|
|
||||||||
Department of Medical Physiology and Sports Medicine, Utrecht University, 3531 HR Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In comparison to the cellular basis of pacemaking, the electrical interactions mediating synchronization and conduction in the sinoatrial node are poorly understood. Therefore, we have taken a combined immunohistochemical and electrophysiological approach to characterize gap junctions in the nodal area. We report that the pacemaker myocytes in the center of the rabbit sinoatrial node express the gap junction proteins connexin (Cx)40 and Cx46. In the periphery of the node, strands of pacemaker myocytes expressing Cx43 intermingle with strands expressing Cx40 and Cx46. Biophysical properties of gap junctions in isolated pairs of pacemaker myocytes were recorded under dual voltage clamp with the use of the perforated-patch method. Macroscopic junctional conductance ranged between 0.6 and 25 nS with a mean value of 7.5 nS. The junctional conductance did not show a pronounced sensitivity to the transjunctional potential difference. Single-channel recordings from pairs of pacemaker myocytes revealed populations of single-channel conductances at 133, 202, and 241 pS. With these single-channel conductances, the observed average macroscopic junctional conductance, 7.5 nS, would require only 30-60 open gap junction channels.
connexin; sinus node; electrophysiology; immunohistochemistry
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE SINOATRIAL (SA) node serves as the normal pacemaker of the mammalian heart. Activation maps obtained using microelectrodes have shown that each beat is initiated in the central, "dominant" region of the node and spreads with increasing velocity toward the right atrium (4). Pacemaker activity results from the combination of ionic channels expressed by nodal myocytes, which have been studied extensively using the voltage-clamp technique (55). However, isolated pacemaker myocytes show a large variation in beating frequency, whereas in the intact node, all pacemaker cells share a common frequency. It is generally believed that synchronization of nodal pacemaker cells is mediated by electrical coupling through gap junction channels (33). The observation that the conduction velocity is an order of magnitude lower in the center of the node than in the atrial and ventricular working myocardium suggests that electrical coupling between pacemaker myocytes is relatively weak (9, 30). This supposed high intercellular resistance is corroborated by ultrastructural studies of the intercellular contacts between pacemaker cells (32), in which gap junctional plaques were reported to be sparse and small compared with those in the working myocardium (for review see Ref. 38).
Gap junction channels are formed by connexin (Cx) subunits. The Cx
family is a large multigene family, of which
13 members are known in
mammals (18). Gap junction channels consisting of a single
type of Cx protein (homomeric channels) have been shown to differ in
biophysical and regulational properties (see Ref. 7 for
overview). In the mammalian heart, mRNA for Cx37, Cx40, Cx43, Cx45, and
Cx46 has been detected (23, 27, 40, 41). Within the heart,
different cell types express different Cx proteins. In most species
investigated, Cx40 and Cx43 are expressed in atrial myocytes. In the
ventricular working myocardium, Cx43 is expressed, and the ventricular
conduction system also expresses Cx40 (for review see Ref.
20). Expression of Cx45 in atrial and ventricular myocytes
has been reported for the rabbit, dog, and human (12, 27,
50). In contrast, Coppen et al. (10) recently
presented evidence that Cx45 expression within the ventricles of rat
and mouse is confined to the ventricular conduction system. Cx37 and
Cx40 are expressed by endothelial and endocardial cells (41,
50). No reports exist on the localization of Cx46 within the
heart, but it could not be detected in the human SA node
(12).
The Cx types expressed in nodal pacemaker cells remain a subject of some controversy. In the rabbit and hamster SA nodes, Cx43 has been detected (1, 44), but in the rat, cow, and human, it was reported to be absent (28, 37; for overview see Ref. 38). In the dog, Cx40 was detected in the central nodal area (31). In addition, strands of anti-Cx43-positive myocytes that penetrate the nodal area from the atrium were observed in the guinea pig (47). In the dog, similar strands expressed Cx43 and Cx45 (31). These strands might form a specialized conduction pathway to direct the electrical impulse from the central node to the atrium. More recently, Coppen et al. (11) demonstrated that Cx40 and Cx45 are expressed in the central region of the rabbit SA node. These authors reported that bundles of Cx43-expressing atrial myocytes penetrate the SA node. Interestingly, Cx43 and Cx45 were coexpressed in a restricted zone at the endocardial side of the nodal-crista terminalis border (11).
A number of reports have described preparations in which the impulse conduction in the SA node could be studied in some detail (5, 9, 25, 30). However, these studies describe measurements on the complete SA node or strips of nodal tissue. Therefore, interpretation of these results is complicated by the heterogeneity of the nodal area, especially with regard to the complex interface between the atrium and the SA node. The properties of gap junctions can be assessed more directly by the double whole cell voltage-clamp technique (36, 51). In recent years, this technique has been used to study gap junction channels in a large variety of cell types (for review see Ref. 7). However, to our knowledge, there has been only one report of its application to cells isolated from the SA node (1). Anumonwo et al. (1) showed that nodal pairs have a relatively high intercellular resistance and that the single-channel conductance and the sensitivity to the transjunctional potential difference (Vj) are in agreement with those of channels formed by Cx43, the presence of which was demonstrated by immunocytochemistry.
Modifications of the double whole cell voltage-clamp technique have been used to investigate the synchronization of pacemaker cells. Two physically unconnected pacemaker myocytes have been coupled via a microcomputer acting as an artificial gap junction (49), or a single myocyte was coupled to a computer simulating another pacemaker cell (56). These studies provide information on the relation between coupling conductance and the synchronization of pacemaker myocytes, but in these simulations, the junctional conductance (Gj) was represented as an ohmic resistor. For a better understanding of pacemaker synchronization, the biophysical properties of nodal gap junctions and their regulation have to be studied in more detail.
We have studied gap junctions in the adult rabbit SA node with immunohistochemical techniques and double whole cell voltage clamp. We present evidence that central pacemaker myocytes in the rabbit SA node express Cx40 and Cx46. This area is connected to the right atrium via strands of cells that resemble pacemaker myocytes in morphology and express Cx43. Expression of Cx45 was not assessed in this study. We demonstrate that pairs of pacemaker myocytes have a low Gj that is relatively insensitive to Vj. In addition, a population of single-channel conductances that we did not observe in rabbit ventricular or atrial myocyte pairs was present in pacemaker myocyte pairs, probably corresponding to channels formed by Cx46.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Myocyte isolation.
Adult male New Zealand White rabbits (1,800-2,000 g) were
anesthetized by injection of 1.5-2.5 ml of pentobarbital sodium (60 mg/ml; Nembutal, Sanofi Sante) in the marginal ear vein together with 0.3 ml of heparin (5,000 IU/ml, Leo). The excised heart was retrogradely perfused with normal modified Tyrode solution for 5 min
and with zero-Ca2+ modified Tyrode solution for 3 min.
Subsequently, the area bordered by the interatrial septum, crista
terminalis, and superior and inferior venae cavae was excised and cut
in 1-mm-wide strips, perpendicular to the crista terminalis, with care
taken to leave ~1 mm of the crista terminalis attached to the strips.
These strips were gently triturated in zero-Ca2+ modified
Tyrode solution containing 1 mg/ml collagenase B (Boehringer), 0.1 mg/ml protease (Sigma Chemical), and 0.03 mg/ml elastase (Sigma Chemical) for 12 min. The solution was then changed to modified Kraftbrühe solution, and tissue fragments were triturated
rigorously for 6 min to release isolated cells. These cells were plated
at low density on 35-mm tissue culture dishes (Falcon 3801 Primaria, Becton Dickinson) in modified Kraftbrühe solution. Cells were used for electrophysiological recording 1-7 h after isolation, and
the modified Kraftbrühe solution was exchanged for normal modified Tyrode solution
30 min before an experiment.
Immunochemistry.
For immunohistochemistry, the SA nodal area was excised from the heart,
pinned to a silicone rubber pad, and frozen rapidly in liquid nitrogen.
After removal of the rubber pad, 10-mm-thick cryosections were cut in
the plane perpendicular to the crista terminalis. For
immunocytochemistry, isolated cells were plated on glass coverslips.
After 1 h, these cells were fixed by a 5-min incubation in 100%
methanol at
20°C. SA nodes from three rabbits were used for
immunohistochemistry, and isolated nodal cells from five rabbits were
used for immunocytochemistry.
Electrophysiology. A symmetrical set-up with two custom-made patch-clamp amplifiers was used. Macroscopic and single-channel recordings were filtered at 2 and 5 kHz and sampled at 1 and 2.5 kHz, respectively. Data were analyzed off-line using MacDaq analysis software (developed by Dr. A. C. G. van Ginneken, Dept. of Physiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Borosilicate glass patch electrodes were pulled on a Narashige PC-10 puller and fire polished. Electrodes were frontfilled with pipette solution and backfilled with pipette solution containing 0.2 mg/ml amphotericin B (Sigma Chemical). Electrode resistances were between 1 and 4 M
. Series resistances were estimated by canceling
the fast initial voltage jump in response to a short current injection
in the current-clamp mode (42). Within minutes after the
cell-attached configuration was attained, series resistances decayed to
a steady-state level of 8.2 ± 4.6 M
. In voltage-clamp mode,
series resistances could be compensated for up to 70% of the value
measured in current-clamp mode.
Junctional and membrane currents were measured in the double
perforated-patch voltage-clamp mode. Membrane currents of the individual cells forming a pair were measured by stepping both cells
simultaneously to the same potential from a common holding potential of
40 mV. On a step in potential in one cell of a pair, junctional
current was recorded in the other cell.
The total resistance (the recorded junctional current divided by the
applied potential difference) is the sum of the junctional resistance
and the uncompensated parts of the series resistances. Uncompensated
series resistance, i.e., the difference between the series resistances
measured in current-clamp mode and the series resistances compensated
in voltage-clamp mode, would have caused a systematic error in an
estimate of Gj (42). To eliminate this error, records were corrected subsequently by subtracting uncompensated series resistances from the total resistance to yield the
true junctional resistance. For
Gj-Vj relations, the expected voltage drops over the uncompensated series resistances were
subtracted from the applied potential difference to yield the true
Vj.
Gating of single gap junction channels could be observed after partial
uncoupling with halothane. Periods with numerous multiple states were
excluded from the analysis, and only transitions from the baseline to a
full open state were analyzed. Single-channel conductance histograms
were fitted in KaleidaGraph (Adelbeck Software) with one, two, or three
Gaussian distributions using the least-squares method. Values are
means ± SD.
Spontaneous electrical activity was recorded in the double
perforated-patch current-clamp mode. All electrophysiological
recordings were performed at 35°C, under continuous perfusion with
normal modified Tyrode solution.
Composition of salines was as follows: Pipette solution contained (in
mmol/l) 125 potassium gluconate, 10 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 0.6 CaCl2, 4 Na2ATP, 5 EGTA, and 5 HEPES, with pCa
7.6 and pH adjusted to 7.2 with KOH. Amphotericin B was stored as a 60 mg/ml stock solution in DMSO at
20°C for
6 h. Pipette solution
containing 0.2 mg/ml amphotericin B was stored in the dark for up to
1 h.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cx expression in the SA node.
On the basis of microelectrode mapping studies in the rabbit SA node,
the dominant pacemaker is expected to be located at ~3 mm from the
superior vena cava (4). From this region, we have cut
serial sections to analyze Cx expression. In the rabbit, the SA node
can be distinguished from the adjacent atrium by its immunoreactivity
to NF marker (Fig. 1,
D and G vs. E, F, H, and I)
(19, 48). In addition, the pattern of anti-desmin labeling in the SA node differed markedly from that in the atrium. In the atrial
myocardium, anti-desmin labeling clearly revealed the cross-striation of the myocytes and more intense labeling in intercalated disks (Fig.
1A). In the SA node, labeling was more uniform and overall more intense (Fig. 1, B and C). We have used both
antibodies as markers for the nodal area in double-labeling experiments
with anti-Cx37, anti-Cx40, anti-Cx43, anti-Cx45, and anti-Cx46
antibodies. As expected (50), endothelial cells in atrial
blood vessels reacted with anti-Cx37 and anti-Cx40 antibody (not
shown). Anti-Cx40, anti-Cx43, anti-Cx45, and anti-Cx46 exhibited
immunoreactivity in the SA node, the pattern of which we have analyzed
in detail (Fig. 1). The anti-Cx40, anti-Cx43, and anti-Cx46 antibodies
that were raised in rabbit displayed vague background fluorescence in
the nodal area. This background was not reduced by coincubation with
peptides homologous to the epitopes against which these antibodies were
raised and is, therefore, nonspecific.
|
Cx expression in isolated myocytes from the SA node.
Isolated cells from the region of the SA node displayed a large
variability in morphology, ranging from cells indistinguishable from
typical atrial myocytes to the "spider," "spindle," and
"elongated spindle" cells, which have been shown to possess
pacemaker properties (48). Not all pacemaker myocytes were
immunoreactive to NF marker, but in the area of the SA node, only
pacemaker myocytes label with this marker (48). Most
spindle and spider cells showed labeling with NF marker or intense
uniform labeling with anti-desmin antibody. Many elongated spindle
cells showed NF marker immunoreactivity and intense anti-desmin
labeling with a clearer cross-striated pattern than spider and spindle
cells. Cells with the morphology of atrial myocytes were not
immunoreactive to NF marker and showed a pronounced cross-striated
pattern of anti-desmin labeling. Cx40, Cx43, and Cx46 were expressed in
subgroups in the isolate. Anti-Cx40 and anti-Cx43 labeling was observed
in anti-NF-negative cells with a typical atrial morphology (Fig.
2, A and
D), whereas anti-Cx46 labeling could not be detected in
these cells (Fig. 2G).
|
Macroscopic Gj.
Because of our interest in electrical coupling between pacemaker cells,
we recorded from pairs of spindle or spider cells, which often
displayed weak spontaneous contractions and had only faint
cross-striation. All experiments were performed at 35°C using the
perforated-patch method to prevent washout of cytoplasmic constituents.
A representative recording from a pacemaker myocyte from the SA node is
shown in Fig. 3, indicating the criteria
we have used to recognize true pacemaker cells. In current-clamp mode,
this cell fired action potentials spontaneously, as expected for a
pacemaker myocyte (Fig. 3A). Membrane resistances were
250 M
. In response to a simultaneous step to negative potentials in both
cells from a holding potential of
40 mV, the slow activation of
hyperpolarizing-activated current (If) is
apparent, which is characteristic for pacemaker myocytes from the SA
node (15). On depolarizing steps from
40 mV, L-type
Ca2+ current was activated (Fig. 3B).
|
|
Sensitivity of Gj to Vj.
For most types of gap junctions, junctional current decays during
sustained large Vjs. We have evaluated the
voltage sensitivity of gap junctions in pairs of SA node myocytes by
applying steps in potential ranging from
100 to +100 mV during 4 s, from a common holding potential of 0 mV. A representative example of
junctional current traces and a Gj-Vj
relation is shown in Fig. 5A.
Even at a Vj of +100 or
100 mV, there was only
a moderate decay of the junctional current. This is reflected in Fig.
5A, right, where the average instantaneous and
steady-state normalized Gj values are plotted
against Vj.
|
) was high compared with the series
resistances (6 and 8 M
) and membrane resistances (both ~0.5 G
).
Even under these favorable recording conditions, there was a decay of
the junctional current of only 20% during a 4-s step to 100 mV.
In this pair, it was possible to resolve single-channel events without
chemical uncoupling. Although this recording had a poor signal-to-noise
ratio, gating from a channel type with a large single-channel
conductance of ~200 pS was observed (Fig. 5B, right).
Single gap junction channel conductances.
In a number of pairs with a morphology typical of pacemaker myocytes,
which exhibited spontaneous action potentials in the current-clamp
mode, in which If could be activated in the
voltage-clamp mode, and in which the Gj showed
only moderate Vj sensitivity, we used halothane
to lower the open probability of gap junction channels to record
single-channel events with greater accuracy (Fig.
6A). In each of these
recordings, several populations of unitary current amplitudes were
present, but in slightly different proportions. Data from five
experiments were pooled and are represented in the conductance
histogram in Fig. 6B. This histogram was best fit with a sum
of three Gaussian distributions, with peaks at 133, 202, and 241 pS.
|
Synchronization in pacemaker cell pairs.
If both cells in a pair are stepped to the same potential from a common
holding potential, there will be no Vj and,
consequently, no net current will flow across the junction. With the
use of this protocol, current-voltage relations of the membranes of
both cells could be recorded simultaneously. As exemplified in Fig. 7A, the membrane currents in
the two cells within a pair will show small differences in current
amplitudes. These differences, together with the difference in membrane
capacitance, would lead to a difference in beating frequency in
unconnected cells. However, these cells were connected by a macroscopic
Gj of 6.2 nS, and synchronous action potentials
were recorded from this pair in current-clamp mode and are shown
superimposed in Fig. 7B, top trace. For an ohmic junctional
resistor, the junctional current is expected to be equal to the
difference in membrane potential divided by the junctional resistance.
The difference in potential is plotted in Fig. 7B, bottom
trace. During the upstroke of the action potential, depolarizing
current flows from the inherently faster-beating cell to the inherently
slower-beating cell, whereas during repolarization, depolarizing
current flows from the slower- to the faster-beating cell.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cx distribution in the rabbit SA node.
We have studied Cx expression in transverse sections from the rabbit SA
node. Labeling patterns of NF marker (19, 48) and
anti-desmin were used to delineate the SA node. As expected, Cx40 and Cx43 are expressed in the myocardium adjoining the SA node
(50), although expression of Cx40 is less abundant in the bulk atrial myocardium. In the NF marker-positive central nodal area,
Cx40 and Cx46 were detected. In agreement with the poor electrical
coupling, immunofluorescent spots in the central node were small and
faint compared with those in the atrial myocardium. Interestingly,
fibers that were positive to NF marker and anti-Cx43 were observed in
the area between the crista terminalis and the central SA node. These
anti-Cx43-positive fibers, in which Cx40 and Cx46 could not be
detected, ran alongside fibers probably expressing Cx40 and Cx46,
although colocalization of Cx40 and Cx46 could not be confirmed
directly, because both antibodies were raised in rabbit. Boundaries
between Cx43- and Cx40/Cx46-expressing strands were sharp. Strands of
myocytes expressing Cx43 have been observed in guinea pig
(47) and dog (31) SA nodes. In the guinea
pig, anti-
-smooth muscle actin (anti-
-SMA) specifically labeled
pacemaker myocytes, but not atrial myocytes. In the transitional area,
anti-Cx43 and anti-
-SMA showed complementary labeling in separate
strands. On the basis of these observations, ten Velde et
al. (47) concluded that the atrium forms
interdigitations into the nodal area. In the rabbit, anti-
-SMA did
not label pacemaker tissue specifically (not shown). However,
in our double-labeling experiments, Cx43-positive strands
labeled with anti-desmin and NF marker in a pattern similar to
pacemaker myocytes, rather than atrial myocytes. These results
therefore suggest that the Cx43-expressing strands in rabbit consist of
transitional cells. The difference in the nature of these strands might
reflect structural differences between guinea pig and rabbit SA nodes.
Interestingly, sharp transitions in action potential morphology over
small distances have been encountered in the guinea pig, but not in the
rabbit (39). In the anti-Cx43-positive strands in the
rabbit, no anti-Cx40 immunoreactivity could be detected. Expression of
Cx40 was not analyzed in the guinea pig SA node, but in the dog the
anti-Cx43-positive strands also expressed Cx40. In all three cases, the
observed anti-Cx43-positive strands may function as preferential
conduction pathways from the central node to the atrium. In addition,
they might provide a gradual increase in cell-to-cell coupling from the
central node toward the right atrium, which, in modeling studies,
prevents clamping of the small SA node to the relatively negative
resting potential of the atrium (26).
Cx expression in isolated myocytes from the SA node. The complexity in morphology and Cx expression observed in tissue sections was reflected in the diversity observed in isolated cells. We used NF marker to distinguish pacemaker myocytes. Not all pacemaker myocytes are positive to this marker, but positive cells have been shown to represent pacemaker myocytes (48). Most spindle and spider cells, which were positive to NF marker and labeled strongly and uniformly with anti-desmin, were immunoreactive to Cx40 and/or Cx46. Immunoreactivity to anti-Cx43 and NF marker was observed mainly in elongated spindle cells, which have been suggested to represent transitional cells (48). Colocalization of Cx40 and Cx43 was often observed in cells with the morphology of atrial myocytes and only rarely in spider, spindle, and elongated spindle cells. Similarly, colocalization of Cx43 and Cx46 in these cells was rare.
Electrophysiological recordings on pacemaker myocyte pairs. In addition to this immunohistochemical and immunocytochemical characterization of Cx expression, we have recorded from cell pairs from the area of the SA node. In a study describing similar recordings on cells from the rabbit SA node, Anumonwo et al. (1) demonstrated the presence of Cx43 in cell pairs with immunocytochemical methods. In recordings from these pairs, the single-channel conductance histogram and the sensitivity of the Gj to Vj were in agreement with the properties of Cx43. Although the average macroscopic Gj we have measured is similar, the Gj-Vj relation and single-channel conductances are clearly different. Moreover, we could not detect Cx43 in the central area of the rabbit SA node. Importantly, we have used criteria for recognizing pacemaker myocytes that are different from those used by Anumonwo et al. Whereas these authors recorded preferentially from round cells with high input resistance, we have recorded from spider and spindle cells, which are believed to represent true pacemaker myocytes by many authors studying isolated cells from the SA node (14, 15, 21, 48). In addition to recording spontaneous action potentials in current-clamp mode, we have routinely checked in voltage-clamp mode for the presence of If, which is characteristic of pacemaker myocytes (15). We are, therefore, confident that we have recorded from true pacemaker myocytes. These criteria were used to select pacemaker myocytes in our double whole cell recordings. For this reason, our electrophysiological data do not reflect the diversity of cell types and Cx expression observed in our immunocytochemical experiments.
After correction for series resistance, the average macroscopic Gj in pacemaker myocyte pairs was 7.5 nS, which is more than an order of magnitude lower than the values we previously reported for myocyte pairs from the rabbit atrial and ventricular working myocardium (50). This poor electrical coupling agrees with observations that gap junctional plaques in the SA node are small and sparse compared with those in the working myocardium (32) and might contribute to the relatively low conduction velocity measured in the rabbit SA node (9, 30). The sensitivity of the Gj to Vj was only very moderate in pacemaker myocyte pairs from the SA node. In double whole cell voltage-clamp recordings, the sensitivity to Vj can be obscured by voltage drops across series resistances (54). For a number of reasons, we believe that the moderate Vj sensitivity observed by us in typical pacemaker myocyte pairs is not artifactual. First, in our perforated-patch recordings, junctional resistances (40 M
to 1.6 G
) were high compared with average
series resistances [8.2 ± 4.6 M
, close to the value obtained
by Habuchi et al. (22) using a similar method]. Moreover,
comparable Gj-Vj
relations were obtained in standard double whole cell recordings with
potassium gluconate as charge carrier (not shown). Second, the
Ca2+ current was well clamped under our recording
conditions, indicating adequate voltage control. Third, the moderate
Vj sensitivity was also observed in cell pairs
that were very poorly coupled and in which single channels could be
resolved without chemical uncoupling (Fig. 5B). Model
studies have shown that Vj sensitivity is also decreased if gap junction channels are assembled in large plaques (54). However, gap-junctional plaques in pacemaker cells
are relatively small (32), and therefore it is unlikely
that this effect can explain the shape of the steady-state
Gj-Vj relation typical of
pacemaker myocyte pairs.
Published values for half-maximal potential and minimum
conductance range from 15 mV and 0.1 for Cx45 (34), 50 mV
and 0.3 for Cx40 (8), and 60 mV and 0.4 for Cx43
(35) to 67 mV and 0.1 for Cx46 (52). Thus the
observed sensitivity to Vj in pacemaker myocyte
pairs is smaller than that of any of the Cx types detected in the SA
node (11; this study). A number of recent studies have investigated the
properties of gap junctions in cells coexpressing two types of Cx
(3, 6, 16, 24). In all cases where electrophysiological properties of putative heteromeric channels were explored,
Vj sensitivity was found to be reduced compared
with homomeric channels formed by the constituent Cxs (6, 16,
24). Although we do not possess the means to investigate this
directly, the observed small sensitivity to Vj
might be due to the occurrence of heteromeric channels in pacemaker
cells of the SA node. With their modest sensitivity to
Vj, these gap junctions will behave as simple
ohmic conductors in the intact tissue.
From pacemaker myocyte pairs, we obtained single-channel conductance
histograms with main populations at 133, 202, and 241 pS. If
single-channel conductances recorded using the perforated-patch method
are comparable to those measured using potassium gluconate as charge
carrier, this is not compatible with the elongated spindle cell
population expressing predominantly Cx43, because Cx43 is expected to
have single-channel conductance of 20, 40-45, and 70 pS in
potassium gluconate (43). In addition, from their
morphology, it is highly probable that these pairs correspond to
the pacemaker myocyte population expressing Cx40 and Cx46. On the basis
of observations reported by Coppen et al. (11), it is
likely that these myocytes also express Cx45. It is not straightforward
to link the observed single-channel conductances with these Cxs,
especially since they might form heteromeric gap junction channels. For
human Cx45, a single-channel conductance of 20 pS in KCl has been
reported (34). Given the signal-to-noise ratio in our
experiments, channels formed by Cx45 will probably have escaped
detection. Unitary conductances of 121 and 153 pS for mouse Cx40 in KCl
(45) and 158 pS for rat Cx40 in potassium glutamate
(2) have been reported. To our knowledge, no reports have
been published on the single-channel conductance of Cx46, but the
reported unitary conductance of rat Cx46 hemichannels is 300 pS
(46). If the unitary conductance of the complete channel
were simply equal to that of two hemichannels in series, it would be
150 pS, similar to the unitary conductance of channels formed by Cx40.
The peak at 133 pS could therefore represent gating of channels formed
by Cx40 or Cx46. It is unlikely that the populations at 202 and 241 pS
can be ascribed to gating of channels formed by Cx40, but neither can
they be ascribed to Cx46 with any certainty. Nonetheless, the
single-channel conductance histogram from pacemaker myocyte pairs
clearly differs from that obtained in rabbit atrial and ventricular
myocytes (50), indicating the presence of at least one
channel type not present in the working myocardium, which, from our
immunocytochemical data, is likely to be Cx46.
Our results do not allow us to infer relative contributions of Cx
subtypes or main single-channel conductances to the macroscopic Gj. There are nevertheless some implications
with respect to electrical coupling between pacemaker cells. Combined
modeling and experimental studies have shown that pacemaker myocytes
from the SA node require a minimal coupling conductance on the order of
0.1 nS for synchronization (49, 56). Therefore, one single
channel with any of the unitary conductances observed by us would be
sufficient to synchronize two cells. Moreover, only 20-40 open
channels are sufficient for the observed medial macroscopic conductance
of 5.3 nS.
For a number of types of Cx, the ability to pair with other types of Cx
has been investigated in Xenopus oocytes (for review see
Ref. 7). In Xenopus oocytes, Cx40 hemichannels
do not form functional gap junction channels with Cx43 or Cx46
hemichannels, whereas Cx43 can form heterotypic channels with Cx46
(53). Cx45, which has also been detected in the central SA
node (11), can form heterotypic channels with Cx40 and
Cx43. Whether incompatibility of Cx can affect electrical coupling in
the SA node is complicated by recent observations that Cx40 and Cx43,
which cannot form heterotypic channels in Xenopus oocytes,
may form heteromeric channels when coexpressed with one cell
(24).
Several studies indicate that, compared with hemichannels formed by
other Cxs, Cx46 hemichannels are more prone to open on membrane
depolarization (40, 46). The high membrane resistance of
pacemaker myocytes would be significantly affected by opening of such
large-conductance hemichannels, but we are not aware of any studies on
SA node pacemaker myocytes describing membrane channels that resemble
the Cx46 hemichannels in behavior.
This report is one of the first to describe the biophysical properties
of gap junctions in the SA node at the level of pacemaker myocyte
pairs. Double whole cell recording will also enable the study of
regulation of these gap junctions in the SA node. Whereas the effects
of many agents on membrane channels in the SA node have been studied in
detail in isolated cells, regulation of gap junction channels has
received comparatively little attention. In the working myocardium,
where intercellular and membrane resistances are low, it is
questionable whether moderate changes in Gj
would significantly affect conduction. In nodal tissue, however, with poor electrical coupling and high membrane resistances, even small changes in Gj might have profound effects on
conduction and synchronization.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors acknowledge Dr. Ronald Wilders for stimulating discussions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Verheule, Krannert Institute of Cardiology, 1111 West 10th St., Indianapolis, IN 46202 (E-mail: sverheul{at}iupui.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 12 May 1999; accepted in final form 7 December 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Anumonwo, JMB,
Wang H-Z,
Trabna-Janik E,
Dunham B,
Veenstra RD,
Delmar M,
and
Jalife J.
Gap junction channels in adult mammalian sinus nodal cells: immunolocalization and electrophysiology.
Circ Res
71:
229-239,
1992
2.
Beblo, DA,
Wang H-Z,
Beyer EC,
Westphale EM,
and
Veenstra RD.
Unique conductance, gating, and selective permeability properties of gap junction channels formed by connexin40.
Circ Res
77:
813-822,
1995
3.
Bevans, CG,
and
Harris AL.
Direct high-affinity modulation of connexin channel activity by cyclic nucleotides.
J Biol Chem
274:
3720-3725,
1999
4.
Bleeker, WK,
Mackaay AJC,
Masson-Pévet M,
Bouman LN,
and
Becker AE.
Functional and morphological organization of the rabbit sinus node.
Circ Res
46:
11-22,
1980
5.
Bouman, LN,
Duivenvoorden JJ,
Bukauskas FF,
and
Jongsma HJ.
Anisotropy of electrotonus in the sinoatrial node of the rabbit heart.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
21:
407-418,
1995.
6.
Brink, PR,
Cronin K,
Banach K,
Peterson E,
Westphale EM,
Seul KH,
Ramanan SV,
and
Beyer EC.
Evidence for heteromeric gap junction channels formed from rat connexin43 and human connexin37.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
273:
C1386-C1396,
1997.
7.
Bruzzone, R,
White TW,
and
Paul DL.
Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signalling.
Eur J Biochem
238:
1-27,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Bukauskas, FF,
Elfgang C,
Willecke K,
and
Weingart R.
Biophysical properties of gap junction channels formed by mouse connexin40 in induced pairs of transfected human HeLa cells.
Biophys J
68:
2289-2298,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
9.
Bukauskas, FF,
Veteikis RP,
Gotman AM,
and
Mutskus KS.
Intercellular coupling in the sinus node of the rabbit heart.
Biofizika
22:
108-112,
1977[Medline].
10.
Coppen, SR,
Dupont E,
Rothery S,
and
Severs NJ.
Connexin45 expression is preferentially associated with the ventricular conduction system in mouse and rat heart.
Circ Res
82:
232-243,
1998
11.
Coppen, SR,
Kodama I,
Boyett MR,
Dobrzynski H,
Takagisji Y,
Honjo H,
Yeh H-I,
and
Severs NJ.
Connexin45, a major connexin of the rabbit sinoatrial node, is co-expressed with connexin43 in a restricted zone at the nodal-crista terminalis border.
J Histochem Cytochem
47:
907-918,
1999
12.
Davis, LM,
Rodefeld ME,
Green K,
Beyer EC,
and
Saffitz JE.
Gap junction protein phenotypes of the human heart and conduction system.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
6:
813-822,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
13.
Delorme, B,
Jary-Guichard T,
Briand JP,
Willecke K,
Gros D,
and
Theveniau-Ruissy M.
Expression pattern of connexin gene products at the early developmental stages of the mouse cardiovascular system.
Circ Res
81:
423-437,
1997
14.
Denyer, JC,
and
Brown HF.
Rabbit sinoatrial node cells: isolation and electrophysiological properties.
J Physiol (Lond)
428:
405-424,
1990
15.
Difrancesco, D,
Ferroni A,
Mazzanti M,
and
Tromba C.
Properties of the hyperpolarizing-activated current (If) in cells isolated from the rabbit sinoatrial node.
J Physiol (Lond)
377:
61-88,
1986
16.
Ebihara, L,
Xu X,
Oberti C,
Beyer EC,
and
Berthoud VM.
Co-expression of lens fiber connexins modifies hemi-gap-junctional channel behavior.
Biophys J
76:
198-206,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
17.
El Aoumari, A,
Fromaget C,
Dupont E,
Reggio H,
Durbec P,
Briand JP,
Beller K,
Kreitman B,
and
Gros D.
Conservation of a cytoplasmatic carboxy terminal domain of Cx43, a gap junction protein, in mammal heart and brain.
J Membr Biol
115:
229-240,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
18.
Goodenough, DA,
Goliger JA,
and
Paul DL.
Connexins, connexons and intercellular communication.
Annu Rev Biochem
65:
475-502,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Gorza, L,
and
Vitadello M.
Distribution of conduction system fibers in the developing and adult rabbit heart revealed by an antineurofilament antibody.
Circ Res
65:
360-369,
1989
20.
Gros, D,
and
Jongsma HJ.
Connexins in mammalian heart function.
Bioessays
18:
719-730,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Guo, J,
Ono K,
and
Noma A.
A sustained inward current activated at the diastolic potential range in rabbit sinoatrial node cells.
J Physiol (Lond)
483:
1-13,
1995
22.
Habuchi, Y,
Lu L-L,
Morikawa J,
and
Yoshimura M.
Angiotensin II inhibition of L-type Ca2+ current in sinoatrial node cells of rabbits.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
268:
H1053-H1060,
1995
23.
Haefliger, J-A,
Bruzzone R,
Jenkins NA,
Gilbert DJ,
Copeland NG,
and
Paul DL.
Four novel members of the connexin family of gap junction proteins.
J Biol Chem
267:
2057-2064,
1992
24.
He, DS,
Jiang JX,
Taffet SM,
and
Burt JM.
Formation of heteromeric gap junction channels by connexins 40 and 43 in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:
6495-6500,
1999
25.
Jalife, J.
Mutual entrainment and electrical coupling as mechanisms of synchronous firing of rabbit sinoatrial pace-maker cells.
J Physiol (Lond)
356:
221-243,
1989
26.
Joyner, RW,
and
van Capelle FJL
Propagation through electrically coupled cells: how a small SA node drives a large atrium.
Biophys J
50:
1157-1164,
1986[Web of Science][Medline].
27.
Kanter, HL,
Saffitz JE,
and
Beyer EC.
Cardiac myocytes express multiple gap junction proteins.
Circ Res
70:
438-444,
1992
28.
Kempen, MJA van,
Fromaget C,
Gros D,
Moorman AFM,
and
Lamers WH.
Spatial distribution of connexin43, the major cardiac gap junction protein, in the developing and adult rat heart.
Circ Res
68:
1638-1651,
1991
29.
Kempen MJA van, ten Velde I, Wessels A, Oosthoek PW, Gros D, Jongsma
HJ, Moorman AFM, and Lamers WH. Differential connexin distribution
accommodates cardiac function in different species. Microsc Res
Tech 420-436: 1995.
30.
Kirchhof, CJHJ,
Bonke FIM,
Allessie MA,
Roos AGJM,
and
Lammers WJEP
An easy and direct approach to investigate conduction properties of the rabbit sinus node.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
11:
667-675,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
31.
Kwong, KF,
Schuessler RB,
Green KG,
Laing JG,
Beyer EC,
Boineau JP,
and
Saffitz JE.
Differential expression of gap junction proteins in the canine sinus node.
Circ Res
82:
604-612,
1998
32.
Masson Pévet, M,
Bleeker WK,
and
Gros D.
The plasma membrane of leading pacemaker cells in the rabbit sinus node: a qualitative and quantitative ultrastructural analysis.
Circ Res
45:
621-629,
1979
33.
Michaels, DC,
Matyas EP,
and
Jalife J.
Mechanisms of pacemaker synchronization: a new hypothesis.
Circ Res
61:
704-714,
1987
34.
Moreno, AP,
Laing JG,
Beyer EC,
and
Spray DC.
Properties of gap junction channels formed of connexin45 endogenously expressed in human hepatoma (SKHep1) cells.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
268:
C356-C365,
1995
35.
Moreno, AP,
Rook MB,
Fishman GI,
and
Spray DC.
Gap junction channels: distinct voltage-sensitive and -insensitive states.
Biophys J
67:
113-119,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
36.
Neyton, J,
and
Trautmann A.
Single channel currents of an intercellular junction.
Nature
317:
331-335,
1985[Medline].
37.
Oosthoek, PW,
Viragh S,
Mayen AEM,
van Kempen MJA,
Lamers WH,
and
Moorman AFM
Immunohistochemical delineation of the conduction system. I. The sinoatrial node.
Circ Res
73:
473-481,
1993
38.
Opthof, T.
Gap junctions in the sinoatrial node: immunohistochemical localization and correlation with activation pattern.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
5:
138-143,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
39.
Opthof, T,
de Jonge B,
Mackaay AJC,
Bleeker WK,
Masson-Pévet M,
Jongsma HJ,
and
Bouman LN.
Functional and morphological organization of the guinea pig sinoatrial node compared with the rabbit sinoatrial node.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
17:
549-564,
1985[Web of Science][Medline].
40.
Paul, DL,
Ebihara L,
Takemoto LJ,
Swenson KI,
and
Goodenough DA.
Connexin46, a novel lens gap junction protein, induces voltage-gated currents in nonjunctional plasma membrane of Xenopus oocytes.
J Cell Biol
115:
1077-1089,
1991
41.
Reed, KE,
Westphale EM,
Larson DM,
Wang H-Z,
Veenstra RD,
and
Beyer EC.
Molecular cloning and functional expression of human connexin37, an endothelial gap junction protein.
J Clin Invest
91:
997-1004,
1993.
42.
Rijen, HVM van,
Wilders R,
van Ginneken ACG,
and
Jongsma HJ.
Quantitative analysis of dual whole-cell voltage-clamp determination of gap junctional conductance.
Pflügers Arch
430:
141-151,
1998.
43.
Takens-Kwak, BR,
Sáez Wilders JCR,
Chanson M,
Fishman GI,
Herzberg EL,
Spray DC,
and
Jongsma HJ.
Effects of cGMP-dependent phosphorylation on rat and human connexin43 gap junction channels.
Pflügers Arch
430:
770-778,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
44.
Trabna-Janik, E,
Coombs W,
Lemanski LF,
Delmar M,
and
Jalife J.
Immunohistochemical localization of gap junction protein channels in hamster sinoatrial node in correlation with electrophysiologic mapping of the pacemaker region.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
5:
125-137,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
45.
Traub, O,
Eckert R,
Lichtenberg-Fraté H,
Elfgang C,
Bastide B,
Scheidtmann KH,
Hülser DF,
and
Willecke K.
Immunochemical and electrophysiological characterization of murine connexin40 and -43 in mouse tissues and transfected human cells.
Eur J Cell Biol
64:
101-112,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
46.
Trexler, EB,
Bennett MVL,
Bargiello TA,
and
Verselis VK.
Voltage gating and permeation in a gap junction hemichannel.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
5836-5841,
1996
47.
Velde, I ten,
de Jonge B,
Verheijck EE,
van Kempen MJA,
Analbers L,
Gros D,
and
Jongsma HJ.
Spatial distribution of connexin43, the major cardiac gap junction protein, visualizes the cellular network for impulse propagation from sinoatrial node to atrium.
Circ Res
76:
802-811,
1995
48.
Verheijck, EE,
Wessels A,
van Ginneken ACG,
Bourier J,
Markman MWM,
Vermeulen JLM,
de Bakker JMT,
Lamers WH,
Opthof T,
and
Bouman LN.
Distribution of atrial and nodal cells within the rabbit sinoatrial node.
Circulation
97:
1623-1631,
1998
49.
Verheijck, EE,
Wilders R,
Joyner RW,
Golod DA,
Kumar R,
Jongsma HJ,
Bouman LN,
and
van Ginneken ACG
Pacemaker synchronization of electrically coupled rabbit sinoatrial node cells.
J Gen Physiol
11:
95-112,
1998.
50.
Verheule, S,
van Kempen MJA,
te Welscher PHJA,
Kwak BR,
and
Jongsma HJ.
Characterization of gap junction channels in adult rabbit atrial and ventricular myocardium.
Circ Res
80:
673-681,
1997
51.
White, RL,
Spray DC,
Campos de Carvalho AC,
Wittenberg BA,
and
Bennet MLV
Some electrical and pharmacological properties of gap junctions between adult ventricular myocytes.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
249:
C447-C455,
1985
52.
White, TW,
Bruzzone R,
Wolfram S,
Paul DL,
and
Goodenough DA.
Selective interactions among multiple connexin proteins expressed in the vertebrate lens: the second extracellular domain is a determinant of compatibility between connexins.
J Cell Biol
125:
879-892,
1994
53.
White, TW,
Paul DL,
Goodenough DA,
and
Bruzzone R.
Functional analysis of selective interactions among rodent connexins.
Mol Biol Cell
6:
459-470,
1995[Abstract].
54.
Wilders, R,
and
Jongsma HJ.
Limitations of the dual voltage clamp method in assaying conductance and kinetics of gap junction channels.
Biophys J
63:
942-953,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
55.
Wilders, R,
Jongsma HJ,
and
van Ginneken ACG
Pacemaker activity of the rabbit sinoatrial node: a comparison of mathematical models.
Biophys J
60:
1202-1216,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
56.
Wilders, R,
Verheijck EE,
Kumar R,
Goolsby WN,
van Ginneken ACG,
Joyner RW,
and
Jongsma HJ.
Model clamp and its application to synchronization of rabbit sinoatrial node cells.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
271:
H2168-H2182,
1996
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-M. Chaldoupi, P. Loh, R. N.W. Hauer, J. M.T. de Bakker, and H. V.M. van Rijen The role of connexin40 in atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2009; 84(1): 15 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A.B. van Veen, H. V.M. van Rijen, M. J.A. van Kempen, L. Miquerol, T. Opthof, D. Gros, M. A. Vos, H. J. Jongsma, and J. M.T. de Bakker Discontinuous Conduction in Mouse Bundle Branches Is Caused by Bundle-Branch Architecture Circulation, October 11, 2005; 112(15): 2235 - 2244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E.J Teunissen and M. F.A Bierhuizen Transcriptional control of myocardial connexins Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2004; 62(2): 246 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P Moreno Biophysical properties of homomeric and heteromultimeric channels formed by cardiac connexins Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2004; 62(2): 276 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. SAEZ, V. M. BERTHOUD, M. C. BRANES, A. D. MARTINEZ, and E. C. BEYER Plasma Membrane Channels Formed by Connexins: Their Regulation and Functions Physiol Rev, October 1, 2003; 83(4): 1359 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M.W van der Velden and H. J Jongsma Cardiac gap junctions and connexins: their role in atrial fibrillation and potential as therapeutic targets Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 270 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Verheijck, R. Wilders, and L. N. Bouman Atrio-Sinus Interaction Demonstrated by Blockade of the Rapid Delayed Rectifier Current Circulation, February 19, 2002; 105(7): 880 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |