|
|
||||||||
-adrenoceptors mediate migration of vascular
smooth muscle cells and adventitial fibroblasts in vitro
Departments of 1 Cell and Molecular Physiology and 2 Orthopedics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Norepinephrine directly induces growth of
the vascular wall, which may involve not only proliferation of smooth
muscle cells (SMCs) and adventitial fibroblasts (AFBs) but also
augmentation of their migration. To test this hypothesis,
growth-arrested SMCs and AFBs from rat aorta were exposed to
norepinephrine. Norepinephrine caused dose-dependent migration of both
cell types that was dependent on chemotaxis. In contrast,
platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB, used as a positive control,
stimulated both chemotaxis and chemokinesis. Only
1D-adrenoceptors (AR) and
2-AR
antagonists inhibited norepinephrine migration of SMCs, whereas
norepinephrine migration of AFBs was only inhibited by
1A-AR and
1B-AR antagonists;
-AR
blockade was without effect. Norepinephrine and PDGF-BB were additive
for AFB, but not SMC, migration. Stimulation of migration was reversed at high norepinephrine concentrations (10 µM); this inhibition was
mediated by
2- and
-ARs in AFBs but not in SMCs. Thus
norepinephrine induces migration of SMCs and AFBs via different
-ARs. This action may participate in wall remodeling and
norepinephrine potentiation of injury-induced intimal lesion growth.
artery; adrenergic receptor; growth; remodeling; platelet-derived growth factor
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
VASCULAR WALL GROWTH and remodeling involve smooth muscle cell (SMC) and adventitial fibroblast (AFB) proliferation, hypertrophy, migration, apoptosis, and extracellular matrix changes. These mechanisms permit adaptive changes in vascular structure in response to sustained increases in arterial pressure or shear stress (reviewed in Refs. 32, 39). On the other hand, excessive wall growth and inward or inadequate outward remodeling are caused by surgical procedures, such as restenosis after angioplasty, stent placement, atherectomy, and bypass grafting. These changes in wall structure also underlie diseases such as atherosclerosis, vasculitis, systemic and pulmonary hypertension, and accelerated arteriosclerosis (32, 39). Thus the mechanisms regulating growth and migration of SMCs, AFBs, and endothelial cells are under intensive investigation.
Recent evidence suggests that catecholamines exert a direct trophic
effect on vascular SMCs and AFBs. Early studies using sympathetic
denervation and infusion of catecholamines and adrenergic antagonists,
as well as studies correlating catecholamines with wall thickness,
fibrosis, and atherosclerosis, indirectly supported this hypothesis
(reviewed in Refs. 5, 16, 37,
41, 44). However, concomitant systemic
hemodynamic and/or humoral effects complicated these studies. Chronic
systemic
1-adrenoceptor (AR) antagonists reduced
proliferation of vascular wall cells, neointimal growth, and restenosis
by at least 50% in the rat and rabbit carotid after balloon injury
(12, 17, 25, 38). However, whether these effects were
secondary to systemic hemodynamic and humoral changes was again
unclear. Recent studies suggest that these findings may derive, at
least in part, from a direct trophic action of catecholamines on SMCs
and AFBs. Norepinephrine (NE) stimulated rat aorta SMCs to proliferate
and hypertrophy through activation of
1-ARs (5,
41, 43) and stimulated AFBs to proliferate (11). In
uninjured rat aorta maintained in organ culture, NE caused medial SMCs
to hypertrophy and adventitial AFBs to proliferate and reduced
expression of marker proteins that characterize the differentiated SMC
phenotype (44). In addition, NE strongly augmented
proliferation in intima-media and adventitia by stimulation of
1A- and
1B-ARs, respectively, in aorta
studied in organ culture several days after balloon injury in vivo; NE
also augmented injury-induced changes in SMC marker proteins
(44). Moreover, in studies employing chronic local
perivascular administration to avoid systemic effects, NE augmented
neointimal growth and lumen narrowing in balloon-injured rat carotid,
whereas
1-AR blockade lessened these effects and adventitial thickening (10).
Migration of SMCs (31), and possibly AFBs (15, 40), to the intima plays an important role in the intimal hyperplastic complications of surgical interventions and vascular diseases such as atherosclerosis. In addition to NE's stimulation of SMC and AFB growth, augmentation of wall growth by NE could arise from stimulation of SMC and/or AFB migration, or from synergism of NE with migratory factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) induced by vascular injury and disease (31, 32). However, although several studies suggest that NE may be capable of stimulating migration of SMCs (24, 28, 42), no studies have examined this hypothesis in SMCs and AFBs or identified the AR subtypes involved.
It has recently been shown that blood vessels express multiple AR
types, some of which do not modulate vascular smooth muscle tone and
whose function is thus unclear (8, 11, 37). For example,
medial SMCs and adventitial AFBs of the rat thoracic aorta in vivo both
express all three
1-ARs (
1A,
1B, and
1D) in the same total
1-AR abundance (11). Both cell types also express
-ARs and one of the three
2-ARs: the
2D/A-AR (hereafter referred to as the
2D-AR which is the species ortholog expressed in the
rat) (11). Whereas
1D- and
2D-ARs signal constriction and
-ARs dilation of rat
aorta,
1A- and
1B-ARs mediate adrenergic growth of the media and adventitia, respectively (11, 44). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether NE
stimulates migration of SMCs or AFBs, and/or if it can interact with
other growth and migratory factors such as PDGF-BB, and to identify the
responsible AR type(s).
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell culture. Medial SMCs and AFBs were obtained from the descending thoracic aorta of 200-g Sprague-Dawley rats. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with high glucose containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 200 mg/ml L-glutamine, as described previously (11). Cells were passaged with 0.1% trypsin EDTA at ~95% confluence every 3 days (AFBs) or 5 days (SMCs) and were used in passages 3-5. When cells reached 100% confluence, they were growth-arrested by maintenance in serum-free medium (DMEM containing 0.1% BSA and 200 mg/ml L-glutamine) for 24 h before the experiment (5, 26, 41).
Migration assay.
Cell migration was measured in Transwell chambers (Costar, Cambridge,
MA). The top chambers with polycarbonate membranes having 8- or 12-µm
pores were used for measurement of migration of AFBs or the larger
SMCs, respectively. Membranes were coated with 0.1% gelatin in DMEM at
4°C overnight and dried at room temperature before use. The bottom
chambers contained serum-free medium with 0.1 mM ascorbic acid to
oppose oxidization of NE. Depending on the experiment, the following
drugs were added to the bottom chambers: recombinant human PDGF-BB
(0.5-10 ng/ml, GIBCO), NE (0.001-10 µM, Sigma),
1D-AR antagonist BMY-7378 (RBI Biochemical, Natick, MA),
1A-AR antagonist KMD-3213 (kindly provided by Dr. Y. Kurashina and Kissei Pharmaceutical, Matsumoto-City, Japan),
1B-AR antagonist AH-11110A (Tocris, Ballwin, MO),
2-AR antagonists atipamezole (Orion-Farmos
Pharmaceutical, Turku, Finland) or RX-821002 (Tocris), and
-AR
antagonist propranolol (Sigma). Final dilution of these competitive
antagonists was in media, and they were present at the same 0.1 µM
concentration in the top and bottom chambers. Atipamezole and RX-821002
have >1,000-fold selectivity for
2-ARs over other ARs
(36, 44) and high affinity for blockade of
2D-ARs, which is the only subtype expressed in the SMCs
and AFBs studied herein (11). The relative affinities and
selectivities, at 0.1 µM, of the above-mentioned
1-AR
antagonists, which are the most selective available, have been
confirmed previously (11, 41, 44; see also DISCUSSION). The
bottom chambers were equilibrated for 30 min in the cell culture
incubator before cells were placed in the top chamber. For
normalization to basal (random) cell migration, all experiments
included contemporary, time-matched control wells (without drugs)
performed at the same n sizes as the drug treatment groups.
Statistical analysis. Data are presented as means ± SE for n number of experiments conducted using approximately equal numbers of passage 3-5 cells for each study. Statistical significance (P < 0.05) was determined by unpaired two-tailed t-tests.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NE is chemotactic for SMCs and AFBs.
As a positive control, PDGF-BB induced dose-dependent migration of SMCs
and AFBs (Fig. 1). At the highest
concentration of PDGF-BB tested (10 ng/ml), migration was completely
reversed in SMCs, but not in AFBs. This inhibition of migration to
PDGF-BB at high concentrations has been noted previously
(6); the responsible mechanism and why it was not evident
in AFBs were not examined. Migration induced by PDGF-BB at 5 ng/ml was
reduced by ~60% when PDGF-BB was present in equal concentrations on
both sides of the membrane. Thus, as expected (4, 6),
PDGF-BB migration of SMCs is dependent on both chemokinetic and
chemotaxic actions. NE caused dose-dependent migration of both cell
types, with threshold at ~10 nM, and was less efficacious than
PDGF-BB (Fig. 1). Migration to NE was completely reversed at 10 µM in
both SMCs and AFBs (mechanism examined below). In contrast to PDGF-BB,
migration to NE involved only stimulation of chemotaxis, and not
chemokinesis, as no migration occurred when NE was in equal
concentration (1 µM) on both sides of the membrane (Fig. 1).
|
Different
1-AR subtypes stimulate and inhibit
migration of SMCs and AFBs.
NE-induced migration of SMCs was inhibited by the
1D-AR
antagonist BMY-7378 and the
2-AR antagonists RX-821002
or atipamezole but was unaffected by
1A-,
1B-, or
-AR antagonists (Fig.
2). There was a trend toward propranolol
inhibition of SMC but not AFB migration to NE, although this was not
statistically significant despite the relatively large sample sizes for
control and propranolol groups (15 and 10, respectively). In contrast,
NE-induced migration of AFBs was inhibited by the
1A-AR
antagonist KMD-3213 and the
1B-AR antagonist AH-11110A;
however, it was unaffected by the
1D- and
-AR
antagonists and was augmented by the
2-AR antagonists (Fig. 2). Antagonists alone (0.1 µM) had no effect on migration. SMC
migration (in % of control) in the presence of KMD-3213, AH-11110A, BMY-7378, RX-821002, and propranolol were, respectively, 106 ± 13, 119 ± 21, 85 ± 19, 101 ± 14, and 100 ± 30 (n = 4 for each).
|
Interaction between PDGF-BB and NE for induction of AFB, but not
SMC, migration.
Migration of SMCs induced by an intermediate concentration of PDGF-BB
(1 ng/ml) was not further increased when an intermediate migratory
concentration of NE (10 nM) was also present in the bottom chamber
(Fig. 3). Likewise, migration induced by
a slightly higher concentration of NE (50 nM) was not further increased
when given in the presence of a slightly lower concentration of PDGF-BB (0.5 ng/ml; Fig. 3). In contrast, using this same design, PDGF-BB and
NE were additive for migration of AFBs (Fig. 3).
|
2- and
-AR stimulation at high NE levels inhibits
1-AR-mediated migration of AFBs but not SMCs.
An additional experiment was performed to test the hypothesis that
reversal of AFB migration observed at high NE concentration (10 µM;
Fig. 1) is due to
2-AR-mediated (and/or possibly
-AR-mediated) inhibition of the migration induced by
1A- and
1B-AR stimulation. This
hypothesis was suggested by the AFB data in Fig. 2. In support of this,
NE-induced inhibition of chemotaxis of AFBs at high NE concentration
(10 µM) (Fig. 1) was completely reversed by the
2-AR
antagonist RX-821002 and was also lessened by propranolol (Fig.
4). In contrast, in SMCs, the inhibition
of migration at high NE concentration was unaffected by RX-821002 or
propranolol (Fig. 4).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These studies demonstrate that NE induces chemotactic migration of
SMCs and AFBs in vitro. Different
1-AR subtypes mediate migration in the two cell types. Moreover, NE and PDGF-BB can act in an
additive manner for migration of AFBs but not SMCs. Despite growing
evidence that catecholamines have growth factor-like actions on
cultured SMCs and AFBs, and on intact media and adventitia of the
normal and injured vascular wall (5, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 25, 37,
38, 41, 43, 44), few studies have examined whether
catecholamines affect migration of SMCs, and none has studied AFBs.
Nishio and Watanabe (24) reported that 10 µM
phenylephrine doubled the number of rabbit aorta SMCs present on the
bottom side of a Transwell membrane when examined 24 h later and
concluded that
1-ARs mediate SMC migration. However, it
was not clear whether this represented adrenergic-induced migration or,
instead, resulted from phenylephrine-induced proliferation of cells
that had randomly migrated to the lower side of the membrane. Indeed,
the authors had confirmed in the same study that phenylephrine induces
strong SMC proliferation, as reviewed previously (5, 16, 37, 41,
43). A similar absence of differentiation between migration and
proliferation makes difficult the interpretation of a more recent
report that concluded that NE stimulates migration of rat aorta SMCs
via
2-ARs (28). In a recent study
(42), 10 µM phenylephrine caused a fivefold increase in
migration in a modified Boyden chamber, measured over a 4-h interval,
of cultured SMCs from rat renal artery. Although prazosin
blockade demonstrated
1-AR dependence,
proliferation was not arrested in these cells before seeding into
migration chambers. In the present study, basal proliferation and that
inducible by NE or PDGF-BB were prevented by using confluent cells that
have greatly reduced proliferation rates, placing them in serum-free
media for 24 h before the experiment, and limiting the duration of
measurement to 6 h, which is well below the time required for
proliferation of growth-arrested SMCs or AFBs after initial seeding
(5, 11, 26, 41). Moreover, we have shown previously that
0.001-1 µM NE dose dependently stimulates hypertrophy but not
proliferation of quiescent SMCs in vitro (5, 41) and in
vivo (11).
In agreement with our results, NE has been reported to induce migration
of several nonvascular cell types. Thus the well-known stimulatory
effects of sympathetic nerves on immune system function appear to
involve
1B-AR-mediated migration of dendritic cells (the
only
1-AR subtype expressed in these cells); this was
demonstrated in vivo, in organ culture, and in cell culture, whereas
2-ARs were inhibitory (20). In addition,
NE, which is released from nerves supplying lymphoid organs, induces
potent in vitro migration of human monocytes and macrophages via
-ARs and cAMP (35).
The migratory efficacy of NE at AFBs and SMCs was ~40 and 60%, respectively, of PDGF-BB. However, PDGF-BB is also more potent and efficacious than other growth factors, such as PDGF-AB, PDGF-AA, bFGF, and epidermal growth factor, that induce migration similar in maximal magnitude to NE (2). Also, growth-arrest of SMCs, as used herein, favors the differentiated phenotype (26) and is known to render SMCs (and possibly AFBs) less responsive to migratory stimuli. Thus NE migration of SMCs and AFBs appears to possess comparable efficacy to other peptide growth factors. In addition, the dose-response range for NE migration is consistent with the range over which NE regulates vasoconstriction in vivo. This is consistent with the hypothesis that NE-mediated migration may occur in vivo under conditions, such as vascular injury, that render SMCs and AFBs competent for migration.
The antagonists BMY-7378, KMD-3213, and AH-11110A were used to
differentiate among
1-AR subtypes. Although they do not
possess the very high selectivity of RX-821002, atipamezole, and
propranolol used herein for differentiating
2- and
-ARs, respectively, they are the most selective
1-AR
subtype antagonists available (reviewed in Refs. 11,
30, 44). Reported inhibitory constant
(Ki) values (in nM) for BMY-7378 at cloned rat
receptors for
1D-,
1B-, and
1A-ARs average 1.2, 320, and 320, respectively,
demonstrating
1D-AR selectivity of 267-fold. At cloned
rat
1A-ARs and the submandibular gland,
Ki values for KMD-3213 averaged 0.28 and showed
56- and 583-fold selectivity against
1D- and
1B-ARs, respectively, and 200-fold selectivity for
1A-ARs over
1B-ARs in binding and
functional studies. We confirmed the selectivity of BMY-7378 and
KMD-3213 at 0.1 µM for blockade of
1D- and
1A-ARs in radioligand binding and functional (growth)
studies of rat aorta SMCs and AFBs and three Rat1 fibroblast cell lines
each transfected with one of the
1-AR subtypes
(11, 41, 44).
In contrast to the appreciable selectivity of BMY-7378 and KMD-3213,
the Ki for AH-11110A at the cloned
1B-AR is 79.4 nM, with 32- and 26-fold selectivity over
1A- and
1D-ARs, respectively; this agrees
with a similar 10- to 20-fold selectivity reported in a functional
study (
1B >
1A >
1D) (9, 14, 30). However, despite this only
moderate selectivity, we previously found that AH-11110A at 0.1 µM
selectively differentiated, when used together with BMY-7378 and
KMD-3213, for NE's stimulation of proliferation, protein synthesis,
and protein contact in intact aorta media (
1A-AR dependent) and adventitia (
1B-AR dependent) studied in
organ culture (44). Saussy et al. (30) and
Giardina et al. (14) reported in binding studies that
AH-11110A possessed 10- to 30-fold selectivity (
1B >
1A >
1D). In a functional study,
Eltze et al. (9) found 12-fold selectivity for AH-11110A
at
1B over
1D but essentially no
selectivity over
1A. The disagreement with the binding
studies could reflect methodological differences. Eltze et al.
(9) had 0.1 µM yohimbine present in their studies. Yohimbine has a 70- to 100-fold selectivity for
2- over
1-ARs. Thus, at this concentration, AH-11110A would be
expected to block a portion of the
1-ARs, possibly to
differing degrees among the subtypes. Eltze et al. (9)
also used the rat vas deferens, not an artery, for their in vitro assay
for
1A-ARs. In the present study, NE-induced migration
of AFBs was abolished by KMD-3213 and reduced by AH-11110A, but these
antagonists were without effect on SMC migration. In contrast, BMY-7378
inhibited migration of SMCs but not AFBs. Importantly, BMY-7378 and
KMD-3213 inhibited migration in one cell type but not at all in the
other. This, together with the high affinity and good selectivity of
these antagonists, provides an internal control for the conclusion that
1D- and
1A-ARs mediate migration of SMCs
and AFBs, respectively. However, the only moderate selectivity of
AH-11110A, despite our previous functional evidence for its apparent
specificity at 0.1 µM in these cell types (44), does not
allow exclusion of the possibility that its inhibition of AFBs is due
to blockade of
1A-ARs. Thus genetic approaches and/or
the development of more selective antagonists are needed for
confirmation of these results.
Differences in receptor density do not explain why
1D-
and
2D-ARs appear to mediate NE migration of SMCs and
why, in contrast,
1A-ARs (and possibly
1B-ARs) mediate migration of AFBs. We previously found
in cells identical in passage number and serum withdrawal treatment as
used herein that total
1-AR density in SMCs is twice that in AFBs and that in SMCs
1B-ARs are twofold more
abundant than
1D-ARs, whereas in AFBs,
1B-ARs are fourfold more abundant than
1D-ARs (11). In both cell types,
1A-ARs were below detection by competition binding
assays, but mRNA levels were almost identical. While the approximately
threefold greater density of
1D-ARs on SMCs than on AFBs
could account for the reliance on
1D-ARs for migration
of SMCs, the absence of any detectable effect of BMY-7378 on AFBs is
not consistent with the hypothesis that differences in receptor density
underlie the results obtained herein. Moreover,
1B-ARs
are more abundant than
1D-ARs in both cell types. In addition, SMCs and AFBs express similar levels of
1A-AR
mRNA, yet KMD-3213 abolished SMC migration but had no effect in SMCs. It is possible that the small density of
1A-ARs on AFBs
are either well coupled to migratory signaling pathways or are
upregulated by exposure to NE to explain our results; however, these
mechanisms would also have to be nonexistent in the SMCs to be
consistent with our findings. Such agonist-induced upregulation of the
1A-AR, but not
1B- or
1D-AR, has been reported in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (29) but not in the SK-N-MC cell line (33).
Differences in receptor abundance among SMCs and AFBs also do not
appear to underlie why
2D-ARs promote migration in SMCs
but inhibit migration of AFBs, and why
-ARs inhibit migration of
AFBs, at least at high NE levels [>1 µM; it is possible that lower
levels of NE stimulated
- and
2D-ARs and lessen the
1A- (and possibly
1B-)AR-induced AFB
migration]. Levels of
2D-AR expression (the only
2-AR subtype detected) are similar in cultured rat aorta
SMCs and AFBs (11). Likewise,
-AR density is higher in
media than adventitia (reviewed in Ref. 11), yet
-AR
stimulation inhibited migration of AFBs but not SMCs. Thus differences
in
- and
-AR abundance between SMCs and AFBs do not correlate
with the differences in the AR types that we have found promote and
oppose their migration.
With the assumption that the fundamental capacity to migrate, which is exhibited by most cells, relies on similar intracellular signaling pathways in SMCs and AFBs, a possible explanation for the cell-specific AR types influencing their migration is that the divergent postreceptor effector pathways activated by different ARs (13, 27, 37, 42) may differ between the two cell types in their interaction with pathways signaling migration. It is also possible that signaling pathways for the same AR type, as well as those mediating migration itself (31, 34), may differ for SMCs and AFBs. However, there is no information on these pathways in AFBs for comparison with those described for SMCs. In addition to the different AR types modulating migration in SMCs and AFBs, migration to PDGF-BB and NE were additive in AFBs but not in SMCs. The surprising absence in SMCs suggests that postreceptor pathways for NE and PDGF-BB migration in SMCs are not parallel but are such that stimulation of one pathway blocks simultaneous signaling through the other pathway. Clearly, future studies are needed to determine if the present findings occur in vivo, how adrenoceptor and migration effector pathways interact in SMCs and AFBs, and whether adrenergic-induced migration is important in vascular remodeling and disease.
We have previously demonstrated that catecholamines are directly
trophic, i.e., NE stimulates proliferation and hypertrophy in cultured
SMCs and AFBs and in the intact wall in organ culture and in vivo and
promotes the dedifferentiated phenotype in vivo; moreover, these
effects are strongly augmented after vascular injury (5, 11, 41,
44). In addition, local blockade of
1-ARs
attenuates, and local increase in NE levels augments, neointimal expansion and restenosis after balloon injury (10). The
present results suggest the hypothesis that worsening of neointimal
expansion by catecholamines may also be dependent on NE-induced
chemotaxis of SMCs and AFBs, particularly in the injured vascular wall
where SMCs and AFBs are known to be competent to respond to migratory factors, and where PDGF-BB is increased, along with many other mediators, and is central in promoting migration (31, 32). However, this hypothesis requires consideration of NE gradients across
the vascular wall. In uninjured vessels, NE release from adrenergic
nerves, that are concentrated at the external elastic lamina, diffuses
toward the much lower concentration of NE in plasma [~1 nM at rest,
~10-fold increase with strong physiological stresses (18,
19)]. Several observations suggest that this gradient may be
reversed by certain types of injury. Vascular nerves become
undetectable by immunohistochemisty in the rat carotid 1 day after
balloon injury but are fully restored when examined 28 days later
(22). Denervation also occurs after organ transplantation or vascular bypass grafting. In addition, various types of wall injury
induce accumulation of activated platelets and monocyte/macrophages (and lesser numbers of neutrophils and T lymphocytes) at the intima and
inner media (31, 32). All of these cells are able to take up and/or synthesize NE (1, 7, 21, 23), which may underlie the threefold increase in wall NE content when measured 28 days after
balloon injury (3). Thus mechanical injury (and possibly other types of injury) may transiently reverse the gradient, allowing NE to contribute to migration of SMCs and AFBs that underlies intimal
expansion (10, 11, 32, 43). Therefore, not only NE-mediated proliferation of SMCs and AFBs, dedifferentiation of SMCs,
and accumulation of collagen (10, 44), but also migration, could explain how catecholamines worsen restenosis in animal models (10, 12, 17, 25, 38, 44).
In conclusion, NE stimulated chemotactic migration of SMCs and AFBs
that appears to be mediated by
1D- and
2D-ARs in SMCs and
1A-ARs (and possibly
1B-ARs) in AFBs. Simulation of
2D- and
-ARs opposed migration of AFBs but not SMCs. Thus alterations in
expression of AR types may have significant effects on modulation of
migration by catecholamines. Whether noradrenergic migration of SMCs
and AFBs occurs in vivo, depends on the same ARs, and contributes to
wall remodeling in physiological adaptation, vascular diseases, or
surgical complications will require development of in vivo methods to
trace cell migration and to selectively activate and inhibit the
multiple AR subtypes expressed. Affirmative findings would raise the
possibility that migration of SMCs and/or AFBs may be suppressed for
therapeutic advantage using AR subtype-selective antagonists.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-62584.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. E. Faber, Dept. of Cell and Molecular Physiology, 474 MSRB, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7545 (E-mail: jefaber{at}med.unc.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published January 10, 2002;10.1152/ajpheart.00858.2001
Received 2 October 2001; accepted in final form 8 January 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bergquist, J,
and
Silberring J.
Identification of catecholamines in the immune system by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom
12:
683-688,
1998.
2.
Bornfeldt, KE,
Raines EW,
Nakano T,
Graves LM,
and
Ross R.
Insulin-like growth factor-1 and platelet-derived growth factor-BB induce directed migration of human arterial smooth muscle cells via signaling pathways that are distinct from those of proliferation.
J Clin Invest
93:
1266-1274,
1994[ISI][Medline].
3.
Candipan, RC,
Hsiun PTC,
Pratt R,
and
Cooke JP.
Vascular injury augments adrenergic neurotransmission.
Circulation
89:
777-784,
1996.
4.
Chandrasekhar, S,
and
Harvey AK.
Modulation of PDGF mediated osteoblast chemotaxis by leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF).
J Cell Physiol
169:
481-490,
1996[ISI][Medline].
5.
Chen, L,
Xin X,
Eckhart AD,
Yang N,
and
Faber JE.
Regulation of vascular smooth muscle growth by
1-adrenoreceptor subtypes in vitro and in situ.
J Biol Chem
270:
30980-30988,
1995
6.
Clunn, GF,
Refson JS,
Lymn JS,
and
Hughes AD.
Platelet-derived growth factor
-receptors can both promote and inhibit chemotaxis in human vascular smooth muscle cells.
Atheroscler Thromb Vasc Biol
17:
2622-2629,
1997.
7.
Cosentino, M,
Marino F,
Bombelli R,
Ferrari M,
Lecchini S,
and
Frigo G.
Endogenous catecholamine synthesis, metabolism, storage and uptake in human neutrophils.
Life Sci
64:
975-981,
1999[ISI][Medline].
8.
Docherty, JR.
Subtypes of functional
1 - and
2-adrenoceptors.
Eur J Pharmacol
361:
1-15,
1998[ISI][Medline].
9.
Eltze, M,
Konig H,
Bllrich B,
and
Grebe T.
Failure of AH11110A to functionally discriminate between
1-adrenoceptor subtypes A, B and D or between
1- and
2-adrenoceptors.
Eur J Pharmacol
415:
265-276,
2001[ISI][Medline].
10.
Erami, C,
and
Faber JE.
1-Adrenoceptor stimulation directly augments growth of the injured vascular wall in vivo (Abstract).
FASEB J
15:
A947,
2001.
11.
Faber, JE,
Yang N,
and
Xin X.
Expression of
-adrenoceptor subtypes by smooth muscle cells and adventitial fibroblasts in rat aorta and in cell culture.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
298:
441-452,
2001
12.
Fingerle, J,
Sanders KH,
and
Fotev Z.
1-Receptor antagonists urapidil and prazosin inhibit neointima formation in rat carotid artery induced by balloon catheter injury.
Basic Res Cardiol
86 Suppl1:
75-81,
1991.
13.
Garcia-Sainz, JA,
Vazques-Prado J,
and
del Carmen Medina L.
Alpha1-adrenoceptors function and phosphorylation.
Eur J Pharmacol
389:
1-12,
2000[ISI][Medline].
14.
Giardina, D,
Crucianelli M,
Romanelli T,
Leonardi A,
Poggesi E,
and
Melchiorre C.
Synthesis and biological profile of the enantiomers of [4-(4-amino-6,7-dimethoxyquinazolin-2-yl)-cis-octahydroquinoxalin-1-yl]furan-2-ylmethanone (cyclazosin), a potent competitive
1B-adrenoceptor antagonist.
J Med Chem
39:
4602-4607,
1996[ISI][Medline].
15.
Gutterman, DD.
Adventitia-dependent influences on vascular function.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
277:
H1265-H1272,
1999
16.
Head, RJ.
Hypernoradrenergic innervation and vascular smooth muscle hyperplastic change.
Blood Vessels
28:
173-178,
1991[ISI][Medline].
17.
Jackson, CL,
Bush RC,
and
Browyer DE.
Inhibitory effect of calcium antagonists on balloon catheter-induced arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation and lesion size.
Atherosclerosis
69:
115-122,
1988[ISI][Medline].
18.
James, MF,
Hickman R,
Janicki P,
Mets B,
and
Fourie J.
Early effects of total hepatectomy on haemodynamic state and organ uptake of catecholamines in the pig.
Br J Anaesth
76:
713-720,
1996
19.
Kuchel, O.
The autonomic nervous system and blood pressure regulation in human hypertension.
In: Hypertension, edited by Genest G,
Kuchel O,
Hamet P,
and Cantin M.. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983, p. 140-160.
20.
Maestroni, GJM
Dendritic cell migration controlled by
1B-adrenergic receptors.
J Immunol
165:
6743-6747,
2000
21.
Miller, LE,
Justen HP,
Scholmerich J,
and
Straub RH.
The loss of sympathetic nerve fibers in the synovial tissue of patients with rheumatoid arthritis is accompanied by increased norepinphrine release from synovial macrophages.
FASEB J
14:
2097-2107,
2000
22.
Milner, P,
Crowe R,
Loesch,
Anglin S,
Burnstock G,
and
McEwan JR.
Neurocompensatory responses to balloon-catheter-induced injury of the rat carotid artery.
J Vasc Res
34:
31-40,
1997[ISI][Medline].
23.
Musso, NR,
Brenci S,
Setti M,
Indiveri F,
and
Lotti G.
Catecholamine content and in vitro catecholamine synthesis in peripheral human lymphocytes.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
81:
3553-3557,
1996[Abstract].
24.
Nishio, E,
and
Watanabe Y.
The involvement of reactive oxygen species and arachidonic acid in
1-adrenoceptor-induced smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration.
Br J Pharmacol
121:
665-670,
1997[ISI][Medline].
25.
O'Malley, MK,
McDermott EW,
Mehigan D,
and
O'Higgins NJ.
Role for prazosin in reducing the development of rabbit intimal hyperplasia after endothelial denudation.
Br J Surg
76:
936-938,
1989[ISI][Medline].
26.
Owens, GK.
Regulation of differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells.
Physiol Rev
75:
487-517,
1995
27.
Piascik, MT,
and
Perez DM.
Alpha1-adrenergic receptors: new insights and directions.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
298:
403-410,
2001
28.
Richman, JG,
and
Regan JW.
2-Adrenergic receptors increase cell migration and decrease F-actin labeling in rat aortic smooth muscle cells.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
274:
C654-C662,
1998
29.
Rokosh, DG,
Stewart AFR,
Chang KC,
Bailey BA,
Karliner JS,
Camacho SA,
Long CS,
and
Simpson PC.
1-Adrenergic receptor subtype mRNAs are differentially regulated by
1-adrenergic and other hypertrophic stimulation in cardiac myocytes in culture and in vivo.
J Biol Chem
271:
5839-5843,
1996
30.
Saussy, DL, Jr,
Goetz AS,
Queen KL,
King HK,
Lutz MW,
and
Rimele TJ.
Structure-activity relationships of a series of buspirone analogs at
1-adrenoceptors: further evidence that rat aorta
1-adrenoceptors are of the
1D-subtype.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
278:
136-144,
1996
31.
Schwartz, SM.
Smooth muscle migration in atherosclerosis and restenosis.
J Clin Invest
99:
2814-2817,
1997[ISI][Medline].
32.
Schwartz, SM,
deBlois D,
and
O'Brien ERM
The intima: soil for atherosclerosis and restenosis.
Circ Res
77:
445-465,
1995
33.
Schwinn, DA,
and
Price RR.
Molecular pharmacology of human alpha1-adrenergic receptors: unique features of the alpha 1a-subtype.
J Urol
160:
937-943,
1998[ISI][Medline].
34.
Shuster, CB,
and
Herman IM.
The mechanics of vascular cell motility.
Microcirculation
5:
239-257,
1998[ISI][Medline].
35.
Straub, RH,
Mayer M,
Kreutz M,
Leeb S,
Scholmerich J,
and
Falk W.
Neurotransmitters of the sympathetic nerve termial are powerful chemoattractants for monocytes.
J Leukoc Biol
67:
553-558,
2000[Abstract].
36.
Trendelenburg, AU,
Wahl CA,
and
Starke K.
Antagonists that differentiate between
2A- and
2D-adrenoceptors.
Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
353:
245-249,
1996.
37.
Varma, DR,
and
Deng X-F.
Cardiovascular
1-adrenoceptor subtypes: functions and signaling.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
78:
267-292,
2000[ISI][Medline].
38.
Vashisht, R,
Sian M,
Franks PJ,
and
O'Malley MK.
Long-term reduction of intimal hyperplasia by the selective
1 adrenergic antagonist doxazosin.
Br J Surg
79:
1285-1288,
1992[ISI][Medline].
39.
Ward, MR,
Pasterkamp G,
Yeung AC,
and
Borst C.
Arterial remodeling. Mechanisms and clinical implications.
Circulation
102:
1186-1191,
2000.
40.
Wilcox, JN,
Cipolla GD,
Martin FH,
Simonet L,
Dunn B,
Ross CE,
and
Scott NA.
Contribution of adventitial myofibroblasts to vascular remodeling and lesion formation after experimental angioplasty in pig coronary arteries.
Ann NY Acad Sci
811:
437-447,
1997.
41.
Xin, X,
Yang N,
Eckhart AD,
and
Faber JE.
1D-Adrenergic receptors and mitogen-activated protein kinase mediate increased protein synthesis by arterial smooth muscle.
Mol Pharmacol
51:
764-775,
1997
42.
Yasunari, K,
Kohno M,
Kano H,
Minami M,
and
Yoshikawa J.
Dopamine as a novel antioxidant agent for rat vascular smooth muscle cells through dopamine D1-like receptors.
Circulation
101:
2302-2308,
2000.
43.
Yu, S-M,
Tsai S-Y,
Guh J-H,
Ko F-N,
Teng C-M,
and
Ou JT.
Mechanism of catecholamine-induced proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells.
Circulation
94:
547-554,
1996.
44.
Zhang, H,
and
Faber JE.
Trophic effect of NE on arterial intima-media and adventitia is augmented by injury and mediated by different
1-adrenoceptor subtypes.
Circ Res
89:
815-822,
2001
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Vinci, L. Bellik, S. Filippi, F. Ledda, and A. Parenti Trophic effects induced by {alpha}1D-adrenoceptors on endothelial cells are potentiated by hypoxia Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2140 - H2147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Faber, C. L. Szymeczek, S. Cotecchia, S. A. Thomas, A. Tanoue, G. Tsujimoto, and H. Zhang {alpha}1-Adrenoceptor-dependent vascular hypertrophy and remodeling in murine hypoxic pulmonary hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2316 - H2323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Faber, C. L. Szymeczek, S. S. Salvi, and H. Zhang Enhanced {alpha}1-adrenergic trophic activity in pulmonary artery of hypoxic pulmonary hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2272 - H2281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Erami, H. Zhang, A. Tanoue, G. Tsujimoto, S. A. Thomas, and J. E. Faber Adrenergic catecholamine trophic activity contributes to flow-mediated arterial remodeling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): H744 - H753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chalothorn, H. Zhang, J. A. Clayton, S. A. Thomas, and J. E. Faber Catecholamines augment collateral vessel growth and angiogenesis in hindlimb ischemia Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): H947 - H959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C McGrath, C. Deighan, A. M Briones, M. M. Shafaroudi, M. McBride, J. Adler, S. M Arribas, E. Vila, and C. J Daly New aspects of vascular remodelling: the involvement of all vascular cell types Exp Physiol, July 1, 2005; 90(4): 469 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhang, D. Chalothorn, L. F. Jackson, D. C. Lee, and J. E. Faber Transactivation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mediates Catecholamine-Induced Growth of Vascular Smooth Muscle Circ. Res., November 12, 2004; 95(10): 989 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhang, S. Cotecchia, S. A. Thomas, A. Tanoue, G. Tsujimoto, and J. E. Faber Gene deletion of dopamine {beta}-hydroxylase and {alpha}1-adrenoceptors demonstrates involvement of catecholamines in vascular remodeling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): H2106 - H2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Wall, J. E. Faber, X. Yang, M. Tsuzaki, and A. J. Banes Norepinephrine-induced calcium signaling and expression of adrenoceptors in avian tendon cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): C912 - C918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bleeke, H. Zhang, N. Madamanchi, C. Patterson, and J. E. Faber Catecholamine-Induced Vascular Wall Growth Is Dependent on Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species Circ. Res., January 9, 2004; 94(1): 37 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Teeters, C. Erami, H. Zhang, and J. E. Faber Systemic alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist inhibits neointimal growth after balloon injury of rat carotid artery Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): H385 - H392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Erami, H. Zhang, J. G. Ho, D. M. French, and J. E. Faber alpha 1-Adrenoceptor stimulation directly induces growth of vascular wall in vivo Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): H1577 - H1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||