|
|
||||||||
1 Circulatory Control Laboratory, Department of Physiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; and 2 Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0084
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blood pressure contains a distinct
low-frequency oscillation often termed the Mayer wave. This oscillation
is caused by the action of the sympathetic nervous system on the
vasculature and results from time delays in the baroreflex feedback
loop for the control of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in response to
changes in blood pressure. In this study, we used bilateral renal
denervation to test the hypothesis that it is SNA to the kidney that
contributes a large portion of the vascular resistance associated with
changes in the strength of the slow oscillation in blood pressure. In conscious rabbits, SNA and blood pressure were measured during hemorrhage (blood withdrawal at 1.35 ml · min
1 · kg
1 for 20 min). Spectral analysis identified a strong increase in power at 0.3 Hz
in SNA and blood pressure in the initial compensatory phase of
hemorrhage before blood pressure started to fall. However, in a
separate group of renal denervated rabbits, although the power of the
0.3-Hz oscillation under control conditions in blood pressure was
similar, it was not altered during hemorrhage. Wavelet analysis
revealed the development of low-frequency oscillations at 0.1 Hz in
both intact and denervated animals. In conclusion, we propose that
changes in the strength of the oscillation at 0.3 Hz in arterial
pressure during hemorrhage are primarily mediated by sympathetic
activity directed to the kidney.
conscious rabbit; sympathetic nervous system; spectral analysis; renal denervation
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED that blood pressure in humans contains a distinct oscillation at 0.1 Hz that is often referred to as the Mayer wave (21, 29). Experiments in a variety of animal models have shown that this oscillation is caused by the action of the sympathetic nervous system on the vasculature. Although the oscillation in blood pressure is shifted to 0.4 Hz in the rat (7) and to 0.3 Hz in the rabbit (17), changes in the strength of this oscillation may reflect changes in the mean level of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) or baroreflex control of SNA, raising the possibility that measurement of the strength of this oscillation may be used as a diagnostic measure of neural control of the cardiovascular system in humans (1, 9, 21).
Current evidence favors the concept of time delays and lags in the baroreflex loop as the origin for the 0.1-Hz oscillation in blood pressure (4, 6, 8, 11, 20, 34). In this model, a change in blood pressure is sensed by the arterial baroreceptors, and the afferent signal to the central nervous system is altered. Subsequently, the mean SNA level is altered, which in turn changes vascular tone in the target organ. Fundamental to this model is that the combination of a series of time delays means that the input change in blood pressure results in an output change in vascular resistance that is slightly phase shifted, and instead of buffering the initial change in blood pressure, it leads to the development of its own change in blood pressure. It is generally thought that the oscillation in blood pressure results from global changes in SNA. However, it is often overlooked that the pattern of SNA to various target organs is not uniform and not always modulated by baroreceptors (24-26), raising the possibility that it is SNA to a few key organs that dominates in the production of the 0.1-Hz oscillation in blood pressure.
In the present study, we used bilateral renal denervation to test the hypothesis that it is SNA to the kidney that contributes a large portion of the vascular resistance associated with changes in the power of the slow oscillation (0.3 Hz in the rabbit) in blood pressure during hemorrhage. SNA and blood pressure were measured in conscious rabbits during hemorrhage, which, as we have previously established (22), produces an increase in the strength of the oscillation at 0.3 Hz in renal SNA.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal preparation. Experiments were performed on rabbits (weight 2.5-3.1 kg, n = 14) that underwent surgery, at least 7 days before the experiment, for implantation of a recording electrode around the left renal sympathetic nerve. With the rabbits under halothane anesthesia, the left renal nerve was exposed by a retroperitoneal approach. With the use of an operating microscope, an intact nerve was fed through a coiled electrode (14). The electrode was held in place and insulated from the surrounding tissue by Wacker Sil-Gel (Wacker-Chemie, Munich, Germany). The other end of the electrode was tunneled under the skin for later retrieval on the day of the experiment. In a separate group of seven animals, instead of implantation of a renal electrode, bilateral renal denervation was performed. All animals also had a Silastic catheter (inner diameter 0.86 mm) inserted into the superior vena cava via the right jugular vein during this surgery for withdrawal of blood. This catheter was filled with heparin (1,000 IU/ml) with the other end sealed and was placed under the skin for retrieval on the day of the experiment.
Experimental protocol.
On the day of the experiment, catheters were inserted in a central ear
artery for measurement of arterial pressure. The ends of the renal
electrode and venous catheter were retrieved from under the skin under
local anesthesia. SNA was amplified, filtered between 50 and 5,000 Hz,
full-wave rectified, and integrated by using a low-pass filter with a
time constant of 20 ms. This integrated SNA signal and arterial
pressure were continuously recorded throughout the experiment and were
sampled at 1,000 Hz by using an analog-to-digital data acquisition card
(National Instruments, Austin, TX). Calibrated signals were displayed
on a computer screen and saved to disk with the use of a program
written in the LabVIEW graphic programming language (National
Instruments). After the preparatory procedures were completed, rabbits
were left for 60 min before the experimental protocol commenced.
Animals were given 1,000 IU in 2 ml of heparin via the chronically
indwelling superior vena cava catheter. After a 20-min period of
control recording, blood was withdrawn with the use of a constant
withdrawal pump at a rate of 1.35 ml · kg
1 · min
1 for 20 min.
This rate is equivalent to 3% of blood volume per minute
(15).
Data processing. The fluctuations in blood pressure and SNA were investigated in the frequency domain with the use of spectral analysis techniques. Although these variables display oscillations at frequencies >2 Hz, such as those occurring with each cardiac cycle, this has already been described in some detail (17) and was not the focus of the present study. Analysis of oscillations at frequencies <2 Hz was performed as previously described (22). Briefly, all beat-to-beat signals were replayed on screen for visual inspection, and data segments with artifacts caused by obstruction of the arterial catheter or movement were eliminated. The 20-min hemorrhage period was divided into sections of 5 min for analysis along with the 20-min prehemorrhage control period. Because equidistantly sampled data are required for a fast Fourier transform, the beat-to-beat data segments were resampled at 10.24 Hz and partitioned into segments of 100 s (1024 points) in length, overlapping by 50 s. Each segment was subjected to detrending to remove the underlying mean value and slow changes in the parameters and was then subjected to an overlapped fast Fourier transform according to methods described by Berger et al. (3). The resulting frequency resolution was 0.01 Hz.
To further clarify changes in the various rhythms during hemorrhage, we also undertook band-pass filtering and wavelet analysis. Wavelet analysis allows one to follow the variations in the oscillations continuously throughout hemorrhage without the need to conduct spectral analysis over set periods of time. Wavelet analysis complements the more standard spectral analysis by giving a picture of fluctuations as a function of both frequency and time. Wavelet analysis is particularly useful in problems like this one, where the dynamics contain several different frequency scales. To construct a filter, we multiplied the Fourier transform of a time series
(f) by a smooth notch function H(f) built from
hyperbolic tangent functions, namely
|
|
= 10
f is the smoothing
interval and f1 and f2
give the frequency range of the filter. To obtain the filtered time series, one takes the inverse Fourier transform of the product. The
wavelet transform
is essentially a band-pass filter
that allows the study of the signal on any chosen scale s
(10). The continuous wavelet transform of a time series
x(t) is defined as
|
has a width on the order of the
scale s and is centered at time t. We used the
Mexican hat wavelet, which is the second derivative of a Gaussian
function. For this wavelet, there is a conversion factor of
approximately four between the scale s and the corresponding
Fourier period (32). Thus, by applying a wavelet with a
scale s = 0.5 to a time series, one picks out rhythms
that have a period of ~2 s. Using a standard Fourier transform
routine, one can efficiently calculate the convolution integral in the
frequency domain and then take the inverse Fourier transform to find
the wavelet transform in the time domain. To compute the amplitudes of
the wavelet transform, we used an analytic signal approach
(16). Let x(t) represent an
arbitrary signal. The analytic signal, a complex function of time, is
defined by z(t)
x(t) + i · y(t), where
y(t) is the conjugate time series or Hilbert
transform of x(t). The amplitude A(t) is then defined as
A(t)
. In the frequency domain,
the Hilbert transform simply multiplies the positive frequency Fourier
modes by i and the negative frequency modes by
i. To visualize the wavelet transform of a time series, we
made contour plots of the amplitude squared as a function of frequency
and time.
Statistical analysis. With regard to the steady-state data, the influence of hemorrhage on the levels of each variable during hemorrhage was tested by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the factors being neural status (intact or denervated) and time (1-min averages). The magnitudes of the power in different frequency bands before and during hemorrhage were compared in the intact and denervated groups by a split-plot ANOVA as described previously (18). The total sums of squares (SS) were partitioned into between-groups mean squares (state of innervation), with further partitioning of the SS of each group into between-animal mean squares. The significance of the difference between groups was assessed from the variance ratio F = between-groups mean square/within-groups mean square.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Steady-state changes during hemorrhage. The steady-state changes during hemorrhage have been reported in detail in our previous study, which followed the same hemorrhage protocol (22). Briefly, therefore, for the present group of renal nerve intact animals, hemorrhage was associated with a profound increase in SNA. After 5 min of blood withdrawal, the increase was 11 ± 13% (between-animal SE of mean) above control levels, at 10 min, 17 ± 9%, at 15 min, 90 ± 31%, and by the end of hemorrhage, SNA had reached 210 ± 115% of control levels. Arterial pressure did not significantly decrease until 9-11 min of blood withdrawal and reached 58 ± 4 mmHg after 20 min (control 83 ± 2 mmHg). The blood pressure responses to the withdrawal of blood were not significantly different between intact and denervated animals.
Oscillations in SNA and mean arterial pressure during hemorrhage.
Under control conditions, five of seven animals showed a spectral peak
at ~0.3 Hz in SNA (Figs. 1 and
2). Strong coupling between SNA and
mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) at this frequency was indicated,
because coherence was generally >0.5 (average 0.57 ± 0.13). This
peak in SNA accounted for 22 ± 2% of total spectral power <2
Hz. In MAP, this same frequency band accounted for 14 ± 2% of
total spectral power <2 Hz. This was not significantly different in
renal denervated animals when measured either as a percentage of total
power or as absolute spectral power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main finding of this study was that changes in the slow oscillation in blood pressure (0.3 Hz) occurring during hemorrhage were caused by the specific action of SNA on the renal vasculature. Rabbits in which both kidneys were denervated showed no significant change in the strength of the MAP oscillation at 0.3 Hz during hemorrhage, indicating that neural control of the renal vasculature plays a key role in generating the pattern of oscillations observed in hemorrhage.
It is often overlooked that the pattern of SNA to the various target organs is quite selective. In particular, SNA to the lungs, kidney, and spleen is highly baroreceptor sensitive (25, 28); however, SNA to the skin and gut is only weakly regulated by baroreceptor activity (24-26). With regard to the human, it appears that SNA to the skin is not dissimilar to that in animals, because previous studies have found little evidence of baroreflex modulation of skin SNA (12, 33). The 0.1-Hz oscillation in blood pressure in humans is proposed to result from time delays and lag in the baroreflex loop (8, 11), where a change in blood pressure is sensed by the arterial baroreceptors and the afferent signal to the central nervous system is altered. Subsequently, the mean SNA level is altered, which in turn changes vascular tone in the target organ. Thus, for vascular resistance in any particular organ to contribute to the occurrence of the oscillation, SNA to that organ must be baroreceptor sensitive.
Renal denervated rabbits were able to maintain arterial pressure during hemorrhage to the same extent as renal nerve intact animals. This does not necessarily indicate that the renal nerves do not contribute to the maintenance of arterial pressure during blood loss, because other factors, both hormonal factors and increased SNA to other organs, may compensate. Previously with regard to the kidney, we found that the onset for a reduction in renal blood flow during hemorrhage was delayed if the renal nerves were not present (22). However, this still raises the question that if the mean blood pressure response to hemorrhage was similar, regardless of the presence or absence of renal nerves, then why was the strength of the 0.3-Hz rhythm in blood pressure different? A possible explanation can be found by considering that SNA to a variety of organs contains common components and also components such as the 0.3-Hz oscillation that may be more specific to the kidney. Generalized SNA to the vasculature of many organs contributes largely to the maintenance of a mean level of blood pressure, i.e., the direct current (DC) gain level of blood pressure. Thus SNA to other organs increased in response to hemorrhage and assisted in maintaining blood pressure; however, the results of the present study indicate that this SNA did not contain a strong 0.3-Hz component. It should be noted that the oscillation at 0.3 Hz is a variation around a DC gain level. Given that the 0.3-Hz power is relatively low compared with that of the other frequencies present in renal SNA (between 15 and 20% of total power in the rabbit, with the balance being cardiac and respiratory related; Ref. 17), it is likely that it contributes in only a modest way to the DC gain level of blood pressure. The value of the 0.3-Hz rhythm lies in its indication of neural control of the circulation and the possibility that its analogous frequency in human blood pressure (0.1 Hz) may be used as an index of sympathetic tone/baroreflex control.
Further support for our results can be derived from analysis of the model proposed by DeBoer et al. (11) and further expanded in the rat by Burgess et al. (8). As has been previously noted, the 0.1-Hz oscillation in blood pressure in humans is analogous to 0.3 Hz in rabbits and 0.4 Hz in rats. This species difference can be accounted for by the larger physical distance between arterial baroreceptors and the brain and various target organs in man compared with that in rabbits and rats, which means that conduction times for the afferent and efferent signals will be longer. However, if all organs with sympathetic innervation contributed to the origin of the oscillations in blood pressure in proportion to their percentage of cardiac output, then it is suggested that no clear oscillation would be evident. The slow conduction velocities in postganglionic nerves [0.7 m/s (13)] would mean that SNA to the extremities would reach its target up to 1 s later than the innervation to major organs in the thoracic cavity. This would result in the vasoconstrictor response to the SNA signal being temporally nonuniform, and although there could still be blood pressure variability around this frequency, it is most likely that this would appear as a much wider band of variability than has been observed (e.g., Fig. 2).
Stauss and colleagues (30, 31) recently observed that the frequency-response characteristic of the mesenteric vasculature to SNA was different from that of the skin vasculature in rats. The vasculature delay and lag time is a large component of the feedback loop, which gives rise to the oscillation at 0.4 Hz in the rat (8). If blood flow to organs such as the skin played a significant role in the generation of the oscillation, one could reasonably expect more than one peak in the spectrum of blood pressure. The existence of a single peak between 0.2 and 0.45 Hz in rabbits and rats (e.g., Fig. 2) supports the concept that it is SNA to organs with similar vasculature time delays and frequency response characteristics that gives rise to the oscillation.
If the 0.3-Hz oscillation is caused by baroreflex feedback, the possibility is raised that a number of factors known to alter baroreflex gain may alter the strength of the oscillation at 0.3 Hz. Such factors include increased circulating levels of angiotensin II, which may act via circumventricular organs such as the area postrema to further increase SNA and alter baroreflex gain. Previously, blockade of endogenous angiotensin II in the medulla produced increases in baroreflex gain (2). Thus increases in circulating angiotensin II might be expected to increase the strength of the 0.3-Hz rhythm. Although there is a lack of studies reporting changes in the 0.3-Hz rhythm in response to a variety of stimuli, if the model of baroreflex feedback via the vasculature proves correct, then any treatment, pathology, or stimuli that is known to alter gain, either between SNA and the vasculature or between blood pressure and SNA, could be expected to alter the strength of the 0.3-Hz rhythm in blood pressure. This possibility can be used in the present study to explain why the 0.3-Hz oscillation increased in strength in blood pressure before a change occurred in mean blood pressure and why this oscillation subsequently diminished in the later phase of hemorrhage despite continued increases in mean SNA levels. In the initial compensatory phase of hemorrhage, increased baroreflex gain between blood pressure and SNA would lead to an increase in power at 0.3 Hz; however, once blood pressure had begun to fall (from the 9th min) and the kidney vasculature was under a moderate level of vasoconstriction, it is possible that the gain between SNA and the vasculature was reduced, thus diminishing the strength of the 0.3-Hz oscillation, independent of arterial baroreflex control over SNA.
Several recent studies have begun to explore the possibility of measuring the 0.1-Hz oscillation in skin blood flow as an index of sympathetic activity or baroreflex gain (5, 27). Our results do not negate this approach. However, it is suggested that changes in the strength of this oscillation in skin blood flow are unlikely to be caused by SNA directed solely toward the skin vasculature, but such changes are more likely to reflect the effect of SNA to organs that are strongly baroreceptor related, i.e., the kidney. As a result, any change in the strength of the oscillation in the skin blood flow would be more likely to be driven by the oscillation in blood pressure in a direct pressure-flow relationship rather than through changes in vascular resistance.
We used hemorrhage as a simple technique to induce an increase in SNA. The advantage of this approach is that, in its initial phase, it has previously been shown to cause an increase in mean SNA to multiple target organs, not just to the kidney (19). Thus the absence of any significant increase in blood pressure variability in the renal denervated animals suggests that the changes in SNA to other organs did not cause an oscillation in blood flow to those organs and thus did not contribute significantly to the oscillation at 0.3 Hz in blood pressure. We previously reported changes in the variability of renal SNA and its effect on renal blood flow during hemorrhage (22). We have presented those results from the present series of animals only where it is relevant for clarity. Previously, however, we made no analysis of MAP variability between renal nerve intact and denervated animals. We propose that this analysis (both wavelet and spectral analysis) and its interpretation provides novel insight into circulatory control. We undertook wavelet analysis because it allows one to follow the variations in the oscillations continuously throughout hemorrhage without the need to conduct spectral analysis over set periods of time. This is particularly useful if one wants to determine the precise onset of an oscillation. This analysis helped us to identify a slow frequency oscillation <0.25 Hz developing during the later phase of hemorrhage as blood pressure began to fall. Because this occurred in both intact and denervated animals, it is not likely to rely on renal SNA. Previously, we found that the renal vasculature displays an inherent ability to resonate between 0.1 and 0.2 Hz (23). We suggested that this was a property of the vasculature that was under both active and passive control. We showed that nitric oxide was likely to buffer this ability, because blockade of endogenous nitric oxide led to an increased ability to oscillate at 0.16 Hz. It is possible that changes in other mediators of vascular tone, such as angiotensin II, also play a role in its occurrence.
One factor that may limit the implication of our results is the possibility that the effect observed is confined to the sympathetic response occurring during hemorrhage. However, we suggest this may not be the case. Our previous research established that hypoxia in conscious rabbits results in an increase in the strength of oscillations in renal blood flow at 0.3 Hz, an effect ablated by prior renal denervation (17). If SNA to other beds had also induced a cycle of vasoconstriction and dilation at 0.3 Hz, then we would have expected there to be little difference between intact and renal denervated rabbits because the kidney would have still shown an oscillation at 0.3 Hz due to a direct pressure-flow relationship. In addition, examination of the data from the study by Janssen et al. (Table 2 in Ref. 17) indicates that the increase in the strength of the 0.3-Hz oscillation in blood pressure during hypoxia was less in renal denervated rabbits, although the effect was not specifically analyzed.
It has been proposed that measurement of blood pressure variability in humans at 0.1 Hz can be used as an index of mean SNA levels and/or baroreflex gain (4, 21). The results of the present study indicate that such measurements may not reflect generalized cardiovascular control but rather neural control of the renal vasculature under some stimuli. In the case of hemorrhage (and possibly other interventions), the increase in SNA triggers a special pattern of MAP variability for which neural control of a particular vascular bed, the renal vasculature, appears to be necessary. In general, the increase in power at one spectral peak should not be thought of in terms of a global oscillation but, rather, may involve underlying dynamics between different vascular beds.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This research was supported by the NZ/USA Co-operative Science Programme and the Marsden Fund of New Zealand.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. C. Malpas, Circulatory Control Laboratory, Dept. of Physiology, Univ. of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand (E-mail: s.malpas{at}auckland.ac.nz).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 20 December 1999; accepted in final form 20 March 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Ando, SI,
Dajani HR,
and
Floras JS.
Frequency domain characteristics of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure and healthy humans.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
273:
R205-R212,
1997
2.
Bendle, RD,
Malpas SC,
and
Head GA.
Role of endogenous angiotensin II on sympathetic reflexes in conscious rabbits.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
272:
R1816-R1825,
1997
3.
Berger, RD,
Saul JP,
and
Cohen RJ.
Transfer function analysis of autonomic regulation. I. Canine atrial rate response.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
256:
H142-H152,
1989
4.
Bernardi, L,
Leuzzi S,
Radaelli A,
Passino C,
Johnston JA,
and
Sleight P.
Low-frequency spontaneous fluctuations of R-R interval and blood pressure in conscious humans: a baroreceptor or central phenomenon?
Clin Sci (Colch)
87:
649-654,
1994[Medline].
5.
Bernardi, L,
Radaelli A,
Solda PL,
Coats AJS,
Reeder M,
Calciati A,
Garrard CS,
and
Sleight P.
Autonomic control of skin microvessels: assessment by power spectrum of photoplethysmographic waves.
Clin Sci (Colch)
90:
345-355,
1996[Medline].
6.
Bertram, D,
Barres C,
Cuisinaud G,
and
Julien C.
The arterial baroreceptor reflex of the rat exhibits positive feedback properties at the frequency of Mayer waves.
J Physiol (Lond)
513:
251-261,
1998
7.
Brown, DR,
Brown LV,
Patwardhan A,
and
Randall DC.
Sympathetic activity and blood pressure are tightly coupled at 0.4 Hz in conscious rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
267:
R1378-R1384,
1994
8.
Burgess, DE,
Hundley JC,
Li SG,
Randall DC,
and
Brown DR.
First-order differential-delay equation for the baroreflex predicts the 0.4-Hz blood pressure rhythm in rats.
Am J Physiol
42:
R1878-R1884,
1997.
9.
Castellano, M,
Rizzoni D,
Beschi M,
Muiesan ML,
Porteri E,
Bettoni G,
Salvetti M,
Cinelli A,
Zulli R,
and
Agabitirosei E.
Relationship between sympathetic nervous system activity, baroreflex and cardiovascular effects after acute nitric oxide synthesis inhibition in humans.
J Hypertens
13:
1153-1161,
1995[ISI][Medline].
10.
Daubechies I. Ten lectures on wavelets. Soc Industrial Appl
Math : 357, 1992.
11.
DeBoer, R,
Karemaker J,
and
Strackee J.
Hemodynamic fluctuations and baroreflex sensitivity in humans: a beat-to-beat model.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
253:
H680-H689,
1987
12.
Delius, W,
Hagbarth-E K,
Hongbell A,
and
Wallin B.
Maneuvres affecting sympathetic outflow in human skin nerves.
Acta Physiol Scand
84:
177-186,
1972[ISI][Medline].
13.
Dorward, PK,
Burke SL,
Jänig W,
and
Cassell J.
Reflex responses to baroreceptor, chemoreceptor and nociceptor inputs in single renal sympathetic neurones in the rabbit and the effects of anaesthesia on them.
J Auton Nerv Syst
18:
39-54,
1987[ISI][Medline].
14.
Dorward, PK,
Riedel W,
Burke SL,
Gipps J,
and
Korner PI.
The renal sympathetic baroreflex in the rabbit. Arterial and cardiac baroreceptor influences, resetting, and effect of anesthesia.
Circ Res
57:
618-633,
1985
15.
Evans, RG,
Hayes IP,
and
Ludbrook J.
Does the haemodynamic response to acute central hypovolaemia depend on the rate of fall of cardiac output.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
19:
657-661,
1992[ISI][Medline].
16.
Ivanov, PC,
Rosenblum MG,
Peng C-K,
Mietus J,
Havlin S,
Stanley HE,
and
Goldberger AL.
Scaling behavior of heartbeat intervals obtained by wavelet-based time-series analysis.
Nature
383:
323-327,
1996[Medline].
17.
Janssen, BJA,
Malpas SC,
Burke SL,
and
Head GA.
Frequency-dependent modulation of renal blood flow by renal nerve activity in conscious rabbits.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
273:
R597-R608,
1997
18.
Korner, PI,
Badoer E,
and
Head GA.
Cardiovascular role of the major noradrenergic cell groups in the rabbit: analysis based on 6-hydroxydopamine-induced transmitter release.
Brain Res
435:
258-272,
1987[ISI][Medline].
19.
Koyama, S,
Sawano F,
Matsuda Y,
Saeki Y,
Shibamoto T,
Hayashi T,
Matsubayashi Y,
and
Kawamoto M.
Spatial and temporal differing control of sympathetic activities during hemorrhage.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
262:
R579-R585,
1992
20.
Madwed, J,
Albrecht P,
Mark R,
and
Cohen R.
Low-frequency oscillations in arterial pressure and heart rate: a simple computer model.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
256:
H1573-H1579,
1989
21.
Malliani, A,
Pagani M,
Lombardi F,
and
Cerutti S.
Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain.
Circulation
84:
482-492,
1991
22.
Malpas, SC,
Evans RG,
Head GA,
and
Lukoshkova EV.
Contribution of renal nerves to renal blood flow variability during hemorrhage.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
274:
R1283-R1294,
1998
23.
Malpas, SC,
Hore TA,
Navakatykyan M,
Lukoshkova EV,
Nguang SK,
and
Austin PC.
Resonance in the renal vasculature evoked by activation of the sympathetic nerves.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
276:
R1311-R1319,
1999
24.
Ninomiya, I,
and
Fujita S.
Reflex effects of thermal stimulation on sympathetic nerve activity to skin and kidney.
Am J Physiol
230:
271-278,
1976.
25.
Ninomiya, I,
Nightmare N,
and
Irisawa H.
Sympathetic nerve activity to spleen, kidney, and heart in response to baroreceptor input.
Am J Physiol
221:
1346-1351,
1971.
26.
Nishimaru, N.
Comparison of gastric and renal nerve activity.
Am J Physiol
220:
1303-1308,
1971.
27.
Radaelli, A,
Bernardi L,
Valle F,
Leuzzi S,
Salvucci F,
Pedrotti L,
Marchesi E,
Finardi G,
and
Sleight P.
Cardiovascular autonomic modulation in essential hypertension. Effect of tilting.
Hypertension
24:
556-563,
1994
28.
Shirai, M,
Matsukawa K,
Nishiura N,
and
Ninomiya I.
Effects of baroreceptor reflex on efferent pulmonary sympathetic nerve activity in anesthetized cat.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
268:
R1078-R1083,
1995
29.
Sleight, P,
Larovere MT,
Mortara A,
Pinna G,
Maestri R,
Leuzzi S,
Bianchini B,
Tavazzi L,
and
Bernardi L.
Physiology and pathophysiology of heart rate and blood pressure variability in humans: is power spectral analysis largely an index of baroreflex gain?
Clin Sci (Colch)
88:
103-109,
1995[Medline].
30.
Stauss, HM,
Persson PB,
Johnson AK,
and
Kregel KC.
Frequency-response characteristics of autonomic nervous system function in conscious rats.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
273:
H786-H795,
1997
31.
Stauss, HM,
Stegmann JU,
Persson PB,
and
Habler HJ.
Frequency response characteristics of sympathetic transmission to skin vascular smooth muscles in rats.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
277:
R591-R600,
1999
32.
Torrence, C,
and
Compo GP.
A practical guide to wavelet analysis.
Bull Am Meteorol Soc
79:
61-78,
1998.
33.
Vissing, SF,
Scherrer U,
and
Victor RG.
Stimulation of skin sympathetic nerve discharge by central command. Differential control of sympathetic outflow to skin and skeletal muscle during static exercise.
Circ Res
69:
228-238,
1991
34.
Wessling, KH,
and
Settels JJ.
Baromodulation explains short term blood-pressure variability.
In: Psychophysiology of Cardiovascular Control, edited by Orlebeke JF,
Mulder J,
and VanDoornen LPJ. New York: Plenum, 1985, p. 69-97.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Zhang, Z. Yang, and J. H. Coote Autonomic Neuroscience: Cross-sample entropy statistic as a measure of complexity and regularity of renal sympathetic nerve activity in the rat Exp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 92(4): 659 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Malpas, R. Ramchandra, S.-J. Guild, D. M. Budgett, and C. J. Barrett Baroreflex mechanisms regulating mean level of SNA differ from those regulating the timing and entrainment of the sympathetic discharges in rabbits Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): R400 - R409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Iliescu, L. L. Yanes, W. Bell, T. Dwyer, O. C. Baltatu, and J. F. Reckelhoff Role of the renal nerves in blood pressure in male and female SHR Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): R341 - R344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Randall, F. H. Wilbur, and T. J. Burkholder Two models for an effective undergraduate research experience in physiology and other natural sciences Advan Physiol Educ, June 1, 2004; 28(2): 68 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. N. Van Vliet, F. Belforti, and J.-P. Montani Baroreflex stabilization of the double (pressure-rate) product at 0.05 Hz in conscious rabbits Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): R1746 - R1753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Malpas Neural influences on cardiovascular variability: possibilities and pitfalls Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): H6 - H20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Ringwood and S. C. Malpas Slow oscillations in blood pressure via a nonlinear feedback model Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2001; 280(4): R1105 - R1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |