|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Division of Cardiology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033; 2 Lebanon Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lebanon, Pennsylvania 17042; and 3 Exercise Science Laboratory, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Exposure
to lower body negative pressure (LBNP) leads to an increased activation
of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and an increase in muscle
sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). In this study, we examined the
relationship between MSNA and interstitial norepinephrine
(NEi) concentrations during LBNP. Twelve healthy volunteers
were studied (26 ± 6 yr). Simultaneous MSNA and microdialysis data were collected in six of these subjects. Measurements of MSNA
(microneurography) and NEi (microdialysis, vastus
lateralis) were performed at rest and then during an incremental LBNP
paradigm (
10,
30, and
50 mmHg). MSNA rose as a function of LBNP
(P < 0.001, n = 12). The plasma
norepinephrine (NEp) concentration was 0.9 ± 0.1 nmol/l at rest (n = 12). NEi measured in
six subjects rose from 5.2 ± 0.8 nmol/l at rest to 17.0 ± 1.7 nmol/l at
50 mmHg (P < 0.001). Of note, the rise
in NEp with LBNP was considerably less compared with the
changes in NEi (
21 ± 6% vs.
197 ± 52%, n = 6, P < 0.015). MSNA and
NEi showed a significant linear relationship (r = 0.721, P < 0.004). Activation of
the SNS increased MSNA and NEi levels. The magnitude of the
NEi increase was far greater than that seen for
NEp suggesting that NE movement into the circulation decreases with baroreceptor unloading.
baroreceptors; nervous system; sympathetic; microdialysis; microneurography
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE SYMPATHETIC NERVOUS SYSTEM (SNS) plays an important role in the regulation of skeletal muscle blood flow. Activation of the SNS leads to an increase in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) resulting in vasoconstriction and a decrease in muscle blood flow (13, 24). In response to the firing of sympathetic nerves, norepinephrine (NE) is released into the synaptic cleft from presynaptic storage vesicles. Once in the neurovascular cleft, NE interacts directly with the receptors on the vessels producing its biological effects.
After synaptic release, NE undergoes metabolism and uptake by both neuronal and non-neuronal tissues. The neuronal uptake process, termed uptake 1, is the predominant process by which NE is cleared from the synaptic cleft (8, 22). A smaller percentage is taken up by non-neuronal tissues (uptake 2), whereas the remainder of the released NE escapes these processes and enters the general circulation, a process known as "NE spillover" (12).
Previous reports have tried to understand neurovascular physiology during sympathetic activation by measuring plasma NE (NEp) and NE spillover. This latter method has generally employed radiotracer techniques (7, 16). However, based on the above discussion, it is clear that NEp and/or NE spillover may not provide a true reflection of events occurring within the synaptic cleft. Compared with these measurements, interstitial NE (NEi) at rest and in response to SNS activation is likely to be more reflective of neurovascular NE concentrations-its main site of action (10). Because of methodological limitations, it has been extremely difficult in humans to directly access the interstitial space for measurements of NE concentrations.
The microdialysis technique allows the measurement and quantification
of various substances within the interstitial space of human subjects.
The purpose of the present study was to utilize this powerful method to
measure skeletal muscle NEi while simultaneously measuring
MSNA during sympathoexcitation. To engage the autonomic nervous system,
a graded lower body negative pressure (LBNP) paradigm was used. The
combination of these techniques allowed the investigators to examine
1) whether differences exist in NE concentrations between the interstitial space and the plasma compartment and 2) the
effects of LBNP and MSNA on NEi versus NEp
levels (Fig. 1).
|
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We studied a total of 12 healthy subjects, 7 men and 5 women, with a mean age of 26 ± 6 yr. We obtained nerve data in 12 subjects, and in 6 of these subjects we simultaneously obtained microdialysis data. All volunteers were nonsmokers and in good health as assessed by a prestudy history and physical examination. All subjects provided an informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board of The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center.
Experimental paradigm. Subjects reported to the General Clinical Research Center in the morning after an overnight fast. They were instructed to refrain from caffeine intake for 24 h before the experiment. Subjects were placed on a padded table with their lower body (up to the level of the umbilicus) positioned inside a LBNP chamber. An IV was placed in an antecubital vein. To perform vastus lateralis muscle microdialysis, a LBNP chamber was constructed in which only the left leg and pelvis were placed within the tank and exposed to LBNP. The right leg from the level of upper thigh down remained outside the tank and readily accessible for the performance of microdialysis and microneurography. Continuous monitoring of the heart rate (HR) was performed with ECG, and arterial blood pressure (BP) was measured using the volume-clamp method (Finapres, Ohmeda; Madison, WI). Microdialysis probes and the peroneal nerve electrodes were then placed (see below for details).
After instrumentation and a 90-min "equalization period," baseline MSNA, BP, and HR were recorded and microdialysate and blood samples were collected. After 10 min of baseline, LBNP was initiated. The negative pressure was applied in a graded incremental manner beginning with
10 mmHg, proceeding to
30 mmHg, and then to
50 mmHg. All
stages were 10 min in length, and BP and HR were closely monitored
during this time. The experiment was terminated when the
paradigm was completed or if any of the following occurred: 1) volunteers developed presyncopal symptoms such as
lightheadedness, dizziness, nausea, cold sweats, yawning, or visual
disturbances, 2) volunteers developed a sudden fall in
systolic BP of >35 mmHg, and/or 3) volunteers developed a
fall in systolic BP to <85 mmHg.
Microdialysis. The microdialysis probes were inserted in the vastus lateralis muscle of the subject's right leg. This muscle was chosen because there are no important nerves or vessels passing through it and thus the risk of neurovascular damage to the lower extremity was extremely small. An area measuring ~25 × 20 cm over the subject's thigh was shaved, prepped with povidone-iodine solution, and then draped using sterile sheets. A skin marker was used to mark the probe insertion sites, which were ~2-3 cm apart. With the use of strict aseptic techniques, the skin and subcutaneous sites at the probe entry and exit sites were anesthetized with a local injection of lidocaine (0.5-1.0 ml). The probes, four to six in number (depending on the muscle size and orientation), were inserted into the muscle via a 20-gauge cannula. After insertion, the microdialysis probes were attached to a perfusion pump (CMA model 102) and perfused at a rate of 5 µl/min with a saline solution containing 3.0 mM glucose and 0.5 mM lactate.
Microdialysis probes. The semipermeable fibers (GFS Plus 12, Gambro) used to construct the microdialysis probes had a molecular mass cutoff of 3,000 kDa [0.20 mm inner diameter (ID), 0.22 mm outer diameter (OD)]. Briefly, each end of a single fiber was inserted ~1 cm into a hollow polyamide tube (0.25 mm ID, 0.36 mm OD) and glued, and the actual diffusible portion (distance between the two polyamide tubes) was 4 cm. A complete description of microdialysis probe construction can be reviewed in MacLean et al. (19).
Determination of probe recovery. To fully utilize the microdialysis technique, an estimate of the extraction fraction of the compound being measured in the interstitial space needs to be made, which is defined as "probe recovery." This determination is necessary to calculate actual interstitial concentrations and to document any possible changes that may occur to probe recovery during the course of the experiment. To achieve this, a small amount of radioactive tracer, in the form of compound being investigated, is added to the microdialysis perfusate. It has been suggested that the relative loss of the isotope from the perfusate into the interstitial space represents probe recovery for that compound. This was confirmed in vitro by Kurosawa et al. (15), where the simultaneous measurement of tracer loss and compound recovery proved to be similar. The major advantage of this method is that probe recovery can be determined in vivo for each collected sample allowing continuous monitoring of probe recovery over time.
To determine the probe recovery of NE in this study, a small amount of [3H]NE (0.1 µCi/ml) was added to the perfusate. Probe recovery was calculated from the loss of radioactive tracer, and the actual interstitial concentration of NE was calculated from the probe recovery values and dialysate NE concentrations (18).Microneurography. This technique provides direct recordings of sympathetic nerve activity directed to blood vessels in skeletal muscle. MSNA was our primary index of sympathoexcitation. External mapping of the peroneal nerve course (40-100 V, 0.2 ms, 1 Hz) was performed just behind the fibular head of the right leg. A reference electrode was placed subcutaneously ~2-3 cm away from the recording site. Multiunit recordings of MSNA in the leg were obtained by transcutaneous placement of a tungsten microelectrode (insulated 200 µm diameter with a tapered uninsulated 1- to 5-µm tip) into a C-fiber-containing fascicle in the nerve. The electrode was manipulated to yield a neurogram with characteristic bursts of MSNA. The signals thus obtained represent postganglionic vasoconstrictor nerve traffic. The signals were amplified 1,000 times by a preamplifier and 50-100 times by an amplifier. The signals were filtered (bandwidth of 700-2,000 Hz), rectified, and integrated to obtain a mean voltage neurogram. The neurograms were analyzed and expressed as bursts per minute. MSNA was also analyzed by signal averaging. For each subject, four 10-min segments of MSNA data were selected, representing signals recorded during baseline and at each level of LBNP. A signal-averaged MSNA waveform was produced for each segment using the signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) extension within the PowerLab v.4.1 software package (ADInstruments). SAECG used the ECG to parse the MSNA signal into packets spanning individual cardiac cycles and summed all MSNA cycles into a composite waveform whether the cycle contained a burst or not. It then divided this composite by the number of cycles in the original data segment to yield the average MSNA signal per cycle, which was then numerically integrated to determine the area under the curve.
Blood and dialysate samples.
A Teflon intravenous catheter was placed in a forearm vein and attached
to a saline lock to ensure patency. Approximately 3 ml of blood were
drawn during baseline and then during minute 9 of each level
of LBNP. Blood samples were placed in prechilled tubes containing EDTA
and glutathione and immediately centrifuged, and the plasma was
separated and frozen at
80°C until analyzed. One milliliter of
plasma was used for the determination of NE concentrations (100 µl
injection volume) using HPLC and electrochemical detection
(26).
10,
30, and
50 mmHg). HR and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were also used for comparison of the different LBNP stages (see below).
Signal-averaged MSNA was measured each minute for every level of LBNP.
With the use of a paired t-test, we found that for each
level of LBNP, minute 9 was not statistically different than any other minute. HR and MAP values at minute 9 were also
compared with each other minute. We found that at
30 and
50 mmHg,
HR took 4 and 3 min, respectively, to reach a steady-state value. At
50 mmHg, the minute 2 value for MAP was 3.3 mmHg higher
than the minute 9 value (91.9 ± 3.9 mmHg at
minute 9 and 95.2 ± 3.9 mmHg at minute 2,
P < 0.036). Thus all values reached a steady state by minute 9.
Microdialysate was collected over the entire 10-min baseline and LBNP
periods to obtain a sufficient volume for NE analysis. The signals for
BP, ECG, and MSNA were sampled at 100 Hz and stored on a computer using
a commercially available data-acquisition system (PowerLab, ADInstruments).
Statistical analysis.
We analyzed MAP, HR, MSNA, and NEp using a two-way ANOVA.
Two main effects were examined: LBNP (a within-subject variable with 4 levels: baseline,
10,
30, and
50 mmHg) and probe placement (a
between-subject variable with 2 levels: subjects with and without microdialysis probes). This approach allowed us to determine whether 1) the one-legged LBNP tank that was specially designed for
these experiments evoked graded autonomic responses and 2)
microdialysis probe placement altered the autonomic responses.
NEi was analyzed with a one-way ANOVA with repeated
measures for the four levels of LBNP. All post hoc analyses were
performed using Dunnett's test to compare all values to baseline.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of microdialysis probe insertion on measured hemodynamic
variables.
As can be seen in Table 1
(n = 12), there was no effect of probe insertion on HR,
MAP, NEp, or MSNA ("probe" main effects were not
significant for all 4 variables). Thus the act of measuring NEi did not in itself systematically alter the study of
LBNP effects on hemodynamics.
|
Effects of one-legged LBNP on HR, MAP, NEp, and MSNA.
As expected, LBNP led to an increase in HR (main effect
P < 0.031) and MAP (main effect P < 0.046). Of note, both NEp and MSNA bursts rose with LBNP
(main effects P < 0.025 and P < 0.001, respectively). Pointwise comparisons demonstrated statistically significant differences between baseline and LBNP
50 mmHg values for
all four parameters.
Effects of one-legged LBNP on NEi.
The number of probes used for the determination of NEi at
baseline and during
10,
30, and
50 mmHg LBNP were 15, 15, 14, and
10, respectively. The reasons for this difference in the number of
probes at different levels of LBNP were as follows: 1) As
LBNP increased, some probes ceased to function. LBNP induced leg
movement, which caused some probes to kink. This resulted in a reduced
volume of perfusate, which was assessed by weighing the sample tubes after collection, and 2) the development of presyncope,
which resulted in insufficient dialysate to measure NEi.
10,
30, and
50
mmHg LBNP was 25.1 ± 0.6%, 24.0 ± 0.6%, 24.7 ± 0.6%, and 23.8 ± 0.7%, respectively. LBNP led to a large
increase in NEi. The values were 5.2 ± 0.8 nM at
rest, 8.4 ± 0.9 nM at
10 mmHg, 11.7 ± 1.5 nM at
30
mmHg, and 17.0 ± 1.7 nM at
50 mmHg (P < 0.001).
Comparative effects of LBNP on NEp and NEi.
The percent increase from baseline to the maximum level of LBNP was
much greater for NEi than for NEp
(n = 6, 197 ± 52% vs. 21 ± 6%,
P < 0.015, paired t-test). This led to a
progressive NEi-to-NEp gradient (Fig.
2).
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main findings of the study are as follows: 1)
one-legged LBNP led to a rise in MSNA, NEi, and
NEp at
50 mmHg; 2) MSNA correlated with both
NEi and NEp; and 3) the rate of rise
of NEp as LBNP increased was much less than the rate of
increase in NEi. The results of our study suggest that
NEi concentrations are reflective of changes in SNS
activity seen during baroreceptor unloading. Furthermore, we believe
that NE concentrations at the neurovascular junction are better
reflected by NEi than by NEp. Finally, the large gradient in NEi and NEp, which increases
as a function of LBNP, suggests that the capillary barrier and the
level of blood flow contributes importantly to the NEp level.
Assessment of autonomic function. Because of the significance of the SNS in circulatory control, numerous methodologies have been employed to understand its functioning under various physiological conditions. These include plasma measurements of NE kinetics and the measurement of MSNA using microneurography. NE kinetics have been studied extensively using compartmental and noncompartmental techniques developed by Linares, Esler, and others (3, 7, 10, 17). The steady-state [3H]NE technique is the most commonly used method to measure NE spillover. The major drawback of this technique is that the rate of entry of NE into the circulation during "stress" may or may not represent the same percentage of released NE that is seen under resting conditions. It must be emphasized that aside from NE release, many local and systemic factors can influence NE spillover. The local factors include NE uptake and metabolism, the width of the neuronal cleft, and conductivity of the capillary bed (6). Systemic factors include the level of cardiac output as well as regional blood flow (2, 4). These additional factors render NE spillover an imprecise index of NE released from sympathetic nerve terminals.
Microneurographic recordings of sympathetic nerve traffic represent another method that has been utilized to increase our understanding of autonomic control in human subjects. This technique provides a measure of sympathetic nerve traffic; however, it does not provide direct information regarding the events taking place at the neuroeffector junction. Moreover, it can be argued that with microneurography, sympathetic "activity" is measured in a nerve fascicle that is proximal to the sympathetic nerve ending. Accordingly, it is unclear whether all nerve impulses translate into electrochemical coupling and the release of NE at the neurovascular junction. Despite these caveats, important information has been gathered by measuring MSNA and NE spillover. For example, in studies conducted by Wallin et al. (25), a positive correlation between MSNA and total body NE spillover and NEp concentration at rest and during isometric hand grip exercise has been shown. Kingwell et al. (14) demonstrated a positive correlation between MSNA and cardiac NE spillover at rest. Thus NE spillover under the appropriate circumstance may be reflective of increased SNS activity. We suggest that this relationship may be greatly dependent on the level of regional blood flow as well as the diffusion capacity of NE from the interstitium into the vascular space.Study findings and their implications. In the present report, we used the microdialysis technique to directly determine NEi concentrations at rest and during LBNP. With the application of LBNP, the SNS is activated through unloading of baroreceptors leading to an increase in the MSNA (23). In addition, LBNP can be employed in a graded and incremental fashion, leading to graded levels of sympathetic activation (3).
In the present study, LBNP resulted in an increase in MSNA associated with a corresponding increase in NEi. MSNA correlated with both NEi and NEp. However, the rate of rise in NEp was much less than that noted for MSNA vs. NEi (Fig. 2). At rest, the NEp concentration was ~18% of the NEi concentration; at
50 mmHg LBNP, NEp was only 7% of NEi.
Parenthetically, the increase in NEp compared with baseline
is smaller than the increases seen in previous reports. We suspect that
the magnitude of the increase was less in this report because we used
the less vigorous one-legged LBNP as the stimulus and not two-legged
LBNP as the stimulus to increase sympathetic outflow (11).
What mechanisms might explain these findings? Previous studies have
suggested that the endothelium serves as a barrier to NE diffusion from
the interstitium into the circulation (21). We suggest
that this barrier accounts for the NEi-to-NE blood concentration gradient seen at rest. Furthermore, a decrease in local blood flow can alter the gradient for diffusion, which could increase the NEi-to-NEp gradient
(9). In our studies, LBNP led to an increase in MSNA and
NEi and presumably to a greater level
-receptor
stimulation by NE. These
-receptors are located at the metarteriole
and precapillary levels. We speculate that this process led to a
reduction in the intracapillary pressure, which was already compromised
by low limb flows as a result of the diminished cardiac output seen
with LBNP. These processes may have even produced a collapse of some
capillary beds, which would have resulted in an even greater gradient
between NEi and NEp (5, 20). We
hypothesize that this effect reduced the area available for diffusion
and limited the rate of NE diffusion into the general circulation (Fig.
2). Further work will be necessary to test this line of reasoning.
It should be noted that a possible limitation to the findings is the
different anatomic location from where each of the variables was
measured. For example, NEp was measured from an antecubital vein, NEi was measured from the vastus lateralis muscle,
and MSNA was measured from the peroneal nerve. It is possible that the degree of sympathetic outflow at the recording site differed from that
at the site of NEi measurement. Moreover, it is possible that there was somewhat less release in NE from the nerves in the arm
than in the leg for a given level of MSNA. Future studies comparing
NEi in the leg and arm will be necessary to further explore
this issue. Despite these potential drawbacks, the magnitude of change
in NEi compared with NEp was so substantial
that any influence of regional MSNA or NE release differences are
unlikely to explain the observed findings.
In conclusion, activation of the SNS with LBNP leads to increases in
MSNA, NEi, and NEp. Both NEi and
NEp correlate with MSNA. At rest, a large concentration
gradient exists between NEi and NEp. This
gradient increases with LBNP. We believe that our findings suggest that
1) NEi is a better reflection of NE release than NEp, and 2) the capillary diffusion barrier as
well as the level of regional blood flow importantly contribute to this gradient.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors are grateful to Kristen S. Gray, Michael Herr, Cynthia Hogeman, Teresa Markle, and Jason Neil for excellent technical support, Allen Kunselman for statistical expertise, and Jennifer Stoner for excellent secretarial skills.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This project was supported by a Pennsylvania State University Dean's Feasibility Grant (to D. A. MacLean and M. H. Khan), a Veterans Administration Merit Review Award (to L. I. Sinoway), National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grants NAG-9-1259-01 (to D. A. MacLean) and NAGW-4400 (to L. I. Sinoway), and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants R01 AG-12227 and R01 HL-60800 (to L. I. Sinoway) and a NIH-sponsored General Clinical Research Center grant with National Center for Research Resources grant M01 RR-10732. L. I. Sinoway was the recipient of a NIH K24 HL-04011 Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. I. Sinoway, Div. of Cardiology, MC H047, The Pennsylvania State Univ. College of Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, PO Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033 (E-mail: lsinoway{at}psu.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
July 26, 2002;10.1152/ajpheart.00412.2001
Received 17 May 2001; accepted in final form 18 July 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Altman, DG.
Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991, p. 288-299.
2.
Baily, RG,
Leuenberger U,
Leaman G,
Silber D,
and
Sinoway LI.
Norepinephrine kinetics and cardiac output during nonhypotensive lower body negative pressure.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
260:
H1708-H1712,
1991
3.
Baily, RG,
Prophet SA,
Shenberger JS,
Zelis R,
and
Sinoway LI.
Direct neurohumoral evidence for isolated sympathetic nervous system activation to skeletal muscle in response to cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading.
Circ Res
66:
1720-1728,
1990
4.
Davis, D,
Sinoway LI,
Robison J,
Minotti JR,
Day FP,
Baily R,
and
Zelis R.
Norepinephrine kinetics during orthostatic stress in congestive heart failure.
Circ Res
61, SupplI:
I87-I90,
1987[Medline].
5.
Dietrich, HH,
and
Tyml K.
Microvascular flow response to localized application of norepinephrine on capillaries in rat and frog skeletal muscle.
Microvasc Res
43:
73-86,
1992[ISI][Medline].
6.
Esler, M.
Clinical application of noradrenaline spillover methodology: delineation of regional human sympathetic nervous responses.
Pharmacol Toxicol
73:
243-253,
1993[ISI][Medline].
7.
Esler, M,
Jennings G,
Korner P,
Blombery P,
Sacharias N,
and
Leonard P.
Measurement of total and organ-specific norepinephrine kinetics in humans.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
247:
E21-E28,
1984
8.
Esler, M,
Jennings G,
Lambert G,
Meredith I,
Horne M,
and
Eisenhofer G.
Overflow of catecholamine neurotransmitters to the circulation: source, fate and functions.
Physiol Rev
70:
963-985,
1990
9.
Ganong, WF.
Dynamics of blood and lymph flow.
In: Review of Medical Physiology (18th ed.). Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1997, chapt. 30, p. 536-552.
10.
Goldstein, DS.
Clinical pharmacology of the autonomic nervous system.
In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology (74 Revised Series 30): The Autonomic Nervous System Part 1, edited by Vinken PJ,
and Bruyn GW.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1999, chapt. 4, p. 135-179.
11.
Greenleaf, JE,
Petersen TW,
Gabrielsen A,
Pump B,
Bie P,
Christensen NJ,
Warberg J,
Videbaek R,
Simonson SR,
and
Norsk P.
Low LBNP tolerance in men is associated with attenuated activation of the renin-angiotensin system.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
279:
R822-R829,
2000
12.
Hoffman, BB,
Lefkowitz RL,
and
Taylor P.
Neurotransmission: the autonomic and somatic motor nervous systems.
In: Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (9th ed.), edited by Hardman JG,
Limbird LE,
Molinoff PB,
Ruddon RW,
and Gilman AG.. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996, sect. II, chapt. 6, p. 105-139.
13.
Johnson, JM,
Rowell LB,
Niederberger M,
and
Eisman MM.
Human splanchnic and forearm vasoconstrictor responses to reductions of right atrial and aortic pressures.
Circ Res
34:
515-524,
1974
14.
Kingwell, BA,
Thompson JM,
Kaye DM,
McPherson GA,
Jennings GL,
and
Esler MD.
Heart rate spectral analysis, cardiac norepinephrine spillover, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity during human sympathetic nervous activation and failure.
Circulation
90:
234-240,
1994
15.
Kurosawa, M,
Hallström A,
and
Ungerstedt U.
Changes in cerebral blood flow do not directly affect in vivo recovery of extracellular lactate through microdialysis probe.
Neurosci Lett
126:
123-126,
1991[ISI][Medline].
16.
Leuenberger, U,
Sinoway L,
Gubin S,
Gaul L,
Davis D,
and
Zelis R.
Effects of exercise intensity and duration on norepinephrine spillover and clearance in humans.
J Appl Physiol
75:
668-674,
1993
17.
Linares, OA,
Jacquez JA,
Zech LA,
Smith MJ,
Sanfield JA,
Morrow LA,
Rosen SG,
and
Halter JB.
Norepinephrine metabolism in humans. Kinetic analysis and model.
J Clin Invest
80:
1332-1341,
1987[ISI][Medline].
18.
MacLean, DA,
Bangsbo J,
and
Saltin B.
Muscle interstitial glucose and lactate levels during dynamic exercise in humans determined by microdialysis.
J Appl Physiol
87:
1483-1490,
1999
19.
MacLean, DA,
Imadojemu VA,
and
Sinoway LI.
Interstitial pH, K+, lactate and phosphate determined with MSNA during exercise in humans.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
278:
R563-R571,
2000
20.
Mitchell, D,
Yu J,
and
Tyml K.
Comparable effects of arteriolar and capillary stimuli on blood flow in rat skeletal muscle.
Microvasc Res
53:
22-32,
1997[ISI][Medline].
21.
Rose, CP,
and
Goresky CA.
Interactions between capillary exchange, cellular entry and metabolic sequestration processes in the heart.
In: Handbook of Physiology. The Cardiovascular System. Microcirculation. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1984, sect. 2, vol. IV, chapt. 16, p. 781-798.
22.
Shannon, JR,
Flattem NL,
Jordan J,
Jacob G,
Black BK,
Biaggioni I,
Blakely RD,
and
Robertson D.
Orthostatic intolerance and tachycardia associated with norepinephrine- transporter deficiency.
N Engl J Med
342:
541-549,
2000
23.
Sundlöf, G,
and
Wallin BG.
Effect of lower body negative pressure on human muscle nerve sympathetic activity.
J Physiol
278:
525-532,
1978
24.
Victor, RG,
and
Leimbach WN, Jr.
Effects of lower body negative pressure on sympathetic discharge to leg muscles in humans.
J Appl Physiol
63:
2558-2562,
1987
25.
Wallin, BG,
Esler M,
Dorward P,
Eisenhofer G,
Ferrier C,
Westerman R,
and
Jennings G.
Simultaneous measurements of cardiac noradrenaline spillover and sympathetic outflow to skeletal muscle in humans.
J Physiol
453:
45-58,
1992
26.
Weicker, H.
Determination of free and sulfoconjugated catecholamines in plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography.
Int J Sports Med
9, Suppl2:
S68-S74,
1988.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Sugawara, H. Komine, K. Hayashi, M. Yoshizawa, T. Otsuki, N. Shimojo, T. Miyauchi, T. Yokoi, S. Maeda, and H. Tanaka Systemic {alpha}-adrenergic and nitric oxide inhibition on basal limb blood flow: effects of endurance training in middle-aged and older adults Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1466 - H1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xing, S. Koba, V. Kehoe, Z. Gao, K. Rice, N. King, L. Sinoway, and J. Li Interstitial norepinephrine concentrations in skeletal muscle of ischemic heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1190 - H1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Momen, K. Thomas, C. Blaha, A. Gahremanpour, A. Mansoor, U. A. Leuenberger, and L. I. Sinoway Renal vasoconstrictor responses to static exercise during orthostatic stress in humans: effects of the muscle mechano- and the baroreflexes J. Physiol., June 15, 2006; 573(3): 819 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Guo, F. Schaller, N. Tierney, S. A. Smith, and X. Shi New Insight into the Mechanism of Cardiovascular Dysfunction in the Elderly: Transfer Function Analysis Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2005; 230(8): 549 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Wilson, K. D. Monahan, D. S. Short, and C. A. Ray Effect of age on cutaneous vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine in humans Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): R1230 - R1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ichinose, M. Saito, T. Ogawa, K. Hayashi, N. Kondo, and T. Nishiyasu Modulation of control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity during orthostatic stress in humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): H2147 - H2153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Monahan, T. E. Wilson, and C. A. Ray Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation Augments Sympathetic Nerve Activity Responses to Physiological Stressors in Humans Hypertension, November 1, 2004; 44(5): 732 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Monahan and C. A. Ray Gender affects calf venous compliance at rest and during baroreceptor unloading in humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): H895 - H901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Markel, J. C. Daley III, C. S. Hogeman, M. D. Herr, M. H. Khan, K. S. Gray, A. R. Kunselman, and L. I. Sinoway Aging and the Exercise Pressor Reflex in Humans Circulation, February 11, 2003; 107(5): 675 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |