AJP - Heart Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283: H2074-H2101, 2002; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00900.2001
0363-6135/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurata, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shibamoto, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurata, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shibamoto, T.
Vol. 283, Issue 5, H2074-H2101, November 2002

Dynamical description of sinoatrial node pacemaking: improved mathematical model for primary pacemaker cell

Yasutaka Kurata1, Ichiro Hisatome2, Sunao Imanishi1, and Toshishige Shibamoto1

1 Department of Physiology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa 920-0293; and 2 First Department of Internal Medicine, Tottori University School of Medicine, Yonago 683-0826, Japan


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

We developed an improved mathematical model for a single primary pacemaker cell of the rabbit sinoatrial node. Original features of our model include 1) incorporation of the sustained inward current (Ist) recently identified in primary pacemaker cells, 2) reformulation of voltage- and Ca2+-dependent inactivation of the L-type Ca2+ channel current (ICa,L), 3) new expressions for activation kinetics of the rapidly activating delayed rectifier K+ channel current (IKr), and 4) incorporation of the subsarcolemmal space as a diffusion barrier for Ca2+. We compared the simulated dynamics of our model with those of previous models, as well as with experimental data, and examined whether the models could accurately simulate the effects of modulating sarcolemmal ionic currents or intracellular Ca2+ dynamics on pacemaker activity. Our model represents significant improvements over the previous models, because it can 1) simulate whole cell voltage-clamp data for ICa,L, IKr, and Ist; 2) reproduce the waveshapes of spontaneous action potentials and ionic currents during action potential clamp recordings; and 3) mimic the effects of channel blockers or Ca2+ buffers on pacemaker activity more accurately than the previous models.

rabbit sinoatrial node; nonlinear dynamical system; computer simulation; bifurcation diagram


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

PACEMAKER ACTIVITY of the sinoatrial (SA) node is well known as the initiation of the spontaneous heart beat. A large body of information on ionic current systems underlying the SA node pacemaker activity has been obtained from recent single cell patch-clamp experiments. On the basis of single cell patch-clamp data, several mathematical models describing the pacemaker activity of a single rabbit SA node cell have been developed in the past decade.

In 1991, Wilders et al. (124) first developed a single SA node cell model based on single cell patch-clamp data to reproduce the electrical behavior of a single rabbit SA node cell quantitatively. Later, Demir et al. (17) proposed a more detailed model for transitional-type cells (rather than for primary pacemaker cells) including intracellular Ca2+ buffering (by calmodulin, troponin, and calsequestrin) and new formulations for Ca2+ handling by the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) based on microanatomic data. Dokos et al. (24) developed a different SA node model incorporating new formulations of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger current (INaCa) and muscarinic K+ channel current (IK,ACh) as a background K+ current. However, these previous models have several difficulties, as follows. First, the formulations of voltage-dependent inactivation and recovery of the L-type Ca2+ channel current (ICa,L) were not based on experimental data. Second, the Ca2+-dependent inactivation of ICa,L, known as an essential property of the L-type Ca2+ channel in the rabbit SA node (10, 67), was not formulated [or not directly dependent on the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i), but a function of the inactivation gating variable fL in Wilders et al. (124)]. Although Dokos et al. (24) incorporated a second inactivation gating variable to represent the [Ca2+]i-dependent inactivation process, they assumed an extraordinarily large maximum ICa,L conductance (gCa,L) and a very high affinity for Ca2+ binding to the inactivation site of L-type Ca2+ channels; such a large gCa,L with a high affinity for Ca2+ binding is rather unlikely and has not been demonstrated. Third, these models do not include the slow component of the delayed rectifier K+ current (IKs), 4-aminopyridine (4-AP)-sensitive currents, or sustained inward current (Ist), whereas these currents are known to be present in primary pacemaker cells. Fourth, intracellular Ca2+ transients in their models (2.5~10 µM at the peak) were much higher than those in atrial or ventricular myocytes (~1 µM) (e.g., Refs. 106 and 110; see also Refs. 68 and 71), probably too high for SA node cells. Finally, SR volumes or Ca2+ concentrations in the SR are comparable to or higher than those experimentally determined for ventricular myocytes (see Refs. 17, 63, and 107), probably too large for SA node cells. Recently, Zhang et al. (130) developed separate models for central and peripheral SA node cells based on recent experiments in which the regional differences in action potential (AP) parameters, ionic current densities, and pharmacological responses (i.e., electrophysiological effects of various current blockers) between central and peripheral SA node cells have been studied. Their central and peripheral models provide a theoretical basis for regional differences in AP parameters and are superior to the previous models in that they incorporate novel current systems such as IKs and 4-AP-sensitive currents. However, their models have at least two apparent difficulties. First, intracellular ion concentrations were assumed to be constant in their models (the net ion flux of Na+, K+, or Ca2+ during an AP cycle is not zero), whereas intracellular Ca2+ dynamics and changes in intracellular Na+ ([Na+]i) and K+ concentrations ([K+]i) are known to exert substantial effects on pacemaker activity (e.g., see Refs. 67, 98, and 122). Second, their models lack some sarcolemmal currents, such as Ist and IK,ACh, known to play important roles in regulating the pacemaker activity of rabbit SA node cells. Thus the previous SA node models all have several drawbacks or serious disadvantages; a satisfactory single cell model is not available.

The aim of this study was to develop an improved mathematical model of a single "primary pacemaker cell" of the rabbit SA node that is more suitable than the previous models for investigating the dynamical mechanisms of pacemaker generation. In addition to the drawbacks stated above, the previous single cell models exhibited different bifurcation structures, i.e., different ways of abolishing automaticity (see Ref. 30) from those of real SA node cells during inhibition of ICa,L or the rapid component of the delayed rectifier K+ current (IKr) not suitable for a study on the mechanisms of pacemaker generation (for details, see RESULTS AND DISCUSSION). Thus an improved model cell should have the same bifurcation structures as real SA node cells have as well as the capability of reproducing experimental data more accurately than the previous models. Such a model would also serve as a base model for developing more sophisticated models. On the basis of recent experimental findings, we were able to update the previous models in several ways: 1) Ist, not included in the previous models, has been incorporated; 2) voltage- and Ca2+-dependent inactivation kinetics of ICa,L have been reformulated; 3) expressions for activation kinetics of IKr have renewed; 4) revised kinetic formulas for 4-AP-sensitive currents have been incorporated; 5) voltage- and concentration-dependent kinetics of the Na+-K+ pump current (INaK) have been reformulated; and 6) the subsarcolemmal space as a diffusion barrier for intracellular Ca2+ has been incorporated.

To validate our model, we first compared the simulated dynamics of the model (spontaneous APs and ionic currents during pacemaker activity) with experimental data from the rabbit SA node as well as with those of the previous SA node models. We further validated our model by simulating the effects of modulations of sarcolemmal ionic currents or intracellular Ca2+ dynamics on pacemaker activity. The experimental findings for verification include 1) whole cell voltage-clamp data for ICa,L, IKr, and Ist; 2) waveshapes of spontaneous APs and ionic currents (such as ICa,L and IKr) as observed during AP-clamp recordings; 3) modulations and cessation of pacemaker activity by applications of ICa,L or IKr blockers; 4) modifications of AP waveforms (changes in AP parameters) by blocking the T-type Ca2+ channel current (ICa,T), hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih), or 4-AP-sensitive currents; 5) effects of blocking SR Ca2+ release (by ryanodine) on pacemaker frequency; and 6) negative chronotropic effects of Ca2+ buffers. Our model could reproduce these experimental data more accurately than the previous SA node models. In this study, we particularly focused on the bifurcation structures during applications of ICa,L or IKr blockers and also the differential effects of BAPTA and EGTA on pacemaker frequency. During inhibition of ICa,L or IKr, our model exhibited essentially the same bifurcation structures as observed in real SA node cells, whereas previous models did not; only our model could simulate the differential responses of SA node cells to BAPTA and EGTA. Detailed comparisons of our model with the previous models as well as experimental data are addressed in THEORY AND METHODS (on modeling) and RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (on simulated results).

Glossary

General
4-AP   4-Aminopyridine
AP   Action potential
APA   AP amplitude
APD50   AP duration at 50% repolarization
CL   Cycle length
F   Faraday constant
I   Current
MDP   Maximum diastolic potential
POP   Peak overshoot potential
R   Universal gas constant
SA   Sinoatrial
SR   Sarcoplasmic reticulum
t   Time
T   Absolute temperature
V   Membrane potential (in mV)

Ionic Channel Currents


Ib,Ca   Background Ca2+ current
Ib,K   Background K+ current
Ib,Na   Background Na+ current
ICa,L   L-type Ca2+ channel current
ICa,T   T-type Ca2+ channel current
Ih   Hyperpolarization-activated current
IK   Delayed rectifier K+ current
IK,ACh   Muscarinic K+ channel current
IKr   Rapid component of the delayed rectifier K+ current
IKs   Slow component of the delayed rectifier K+ current
INa   Fast Na+ channel current
INaCa   Na+/Ca2+ exchanger current
INaen   Electroneutral Na+ influx current
INaK   Na+-K+ pump current
INaKmax   Maximum INaK
Ip,Ca   Sarcolemmal Ca2+ pump current
Ist   Sustained inward current
Isus   Sustained component of the 4-AP-sensitive current
Ito   Transient component of the 4-AP-sensitive current

Cell Geometry


Cm   Cell membrane capacitance
Vcell   Cell volume
Vi   Myoplasmic volume available for Ca2+ diffusion
Vrel   Volume of junctional SR (Ca2+ release store)
Vsub   Subspace volume
Vup   Volume of network SR (Ca2+ uptake store)

Ionic Concentrations


Ca2+i   Myoplasmic Ca2+ concentration
[Ca2+]o   Extracellular Ca2+ concentration
[Ca2+]rel   Ca2+ concentration in the junctional SR
[Ca2+]sub   Subspace Ca2+ concentration
[Ca2+]up   Ca2+ concentration in the network SR
[K+]i   Intracellular K+ concentration
[K+]o   Extracellular K+ concentration
[Mg2+]i   Intracellular Mg2+ concentration
[Na+]i   Intracellular Na+ concentration
[Na+]o   Extracellular Na+ concentration

Equilibrium (Reversal) Potentials


ECa,L   Apparent reversal potential of ICa,L
ECa,T   Apparent reversal potential of ICa,T
EK   Equilibrium (Nernst) potential for K+
EKr   Reversal potential of IKr
EKs   Reversal potential of IKs
Emh   Reversal potential of INa
ENa   Equilibrium (Nernst) potential for Na+
Est   Apparent reversal potential of Ist

Sarcolemmal Ionic Currents


L   Activation gating variable for ICa,L
dL,infinity    Steady-state dL
dT   Activation gating variable for ICa,T
dT,infinity    Steady-state dT
fCa   Ca2+-dependent inactivation gating variable for ICa,L
fCa,infinity    Steady-state fCa
fL   Voltage-dependent inactivation gating variable for ICa,L
fL,infinity    Steady-state fL
fT   Inactivation gating variable for ICa,T
fT,infinity    Steady-state fT
FNa   Fraction of slow inactivation of INa
gb,Na   Background Na+ conductance
gCa,L   Maximum ICa,L conductance
gCa,T   Maximum ICa,T conductance
gh   Maximum Ih conductance
gh,K   K+ current component of gh
gh,Na   Na+ current component of gh
gK,ACh   Scaling factor for IK,ACh
gKr   Maximum IKr conductance
gKs   Maximum IKs conductance
gNa   Maximum INa conductance
gst   Maximum Ist conductance
gsus   Maximum Isus conductance
gto   Maximum Ito conductance
h   Inactivation gating variable for INa
hinfinity    Steady-state h
hF   Fast inactivation gating variable for INa
hS   Slow inactivation gating variable for INa
jCa,sm   Net Ca2+ flux through the sarcolemmal membrane
kNaCa   Scaling factor for INaCa
K1ni   Dissociation constant for intracellular Na+ binding to first site on INaCa transporter
K2ni   Dissociation constant for intracellular Na+ binding to second site on INaCa transporter
K3ni   Dissociation constant for intracellular Na+ binding to third site on INaCa transporter
K1no   Dissociation constant for extracellular Na+ binding to first site on INaCa transporter
K2no   Dissociation constant for extracellular Na+ binding to second site on INaCa transporter
K3no   Dissociation constant for extracellular Na+ binding to third site on INaCa transporter
Kci   Dissociation constant for intracellular Ca2+ binding to INaCa transporter
Kco   Dissociation constant for extracellular Ca2+ binding to INaCa transporter
Kcni   Dissociation constant for intracellular Na+ and Ca2+ simultaneous binding to INaCa transporter
KmfCa   Dissociation constant for Ca2+-dependent inactivation of ICa,L
KmKp   Half-maximal [K+]o for INaK
KmNap   Half-maximal [Na+]i for INaK
m   Activation gating variable for INa
minfinity    Steady-state m
n   Activation gating variable for IKs
ninfinity    Steady-state n
pa   Activation gating variable for IKr
pa,infinity    Steady-state pa
paF   Fast activation gating variable for IKr
paS   Slow activation gating variable for IKr
pi   Inactivation gating variable for IKr
pi,infinity    Steady-state pi
q   Inactivation gating variable for Ito
qinfinity    Steady-state q
qa   Activation gating variable for Ist
qa,infinity    Steady-state qa
qi   Inactivation gating variable for Ist
qi,infinity    Steady-state qi
Qci   Fractional charge movement during intracellular Ca2+ occlusion reaction of INaCa transporter
Qco   Fractional charge movement during extracellular Ca2+ occlusion reaction of INaCa transporter
Qn   Fractional charge movement during Na+ occlusion reactions of INaCa transporter
r   Activation gating variable for Ito and Isus
rinfinity    Steady-state r
x   Gating variable
xinfinity    Steady-state value of x
y   Activation gating variable for Ih
yinfinity    Steady-state value of y
 alpha dL   Opening rate constant of dL
 alpha fCa   Ca2+ dissociation rate constant for ICa,L
 alpha qa   Opening rate constant of qa
 alpha qi   Opening rate constant of qi
 alpha n   Opening rate constant of n
 beta dL   Closing rate constant of dL
 beta fCa   Ca2+ association rate constant for ICa,L
 beta n   Closing rate constant of n
 beta qa   Closing rate constant of qa
 beta qi   Closing rate constant of qi
 tau dL   Time constant of dL
 tau dT   Time constant of dT
 tau fCa   Time constant of fCa
 tau fL   Time constant of fL
 tau fT   Time constant of fT
 tau hF   Time constant of hF
 tau hS   Time constant of hS
 tau m   Time constant of m
 tau n   Time constant of n
 tau paF   Time constant of paF
 tau paS   Time constant of paS
 tau q   Time constant of q
 tau qa   Time constant of qa
 tau qi   Time constant of qi
 tau r   Time constant of r
 tau x   Time constant for a gating variable x
 tau y   Time constant of y

Ca2+ Diffusion


jCa,dif   Ca2+ diffusion flux from subspace to myoplasm
 tau dif,Ca   Time constant of Ca2+ diffusion from the subspace to myoplasm

SR Function


jrel   Ca2+ release flux from the junctional SR to subspace
jtr   Ca2+ transfer flux from the network to junctional SR
jup   Ca2+ uptake flux from the myoplasm to network SR
Krel   Half-maximal [Ca2+]sub for Ca2+ release from the junctional SR
Kup   Half-maximal [Ca2+]i for Ca2+ uptake by the Ca2+ pump in the network SR
Prel   Rate constant for Ca2+ release from the junctional SR
Pup   Rate constant for Ca2+ uptake by the Ca2+ pump in the network SR
 tau tr   Time constant for Ca2+ transfer from the network to junctional SR

Ca2+ Buffering


CQtot   Total calsequestrin concentration
[CM]tot   Total calmodulin concentration
fCMi   Fractional occupancy of calmodulin by Ca2+ in myoplasm
fCMs   Fractional occupancy of calmodulin by Ca2+ in subspace
fCQ   Fractional occupancy of calsequestrin by Ca2+
fTC   Fractional occupancy of the troponin-Ca site by Ca2+
fTMC   Fractional occupancy of the troponin-Mg site by Ca2+
fTMM   Fractional occupancy of the troponin-Mg site by Mg2+
kbBAPTA   Ca2+ dissociation constant for BAPTA
kbCM   Ca2+ dissociation constant for calmodulin
kbCQ   Ca2+ dissociation constant for calsequestrin
kbEGTA   Ca2+ dissociation constant for EGTA
kbTC   Ca2+ dissociation constant for the troponin-Ca site
kbTMC   Ca2+ dissociation constant for the troponin-Mg site
kbTMM   Mg2+ dissociation constant for the troponin-Mg site
kfBAPTA   Ca2+ association constant for BAPTA
kfCM   Ca2+ association constant for calmodulin
kfCQ   Ca2+ association constant for calsequestrin
kfEGTA   Ca2+ association constant for EGTA
kfTC   Ca2+ association constant for troponin
kfTMC   Ca2+ association constant for the troponin-Mg site
kfTMM   Mg2+ association constant for the troponin-Mg site
[TC]tot   Total concentration of the troponin-Ca site
[TMC]tot   Total concentration of the troponin-Mg site


    THEORY AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Model Development

We formulated a mathematical model describing the dynamic properties of a single primary pacemaker cell of the rabbit SA node under space-clamp conditions (at 37°C). Our model is an extension of previous SA node models (17, 24, 124, 130) that utilized classical Hodgkin-Huxley formalism, including variations in intracellular ion concentrations, Ca2+ handling by the SR, and Ca2+ buffering. The standard model for normal pacemaker activity is described as a nonlinear dynamical system of 27 simultaneous, first-order, ordinary differential equations. A complete list of the equations and standard parameter values is presented in the APPENDIX.

Geometrical considerations. We assumed our model cell to be a 70-µm-long by 8-µm-diameter cylinder (i.e., a "spindle-shaped" cell with a length of 70 µm and a mean width of 8 µm) and set the cell volume and membrane capacitance to 3.5 pl and 32 pF, respectively. The cell volume of 3.5 pl was nearly identical to that used by Demir et al. (17) but smaller than the value of 5 pl estimated by Denyer and Brown (19) for spindle-shaped isolated SA node cells and used for the models of Wilders et al. (124) and Dokos et al. (24). Primary pacemaker cells are thought to be smaller than transitional or peripheral cells (see Refs. 44 and 130); thus we chose the smaller value of 3.5 pl for our primary pacemaker cell model. The membrane capacitance of 32 pF is derived from Wilders et al. (124) and Dokos et al. (24), smaller than the value of 55 pF used by Demir et al. (17) for their transitional cell model and larger than the value of 20 pF for the central model of Zhang et al. (130). Microanatomic data such as SR volumes used in this study are from Demir et al. (17). The effective intracellular volume of a SA node cell wherein free Ca2+ is available to enter into reaction was set to 46% of the cell volume (1.6 pl), because there are various intracellular structures and organelles, as summarized by Demir et al. (17).

There is now evidence that there exists a small restricted subsarcolemmal domain where Ca2+ concentrations may transiently reach higher levels than in the bulk myoplasm (29, 47, 62, 86, 88, 122). Therefore, we assumed the subsarcolemmal space as a barrier for Ca2+ diffusion to the myoplasm. The subspace volume Vsub was tentatively set to 1% of the cell volume (0.035 pl), assuming that the subspace is limited to 20 nm below the sarcolemmal membrane (see Fig. 1A). The time constant of the Ca2+ diffusion from subspace to myoplasm (tau dif,Ca) was set to 40 µs; this value corresponded to a diffusion coefficient of approx 1 × 10-9 cm2/ms if the mean distance between the openings of the L-type Ca2+ channel or SR Ca2+ release channel and the myoplasmic compartment is assumed to be 200 nm (see Refs. 29, 61, and 113). A tau dif,Ca value of 40 µs was chosen to yield a peak [Ca2+]sub of ~1.8 µM, as reported in the modeling studies of Glukhovsky et al. (29) and Snyder et al. (113). The subspace of our model corresponds to the "fuzzy" space, a functionally restricted intracellular space accessible to the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger as well as to the L-type Ca2+ channel and Ca2+-gated Ca2+ channel in the SR (see Refs. 51 and 62). Note that it is different from the "diadic" space between the L-type Ca2+ channel and the ryanodine receptor (Ca2+-gated Ca2+ channel), where Ca2+ concentrations increase to several tens of micromolars; in ventricular myocytes, the ryanodine receptor and SR Ca2+ release are closely linked to the L-type Ca2+ channel and its Ca2+-dependent inactivation in the diadic space (1, 5, 50, 93, 106, 114, 115). In SA node cells, however, such a microdomain or cross-signaling between the L-type Ca2+ channel and SR Ca2+ release channel has not been demonstrated, being possibly absent because the SR is poorly developed in SA node cells compared with ventricular or atrial myocytes (see Refs. 17 and 47). Thus we did not incorporate the diadic space into our model.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic diagrams depicting a cross section of the model cell (A) and intracellular fluid compartments for Ca2+ (B). R and L represent the radius of the cell (4 µm) and the thickness (depth) of the subsarcolemmal space (20 nm), respectively. Volumes of the cell and each compartment are given in the text. The Ca2+ release from junctional SR (JSR) and Ca2+ uptake to the network SR (NSR) were assumed to be strictly into the restricted subspace and from the bulk myoplasm, respectively. Definitions of the symbols for the Ca2+ concentration in each compartment and Ca2+ flux between compartments are given in the Glossary.

Descriptions of membrane currents. The mathematical expressions used for the membrane current system are essentially the same as those formulated previously (17, 24, 124, 130) with modifications according to newly reported experimental data. The complete model for the normal pacemaking includes 13 membrane current components. The differential equation for the membrane potential (V) is
d<IT>V/</IT>d<IT>t=</IT>−(<IT>I</IT><SUB>Ca,L</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Ca,T</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>to</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>sus</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>h</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>st</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Na</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>b,Na</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>K,ACh</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>NaK</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>NaCa</SUB>)<IT>/C</IT><SUB>m</SUB> (1)
where ICa,L and ICa,T represent the L-type and T-type Ca2+ channel currents, respectively. The rapid and slow components of the delayed rectifier K+ current are denoted as IKr and IKs, respectively. The membrane current system also includes the transient (Ito) and sustained (Isus) components of 4-AP-sensitive currents, hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih), sustained inward current (Ist), Na+ channel current (INa), background Na+ current (Ib,Na), muscarinic K+ channel current (IK,ACh), Na+-K+ pump current (INaK), and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger current (INaCa) charging the membrane capacitance (Cm). For parameter adjustments, the regional differences of current densities in the SA node were taken into account (44, 130).

Model equations for channel gating behaviors are essentially the same as those of the previous Hodgkin-Huxley type models. A gating variable, x, can be computed as a solution of the first-order differential equation of the form
d<IT>x/</IT>d<IT>t=</IT>(<IT>x<SUB>∞</SUB>−x</IT>)<IT>/&tgr;<SUB>x</SUB></IT> (2)
where xinfinity and tau x are the steady-state x value and relaxation time constant, respectively, as functions of V. Relaxation time constants have been appropriately scaled for the temperature of 37°C with the use of a Q10 of 1.6~3.0. The functions xinfinity (V) and tau x(V) for individual gating variables are provided in the APPENDIX (Fig. 16).

L-type Ca2+ channel current. The kinetics of ICa,L are described with activation (dL), voltage-dependent inactivation (fL), and Ca2+-dependent inactivation (fCa) gating variables. The inactivation of ICa,L consists of two exponential terms: rapid and slow components. The rapid component is mediated by the intracellular Ca2+-dependent inactivation with a time constant ranging from 10 to 30 ms for rabbit SA node cells, whereas the slower component reflects the voltage-dependent inactivation with a time constant of 30~70 ms (5, 34, 72, 81, 102). To describe the inactivation process, we adopted a simple model in which the Ca2+-dependent inactivation process is independent of the voltage-dependent one (see Refs. 35 and 105); the inactivation process was described by the two Hodgkin-Huxley type gating variables fL and fCa.

The voltage dependences of ICa,L activation and inactivation (steady-state probabilities and time constants for dL and fL) are shown in Fig. 2, top. For the steady-state activation and inactivation curves (dL,infinity and fL,infinity ), we used the formulas of Demir et al. (17) based on the data from Fermini and Nathan (27). Expressions of the activation time constant tau dL were adopted from Demir et al. (17), who modified the formulation of Nilius (84). To formulate the time constant of the voltage-dependent inactivation/recovery (tau fL), the previous models employed different equations with different voltage dependences; however, these equations did not fit the recovery time course of ICa,L experimentally observed in single rabbit cardiac myocytes (see Fig. 2). Therefore, we originally formulated the inactivation time constant tau fL from the data of Nakayama et al. (81), Hagiwara et al. (37), and Kawano and Hiraoka (54). According to Demir et al. (17), a Q10 factor of 2.3 was applied to scale the gating time constant data for a temperature of 37°C. The inactivation/recovery time constant data were fitted to a function similar to that used by Lindblad et al. (68) for a rabbit atrial model and by Nygren et al. (88) for a human atrial model, using a least-square minimization procedure. Formulas for the Ca2+-dependent inactivation fCa are similar to those used by DiFrancesco and Noble (22). We included the subsarcolemmal domain and modeled the Ca2+-dependent inactivation as a function of the subspace Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]sub). The half-maximum Ca2+ concentration for the Ca2+-dependent inactivation was set to 0.35 µM, the same value as used by Courtemanche et al. (15). To reproduce the Ca2+-dependent inactivation with a time constant of ~10 ms during voltage-clamp pulses, the rate constant of Ca2+ binding was set to 60 ms-1 · mM-1.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Kinetics of ICa,L. Top: voltage dependence of steady-state probabilities (dL and fL) and time constants for ICa,L activation (tau dL) and inactivation (tau fL). The equations used for the present model are shown as thick lines (K). For comparison, those used for previous models are also shown as thin lines: W, Wilders et al. (124); De, Demir et al. (17); Do, Dokos et al. (24); and Z, Zhang et al. (130). The experimental data for tau fL are from Kawano and Hiraoka (54) (open circle ), Hagiwara et al. (37) (), and Nakayama et al. (81) (). Bottom: computed voltage-clamp records for ICa,L (left) and the peak ICa,L-V relationship (right). Currents were evoked by 100-ms step pulses to test potentials ranging from -30 to +50 mV (in 10-mV increments). The holding potential was -40 mV. Simulating the whole cell perforated-patch recording, [Ca2+]i was not fixed (intracellular Ca2+ was not buffered by EGTA or BAPTA), whereas [Na+]i and [K+]i were fixed at 10 and 140 mM, respectively. The experimental data for the peak ICa,L-V relationship (peak currents normalized to the maximum value at 0 mV) are from Honjo et al. (44) (), Hagiwara et al. (37) (), Vinogradova et al. (122) (triangle ), and Verheijck et al. (120) (black-triangle). See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

Maximum ICa,L has been formulated as a fully selective Ca2+ current, with its reversal potential (ECa,L) fixed at +45 mV and the maximum conductance gCa,L set to 0.58 nS/pF at 2 mM [Ca2+]o. As Dokos et al. (24) have pointed out, ICa,L has a relatively low ECa,L albeit its high Ca2+ selectivity. Wilders et al. (124) adopted the constant-field formulation to describe the conductance property of ICa,L with a low ECa,L; as suggested by Dokos et al. (24), however, their formulas introduce large unnecessary fluxes of Na+ and K+, leading to an overestimation of INaK. The ECa,L has been reported to shift with changing [Ca2+]o in accordance with an ideal Nernstian Ca2+ electrode, although displaced negatively below ECa (see Ref. 11); thus Dokos et al. (24) formulated ICa,L as a fully selective Ca2+ current with ECa,L displaced at a constant 75 mV negative to ECa. The negative displacement of ECa,L may be attributable to the existence of a high-concentration Ca2+ domain at the intracellular surface of the L-type Ca2+ channel pore. Nevertheless, there are no available data on the [Ca2+]i dependence of ECa,L. It has been suggested that once the L-type Ca2+ channel is open, the Ca2+ concentration at the inner mouth does not change; the Ca2+ concentration in the vicinity of the inner mouth of the channel may be nearly constant (see Refs. 50, 111, and 128). In our model, therefore, ECa,L was set to a constant value of +45 mV, as in the model of Demir et al. (17) utilizing a fully Ca2+-selective formulation of ICa,L with the ECa,L fixed at +46.4 mV. It might be difficult to express ECa,L (or permeation kinetics) as a simple elementary function of ion concentrations, because the mechanisms of ion permeation in the L-type Ca2+ channel have been shown to involve complex ion-ion or ion-channel interactions (e.g., Refs. 41, 76, and 116).

The model-generated ICa,L during voltage-clamp pulses and the peak ICa,L-V relationship are depicted in Fig. 2, bottom. Our model can simulate the Ca2+-dependent inactivation of ICa,L experimentally observed in rabbit SA node cells (10, 67); inactivation time courses of the simulated currents are very similar to the experimental data reported by Hagiwara et al. (37), Honjo et al. (44), Verheijck et al. (120), and Vinogradova et al. (122). The simulated peak ICa,L-V relation is comparable to the experimental data as shown by the symbols. The maximum amplitude of ICa,L measured in the simulated voltage-clamp experiment was 9.44 pA/pF, attained at 0 mV; this value is in good agreement with experimental data (44, 81, 119, 120, 122).

T-type Ca2+ channel current. Contributions of ICa,T to pacemaker depolarization in the previous models are different: Wilders et al. (124) and Dokos et al. (24) assumed small contribution of ICa,T according to the experimental report of Hagiwara et al. (37), whereas Demir et al. (17) assumed much larger ICa,T based on the data from Doerr et al. (23). With the use of the ICa,T expressions of Demir et al. (17), our standard model could reproduce the relatively large effects of blocking ICa,T on CL as observed experimentally (23, 37, 103); in contrast, the spontaneous AP of our standard model cell was little affected by incorporating the ICa,T expressions of Wilders et al. (124), with CL increasing only by 2.1% on eliminating ICa,T. Therefore, we adopted the expressions of Demir et al. (17) rather than those of Wilders et al. (124) or Dokos et al. (24) for the steady-state probabilities and time constants of the activation gating variable dT and inactivation gating variable fT. The conductance property of ICa,T was formulated using a linear voltage relation, with the reversal potential ECa,T fixed at +45 mV and the maximum conductance gCa,T set to 0.458 nS/pF, according to Demir et al. (17).

Delayed rectifier K+ currents. Recent studies in rabbit, guinea pig, and human cardiac myocytes have identified two types of delayed rectifier K+ currents: 1) the rapidly activating component IKr, exhibiting strong inward rectification, and 2) the slowly activating component IKs, exhibiting only weak rectification (2, 34, 64, 66, 100, 101, 123). Whereas IK in the rabbit SA node appears to predominantly reflect only IKr-type behavior (2, 108), the IKs-type component has also been identified in isolated rabbit SA node cells (34, 48, 64). For the standard pacemaker model, therefore, we assumed both IKr- and IKs-type components of IK.

The voltage dependences of IKr activation and inactivation (steady-state probabilities and time constants for the activation gating variable pa and inactivation gating variable pi) are shown in Fig. 3, top, along with those for the previous models. To describe the gating kinetics of IKr, the previous models (17, 24, 124) used the equations provided by Shibasaki (108). However, Ono and Ito (90) recently reported the complete quantitative data on the activation kinetics of IKr in single rabbit SA node cells and mathematically described the activation kinetics with two gating variables, paF and paS. According to their report, therefore, we described the general activation variable pa as a weighted sum of the fast (paF) and slow (paS) activation variables and used their original expressions for IKr activation kinetics (pa,infinity , tau paF, and tau paS). A modified version of the formulation of Ono and Ito (90) for IKr activation was also utilized by Zhang et al. (130). We also employed the expression of Ono and Ito (90) for steady-state inactivation (pi,infinity ). No detailed experimental data are available on the time constant of the voltage-dependent IKr inactivation (tau pi); thus we adopted the expression of Shibasaki (108) for tau pi.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Kinetics of IKr. Top: voltage dependence of steady-state probabilities for IKr activation (pa) and inactivation (pi) and activation time constants (tau pa). Thick lines represent the present model (K); those for previous models (W, De, Do, and Z) are also shown as thin lines for comparison. open circle  and , Experimental data from Ono and Ito (90). Bottom: computed voltage-clamp records for IKr (left) and amplitudes of IKr measured at the end of test pulses as a function of the test potential (right). Currents were elicited by 1-s step pulses from a holding potential of -60 mV to test potentials ranging from -50 to +40 mV (in 10-mV increments). , Experimental data from Ono and Ito (90). See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

The conductance of IKr was chosen as to allow a maximum diastolic potential (MDP) between -60 and -55 mV (approximately equal to -58 mV) to be achieved. The standard gKr value of our model is smaller than that determined by Ono and Ito (90); this difference in gKr may reflect the regional difference in IKr density between the center and periphery of the SA node (see Ref. 56). We also included a term to describe the "square root" activation of IKr single channel conductance by [K+]o, as reported by Shibasaki (108). Dokos et al. (24) pointed out that the reversal potential of IKr (EKr) is positive to EK by 10~19 mV, thus assumed that IKr channels are slightly permeable to Na+. According to recently published reports (e.g., Refs. 90 and 119), however, EKr is nearly equal to EK; therefore, the IKr channel was assumed to be highly selective to K+. The model-generated IKr during the voltage-clamp pulses simulating the experiment of Ono and Ito (90) are shown in Fig. 3, bottom.

The kinetics of IKs were described by the formulation of Zhang et al. (130). The steady-state activation curve for IKs used in this study is from Lei and Brown (64). There are limited experimental data available for the time constant of the voltage-dependent activation of IKs in rabbit SA node cells. Thus the time constant of IKs activation was described using the expressions of Zhang et al. (130), i.e., the equations of Heath and Terrar (40) based on their data from guinea pig ventricular myocytes.

4-AP-sensitive K+ currents. Recent studies for rabbit SA node cells have identified the transient and sustained outward currents sensitive to 4-AP (46, 65, 119). The models of Zhang et al. (130) incorporated these currents, whereas most previous SA node models did not. Therefore, we incorporated the transient (Ito) and sustained (Isus) components of 4-AP-sensitive currents into our model. According to Zhang et al. (130), we treated the two 4-AP-sensitive components as separated currents and used the same activation variable r for both Ito and Isus.

The steady-state activation and inactivation curves (rinfinity and qinfinity ) were based on the experimental data from Honjo et al. (46) and Lei et al. (65). The time constant of the voltage-dependent activation (tau r) was formulated from the data of Giles and van Ginneken (28) for rabbit crista terminalis cells; the inactivation time constant (tau q) was from Giles and van Ginneken (28) and Honjo et al. (46). To correct the data collected at 20.5~25°C for 37°C, Zhang et al. (130) used a Q10 of 2.18. However, the use of Q10 = 2.18 yielded a pronounced phase 1 notch in APs. Thus we slightly accelerated the gating kinetics by using a Q10 of 3.0. The corrected time constants were comparable to those reported by Honjo et al. (46) and Uese et al. (117).

The values of the scaling parameters (conductances) for Ito and Isus were determined by exploring the change in peak overshoot potential (POP) and variation of [K+]i . The experimentally measured densities of Ito and Isus were significantly correlated with Cm, i.e., cell size, and are larger in cells with a higher Cm (46, 65); this probably reflects the regional differences of the current densities (see Ref. 7). We selected relatively small conductance values for our primary pacemaker cell model with relatively small Cm, because the current densities in the central SA node region would be relatively small (see Refs. 64 and 130). Whereas Zhang et al. (130) set the Isus conductance to a very small value of 3.3 pS/pF for their central model, we used a larger value of 20 pS/pF to accentuate the prolongation of AP duration during the blockade of the 4-AP-sensitive currents, i.e., to reproduce the experimental data of Boyett et al. (7).

Hyperpolarization-activated current. It is difficult to quantify Ih and its participation in the diastolic depolarization, in part due to the large variation in its threshold of activation ranging from -30 to -70 mV, as well as the variation in current density (18, 21, 73, 81, 118). In previous models, the kinetic data from van Ginneken and Giles (118) were used to formulate the gating kinetics of Ih; however, the contributions of Ih to pacemaker depolarization in the model cells are quite different (refer to Table 3). For our standard model, we adopted the formulation of Wilders et al. (124) to reproduce the relatively large effects of blocking Ih on CL as observed in experiments. The data of van Ginneken and Giles (118) were collected at 30~33°C; following Demir et al. (17), activation time constants were corrected for 37°C by the use of a Q10 = 2.3. According to van Ginneken and Giles (118), the maximum conductance and reversal potential of Ih were assumed to be 0.375 nS/pF and -24 mV, respectively. These values were achieved by setting gh,K = 7.4 nS and gh,Na = 4.6 nS for a model cell, as used in Wilders et al. (124).

Sustained inward current. Guo et al. (32) reported a novel pacemaker current activated within the range of pacemaker depolarization in the rabbit SA node (see also Ref. 33). This current, named the sustained inward current (Ist), is carried by Na+ under physiological conditions, blocked by both organic and inorganic Ca2+ channel blockers as well as by external Ca2+ and Mg2+, and enhanced by isoprenaline or a Ca2+ agonist, BAY K 8644. These biophysical and pharmacological characteristics are compatible with those of the monovalent cation conductance of the L-type Ca2+ channel; thus Guo et al. (32) concluded that Ist is generated by a novel subtype of the L-type Ca2+ channel. Ist has also been recorded in SA node cells of other animal species, such as guinea pigs and rats (31, 77, 78, 109). Because Ist was observed only in spontaneously beating SA node cells but was absent in quiescent cells, Ist may play an essential role in the generation of intrinsic cardiac automaticity (32, 78). Therefore, we incorporated Ist in our standard SA node model for a primary pacemaker cell, whereas previous SA node models did not include Ist.

The voltage dependences of Ist activation and inactivation (steady-state probabilities and time constants for the activation gating variable qa and inactivation gating variable qi) are shown in Fig. 4, top. Because there is no detailed report on the gating kinetics (time constant) of Ist in the rabbit SA node, we modified the formulation of Shinagawa et al. (109) for the rat SA node Ist. From the data of Guo et al. (32), the half-activation voltage and slope factor for the activation curve were set to -57.0 and 5.0 mV, respectively. The inactivation and recovery of the rabbit Ist, as reported in Guo et al. (32), appear to be slower than those of the rat Ist reported by Shinagawa et al. (109). Thus the time constants of inactivation and recovery of the rabbit Ist were assumed to be 6.65 times larger than those of the rat Ist. The maximum conductance and reversal potential of Ist were set to 15.0 pS/pF and +37.4 mV, respectively, according to Guo et al. (32). As shown in Fig. 4, bottom, our equations for Ist could reproduce the kinetic properties of Ist reported by Guo et al. (32).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Kinetics of Ist. Top: voltage dependence of steady-state probabilities (qa and qi) and time constants for Ist activation (tau qa) and inactivation (tau qi). Thick lines, present model; thin lines, qa and tau qi formulated by Shinagawa et al. (109) for the rat SA node Ist. open circle  and , Experimental values approximated from the data of Guo et al. (32). Bottom: computed voltage-clamp records for Ist (left) and the peak Ist-V relation (right). Currents were evoked by 500-ms depolarizing test pulses ranging from -70 to +50 mV (in 10-mV increments). The holding potential was -80 mV. See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

Na+ channel current. Although most of the previous SA node models incorporated the fast Na+ channel current (INa), the contribution of INa to model cell dynamics is relatively small: in the models of Wilders et al. (124) and Dokos et al. (24), eliminating INa yielded only a 0.7~0.9% increase in CL, whereas it yielded a 8.4% increase in the model of Demir et al. (17) for transitional cells. In a preliminary study, we incorporated INa into our model to assess the possible contribution of INa to the pacemaker activity of our model cell. The kinetics of INa were reformulated from the recent experimental data: 1) steady-state activation and inactivation curves are based on the data from Muramatsu et al. (80) and Baruscotti et al. (3); 2) for the time constant of activation, we used the formulation of Zhang et al. (130); and 3) the inactivation of INa was described by a weighted sum of two gating variables, hF and hS, with the fraction of slow inactivation (FNa) being expressed as a function of V (see Ref. 130). The formulation for the inactivation time constant is based on data from Muramatsu et al. (80). According to Lindblad et al. (68), a Q10 of 1.7 was used to correct the experimental data for 37°C. Incorporating INa with a conductance of 1.8 pS/pF, the mean experimental value for transitional or peripheral cells (44), decreased CL only by 5.6% (from 307.4 to 290.2 ms), indicating that the contribution of INa to pacemaking is relatively small in our model cell as well.

INa appears to be completely absent or almost negligible in primary pacemaker cells located in the central region of the SA node (57, 59, 82, 118, 130). Baruscotti et al. (3, 4) reported that both the density and frequency of occurrence of INa in the SA node decrease with development, with INa in adult rabbit SA node cells being very small or negligible. Thus INa would not play an important role in normal pacemaking of primary pacemaker cells. The central model of Zhang et al. (130) for the leading pacemaker cell did not include INa. In our simulations for primary pacemaker (central SA node) cells, therefore, INa was assumed to be zero (negligible or completely inactivated).

Na+-dependent background current and muscarinic K+ channel current. Our model includes two background current components: 1) Na+-dependent background current (Ib,Na), reported by Hagiwara et al. (38), in which Ib,Na was measured as 0.73 ± 0.21 pA/pF at -50 mV; and 2) muscarinic K+ channel current (IK,ACh), reported by Ito et al. (49), who attributed the entire background K+ component in rabbit SA node cells to the spontaneous opening of muscarinic K+ channels in the absence of an ACh agonist and characterized IK,ACh as exhibiting inward rectification with an amplitude of 0.33 ± 0.28 pA/pF at -50 mV under physiological conditions. Following their experimental data, we modeled Ib,Na with an ohmic I-V relationship and defined IK,ACh as a background K+ current component exhibiting inward rectification. The Ib,Na conductance gb,Na was set to 5.4 pS/pF, yielding a current density of 0.65 pA/pF at -50 mV. The gb,Na value of 5.4 pS/pF is comparable to that in the previous SA node models (2.9~7.5 pS/pF). To model the inward rectifying behavior for IK,ACh, we chose the formula of Dokos et al. (24) adopted from Egan and Noble (26). The standard value of IK,ACh amplitude used in this study was 0.23 pA/pF at -50 mV, smaller than the value of 0.46 pA/pF in Dokos et al. (24).

The background Ca2+ current (Ib,Ca) has been frequently incorporated in mathematical models of the SA node to balance the Ca2+ extrusion via Na+/Ca2+ exchange during diastole: the models of Wilders et al. (124), Demir et al. (17), and Zhang et al. (130) included Ib,Ca with a conductance of 0.66~1.25 pS/pF. In our model, however, incorporating an Ib,Ca of 0.66~1.25 pS/pF attenuated pacemaker activity (decreased APA to <70 mV) and induced Ca2+ overload (diastolic [Ca2+]i > 0.3 µM) via unnecessary Ca2+ influx, unfavorable for improving the model. Although the sarcolemmal Ca2+ pump current (Ip,Ca) may balance Ib,Ca, the contribution of Ip,Ca to Ca2+ efflux through the SA node cell membrane is unknown. Ib,Ca has not yet been recorded directly in SA node cells; the report of Hagiwara et al. (38) suggests that the rabbit SA node membrane is impermeable to Ca2+. In our modeling, therefore, Ib,Ca (as well as Ip,Ca) was assumed to be negligible.

Na+-K+ pump current. In previous SA node models, the formulations of INaK were not based on experimental data from SA node cells. The novel INaK formulation used in this study is based on the recent experimental work of Sakai et al. (99) for rabbit SA node cells. Parameter values were determined from the voltage- and concentration-dependent data provided by Sakai et al. (99): Km values for Na+ and K+ binding were set to 14.0 and 1.4 mM, respectively. The voltage dependence of INaK in our model is steeper than that in previous models (see Fig. 17), consistent with experimental data from the rabbit SA node (99). The magnitude of INaK is linked to the influx of Na+ through Ib,Na (and Ist) and efflux of K+ through K+ channels. According to the data of Sakai et al. (99), we set the maximum attainable current (INaKmax) to 3.6 pA/pF, a value high enough to maintain [Na+]i of <10 mM and [K+]i of ~140 mM during long runs of the normal pacemaker activity.

Na+/Ca2+ exchange current. Most existing models of SA node activity have relied on the hypothetical INaCa formulation utilized by DiFrancesco and Noble (22), describing the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger as a simultaneous transfer of the ions with an exponential voltage dependency. In contrast, Dokos et al. (24) utilized a more accurate model of consecutive translocation, i.e., the "E4" model originally formulated by Matsuoka and Hilgemann (74), which correctly reproduces the saturation characteristics of INaCa at large [Ca2+]i and for negative potential-low [Ca2+]i conditions. To describe INaCa kinetics, we adopted the formulation of Dokos et al. (24), a modified version of the Matsuoka-Hilgemann "E4" model. The scaling parameter kNaCa was set to 125 pA/pF, the same value as determined by Dokos et al. (24) from the study of Hagiwara and Irisawa (36), who reported an INaCa density of 1 pA/pF at -40 mV and [Ca2+]i = 0.5 µM. A kNaCa value of 125 pA/pF yielded an INaCa of 0.83 pA/pF at -40 mV and [Ca2+]i = 0.5 µM, giving a diastolic free Ca2+ level in the presumed physiological range of <0.3 µM.

SR functions. The SR was modeled as consisting of two compartments: the Ca2+ uptake store (network SR) and release store (junctional SR), as shown in Fig. 1B. Owing to the lack of available data for updating the kinetic formulation of Ca2+ uptake and release by the SR in SA node cells, we utilized simple formulas similar to those of DiFrancesco and Noble (22), which have been incorporated in previous SA node models (24, 85, 124). The model of Demir et al. (17) utilized more complex SR kinetics based largely on the modeling study by Hilgemann and Noble (42), including the internal SR Ca2+ buffering by calsequestrin. Their formulation is, however, overly complex, given the complete lack of associated data in SA node cells; in their model, Ca2+ concentrations in the SR are unreasonably high compared with those in other models, much higher than experimental values for ventricular myocytes (see Refs. 63 and 107). We therefore opted for simpler kinetics, which are able to reproduce the essential features of both the uptake and release processes. According to Demir et al. (17), the fractional volumes of Ca2+ uptake and release stores in our model cell were taken to be 1.16 and 0.12%, respectively, of the cell volume, corresponding to one-third of the values given for ventricular myocytes.

Because no experimental data are available to estimate the kinetic parameters for SR Ca2+ uptake and release in SA node cells, the parameter values were determined from previous modeling studies. The formula for the Ca2+ release mechanism was adopted from Dokos et al. (24), with the kinetics of Ca2+ release to subspace expressed as a function of [Ca2+]sub (not [Ca2+]i). The values of Krel used in previous models ranged from 0.8 to 2.0 µM; we chose a medium value of 1.2 µM. The Prel value was determined so as to make the peak [Ca2+]sub and [Ca2+]i nearly maximum with a Krel of 1.2 µM. The formulation for Ca2+ uptake was adopted from Luo and Rudy (71). The values of tau tr used in previous SA node models ranged from 6.64 to 400 ms. In our modeling, the tau tr value was set to a medium value of 60 ms, although some reports have suggested a smaller tau tr or single compartment for SR (e.g., Refs. 29 and 113).

Ca2+ buffering. Our model includes the dynamics of three Ca2+ buffers: calmodulin, troponin, and calsequestrin. The amounts of calmodulin and troponin available for Ca2+ binding, and the rate constants for Ca2+ binding to and release from these buffers, were adopted from Demir et al. (17) and Lindblad et al. (68), who used data from Robertson et al. (95). The rate constants for Ca2+ binding to calmodulin and troponin were scaled with the use of a Q10 of 1.8, according to Lindblad et al. (68). The concentration of calsequestrin within the SR release compartment was set to a relatively low value of 10 mM, the value used by Luo and Rudy (71), Courtemanche et al. (15), and Priebe and Beuckelmann (91). The on and off rates for Ca2+ binding to calsequestrin were based on the study of Cannell and Allen (12), adjusted to 37°C via a Q10 of 1.6 (see Ref. 68).

We also examined the effects of exogenous Ca2+ buffers, BAPTA and EGTA, on pacemaker activity. The rate constants for Ca2+ binding to and release from these buffers were adopted from Sham (106), Smith et al. (112), and You et al. (128).

Ion concentration homeostasis. Our model also includes material balance expressions to define the temporal variations in [Na+]i, [K+]i, and [Ca2+]i. [Na+]i and [K+]i were assumed to be homogeneous, because subspace [Na+] (or [K+]) was nearly equal to myoplasmic [Na+] (or [K+]) unless the diffusion time constant for Na+ (or K+) was more than 10 times larger than that for Ca2+. As suggested by Nygren et al. (88), there may be electroneutral Na+ influx (and K+ efflux as well) via electroneutral transport mechanisms such as Na+/H+ exchange and Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransport; thus it is difficult to estimate [Na+]i (and [K+]i) accurately from model simulation. In our simulations, net electroneutral Na+ and K+ fluxes were assumed to be zero; in the free running model with the standard parameter values listed in the APPENDIX, the intracellular free Na+ and K+ levels averaged 9.44 and 140.0 mM, respectively, during a long period of normal pacemaking. [Na+]o, [K+]o, and [Ca2+]o were set equal to 140, 5.4, and 2 mM, respectively.

Numerical Integration (Dynamic Simulation)

Dynamic behavior of the model cell was determined by solving the simultaneous nonlinear ordinary differential equations numerically. We employed a fourth-order adaptive-step Runge-Kutta algorithm, which includes an automatic step-size adjustment based on an error estimate, or a variable time-step numerical differentiation approach selected for its suitability to stiff systems. The maximum relative error tolerance for our integration methods was set to 1 × 10-6.

The APA as a voltage difference between the local potential minimum and maximum, as well as the CL, were determined for each calculation of a cycle. Numerical integration was continued until the differences in both APA and CL between the newly calculated cycle and the preceding one became <1 × 10-3 of the preceding APA and CL values. When periodic behavior was irregular or unstable, model dynamics were computed for 30~60 s; all potential extrema and CL values were then plotted in the diagram. The value of current conductance is expressed as a ratio to the control value unless otherwise stated.

Numerical computations were performed on Power Macintosh G4 computers (Apple Computers; Cupertino, CA) using Matlab 5.2 (MathWorks; Natick, MA).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Dynamic Properties of Simulated Pacemaker Activity

Spontaneous APs and sarcolemmal ionic currents. Figure 5, left, shows spontaneous APs and temporal behavior of sarcolemmal ionic currents simulated by the present model with the standard parameter values listed in the APPENDIX. The MDP, POP, and APA are -58.6, +16.6, and 75.2 mV, respectively; the CL and AP duration at 50% repolarization (APD50) are 307.5 and 107.0 ms, respectively. The simulated AP parameters of our model cell are listed in Table 1, along with those of previous SA node models as well as corresponding experimental data for comparison (see also Fig. 6). The AP parameters of our model appear to be in reasonable agreement with the mean experimental values recently determined for central SA node (primary pacemaker) cells and spindle- or spider-shaped cells. The previous models developed by Wilders et al. (124), Demir et al. (17), and Dokos et al. (24) are all likely to reflect the activity of a typical transitional cell. Compared with these previous models for transitional cells, our model for primary pacemaker cells exhibited 1) more positive MDP, 2) relatively small APA, and 3) long APD50. These AP characteristics of our model are comparable to those of primary pacemaker cells in the central region of the rabbit SA node (8, 44, 55, 57), reflecting the regional difference in AP parameters.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Model-generated behavior of spontaneous APs, underlying transmembrane ionic currents (left) and intracellular Ca2+ dynamics (right) in the steady state. The differential equations were numerically solved for 11 s with an initial condition appropriate to a zero current potential (-24.3 mV) and a 1-ms stimulus of 1 pA/pF for triggering an AP. Model cell behavior during the last 1 s (from MDP) of the simulated free-running activity is depicted. Note the differences in the ordinate scales for individual currents. The intracellular Ca2+ dynamics shown on the right include the changes in Ca2+ concentrations (in the subspace, myoplasm, and SR), associated percent changes in the occupancies of intracellular Ca2+ buffers, and Ca2+ fluxes produced by the SR during Ca2+ uptake, release, and transfer. Changes in [Na+]i and [K+]i during pacemaker activity are also shown at the bottom. See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   AP parameters of a single rabbit SA node cell: model values and experimentally observed values



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Spontaneous APs and underlying transmembrane time-dependent currents in various SA node models developed by Wilders et al. (124) (A), Demir et al. (17) (B), Dokos et al. (24) (C), Zhang et al. (130) (D; central model), and 5) the present study (E). The differential equations for previous models were numerically solved for 11 s with the initial conditions provided in the original articles. Model cell behaviors during the last 600 ms (from MDP) are depicted. Spontaneous APs recorded in the central SA node (leading pacemaker site) and the currents experimentally determined by the AP clamp method are also shown (F) for validation of the models: AP, Miyamae and Goto (79); ICa,L, Zaza et al. (129); IKr, Ono and Ito (90); ICa,T, Doerr et al. (23); and Ih, Zaza et al. (129). See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

As shown in Fig. 6, our model-generated ICa,L waveform during spontaneous APs was very similar to that recorded by Zaza et al. (129) and Doerr et al. (23) during the "AP clamp" of a single rabbit SA node cell. The model-generated IKr waveform was also very similar to that measured as an E-4031-sensitive current during AP clamp (90, 129). Furthermore, the time course of the simulated ICa,T was similar to that of ICa,T measured as a Ni2+-sensitive current by Doerr et al. (23); the Ih during pacemaker depolarization was similar to the Cs+-sensitive current recorded by Zaza et al. (129) and also to the Ih computed by Maruoka et al. (73). Thus the simulated changes in ICa,L, IKr, ICa,T, and Ih during pacemaking are comparable to the experimentally observed changes in these currents during spontaneous APs in rabbit SA node cells.

Simulated ionic currents, as well as an AP waveform, in our model were compared with those in the previous models (Figs. 6 and 7). The time courses of ICa,L and IKr during pacemaker activity in the models were different. In the models of Wilders et al. (124), Demir et al. (17), and Dokos et al. (24), the fast inhibition of ICa,L was followed by a secondary increase (inward "hump"); in contrast, the inward hump was absent in our simulated ICa,L. Consistent with our model simulation, the secondary increase in ICa,L was not observed in the AP-clamp experiments (23, 129). The rapid inactivation of IKr on AP upstroke (during phase 0) observed in the AP-clamp experiments (90, 129) was reproduced only by our model and the model of Zhang et al. (130). Thus our model is apparently superior to previous models in generating the ICa,L and IKr waveforms experimentally observed in single rabbit SA node cells. The amplitudes of Ib,Na and IK,ACh (as Ib,K) during pacemaker activity of our model are comparable to those of previous models (see Fig. 7). On the other hand, the time courses of INaCa in the model cells were quite different, reflecting the different intracellular Ca2+ dynamics. In our model, INaCa during phase 4 was relatively large, suggesting the large contribution of INaCa to pacemaker depolarization.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Time-independent background and transporter currents during spontaneous pacemaking in various SA node models formulated by Wilders et al. (124) (A), Demir et al. (17) (B), Dokos et al. (24) (C), Zhang et al. (130) (D; central model), and the present study (E). See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

Intracellular Ca2+ dynamics. Intracellular Ca2+ dynamics (concentration changes, SR Ca2+ uptake and release, and Ca2+ buffering) during normal pacemaking are shown in Fig. 5, right. The free Ca2+ concentrations in subspace ([Ca2+]sub) and myoplasm ([Ca2+]i) during the spontaneous APs were 0.18~1.81 and 0.25~0.68 µM, respectively. Although there are no available data on intracellular Ca2+ concentrations in the rabbit SA node cell, these values are comparable to those measured in other pacemaker cells (47, 53).

As shown in Fig. 8, the simulated intracellular Ca2+ dynamics in our model cell were quite different from those in previous models, because we assumed a subsarcolemmal space and relatively small SR volumes. The myoplasmic Ca2+ transient in our model, the peak value of which is 0.68 µM, was much smaller than that in previous SA node models but is comparable to that experimentally or theoretically determined for atrial or ventricular myocytes (e.g., Refs. 68, 71, and 110). In contrast, peak [Ca2+]i values in previous SA node models were >2.5 µM, unreasonably larger than those in atrial or ventricular models. The Ca2+ concentrations in the SR ([Ca2+]rel and [Ca2+]up) of our model are similar to those of previous models except for the model of Demir et al. (17), in which the SR Ca2+ concentrations (>10 mM) are much higher than experimental values for ventricular myocytes (see Refs. 63 and 107). The Ca2+ release from the SR in our model is much smaller than that in the model of Wilders et al. (124) or Demir et al. (17), whereas it is comparable to that in the model of Dokos et al. (24), suggesting a relatively small contribution of SR Ca2+ release to intracellular Ca2+ transients in primary pacemaker cells.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Intracellular Ca2+ dynamics during spontaneous pacemaking in various SA node models formulated by Wilders et al. (124) (A), Demir et al. (17) (B), Dokos et al. (24) (C), and the present study (D). Note the differences in the ordinate scales for individual models. See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

Contribution of Ist to pacemaker activity. Figure 9 shows the simulated effects of block of Ist on pacemaker activity of our model cell. When the maximum Ist conductance (gst) was reduced from the control value to zero, pacemaking slowed, with CL increasing from 307.5 to 473.2 ms, but did not cease. The effects of eliminating Ist on MDP and POP were relatively small, with MDP hyperpolarized from -58.6 to -63.6 mV. These alterations in the AP waveform by the removal of Ist could partly be compensated for by reducing the maximum IKr conductance (gKr): the Ist-removed model cell with gKr reduced to 75% of the control value produced spontaneous APs with MDP = -58.9 mV and CL = 379.8 ms (see Fig. 9, bottom right). Thus Ist is not essential for generating pacemaker activity.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Contribution of Ist to pacemaker activity of the SA node. Left: dynamics of the model cell during inhibition of Ist. Changes in MDP/POP (top) and CL (bottom) are shown as functions of the maximum Ist conductance (gst). The gst value, shown as a ratio to the control value of 15 pS/pF, was reduced at an interval of 0.01. Right: simulated spontaneous APs of the standard (control) system (top), Ist-removed system (middle), and Ist-removed system with the IKr conductance (gKr) reduced to 75% of the control (bottom). See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

Effects of Modulating Sarcolemmal Ionic Currents on Pacemaker Activity

We simulated the effects of inhibition of sarcolemmal ionic currents on pacemaker activity and then compared the simulated behaviors of our model cell with experimental findings as well as with those of previous models. We used two different systems, the Ist-incorporated (standard) system and the Ist-removed (gKr = 0.75) system, because Ist is not always present in spontaneously beating SA node cells (see Ref. 120).

Simulated blockade of ICa,L. We first examined the effects of blocking ICa,L on pacemaker activity of the model cell by decreasing the maximum ICa,L conductance (gCa,L). Figure 10A shows the dynamic behaviors of the Ist-incorporated [Ist(+)] and Ist-removed [Ist(-)] systems during gCa,L decrease, depicting MDP/POP and CL as functions of gCa,L (i.e., bifurcation diagrams for the bifurcation parameter gCa,L). As gCa,L diminished, APA was reduced and CL increased; POP gradually decreased with reducing gCa,L, whereas MDP was relatively stable. Blocking ICa,L by 76.6% (reducing gCa,L to 23.4% of the control) abolished spontaneous activity of the standard system, with V settling at -29.5 mV; the complete block of ICa,L yielded a resting potential of -32.6 mV. In the Ist-removed system, pacemaker activity abruptly ceased at gCa,L = 0.298 (V = -37.6 mV) via irregular (chaotic) dynamics between gCa,L = 0.439 and 0.304; the complete block of ICa,L yielded a resting potential of -42.0 mV. Note that the bifurcation structure as a way to quiescence during inhibition of ICa,L depends on whether the model cell includes Ist or not: APA of our standard model gradually and continuously decreased during the gCa,L decline, whereas the irregular (chaotic) dynamics occurred when Ist was removed or concomitantly blocked.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Effects of block of ICa,L on pacemaker activity of the SA node. A: dynamics during ICa,L inhibition of our standard model system including Ist [Ist(+)] and the Ist-removed system with gKr reduced to 75% of the control [Ist(-)]. Changes in MDP/POP (top) and CL (bottom) are shown as functions of the maximum ICa,L conductance (gCa,L). The gCa,L value, shown as a ratio to the control value of 0.58 nS/pF, was reduced at an interval of 0.001. Note the difference in the scales of CL. B: experimentally observed behaviors of SA node cells in the presence of a Ca2+ antagonist (ICa,L blocker) and simulated dynamics of our model cell with blocked ICa,L. The experimental data are from Kohlhardt et al. (58) (top) and Vinogradova et al. (122) (bottom). Simulated spontaneous APs of the standard (top) or Ist-removed (bottom) system with reduced gCa,L are shown at the bottom of each experimental record. See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

Dynamic behaviors of real SA node cells, as well as the model cell, during inhibition of ICa,L are shown in Fig. 10B. In experiments using Ca2+ antagonists (L-type Ca2+ channel blockers), such as nifedipine and verapamil, two ways of abolishing pacemaker activity have been observed: one is characterized by a gradual and continuous decline in APA (with a marked decrease in POP) to quiescence as well as an increase in CL (57, 58) and the other is characterized by irregular (chaotic) dynamics, called "skipped-beat runs," as observed in the rabbit SA node (122) or cat subsidary pacemaker cells (97). Our model could simulate both of the two distinct bifurcation structures experimentally observed during applications of Ca2+ antagonists. In the experiment for small balls of rabbit SA node tissues, nifedipine (2 µM) abolished spontaneous APs in the center of the SA node (i.e., the leading pacemaker site); the resting potential at which SA node cells settled after block of ICa,L was -40 ± 5 mV (57). The resting potential in this experiment was ~10 mV more negative than the prediction of our standard model (approximately -29.5 to -32.6 mV), whereas it was close to the value in the Ist-removed system (approximately -37.6 to -42.0 mV). This inconsistency may be due in part to a concomitant block of Ist by the Ca2+ channel blocker, which is known to inhibit Ist (see Refs. 32 and 78), as well as to the absence of Ist in some preparations; the complete block of both ICa,L and Ist in the standard model yielded a resting potential of -43.7 mV.

The effects of blocking ICa,L (decreasing gCa,L) on spontaneous APs of previous SA node models are shown in Fig. 11 for comparison. In all of the models, blocking ICa,L caused cessation of pacemaker activity; resting potentials of the quiescent model cells at critical gCa,L values and with complete block of ICa,L are compared in Table 2. The simulated behaviors of previous models during gCa,L decrease are inconsistent with experimental observations (30, 57, 58, 122) in the following respects: 1) the model of Dokos et al. (24) did not exhibit the gradual decline in APA (POP) observed in experiments, with pacemaker activity being abruptly abolished via irregular dynamics; 2) in the central model of Zhang et al. (130), pacemaker activity abruptly ceased with no irregular dynamics; 3) in the models of Demir et al. (17) and Zhang et al. (130), CL monotonously decreased with reducing gCa,L, whereas pacemaking slowed during applications of Ca2+ antagonists; and 4) the resting potentials predicted by the models of Wilders et al. (124), Demir et al. (17), and Zhang et al. (130) were 5~15 mV more positive than those experimentally determined by Kodama et al. (57) and predicted by our Ist-removed system. Thus our model is superior to previous models in predicting changes in AP parameters, bifurcation structures, and resting potentials during applications of Ca2+ antagonists.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Effects of block of ICa,L on pacemaker activities of various SA node models developed by Wilders et al. (124) (A), Demir et al. (17) (B), Dokos et al. (24) (C), Zhang et al. (130) (D; central model), and the present study (E; standard model). Changes in MDP/POP (top) and CL (bottom) during gCa,L decrease are depicted. The gCa,L value, shown as a ratio to the control value for each model, was reduced at an interval of 0.001. Note the differences in the scales of CL. See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Resting potentials yielded by block of ICa,L or IKr: model predictions and experimental data

Simulated blockade of IKr. Figure 12 illustrates the simulated effects of blocking IKr [decreasing the maximum IKr conductance (gKr)] on pacemaker activity of the standard and Ist-removed model systems along with experimental data showing the behaviors of central SA node cells during applications of a selective IKr blocker, E-4031 (56). In the simulations, reducing gKr markedly depolarized MDP, whereas POP was little changed until gKr diminished to ~0.5; MDP depolarization during the gKr decline was more prominent than that during the gCa,L decline (compare Figs. 10 and 12). With reducing gKr, CL in the standard system first increased and then decreased, being fairly stable; in contrast, CL in the Ist-removed system monotonously decreased. Whether Ist is incorporated or not, the bifurcation structure of the model system during gKr reduction was essentially the same: APA gradually and continuously declined to zero. Pacemaker activities of the standard and Ist-removed systems ceased when gKr decreased by 64.0 and 64.9%, respectively, with V settling at -13.8 and -13.5 mV, respectively. The complete block of IKr yielded a resting potential of -7.6 mV in the standard system and -8.3 mV in the Ist-removed system.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12.   Effects of block of IKr on pacemaker activity of the SA node. Left: simulated dynamics during IKr inhibition of our standard model [Ist(+)] and Ist-removed model [Ist(-)]. Changes in MDP/POP (top) and CL (bottom) are shown as functions of gKr. The gKr value, shown as a ratio to the control value, was reduced at an interval of 0.001. Note that the control gKr value for the Ist-removed system is 0.75 times that for the standard system. Right: experimentally observed behaviors of SA node cells during applications of a selective IKr blocker, E-4031, from Kodama et al. (56). Note the gradual and continuous decline in APA with accentuated depolarization of MDP on the way to cessation of pacemaker activity. See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

Selective IKr blockers such as E-4031 have been experimentally found to cause a gradual and continuous decline in APA with marked depolarization in MDP and then quiescence (see Fig. 12, right). These dynamic changes during applications of IKr blockers are in good agreement with the predictions of our model cell. Our model predicted only a slight increase or even decrease in CL during the gKr decline. In most experiments, however, CL was increased by applications of IKr blockers (e.g., see Refs. 56, 64, and 119), although 0.1 µM E-4031 did not significantly change CL in Ono and Ito (90). This inconsistency may result from the state-dependent kinetics of IKr block. Alternatively, IKr blockers may also modulate other ionic currents directly or secondary via changing intracellular ion concentrations. In recent experiments, block of IKr by 1 µM E-4031 caused a cessation of spontaneous activity; after block of IKr, the V of rabbit SA node cells or tissues settled at -32 ± 2 mV (56), -37.4 ± 2.9 mV (90), or -24.5 ± 1.8 mV (119). These experimentally observed resting potentials after block of IKr were 10~20 mV more negative than the predictions of our model. In other reports, however, the resting or zero current potential after block of IKr was relatively positive: 1) Yanagihara and Irisawa (126) reported a cessation of pacemaker activity with a resting potential of -10 mV on application of Ba2+ to block IK and 2) in the report of Verheijck et al. (119), 10 µM E-4031 stabilized V at -19.6 ± 1.8 mV and yielded a zero current crossing of approximately -10.0 mV in the I-V curve. These experimental data are in reasonable agreement with the predictions of our model. The relatively deep resting potentials in some experiments may be due to 1) the regional difference between the central (primary pacemaker) cell and the transitional or peripheral (latent pacemaker) cell (e.g., in the density of background currents); 2) the difference in recording methods or other experimental conditions (when [Na+]i and [K+]i were fixed at constant values of 10 and 140 mM, respectively, as in the perforated-patch recording for single SA node cells, the resting potential of our standard system was -18.5 mV at gKr = 0.11 and -17.5 mV with the complete block of IKr); 3) a Ca2+-dependent increase of background Cl- or K+ conductance in the region of ICa,L window current (e.g., see Ref. 92); or 4) direct modifications of ionic currents other than IKr by IKr blockers.

The effects of block of IKr (decreasing gKr) on spontaneous APs of previous SA node models are shown in Fig. 13 for comparison. During the decrease in gKr, pacemaker activity of previous models abruptly ceased or attenuated with MDP only slightly depolarized; in the model of Dokos et al. (24), irregular dynamics appeared before the cessation of pacemaker activity. In experiments using IKr blockers such as E-4031, however, application of an IKr blocker always induced the gradual and continuous decline in APA to quiescence with a marked depolarization in MDP and no irregular dynamics, as simulated by our model (see Fig. 12). Abrupt cessation of pacemaker activity or irregular dynamics as predicted by previous models has never been observed during applications of IKr blockers. Thus the bifurcation structures during IKr inhibition of real SA node cells are different from those of previous models, whereas they are essentially the same as those of our model. Block of IKr caused a cessation of pacemaker activity in all of the models; the resting potentials at critical gKr values and with the complete block of IKr for SA node models are compared in Table 2, along with the experimental data. Resting potentials in the models of Wilders et al. (124), Demir et al. (17), and Dokos et al. (24) were more positive than those predicted by our model as well as those observed in the experiments. Taken together, our model appears to be superior to previous models in predicting the behavior of real SA node cells during applications of IKr blockers.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 13.   Effects of block of IKr on pacemaker activities of various SA node models formulated by Wilders et al. (124) (A), Demir et al. (17) (B), Dokos et al. (24) (C), Zhang et al. (130) (D; central model), and the present study (E; standard model). Changes in MDP/POP (top) and CL (bottom) during gKr decrease are depicted. The gKr value, shown as a ratio to the control value for each model, was reduced at an interval of 0.001. See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

Block of ICa,T. The effects of block of ICa,T on pacemaker frequency have been largely different in previous experimental reports: Doerr et al. (23) found that the block of ICa,T by 40 µM Ni2+ exerted a pronounced negative chronotropic effect on pacemaker activity by nearly doubling the basal CL (see also Refs. 84 and 103). In contrast, Wilders et al. (124) reported that the Ni2+-induced block of ICa,T had a negligible influence on pacemaker frequency. Because of this inconsistency in experimental results, the simulated effects of eliminating ICa,T on CL of the previous models were also quite different: the increase in CL was relatively small in the models of Wilders et al. (124) and Dokos et al. (24), whereas it was relatively large in the others (see Table 3). Incorporating the ICa,T expressions of Demir et al. (17) based on the AP-clamp experiment of Doerr et al. (23), our model predicted a 17.0~22.4% increase in CL by the complete block of ICa,T (Fig. 14, top); this relatively large effect is comparable to the experimental data from Hagiwara et al. (37) and Satoh (103). Owing to the large variation in experimental results, however, it is difficult to validate a model from the contribution of ICa,T to diastolic depolarization.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Effects of elimination of ICa,T or Ih on CL: model predictions and experimental data



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 14.   Effects of block of ICa,T (top), Ih (middle), or 4-AP-sensitive currents (bottom) on spontaneous APs of our model cell. Both the standard system including Ist (left) and the Ist-removed system with gKr reduced to 75% of the control (middle) were tested. Control APs are shown as thin lines; dashed lines indicate zero potentials. Experimentally observed responses of rabbit SA node cells to application of 40 µM Ni2+ (to block ICa,T), 2 mM Cs+ (to block Ih), or 5 mM 4-AP are also shown for comparison (right). The data are from Hagiwara et al. (37) (top), Nikmaram et al. (83) (middle), and Boyett et al. (7) (bottom). See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.

The discrepancy in the apparent contribution of ICa,T to pacemaker activity may in part result from the heterogeneity of SA node cells (regional difference) in the density of Ist as well as of INa or ICa,T itself. In most experiments, Ni2+ was used as the selective ICa,T blocker. However, Ni2+ has been found to block Ist as well: Ni2+ at 40 µM, which blocks ICa,T completely, also decreases the amplitude of Ist to 46~64% of the control; Ni2+ at 1 mM completely abolishes Ist (32, 78). As shown in Fig. 9, the pacemaker activity of our model cell was dramatically slowed by reducing the Ist conductance: the complete block of Ist increased CL by 53.0% (from 307.5 to 470.5 ms). When a SA node cell possesses Ist sensitive to Ni2+, therefore, the effect of block of ICa,T would be overestimated because of a concomitant block of Ist by Ni2+. Thus the differences in the Ni2+-induced CL prolongation between experimental studies may reflect the difference in Ist density. The Ni2+-sensitive current recorded by Doerr et al. (23) during pacemaker depolarization, considerably larger (~20 pA/cell) than ICa,T in our model (~7 pA/cell), may also include Ist.

Block of Ih. We also simulated the effect of Cs+-induced Ih block on pacemaker activity by setting Ih = 0. As listed in Table 3, the contributions of Ih to pacemaker depolarization of previous models were different: the increase in CL on the removal of Ih was relatively large in the models of Wilders et al. (124) and Dokos et al. (24), whereas it was relatively small in the others. Incorporating the Ih expressions of Wilders et al. (124), our model predicted a 8.4~25.3% increase in CL by the complete block of Ih (Fig. 14, middle). The effect of block of Ih on CL was much greater in the Ist-removed system than in the standard system.

The simulated effect of elimination of Ih in our standard model for the primary pacemaker cell (8.4% increase in CL) is in good agreement with experimental data from central SA node tissues: Nikmaram et al. (83) reported that in central SA node tissues, block of Ih by 2 mM Cs+ caused a 5~10% increase in CL (see also Ref. 130). In other previous reports, the effects of block of ih on CL were greater than in the report of Nikmaram et al. (83): Denyer and Brown (18) and van Ginneken and Giles (118) reported increases in CL of 19~30% and 57%, respectively (see Table 3). Nikmaram et al. (83) also reported a regional difference in the effect of Cs+ on CL: the decrease in the spontaneous rate induced by 2 mM Cs+ was largest in the periphery (~19%) and least in the center (~7%). Because Honjo et al. (44) have shown that the density of Ih in the rabbit SA node was significantly greater in larger cells from the periphery than in smaller cells from the center, the different effects of block of Ih on CL may reflect the regional difference in Ih density. Furthermore, the degree of CL prolongation on block of Ih strongly depends on basic CL, MDP, and thus on densities of ionic currents other than Ih itself; values of MDP and CL would vary depending on both the experimental condition and area of the SA node from which cells were isolated. As already mentioned, the effect of elimination of Ih on CL was much greater in the Ist-removed system with longer CL than in the standard system with shorter CL. When Ist was eliminated from the standard system (MDP = -63.64 mV), the complete block of Ih increased CL by 43.9% (from 470.5 to 677.0 ms). Thus the large differences in the effect of block of Ih on CL (different contributions of Ih to pacemaker depolarization) reported previously (18, 20, 83, 87, 118) would arise from the regional variations in MDP and basic CL as well as in the density or activation threshold of Ih.

Block of 4-AP-sensitive currents. The effects of block of 4-AP-sensitive currents (Ito and Isus) on AP configurations are shown in Fig. 14, bottom. Complete block of 4-AP-sensitive currents in the standard and Ist-removed systems prolonged APD50 by 26.7 and 22.3%, respectively, and also caused positive shifts in POP (from +16.6 to +32.9 mV in the standard system). On elimination of both Ito and Isus, the CL of the standard system increased by 5.1%, whereas that of the Ist-removed system decreased by 7.2%. The simulated increase in APD50 (22.3~26.7%) is in good agreement with the experimental data of Boyett et al. (7): block of 4-AP-sensitive currents by 5 mM 4-AP caused an AP duration prolongation of 25 ± 5% in small balls from central SA node tissues. They also reported a 5 ± 2% decrease in CL by 5 mM 4-AP, consistent with the behavior of our Ist-removed system.

Effects of Modulating Intracellular Ca2+ Dynamics on Pacemaker Activity

Effects of block of SR Ca2+ release. SR Ca2+ release is known to affect intracellular Ca2+ transients, Ca2+-dependent inactivation of ICa,L, and activation of INaCa, possibly playing an important role in regulating pacemaker activity (39, 67, 104). We therefore assessed the contributions of SR Ca2+ release to pacemaker activities of the model cells by reducing the SR volume to 0.1% of the control. As shown in Table 4, the influences of block of SR Ca2+ release on pacemaker frequencies of the model cells were different but relatively small. In our standard model for primary pacemaker cells, elimination of SR Ca2+ release decreased the peak [Ca2+]sub only by 22.4% (from 1.81 to 1.41 µM) and increased CL by only 3.4% (from 307.5 to 317.6 ms). Thus, in our primary pacemaker model, SR Ca2+ release plays only a minor role in generating subsarcolemmal Ca2+ transients and regulating pacemaker activity (via modifications of the Ca2+-dependent inactivation of ICa,L and activation of INaCa). This simulated result agrees well with the reports of Janvier and Boyett (52) and Miyamae and Goto (79), in which application of ryanodine to abolish SR Ca2+ release resulted in little or no slowing of pacemaker activity in SA node cells. The Ca2+-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca2+ channels in rat ventricular or atrial myocytes is mediated primarily by Ca2+ release from the SR to the microdomain (5, 60). In our SA node model, however, the Ca2+-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca2+ channels is chiefly mediated by Ca2+ influx through the L-type Ca2+ channel itself. Consistent with our model behavior, ryanodine little slowed the fast decay of ICa,L in SA node cells (67), suggesting that SR Ca2+ release does not contribute to the Ca2+-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca2+ channels in the SA node. Morphological studies indicate that the SR is poorly formed in typical SA node cells and is therefore unlikely to play a major role in modulation of pacemaker activity (see Ref. 17). As suggested by Janvier and Boyett (52), the contributions of SR Ca2+ release to intracellular Ca2+ transients and to pacemaker activity (via inactivation of ICa,L or activation of INaCa) would be relatively small in SA node cells because of the poor development of the SR.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.   Effects of block of SR Ca2+ release on CL: model predictions and experimental data

In some experimental reports (6, 39, 67, 104), the block of SR Ca2+ release by ryanodine has been shown to exert a negative chronotropic effect on rabbit SA node cells, suggesting the important roles of SR Ca2+ release, intracellular Ca2+ transients, and subsequent activation of INaCa in regulating pacemaker activity of the SA node. This inconsistency may be due to the regional difference in the development of the SR between the central and peripheral SA node, i.e., poor development of the SR in primary pacemaker cells (see Refs. 47 and 96). Alternatively, ryanodine may directly block sarcolemmal ionic currents, such as ICa,T and INaCa, or secondarily modify Ca2+-dependent currents including ICa,L, IKr, and Ih via affecting intracellular Ca2+ dynamics (see Refs. 6, 39, 67, 94, and 104). Recent experiments have shown that the ICa,T-triggered focal Ca2+ release from the junctional SR to subspace stimulates INaCa, thereby playing an important role in regulating pacemaker activity (6, 47). Our model cannot simulate such local events (i.e., Ca2+ sparks and waves) due to the spatial heterogeneity of intracellular Ca2+ distribution; further compartmentalization for intracellular Ca2+ or the use of partial differential equations is required for simulating these phenomena involved in pacemaker regulation.

Effects of Ca2+ buffers. To buffer intracellular Ca2+, Ca2+ buffers such as EGTA and BAPTA are routinely used for whole cell patch-clamp experiments. These Ca2+ buffers to reduce intracellular Ca2+ transients have been shown to affect the pacemaker activity of SA node cells (67, 122). We therefore examined the effects of the Ca2+ buffers BAPTA and EGTA on the pacemaker activity of SA node models. Wilders et al. (124) simulated EGTA buffering by fixing [Ca2+]i to 80 nM. However, it is known that the slow buffer EGTA cannot efficiently buffer free Ca2+ in the subsarcolemmal space: although both BAPTA and EGTA can efficiently suppress global (myoplasmic) Ca2+ transients, only the fast buffer BAPTA is efficient in buffering local (subsarcolemmal) Ca2+ transients (see Refs. 5, 106, 122, and 128). Therefore, we calculated intracellular Ca2+ dynamics in the presence of BAPTA or EGTA to simulate the differential effects of Ca2+ buffers on [Ca2+]sub and on spontaneous APs. As shown in Fig. 15 and Table 5, the fast buffer BAPTA at 10 mM remarkably reduced both the subsarcolemmal and myoplasmic Ca2+ transients and dramatically slowed pacemaker activity with CL increasing by 43.4% in our standard model. This negative chronotropic effect is a consequence of the reduction in INaCa during the late phase of pacemaker depolarization. In contrast to BAPTA, the slow buffer EGTA at 10 mM could not sufficiently inhibit the subsarcolemmal Ca2+ transient, whereas it almost completely suppressed the myoplasmic Ca2+ transient to ~0.1 µM; pacemaker frequency was little affected by 10 mM EGTA. These differential effects of BAPTA and EGTA on pacemaker frequency have been experimentally observed (122): only BAPTA significantly reduced the rate of spontaneous APs (by 54%), whereas EGTA did not (see Fig. 15). In contrast to our model, previous models have failed to simulate the differential responses of SA node cells to Ca2+ buffers: both BAPTA and EGTA dramatically suppressed intracellular Ca2+ transients, exerting negative (or positive) chronotropic effects (see Table 5). Thus only our model could reproduce the differential responses of SA node cells to BAPTA and EGTA. Our model incorporates two compartments for intracellular Ca2+, including the subsarcolenmal space as a diffusion barrier for Ca2+, whereas previous models assumed only one intracellular compartment. Subspace Ca2+ dynamics are indispensable for simulating the differential effects of BAPTA and EGTA on SA node dynamics. A recent experimental report suggests local high Ca2+ gradients in the subsarcolemmal microdomain in SA node cells (122).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 15.   A: effects of Ca2+ buffers, BAPTA and EGTA (10 mM), on spontaneous APs (top) and intracellular Ca2+ concentrations (middle and bottom) in our standard model. Simulating the whole cell patch-clamp recording for internally perfused SA node cells, [Na+]i and [K+]i were fixed at 10 and 140 mM, respectively. The equations were numerically integrated for 11 s with an initial condition of a steady state at -60 mV, and membrane potential behavior and intracellular Ca2+ dynamics during the last 1 s (from MDP) were then depicted. Control APs and Ca2+ transients are shown as thin lines. B: experimentally observed responses of rabbit SA node cells to BAPTA and EGTA, the data from Vinogradova et al. (122), are also shown for comparison. See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5.   Effects of Ca2+ buffers on CL: model predictions and experimental data

Achievements and Limitations of the Present Model

On the basis of recently published experimental data, we were able to develop an improved SA node model incorporating 1) the novel pacemaker current Ist not included in previous models, 2) new formulations for voltage- and Ca2+-dependent inactivation kinetics of the L-type Ca2+ channel, 3) new expressions for activation kinetics of IKr, 4) revised kinetic formulas for 4-AP-sensitive currents (Ito and Isus), 5) new formulations for voltage- and concentration-dependent kinetics of INaK, and 6) the subsarcolemmal space as a diffusion barrier for Ca2+. The present model provides well-integrated explanations of the electrophysiological behavior of primary pacemaker cells in the rabbit SA node, representing significant improvements over earlier models. As described above, our model can 1) simulate whole cell voltage-clamp data for ICa,L, IKr, and Ist; 2) reproduce the waveshapes of spontaneous APs and sarcolemmal ionic currents (ICa,L, IKr, ICa,T, and Ih) observed during AP-clamp recordings; 3) reproduce the bifurcation structures seen during applications of ICa,L or IKr blockers; 4) mimic the reported effects of block of ICa,T, Ih, or 4-AP-sensitive currents on pacemaker activity; and 5) simulate the differential effects of BAPTA and EGTA on pacemaker frequency more accurately than previous SA node models.

Despite several improvements over previous models, the present model still has some limitations. Quantitatively, our model predictions (e.g., simulated changes in pacemaker frequency or resting potentials during inhibition of IKr) exhibited some inconsistencies with experimental data. These discrepancies may be due to 1) incomplete experimental data on the kinetics (or density) of ionic currents as well as on intracellular Ca2+ dynamics (and SR functions) in the SA node; 2) the large heterogeneity of SA node cells (e.g., regional differences in current densities); 3) poor selectivity of the agents used experimentally to block ionic currents or state-dependent kinetics of channel blockade; 4) the existence of some ionic current components not included in our model (e.g., Ca2+-activated Cl- current; see Ref. 92); 5) the spatial heterogeneity of intracellular distributions of Ca2+ and Na+ (see Ref. 13); 6) the lack of intracellular or intramembrane regulatory systems in our model; and 7) inappropriate kinetic formulations based on the Hodgkin-Huxley formalism for ionic channel currents such as ICa,L and IKr, which are essential to pacemaker generation (see Refs. 14, 43, 50, 88, 115, and 127). These points are of great importance in future modeling to develop more sophisticated models.

It should be noted that one limitation in estimating the contribution of a current to pacemaking, as well as in measuring a current by AP clamp, is the need of a pharmacological block of the current (see Ref. 72). Bindings of channel blockers used for experiments are known to be nonspecific and voltage (state) dependent (5, 70, 119, 129). Therefore, the currents recorded during AP clamp may be different from the real pure current, rather reflecting the total current blocked by an agent. As Verheijck et al. (119) suggested, changes in AP parameters induced by a drug are most likely the result of a combination of direct and indirect effects on various ionic currents. An agent used to block a current may directly affect other ionic currents, or, alternatively, secondarily affect ion channel properties via changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations and/or modifications of second messengers (see Refs. 9 and 129). Thus we should be cautious when simulated current waveforms or blocking effects are compared with experimental data.

There are numerous factors involved in the regulation of ion channel and SR functions in intact cardiac myocytes: intracellular second messengers (e.g., Ca2+, cyclic nucleotides, and protein kinases), as well as intramembrane modulators (e.g., receptors, G proteins, and enzymes), have been shown to modify various ionic current systems (for reviews, see Refs. 5, 9, 16, 25, and 91). Therefore, incorporating the dynamics of these modulating factors would be indispensable for predicting SA node behavior more accurately and might at least in part solve the discrepancies between model predictions and experimental data. Tentative models including putative intracellular Ca2+-dependent changes in ionic currents or modifications of channel functions by receptors and second messengers have recently been published (9, 16, 25, 75). In this study, however, we did not incorporate these modulating factors, because the aim of this study was not to develop a complete model but to develop an improved model for investigating the dynamical mechanisms of pacemaker generation. The present model could also serve as a base model for the development of a complete model incorporating the intramembrane modulators and intracellular second messengers and further the genetic regulation of ion channels and transporters.

Despite many limitations, our model and simulations can provide the guidance for future developments of more sophisticated single SA node cell models, multicellular (two or three dimensional) models of the intact SA node, and whole heart models.


    APPENDIX
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

The mathematical expressions used in our SA node model are given below. The units used are millivolts, picoamps, nanosiemens, milliseconds, nanofarads, millimolars, and liters. The temperature assumed for the computations was 37°C; the experimental data of gating kinetics obtained at <37°C were corrected for temperature with a Q10 = 1.6~3.0 (see THEORY AND METHODS). The functions xinfinity (V) and tau x(V) for individual gating variables and steady-state I-V relations for P individual current systems are plotted in Figs. A1 and A2, respectively; the model constants (standard parameter values) are given in Table A1.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 16.   Computed gating characteristics of each ion channel. Steady-state probabilities (top) and time constants (middle and bottom) for activation and inactivation are shown as functions of the membrane potential. Curves are drawn according to the equations listed in the APPENDIX. See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 17.   Voltage dependence of steady-state time-dependent and -independent currents computed with [Na+]i, [K+]i, and [Ca2+]i (equal to [Ca2+]sub) fixed at 10, 140, and 0.0001 mM, respectively. See the Glossary for definitions of the abbreviations. Ib,sum represents the sum of the background and transporter currents (i.e., Ib,sum = Ib,Na + IK,Ach + INaK + INaCa). The total sarcolemmal membrane current is denoted as Itotal.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table A1.   Model constants (standard parameter values)

Sarcolemmal Ionic Currents

L-type Ca2+ channel current.
I<SUB>Ca,L</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Ca,L</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>Ca,L</SUB>)<IT> · d</IT><SUB>L</SUB><IT> · f</IT><SUB>L</SUB><IT> · f</IT><SUB>Ca</SUB>

d<SUB>L,∞</SUB><IT>=</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[−(<IT>V+</IT>14.1)<IT>/</IT>6]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

f<SUB>L,∞</SUB><IT>=</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[(<IT>V+</IT>30)<IT>/</IT>5]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

f<SUB>Ca,∞</SUB><IT>=K</IT><SUB>m<IT>f</IT><SUB>Ca</SUB></SUB><IT>/</IT>(<IT>K</IT><SUB>m<IT>f</IT><SUB>Ca</SUB></SUB> + [Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>sub</SUB>)

&tgr;<SUB>d<SUB>L</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>&agr;</IT><SUB><IT>d</IT><SUB>L</SUB></SUB><IT>+&bgr;</IT><SUB><IT>d</IT><SUB>L</SUB></SUB>)<SUP>−1</SUP>

&agr;<SUB>d<SUB>L</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>−0.02839<IT> · </IT>(<IT>V+</IT>35)<IT>/</IT>{exp[−(<IT>V+</IT>35)<IT>/</IT>2.5]<IT>−</IT>1}

<IT>−</IT>0.0849<IT> · V/</IT>[exp(−<IT>V/</IT>4.8)<IT>−</IT>1]

&bgr;<SUB>d<SUB>L</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>0.01143<IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−</IT>5)<IT>/</IT>{exp[(<IT>V−</IT>5)<IT>/</IT>2.5]<IT>−</IT>1}

&tgr;<SUB>f<SUB>L</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>257.1<IT> · </IT>exp{−[(<IT>V+</IT>32.5)<IT>/</IT>13.9]<SUP>2</SUP>}<IT>+</IT>44.3

&tgr;<SUB>f<SUB>Ca</SUB></SUB><IT>=f</IT><SUB>Ca,∞</SUB><IT>/&agr;</IT><SUB><IT>f</IT><SUB>Ca</SUB></SUB>

T-type Ca2+ channel current.
I<SUB>Ca,T</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Ca,T</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>Ca,T</SUB>)<IT> · d</IT><SUB>T</SUB><IT> · f</IT><SUB>T</SUB>

d<SUB>T,∞</SUB><IT>=</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[−(<IT>V+</IT>26.3)<IT>/</IT>6.0]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

f<SUB>T,∞</SUB><IT>=</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[(<IT>V+</IT>61.7)<IT>/</IT>5.6]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

&tgr;<SUB>d<SUB>T</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>{1.068<IT> · </IT>exp[(<IT>V+</IT>26.3)<IT>/</IT>30]

<IT>+</IT>1.068<IT> · </IT>exp[−(<IT>V+</IT>26.3)<IT>/</IT>30]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

&tgr;<SUB>f<SUB>T</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>{0.0153<IT> · </IT>exp[−(<IT>V+</IT>61.7)<IT>/</IT>83.3]

<IT>+</IT>0.015<IT> · </IT>exp[(<IT>V+</IT>61.7)<IT>/</IT>15.38]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

Rapidly activating delayed rectifier K+ current.
I<SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Kr</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>K</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>(0.6<IT> · p</IT><SUB>aF</SUB><IT>+</IT>0.4<IT> · p</IT><SUB>aS</SUB>)<IT> · p</IT><SUB>i</SUB>

p<SUB>a,∞</SUB><IT>=</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[−(<IT>V+</IT>23.2)<IT>/</IT>10.6]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

p<SUB>i,∞</SUB><IT>=</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[(<IT>V+</IT>28.6)<IT>/</IT>17.1]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

&tgr;<SUB>p<SUB>aF</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>0.84655<IT>/</IT>[0.0372<IT> · </IT>exp(<IT>V/</IT>15.9)<IT>+</IT>0.00096<IT> · </IT>exp(−<IT>V/</IT>22.5)]

&tgr;<SUB>p<SUB>aS</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>0.84655<IT>/</IT>[0.0042<IT> · </IT>exp(<IT>V/</IT>17.0)<IT>+</IT>0.00015<IT> · </IT>exp(−<IT>V/</IT>21.6)]

&tgr;<SUB>p<SUB>i</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>[0.1<IT> · </IT>exp(−<IT>V/</IT>54.645)<IT>+</IT>0.656<IT> · </IT>exp(<IT>V/</IT>106.157)]<SUP>−1</SUP>

Slowly activating delayed rectifier K+ current.
I<SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Ks</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>Ks</SUB>)<IT> · n</IT><SUP>2</SUP>

n<SUB>∞</SUB>=&agr;<SUB>n</SUB>/(&agr;<SUB>n</SUB>+&bgr;<SUB>n</SUB>)

&tgr;<SUB>n</SUB>=(&agr;<SUB>n</SUB>+&bgr;<SUB>n</SUB>)<SUP>−1</SUP>

&agr;<SUB>n</SUB>=0.014/{1+exp[−(<IT>V−</IT>40)<IT>/</IT>9]}

&bgr;<SUB>n</SUB>=0.001 · exp(−<IT>V/</IT>45)

4-AP-sensitive currents.
I<SUB>to</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>to</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>K</SUB>)<IT> · q · r</IT>

I<SUB>sus</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>sus</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>K</SUB>)<IT> · r</IT>

q<SUB>∞</SUB>={1+exp[(<IT>V+</IT>49)<IT>/</IT>13]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

r<SUB>∞</SUB>={1+exp[−(<IT>V−</IT>19.3)<IT>/</IT>15]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

&tgr;<SUB>q</SUB>=65.17/{0.57 · exp[−0.08<IT> · </IT>(<IT>V+</IT>44)]

<IT>+</IT>0.065<IT> · </IT>exp[0.1<IT> · </IT>(<IT>V+</IT>45.93)]}<IT>+</IT>10.1

&tgr;<SUB>r</SUB>=21.826/{1.037 · exp[0.09<IT> · </IT>(<IT>V+</IT>30.61)]

<IT>+</IT>0.369<IT> · </IT>exp[−0.12<IT> · </IT>(<IT>V+</IT>23.84)]}<IT>+</IT>4.172

Hyperpolarization-activated current.
I<SUB>h</SUB><IT>=</IT>[<IT>g</IT><SUB>h,Na</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>Na</SUB>)<IT>+g</IT><SUB>h,K</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>K</SUB>)]<IT> · y</IT><SUP>2</SUP>

y<SUB>∞</SUB>={1+exp[(<IT>V+</IT>64)<IT>/</IT>13.5]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

&tgr;<SUB>y</SUB>=0.71665/{exp[−(<IT>V+</IT>386.9)<IT>/</IT>45.3]

<IT>+</IT>exp[(<IT>V−</IT>73.08)<IT>/</IT>19.23]}

Sustained inward current.
I<SUB>st</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>st</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>st</SUB>)<IT> · q</IT><SUB>a</SUB><IT> · q</IT><SUB>i</SUB>

q<SUB>a,∞</SUB><IT>=</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[−(<IT>V+</IT>57)<IT>/</IT>5]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

&tgr;<SUB>q<SUB>a</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>&agr;</IT><SUB><IT>q</IT><SUB>a</SUB></SUB><IT>+&bgr;</IT><SUB><IT>q</IT><SUB>a</SUB></SUB>)<SUP>−1</SUP>

&agr;<SUB>q<SUB>a</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>[0.15<IT> · </IT>exp(−<IT>V/</IT>11)<IT>+</IT>0.2<IT> · </IT>exp(−<IT>V/</IT>700)]<SUP>−1</SUP>

&bgr;<SUB>q<SUB>a</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>[16<IT> · </IT>exp(<IT>V/</IT>8)<IT>+</IT>15<IT> · </IT>exp(<IT>V/</IT>50)]<SUP>−1</SUP>

q<SUB>i,∞</SUB><IT>=&agr;</IT><SUB><IT>q</IT><SUB>i</SUB></SUB>(<IT>&agr;</IT><SUB><IT>q</IT><SUB>i</SUB></SUB><IT>+&bgr;</IT><SUB><IT>q</IT><SUB>i</SUB></SUB>)

&tgr;<SUB>q<SUB>i</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>&agr;</IT><SUB><IT>q</IT><SUB>i</SUB></SUB><IT>+&bgr;</IT><SUB><IT>q</IT><SUB>i</SUB></SUB>)<SUP>−1</SUP>

&agr;<SUB>q<SUB>i</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>0.1504<IT>/</IT>[3,100<IT> · </IT>exp(<IT>V/</IT>13)<IT>+</IT>700<IT> · </IT>exp(<IT>V/</IT>70)]

&bgr;<SUB>q<SUB>i</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>0.1504<IT>/</IT>[95<IT> · </IT>exp(−<IT>V/</IT>10)<IT>+</IT>50<IT> · </IT>exp(−<IT>V/</IT>700)]

<IT>+</IT>0.000229<IT>/</IT>[1<IT>+</IT>exp(−<IT>V/</IT>5)]

Na+ channel current.
I<SUB>Na</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Na</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>mh</SUB>)<IT> · m</IT><SUP>3</SUP><IT> · </IT>[(1<IT>−F</IT><SUB>Na</SUB>)<IT> · h</IT><SUB>F</SUB><IT>+F</IT><SUB>Na</SUB><IT> · h</IT><SUB>S</SUB>]

m<SUB>∞</SUB>={1+exp[−(<IT>V+</IT>21.4)<IT>/</IT>6.0]}<SUP>−1<IT>/</IT>3</SUP>

&tgr;<SUB>m</SUB>=0.6247/{0.832 · exp[−(<IT>V+</IT>36.7)<IT>/</IT>2.985]

<IT>+</IT>0.627<IT> · </IT>exp[(<IT>V+</IT>45.01)<IT>/</IT>12.195]}<IT>+</IT>0.04

h<SUB>∞</SUB>={1+exp[(<IT>V+</IT>70.6)<IT>/</IT>6.4]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

&tgr;<SUB>h<SUB>F</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>0.4757<IT>/</IT>({15,600<IT> · </IT>exp[(<IT>V−</IT>20)<IT>/</IT>16.949]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

<IT>+</IT>{0.92<IT>+</IT>0.037<IT> · </IT>exp[−(<IT>V−</IT>20)<IT>/</IT>11.494]}<SUP>−1</SUP>)

&tgr;<SUB>h<SUB>S</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>0.4757<IT>/</IT>({168,000<IT> · </IT>exp[(<IT>V−</IT>20)<IT>/</IT>18.182]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

<IT>+</IT>{2.58<IT>+</IT>0.94<IT> · </IT>exp[−(<IT>V−</IT>20)<IT>/</IT>15.873]}<SUP>−1</SUP>)

F<SUB>Na</SUB><IT>=</IT>0.0952<IT> · </IT>exp[−0.063<IT> · </IT>(<IT>V+</IT>14.4)]

<IT>÷</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>1.66<IT> · </IT>exp[−0.225<IT> · </IT>(<IT>V+</IT>43.7)]}<IT>+</IT>0.0869

Na+-dependent background current.
I<SUB>b,Na</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>b,Na</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>Na</SUB>)

Background muscarinic K+ channel current.
I<SUB>K,ACh</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>K,ACh</SUB><IT> · </IT>{[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT>−</IT>[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT> · </IT>exp(−<IT>V · F/RT</IT>)}

Na+-K+ pump current.
I<SUB>NaK</SUB><IT>=I</IT><SUB>NaK<SUB>max</SUB></SUB><IT> · </IT>[1<IT>+</IT>(<IT>K</IT><SUB>mKp</SUB><IT>/</IT>[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB>)<SUP>1.2</SUP>]<SUP>−1</SUP><IT> · </IT>[1<IT>+</IT>(<IT>K</IT><SUB>mNap</SUB>/[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)<SUP>1.3</SUP>]<SUP>−1</SUP>

<IT>×</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[−(<IT>V−E</IT><SUB>Na</SUB><IT>+</IT>120)<IT>/</IT>30]}<SUP>−1</SUP>

Na+/Ca2+ exchange current.
d<SUB>i</SUB><IT>=</IT>1<IT>+</IT>([Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>sub</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>ci</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp(−<IT>Q</IT><SUB>ci</SUB><IT> · V · F/R</IT>T)

<IT>+</IT>[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>cni</SUB>}<IT>+</IT>([Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>1n<IT>i</IT></SUB>)<IT> · </IT>{1<IT>+</IT>([Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>2ni</SUB>)

<IT>×</IT>(1<IT>+</IT>[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>3ni</SUB>)}

d<SUB>o</SUB><IT>=</IT>1<IT>+</IT>([Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>co</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp(<IT>Q</IT><SUB>co</SUB><IT> · V · F/R</IT>T)}

<IT>+</IT>([Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>1no</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>{1<IT>+</IT>([Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>2no</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>(1<IT>+</IT>[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>3no</SUB>)}

k<SUB>43</SUB>=[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT>/</IT>(<IT>K</IT><SUB>3ni</SUB><IT>+</IT>[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)

k<SUB>12</SUB>=([Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>sub</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>ci</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>exp(−<IT>Q</IT><SUB>ci</SUB><IT> · V · F/R</IT>T)<IT>/d</IT><SUB>i</SUB>

k<SUB>14</SUB>=([Na<SUP><IT>+</IT></SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>1ni</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>([Na<SUP><IT>+</IT></SUP>]<SUB><IT>i</IT></SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>2ni</SUB>) 

<IT>× </IT>(1<IT>+</IT>[Na<SUP><IT>+</IT></SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>3ni</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>exp(<IT>Q</IT><SUB>n</SUB><IT> · V · F/R</IT>T<IT>/</IT>2)<IT>/d</IT><SUB>i</SUB>

k<SUB>41</SUB>=exp(−<IT>Q</IT><SUB>n</SUB><IT> · V · F/R</IT>T<IT>/</IT>2)

k<SUB>34</SUB>=[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>(<IT>K</IT><SUB>3no</SUB><IT>+</IT>[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB>)

k<SUB>21</SUB>=([Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>co</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>exp(<IT>Q</IT><SUB>co</SUB><IT> · V · F/R</IT>T)<IT>/d</IT><SUB>o</SUB>

k<SUB>23</SUB><IT>=</IT>([Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>1no</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>([Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>2no</SUB>)<IT> · </IT>(1<IT>+</IT>[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>3no</SUB>)

<IT>×</IT>exp(−<IT>Q</IT><SUB>n</SUB><IT> · V · F/R</IT>T<IT>/</IT>2)<IT>/d</IT><SUB>o</SUB>

k<SUB>32</SUB>=exp(<IT>Q</IT><SUB>n</SUB><IT> · V · F/R</IT>T<IT>/</IT>2)

x<SUB>1</SUB>=k<SUB>34</SUB> · k<SUB>41</SUB> · (k<SUB>23</SUB>+k<SUB>21</SUB>)+k<SUB>21</SUB> · k<SUB>32</SUB> · (k<SUB>43</SUB>+k<SUB>41</SUB>)

x<SUB>2</SUB>=k<SUB>43</SUB> · k<SUB>32</SUB> · (k<SUB>14</SUB>+k<SUB>12</SUB>)+k<SUB>41</SUB> · k<SUB>12</SUB> · (k<SUB>34</SUB>+k<SUB>32</SUB>)

x<SUB>3</SUB>=k<SUB>43</SUB> · k<SUB>14</SUB> · (k<SUB>23</SUB>+k<SUB>21</SUB>)+k<SUB>12</SUB> · k<SUB>23</SUB> · (k<SUB>43</SUB>+k<SUB>41</SUB>)

x<SUB>4</SUB>=k<SUB>34</SUB> · k<SUB>23</SUB> · (k<SUB>14</SUB>+k<SUB>12</SUB>)+k<SUB>21</SUB> · k<SUB>14</SUB> · (k<SUB>34</SUB>+k<SUB>32</SUB>)

I<SUB>NaCa</SUB><IT>=k</IT><SUB>NaCa</SUB><IT> · </IT>(<IT>k</IT><SUB>21</SUB><IT> · x</IT><SUB>2</SUB><IT>−k</IT><SUB>12</SUB><IT> · x</IT><SUB>1</SUB>)<IT>/</IT>(<IT>x</IT><SUB>1</SUB><IT>+x</IT><SUB>2</SUB><IT>+x</IT><SUB>3</SUB><IT>+x</IT><SUB>4</SUB>)

Intracellular Ca2+ Dynamics

Ca2+ diffusion flux.
j<SUB>Ca,dif</SUB><IT>=</IT>([Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>sub</SUB><IT>−</IT>[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)<IT>/&tgr;</IT><SUB>dif,Ca</SUB>

Ca2+ handling by the SR.
j<SUB>rel</SUB><IT>=P</IT><SUB>rel</SUB><IT> · </IT>([Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>rel</SUB><IT>−</IT>[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>sub</SUB>)<IT>/</IT>[1<IT>+</IT>(<IT>K</IT><SUB>rel</SUB><IT>/</IT>[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>sub</SUB>)<SUP>2</SUP>]

j<SUB>up</SUB><IT>=P</IT><SUB>up</SUB><IT>/</IT>(1<IT>+K</IT><SUB>up</SUB><IT>/</IT>[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)

j<SUB>tr</SUB><IT>=</IT>([Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>up</SUB><IT>−</IT>[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>rel</SUB>)<IT>/&tgr;</IT><SUB>tr</SUB>

State Variables and Differential Equations

Membrane potential.
d<IT>V/</IT>d<IT>t=</IT>−(<IT>I</IT><SUB>Ca,L</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Ca,T</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>to</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>sus</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>h</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>st</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Na</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>b,Na</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>K,ACh</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>NaK</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>NaCa</SUB>)<IT>/C</IT><SUB>m</SUB>

Gating variables.
d<IT>x/</IT>d<IT>t=</IT>(<IT>x</IT><SUB>∞</SUB><IT>−x</IT>)<IT>/&tgr;</IT><SUB>x</SUB>

 (<IT>x=d</IT><SUB>L</SUB><IT>, f</IT><SUB>L</SUB><IT>, f</IT><SUB>Ca</SUB><IT>, d</IT><SUB>T</SUB><IT>, f</IT><SUB>T</SUB><IT>, p</IT><SUB>aF</SUB><IT>, p</IT><SUB>aS</SUB><IT>, p</IT><SUB>i</SUB><IT>, n, q, r, y, q</IT><SUB>a</SUB><IT>, q</IT><SUB>i</SUB><IT>, m, h</IT><SUB>F</SUB><IT>, h</IT><SUB>S</SUB>)

Intracellular ion concentrations.
d[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>/d<IT>t=</IT>(<IT>j</IT><SUB>Ca,dif</SUB><IT> · V</IT><SUB>sub</SUB><IT>−j</IT><SUB>up</SUB><IT> · V</IT><SUB>up</SUB>)<IT>/V</IT><SUB>i</SUB><IT>−</IT>([CM]<SUB>tot</SUB><IT> · </IT>d<IT>f</IT><SUB>CMi</SUB>/d<IT>t</IT>

<IT>+</IT>[TC]<SUB>tot</SUB><IT> · </IT>d<IT>f</IT><SUB>TC</SUB>/d<IT>t+</IT>[TMC]<SUB>tot</SUB><IT> · </IT>d<IT>f</IT><SUB>TMC</SUB>/d<IT>t</IT>)

d[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>sub</SUB>/d<IT>t=</IT>[−(<IT>I</IT><SUB>Ca,L</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Ca,T</SUB><IT>−</IT>2<IT> · I</IT><SUB>NaCa</SUB>)<IT>/</IT>(2<IT> · F</IT>)

<IT>+j</IT><SUB>rel</SUB><IT> · V</IT><SUB>rel</SUB>]<IT>/V</IT><SUB>sub</SUB><IT>−j</IT><SUB>Ca,dif</SUB><IT>−</IT>[CM]<SUB>tot</SUB><IT> · </IT>d<IT>f</IT><SUB>CMs</SUB>/d<IT>t</IT>

d[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>rel</SUB>/d<IT>t=j</IT><SUB>tr</SUB><IT>−j</IT><SUB>rel</SUB><IT>−</IT>[CQ]<SUB>tot</SUB><IT> · df</IT><SUB>CQ</SUB><IT>/dt</IT>

d[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>up</SUB>/d<IT>t=j</IT><SUB>up</SUB><IT>−j</IT><SUB>tr</SUB><IT> · V</IT><SUB>rel</SUB><IT>/V</IT><SUB>up</SUB>

d[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>/d<IT>t=−</IT>(<IT>I</IT><SUB>h,Na</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>st</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>b,Na</SUB><IT>+</IT>3<IT> · I</IT><SUB>NaK</SUB><IT>+</IT>3<IT> · I</IT><SUB>NaCa</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Naen</SUB>)<IT>/</IT>(<IT>F · V</IT><SUB>i</SUB>)

d[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>/d<IT>t=</IT>−(<IT>I</IT><SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>to</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>sus</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>h,K</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>K,ACh</SUB><IT>−</IT>2<IT> · I</IT><SUB>NaK</SUB>)<IT>/</IT>(<IT>F · V</IT><SUB>i</SUB>)

Ca2+ buffering.
d<IT>f</IT><SUB>TC</SUB>/d<IT>t=k</IT><SUB>f<SUB>TC</SUB></SUB><IT> · </IT>[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT> · </IT>(1<IT>−f</IT><SUB>TC</SUB>)<IT>−k</IT><SUB>bTC</SUB><IT> · f</IT><SUB>TC</SUB>

d<IT>f</IT><SUB>TMC</SUB>/d<IT>t=k</IT><SUB>f<SUB>TMC</SUB></SUB><IT> · </IT>[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT> · </IT>(1<IT>−f</IT><SUB>TMC</SUB><IT>−f</IT><SUB>TMM</SUB>)<IT>−k</IT><SUB><IT>b</IT><SUB>TMC</SUB></SUB><IT> · f</IT><SUB>TMC</SUB>

d<IT>f</IT><SUB>TMM</SUB>/d<IT>t=k</IT><SUB><IT>f</IT><SUB>TMM</SUB></SUB><IT> · </IT>[Mg<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT> · </IT>(1<IT>−f</IT><SUB>TMC</SUB><IT>−f</IT><SUB>TMM</SUB>)<IT>−K</IT><SUB><IT>b</IT><SUB>TMM</SUB></SUB><IT> · f</IT><SUB>TMM</SUB>

d<IT>f</IT><SUB>CMi</SUB>/d<IT>t=k</IT><SUB><IT>f</IT><SUB>CM</SUB></SUB><IT> · </IT>[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT> · </IT>(1<IT>−f</IT><SUB>CMi</SUB>)<IT>−k</IT><SUB><IT>b</IT><SUB>CM</SUB></SUB><IT> · f</IT><SUB>CMi</SUB>

d<IT>f</IT><SUB>CMs</SUB>/d<IT>t=k</IT><SUB>f<SUB>CM</SUB></SUB><IT> · </IT>[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>sub</SUB><IT> · </IT>(1<IT>−f</IT><SUB>CMs</SUB>)<IT>−k</IT><SUB><IT>b</IT><SUB>CM</SUB></SUB><IT> · f</IT><SUB>CMs</SUB>

d<IT>f</IT><SUB>CQ</SUB>/d<IT>t=k</IT><SUB>f<SUB>CQ</SUB></SUB><IT> · </IT>[Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>rel</SUB><IT> · </IT>(1<IT>−f</IT><SUB>CQ</SUB>)<IT>−k</IT><SUB><IT>b</IT><SUB>CQ</SUB></SUB><IT> · f</IT><SUB>CQ</SUB>


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported in part by Ministry for Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (c) 11670717 (to S. Imanishi) and by Kanazawa Medical University Grant for Project Research P99-6 (to Y. Kurata).


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Y. Kurata, Dept. of Physiology, Kanazawa Medical University, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada-machi, Kahoku-gun, Ishikawa 920-0293, Japan (E-mail: yasu{at}kanazawa-med.ac.jp).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

10.1152/ajpheart.00900.2001

Received 16 October 2001; accepted in final form 27 June 2002.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THEORY AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

1.   Adachi-Akahane, S, Cleemann L, and Morad M. Cross-signaling between L-type Ca2+ channels and ryanodine receptors in rat ventricular myocytes. J Gen Physiol 108: 435-454, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Anumonwo, JMB, Freeman LC, Kwok WM, and Kass RS. Delayed rectification in single cells isolated from guinea pig sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 262: H921-H925, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3.   Baruscotti, M, DiFrancesco D, and Robinson RB. A TTX-sensitive inward sodium current contributes to spontaneous activity in newborn rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 492: 21-30, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

4.   Baruscotti, M, DiFrancesco D, and Robinson RB. Na+ current contribution to the diastolic depolarization in newborn rabbit SA node cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H2303-H2309, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5.   Bers, DM, and Perez-Reyes E. Ca channels in cardiac myocytes: structure and function in Ca influx and intracellular Ca release. Cardiovasc Res 42: 339-360, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Bogdanov, KY, Vinogradova TM, and Lakatta EG. Sinoatrial nodal cell ryanodine receptor and Na+-Ca2+ exchanger: molecular partners in pacemaker regulation. Circ Res 88: 1254-1258, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Boyett, MR, Honjo H, Yamamoto M, Nikmaram MR, Niwa R, and Kodama I. Regional differences in effects of 4-aminopyridine within the sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 275: H1158-H1168, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Boyett, MR, Honjo H, Yamamoto M, Nikmaram MR, Niwa R, and Kodama I. Downward gradient in action potential duration along conduction path in and around the sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H686-H698, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Boyett, MR, Zhang H, Garny A, and Holden AV. Control of the pacemaker activity of the sinoatrial node by intracellular Ca2+. Experiments and modelling. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 359: 1091-1110, 2001.

10.   Brown, HF, Kimura J, Noble D, Noble SJ, and Taupignon A. The ionic currents underlying pacemaker activity in rabbit sino-atrial node: experimental results and computer simulations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 222: 329-347, 1984[Medline].

11.   Campbell, DL, Giles WR, Hume JR, Noble D, and Shibata EF. Reversal potential of the calcium current in bull-frog atrial myocytes. J Physiol 403: 267-286, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

12.   Cannell, MB, and Allen DG. Model of calcium movements during activation in the sarcomere of frog skeletal muscle. Biophys J 45: 913-925, 1984[Web of Science][Medline].

13.   Carmeliet, E. A fuzzy subsarcolemmal space for intracellular Na+ in cardiac cells? Cardiovasc Res 26: 433-442, 1992[Web of Science][Medline].

14.   Clancy, CE, and Rudy Y. Cellular consequences of HERG mutations in the long QT syndrome: precursors to sudden cardiac death. Cardiovasc Res 50: 301-313, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15.   Courtemanche, M, Ramirez RJ, and Nattel S. Ionic mechanisms underlying human atrial action potential properties: insights from a mathematical model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 275: H301-H321, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16.   Demir, SS, Clark JW, and Giles WR. Parasympathetic modulation of sinoatrial node pacemaker activity in rabbit heart: a unifying model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H2221-H2244, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Demir, SS, Clark JW, Murphey CR, and Giles WR. A mathematical model of a rabbit sinoatrial node cell. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 266: C832-C852, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Denyer, JC, and Brown HF. Pacemaking in rabbit isolated sino-atrial node cells during Cs+ block of the hyperpolarization-activated current if. J Physiol 429: 401-409, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Denyer, JC, and Brown HF. Rabbit sino-atrial node cells: isolation and electrophysiological properties. J Physiol 428: 405-424, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20.   DiFrancesco, D. The contribution of the "pacemaker" current (if) to generation of spontaneous activity in rabbit sino-atrial node myocytes. J Physiol 434: 23-40, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   DiFrancesco, D, Ferroni A, Mazzanti M, and Tromba C. Properties of the hyperpolarizing-activated current (if) in cells isolated from the rabbit sino-atrial node. J Physiol 377: 61-88, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   DiFrancesco, D, and Noble D. A model of cardiac electrical activity incorporating ionic pumps and concentration changes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 307: 353-398, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Doerr, T, Denger R, and Trautwein W. Calcium currents in single SA nodal cells of the rabbit heart studied with action potential clamp. Pflügers Arch 413: 599-603, 1989[Web of Science][Medline].

24.   Dokos, S, Celler B, and Lovell N. Ion currents underlying sinoatrial node pacemaker activity: a new single cell mathematical model. J Theor Biol 181: 245-272, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

25.   Dokos, S, Celler B, and Lovell N. Vagal control of sinoatrial rhythm: a mathematical model. J Theor Biol 182: 21-44, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

26.   Egan, T, and Noble D. Acetylcholine and the mammalian "slow inward" current: a computer investigation. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 230: 315-337, 1987[Medline].

27.   Fermini, B, and Nathan R. Removal of sialic acid alters both T- and L-type calcium currents in cardiac myocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 260: H735-H743, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Giles, WR, and van Ginneken ACG A transient outward current in isolated cells from the crista terminalis of rabbit heart. J Physiol 368: 243-264, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29.   Glukhovsky, A, Adam DR, Amitzur G, and Sideman S. Machanisms of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum: a computer model. Ann Biomed Eng 26: 213-229, 1998[Web of Science][Medline].

30.   Guevara, MR, and Jongsma HJ. Three ways of abolishing automaticity in sinoatrial node: ionic modeling and nonlinear dynamics. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 262: H1268-H1286, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31.   Guo, J, Mitsuiye T, and Noma A. The sustained inward current in sino-atrial node cells of guinea-pig heart. Pflügers Arch 433: 390-396, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

32.   Guo, J, Ono K, and Noma A. A sustained inward current activated at the diastolic potential range in rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 483: 1-13, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33.   Guo, J, Ono K, and Noma A. Monovalent cation conductance of the sustained inward current in rabbit sinoatrial node cells. Pflügers Arch 433: 209-211, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

34.   Habuchi, Y, Han X, and Giles WR. Comparison of the hyperpolarization-activated and delayed rectifier currents in rabbit atrioventricular node and sinoatrial node. Heart Vessels Suppl 9: 203-206, 1995.

35.   Hadley, RW, and Lederer WJ. Ca2+ and voltage inactivate Ca2+ channels in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes through independent mechanisms. J Physiol 444: 257-268, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

36.   Hagiwara, N, and Irisawa H. Na-Ca exchange current in sinoatrial node cell of rabbit (Abstract). Circulation, Suppl 78: 490a, 1988.

37.   Hagiwara, N, Irisawa H, and Kameyama M. Contribution of two types of calcium currents to the pacemaker potentials of rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 395: 233-253, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

38.   Hagiwara, N, Irisawa H, Kasanuki H, and Hosoda S. Background current in sino-atrial node cells of the rabbit heart. J Physiol 448: 53-72, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

39.   Hata, T, Noda T, Nishimura M, and Watanabe Y. The role of Ca2+ release from sarcoplasmic reticulum in the regulation of sinoatrial node automaticity. Heart Vessels 11: 234-241, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

40.   Heath, BM, and Terrar DA. The deactivation kinetics of the delayed-rectifier components iKr and iKs in guinea-pig isolated ventricular myocytes. Exp Physiol 81: 605-621, 1996[Abstract].

41.   Hess, P, and Tsien RW. Mechanism of ion permeation through calcium channels. Nature 309: 453-456, 1984[Medline].

42.   Hilgemann, DW, and Noble D. Excitation-contraction coupling and extracellular calcium transients in rabbit atrium: reconstruction of basic cellular mechanisms. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 230: 163-205, 1987[Medline].

43.   Ho, WK, Earm YE, Lee SH, Brown HF, and Noble D. Voltage- and time-dependent block of delayed rectifier K+ current in rabbit sino-atrial node cells by external Ca2+ and Mg2+. J Physiol 494: 727-742, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

44.   Honjo, H, Boyett MR, Kodama I, and Toyama J. Correlation between electrical activity and the size of rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 496: 795-808, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

45.   Honjo, H, Kodama I, Zang WJ, and Boyett MR. Desensitization to acetylcholine in single sinoatrial node cells isolated from rabbit hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 263: H1779-H1789, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

46.   Honjo, H, Lei M, Boyett MR, and Kodama I. Heterogeneity of 4-aminopyridine-sensitive current in rabbit sinoatrial node cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H1295-H1304, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

47.   Hüser, J, Blatter LA, and Lipsius SL. Intracellular Ca2+ release contributes to automaticity in cat atrial pacemaker cells. J Physiol 524: 415-422, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

48.   Ito, H, and Ono K. A rapidly activating delayed rectifier K+ channel in rabbit sinoatrial node cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 269: H443-H452, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

49.   Ito, H, Ono K, and Noma A. Background conductance attributable to spontaneous opening of muscarinic K+ channels in rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 476: 55-68, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

50.   Jafri, MS, Rice JJ, and Winslow RL. Cardiac Ca2+ dynamics: the roles of ryanodine receptor adaptation and sarcoplasmic reticulum load. Biophys J 74: 1149-1168, 1998[Web of Science][Medline].

51.   Janiak, R, Lewartowski B, and Langer GA. Functional coupling between sarcoplasmic reticulum and Na/Ca exchange in single myocytes of guinea-pig and rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 28: 253-264, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

52.   Janvier, NC, and Boyett MR. The role of Na-Ca exchange current in the cardiac action potential. Cardiovasc Res 32: 69-84, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

53.   Ju, YK, and Allen DG. Intracellular calcium and Na+-Ca2+ exchange current in isolated toad pacemaker cells. J Physiol 508: 153-166, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

54.   Kawano, S, and Hiraoka M. Transient outward currents and action potential alterations in rabbit ventricular myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 23: 681-693, 1991[Web of Science][Medline].

55.   Kodama, I, and Boyett MR. Regional differences in the electrical activity of the rabbit sinus node. Pflügers Arch 404: 214-226, 1985[Web of Science][Medline].

56.   Kodama, I, Boyett MR, Nikmaram MR, Yamamoto M, Honjo H, and Niwa R. Regional differences in effects of E-4031 within the sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H793-H802, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

57.   Kodama, I, Nikmaram MR, Boyett MR, Suzuki R, Honjo H, and Owen JM. Regional differences in the role of the Ca2+ and Na+ currents in pacemaker activity in the sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H2793-H2806, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

58.   Kohlhardt, M, Figulla HR, and Tripathi O. The slow membrane channel as the predominant mediator of the excitation process of the sinoatrial pacemaker cell. Basic Res Cardiol 71: 17-26, 1976[Web of Science][Medline].

59.   Kreitner, D. Electrophysiological study of the two main pacemaker mechanisms in the rabbit sinus node. Cardiovasc Res 19: 304-318, 1985[Web of Science][Medline].

60.   Lacampagne, A, Caputo C, and Argibay J. Effect of ryanodine on cardiac calcium current and calcium channel gating current. Biophys J 70: 370-375, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

61.   Langer, GA, and Peskoff A. Calcium concentration and movement in the diadic cleft space of the cardiac ventricular cell. Biophys J 70: 1169-1182, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

62.   Lederer, WJ, Niggli E, and Hadley RW. Sodium-calcium exchange in excitable cells: fuzzy space. Science 248: 283, 1990[Free Full Text].

63.   Lee, AJ, and Allen DJ. EMD 53988 sensitizes the contractile proteins to calcium in intact ferret ventricular muscle. Circ Res 69: 927-936, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

64.   Lei, M, and Brown HF. Two components of the delayed rectifier potassium current, IK, in rabbit sino-atrial node cells. Exp Physiol 81: 725-741, 1996[Abstract].

65.   Lei, M, Honjo H, Kodama I, and Boyett MR. Characterization of the transient outward K+ current in rabbit sinoatrial node cells. Cardiovasc Res 46: 433-441, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

66.   Li, GR, Feng J, Yue L, Carrier M, and Nattel S. Evidence for two components of delayed rectifier K+ current in human ventricular myocytes. Circ Res 78: 689-696, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

67.   Li, J, Qu J, and Nathan RD. Ionic basis of ryanodine's negative chronotropic effect on pacemaker cells isolated from the sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 273: H2481-H2489, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

68.   Lindblad, DS, Murphey CR, Clark JW, and Giles WR. A model of the action potential and underlying membrane currents in a rabbit atrial cell. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 271: H1666-H1696, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

69.   Liu, S, and Rasmusson RL. Hodgkin-Huxley and partially coupled inactivation models yield different voltage dependence of block. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H2013-H2022, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

70.   Liu, YM, Yu H, Li CZ, Cohen IS, and Vassalle M. Cesium effects on if and iK in rabbit sinoatrial node myocytes: implications for SA node automaticity. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 32: 783-790, 1998[Web of Science][Medline].

71.   Luo, CH, and Rudy Y. A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. I. Simulations of ionic currents and concentration changes. Circ Res 74: 1071-1096, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

72.   Mangoni, ME, Fontanaud P, Noble PJ, Noble D, Benkemoun H, Nargeot J, and Richard S. Facilitation of the L-type calcium current in rabbit sino-atrial cells: effect on cardiac automaticity. Cardiovasc Res 48: 375-392, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

73.   Maruoka, F, Nakashima Y, Takano M, Ono K, and Noma A. Cation-dependent gating of the hyperpolarization-activated cation current in the rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 477: 423-435, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

74.   Matsuoka, S, and Hilgemann DW. Steady-state and dynamic properties of cardiac sodium-calcium exchange: ion and voltage dependencies of the transport cycle. J Gen Physiol 100: 963-1001, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

75.   Michailova, A, and McCulloch A. Model study of ATP and ADP buffering, transport of Ca2+ and Mg2+, and regulation of ion pumps in ventricular myocyte. Biophys J 81: 614-629, 2001[Web of Science][Medline].

76.   Mironov, SL. Conformational model for ion permeation in membrane channels: a comparison with multi-ion models and applications to calcium channel permeability. Biophys J 63: 485-496, 1992[Web of Science][Medline].

77.   Mitsuiye, T, Guo J, and Noma A. Nicardipine-sensitive Na+-mediated single channel currents in guinea-pig sinoatrial node pacemaker cells. J Physiol 521: 69-79, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

78.   Mitsuiye, T, Shinagawa Y, and Noma A. Sustained inward current during pacemaker depolarization in mammalian sinoatrial node cells. Circ Res 87: 88-91, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

79.   Miyamae, S, and Goto K. Effects of caffeine and ryanodine on regenerative potential induced by Ca++, Mg++ reduction in rabbit sinoatrial node cell treated with K-free medium. J Kanazawa Med Univ 16: 406-412, 1991.

80.   Muramatsu, H, Zou AR, Berkowitz GA, and Nathan RD. Characterization of a TTX-sensitive Na+ current in pacemaker cells isolated from rabbit sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 270: H2108-H2119, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

81.   Nakayama, T, Kurachi Y, Noma A, and Irisawa H. Action potential and membrane currents of single pacemaker cells of the rabbit heart. Pflügers Arch 402: 248-257, 1984[Web of Science][Medline].

82.   Nathan, RD. Two electrophysiologically distinct types of cultured pacemaker cells from rabbit sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 250: H325-H329, 1986[Abstract/Free Full Text].

83.   Nikmaram, MR, Boyett MR, Kodama I, Suzuki R, and Honjo H. Variation in effects of Cs+, UL-FS-49, and ZD-7288 within sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H2782-H2792, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

84.   Nilius, B. Possible functional significance of a novel type of cardiac Ca channel. Biomed Biochim Acta 45: 37-45, 1986.

85.   Noble, D, and Noble SJ. A model of sino-atrial node electrical activity based on a modification of the DiFrancesco-Noble (1984) equations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 222: 295-304, 1984[Medline].

86.   Noble, D, Varghese A, Kohl P, and Noble P. Improved guinea-pig ventricular cell model incorporating a diadic space, IKr and IKs, and length- and tension-dependent processes. Can J Cardiol 14: 123-134, 1998[Web of Science][Medline].

87.   Noma, A, Morad M, and Irisawa H. Does the "pacemaker current" generate the diastolic depolarization in the rabbit SA node cells? Pflügers Arch 397: 190-194, 1983[Web of Science][Medline].

88.   Nygren, A, Fiset C, Firek L, Clark JW, Lindblad DS, Clark RB, and Giles WR. Mathematical model of an adult human atrial cell: the role of K+ currents in repolarization. Circ Res 82: 63-81, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

89.   Oei, HI, van Ginneken ACG, Jongsma HJ, and Bouman LN. Mechanisms of impulse generation in isolated cells from the rabbit sinoatrial node. J Mol Cell Cardiol 21: 1137-1149, 1989[Web of Science][Medline].

90.   Ono, K, and Ito H. Role of rapidly activating delayed rectifier K+ current in sinoatrial pacemaker activity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 269: H453-H462, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

91.   Priebe, L, and Beuckelmann DJ. Simulation study of cellular electric properties in heart failure. Circ Res 82: 1206-1223, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

92.   Puglisi, JL, and Bers DM. LabHEART: an interactive computer model of rabbit ventricular myocyte ion channels and Ca transport. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 281: C2049-C2060, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

93.   Rice, JJ, Jafri MS, and Winslow RL. Modeling gain and gradedness of Ca2+ release in the functional unit of the cardiac diadic space. Biophys J 77: 1871-1884, 1999[Web of Science][Medline].

94.   Rigg, L, and Terrer DA. Possible role of calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in pacemaking in guinea-pig sino-atrial node. Exp Physiol 81: 877-880, 1996[Abstract].

95.   Robertson, SP, Johnson JD, and Potter JD. The time-course of Ca2+ exchange with calmodulin, troponin, parvalbumin, and myosin in response to transient increases in Ca2+. Biophys J 34: 559-569, 1981[Web of Science][Medline].

96.   Rubenstein, DS, Fox LM, McNulty JA, and Lipsius SL. Electrophysiology and ultrastructure of Eustachian ridge from cat right atrium: a comparison with SA node. J Mol Cell Cardiol 19: 965-976, 1987[Web of Science][Medline].

97.   Rubenstein, DS, and Lipsius SL. Mechanisms of automaticity in subsidiary pacemakers from cat right atrium. Circ Res 64: 648-657, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].

98.   Saint, DA. Pacemaking in the heart: the interplay of ionic currents. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 25: 841-846, 1998[Web of Science][Medline].

99.   Sakai, R, Hagiwara N, Matsuda N, Kasanuki H, and Hosoda S. Sodium-potassium pump current in rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 490: 51-62, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].

100.   Sanguinetti, MC, and Jurkiewicz NK. Two components of cardiac delayed rectifier K+ current: differential sensitivity to block by class III antiarrhythmic agents. J Gen Physiol 96: 195-215, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

101.   Sanguinetti, MC, and Jurkiewicz NK. Delayed rectifier outward K+ current is composed of two currents in guinea pig atrial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 260: H393-H399, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

102.   Satoh, H. Ouabain actions on the spontaneous activity and ionic currents in rabbit sino-atrial node cells. Gen Pharmacol 25: 1591-1598, 1994[Web of Science][Medline].

103.   Satoh, H. Role of T-type Ca2+ channel inhibitors in the pacemaker depolarization in rabbit sino-atrial nodal cells. Gen Pharmacol 26: 581-587, 1995[Web of Science][Medline].

104.   Satoh, H. Electrophysiological actions of ryanodine on single rabbit sinoatrial nodal cells. Gen Pharmacol 28: 31-38, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

105.   Schmid, R, Seydl K, Baumgartner W, Groschner K, and Romanin C. Trypsin increases availability and open probability of cardiac L-type Ca2+ channels without affecting inactivation induced by Ca2+. Biophys J 69: 1847-1857, 1995[Web of Science][Medline].

106.   Sham, JSK Ca2+ release-induced inactivation of Ca2+ current in rat ventricular myocytes: evidence for local Ca2+ signaling. J Physiol 500: 285-295, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

107.   Shannon, TR, and Bers DM. Assessment of intra-SR free [Ca] and buffering in rat heart. Biophys J 73: 1524-1531, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

108.   Shibasaki, T. Conductance and kinetics of delayed rectifier potassium channels in nodal cells of the rabbit heart. J Physiol 387: 227-250, 1987[Abstract/Free Full Text].

109.   Shinagawa, Y, Satoh H, and Noma A. The sustained inward current and inward rectifier K+ current in pacemaker cells disociated from rat sinoatrial node. J Physiol 523: 593-605, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

110.   Sipido, KR, Maes M, and Van de Werf F. Low efficiency of Ca2+ entry through the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger as trigger for Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum: a comparison between L-type Ca2+ current and reverse-mode Na+-Ca2+ exchange. Circ Res 81: 1034-1044, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

111.   Smith, GD. Analytical steady-state solution to the rapid buffering approximation near an open Ca2+ channel. Biophys J 71: 3064-3072, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

112.   Smith, PD, Liesegang GW, Berger RL, Czerlinski G, and Podolsky RJ. A stopped-flow investigation of calcium ion binding by ethylene glycol bis (beta -aminoethyl ether)-N,N-tetraacetic acid. Anal Biochem 143: 188-195, 1984[Web of Science][Medline].

113.   Snyder, SM, Palmer BM, and Moore RL. A mathematical model of cardiocyte Ca2+ dynamics with a novel representation of sarcoplasmic reticular Ca2+ control. Biophys J 79: 94-115, 2000[Web of Science][Medline].

114.   Soeller, C, and Cannell MB. Numerical simulation of local calcium movements during L-type calcium channel gating in the cardiac diad. Biophys J 73: 97-111, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

115.   Stern, MD, Song LS, Cheng H, Sham JSK, Yang HT, Boheler KR, and Rios E. Local control models of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling: a possible role for allosteric interactions between ryanodine receptors. J Gen Physiol 113: 469-489, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

116.   Sun, L, Fan JS, Clark JW, and Palade PT. A model of the L-type Ca2+ channel in rat ventricular myocytes: ion selectivity and inactivation mechanisms. J Physiol 529: 139-158, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

117.   Uese, K, Hagiwara N, Miyawaki T, and Kasanuki H. Properties of the transient outward current in rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol 31: 1975-1984, 1999[Web of Science][Medline].

118.   Van Ginneken, ACG, and Giles WR. Voltage clamp measurements of the hyperpolarization-activated inward current If in single cells from rabbit sino-atrial node. J Physiol 434: 57-83, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].

119.   Verheijck, EE, van Ginneken ACG, Bourier J, and Bouman LN. Effects of delayed rectifier current blockade by E-4031 on impulse generation in single sinoatrial nodal myocytes of the rabbit. Circ Res 76: 607-615, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

120.   Verheijck, EE, van Ginneken ACG, Wilders R, and Bouman LN. Contribution of L-type Ca2+ current to electrical activity in sinoatrial nodal myocytes of rabbits. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H1064-H1077, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

121.   Verheijck, EE, Wessels A, van Ginneken ACG, Bourier J, Markman MWM, Vermeulen JLM, de Bakker JMT, Lamers WH, Opthof T, and Bouman LN. Distribution of atrial and nodal cells within the rabbit sinoatrial node: models of sinoatrial transition. Circulation 97: 1623-1631, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

122.   Vinogradova, TM, Zhou YY, Bogdanov KY, Yang D, Kuschel M, Cheng H, and Xiao RP. Sinoatrial node pacemaker activity requires Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II activation. Circ Res 87: 760-767, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

123.   Wang, Z, Fermini B, and Nattel S. Rapid and slow components of delayed rectifier current in human atrial myocytes. Cardiovasc Res 28: 1540-1546, 1994[Web of Science][Medline].

124.   Wilders, R, Jongsma HJ, and van Ginneken ACG Pacemaker activity of the rabbit sinoatrial node: a comparison of mathematical models. Biophys J 60: 1202-1216, 1991[Web of Science][Medline].

125.   Wu, J, Schuessler RB, Rodefeld MD, Saffitz JE, and Boineau JP. Morphological and membrane characteristics of spider and spindle cells isolated from rabbit sinus node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H1232-H1240, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text].

126.   Yanagihara, K, and Irisawa H. Potassium current during the pacemaker depolarization in rabbit sinoatrial node cell. Pflügers Arch 388: 255-260, 1980[Web of Science][Medline].

127.   You, Y, Pelzer DJ, and Pelzer S. Trypsin and forskolin decrease the sensitivity of L-type calcium current to inhibition by cytoplasmic free calcium in guinea pig heart muscle cells. Biophys J 69: 1838-1846, 1995[Web of Science][Medline].

128.   You, Y, Pelzer DJ, and Pelzer S. Modulation of L-type Ca2+ current by fast and slow Ca2+ buffering in guinea pig ventricular cardiomyocytes. Biophys J 72: 175-187, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

129.   Zaza, A, Micheletti M, Brioschi A, and Rocchetti M. Ionic currents during sustained pacemaker activity in rabbit sino-atrial myocytes. J Physiol 505: 677-688, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

130.   Zhang, H, Holden AV, Kodama I, Honjo H, Lei M, Varghese T, and Boyett MR. Mathematical models of action potentials in the periphery and center of the rabbit sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H397-H421, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283(5):H2074-H2101
0363-6135/02 $5.00 Copyright © 2002 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc AHome page
S. Severi, C. Corsi, and E. Cerbai
From in vivo plasma composition to in vitro cardiac electrophysiology and in silico virtual heart: the extracellular calcium enigma
Phil Trans R Soc A, June 13, 2009; 367(1896): 2203 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
X. Zhao, A. Bucchi, R. V. Oren, Y. Kryukova, W. Dun, C. E. Clancy, and R. B. Robinson
In vitro characterization of HCN channel kinetics and frequency dependence in myocytes predicts biological pacemaker functionality
J. Physiol., April 1, 2009; 587(7): 1513 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y.-H. Yeh, B. Burstein, X. Y. Qi, M. Sakabe, D. Chartier, P. Comtois, Z. Wang, C.-T. Kuo, and S. Nattel
Funny Current Downregulation and Sinus Node Dysfunction Associated With Atrial Tachyarrhythmia: A Molecular Basis for Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome
Circulation, March 31, 2009; 119(12): 1576 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
V. A. Maltsev and E. G. Lakatta
Synergism of coupled subsarcolemmal Ca2+ clocks and sarcolemmal voltage clocks confers robust and flexible pacemaker function in a novel pacemaker cell model
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): H594 - H615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Tao, S. C. O'Neill, M. E. Diaz, Y. T. Li, D. A. Eisner, and H. Zhang
Alternans of cardiac calcium cycling in a cluster of ryanodine receptors: a simulation study
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): H598 - H609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. E. Mangoni and J. Nargeot
Genesis and Regulation of the Heart Automaticity
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 919 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y. Kurata, H. Matsuda, I. Hisatome, and T. Shibamoto
Effects of pacemaker currents on creation and modulation of human ventricular pacemaker: theoretical study with application to biological pacemaker engineering
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H701 - H718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. N. Ebert and D. G. Taylor
Catecholamines and development of cardiac pacemaking: An intrinsically intimate relationship
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2006; 72(3): 364 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Puopolo, B. P. Bean, and E. Raviola
Spontaneous Activity of Isolated Dopaminergic Periglomerular Cells of the Main Olfactory Bulb
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3618 - 3627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Krogh-Madsen, P. Schaffer, A. D. Skriver, L. K. Taylor, B. Pelzmann, B. Koidl, and M. R. Guevara
An ionic model for rhythmic activity in small clusters of embryonic chick ventricular cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H398 - H413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. C. Jackson, G. L. Yao, and B. P. Bean
Mechanism of Spontaneous Firing in Dorsomedial Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Neurons
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2004; 24(37): 7985 - 7998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y. Kurata, I. Hisatome, S. Imanishi, and T. Shibamoto
Roles of L-type Ca2+ and delayed-rectifier K+ currents in sinoatrial node pacemaking: insights from stability and bifurcation analyses of a mathematical model
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): H2804 - H2819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurata, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shibamoto, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurata, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shibamoto, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online