AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H925-H928, 2001;
0363-6135/01 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (66)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stirrat, A.
Right arrow Articles by MacLean, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stirrat, A.
Right arrow Articles by MacLean, M. R.
Vol. 280, Issue 2, H925-H928, February 2001

RAPID COMMUNICATION
Potent vasodilator responses to human urotensin-II in human pulmonary and abdominal resistance arteries

Alison Stirrat2, Marie Gallagher2, Stephen A. Douglas1, Eliot H. Ohlstein1, Colin Berry3, A. Kirk4, M. Richardson5, and Margaret R. MacLean2

1 Department of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406-0939; 2 Division of Neuroscience and Biomedical Systems, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ; and 3 Departments of Cardiology, 4 Cardiothoracic Surgery, and 5 Surgery, Glasgow Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT, United Kingdom


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The peptide human urotensin-II (hUT-II) and its receptor have recently been cloned. The vascular function of this peptide in humans, however, has yet to be determined. Vasoconstrictor and vasodilator responses to hUT-II were investigated in human small muscular pulmonary arteries [~170 µm internal diameter (ID)] and human abdominal resistance arteries (~200 µm ID). Vasodilator responses were investigated in endothelin-1 (3 nM) precontracted vessels and, in the small pulmonary vessels, compared with the known vasodilators adrenomedullin, sodium nitroprusside, and acetylcholine. In human small pulmonary arteries, hUT-II did not induce vasoconstriction but was a potent vasodilator [-log M concentration causing 50% of the maximum vasodilator effect (pIC50) 10.4 ± 0.5; percentage of reduction in tone (Emax) 81 ± 8% (vs. 23 ± 11% in time controls), n = 5]. The order of potency for vasodilation was human urotensin-II = adrenomedullin (pIC50 10.1 ± 0.4, n = 6) > sodium nitroprusside (pIC50 7.4 ± 0.2, n = 6) = acetylcholine (pIC50 6.8 ± 0.3, n = 6). In human abdominal arteries, hUT-II did not induce vasoconstriction but was a potent vasodilator [pIC50 10.3 ± 0.7; Emax 96 ± 8% (vs. 43 ± 16% in time controls), n = 4]. This is the first report that hUT-II is a potent vasodilator but not a vasoconstrictor of human small pulmonary arteries and systemic resistance arteries.

vasoconstriction; adrenomedullin; sodium nitroprusside; acetylcholine; vasodilators


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

HUMAN UROTENSIN-II (hU-II) is a recently cloned human cyclic peptide and present in human cardiac tissue and arteries. Rat, mouse, and porcine isoforms of U-II have also recently been cloned (2, 10). A receptor for hU-II has very recently been described in humans, and hU-II mediates vasoconstriction in many arteries from nonhuman primates, including coronary, large pulmonary, and carotid arteries (1). It is a magnitude more potent than endothelin-1 (ET-1) and, hence, the most potent mammalian vasoconstrictor identified so far. Ames et al. (1) also noted that low doses of hU-II decrease total peripheral resistance in the anesthetised monkey, and fish U-II has been shown to vasodilate isolated rat aortas (3).

We recently reported that hU-II is a potent vasoconstrictor in rat main pulmonary arteries. It did not however, constrict human small muscular pulmonary arteries (6). However, when these vessels were pretreated with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor Nomega -nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 3 of 10 vessels did contract to hU-II. Here, we investigated the possibility that hU-II induces vasodilation, which would obscure any vasoconstrictor response. We have examined the ability of hU-II to relax preconstricted human small muscular pulmonary arteries and compared responses with the following known vasodilators: adrenomedullin (ADM), sodium nitroprusside (SNP), and acetylcholine (ACh). We subsequently examined vasodilator responses to hU-II in human abdominal resistance arteries.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protocols were approved by the West Ethics Committee, and patients gave written informed consent.

Macroscopically normal small muscular pulmonary arteries [~170 µm internal diameter (ID)] were dissected from lung tissue removed during bronchial carcinoma removal (male patients, age range 35-75). Human abdominal resistance arteries (~200 µm ID) were dissected from abdominal adipose tissue biopsies obtained from otherwise healthy, male patients (age range 35-75) undergoing hernia repair. All vessels were isolated and mounted as ring preparations in isometric wire myographs. Tension was applied to vessels to give a transmural pressure equivalent to ~12-16 mmHg (small pulmonary arteries) or 90 mmHg (systemic arteries) to simulate in vivo pressures.

All vessels were bathed in Krebs-buffer solution at 37°C with a constant supply of 16% O2-5% CO2-balance N2 to mimic in vivo PO2 values (bath PO2 ~ 120 mmHg). All vessels have walls <1.5 µm thick, and, hence, tissue diffusional problems are not encountered with active bubbling.

Experimental protocols. After 45 min of equilibration, the response to 50 mM KCl was determined. Vessels were constricted with 0.1 µM 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), and 1 µM ACh was added to test for endothelial integrity. Protocols were subsequently applied to study either vasoconstrictor or vasodilator activity.

Vasoconstrictor responses. Cumulative concentration-response curves (CCRCs) were constructed to hU-II (1 pM-0.1 µM). Concentrations were administered every 3 min (with 11 concentrations giving a total time course of ~33 min).

Vasodilator responses. Vessels were preconstricted with 3 nM ET-1. CCRCs were constructed to hU-II (1 pM-0.1 µM). In the small pulmonary arteries, responses were also compared with those to ACh (1 nM-10 µM), SNP (10 nM-10 µM), and ADM (1 pM-0.1 µM). Stable responses were allowed to develop. Maximum responses to ADM and hU-II were stable after 5-6 min, and, hence, concentrations were administered every 6-7 min (with 11 concentrations giving a total time course of ~70-80 min). Maximum responses to ACh and SNP were achieved after 3-4 min, and concentrations were administered every 4-5 min (with 9 concentrations, giving a total time course of ~36-45 min). From each lung or abdominal vessel, adjacent vessels were set up and preconstricted with ET-1, but no vasodilator was subsequently added; these served as time controls.

Statistical analysis of data. All responses to hU-II were calculated as both a percentage of the initial response to 3 nM ET-1 to calculate the percentage of reduction in tone induced (Emax) and as a percentage of the maximum response achieved. The -log M concentration causing 50% of the maximum vasodilator effect in each vessel (pIC50) values were subsequently calculated from each individual experiment by British Broadcasting Corporation microcomputer graphical interpolation. Initial responses to ACh were assessed as a percentage of the preconstriction to 5-HT. Statistical comparisons of unpaired data sets were carried out by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multicomparisons test, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Comparisons were also made with time control data obtained over the same periods of time as the experimental procedures were conducted.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Human small muscular pulmonary arteries (n = 5). The vasoconstrictor response to 50 mM KCl was 1.08 ± 0.22 mN. The vasoconstrictor response to 0.1 µM 5-HT was 65 ± 9% of the response to 50 mM KCl. ACh (1 µM) caused a 61 ± 10% reduction in 5-HT-induced tone. The vasoconstriction to 3 nM ET-1 was 171 ± 37% of the response to 50 mM KCl. The internal diameter (ID) for the hU-II-treated vessels was 163 ± 15 µm, and the ID for the time controls was 184 ± 15 µm.

hU-II did not induce vasoconstriction in any vessel (n = 10). It did, however, induce a vasodilation (Fig. 1). The pIC50 value for the response to hU-II was 10.4 ± 0.5. Figure 1 and Table 1 compare the responses to hU-II with other known vasodilators. hU-II was equipotent with ADM, and it can be seen that both are extremely potent vasodilators of small pulmonary arteries. The order of potency was hU-II = ADM > SNP = ACh. For ADM, SNP, and ACh, all responses were significantly different from time controls, and the maximum fall off in tone with time was not significantly different among groups: ADM 20 ± 6%, SNP 24 ± 7%, and ACh 21 ± 6%. There were no significant differences in the maximum vasodilation achieved at the concentration ranges used. It should be noted that higher concentrations were used in limited experiments for all vasodilators to ensure that a maximum response had been achieved.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Vasodilator responses in human pulmonary resistance arteries. Data are expressed as a percentage of the response to endothelin 1 (ET-1)-induced precontraction and shown as means ± SE. n, Number of patients.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Vasodilator effect of hUT-II in human small pulmonary arteries and human systemic abdominal resistance arteries: comparison with other vasodilators in the pulmonary arteries

Human abdominal resistance vessels (n = 4). The vasoconstrictor response to 50 mM KCl was 3.15 ± 1.22 mN. The vasoconstrictor response to 0.1 µM 5-HT was 67 ± 18% of the response to 50 mM KCl. ACh (1 µM) caused a 56 ± 9% reduction in 5-HT-induced tone. The vasoconstriction to 3 nM ET-1 was 146 ± 26% of the response to 50 mM KCl. The ID for the hU-II-treated vessels was 191 ± 23 µm, and the ID for the time controls was 194 ± 27 µm.

hU-II did not induce a vasoconstriction in any vessels tested. In light of the results in the small pulmonary arteries, we therefore investigated vasodilator responses. hU-II induced a concentration-dependent vasodilation. The pIC50 value for the response to hU-II was 10.3 ± 0.7. The maximum vasodilation achieved was 94 ± 6% and not significantly different from that to hU-II in the small pulmonary arteries (Fig. 2 and Table 1).


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Vasodilator responses to human urotensin-II in human pulmonary and abdominal resistance arteries. Time control data are also shown and illustrate the fall in vascular tone in adjacent vessel sections from the same patients set up in parallel with those to which human urotensin-II was added. Data are expressed as a percentage of the response to ET-1-induced precontraction and shown as means ± SE.

Time controls. Figure 2 illustrates the fall off in vascular tone during the time course of each experiment. This was significantly different from the hU-II response data at every time point of hU-II administration [for both small pulmonary and abdominal resistance arteries, P < 0.05 (response to 1 pM hU-II vs. time control) to P < 0.001 (response to 0.1 µM hU-II vs. time control)].


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This is the first report that hU-II is a potent vasodilator of human small pulmonary and systemic resistance vessels. Less profound vasodilator responses to fish U-II in the rat aorta have been reported (3). hU-II has been shown to be a potent vasoconstrictor in other species (1). Indeed, we have previously shown that hU-II is a potent vasoconstrictor in the rat main pulmonary artery, being some four times more potent than ET-1 (6). hU-II did not, however, constrict smaller pulmonary arteries of the rat nor did it contract human small pulmonary arteries under normal conditions, as verified here. ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor of human pulmonary resistance arteries having a -log M concentration giving 50% of maximum response (pEC50) value of 8.1-8.3 (7, 8). The current results suggest, therefore, that hU-II and ET-1, at least in the human circulation, may play differential roles in the regulation of vascular tone and resistance.

The results presented here suggest that any vasoconstrictor effect of hU-II in the small pulmonary and abdominal arteries may be masked by the potent vasodilator effects of hU-II. The "anatomically diverse" contractile profile of hU-II is consistent with previous observations made in the rat. In the rat, the vasoconstrictor activity of hU-II is limited to the thoracic aorta, and hU-II has no effect on the rat abdominal aorta or femoral and renal arteries (1).

hU-II has been shown to constrict all nonhuman primate arteries tested to date, although the vessels studied by Ames et al. in 1999 (1) were all large conduit arteries. The current study may suggest, however, that there is species variation in responses to hU-II and that vasodilator responses may predominate in certain human resistance arteries.

The pEC50 for the contractile response to hU-II ranges from 8.55 (in the rat pulmonary artery; see Ref. 6) to 9-9.4 (in nonhuman primate arteries; see Ref. 1). As the pIC50 for the vasodilator effect observed here is 10.2-10.4, this may suggest that more than one receptor subtype exists for hU-II, but this requires molecular confirmation. Parallels can be drawn with the pharmacology of ET-1, which is both a potent vasoconstrictor and a vasodilator, activating two receptor subtypes (4).

We have previously published (5a) preliminary studies indicating that ADM is an extremely potent vasodilator in the human small pulmonary artery compared with resistance vessels obtained from buttock biopsies where the pIC50 is only ~7.7. Plasma ADM levels range from ~5 pM in normal subjects to 10-14 pM in patients with cardiovascular and pulmonary arterial disease (5, 9, 11, 12). The results presented here indicate that these concentration will have a direct effect on pulmonary resistance arteries to produce vasodilation. ADM is likely, therefore, to regulate pulmonary vascular tone, and increased levels in cardiopulmonary disease would provide a compensatory vasodilator mechanism. hU-II (3 nmol/kg iv) has been shown to induce significant increases in total peripheral resistance in the monkey (1).

We previously considered that ADM was probably the most potent small pulmonary artery vasodilator (5a), but here we show that hU-II is equipotent to ADM and also equipotent in the human abdominal resistance artery. Both are magnitudes more potent than SNP and ACh, which act through endothelium-independent and -dependent mechanisms, respectively. The mechanism of hU-II and ADM-induced vasodilation in human resistance vessels is still unclear and under investigation.

In conclusion, therefore, this is the first report to suggest that hU-II may be a potent vasodilator of human small pulmonary arteries and systemic resistance arteries being devoid of contractile activity.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust, United Kingdom.


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. R. MacLean, Div. of Neuroscience and Biomedical Systems, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, West Medical Bldg., Glasgow Univ., Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK (E-mail: M.MacLean{at}bio.gla.ac.uk).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 8 September 2000; accepted in final form 18 October 2000.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Ames, RS, Sarau HM, Chambers JK, Willette RN, Aiyar NV, Romanic AM, Louden CS, Foley JJ, Sauermelch CF, Coatney RW, Ao Z, Disa J, Holmes SD, Stadel JM, Martin JD, Liu WS, Glover GI, Wilson S, Mcnulty DE, Ellis CE, Elshourbagy NA, Shabon U, Trill JJ, Hay DWP, Ohlstein EH, Bergsman DJ, and Douglas SA. Human urotensin-II is a potent vasoconstrictor and agonist for the orphan receptor GPR14. Nature 401: 282-286, 1999[Medline].

2.   Coulouarn, Y, Jegou S, Tostivint H, Vaundry H, and Lihrmann I. Cloning, sequence analysis and tissue distribution of the mouse and rat urotensin II precursors. FEBS Lett 457: 28-32, 1999[ISI][Medline].

3.   Gibson, A. Complex effects of Gillichthys urotensin II on rat aortic strips. Br J Pharmacol 91: 205-212, 1987[ISI][Medline].

4.   Hay, DW. Endothelin-1: an interesting peptide or an important mediator in pulmonary disease? Pulm Pharmacol 11: 141-146, 1998.

5.   Kakishita, M, Nishikimi T, Okano Y, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Nagaya N, Fukushima K, Nakanishi N, Takishita S, Miyata A, Kangawa K, Matsuo H, and Kunieda T. Increased plasma levels of adrenomedullin in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Clin Sci (Colch) 96: 33-39, 1999[Medline].

5a.   MacLean, M, Gallacher M, Petrie MC, Hillier C, and McMurray JV. Adrenomedullin is an extremely potent vasodilator of human small muscular pulmonary arteries (Abstract). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159: A574, 1999.

6.   Maclean, MR, Alexander D, Stirrat A, Gallagher M, Douglas SA, Ohlstein EH, Morecroft I, and Polland K. Contractile responses to human urotensin-II in rat and human pulmonary arteries: effect of endothelial factors and chronic hypoxia in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 130: 201-204, 2000[ISI][Medline].

7.   McCulloch, KM , Docherty CC, and MacLean MR. Endothelin receptors mediating contraction of rat and human pulmonary resistance arteries: effect of chronic hypoxia in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 123: 1621-1630, 1998[ISI][Medline].

8.   McCulloch, KM, Docherty CC, Morecroft I, and MacLean MR. Endothelin B receptor-mediated contraction in human pulmonary resistance arteries. Br J Pharmacol 119: 1125-1130, 1996[ISI][Medline].

9.   Miyao, Y, Nishikimi T, Kojima S, Daikoku S, Morii I, Matsumoto T, Takishita S, Miyata A, Matsuo H, Kangawa K, and Nonogi H. Increased plasma adrenomedullin levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction in proportion to the clinical severity. Heart 79: 39-44, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Mori, M, Sugo T, Abe M, Shimomura Y, Kurihara M, Kitada C, Kikuchi K, Shintani Y, Kurokawa T, Onda H, Nishimura O, and Fujino M. Urotensin II is the endogenous ligand of a G-protein-coupled orphan receptor, SENR (GPR14). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 265: 123-129, 1999[ISI][Medline].

11.   Nagaya, N, Nishikimi T, Uematsu M, Yoshitomi Y, Miyao Y, Miyazaki S, Goto Y, Kojima S, Kuramochi M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K, and Nonogi H. Plasma adrenomedullin as an indicator of prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Heart 81: 483-487, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Yoshitomi, Y, Nishikimi T, Kojima S, Kuramochi M, Takishita S, Matsuoka H, Miyata A, Matsuo H, and Kangawa K. Plasma levels of adrenomedullin in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Clin Sci (Colch) 94: 135-139, 1998[Medline].


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280(2):H925-H928
0363-6135/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. D. Proulx, B. J. Holleran, A. A. Boucard, E. Escher, G. Guillemette, and R. Leduc
Mutational Analysis of the Conserved Asp2.50 and ERY Motif Reveals Signaling Bias of the Urotensin II Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 552 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Zoccali, F. Mallamaci, F. A. Benedetto, G. Tripepi, P. Pizzini, S. Cutrupi, and L. Malatino
Urotensin II and Cardiomyopathy in End-Stage Renal Disease
Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 326 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
G. Giebing, M. Tolle, J. Jurgensen, J. Eichhorst, J. Furkert, M. Beyermann, F. Neuschafer-Rube, W. Rosenthal, W. Zidek, M. van der Giet, et al.
Arrestin-Independent Internalization and Recycling of the Urotensin Receptor Contribute to Long-Lasting Urotensin II-Mediated Vasoconstriction
Circ. Res., September 30, 2005; 97(7): 707 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. Gong, Y.-X. Wang, Y.-Z. Zhu, W.-W. Wang, M.-J. Wang, T. Yao, and Y.-C. Zhu
Cellular distribution of GPR14 and the positive inotropic role of urotensin II in the myocardium in adult rat
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2004; 97(6): 2228 - 2235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Lim, S. Honisett, C. D. Sparkes, P. Komesaroff, A. Kompa, and H. Krum
Differential Effect of Urotensin II on Vascular Tone in Normal Subjects and Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
Circulation, March 16, 2004; 109(10): 1212 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y. Z. Zhu, Z. J. Wang, Y. C. Zhu, L. Zhang, R. M. E. Oakley, C. W. Chung, K. W. Lim, H. S. Lee, M. L. Ozoux, W. Linz, et al.
Urotensin II causes fatal circulatory collapse in anesthesized monkeys in vivo: a "vasoconstrictor" with a unique hemodynamic profile
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): H830 - H836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
A. Y. Zhang, Y.-F. Chen, D. X. Zhang, F.-X. Yi, J. Qi, P. Andrade-Gordon, L. de Garavilla, P.-L. Li, and A.-P. Zou
Urotensin II is a nitric oxide-dependent vasodilator and natriuretic peptide in the rat kidney
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): F792 - F798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. Brkovic, A. Hattenberger, E. Kostenis, T. Klabunde, S. Flohr, M. Kurz, S. Bourgault, and A. Fournier
Functional and Binding Characterizations of Urotensin II-Related Peptides in Human and Rat Urotensin II-Receptor Assay
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2003; 306(3): 1200 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Fisher, M. MacLean, I. Morecroft, A. Seed, F. Johnston, C. Hillier, and J. McMurray
Is the Pregnancy Hormone Relaxin Also a Vasodilator Peptide Secreted by the Heart?
Circulation, July 16, 2002; 106(3): 292 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
I. B Wilkinson, J. T Affolter, S. L de Haas, M Paola Pellegrini, J. Boyd, M. J Winter, R. J Balment, and D. J Webb
High plasma concentrations of human urotensin II do not alter local or systemic hemodynamics in man
Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2002; 53(2): 341 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (66)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stirrat, A.
Right arrow Articles by MacLean, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stirrat, A.
Right arrow Articles by MacLean, M. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online