Vol. 280, Issue 6, H2920-H2928, June 2001
Nonlinear dynamics of heart rate variability in
cocaine-exposed neonates during sleep
Smita
Garde,
Michael G.
Regalado,
Vicki L.
Schechtman, and
Michael C. K.
Khoo
Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Southern
California, Los Angeles 90089; Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai
Medical Center, Los Angeles 90048; and Brain Research Institute,
University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
90095
 |
ABSTRACT |
The aim of this study was to
determine the effects of prenatal cocaine exposure (PCE) on the
dynamics of heart rate variability in full-term neonates during sleep.
R-R interval (RRI) time series from 9 infants with PCE and 12 controls
during periods of stable quiet sleep and active sleep were analyzed
using autoregressive modeling and nonlinear dynamics. There were no
differences between the two groups in spectral power distribution,
approximate entropy, correlation dimension, and nonlinear
predictability. However, application of surrogate data analysis to
these measures revealed a significant degree of nonlinear RRI dynamics
in all subjects. A parametric model, consisting of a nonlinear
delayed-feedback system with stochastic noise as the perturbing input,
was employed to estimate the relative contributions of linear and
nonlinear deterministic dynamics in the data. Both infant groups showed similar proportional contributions in linear, nonlinear, and stochastic dynamics. However, approximate entropy, correlation dimension, and
nonlinear prediction error were all decreased in active versus quiet
sleep; in addition, the parametric model revealed a doubling of the
linear component and a halving of the nonlinear contribution to overall
heart rate variability. Spectral analysis indicated a shift in relative
power toward lower frequencies. We conclude that 1) RRI
dynamics in infants with PCE and normal controls are similar; and
2) in both groups, sympathetic dominance during active sleep
produces primarily periodic low-frequency oscillations in RRI, whereas
in quiet sleep vagal modulation leads to RRI fluctuations that are
broadband and dynamically more complex.
autonomic function; cardiovascular control; infants; modeling
 |
INTRODUCTION |
PRENATAL COCAINE
EXPOSURE is believed to affect infant heart rate control and
sleep-wake state organization. However, the number of studies that have
investigated these effects are few, and the conclusions that have been
drawn from the various data pools remain ambiguous (20).
On one hand, some studies (21, 33) have found mean heart
rate to be elevated and heart rate variability (HRV) to be reduced in
infants with prenatal cocaine exposure. On the other hand, a recent
study (23) found reduced median heart rates and increased
HRV in cocaine-exposed neonates relative to controls. Spectral analysis
of these data has shown that the higher HRV is due to increases in
spectral power across all frequency bands in quiet sleep and increases
in spectral power in the low-frequency (0.03-0.1 Hz) and
mid-frequency (0.1-0.2 Hz) bands in active sleep
(24). These results differ somewhat from the study of
Oriol et al. (21), which found a significant reduction in
high-frequency power.
The apparent discrepancy among these previous findings may be due in
part to differences in the development of the subject groups that were
studied as well as to the difficulty of controlling and determining the
amount of prenatal cocaine exposure. Another possibility is that
summary statistics and linear measures of heart rate dynamics may not
be sufficiently sensitive to uncover differences in cardiovascular
function between infants with prenatal cocaine exposure and controls
without prior prenatal cocaine exposure. There may well be more subtle
differences that become detectable only through methods that have the
capability of characterizing the nonlinear aspects of the underlying
dynamics. A number of studies (9, 11, 29) have suggested
that the irregular behavior found in HRV may be a manifestation of
deterministic chaos: complex dynamics that arise from nonlinear
interactions among the many mechanisms that control or influence heart
rate. However, other studies (7, 14), applying more
stringent mathematical tests for chaos, found no evidence to support
this hypothesis, although these researchers did find significant
nonlinear correlations in the data. Recent findings by some groups
(6, 13) suggest further that the irregular dynamics of HRV
may be due in large part to stochastic influences.
In this study, we applied a variety of computational techniques to
determine whether there are differences in the nonlinear dynamics of
HRV of cocaine-exposed neonates and age-matched controls. We further
hypothesized that the fluctuations in R-R interval (RRI) in both groups
of neonates can be modeled as the output of a dynamic deterministic
feedback system with stochastic noise as a possible perturbing input.
Employing this structural framework, we sought to determine whether the
dynamics of the feedback system could be adequately characterized by a
linear model or whether it was necessary to include nonlinear
contributions. Furthermore, this model allowed us to estimate the
relative contributions of deterministic versus stochastic components to
overall HRV in these two groups of infants during quiet and active sleep.
 |
METHODS |
Subjects.
We studied 12 normal neonates and 9 infants with prenatal cocaine
exposure. All infants were products of single births by vaginal
delivery with birth weights of >2,500 g and Apgar scores at 5 min of
>7. The birth weights of the two groups of infants [controls
3,415 ± 130 g (SE) vs. cocaine-exposed 3,528 ± 236 g] were not significantly different. All subjects were studied at 2 wk
postpartum. The mothers of all the subjects were single
African-American and Hispanic women. Cocaine exposure was determined by
maternal self-report or neonatal toxicological urinalysis (EMIT
procedure) in the perinatal period. Histories of current and past
cocaine (reported in terms of frequency of use during each trimester of pregnancy), alcohol (reported as absolute ounces of alcohol per week
during each trimester), and tobacco (reported as mean number of
cigarettes per week during each trimester) use were taken from each
woman at the time of the sleep recording according to the recommendations of Day et al. (8). The Obstetric
Complications Scale (17) was completed for each
participant. Mothers of the control infants tested negative for cocaine
and were selected from the same population of single African-American
and Hispanic women. Radioimmunoassay of the mothers' hair
(3) was used to verify cocaine exposure and the lack
thereof in the cocaine group and the control group, respectively. The
study was approved by the institutional review board of the King-Drew
Medical Center (Los Angeles, CA), and each participating mother gave
written informed consent.
Measurements and data preprocessing.
Four-hour daytime recordings of the electrocardiogram (ECG) were
obtained from the infants during spontaneous sleep and wakefulness. These recordings were made between 0900 and 1500 hours. Each 1-min epoch (of a total of ~240 epochs) was classified as quiet sleep, active sleep, indeterminate sleep, or waking on the basis of behavioral criteria using a previously reported protocol (25). The
intervals between successive R waves of the ECG (RRI) were determined
with 1-ms accuracy by subtracting the time of each R wave from the time
of the previous R wave. In each subject, we selected for analysis two
artifact-free segments of RRI data of ~1,000 beats (8-10 min)
duration each; one of these was from quiet sleep and the other was from
active sleep. Care was taken to ensure that no state changes occurred
within a given segment. Segments representing wakefulness were not
included in our comparisons because we were unable to find a
sufficiently large number of data segments (containing 1,000 contiguous
beats) that were free of artifacts. During wakefulness, there was
frequently crying or other behavioral activities that produced motion
artifacts in the ECG recordings.
All the data sets were first linearly detrended. To test further for
stationarity, each detrended data set was divided into segments
of 1-min duration, and the means and standard deviations of the RRI in
each segment were computed. Subsequently, for each subject, we applied
one-way repeated measures analysis of variance to determine if there
were significant differences among the segment means; the same
procedure was applied to the segment standard deviations. We found no
intersegmental differences in either means or standard deviations in
the selected data sets, suggesting that all the time series to be
analyzed were stationary.
Spectral analysis.
A linear interpolation algorithm was first used to convert the RRI into
equally spaced measures of heart rate with a new sampling rate of 16 Hz
(4). After linear detrending, the power spectrum of HRV
was computed from each data segment using the prewhitened autoregressive spectral analysis method of Birch et al.
(5). Briefly, this procedure involved the following steps:
fitting an autoregressive model to the data; determining the residuals between the measurements and the model predictions; computing the
spectrum of the residuals via fast Fourier transform; and, finally,
filtering the residuals spectrum with the autoregressive model to
obtain the spectrum of variations in RRI. It should be noted that a
relatively high resampling rate (16 Hz) was required to obtain good
frequency resolution in the resulting spectrum, because this algorithm
required the fast Fourier transform of the residuals. Before the
spectral computations, a preliminary analysis showed that an
autoregressive model of order 10 was adequate for fitting the data.
We obtained compact descriptors of the spectral characteristics of HRV
by deducing the power contained in specific frequency bands. These
bands were as follows: low-frequency power (LFP), between 0.03 and 0.1 Hz; mid-frequency power (MFP), between 0.1 and 0.2 Hz; and
high-frequency power (HFP), between 0.3 and 2 Hz. To gain further
insight into the relative contributions of the sympathetic and
parasympathetic nervous systems to cardiac autonomic control, we
computed the low-to-high frequency ratio (LHR), defined as
|
(1)
|
LHR has been used to represent sympathovagal balance, so that an
increased value would reflect greater sympathetic modulation and/or
reduced vagal modulation of heart rate (31). We also computed the normalized high-frequency power (NHFP), a commonly accepted index of parasympathetic modulation of the heart
(31), by dividing HFP by the total spectral power between
0.03 and 2 Hz. Total HRV was assessed by computing the standard
deviation (SDRR) of each data set after removal of any linear trend.
Approximate entropy.
Approximate entropy (ApEn) is defined as the logarithmic likelihood
that the patterns of the data that are close to each other will remain
close for the next comparison with a longer pattern. Thus ApEn provides
a generalized measure of regularity. A deterministic signal with high
regularity has a higher probability of remaining close for longer
vectors of the series and hence has a very small ApEn value. On the
other hand, a random signal has a very low regularity and produces a
high ApEn value.
To compute ApEn of each data set, m-dimensional vector
sequences [x(n)] were constructed from the RRI
time series
|
(2)
|
where the index n can take on values ranging from 1 to N
m + 1 and N is the total
number of data points in the RRI time series. If the distance
between two vectors x(i) and
x(j), is defined as
d[x(i),x(j)],
then we have
|
(3a)
|
where
C
(r) = {number of x(j) such that
d[x(i),
x(j)]
r}/(N
m + l) and
r is the tolerance ApEn
(m,r,N) is then defined as follows
|
(3b)
|
The selection of the parameter m was made
such that the conditional probabilities defined in Eq. 3a
could be estimated with reasonable accuracy from 1,000 data points. On
the basis of the work of Pincus et al. (22), this
suggested two possibilities: m = 2 and m =
3. The tolerance r was chosen such that it was larger than
most of the noise but, at the same time, not so large that detailed
information about the system dynamics would be lost. We found values of
r ranging between 10 and 20% of SDRR to be adequate from
this perspective.
Correlation dimension.
The correlation dimension (CD) describes the dimensionality of the
underlying process in relation to its geometrical reconstruction in
phase space. We estimated CD using an approach based on the Grassberger-Procaccia algorithm (10). From the RRI time
series, the following m-dimensional time-lag vectors were
first constructed
|
(4)
|
where
is the embedding lag. For each of the vectors
zi we computed the distances
zi
zj to all the remaining vector
points zj, excluding those that were
close because of temporal correlations (15). The number of
data points within a distance r in the phase space for each
vector was counted, and this is counted for all
zi. The correlation integral
C(r) is given by
|
(5a)
|
where
min is the average correlation time
(expressed in units of the number of data points), defined as the time
taken for the autocorrelation function to first decay to
1/e.
(u) is the Heaviside function, defined as
|
(5b)
|
C(r) was computed for a range of
values of distances r, and, subsequently, log
C(r) was plotted against log r. A
scaling region was chosen in which this curve was
approximately linear, and CD was computed as the slope of the
curve in this region
|
(6)
|
The dimension m of the reconstructed
vectors was selected by applying the method of false nearest neighbors
(26). For the embedding time lag
, we chose the value
of one beat, because this was the natural time scale of the RRI time
series (2). We also repeated our analyses with embedding
lags of up to six beats (corresponding to the first zero crossing of
the autocorrelation functions in most of our data sets), but these did
not alter the relative differences of CD among subject groups and sleep states.
Nonlinear predictability.
Nonlinear predictability provides a means for detecting determinism in
any given time series. Predictability is low for a stochastic time
series regardless of how far in the future one tries to predict. On the
other hand, a periodic signal is highly predictive. With a chaotic
signal or a correlated noise sequence, predictability would be high in
the immediate future, but with increasing time steps, predictive
capability would decrease significantly.
In this study, we employed a modification of the Sugihara and May
method (30). Time-delay vectors were first reconstructed from each RRI signal using the procedures described earlier. The embedded sequence was divided into equal halves, of which the first
half was used as the library pattern to make predictions about the
behavior of the second half. For a given vector
zt ("predictee") selected from
the second half of the time series, the m + 1 vectors
located closest (in Euclidean distance) to it were determined from the
library patterns so that the predictee was contained in the smallest
simplex formed by the m + 1 neighbors. The predicted value
of the predictee p time steps ahead,
x't + p, was determined by following the time evolution of each of the m + 1 closest neighbors. If xj
and x
(j = 1 ... m + 1) represent
the first coordinates of each of the m + 1 closest neighbors
at the current time and after p time steps, respectively,
then
|
(7a)
|
where the weights wj were chosen to be
inversely proportional to the distances between each of the m
+ 1 closest neighbors and the predictee vector
zt, i.e.
|
(7b)
|
As a measure of (non)predictability, we computed the normalized
mean square error (
2). Between the one step ahead
(p = 1) prediction and its corresponding data value
|
(7c)
|
where t is the time index of the predictee, and
is the mean value of x.
Detection of nonlinearity using surrogate data.
The preceding measures of nonlinear dynamics can be easily corrupted by
the presence of stochastic noise. The surrogate data technique provides
a means for testing the statistical significance of each computed
measure. We employed the amplitude-adjusted Fourier transform algorithm
(32) to generate surrogate data sets from the original
time series. Here, the original data set was first rescaled so that the
distribution became Gaussian. Surrogate data sets of the same length
were then generated from this rescaled time series by randomizing the
phase components of its Fourier transform while preserving the
magnitude of the spectrum. Finally, the Gaussian surrogates were
rescaled back to the original amplitude distribution of the data.
For each of the estimated measures of nonlinear dynamics, we computed
the significance level (
) as
|
(8)
|
where Qr is the parameter value for the
real data, and µsurr and
surr are the mean
and variance of the surrogates, respectively. A significance level >2
implied that we could reject the null hypothesis that the computed
measure reflected linear correlations within the time series being analyzed.
Parametric models.
In addition to detecting nonlinearity in the underlying dynamics of
HRV, we were also interested in determining the extent of the
nonlinearity present. To quantify the degree of nonlinearity, we turned
to parametric modeling. Figure 1 shows
two possible model structures, both assuming delayed feedback, that can
produce the dynamic fluctuations observed in the RRI time series.
Model A assumes that the feedback dynamics are constrained
to be linear, whereas in model B the dynamics of the
feedback block are nonlinear. In model A, aperiodic
fluctuations in RRI can only be produced when the feedback system is
driven by a stochastic noise input. In contrast, in model B,
aperiodic fluctuations in RRI can arise with or without any noise
perturbation if the system dynamics are chaotic. The feedback structure
inherent in both models encapsulates all the deterministic correlation
between the present RRI and past changes in RRI. Thus both models
represent the totality of all physiological mechanisms that can affect
HRV, including respiration. The stochastic noise that enters these
systems represents the combined effects of random fluctuations in
autonomic neural modulation of heart rate, cardiac contractility,
peripheral circulatory resistance, and blood pressure as well as
transient variations in sleep-wake state (microarousals).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Parametric models for underlying dynamics of heart rate
variability. Top: model A, linear model;
bottom: model B, nonlinear model.
RRIn, change in R-R interval (RRI) at beat
n from the mean RRI of the data set in question.
|
|
Model A was represented mathematically by the autoregressive
equation
|
(9)
|
where
RRIn represents the change in
RRI at beat n from the mean RRI of the data set in question,
en is the residual error between the
nth measurement and the corresponding model prediction,
ai represents the ith model
coefficient (1
i
K), and
K is the model order. In model B, we
assumed the nonlinear feedback structure to take the form of a
d-degree polynomial function
|
(10)
|
M is the total number of unknown parameters to be
estimated in Eq. 10, where
|
(11)
|
In model B, K was assumed to be equal to
the embedding dimension (1), which we computed using the
false nearest neighbor algorithm (26). The coefficient
ai (l
i
M) was estimated from the RRI signal using the
Korenberg method (16), which employs a recursive
Gram-Schmidt procedure for orthogonal expansion. With the use of
simulated data, Korenberg (16) showed that this algorithm produces reliable estimates of the expansion coefficients for data sets
of 1,000 points with noise levels as large as 32% of signal amplitude.
In both models, the total number of model parameters to be estimated,
M (note that K = M in model A),
was determined by increasing the number of terms in Eqs. 9 or 10 until the following information criterion (IC)
(1) was minimized
|
(12)
|
The percent contribution to total variance (CTV) in the data for
both models was defined as follows
|
(13)
|
Once the optimal model order (for model B) was
determined, the variance of the residuals (
n)
was taken to represent the stochastic contribution to total variance in
the data. Thus the variance of
n provided an
estimate of the magnitude of the noise input driving the feedback
model (Fig. 1, bottom; model B).
Statistical analysis.
Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was employed, with
subject group (control vs. cocaine) as one factor and sleep state
(quiet sleep vs. active sleep) as the repeated factor. A Student-Newman-Keuls test was employed for post hoc multiple pairwise comparisons if statistical significance was indicated by the analysis of variance. All statistical tests were implemented using
SigmaStat/Windows (Jandel Scientific; San Rafael, CA). The level of
significance was set at P = 0.05 unless otherwise
stated. In addition, each of the indexes of nonlinear dynamics (i.e.,
ApEn, CD, and nonlinear predictability) was tested in every subject for
significance by computing
in Eq. 8 and determining
whether the computed value was >2.
 |
RESULTS |
Spectral analysis.
Table 1 shows the values for the
estimated parameters in the two groups of infants in quiet and active
sleep. Mean RRI in both groups of infants was not significantly
different. There were no group differences in SDRR, LHR, and NHFP.
However, NHFP was significantly higher in quiet sleep compared with
active sleep in both groups (P < 0.001). At the same
time, LHR and SDRR were each higher in active sleep relative to quiet
sleep (P < 0.001 for both).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1.
Values for estimated parameters in control and prenatal
cocaine-exposed infants in quiet and active sleep
|
|
Approximate entropy.
ApEn was not significantly different between the two groups regardless
of which combinations of parameters (m = 2 or 3 and r
= 10 or 20%) were employed. However, ApEn was higher in quiet sleep compared with active sleep (P < 0.001). The
results for the individual subjects for m = 2 and r
= 10% are presented graphically in Fig.
2 (cocaine subjects are shown as filled
circles, whereas the controls appear as open squares). For each
subject, the ApEn value deduced from data (horizontal axis) has been
plotted against the mean ( ±2
confidence intervals, shown as error
bars; vertical axis) of the corresponding ApEn values for the 10 sets
of surrogates generated from the original time series. Significance
levels for the difference in ApEn between the measured RRI and the
corresponding surrogate data were >2 in virtually all subjects in both
groups and states. In Fig. 2, this result is represented by the fact that almost all the circles and error bars lie above the line of
identity, which is the graphical correlate of the null hypothesis. Thus
ApEn values were found to be lower than what would have been expected
if the dynamics of the RRI fluctuations reflected only linear
correlations. In other words, the time series of all subjects showed a
greater degree of regularity as a consequence of nonlinear correlations
in the data.
Correlation dimension.
The estimated values of CD for the two infant groups in the two sleep
states are displayed in Table 1. Group differences were not
significant. However, CD was higher in quiet sleep compared with active
sleep in both groups (P < 0.001). Figure
3 shows the estimated CD values plotted
against their corresponding surrogate data values. The surrogate data
show higher CD values than the RRI signal itself in both states. The
significance factor of this difference in the original data and the
surrogate data was >2
for both groups, indicating the contribution
of nonlinear correlations in the signal.
Prediction analysis.
The normalized variance of the error between the one-step-ahead
predictions and their corresponding data values was higher in quiet
sleep versus active sleep (P < 0.001) but was not
significantly different between the cocaine and control subjects (Table
1). Individual prediction errors are plotted against the corresponding prediction errors estimated from the surrogate data sets in Fig. 4. In most of the cases, prediction error
is larger in the surrogate data relative to the prediction error
deduced from the original data sets, implying again that the nonlinear
contribution to the underlying dynamics was significant in both groups
of infants in both sleep states.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Results of nonlinear prediction analysis shown as the normalized
mean squared error. A: quiet sleep; B: active
sleep.
|
|
Parametric model.
The number of autoregressive terms that minimized the cost function
(Eq. 12) for model A ranged from 7 to 14. In
model B, the "optimum" model order contained 36-43
terms, which generally included linear, second-degree, and some
third-degree terms. Figure 5 shows the
percent CTV for model A (top) and model
B (bottom) in each individual data set. Statistical
analysis showed that there were no differences in CTV between subject
groups. However, CTV increased substantially (P < 0.001) from model A to model B in both sleep states. Furthermore, there was a significant state versus model interaction (P < 0.001). In quiet sleep, the linear
model (model A) was able to account for 31.6 ± 5.1%
of the dynamic fluctuations in RRI in the cocaine group and 32.6 ± 5.2% in the control group, whereas in active sleep the linear CTV
increased to 65.7 ± 3.3 and 65.2 ± 2.1%, respectively. In
quiet sleep, CTV for the nonlinear model was 81.5 ± 4.7 and
76.6 ± 3.5% in the cocaine and control groups, respectively.
These contributions remained little changed in active sleep at
85.6 ± 2.5 and 89.9 ± 1.0%, respectively. Because model B also includes linear terms, these results imply that
the nonlinear contribution to RRI dynamics in quiet sleep was
substantially larger than that in active sleep. However, there were no
differences in nonlinear contributions between infant groups.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Results of parametric models shown as percent contribution to total
variance. Top: model A, linear model;
bottom: model B, nonlinear model.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Two findings emerged with great consistency in this study. First,
there was a substantial amount of intersubject variability in all the
measures of linear and nonlinear dynamics that were estimated. Second,
we could find no significant differences in ApEn, CD, nonlinear
predictability, or any of the spectral measures between a group of
neonates with prenatal cocaine exposure and a group of age-matched
controls. The second finding could well be a consequence of the first:
a large degree of intersubject variability can easily mask small
differences in heart rate dynamics between the groups. It should be
emphasized that the large intersubject variability was found not only
in the cocaine-exposed group but also in the control group. Thus it
appears that any alterations in heart rate dynamics in cocaine-exposed
neonates are likely to be too subtle for detection even by nonlinear
techniques unless much larger sample sizes are employed. This could
explain why previous studies using spectral analysis of HRV have
arrived at differing conclusions. For instance, Mehta et al.
(19) reported a significantly lower LHR and higher NHFP in
21 cocaine-exposed neonates, suggesting enhanced parasympathetic
activity. Oriol et al. (21) found reduced overall HRV,
LFP, and HFP in a group of five cocaine-exposed neonates relative to
normal controls, which suggested increased sympathetic tone. On the
other hand, they did not find significant differences in ApEn between
the groups. Another confounding factor could be the possible influence of nonstationarity in these previous studies. In the Mehta et al. study
(19), the spectral analysis results appear to have been
based on data derived from Holter recordings of 22 h or more. Comparison of spectral indexes of HRV between the cocaine infants and
controls was performed without consideration of the sleep-wake state.
In the Oriol et al. study (21), the data segments analyzed were similar in length (~10 min) to ours. However, only visual inspection was employed to determine stationarity of the data, whereas
in our present study we applied statistical testing to rule out any
nonstationary behavior.
In our previous analysis of a larger group of 15 cocaine-exposed
neonates and 13 controls (inclusive of the subjects studied here), the
cocaine infants showed enhanced HRV, reflected by an increase in
spectral power across all frequency bands during active sleep; however,
in quiet sleep, only HFP was higher (24). The discrepancy
between these results and our present findings may be due in part to
the slightly larger sample size employed in the previous analysis. In
the present study, we were constrained to use only a subset of the
overall database because, in some of the subjects, we were not able to
find contiguous periods of at least eight (1 min) epochs of quiet or
active sleep. The discrepancy may also be related to methodological
differences between our previous and present analyses. In the previous
study, spectral estimates were computed on an epoch-by-epoch basis.
These epochs were classified into one of the following four states:
quiet sleep, active sleep, indeterminate sleep, and wakefulness.
Subsequently, the median value deduced from all epochs in each state
was taken to be representative of the spectral estimate in that state
for a given subject. No attention was paid to whether these median values reflected heart rate dynamics during relatively stable and
extended periods of a given sleep state. In contrast, in the present
study, care was taken to ensure that the data analyzed were extracted
from sections in which there were 8-10 contiguous epochs (1 min)
of either quiet or active sleep; furthermore, we were careful to test
these data segments for stationarity. Because sleep
organization is known to be altered in cocaine-exposed infants (25), it is possible that the conclusions arrived at in
our previous study may have been affected by the cardiorespiratory effects of transitions between states. If this was indeed the case, our
present findings would suggest that the primary effect of prenatal
cocaine exposure is the disorganization of sleep architecture and that
any observed differences in heart rate control are secondary to these
alterations in sleep-state patterning.
Application of the surrogate data method to our estimates of ApEn, CD,
and nonlinear predictability showed that there was a significant
nonlinear deterministic component in the HRV of both groups of neonates
during quiet and active sleep. Parametric modeling confirmed this
finding and, furthermore, allowed us to quantify the relative
contributions of the linear and nonlinear components of the underlying
dynamics. Our results suggest that the dynamic fluctuations in RRI in
both cocaine-exposed and control infants can be modeled as the output
of a deterministic nonlinear delayed-feedback system with stochastic
noise as the perturbing input ("model B"). In both
infant groups, the nonlinear system was of relatively low order,
containing lagged products of
RRI up to only the third degree. We
found that the combined contributions from linear and nonlinear
correlations accounted for between 65 and 99% of the total variance in
the data, which meant that in some cases the direct contribution from
stochastic noise was as low as 1%. This suggests that, in some of the
data sets, the dynamics of HRV may have been chaotic. To test this
possibility further, we estimated the largest Lyapunov exponents of
these data sets using the method of Rosenstein et al.
(27), with the presumption that the presence of a positive
characteristic exponent would indicate chaos. We found that these
exponents were positive but not significantly different from the
Lyapunov exponents computed from the corresponding surrogate data. Thus
the determination of whether chaos was present or not was inconclusive.
This highlights a major limitation of current methods of nonlinear
dynamical analysis: the sensitivity to noise of estimates derived from
relatively short (<10,000 points) data sets.
One feature that was continually affirmed in all our computational
tests was the clear difference in heart rate dynamics between quiet
sleep and active sleep regardless of infant group. Overall HRV was
higher in active sleep. NHFP was lower and LHR was higher in active
sleep versus quiet sleep, indicating a shift in relative dominance of
LFP versus HFP in HRV. All measures of nonlinearity, such as ApEn, CD,
and nonlinear prediction error, decreased in active sleep, indicating a
reduction in complexity and an increase in regularity in heart rate
dynamics. Furthermore, parametric modeling showed that, in percent
terms, the linear contribution to HRV was approximately doubled in
active sleep, whereas the nonlinear contribution was reduced by roughly
one-half. These results are consistent with previous findings
that sympathetic modulation of heart rate is enhanced during active
or rapid-eye movement sleep, whereas parasympathetic activity is
decreased; conversely, in synchronized or quiet sleep, vagal modulation
predominates (12, 18). Furthermore, sympathetic modulation
leads to dynamic variations of heart rate that are predominantly
periodic and in the low-to-mid-frequency range; in contrast, vagal
modulation of heart rate produces broadband fluctuations that are
dynamically more complex and much less predictable. There are a number
of possible reasons why HRV assumes the form of low-frequency
periodicities during sympathetic dominance in active sleep. First, the
sinoatrial node can only track changes in sympathetic activity that are
slower than 0.15 Hz, whereas vagal activity can modulate heart rate to much higher frequencies (28). Sympathetic
modulation of changes in vascular resistance is also slow, on the order
of several seconds. With increased sympathetic gain, these delays in
the baroreflex control system can lead to oscillatory activity mediated
by feedback instability. A less likely, but nevertheless plausible,
explanation is that sympathetic dominance during active sleep leads to
a filtering out of high-frequency activity, thereby unmasking the
low-frequency oscillation that is intrinsic to central rhythmic
modulation of neural activity (18).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
This work was supported in part by March of Dimes Birth Defects
Foundation Grant 12-FY92-0833, by Biomedical Research Support Grant 2S07-RR05780-15, by University of California Los Angeles Academic Senate awards (to M. G. Regalado), and by National
Institutes of Health Grants RR-01861 and HL-58725 (to M. C. K. Khoo).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. C. K. Khoo, Biomedical Engineering Dept., Univ. of Southern
California, OHE-500, University Park, CA 90089-1451 (E-mail:
khoo{at}bmsrs.usc.edu).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 18 September 2000; accepted in final form 6 February 2001.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Barahona, M,
and
Poon CS.
Detection of nonlinear dynamics in short, noisy time series.
Nature
381:
215-217,
1996.
2.
Bassingthwaighte, JB,
Liebovitch LS,
and
West BJ.
Fractal Physiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994, p. 154-158.
3.
Baumgartner, W,
Hill V,
and
Bland W.
Hair analysis for drug abuse.
J Forensic Sci
34:
1433-1453,
1989.
4.
Berger, RD,
Akselrod S,
Gordon D,
and
Cohen RJ.
An efficient algorithm for spectral analysis of heart rate variability.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
33:
900-904,
1986[Web of Science][Medline].
5.
Birch, GE,
Lawrence PD,
Lind JC,
and
Hare RD.
Application of prewhitening to AR spectral estimation of EEG.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
35:
640-645,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
6.
Chon, KH,
Kanters JK,
Cohen RJ,
and
Holstein-Rathlou N-H.
Detection of "noisy" chaos in a time series.
Methods Inf Med
36:
294-297,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
7.
Costa, M,
Pimentel IP,
Santiago T,
Sarreira P,
Melo J,
and
Ducla-Soares E.
No evidence of chaos in the heart rate variability of normal and cardiac transplant human subjects.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
10:
1350-1357,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Day NL, Wagener DK, and Taylor PM. Measurement of substance use
during pregnancy: methodologic issues. In: Consequences of
Maternal Drug Abuse, edited by Pinkert TM. Rockville, MD: NIDA
Res. Monogr. 59: 36-47, 1985.
9.
Goldberger, AL.
Is the normal heartbeat chaotic or homeostatic?
News Physiol Sci
6:
87-91,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10.
Grassberger, P,
and
Procaccia I.
Characterization of strange attractors.
Physica D
9:
189-208,
1985.
11.
Guzzetti, S,
Signorini MG,
Cogliati C,
Mezzetti S,
Porta A,
Cerruti S,
and
Malliani A.
Non-linear dynamics and chaotic indices in heart rate variability of normal subjects and heart-transplanted patients.
C R Seances Soc Biol Fil
31:
441-446,
1996.
12.
Harper, RM,
Walter DO,
Leake B,
Hoffman HJ,
Sieck GC,
Sterman MB,
Hoppenbrouwers T,
and
Hodgman J.
Development of sinus arrhythmia during sleeping and waking states in normal infants.
Sleep
1:
33-48,
1978[Web of Science][Medline].
13.
Ivanov, PC,
Amaral LA,
Goldberger AL,
Havlin S,
Rosenblum MG,
Struzik ZR,
and
Stanley HE.
Stochastic feedback and the regulation of biological rhythms.
Europhys Lett
43:
363-368,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
14.
Kanters, JK,
Holstein-Rathlou N-H,
and
Agner E.
Lack of evidence for low-dimensional chaos in heart rate variability.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
5:
591-601,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Kantz, H,
and
Schreiber T.
Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 72-75.
16.
Korenberg, M.
Identifying nonlinear difference equation and functional expansion representations: the fast orthogonal algorithm.
Ann Biomed Eng
16:
123-142,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
17.
Littman, B,
and
Parmalee AH.
Medical correlates of infant development.
Pediatrics
61:
470-74,
1978[Abstract].
18.
Mancia, G.
Autonomic modulation of the cardiovascular system during sleep.
N Engl J Med
328:
347-349,
1993[Free Full Text].
19.
Mehta, SK,
Finkelhor RS,
Anderson RL,
Harcar-Sevcik RA,
Wasser TE,
and
Bahler RC.
Transient myocardial ischemia in infants prenatally exposed to cocaine.
J Pediatr
122:
945-949,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
20.
Needleman, R,
Frank DA,
Augustyn M,
and
Zuckerman BS.
Neurophysiological effects of prenatal cocaine exposure: comparison of human and animal investigations.
In: Mothers, Babies, and Cocaine: the Role of Toxins in Development, edited by Lewis M,
and Bendersky M.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995, p. 229-250.
21.
Oriol, N,
Bennett F,
Rigney D,
and
Goldberger A.
Cocaine effects on neonatal heart rate dynamics: preliminary findings and methodological problems.
Yale J Biol Med
66:
75-84,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
22.
Pincus, SM,
Cummins TR,
and
Haddad G.
Heart rate control in normal and aborted-SIDS infants.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
264:
R638-R646,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23.
Regalado, M,
Schechtman V,
Del Angel P,
and
Bean X.
Cardiac and respiratory patterns during sleep in cocaine-exposed neonates.
Early Hum Dev
44:
187-200,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Regalado, M,
Schechtman V,
Khoo MCK,
Shin J,
and
Bean X.
Sources of heart rate variation during sleep in cocaine exposed neonates.
Ann NY Acad Sci
846:
415-418,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
25.
Regalado, MG,
Schechtman VL,
Del Angel AP,
and
Bean X.
Sleep disorganization in cocaine-exposed neonates.
Infant Behav Dev
18:
319-327,
1995.
26.
Rhodes, C,
and
Morari M.
False nearest neighbors algorithm and noise-corrupted time series.
Physiol Rev
55:
6162-6170,
1997.
27.
Rosenstein, MT,
Collins JJ,
and
De Luca CJ.
A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets.
Physica D
65:
117-134,
1991.
28.
Saul, JP,
Berger RD,
Albrecht P,
Stein SP,
Chen MH,
and
Cohen RJ.
Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique insights into cardiovascular regulation.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
261:
H1231-H1245,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29.
Sugihara, G,
Allan W,
Sobel D,
and
Allan KD.
Nonlinear control of heart-rate variability in human infants.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
2608-2613,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
30.
Sugihara, G,
and
May RM.
Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series.
Nature
344:
734-741,
1990[Medline].
31.
Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.
Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use.
Circulation
93:
1043-1065,
1996[Free Full Text].
32.
Theiler, J,
Eubank S,
Lontin A,
Galdrikian B,
and
Farmer JD.
Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data.
Physica D
58:
77-94,
1992[Web of Science].
33.
Woo, M,
Chang M,
Bautista D,
Keens T,
and
Davidson-Ward S.
Elevated heart rates in infants of cocaine abusing mothers during normoxia and hypoxia (Abstract).
Am Rev Respir Dis
141:
908A,
1990.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280(6):H2920-H2928
0363-6135/01 $5.00
Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society