demonstrated in the formation of the focal adhesion
complex (9). It has been proposed that RhoA and FAK interact through
the clustering of integrin induced by RhoA activation that may thereby
activate FAK (29). This may occur through a direct interaction, because
FAK has recently been found to associate with Graf, a Rho
GTPase-activating protein (16). However, a role for FAK in muscle
differentiation has not been reported. The present study shows that FAK
modulates RhoA-dependent activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter,
suggesting a functional relationship between RhoA and FAK in regulating
muscle-specific gene expressions in myoblasts. In primary cultured
chicken myoblasts, we observed that FRNK reduced myosin heavy chain
expression in mature myotubes (unpublished results), also supporting a
role for FAK in myodifferentiation.
PI 3-kinase is required for efficient activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter.
Recent reports have shown that PI 3-kinase plays a vital role in
myogenesis (19-21). Functional interactions between RhoA and PI
3-kinase have been observed between RhoA and PI 3-kinase in platelet
and Swiss 3T3 cells, where RhoA is required for PI 3-kinase activation
in response to extracellular stimuli (22, 42). Our results demonstrate
that PI 3-kinase may be a mediator of the RhoA signaling pathway in
regulating muscle-specific gene expression. Wortmannin, a known
inhibitor of PI 3-kinase, and a dominant negative mutant of the p85
subunit of PI 3-kinase both inhibited RhoA-dependent activation of the
skeletal
-actin promoter. PI 3-kinase activity associated with
cotransfected p85 was also increased by V14-RhoA in myoblasts.
RhoA regulates SRF-dependent gene expressions through different
signaling pathways in myoblasts and fibroblasts.
SRF mediates RhoA signaling to the skeletal
-actin promoter through
the proximal SRE site of the promoter (40). Since the discovery of
regulation of c-fos transcription by RhoA through SRF in
fibroblasts, considerable progress has been made in identifying signaling pathways involved in RhoA activation of c-fos
promoter. Regulators of actin dynamics such as LIM kinases (where LIM
is an acronym of the three gene products Lin-11, Isl-1 and Mec-3) (33), nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B) and
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein transcription factors (26), protein
kinases C-
and -
(32), and Rho kinases (7) have been shown to
mediate RhoA signaling to c-fos SRE in fibroblasts. In
addition, the PI 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin had no significant
effect on the c-fos promoter activation by RhoA (17), and PI
3-kinase was reported to function upstream RhoA to activate
c-fos promoter (39) in fibroblasts. In
C2C12 myoblasts, treatment with the Rho kinase
inhibitor Y27632 (35) had no effect on myoblast differentiation and on
activation of the skeletal
-actin promoter by RhoA (unpublished
results). An NF-
B inhibitor, I
B
S32A/S36A, had no effect on the
activation of the skeletal
-actin by RhoA (unpublished results). We
are currently evaluating whether there is a role for LIM kinases in RhoA signaling to skeletal
-actin in myoblasts. These observations suggest that RhoA signaling to c-fos promoter in fibroblasts
may be different from RhoA signaling to skeletal
-actin promoter in
myoblasts. We have previously shown that activation of cardiac
-actin promoter by SRF is regulated by the formation of a functional complex of SRF with other muscle-specific cofactors such as Nkx2.5 (6)
and GATA4 (unpublished results). SRF also associates with myogenic
factors such as myogenin and MyoD (11). These observations may explain
the discrepancies observed for nonmuscle c-fos versus myogenic
SRE-dependent activities and suggest that RhoA activation of
SRF-dependent muscle gene expression may involve recruitment of
muscle-specific accessory factors that are susceptible to other myogenic signals.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Kenneth M. Yamada (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), Susan E. LaFlamme (Albany Medical College, Albany, NY), Alexey M. Belkin (American Red Cross Holland Laboratory, Rockville, MD), J. Thomas Parsons (University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA), and Masato Kasuga (Kobe University, Kobe, Japan) for providing plasmids. We thank James E. Agan for help in the tissue culture of myoblasts.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants R01-HL-50422 and P01-HL-49953 (to R. J. Schwartz) and an American Heart Association-Texas Affiliate Beginning Grant-in-Aid Award (to L. Wei).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. J. Schwartz, Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Rm. 145E, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030 (E-mail: schwartz{at}bcm.tmc.edu).
Received 1 December 1999; accepted in final form 19 January 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Baudoin, C,
Goumans MJ,
Mummery C,
and
Sonnenberg A.
Knockout and knockin of the
1 exon D define distinct roles for integrin splice variants in heart function and embryonic development.
Genes Dev
12:
1202-1216,
1998
2.
Belkin, AM,
and
Retta SF.
1D integrin inhibits cell cycle progression in normal myoblasts and fibroblasts.
J Biol Chem
273:
15234-15240,
1998
3.
Belkin, AM,
Zhidkova NI,
Balzac F,
Altruda F,
Tomatis D,
Maier A,
Tarone G,
Koteliansky VE,
and
Burridge K.
1D integrin displaces the
1A isoform in striated muscles: localization at junctional structures and signaling potential in nonmuscle cells.
J Cell Biol
132:
211-226,
1996
4.
Boxer, LM,
Prywes R,
Roeder RG,
and
Kedes L.
The sarcomeric actin CArG-binding factor is indistinguishable from the c-fos serum response factor.
Mol Cell Biol
9:
515-522,
1989
5.
Burridge, K,
and
Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M.
Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling.
Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol
12:
463-518,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
6.
Chen, CY,
and
Schwartz RJ.
Recruitment of the tinman homolog Nkx-2.5 by serum response factor activates cardiac
-actin gene transcription.
Mol Cell Biol
16:
6372-6384,
1996[Abstract].
7.
Chihara, K,
Amano M,
Nakamura N,
Yano T,
Shibata M,
Tokui T,
Ichikawa H,
Ikebe R,
Ikebe M,
and
Kaibuchi K.
Cytoskeletal rearrangements and transcriptional activation of c-fos serum response element by Rho-kinase.
J Biol Chem
272:
25121-25127,
1997
8.
Chow, KL,
and
Schwartz RJ.
A combination of closely associated positive and negative cis-acting promoter elements regulates transcription of the skeletal
-actin gene.
Mol Cell Biol
10:
528-538,
1990
9.
Flinn, HM,
and
Ridley AJ.
Rho stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase, p130 and paxillin.
J Cell Sci
109:
1133-1141,
1996[Abstract].
10.
George, EL,
Georges-Labouesse EN,
Patel-King RS,
Rayburn H,
and
Hynes RO.
Defects in mesoderm, neural tube and vascular development in mouse embryos lacking fibronectin.
Development
119:
1079-1091,
1993[Abstract].
11.
Groisman, R,
Masutani H,
Leibovitch MP,
Robin P,
Soudant I,
Trouche D,
and
Harel-Bellan A.
Physical interaction between the mitogen-responsive serum response factor and myogenic basic-helix-loop-helix proteins.
J Biol Chem
271:
5258-5264,
1996
12.
Guinebault, C,
Payrastre B,
Racaud-Sultan C,
Mazarguil H,
Breton M,
Mauco G,
Plantavid M,
and
Chap H.
Integrin-dependent translocation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase to the cytoskeleton of thrombin-activated platelets involves specific interactions of p85
with actin filaments and focal adhesion kinase.
J Cell Biol
129:
831-842,
1995
13.
Gullberg, D,
Velling T,
Lohikangas L,
and
Tiger CF.
Integrins during muscle development and in muscular dystrophies.
Front Biosci
3:
D1039-D1050,
1998[Medline].
14.
Hall, A.
Small GTP-binding proteins and the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton.
Annu Rev Cell Biol
10:
31-54,
1994[Web of Science].
15.
Hara, K,
Yonezawa K,
Sakaue H,
Ando A,
Kotani K,
Kitamura T,
Kitamura Y,
Ueda H,
Stephens L,
Jackson TR.,
Hawkins PT,
Dhand R,
Clark AE,
Holman GD,
Waterfield MD,
and
Kasuga M.
1-Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity is required for insulin-stimulated glucose transport but not for RAS activation in CHO cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
91:
7415-7419,
1994
16.
Hildebrand, JD,
Taylor JM,
and
Parsons JT.
An SH3 domain-containing GTPase-activating protein for Rho and Cdc42 associates with focal adhesion kinase.
Mol Cell Biol
16:
3169-3178,
1996[Abstract].
17.
Hill, CS,
Wynne J,
and
Treisman R.
The Rho family GTPases RhoA, Rac1, and CDC42Hs regulate transcriptional activation by SRF.
Cell
81:
1159-1170,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
18.
Ilic, D,
Furuta Y,
Kanazawa S,
Takeda N,
Sobue K,
Nakatsuji N,
Nomura S,
Fujimoto J,
Okada M,
and
Yamamoto T.
Reduced cell motility and enhanced focal adhesion contact formation in cells from FAK-deficient mice.
Nature
377:
539-544,
1995[Medline].
19.
Jiang, BH,
Zheng JZ,
and
Vogt PK.
An essential role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in myogenic differentiation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
95:
14179-14183,
1998
20.
Kaliman, P,
Canicio J,
Shepherd PR,
Beeton CA,
Testar X,
Palacin M,
and
Zorzano A.
Insulin-like growth factors require phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to signal myogenesis: dominant negative p85 expression blocks differentiation of L6E9 muscle cells.
Mol Endocrinol
12:
66-77,
1998
21.
Kaliman, P,
Vinals F,
Testar X,
Palacin M,
and
Zorzano A.
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors block differentiation of skeletal muscle cells.
J Biol Chem
271:
19146-19151,
1996
22.
Kumagai, N,
Morii N,
Fujisawa K,
Nemoto Y,
and
Narumiya S.
ADP-ribosylation of rho p21 inhibits lysophosphatidic acid-induced protein tyrosine phosphorylation and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation in cultured Swiss 3T3 cells.
J Biol Chem
268:
24535-24538,
1993
23.
LaFlamme, SE,
Akiyama SK,
and
Yamada KM.
Regulation of fibronectin receptor distribution.
J Cell Biol
117:
437-447,
1992
24.
MacLellan, WR,
Lee TC,
Schwartz RJ,
and
Schneider MD.
Transforming growth factor-beta response elements of the skeletal alpha-actin gene. Combinatorial action of serum response factor, YY1, and the SV40 enhancer-binding protein, TEF-1.
J Biol Chem
269:
16754-16760,
1994
25.
Menko, AS,
and
Boettiger D.
Occupation of the extracellular matrix receptor, integrin, is a control point for myogenic differentiation.
Cell
51:
51-57,
1987[Web of Science][Medline].
26.
Montaner, S,
Perona R,
Saniger L,
and
Lacal JC.
Activation of serum response factor by RhoA is mediated by the nuclear factor-
B and C/EBP transcription factors.
J Biol Chem
274:
8506-8515,
1999
27.
Montarras, D,
Pinset C,
Chelly J,
Kahn A,
and
Gros F.
Expression of MyoD1 coincides with terminal differentiation in determined but inducible muscle cells.
EMBO J
8:
2203-2207,
1989[Web of Science][Medline].
28.
Muscat, GE,
and
Kedes L.
Multiple 5'-flanking regions of the human
-skeletal actin gene synergistically modulate muscle-specific expression.
Mol Cell Biol
7:
4089-4099,
1987
29.
Parsons, JT.
Integrin-mediated signalling: regulation by protein tyrosine kinases and small GTP-binding proteins.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
8:
146-152,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
30.
Ren, XD,
and
Schwartz MA.
Regulation of inositol lipid kinases by Rho and Rac.
Curr Opin Genet Dev
8:
63-67,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
31.
Richardson, A,
and
Parsons T.
A mechanism for regulation of the adhesion-associated protein tyrosine kinase pp125FAK.
Nature
380:
538-540,
1996[Medline].
32.
Soh, JW,
Lee EH,
Prywes R,
and
Weinstein IB.
Novel roles of specific isoforms of protein kinase C in activation of the c-fos serum response element.
Mol Cell Biol
19:
1313-1324,
1999
33.
Sotiropoulos, A,
Gineitis D,
Copeland J,
and
Treisman R.
Signal-regulated activation of serum response factor is mediated by changes in actin dynamics.
Cell
98:
159-169,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
34.
Takano, H,
Komuro I,
Oka T,
Shiojima I,
Hiroi Y,
Mizuno T,
and
Yazaki Y.
The Rho family G proteins play a critical role in muscle differentiation.
Mol Cell Biol
18:
1580-1589,
1998
35.
Uehata, M,
Ishizaki T,
Satoh H,
Ono T,
Kawahara T,
Morishita T,
Tamakawa H,
Yamagami K,
Inui J,
Maekawa M,
and
Narumiya S.
Calcium sensitization of smooth muscle mediated by a Rho-associated protein kinase in hypertension.
Nature
389:
990-994,
1997[Medline].
36.
Ui, M,
Okada T,
Hazeki K,
and
Hazeki O.
Wortmannin as a unique probe for an intracellular signalling protein, phosphoinositide 3-kinase.
Trends Biochem Sci
20:
303-307,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
37.
Van Aelst, L,
and
D'Souza-Schorey C.
Rho GTPases and signaling networks.
Genes Dev
11:
2295-2322,
1997
38.
Van der Flier, A,
Gaspar AC,
Thorsteinsdottir S,
Baudoin C,
Groeneveld E,
Mummery CL,
and
Sonnenberg A.
Spatial and temporal expression of the
1D integrin during mouse development.
Dev Dyn
210:
472-486,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
39.
Wang, Y,
Falasca M,
Schlessinger J,
Malstrom S,
Tsichlis P,
Settleman J,
Hu W,
Lim B,
and
Prywes R.
Activation of the c-fos serum response element by phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase and rho pathways in HeLa cells.
Cell Growth Differ
9:
513-522,
1998[Abstract].
40.
Wei, L,
Zhou W,
Croissant JD,
Johansen FE,
Prywes R,
Balasubramanyam A,
and
Schwartz RJ.
RhoA signaling via serum response factor plays an obligatory role in myogenic differentiation.
J Biol Chem
273:
30287-30294,
1998
41.
Whitman, M,
Kaplan DR,
Schaffhausen B,
Cantley L,
and
Roberts TM.
Association of phosphatidylinositol kinase activity with polyoma middle-T competent for transformation.
Nature
315:
239-242,
1985[Medline].
42.
Zhang, J,
King WG,
Dillon S,
Hall A,
Feig L,
and
Rittenhouse SE.
Activation of platelet phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase requires the small GTP-binding protein Rho.
J Biol Chem
268:
22251-22254,
1993
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. I. Kontaridis, S. Eminaga, M. Fornaro, C. I. Zito, R. Sordella, J. Settleman, and A. M. Bennett SHP-2 Positively Regulates Myogenesis by Coupling to the Rho GTPase Signaling Pathway Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2004; 24(12): 5340 - 5352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Lee, R. W. Thompson, J. M. McClung, and J. A. Carson Regulation of androgen receptor expression at the onset of functional overload in rat plantaris muscle Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): R1076 - R1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Gordon, M. Fluck, and F. W. Booth Plasticity in Skeletal, Cardiac, and Smooth Muscle: Selected Contribution: Skeletal muscle focal adhesion kinase, paxillin, and serum response factor are loading dependent J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2001; 90(3): 1174 - 1183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Vatner and D. L. Kunze Prologue: low-molecular-weight GTPases in the heart and circulation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2000; 278(6): H1733 - H1735. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gineitis and R. Treisman Differential Usage of Signal Transduction Pathways Defines Two Types of Serum Response Factor Target Gene J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2001; 276(27): 24531 - 24539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Osses and E. Brandan ECM is required for skeletal muscle differentiation independently of muscle regulatory factor expression Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): C383 - C394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |