|
|
||||||||
B
1 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Centre de Recherche du Pavillon l'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Québec G1R 2J6; and 2 Angiogene Incorporated, Montréal, Québec, Canada H2L 4M1
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kinin B1
receptor (B1R) expression and the importance of the
transcription factor nuclear factor (NF)-
B in this process were evaluated in models based on the rabbit aorta: freshly isolated tissue
(postisolation induction) and cultured smooth muscle cells (SMCs). A
3-h incubation of freshly isolated tissues determined a sharp
B1R mRNA increase (RT-PCR). Coincubation of tissues with a
stimulus (interleukin-1
, fetal bovine serum, epidermal growth factor, or cycloheximide) further increased mRNA levels. Cultured SMCs
possessed a basal population of surface B1Rs
([3H]Lys-des-Arg9-bradykinin binding) that
was upregulated by treatments with the same set of stimuli (binding,
mRNA, nuclear runon). Pharmacological inhibitors of NF-
B (MG-132,
BAY 11-7082, dexamethasone) or actinomycin D reduced the
postisolation induction of B1Rs in fresh aortic tissue
(contractility or mRNA) and the cytokine effect on cells (mRNA,
binding). NF-
B may be a common mediator of various stimuli that
increase B1R gene transcription in the rabbit aorta,
including tissue isolation, but cycloheximide also stabilizes
B1R mRNA. The SMC models faithfully mimic the in vivo
situation with regard to B1R regulation.
rabbit aortic smooth muscle cells; nuclear factor-
B; interleukin-1; epidermal growth factor
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE KININS [peptides related to bradykinin (BK)] are known to activate two types of G protein-coupled receptors, termed B1 receptors (B1R) and B2 receptors (B2R) (27). Lys-des-Arg9-BK (des-Arg10-kallidin) is the optimal agonist sequence of human and rabbit B1Rs, and des-Arg9-BK is also a selective agonist, but of lower affinity in these species. The initial pharmacological definition of the B1R was based on the analysis of the contractile effects of kinins on the isolated rabbit aorta (39). The B1R is now widely recognized as an inducible gene, as certain forms of tissue injury trigger its de novo synthesis in tissues. For instance, bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection in several animal species induces B1R expression at the vascular cell level (14, 27, 32). The analysis of isolated rabbit blood vessel contractility has provided early insight into the inducible behavior, as the preparations, initially insensitive to kinins, specifically developed increasing maximal response (Emax) in response to B1R agonists in a time-, temperature-, and metabolism-dependent manner (7, 40). This phenomenon, coined the postisolation induction paradigm (27), was prevented by treatment with inhibitors of RNA or protein synthesis and was potentiated by certain cytokines such as epidermal growth factor (EGF), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and oncostatin M, but only modestly by LPS applied in vitro. Glucocorticoids and some mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors could reduce specifically the spontaneous or cytokine-mediated upregulation of the contractile response to des-Arg9-kinins without acutely interfering with kinin-induced contraction (11-13, 20). Similar reasoning has been applied to the postisolation increase in responsiveness to a B1R agonist in the isolated human umbilical vein (42). These observations suggested a complex regulatory control of B1R expression, but the demonstration of receptor upregulation was limited to the description of specific alterations of the contractile response.
The molecular analysis of the expression of the B1R gene
has been mostly dependent on human or animal cultured cells capable of
expressing B1Rs, but these systems may not be satisfactory in all respects. For instance, cultured smooth muscle cells (SMCs) derived from the rabbit arteries express a population of
B1R that mediates such effects as increased inositol
phosphate turnover, intracellular calcium increase, prostacylin
secretion, and DNA synthesis; radioligand-binding techniques show that
there is a functional baseline receptor population that is variably
increased by cytokine treatment (16, 24-26, 30, 44).
Furthermore, studies of various human cell lines have shown that the
baseline B1R mRNA concentration is increased partly or
exclusively via mRNA stabilization after IL-1 or tumor necrosis-
treatment, not by an increased transcriptional rate (17,
51). Interestingly, independent laboratories have found that
protein synthesis inhibition is a powerful upregulator of
B1R mRNA in human cell lines (37, 51) via the
inhibition of mRNA degradation (51). These findings may be
related to the stimulation of the postisolation induction of
B1Rs by temporary inhibition of protein synthesis in the
rabbit aorta (13). The present experiments aimed at
comparing the regulation of B1R expression in rabbit
freshly isolated aortic tissue (postisolation induction) and primary
SMCs. Because nuclear factor (NF)-
B is a transcription factor
controlling the expression of numerous genes associated with immunity
and inflammation (3) and previous experimental results
support a role of NF-
B in B1R induction (8, 34,
43), its implication in the upregulation of the kinin
B1R was studied in the present systems.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drugs.
Des-Arg9-BK was purchased from Bachem Bioscience (King of
Prussia, PA). MG-132 (Cbz-Leu-Leu-leucinal) and BAY 11-7082 were purchased from BioMol Research Laboratories (Plymouth Meeting, PA).
Human recombinant EGF was from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA), IL-1
was
purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN), and actinomycin D
(dactinomycin) was obtained from Merck (West Point, PA). The other
drugs used were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Treatment of animals used as sources of tissues.
Groups of male New Zealand White, pathogen-free rabbits (Charles River
Canada) weighing 1.5-2.2 kg were used as a source of tissues for
all experiments. Most animals were not treated and directly euthanized
as outlined below to aseptically remove the thoracic aorta to study the
postisolation induction of the B1R (see below). Two
additional groups of four rabbits each were treated before
euthanization: the acute treatments consisted of the intravenous injection of LPS (50 µg/kg, extracted from Escherichia
coli serotype O111:B4, Difco; Detroit, MI) or its saline vehicle
(500 µl/kg). Five hours after the injection, all treated rabbits were
consecutively euthanized by CO2-O2
asphyxiation, and the thoracic aorta was quickly removed, frozen in
liquid N2, and kept at
80°C until RNA isolation
(methods described previously) (28).
Postisolation treatment of rabbit aorta segments. This series of experiments was designed to mimic the procedures applied in previous contractility studies based on the rabbit aorta but in a manner compatible with mRNA harvesting. Aseptically removed thoracic aortas were placed in serum-free medium 199 (Life Technologies), further cleaned, deendothelialized, and cut into five pieces. Some pieces were immediately frozen in liquid N2 (nonincubated controls). The other pieces were distributed in 12-well plates containing sterile medium 199 (2 ml) and, in some wells, a drug documented to influence the upregulation of B1R. After 3 h of incubation (37°C, 5% CO2), the tissue pieces were frozen and the RNA was later extracted as outlined above.
Contractility experiments.
The contractile effect of the B1R agonist
des-Arg9-BK and of the
-adrenoceptor agonist
phenylephrine (PE) were recorded precisely as described
(20) to test the effect of some treatments that inhibit
the function of NF-
B on the postisolation induction of B1R and the specificity of the effects, respectively.
Briefly, all tissues were submitted to the construction of five full
cumulative concentration-effect curves. The ones for the
B1R agonist des-Arg9-BK were conducted after 1, 3, and 6 h of incubation. The concentration-effect curves for PE
were established at 1.5 and 7.5 h as more stable contractile
responses. Tissues were amply washed with fresh Krebs solution between
stimulations. The selected inhibitory drugs, postulated to exert no
direct myotropic effect and no overt toxicity on the contractile
mechanisms, were introduced in the bathing fluid of some tissues
(continuous application) to analyze the mechanism of the postisolation
B1R induction. Contractions are expressed as the percentage
of the maximum PE-induced contraction recorded at a time of 1.5 h,
an internal standard for each tissue. Sigmoidal concentration-effect
curves are characterized by the half-maximal effective concentration
(EC50) and the maximum relative contraction maximum
(Emax; percentage of the internal standard).
B1R expression in cultured rabbit aortic SMCs.
Rabbit aortic SMCs, cultured and characterized as previously described
(24), were the alternate model to study B1Rs
regulation in vitro. Cells were used at passages 3-6,
at a stage where the B1R basal expression is relatively low
and its hormonal induction (EGF treatment) is high (44).
Separate protocols dealt with the effect of drugs or fetal bovine serum
(FBS) on B1R expression; both mRNA and radioligand were
assessed in these experiments, which were based on cells cultured in 6- or 12-well plates, respectively. To reduce the basal B1R
expression level, the FBS-containing medium was replaced by serum-free
medium 199 for 24 h; various stimulant or inhibitory drugs were
then added to the serum-free medium and the total RNA was extracted
after 3 h according to Chomczynski and Sacchi (10),
or the binding was determined as outlined above after 4 h of
incubation. When inhibitory drugs were tested against stimulatory
drugs, the first type of compounds was introduced 30 min before the
second (at a time of
4.5 h relative to the binding assay). The
binding assay was conducted as described (24) except for
the identity of the ligand, which was
[3H]Lys-des-Arg9-BK
([3H]des-Arg10-kallidin, NEN Biosciences, 64 Ci/mmol). Briefly, cells were seeded at a density of 1.5 × 105 cells/well in 12-well plates coated with gelatin. After
24 h, the wells were washed twice with the binding medium
[consisting of medium 199 supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum
albumin, 3 µM amastatin, 1 µM captopril, 1 µM phosphoramidon
(Sigma), and 0.02% (wt/vol) sodium azide] and filled with 1.0 ml of
prewarmed (37°C) binding medium. The B1R ligand
(0.125-8 nM) and cold competing peptides (1 µM Lys-
des-Arg9-BK for the determination of nonspecific binding)
were added to the wells. After 60 min of incubation at 37°C, each
well was washed three times with 2 ml ice-cold PBS (pH 7.4). One
milliliter of 0.1 N NaOH was finally added to dissolve the cells.
Radioactivity in the resulting suspension was determined by
scintillation counting (5-10 min/vial).
Semiquantitative duplex RT-PCR. The RT-PCR experiments were applied to RNA extracted from fresh or incubated aortic tissue or from cultured aotic SMCs and were conducted using Ready-To-Go RT-PCR Beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as indicated by the manufacturer. The general conditions (primers used, PCR conditions, and Southern blot analysis of the RT-PCR) were as previously reported (28). Briefly, 2 µg of total RNA sample, 250 ng of the sense and antisense primers for a specific fragment of the rabbit B1R, 25 ng of the sense and antisense primers for a specific fragment of rabbit glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 250 ng of an oligo (dT)15, and water to a final volume of 50 µl were added to each tube of Ready-To-Go RT-PCR Beads. The tubes were incubated for 30 min at 42°C for the RT reaction. The samples were then submitted to a PCR followed by a Southern blot analysis as described previously (28).
Nuclear runon. This protocol was modified from Chacko et al. (9). Three days before the experiment, 30 75-cm2 flasks were plated with 106 rabbit aortic SMCs each and grown up to confluence in medium 199 containing 10% serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were serum starved 24 h before the experimentation. Cell flasks were treated with saline, IL-1 (5 ng/ml), EGF (100 ng/ml), cycloheximide (CHX; 71 µM), or FBS (10%) 2 h before SMCs were collected in their serum-free medium. The lysates were spun for 5 min at 2,500 g at 4°C. The pellets were washed in cold PBS and centrifuged once more. The pellets were resuspended in 2.5 ml lysis buffer (10 mM Tris · HCl, 10 mM NaCl, and 3 mM MgCl2). While vortexing continued, 2.5 ml lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40 was added to each tube. The resulting solution was cooled on ice for 5 min and centrifuged at 700 g for 5 min. The nuclear pellets were washed, centrifuged, resuspended in freezing buffer (50 mM Tris · HCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 40% glycerol), and frozen in liquid N2.
Nuclear aliquots (107 nuclei) were thawed on ice and spun for 5 min at 300 g. The pellets were resuspended in 50 µl transcription buffer 1× [25 mM Tris · HCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 3 mM spermidine, 2.5 mM MgCl2, and 500 mM NaCl containing 5 µl ATP, 3 mM GTP and CTP, and 10 µl [
-32P]UTP (100 µCi)] and incubated 30 min at
37°C. The mixes were digested with DNAse I (Amersham Pharmacia, 100 U/ml, 37°C, 30 min) and then digested with proteinase K (USB, 200 µg/ml, 37°C, 1 h). RNA was then obtained with two successive
phenol-chloroform-isoamylic alcohol extractions, precipitated with
ethanol, and resuspended in 50 µl of 10 mM Tris · HCl (pH
8)-1 mM EDTA. To perform the dot blots, a nylon membrane
layered on a 3 M Whatman filter, both prewet in 1.4 M
NH4OAc, was inserted in the dot blot apparatus. Ten
micograms of plasmidic DNA (rabbit wild-type B1R coding
sequence in pcDNA3) (21) were denatured, fragmented by a
15-min boiling treatment in 0.3 M NaOH, and neutralized with
NH4OAc to a 1.4 M final concentration before being loaded
in a slot of the dot blot apparatus. The slot was then washed with 1.4 M NH4OAc, and the nylon membrane was rinsed, dried, and
exposed to ultraviolet light for 5 min. Each slot was cut, inserted in
separate tubes, and prehybridized [50% formamide, 50 mM phosphate
buffer, 5× saline-sodium citrate (SSC), 1% SDS, 5× Denhardt, and 100 µg/ml ssDNA] for 3 h at 42°C. Prehybridation buffer was then
replaced by 0.5 ml hybridation buffer (50% formamide, 50 mM phosphate
buffer, 5× SSC, 1% SDS, 1× Denhardt, 100 µg/ml ssDNA, and 50 µl
radiolabeled RNA). Membranes were incubated 72 h at 42°C before
being washed three times for 30 min in SSPE-SDS solutions. Membranes
were exposed for 24 h, and the results were analyzed
(Phosphorimager) and quantified (Imagequant software).
Drug effect on the translocation of NF-
B p65 from the cytosol
to the nucleus.
The effect of stimulants and inhibitors of B1R expression
was tested in an immunofluorescence assay of subcellular localization of the NF-
B subunit p65, as this protein is translocated from the
cytosol to the nucleus upon activation of NF-
B (3).
Subconfluent rabbit aortic SMCs were transferred in a serum-free medium
for 24 h and then treated with a drug for 3 h or with a drug
combination for 3.5 h (a drug tested for inhibition was applied
first, and then IL-1
was applied 30 min later). After incubation at
37°C, the cells were fixed (1% paraformaldehyde), permeabilized
(0.5% Triton X-100), and stained with monoclonal antibodies to p65
(Transduction Laboratories, 1:100 dilution) or to
-actin (a smooth
muscle marker, Sigma, dilution 1:200). The monoclonal antibody staining
was revealed using Alexa fluor 594-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Molecular
Probes; Eugene, OR).
Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney test using the InStat 2.0 computer program (GraphPad Software; San Diego, CA). The parameters of Scatchard plots (binding data treatment) were obtained using a computer program (45).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Multiplex RT-PCR analysis of kinin B1R mRNA in fresh
aortic tissue.
Deendothelialized aortic tissue freshly isolated from healthy rabbits
and frozen as quickly as possible contains a low measurable concentration of B1R mRNA according to the RT-PCR
techniques applied (Fig. 1,
nonincubated). A 3-h incubation at 37°C was associated with a nearly
fourfold stronger signal (Fig. 1, incubated control). This experimental
situation mimics the postisolation induction of B1R in the
contractility assays based on the rabbit aorta. The latter system is
known to be influenced by several drugs introduced in the tissue
bathing fluid, and some of these treatments were assessed for an effect
on tissue mRNA (Fig. 1, postisolation induction). Incubation of aortic
tissue with IL-1
or FBS (10%) significantly increased the
B1R mRNA concentration above the level of incubated tissues, whereas the effects of EGF or CHX coincubation did not reach
statistical significance. Actinomycin D or dexamethasone treatments
significantly reduced the B1R mRNA concentration, but the
DMSO vehicle of the latter drug had no significant effect.
|
Effect of treatments intended to inhibit NF-
B function on fresh
rabbit aortas.
Control aortic rings isolated from normal rabbits exhibited the
well-characterized transition from a null response to a time-dependent increase in the maximal response to the B1R agonist
des-Arg9-BK (Fig. 2, control
curves). In this graphic representation, Fig. 2, C and
D, represents the responses recorded after 3 or 6 h of
incubation, respectively. The maximal level of response to the kinin
recorded at 1 h was always close to zero (0.4 ± 0.1% of the
maximal PE-induced contraction recorded at 1.5 h in the control
group, not significantly influenced by drugs). BAY 11-7082 (used here
at 5 µM) is an inhibitor of inhibitory (I)
B phosphorylation indirectly inhibiting NF-
B function (38). Proteasome
inhibitors also indirectly inhibit NF-
B by stabilizing ubiquitinated
I
B in the cytosol (47); we used MG-132 (1 µM) as a
representative proteasome inhibitor (22). The two drugs
were remarkably effective to prevent the time-related increase of
responsiveness to the B1R agonist (Fig. 2; both drugs
significantly reduce 6-h Emax and BAY 11-7082 reduces the 3-h Emax, Mann-Whitney test).
However, the two drugs also significantly depressed the late response
to the
-adrenoceptor agonist PE, an outcome that was never observed with treatments based on the other drugs shown in Fig. 1 or additional ones (21).
|
Multiplex RT-PCR analysis of kinin B1R mRNA in cultured
aortic SMCs.
The control B1R mRNA concentration in rabbit aortic SMCs
was measured in confluent cells starved of FBS for 24 h (Fig.
3). The set of drug treatments applied to
fresh tissues incubated ex vivo was applied to cultured cells (Fig.
3A). IL-1
, CHX, EGF, or FBS treatment (that is, restoring
the FBS concentration to 10% after serum starving) were statistically
significant stimulants, whereas actinomycin D reduced the
B1R-to-GAPDH mRNA concentration ratio. Dexamethasone or the
NF-
B inhibitors MG-132 or BAY 11-7082 or their DMSO vehicle exerted
no significant effect (Fig. 3A) as well as diclofenac sodium
(500 nM). The latter drug, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor that prevents the
synthesis of prostaglandins, was tested because it prevented
interference from autocrine prostaglandins in an assay based on these
cells (B1R-mediated DNA synthesis) (26).
|
or FBS (Fig. 3B). The alternate NF-
B inhibitor BAY 11-7082 (5 µM)
prevented the effect of EGF and FBS on B1R mRNA
concentration. Other inhibitory interactions did not reached
statistical significance (Fig. 3B).
The multiplex RT-PCR assay for B1R mRNA was applied to
cells stimulated for short periods with IL-1
, EGF, FBS, or CHX (2 h
except for CHX, which was 30 min) and then treated with actinomycin D
for up to 4 h to inhibit transcription (Fig.
4A). Both the basal and the
cytokine- or FBS-stimulated mRNA concentrations decreased in cells over
the 4-h period; more precisely, the B1R mRNA decreased faster than that coding for GAPDH during transcription inhibition by
actinomycin, producing the negative slopes shown in Fig. 4A. The effect of CHX was opposite: the positive slope indicates that GAPDH
mRNA decreased faster than that coding for B1R, evidencing a major effect of CHX on B1R mRNA stability.
|
Nuclear runon.
The nuclear runon experiments support that IL-1
, EGF, FBS, and CHX
are all transcriptional activators of the B1R gene (Fig. 4B). The effect of CHX was particularly strong.
Effect of treatments on the subcellular localization of NF-
B
p65.
The marker
-actin was expressed as stress fibers in aortic SMCs,
whereas p65 was distributed mainly as a smooth labeling of the cytosol
in FBS-starved cells (Fig. 5,
top microphotographs and control-saline frame). The nuclear
staining was markedly reinforced in cells treated with IL-1
, EGF,
FBS, or CHX, but weak in cells treated with dexamethasone, MG-132, BAY
11-7082, or their DMSO vehicle (continuous 3-h application; Fig. 5).
The inhibitory drugs or their DMSO vehicle were combined with two of
the strong stimulants of nuclear translocation, IL-1
or FBS.
Dexamethasone, MG-132, or BAY 11-7082 reduced p65 translocation to the
cell nucleus induced by these stimuli; dexamethasone being relatively
less effective.
|
Effect of treatments on the binding of
[3H]Lys-des-Arg9-BK to cultured SMCs.
In initial studies, the specific binding of
[3H]Lys-des-Arg9-BK to FBS-starved SMCs was
found to be saturable (Fig. 6, Scatchard regression at bottom). The calculated regression parameters
were a dissociation constant (Kd) of 0.13 nM and
a maximal receptor binding (Bmax) of 1.39 ± 0.14 fmol/well for this particular cell line. Treating the cells
continuously with the protein synthesis inhibitor CHX (71 µM) for
4 h before the binding assay slightly reduced the Bmax
(0.88 ± 0.10 fmol/well). However, a pulsed application of the
drug (a period of 3.5-4 h before the binding assay, followed by
rinsing with the serum-free cultured medium prewarmed at 37°C) variably upregulated B1R in these cells (Fig. 6;
Bmax of 1.86 ± 0.29 fmol/well;
Kd of 0.18 nM in this example), as reported for
IMR-90 cells (48). This system is reminiscent of the
contractility assay in the fresh aorta for which either inhibition or
stimulation of Emax was observed depending
whether CHX was applied continuously or temporarily (13).
A sharp stimulatory effect of FBS restoration was also observed
(Bmax increased to 5.09 ± 0.23 fmol/well;
Kd constant at 0.14 nM; Fig. 6).
|
, EGF, or FBS only, not the basal
value or the one increased by pulsed CHX treatment (Fig.
7A). Dexamethasone did not modify basal binding but
prevented a variable fraction of the stimulatory effect of IL-1
,
EGF, FBS, or pulsed CHX (Fig. 7B). Similarly, cotreatment
with dexamethasone partially inhibited the stimulation of
B1R-mediated contractility in rabbit aortas treated with
EGF, IL-1, or pulsed CHX (11, 12). The drugs inhibiting
the function of NF-
B, MG-132 and BAY 11-7082, prevented the
stimulatory effect of IL-1
, EGF, or FBS but were not effective against pulsed CHX on binding (Fig. 7, C and D).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several in vivo systems have evidenced the induction of B1Rs from a null level by inflammatory stimuli (27, 32); in a fraction of them, Northern blot or RT-PCR techniques have supported the functional data by showing that B1R mRNA, expressed at very low levels in normal tisssues, is sharply upregulated. These systems include LPS injection in the rabbit (28, 29, 41) and the rat (32), ischemia and reperfusion in the rabbit heart (31), and inflammatory models, systemic heat shock, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-induced angiogenesis in the rat (5, 6, 15, 19, 46).
In previous studies of postisolation induction of the B1R,
the maximal contractile effect mediated by agonists of this receptor was evaluated after 6 h of incubation in organ baths containing Krebs medium. Most of the drugs shown in Fig. 1 were used at the same
concentration as in the present RT-PCR experiments and exerted a
statistically significant effect on the in vitro development of this
contractile effect without affecting the effect of an
-adrenoceptor
agonist (see original publications for statistical analysis).
Inhibitory drugs were actinomycin D (unpublished data) and
dexamethasone (11). The stimulant treatments were human recombinant IL-1
(13, 20), recombinant human EGF
(20), and FBS (5%, D. deBlois, PhD Thesis, 1992). DMSO
(0.1% vol/vol) has a slightly stimulatory effect. CHX can be either
inhibitory if applied continuously to aortic tissue (2, 7,
12) or stimulatory if applied during the first hour of in vitro
incubation and then washed out (13). Nonincubated aortic
tissue or tissue derived from saline-treated animals essentially do not
functionally respond to B1R agonists in the first hour of
ex vivo incubation (7, 41). In contrast, tissue derived
from LPS-treated rabbits exhibits an immediate and strong response to a
B1R agonist when tested during the first hour after
isolation (41). The effect of stimuli of various nature
(long in vitro incubation, cytokines, FBS, pulsed CHX, LPS given before
animal death) and of some inhibitors (actinomycin, dexamethasone) on
B1R mRNA concentration in the fresh rabbit aorta is well
correlated to the contractile response to a B1R agonist,
thus validating older functional work on B1R regulation
based on contractility (see Introduction).
The same sets of stimulants (cytokines, FBS, pulsed CHX) and inhibitors
(actinomycin D, dexamethasone) generally retain their effect on
B1R expression (mRNA, binding site abundance) in SMC derived from the rabbit aorta (Figs. 3 and 6). Thus the cultured cell
model is relevant to the tissue reactions and allows a fuller mechanistic investigation of the induction mechanism. Inhibition of
NF-
B with the drugs MG-132 or BAY 11-7082 reduced the stimulatory effect of isolation in the fresh aorta (Fig. 2) and of at least IL-1,
EGF, and FBS in the cultured cells (mRNA, Fig. 3B; binding sites, Fig. 7). The inhibitory drug effect may be better appreciated in
the binding assays (Fig. 7) than in the RT-PCR (Fig. 3B), as the receptor protein population perhaps integrates the effect of the
cytokines and the drugs over a longer time period and represents a less
fragmented temporal image. However, some drug effects seem of
questionable selectivity (nonspecific depression of contractility in
the fresh aorta, Fig. 2; a certain stimulatory effect of MG-132 that
seemed to counteract the expected inhibitions of cytokine-induced increase of B1R mRNA, Fig. 3B; the theoretical
accumulation of p53 when proteasome is blocked, a situation that may be
significant as p53 inhibits B1R gene promoter activity,
Ref. 49). NF-
B is antiapoptotic in many
experimental system (3) and its functional inhibition may
result in accelerated cell death in isolated tissues, thus explaining
the nonspecific depression of contractility. Although BAY 11-7082 and
MG-132 did not produce apoptosis at the concentrations employed
in the present experiments in rabbit aortic SMCs, the alternate
proteasome inhibitor TPCK produced apoptosis in 6 h at 50 µM (DNA Ladder Isolation kit, Oncogene; Boston, MA; data not shown),
supporting that cell survival may be affected by such drugs. However,
the p65 nuclear translocation assay supports that MG-132, BAY 11-7082, and dexamethasone are capable of reducing the activation of NF-
B by
IL-1
or FBS (Fig. 5), which was the primary effect desired.
Dexamethasone inhibition of postisolation induction of B1R
in fresh aortic tissue (mRNA, function, Fig. 1) and of the upregulation of B1Rs in cultured cells by all tested stimuli (Fig. 7) is
consistent with an effect of NF-
B. Glucocorticoids may inhibit this
transcription factor by inducing the synthesis of I
B
, by direct
protein-protein interaction between the activated glucocorticoid
receptor and the p65 subunit of NF-
B, and by competition for
coactivators common to the glucocorticoid receptor and NF-
B
(47). Because dexamethasone inhibits at least a part of
p65 translocation to the cell nucleus (Fig. 5), induction of I
B is a
likely mode of action in the present SMC model. However,
glucocorticoids also affect other systems of transcription factors and
their action may exceed that of more selective NF-
B inhibitors, as
suggested by the partial inhibition of CHX-induced increased
radioligand Bmax by dexamethasone not seen with more
selective inhibitors (Fig. 7B).
As reported in other systems, CHX is a powerful agent to upregulate
B1R mRNA and, if applied as a pulse to allow translation, the receptor protein itself in rabbit aortic SMCs (Figs. 3, 6, and 7).
The drug may stimulate NF-
B activation in a powerful manner, as
other cytokine regulators of B1R expression (Fig. 5), and
indeed the nuclear runon experiments support that CHX is a transcriptional activator of the B1R gene (Fig.
4B). NF-
B activation by CHX has been previously observed
and analyzed in other systems (33). However, experiments
involving the measurement of the B1R mRNA-to-GAPDH mRNA
ratio in the presence of actinomycin D suggest that CHX treatment
increases the half-life of B1R mRNA over that of GAPDH
(itself greater or equal to 24 h) (18, 23), a finding
not observed with the other stimuli (Fig. 4A). It is striking that actinomycin D did not decrease the stimulatory effect of
pulsed CHX on the production of new B1R proteins (Fig.
7A), as though the high mRNA stability achieved in the
absence of transcription was sufficient for efficient translation.
Actinomycin D decreased the basal B1R mRNA concentration in
cells as well as those increased by cytokines or FBS (Figs.
3A and 4A), implying that transcription stimulation is probably a major effect of cytokines and FBS. Another important difference between CHX and the other stimuli was the sensitivity to treatments that inhibit NF-
B: MG 132 or BAY 11-7082 failed to reduce the stimulatory effect of CHX on binding (Fig. 7) and
the drugs did not exert a consistent effect on the corresponding mRNA
(Fig. 3B). Thus a model of B1R expression in
cultured aortic SMCs could include a transcriptional effect of
cytokines (including those present in FBS) or CHX mediated by NF-
B,
a basal expression not clearly dependent on NF-
B activity in
serum-starved cells and a profound stabilization of B1R
mRNA after CHX treatment, suggesting that a labile factor regulates
B1R mRNA stability, as previously discussed
(48).
The site of interaction of activated NF-
B within the B1R
gene is presently rather controversial. Fragments of the human
B1R gene promoter supported reporter gene expression in
several cell lines, but cytokine-regulated behavior only in one (rat
SMCs; attributed to a NF-
B-binding sequence proximal to the
transcription initiation site) (34). Other investigators
(1, 49) have characterized upstream elements in the core
promoter of the gene, such as a possible activator
protein-1-binding site, but those did not confer significant
responsiveness to LPS, tumor necrosis factor-
, or phorbol ester.
Perhaps in line with these negative findings, extensive protein-DNA
interaction was observed at the core promoter region of the
B1R gene but was not influenced by LPS or IL-1 treatments
in three types of cultured human cells, including SMCs derived
from the human umbilical artery (footprinting established in living
cells using ligation-mediated PCR) (1). Recent evidence
based on a reporter gene coupled to large parts of the B1R
gene, including introns and exons 1 and 2, suggests that the
inducibility resides in motifs exclusive of the core promoter and
stress the importance of c-Jun (50). The present data
support that NF-
B is obligatory for B1R gene expression induced by cytokines but also reveal a B1R gene basal
transcription rate independent of NF-
B in cultured SMCs. We have
also isolated a important NF-
B mediated effect of serum on
B1R expression in the cellular model (FBS is one of the
most potent stimulus in the sampled cell lines shown in Figs. 6 and 7),
a factor not systematically accounted for in previous studies. The
precise factor(s) responsible for FBS activity remain to be identified.
Human embryonic lung fibroblasts (IMR-90, WI-38, and HEL 299 lines)
have assumed a particular importance in the study of the regulation of
B1Rs, perhaps because they are so permissive in this
respect (17, 35-37, 51). At least in the IMR 90 cells, there is autocrine secretion of IL-1
which indirectly makes
the B1R regulation reactive to a wide range of stimuli,
including the stimulation of some G protein-coupled receptors
(B1R, B2R, and IL-8 receptor) (4, 35, 36,
43). However, recent investigations based on the rabbit (in vivo
kallikrein-kinin system activation or in vitro treatment of aortic SMCs
with B1R or B2R stimulants) suggest that the
stimulation of kinin receptors is not generally followed by
B1R expression in several tissues (41).
Specifically, rabbit vascular SMCs appear to be a less permissive
system for the study of B1R regulation, relative to IMR 90 cells, as kinin receptor stimulation in these cells does not upregulate
B1R expression (mRNA, binding) (41).
In summary, the B1R mRNA concentration in the fresh rabbit
aorta is highly correlated to pharmacological response in the fresh rabbit aorta; cultured SMCs derived from this tissue respond to the
same set of stimulants as the fresh tissue by an increased expression
of B1Rs. In this case, the cytokine-related stimulations are dependent on NF-
B, but the action of CHX is more complex.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant MOP 14077. T. Sabourin is the recipient of a studentship from Fonds de recherche en Santé du Québec/Fonds pour la formation de chercheurs et l'aide à la recherche, Québec, Canada.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F. Marceau, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Centre de Recherche, Pavillon l'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, 11 Côte-du-Palais, Québec, Québec, Canada G1R 2J6 (E-mail: francois.marceau{at}crhdq.ulaval.ca).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published March 28, 2002;10.1152/ajpheart.00978.2001
Received 8 November 2001; accepted in final form 21 March 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Angers, M,
Drouin R,
Bachvarova M,
Paradis I,
Marceau F,
and
Bachvarov DR.
In vivo protein-DNA interactions at the kinin B1 receptor promoter: no modification upon interleukin-1
or lipopolysaccharide induction.
J Cell Biochem
78:
278-296,
2000[ISI][Medline].
2.
Audet, R,
Petitclerc E,
Drapeau G,
Rioux F,
and
Marceau F.
Further analysis of the upregulation of bradykinin B1 receptors in isolated rabbit aorta by using metabolic inhibitors.
Eur J Pharmacol
271:
551-555,
1994[ISI][Medline].
3.
Baldwin, AS.
The transcription factor NF-
B and human disease.
J Clin Invest
107:
3-6,
2001[ISI][Medline].
4.
Bastian, S,
Paquet JL,
Robert C,
Cremers B,
Loillier B,
Larrivée JF,
Bachvarov DR,
Marceau F,
and
Pruneau D.
Interleukin 8 (IL-8) induces the expression of kinin B1 receptor in human lung fibroblasts.
Biochim Biophys Res Commun
253:
750-755,
1998[ISI][Medline].
5.
Bélichard, P,
Landry M,
Faye P,
Bachvarov DR,
Bouthillier J,
Pruneau D,
and
Marceau F.
Inflammatory hyperalgesia induced by zymosan in the plantar tissue of the rat: effect of kinin receptor antagonists.
Immunopharmacology
46:
139-147,
2000[ISI][Medline].
6.
Bélichard, P,
Luccarini JM,
Defrêne E,
Faye P,
Franck RM,
Duclos H,
Paquet JL,
and
Pruneau D.
Pharmacological and molecular evidence for kinin B1 receptor expression in urinary bladder of cyclophosphamide-treated rats.
Br J Pharmacol
128:
213-219,
1999[ISI][Medline].
7.
Bouthillier, J,
deBlois D,
and
Marceau F.
Studies on the induction of pharmacological responses to des-Arg9-bradykinin in vitro and in vivo.
Br J Pharmacol
92:
257-264,
1987[ISI][Medline].
8.
Cabrini, DA,
Campos MM,
Tratsk KS,
Merino VF,
Silva JA, Jr,
Souza GE,
Avellar MC,
Pesquero JB,
and
Calixto JB.
Molecular and pharmacological evidence for modulation of kinin B1 receptor expression by endogenous glucocorticoids hormones in rats.
Br J Pharmacol
132:
567-577,
2001[ISI][Medline].
9.
Chacko, G,
Ling Q,
and
Hajjar KA.
Induction of acute translational response genes by homocysteine: elongation factors-1
, -
and -
.
J Biol Chem
273:
19840-19846,
1998
10.
Chomczynski, P,
and
Sacchi N.
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem
162:
156-159,
1987[ISI][Medline].
11.
DeBlois, D,
Bouthillier J,
and
Marceau F.
Effect of glucocorticoids, monikines and growth factors on the spontaneously developing responses of the rabbit isolated aorta to des-Arg9-bradykinin.
Br J Pharmacol
93:
969-977,
1988[ISI][Medline].
12.
DeBlois, D,
Bouthillier J,
and
Marceau F.
Pharmacological modulation of the up-regulated responses to des-Arg9-bradykinin in vivo and in vitro.
Immunopharmacology
17:
187-198,
1989[ISI][Medline].
13.
DeBlois, D,
Bouthillier J,
and
Marceau F.
Pulse exposure to protein synthesis inhibitors enhances tissue response to des-Arg9-bradykinin: possible role of interleukin-1.
Br J Pharmacol
103:
1057-1066,
1991[ISI][Medline].
14.
DeBlois, D,
and
Horlick RA.
Endotoxin sensitization to kinin B1 receptor agonist in a non-human primate model: haemodynamic and pro-inflammatory effects.
Br J Pharmacol
132:
327-335,
2001[ISI][Medline].
15.
Emanueli, C,
Minasi A,
Zacheo A,
Chao J,
Chao L,
Salis MB,
Straino S,
Tozzi MG,
Smith R,
Gaspa L,
Bianchini G,
Stillo F,
Capogrossi MC,
and
Madeddu P.
Local delivery of human tissue kallikrein gene accelerates spontaneous angiogenesis in mouse model of hindlimb ischemia.
Circulation
103:
125-132,
2001
16.
Galizzi, JP,
Bodinier MC,
Chapelain B,
Ly SM,
Coussy L,
Giraud S,
Neliat G,
and
Jean T.
Up-regulation of [3H]-des-Arg10-kallidin binding to the bradykinin B1 receptor by interleukin-1
in isolated smooth muscle cells: correlation with B1 agonist-induced PGI2 production.
Br J Pharmacol
113:
389-394,
1994[ISI][Medline].
17.
Haddad, EB,
Fox AJ,
Roussell J,
Burgess G,
McIntyre P,
Barnes PJ,
and
Chung KF.
Post-transcriptional regulation of bradykinin B1 and B2 receptor gene expression in human lung fibroblasts by tumor necrosis factor-
: modulation by dexamethasone.
Mol Pharmacol
57:
1123-1131,
2000
18.
Ing, NH,
and
Ott TL.
Estradiol up-regulates estrogen receptor-
messenger ribonucleic acid in sheep endometrium by increasing its stability.
Biol Reprod
60:
134-139,
1999
19.
Lagneux, C,
Innocenti-Francillard P,
Godin-Ribuot D,
Bader M,
and
Ribuot C.
Heat stress-induced B1 receptors in the rat: an ex vivo study.
Br J Pharmacol
125:
812-816,
1998[ISI][Medline].
20.
Larrivée, JF,
Bachvarov DR,
Houle F,
Landry J,
Huot J,
and
Marceau F.
Role of the mitogen-activated protein kinases in the expression of the kinin B1 receptors induced by tissue injury.
J Immunol
160:
1419-1426,
1998
21.
Larrivée, JF,
Gera L,
Houle S,
Bouthillier J,
Bachvarov DR,
Stewart J,
and
Marceau F.
Non-competitive pharmacological antagonism at the rabbit B1 receptor.
Br J Pharmacol
131:
885-892,
2000[ISI][Medline].
22.
Lee, DH,
and
Goldberg AL.
Proteasome inhibitors: valuable new tools for cell biologists.
Trends Cell Biol
8:
397-403,
1998[ISI][Medline].
23.
Lekas, P,
Tin KL,
Lee C,
and
Prokipcak RD.
The human cytochrome P450 1A1 mRNA is rapidly degraded in HepG2 cells.
Arch Biochem Biophys
384:
311-318,
2000[ISI][Medline].
24.
Levesque, L,
Drapeau G,
Grose JH,
Rioux F,
and
Marceau F.
Vascular mode of action of kinin B1 receptors and development of a cellular model for the investigation of these receptors.
Br J Pharmacol
109:
1254-1262,
1993[ISI][Medline].
25.
Levesque, L,
Harvey N,
Rioux F,
Drapeau G,
and
Marceau F.
Development of a binding assay for the B1 receptors for kinins.
Immunopharmacology
29:
141-147,
1995[ISI][Medline].
26.
Levesque, L,
Larrivée JF,
Bachvarov DR,
Rioux F,
Drapeau G,
and
Marceau F.
Regulation of kinin-induced contraction and DNA synthesis by inflammatory cytokines in the smooth muscle of the rabbit aorta.
Br J Pharmacol
116:
1673-1679,
1995[ISI][Medline].
27.
Marceau, F,
Hess JF,
and
Bachvarov DR.
The B1 receptors for kinins.
Pharmacol Rev
50:
357-386,
1998
28.
Marceau, F,
Larrivée JF,
Bouthillier J,
Bachvarova M,
Houle S,
and
Bachvarov DR.
Effect of endogenous kinins, prostanoids, and NO on kinin B1 and B2 receptor expression in the rabbit.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
277:
R1568-R1578,
1999
29.
Marceau, F,
Larrivée JF,
Saint-Jacques E,
and
Bachvarov DR.
The kinin B1 receptor: an inducible G protein-coupled receptor.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
75:
725-730,
1997[ISI][Medline].
30.
Mathis, SA,
Criscimagna NL,
and
Leeb-Lundberg LMF
B1 and B2 kinin receptors mediate distinct patterns of intracellular Ca2+ signaling in single vascular smooth muscle cells.
Mol Pharmacol
50:
128-139,
1996[Abstract].
31.
Mazenot, C,
Loufrani L,
Henrion D,
Ribuot C,
Müller-Esterl W,
and
Godin-Ribuot D.
Endothelial kinin B1-receptors are induced by myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion in the rabbit.
J Physiol (Lond)
530:
69-78,
2001
32.
McLean, PG,
Perretti M,
and
Ahluwalia A.
Kinin B1 receptors and the cardiovascular system: regulation of expression and function.
Cardiovasc Res
48:
194-210,
2000
33.
Newton, R,
Stevens DA,
Hart LA,
Lindsay M,
Adcock IM,
and
Barnes PJ.
Superinduction of COX-2 mRNA by cycloheximide and interleukin-1
involves increased transcription and correlates with increased NF-
B and JNK activation.
FEBS Lett
418:
135-138,
1997[ISI][Medline].
34.
Ni, A,
Chao L,
and
Chao J.
Transcription factor nuclear factor
B regulates the inducible expression of the human B1 receptor gene in inflammation.
J Biol Chem
273:
2784-2791,
1998
35.
Phagoo, SB,
Poole S,
and
Leeb-Lundberg LMF
Autoregulation of bradykinin receptors: agonists in the presence of interleukin-1
shift the repertoire of receptor subtypes from B2 to B1 in human lung fibroblasts.
Mol Pharmacol
56:
325-333,
1999
36.
Phagoo, SB,
Reddi K,
Anderson KD,
Leeb-Lundberg LM,
and
Warburton D.
Bradykinin B1 receptor up-regulation by interleukin-1
and B1 agonist occurs through independent and synergistic intracellular signaling mechanisms in human lung fibroblasts.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
298:
77-85,
2001
37.
Phagoo, SB,
Yaqoob M,
Herrera-Martinez E,
McIntyre P,
Jones C,
and
Burgess GM.
Regulation of bradykinin receptor gene expression in human lung fibroblasts.
Eur J Pharmacol
397:
237-246,
2000[ISI][Medline].
38.
Pierce, JW,
Schoenleber R,
Jesmok G,
Best J,
Moore SA,
Collins T,
and
Gerritsen ME.
Novel inhibitors of cytokine-induced I
B
phosphorylation and endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression show anti-inflammatory effects in vivo.
J Biol Chem
272:
21096-21103,
1997
39.
Regoli, D,
and
Barabé J.
Pharmacology of bradykinin and related kinins.
Pharmacol Rev
32:
1-46,
1980[ISI][Medline].
40.
Regoli, D,
Marceau F,
and
Barabé J.
De novo formation of vascular receptors for kinins.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
56:
674-677,
1978[ISI][Medline].
41.
Sabourin, T,
Guay K,
Houle S,
Bouthillier J,
Bachvarov DR,
Adam A,
and
Marceau F.
Absence of ligand-induced regulation of kinin receptor expression in the rabbit.
Br J Pharmacol
133:
1154-1162,
2001[ISI][Medline].
42.
Sardi, SP,
Daray FM,
Errasti AE,
Pelorosso FG,
Pujol-Lereis VA,
Rey-Ares V,
Rogines-Velo MP,
and
Rothlin RP.
Further pharmacological characterization of bradykinin B1 receptor up-regulation in human umbilical vein.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
290:
1019-1025,
2001.
43.
Schanstra, JP,
Bataille E,
Marin Castano ME,
Barascud Y,
Hirtz C,
Pesquero JB,
Pecher C,
Gauthier F,
Girolami JP,
and
Bascands JL.
The B1-agonist [des-Arg10]-kallidin activates transcription factor NF-
B and induces homologous upregulation of the bradykinin B1-receptor in cultured human lung fibroblasts.
J Clin Invest
101:
2080-2091,
1998[ISI][Medline].
44.
Schneck, KA,
Hess JF,
Stonesifer GY,
and
Ransom RW.
Bradykinin B1 receptors in rabbit aorta smooth muscle cells in culture.
Eur J Pharmacol
266:
277-282,
1994[ISI][Medline].
45.
Tallarida, RJ,
and
Murray RB.
Manual of Pharmacologic Calculations with Computer Programs. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.
46.
Tschöpe, C,
Heringer-Walther S,
and
Walther T.
Regulation of the kinin receptors after induction of myocardial infarction: a mini-review.
Braz J Med Biol Res
33:
701-708,
2000[ISI][Medline].
47.
Yamamoto, Y,
and
Gaynor RB.
Therapeutic potential of inhibition of the NF-
B pathway in the treatment of inflammation and cancer.
J Clin Invest
107:
135-142,
2001[ISI][Medline].
48.
Yang, X,
Taylor L,
and
Polgar P.
Mechanisms in the transcriptional regulation of bradykinin B1 receptor gene expression.
J Biol Chem
273:
10763-10770,
1998
49.
Yang, X,
Taylor L,
and
Polgar P.
p53 down-regulates human bradykinin B1 receptor gene expression.
J Cell Biochem
82:
38-45,
2001[ISI][Medline].
50.
Yang, X,
Taylor L,
Yu J,
Fenton MJ,
and
Polgar P.
Mediator caused induction of a human bradykinin B1 receptor minigene: participation of c-Jun in the process.
J Cell Biochem
82:
163-170,
2001[ISI][Medline].
51.
Zhou, X,
Prado G,
Chai M,
Yang X,
Taylor L,
and
Polgar P.
Posttranscriptional destabilization of the bradykinin B1 receptor messenger RNA : cloning and functional characterization of the 3'-untranslated region.
Mol Cell Biol Res Comm
1:
29-35,
1999[Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-P. Fortin, L. Gera, J. Bouthillier, J. M. Stewart, A. Adam, and F. Marceau Endogenous Aminopeptidase N Decreases the Potency of Peptide Agonists and Antagonists of the Kinin B1 Receptors in the Rabbit Aorta J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2005; 314(3): 1169 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Fortin, G. E. Rivard, A. Adam, and F. Marceau Studies on rabbit natural and recombinant tissue factors: intracellular retention and regulation of surface expression in cultured cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): H2192 - H2202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Medeiros, D. A. Cabrini, J. Ferreira, E. S. Fernandes, M. A.S. Mori, J. B. Pesquero, M. Bader, M. C.W. Avellar, M. M. Campos, and J. B. Calixto Bradykinin B1 Receptor Expression Induced by Tissue Damage in the Rat Portal Vein: A Critical Role for Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Signaling Pathways Circ. Res., May 28, 2004; 94(10): 1375 - 1382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||