|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Pharmacology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gender differences have been described in the response of the cardiovascular system to a number of stimuli, including ventricular remodeling in response to pressure overload, but the molecular basis for these differences remains unclear. Because gender differences in the cardiac expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) could contribute to differences in myocardial remodeling, we examined myocardial ACE expression in age-matched male and female mice. Ventricular ACE was more abundant in male than female mice at both mRNA and protein levels. These differences became apparent once the mice reached sexual maturity and became more pronounced with increasing age. The influence of mouse gonadal status on ventricular ACE expression was also examined. Oophorectomy slightly increased ACE levels in female mice, whereas ventricular ACE levels were substantially decreased in androgen-deprived males. The antithetical changes in ventricular ACE abundance seen in agonadal male and female mice suggest that testosterone as well as estrogen may play a role in regulating ACE expression in the heart.
angiotensin; angiotensin-converting enzyme; gene expression; estrogen; testosterone
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE LOWER INCIDENCE of cardiovascular disease in premenopausal women compared with men and postmenopausal women has lead to the hypothesis that estrogens are cardioprotective. However, the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study failed to demonstrate decreased cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women receiving estrogen replacement therapy (21). Moreover, epidemiological evidence suggests that the male gender is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but it is unclear what role androgens play in modulating cardiac gene expression. Consideration of these facts raises the following questions: 1) do both estrogens and androgens contribute to gender differences in the heart, and 2) what influences do these hormones have on the molecular phenotype of the heart in pathological states?
After menopause, the incidence of cardiovascular disease increases in women as estrogen levels decrease. Because the postmenopausal drop in estrogen levels may contribute to the increased risk of cardiovascular disease, significant efforts have been spent identifying estrogen-responsive behaviors of the heart and vasculature (for reviews, see Refs. 16, 27, and 32). Cardiovascular adaptations that have been demonstrated to be influenced by circulating estrogen levels include the vascular proliferative response to injury (14) and the development of endothelial dysfunction (44) and cardiac hypertrophy (37, 39). The influence of estrogens on these cardiovascular adaptations may reflect underlying transcriptional changes mediated by ligand-bound estrogen receptors of genes such as endothelial nitric oxide synthase (29) or cyclooxygenase (22). Alternatively, nontranscriptional effects of estrogen may be involved. It is clear that estrogen levels have a profound impact on cardiovascular function in females, but can we account for the lower incidence of cardiovascular disease in premenopausal women through estrogenic effects only? To answer this question requires a complete accounting of gender differences in cardiovascular biology and the role of sex hormones in modulating those differences.
Numerous gender-specific differences have been described in the cardiovascular system of humans and experimental animals. For example, several measures of cardiac performance (coronary flow, end-diastolic volume, stroke work, ejection fraction, and fractional shortening) are greater in male rats than in female rats when hearts of equivalent size are compared (35). Gender differences also have been demonstrated in the response of rats to catecholamines, hypoxia, physical training, or increased afterload (3, 28, 33, 34, 43, 46). A gender difference in cardiomyocyte size also has been described with larger cardiomyocytes found in adult male rats than in females (2). At the molecular level, it is likely that gender differences in cardiac physiology and pathophysiology reflect the sum of differential expression/activity of numerous molecules that impact cardiac function. The twofold greater phospho-Akt (protein kinase B) seen in female mouse hearts compared with males (8) is one gender difference that has recently been identified.
It has been proposed that increased angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) abundance in the hypertrophied and failing heart may contribute to the local generation of angiotensin II and impact cardiac remodeling through local paracrine or autocrine effects (1, 45). In this report, we demonstrate a gender difference in the expression of ACE in the murine heart that suggests that differences in the cardiac expression of ACE could contribute to the gender differences in cardiac adaptation to stimuli such as physical training, hypoxia, or remodeling in response to pressure overload.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal husbandry.
Mice were maintained on a 10:14-h light-dark cycle in microisolator
cages with free access to water and food. Swiss-Webster and C57/BL6
mice were purchased from Taconic Farms and Jackson Laboratories,
respectively. A previously described transgenic mouse model for
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was also used for this study. These animals
express a mutant
-myosin heavy chain with expression driven by a rat
-heavy chain promoter (for details, see Ref. 41). The
transgenic line was maintained by crossing transgenic males with
C57BL/6J females (Jackson Laboratories). Pups were genotyped by PCR,
and nontransgenic littermates were used for age-matched controls.
Surgical procedures. Atropine sulfate (0.08 mg/100 g ip) was administered to 6- to 8-wk-old mice, and the animals were then anesthetized with ketamine (42 mg/100 g body wt ip) and xylazine (2 mg/100 g body wt ip). In males, the testes were exposed via bilateral midscrotal incisions, the vas deferens was ligated with 5-0 coated vicryl, and the caudal epididymis and testes were removed. In females, a small transverse incision was made at the approximate level of the last rib, another incision was made through the body wall, and the fat pad was pulled through the opening to expose the ovaries. The fallopian tubes were ligated, and the ovaries were removed. Analgesia was administered postoperatively (0.05-0.1 mg/kg sc buprenorphine) and as needed for 2-3 days after the surgery. Animals were euthanized, and tissues were collected 5 mo after the surgery. All animal protocols were approved by the Committee for the Humane Use of Animals at the State University of New York Upstate Medical University.
RNA analysis.
Animals were euthanized humanely, and their hearts were excised. After
being rinsed in Krebs-Henseleit buffer (118 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.52 mM CaCl2, 1.64 mM MgSO4, 25 mM
NaHCO3, 1.18 mM KH2PO4, 5.55 mM
glucose, and 2.0 mM sodium pyruvate), the right ventricle (RV) was
dissected free from the left ventricle (LV) and septum under a
stereomicroscope. The tissues were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and
stored at
70°C. Total RNA was isolated using the guanidinium-acid
phenol method (10), and ACE mRNA levels were then measured
using an RNase protection assay. A riboprobe specific for the somatic
isoform of mouse ACE was generated by amplifying a 272-bp cDNA
(gb:J03940, nucleotides 69-341) by RT-PCR. The PCR product was
subcloned into the pCR-Script vector (Stratagene; LaJolla, CA), and the
sequence was verified. The mouse glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA clone (gb:M32599, nucleotides 590-754) was generously provided by Dr. Brian Liu. Plasmids were linearized, and
antisense riboprobes were synthesized using T3 RNA polymerase (GIBCO-BRL; Gaithersburg, MD). To compensate for the much greater abundance of the GAPDH transcript, ACE and GAPDH riboprobes were synthesized at different specific activities (3.92 × 108 and 7.38 × 107
counts · min
1 · µg
1,
respectively). The linearity of the assay was verified for both probes;
5 × 104 counts/min of each probe and 4.5 µg of
total RNA were used in the RNase protection assay. RNA and diethyl
pyrocarbonate-treated (DEPC) water were combined in a total
volume of 8 µl, and 42 µl of buffer-containing probe were then
added [final concentration: 72.24% formamide, 0.84 mM EDTA (pH 7.4),
0.3612 M NaCl, and 42 mM PIPES (pH 6.9)]. Samples were heat denatured
at 85°C and then incubated overnight at 55°C. The samples were
digested in a final concentration of 18 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 0.27 M NaCl,
4.54 mM EDTA (pH 7.4), 110 U/ml RNase T1, and 1.0 µg/ml RNase A (RPA
grade enzymes, Ambion). After RNase digestion, the samples were
extracted with phenol-chloroform, ethanol precipitated, and resuspended in formamide loading dye [0.05% bromphenol blue, 0.05% xylene cyanol, 20 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), and 86% formamide]. The samples were separated on a 30 × 40-cm, 6% acrylamide-8 M urea gel. A
radiolabeled DNA ladder (SeqaMark, Research Genetics) was included for
a size reference. After electrophoresis, the gel was dried and used to expose a Phosphoimager screen (Molecular Dynamics). The data were quantified using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad). Mouse kidney RNA from
a single preparation was run in triplicate for each RNase protection
assay and served as an interassay reference. This analysis was repeated
at least twice for all tissues examined.
Western blot analysis. Membrane proteins were extracted from LV tissues using a modification of published methods (24). The pellet was resuspended with buffer (1:10 wt/vol; 20 mM NaPO4, 0.5% SDS, and 3 M urea), briefly sonicated, and then clarified (4,340 g, 5 min). Membrane protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit II (6) using bovine serum albumin as the standard. The sample (20 µg) was electrophoresed using standard protocols (25), and gels were stained with Coomassie blue or transferred to 0.45-µm nitrocellulose membranes (38). Purified rabbit lung ACE (0.4 µg, Sigma; St. Louis, MO) served as a positive control. Anti-human ACE antibody (Peninsula Laboratories) was used at a concentration of 1 µg/ml, anti-actin antibody (clone C4, ICN Biomedicals) was used at a 1:3,000 dilution, and peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) was used at 0.04 µg/ml. Bands were detected with chemiluminescence using Super Signal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate (Pierce). Band intensity was determined densitometrically using a Fluor-S Imager (Bio-Rad) and Quantity One software.
Statistical analysis. The data presented are representative of a minimum of two separate experiments. Data are expressed as means ± SD. Differences between groups were assessed using an unpaired Student's t-test. In all cases, differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gender differences in ventricular expression of murine ACE. To test whether gender differences exist in cardiac ACE expression in the adult mouse, a RNase protection assay was developed to measure ACE mRNA levels. A synthetic antisense RNA complementary to a 272-nucleotide region at the 5' end of the somatic isoform of murine ACE was produced. This segment of the ACE mRNA exhibits only 43% nucleotide identity with the testis-specific isoform with the nucleotide identity restricted to stretches of 10 nucleotides or less. As a result, this riboprobe is specific to the somatic isoform of ACE. Quantitative detection of ACE transcript levels was assured by verifying that RNase protection was performed under conditions of probe excess.
ACE mRNA levels in 12-wk-old Swiss-Webster mice were measured by RNase protection and normalized to GAPDH levels to correct for variation in sample loading (Fig. 1A). Quantitation of the RNase protection assay revealed that ACE mRNA was significantly more abundant in ventricular RNA from male mice compared with female mice (Fig. 1, B and C; RV: 1.5-fold, P < 0.05; LV: 2.0-fold, P < 0.0005). This gender difference in ACE mRNA expression was seen in both the RV and LV (Fig. 1, B and C). It was not apparent in RNA isolated from the lung, whereas a slight gender difference was detected in the kidney (data not shown). Because ACE mRNA is substantially more abundant in the lung than in the heart, we questioned whether the lack of gender difference in lung ACE mRNA expression correlated with the robustness of ACE expression in that tissue. To address this, we repeated this analysis with total brain RNA. Despite similar ACE transcript abundance in brain and heart RNA, no gender difference in ACE expression was detected in the brain (Fig. 1D).
|
|
|
Underlying gender differences in ACE expression result in greater
absolute levels of ACE in male cardiomyopathic mice.
Many investigators have shown that cardiac ACE levels increase in
experimental models of cardiac hypertrophy or failure (4, 18, 26,
36) as well as in the failing human heart (28a). Are gender
differences in ventricular ACE levels apparent in diseased hearts as
well? To address this question, ventricular ACE mRNA levels were
measured in a transgenic mouse model of cardiomyopathy (41) and compared with age- and gender-matched
nontransgenic littermates. Ventricular ACE mRNA levels were increased
in cardiomyopathic mice (Fig. 4, hatched
bars) compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Both male
and female cardiomyopathic mice had increased levels of ventricular ACE
relative to age- and sex-matched controls. However, when the absolute
ACE mRNA levels were compared, it was clear that ACE mRNA levels were
greatest in male cardiomyopathic animals (Fig. 4).
|
Surgical gonadectomy in male and female mice results in
antithetical effects on ventricular ACE mRNA levels.
Given the role of estrogen in influencing the levels of
renin-angiotensin system components in noncardiac tissues (see Refs. 7 and 30), we questioned whether gonadal steroids play a role in regulating the expression of the cardiac ACE levels in the
mouse. To address this question, albeit indirectly, C57/Bl6 mice were
subjected to surgical gonadectomy, RNA was prepared from the hearts of
these animals, and left ventricular ACE mRNA levels were measured in
surgically intact and gonadectomized mice. As expected, there was an
increase in ventricular ACE mRNA levels in agonadal females (28%
increase vs. surgically intact controls, P < 0.05).
Unexpectedly, ventricular ACE mRNA levels in androgen-deprived males
were substantially lower than in surgically intact males (37% decrease
vs. surgically intact controls, P < 0.0005) and were
equivalent to the levels measured in surgically intact females (Fig.
5).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have presented data demonstrating a gender difference in the expression of ACE in the murine heart with greater cardiac ACE levels seen in male animals compared with females. Moreover, we have shown that ventricular ACE abundance is altered in agonadal animals and that male and female mice exhibit antithetical changes in ACE expression in response to surgical gonadectomy. It has been proposed that increased ACE abundance in the hypertrophied and failing heart may contribute to the local generation of angiotensin II and impact cardiac remodeling through local paracrine or autocrine effects (1, 31, 45). The greater abundance of ventricular ACE in males may contribute to the tendency of male rodents to develop cardiac dilation, which has been described in transgenic mouse models (23, 41), spontaneously hypertensive rats (43), and in response to LV pressure overload in rats (46) and in humans (9, 13, 42).
Potential mechanisms contributing to gender differences in cardiac ACE expression include negative regulation of ACE expression by estrogen and positive regulation of ACE expression by testosterone. Gallagher et al. (15) demonstrated that supraphysiological concentrations of estrogen in the rat (894 pg/ml) decrease ACE expression in the kidney, lung, and aorta (15). Our data are consistent with that report and suggest that estrogens also have a negative effect on the cardiac expression of ACE. No conserved estrogen response elements have been identified in 5' flanking DNA from ACE genes (19, 20, 47). However, there is a putative activator protein-1 (AP-1) site located ~300 bp 5' to the transcriptional start site in human, rabbit, and mouse ACE genes, and AP-1 sites have been shown to be negatively responsive to estrogen in other genes. In addition, because ventricular ACE mRNA levels were decreased in androgen-deprived males, we suggest that testosterone may play a role in regulating ACE expression in the mouse heart. However, further experimentation is needed to determine whether ligand-bound steroid hormone receptors regulate ACE expression directly.
Although the testis-specific ACE isoform is positively regulated by
androgens (40), studies on the regulation of the somatic ACE isoform by nonestrogenic steroids have focussed on the effects of
glucocorticoids. Dexamethasone treatment increases ACE activity in
cultured endothelial cells (12) and cultured cardiac
fibroblasts (5, 17). However, Dasarathy et al.
(12) reported that testosterone did not stimulate and
estrogens did not decrease ACE activity in cultured bovine pulmonary
artery endothelial cells (12). It is not clear whether the
lack of stimulation of ACE by testosterone described by Dasarathy et
al. (12) in cultured endothelial cells reflects the
response of all ACE-expressing cells in vivo. A number of cell types
have been shown to express ACE, including endothelial cells, vascular
smooth muscle cells, and activated macrophages. However, it is not
clear whether cells other than endothelial and vascular smooth muscle
cells express ACE in the healthy adult mouse heart. We also do not know
whether the gender difference in cardiac ACE expression we report in
this study reflects differential ACE expression in several cardiac cell
types or differential expression in a subset of cells. Furthermore,
gender differences in ACE expression were not detected in all tissues.
Because we expect that different tissues within an individual mouse
would be exposed to the same hormonal milieu, this suggests that the
hormonal milieu is necessary but not sufficient to generate a gender
difference in ACE expression. In addition, no correlation was seen
between the robustness of ACE expression in a tissue and the presence
of a gender difference in its expression. For steroid hormone receptors
to influence the expression of the ACE gene, the appropriate hormone
receptors must be coexpressed in the target cell. ACE expression in
different tissues also may be influenced by the presence of
tissue-specific coactivators, such as FLH2, a cardiac-specific
coactivator of the androgen receptor (28a). To clarify whether this
scenario operates in the heart, further studies are needed to identify cells in the male and female mouse heart that coexpress ACE, the androgen receptor, or estrogen receptors (
or
) and coactivators for these steroid-hormone receptors.
A number of investigators have demonstrated increased cardiac ACE levels in failing hearts. It is interesting to note that the gender difference in cardiac ACE levels that we report in healthy mice (1.4-fold in C57/Bl6 mice and 2.0-fold in Swiss-Webster mice) are similar in magnitude to the differences reported between healthy and failing hearts of several species (for examples, see Refs. 4, 18, 36, and 49). Moreover, we demonstrated that in a cardiomyopathic mouse model, ventricular ACE mRNA levels were increased in both male and female animals, but the absolute levels of ACE were greatest in hearts from male cardiomyopathic mice. The functional significance of this difference remains to be determined. However, if the heart is taking up angiotensin I from the circulation, these gender differences in cardiac ACE expression could prove sufficient to influence local production of angiotensin II. On the basis of our findings, we propose that cardiac production of angiotensin II is greater in the hearts of male mice than female mice and that this increased local capacity to generate angiotensin II is sufficient to influence the remodeling of the heart when a pathological stimulus is imposed. Further studies are needed to determine whether these gender differences in tissue ACE expression exist in humans and to clarify the roles of estrogens and testosterone in regulating these differences.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. L. Vikstrom, Dept. of Pharmacology, SUNY Upstate Medical Univ., 750 East Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13210 (E-mail: vikstrok{at}upstate.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
July 18, 2002;10.1152/ajpheart.01054.2001
Received 3 December 2001; accepted in final form 12 July 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bader, M,
Peters J,
Baltatu O,
Muller DN,
Luft FC,
and
Ganten D.
Tissue renin-angiotensin systems: new insights from experimental animal models in hypertension research.
J Mol Med
79:
76-102,
2001.
2.
Bai, S,
Campbell SE,
Moore JA,
Morales MC,
and
Gerdes AM.
Influence of age, growth, and sex on cardiac myocyte size and number in rats.
Anat Rec
226:
207-212,
1990.
3.
Baker, PJ,
Ramey ER,
and
Ramwell PW.
Androgen-mediated sex differences of cardiovascular responses in rats.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
235:
H242-H246,
1978.
4.
Barlucchi, L,
Leri A,
Dostal DE,
Fiordaliso F,
Tada H,
Hintze TH,
Kajstura J,
Nadal-Ginard B,
and
Anversa P.
Canine ventricular myocytes possess a renin-angiotensin system that is upregulated with heart failure.
Circ Res
88:
298-304,
2001.
5.
Barreto-Chaves, MLM,
Aneas I,
and
Krieger JE.
Glucocorticoid regulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme in primary culture of adult cardiac fibroblasts.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
280:
R25-R32,
2001.
6.
Bradford, M.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal Biochem
72:
248-254,
1976.
7.
Brosnihan, KB,
Senanayake PS,
Li P,
and
Ferrario CM.
Bi-directional actions of estrogen on the renin-angiotensin system.
Braz J Med Biol Res
32:
373-381,
1999.
8.
Camper-Kirby, D,
Welch S,
Walker A,
Shiraishi I,
Setchell KR,
Schaefer E,
Kajstura J,
Anversa P,
and
Sussman MA.
Myocardial Akt activation and gender-increased nuclear activity in females versus males.
Circ Res
88:
1020-1027,
2001.
9.
Carroll, JD,
Carroll EP,
Feldman T,
Ward DM,
Lang RM,
McGaughey D,
and
Karp RB.
Sex-associated differences in left ventricular function in aortic stenosis of the eldery.
Circulation
86:
1099-1107,
1992.
10.
Chomczynski, P,
and
Sacchi N.
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem
162:
156-169,
1987.
11.
Danilov, S,
Jaspard E,
Churakova T,
Towbin H,
Savoie F,
Wei L,
and
Alhenc-Gelas F.
Structure-function analysis of angiotensin I-converting enzyme using monoclonal antibodies. Selective inhibition of the amino-terminal active site.
J Biol Chem
269:
26806-26814,
1994.
12.
Dasarathy, Y,
Lanzillo JJ,
and
Fanburg BL.
Stimulation of bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cell ACE by dexamethasone: involvement of steroid receptors.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
263:
L645-L649,
1992.
13.
Douglas, PS,
Katz SE,
Weinberg EO,
Chen MH,
Bishop SP,
and
Lorell BH.
Hypertrophic remodeling: gender differences in the early response to left ventricular pressure overload.
J Am Coll Cardiol
32:
1118-1125,
1998.
14.
Foegh, ML,
Asotra S,
Howell MH,
and
Ramwell PW.
Estradiol inhibition of arterial neointimal hyperplasia after balloon injury.
J Vasc Surg
19:
722-726,
1994.
15.
Gallagher, PE,
Li P,
Lenhart JR,
Chappell MC,
and
Brosnihan KB.
Estrogen regulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme mRNA.
Hypertension
33:
323-328,
1999.
16.
Gray, GA,
Sharif I,
Webb DJ,
and
Seckl JR.
Oestrogen and the cardiovascular system: the good, the bad and the puzzling.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
22:
152-156,
2001.
17.
Hafizi, S,
Wharton J,
Morgan K,
Allen SP,
Chester AH,
Catravas JD,
Polak JM,
and
Yacoub MH.
Expression of functional angiotensin-converting enzyme and AT1 receptors in cultured human cardiac fibroblasts.
Circulation
98:
2553-2559,
1998.
18.
Hirsch, AT,
Talsness CE,
Schunkert H,
Paul M,
and
Dzau VJ.
Tissue-specific activation of cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme in experimental heart failure.
Circ Res
69:
475-482,
1991.
19.
Howard, HL,
McLaughlin-Taylor E,
and
Hill RL.
The effect of mouse euthanasia technique on subsequent lymphocyte proliferation and cell mediated lympholysis assays.
Lab Anim Sci
40:
510-514,
1990.
20.
Hubert, C,
Houot AM,
Corvol P,
and
Soubrier F.
Structure of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene. Two alternate promoters correspond to evolutionary steps of a duplicated gene.
J Biol Chem
266:
15377-15383,
1991.
21.
Hulley, S,
Grady D,
Bush T,
Furberg C,
Herrington D,
Riggs B,
and
Vittinghoff E.
Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group.
JAMA
280:
605-613,
1998.
22.
Jun, SS,
Chen Z,
Pace MC,
and
Shaul PW.
Estrogen upregulates cyclooxygenase-1 gene expression in ovine fetal pulmonary artery endothelium.
J Clin Invest
102:
176-183,
1998.
23.
Kadokami, T,
McTiernan CF,
Kubota T,
Frye CS,
and
Feldman AM.
Sex-related survival differences in murine cardiomyopathy are associated with differences in TNF-receptor expression.
J Clin Invest
106:
589-597,
2000.
24.
Kinoshita, A,
Urata H,
Bumpus FM,
and
Husain A.
Measurement of angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibition in the heart.
Circ Res
73:
51-60,
1993.
25.
Laemmli, UK.
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:
680-685,
1970.
26.
Lee, YA,
Liang CS,
Lee MA,
and
Lindpaintner K.
Local stress, not systemic factors, regulate gene expression of the cardiac renin-angiotensin system in vivo: a comprehensive study of all its components in the dog.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
11035-11040,
1996.
27.
Mendelsohn, ME,
and
Karas RH.
The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system.
N Engl J Med
340:
1801-1811,
1999.
28.
Moore, LG,
McMurtry IF,
and
Reeves JT.
Effects of sex hormones on cardiovascular and hematologic responses to chronic hypoxia in rats.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med
158:
658-664,
1978.
28a.
Muller, JM,
Isele U,
Metzger E,
Rempel A,
Moser M,
Pscherer A,
Breyer T,
Holubarsch C,
Buettner R,
and
Schule R.
FHL2, a novel tissue-specific coactivator of the androgen receptor.
EMBO J
19:
359-369,
2000.
29.
Nuedling, S,
Kahlert S,
Loebbert K,
Doevendans PA,
Meyer R,
Vetter H,
and
Grohe C.
17
-Estradiol stimulates expression of endothelial and inducible NO synthase in rat myocardium in-vitro and in-vivo.
Cardiovasc Res
43:
666-674,
1999.
30.
Oelkers, WK.
Effects of estrogens and progestogens on the renin-aldosterone system and blood pressure.
Steroids
61:
166-171,
1996.
31.
Pratt, RE.
Angiotensin II and the control of cardiovascular structure.
J Am Soc Nephrol
10:
S120-S128,
1999.
32.
Reckelhoff, JF.
Gender differences in the regulation of blood pressure.
Hypertension
37:
1199-1208,
2001.
33.
Schiable, TF,
Penpargkul S,
and
Scheuer J.
Differences in male and female rats in cardiac conditioning.
J Appl Physiol
50:
112-117,
1981.
34.
Schiable, TF,
and
Scheuer J.
Effects of physical training by running or swimming on ventricular performance of rat hearts.
J Appl Physiol
46:
854-860,
1979.
35.
Schaible, TF,
and
Scheuer J.
Comparison of heart function in male and female rats.
Basic Res Cardiol
79:
402-412,
1984.
36.
Schunkert, H,
Dzau VJ,
Tang SS,
Hirsch AT,
Apstein CS,
and
Lorell BH.
Increased rat cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme activity and mRNA expression in pressure overload left ventricular hypertrophy. Effects on coronary resistance, contractility and relaxation.
J Clin Invest
86:
1913-1920,
1990.
37.
Sharkey, LC,
Holycross BJ,
Park S,
Shiry LJ,
Hoepf TM,
McCune SA,
and
Radin MJ.
Effect of ovariectomy and estrogen replacement on cardiovascular disease in heart failure-prone SHHF/Mcc-fa cp rats.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
31:
1527-1537,
1999.
38.
Towbin, M,
Staehelin T,
and
Gordon J.
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: proceedures and some applications.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
76:
4350-4354,
1979.
39.
van Eickels, M,
Grohe C,
Cleutjens JP,
Janssen BJ,
Wellens HJ,
and
Doevendans PA.
17
-Estradiol attenuates the development of pressure-overload hypertrophy.
Circulation
104:
1419-1423,
2001.
40.
Velletri, PA,
Aquilano DR,
Bruckwick E,
Tsai-Morris CH,
Dufau ML,
and
Lovenberg W.
Endocrinological control and cellular localization of rat testicular angiotensin-converting enzyme (EC 3.4151).
Endocrinology
116:
2516-2522,
1985.
41.
Vikstrom, KL,
Factor SM,
and
Leinwand LA.
Mice expressing mutant myosin are a model for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Mol Med
2:
556-567,
1996.
42.
Villarreal, FJ,
and
Dillmann WH.
Cardiac hypertrophy-induced changes in mRNA levels for TGF-
1, fibronectin, and collagen.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
262:
H1861-H1866,
1992.
43.
Wallen, WJ,
Cserti C,
Belanger MP,
and
Wittnich C.
Gender-differences in myocardial adaptation to afterload in normotensive and hypertensive rats.
Hypertension
36:
774-779,
2000.
44.
Wassmann, S,
Baumer AT,
Strehlow K,
van Eickels M,
Grohe C,
Ahlbory K,
Rosen R,
Bohm M,
and
Nickenig G.
Endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress during estrogen deficiency in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Circulation
103:
435-441,
2001.
45.
Weber, KT.
Extracellular matrix remodeling in heart failure. A role for de novo angiotensin II generation.
Circulation
96:
4065-4082,
1997.
46.
Weinberg, EO,
Thienelt CD,
Katz SE,
Bartunek J,
Tajima M,
Rohrbach S,
Douglas PS,
and
Lorell BH.
Gender differences in molecular remodeling in pressure overload hypertrophy.
J Am Coll Cardiol
34:
264-273,
1999.
47.
Xavier-Neto, J,
Pereira AC,
Junqueira ML,
Carmona R,
and
Krieger JE.
Rat angiotensin-converting enzyme promoter regulation by beta-adrenergics and cAMP in endothelium.
Hypertension
34:
31-38,
1999.
49.
Zisman, LS,
Asano K,
Dutcher DL,
Ferdensi A,
Robertson AD,
Jenkin M,
Bush EW,
Bohlmeyer T,
Perryman MB,
and
Bristow MR.
Differential regulation of cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme binding sites and AT1 receptor density in the failing human heart.
Circulation
98:
1735-1741,
1998.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Paul, A. Poyan Mehr, and R. Kreutz Physiology of local Renin-Angiotensin systems. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 747 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Dean, J. Tan, R. White, E. R. O'Brien, and F. H. H. Leenen Regulation of components of the brain and cardiac renin-angiotensin systems by 17beta-estradiol after myocardial infarction in female rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): R155 - R162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Arimura, A. Helbling-Leclerc, C. Massart, S. Varnous, F. Niel, E. Lacene, Y. Fromes, M. Toussaint, A.-M. Mura, D. I. Keller, et al. Mouse model carrying H222P-Lmna mutation develops muscular dystrophy and dilated cardiomyopathy similar to human striated muscle laminopathies Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 155 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-J. Du Gender modulates cardiac phenotype development in genetically modified mice Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2004; 63(3): 510 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |