Vol. 280, Issue 3, H1129-H1135, March 2001
Vascular
-adrenergic receptor system is dysfunctional after
myocardial infarction
Mohamed A.
Gaballa1,
Andrea
Eckhart2,
Walter J.
Koch2, and
Steven
Goldman1
1 Departments of Internal Medicine, Veterans Administration
Medical Center, and University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center,
Tucson, Arizona 85723; and 2 Department of Surgery, Duke
University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
 |
ABSTRACT |
We identified abnormalities in the
vascular
-adrenergic receptor (
-AR) signaling pathway in heart
failure after myocardial infarction (MI). To examine these
abnormalities, we measured
-AR-mediated hemodynamics, vascular
reactivity, and the vascular
-AR molecular signaling components in
rats with heart failure after MI. Six weeks after MI, these rats had an
increased left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure, decreased LV
systolic pressure, and decreased rate of LV pressure change
(dP/dt). LV dP/dt responses to
isoproterenol were shifted downward, although the responses for
systemic vascular resistance were shifted upward in heart failure rats
(P < 0.05). Isoproterenol- and IBMX-induced
vasorelaxations were blunted in heart failure rats (P < 0.05) with no change in the forskolin-mediated vasorelaxation. These
changes were associated with the following alterations in
-AR
signaling (P < 0.05): decreases in
-AR density (aorta: 58.7 ± 6.0 vs. 35.7 ± 1.9 fmol/mg membrane protein;
carotid: 29.6 ± 5.6 vs. 18.0 ± 3.9 fmol/mg membrane
protein, n = 5), increases in G protein-coupled
receptor kinase activity levels (relative phosphorimage counts of
191 ± 39 vs. 259 ± 26 in the aorta and 115 ± 30 vs.
202 ± 7 in the carotid artery, n = 5), and
decreases in cGMP and cAMP in the carotid artery (0.85 ± 0.10 vs.
0.31 ± 0.06 pmol/mg protein and 2.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.2 ± 0.1 pmol/mg protein, n = 5) with no change in
G
s or G
i in the aorta. Thus in heart failure there are abnormalities in the vascular
-AR system that are
similar to those seen in the myocardium. This suggests a common neurohormonal mechanism and raises the possibility that treatment in
heart failure focused on the myocardium may also affect the vasculature.
heart failure; G protein; hemodynamics, cAMP/cGMP;
-adrenergic
receptor-coupled kinase
 |
INTRODUCTION |
OVER THE YEARS,
investigators have reported abnormalities in the myocardial
-adrenergic receptor (
-AR) signaling pathway in heart failure
(3-5, 21, 24, 27, 35). It is generally believed that
in the myocardium, downregulation of the
-AR system results in
desensitization due to elevated circulating and tissue levels of
catecholamines. In addition to the abnormalities in the myocardium,
decreases in
-AR density and adenylyl cyclase activity have been
reported in skeletal muscle in a dog model of heart failure
(25). The
-AR system plays a major role in the
pathophysiology of heart failure not only in the heart but also in the
vasculature. Understanding the changes that occur in both the heart and
the vasculature is now even more important because of the data
demonstrating the beneficial effects of
-AR blockade in the
treatment of patients with heart failure (1, 14, 28).
Although
-ARs are located in both myocardial and vascular tissues,
most of the work on changes in
-AR signaling in heart failure has
focused on the myocardium, and alterations of
-AR signaling in the
vasculature have received less attention. The data on changes in the
vascular
-AR system show that in a dog model of heart failure
-AR
density was decreased in the mesenteric arteries (24), and
in a rat model of heart failure (26) both cAMP- and
cGMP-mediated vasorelaxation were decreased.
Abnormalities in the vascular
-AR system are important in heart
failure because this system is primarily responsible for vascular
smooth muscle-dependent vasodilatation. In heart failure, decreased
vasodilatation at baseline and a decreased vasodilatory response to
-AR stimulation leads to impaired peripheral vasodilatation and
inappropriate vasoconstriction. The end result is increased left
ventricular (LV) afterload and worsening LV function. To help
understand the mechanisms that control vascular
-AR function in
heart failure, we measured in vivo and in vitro
-AR-stimulated responses and vascular
-AR molecular signaling components in the rat
coronary artery ligation model of heart failure. The purpose of the
current study was to define the abnormalities in the vascular
-AR
signaling cascade in an attempt to determine how these changes affect
the pathophysiology of heart failure.
 |
METHODS |
Two groups of Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 175-275 g were
used in this study: sham noninfarcted rats and myocardial infarction (MI) rats. In both sham and MI rats, in vivo
-AR-stimulated
responses were examined by measuring hemodynamic parameters at baseline and after administration of escalating doses of isoproterenol (0-2
µg/kg). In vitro
-AR-stimulated vascular responses were studied by
measuring isoproterenol (10
8-10
4
M)-induced vasorelaxation in isolated aortic rings. Molecular signaling
components of the vascular
-AR system measured in the current study
included
-AR density, cAMP and cGMP nucleotide levels, inhibitory G
protein subunit (G
i), stimulatory G protein subunit
(G
s), and
-AR-coupled kinase 1 (
-ARK1) protein levels.
Experimental MI.
Heart failure was created in rats using standard techniques developed
in our laboratory (18); these techniques result in 50%
mortality within the first 3 wk. Animals without confirmation of
infarction at time of death were employed as sham-operated controls.
Animals were studied 6 wk after surgery.
LV hemodynamics (
-AR-mediated response in vivo).
Studies were performed 3 wk after coronary artery ligation. The
hemodynamic measurements were obtained using methods that have been
reported previously by our laboratory (19, 29, 35). In
brief, after anesthesia, a 2-F catheter with two pressure sensors was
inserted through the left carotid artery such that one sensor was
located in the LV and the second sensor was located in the ascending
aorta. We measured heart rate, aortic pressure, LV
end-diastolic pressure, and rate of LV pressure change (LV
dP/dt) using a two-sensor pressure transducer
(Millar). After the baseline measurements were obtained, the
data were recorded after
-AR stimulation with increasing doses of
isoproterenol (0-2 µg/kg).
Relaxation of arterial rings (
-AR-mediated response in vitro).
In separate groups of animals, after the baseline in vivo measurements
were completed, the rat was euthanized and a 3- to 4-mm segment was cut
from the ascending aorta for physiological studies before and after
removal of the endothelial layer by gentle rubbing. The rest of the
aorta and both carotid arteries were frozen for biochemical studies.
The relaxation response of the ascending aorta was examined using a
commercially available mounting apparatus attached to a force
transducer. The arterial segment was attached to stainless steel wire
stirrups. One wire was fixed in place and the other was attached to a
force transducer. This preparation was suspended in an aerated organ
bath chamber filled with 7 ml of modified Krebs-Henseleit solution
maintained at 37°C by an outer water jacket. Studies were carried out
by passively stretching the segments to 1 g, a predetermined
baseline tension that results in maximum developed tension, for at
least 45 min. Rings were then precontracted with 30 mM KCl. The
presence of intact endothelium was verified physiologically by the ring
response to 10
6 M ACh and histologically by staining of
the endothelial cells with factor VIII.
To examine the
-AR-stimulated vasorelaxation, isolated arterial
rings were preconstricted with 3 µM phenylephrine (PE) and relaxation
responses to escalating doses of isoproterenol
(10
8-10
4 M) were recorded. Data were
normalized to the PE-induced contraction. In addition, to define the
functional role of the vascular
-AR signaling components,
dose-dependent relaxation curves to increasing concentrations of
forskolin (10
9-10
6 M) and IBMX (5 × 10
6-5 × 10
4 M) were measured.
-AR density assay.
Arterial membranes were prepared as previously described (17,
25) for heart tissue. Arterial tissue had to be pooled to yield
enough protein for the binding assay. In brief, tissue was homogenized
in ice-cold lysis buffer [5 mM Tris · HCl at pH 7.4, 5 mM
EDTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mm
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)]. Nuclei were obtained by
centrifugation at 500 g for 15 min and the supernatant was
filtered through two layers of cheesecloth. Final membranes were
sedimented at 40,000 g for 15 min and washed in binding
buffer (in mM: 75 Tris · HCl at pH 7.4, 12.5 MgCl2,
and 2 EDTA) before resuspension. Ligand-binding assays were performed
in triplicate on membranes in 500 µl volume of binding buffer with
saturating concentrations of the 125I-labeled-AR ligand
cyanopindolol (~500 pM). Nonspecific binding was measured in
the presence of 1 µM alprenolol. Assays were performed at 37°C for
60 min and samples were filtered over glass-fiber filters then washed
and counted using a gamma counter. Specific binding (Bmax)
was normalized to membrane protein.
Protein immunoblotting for G
i and
G
s.
Western analysis was performed for G
i and G
s
as previously described (31). In brief, thoracic
aortas were ground using a mortar and pestle and added to ice-cold
buffer (25 mM Tris · HCl at pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM PMSF). After
homogenization, nuclei and tissue were separated by centrifugation at
800 g for 15 min. Protein concentrations were determined on
the supernatant (cytosolic fraction). Sedimented proteins (membrane
fraction) were resuspended in 50 mM HEPES (at pH 7.3 with 5 mM
MgCl2), then 10 µg of membrane proteins were run on a
12% Tris-glycine gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane.
G
i and G
s were both identified using
polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and
chemiluminescent detection of anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with
horseradish peroxidase (Blaze, Pierce).
G protein receptor kinase activity.
The activity assay was performed as described previously
(31). In brief, supernatant prepared from pooled arterial
tissues (3-5 mg) were adjusted to 50 mM NaCl concentration and
partially purified using DEAE Sephacel chromatography. Between 50 and
60 µg protein of purified samples were incubated in a volume of 100 µl of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris · HCl at pH 7.4, 250 mM
sucrose, 5 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 0.1 mM PMSF) supplemented with 0.1 mM ATP (containing
[
-32P]ATP), 10 mM MgCl2, and
rhodopsin-enriched rod outer segments. After 15 min incubation in white
light, the reactions were quenched with 300 µl of ice-cold lysis
buffer and centrifuged for 15 min at 13,000 g. The
sedimented proteins were resuspended in 25 µl of protein gel-loading
dye and electrophoresed on 12% polyacrylamide/Tris-glycine gels. Gels
were then dried and phosphorylated rhodopsin was quantitated with a
PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
Statistical analysis.
Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to determine alterations in all
measured variables in heart failure compared with sham rats. The
effects of heart failure on hemodynamics and in vitro isoproterenol,
forskolin, and IBMX dose responses were determined by two-way ANOVA
(disease × intervention) with repeated measures.
 |
RESULTS |
Baseline hemodynamics.
Changes in body weight, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, LV
dP/dt, and LV end-diastolic pressure after MI are listed in
Table 1. The important changes with heart
failure after MI were decreases in systolic and diastolic pressures, LV
dP/dt, and increases in LV end-diastolic pressure. Right
ventricular (RV) weight was increased, although LV weight-to-body
weight was unchanged. These data are consistent with previous reports
from our laboratory in the same model (17).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1.
Body weight, heart weight, and left-ventricular and aortic pressures in
sham and congestive heart failure rats
|
|
-AR-mediated response in vivo.
The
-AR-stimulated changes in heart rate, LV dP/dt,
and peripheral vascular resistance are shown in Fig.
1. Heart failure resulted in no change in
heart rate, a decrease in LV dP/dt, and an increase in
systemic vascular resistance. There was a predictable isoproterenol
dose response for heart rate, LV dP/dt, and systemic vascular resistance. Although LV dP/dt increased at
high-dose isoproterenol, the maximal response in heart failure was
flatter, which suggests a limit in contractile reserves in heart
failure. For systemic vascular resistance, the two curves converge with higher doses of isoproterenol; this suggests that there is a
physiological limit to the decrease in systemic vascular resistance.
The data reported here for isoproterenol dose response are similar to
those previously reported by our laboratory in an investigation of the effects of inducible versus endothelial-mediated nitric oxide (NO)
synthase in heart failure (17).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Isoproterenol-stimulated hemodynamic response in sham
control and heart failure rats. Data are presented as the changes with
each data point (sham control and congestive heart failure, CHF)
normalized for the respective baselines. A: changes in heart
rate. B: changes in left ventricular rate of pressure change
( LV dP/dt). C: changes in systemic ventricular
resistance ( SVR). Each data point presented as mean ± SD;
n = 8-11 in each group; *P < 0.05.
|
|
-AR control of arterial relaxation in vitro.
There was a dose-dependent increase in arterial vasorelaxation in
response to isoproterenol in both the sham and heart failure rats.
Arteries from heart failure rats demonstrated markedly decreased arterial vasodilatation compared with sham control rats (Fig. 2). Removal of the endothelium decreased
isoproterenol-induced vasorelaxation by 30% in sham rats but induced
no change in heart failure rats.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Isoproterenol dose response in rat aorta from sham
(n = 6) and CHF (n = 6) rats with
endothelium intact (E) and endothelium removed (NoE). With the
endothelium removed, there is decreased arterial vasorelaxation, which
suggests that there is a -adrenergic receptor ( -AR)-mediated
component of endothelial-dependent vasorelaxation. The vasorelaxation
response is decreased in heart failure and removal of the endothelium
does not change the response. No differences were found in CHF with or
without endothelium. Only one curve is shown for clarity. Each data
point presented as mean ± SD; *P < 0.05.
|
|
Mechanisms of decreased
-AR responsiveness.
To elucidate the mechanisms of diminished
-AR-stimulated
vasorelaxation, vascular responses to forskolin (a direct adenylyl cyclase activator) and IBMX (a phosphodieasterase inhibitor) were measured in vitro. Heart failure resulted in a decrease in IBMX dose
response with no change in the vasorelaxation to forskolin (Figs.
3 and
4).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Forskolin dose response in aorta from sham
(n = 6) and CHF (n = 6) rats. No
differences were noted between sham and CHF responses. Each data point
presented as mean ± SD.
|
|

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
IBMX dose response in aorta from sham (n = 6) and CHF (n = 6) rats. CHF rats exhibited decreased
response to IBMX. Each data point presented as mean ± SD;
*P < 0.05.
|
|
Alterations in
-AR signaling components.
In heart failure rats, the following changes were observed: decreases
(P < 0.05; n = 5) in
-AR density as
shown in Fig. 5 (58.7 ± 6.0 vs.
35.7 ± 1.9 fmol/mg membrane protein for the aorta, and 29.6 ± 5.6 vs. 18.0 ± 3.9 fmol/mg membrane protein for the carotid
artery) and increases (P < 0.05; n = 5) in G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) activity levels as shown
in Fig. 6 (relative phosphorimage counts
of 191 ± 39 vs. 259 ± 26 in the aorta and 115 ± 30 vs. 202 ± 7 in the carotid artery). It should be noted that these
activities were measured in cytosolic extracts which are predominantly
-ARK1 (9).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
-AR density in aorta and carotid artery from sham
(n = 5) and CHF (n = 5) rats;
*P < 0.05. Note there are decreases in receptor
density in both aorta and carotid artery in heart failure.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
-AR-coupled kinase 1 ( -ARK1) activity levels in
aorta and carotid artery from sham (n = 6) and CHF rats
(n = 5). Note the increased -ARK1 activity levels in
CHF. Each data point presented as mean ± SD; *P < 0.05.
|
|
G protein, cGMP, and cAMP.
As shown in Fig. 7, in heart failure rats
we found a trend toward decrease (P = 0.054) in
G
s in the aorta (9,502 ± 965 vs. 7,173 ± 544 arbitrary densitometry units; n = 9) but no change in
G
i in the aorta (11,521 ± 1,636 vs. 14,015 ± 1,840 arbitrary densitometry units; n = 9). In heart
failure rats there were also decreases (P < 0.05;
n = 5) in cGMP and cAMP in the carotid artery (0.85 ± 0.10 vs. 0.31 ± 0.06 and 2.3 ± 0.3 vs.
1.2 ± 0.1 pmol/mg protein, respectively); see Fig.
8.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Content of inhibitory G protein subunit
(G i) and stimulatory G protein subunit
(G s) in both sham (solid bars,
n = 9) and CHF (open bars, n = 9) rats. CHF rats showed a trend to decrease (P = 0.047) in the G s level; however, there was no difference
in G i between the two groups. Each data point presented
as mean ± SD.
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
cAMP and cGMP levels in carotid artery from sham and CHF
(n = 6 in each group) rats. Note both cAMP and cGMP
levels are decreased in carotid arteries from CHF rats. Each data point
presented as mean ± SD; *P < 0.05.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The most important finding of this study is that heart failure
after MI results in functional and molecular alterations in the
vascular
-AR signaling pathway. Interestingly the changes in the
vasculature are similar to those that are known to occur in the
myocardium: a depressed functional response to isoproterenol accompanied by decreases in
-AR density, cGMP and cAMP levels, and
upregulation of
-ARK1. The fact that these alterations seen in the
vasculature are similar to those previously reported in the myocardium
suggests a common systemic neurohormonal mechanism.
Although previous workers have shown decreases in vascular
-AR
density and cAMP and cGMP-mediated vasorelaxation in heart failure
(24, 26), our data examine the alterations in the vascular
-AR signaling pathway and its physiological consequences. It is
clear from our data that the primary defect results in a decrease in
receptor density accompanied by decreases in the second messenger
systems. The increase in
-ARK1 implies increased phosphorylation of
the agonist-occupied receptor, triggering desensitization in the
vasculature similar to what has been postulated for the heart. Based on
our work these alterations in vascular
-AR signaling have specific
physiological (hemodynamic) effects, i.e., blunted in vivo hemodynamic
responses to isoproterenol and decreased in vitro vasorelaxation.
Chronic stimulation of
-ARs causes "desensitization" and
downregulation of cardiovascular
-receptors, which may be the basis of their long-term harmful effects in patients with heart failure. Mechanisms underlying
-AR desensitization (homologous and
heterologous) have been elucidated in the heart. Homologous
desensitization occurs in response to
-AR stimulation and results in
decreased responsiveness to
-AR agonists such as isoproterenol but
not to other agonists linked to adenylyl cyclase. Homologous
desensitization is associated with phosphorylation of the
agonist-occupied receptor by a cAMP-independent protein kinase,
-ARK1, or other members of the GRK family.
-ARK1 can
phosphorylate agonist-occupied
-ARs, triggering desensitization when
responsiveness of adenylyl cyclase to other stimulatory responses is
diminished (23). Previous work with
-ARK1 has focused
on the heart, where
-ARK1 has been shown to be elevated in LV tissue
from explanted hearts in patients with heart failure (33)
as well as from the hearts of rats and rabbits after coronary artery
ligation (27, 34). Because our data define alterations in
-AR signaling in the vasculature in heart failure, the possibility
is raised that action of
-ARK1 is a possible mechanism for the
desensitization of vascular
-ARs and the decrease in vasorelaxation
response to isoproterenol in heart failure.
A possible mechanism of decreased
-AR density in the present study
is the hypotension associated with heart failure. This mechanism is
unlikely for the following reasons: 1) there are no data to
support the contention that hypotension decreases
-AR density in vascular smooth muscle; in contrast, there are data to show
that hypotension produced by verapamil treatment of normotensive animals does not decrease but rather increases
-AR density in the
cardiac muscle (8); 2) hypertension in human
and animal models is generally associated with decreased vascular
-AR density (7, 10, 15); and 3)
the question of whether downregulation of vascular
-AR density in
hypertension might be related nonspecifically to blood pressure level
has been addressed (15). In that study, treatment with
verapamil or hydrochlorothiazide lowered blood pressure without any
change in
-AR number. The study concluded that vascular
-AR
function is selectively impaired in hypertension independent of blood
pressure (15).
Our data support the concept that there is a common "catecholamine
trigger" in heart failure that is responsible for the accompanied alterations in
-AR signaling. If the enhanced sympathetic tone in
heart failure is responsible for the changes in
-AR signaling, we
would expect to see them present globally, i.e., in the vasculature as
reported in the present study as well as in the RVs and LVs as has been
reported in the rabbit coronary artery ligation model of heart failure
(27). Other evidence supporting this is that chronic
treatment of mice with isoproterenol results in enhanced expression of
-ARK1 in the heart (22), and in transgenic mice overexpression of
-ARK1 in the heart results in cardiac dysfunction (25).
This common neurohormonal pathway raises the interesting possibility
that treatment in heart failure previously focused on the myocardium
may also affect the vasculature. For example, to date investigators
have not been able to clearly define why
-AR blockade improves
survival in patients with heart failure. One explanation of our
inability to determine the mechanisms of action of
-AR blockade may
be that attention had been focused at the heart and not the
vasculature. In view of our data, it would be appropriate to examine
the vascular
-AR signaling cascade after treatment with
-blockers. Another experimental approach based on our data would be
to use
-ARK inhibition as a possible tool to rescue vascular
-ARs
in heart failure. This concept is based on previous work in the heart
where
-ARKct, a
-ARK1 inhibitor, was able to rescue the disrupted
muscle LIM protein gene (MLP) heart failure mouse
(30). That data showed that by targeting myocardial
-ARK1 in heart failure in mice, that phenotype could be
rescued with
-ARK inhibition. The parallel between the heart and the
vasculature is obvious. Because we have shown that the
-ARs in the
vasculature are also desensitized and
-ARK activity is increased,
the vasculature could be an important target in heart failure because
-ARK inhibition should lead to vasodilatation and potentially a
decreased LV afterload.
Although
-ARs are primarily located in vascular smooth muscle, there
are
-ARs on endothelial cells (32). It is not clear whether vascular endothelial
-ARs participate in the
-AR-mediated vasodilatation. Previous work indicates that activation of these receptors stimulates release of NO, a major component of
endothelial-dependent vasodilatation (20). Both
endothelium-independent (11) and endothelium-dependent
(2)
-AR-mediated vasorelaxation have been reported. Our
data describing the responses with removed endothelium show that the
vascular relaxation response to isoproterenol is reduced but not
abolished, suggesting that both endothelial and vascular smooth muscle
-ARs are involved in heart failure (Fig. 2). Support that
endothelial release of NO contributes to
-AR-mediated vasodilatation
comes from human studies where forearm blood flow during isoproterenol
and salbutamol infusions was attenuated with
NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (6,
12) and
-AR stimulation increased NO release in endothelial
cells from patients in heart failure (13).
The physiological coupling between NO and
-AR pathways and how this
alters in vivo hemodynamics in heart failure was recently reported by
our laboratory (19). The interaction between these two
pathways in human forearm vasculature was studied previously (12); however, the interaction between diminished NO and
downregulation of vascular
-AR-mediated relaxation in heart failure
is still under investigation. At the cellular level the interaction
between NO release and altered
-AR signaling in the vasculature in
heart failure is unclear.
In summary, our data clearly demonstrate that there are abnormalities
in vascular
-AR signaling in heart failure that directly alter
hemodynamics. The fact that these changes in the vasculature are
similar to those in the heart supports the concept that there is a
common systemic neurohormonal pathway in heart failure that may be in
part responsible for the progressive nature of the disease. Although
-AR blockade has been found to improve survival in patients with
heart failure, the mechanisms responsible for this benefit are not
clear. It is possible that some of the beneficial effects of blocking
-AR activation in heart failure are due to the effects of these
agents on the vasculature.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
The authors acknowledge Howard Byrne, Maribeth Stansifer, and Kyle
Shotwell for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
This study was supported in part by grants from the Veterans
Administration, American Heart Association, WARMER Foundation, Wyss
Foundation, Biomedical Research Foundation of Southern Arizona, and
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-61690 and HL-59333.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. A. Gaballa, Cardiology Section, 111C, Tucson VA Medical Center, Tucson,
AZ 85723 (E-mail: mgaballa{at}u.arizona.edu).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 14 June 2000; accepted in final form 13 September 2000.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Australia-New Zealand Heart Failure Research Collaborative Group.
Effects of carvedilol, a vasodilator-
-blocker, in patients with congestive heart failure due to ischemic heart disease.
Circulation
92:
212-218,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.
Blankenstein, WM,
and
Thien T.
Effect of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine on the
-adrenoceptor-mediated relaxation of rat mesenteric resistance arteries.
Life Sci
52:
35-139,
1993[ISI][Medline].
3.
Bristow, MR,
Ginsburg R,
Minobe W,
Cubicciotti R,
Sageman WS,
Lurie K,
Billingham ME,
Harrison DC,
and
Stinson EB.
Decreased catecholamine sensitivity and
-adrenergic receptor density in failing human hearts.
N Engl J Med
307:
205-211,
1982[Abstract].
4.
Bristow, MR,
Minobe W,
Raynolds MV,
Port JD,
Rasmussen R,
Ray PE,
and
Feldman AM.
Reduced
1 receptor messenger RNA abundance in the failing human heart.
J Clin Invest
92:
2737-2745,
1993.
5.
Bristow, MR,
O'Connell JB,
Gilbert EM,
French WJ,
Leatherman G,
Kantrowitz NE,
Orie J,
Smucker ML,
Marshall G,
Kelly P,
Deitchman D,
and
and Anderson JL for the Bucindolol Investigators
Dose-response of chronic
-blocker treatment in heart failure from either idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Circulation
89:
1632-1642,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6.
Cardillo, C,
Kilcoyne CM,
Quyyumi AA,
Cannon RO,
and
Panza JA.
Stimulatory effect of
-adrenergic agonists on endothelium-derived nitric oxide activity in humans.
Circulation
94:
1-6,
1996[Free Full Text].
7.
Chang, HR,
Chen SS,
Tsao DA,
Cheng JT,
Ho CK,
and
Yu HS.
Reduced vascular
-adrenergic receptors and catecholamines response in rats with lead-induced hypertension.
Arch Toxicol
71:
778-781,
1997[ISI][Medline].
8.
Chen, G,
Barr S,
Walsh D,
Rohde S,
Brewer A,
Bilezikian JP,
Wittner M,
Tanowitz HB,
and
Moris SA.
Cardioprotective actions of verapamil on the
-adrenergic receptor complex in acute canine Chagas' disease.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
28:
931-941,
1996[ISI][Medline].
9.
Choi, DJ,
Koch WJ,
Hunter JJ,
and
Rockman HA.
Mechanism of
-adrenergic receptor desensitization in cardiac hypertrophy is increased
-adrenergic receptor kinase.
J Biol Chem
272:
17223-17229,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
Clark, CJ,
Milligan G,
and
Connell JM.
Guanine nucleotide regulatory protein alterations in young Milan hypertensive strain rats.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1225:
149-157,
1994[Medline].
11.
Corr, L,
Burnstock G,
and
Poole-Wilson P.
Responses of the rabbit epicardial coronary artery to acetylcholine and adenoceptor agonists.
Cardiovasc Res
25:
256-262,
1991[ISI][Medline].
12.
Dawes, M,
Chowienczyk PJ,
and
Ritter JM.
Effects of inhibition of the L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway on vasodilation caused by
-adrenergic agonists in human forearm.
Circulation
95:
2293-2297,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13.
Drexler, H,
Kastner S,
Strobel A,
Brodde OE,
and
Hasenfuss G.
Expression, activity, and functional significance of inducible NOS in the failing human heart.
J Am Coll Cardiol
32:
955-963,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14.
Eichhorn, EJ,
and
Bristow MR.
Medical therapy can improve the biological properties of the chronically failing heart: a new era in the treatment of heart failure.
Circulation
94:
2285-2296,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15.
Feldman, RD,
Freeman DJ,
Bierbrier GS,
Anthony SE,
and
Brown JE.
-adrenergic responsiveness is regulated selectively in hypertension.
Clin Pharmacol Ther
54:
654-660,
1993[ISI][Medline].
16.
Frey, MJ,
Vita L,
Molinoff PB,
and
Wilson JR.
Skeletal muscle
-receptors and isoproterenol-stimulated vasodilatation in canine heart failure.
J Appl Physiol
67:
2026-2031,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Gaballa, MA,
Peppel K,
Lefkowitz RJ,
Aguirre M,
Dolber PC,
Koch WJ,
and
Goldman S.
Enhanced in-vivo vasorelaxation by overexpression of
2-adrenergic receptors in large arteries.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
30:
1037-1045,
1998[ISI][Medline].
18.
Gaballa, MA,
Raya TE,
and
Goldman S.
Large artery remodeling after myocardial infarction.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
268:
H2092-H2103,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19.
Gaballa, MA,
Raya TE,
Hoover CA,
and
Goldman S.
The effects of endothelial and inducible nitric oxide synthases inhibition on circulatory function in rats after myocardial infarction.
Cardiovasc Res
42:
627-635,
1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20.
Gary, DW,
and
Marshall I.
Novel signal transduction pathway mediating endothelium-dependent
-adrenergic vasorelaxation in rat thoracic aorta.
Br J Pharmacol
107:
684-690,
1992[ISI][Medline].
21.
Gay, RG,
Raya TE,
and
Goldman S.
Left ventricular systolic function is preserved during chronic propranolol treatment after large myocardial infarction in rats.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
16:
529-537,
1990[ISI][Medline].
22.
Iaccarino, G,
Tomhave ED,
Lefkowitz RJ,
and
Koch WJ.
Reciprocal in vivo regulation of myocardial G protein-coupled receptor kinase expression by
-adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade.
Circulation
98:
1783-1789,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23.
Inglese, J,
Freedman NJ,
Koch WJ,
and
Lefkowitz RJ.
Structure and mechanism of the G protein-coupled receptor kinases.
J Biol Chem
268:
23735-23738,
1993[Free Full Text].
24.
Kiuchi, K,
Soto N,
Shannon RP,
Vatner DE,
Morgan K,
and
Vatner SF.
Depressed
-adrenergic receptor and endothelium-mediated vasodilatation in conscious dogs with heart failure.
Circ Res
73:
1013-1023,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25.
Koch, WJ,
Rockman HA,
Samama P,
Hamilton RA,
Bond RA,
Milano CA,
and
Lefkowitz RJ.
Cardiac function in mice overexpressing the
-adrenergic receptor kinase or
-ARK inhibitor.
Science
268:
1350-1353,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26.
Mathew, R,
Wang J,
Gewitz MH,
Hintze TH,
and
Wolin MS.
Congestive heart failure alters receptor-dependent cAMP-mediated relaxation of canine pulmonary arteries.
Circulation
87:
1722-1728,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27.
Maurice, JP,
Shah AS,
Kypson AP,
Hata JA,
White DC,
Glower DD,
and
Koch WJ.
Molecular
-adrenergic signaling abnormalities in failing rabbit hearts after infarction.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
276:
H1853-H1860,
1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28.
Packer, M,
Bristow MR,
Cohn JN,
Colucci WS,
Fowler MB,
Gilbert EM,
and
Shusterman NH.
The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. US Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group.
N Engl J Med
334:
1349-1355,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29.
Raya, TE,
Gay RG,
Aguirre M,
and
Goldman S.
The importance of venodilatation in the prevention of left ventricular dilatation after chronic large myocardial infarction in rats: a comparison of captopril and hydralazine.
Circ Res
64:
330-338,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
30.
Rockman, HA,
Chien KR,
and
Choi DJ.
Expression of a
-adrenergic receptor kinase-1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
12:
7000-7005,
1998.
31.
Xia, R-P,
Tomhave ED,
Wang D-J,
Ji X,
Boluyt MO,
Cheng H,
Lakatta EG,
and
Koch WJ.
Age-associated reductions in cardiac
1- and
2-adrenergic responses without changes in inhibitory G proteins or receptor kinases.
J Clin Invest
6:
1273-1282,
1998.
32.
Stephenson, JA,
and
Summers RJ.
Autoradiographic analysis of receptors on vascular endothelium.
Eur J Pharmacol
134:
35-43,
1987[ISI][Medline].
33.
Ungerer, M,
Bohm M,
Elce S,
Erdman E,
and
Lohse ML.
Altered expression of
-adrenergic receptor kinase and
1-adrenergic receptors in the failing heart.
Circulation
87:
454-463,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34.
Ungerer, M,
Kessebohn K,
Kronsbein K,
Lohse ML,
and
Richardt G.
Activation of
-adrenergic receptor kinase during myocadial ischemia.
Circ Res
79:
455-460,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
35.
Warner, AL,
Bellah KL,
Raya TE,
Roeske WR,
and
Goldman S.
Effects of
-adrenergic blockade on papillary muscle function and the
-adrenergic receptor system in noninfarcted myocardium in compensated left ventricular dysfunction.
Circulation
86:
1584-1595,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280(3):H1129-H1135