|
|
||||||||
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The contribution of endothelin to resting pulmonary vascular tone and hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in humans is unknown. We studied the hemodynamic effects of BQ-123, an endothelin type A receptor antagonist, on healthy volunteers exposed to normoxia and hypoxia. Hemodynamics were measured at room air and after 15 min of exposure to hypoxia (arterial PO2 99.8 ± 1.8 and 49.4 ± 0.4 mmHg, respectively). Measurements were then repeated in the presence of BQ-123. BQ-123 decreased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) 26% and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) 21%, whereas it increased cardiac output (CO) 22% (all P < 0.05). Hypoxia raised CO 28% and PVR 95%, whereas it reduced SVR 23% (all P < 0.01). During BQ-123 infusion, hypoxia increased CO 29% and PVR 97% and decreased SVR 22% (all P < 0.01). The pulmonary vasoconstrictive response to hypoxia was similar in the absence and presence of BQ-123 [P = not significant (NS)]. In vehicle-treated control subjects, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction did not change with repeated exposure to hypoxia (P = NS). Endothelin contributes to basal pulmonary and systemic vascular tone during normoxia, but does not mediate the additional pulmonary vasoconstriction induced by acute hypoxia.
hypoxia; vascular resistance; vasodilation; pulmonary hypertension
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE VASCULAR ENDOTHELIUM plays a pivotal role in the regulation of systemic and pulmonary vascular tone. It elaborates a number of vasoactive factors that act in a paracrine fashion to modulate vascular smooth muscle tone. Abnormalities in vascular smooth muscle tone and proliferation underlie several diseases such as atherosclerosis and pulmonary hypertension. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is an endothelium-derived, 21-amino acid peptide with potent vasoconstrictor (69, 70) and mitogenic properties (31, 36, 45). The vascular effects of ET-1 are mediated by ETA and ETB receptor subtypes (4, 52, 61). The ETA receptor, located on vascular smooth muscle cells, causes vasoconstriction, whereas the ETB receptor, located on vascular endothelial cells, results in vasodilation through the release of endothelium-derived mediators such as nitric oxide and prostacyclin (35, 68). ETB receptors are also present on vascular smooth muscle cells and mediate vasoconstriction (33), although their relative contribution to ET-induced vasoconstriction remains ill defined.
ET-1 concentrations are increased in animal models of monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension (25, 55), endotoxin-induced pulmonary hypertension (70), and pulmonary hypertension related to left heart failure (60). Notably, ET-1 immunoreactivity and ET mRNA expression are increased in plasma and lung specimens of patients with pulmonary hypertension (11, 16, 20, 27, 54, 64). Thus ET-1 has been implicated as a potential mediator of pulmonary hypertension.
Hypoxia is an important physiological stimulus for pulmonary vasoconstriction. Plasma ET-1 levels are elevated in subjects exposed to high altitudes and are directly proportional to pulmonary artery pressure and inversely related to arterial PO2 (28, 62). In animals, both nonselective ET-1 receptor blockade (21, 24, 37, 71) and specific ETA antagonism have been shown to attenuate hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension (14, 21, 24, 30, 42, 56), whereas specific ETB antagonism has minimal effect on pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) (24, 38). However, the role of ET-1 in human hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction remains to be studied.
We hypothesized that ET-1 contributes to the maintenance of basal systemic and pulmonary vascular tone in humans and that hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is mediated in part by the increased activity of ET-1. Accordingly, we investigated the effect of D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu (BQ-123), a selective ETA receptor antagonist (41), on resting hemodynamics and on the hemodynamic response to acute hypoxia in healthy human volunteers.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study population. Participants in this study included 19 healthy volunteers who were recruited from the local community via newspaper advertisements. Eleven volunteers (seven men and four women, age 31 ± 4 yr) were enrolled in the experimental arm, and nine volunteers (four men and five women, age 26 ± 6 yr) served as controls. One subject was common to both groups. All of the subjects had a normal medical history and physical examination. Fasting glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, complete blood count, and fasting lipid profile were all within normal limits. No subject had diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or any clinical evidence of cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, or hematological abnormalities. All subjects denied a history of cigarette smoking, but one subject was retrospectively discovered to be a smoker. All subjects gave written, informed, and voluntary consent. The Human Research Committee of Brigham and Women's Hospital approved the study.
Hemodynamic measurements.
Each subject was studied in a quiet, 23°C temperature-controlled room
in the fasting state. Caffeine, alcohol, aspirin, and nonsteroidal
inflammatory agents were prohibited within 48 h of the study.
Under local anesthesia and sterile conditions, a 20-gauge polyethylene
catheter was inserted into the left radial artery of each subject to
measure mean systemic arterial pressure (MAP) and to obtain arterial
blood gas and plasma samples. An 8.5-Fr sheath (Cordis, Miami, FL) was
placed percutaneously into the right internal jugular vein. An 8-Fr,
5-lumen thermodilution catheter (Abbott Critical Care Systems, North
Chicago, IL) was then advanced under continuous pressure monitoring
into the pulmonary artery to measure pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
(PCWP), PAP, and right atrial pressure (RAP). All pressures were
recorded in the supine position with pressure transducers (Gould,
Oxnard, CA; or Abbott Critical Care Systems) calibrated against a
saline manometer positioned at the midchest level and zeroed against
atmospheric pressure. Measurements were recorded using a Gould 4600 Physiologic Recorder (Gould) or a Marquette Transcope 12C System (Gems
I. T.; Milwaukee, WI). Heart rate (HR) was obtained from the
electrocardiogram. Cardiac output (CO) was measured by thermodilution
using 10-ml boluses of room temperature-normal saline as the injectate.
At least five cardiac output measurements were made at each time point.
The highest and lowest measurements were eliminated, and the remaining
results were averaged. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR; in
dyn · s · cm
5) was calculated as
[(MAP
RAP)/CO] × 80 and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR;
in dyn · s · cm
5) was calculated as
[(PAP
PCWP)/CO] × 80.
Induction of hypoxia. Hypoxia was induced by a protocol previously utilized and validated in our laboratory (6). Study subjects breathed a nitrogen-oxygen mixture via an air-oxygen blender (Puritan Bennett; Lawrenceville, GA) with nitrogen connected to the air inlet and wall source oxygen to the oxygen inlet of the blender. By changing the proportion of the two gases through the blender, the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) delivered to the study participant was precisely regulated. The blender was connected to a gas-powered demand valve in series with a nonrebreathing valve (Diemolding Healthcare Division; Canasta, NY). The subject breathed through a sealed facemask (Ventlab; Mocksville, NC).
Real-time measurements of the inspired oxygen content were made using a digital oxygen monitor (Catalyst Research; Owings Mills, MD) attached to the inlet of the nonrebreathing valve. Blood oxygen saturation was approximated by finger probe oximetry and confirmed by arterial blood gas analysis. Basal FIO2 was 21% oxygen. A FIO2 of between 10.8% and 17.2% was required to create hypoxic conditions approximating an arterial PO2 of 50 mmHg, corresponding to an oxygen saturation of 84%.Experimental protocol. All subjects rested for 30 min after the insertion of catheters to establish a stable baseline before data collection. The research laboratory was kept quiet and the lights were dimmed. Baseline hemodynamic measurements were initially taken with the subject breathing a FIO2 of 21% (normoxic conditions) for ~30 min. Thereafter, hypoxia was induced to reduce the PO2 to ~50 mmHg, and this was maintained for a period of 15 min. This period was sufficient to establish a steady state without causing discomfort to subjects from a more prolonged hypoxic exposure. Hemodynamic measurements and blood gas analyses were then repeated. The subject breathed a FIO2 of 21% for at least 15 min to reestablish baseline oxygen saturation and hemodynamic indexes. Next, normal saline or the ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 (Clinalfa; Laufelfingen, Switzerland) was administered via the right atrial catheter port at a rate of 0.4 ml/min or 200 nmol/min. This dose of BQ-123 was chosen to produce steady-state plasma concentrations 10-fold higher than the IC50 for the ETA receptor and 10-fold lower than the IC50 of BQ-123 for the ETB receptor (40). After 60 min of normal saline or BQ-123 administration, hemodynamic measurements were made under normoxic conditions. The hypoxic challenge was then repeated with measurements of the hemodynamic response and blood gas analysis. ET-1 levels were drawn from the arterial catheter at the completion of the initial baseline data collection, at the end of the first hypoxic challenge, and again after 60 min of BQ-123 infusion.
Measurement of ET.
Samples for ET-1 levels were immediately placed on ice and then
centrifuged. The plasma was then quick-frozen and stored at
70°C.
ET-1 concentrations were measured by a commercially available ELISA
(Biomedica; Vienna, Austria).
Statistical analysis. Values are expressed as means ± SE. Mean change (absolute and percent) in hemodynamic parameters was calculated by averaging the change for each individual. The effect of BQ-123 and hypoxia on pulmonary and systemic hemodynamic measurements was evaluated using a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Arterial blood gas analyses were compared using two-tailed paired t-tests. Statistical significance was accepted at the 95% confidence level (P < 0.05).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of ETA receptor blockade on the pulmonary
vascular bed during normoxia.
ETA receptor antagonism with BQ-123 reduced normoxic PVR by
26 ± 8% (P = 0.02) (Fig.
1). CO increased by 22 ± 2%
(P < 0.001), whereas SVR and MAP fell 22 ± 2%
(P < 0.001) and 5 ± 2% (P = 0.03), respectively (Table 1). PAP, RAP,
PCWP, and HR did not change [all P = not significant
(NS)] (Table 1). During BQ-123 infusion, plasma ET-1 levels did not
change (from 4.7 ± 1.0 to 4.7 ± 1.3 pg/ml,
P = 0.67).
|
|
Effects of acute hypoxia on pulmonary vascular tone.
In the experimental group, the hypoxic stimulus decreased
PO2 from 99.8 ± 1.8 to 49.4 ± 0.4 mmHg (P < 0.001); oxygen saturation fell from
98.2 ± 0.2% to 84.1 ± 0.2% (P < 0.001).
Arterial pH and PCO2 did not change, indicating
that the acute hypoxic stimulus did not result in hyperventilation in
these healthy subjects (Table 2).
|
Effects of ETA receptor blockade on the hemodynamic
response to hypoxia.
Hypoxia, in the presence of BQ-123, increased PVR by 97 ± 17%
compared with the value obtained under normoxic conditions after 60 min
of BQ-123 infusion (P = 0.0003) (Table 1). Although the absolute increase in PVR was modestly blunted (55 ± 9 vs. 40 ± 7 dyn · s · cm
1, P = 0.046), the 97% increase in PVR was comparable to the 95% increase that occurred during hypoxia in the absence of BQ-123 (P = 0.93) (Fig. 2).
Stated differently, for a given value of baseline PVR, the incremental
increase in PVR was the same under hypoxic conditions with or without
BQ-123. Thus these results suggest that, although BQ-123 decreased the
absolute PVR induced by hypoxia, its effect was largely derived from a
reduction in resting PVR under normoxic conditions rather than an
attenuation in the pulmonary vasoconstrictive response to hypoxia.
|
Effect of repeated hypoxia on pulmonary vascular tone. To ascertain the effect of repeated hypoxia on PVR, a control group of nine patients was subjected to two sequential hypoxic exposures without ETA antagonism. Oxygen saturation decreased from 98.2 ± 0.4% to 83.1 ± 0.6% with the first hypoxic exposure and from 98.8 ± 0.3% to 85.2 ± 0.8% with the second hypoxic exposure.
The primary hypoxic challenge raised PVR by 44 ± 7 dyn · s · cm
5 or 77 ± 9%
(P < 0.001), reflecting a 22 ± 7% increase in
mean PAP (P = 0.02) and a 29 ± 4% increase in CO
(P < 0.001) (Table 3).
The second hypoxic exposure increased PVR by 56 ± 10 dyn · s · cm
5 or 136 ± 32%
(P < 0.001) as a consequence of a 33 ± 10%
increase in mean PAP (P < 0.01) and a 25 ± 4%
increase in CO (P < 0.001) (Table 3). Although there
was a trend toward increased pulmonary vasoconstriction with repeated
exposure to hypoxia, the difference in the absolute or percent response
did not achieve statistical significance in this analysis
(P = 0.45 and P = 0.12, respectively). Both hypoxic exposures increased HR and decreased SVR to a comparable extent, whereas MAP, RAP, and PCWP remained unchanged (all
P = NS) (Table 3).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The salient new findings in this study are that 1) ET-1 constitutively constricts the systemic and pulmonary vascular bed in healthy, young subjects and 2) the ETA receptor has a limited role, if any, in mediating the additional pulmonary vascular constriction that occurs during acute hypoxia in healthy individuals.
The potential contribution of the ET system to the regulation of pulmonary vascular tone is highlighted by its known alterations in pathological conditions. In animal models of monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension, endotoxin-induced pulmonary hypertension, and heart failure-induced pulmonary hypertension, ET receptor blockade blunts the rise in PAP (31, 40, 51, 65, 66). In humans, elevated ET-1 levels have been identified in patients with congestive heart failure and may be a marker of poor prognosis (51, 57, 64). Both nonselective ETA/ETB and selective ETA receptor antagonists have been shown to decrease PVR in patients with heart failure (23, 43). High levels of ET-1 immunoreactivity and ET-1 mRNA have been found in pulmonary arterial endothelial cells of patients with plexogenic pulmonary arteriopathy (27). Chronic use of the nonselective ETA/ETB receptor antagonist bosentan has been demonstrated to reduce PVR and improve symptoms in patients with primary and scleroderma-induced pulmonary hypertension (13). The importance of ET in these pathological conditions in humans may be better understood as we examine the contribution of ET to the regulation of pulmonary vascular tone under physiological conditions.
ET and the physiological regulation of vascular tone. ET-1 administration in intact organisms, including humans, produces a biphasic hemodynamic response: a transient vasodilation, best observed at lower ET-1 concentrations, followed by sustained vasoconstriction (12, 55, 67, 70). Intrabrachial artery infusion of ET-1 increases forearm vascular resistance in humans (1, 15, 34), and systemic infusion of ET-1 increases SVR and MAP, with a concomitant decrease in CO and stroke volume (2, 3, 44). ET-1 administration also causes constriction of epicardial arteries and coronary arterioles (58). Studies in vitro suggest that ET-1-induced constriction is mediated primarily by the ETA receptor (56).
Several studies have assessed the contribution of ET to systemic vascular tone in healthy humans. Intra-arterial infusion of an ETA receptor antagonist reduced forearm vascular resistance in some studies (6, 23, 34, 68) but not in others (12). Local and systemic administration of BQ-788, an ETB antagonist, caused vasoconstriction (12, 65, 68), suggesting that the balance of effects of endogenous ET-1 on the ETB receptor favors vasodilation. Systemic administration of a nonselective ETA/B receptor antagonist TAK-044 decreased mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance, determined noninvasively by bioimpedance, in healthy subjects (32). Our results, showing decreased SVR with systemic infusion of BQ-123, support the notion that ET contributes to basal systemic vascular tone via the ETA receptor. In vitro and in vivo animal studies indicate that ET induces pulmonary vasoconstriction (9, 10, 48) and that it mediates vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation (43). Both mitogenic and pulmonary vasoconstrictor effects are mediated by the ETA receptor in animals (9, 73). In healthy humans, systemic ET infusion leads to increased PVR (2, 44). No prior study has assessed the physiological role of endogenous ET in regulating pulmonary vascular tone in healthy humans. By infusing the ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 systemically, we found that ET contributes to basal pulmonary vascular tone in healthy humans via the ETA receptor. This finding is at odds with observations in animals that have been exposed to both nonselective ETA/ETB and selective ETA receptor antagonists under resting normoxic conditions (19, 72). However, in humans, it is believed that normal vascular tone is maintained via a balance of vasoconstricting and vasodilating factors. Several authors have shown that human endothelial and pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells release ET-1 under normoxic conditions (46, 49). Furthermore, nitroprusside, a nitric oxide donor, has been shown to decrease basal ET-1 mRNA levels in human endothelial cells exposed to normoxia (46). These results, combined with our previous observation that acetylcholine decreases PVR in normoxic humans, suggest that unlike animals, the human pulmonary vasculature is not maximally dilated at rest and support our finding that ET-1 may be involved in maintaining optimal pulmonary vascular tone under resting conditions (17).Role of ET-1 in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction was first reported in an animal model in 1946 by von Euler and Liljestrand (69) and in humans in 1947 by Motley et al. (53). Hypoxia is an important cause of pulmonary hypertension in diseases such as obstructive sleep apnea, sickle cell disease, and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Our laboratory and others (8, 26) have shown previously that acute hypoxia causes peripheral vasodilation, pulmonary vasoconstriction, increased CO, and decreased mean arterial pressure. We have shown that nitric oxide serves as a counterregulatory mechanism for hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, and yet the mechanism of the vasoconstriction itself remains ill defined (8). Animal models indicate that chronic hypoxia results in increased plasma ET-1 immunoreactivity and ETA and ETB receptor expression (22, 47). In several animal models of chronic hypoxia, ETA or combined ETA/ETB receptor antagonists prevent or attenuate hypoxia-induced increases in PAP and suppress vascular remodeling and progression of right ventricular hypertrophy (9, 14, 18, 21, 24, 29, 30, 39, 56, 63). ETB antagonism alone has little effect on chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension (24, 38). There are conflicting reports, however, regarding the role of ET-1 in the pulmonary vascular response to acute hypoxia. Evidence supporting a role for ET-1 has been reported in dogs who were made acutely hypoxic in the presence and absence of BQ-485, an ETA selective receptor antagonist, as well as bosentan (19). Conversely, data disputing the contribution of ET-1 have been shown in rats and newborn lambs exposed to acute hypoxia with and without BQ-123 (66, 72). Our data indicates that ETA receptor blockade in humans does not prevent the vasoconstrictive response induced by acute hypoxia, beyond its effect on lowering basal pulmonary vascular tone. The absence of an increase in plasma ET-1 levels is consistent with the contention that ET does not contribute to pulmonary vasoconstriction during acute hypoxia. Furthermore, the lack of increase in plasma ET-1 levels suggest that BQ-123 selectively blocked ETA receptors and did not displace ET-1 from ETB receptors.
Potential limitations. One of the shortcomings inherent in human experimentation is the inability to measure PVR by constructing a multipoint plot relating the transpulmonary gradient to CO. Our results are therefore susceptible to the errors introduced by the calculation of PVR from single point measurements of pressure-flow ratios (50).
A limitation of this study is that we were unable in one experimental setting to administer both vehicle and BQ-123, due to its long half-life, in a randomized fashion. This raises the concern that the effect of BQ-123 may have been underestimated if repetitive exposures to hypoxia result in progressive increases in PVR. Studies in dogs have suggested that the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstrictive response is potentiated by repeated exposures to hypoxia (5, 59, 67). However, the only human study evaluating the pulmonary vascular response to repetitive hypoxia did not show any augmentation of the pulmonary vasoconstrictive response with three consecutive hypoxic exposures (7). Our data in the control population suggest a trend toward increased vasoconstriction with repeated hypoxia, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Thus we believe that it is unlikely that the effects of ETA receptor blockade were underestimated in this study because of nonrandom BQ-123 administration. Another potential shortcoming of this study was that time and patient safety concerns did not permit us to conduct a dose-response curve to assess the effect of variable doses of BQ-123 on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Dose-dependency studies looking at the effect of intra-arterial BQ-123 on forearm blood flow demonstrated that maximal vasodilation was achieved at a dose of 50 nmol/min (6). The BQ-123 dose of 200 nmol/min utilized in our study far exceeds the dose required to produce maximal vasodilation. Therefore, it is unlikely that the contribution of ET-1 to hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction was underappreciated secondary to inadequate ETA receptor blockade. The role of ET-1 in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and in primary and secondary pulmonary hypertension may be affected by the duration of the hypoxic stimulus. Our findings assess the contribution of ET-1 to acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. We cannot discount the possibility that ET-1 may contribute to pulmonary tone during chronic hypoxia that underlies many pathological forms of pulmonary hypertension. Furthermore, ET-1 might only be involved in mediating the pulmonary vascular response to acute hypoxia at arterial PO2 concentrations <50 mmHg. Once again, time and safety considerations did not allow us to assess the response to BQ-123 at different oxygen concentrations. Nonetheless, at an arterial PO2 of 50 mmHg, well within the range of tensions seen clinically, other mechanisms as yet undefined must account for the increase in PVR that occurs in humans during acute exposure to hypoxic conditions. In conclusion, the data presented here contribute importantly to our understanding of the physiological regulation of vasomotor tone in humans. We found that ET, via the ETA receptor, constitutively constricts the pulmonary vascular bed in healthy individuals. However, acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is not primarily mediated by ET beyond its effects on basal tone.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant P01 HL-48743. A. Nohria was supported by the Clinical Investigation Training Program held in conjunction with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, and Pfizer. M. A. Creager is the Simon C. Fireman Scholar in Cardiovascular Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* W. Johnson and A. Nohria contributed equally to this work.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. A. Creager, Cardiovascular Div., Brigham and Women's Hosp., 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115 (E-mail: mcreager{at}partners.org).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/ajpheart.00099.2001
Received 17 February 2001; accepted in final form 13 April 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Abernethy, DR,
Laurie N,
and
Andrawis NS.
Local angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition blunts endothelin-1-induced increase in forearm vascular resistance.
Clin Pharmacol Ther
58:
328-334,
1995[ISI][Medline].
2.
Ahlborg, G,
Ottosson-Seeberger A,
Hemsen A,
and
Lundberg JM.
Central and regional hemodynamic effects during infusion of Big endothelin-1 in healthy humans.
J Appl Physiol
80:
1921-1927,
1996
3.
Ahlborg, G,
Weitzberg E,
and
Lundberg JM.
Circulating endothelin-1 reduces splanchnic and renal blood flow and splanchnic glucose production in humans.
J Appl Physiol
79:
141-145,
1995
4.
Arai, H,
Hori S,
Aramori I,
Ohkubo H,
and
Nakanishi S.
Cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding an endothelin receptor.
Nature
348:
730-732,
1990[Medline].
5.
Benumof, JL.
Intermittent hypoxia increases lobar hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.
Anesthesiology
58:
399-404,
1983[ISI][Medline].
6.
Berrazueta, JR,
Bhagat K,
Vallance P,
and
MacAllister RJ.
Dose- and time-dependency of the dilator effects of the endothelin antagonist, BQ-123, in the human forearm.
Br J Clin Pharmacol
44:
569-571,
1997[ISI][Medline].
7.
Bindslev, L,
Jolin A,
Hedenstierna G,
Baehrendtz S,
and
Santesson J.
Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the human lung: effect of repeated hypoxic challenges during anesthesia.
Anesthesiology
62:
621-625,
1985[ISI][Medline].
8.
Blitzer, ML,
Loh E,
Roddy MA,
Stamler JS,
and
Creager MA.
Endothelium-derived nitric oxide regulates systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance during acute hypoxia in humans.
J Am Coll Cardiol
28:
591-596,
1996[Abstract].
9.
Bonvallet, ST,
Oka M,
Yano M,
Zamora MR,
McMurtry IF,
and
Stelzner TJ.
BQ123, an ETA receptor antagonist, attenuates endothelin-1-induced vasoconstriction in rat pulmonary circulation.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
22:
39-43,
1993[ISI][Medline].
10.
Buchan, KW,
Magnusson H,
Rabe KF,
Sumner MJ,
and
Watts IS.
Characterisation of the endothelin receptor mediating contraction of human pulmonary artery using BQ123 and Ro 46-2005.
Eur J Pharmacol
260:
221-226,
1994[ISI][Medline].
11.
Cacoub, P,
Dorent R,
Nataf P,
Carayon A,
Riquet M,
Noe E,
Piette JC,
Godeau P,
and
Gandjbakhch I.
Endothelin-1 in the lungs of patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Cardiovasc Res
33:
196-200,
1997
12.
Cardillo, C,
Kilcoyne CM,
Waclawiw M,
Cannon RO, 3rd,
and
Panza JA.
Role of endothelin in the increased vascular tone of patients with essential hypertension.
Hypertension
33:
753-758,
1999
13.
Channick, RN,
Simonneau G,
Sitbon O,
Robbins IM,
Frost A,
Tapson VF,
Badesch DB,
Roux S,
Rainisio M,
Bodin F,
and
Rubin LJ.
Effects of the dual endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a randomised placebo-controlled study.
Lancet
358:
1119-1123,
2001[ISI][Medline].
14.
Chen, SJ,
Chen YF,
Opgenorth TJ,
Wessale JL,
Meng QC,
Durand J,
DiCarlo VS,
and
Oparil S.
The orally active nonpeptide endothelin A-receptor antagonist A-127722 prevents and reverses hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary vascular remodeling in Sprague-Dawley rats.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
29:
713-725,
1997[ISI][Medline].
15.
Clarke, JG,
Benjamin N,
Larkin SW,
Webb DJ,
Davies GJ,
and
Maseri A.
Endothelin is a potent long-lasting vasoconstrictor in men.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
257:
H2033-H2035,
1989
16.
Cody, RJ,
Haas GJ,
Binkley PF,
Capers Q,
and
Kelley R.
Plasma endothelin correlates with the extent of pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic congestive heart failure.
Circulation
85:
504-509,
1992
17.
Cooper, CJ,
Landzberg MJ,
Anderson TJ,
Charbonneau F,
Creager MA,
Ganz P,
and
Selwyn AP.
Role of nitric oxide in the local regulation of pulmonary vascular resistance in humans.
Circulation
93:
266-271,
1996
18.
DiCarlo, VS,
Chen SJ,
Meng QC,
Durand J,
Yano M,
Chen YF,
and
Oparil S.
ETA-receptor antagonist prevents and reverses chronic hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in rat.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
269:
L690-L697,
1995
19.
Doi, S,
Smedira N,
and
Murray PA.
Pulmonary vasoregulation by endothelin in conscious dogs after left lung transplantation.
J Appl Physiol
88:
210-218,
2000
20.
Dupuis, J,
Cernacek P,
Tardif JC,
Stewart DJ,
Gosselin G,
Dyrda I,
Bonan R,
and
Crepeau J.
Reduced pulmonary clearance of endothelin-1 in pulmonary hypertension.
Am Heart J
135:
614-620,
1998[ISI][Medline].
21.
Eddahibi, S,
Raffestin B,
Clozel M,
Levame M,
and
Adnot S.
Protection from pulmonary hypertension with an orally active endothelin receptor antagonist in hypoxic rats.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
268:
H828-H835,
1995
22.
Elton, TS,
Oparil S,
Taylor GR,
Hicks PH,
Yang RH,
Jin H,
and
Chen YF.
Normobaric hypoxia stimulates endothelin-1 gene expression in the rat.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol
263:
R1260-R1264,
1992
23.
Ferro, CJ,
Spratt JC,
Haynes WG,
and
Webb DJ.
Inhibition of neutral endopeptidase causes vasoconstriction of human resistance vessels in vivo.
Circulation
97:
2323-2330,
1998
24.
Franco-Cereceda, A,
and
Holm P.
Selective or nonselective endothelin antagonists in porcine hypoxic pulmonary hypertension?
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
31, Suppl 1:
S447-S452,
1998[Medline].
25.
Frasch, HF,
Marshall C,
and
Marshall BE.
Endothelin-1 is elevated in monocrotaline pulmonary hypertension.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
276:
L304-L310,
1999
26.
Frostell, CG,
Blomqvist H,
Hedenstierna G,
Lundberg J,
and
Zapol WM.
Inhaled nitric oxide selectively reverses human hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction without causing systemic vasodilation.
Anesthesiology
78:
427-435,
1993[ISI][Medline].
27.
Giaid, A,
Yanagisawa M,
Langleben D,
Michel RP,
Levy R,
Shennib H,
Kimura S,
Masaki T,
Duguid WP,
and
Stewart DJ.
Expression of endothelin-1 in the lungs of patients with pulmonary hypertension.
N Engl J Med
328:
1732-1739,
1993
28.
Goerre, S,
Wenk M,
Bartsch P,
Luscher TF,
Niroomand F,
Hohenhaus E,
Oelz O,
and
Reinhart WH.
Endothelin-1 in pulmonary hypertension associated with high-altitude exposure.
Circulation
91:
359-364,
1995
29.
Gosselin, R,
Gutkowska J,
Baribeau J,
and
Perreault T.
Endothelin receptor changes in hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in the newborn piglet.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
273:
L72-L79,
1997
30.
Haleen, S,
Schroeder R,
Walker D,
Quenby-Brown E,
Welch K,
Hallak H,
Uprichard A,
and
Keiser J.
Efficacy of CI-1020, an endothelin-A receptor antagonist, in hypoxic pulmonary hypertension.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
31, Suppl 1:
S331-S335,
1998[ISI][Medline].
31.
Hassoun, PM,
Thappa V,
Landman MJ,
and
Fanburg BL.
Endothelin 1: mitogenic activity on pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells and release from hypoxic endothelial cells.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
199:
165-170,
1992[Abstract].
32.
Haynes, WG,
Ferro CJ, OKKP,
Somerville D,
Lomax CC,
and
Webb DJ.
Systemic endothelin receptor blockade decreases peripheral vascular resistance and blood pressure in humans.
Circulation
93:
1860-1870,
1996
33.
Haynes, WG,
Strachan FE,
and
Webb DJ.
Endothelin ETA and ETB receptors cause vasoconstriction of human resistance and capacitance vessels in vivo.
Circulation
92:
357-363,
1995
34.
Haynes, WG,
and
Webb DJ.
Contribution of endogenous generation of endothelin-1 to basal vascular tone.
Lancet
344:
852-854,
1994[ISI][Medline].
35.
Hirata, Y,
Emori T,
Eguchi S,
Kanno K,
Imai T,
Ohta K,
and
Marumo F.
Endothelin receptor subtype B mediates synthesis of nitric oxide by cultured bovine endothelial cells.
J Clin Invest
91:
1367-1373,
1993[ISI][Medline].
36.
Hirata, Y,
Fukuda Y,
Yoshimi H,
Emori T,
Shichiri M,
and
Marumo F.
Specific receptor for endothelin in cultured rat cardiocytes.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
160:
1438-1444,
1989[ISI][Medline].
37.
Holm, P,
Liska J,
Clozel M,
and
Franco-Cereceda A.
The endothelin antagonist bosentan: hemodynamic effects during normoxia and hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in pigs.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
112:
890-897,
1996
38.
Holm, P,
Liska J,
and
Franco-Cereceda A.
The endothelin ETB receptor antagonist BQ-788 reduces the pulmonary vasodilator effect of endothelin-1 during acute hypoxia in pigs.
Eur J Pharmacol
323:
83-87,
1997[ISI][Medline].
39.
Holm, P,
Liska J,
and
Franco-Cereceda A.
The ETA receptor antagonist, BMS-182874, reduces acute hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in pigs in vivo.
Cardiovasc Res
37:
765-771,
1998
40.
Ihara, M,
Ishikawa K,
Fukuroda T,
Saeki T,
Funabashi K,
Fukami T,
Suda H,
and
Yano M.
In vitro biological profile of a highly potent novel endothelin (ET) antagonist BQ-123 selective for the ETA receptor.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
20, Suppl 12:
S11-S14,
1992.
41.
Ihara, M,
Noguchi K,
Saeki T,
Fukuroda T,
Tsuchida S,
Kimura S,
Fukami T,
Ishikawa K,
Nishikibe M,
and
Yano M.
Biological profiles of highly potent novel endothelin antagonists selective for the ETA receptor.
Life Sci
50:
247-255,
1992[ISI][Medline].
42.
Itoh, H,
Yokochi A,
Yamauchi-Kohno R,
and
Maruyama K.
Effects of the endothelin ETA receptor antagonist, TA-0201, on pulmonary arteries isolated from hypoxic rats.
Eur J Pharmacol
376:
233-238,
1999[ISI][Medline].
43.
Janakidevi, K,
Fisher MA,
Del Vecchio PJ,
Tiruppathi C,
Figge J,
and
Malik AB.
Endothelin-1 stimulates DNA synthesis and proliferation of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
263:
C1295-C1301,
1992
44.
Kiely, DG,
Cargill RI,
Struthers AD,
and
Lipworth BJ.
Cardiopulmonary effects of endothelin-1 in man.
Cardiovasc Res
33:
378-386,
1997
45.
Komuro, I,
Kurihara H,
Sugiyama T,
Yoshizumi M,
Takaku F,
and
Yazaki Y.
Endothelin stimulates c-fos and c-myc expression and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells [Erratum. FEBS Lett 1989, Feb 27: 244, p. 509].
FEBS Lett
238:
249-252,
1988[ISI][Medline].
46.
Kourembanas, S,
McQuillan LP,
Leung GK,
and
Faller DV.
Nitric oxide regulates the expression of vasoconstrictors and growth factors by vascular endothelium under both normoxia and hypoxia.
J Clin Invest
92:
99-104,
1993[ISI][Medline].
47.
Li, H,
Chen SJ,
Chen YF,
Meng QC,
Durand J,
Oparil S,
and
Elton TS.
Enhanced endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor gene expression in chronic hypoxia.
J Appl Physiol
77:
1451-1459,
1994
48.
Lippton, HL,
Hauth TA,
Summer WR,
and
Hyman AL.
Endothelin produces pulmonary vasoconstriction and systemic vasodilation.
J Appl Physiol
66:
1008-1012,
1989
49.
Markewitz, BA,
Farrukh IS,
Chen Y,
Li Y,
and
Michael JR.
Regulation of endothelin-1 synthesis in human pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells. Effects of transforming growth factor-beta and hypoxia.
Cardiovasc Res
49:
200-206,
2001
50.
McGregor, M,
and
Sniderman A.
On pulmonary vascular resistance: the need for more precise definition.
Am J Cardiol
55:
217-221,
1985[ISI][Medline].
51.
McMurray, JJ,
Ray SG,
Abdullah I,
Dargie HJ,
and
Morton JJ.
Plasma endothelin in chronic heart failure.
Circulation
85:
1374-1379,
1992
52.
Mizuguchi, T,
Nishiyama M,
Moroi K,
Tanaka H,
Saito T,
Masuda Y,
Masaki T,
de Wit D,
Yanagisawa M,
and
Kimura S.
Analysis of two pharmacologically predicted endothelin B receptor subtypes by using the endothelin B receptor gene knockout mouse.
Br J Pharmacol
120:
1427-1430,
1997[ISI][Medline].
53.
Motley, HL,
Cournand A,
Werko L,
Himmelstein A,
and
Dresdale D.
The influence of short periods of induced hypoxia upon pulmonary artery pressures in man.
Am J Physiol
150:
315-320,
1947
54.
Nootens, M,
Kaufmann E,
Rector T,
Toher C,
Judd D,
Francis GS,
and
Rich S.
Neurohormonal activation in patients with right ventricular failure from pulmonary hypertension: relation to hemodynamic variables and endothelin levels.
J Am Coll Cardiol
26:
1581-1585,
1995[Abstract].
55.
Okada, M,
Yamashita C,
Okada M,
and
Okada K.
Endothelin receptor antagonists in a beagle model of pulmonary hypertension: contribution to possible potential therapy?
J Am Coll Cardiol
25:
1213-1217,
1995[Abstract].
56.
Oparil, S,
Chen SJ,
Meng QC,
Elton TS,
Yano M,
and
Chen YF.
Endothelin-A receptor antagonist prevents acute hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in the rat.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
268:
L95-L100,
1995
57.
Pacher, R,
Stanek B,
Hulsmann M,
Koller-Strametz J,
Berger R,
Schuller M,
Hartter E,
Ogris E,
Frey B,
Heinz G,
and
Maurer G.
Prognostic impact of big endothelin-1 plasma concentrations compared with invasive hemodynamic evaluation in severe heart failure.
J Am Coll Cardiol
27:
633-641,
1996[Abstract].
58.
Pernow, J,
Ahlborg G,
Lundberg JM,
and
Kaijser L.
Long-lasting coronary vasoconstrictor effects and myocardial uptake of endothelin-1 in humans.
Acta Physiol Scand
159:
147-153,
1997[ISI][Medline].
59.
Pirlo, AF,
Benumof JL,
and
Trousdale FR.
Potentiation of lobar hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction by intermittent hypoxia in dogs.
Anesthesiology
55:
226-230,
1981[ISI][Medline].
60.
Sakai, S,
Miyauchi T,
Sakurai T,
Kasuya Y,
Ihara M,
Yamaguchi I,
Goto K,
and
Sugishita Y.
Endogenous endothelin-1 participates in the maintenance of cardiac function in rats with congestive heart failure. Marked increase in endothelin-1 production in the failing heart.
Circulation
93:
1214-1222,
1996
61.
Sakurai, T,
Yanagisawa M,
Takuwa Y,
Miyazaki H,
Kimura S,
Goto K,
and
Masaki T.
Cloning of a cDNA encoding a non-isopeptide-selective subtype of the endothelin receptor.
Nature
348:
732-735,
1990[Medline].
62.
Sartori, C,
Vollenweider L,
Loffler BM,
Delabays A,
Nicod P,
Bartsch P,
and
Scherrer U.
Exaggerated endothelin release in high-altitude pulmonary edema.
Circulation
99:
2665-2668,
1999
63.
Sato, K,
Morio Y,
Morris KG,
Rodman DM,
and
McMurtry IF.
Mechanism of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriciton involves ETA receptor-mediated inhibition of KATP channel.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
278:
L434-L442,
2000
64.
Stewart, DJ,
Cernacek P,
Costello KB,
and
Rouleau JL.
Elevated endothelin-1 in heart failure and loss of normal response to postural change.
Circulation
85:
510-517,
1992
65.
Strachan, FE,
Spratt JC,
Wilkinson IB,
Johnston NR,
Gray GA,
and
Webb DJ.
Systemic blockade of the endothelin-B receptor increases peripheral vascular resistance in healthy men.
Hypertension
33:
581-585,
1999
66.
Takeoka, M,
Ishizaki T,
Sakai A,
Chang SW,
Shigemori K,
Higashi T,
and
Ueda G.
Effect of BQ123 on vasoconstriction as a result of either hypoxia or endothelin-1 in perfused rat lungs.
Acta Physiol Scand
155:
53-60,
1995[ISI][Medline].
67.
Unger, M,
Atkins M,
Briscoe WA,
and
King TK.
Potentiation of pulmonary vasoconstrictor response with repeated intermittent hypoxia.
J Appl Physiol
43:
662-667,
1977
68.
Verhaar, MC,
Strachan FE,
Newby DE,
Cruden NL,
Koomans HA,
Rabelink TJ,
and
Webb DJ.
Endothelin-A receptor antagonist-mediated vasodilatation is attenuated by inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis and by endothelin-B receptor blockade.
Circulation
97:
752-756,
1998
69.
Von Euler, US,
and
Liljestrand G.
Observations on the pulmonary arterial blood pressure in the cat.
Acta Physiol Scand
12:
301-320,
1946.
70.
Wanecek, M,
Oldner A,
Rudehill A,
Sollevi A,
Alving K,
and
Weitzberg E.
Cardiopulmonary dysfunction during porcine endotoxin shock is effectively counteracted by the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan.
Shock
7:
364-370,
1997[ISI][Medline].
71.
Willette, RN,
Ohlstein EH,
Mitchell MP,
Sauermelch CF,
Beck GR,
Luttmann MA,
and
Hay DW.
Nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonists. VIII. Attentuation of acute hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in the dog.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
280:
695-701,
1997
72.
Wong, J,
Vanderford PA,
Winters JW,
Chang R,
Soifer SJ,
and
Fineman JR.
Endothelin-1 does not mediate acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the intact newborn lamb.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
22, Suppl 8:
S262-S266,
1993[ISI][Medline].
73.
Zamora, MA,
Dempsey EC,
Walchak SJ,
and
Stelzner TJ.
BQ123, an ETA receptor antagonist, inhibits endothelin-1-mediated proliferation of human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
9:
429-433,
1993[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Berger, C. Hesse, C. Dehnert, H. Siedler, P. Kleinbongard, H. J. Bardenheuer, M. Kelm, P. Bartsch, and W. E. Haefeli Hypoxia Impairs Systemic Endothelial Function in Individuals Prone to High-Altitude Pulmonary Edema Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2005; 172(6): 763 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Moudgil, E. D. Michelakis, and S. L. Archer Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2005; 98(1): 390 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |