AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282: H2265-H2277, 2002. First published February 28, 2002; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01080.2001
0363-6135/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/6/H2265    most recent
01080.2001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsoukias, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Popel, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsoukias, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Popel, A. S.
Vol. 282, Issue 6, H2265-H2277, June 2002

Erythrocyte consumption of nitric oxide in presence and absence of plasma-based hemoglobin

Nikolaos M. Tsoukias and Aleksander S. Popel

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Computational Medicine and Biology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Experimental measurements have suggested a consumption rate of nitric oxide (NO) by red blood cells (RBCs) that is orders of magnitude smaller than that of an equivalent concentration of free hemoglobin in solution. This difference has been attributed to external diffusion limitations in the transport of NO from the plasma to the surface of the RBC or to resistance in the transport through the erythrocytic membrane. A detailed mathematical model is developed to quantify the resistance to NO transport around a single RBC and to predict the consumption rate in the presence and absence of extracellular hemoglobin. We provide a description for the NO consumption rate as a function of hematocrit, RBC radius, membrane permeability, and extracellular hemoglobin concentration. We predict a first-order rate constant for NO consumption in blood between 7.5 × 102 and 6.5 × 103 s-1 at a hematocrit of 45% for membrane permeability values between 0.1 and 40 cm/s. Our results suggest that the difference in NO uptake by RBCs and free hemoglobin is smaller than previously reported and it is hematocrit dependent.

red blood cells; diffusion; reaction; blood substitutes


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

NITRIC OXIDE (NO) is a signal transduction molecule of extreme physiological importance. It is produced in a number of cells through the enzymatic degradation of L-arginine by one of several isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). NO is a relatively reactive molecule with a short half-life in vivo. It can be degraded by a number of reactions, but under physiological conditions, NO concentrations are submicromolar, and it is the first-order reactions with superoxide and heme-containing proteins such as hemoglobin (Hb) and guanylate cyclase that should dominate its chemistry in vivo (3).

One of the important roles that NO plays in the body is the regulation of vascular smooth muscle tone. NO produced in the vascular endothelial cells can diffuse freely across cell membranes to the adjacent smooth muscle where it activates the enzyme soluble guanylate cyclase, leading to an increase in the intracellular cGMP concentration and to smooth muscle relaxation. The close proximity of the red blood cells (RBC) to the site of NO production and the fast consumption of NO by both oxy- and deoxyHb observed in vitro (10, 16) suggest, however, that a significant amount of NO will be scavenged by the blood. Thus it is unclear how much of the endothelium-derived NO is able to reach the smooth muscle where it needs to sustain physiologically significant concentrations for the activation of soluble guanylate cyclase.

A number of experimental and theoretical studies have been performed to investigate the diffusional spread of NO away from its site of production (5, 21, 24, 36, 40). Theoretical studies have recently been reviewed by Buerk (4). They represent a first generation of models that consider only transport of free NO. They do not account for preservation of NO-related bioactivity through the formation of more stable intermediates such as S-nitrosothiols. Theoretical simulations by Lancaster (21) showed that physiological amounts of Hb (2 mM) flowing in the lumen of a 20-µm arteriole scavenges significant amounts of NO, leading to a dramatic reduction of the NO concentration in the arteriolar smooth muscle. The result questioned earlier experimental observations that free NO is the endothelium-derived relaxing factor (12, 20, 26). Butler et al. (5) included in their theoretical model a layer free of RBCs next to the endothelium. They demonstrated that despite the significant scavenging of NO by Hb, a substantial amount of NO diffuses toward the smooth muscle; at least for vessels with diameters >160 µm that were examined. They also suggested that the reaction of NO with the Hb "packed" in RBCs might be slower than the reaction of NO with free Hb due to transport resistance through the membrane. Using a detailed mathematical model, Vaughn et al. (36) also suggested the importance of the RBC-free layer in the NO diffusion toward the smooth muscle; however, they concluded that the uptake of NO by RBCs has to be several orders of magnitude smaller than the uptake by an equivalent amount of free Hb in solution for the concentration in the smooth muscle to reach physiologically significant levels. It became obvious that a more detailed description of the NO uptake by RBCs must be incorporated in the modeling studies of NO diffusion.

Recently, two research groups performed experimental studies combined with theoretical analyses to acquire a more detailed description for the uptake of NO by RBCs. Liu et al. (22) measured the disappearance of NO in a suspension of RBCs in a phosphate-buffered solution with the use of an NO-sensitive electrode. Small concentrations of RBCs were utilized (three orders of magnitude less than blood). The disappearance of NO followed a first-order reaction rate with a half-life on the order of seconds. This corresponds to a reaction rate constant ~650 times less than that of free Hb. Utilizing a mathematical model for current flow around a microelectrode, Lui et al. (22) were able to reproduce their experimental observations. Thus they attributed the significant reduction in the reaction rate to external diffusion resistance in the transport of NO from the solution to the RBC membrane. Assuming that this resistance remains the same independent of hematocrit (Hct), they suggested a linear relationship between NO consumption rate and Hct and extrapolated their prediction to normal Hct.

Vaughn et al. (35) used the "competition experiment," where RBCs in a suspension with free Hb are competing for NO generated in a homogenous phase by an NO donor, to measure the NO uptake by RBCs at high Hct under conditions that should minimize the external diffusion resistance. Measurement of the extracellular methemoglobin (MetHb) concentration that is formed allows the estimation of the ratio of the rate of uptake of NO by the RBC and by free Hb and, thus the ratio of the reaction rate constants. Vaughn et al. (35) noted that the external diffusion resistance should decrease with increasing Hct due to a smaller plasma layer around each RBC. Their experimental data, however, suggested that the reaction rate for the RBCs plateaus for Hct >5%. They attributed this behavior to a significant resistance in transport through the RBC membrane or intracellular diffusion limitations, which become the rate-limiting step of NO uptake at higher Hct. In experiments performed at higher Hct (15.6%), changes in the NO donor or free Hb concentrations did not alter the rate of uptake by RBCs, providing additional indications that NO transport is not external diffusion limited, at least under these experimental conditions. The NO consumption by the RBCs was a 1,000 times less than that of an equivalent concentration of free Hb. In a subsequent study (34), they utilized a more detailed model for the analysis of the competition experiment. The model takes into consideration internal, external, and membrane diffusion limitations. The model was fitted to the experimental data for the estimation of membrane permeability or the intracellular reaction rate constant. The predicted value in either case was 2,000 times smaller than expected. Although the competition experiment could not distinguish between the two resistances, the fact that significantly reducing the intracellular Hb concentration did not affect the rate of uptake suggested that it is likely the membrane permeability that limits the NO transport. However, NO is a small and highly diffusible molecule that has been previously thought to have a high membrane permeability (3, 24, 30).

Recently, Huang et al. (17) proposed a mechanism to explain such a significant resistance to NO transport in the RBC membrane. They utilized the same competition experiment to estimate the rate of NO uptake by pretreated RBCs. The results suggested that altering the band 3 binding to cytoskeleton or altering metHb and denatured Hb binding to the RBC membrane or cytoskeleton, significantly alters NO uptake by the RBC. They concluded that RBC membrane- and cytoskeleton-associated NO-inert proteins provide a significant barrier for NO diffusion into the cell. In another experiment, changes in the viscosity of the solution did not alter the NO uptake rate significantly, suggesting negligible external diffusion limitation at least under the conditions of the competition experiment, thus providing additional indications that membrane resistance is the limiting factor for NO uptake.

Administration of extracellular Hb-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs) holds promise as an alternative to blood transfusion. The hypertensive effects often seen after administration, however, are considered a significant obstacle to the potential use of HBOCs (1, 29, 31-33, 38, 39). This phenomenon has been attributed to the scavenging of NO by the plasma-based Hb. Plasma-based Hb should be able to get closer to the endothelial cells in the lumen and can possibly extravasate to the space between the endothelial cells and the smooth muscle. In addition, the consumption of NO by a mixture containing RBCs and free Hb would be different from that of RBC alone.

The purpose of this paper is to provide an analytic description for the consumption of NO by the blood in the presence and absence of plasma-based Hb and for different levels of Hct. Such a description is needed for the development of detailed NO transport models in the presence of Hb-based blood substitutes. In the process, we examine previous hypotheses for the importance of the membrane and extracellular transport resistances for the uptake of NO by the RBCs. The theoretical predictions will be compared with previous analyses and available experimental data.


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Model development. A spherically symmetric model was utilized to characterize the uptake of NO by an RBC as illustrated in Fig. 1. An RBC is assumed spherical and is surrounded by a plasma layer. NO diffuses through the plasma layer and the membrane of the RBC, reaching the intracellular region, where it reacts with the Hb through an irreversible, fast, first-order reaction. Hb is present in abundance inside the cell, and its concentration does not decrease significantly from the reaction with NO. Thus we assume that the RBC represents an infinite sink for NO. To characterize the NO uptake, we need to take into consideration both external and internal resistances to mass transfer as well as resistance for transport through the membrane.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic representation of the model. A spherical red blood cell (RBC) is surrounded by a plasma layer with thickness that depends on hematocrit (Hct). Concentration at the outer boundary of the RBC is assumed constant. Simultaneous solution of the diffusion reaction equations in all three layers yields a concentration profile. Gradient of the concentration at the surface of the RBC is utilized to estimate the consumption rate of nitric oxide (NO) by the RBC. Integration of the profile yields the average NO concentration over the plasma layer or over the entire simulation volume. RR, RBC radius; RC, cytoplasm radius; RP, plasma radius; CP, concentration of outer boundary of plasma; RP, radius of plasma layer. See text and equations for other definitions of mathematical abbreviations.

In the analysis below, we assume no convective mixing facilitation of NO transport in the plasma layer. The plasma layer (Rp) has a finite thickness as determined by the local Hct according to the equation
R<SUB>P</SUB><IT>=R</IT><SUB>R</SUB> Hct<SUP>−1/3</SUP> (1)
where RR is the effective radius of the RBC, defined as the radius of a sphere with the same volume or surface area as the RBC (a corresponding range of RR values will be considered). NO can be consumed by a number of substrates in the plasma layer, including superoxide and thiols and by plasma-based Hb. An overall first-order rate expression is used to model the NO consumption inside the plasma. Negligible consumption of NO is assumed inside the membrane of RBC. A first-order rate expression is used to model the NO consumption inside the RBC as well, where we assume that it is dominated by the reaction with erythrocytic Hb. Second-order reactions of NO such as the reaction with oxygen are considered negligible. Differential steady-state mass balances in each region then yield
D<SUB>pl</SUB><FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR> <FR><NU><IT>∂</IT></NU><DE><IT>∂R</IT></DE></FR> <FENCE><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><FR><NU><IT>∂C</IT></NU><DE><IT>∂R</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><IT>−k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB><IT>C=</IT>0  with <IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB><IT><R<R</IT><SUB>P</SUB> (2)

D<SUB>m</SUB><FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR> <FR><NU><IT>∂</IT></NU><DE><IT>∂R</IT></DE></FR> <FENCE><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><FR><NU><IT>∂C</IT></NU><DE><IT>∂R</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><IT>=</IT>0  with <IT>R</IT><SUB>C</SUB><IT><R<R</IT><SUB>R</SUB> (3)

D<SUB>cy</SUB><FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR> <FR><NU><IT>∂</IT></NU><DE><IT>∂R</IT></DE></FR> <FENCE><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><FR><NU><IT>∂C</IT></NU><DE><IT>∂R</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><IT>−k</IT><SUB>cy</SUB><IT>C=</IT>0 with 0<IT><R<R</IT><SUB>C</SUB> (4)
where Dpl, Dm, and Dcy are the diffusivity coefficients of NO in plasma, membrane, and cytoplasm, respectively, and kpl and kcy are the first-order reaction rate constants of NO consumption in the plasma and cytosolic regions.

Continuity of partial pressure and flux at the interfaces provide the following boundary conditions
C(<IT>R=R</IT><SUB>P</SUB>) = C<SUB>P</SUB> (5)

C(<IT>R=R</IT><SUP>+</SUP><SUB>R</SUB>) = C(<IT>R=R</IT><SUP>−</SUP><SUB>R</SUB>)/&lgr; (6)

C(<IT>R=</IT>R<SUP>+</SUP><SUB>C</SUB>)/&lgr; = C(<IT>R=R</IT><SUP>−</SUP><SUB>C</SUB>) (7)

D<SUB>pl</SUB><FENCE><FR><NU>∂C</NU><DE>∂<IT>R</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><IT>R</IT>=<IT>R</IT><SUP>+</SUP><SUB>R</SUB></SUB> = <IT>D</IT><SUB>m</SUB><FENCE><FR><NU>∂C</NU><DE>∂<IT>R</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><IT>R</IT>=<IT>R</IT><SUP>−</SUP><SUB>R</SUB></SUB> = <IT>F</IT><SUB>RBC</SUB> (8)

D<SUB>m</SUB><FENCE><FR><NU>∂C</NU><DE>∂<IT>R</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><IT>R</IT>=<IT>R</IT><SUP>+</SUP><SUB>C</SUB></SUB> = D<SUB>cy</SUB><FENCE><FR><NU>∂C</NU><DE>∂<IT>R</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><IT>R</IT>=<IT>R</IT><SUP>−</SUP><SUB>C</SUB></SUB> = <IT>F</IT><SUB>RBC</SUB> <FR><NU><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>R</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>C</SUB></DE></FR> (9)

<FENCE><FR><NU>∂C</NU><DE><IT>∂R</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><IT>R</IT>=0</SUB><IT>=</IT>0 (10)
where CP is the concentration at the outer boundary of the plasma layer and is assumed constant, and FRBC is the rate of NO uptake by the RBC per unit area. CP will be eliminated from the final results and its value will not be required in the calculations. The partition coefficient lambda  was utilized to account for the increased solubility of NO in the membrane relative to the plasma and cytosol. For simplicity, we assumed same solubilities for NO in the plasma and cytosol. Because we assumed negligible consumption of NO in the erythrocytic membrane, the flux of NO at the inner and outer boundaries of the membrane will be inversely proportional to the ratio of the surface areas. The equations and boundary conditions are nondimensionilized by introducing the following dimensionless variables
r=<FR><NU>R</NU><DE>R<SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR><IT>,  &PSgr;</IT>(<IT>r</IT>)<IT>=</IT><FR><NU>C(<IT>r</IT>)</NU><DE>C<SUB>P</SUB></DE></FR><IT>,  &rgr;=R</IT><SUB>R</SUB><RAD><RCD><FR><NU><IT>k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></NU><DE><IT>D</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></DE></FR></RCD></RAD><IT>,</IT>

<IT>&xgr;=R</IT><SUB>R</SUB><RAD><RCD><FR><NU><IT>k</IT><SUB>cy</SUB></NU><DE><IT>D</IT><SUB>cy</SUB></DE></FR></RCD></RAD><IT>,  &egr;=</IT><FR><NU><IT>R</IT><SUB>P</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR><IT>,  &dgr;=</IT><FR><NU><IT>R</IT><SUB>C</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR>

Plasma layer. The solution of Eq. 2 gives the concentration profile of NO in the plasma
&PSgr;(r)=<FR><NU>1</NU><DE>r sinh [<IT>&rgr;</IT>(<IT>&egr; − </IT>1)]</DE></FR> {<IT>&PSgr;</IT><SUB>R</SUB> sinh [<IT>&rgr;</IT>(<IT>&egr; − r</IT>)]  (11)

<IT>+ &egr;&PSgr;</IT><SUB>P</SUB> sinh [<IT>&rgr;</IT>(<IT>r−</IT>1)]} 1<IT>≤r≤&egr;</IT>
where Psi P = Psi (epsilon ) = 1 and Psi R = Psi  (1). Differentiation of the solution at r = 1+ gives the rate of NO uptake by the RBC per unit RBC area (FRBC)
F<SUB>RBC</SUB><IT>=</IT><FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>pl</SUB>C<SUB>P</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU>∂&PSgr;</NU><DE>∂<IT>r</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><IT>r</IT>=1<SUP><IT>+</IT></SUP></SUB><IT>=a</IT><SUB>1</SUB><IT>&PSgr;<SUB>R</SUB>+a</IT><SUB>2</SUB><IT>&PSgr;</IT><SUB>P</SUB> (12a)

a<SUB>1</SUB>=−<FR><NU>D<SUB>pl</SUB>C<SUB>P</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> {&rgr; coth [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)] + 1} (12b)

a<SUB>2</SUB>=<FR><NU>D<SUB>pl</SUB>C<SUB>P</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> <FR><NU>&egr;&rgr;</NU><DE>sinh [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)]</DE></FR> (12c)
A more convenient description for FRBC can be obtained by expressing the flux as a function of the average concentration of NO in the plasma layer (<A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>pl)
<A><AC>&PSgr;</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> = <FR><NU><A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB></NU><DE>C<SUB>p</SUB></DE></FR> = <FR><NU><LIM><OP>∫</OP><LL>l</LL><UL>&egr;</UL></LIM>4&pgr;<IT>r</IT><SUP>2</SUP><IT>&PSgr;</IT>(<IT>r</IT>)d<IT>r</IT></NU><DE><LIM><OP>∫</OP><LL>l</LL><UL>&egr;</UL></LIM>4&pgr;<IT>r</IT><SUP>2</SUP>d<IT>r</IT></DE></FR><IT>=b</IT><SUB>1</SUB><IT>&PSgr;<SUB>R</SUB>+b</IT><SUB>2</SUB><IT>&PSgr;</IT><SUB>P</SUB> (13a)

b<SUB>1</SUB>=<FR><NU>3</NU><DE>&rgr;<SUP>2</SUP>(&egr;<SUP>3</SUP>−1)</DE></FR> {1+&rgr; coth [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)] − &rgr;&egr; csch [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)]} (13b)

b<SUB>2</SUB>=−<FR><NU>3&egr;</NU><DE>&rgr;<SUP>2</SUP>(&egr;<SUP>3</SUP>−1)</DE></FR> {1−&rgr;&egr; coth [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)] + &rgr; csch [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)]} (13c)
Replacing Psi P with the dimensionless average concentration estimated over the plasma layer (Psi pl) in Eq. 12 utilizing Eq. 13, we get
F<SUB>RBC</SUB> = <IT>K<SUP>*</SUP></IT><SUB>pl</SUB> C<SUB>P</SUB>(f<A><AC>&PSgr;</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> − &PSgr;<SUB><IT>R</IT></SUB>) (14a)

K<SUP>*</SUP><SUB>pl</SUB> = <FR><NU><IT>a</IT><SUB>2</SUB><IT>b</IT><SUB>1</SUB><IT>−a</IT><SUB>1</SUB><IT>b</IT><SUB>2</SUB></NU><DE><IT>b</IT><SUB>2</SUB>C<SUB>P</SUB></DE></FR> = <FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R<SUB>R</SUB></IT></DE></FR> <FR><NU>(<IT>&rgr;</IT><SUP>2</SUP><IT>&egr;−</IT>1) sinh<SUP>2</SUP> [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)] + <FR><NU>&rgr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> (&egr; − 1) sinh [2&rgr;(&egr; − 1)]</NU><DE><FR><NU>&rgr;&egr;</NU><DE>2</DE></FR> sinh [2&rgr;(&egr; − 1)] − sinh<SUP>2</SUP> [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)] − &rgr; sinh [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)]</DE></FR> (14b)

f=<FR><NU>a<SUB>2</SUB></NU><DE>a<SUB>2</SUB>b<SUB>1</SUB>−a<SUB>1</SUB>b<SUB>2</SUB></DE></FR>=<FR><NU>&rgr;<SUP>3</SUP>(&egr;<SUP>3</SUP>−1)</NU><DE>3{(&rgr;<SUP>2</SUP>&egr;−1) sinh [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)] + &rgr;(&egr; − 1) cosh [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)]}</DE></FR> (14c)

RBC membrane. The solution of Eq. 3 utilizing Eqs. 6 and 7 provides the concentration profile in the membrane. Differentiation of the solution at r = 1- provides the flux at the outer boundary
F<SUB>RBC</SUB> = <FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>m</SUB>C<SUB>P</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU><IT>∂&PSgr;</IT></NU><DE><IT>∂r</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><IT>r</IT>=1<SUP>−</SUP></SUB><IT>=P</IT><SUB>m</SUB>C<SUB>P</SUB>(&PSgr;<SUB>R</SUB> − &PSgr;<SUB>C</SUB>) (15a)

P<SUB>m</SUB> = <FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>m</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> <FR><NU><IT>&lgr;&dgr;</IT></NU><DE>(1<IT>−&dgr;</IT>)</DE></FR> (15b)
where Psi C = Psi (delta ) and Pm represents the membrane permeability, which is commonly used to describe the transport of species through a membrane.

Intracellular region. The solution of the differential mass balance in the intracellular region, Eq. 4 using Eqs. 7 and 10 yields
&PSgr;(r)=<FR><NU>&dgr; sinh (&xgr;<IT>r</IT>)</NU><DE><IT>r </IT>sinh (&xgr;&dgr;)</DE></FR> &PSgr;<SUB>C</SUB>,  0 ≤ <IT>r≤&dgr;</IT> (16)
Differentiating Eq. 16 at r = delta - utilizing Eq. 9, we get an expression for FRBC
F<SUB>RBC</SUB> = <FR><NU><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>C</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> <FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>cy</SUB>C<SUB>P</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU><IT>∂&PSgr;</IT></NU><DE><IT>∂r</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><IT>r</IT>=&dgr;<SUP>−</SUP></SUB><IT>=</IT><FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>cy</SUB>C<SUB>P</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> [<IT>&dgr;</IT><SUP>2</SUP><IT>&xgr; </IT>coth (&xgr;&dgr;) − &dgr;]&PSgr;<SUB>cy</SUB> = <IT>K<SUP>*</SUP></IT><SUB>cy</SUB> C<SUB>P</SUB>&PSgr;<SUB>C</SUB> (17a)
where
K<SUP>*</SUP><SUB>cy</SUB> = <FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>cy</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> [<IT>&dgr;</IT><SUP>2</SUP><IT>&xgr; </IT>coth (&xgr;&dgr;) − &dgr;] (17b)
Equations 14, 15, and 17 describe the flux into the RBC as a function of concentration gradients in the plasma, membrane, and cytoplasm. The three equations can be combined by adding the three in-series resistances as follows
F<SUB>RBC</SUB>=<FR><NU>1</NU><DE>1/<IT>K<SUP>*</SUP></IT><SUB>pl</SUB> + 1/<IT>P</IT><SUB>m</SUB> + 1/<IT>K</IT><SUP>*</SUP><SUB>cy</SUB></DE></FR> <IT>f</IT>C<SUB>P</SUB><A><AC>&PSgr;</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> = <IT>K*f</IT><A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> (18a)
where
<FR><NU>1</NU><DE>K*</DE></FR>=<FR><NU>1</NU><DE>K<SUP>*</SUP><SUB>pl</SUB></DE></FR> + <FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>P</IT><SUB>m</SUB></DE></FR> + <FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>K<SUP>*</SUP></IT><SUB>cy</SUB></DE></FR> (18b)
The total uptake of NO per unit RBC volume will be
Q<SUB>RBC</SUB> = <IT>K*</IT><FR><NU>3</NU><DE><IT>R<SUB>R</SUB></IT></DE></FR><IT> f</IT><A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> = <IT>k</IT><SUB>RBC</SUB><A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> (19)
and the local consumption of NO per unit blood volume
Q<SUB>blood</SUB> = [Hct <IT>k</IT><SUB>RBC</SUB> + (1 − Hct) <IT>k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB>]<A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> (20)
The average concentration of NO in the RBC (membrane and intracellular) will be
<A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>RBC</SUB> = <FR><NU><LIM><OP>∫</OP><LL>0</LL><UL><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></UL></LIM>4<IT>&pgr;r</IT><SUP>2</SUP>C(<IT>r</IT>)d<IT>r</IT></NU><DE><LIM><OP>∫</OP><LL>0</LL><UL><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></UL></LIM>4<IT>&pgr;r</IT><SUP>2</SUP>d<IT>r</IT></DE></FR><IT>=g</IT><A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> (21a)
where
<IT>g=</IT>3<IT>fK*</IT><FENCE><FENCE><FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>K</IT><SUP>*</SUP><SUB>cy</SUB></DE></FR> [<IT>&dgr;</IT><SUP>2</SUP><IT>&xgr;</IT><SUP><IT>−</IT>1</SUP> coth (&xgr;) − &dgr;&xgr;<SUP>−2</SUP> + &lgr;<IT>s</IT><SUB>1</SUB>]<IT>+&lgr;s</IT><SUB>2</SUB><FENCE><FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>P</IT><SUB>m</SUB></DE></FR><IT>+</IT><FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>K</IT><SUP>*</SUP><SUB>cy</SUB></DE></FR></FENCE></FENCE></FENCE> (21b)

s<SUB>1</SUB>=<FR><NU>1</NU><DE>6</DE></FR> &dgr;(1+2&dgr;)(1−&dgr;) (21c)

s<SUB>2</SUB>=−<FR><NU>1</NU><DE>6</DE></FR> (1−&dgr;)<SUP>2</SUP> (21d)
Then the local (average) NO concentration CNO will be
C<SUB>NO</SUB> = Hct <A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>RBC</SUB> + (1 − Hct) <A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> = [1 + (<IT>g−</IT>1)Hct] <A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> (22)
Replacing <A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A>pl in Eq. 20 gives
Q<SUB>blood</SUB> = <FR><NU>Hct <IT>k</IT><SUB>RBC</SUB> + (1 − Hct) <IT>k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></NU><DE>1 + (<IT>g−</IT>1)Hct</DE></FR> C<SUB>NO</SUB> = <IT>k</IT><SUB>blood</SUB>C<SUB>NO</SUB> (23)
where kblood is the observed first-order rate constant of NO consumption in the blood. Note that because of the linearity of Eqs. 2-4, the calculated reaction rates kRBC and kblood are independent of the concentration CP. The half-life of NO in the whole blood (t<UP><SUB>1/2</SUB><SUP>blood</SUP></UP>) and plasma (t<UP><SUB>1/2</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP>) will be
t<SUP>blood</SUP><SUB>1/2</SUB> = <FR><NU>ln (2)</NU><DE><FR><NU>Q<SUB>blood</SUB></NU><DE>C<SUB>NO</SUB></DE></FR></DE></FR> = <FR><NU>ln (2)</NU><DE><IT>k</IT><SUB>blood</SUB></DE></FR> (24)

t<SUP>pl</SUP><SUB>1/2</SUB> = <FR><NU>ln (2)</NU><DE><FR><NU>Q<SUB>blood</SUB></NU><DE>(1 − Hct)<A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB></DE></FR></DE></FR> = <FR><NU>ln (2)</NU><DE><FR><NU>Hct</NU><DE>1 − Hct</DE></FR> <IT>k</IT><SUB>RBC</SUB> + <IT>k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></DE></FR> (25)
Note that the two definitions of NO half-life are equivalent for very dilute RBC solutions (Hct right-arrow 0) or for negligible NO concentration in the membrane and cytosol of the RBC (g right-arrow 0).

Parameter values. Values used in calculations are presented in Table 1. RR can be estimated such as to conserve either the volume (90-98 µm3) or the surface area (130-144 µm2) of a human RBC (2, 11). Thus we examine a range of values for RR between 2.8 and 3.38 µm. The Dpl was set to 3.3 × 10-5 cm2/s at 37°C based on the data from Malinski et al. (24). Dpl at 25°C was assumed 2.6 × 10-5 cm2/s based on the diffusivity of NO in water at 25°C. The Dcy should be decreased compared with the plasma due to the high concentration of Hb present. We set Dcy to half the value of Dpl (i.e., 1.6 × 10-5 cm2/s at 37°C) based on the ratio of the extracellular and intracellular diffusivities for O2 from experimental measurements (14, 28) and assuming a similar dependence for NO. Malinski et al. (24) suggested values for the diffusivity of NO in the lipophilic environment of a membrane (Dm) of 0.3 × 10-5 cm2/s and a partition coefficient (lambda ) of 6.5 for the membrane-water system, based on measurements performed on a 1-octanol-water system at 37°C. Denicola et al. (9) measured the diffusion coefficient of NO in the RBC plasma membrane (0.4 × 10-5 cm2/s) and in liposomes (1.3 × 10-5 cm2/s) at 20°C by utilizing a fluorescence quenching technique. Thus, based on value of 0.4 × 10-5 cm2/s for Dm and a membrane thickness of ~7 nm, Eq. 15b suggests a Pm of ~40 cm/s. This value is in agreement with the value of 93 cm/s reported by Subczynski et al. (30). The value for Pm utilized by Vaughn et al. (34) to explain the competition experiment is 2,000 times smaller (0.041 cm/s).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Parameter values

Previous modeling studies have used a reaction rate constant for the reaction of NO with oxyHb (koxy) of 25 and 34 µM-1 · s-1 (per heme) (22, 34, 35). Cassoly and Gibson (7) determined the reaction rate by stopped-flow spectroscopy of 25 µM-1 · s-1 at 20°C and pH 7.0. Eich et al. (10) reported reaction rate constants in the range of 30-50 µM-1 · s-1 and similar reaction rates between oxy- and deoxyHb. In a recent study, Herold et al. (16) suggested a reaction rate of 89 µM-1 · s-1 at 20°C and pH 7.0; the reaction rate increases at higher pH. The temperature dependence of the reaction is not known. Carlsen and Comroe (6) and Cassoly and Gibson (7) suggested a temperature coefficient of 1.25 and 1.4, respectively, per 10°C for the reaction of CO with deoxyHb. If we assume a temperature coefficient of 1.4 per 10°C for koxy and extrapolate the value proposed by Herold et al. (16), we obtain koxy at 25° and 37°C as high as 106 and 160 µM-1 · s-1, respectively. Throughout the paper, extrapolation of the value of koxy at 25° or 37°C is needed to simulate in vitro experimental data or physiological conditions, respectively. We utilize for the extrapolations a temperature coefficient of 1.4 and note the temperature of extrapolation with a superscript on koxy. The reaction rate constants of plasma (kpl) and cytoplasm (kcy), can be estimated from the product of koxy with the heme concentration in the plasma (C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP>) and cytoplasm (C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>), respectively. In addition, we add a small value (~1 s-1) to kpl to account for the consumption of NO by other substrates present in the plasma. Such a value is justified based on the reaction rate of NO with O<UP><SUB>2</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> [4,300 µM-1 · s-1 (13)] and a concentration of O<UP><SUB>2</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> in the plasma in the subnanomolar range. The consumption of NO in the plasma is dominated by the reaction with free Hb and in the absence of plasma-based Hb; small consumption of NO occurs in the plasma layer mostly through reaction with O<UP><SUB>2</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>.

For the simulations below unless otherwise stated, we chose reference parameter values of 45% for Hct, 2.8 µm for RR, 40 cm/s for Pm, 3.30 × 10-5 cm2/s for Dpl at 37°C, and 160 µM-1 · s-1 for koxy at 37°C. We examine, however, the effect of variation in the parameter values within the previously described ranges.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Model analysis. The solution of model equations for the reference values of parameters is presented in Fig. 2. The dimensionless concentration (Psi ) is plotted as a function of dimensionless distance (r) from the center of the RBC. Control parameter values are utilized and simulations are performed for two different levels of Hct: 45% (Fig. 2A) and 15% (Fig. 2B). The average dimensionless concentration estimated over the plasma layer (Psi pl) or over the total plasma and RBC volume (Psi NO = CNO/CP) is also plotted. There is a discontinuity in the NO concentration profile at the RBC membrane due to the increased solubility of NO in the lipophilic environment of the membrane. The thickness of the plasma layer changes with Hct leading to changes in the NO uptake by the RBC.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Dimensionless concentration as a function of dimensionless distance from the center of the RBC. Model simulations are performed for the reference parameter values and for two different Hct levels, 45% (A) and 15% (B). Dimensionless average plasma concentration (Psi pl) and the dimensionless average concentration over the entire volume (Psi NO = CNO/CP) are also presented. See text and equations for definitions of other mathematical abbreviations.

In Fig. 3, we present the model predictions for the observed kblood as a function of model parameters within a wide range of parameter variation. The effect of variation in a single parameter is explored while keeping the others at the control values. Figure 3A presents the dependence of kblood on the RBC effective radius. The two estimations of RR (based on the volume or surface area of human RBCs) are highlighted for reference. The consumption rate of NO decreases with increasing RBC radius. At the control value (solid circle) kblood is 6.5 × 103 s-1. For a change in radius from 2.8 to 3.38 µm, there is a 30% decrease in the NO consumption. Figure 3B examines the dependence of kblood on koxy. The control value is shown as a solid circle. NO consumption is essentially constant for a wide range of koxy values that include previously reported values for koxy by Cassoly and Gibson (7) and Vaughn et al. (34) (solid triangle), Eich et al. (10) and Liu et al. (22) (solid square), and Herold et al. (16) (open circle). In Fig. 3C the Pm changes over a wide range of values that include the value proposed by Vaughn et al. (34) (solid triangle) and the experimental estimate by Subczynski et al. (30) (solid square). For Pm values higher than 1 cm/s the dependence of the consumption rate on Pm is small. NO consumption decreases significantly when Pm becomes <1 cm/s. At the value proposed by Vaughn et al. (34) kblood is reduced more than 20 times compared with the control (solid circle).


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Observed first-order reaction rate constant of NO consumption in the blood (kblood) as a function of RR (A), bimolecular reaction rate constant of NO with free hemoglobin (Hb) (koxy) (B), and membrane permeability (Pm) (C). Solid circles represent the reference parameter values. Other previously reported values for the parameters are also highlighted for reference (see text).

Comparison with experimental data. In Fig. 4 the model predictions are compared with previously reported measurements of NO consumption by RBCs. The erythrocytic NO consumption rate per RBC volume and per average plasma concentration (kRBC) is plotted as a function of Hct. Experimental data from a dilute suspension of rat RBCs (Hct was more than 2,000 times less than normal) at 25°C are presented (solid circles) (22). The extrapolation to normal Hct proposed by Liu et al. (22) is also shown (dashed line). Note that the data and model by Liu et al. were presented in Ref. 22 on a per blood volume basis (Eq. 10 of Ref. 22) and have been converted in this figure on a per RBC volume by dividing with Hct. Thus their model predicts a constant kRBC independent of Hct. Data from Carlsen and Comroe (6) are represented by a solid triangle. Our theoretical predictions are also shown as a solid line. To simulate the experimental conditions, we utilized a value for RR of 2.44 µm to account for a smaller size of rat RBC (volume of 60 µm3), k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> of 106 µM-1 · s-1 (based on a koxy at 20°C of 89 µM-1 · s-1 and extrapolation to 25°C using a temperature coefficient of 1.4 per 10°C) and Dpl of 2.6 × 10-5 cm2/s (Fig. 4). There is a close agreement between the models as the Hct approaches zero. At physiological Hct, however, our results differ from those of Liu et al. (22) by a factor of 6. Our prediction for the half-life of NO in blood at 30% Hct (5 × 109 RBCs/ml) is 0.23 ms, which is significantly less than the estimate of Liu et al. The experimental data collected at very low Hct cannot be used to distinguish between the two models. Simulation using values for Pm and koxy of 0.04 cm/s and 25 µM-1 · s-1, respectively, is also presented. These values lead to significant underestimation of the experimental data of Liu et al. (22) and Carlsen and Comroe (6). For this value of Pm the effect of Hct on kblood is minimal.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Model predictions for the rate of NO consumption per unit RBC volume and per average plasma concentration (kRBC) as a function of Hct. Model simulations (solid lines) are presented for the control values for Pm and k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> and for a "low" Pm and k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> (0.04 cm/s and 25 µM-1 · s-1, respectively). The experimental data (solid circles) and the model predictions (dashed line) of Liu et al. (22) are also presented. Simulations for both models are performed with diffusivity of coefficient of NO in plasma (Dpl) of 2.6 × 10-5 cm2/s and RR of 2.44 µm. Solid triangle present data from Carlsen and Comroe (6).

Analysis of the "competition experiment." In Fig. 5, we present results from the "competition experiment" (35). The analysis of the corresponding problem is presented in the APPENDIX. The ratio of kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) is presented as a function of Hct (Fig. 5A) or C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> (Fig. 5B). Note that this is equivalent to the ratio of kRBC/kHb in the studies of Vaughn et al. (34, 35). Simulations are performed utilizing the single cell model of Ref. 34 (see APPENDIX) and for different scenarios of parameter values. First, and in agreement with Ref. 34, we utilized a "low" Pm (0.04 cm/s) and a "low" k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> (25 µM-1 · s-1). We also perform simulations for a k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> of 106 µM-1 · s-1 and a Pm 1,000 times higher (40 cm/s). All simulations were performed for Dpl of 2.6 × 10-5 cm2/s, RR of 3.38 µm, first-order reaction rate constant (kd) = ln (2)/6 h-1, CNO donor of 10 µM, and C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> of 9 µM or Hct of 15.6%. The experimental results presented as solid circles are extracted from Figs. 3 and 4 of Ref. 35. The ratio kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) is essentially constant and independent of either Hct or C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> when the "low" Pm is utilized. When the control value for Pm = 40 cm/s is utilized, a positive slope is observed in Fig. 5, A and B. The model can simulate satisfactorily the experimental data without the need for a 1,000 times reduction of Pm when k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> is set to 106 µM-1 · s-1 instead of 25 µM-1 · s-1. Figure 5C presents estimations for Pm utilizing the single cell model of Ref. 34 and Eq. A8 in the APPENDIX of this study. Parameter estimation is performed for a wide range of values for k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> (25-175 µM-1 · s-1) and for values of the ratio kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) in the range 0.0006-0.0024. Simulations were performed for Hct = 15%, Dpl of 2.6 × 10-5 cm2/s, RR of 3.38 µm, C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> of 9 µM, kd = ln(2)/6 h-1, and CNO donor of 10 µM. For high k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> values a wide range of Pm values can produce ratios of kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) that are in close agreement with the experimental measurements (34, 35). At low k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> values only a small range of low Pm values are in agreement with the experimental data. With typical values from competition experiments at 15.6% Hct, of kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) in the order of 0.0012 ± 0.0001 (35), and expected k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> within the range of 30-110 µM-1 · s-1, Fig. 5C suggests acceptable values for Pm within the range of 0.1-40 cm/s. On the basis of a ratio of 0.0012, an empirical correlation was obtained that produces pairs of parameter values for Pm and k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> that satisfy the competition experiment over the above ranges of variation for the two parameters
ln (<IT>P</IT><SUB>m</SUB>) = <FR><NU>0.0375k<SUP>25°</SUP><SUB>oxy</SUB> − 3.258</NU><DE>1 − <FENCE><FR><NU><IT>k</IT><SUP>25°</SUP><SUB>oxy</SUB></NU><DE>126.4</DE></FR></FENCE><SUP>7.14</SUP></DE></FR> (26)
In Fig. 6 two independent experimental observations are simulated for different values of Pm. t<UP><SUB>1/2</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> at 0.0126% Hct is simulated utilizing Eq. 25, RR of 2.44 µm, and Dpl of 2.6 × 10-5 cm2/s. In addition, simulations of the competition experiment (Eq. A8) are also performed in an effort to simulate the change in kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) after doubling the viscosity of the solution (Fig. 4 of Ref. 17). Simulations of the competition experiment are performed for Hct of 15%, Dpl of 2.6 × 10-5 cm2/s, RR of 3.38 µm, C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> of 9 µM, kd = ln (2)/6 h-1, and CNO donor of 10 µM. In the simulations at any given Pm, a koxy value that satisfies Eq. 26 is chosen and thus the pairs of Pm and koxy utilized are in agreement with a ratio of kRBC(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) of 0.0012. The results are compared with the experimental measurement (±SD) of 4.25 ± 0.2 s for t<UP><SUB>1/2</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> (22) and the 15 ± 6% observed change in kRBC after increasing the viscosity twofold (17). The ranges of Pm values that can reproduce these experimental observations with accuracy no worse than twice the standard deviation of the measurement are highlighted. Because these ranges do not overlap, there are no values for Pm that would quantitatively explain both experiments.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Experimental results from the competition experiment (solid circles) reproduced from Figs. 3 and 4 of Vaughn et al. (35). The ratio of reaction rate constants of NO consumption by RBC and free Hb [kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>)] is plotted as a function of Hct (A) and extracellular Hb (B) concentration. Simulations are performed utilizing the model of Vaughn et al. (34) and for three different scenarios of parameter values. First scenario includes values for Pm and k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> of 40 cm/s and 106 µM-1 · s-1, respectively. Values for the second scenario are 40 cm/s and 25 µM-1 · s-1, respectively, and values for the third scenario are 0.041 cm/s and 25 µM-1 · s-1. The following parameters values were utilized in all three scenarios: Dpl of 2.6 × 10-5 cm2/s, RR of 3.38 µm, kd of ln (2)/6 h-1, CNO donor of 10 µM, and C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> of 9 µM or Hct of 15.6%. C: Eq. A8 in the APPENDIX is utilized to estimate Pm for different values for k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> = 25-175 µM-1 · s-1 and different ratios of kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) = 0.0006-0.0024. Same values were utilized as before for the rest of the parameters. The parameter values for Pm and k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> utilized in the three scenarios above are also highlighted for reference.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Two independent experimental observations are simulated for different values of Pm. t<UP><SUB>½</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> at 0.0126% Hct is simulated utilizing Eq. 25 and the following parameters: RR =2.44 µm and Dpl = 2.6 × 10-5 cm2/s. In addition, simulations of the "competition experiment" Eq. A8 are also performed in an effort to simulate the change in kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) after doubling the viscosity of the solution for Hct =15%, Dpl = 2.6 × 10-5 cm2/s, RR = 3.38 µm, C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> = 9 µM, kd = ln(2)/6 h-1, and CNO donor = 10 µM. In the simulations at any given Pm a value for k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> that satisfies Eq. 26 is chosen. Experimental measurements (±SD) for t<UP><SUB>½</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> from Ref. 22 and for the percent change in kRBC after increasing the viscosity twofold from Ref. 17 are also shown.

NO consumption at physiological conditions. In Fig. 7A, predictions for kblood at physiological temperature (k<UP><SUB>blood</SUB><SUP>37°</SUP></UP>) is presented as a function of Hct. Different Pm values were utilized. For any given Pm value, the corresponding koxy at 25°C k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> was estimated utilizing Eq. 26. For the extrapolation of koxy at 37°C (k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>37°</SUP></UP>), a temperature factor of 1.4 per 10°C was used. The rest of the parameters were held at the reference values. At 45% Hct, predictions for k<UP><SUB>blood</SUB><SUP>37°</SUP></UP> vary between 7.5 × 102 and 6.5 × 103 s-1 when Pm changes between 0.1 and 40 cm/s. In Fig. 7B, k<UP><SUB>blood</SUB><SUP>37°</SUP></UP> is compared with the rate of reaction of free Hb. The ratio HctC<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>37°</SUP></UP>/k<UP><SUB>blood</SUB><SUP>37°</SUP></UP> is plotted as a function of Pm for different Hct. k<UP><SUB>blood</SUB><SUP>37°</SUP></UP> values are shown in the secondary x-axis. For Pm values between 0.1 and 40 cm/s, k<UP><SUB>blood</SUB><SUP>37°</SUP></UP> is 500-250 times less than the reaction with an equivalent concentration of free Hb.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Model predictions for the observed first-order reaction rate constant of NO in blood (37°C, 45% Hct), k<UP><SUB>blood</SUB><SUP>37°</SUP></UP> (A), and the ratio of NO consumption by the blood and by an equivalent concentration of free Hb, as a function of Hct and Pm (B). For the simulations reference parameter values were utilized and k<UP><SUB>blood</SUB><SUP>37°</SUP></UP> from Eq. 26 and extrapolation from 25° to 37°C using a temperature coefficient of 1.4 per 10°C. Predictions for the range of Pm values that satisfy the "competition experiment" (Fig. 5C) are highlighted.

NO consumption after HBOC administration. In Fig. 8, we investigate the effect of Hct and plasma-based Hb concentration on the NO consumption. The reference parameter values for RR, koxy, and Pm are utilized. The rate constant (ksol), for the NO consumption if the erythrocytic Hb was uniformly distributed in the solution (i.e., as if the cell were lysed) is also presented (estimated as the product of koxy with Hct). In the absence of plasma-based Hb, the consumption is a strong, nonlinear function of Hct. As Hct goes to zero, kblood also approaches zero, similar to ksol. In the presence of plasma-based Hb, the consumption is practically constant independent of Hct; kblood becomes equal to the product of koxy and C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP>. For plasma-based heme concentrations of 40 µM (7.7 × 10-2 g/dl of Hb), the total NO consumption is not much different from that in the absence of plasma-based Hb and 45% Hct. However, at a physiologically important plasma-based heme concentration of 3,000 µM (~5 g/dl of Hb), consumption is increased significantly. The ratio RHBOC of the consumption rate in the presence of 5 g/dl of plasma-based Hb over the consumption in the absence of plasma-based Hb and normal Hct (i.e., 45% Hct) is presented on Fig. 8B as a function of koxy. Simulations are performed for Pm values that change with koxy according to Eq. 26 at 25°C and 37°C. For the latter case, in addition to Eq. 26, extrapolation of koxy values from 25°C to 37°C was utilized at any given Pm value, using a temperature coefficient of 1.4 per 10°C. The consumption of NO in the presence of 5 g/dl of plasma-based free-Hb is increased approximately two orders of magnitude relative to the physiological condition (45% Hct).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effect of Hct and plasma-based Hb concentration on the NO consumption. A: observed kblood as a function of Hct in the presence and absence of plasma-based Hb (C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>pl</SUP></UP> = 0 µM, 40 µM, and 3,000 µM). The rate constant for the NO consumption if the erythrocytic Hb was uniformly distributed in the solution is also presented (ksol). B: ratio of NO consumption rate in the presence of 5 g/dl of free Hb over the consumption in the absence of free Hb at 45% Hct is presented as a function of koxy. Simulations are performed for different Pm values and at two different temperatures, 25°C and 37°C.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

A simplified spherically symmetric mathematical model was utilized to predict the NO consumption by RBCs. The results suggest that under the reference parameter values, which include a value for the RBC membrane permeability based on experimental measurements in lipid bilayers, extracellular diffusion is the rate-limiting step. The plasma layer surrounding each RBC and thus the extracellular diffusion resistance depends on Hct. This leads to a nonlinear dependence of the consumption rate on Hct. For human RBCs at 45% Hct, we predict a NO consumption rate constant on a per blood volume basis of 6.5 × 103 s-1 or 0.7 µM-1 · s-1 on a per total heme concentration basis, and a plasma half-life of 0.1 ms. These predictions were based on the assumption of Pm equal to 40 cm/s, which is in agreement with the expected NO permeability in the lipid bilayer of the RBC membrane.

The results presented in Fig. 3 suggest that under the control conditions described above, the consumption of NO in the blood as predicted by the model is sensitive to the effective radius of the RBC but not to the intracellular reaction rate or the membrane permeability. The results suggest that the resistance to NO transport is dominated by the extracellular diffusion. Thus changes in the size and probably the shape of the RBC may alter the NO consumption rate. The values of koxy and Pm have to decrease more than an order of magnitude for the resistances in the two layers (i.e., intracellular and membrane) to have a significant effect in the NO uptake by the RBC. At the value proposed by Vaughn et al. (34) for Pm, however, significant resistance is attributed to the membrane. Most importantly, this value leads to a significant reduction (almost 20 times) of the consumption rate.

Huxley and Kutchai (18, 19) tested the hypothesis that extracellular diffusion is the rate-limiting step in the initial uptake of O2 by RBCs in a stopped-flow apparatus. Their experimental findings suggested that 82-100% of the resistance in O2 uptake could be attributed to extracellular diffusion limitations. Experimental studies for O2 uptake by RBCs by Coin and Olson (8) are also consistent with a significant diffusion boundary layer. This boundary layer is a result of O2 depletion in the area surrounding the RBC, faster than molecular diffusion or convective mixing can replenish it. NO has similar diffusivity with O2, and Hb consumes it faster than O2; thus a significant boundary layer should be present for NO as well. Huxley and Kutchai (18) utilized the Frossling correlation to predict a maximum value for the external diffusional resistance of oxygen uptake by an RBC. Assuming laminar flow, no extracellular reaction, and no interactions with neighboring RBCs (i.e., infinite thickness of the plasma layer), the correlation provides a description for the Sherwood number Sh = kem 2RR/Dpl in the form Sh = 2 + 0.6 Re1/2Sc1/3, where kem is the external mass transfer coefficient, the Reynolds number (Re) is defined as a function of the particles slip velocity, and the Schmidt number (Sc) is defined as the ratio of kinematic viscosity and diffusivity. Estimates show that the transport is not significantly facilitated by convective mixing, yielding Sh = 2 (18). Thus we get an estimation for the kem equal to Dpl/RR. Applying this relationship for NO and assuming that the membrane and internal resistances are negligible compared with the external diffusion resistance, we can get an estimation for the consumption of NO by RBCs and an observed reaction rate in the blood
Q<SUB>RBC</SUB> = <IT>k</IT><SUB>em</SUB> <IT>S</IT><SUB>RBC</SUB>/V<SUB>RBC</SUB>C<SUB>NO</SUB> = 3<IT>D</IT><SUB>pl</SUB>/<IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>R</SUB>C<SUB>NO</SUB> (27)

Q<SUB>blood</SUB> = Q<SUB>RBC</SUB> Hct (28)
where SRBC and VRBC represent the surface area and volume of RBC, respectively.

The model presented by Liu et al. (22) utilized these assumptions and equivalent equations, and they found close agreement with experimental results for the uptake of NO by rat RBCs at very low Hct (2,000 times smaller than normal). They concluded that the rate of uptake of NO by RBC is diffusion limited. The small difference (~25%) between their model and experimental data might be attributed to the values chosen for Dpl or RR. They utilized a value of Dpl = 3,300 µm2/s based on the experimental data of Malinski et al. (24) conducted at 37°C. This value is in close agreement with the expected diffusivity of NO in water at 37°C. Here we utilized a Dpl of 2,600 µm2/s [the diffusivity of NO in water at 25°C, corresponding to the experiment (22)], the external resistance is increased and resulting in a closer fit of their experimental data (Fig. 4). Our analysis suggests that although these assumptions may be valid for such low Hct, extrapolation of these equations to higher Hct can lead to significant differences, i.e., sixfold at 30% Hct (Fig. 4). These differences originate from the simplifying assumption that the plasma layer around the RBC has an infinite thickness (which is not true for higher Hct), which leads to an overestimation of the external diffusion resistance. Our model utilizing the control parameter values suggests, in agreement with Liu et al. (22), that the external diffusion resistance limits the NO transport at low Hct. However, we also suggest that this resistance decreases with increasing Hct, and becomes negligible as Hct approaches one.

Vaughn et al. (34) suggested that Pm is much lower than the value expected based on the diffusivity and solubility of NO in lipid membranes. Their competition experiment predicts a 2,000 times lower Pm than the experimental value of Subczynski et al. (30). Under such a condition there will be significant resistance in the membrane even at very low Hct and the transport will not be dominated by external diffusion limitations. Such a reduction of Pm leads to a significant reduction of kRBC at very low Hct, resulting in disagreement with the experimental data of Liu et al. (22) (Fig. 4).

Analysis of the "competition experiment." The disagreement illustrated in Fig. 4 between experimental measurements for the rate of NO uptake by RBCs and the value for Pm proposed by Vaughn et al. (34) motivated us to reexamine the analysis of the competition experiment. For the analysis we utilized the single cell model (34) to predict the ratio kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) (see Eq. A8) in the APPENDIX. This is equivalent to the ratio of kRBC/kHb in the studies of Vaughn et al. (34, 35). We simulated experimental data for the ratio of kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) from Ref. 35 rather than the metHb production from Ref. 34, because these data were easily extracted from the figures, and according to Eq. A8, these data are independent of the NO production rate (and thus, independent of kd, CNO donor). The ratio kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) was experimentally determined in Ref. 35 from the ratio of metHb formation in the presence and absence of RBC. In the process, the NO production rate is eliminated from the fitting equation, and the results are independent of the NO production rate. This is not the case when the metHb concentration is measured only in a system with RBCs. The formation of metHb and thus the parameter estimation results will depend on the NO release rate from the NO donor. Interestingly, utilizing a higher value for koxy, we were able to reproduce the experimental findings without the need for a 1,000 times decrease in Pm (Fig. 5, A and B). Most importantly, the value of 106 µM-1 · s-1 utilized in the simulations represents a reasonable estimation for k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> based on the recent results by Herold et al. (16) and extrapolation at 25°C. Figure 5C suggests that accurate determination of k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP> is needed for an accurate estimation of Pm from the competition experiment. In addition, for high values of k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>, the ratio becomes insensitive to Pm, suggesting that the rate of NO uptake is not limited by transport through the RBC membrane. Thus, based on the uncertainty in the value of k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>, a wide range of Pm values (0.1-40 cm/s) can be in agreement with the experimental findings in the study by Vaughn et al. (35). Uncertainty regarding other model parameters such as Dpl and RR also contributes, to a smaller degree, to the uncertainty in the estimation of Pm.

Recently, Huang et al. (17) presented evidence for significant resistance to NO transport in the RBC membrane utilizing the competition experiment. In these experiments, twofold increase in buffer viscosity increased kRBC by only 15 ± 6%. Assuming that the change in viscosity did not change the bimolecular rate constant of NO with the free Hb (k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>), this result implies significant membrane resistance or a Pm less than 0.25 cm/s (Fig. 6). A low Pm value is also suggested by the significant increase in kRBC as a result of chemical modifications that alter the band 3 binding to cytoskeleton or metHb binding to RBC membrane. In some cases this increase was as high as twofold. Figure 5 suggests that to increase the kRBC and thus the ratio kRBC/(k<UP><SUB>oxy</SUB><SUP>25°</SUP></UP>C<UP><SUB>Hb</SUB><SUP>RBC</SUP></UP>) twofold from ~0.0012 to ~0.0024, Pm has to be <0.2 cm/s. However, as Fig. 6 depicts a half-life of 4.2 s measured by Liu et al. (22) for a suspension of RBCs with Hct of 0.0126% yields a Pm greater than 0.8 cm/s. This limit for Pm depends on the parameters values utilized in the simulations and can decrease as Dpl increases. However, calculations indicate that to produce Pm values less than 0.25 cm/s one needs to utilize Dpl values beyond the expected range of NO diffusivity in aqueous solutions. Thus it appears that no single value for Pm can satisfy all the available experimental data.

Interestingly, if membrane- and cytoskeleton-associated proteins provide a barrier for NO, then it is likely that they should also provide a barrier for O2. At this point it is not clear whether the experimental results by Huang et al. (17) collected under nonphysiological conditions (presence of NO donor, free Hb) are in disagreement with earlier experimental observations that suggested the rate of O2 uptake by RBCs is significantly limited by extracellular diffusion boundary layer (8, 18, 19). The conditions in the competition experiment may alter the extracellular diffusion resistance. Thus the significance of membrane resistance to NO transport observed may be overestimated relative to the significance of the resistance under physiological conditions. Quantitative information about the membrane resistance is needed, and this information is not available due to mainly the uncertainty regarding the value of koxy.

NO consumption at physiological conditions. Previous experimental data have suggested a reaction rate of NO with RBC 650-1,000 times smaller than the reaction with free Hb (22, 34, 35). These data, however, were collected under nonphysiological conditions (i.e., different temperature and presence of NO donor and free Hb) and/or at lower Hct, and thus they do not provide a direct measurement of kblood. The theoretical model presented above was utilized for the interpretation of these data and extrapolation to the desired conditions.

There is uncertainty in our prediction for the kblood at physiological Hct (Fig. 7A). The uncertainty originates from uncertainty in Pm. For Pm values between 0.1 and 40 cm/s, our predictions for kblood at 45% Hct are in the ranges between 7.5 × 10-2 and 6.5 × 10-3 s-1 or 0.08-0.7 µM-1 · s-1 on a per total heme basis. The predicted reaction rate of NO with RBC is 250-500 times smaller than the reaction with an equivalent concentration of free Hb at 37°C (Fig. 7B), significantly less that the previous estimates. The difference is mainly attributed to the nonlinear dependence of NO consumption with Hct and the values assumed for Pm and koxy.

NO consumption after HBOC administration. The model predicts significant increase of the consumption rate of NO in the presence of plasma-based Hb relative to that of the blood. The consumption is essentially constant, independent of Hct. This can be attributed to significant NO scavenging in the plasma layer surrounding the RBC, when plasma-based Hb is present. At a physiological important plasma-based Hb concentration of 5 g/dl, we predict that the consumption of NO in the blood will be increased approximately two orders of magnitude or ~20-fold per gram per deciliter of Hb concentration in the plasma (Fig. 8B). The exact value of this increase will depend on parameters such as membrane permeability, temperature, and koxy. The nonmonotonic dependence of the ratio RHBOC on koxy observed in Fig. 8B is attributed to the values for Pm and koxy utilized in the simulations, which were chosen to agree with experimental measurements (Eq. 26). The value of Pm in the simulations increased as koxy increased (Eq. 26). The increase in koxy leads to an increase in NO consumption in the presence of plasma based-Hb, whereas the increase in Pm leads to an increase in the rate of NO uptake by the blood in the absence of plasma-based Hb. The result is a ratio of NO consumption in the presence and absence of plasma-based Hb that change in a nonmonotonic fashion.

The predicted relative increase in NO consumption refers to a solution of RBCs in the presence and absence of free Hb. When blood flows in an arteriolar vessel, an RBC-free layer forms near the walls due to hydrodynamic effects. Thus plasma-based Hb should be able to get closer to the vessel wall than the RBCs. This will tend to further increase the consumption of endothelium-derived NO in the presence of HBOCs relative to normal blood.

Model limitations. The model assumes spherical RBCs and neglects convective mixing facilitation of NO transport in the plasma layer surrounding the RBC. Both assumptions can affect the extracellular resistance and thus the NO uptake by the RBCs. We also assumed negligible consumption of NO inside the RBC membrane. Liu et al. (23) suggested 300 times more rapid reaction of NO with O2 inside the hydrophobic environment of membranes. The small volume of the RBC membrane and the third-order reaction rate of NO with O2, however, suggest that this assumption has only a small impact on the results of the transport calculations. In the development of the model's equations, we also assumed steady state, based on the high diffusivities and reaction rates and the small volume. We assumed that Hb consumes the NO through an irreversible reaction. There is increasing evidence, however, that Hb can preserve the NO bioactivity through the nitrosylation of a cystein residue in the beta -subunit of the Hb molecule and later release the NO molecule probably in the form of a S-nitrosothiol (15, 25, 27). At this point it is not known to what extent this mechanism can result in the release of free NO.

In conclusion, extracellular diffusion and/or resistance to the transport through the RBC membrane limit the NO uptake by RBCs. At this point there is uncertainty regarding the contribution of each of these mechanisms under physiological conditions. For the estimation of NO uptake rate by RBCs one needs to extrapolate data collected at very low Hct or interpret data collected under nonphysiological conditions. In either case, the value for Pm is required. Our analysis, however, suggests that there is not a single value for Pm that can describe all the available experimental data. The uncertainty in the value of Pm causes uncertainty in our prediction for kblood under physiological conditions within a range 7.5 × 102-6.5 × 103 s-1. Our prediction for blood at normal Hct is 250-500 times slower than for the reaction with an equivalent concentration of free Hb. Further experimentation is needed to delineate the magnitude of extracellular and RBC membrane resistance to NO transport and determine accurately the rate of NO consumption in the blood at physiological Hct.


    APPENDIX
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Competition experiment. For the analysis of the competition experiment, we use the "single cell" model presented by Vaughn et al. (34). It differs from the one presented earlier by the addition of a production rate in the plasma equation and in the condition at the outer boundary of the plasma layer. Thus Eqs. 2 and 5 are replaced by
D<SUB>pl</SUB><FR><NU>1</NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP></DE></FR> <FR><NU><IT>∂</IT></NU><DE><IT>∂R</IT></DE></FR> <FENCE><IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><FR><NU><IT>∂</IT>C</NU><DE>∂<IT>R</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><IT>−k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB>C + <IT>S=</IT>0  with <IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB><IT><R<R</IT><SUB>P</SUB> (A1)

<FENCE><FR><NU>∂C</NU><DE><IT>∂R</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><IT>R</IT>=<IT>R</IT><SUB>P</SUB></SUB> = 0 (A2)
Here S is the production rate of NO per unit plasma volume, which is assumed constant for a pseudo steady-state approximation and equal to 2kdCNO donor/(1 - Hct), where kd is a first-order reaction rate constant and CNO donor is the concentration of NO donor computed based on the total volume of solution. Vaughn et al. (34) have not presented the solution explicitly; for the sake of convenience, we present the solution here using notations introduced above in the body of the paper.

Making the substitution Phi (r) = C(r- S/kpl, the solution of Eq. A1 using the Eqs. A2 and Eq. 6 will be
&PHgr;(r)=[E<SUB>1</SUB> sinh (<IT>&rgr;r</IT>)<IT>+E</IT><SUB>2</SUB> cosh (<IT>&rgr;r</IT>)] <FR><NU><IT>&PHgr;</IT>(1)</NU><DE><IT>r</IT></DE></FR><IT>, r=</IT><FR><NU><IT>R</IT></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR><IT>, </IT> (A3a)

<IT>&rgr;=R</IT><SUB>R</SUB><RAD><RCD><FR><NU><IT>k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></NU><DE><IT>D</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></DE></FR></RCD></RAD>, &egr; = <FR><NU><IT>R</IT><SUB>P</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR>
with
E<SUB>1</SUB>=<FR><NU>&rgr;&egr; sinh (&rgr;&egr;) − cosh (&rgr;&egr;)</NU><DE>sinh [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)] − &rgr;&egr; cosh [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)]</DE></FR> (A3b)

E<SUB>2</SUB>=−<FR><NU>&rgr;&egr; cosh (&rgr;&egr;) − sinh (&rgr;&egr;)</NU><DE>sinh [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)] − &rgr;&egr; cosh [&rgr;(&egr; − 1)]</DE></FR> (A3c)
Differentiating Eq. A3 at r = 1+, we get the flux at the RBC boundary under the conditions of the competition experiment
F<SUB>RBC</SUB> = <FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> <FENCE><FR><NU>∂&PHgr;</NU><DE>∂<IT>r</IT></DE></FR></FENCE><SUB><IT>r</IT>=1<SUP><IT>+</IT></SUP></SUB><IT>=</IT><FR><NU><IT>D</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> {<IT>E</IT><SUB>1</SUB>[&rgr; cosh (&rgr;) − sinh (&rgr;)]  (A4)

+ <IT>E</IT><SUB>2</SUB> [&rgr; sinh (&rgr;) − cosh (&rgr;)]} &PHgr;(1)= <IT>K</IT><SUP>*</SUP><SUB>spl</SUB> [<IT>Sk</IT><SUP>−1</SUP><SUB>pl</SUB> − C(<IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB>)]
Similarly, combining Eq. A4 with Eqs. 15 and 17 yields
F<SUB>RBC</SUB> = <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>1/<IT>K<SUP>*</SUP></IT><SUB>spl</SUB> + 1/<IT>P</IT><SUB>m</SUB> + 1/<IT>K<SUP>*</SUP></IT><SUB>cy</SUB></DE></FR> <FR><NU><IT>S</IT></NU><DE><IT>k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></DE></FR> = <IT>K<SUP>*</SUP><SUB>s</SUB> </IT><FR><NU><IT>S</IT></NU><DE><IT>k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></DE></FR> (A5)
The average NO concentration in the plasma will be
<A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> = <FENCE>1 − <FR><NU>3<IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>R</SUB></NU><DE>(<IT>R</IT><SUP>3</SUP><SUB>P</SUB> − <IT>R</IT><SUP>3</SUP><SUB>R</SUB>)</DE></FR> <FR><NU><IT>K<SUP>*</SUP><SUB>s</SUB></IT></NU><DE><IT>k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></DE></FR></FENCE><FR><NU><IT>S</IT></NU><DE><IT>k</IT><SUB>P</SUB></DE></FR> (A6)
Substitution of Eq. A6 in Eq. A5 yields
F<SUB>RBC</SUB> = <FR><NU><IT>K<SUP>*</SUP><SUB>s</SUB></IT></NU><DE>1<IT> − </IT><FR><NU>3<IT>R</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>R</SUB></NU><DE>(<IT>R</IT><SUP>3</SUP><SUB>P</SUB> − <IT>R</IT><SUP>3</SUP><SUB>R</SUB>)</DE></FR> <FR><NU><IT>K<SUP>*</SUP><SUB>s</SUB></IT></NU><DE><IT>k</IT><SUB>pl</SUB></DE></FR></DE></FR> <A><AC>C</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A><SUB>pl</SUB> (A7)
Then the ratio of the reaction rate constants for NO consumption by the RBC and by the extracellular Hb will be
<FR><NU>k<SUB>RBC</SUB></NU><DE><IT>C</IT><SUP>RBC</SUP><SUB>Hb</SUB><IT>k</IT><SUB>oxy</SUB></DE></FR> = <FR><NU>3<IT>K<SUP>*</SUP><SUB>s</SUB></IT> C<SUP>pl</SUP><SUB>Hb</SUB>(1 − Hct)</NU><DE>C<SUP>RBC</SUP><SUB>Hb</SUB>[<IT>k</IT><SUB>oxy</SUB><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB>C<SUP>pl</SUP><SUB>Hb</SUB>(1 − Hct) − 3<IT>K<SUP>*</SUP><SUB>s</SUB></IT> Hct]</DE></FR> (A8)
Taking the limit of Eq. A8 for very small Pm, we obtain
<FR><NU>k<SUB>RBC</SUB></NU><DE>C<SUP>RBC</SUP><SUB>Hb</SUB><IT>k</IT><SUB>oxy</SUB></DE></FR> = <FR><NU>3</NU><DE><IT>R</IT><SUB>R</SUB>C<SUP>RBC</SUP><SUB>Hb</SUB></DE></FR> <FR><NU><IT>P</IT><SUB>m</SUB></NU><DE><IT>k</IT><SUB>oxy</SUB></DE></FR> (A9)


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This project was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant HL-18292 and the Center for Advanced Transfusion Practices and Blood Research.


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: N. Tsoukias, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Univ. School of Medicine, 613 Traylor Bldg., 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205 (E-mail: tsoukias{at}bme.jhu.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

First published February 28, 2002;10.1152/ajpheart.01080.2001

Received 10 December 2001; accepted in final form 22 February 2002.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

1.   Alayash, AI. Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes: oxygen carriers, pressor agents, or oxidants? Nat Biotechnol 17: 545-549, 1999[Web of Science][Medline].

2.   Altman, PL, and Dittmer DS. Respiration and Circulation. Bethesda, MD: Fed Am Soc Exp Biol, 1971.

3.   Beckman, JS, and Koppenol WH. Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: the good, the bad, and ugly. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 271: C1424-C1437, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Buerk, DG. Can we model nitric oxide biotransport? A survey of mathematical models for a simple diatomic molecule with surprisingly complex biological activities. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 3: 109-143, 2001[Web of Science][Medline].

5.   Butler, AR, Megson IL, and Wright PG. Diffusion of nitric oxide and scavenging by blood in the vasculature. Biochim Biophys Acta 1425: 168-176, 1998.

6.   Carlsen, E, and Comroe JH. The rate of uptake of carbon monoxide and of nitric oxide by normal human erythrocytes and experimentally produced spherocytes. J Gen Physiol 42: 83-107, 1958[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Cassoly, R, and Gibson Q. Conformation, co-operativity and ligand binding in human hemoglobin. J Mol Biol 91: 301-313, 1975[Web of Science][Medline].

8.   Coin, JT, and Olson JS. The rate of oxygen uptake by human red blood cells. J Biol Chem 254: 1178-1190, 1979[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Denicola, A, Souza JM, Radi R, and Lissi E. Nitric oxide diffusion in membranes determined by fluorescence quenching. Arch Biochem Biophys 328: 208-212, 1996.

10.   Eich, RF, Li T, Lemon DD, Doherty DH, Curry SR, Aitken JF, Mathews AJ, Johnson KA, Smith RD, Phillips GN, Jr, and Olson JS. Mechanism of NO-induced oxidation of myoglobin and hemoglobin. Biochemistry 35: 6976-6983, 1996[Medline].

11.   Fung, YC. Biomechanics. Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.

12.   Furchgott, RF, and Zawadzki JV. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature 288: 373-376, 1980[Medline].

13.   Goldstein, S, and Czapski G. The reaction of NO with O2- and HO2: a pulse radiolysis study. Free Radic Biol Med 19: 505-510, 1995[Web of Science][Medline].

14.   Goldstick, TK, Ciuryla VT, and Zuckerman L. Diffusion of oxygen in plasma and blood. Adv Exp Med Biol 75: 183-190, 1976[Medline].

15.   Gow, AJ, Luchsinger BP, Pawloski JR, Singel DJ, and Stamler JS. The oxyhemoglobin reaction of nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 9027-9032, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Herold, S, Exner M, and Nauser T. Kinetic and mechanistic studies of the NO(*)-mediated oxidation of oxymyoglobin and oxyhemoglobin. Biochemistry 40: 3385-3395, 2001[Medline].

17.   Huang, KT, Han TH, Hyduke DR, Vaughn MW, Van Herle H, Hein TW, Zhang C, Kuo L, and Liao JC. Modulation of nitric oxide bioavailability by erythrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 11771-11716, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Huxley, VH, and Kutchai H. Effect of diffusion boundary layers on the initial uptake of O2 by red cells. Theory versus experiment. Microvasc Res 26: 89-107, 1983[Web of Science][Medline].

19.   Huxley, VH, and Kutchai H. The effect of the red cell membrane and a diffusion boundary layer on the rate of oxygen uptake by human erythrocytes. J Physiol 316: 75-83, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   Ignarro, LJ, Buga GM, Wood KS, Byrns RE, and Chaudhuri G. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor produced and released from artery and vein is nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 9265-9269, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Lancaster, JR, Jr. Simulation of the diffusion and reaction of endogenously produced nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 8137-8141, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Liu, X, Miller MJ, Joshi MS, Sadowska-Krowicka H, Clark DA, and Lancaster JR, Jr. Diffusion-limited reaction of free nitric oxide with erythrocytes. J Biol Chem 273: 18709-18713, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Liu, X, Miller MJ, Joshi MS, Thomas DD, and Lancaster JR, Jr. Accelerated reaction of nitric oxide with O2 within the hydrophobic interior of biological membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 2175-2179, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Malinski, T, Taha Z, Grunfeld S, Patton S, Kapturczak M, and Tomboulian P. Diffusion of nitric oxide in the aorta wall monitored in situ by porphyrinic microsensors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 193: 1076-1082, 1993[Web of Science][Medline].

25.   McMahon, TJ, Stone AE, Bonaventura J, Singel DJ, and Stamler JS. Functional coupling of oxygen binding and vasoactivity in S-nitrosohemoglobin. J Biol Chem 275: 16738-16745, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

26.   Palmer, RM, Ferrige AG, and Moncada S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature 327: 524-526, 1987[Medline].

27.   Pawloski, JR, Hess DT, and Stamler JS. Export by red blood cells of nitric oxide bioactivity. Nature 409: 622-626, 2001[Medline].

28.   Spaan, JA, Kreuzer F, and van Wely FK. Diffusion coefficients of oxygen and hemoglobin as obtained simultaneously from photometric determination of the oxygenation of layers of hemoglobin solutions. Pflügers Arch 384: 241-251, 1980[Web of Science][Medline].

29.   Stowell, CP, Levin J, Spiess BD, and Winslow RM. Progress in the development of RBC substitutes. Transfusion 41: 287-299, 2001[Web of Science][Medline].

30.   Subczynski, WK, Lomnicka M, and Hyde JS. Permeability of nitric oxide through lipid bilayer membranes. Free Radic Res 24: 343-349, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

31.   Ulatowski, JA, Asano Y, Koehler RC, Traystman RJ, and Bucci E. Sustained endothelial dependent dilation in pial arterioles after crosslinked hemoglobin transfusion. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 25: 115-120, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

32.   Ulatowski, JA, Koehler RC, Nishikawa T, Traystman RJ, Razynska A, Kwansa H, Urbaitis B, and Bucci E. Role of nitric oxide scavenging in peripheral vasoconstrictor response to beta beta cross-linked hemoglobin. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 23: 263-269, 1995[Web of Science][Medline].

33.   Ulatowski, JA, Nishikawa T, Matheson-Urbaitis B, Bucci E, Traystman RJ, and Koehler RC. Regional blood flow alterations after bovine fumaryl beta beta-crosslinked hemoglobin transfusion and nitric oxide synthase inhibition. Crit Care Med 24: 558-565, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

34.   Vaughn, MW, Huang K, Kuo L, and Liao JC. Erythrocyte consumption of nitric oxide: competition experiment and model analysis. Nitric Oxide 5: 18-31, 2001[Web of Science][Medline].

35.   Vaughn, MW, Huang KT, Kuo L, and Liao JC. Erythrocytes possess an intrinsic barrier to nitric oxide consumption. J Biol Chem 275: 2342-2348, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

36.   Vaughn, MW, Kuo L, and Liao JC. Effective diffusion distance of nitric oxide in the microcirculation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 274: H1705-H1714, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

37.   Vaughn, MW, Kuo L, and Liao JC. Estimation of nitric oxide production and reaction rates in tissue by use of a mathematical model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 274: H2163-H2176, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

38.   Winslow, RM. alpha alpha -Crosslinked hemoglobin: was failure predicted by preclinical testing? Vox Sang 79: 1-20, 2000[Web of Science][Medline].

39.   Winslow, RM. Blood substitutes: refocusing an elusive goal. Br J Haematol 111: 387-396, 2000[Web of Science][Medline].

40.   Wood, J, and Garthwaite J. Models of the diffusional spread of nitric oxide: implications for neural nitric oxide signalling and its pharmacological properties. Neuropharmacology 33: 1235-1244, 1994[Web of Science][Medline].


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282(6):H2265-H2277
0363-6135/02 $5.00 Copyright © 2002 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
D. L. Diesen, D. T. Hess, and J. S. Stamler
Hypoxic Vasodilation by Red Blood Cells: Evidence for an S-Nitrosothiol-Based Signal
Circ. Res., August 29, 2008; 103(5): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
W. Zhang and A. Edwards
A model of nitric oxide tubulovascular cross talk in a renal outer medullary cross section
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): F711 - F722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
P. Pacher, J. S. Beckman, and L. Liaudet
Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 315 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Rebel, S. Cao, H. Kwansa, S. Dore, E. Bucci, and R. C. Koehler
Dependence of acetylcholine and ADP dilation of pial arterioles on heme oxygenase after transfusion of cell-free polymeric hemoglobin
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): H1027 - H1037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
X. Chen, D. Jaron, K. A. Barbee, and D. G. Buerk
The influence of radial RBC distribution, blood velocity profiles, and glycocalyx on coupled NO/O2 transport
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2006; 100(2): 482 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Kavdia and A. S. Popel
Venular endothelium-derived NO can affect paired arteriole: a computational model
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): H716 - H723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. R. Hyduke and J. C. Liao
Analysis of nitric oxide donor effectiveness in resistance vessels
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): H2390 - H2399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
W. Zhang, T. Pibulsonggram, and A. Edwards
Determinants of basal nitric oxide concentration in the renal medullary microcirculation
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): F1189 - F1203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
N. M. Tsoukias, M. Kavdia, and A. S. Popel
A theoretical model of nitric oxide transport in arterioles: frequency- vs. amplitude-dependent control of cGMP formation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): H1043 - H1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/6/H2265    most recent
01080.2001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsoukias, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Popel, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsoukias, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Popel, A. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online