AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H1299-H1306, 2000;
0363-6135/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malpas, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malpas, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, D. E.
Vol. 279, Issue 3, H1299-H1306, September 2000

Renal SNA as the primary mediator of slow oscillations in blood pressure during hemorrhage

Simon C. Malpas1 and Don E. Burgess2

1 Circulatory Control Laboratory, Department of Physiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; and 2 Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0084


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Blood pressure contains a distinct low-frequency oscillation often termed the Mayer wave. This oscillation is caused by the action of the sympathetic nervous system on the vasculature and results from time delays in the baroreflex feedback loop for the control of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in response to changes in blood pressure. In this study, we used bilateral renal denervation to test the hypothesis that it is SNA to the kidney that contributes a large portion of the vascular resistance associated with changes in the strength of the slow oscillation in blood pressure. In conscious rabbits, SNA and blood pressure were measured during hemorrhage (blood withdrawal at 1.35 ml · min-1 · kg-1 for 20 min). Spectral analysis identified a strong increase in power at 0.3 Hz in SNA and blood pressure in the initial compensatory phase of hemorrhage before blood pressure started to fall. However, in a separate group of renal denervated rabbits, although the power of the 0.3-Hz oscillation under control conditions in blood pressure was similar, it was not altered during hemorrhage. Wavelet analysis revealed the development of low-frequency oscillations at 0.1 Hz in both intact and denervated animals. In conclusion, we propose that changes in the strength of the oscillation at 0.3 Hz in arterial pressure during hemorrhage are primarily mediated by sympathetic activity directed to the kidney.

conscious rabbit; sympathetic nervous system; spectral analysis; renal denervation


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED that blood pressure in humans contains a distinct oscillation at 0.1 Hz that is often referred to as the Mayer wave (21, 29). Experiments in a variety of animal models have shown that this oscillation is caused by the action of the sympathetic nervous system on the vasculature. Although the oscillation in blood pressure is shifted to 0.4 Hz in the rat (7) and to 0.3 Hz in the rabbit (17), changes in the strength of this oscillation may reflect changes in the mean level of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) or baroreflex control of SNA, raising the possibility that measurement of the strength of this oscillation may be used as a diagnostic measure of neural control of the cardiovascular system in humans (1, 9, 21).

Current evidence favors the concept of time delays and lags in the baroreflex loop as the origin for the 0.1-Hz oscillation in blood pressure (4, 6, 8, 11, 20, 34). In this model, a change in blood pressure is sensed by the arterial baroreceptors, and the afferent signal to the central nervous system is altered. Subsequently, the mean SNA level is altered, which in turn changes vascular tone in the target organ. Fundamental to this model is that the combination of a series of time delays means that the input change in blood pressure results in an output change in vascular resistance that is slightly phase shifted, and instead of buffering the initial change in blood pressure, it leads to the development of its own change in blood pressure. It is generally thought that the oscillation in blood pressure results from global changes in SNA. However, it is often overlooked that the pattern of SNA to various target organs is not uniform and not always modulated by baroreceptors (24-26), raising the possibility that it is SNA to a few key organs that dominates in the production of the 0.1-Hz oscillation in blood pressure.

In the present study, we used bilateral renal denervation to test the hypothesis that it is SNA to the kidney that contributes a large portion of the vascular resistance associated with changes in the power of the slow oscillation (0.3 Hz in the rabbit) in blood pressure during hemorrhage. SNA and blood pressure were measured in conscious rabbits during hemorrhage, which, as we have previously established (22), produces an increase in the strength of the oscillation at 0.3 Hz in renal SNA.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Animal preparation. Experiments were performed on rabbits (weight 2.5-3.1 kg, n = 14) that underwent surgery, at least 7 days before the experiment, for implantation of a recording electrode around the left renal sympathetic nerve. With the rabbits under halothane anesthesia, the left renal nerve was exposed by a retroperitoneal approach. With the use of an operating microscope, an intact nerve was fed through a coiled electrode (14). The electrode was held in place and insulated from the surrounding tissue by Wacker Sil-Gel (Wacker-Chemie, Munich, Germany). The other end of the electrode was tunneled under the skin for later retrieval on the day of the experiment. In a separate group of seven animals, instead of implantation of a renal electrode, bilateral renal denervation was performed. All animals also had a Silastic catheter (inner diameter 0.86 mm) inserted into the superior vena cava via the right jugular vein during this surgery for withdrawal of blood. This catheter was filled with heparin (1,000 IU/ml) with the other end sealed and was placed under the skin for retrieval on the day of the experiment.

Experimental protocol. On the day of the experiment, catheters were inserted in a central ear artery for measurement of arterial pressure. The ends of the renal electrode and venous catheter were retrieved from under the skin under local anesthesia. SNA was amplified, filtered between 50 and 5,000 Hz, full-wave rectified, and integrated by using a low-pass filter with a time constant of 20 ms. This integrated SNA signal and arterial pressure were continuously recorded throughout the experiment and were sampled at 1,000 Hz by using an analog-to-digital data acquisition card (National Instruments, Austin, TX). Calibrated signals were displayed on a computer screen and saved to disk with the use of a program written in the LabVIEW graphic programming language (National Instruments). After the preparatory procedures were completed, rabbits were left for 60 min before the experimental protocol commenced. Animals were given 1,000 IU in 2 ml of heparin via the chronically indwelling superior vena cava catheter. After a 20-min period of control recording, blood was withdrawn with the use of a constant withdrawal pump at a rate of 1.35 ml · kg-1 · min-1 for 20 min. This rate is equivalent to 3% of blood volume per minute (15).

Data processing. The fluctuations in blood pressure and SNA were investigated in the frequency domain with the use of spectral analysis techniques. Although these variables display oscillations at frequencies >2 Hz, such as those occurring with each cardiac cycle, this has already been described in some detail (17) and was not the focus of the present study. Analysis of oscillations at frequencies <2 Hz was performed as previously described (22). Briefly, all beat-to-beat signals were replayed on screen for visual inspection, and data segments with artifacts caused by obstruction of the arterial catheter or movement were eliminated. The 20-min hemorrhage period was divided into sections of 5 min for analysis along with the 20-min prehemorrhage control period. Because equidistantly sampled data are required for a fast Fourier transform, the beat-to-beat data segments were resampled at 10.24 Hz and partitioned into segments of 100 s (1024 points) in length, overlapping by 50 s. Each segment was subjected to detrending to remove the underlying mean value and slow changes in the parameters and was then subjected to an overlapped fast Fourier transform according to methods described by Berger et al. (3). The resulting frequency resolution was 0.01 Hz.

To further clarify changes in the various rhythms during hemorrhage, we also undertook band-pass filtering and wavelet analysis. Wavelet analysis allows one to follow the variations in the oscillations continuously throughout hemorrhage without the need to conduct spectral analysis over set periods of time. Wavelet analysis complements the more standard spectral analysis by giving a picture of fluctuations as a function of both frequency and time. Wavelet analysis is particularly useful in problems like this one, where the dynamics contain several different frequency scales. To construct a filter, we multiplied the Fourier transform of a time series x(f) by a smooth notch function H(f) built from hyperbolic tangent functions, namely
H(f)=<FR><NU>1</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> <FENCE>tanh <FENCE><FR><NU>(<IT>f−f<SUB>1</SUB></IT>)</NU><DE><IT>&sfgr;</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><IT>−</IT>tanh <FENCE><FR><NU>(<IT>f−f<SUB>2</SUB></IT>)</NU><DE><IT>&sfgr;</IT></DE></FR></FENCE></FENCE>

<FENCE><IT>+</IT>tanh <FENCE><FR><NU>(<IT>f+f<SUB>2</SUB></IT>)</NU><DE><IT>&sfgr;</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><IT>−</IT>tanh <FENCE><FR><NU>(<IT>f+f<SUB>1</SUB></IT>)</NU><DE><IT>&sfgr;</IT></DE></FR></FENCE></FENCE>
where sigma  = 10Delta f is the smoothing interval and f1 and f2 give the frequency range of the filter. To obtain the filtered time series, one takes the inverse Fourier transform of the product. The wavelet transform x~ is essentially a band-pass filter that allows the study of the signal on any chosen scale s (10). The continuous wavelet transform of a time series x(t) is defined as
<A><AC>x</AC><AC>˜</AC></A>(s, t)=<FR><NU>1</NU><DE><RAD><RCD>s</RCD></RAD></DE></FR> <LIM><OP>∫</OP><LL>−∞</LL><UL>+∞</UL></LIM> x(t′)ϕ<FENCE><FR><NU>t′−t</NU><DE>s</DE></FR></FENCE>d<IT>t′</IT>
where the analyzing wavelet phi has a width on the order of the scale s and is centered at time t. We used the Mexican hat wavelet, which is the second derivative of a Gaussian function. For this wavelet, there is a conversion factor of approximately four between the scale s and the corresponding Fourier period (32). Thus, by applying a wavelet with a scale s = 0.5 to a time series, one picks out rhythms that have a period of ~2 s. Using a standard Fourier transform routine, one can efficiently calculate the convolution integral in the frequency domain and then take the inverse Fourier transform to find the wavelet transform in the time domain. To compute the amplitudes of the wavelet transform, we used an analytic signal approach (16). Let x(t) represent an arbitrary signal. The analytic signal, a complex function of time, is defined by z(t) triple-bond  x(t) + i · y(t), where y(t) is the conjugate time series or Hilbert transform of x(t). The amplitude A(t) is then defined as A(t) triple-bond  <RAD><RCD><IT>x</IT><SUP>2</SUP>(<IT>t</IT>) + <IT>y</IT><SUP>2</SUP>(<IT>t</IT>)</RCD></RAD>. In the frequency domain, the Hilbert transform simply multiplies the positive frequency Fourier modes by i and the negative frequency modes by -i. To visualize the wavelet transform of a time series, we made contour plots of the amplitude squared as a function of frequency and time.

Statistical analysis. With regard to the steady-state data, the influence of hemorrhage on the levels of each variable during hemorrhage was tested by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the factors being neural status (intact or denervated) and time (1-min averages). The magnitudes of the power in different frequency bands before and during hemorrhage were compared in the intact and denervated groups by a split-plot ANOVA as described previously (18). The total sums of squares (SS) were partitioned into between-groups mean squares (state of innervation), with further partitioning of the SS of each group into between-animal mean squares. The significance of the difference between groups was assessed from the variance ratio F = between-groups mean square/within-groups mean square.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Steady-state changes during hemorrhage. The steady-state changes during hemorrhage have been reported in detail in our previous study, which followed the same hemorrhage protocol (22). Briefly, therefore, for the present group of renal nerve intact animals, hemorrhage was associated with a profound increase in SNA. After 5 min of blood withdrawal, the increase was 11 ± 13% (between-animal SE of mean) above control levels, at 10 min, 17 ± 9%, at 15 min, 90 ± 31%, and by the end of hemorrhage, SNA had reached 210 ± 115% of control levels. Arterial pressure did not significantly decrease until 9-11 min of blood withdrawal and reached 58 ± 4 mmHg after 20 min (control 83 ± 2 mmHg). The blood pressure responses to the withdrawal of blood were not significantly different between intact and denervated animals.

Oscillations in SNA and mean arterial pressure during hemorrhage. Under control conditions, five of seven animals showed a spectral peak at ~0.3 Hz in SNA (Figs. 1 and 2). Strong coupling between SNA and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) at this frequency was indicated, because coherence was generally >0.5 (average 0.57 ± 0.13). This peak in SNA accounted for 22 ± 2% of total spectral power <2 Hz. In MAP, this same frequency band accounted for 14 ± 2% of total spectral power <2 Hz. This was not significantly different in renal denervated animals when measured either as a percentage of total power or as absolute spectral power.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Examples of 0.3-Hz oscillations in 1 rabbit before (A) and during (B) hemorrhage. The top trace in each panel refers to the mean arterial pressure (MAP). SNA, sympathetic nerve activity.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Changes in spectral power for MAP and SNA in 1 rabbit in the control period (A) and between 5 and 10 min of hemorrhage (B). Mean SNA increased 32% in this rabbit by 10 min of hemorrhage. Coherence between SNA and MAP was over 0.5 in the frequency band from 0.25 to 0.35 Hz and was maximal at 0.3 Hz in each animal. Oscillations associated with respiration were also present between 0.75 and 1.40 Hz in all animals. These data are not presented because this finding has already been reported in a previous study (22).

Our previous study (22) reported the changes in the power of the oscillation in SNA during hemorrhage in detail. The new data and analysis in the present study relates to the comparison of the oscillation in MAP in renal nerve intact versus denervated rabbits. The first 10 min of hemorrhage were associated with pronounced increases in the power of oscillations centered at 0.3 Hz in SNA and in MAP (Figs. 1 and 2). In each rabbit, there was a significant increase in coherence between SNA and MAP in the initial 10 min of hemorrhage (range 0.48-0.95, average 0.79 ± 0.08). The phase delay between SNA and MAP under control conditions was positive, with the change in SNA leading the change in MAP by 1.37 ± 0.1 s at 0.3 Hz. This phase delay was not altered during hemorrhage. Although mean SNA continued to increase throughout the 20-min period, the power around 0.3 Hz did not remain high, returned to control levels in the second 10-min period, and was replaced by oscillations at frequencies <0.25 Hz. (Table 1). The contour plots of the wavelet spectrum revealed that the dominant scale of blood pressure variability shifted to a lower frequency at ~10 min into hemorrhage for intact rabbits (Fig. 3). Similar information was obtained from a set of band-pass filters as shown in (Fig. 4). In renal nerve intact animals, the absolute spectral power of MAP between 0.25 and 0.45 Hz was profoundly increased during the first 10 min of hemorrhage (Figs. 3-5). Subsequently, the next 10 min were associated with relative decreases in power in this frequency band, although it still remained above control levels. However, in the renal denervated group, although absolute spectral power of MAP between 0.25 and 0.45 Hz was similar to that in the intact group in the control period, there were no significant changes in the power of MAP at any phase of hemorrhage in this frequency band (Fig. 5). The wavelet spectrums showed significant increases in spectral power of MAP oscillations <0.25 Hz during hemorrhage in both intact and denervated animals (Figs. 3 and 4).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Changes in SNA spectral power in three frequency bands during hemorrhage



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Contour plots for blood pressure wavelet spectrums from a renal nerve intact rabbit (A) and a denervated rabbit (B) during the 20-min control period and hemorrhage. The presence of color (scale: 10, 40, and 160 spectral power) indicates significant power at the corresponding frequency and time. The vertical line near 1,200 s represents the start of hemorrhage. In the intact rabbit, variability in the 0.20- to 0.45-Hz frequency range increased during the first 5 min of hemorrhage. However, variability in the same frequency range remained relatively constant in the denervated animal during the same period. Note the development of a strong low-frequency rhythm (around 0.1 Hz) during hemorrhage in both the intact and denervated animals.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Band-pass filtered time series for MAP (in mmHg) from an intact rabbit (A) and a denervated rabbit (B). The band-pass filtering was used to resolve changes in the power of oscillations between 0.2 and 0.45 Hz (top) and between 0.04 and 0.2 Hz (bottom). The vertical line near 1,200 s represents the start of hemorrhage. During hemorrhage, variability in the mid-frequency range increased during the first 5 min in the intact animal (A, top). On the other hand, variability in the mid-frequency range remained relatively constant in the denervated animal (B, top) during the first 5 min of hemorrhage. Notice the development of a strong low-frequency rhythm near the end of hemorrhage in both the intact and denervated animals.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Changes in the absolute spectral power of MAP in low (0.04-0.25 Hz; A), mid (0.25-0.45 Hz; B), and high frequencies (0.75-1.40 Hz; C) in renal nerve intact rabbits (open bars) and renal denervated rabbits (solid bars). *Significant increases in spectral power occurred during hemorrhage in the low-frequency band in both groups. **A significant increase in power occurred in the renal nerve intact group in the mid-frequency range, whereas power was unchanged from the control value in denervated rabbits (P < 0.05). Spectral power was not significantly altered in the respiratory-related high-frequency band in either group. Values are means ± SE.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The main finding of this study was that changes in the slow oscillation in blood pressure (0.3 Hz) occurring during hemorrhage were caused by the specific action of SNA on the renal vasculature. Rabbits in which both kidneys were denervated showed no significant change in the strength of the MAP oscillation at 0.3 Hz during hemorrhage, indicating that neural control of the renal vasculature plays a key role in generating the pattern of oscillations observed in hemorrhage.

It is often overlooked that the pattern of SNA to the various target organs is quite selective. In particular, SNA to the lungs, kidney, and spleen is highly baroreceptor sensitive (25, 28); however, SNA to the skin and gut is only weakly regulated by baroreceptor activity (24-26). With regard to the human, it appears that SNA to the skin is not dissimilar to that in animals, because previous studies have found little evidence of baroreflex modulation of skin SNA (12, 33). The 0.1-Hz oscillation in blood pressure in humans is proposed to result from time delays and lag in the baroreflex loop (8, 11), where a change in blood pressure is sensed by the arterial baroreceptors and the afferent signal to the central nervous system is altered. Subsequently, the mean SNA level is altered, which in turn changes vascular tone in the target organ. Thus, for vascular resistance in any particular organ to contribute to the occurrence of the oscillation, SNA to that organ must be baroreceptor sensitive.

Renal denervated rabbits were able to maintain arterial pressure during hemorrhage to the same extent as renal nerve intact animals. This does not necessarily indicate that the renal nerves do not contribute to the maintenance of arterial pressure during blood loss, because other factors, both hormonal factors and increased SNA to other organs, may compensate. Previously with regard to the kidney, we found that the onset for a reduction in renal blood flow during hemorrhage was delayed if the renal nerves were not present (22). However, this still raises the question that if the mean blood pressure response to hemorrhage was similar, regardless of the presence or absence of renal nerves, then why was the strength of the 0.3-Hz rhythm in blood pressure different? A possible explanation can be found by considering that SNA to a variety of organs contains common components and also components such as the 0.3-Hz oscillation that may be more specific to the kidney. Generalized SNA to the vasculature of many organs contributes largely to the maintenance of a mean level of blood pressure, i.e., the direct current (DC) gain level of blood pressure. Thus SNA to other organs increased in response to hemorrhage and assisted in maintaining blood pressure; however, the results of the present study indicate that this SNA did not contain a strong 0.3-Hz component. It should be noted that the oscillation at 0.3 Hz is a variation around a DC gain level. Given that the 0.3-Hz power is relatively low compared with that of the other frequencies present in renal SNA (between 15 and 20% of total power in the rabbit, with the balance being cardiac and respiratory related; Ref. 17), it is likely that it contributes in only a modest way to the DC gain level of blood pressure. The value of the 0.3-Hz rhythm lies in its indication of neural control of the circulation and the possibility that its analogous frequency in human blood pressure (0.1 Hz) may be used as an index of sympathetic tone/baroreflex control.

Further support for our results can be derived from analysis of the model proposed by DeBoer et al. (11) and further expanded in the rat by Burgess et al. (8). As has been previously noted, the 0.1-Hz oscillation in blood pressure in humans is analogous to 0.3 Hz in rabbits and 0.4 Hz in rats. This species difference can be accounted for by the larger physical distance between arterial baroreceptors and the brain and various target organs in man compared with that in rabbits and rats, which means that conduction times for the afferent and efferent signals will be longer. However, if all organs with sympathetic innervation contributed to the origin of the oscillations in blood pressure in proportion to their percentage of cardiac output, then it is suggested that no clear oscillation would be evident. The slow conduction velocities in postganglionic nerves [0.7 m/s (13)] would mean that SNA to the extremities would reach its target up to 1 s later than the innervation to major organs in the thoracic cavity. This would result in the vasoconstrictor response to the SNA signal being temporally nonuniform, and although there could still be blood pressure variability around this frequency, it is most likely that this would appear as a much wider band of variability than has been observed (e.g., Fig. 2).

Stauss and colleagues (30, 31) recently observed that the frequency-response characteristic of the mesenteric vasculature to SNA was different from that of the skin vasculature in rats. The vasculature delay and lag time is a large component of the feedback loop, which gives rise to the oscillation at 0.4 Hz in the rat (8). If blood flow to organs such as the skin played a significant role in the generation of the oscillation, one could reasonably expect more than one peak in the spectrum of blood pressure. The existence of a single peak between 0.2 and 0.45 Hz in rabbits and rats (e.g., Fig. 2) supports the concept that it is SNA to organs with similar vasculature time delays and frequency response characteristics that gives rise to the oscillation.

If the 0.3-Hz oscillation is caused by baroreflex feedback, the possibility is raised that a number of factors known to alter baroreflex gain may alter the strength of the oscillation at 0.3 Hz. Such factors include increased circulating levels of angiotensin II, which may act via circumventricular organs such as the area postrema to further increase SNA and alter baroreflex gain. Previously, blockade of endogenous angiotensin II in the medulla produced increases in baroreflex gain (2). Thus increases in circulating angiotensin II might be expected to increase the strength of the 0.3-Hz rhythm. Although there is a lack of studies reporting changes in the 0.3-Hz rhythm in response to a variety of stimuli, if the model of baroreflex feedback via the vasculature proves correct, then any treatment, pathology, or stimuli that is known to alter gain, either between SNA and the vasculature or between blood pressure and SNA, could be expected to alter the strength of the 0.3-Hz rhythm in blood pressure. This possibility can be used in the present study to explain why the 0.3-Hz oscillation increased in strength in blood pressure before a change occurred in mean blood pressure and why this oscillation subsequently diminished in the later phase of hemorrhage despite continued increases in mean SNA levels. In the initial compensatory phase of hemorrhage, increased baroreflex gain between blood pressure and SNA would lead to an increase in power at 0.3 Hz; however, once blood pressure had begun to fall (from the 9th min) and the kidney vasculature was under a moderate level of vasoconstriction, it is possible that the gain between SNA and the vasculature was reduced, thus diminishing the strength of the 0.3-Hz oscillation, independent of arterial baroreflex control over SNA.

Several recent studies have begun to explore the possibility of measuring the 0.1-Hz oscillation in skin blood flow as an index of sympathetic activity or baroreflex gain (5, 27). Our results do not negate this approach. However, it is suggested that changes in the strength of this oscillation in skin blood flow are unlikely to be caused by SNA directed solely toward the skin vasculature, but such changes are more likely to reflect the effect of SNA to organs that are strongly baroreceptor related, i.e., the kidney. As a result, any change in the strength of the oscillation in the skin blood flow would be more likely to be driven by the oscillation in blood pressure in a direct pressure-flow relationship rather than through changes in vascular resistance.

We used hemorrhage as a simple technique to induce an increase in SNA. The advantage of this approach is that, in its initial phase, it has previously been shown to cause an increase in mean SNA to multiple target organs, not just to the kidney (19). Thus the absence of any significant increase in blood pressure variability in the renal denervated animals suggests that the changes in SNA to other organs did not cause an oscillation in blood flow to those organs and thus did not contribute significantly to the oscillation at 0.3 Hz in blood pressure. We previously reported changes in the variability of renal SNA and its effect on renal blood flow during hemorrhage (22). We have presented those results from the present series of animals only where it is relevant for clarity. Previously, however, we made no analysis of MAP variability between renal nerve intact and denervated animals. We propose that this analysis (both wavelet and spectral analysis) and its interpretation provides novel insight into circulatory control. We undertook wavelet analysis because it allows one to follow the variations in the oscillations continuously throughout hemorrhage without the need to conduct spectral analysis over set periods of time. This is particularly useful if one wants to determine the precise onset of an oscillation. This analysis helped us to identify a slow frequency oscillation <0.25 Hz developing during the later phase of hemorrhage as blood pressure began to fall. Because this occurred in both intact and denervated animals, it is not likely to rely on renal SNA. Previously, we found that the renal vasculature displays an inherent ability to resonate between 0.1 and 0.2 Hz (23). We suggested that this was a property of the vasculature that was under both active and passive control. We showed that nitric oxide was likely to buffer this ability, because blockade of endogenous nitric oxide led to an increased ability to oscillate at 0.16 Hz. It is possible that changes in other mediators of vascular tone, such as angiotensin II, also play a role in its occurrence.

One factor that may limit the implication of our results is the possibility that the effect observed is confined to the sympathetic response occurring during hemorrhage. However, we suggest this may not be the case. Our previous research established that hypoxia in conscious rabbits results in an increase in the strength of oscillations in renal blood flow at 0.3 Hz, an effect ablated by prior renal denervation (17). If SNA to other beds had also induced a cycle of vasoconstriction and dilation at 0.3 Hz, then we would have expected there to be little difference between intact and renal denervated rabbits because the kidney would have still shown an oscillation at 0.3 Hz due to a direct pressure-flow relationship. In addition, examination of the data from the study by Janssen et al. (Table 2 in Ref. 17) indicates that the increase in the strength of the 0.3-Hz oscillation in blood pressure during hypoxia was less in renal denervated rabbits, although the effect was not specifically analyzed.

It has been proposed that measurement of blood pressure variability in humans at 0.1 Hz can be used as an index of mean SNA levels and/or baroreflex gain (4, 21). The results of the present study indicate that such measurements may not reflect generalized cardiovascular control but rather neural control of the renal vasculature under some stimuli. In the case of hemorrhage (and possibly other interventions), the increase in SNA triggers a special pattern of MAP variability for which neural control of a particular vascular bed, the renal vasculature, appears to be necessary. In general, the increase in power at one spectral peak should not be thought of in terms of a global oscillation but, rather, may involve underlying dynamics between different vascular beds.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by the NZ/USA Co-operative Science Programme and the Marsden Fund of New Zealand.


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. C. Malpas, Circulatory Control Laboratory, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand (E-mail: s.malpas{at}auckland.ac.nz).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 20 December 1999; accepted in final form 20 March 2000.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Ando, SI, Dajani HR, and Floras JS. Frequency domain characteristics of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure and healthy humans. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 273: R205-R212, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Bendle, RD, Malpas SC, and Head GA. Role of endogenous angiotensin II on sympathetic reflexes in conscious rabbits. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 272: R1816-R1825, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Berger, RD, Saul JP, and Cohen RJ. Transfer function analysis of autonomic regulation. I. Canine atrial rate response. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 256: H142-H152, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Bernardi, L, Leuzzi S, Radaelli A, Passino C, Johnston JA, and Sleight P. Low-frequency spontaneous fluctuations of R-R interval and blood pressure in conscious humans: a baroreceptor or central phenomenon? Clin Sci (Colch) 87: 649-654, 1994[Medline].

5.   Bernardi, L, Radaelli A, Solda PL, Coats AJS, Reeder M, Calciati A, Garrard CS, and Sleight P. Autonomic control of skin microvessels: assessment by power spectrum of photoplethysmographic waves. Clin Sci (Colch) 90: 345-355, 1996[Medline].

6.   Bertram, D, Barres C, Cuisinaud G, and Julien C. The arterial baroreceptor reflex of the rat exhibits positive feedback properties at the frequency of Mayer waves. J Physiol (Lond) 513: 251-261, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Brown, DR, Brown LV, Patwardhan A, and Randall DC. Sympathetic activity and blood pressure are tightly coupled at 0.4 Hz in conscious rats. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 267: R1378-R1384, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Burgess, DE, Hundley JC, Li SG, Randall DC, and Brown DR. First-order differential-delay equation for the baroreflex predicts the 0.4-Hz blood pressure rhythm in rats. Am J Physiol 42: R1878-R1884, 1997.

9.   Castellano, M, Rizzoni D, Beschi M, Muiesan ML, Porteri E, Bettoni G, Salvetti M, Cinelli A, Zulli R, and Agabitirosei E. Relationship between sympathetic nervous system activity, baroreflex and cardiovascular effects after acute nitric oxide synthesis inhibition in humans. J Hypertens 13: 1153-1161, 1995[ISI][Medline].

10.  Daubechies I. Ten lectures on wavelets. Soc Industrial Appl Math : 357, 1992.

11.   DeBoer, R, Karemaker J, and Strackee J. Hemodynamic fluctuations and baroreflex sensitivity in humans: a beat-to-beat model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 253: H680-H689, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Delius, W, Hagbarth-E K, Hongbell A, and Wallin B. Maneuvres affecting sympathetic outflow in human skin nerves. Acta Physiol Scand 84: 177-186, 1972[ISI][Medline].

13.   Dorward, PK, Burke SL, Jänig W, and Cassell J. Reflex responses to baroreceptor, chemoreceptor and nociceptor inputs in single renal sympathetic neurones in the rabbit and the effects of anaesthesia on them. J Auton Nerv Syst 18: 39-54, 1987[ISI][Medline].

14.   Dorward, PK, Riedel W, Burke SL, Gipps J, and Korner PI. The renal sympathetic baroreflex in the rabbit. Arterial and cardiac baroreceptor influences, resetting, and effect of anesthesia. Circ Res 57: 618-633, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Evans, RG, Hayes IP, and Ludbrook J. Does the haemodynamic response to acute central hypovolaemia depend on the rate of fall of cardiac output. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 19: 657-661, 1992[ISI][Medline].

16.   Ivanov, PC, Rosenblum MG, Peng C-K, Mietus J, Havlin S, Stanley HE, and Goldberger AL. Scaling behavior of heartbeat intervals obtained by wavelet-based time-series analysis. Nature 383: 323-327, 1996[Medline].

17.   Janssen, BJA, Malpas SC, Burke SL, and Head GA. Frequency-dependent modulation of renal blood flow by renal nerve activity in conscious rabbits. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 273: R597-R608, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Korner, PI, Badoer E, and Head GA. Cardiovascular role of the major noradrenergic cell groups in the rabbit: analysis based on 6-hydroxydopamine-induced transmitter release. Brain Res 435: 258-272, 1987[ISI][Medline].

19.   Koyama, S, Sawano F, Matsuda Y, Saeki Y, Shibamoto T, Hayashi T, Matsubayashi Y, and Kawamoto M. Spatial and temporal differing control of sympathetic activities during hemorrhage. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 262: R579-R585, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Madwed, J, Albrecht P, Mark R, and Cohen R. Low-frequency oscillations in arterial pressure and heart rate: a simple computer model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 256: H1573-H1579, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Malliani, A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, and Cerutti S. Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation 84: 482-492, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Malpas, SC, Evans RG, Head GA, and Lukoshkova EV. Contribution of renal nerves to renal blood flow variability during hemorrhage. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 274: R1283-R1294, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Malpas, SC, Hore TA, Navakatykyan M, Lukoshkova EV, Nguang SK, and Austin PC. Resonance in the renal vasculature evoked by activation of the sympathetic nerves. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 276: R1311-R1319, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Ninomiya, I, and Fujita S. Reflex effects of thermal stimulation on sympathetic nerve activity to skin and kidney. Am J Physiol 230: 271-278, 1976.

25.   Ninomiya, I, Nightmare N, and Irisawa H. Sympathetic nerve activity to spleen, kidney, and heart in response to baroreceptor input. Am J Physiol 221: 1346-1351, 1971.

26.   Nishimaru, N. Comparison of gastric and renal nerve activity. Am J Physiol 220: 1303-1308, 1971.

27.   Radaelli, A, Bernardi L, Valle F, Leuzzi S, Salvucci F, Pedrotti L, Marchesi E, Finardi G, and Sleight P. Cardiovascular autonomic modulation in essential hypertension. Effect of tilting. Hypertension 24: 556-563, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Shirai, M, Matsukawa K, Nishiura N, and Ninomiya I. Effects of baroreceptor reflex on efferent pulmonary sympathetic nerve activity in anesthetized cat. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 268: R1078-R1083, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   Sleight, P, Larovere MT, Mortara A, Pinna G, Maestri R, Leuzzi S, Bianchini B, Tavazzi L, and Bernardi L. Physiology and pathophysiology of heart rate and blood pressure variability in humans: is power spectral analysis largely an index of baroreflex gain? Clin Sci (Colch) 88: 103-109, 1995[Medline].

30.   Stauss, HM, Persson PB, Johnson AK, and Kregel KC. Frequency-response characteristics of autonomic nervous system function in conscious rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 273: H786-H795, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31.   Stauss, HM, Stegmann JU, Persson PB, and Habler HJ. Frequency response characteristics of sympathetic transmission to skin vascular smooth muscles in rats. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 277: R591-R600, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

32.   Torrence, C, and Compo GP. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79: 61-78, 1998.

33.   Vissing, SF, Scherrer U, and Victor RG. Stimulation of skin sympathetic nerve discharge by central command. Differential control of sympathetic outflow to skin and skeletal muscle during static exercise. Circ Res 69: 228-238, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

34.   Wessling, KH, and Settels JJ. Baromodulation explains short term blood-pressure variability. In: Psychophysiology of Cardiovascular Control, edited by Orlebeke JF, Mulder J, and VanDoornen LPJ. New York: Plenum, 1985, p. 69-97.


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279(3):H1299-H1306
0363-6135/00 $5.00 Copyright © 2000 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
T. Zhang, Z. Yang, and J. H. Coote
Autonomic Neuroscience: Cross-sample entropy statistic as a measure of complexity and regularity of renal sympathetic nerve activity in the rat
Exp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 92(4): 659 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. C. Malpas, R. Ramchandra, S.-J. Guild, D. M. Budgett, and C. J. Barrett
Baroreflex mechanisms regulating mean level of SNA differ from those regulating the timing and entrainment of the sympathetic discharges in rabbits
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): R400 - R409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. Iliescu, L. L. Yanes, W. Bell, T. Dwyer, O. C. Baltatu, and J. F. Reckelhoff
Role of the renal nerves in blood pressure in male and female SHR
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): R341 - R344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
D. C. Randall, F. H. Wilbur, and T. J. Burkholder
Two models for an effective undergraduate research experience in physiology and other natural sciences
Advan Physiol Educ, June 1, 2004; 28(2): 68 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
B. N. Van Vliet, F. Belforti, and J.-P. Montani
Baroreflex stabilization of the double (pressure-rate) product at 0.05 Hz in conscious rabbits
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): R1746 - R1753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. C. Malpas
Neural influences on cardiovascular variability: possibilities and pitfalls
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): H6 - H20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. V. Ringwood and S. C. Malpas
Slow oscillations in blood pressure via a nonlinear feedback model
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2001; 280(4): R1105 - R1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malpas, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malpas, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, D. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online