|
|
||||||||
-adrenergic receptor blockade
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, and Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada H1T 1C8
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We hypothesized that nitric
oxide (NO), in addition to
-adrenergic effects, may contribute to
exercise-induced coronary responses after
-adrenergic receptor
blockade. Data were analyzed as relationships between coronary sinus
(CS) O2 saturation (CS O2sat) or coronary blood
flow (CBF) and myocardial O2 consumption
(M
O2). As
M
O2 increased, CS O2sat fell
more (P < 0.05) after
N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME; slope =
2.9 ± 0.4 × 10
2 %saturation · µl
O2 · min
1 · g
1)
than before (slope =
2.1 ± 0.3 × 10
2
%saturation · µl
O2 · min
1 · g
1).
The slope of CBF versus M
O2 was not
altered. After blockade of
-adrenergic receptors alone
(phentolamine), CS O2sat failed to decrease as
M
O2 increased (slope =
0.1 ± 0.5 × 10
2 %saturation · µl
O2 · min
1 · g
1).
L-NAME given after phentolamine led to substantial
decreases in CS O2sat (P < 0.01) as
M
O2 increased (slope =
2.1 ± 0.4 × 10
2 percent saturation · µl
O2
1 · min
1 · g
1).
CBF responses to exercise were smaller (P < 0.01)
after phentolamine + L-NAME (slope = 6.1 ± 0.1 × 10
3 ml/µl O2) than after
phentolamine alone (slope = 6.9 ± 0.2 × 10
3 ml/µl O2). Thus a significant portion
of exercise-induced coronary responses after
-adrenergic receptor
blockade involves NO formation.
endothelium; metabolism; oxygen; adrenergic receptors; coronary sinus
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DURING EXERCISE,
THE BALANCE between coronary blood flow (CBF) and myocardial
oxygen consumption (M
O2) is finely tuned
through local metabolic feedback mechanisms (6), over
which
-adrenergic constriction and feedforward
-adrenergic
dilation are superimposed (7). Together, these factors
lead to a relative mismatch between myocardial perfusion and metabolic
demand displayed as a decrease in coronary sinus (CS) blood
O2 levels in the face of increases in
M
O2 (2, 9-11, 19).
Nitric oxide (NO) production, which is increased during exercise
(3, 23), has been considered as a factor that contributes
to maintain the equilibrium between myocardial O2 supply
and demand. While NO production plays a major role in the dilation of
large epicardial conductance arteries during exercise
(27), its contribution to vasomotor responses of
resistance coronary vessels has been reported to be minimal (1,
3, 25). In fact, arginine analogues had only a limited influence
on the slope of the relationship between Cs O2 tension and
M
O2, an index of the match between
coronary perfusion and M
O2 (1, 3,
25). Conceivably, the loss of NO formation may trigger
compensatory mechanisms, which can impair a further decrease in CS
O2 tension (13, 14). The possibility that
adenosine production becomes more important after the blockade of NO
formation has been recently ruled out (25).
On the basis of our earlier studies (15, 20) showing that
coronary
-adrenergic dilation of resistance coronary vessels in
conscious dogs involves NO formation, we hypothesized that exercise
performed after
-adrenergic receptor blockade may involve a greater
contribution of NO triggered directly through enhanced
-adrenergic
receptor activation or indirectly through hemodynamic effects of
-adrenergic receptor blockade. The contribution of NO formation was
assessed as differences of the slopes of relationships between CS
O2 saturation levels or CBF and
M
O2 after
-adrenergic blockade alone
and after the combined blockade of
-adrenergic receptors and NO
formation in exercising dogs.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Instrumentation.
After general anesthesia with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg iv) and
under sterile conditions and artificial ventilation, eight mongrel dogs
(33 ± 1 kg) were instrumented and treated postoperatively as
previously described (22). CBF was measured with an
implanted flow probe around the circumflex coronary artery and a
pulsed-Doppler flowmeter (22). After death, the
cross-sectional area of the vessel under the probe was measured and the
perfusion territory of the circumflex artery was determined by dye
perfusion (CBF is reported as
ml · min
1 · g
1 of tissue).
Protocols. Experiments were initiated 2-4 wk after surgery. While the dogs were standing quietly on a treadmill, blood samples were simultaneously withdrawn from the aortic and the CS catheters. Measurements of hemoglobin (Hb) content and O2 saturation were made on a cooxymeter (model OSM-2, Radiometer; Copenhagen, Denmark) immediately after 1 ml of blood was collected in lightly heparinized syringes and sealed after sampling.
Dogs ran successively for 3 min at 3 miles/h (0% grade), 4 miles/h (5% grade), and 6 miles/h (10% grade). Blood samples were obtained 2.5-3.0 min after the beginning of each step under steady-state conditions. One hour after the first run, 1.5 mg/kg of phentolamine was administered intravenously, and the dogs were immediately placed on the treadmill to perform the exercise protocol. Adequacy of
-adrenergic
blockade was demonstrated in preliminary experiments (n = 5). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) responses (24 ± 1 from 93 ± 5 mmHg) caused by 3.0 µg/kg iv phenylephrine (Sabex; Boucherville, Quebec, Canada) were blunted (P < 0.01) after
phentolamine (
2 ± 1 from 93 ± 4 mmHg).
On different days, the exercise protocol was performed after
N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME; 10 mg/kg iv) was given over 10 min. Adequacy of NO
formation blockade with this dose of L-NAME has been
demonstrated earlier (21) and confirmed in preliminary
experiments (n = 5) by smaller (P < 0.01) acetylcholine chloride-induced (3 µg/kg iv) CBF increases after
L-NAME (67 ± 15 from 61 ± 7 ml/min) than before
(121 ± 13 from 61 ± 7 ml/min).
The exercise protocol was repeated at least 48 h later after
combined administration of phentolamine + L-NAME or
propranolol (1.0 mg/kg iv) + phentolamine. All drugs except for
phenylephrine were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Except for one
animal, in which the L-NAME alone protocol could not be
completed, all other experiments were carried out in the same eight dogs.
Data analysis.
Data are reported as means ± SE and statistical significance was
reached when P < 0.05 in all cases. An analysis of
variance for repeated measurements was used for simultaneous overall
comparisons of baseline hemodynamic variables under the five
experimental conditions (28). Post hoc comparisons were
made with the Newman-Keuls test to isolate contrasts of interest.
Overall responses to exercise before and after L-NAME were
compared using a two-way analysis of variance for repeated
measurements. A similar approach was used to simultaneously compare
phentolamine alone versus phentolamine + L-NAME and
propranolol + phentolamine. Data for CBF and CS O2 saturation were reported as relationships centered on
corresponding mean M
O2 levels for
each exercise level. A one-way analysis of variance was first
performed to determine if the dependent variable was altered during
exercise and a two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the
effects of the various treatments. A linear regression analysis was
then performed for each animal after each drug, followed by an analysis
of variance for repeated measurements on slopes or a paired Student's
t-test when only two experimental conditions were
compared. Because CS O2 saturation failed to
decrease as M
O2 increased after
phentolamine alone (one-way analysis of variance), a relationship
between CS O2 saturation and
M
O2 could not be demonstrated (slope not
different from 0). Therefore, control or treatments were considered
statistically different from phentolamine when the slopes differed from zero.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baseline hemodynamics.
Baseline hemodynamic variables for all experimental groups are reported
in Table 1. Except for the expected
increases (P < 0.01) in left ventricular pressure
(LVP) and MAP and decreases (P < 0.01) in heart rate,
L-NAME had no other significant effects. A similar response
pattern was observed when L-NAME + phentolamine was
compared with phentolamine alone. Propranolol + phentolamine caused no further hemodynamic effects compared with phentolamine alone,
except for a significant decrease (P < 0.01) in the LV first derivative of pressure development over time (dP/dt),
as reported in Table 1.
|
Blockade of NO formation.
As reported in Fig. 1, LVP and MAP were
higher (P < 0.01) and LV dP/dt was lower
(P < 0.01) throughout exercise in dogs treated with
L-NAME. Heart rate, aortic blood O2 saturation,
and Hb levels did not significantly differ before and after
L-NAME.
|
O2 augmented (Fig.
2). Mean CBF levels achieved during
exercise did not statistically differ before and after
L-NAME. The slopes of the relationships between CBF and M
O2 did not differ before (5.0 ± 0.1 × 10
3 ml/µl O2) and after
L-NAME (4.9 ± 0.2 × 10
3 ml/µl
O2). CS O2 saturation fell significantly
(P < 0.01) as M
O2
increased under control conditions and after L-NAME.
Overall, mean CS O2 saturation levels did not significantly
differ during exercise performed before and after L-NAME.
However, the slope of the relationships between CS O2
saturation levels and M
O2 was steeper
(P < 0.05) after L-NAME (
2.9 ± 0.4 × 10
2 %saturation · µl
O2 · min
1 · g
1)
than before (
2.1 ± 0.3 × 10
2
%saturation · µl
O2 · min
1 · g
1).
Thus, for any given increase in M
O2, CS
O2 saturation fell more after L-NAME,
consistent with a greater mismatch between myocardial O2
demand and supply.
|
Blockade of
-adrenergic receptors.
Coronary responses involving metabolic and
-adrenergic dilation
(after phentolamine) and metabolic dilation alone (after propranolol + phentolamine) were compared to demonstrate the
involvement of
-adrenergic influences after
-adrenergic receptor blockade.
-adrenergic receptors with propranolol resulted in a substantial fall (P < 0.01) in CS O2 saturation levels
during exercise. As expected, increases in CBF throughout exercise were
smaller (P < 0.01) after the combined blockade of
-
and
-adrenergic receptors than after
-adrenergic receptor
blockade alone.
|
O2 increased (slope =
5.3 ± 1.0 × 10
2 %saturation · µl
O2 ·min
1 · g
1). In
contrast, CS O2 saturation failed to decrease throughout exercise performed after phentolamine alone (slope =
0.1 ± 0.5 × 10
2 %saturation · µl
O2 · min
1 · g
1)
(Fig. 3). Consistent with these findings, the slope of the relationship between CBF and M
O2 was steeper
(P < 0.01) after phentolamine (6.9 ± 0.2 × 10
3 ml/µl O2) than after propranolol + phentolamine (5.0 ± 0.2 × 10
3 ml/µl
O2) or under control conditions (4.9 ± 0.1 × 10
3 ml/µl O2). Thus lifting
-adrenergic
constriction led to a better match between cardiac metabolic demand and
O2 delivery as M
O2 increased
during exercise. After
-adrenergic receptor blockade,
-adrenergic
receptor activation was an important determinant of coronary dilator responses.
Combined blockade of
-adrenergic receptors and NO formation.
L-NAME + phentolamine lead to augmented LVP
(P < 0.05) and MAP (P < 0.01) levels
throughout exercise compared with phentolamine alone but did not
influence other hemodynamic variables as reported in Fig.
4. After the combined administration of
propranolol + phentolamine, LVP (P < 0.05), LV
dP/dt (P < 0.01), and heart rate (P < 0.01) remained lower than after phentolamine
alone.
|
O2
was found after phentolamine + L-NAME (slope=
2.1 ± 0.4 × 10
2 %saturation · µl
O2 · min
1 · g
1)
but not after phentolamine alone, as indicated earlier. Thus, for any
given increase in M
O2, CS O2
saturation fell more (P < 0.01) after
phentolamine + L-NAME than after phentolamine alone, consistent with the involvement of NO in coronary dilation displayed after
-adrenergic receptor blockade. NO accounted for ~45% of the
differences in slopes between phentolamine alone and phentolamine + propranolol.
The slope of the relationship between CBF and
M
O2 after phentolamine (6.9 ± 0.2 × 10
3 ml/µl O2) was decreased
(P < 0.01) by the addition of L-NAME (6.1 ± 0.1 × 10
3 ml/µl O2).
Thus, for any given increase in M
O2, CBF
increased less (P < 0.01) after phentolamine + L-NAME than after phentolamine alone, consistent with the
involvement of NO formation to the dilation of coronary resistance
vessels after
-adrenergic receptor blockade.
The steeper (P < 0.01) slope of the relationship
between CBF and M
O2 after
phentolamine + L-NAME (6.1 ± 0.1 × 10
3 ml/µl O2) than under control conditions
(4.9 ± 0.1 × 10
3 ml/µl O2) is
indicative of
-adrenergic vasoconstriction. Changes in the
slope of the relationship between CS O2 saturation and M
O2 caused by phentolamine + L-NAME (
2.1 ± 0.4 × 10
2
%sauration · µl
O2 · min
1 · g
1)
from control conditions (
2.9 ± 0.8 × 10
2
%saturation · µl
O2 ·min
1 · g
1)
were directionally consistent with
-adrenergic influences but statistical significance was not reached.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study highlights the significant contribution of NO to
exercise-induced coronary dilation after
-adrenergic receptor blockade. We have relied on a strategy allowing, by pharmacological means, to exclude
-adrenergic constriction and to specifically examine dilator mechanisms contributing to exercise-induced coronary responses thereafter. Our data demonstrate that NO, in addition to
-adrenergic effects, is pivotal in causing coronary dilation during
exercise performed under
-adrenergic receptor blockade. Together,
these mechanisms help to ensure a closer match between myocardial
O2 demand and supply.
One important limitation should be kept in mind when considering
the present data. By lifting the inhibitory activity of
-adrenergic receptors on norepinephrine release, phentolamine
will cause an exaggerated
-adrenergic activation. Consequently,
experiments conducted under
-adrenergic blockade cannot allow a
direct quantitative assessment of
-adrenergic-induced coronary
dilation taking place during normal exercise although under normal
conditions, interstitial norepinephrine levels are well above the
threshold for causing coronary
-adrenergic dilation
(8).
During exercise, the level of CBF is determined through several
mechanisms, including local vasodilator effects coupled to increases in
cardiac metabolism over which are superimposed
-adrenergic constriction and
-adrenergic dilation (7). Acting in
concert, these factors are responsible for determining the subtle
equilibrium between O2 demand and supply reflected by the
relationship between CS O2 levels and
M
O2. Under normal exercise conditions, a
relative mismatch exists between O2 demand and supply
displayed as a reduction of coronary venous O2 levels in
the face of increases in M
O2 (2,
7, 9-11, 19). Local feedback mechanisms coupled to cardiac
metabolism are considered to be the major determinants of CBF
(6). The error signal generated through this process cannot, however, completely ensure an adequate match between myocardial perfusion and metabolic demand. Coronary venous O2 tension
has been reported to fall as M
O2 was
increased by pacing-induced tachycardia + paired-pace stimulation
(16). A similar phenomenon occurs during exercise
performed only under local metabolic control (after
- and
-adrenergic blockade), i.e., CS O2 level declines as
M
O2 increases (7).
Our data concerning the effects of blockade of NO formation (without
prior blockade of
-adrenergic receptors) on the relationship between
coronary venous blood O2 saturation and
M
O2 during exercise slightly differed
from earlier studies. Altman et al. (1) and Tune et al.
(25) reported that blockade of NO formation caused a
parallel shift in the relationships between CS blood
PO2 and M
O2,
consistent with a slight contribution of NO of similar magnitude under
baseline condition and during exercise. Bernstein et al.
(3) also reported a parallel shift in the relationship between CS blood PO2 and
M
O2, although limited to the lower levels of M
O2 during exercise.
Interestingly, none of these studies observed that blockade of NO
formation caused a significant reduction of CBF as
M
O2 increased during exercise. Thus NO
was not essential for the coronary dilation during exercise. In that respect, our data are consistent with these earlier studies because the
slopes of relationships between CBF and
M
O2 were similar before and after
L-NAME. In contrast, the slope of the relationship between
CS O2 saturation and M
O2 was
slightly steeper after L-NAME than before in our study.
This suggests that NO may help to better match CBF to cardiac metabolic
demand at higher levels of M
O2. In this
connection, it is of interest to note that nitrite and nitrate
production across the coronary bed has been reported to increase at the
highest exercise intensities (3, 23). Given the limited
consequences of the blockade of NO formation on the match between
myocardial O2 demand and CBF reported by us and by others,
we have to acknowledge that NO could only play a limited role during
exercise under normal conditions. This conclusion ignores other
important effects of NO, which uncouples mitochondrial oxidative
phosphorylation and alters substrate utilization by the heart
(24). By targeting those mechanisms, the blockade of NO
formation could have conceivably modified the relationship between
myocardial perfusion and cardiac metabolism.
Several earlier studies (2, 7, 9-11, 19) have
demonstrated that
-adrenergic influences limit CBF during exercise by showing higher CS O2 levels at any given level of
M
O2 after pharmacological blockade of
these receptors. Therefore,
-adrenergic constriction competes with
metabolically induced coronary dilation and limits coronary perfusion
(17).
In this context,
-adrenergic dilation during exercise may serve to
add to local metabolic feedback and limit the consequences of
-adrenergic constriction on the match between coronary perfusion and
M
O2. Miyashiro and Feigl
(16) first provided evidence supporting the existence of
feedforward
-adrenergic dilation in the coronary circulation. They
showed that norepinephrine administration after
-adrenergic
blockade, which unmasks
-adrenergic effects, caused significant
coronary dilation and prevented the fall in CS O2 levels.
During exercise, a similar phenomenon takes place. Feedforward
-adrenergic dilation can be demonstrated on the basis of an altered
relationship between CS O2 levels and
M
O2. As M
O2 increased during exercise, CS
O2 levels were disproportionately higher when
-adrenergic effects and local metabolic feedback intervened, i.e.,
after phentolamine, than when local metabolic feedback alone accounted
for coronary dilation, i.e., after propranolol + phentolamine
(7). Our data agree with those of Gorman et al.
(7), who demonstrated the contribution of feedforward
-adrenergic dilation to coronary responses caused by exercise in
dogs. On the basis of a quantitative model allowing calculations of
interstitial norepinephrine concentration during exercise, they
estimated the contribution of feedforward
-adrenergic dilation to
overall CBF response to exercise to be ~25% (8). This
phenomenon allows for a better match between CBF and cardiac metabolism
during exercise. The relative contribution of feedforward
-adrenergic activation to coronary dilation may show substantial
interspecies differences. In contrast to dogs, swine display minimal
-adrenergic constriction during exercise, thereby allowing the
contribution of feedforward
-adrenergic dilation to exercise-induced
coronary responses to become more apparent, as demonstrated by Duncker
et al. (5).
In the present study, we measured CS O2 saturation levels
as an index of the match between myocardial O2 supply and
demand, whereas Gorman et al. (7) used CS O2
tension as an index of tissue O2 level to achieve the same
objective. In the present study, the shifts of the slopes of the
relationships between CS O2 saturation and
M
O2 caused by phentolamine and
phentolamine + propranolol were qualitatively similar to those
reported by Gorman et al. (7). In fact, absolute values of
slopes in both studies were very close under the various experimental
conditions. This indicates that the slope of the relationship between
O2 tension and saturation was close to unity over the
narrow range of O2 levels measured in CS blood. Therefore,
the potential bias created by measuring O2 saturation
levels in the present experiments could only have been limited.
As M
O2 increased during exercise, CS
O2 saturation fell after phentolamine + L-NAME but did not after phentolamine alone. Consequently,
the relationship between CS O2 saturation and
M
O2 had a negative slope after
phentolamine + L-NAME but not after phentolamine
alone. In this situation, the slope of the relationship between CBF and
M
O2 was steeper after phentolamine alone
than after L-NAME + phentolamine, i.e., for any given
increase in M
O2 during exercise, CBF
increased more after phentolamine alone than after
L-NAME + phentolamine. Thus NO formation played a
significant role in exercise-induced coronary dilation after
-adrenergic receptor blockade. NO helped to maintain a better match
between myocardial perfusion and cardiac metabolic demand. The
contribution of NO became more important as exercise intensity
increased because the differences in CS O2 saturation
between phentolamine alone and phentolamine + L-NAME
widened as M
O2 increased.
Our data indicate that after
-adrenergic receptor blockade, NO was
an important determinant of the balance between myocardial O2 supply and demand. This raises an important question.
What is the mechanism triggering NO formation after
-adrenergic
receptor blockade? A receptor-operated process involving
-adrenergic
receptors may trigger NO formation, as suggested by our earlier studies (15, 20). It is also possible that augmented NO production may be a consequence of hemodynamic conditions created by the blockade
of
-adrenergic receptors, in particular a flow-dependent phenomenon
caused by elevated CBF after phentolamine. If
-adrenergic activation
directly triggered NO formation, L-NAME should have produced consistent shifts in the slopes of the relationship between CS
O2 saturation or CBF and M
O2
with and without phentolamine. Our data do not support this hypothesis.
Given that blockade of NO formation had disproportionately greater
effects after phentolamine than before, NO production cannot be
directly linked to
-adrenergic receptor activation because this
process should be operative in both situations. An alternate mechanism
has to be involved. The hemodynamic conditions created after the
blockade of
-adrenergic receptors most likely account for NO
production after phentolamine. Consistent with this possibility, CBF
increased more for any given increase in
M
O2 after phentolamine than under
control conditions. This relative excess in CBF may be the trigger of
NO formation by augmenting shear stress levels in the microcirculation
(12). This hypothesis agrees with the observation that NO
formation caused by intracoronary boluses of norepinephrine was
primarily a flow-dependent process (26). A further
increase of CBF caused by norepinephrine given after phentolamine would
be expected to magnify this phenomenon. Rate-dependent effects and
changes in pulsatility have been reported to trigger NO formation in
large epicardial coronary arteries (4). Within the
coronary microcirculation, Morita et al. (18) showed that
-adrenergic blockade increased norepinephrine-induced retrograde
systolic flow, thereby causing greater to-and-fro flow oscillation.
These changes in the pulsatile pattern of CBF caused by phentolamine in
concert with higher heart rates achieved after
-adrenergic receptor
blockade could most likely act as the trigger for NO formation. This
may explain why NO-dependent effects were more important after
-adrenergic receptor blockade and minimally displayed under control conditions.
Differences in slopes of CS O2 saturation levels versus
M
O2 between phentolamine alone and
phentolamine + propranolol have been used to demonstrate the
contribution of feedforward
-adrenergic dilation to exercise-induced
coronary responses (7). The present experiments bring new
insight into the interpretation of data obtained after phentolamine.
-Adrenergic and metabolic signals were not the sole determinants of
coronary perfusion in that situation, as a significant contribution of
NO formation was apparent after phentolamine.
In conclusion, NO-dependent effects account for a substantial portion
of exercise-induced coronary dilation after
-adrenergic receptor
blockade. In contrast, NO played a minor role under control conditions.
This apparent discrepancy may be explained by the disproportionate
increases in CBF along with increases of to-and-fro flow oscillation
after
-adrenergic blockade, which may act as the trigger for NO
formation. NO formation after
-adrenergic receptor blockade was
pivotal in maintaining a better match between cardiac metabolic demand
and O2 supply.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank Claude Mousseau, Jhésabelle Voyer, and Claudy Patry for expert technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation, and Fonds de la Recherche de l'Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal. M. Takamura was supported by a grant from the Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Autonome.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Lavallée, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, 5000 E. Bélanger St., Montréal, Québec, Canada H1T 1C8 (E-mail: lavallem{at}icm.umontreal.ca).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/ajpheart.00722.2001
Received 13 August 2001; accepted in final form 10 October 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Altman, JD,
Kinn J,
Duncker DJ,
and
Bache RJ.
Effect of inhibition of nitric oxide formation on coronary blood flow during exercise in the dog.
Cardiovasc Res
28:
119-124,
1994.
2.
Bache, RJ,
Dai XZ,
Herzog CA,
and
Schwartz JS.
Effect of nonselective and selective
1-adrenergic blockade on coronary blood flow during exercise.
Circ Res
61, Suppl:
II36-II41,
1987.
3.
Bernstein, RD,
Ochoa FY,
Xu X,
Forfia P,
Shen W,
Thompson CI,
and
Hintze TH.
Function and production of nitric oxide in the coronary circulation of the conscious dog during exercise.
Circ Res
79:
840-848,
1996.
4.
Canty, JM, Jr,
and
Schwartz JS.
Nitric oxide mediates flow-dependent epicardial coronary vasodilation to changes in pulse frequency but not mean flow in conscious dogs.
Circulation
89:
375-384,
1994.
5.
Duncker, DJ,
Stubenitsky R,
and
Verdouw PD.
Autonomic control of vasomotion in the porcine coronary circulation during treadmill exercise. Evidence for feed-forward
-adrenergic control.
Circ Res
82:
1312-1322,
1998.
6.
Feigl, EO.
Coronary physiology.
Physiol Rev
63:
1-205,
1983.
7.
Gorman, MW,
Tune JD,
Richmond KN,
and
Feigl EO.
Feedforward sympathetic coronary vasodilation in exercising dogs.
J Appl Physiol
89:
1892-1902,
2000.
8.
Gorman, MW,
Tune JD,
Richmond KN,
and
Feigl EO.
Quantitative analysis of feedforward sympathetic coronary vasodilation in exercising dogs.
J Appl Physiol
89:
1903-1911,
2000.
9.
Gwirtz, PA,
and
Stone HL.
Coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption after alpha-adrenergic blockade during submaximal exercise.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
217:
92-98,
1981.
10.
Gwirtz, PA,
Overn SP,
Mass HJ,
and
Jones CE.
1-Adrenergic constriction limits coronary flow and cardiac function in running dogs.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
250:
H1117-H1126,
1986.
11.
Heyndrickx, GR,
Muylaert P,
and
Pannier JL.
-Adrenergic control of oxygen delivery to myocardium during exercise in conscious dogs.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
242:
H805-H809,
1982.
12.
Kuo, L,
Davis MJ,
and
Chilian WM.
Longitudinal gradients for endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular responses in the coronary microcirculation.
Circulation
92:
518-525,
1995.
13.
Matsunaga, T,
Okumura K,
Tsunoda R,
Tayama S,
Tabuchi T,
and
Yasue H.
Role of adenosine in regulation of coronary flow in dogs with inhibited synthesis of endothelium-derived nitric oxide.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
270:
H427-H434,
1996.
14.
Minamino, T,
Kitakaze M,
Node K,
Funaya H,
and
Hori M.
Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis increases adenosine production via an extracellular pathway through activation of protein kinase C.
Circulation
96:
1586-1592,
1997.
15.
Ming, Z,
Parent R,
and
Lavallée M.
2-Adrenergic dilation of resistance coronary vessels involves KATP channels and nitric oxide in conscious dogs.
Circulation
95:
1568-1576,
1997.
16.
Miyashiro, JK,
and
Feigl EO.
Feedforward control of coronary blood flow via coronary
-receptor stimulation.
Circ Res
73:
252-263,
1993.
17.
Mohrman, DE,
and
Feigl EO.
Competition between sympathetic vasoconstriction and metabolic vasodilation in the canine coronary circulation.
Circ Res
42:
79-86,
1978.
18.
Morita, K,
Mori H,
Tsujioka K,
Kimura A,
Ogasawara Y,
Goto M,
Hiramatsu O,
Kajiya F,
and
Feigl EO.
-Adrenergic vasoconstriction reduces systolic retrograde coronary blood flow.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
273:
H2746-H2755,
1997.
19.
Murray, PA,
and
Vatner SF.
-Adrenoceptor attenuation of the coronary vascular response to severe exercise in the conscious dog.
Circ Res
45:
654-660,
1979.
20.
Parent, R,
Al-Obaidi M,
and
Lavallée M.
Nitric oxide formation contributes to
-adrenergic dilation of resistance coronary vessels in conscious dogs.
Circ Res
73:
241-251,
1993.
21.
Smith, TP,
and
Canty JM, Jr.
Modulation of coronary autoregulatory responses by nitric oxide. Evidence for flow-dependent resistance adjustments in conscious dogs.
Circ Res
73:
232-240,
1993.
22.
Takamura, M,
Parent R,
Cernacek P,
and
Lavallée M.
Influence of dual ETA/ETB-receptor blockade on coronary responses to treadmill exercise in dogs.
J Appl Physiol
89:
2041-2048,
2000.
23.
Traverse, JH,
Wang YL,
Du R,
Nelson D,
Lindstrom P,
Archer SL,
Gong G,
and
Bache RJ.
Coronary nitric oxide production in response to exercise and endothelium-dependent agonists.
Circulation
101:
2526-2531,
2000.
24.
Trochu, JN,
Bouhour JB,
Kaley G,
and
Hintze TH.
Role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in the regulation of cardiac oxygen metabolism. Implications in health and disease.
Circ Res
87:
1108-1117,
2000.
25.
Tune, JD,
Richmond KN,
Gorman MW,
and
Feigl EO.
Role of nitric oxide and adenosine in control of coronary blood flow in exercising dogs.
Circulation
101:
2942-2948,
2000.
26.
Van Bibber, R,
Traub O,
Kroll K,
and
Feigl EO.
EDRF and norepinephrine-induced vasodilation in the canine coronary circulation.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
268:
H1973-H1981,
1995.
27.
Wang, J,
Wolin MS,
and
Hintze TH.
Chronic exercise enhances endothelium-mediated dilation of epicardial coronary artery in conscious dogs.
Circ Res
73:
829-838,
1993.
28.
Winer, BJ.
Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971, p. 514-603.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Madsen, H. M. Sondergaard, M. Bottcher, N. H. Buus, O. Schmitz, H. E. Botker, and T. T. Nielsen Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Nitric Oxide and Adrenergic Modulation of Myocardial Perfusion Diabetes, February 1, 2007; 56(2): 468 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Tune, M. W. Gorman, and E. O. Feigl Matching coronary blood flow to myocardial oxygen consumption J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2004; 97(1): 404 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Setty, W. Sun, R. Martinez, H. F. Downey, and J. D. Tune {alpha}-Adrenoceptor-mediated coronary vasoconstriction is augmented during exercise in experimental diabetes mellitus J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2004; 97(1): 431 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zong, W. Sun, S. Setty, J. D. Tune, and H. F. Downey {alpha}-Adrenergic Vasoconstrictor Tone Limits Right Coronary Blood Flow in Exercising Dogs Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 1, 2004; 229(4): 312 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Okajima, M. Takamura, P. Vequaud, R. Parent, and M. Lavallee beta -Adrenergic receptor blockade impairs NO-dependent dilation of large coronary arteries during exercise Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2003; 284(2): H501 - H510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |