|
|
||||||||
-isoprostane production in
cultured human endothelial cells
1 Research Unit, Hospital Clinic Universitari de Valencia and Departments of 2 Physiology, 3 Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and 4 Functional Biology and Physical Anthropology, University of Valencia, E-46010 Valencia, Spain
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Free radical-generated
F2
-isoprostanes are a group of compounds with
vasoconstrictor properties. To investigate whether estradiol exerts
antioxidant actions modifying F2
-isoprostane production,
cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells were exposed to
estradiol and other compounds and F2
-isoprostanes were
measured in culture medium. Exposure to 1 and 10 nM estradiol for
24 h reduced F2
-isoprostane production by 36 and
49%, respectively (P < 0.001 vs. control).
Exposure to antiestrogens alone (ICI-182780 or EM-652) slightly reduced
F2
-isoprostanes (P < 0.05 vs. control), but much less than exposure to estradiol (P < 0.05). ICI-182780 reversed the estradiol-induced
reduction of F2
-isoprostane concentration
(P < 0.05). Along with time-course analysis, these
results suggest that estradiol effects were mediated through estrogen
receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Progestogens alone
(progesterone or medroxyprogesterone acetate) did not modify
F2
-isoprostane production at any of the tested concentrations (1, 10, and 100 nM). Progesterone completely reversed estradiol-induced reduction of F2
-isoprostane production (P < 0.05 vs. control and estradiol), but
medroxyprogesterone acetate did not (P < 0.05 vs. control).
antioxidant; endothelium; estrogens; hormone replacement therapy; isoprostanes
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ESTRADIOL (E2) has been proposed to exert antioxidant effects in in vitro models as well as in many biological systems (24), a property that has been related to the beneficial effects of estrogens on cardiovascular parameters (18). High, nonphysiological E2 concentrations inhibit in vitro low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation, a parameter that has been related to progression of atherosclerosis (1, 20). E2 has been reported to diminish LDL oxidation in postmenopausal women in some studies (29, 38), but not in others (9, 30). Progestogens usually accompany E2 exposure. The effect of such coexposure on the antioxidant action of E2 is unclear; the effects of progestogens on LDL oxidation have been refuted (23) and confirmed (42).
Classically, the antioxidant effects of E2 have been ascribed to the aromatic hydroxyphenol structure of the A ring (24). Nevertheless, an antioxidant action mediated by estrogen receptors (ER) cannot be completely ruled out.
E2 acts directly on the endothelium and influences the vascular function and reactivity. Among other mechanisms, E2 enhances endothelial production of vasodilator compounds, such as nitric oxide and prostacyclin, and reduces production of vasoconstrictors, such as endothelin-1 and thromboxane A2 (18). Moreover, E2 prevents oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of endothelial cells (34). The measurement of E2 antioxidant capacity could be relevant to an understanding of the vascular actions of the hormone, because the endothelium is an important source of beneficial and deleterious free radicals that have been involved in numerous physiological pathways (5, 35).
Recently, F2
-isoprostanes have been recognized as a
stable, good biomarker of in vivo oxidative stress (4,
27). F2
-isoprostanes are
prostaglandin-like products of nonenzymatic, free radical-catalyzed
peroxidation of arachidonic acid (4), which has been
correlated with conditions of increased oxidation. In humans, for
instance, elevated plasma F2
-isoprostane levels have
been found in several conditions associated with enhanced oxidative
stress, such as chronic cigarette smoking (21), cystic fibrosis (2), and long-term hemodialysis (6).
Furthermore, increased F2
-isoprostane levels have been
found in human atherosclerotic lesions (25). As a result,
recently, there has been great interest in the cardiovascular actions
of F2
-isoprostanes (26, 41).
Under the assumption that F2
-isoprostane production
could be a good index for assessing the antioxidant effects of
E2 in endothelial cells as well as an important biomarker
of its vascular actions, the aims of our work were 1) to
study the effects of physiological and near-physiological
concentrations of E2 on F2
-isoprostane
production by endothelial cells, 2) to determine whether this action is mediated by ER, and 3) to describe
the role of progestogens, with or without E2, on
F2
-isoprostane production.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
Culture flasks and plates were obtained from Orange Scientific (Waterloo, Belgium). ICI-182780 was purchased from Tocris Cookson (Bristol, UK). EM-652 was a generous gift from Dr. Labrie (Endorecherche, Quebec, Canada). All other materials were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO).Cell Culture
Primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) from male or female newborns were isolated by collagenase treatment of human umbilical veins as described elsewhere (10). Briefly, HUVECs were cultured in 25-cm2 flasks in human endothelial cell-specific medium (EBM-2, Clonetics, BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with EGM-2 (Clonetics) at the manufacturer's recommended concentration and maintained in a cell culture incubator at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.Cells were identified as endothelial by their characteristic cobblestone morphology and the presence of factor VIII antigen (von Willebrand factor) by immunocytochemistry using a specific antibody (sc-8068, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).
Experimental Design
Cells from passages 4-6 were seeded onto 24-well plates. At 75% confluence, culture medium was removed, and cells were maintained for 24 h in phenol red-free medium 199 (GIBCO-BRL, Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) supplemented with 20% charcoal-dextran-treated, heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (GIBCO-BRL). For exposure to different treatments, culture medium was eliminated, and immediately 500 µl of phenol red-free medium 199 containing the desired treatments were added to each well.After different times of incubation, culture medium was removed and
stored at
20°C until assayed. Culture wells were then washed with
phosphate-buffered saline, and cells were collected in 100 µl of 0.5 N NaOH for protein determination.
Analytic Methods
F2
-isoprostane determination.
To measure total (free + esterified)
F2
-isoprostanes, 400 µl of culture medium were
deproteinized with 800 µl of absolute ethanol and then subjected to
alkaline hydrolysis with 15% KOH for 1 h at 40°C to transform
the esterified isoprostane to free isoprostane.
F2
-isoprostanes were purified by using specific F2
-isoprostane affinity columns according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI). Briefly,
samples were diluted 1:5 with 0.1 M phosphate buffer, applied to the
column, and eluted with 95% ethanol. After evaporation of ethanol to
dryness by vacuum centrifugation, samples were immediately dissolved in 100 µl of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) buffer and assayed in duplicate by
using a commercial F2
-isoprostane EIA kit (Cayman
Chemical). The range of the standard curve was 3.9-500 pg/ml. The
samples were read at 415 nm in a 96-well Benchmark Microplate reader
(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Plasma recovery was >90%, with
a variance of <20%. The intra- and interassay coefficients of
variation for this method were <10%.
Protein measurement. Protein concentration in culture wells was measured by the modified Lowry procedure (16).
Statistical Analysis
Values are means ± SE. Repeated-measures ANOVA was applied for comparisons of means, and then Student's t-test was performed. P
0.05 was considered significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To investigate the effects of E2 on
F2
-isoprostane production, endothelial cells were
exposed to three different E2 concentrations for up to
48 h. The time course of control and E2-induced
effects is presented in Fig. 1. There was
a sustained, spontaneous production of F2
-isoprostane in
control, nonstimulated endothelial cells (exposed only to vehicle) for
48 h. Control F2
-isoprostane concentrations in
culture medium were significantly higher at 16, 24, and 48 h than
at shorter incubation times. Exposure to different concentrations of
E2 for
8 h did not modify F2
-isoprostane production. Exposure to 1 nM E2 decreased
F2
-isoprostane production only after 24 h, whereas
10 nM E2-induced reduction of F2
-isoprostane
production was significant after 16 h.
|
Therefore, the remaining experiments were performed at 24 h of
incubation with different compounds. F2
-isoprostane
formation in control endothelial cells was 112 ± 13 pg/mg protein
in 24 h. Exposure of endothelial cells to 1 and 10 nM
E2 for 24 h decreased F2
-isoprostane
production by 36 and 49%, respectively (P < 0.001 for
both values).
The time course of E2 effects (Fig. 1) suggested a genomic
action of E2. To test whether this effect was mediated
through ER activation, endothelial cells were exposed to ICI-182780 or EM-652, two compounds with antiestrogenic activity (Fig.
2). Exposure to 10 µM ICI-182780 alone
slightly reduced F2
-isoprostane content in culture
medium (P < 0.05 vs. control), but the
reduction was much less than that observed with exposure to
E2 (P < 0.05 vs. E2
values). When administered along with 1 nM E2, ICI-182780 reversed the E2-induced reduction of
F2
-isoprostane concentration (P < 0.05 vs. E2 values) to the same levels as ICI-182780
alone. Administration of EM-652 alone also reduced
F2
-isoprostane content in culture medium
(P < 0.05 vs. control), but the reduction was less than that observed with administration of E2
(P < 0.05 vs. E2 values).
|
To test the effects of progestogens, endothelial cells were exposed to
three different concentrations of progesterone and medroxyprogesterone
acetate. None of the tested compounds, at any concentration (1, 10, and
100 nM) modified the endothelial cell production of
F2
-isoprostanes (Fig. 3).
When used in combination with E2, however, each progestogen
behaved differently (Fig. 4). Thus
progesterone almost completely reversed the E2-induced reduction of F2
-isoprostane production
(P < 0.05 vs. control values and
vs. E2 values). Instead, medroxyprogesterone
acetate did conserve the effect achieved by E2 alone
(P < 0.05 vs. control values).
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results clearly indicate that physiological (1 nM) and
near-physiological (10 nM) E2 concentrations caused a
dose-dependent decrease in spontaneous endothelial cell
production of F2
-isoprostanes. This finding is
important, because the majority of in vitro studies required
supraphysiological, micromolar concentrations (1,000-fold higher than
the average physiological level) to reveal an antioxidant action of
estrogens (1, 20).
Endothelial cells are a major target of oxidative stress and a critical
element in the pathophysiology of several diseases, including
hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerosis, hypertension, and heart failure.
F2
-isoprostane reduction confirms an
E2-induced impairment of oxidative stress and supports a
role for the hormone in maintaining the integrity of endothelial cells.
Time-course analysis, in which E2 effects are evident only
after 16-24 h (10 and 1 nM E2, respectively), suggests
an ER-mediated, genomic effect. The implication that ER have a role in
the antioxidant effects of E2 has been refuted by using
17
-estradiol, an E2 isomer that has antioxidant activity
but cannot bind to ER (20), or by using ER-free systems
(1, 33).
Two antiestrogens, ICI-128780 and EM-652, were used to study the role of ER. Both antiestrogens are competitive inhibitors of the E2-ER relationship, although some differences in their mechanism of action have been reported. For instance, ICI-182780 is able to bind to ER in the cell cytoplasm, diminishing ER transport to the nucleus, and also has been reported to inhibit aromatase activity (7).
Administration of both antiestrogens at doses that are adequate to ensure ER antagonism (11, 15) partially abolished the antioxidant effect of E2. Taken together, data from Figs. 1 and 2 imply that E2 antioxidant actions are, at least in part, genomic actions mediated through ER activation. The mechanism by which this occurs is unknown, but E2 could act, at physiological doses, as an antioxidant at the genomic level in endothelial cells by inhibiting NADPH oxidase expression, an important source of free radicals (36).
Nevertheless, because a tendency to decrease
F2
-isoprostane concentration is evident from the first
time point (Fig. 1), rapid, nongenomic actions mediated through ER
should not be completely ruled out. Among the signaling pathways
activated by E2 are those mediated by
phosphatidylinositol-3-hydroxykinase Akt, Src tyrosine kinase, and
mitogen-activated protein kinases (reviewed in Ref. 19).
These pathways increase endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity and
nitric oxide production (19), which in turn modulate
production of free radicals, mainly superoxide anion and hydrogen
peroxide (35).
Interestingly, antiestrogens partially decreased
F2
-isoprostane production by endothelial cells. In
agreement with our data, ICI-182780 has recently been reported to
indirectly exert antioxidant actions by inducing the antioxidant enzyme
quinone reductase in breast cancer cells (12) or by
decreasing the mitogenic response to lysophosphatidylcholine in
vascular smooth muscle cells (40). Also, both
antiestrogens have revealed antioxidant activity against in vitro
copper-induced LDL oxidation (8).
Progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate had a neutral effect on
endothelial F2
-isoprostane production. This is in accordance with most of the in vitro and in vivo available studies (32) but is in contrast to a recent report, where
micromolar concentrations of medroxyprogesterone acetate exerted a
stronger prooxidant action (42). It is then possible that
the prooxidant effect of progestogens, if real, is detected only at
concentrations that exceed physiological levels.
Interestingly, a different effect was observed when cells were exposed to E2 along with progestogen. Progesterone, at doses within physiological levels, reversed the effect of E2, but medroxyprogesterone acetate did not. The effect of the association of progestogen with E2 on cardiovascular risk factors remains debatable, with authors supporting a neutral action (13), or even a prejudicial effect, for medroxyprogesterone acetate (37). Previous studies support the differential effect reported in the present work. For instance, progesterone opposes the antioxidant actions of estrogen on plasma LDL oxidation in primates (17), whereas medroxyprogesterone acetate, used in hormone replacement therapy, did not counteract the effect of E2 on LDL oxidation (23).
Interactions of physiological concentrations of progesterone and E2 may be of interest in premenopausal, pregnant women and postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy for cyclic variations in progesterone concentrations. Such variations could significantly modify or mask the effects of E2, and careful time-dependent studies should be done. Among other possibilities, progesterone downregulates ER and also may have direct progesterone receptor-mediated effects that oppose favorable effects of estrogen (31).
The initial criticism against the F2
-isoprostane
measurement by EIA has been eliminated by the use of specific columns to adequately prepare the samples (28) and by the
improvement of the commercially available kits, which actually exhibit
a very good correlation with other analytic methods, such as gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry (3, 39).
In addition to diminishing oxidative stress,
F2
-isoprostane reduction has its own impact in vascular
function, because F2
-isoprostanes are powerful
vasoconstrictors in vivo and in vitro (22, 26) and potent
stimulants of vascular smooth muscle cells (14). Also,
F2
-isoprostanes exert different effects on endothelial
cell function: stimulation of cell proliferation and enhancement of
expression and release of endothelin-1 (41). The majority,
if not all, of these vasoconstrictor actions are mediated through
activation of thromboxane A2 receptors or other closely
related receptors (26, 41).
In conclusion, our results demonstrate an antioxidant effect of
physiological concentrations of E2, probably mediated by
genomic, ER-mediated mechanisms of action. Progesterone, but not
medroxyprogesterone acetate, neutralizes the effects of E2.
Reduction of F2
-isoprostane production reveals new
insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in the beneficial
effects of estrogens on cardiovascular function.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors are indebted to R. Aliaga and E. Calap for excellent technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by Spanish Ministry of Education and Culture Grant 1FD97-1035-C02-01 and European Union Grants 00/0960 and 01/0917 from the Spanish Ministry of Healthy and GV01/69 from the Oficina de Ciencia y Tecnología (Generalitat Valenciana).
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. Hermenegildo, Depts. of Paediatrics and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Avda. Blasco Ibañez 17, E-46010 Valencia, Spain (E-mail: carlos.hermenegildo{at}uv.es).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
July 26, 2002;10.1152/ajpheart.00369.2002
Received 29 April 2002; accepted in final form 24 July 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Arteaga, E,
Rojas A,
Villaseca P,
Bianchi M,
Arteaga A,
and
Duran D.
In vitro effect of estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, and of combined estradiol/progestins on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation in postmenopausal women.
Menopause
5:
16-23,
1998[ISI][Medline].
2.
Collins, CE,
Quaggiotto P,
Wood L,
O'Loughlin EV,
Henry RL,
and
Garg ML.
Elevated plasma levels of F2
-isoprostane in cystic fibrosis.
Lipids
34:
551-556,
1999[ISI][Medline].
3.
Devaraj, S,
Hirany SV,
Burk RF,
and
Jialal I.
Divergence between LDL oxidative susceptibility and urinary F2-isoprostanes as measures of oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes.
Clin Chem
47:
1974-1979,
2001
4.
De Zwart, LL,
Meerman JH,
Commandeur JN,
and
Vermeulen NP.
Biomarkers of free radical damage: applications in experimental animals and in humans.
Free Radic Biol Med
26:
202-226,
1999[ISI][Medline].
5.
Finkel, T.
Oxygen radicals and signaling.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
10:
248-253,
1998[ISI][Medline].
6.
Handelman, GJ,
Walter MF,
Adhikarla R,
Gross J,
Dallal GE,
Levin NW,
and
Blumberg JB.
Elevated plasma F2-isoprostanes in patients on long-term hemodialysis.
Kidney Int
59:
1960-1966,
2001[ISI][Medline].
7.
Hermenegildo, C,
and
Cano A.
Pure anti-oestrogens.
Hum Reprod Update
6:
237-243,
2000
8.
Hermenegildo C, Garcia-Martinez MC, Tarin JJ, and Cano A. Inhibition of LDL oxidation by the pure antiestrogens ICI-182780 and
EM-652 (SCH 57068). Menopause. In press.
9.
Hermenegildo, C,
Garcia-Martinez MC,
Tarin JJ,
Llacer A,
and
Cano A.
The effect of oral hormone replacement therapy on lipoprotein profile, resistance of LDL to oxidation and LDL particle size.
Maturitas
38:
287-295,
2001[ISI][Medline].
10.
Jaffe, EA,
Nachman RL,
Becker CG,
and
Minick CR.
Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins. Identification by morphologic and immunologic criteria.
J Clin Invest
52:
2745-2756,
1973[ISI][Medline].
11.
Jayachandran, M,
Hayashi T,
Sumi D,
Iguchi A,
and
Miller VM.
Temporal effects of 17
-estradiol on caveolin-1 mRNA and protein in bovine aortic endothelial cells.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
281:
H1327-H1333,
2001
12.
Katzenellenbogen, BS,
Choi I,
Delage-Mourroux R,
Ediger TR,
Martini PG,
Montano M,
Sun J,
Weis K,
and
Katzenellenbogen JA.
Molecular mechanisms of estrogen action: selective ligands and receptor pharmacology.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol
74:
279-285,
2000[ISI][Medline].
13.
Koh, KK,
Jin DK,
Yang SH,
Lee SK,
Hwang HY,
Kang MH,
Kim W,
Kim DS,
Choi IS,
and
Shin EK.
Vascular effects of synthetic or natural progestogen combined with conjugated equine estrogen in healthy postmenopausal women.
Circulation
103:
1961-1966,
2001
14.
Kromer, BM,
and
Tippins JR.
Coronary artery constriction by the isoprostane 8-epiprostaglandin F2
.
Br J Pharmacol
119:
1276-1280,
1996[ISI][Medline].
15.
Labrie, F,
Labrie C,
Belanger A,
Simard J,
Gauthier S,
Luu-The V,
Merand Y,
Giguere V,
Candas B,
Luo S,
Martel C,
Singh SM,
Fournier M,
Coquet A,
Richard V,
Charbonneau R,
Charpenet G,
Tremblay A,
Tremblay G,
Cusan L,
and
Veilleux R.
EM-652 (SCH 57068), a third-generation SERM acting as pure antiestrogen in the mammary gland and endometrium.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol
69:
51-84,
1999[ISI][Medline].
16.
Lowry, OH,
Rosebrough NJ,
Farr AL,
and
Randall RJ.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J Biol Chem
196:
265-275,
1951[ISI].
17.
McKinney, KA,
Duell PB,
Wheaton DL,
Hess DL,
Patton PE,
Spies HG,
and
Burry KA.
Differential effects of subcutaneous estrogen and progesterone on low-density lipoprotein size and susceptibility to oxidation in postmenopausal rhesus monkeys.
Fertil Steril
68:
525-530,
1997[ISI][Medline].
18.
Mendelsohn, ME,
and
Karas RH.
The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system.
N Engl J Med
340:
1801-1811,
1999
19.
Moggs, JG,
and
Orphanides G.
Estrogen receptors: orchestrators of pleiotropic cellular responses.
EMBO Rep
2:
775-781,
2001[ISI][Medline].
20.
Moosmann, B,
and
Behl C.
The antioxidant neuroprotective effects of estrogens and phenolic compounds are independent from their estrogenic properties.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:
8867-8872,
1999
21.
Morrow, JD,
Frei B,
Longmire AW,
Gaziano JM,
Lynch SM,
Shyr Y,
Strauss WE,
Oates JA,
and
Roberts LJ.
Increase in circulating products of lipid peroxidation (F2-isoprostanes) in smokers. Smoking as a cause of oxidative damage.
N Engl J Med
332:
1198-1203,
1995
22.
Morrow, JD,
Minton TA,
Mukundan CR,
Campbell MD,
Zackert WE,
Daniel VC,
Badr KF,
Blair IA,
and
Roberts LJ.
Free radical-induced generation of isoprostanes in vivo. Evidence for the formation of D-ring and E-ring isoprostanes.
J Biol Chem
269:
4317-4326,
1994
23.
Mueck, AO,
Seeger H,
and
Lippert TH.
Estradiol inhibits LDL oxidation: do the progestins medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone acetate influence this effect?
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol
25:
26-28,
1998[Medline].
24.
Nathan, L,
and
Chaudhuri G.
Antioxidant and prooxidant actions of estrogens: potential physiological and clinical implications.
Semin Reprod Endocrinol
16:
309-314,
1998[ISI][Medline].
25.
Oguogho, A,
Kritz H,
Wagner O,
and
Sinzinger H.
6-Oxo-PGF1
and 8-epi-PGF2
in the arterial wall layers of various species: a comparison between intact and atherosclerotic areas.
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids
64:
167-171,
2001[ISI][Medline].
26.
Oliveira, L,
Stallwood NA,
and
Crankshaw DJ.
Effects of some isoprostanes on the human umbilical artery in vitro.
Br J Pharmacol
129:
509-514,
2000[ISI][Medline].
27.
Pratico, D.
F2-isoprostanes: sensitive and specific non-invasive indices of lipid peroxidation in vivo.
Atherosclerosis
147:
1-10,
1999[ISI][Medline].
28.
Proudfoot, J,
Barden A,
Mori TA,
Burke V,
Croft KD,
Beilin LJ,
and
Puddey IB.
Measurement of urinary F2-isoprostanes as markers of in vivo lipid peroxidation
a comparison of enzyme immunoassay with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.
Anal Biochem
272:
209-215,
1999[ISI][Medline].
29.
Sack, MN,
Rader DJ,
and
Cannon RO.
Oestrogen and inhibition of oxidation of low-density lipoproteins in postmenopausal women.
Lancet
343:
269-270,
1994[ISI][Medline].
30.
Santanam, N,
Shern-Brewer R,
McClatchey R,
Castellano PZ,
Murphy AA,
Voelkel S,
and
Parthasarathy S.
Estradiol as an antioxidant: incompatible with its physiological concentrations and function.
J Lipid Res
39:
2111-2118,
1998
31.
Sarrel, PM.
The differential effects of oestrogens and progestins on vascular tone.
Hum Reprod Update
5:
205-209,
1999
32.
Schroder, J,
Doren M,
Schneider B,
and
Oettel M.
Are the antioxidative effects of 17
-estradiol modified by concomitant administration of a progestin?
Maturitas
25:
133-139,
1996[ISI][Medline].
33.
Shwaery, GT,
Vita JA,
and
Keaney JFJ
Antioxidant protection of LDL by physiologic concentrations of estrogens is specific for 17
-estradiol.
Atherosclerosis
138:
255-262,
1998[ISI][Medline].
34.
Sudoh, N,
Toba K,
Akishita M,
Ako J,
Hashimoto M,
Iijima K,
Kim S,
Liang YQ,
Ohike Y,
Watanabe T,
Yamazaki I,
Yoshizumi M,
Eto M,
and
Ouchi Y.
Estrogen prevents oxidative stress-induced endothelial cell apoptosis in rats.
Circulation
103:
724-729,
2001
35.
Vanhoutte, PM.
Endothelium-derived free radicals: for worse and for better.
J Clin Invest
107:
23-25,
2001[ISI][Medline].
36.
Wagner, AH,
Schroeter MR,
and
Hecker M.
17
-Estradiol inhibition of NADPH oxidase expression in human endothelial cells.
FASEB J
15:
2121-2130,
2001
37.
Wagner, JD.
Rationale for hormone replacement therapy in atherosclerosis prevention.
J Reprod Med
45:
245-258,
2000[ISI][Medline].
38.
Wakatsuki, A,
Ikenoue N,
and
Sagara Y.
Effects of estrogen on susceptibility to oxidation of low-density and high-density lipoprotein in postmenopausal women.
Maturitas
28:
229-234,
1998[ISI][Medline].
39.
Walsh, SW,
Vaughan JE,
Wang Y,
and
Roberts LJ.
Placental isoprostane is significantly increased in preeclampsia.
FASEB J
14:
1289-1296,
2000
40.
Yoon, BK,
Oh WJ,
Kessel B,
Roh CR,
Choi D,
Lee JH,
and
Kim DK.
17
-Estradiol inhibits proliferation of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells induced by lysophosphatidylcholine via a nongenomic antioxidant mechanism.
Menopause
8:
58-64,
2001[ISI][Medline].
41.
Yura, T,
Fukunaga M,
Khan R,
Nassar GN,
Badr KF,
and
Montero A.
Free-radical-generated F2-isoprostane stimulates cell proliferation and endothelin-1 expression on endothelial cells.
Kidney Int
56:
471-478,
1999[ISI][Medline].
42.
Zhu, X,
Bonet B,
and
Knopp RH.
Estradiol-17
inhibition of LDL oxidation and endothelial cell cytotoxicity is opposed by progestins to different degrees.
Atherosclerosis
148:
31-41,
2000[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Ospina, S. P. Duckles, and D. N. Krause 17{beta}-Estradiol decreases vascular tone in cerebral arteries by shifting COX-dependent vasoconstriction to vasodilation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 5, 2003; 285(1): H241 - H250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |