AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282: H1035-H1040, 2002. First published November 29, 2001; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00808.2001
0363-6135/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/3/H1035    most recent
00808.2001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kilpatrick, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lasley, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kilpatrick, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lasley, R. D.
Vol. 282, Issue 3, H1035-H1040, March 2002

Cardiac myocyte adenosine A2a receptor activation fails to alter cAMP or contractility: role of receptor localization

Eric L. Kilpatrick1, Prakash Narayan2, Robert M. Mentzer Jr.1,2, and Robert D. Lasley1,2

Departments of 1 Physiology and 2 Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky 40536


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Adenosine A2a receptors are found in coronary vascular tissue although, their presence in myocardium is subject to investigation. Although there have been numerous studies on adenosine A2a receptor agonist effects on contractility and cAMP levels in ventricular myocytes, these have yielded conflicting results. Negative pharmacological studies have even led to the conclusion that A2a receptors are not present in cardiac myocytes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether A2a receptors are expressed in rat ventricular myocytes and what physiological effects are mediated via activation of these receptors. Western blot analysis with a polyclonal antibody raised against a peptide sequence specific to the carboxy terminus of the A2a receptor revealed the presence of a band at ~45 kDa. However, the immunoreactivity was located in the nonmembrane fraction of the cell lysate. The membrane fraction only exhibited an immunoreactive band >= 50 kDa. Treatment of isolated myocytes with the adenosine A2a agonist 2-[4-[(2-carboxyethyl)-phenyl]ethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS-21680) exerted no effects on cAMP levels or myocyte twitch amplitude. These results indicate that although rat ventricular myocytes appear to express adenosine A2a receptors, stimulation with an A2a agonist exerts no functional effects, possibly because of the subcellular localization of the A2a receptor.

phosphodiesterase inhibitor; Western blot


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ADENOSINE EXERTS A VARIETY of effects in the heart by the activation of purinergic P1 receptor subtypes. Activation of the myocyte A1 receptor alters sinoatrial and atrioventricular conduction and attenuates the metabolic and contractile effects of beta -adrenergic receptor stimulation (3, 35-37). Adenosine A1 receptor activation before ischemia also exerts significant protective effects in ischemic-reperfused myocardium (15). Stimulation of A2a receptors located on coronary endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle mediates coronary vasodilation (17, 33). Additional reports indicate that coronary A2a receptor stimulation during reperfusion may exert beneficial effects (16, 47).

There is universal agreement that A1 receptor agonists alter neither contractility nor cAMP accumulation in normal ventricular myocardium; however, there are conflicting reports on the effects of adenosine A2a receptor agonists. Initial studies in several species (dog, rat, guinea pig) indicated that the mixed agonist 5'-(N-ethylcarboxamido)adenosine (NECA) had no effect on cAMP accumulation (11, 30, 38). Subsequent studies indicated that more selective adenosine A2a agonists exerted no effects on cAMP accumulation or contractility, suggesting that ventricular cardiomyocytes do not express adenosine A2a receptors (40, 43). In contrast, there are additional reports that A2a receptor agonists increase adenylyl cyclase activity, myocyte twitch amplitude, or cAMP accumulation in isolated guinea pig, rat, and fetal chick ventricular myocytes (4, 6, 18, 37, 41, 46).

In addition to the conflicting pharmacological evidence for the existence of myocyte A2a receptors, molecular studies have yielded disparate findings. The first report of the presence of adenosine A2a receptor mRNA in ventricular myocardium was based on Northern blotting of rat myocyte lysates (46). Subsequently, the A2a receptor protein was detected by immunoblotting in isolated porcine myocytes (24). However, a more recent investigation with RT-PCR concluded that adenosine A2a receptor transcript was absent in porcine myocardial homogenate (10).

Although it has been reported that adult rat ventricular myocytes contain A2a receptor mRNA, there have been no reports of the expression of A2a receptor protein in this species. Additionally, the pharmacological evidence for functional myocyte A2a receptors is controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to ascertain the effects of the A2a receptor agonist CGS-21680 on ventricular myocyte cAMP levels and twitch amplitude. Furthermore, Western blot analysis was used to investigate the presence of A2a receptors in these cells.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

All animals in this study received humane care according to the guidelines set forth in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council (National Institutes of Health Publication No. 85-23, 1996) and according to the guidelines of the Department of Laboratory Animal Resources, University of Kentucky.

Isolation of myocytes. Ventricular myocytes were enzymatically dissociated from male Sprague-Dawley rats (350-400 g) by previously described methods (28, 29) with minor modifications. Rats were heparinized (500 U ip) and anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (65 mg/kg ip). The hearts were rapidly excised and retrogradely perfused for 4 min at constant pressure (70 mmHg) with calcium-free modified HEPES buffer (10 mM HEPES and 2 mM pyruvate, pH 7.2, gassed with 100% O2 at 37°C). After addition of Liberase Blendzyme (0.14 mg/ml; Roche Diagnostic, Indianapolis, IN), the perfusate was recirculated for 15-17 min. Calcium was gradually added during the final 10 min of enzyme recirculation to reach 500 µM. The ventricles were minced and placed in a shaking water bath (37°C) with 20 ml of HEPES-enzyme buffer for 10 min followed by gentle tituration. The digestion mixture was filtered through 250-µm nylon mesh, washed twice with enzyme-free buffer containing 500 µM Ca2+, and resuspended in HEPES buffer (1 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4). This protocol typically yielded >75% rod-shaped myocytes. All cells were used within 6 h of isolation.

cAMP measurement. cAMP was measured as previously described with modifications (28). Myocytes were incubated at room temperature (30 min) in HEPES buffer supplemented with adenosine deaminase (1 U/ml) to degrade endogenous adenosine. The myocyte suspensions from 10 separate isolations were divided into 1.5-ml aliquots and assigned to the following groups: control (DMSO vehicle), the cAMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor rolipram (50 µM), the adenosine A2a receptor agonist CGS-21680 (100 nM), and CGS-21680 + rolipram. In three of these isolations, additional myocyte aliquots were treated with isoproterenol (10 nM) or isoproterenol + rolipram. Cells were initially treated with rolipram or vehicle (10 min, 37°C) followed by application of CGS-21680, isoproterenol, or vehicle for 10 min. After treatments, the cells were pelleted by centrifugation (1 min, 1,000 g) and the supernatant was discarded. Myocytes were lysed in 500 µl of HCl (0.1 N, 10 min) and vortexed. The suspension was centrifuged (4 min, 3,000 g), and the supernatant was assayed for cAMP (ELISA kit; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The pellet was solubilized with 1 N NaOH, and protein was assayed by the Lowry method. Intracellular cAMP was expressed as picomoles per milligram of protein.

Myocyte contractility measurements. Myocytes were adhered to the laminin coated-glass coverslip floor of the recording chamber (RC-24; Warner Instrument, Hamden, CT) and mounted on the stage of an inverted microscope (IX-70; Olympus America, Melville, NY). Cells were suffused with HEPES buffer (100% O2, pH 7.4, 1 ml/min) from an inline heater (37°C, TS 28; Warner Instrument, Hamden, CT), field stimulated (0.5 Hz, SD9 stimulator; Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA), and imaged with a charge-coupled device camera. Changes in cell length were quantified via edge-motion detection with a video dimension analyzer (Coyote Bay), and twitch amplitude was expressed as a percentage of diastolic length. Baseline measurements were obtained after a 10-min equilibration period to ensure the presence of steady-state contractions.

The effect of CGS-21680 at different concentrations was analyzed in three groups: group 1, 100 nM (n = 8 myocytes from 4 hearts); group 2, 1 µM (n = 11 myocytes from 4 hearts); and group 3, vehicle (n = 7 myocytes from 4 hearts). The myocytes were exposed to CGS-21680 or vehicle (10 min) followed by washout. Isoproterenol (2 min, 5 nM) was used as a positive control. Two further groups tested the effects of the PDE inhibitor rolipram on twitch amplitude. Myocytes were treated with either rolipram (50 µM; n = 17 myocytes from 3 hearts) or vehicle (DMSO; n = 9 from 3 hearts) for a total of 20 min (twitch amplitude measured every 5 min) followed by 10-min washout.

Western blot analysis. Myocytes were centrifuged twice (3 min, 60 g, 4°C) with intervening resuspension in 10 ml of PBS. The pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of buffer A (in mM: 250 sucrose, 5 Tris · HCl, 0.4 MgCl2, pH 7.5) with the addition of aprotinin (2 µg/ml), leupeptin (2 µg/ml), pepstatin A (2 µg/ml), benzamidine (0.1 mM), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.1 mM) and received 20 strokes with a Teflon Dounce on ice. The homogenate was centrifuged (10 min, 200 g, 4°C), and the resulting supernatant was centrifuged at 105,000 g for 1 h. The supernatant containing soluble proteins was reserved, and the pellet was washed twice with buffer A followed by resuspension in buffer B (in mM: 50 Tris · HCl and 4 MgCl2 containing protease inhibitors). Proteins were assayed by the Lowry method. Fifty micrograms of protein from the soluble and particulate fractions was subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE (25 mA) under reducing conditions as described by Laemmli (14). After electrophoresis, the proteins were electroblotted (200 mA, 2 h) to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (0.45 µm). The membranes were blocked by rocking incubation (1 h, room temperature) with PBS containing 5% milk. Incubation (2 h, room temperature) of primary anti-A2a peptide antiserum (1:1,000) in PBS-milk was followed by four 10-min washes with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20. Secondary antibody (1:7,500) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase was incubated (1 h, room temperature) with PBS (1% milk + 0.05% Tween-20) followed by four 10-min washes. The membrane was incubated with enhanced chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and exposed to Kodak X-OMAT film for up to 5 min. Specificity of the primary antibody for the rat A2a receptor protein was verified by cross-reaction with the heterologously expressed human A2a receptor (RBI, Natick, MA). In addition, rat A1 receptor and rat A3 receptor from NEN Life Science (Boston, MA) were used as negative controls.

Materials. Isoproterenol, CGS-21680, adenosine deaminase, and DMSO were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Rolipram was obtained from Alexis Biochemical (San Diego, CA). Antiserum from rabbit raised against a peptide sequence from the carboxy terminus of the canine adenosine A2a receptor was a kind gift of Dr. S. J. Mustafa (East Carolina University, Greenville, NC). The secondary antibody was goat anti-rabbit IgG from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Lowry protein assay kit was purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA).

Data analysis. Data are expressed as means ± SE and analyzed by two-way ANOVA with mixed factors or repeated measures, and Tukey honestly significant difference test was used for post hoc analysis with Statistica software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK). Significance was regarded as P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Effect of CGS-21680 on isolated myocyte cAMP accumulation. Basal myocyte intracellular cAMP levels were 11.7 ± 0.8 pmol/mg protein. As shown in Fig. 1A, treatment with the adenosine A2a agonist CGS-21680 (100 nM) for 10 min had no effect on cAMP (11.3 ± 1.3 pmol/mg). Although the combination of CGS-21680 + rolipram elevated cAMP levels to 13.2 ± 1.2 pmol/mg (P < 0.05), this effect was not different from treatment with rolipram alone (14.0 ± 1.0 pmol/mg). In contrast to the lack of effect of CGS-21680, isoproterenol (10 nM, 10 min) increased cAMP levels from 9.3 ± 1.4 to 20.3 ± 6.0 pmol/mg (P < 0.05; Fig. 1B). The addition of rolipram potentiated the effects of isoproterenol on cAMP as levels increased to 44.3 ± 3.5 pmol/mg.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effects of CGS-21680, rolipram, and isoproterenol (Iso) on cAMP accumulation in isolated rat myocytes pretreated with adenosine deaminase. A: myocytes were divided into 4 treatment groups and treated as described in METHODS to determine A2a agonist and rolipram effects (n = 10). B: myocytes were further divided into 4 treatment groups to test the effect of rolipram and Iso (n = 3). *P < 0.05, rolipram vs. nonrolipram; #P < 0.05, Iso vs. non-Iso.

Effect of CGS-21680 on myocyte contractility. The effects of two doses of CGS-21680 on myocyte twitch amplitude were tested (Fig. 2). Basal twitch amplitudes in vehicle- and CGS-21680-treated myocytes were similar (6.3 ± 0.7%, 5.7 ± 0.6%, and 6.1 ± 0.5% of resting cell length, respectively). Neither 100 nM nor 1 µM CGS-21680 treatment for 10 min had any effect on contractility. After washout of the CGS-21680, myocytes were exposed to isoproterenol (5 nM) as a positive control. Twitch amplitude in vehicle- and CGS-21680-treated myocytes increased similarly with isoproterenol (53 ± 6%; P < 0.05). In an additional group of myocytes, 20-min application of rolipram (50 µM) exerted no effects on contractility (Fig. 3).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effect of CGS-21680 on twitch amplitude of isolated myocytes expressed as percent decrease of baseline diastolic length. Cells from 4 isolations were treated for 10 min with vehicle [dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO); n = 7], 100 nM CGS-21680 (n = 8), or 1 µM CGS-21680 (n = 11). After a 10-min washout, 5 nM Iso was applied for 2 min. *P < 0.05, Iso vs. non-Iso.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of rolipram on twitch amplitude of isolated myocytes expressed as % decrease of baseline diastolic length. Myocytes from 3 isolations received treatment for 10 min with either vehicle (DMSO; n = 11) or 50 µM rolipram (n = 18).

Western blot analysis of adenosine A2a receptor. Whole antiserum was used for Western blotting. An enhanced chemiluminescence blot of PVDF membrane probed with adenosine A2a receptor antiserum is shown in Fig. 4. Protein from the soluble fraction of isolated rat ventricular myocytes showed a major immunoreactive band at ~45 kDa that comigrated with the human A2a receptor. This band was not detectable in the lane containing the particulate fraction, although a distinct immunoreactive band was observed at a higher molecular mass (Mr) (~50 kDa). Protein from heterologously expressed rat A1 and A3 receptors did not demonstrate any cross-reactivity, confirming the specificity of the antibody for the A2a receptor.


View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Western blot analysis. Proteins were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and analyzed by probing with anti-A2a receptor peptide polyclonal antiserum (1:1,000 dilution), followed by goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. The immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence. A blot containing protein (50 µg) from rat myocyte particulate (lane 1) and soluble (lane 2) fractions is shown. Lanes 3-5 contain 1 µg of commercially available heterologously expressed human A2a receptor, rat A1 receptor, and rat A3 receptor, respectively. The experiment was repeated at least 3 times with identical results.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The results of the present study indicate that the adenosine A2a receptor agonist CGS-21680 did not increase accumulation of intracellular cAMP in isolated rat ventricular myocytes in the presence or absence of the PDE inhibitor rolipram. Similarly, application of the A2a agonist did not alter myocyte twitch amplitude. Western blot analysis revealed that ventricular myocytes expressed A2a receptors in both the soluble and particulate fractions, albeit at different molecular masses. These findings indicate that, despite the presence of A2a receptors within rat ventricular myocytes, their activation is not associated with increases in cAMP or inotropy. The lack of functional effects of adenosine A2a receptor stimulation may be caused by compartmentation of the receptor or inefficient coupling to G proteins.

The best-known mechanism of A2a receptor signaling is the accumulation of cAMP. However, studies examining cAMP accumulation with A2a agonists in isolated myocytes have yielded inconsistent results. There are several reports that NECA and the more selective A2a agonists CGS-21680 and 2-[2-(4-methylphenyl)ethoxy]adenosine (WRC-0090) do not alter cAMP levels in ventricular myocytes (11, 23, 30, 38, 40, 43). In contrast, there are additional reports that these same agonists do increase cAMP, either by directly activating adenylyl cyclase or indirectly by inhibiting cAMP PDE (1, 4, 6, 18, 37, 41, 46). Two of these studies, in guinea pig and rat (41, 46), reported increases in cAMP accumulation with 100 nM CGS-21680, but another, in the rat (6), did not. The results of myocyte studies with PDE inhibitors with A2a agonists have consistently reported no changes in cAMP (11, 30, 38, 40, 43), whereas those without PDE inhibitors have reported increases (4, 6, 41, 46). Although the presence or absence of PDE inhibitors could potentially explain these divergent results, none of the above studies directly tested the effect of PDE inhibition on A2a receptor-mediated increases in cAMP accumulation. Our results indicate that the A2a agonist CGS-21680 did not affect cAMP accumulation whether or not the PDE inhibitor rolipram was present. Rolipram alone increased cAMP content by 21%, consistent with previous reports (4, 25, 27). Isoproterenol (10 nM) increased cAMP by 118%, which was potentiated by rolipram (238% increase), confirming the ability of the myocytes to accumulate cAMP and to respond to PDE inhibition. The results of the present study thus indicate that adenosine A2a receptor stimulation does not alter ventricular myocyte cAMP levels.

Previous studies of A2a-mediated positive inotropic effects in isolated myocytes have also yielded conflicting results. Both nonselective and selective A2a agonists have been reported to have no effect on guinea pig myocyte twitch amplitude (30, 40, 41). In contrast, there are reports showing that NECA and CGS-21680 increase twitch amplitude in chick and rat ventricular myocytes (6, 18, 19, 44, 46). In our hands, neither 100 nM nor 1 µM CGS-21680 altered rat ventricular myocyte twitch amplitude. The PDE inhibitor rolipram, which did increase cAMP levels, also did not alter myocyte twitch amplitude, in agreement with previous observations (12, 13). Despite the lack of response to CGS-21680 and rolipram, the myocytes responded robustly to isoproterenol (5 nM), confirming their ability to respond to inotropic agents. Our present results are consistent with the lack of inotropic effect of CGS-21680 in normal intact guinea pig, rat, and porcine myocardium (8, 16, 26). We also observed no effects of CGS-21680 (1-1,000 nM) on left ventricular developed pressure in isolated rat hearts despite dose-dependent increases in coronary flow (data not shown). Given that we observed no increase in cAMP, and that it has been reported that CGS-21680 did not alter intracellular Ca2+ in rat ventricular myocytes (43), it is not surprising that CGS-21680 had no effect on myocyte contractility.

There are several possible explanations for the lack of CGS-21680 effects in the present study. It is possible that we did not use an adequate dose of the agonist. However, this seems unlikely, given that we used 100 nM and 1 µM concentrations of CGS-21680, and the EC50 values for this agonist on cAMP accumulation in PC12 cells and human neutrophils have been reported to be <20 nM (9, 42). Several reports have suggested that possible cross-activation of the myocyte A1 receptor may mask A2a stimulatory effects on cAMP and contractility (6, 18, 19, 37, 41, 46). The results of additional studies, performed in the presence of the A1 antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) and/or pertussis toxin (to block inhibitory G proteins), have indicated no effects of A2a agonists on adenylate cyclase activity, cAMP accumulation, or myocyte inotropy (23, 40, 43). Therefore, it does not appear that our inability to demonstrate CGS-21680 effects in the present study could be due simply to omission of DPCPX or pertussis toxin.

A third possibility for the lack of CGS-21680 effects is that ventricular myocytes lack adenosine A2a receptors. In fact, the results of several negative pharmacological studies have led to the conclusion that A2a receptors are not expressed on cardiac myocytes (40, 43). However, Western blot analysis of our whole cell lysates indicated an immunoreactive band at ~45 kDa that comigrated with heterologously expressed human A2a receptors but had no cross-reactivity with either rat A1 or A3 receptors. These results are consistent with the Mr reported in membranes from human and porcine heart (24) and rat striatum (34) and kidney (48). Interestingly the 45-kDa band was found exclusively in the soluble, rather than the membrane, fraction of myocyte lysates. We did observe immunoreactivity in the particulate fraction. but this band appeared >= 50 kDa. The location of this band is consistent with the higher mass (~52 kDa) reported for the A2a receptor in canine liver plasma membranes (32) and the canine thyroid-derived receptor (~60 kDa) transfected into CHO cells (31). Thus, as originally concluded by Palmer et al. (32), there appear to be both tissue- and species-dependent differences in the size of the adenosine A2a receptor.

The Western blot results may provide an explanation for why the A2a agonist CGS-21680 was unable to increase cAMP accumulation or alter myocyte contractility. Localization of the 45-kDa form of the A2a receptor in the soluble fraction of the myocytes would preclude receptor interaction with membrane-bound stimulatory G proteins and adenylyl cyclase. It is possible that our soluble fractions were contaminated with intracellular organelles such as endosomes or microsomes or other small vesicles. The movement of A2a receptors into light vesicles has been proposed to be a possible explanation for receptor desensitization (31). Alternatively "cytosolic" adenosine A2a receptors have been observed in human skeletal muscle (22) and PC12 cells (2). In the latter study cytosolic A2a receptors appeared to translocate to the plasma membrane during anoxia, an effect that was associated with a fivefold decrease in EC50 for CGS-21680 stimulation of cAMP accumulation (2). Although our observation that the 45-kDa immunoreactivity resided exclusively in the soluble fraction was unexpected, the A2a receptor is unique among adenosine receptors in lacking a cysteine palmitoylation site (20), which appears to play a key role in targeting and anchoring proteins to membranes (7).

Although the 50-kDa band was found in the membrane fraction, it is possible that the higher-mass form of the protein may not effectively couple to Gs, because immunoreactivity provides no information regarding appropriate coupling or functionality of the identified protein. Rat striatal adenosine receptors have been shown to have both a high- and a low-affinity state, with the majority of receptors being of low affinity and not G protein coupled (21). Alternatively, A2a receptor stimulation may have increased cAMP in a subcellular compartment that does not lead to increased inotropy. The compartmentation of cAMP in cardiac myocytes was first reported nearly two decades ago (5), when it was reported that prostaglandin E1 increased cAMP in the soluble, but not the particulate, fraction of rabbit ventricular myocytes, whereas the beta -adrenergic agonist isoproterenol increased cAMP in both fractions. More recently, it has been determined that increases in particulate cAMP levels correlate with the inotropic effects of beta -adrenergic receptor stimulation (45) and adenylyl cyclase is compartmentalized in cardiac myocyte plasma membranes within caveolae (39). Thus it is possible that CGS-21680 increased cAMP in the soluble fraction, which is not associated with an inotropic effect.

In summary, we showed that although the adenosine A2a receptor protein is expressed in rat ventricular myocytes, its activation does not lead to changes in inotropy. The lack of an A2a receptor inotropic effect is consistent with the lack of effect of CGS-21680 on myocyte cAMP accumulation in the presence or absence of a PDE inhibitor. In conclusion, adenosine A2a receptor stimulation in rat ventricular myocytes does not increase whole cell intracellular cAMP levels or alter twitch amplitude, possibly because of receptor subcellular localization and/or poor receptor-transduction coupling.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Drs. Eric J. Smart and S. Jamal Mustafa for helpful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES

This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants RO1-HL-66132 (R. D. Lasley) and RO1-HL-34759 (R. M. Mentzer, Jr).

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. D. Lasley, Dept. of Surgery, MN276, Univ. of Kentucky Medical Center, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40536 (E-mail: rlasley{at}pop.uky.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

10.1152/ajpheart.00808.2001

Received 13 September 2001; accepted in final form 15 November 2001.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1.   Anand-Srivastava, MB. Regulation of adenylate cyclase by adenosine and other agonists in rat myocardial sarcolemma. Arch Biochem Biophys 243: 439-446, 1985.

2.  Arslan G, Kull B, and Fredholm BB. Anoxia redistributes adenosine A2A receptors in PC12 cells and increases receptor-mediated formation of cAMP. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. DOI 10.1007/s002100100456, published online 7 August 2001.

3.   Bellardinelli, L, Lu J, Dennis D, Martens J, and Shryock JC. The cardiac effects of a novel A1-adenosine receptor agonist in guinea pig isolated heart. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 271: 1371-1382, 1994.

4.   Boknik, P, Neumann J, Schmitz W, Scholz H, and Wenzlaff H. Characterization of biochemical effects of CGS 21680C, an A2-adenosine receptor agonist, in the mammalian ventricle. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 30: 750-758, 1997.

5.   Buxton, ILO, and Brunton LL. Compartments of cyclic AMP and protein kinase in mammalian cardiomyocytes. J Biol Chem 258: 10233-10239, 1983.

6.   Dobson, JG, Jr, and Fenton RA. Adenosine A2 receptor function in rat ventricular myocytes. Cardiovasc Res 34: 337-347, 1997.

7.   Dunphy, JT, and Linder ME. Signalling functions of protein palmitoylation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1436: 245-261, 1998.

8.   Felsh, A, Stocker K, and Borchard U. Adenosine A1 and A2 receptor agonists alter cardiac functions and prostacyclin release in the isolated guinea-pig heart. Eur J Pharmacol 263: 261-268, 1994.

9.   Gao, Z, Li Z, Baker SP, Lasley RD, Meyer S, Elzein E, Palle V, Zablocki JA, Blackburn B, and Belardinelli L. Novel short-acting A2A adenosine receptor agonists for coronary vasodilation: inverse relationship between affinity and duration of action of A2A agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298: 209-218, 2001.

10.   Hein, TW, Wang W, Zoghi B, Muthuchamy M, and Kuo L. Functional and molecular characterization of receptor subtypes mediating coronary microvascular dilation to adenosine. J Mol Cell Cardiol 33: 271-282, 2001.

11.   Henrich, M, Piper HM, and Schrader J. Evidence for adenylate cyclase-coupled A1-adenosine receptors on ventricular cardiomyocytes from adult rat and dog heart. Life Sci 41: 2381-2388, 1987.

12.   Katano, Y, and Endoh M. Effects of a cardiotonic quinolinone derivative Y-20487 on the isoproterenol-induced positive inotropic action and cyclic AMP accumulation in rat ventricular myocardium: comparison with rolipram, Ro-20-1724, milrinone, and isobutylmethylxanthine. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 20: 715-722, 1992.

13.   Kelso, EJ, McDermott BJ, and Silke B. Differential effects of phosphodiesterase inhibitors on accumulation of cyclic AMP in isolated ventricular cardiomyocytes. Biochem Pharmacol 49: 441-452, 1995.

14.   Laemmli, UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685, 1970.

15.   Lasley, RD. Adenosine cardioprotection and potential mechanisms. In: Adenosine, Cardioprotection and Clinical Application, edited by Mentzer RM, Jr, Kitakaze M, Downey JM, and Hori M.. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, 1997, p. 93-102.

16.   Lasley, RD, Jahania MS, and Mentzer RM, Jr. Beneficial effects of adenosine A2a agonist CGS-21680 in infarcted and stunned porcine myocardium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H1660-H1666, 2001.

17.   Lew, MJ, and Kao SW. Examination of adenosine receptor-mediated relaxation of the pig coronary artery. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 26: 438-443, 1999.

18.   Liang, BT, and Haltiwanger B. Adenosine A2a and A2b receptors in cultured fetal chick heart cells. High- and low-affinity coupling to stimulation of myocyte contractility and cAMP accumulation. Circ Res 76: 242-251, 1995.

19.   Liang, BT, and Haltiwanger B. A new cyclic AMP-independent, Gs-mediated stimulatory mechanism via the adenosine A2a receptor in the intact cardiac cell. J Biol Chem 271: 18678-18685, 1996.

20.   Linden, J. Cloned adenosine A3 receptors: pharmacological properties, species differences and receptor functions. Trends Pharmacol Sci 15: 298-306, 1994.

21.   Luthin, DR, Olsson RA, Thompson RD, Sawmiller DR, and Linden J. Characterization of two affinity states of adenosine A2a receptors with a new radioligand, 2-[2-(4-amino-3-[125I]iodophenyl)ethylamino]adenosine. Mol Pharmacol 47: 307-313, 1995.

22.   Lynge, J, and Hellsten Y. Distribution of adenosine A1, A2a and A2b receptors in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 169: 283-290, 2000.

23.   Ma, H, and Green RD. Modulation of cardiac cyclic AMP metabolism by adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists. Mol Pharmacol 42: 831-837, 1992.

24.   Marala, RB, and Mustafa SJ. Immunological characterization of adenosine a2a receptors in human and porcine cardiovascular tissues. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286: 1051-1057, 1998.

25.   Martens, D, Lohse MJ, Rauch B, and Schwabe U. Pharmacological characterization of A1 adenosine receptors in isolated rat ventricular myocytes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 336: 342-348, 1987.

26.   Monahan, TS, Sawmiller DR, Fenton RA, and Dobson JG, Jr. Adenosine A2a-receptor activation increases contractility in isolated perfused hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H1472-H1481, 2000.

27.   Murphy, MG, and Horackova M. Short-term exposure of intact ventricular myocytes to isoproterenol results in desensitization of adenylate cyclase. Eur J Pharmacol 268: 121-128, 1994.

28.   Narayan, P, Mentzer RM, Jr, and Lasley RD. Phosphatase inhibitor cantharidin blocks adenosine A1 receptor anti-adrenergic effect in rat cardiac myocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278: H1-H7, 2000.

29.   Narayan, P, Valdivia HH, Mentzer RM, Jr, and Lasley RD. Adenosine A1 receptor stimulation antagonizes the negative inotropic effects of the PKC activator dioctanoylglycerol. J Mol Cell Cardiol 30: 913-921, 1998.

30.   Neumann, J, Schmitz W, Scholz H, and Stein B. Effects of adenosine analogues on contractile response and cAMP content in guinea-pig isolated ventricular myocytes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 340: 689-695, 1989.

31.   Palmer, TM, Gettys TW, Jacobson KA, and Stiles GL. Desensitization of the canine A2a adenosine receptor: delineation of multiple processes. Mol Pharmacol 45: 1082-1094, 1994.

32.   Palmer, TM, Jacobson KA, and Stiles GL. Immunological identification of A2 adenosine receptors by two antipeptide antibody preparations. Mol Pharmacol 42: 391-307, 1992.

33.   Prentice, DJ, and Hourani SM. Characterisation of adenosine receptors mediating relaxation in hamster isolated aorta. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 362: 427-434, 2000.

34.   Robeva, AS, Woodard RL, Jin X, Gao Z, Bhattacharya S, Taylor HE, Rosin DL, and Linden J. Molecular characterization of recombinant human adenosine receptors. Drug Dev Res 39: 243-252, 1996.

35.   Romano, FD, Naimi TS, and Dobson JG, Jr. Adenosine attenuation of catecholamine-enhanced contractility of rat heart in vivo. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 260: H1635-H1659, 1991.

36.   Romano, FD, and Dobson JG, Jr. Adenosine modulates beta -adrenergic signal transduction in guinea-pig heart ventricular membranes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 22: 1359-1370, 1990.

37.   Romano, FD, MacDonald SG, and Dobson JG, Jr. Adenosine receptor coupling to adenylate cyclase of rat ventricular myocyte membranes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 257: H1088-H1095, 1989.

38.   Schrader, J, Kroll K, Henrich M, and Piper HM. Coronary and myocardial adenosine receptors. Biomed Biochim Acta 46: S421-S426, 1987.

39.   Schwencke, C, Yamamoto M, Okumura S, Toya Y, Kim SJ, and Ishikawa Y. Compartmentation of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate signaling in caveolae. Mol Endocrinol 13: 1061-1070, 1999.

40.   Shryock, J, Song Y, Wang D, Baker SP, Olsson RA, and Belardinelli L. Selective A2-adenosine receptor agonists do not alter action potential duration, twitch shortening, or cAMP accumulation in guinea pig, or rabbit isolated ventricular myocytes. Circ Res 72: 194-205, 1993.

41.   Stein, B, Schmitz W, Scholz H, and Seeland C. Pharmacological characterization of A2-adenosine receptors in guinea-pig ventricular cardiomyocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 26: 403-414, 1994.

42.   Sullivan, GW, Rieger JM, Scheld WM, Macdonald TL, and Linden J. Cyclic AMP-dependent inhibition of human neutrophil oxidative activity by substituted 2-propynylcyclohexyl adenosine A(2A) receptor agonists. Br J Pharmacol 132: 1017-1026, 2001.

43.   Wilken, A, Tawfik-Schlieper H, and Schwabe U. Evidence against the presence of A2 adenosine receptors on guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 192: 161-163, 1991.

44.   Woodiwiss, AJ, Honeyman TW, Fenton RA, and Dobson JG, Jr. Adenosine A2a-receptor activation enhances cardiomyocyte shortening via Ca2+-independent mechanisms. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H1434-H1441, 1999.

45.   Xiao, RP, Hohl C, Altschuld R, Jones L, Livingston B, Ziman B, Tantini B, and Lakatta EG. beta 2-Adrenergic receptor-stimulated increase in cAMP in rat heart cells is not coupled to changes in Ca2+ dynamics, contractility, or phospholamban phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 269: 19151-19156, 1994.

46.   Xu, H, Stein B, and Liang B. Characterization of a stimulatory adenosine A2a receptor in adult rat ventricular myocyte. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 270: H1655-H1661, 1996.

47.   Zhao, ZQ, Nakanishi K, McGee DS, Tan P, and Vinten-Johansen J. A1 receptor mediated myocardial infarct size reduction by endogenous adenosine is exerted primarily during ischaemia. Cardiovasc Res 28: 270-279, 1994.

48.   Zou, AP, Wu F, Li PL, and Cowley AW, Jr. Effect of chronic salt loading on adenosine metabolism and receptor expression in renal cortex and medulla in rats. Hypertension 33: 511-516, 1999.


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282(3):H1035-H1040
0363-6135/02 $5.00 Copyright © 2002 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. D. Lasley, G. Kristo, B. J. Keith, and R. M. Mentzer Jr.
The A2a/A2b receptor antagonist ZM-241385 blocks the cardioprotective effect of adenosine agonist pretreatment in in vivo rat myocardium
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H426 - H431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
L. Hove-Madsen, C. Prat-Vidal, A. Llach, F. Ciruela, V. Casado, C. Lluis, A. Bayes-Genis, J. Cinca, and R. Franco
Adenosine A2A receptors are expressed in human atrial myocytes and modulate spontaneous sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2006; 72(2): 292 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
W. R. Law
Adenosine receptors in the response to sepsis: what do receptor-specific knockouts tell us?
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): R957 - R958.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
W. Hleihel, A. Lafoux, N. Ouaini, A. Divet, and C. Huchet-Cadiou
Adenosine affects the release of Ca2+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via A2A receptors in ferret skinned cardiac fibres
Exp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 91(4): 681 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. M. Marin and K. G. Franchini
Reduced oxygen supply explains the negative force-frequency relation and the positive inotropic effect of adenosine in buffer-perfused hearts
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H131 - H136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Z. Yang, Y.-J. Day, M.-C. Toufektsian, S. I. Ramos, M. Marshall, X.-Q. Wang, B. A. French, and J. Linden
Infarct-Sparing Effect of A2A-Adenosine Receptor Activation Is Due Primarily to Its Action on Lymphocytes
Circulation, May 3, 2005; 111(17): 2190 - 2197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. A. Reid, G. Kristo, Y. Yoshimura, C. Ballard-Croft, B. J. Keith, R. M. Mentzer Jr, and R. D. Lasley
In vivo adenosine receptor preconditioning reduces myocardial infarct size via subcellular ERK signaling
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): H2253 - H2259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Ballard-Croft, G. Kristo, Y. Yoshimura, E. Reid, B. J. Keith, R. M. Mentzer Jr., and R. D. Lasley
Acute adenosine preconditioning is mediated by p38 MAPK activation in discrete subcellular compartments
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1359 - H1366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y. Chen, S. Epperson, L. Makhsudova, B. Ito, J. Suarez, W. Dillmann, and F. Villarreal
Functional effects of enhancing or silencing adenosine A2b receptors in cardiac fibroblasts
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2478 - H2486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
G. Kristo, Y. Yoshimura, J. Niu, B. J. Keith, R. M. Mentzer Jr., R. Bunger, and R. D. Lasley
The intermediary metabolite pyruvate attenuates stunning and reduces infarct size in in vivo porcine myocardium
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): H517 - H524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/3/H1035    most recent
00808.2001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kilpatrick, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lasley, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kilpatrick, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lasley, R. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online