AJP - Heart Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284: H372-H384, 2003. First published September 19, 2002; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00512.2002
0363-6135/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
284/1/H372    most recent
00512.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cabo, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boyden, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cabo, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boyden, P. A.
Vol. 284, Issue 1, H372-H384, January 2003

Electrical remodeling of the epicardial border zone in the canine infarcted heart: a computational analysis

Candido Cabo1,2,3 and Penelope A. Boyden1,2

1 Department of Pharmacology and 2 Center for Molecular Therapeutics, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York 10032; and 3 Department of Computer Systems, New York City College of Technology, City University of New York, New York, New York 11201


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

The density and kinetics of several ionic currents of cells isolated from the epicardial border zone of the infarcted heart (IZs) are markedly different from cells from the noninfarcted canine epicardium (NZs). To understand how these changes in channel function affect the action potential of the IZ cell as well as its response to antiarrhythmic agents, we developed a new ionic model of the action potential of a cell that survives in the infarct (IZ) and one of a normal epicardial cell (NZ) using formulations based on experimental measurements. The difference in action potential duration (APD) between NZ and IZ cells during steady-state stimulation (basic cycle length = 250 ms) was 6 ms (156 ms in NZ and 162 ms in IZ). However, because IZs exhibit postrepolarization refractoriness, the difference in the effective refractory period (ERP), calculated using a propagation model of a single fiber of 100 cells, was 43 ms (156 ms in NZ and 199 ms in IZ). Either an increase in L-type Ca2+ current (to simulate the effects of BAY Y5959) or a decrease of both or either delayed rectifier currents (e.g., to simulate the effects of azimilide, sotalol, and chromanol) had significant effects on NZ ERP. In contrast, the effects of these agents in IZs were minor, in agreement with measurements in the in situ canine infarcted heart. Therefore 1) because IZs exhibit postrepolarization refractoriness, conclusions drawn from APD measurements cannot be extrapolated directly to ERPs; 2) ionic currents that are the major determinants of APD and the ERP in NZs are less important in IZs; and 3) differential effects of either BAY Y5959 or azimilide in NZs versus IZs are predicted to decrease ERP dispersion and in so doing prevent initiation of arrhythmias in a substrate of inhomogeneous APD/ERPs.

computer model; infarction; postrepolarization refractoriness; antiarrhythmic drugs


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

SUSTAINED VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT) can be induced by electrical stimulation in the canine heart 4-5 days after ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery, during infarct healing. Reentrant circuits causing VT are located in a thin layer of epicardial cells that survive the infarct, the epicardial border zone (EBZ) (7). Action potential measurements on multicellular preparations isolated from the EBZ showed electrical (14, 31) and structural abnormalities (31).

Action potential duration (APD) is similar in EBZ and normal myocardium, but EBZ myocardium has a longer effective refractory period (ERP) as a result of postrepolarization refractoriness (14, 17, 31). During acute myocardial ischemia, the ionic mechanism of postrepolarization refractoriness is thought to be due to delayed recovery of the sodium channel, which results from an elevated extracellular K+ concentration ([K+]o) (29). However, during the healing phase of infarction, it is not known whether this same mechanism can explain postrepolarization refractoriness in EBZ myocardium. Modulation of ERPs by class III antiarrhythmic drugs also differs in normal and EBZ myocardium. For example, drugs that increase L-type Ca2+ channel current (ICaL) or decrease the delayed rectifier currents prolong the ERP in normal myocardium but not in EBZ myocardium (5, 28). The ionic mechanism of this differential response is uncertain but is likely to play a role in how those drugs prevent VT.

Recent measurements of ionic currents in myocytes dispersed from the EBZ (IZ cells) have demonstrated that the function of several currents is modified, a process referred to as electrical remodeling (21). To better understand how changes in ion channel function affect the action potential and refractory period of cells that survive the infarct, as well as their response to antiarrhythmic agents, we formulated computer ionic models of the action potential of a normal cell (NZ) and an IZ cell based on experimental data.

Glossary


APA   Action potential amplitude
APD   Action potential duration
APD90   APD at 90% repolarization
BCL   Basic cycle length
Cm   Membrane capacitance
[Ca2+]i   Intracellular Ca2+ concentration
[Ca2+]o   Extracellular Ca2+ concentration
d   Activation gate of the L-type Ca2+ channel
dinfinity    Steady state of activation gate of the L-type Ca2+ channel
EX   Nernst potential of ion X
EBZ   Epicardial border zone
ERP   Effective refractory period
f   Fast inactivation gate of the L-type Ca2+ channel
finfinity    Steady state of fast inactivation gate of the L-type Ca2+ channel
fCa   Ca2+-dependent inactivation gate of the L-type Ca2+ channel
fs   Slow inactivation gate of the L-type Ca2+ channel
F   Faraday's constant
gi   Maximum conductance of channel i
h   Fast inactivation gate of the Na+ channel
ICa   Ca2+ current
ICab   Background Ca2+ current
ICaL   L-type Ca2+ channel current
ICaL,Ca   Ca2+ current through the L-type Ca2+ channel
ICaL,K   K+ current through the L-type Ca2+ channel
ICaL,Na   Na+ current through the L-type Ca2+ channel
ICaT   T-type Ca2+ channel current
Iion   Total ionic current
IK1   Inward rectifier K+ current
IKp   Plateau K+ current
IKr   Rapid component of the delayed rectifier K+ current
IKs   Slow component of the delayed rectifier K+ current
Im   Total transmembrane current
INab   Background Na+ current
InsCa   Nonspecific Ca2+-activated current
INa   Na+ current
INaCa   Na+/Ca2+ exchanger current
INaK   Na+-K+ pump current
IpCa   Ca2+ pump current in the sarcolemma
Ist   Externally applied stimulus current
Ito   Transient outward K+ current
Itot   Total transmembrane current
IPI   Interpulse interval
IZ   Epicardial border zone of the infarcted heart
j   Slow inactivation gate of the Na+ channel
JSR   Junctional sarcoplasmic reticulum
klinfinity    Steady state of the inactivation gate of IK1
KCa   Half-saturation concentration of the L-type Ca2+ channel
[K+]i   Intracellular K+ concentration
[K+]o   Extracellular K+ concentration
m   Activation gate of the Na+ channel
[Na+]i   Intracellular Na+ concentration
[Na+]o   Extracellular Na+ concentration
NSR   Nonjunctional sarcoplasmic reticulum
NZ   Epicardium from a noninfarcted area of the heart
pCa   Permeability of the L-type Ca2+ channel to Ca2+
pK   Permeability of the L-type Ca2+ channel to K+
pNa   Permeability of the L-type Ca2+ channel to Na+
R   Gas constant
riK   Time-independent inactivation gate of IKr
Ri   Intracellular resistance
RP   Resting membrane potential
Sv   Surface-to-volume ratio
t   Time
T   Absolute temperature
V0.5   50% Activation voltage
Vc   Conditioning voltage
Vm   Transmembrane potential
VT   Ventricular tachycardia
xr   Activation gate of the rapid component of IKr
xs   Activation gate of the slow component of IKs
X   Ca2+, Na+, or K+
zX   Valence of ion X
 alpha i   Opening rate constant of gate i
 beta i   Closing rate constant of gate i
 gamma X   Activity coefficient of ion X
 tau d   Time constant of activation gate of the L-type Ca 2+ channel
 tau f   Time constant of the fast inactivation gate of the L-type Ca 2+ channel


    METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Single Cell Model

In the single cell model, the differential equation describing the changes in transmembrane potential (Vm) is
d<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>/</IT>d<IT>t=</IT>−(1<IT>/C</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)(<IT>I</IT><SUB>tot</SUB>)
where Cm is the membrane capacitance (1 µF/cm2) and Itot is the total transmembrane current. The currents that contribute to Itot depend on many factors, including the species, type of cell (atria, Purkinje, ventricle), and whether the cells are isolated from healthy or diseased hearts. To model the cells that survive in the EBZ (IZs), we included the following currents in Itot
I<SUB>tot</SUB><IT>=I</IT><SUB>st</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Na</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>CaL</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>to</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Kl</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Kp</SUB>

<IT>+I</IT><SUB>NaCa</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>NaK</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>nsCa</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB><IT>p</IT>Ca</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Cab</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>Nab</SUB>
The major currents that determine the action potential of cells isolated from the canine left ventricular epicardium have been measured in both normal and infarcted hearts (1, 12, 17, 21, 24, 25). These currents include the Na+ current (INa), ICaL, transient outward K+ current (Ito), delayed rectifier K+ currents (IKr and IKs), inward rectifier K+ current (IK1), and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger current (INaCa). The currents were formulated by fitting mathematical functions to voltage-clamp experimental measurements following the Hodgkin-Huxley formalism and incorporated in the model. The model also includes currents that have not been completely characterized in IZs (IKp, INaK, InsCa, IpCa, ICab, and INab). Therefore, for this study, we adopted the formulation proposed by Luo and Rudy (18). Such an approach has been used in modeling the human ventricle (22) and midmyocardial dog ventricle action potential (34). The complete set of equations of previously unreported ionic currents is provided in the APPENDIX. Ist is an externally applied stimulus current. In our simulations, the stimulus current is a square wave with duration of 1 ms and a strength twice the diastolic threshold. To measure APA and dV/dtmax in the model of an isolated cell, the strength of the stimulus was adjusted so that the latency between the end of the stimulus and the time at which dV/dtmax occurred was ~1 ms (17). To estimate the value of time constants at 37°C from experimental values obtained at room temperature, we used a Q10 of 3 (18). While the cell capacitance of IZs is larger than that of NZs, there is no significant difference in the geometry (length and radius) of the two types of cells (17). Therefore, the cell geometry proposed by Luo and Rudy (18) was used for both NZs and IZs. In the computations, the extracellular ionic concentrations are [Na+]o = 140 mM, [K+]o = 4 mM or 5.4 mM as indicated, and [Ca2+]o = 2 mM. Initial intracellular ionic concentrations are [Na+]i = 10 mM, [K+]i = 145 mM, and [Ca2+]i = 0.00012 mM and were dynamically updated (18). The stimulus current is assumed to carry K+ (11, 13).

Na+ current. INa was formulated from whole cell voltage-clamp measurements of Na+ current reported by Pu and Boyden (24) using one activation gate (m) and two inactivation gates (h and j), similar to the formulation used in the Luo-Rudy model. To estimate the magnitude of the shift of steady-state inactivation relations with temperature (19), we used measurements of INa availability obtained from action potential dV/dtmax performed on single cells at 37°C (17). The three main differences measured experimentally between INa in NZ and IZ cells are reproduced in the model. First, steady-state inactivation of INa is shifted between 5 and 10 mV in the hyperpolarizing direction for IZs (in the model, V0.5 is -59 mV in NZ and -66 mV in IZ cells; Fig. 1A). Second, INa recovery from inactivation is not only slower in IZ cells but also exhibits a lag before the onset of recovery (Fig. 1B) (17, 24). To reproduce the lag, the slow inactivation gate (j) was raised to the second power in IZs (see the APPENDIX). There are no differences in INa activation between NZ and IZ cells. Third, measured INa density is reduced in IZs. The hyperpolarizing shift of the IZ steady-state inactivation curve results in a reduction in current density in IZs that is similar to the reduction that has been measured experimentally (see RESULTS). Therefore, we used the same maximum gNa of 20 mS/cm2 for both NZ and IZ cell models.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A: steady-state inactivation of INa (hinfinity ) versus conditioning voltage (Vc) in the NZ and IZ models. Note that the curve is shifted in IZ cells in the hyperpolarizing direction. B: recovery from inactivation of INa in the NZ and IZ models. The amplitude of INa at each IPI was normalized to value at IPI = 200 ms. The pulse protocol is shown in the inset. Calculations were performed at 37°C, with [Na+]o = 140 mM and [Na+]i = 10 mM. See Glossary for abbreviations.

Ca2+ currents. ICaL was formulated using the constant-field equation, the same approach used by Luo and Rudy (18). Voltage dependence of activation and inactivation were formulated from voltage-clamp measurements reported by Aggarwal and Boyden (1, 2). The three main differences measured experimentally between the ICaL in NZ and IZ cells are reproduced in the model using similar voltage-clamp protocols. First, peak ICaL density is reduced by ~50% in IZs compared with NZs, and this reduction is not associated with changes in steady-state activation or deactivation and may indicate a decrease in the number of functional channels (1, 2). Consequently, the maximum conductance of the L-type Ca2+ channel (and corresponding permeabilities) was reduced by 50% in the IZ model (Fig. 2A). Second, the decay of peak ICa,L is faster in IZs versus in NZs. Therefore, tau f in the IZ model was one-half the value in the NZ model (Fig. 2B). Third, experimental results suggest a slowed recovery from inactivation of the L-type Ca2+ channel in IZ cells (1). The time constant of recovery was 50% larger in IZs than in NZs, although, due to variability, this difference was not significant. Furthermore, a significant frequency-dependent reduction of the ICaL peak was measured in IZ cells. Therefore, we used a slow inactivation gate (fs) to implement the slower recovery from inactivation measured in IZ cells. Finally, because no information is available on calcium-induced inactivation of the channel, we used the implementation proposed by Luo and Rudy (18) for both IZ and NZ cells.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Simulated ICa calculated by removing calcium-induced inactivation (fCa = 1) to show voltage-dependent activation and inactivation of ICaL. A: ICaL in the absence of calcium-induced inactivation in the NZ and IZ models. B: same ICaL as in A normalized to the peak to illustrate different time constants of decay. The pulse protocol is shown in the inset. Calculations were performed at 37°C, and [Ca2+]o = 2 mM. See Glossary for abbreviations.

ICaT was not included in either model because it was absent in the majority of the myocytes isolated from the epicardial border. Additionally, when ICaT was measured, there was no difference between NZ and IZ cells (1).

Transient outward K+ current. Several computer models of Ito have been proposed (8, 9, 22, 34). Because the model of Ito proposed by Priebe and Beuckelmann (22) for human ventricular cells fits well the experimental measurements of Ito in canine epicardium (17), we adopted their formulation to model Ito in the NZ model. Most IZ cells lack Ito (17); therefore, Ito was not included in the IZ model.

Delayed rectifier K+ currents. IKr and IKs were formulated from measurements of cells from normal canine epicardium by Liu and Antzelevitch (16) and Jiang et al. (12). The formulation is similar to the one used by Sanguinetti and Jurkiewicz (27) and Priebe and Beuckelmann (22). The three main differences measured experimentally between the delayed rectifier currents in NZ and IZ cells (12) are reproduced in the model using similar voltage-clamp protocols. First, the current density of IKr is reduced in IZ cells to 30% of the value in NZ cells, and the current density of IKs is reduced in IZ cells to 20% of the value in NZ cells. Second, there is an acceleration of IKr activation in IZ cells compared with NZ cells. Third, there is an acceleration of IKs deactivation in IZs compared with NZs.

Inward rectifier K+ current. To model IK1 in NZ cells, we used the formulation proposed by Winslow et al. (34), which is based on canine midmyocardial myocytes and fits well with experimental measurements in epicardial myocytes (21). To simulate IK1 in the IZ cell model, the rectification of the channel was modified to simulate the reduced total membrane current measured in IZ cells either during ramp or clamp protocols (17, 21). Rectification is controlled by the parameter klinfinity in the equations to model IK1 (see the APPENDIX). As a result, IK1 density is smaller in IZ cells than in IZ cells. In NZ cells at -60 mV, IK1 density is ~2.5 pA/pF, whereas in IZ cells it is ~1.5 pA/pF.

Na+/Ca2+ exchanger current. We use the same formulation proposed by Luo and Rudy (18) because that formulation reproduces the experimental results obtained in NZ cells (25). The formulation of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in IZ cells was identical to that used for NZ cells because no differences were found experimentally even under different [Na+]i loads (25).

Intracellular calcium handling. Simulation of intracellular calcium handling in NZ cells is identical to the formulation by Luo and Rudy (18). In the IZ cell model, the value of the time constant for the translocation between the NSR and JSR was increased to 300 ms (from 180 ms in NZ cells). With these values, the first intracellular calcium transient after a 3-s rest is potentiated in IZ cells to a larger extent than in NZ cells, as was measured experimentally by Licata et al. (15).

Propagation Model

To compute how ionic current changes in IZ cells affect the refractory period and conduction velocity, we implemented a propagation model. Despite the complexity of the cardiac structure, the response of a cardiac fiber to electrical stimulation and propagation can be accurately modeled by the cable equation (6, 33). Each cell is considered isopotential, and cells are connected by resistors that represent both the electrical resistance of gap junctions and the intracellular resistance of the cytoplasm. The value of the intracellular resistivity has been measured experimentally (6). The fiber model consisted of an array of 100 cell elements. Assuming that both the intracellular and extracellular spaces are continuous, the governing equation can be expressed as
I<SUB>m</SUB><IT>=</IT>[(1<IT>/</IT>(<IT>S</IT><SUB>v</SUB><IT>R</IT><SUB>i</SUB>)](<IT>∂</IT><SUP>2</SUP><IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>/∂x</IT><SUP>2</SUP>)<IT>=I</IT><SUB>ion</SUB><IT>+C</IT><SUB>m</SUB>(<IT>∂V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>/∂t</IT>)
where Im is the total transmembrane current (in µA/cm2), Sv is the surface-to-volume ratio of the preparation (2,000 cm-1), Ri is the intracellular resistance (0.5 kOmega · cm), Vm is the transmembrane current (in mV), Iion is the ionic current (in µA/cm2), and Cm is the specific capacitance (1 µF/cm2). The governing equation was integrated using the semi-implicit Crank-Nicholson method with a time step of 10 µs and a space step of 100 µm. Neumann boundary conditions were used at the ends of the fiber. For the calculation of ERPs, we used a train of 10 basic stimuli with S1S1 = 250 ms followed by a premature stimulus, S2. The maximum S1S2 coupling interval that failed to initiate a propagated response was defined as the ERP. The stimulus current of S1 and S2 was a square wave with a duration of 1 ms and a strength twice the diastolic threshold.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Action Potentials of NZ and IZ Cells: the Effects of [K+]o

Figure 3A shows stimulated action potentials generated with the NZ and IZ cell models (BCL = 1,000 ms) when [K+]o = 4 mM. The shape of the NZ epicardial action potential shows the characteristic spike and dome. The IZ model reproduces well the loss of plateau observed experimentally in the triangularly shaped action potentials of IZs (17, 31). Table 1 compares the values of the RP, APA, APD90, and dV/dtmax in NZ and IZ cells for [K+]o = 4 mM. RP is unchanged and APA is reduced by 9% in IZ cells. Computed values of APA are within 10% of those measured experimentally. APD90 is ~50 ms longer in IZs than in NZs, similar to measurements in isolated cells. Because of the 26% decrease in the peak INa in IZ cells, the maximum rate of depolarization is reduced by 30% in IZ cells [experimentally, the observed reduction was ~45% (17)]. This reduction in INa is due to a shift in the steady-state inactivation curve in the hyperpolarizing direction (Fig. 1A) (17, 24), which leads to a reduced value of the h gate at the RP and immediately after stimulation.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Simulated action potential of a single cell in the NZ and IZ models at BCL = 1,000 ms. A: [K+]o = 4 mM; B: [K+]o = 5.4 mM.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Action potential characteristics of NZ and IZ cell models

APD90 measured in multicellular preparations isolated from the EBZ are considerably smaller than those reported in isolated cells (21, 31). Also, APD90 in IZ cells is similar or even shorter than APD90 in NZ cells (21, 31). To investigate whether a higher [K+]o in the multicellular preparations explains the experimental differences, we calculated the action potentials in NZs and IZs when [K+]o = 5.4 mM and BCL = 1,000 ms (Fig. 3B). APD90 of NZs and IZs is shorter at [K+]o= 5.4 mM than at [K+]o = 4 mM, and their differences are reduced (Table 1). The results of Fig. 3 suggest that the [K+]o in multicellular preparations is higher than 4 mM. Because we are interested in characterizing the model to simulate what is most likely to occur in multicellular preparations, we used a [K+]o = 5.4 mM for all the following simulations.

The loss of plateau during the IZ action potential is in part (see Repolarizing Currents During the Action Potential in NZ and IZ Cells: Importance of IK1 and INaCa in IZ Cells) due to decreased ICaL in IZ cells (Fig. 4A). The peak of the calcium transient during the action potential is reduced in IZs with respect to NZs. Calcium transients decay more slowly from their peak to the diastolic value in IZs, in agreement with experimental measurements (Fig. 4B) (25).


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   A: ICaL during the action potentials of Fig. 3B in the NZ and IZ models. B: [Ca2+]i transient during the action potential in the NZ and IZ model. BCL = 1,000 ms. Arrows indicate the time of repolarization to APD90. [K+]o = 5.4 mM. (Note that at BCL = 1,000 ms, APD90 is about the same in the NZ and IZ models; see Fig. 7.) See Glossary for abbreviations.

Repolarizing Currents During the Action Potential in NZ and IZ Cells: Importance of IK1 and INaCa in IZ Cells

Figure 5 shows the delayed rectifier currents (IKr and IKs), IK1, and INaCa during the action potential in NZ (dotted lines) and IZ (solid lines) cells at a BCL = 1,000 ms. As expected from single cell measurements (12), IKr and IKs are dramatically reduced during the IZ action potential compared with NZs (Fig. 5, A and B). Note also that for both NZs and IZs, IKr is larger than IKs for the duration of the action potential, indicating that IKr plays a more important role in repolarization than IKs.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Repolarizing currents in the NZ and IZ models during the action potentials of Fig. 3B. A: IKr; B: IKs; C: IK1; D: INaCa. BCL = 1,000 ms. Arrows indicate the time of repolarization to APD90. [K+]o = 5.4 mM. See Glossary for abbreviations.

Not all ionic currents are reduced in IZs. In contrast to delayed rectifier currents, IK1 and INaCa are not dramatically altered in IZs (Fig. 5, C and D) (21, 25). However, note that despite having an identical formulation for NZ and IZ cells (25), during the first 50 ms of the action potential, INaCa is larger in IZ cells than in NZ cells (Fig. 5D). This is a consequence of the dynamic voltage changes occurring during the action potential. Because the delayed rectifier currents are reduced in IZ cells and IK1 and INaCa are not, it is expected that these latter currents gain in importance during the time course of repolarization of the action potential in IZs.

To further illustrate the relative contribution of the different repolarizing currents in IZ and NZ cells, Fig. 6 shows Ito, IKr, IKs, IK1, IKp, and INaCa in the same plot. In NZs (Fig. 6A), during the first 50 ms of the action potential, repolarization is dominated by Ito, which is orders of magnitude larger than other repolarizing currents. After the first 50 ms, repolarizing currents are of similar magnitude and, therefore, all play a significant role in action potential repolarization. In IZs (Fig. 6B), during the first 100 ms of the action potential, IKp and INaCa are large relative to the delayed rectifier currents (note that Ito is absent in IZs) and dominate repolarization. Earlier, we discussed that the loss of plateau in IZ cells is caused in part by the diminished ICaL (Fig. 4B). From Fig. 6B it is now evident that a large INaCa (repolarizing) current during the first 100 ms of the action potential also contributes significantly to the time course of early repolarization and the subsequent loss of the plateau phase in the action potential of IZ cells.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Relative magnitudes of repolarizing currents during the first 100 ms of action potentials of Fig. 3B. A: NZ model; B: IZ model. BCL = 1,000 ms. [K+]o = 5.4 mM. See Glossary for abbreviations.

In summary, currents that are critical to the repolarization of NZ action potentials, like the delayed rectifier currents, are not as critical to the repolarization of IZs. Because delayed rectifier currents are diminished by both disease and action potential dynamics, time-independent currents (IKp, IK1, and INaCa) gain importance in the repolarization process of IZs.

Rate Adaptation of APD: Importance of ICaL

Figure 7 shows that APD in both NZ (A) and IZ (B) cells decreases as the BCL decreases from 1,000 to 200 ms (C). Note that while at pacing rates such as those of sinus rhythm (BCLs of 500 and 1,000 ms), APDs in NZs and IZs are similar: the differences in APD increase as the BCL is decreased to that of sustained VT (e.g., 13% difference at BCL = 200 ms).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Rate adaptation of the APD. A: superimposed action potentials at BCLs = 1,000, 500, and 200 ms in the NZ model. B: superimposed action potentials at BCLs = 1,000, 500, and 200 ms in the IZ model. C: APD90 at different cycle lengths (BCL) in the NZ () and IZ () models. [K+]o = 5.4 mM. See Glossary for abbreviations.

The mechanism of APD rate adaptation differs in NZ and IZ cells. Figure 8A shows IKs (left), ICaL (middle), and IKr (right) of an NZ cell when stimulated at a BCL = 500 (dotted lines) or 200 ms (solid lines). Note that in NZs, IKs increases with a decrease in BCL particularly during the initial 100 ms of the action potential (Fig. 8A, left). A larger repolarizing current at shorter cycle lengths suggests an important role of IKs in APD rate adaptation. At shorter BCLs, IKs is incompletely deactivated, resulting in an abrupt increase in IKs when the NZ cell is next depolarized (IKs "accumulation"). However, IKs is not the only current that plays a role in APD rate adaptation in NZ cells. In the NZ model, peak as well as sustained ICaL decreases at short BCLs (Fig. 8A, middle) because the channel has only partially recovered from inactivation between stimuli. Thus a decreased ICaL contributes to the decrease in APD at short BCLs in NZ cells. Finally, IKr is larger during the initial 100 ms of the action potential at shorter BCL (Fig. 8A, right) and therefore also contributes to APD rate adaptation in NZs. The decrease in depolarizing ICaL at the shorter BCL outweighs the increase in repolarizing delayed rectifier currents, and, therefore, ICaL is largely responsible for APD rate adaptation in NZs.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Ionic currents during the action potential at BCL = 500 and 200 ms. A: IKs (left), ICaL (middle), and IKr (right) at BCL = 200 and 500 ms in the NZ model. B: IKs (left), ICaL (middle), and IKr (right) at BCL = 200 and 500 ms in the IZ model. The two arrows indicate the time of repolarization to APD90 at the two different BCLs. [K+]o = 5.4 mM. See text for more details. (Note different y-axis scales.)

The mechanism of APD rate adaptation in IZs differs markedly. Figure 8B shows IKs (left), ICaL (middle), and IKr (right) when an IZ cell is stimulated with BCL = 500 (dotted lines) and 200 ms (solid lines). Note that unlike NZs, IKs is smaller at the shorter BCLs in IZs. A small IKs would tend to increase APD at faster rates, and, therefore, it seems does not play a role in IZ APD rate adaptation (as seen in Fig. 7C). IKs has no accumulation in IZs at short BCLs due to the acceleration of deactivation kinetics in IZs (12). On the other hand, except for the initial 10 ms, ICaL is decreased at short BCLs (Fig. 8B, middle) because the channel has only partially recovered from inactivation between stimuli. Finally, somewhat similar to NZs, IKr is large during the initial 100 ms of the action potential at shorter BCL in IZs (Fig. 8B, right) and therefore contributes to APD rate adaptation. However, overall and as it occurred in NZs, the decrease in a depolarizing current outweighs the increase in IKr, and, therefore, ICaL plays an important role in rate adaptation of APD in IZ cells.

In summary, while in NZ cells, IKs, IKr, and ICaL all contribute to shortening of the action potential at short cycle lengths; only a weak IKr and ICaL are responsible for modest shortening in IZ cells.

Conduction Velocity in NZ and IZ Cells in Steady-State Conditions

To quantify conduction velocity in the NZ and IZ models, we implemented one-dimensional fibers of normally coupled NZ and IZ cells. In single cells, the maximum rate of depolarization of the action potential in NZs is larger than that of IZs (Table 1) due to the large INa of NZs (see Action Potentials of NZ and IZ Cells: the Effects of [K+]o). The maximum rate of depolarization is also larger in NZs (179 mV/ms) versus IZs (106 mV/ms) during propagation when cells are coupled in a fiber. As expected, for both cell models, the depolarization rates calculated during propagation in the fiber are smaller than those calculated in the single cell. Moreover, the conduction velocity of a stimulated beat (BCL = 250 ms) in the homogeneous NZ fiber (50 cm/s) was faster than that of the IZ fiber (39 cm/s). The 22% reduction in conduction velocity in the IZ fiber is a result of the reduced availability of INa in IZs.

Increased ERP due to Postrepolarization Refractoriness in IZ Cells

At BCL = 250 ms, APD is 6 ms longer in IZ cells versus NZ cells (Fig. 7C). We have speculated that the changes in INa kinetics in IZs could result in postrepolarization refractoriness (24). If this were the case, differences in ERP of an NZ and IZ cell would be larger than differences in APD. To test whether the altered INa in IZs results in postrepolarization refractoriness, we calculated the ERP in one-dimensional fibers of normally coupled NZ and IZ cells. Stimulation occurred at one end of the fiber, and propagation was sampled at various cells in the fiber (Fig. 9).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   ERPs in a propagation model of NZ (A) and IZ (B) cells (S1S1 = 250 ms). Top: premature impulse at coupling interval S1S2 that does not propagate; bottom: premature impulse at the S1S2 interval that propagates along the fiber. Action potentials were initiated by electrical stimulation at one end of the fiber. Action potentials were calculated at the stimulation site (a), 2.5 mm from the stimulation site (b), and 5 mm away from the stimulation site (c). [K+]o = 5.4 mM. See text for more details.

Figure 9A shows the last beat of a train of 10 stimuli at BCL = 250 ms (S1)- and premature impulse (S2)-initiated action potentials calculated at the stimulation site (site a) and sites 2.5 (site b) and 5 mm (site c) away in the NZ fiber. Note that at S1S2 = 156 ms, no action potential propagated (Fig. 9A, top). However, a propagated response was initiated with S1S2 = 157 ms, indicating an ERP of 156 ms (Figs. 9A, bottom). Figure 9B shows a similar experiment in IZs. Here, a propagated response was initiated only when S1S2 >=  200 ms, well after the end of APD repolarization, indicating an ERP of 199 ms.

To understand the ionic mechanism of postrepolarization refractoriness in the IZ fiber, we determined a "membrane responsiveness" curve in NZs and IZs by applying an S2 at different times after repolarization to -70 mV that coincides with APD90 (Fig. 10A). In the NZ fiber, a propagated S2 action potential was initiated when the peak INa reached -66 pA/pF and occurred within 1 ms after the fiber had repolarized to -70 mV (arrow in Fig. 10A). In the IZ fiber, the first propagating action potential occurred when the peak INa had reached -50 pA/pF. However, this occurred 40 ms after repolarization (arrow in Fig. 10A). Even though the INa necessary to initiate a propagated response is smaller in IZs versus NZs, it took a longer time in the IZ fiber to reach that value. This may be due to INa slowed recovery from inactivation in IZ cells (Fig. 1B) (17, 24).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Ionic mechanism of postrepolarization refractoriness. A: INa of the cell at the stimulation site (site a in Fig. 9) in a NZ and IZ fiber at different times after repolarization to -70 mV. (Time 0 represents the time at which the cell has repolarized to -70 mV.) Arrows indicate the INa necessary to initiate the first propagated action potential. B: availability of INa of a cell at the stimulation site (solid line) during stimulation at the shortest S1S2 interval that initiates a propagating action potential (dashed line) in the NZ (top) and IZ (bottom) fiber. See text for more details.

To further understand the mechanism of postrepolarization refractoriness, we plotted changes in INa availability (solid line) during a propagated action potential (dashed line) initiated with a S1S2 just above the ERP in an NZ fiber (Fig. 10B, top) and IZ fiber (Fig. 10B, bottom). Availability was calculated as hj in NZs and as hj2 in IZs. Note that to initiate a propagated action potential in the IZ fiber, availability had to reach a higher value than that in the NZ fiber, indicating that in IZs a larger percentage of the Na+ channels must be recovered from inactivation before propagation. Also, the time necessary for that to happen is longer in the IZ fiber than in the NZ fiber.

Differential Response of the Refractory Period of NZ and IZ Cells to Antiarrhythmic Drugs

From the results depicted in Figs. 4 and 5, we might predict that the effect of antiarrhythmic agents that prolong APD in normal tissues (e.g., by decreasing delayed rectifier currents or enhancing ICaL) may affect IZ cells differently. However, because IZ cells also exhibit postrepolarization refractoriness, it is difficult to predict how such agents would affect ERPs of IZ cells.

Therefore, we simulated the effects of a 50% increase of ICaL [to simulate the effects of the calcium agonist BAY Y5959 (3, 26)] or 100% block of delayed rectifier currents [simulating the effects of azimilide (4)] in an NZ and IZ fiber. In our simulations, both agents prolong the ERP in the NZ fiber by ~15% (Table 2). In contrast, the prolongation of the ERP in the IZ fiber was only 5%. These results of the computer simulations are in agreement with experimental measurements in the in situ canine infarcted heart, which showed that refractory periods are prolonged to a larger extent in normal myocardium than in the EBZ (5, 28). The relative contribution of each of the two components of the delayed rectifier current, IKr and IKs, to the prolongation of the ERP also differs in NZs and IZs. The effects of 100% block of IKr (to simulate the effects of sotalol or E4031) and 100% block of IKs (to simulate the effects of chromanol) are shown in Table 2. Whereas the contribution of IKs and IKr to ERP prolongation is about the same in NZs, in IZs the contribution of blocking IKs to ERP prolongation is almost negligible. In the simulations, the effects of these drugs on APD90 are similar to the effects observed for ERP (Table 3).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Simulation of the effect of "drugs" on ERP in NZ and IZ fiber models during action potential propagation


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   Simulation of the effect of drugs on APD90 in NZ and IZ fiber models during action potential propagation


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Repolarizing Currents in NZ Cells

We have shown that in the NZ model, the delayed rectifier currents contribute modestly to the repolarization of the action potential in canine epicardial cells, with IKr playing a more important role than IKs. Because the NZ model was formulated based on measurements of ionic currents in isolated cells using voltage-clamp steps protocols, it is useful to compare currents generated during the action potential in the computer model with currents generated during "action potential-clamp" protocols in isolated cells.

Gintant (10) and Varro et al. (32) reported IKr peak values of 0.25-0.5 pA/pF during action potential-clamp protocols in normal canine ventricular myocytes. The IKr peak value during a NZ action potential in the computer model is 0.2 pA/pF (Fig. 5), similar to the lower end of reported experimental values. Varro et al. (32) also found that the IKr peak value is several times greater than the IKs peak. In the NZ action potential, IKr is about two times larger than IKs (Fig. 5). Therefore, in NZs, IKr plays a more prominent role than IKs in initiation of repolarization (32). This is in contrast with findings in other species, like the guinea pig, where IKs has a large magnitude and consequently plays a dominant role in initiation of repolarization (27).

Gintant (10) measured a IK1 peak value of 1.5 pA/pF during an action potential clamp, whereas the IK1 peak value in our NZ model is 2 pA/pF. It is usually thought that repolarization during the phase 2 plateau results from the activation of the delayed rectifier K+ channels and that IK1 contributes only to late (phase 3) repolarization. However, our simulations show that IK1 and IKr are of similar magnitude during the phase 2 plateau. Therefore, we suggest that IK1 plays an important role in both the early and late phases of repolarization in NZs. Indeed, complete block of both delayed rectifier currents in the NZ model does not prevent repolarization of the NZ; it causes only a 15% prolongation of APD (see azimilide in Table 3). Similarly, experimental studies have shown that complete block of IKr with E4031 in isolated cells prolongs APD by only 20%, whereas block of IKs has a minimal effect on APD (32).

Repolarizing Currents in IZ Cells

One of the key findings of this study is that ionic currents that are major determinants of repolarization and APD in NZs are less important in IZs. In NZs, the major repolarizing current during the first 50 ms of the action potential is Ito (Fig. 6A). Because Ito is not present in IZs, initial repolarization is now dominated by INaCa and IKp (Fig. 6B). In NZs, IKr and IK1 dominate the late phase of repolarization, with IKs contributing little (see above). In IZs, delayed rectifier currents are diminished (Fig. 5, A and B), and, as a result, IK1 dominates the late phase of repolarization in IZs. This is further confirmed by the minimal APD prolongation in IZs caused by total blockade of the delayed rectifier currents (Table 3).

This finding has important consequences for the development of antiarrhythmic agents aimed at the prevention of postinfarction VTs. Currently, most class III antiarrhythmic drugs are thought to prolong APD by blocking IKs and/or IKr. But this categorization appears to hold true for cells from normal myocardium. If the therapeutic goal is to prolong APD in IZ cells to prevent arrhythmias, the results of our computer simulations show that blocking delayed rectifier currents together or separately will not produce the desired effects. Rather, on the basis of our results, we suggest that agents aimed at increasing INaCa and/or reducing IK1 would be effective in prolonging APD in IZs.

Propagation in IZ Cells

Although differences in APD between NZs and IZs are small at BCL = 250 ms, differences in ERP are much larger as a result of postrepolarization refractoriness in IZs. During acute myocardial ischemia, the mechanism of postrepolarization refractoriness is the delayed recovery of the sodium channel, which results from an elevated [K+]o (29). In IZ cells, the mechanism of postrepolarization refractoriness is also a delayed recovery from inactivation of the sodium channel; however, this delayed recovery results from chronic changes in INa function that occur during infarct healing (24) and not as a result of an elevated [K+]o. Postrepolarization refractoriness creates a dispersion of ERPs between NZs and IZs that can contribute, along with other factors like gap junction remodeling (20), to the creation of a substrate where reentrant tachycardias can be initiated. Therefore, treatment of postrepolarization refractoriness in IZs would be predicted to have an antiarrhythmic effect in the EBZ.

Electrical mapping studies of the EBZ have shown that there are areas where conduction velocity is almost normal, whereas in other areas conduction velocity is very slow (<5 cm/s) (5). The values of conduction velocity calculated in a fiber of IZ cells are consistent with measurements in the in situ heart in the areas that show reasonably normal conduction velocities in the EBZ (5). Previous computer simulations (30) have shown that a reduction in peak INa, similar to the reduction observed in IZ cells, is not sufficient to cause very slow conduction. Therefore, the very slow conduction occurring in certain areas of the EBZ may be the result of other factors like gap junction remodeling (20) in addition to remodeling of the INa channel.

Effect of Drugs on ERPs and Initiation of VT

BAY Y5959 (a L-type Ca2+ channel agonist) and azimilide (a delayed rectifier channel blocker) prolong ERPs more in NZs than in IZs (5, 28). In IZs, some depolarizing (ICaL) and repolarizing (IKr and IKs) ion channels are downregulated (with respect to NZs), whereas others are not (IK1 and INaCa). Therefore, it is expected that drugs aimed at modulating downregulated channels would have a smaller effect on ERPs and APDs in IZs versus that in NZs.

Still, despite a negligible effect on the ERPs of EBZ myocardium, BAY Y5959 and azimilide have been shown to prevent initiation of VT in the canine infarcted heart (5, 28). It is possible that the differential effect of drug action in IZs vs. NZs and a subsequent decrease in the dispersion of refractory periods in the EBZ contributed to prevention of VT in the experimental studies. However, in some experiments, prevention of VT during infusion of BAY Y5959 was secondary to an effect on cell-to-cell coupling, possibly as a result of increased intracellular calcium. The latter resulted in conduction block in areas of the EBZ that were crucial for initiation of VT (5).

Limitations of the Model

In summary, the development of computer models of both an NZ and IZ cell has allowed us for the first time to determine how changes in ion channel function during infarct healing affect important properties of the action potential and its propagation and modulation by drugs. A number of factors should be considered when interpreting our results. Computer models inherently have limitations, because data/parameters must be selected for modeling, scaled, and estimated. This is often a consequence of the fact that the experimental data on which the model are based are recorded under conditions that are not physiological or that experimental data for a certain current or biological process are lacking. In the model presented here, background currents, IKp, and intracellular calcium handling have not been completely characterized in IZs. As a result of these limitations, some experimental findings are not fully reproduced by the model. For example, in the model, the APA is ~10% larger than in the experiments, and the reduction in the maximum depolarization rate of the action potential in isolated IZs with respect to NZs is 30% in the model and 45% in the experiments (17).

Furthermore, cell populations are not uniform. For example, some IZs cells have a small but measurable ICaT (1, 2) and/or Ito (17), but most of them do not. Because the goal of this paper is to model a "typical" IZ cell, we did not included these currents in the IZ model. Therefore, the propagation model described here treats all cells as having homogenous electrophysiological properties, which may not simulate well the intact myocardium. Also, we have not included gap junction remodeling (20) in the IZ fiber model because it is unknown at this time what is the functional effect of such a remodeling. The gap junctions in the propagation model are modeled as pure resistors, and consequently possible effects of drugs on gap junctions (5) have not been incorporated in the model. Future studies are needed to determine the effects of all these factors on the results and conclusions presented here.


    APPENDIX
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

Na+ Current

NZ model.
I<SUB>Na</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Na</SUB><IT>m</IT><SUP>3</SUP><IT>hj</IT>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−E</IT><SUB>Na</SUB>)
where gNa = 20 mS/cm2.
&agr;<SUB>m</SUB>={0.2[(V<SUB>m</SUB>)<IT>+</IT>53.8]}<IT>/</IT>(1<IT>−</IT>exp{−[(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)<IT>+</IT>53.8]<IT>/</IT>2.29})

&bgr;<SUB>m</SUB>=1.45 exp[−(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)<IT>/</IT>28.6]

&agr;<SUB>h</SUB>=0.00018 exp[−(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>20)<IT>/</IT>14.83]

&bgr;<SUB>h</SUB>=9.2/(1+exp{−[(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>20)<IT>+</IT>18.12]<IT>/</IT>11})

&agr;<SUB>j</SUB>=12.5×10<SUP>−5</SUP> exp[−(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>−20)/14.49]

&bgr;<SUB>j</SUB>=0.3386/(1+exp{−[(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>20)<IT>+</IT>46.5]<IT>/</IT>12.4})

E<SUB>Na</SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>R</IT>T<IT>/F</IT>) ln ([Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>[Na<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)

IZ model.
I<SUB>Na</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Na</SUB><IT>m</IT><SUP>3</SUP><IT>hj</IT><SUP>2</SUP>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−E</IT><SUB>Na</SUB>)
where gNa = 20 mS/cm2.
&agr;<SUB>m</SUB>={0.2[(V<SUB>m</SUB>)<IT>+</IT>53.8]}<IT>/</IT>(1<IT>−</IT>exp{−[(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)<IT>+</IT>53.8]<IT>/</IT>2.29})

&bgr;<SUB>m</SUB>=2.06 exp[−(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)<IT>/</IT>36.75]

&agr;<SUB>h</SUB>=0.00027 exp[−(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>20)<IT>/</IT>16.38]

&bgr;<SUB>h</SUB>=11.3/(1+exp{−[(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>20)<IT>+</IT>10.95]<IT>/</IT>13.82})

&agr;<SUB>j</SUB>=1.182×10<SUP>−5</SUP> exp[−(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>20)<IT>/</IT>12.96]

&bgr;<SUB>j</SUB>=1.083/(1+exp{−[(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>20)<IT>+</IT>6.44]<IT>/</IT>16.25})

E<SUB>Na</SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>R</IT>T<IT>/F</IT>) ln ([Na]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>[Na]<SUB>i</SUB>)

L-Type Ca2+ Channel Current

NZ model.
I<SUB>CaL</SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>d</IT>)(<IT>f</IT>)(<IT>f</IT><SUB>Ca</SUB>)(<IT>I</IT><SUB>CaL,Ca</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>CaL,K</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>CaL,Na</SUB>)

d<SUB>∞</SUB>=1/(1+exp{[9.3<IT>−</IT>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)]<IT>/</IT>5.7})

&tgr;<SUB>d</SUB>=d<SUB>∞</SUB>{1−exp[−(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>10)<IT>/</IT>6.24]}<IT>/</IT>[0.035(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>10)]

f<SUB>∞</SUB>=1/(1+exp{−[−19.7<IT>−</IT>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)]<IT>/</IT>6.8})

<IT>+</IT>(0.6<IT>/</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp([50<IT>−V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)<IT>/</IT>20]})

&tgr;<SUB>f</SUB>=1/[(0.012 exp{−[0.0337(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>30)]<SUP>2</SUP>})<IT>+</IT>0.012]

f<SUB>Ca</SUB><IT>=</IT>1<IT>/</IT>[1<IT>+</IT>([Ca<SUP>2<IT>+</IT></SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>Ca</SUB>)]
where KCa = 0.0006 mM.

For ion X, where X is Ca2+, Na+, and K+
I<SUB>CaL<IT>,X</IT></SUB><IT>=</IT><IT>p</IT><SUB><IT>X</IT></SUB><IT>z</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB><IT>X</IT></SUB><IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>[<IT>F</IT><SUP>2</SUP><IT>/</IT>(<IT>R</IT>T)]{[(<IT>&ggr;</IT><SUB><IT>X</IT><SUB>i</SUB></SUB>[<IT>X</IT>]<SUB>i</SUB> exp{<IT>z<SUB>X</SUB>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>[<IT>F/</IT>(R<IT>T</IT>)]})<IT>−&ggr;</IT><SUB><IT>X</IT><SUB>o</SUB></SUB>[<IT>X</IT>]<SUB>o</SUB>]<IT>/</IT>(exp{<IT>z<SUB>X</SUB>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>[<IT>F/</IT>(<IT>R</IT>T)]}<IT>−</IT>1)}
where pCa = 0.00030 cm/s, pK = 0.000000193 cm/s, pNa = 0.000000675 cm/s, gamma Cai = 1, gamma Cao = 0.341, gamma Nai = 0.75, gamma Nao = 0.75, gamma Ki = 0.75, gamma Ko = 0.75, zCa = 2, zK = 1, and zNa = 1.

IZ model.
I<SUB>CaL</SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>d</IT>)(<IT>f</IT>)(<IT>f</IT><SUB>s</SUB>)(<IT>f</IT><SUB>Ca</SUB>)(<IT>I</IT><SUB>CaL,Ca</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>CaL,K</SUB><IT>+I</IT><SUB>CaL,Na</SUB>)

d<SUB>∞</SUB>=1/(1+exp{[9.3<IT>−</IT>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)]<IT>/</IT>5.7})

&tgr;<SUB>d</SUB>=d<SUB>∞</SUB>{1−exp[−(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>10)<IT>/</IT>6.24]}<IT>/</IT>[0.035(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>10)]

f<SUB>∞</SUB>=1/(1+exp{−[−19.7<IT>−</IT>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)]<IT>/</IT>6.8})

<IT>+</IT>(0.6<IT>/</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[(50<IT>−V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>)<IT>/</IT>20]})

&tgr;<SUB>f</SUB>=1/[(0.024 exp{−[0.0337(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>30)]<SUP>2</SUP>})<IT>+</IT>0.024]

f<SUB>S<SUB><IT>∞</IT></SUB></SUB><IT>=f<SUB>∞</SUB></IT>

&tgr;<SUB>f<SUB>S</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>10<IT>&tgr;<SUB>f</SUB></IT>

f<SUB>Ca</SUB><IT>=</IT>1<IT>/</IT>(1<IT>+</IT>([Ca<SUP>2+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB><IT>/K</IT><SUB>Ca</SUB>))
where KCa = 0.0006 mM.

For ion X, where X is Ca2+, Na+, and K+
I<SUB>CaL<IT>,X</IT></SUB><IT>=</IT><IT>p</IT><SUB><IT>X</IT></SUB>(<IT>z<SUB>X</SUB></IT>)<SUP>2</SUP><IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>[<IT>F</IT><SUP>2</SUP><IT>/</IT>(R<IT>T</IT>)]{[(<IT>&ggr;</IT><SUB><IT>X</IT><SUB>i</SUB></SUB>[<IT>X</IT>]<SUB>i</SUB> exp{<IT>z<SUB>X</SUB>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>[<IT>F/</IT>(R<IT>T</IT>)]})<IT>−&ggr;</IT><SUB><IT>X</IT><SUB>o</SUB></SUB>[<IT>X</IT>]<SUB>o</SUB>]<IT>/</IT>(exp{<IT>z<SUB>X</SUB>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB>[<IT>F/</IT>(R<IT>T</IT>)]}<IT>−</IT>1)}
where pCa = 0.00015 cm/s, pK = 0.0000000965 cm/s, pNa = 0.0000003375 cm/s, gamma Cai = 1, gamma Cao = 0.341, gamma Nai = 0.75, gamma Nao = 0.75, gamma Ki = 0.75, gamma Ko = 0.75, zCa = 2, zK = 1, and zNa = 1.

Rapid Delayed Rectifier K+ Current

NZ model.
I<SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>x</IT><SUB>r</SUB><IT>r</IT><SUB>ik</SUB>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−E</IT><SUB>Kr</SUB>)

g<SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>=</IT>0.0154([K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>5.4)<SUP>0.5</SUP>

&agr;<SUB>x<SUB>r</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>{0.005 exp[5.266<IT>×</IT>10<SUP>−4</SUP>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>4)]}<IT>/</IT>

{1<IT>+</IT>exp[−0.1262(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>4)]}

&bgr;<SUB>x<SUB>r</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>{0.016 exp[1.6<IT>×</IT>10<SUP>−3</SUP>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>55)]}<IT>/</IT>

{1<IT>+</IT>exp[0.0783(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>55)]}

r<SUB>ik</SUB><IT>=</IT>1<IT>/</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>26)<IT>/</IT>23]}

E<SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>R</IT>T<IT>/F</IT>) ln ([K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)

IZ model.


I<SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>x</IT><SUB>r</SUB><IT>r</IT><SUB>ik</SUB>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−E</IT><SUB>Kr</SUB>)

g<SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>=</IT>0.00462([K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>5.4)<SUP>0.5</SUP>

&agr;<SUB>x<SUB>r</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>{0.005 exp[5.266<IT>×</IT>10<SUP>−4</SUP>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>15)]}<IT>/</IT>

{1<IT>+</IT>exp[−0.1262(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>15)]}

&bgr;<SUB>x<SUB>r</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>{0.016 exp[1.6<IT>×</IT>10<SUP><IT>−</IT>3</SUP>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>55)]}<IT>/</IT>

{1<IT>+</IT>exp[0.0783(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>55)]}

r<SUB>ik</SUB><IT>=</IT>1<IT>/</IT>{1<IT>+</IT>exp[(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>+</IT>26)<IT>/</IT>23]}

E<SUB>Kr</SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>R</IT>T<IT>/F</IT>) ln ([K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>[K<SUP><IT>+</IT></SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)

Slow Delayed Rectifier K+ Current

NZ model.
I<SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>x</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>s</SUB>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−E</IT><SUB>Ks</SUB>)
where gKs = 0.068 mS/cm2.
&agr;<SUB>x<SUB>s</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>3<IT>×</IT>10<SUP>−3</SUP><IT>/</IT>(1<IT>+</IT>exp{[7.44<IT>−</IT>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>10)]<IT>/</IT>14.32})

&bgr;<SUB>x<SUB>s</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>5.87<IT>×</IT>10<SUP>−3</SUP><IT>/</IT>(1<IT>+</IT>exp{[−5.95<IT>−</IT>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>10)]<IT>/</IT>(−15.82)})

E<SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>R</IT>T<IT>/F</IT>) ln ([K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)

IZ model.
I<SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>x</IT><SUP>2</SUP><SUB>s</SUB>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−E</IT><SUB>Ks</SUB>)
where gKs = 0.0136 mS/cm2.
&agr;<SUB>x<SUB>s</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>6<IT>×</IT>10<SUP>−3</SUP><IT>/</IT>(1<IT>+</IT>exp{[7.44<IT>−</IT>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>10)]<IT>/</IT>14.32})

&bgr;<SUB>x<SUB>s</SUB></SUB><IT>=</IT>11.74<IT>×</IT>10<SUP>−3</SUP><IT>/</IT>(1<IT>+</IT>exp{[−5.95<IT>−</IT>(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−</IT>10)]<IT>/</IT>(−15.82)})

E<SUB>Ks</SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>R</IT>T<IT>/F</IT>) ln ([K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)

Inward Rectifier K+ Current

NZ model.
I<SUB>Kl</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Kl</SUB><IT>kl<SUB>∞</SUB></IT>[[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>([K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>+</IT>13)](<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−E</IT><SUB>Kl</SUB>)
where gK1 = 1.96 mS/cm2.
kl<SUB>∞</SUB>=1/{2+exp[1.5(<IT>F/</IT>R<IT>T</IT>)(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−E</IT><SUB>Kl</SUB>)]}

E<SUB>Kl</SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>R</IT>T<IT>/F</IT>) ln ([K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)

IZ model.
I<SUB>Kl</SUB><IT>=g</IT><SUB>Kl</SUB><IT>kl<SUB>∞</SUB></IT>[[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>([K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>+</IT>13)](<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−E</IT><SUB>Kl</SUB>)
where gK1= 1.96 mS/cm2.
kl<SUB>∞</SUB>=1/{2+exp[2.2(<IT>F/</IT>R<IT>T</IT>)(<IT>V</IT><SUB>m</SUB><IT>−E</IT><SUB>Kl</SUB>)]}

E<SUB>Kl</SUB><IT>=</IT>(<IT>R</IT>T<IT>/F</IT>) ln ([K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>o</SUB><IT>/</IT>[K<SUP>+</SUP>]<SUB>i</SUB>)

Constants

In the equations, R is the gas constant (8.314 J · K-1 · mol-1), T is the absolute temperature (310 K), and F is Faraday's constant (96,487 C/mol).


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-30557 and HL-66140, The Whitaker Foundation, and Professional Staff Congress-City University of New York Grant 62834-00-31.


    FOOTNOTES

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. Cabo, Dept. of Pharmacology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia Univ., 630 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032 (E-mail: cc296{at}columbia.edu).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

First published September 19, 2002;10.1152/ajpheart.00512.2002

Received 20 June 2002; accepted in final form 13 September 2002.


    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
APPENDIX
REFERENCES

1.   Aggarwal, R, and Boyden PA. Diminished Ca2+ and Ba2+ currents in myocytes surviving in the epicardial border zone of the 5-day infracted canine heart. Circ Res 77: 1180-1191, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2.   Aggarwal, R, and Boyden PA. Altered pharmacologic responsiveness of reduced L-type calcium currents in myocytes surviving in the infarcted heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 7: 20-35, 1996[Web of Science][Medline].

3.   Bechem, M, Goldman S, Gross R, Hallermann S, Hebisch S, Hutter J, Rounding HP, Schramm M, Stoltefuss J, and Straub A. A new type of Ca-channel modulation by a novel class of 1,4-dyhydropyridines. Life Sci 60: 107-118, 1997[Web of Science][Medline].

4.   Brooks, RR, Carpenter JF, Miller KE, and Maynard AE. Efficacy of the class III antiarrhythmic agent azimilide in rodent models of ventricular arrhythmia. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 212: 84-93, 1996[Medline].

5.   Cabo, C, Schmitt H, and Wit AL. New mechanism of antiarrhythmic drug action: increasing L-type calcium current prevents reentrant ventricular tachycardia in the infarcted canine heart. Circulation 102: 2417-2425, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6.   Clerc, L. Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. J Physiol 255: 335-346, 1976[Abstract/Free Full Text].

7.   Dillon, SM, Allessie MA, Ursell PC, and Wit AL. Influences of anisotropic tissue structure on reentrant circuits in the epicardial border zone of subacute canine infarcts. Circ Res 63: 182-206, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8.   Dumaine, R, Towbin JA, Brugada P, Vatta M, Nesterenko DV, Nesterenko VV, Brugada J, Brugada R, and Antzelevitch C. Ionic mechanisms responsible for the electrocardiographic phenotype of the Brugada syndrome are temperature dependent. Circ Res 85: 803-809, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9.   Fox, JJ, McHarg JL, and Gilmour RF. Ionic mechanism of electrical alternans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282: H516-H530, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10.   Gintant, GA. Characterization and functional consequences of delayed rectifier current transient in ventricular repolarization. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278: H806-H817, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

11.   Hund, TJ, Kucera JP, Otani NF, and Rudy Y. Ionic charge conservation and long-term steady state in the Luo-Rudy dynamic cell model. Biophys J 81: 3324-3331, 2001[Web of Science][Medline].

12.   Jiang, M, Cabo C, Yao J, Boyden PA, and Tseng G. Delayed rectifier K currents have reduced amplitudes and altered kinetics in myocytes from infarcted canine ventricle. Cardiovasc Res 48: 34-43, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13.   Kneller, J, Ramirez RJ, Chartier D, Courtemanche M, and Nattel S. Time-dependent transients in an ionically based mathematical model of the canine atrial action potential. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282: H1437-H1451, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text].

14.   Lazzara, R, and Scherlag BJ. Electrophysiologic basis for arrhythmias in ischemic heart disease. Am J Cardiol 53: 1B-7B, 1984[Medline].

15.   Licata, A, Aggarwal R, Robinson RB, and Boyden P. Frequency dependent effects on Cai transients and cell shortening in myocytes that survive in the infarcted heart. Cardiovasc Res 33: 341-350, 1996.

16.   Liu, DW, and Antzelevitch C. Characteristics of the delayed rectifier current (IKr and IKs) in canine ventricular epicardial, midmyocardial, and endocardial myocytes. A weaker IKs contributes to the longer action potential of the M cell. Circ Res 76: 351-365, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17.   Lue, WM, and Boyden PA. Abnormal electrical properties of myocytes from chronically infarcted canine heart. Alterations in Vmax and the transient outward current. Circulation 85: 1175-1188, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18.   Luo, CH, and Rudy Y. A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. I. Simulations of ionic currents and concentration changes. Circ Res 74: 1071-1096, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19.   Murray, KT, Anno T, Bennett PB, and Hondeghem LM. Voltage clamp of the cardiac sodium current at 37 degrees C in physiologic solutions. Biophys J 57: 607-613, 1990[Web of Science][Medline].

20.   Peters, NS, Coromilas J, Severs NJ, and Wit AL. Disturbed connexin43 gap junction distribution correlates with the location of reentrant circuits in the epicardial border zone of healing canine infarcts that cause ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 95: 988-996, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

21.   Pinto, JM, and Boyden PA. Electrical remodeling in ischemia, and infarction. Cardiovasc Res 42: 284-297, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22.   Priebe, L, and Beuckelmann DJ. Simulation study of cellular electric properties in heart failure. Circ Res 82: 1206-1223, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23.   Pu, J, Balser JR, and Boyden PA. Lidocaine action on Na+ currents in ventricular myocytes from the epicardial border zone of the infracted heart. Circ Res 83: 431-440, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24.   Pu, J, and Boyden PA. Alterations of Na+ currents in myocytes from epicardial border zone of the infarcted heart. A possible ionic mechanism for reduced excitability and postrepolarization refractoriness. Circ Res 81: 110-119, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

25.   Pu, J, Robinson RB, and Boyden PA. Abnormalities in Cai handling in myocytes that survive in the infarcted heart are not just due to alterations in repolarization. J Mol Cell Cardiol 32: 1509-1523, 2000[Web of Science][Medline].

26.   Pu, J, Ruffy F, and Boyden PA. Effects of Bay Y5959 on Ca2+ currents and intracellular Ca2+ in cells that have survived in the epicardial border of the infarcted canine heart. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 33: 929-937, 1999[Web of Science][Medline].

27.   Sanguinetti, MC, and Jurkiewicz NK. Two components of cardiac delayed rectifier K+ current. Differential sensitivity to block by class III antiarrhythmic agents. J Gen Physiol 96: 195-215, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28.   Schmitt, H, Cabo C, Coromilas J, and Wit AL. Effects of azimilide, a new class III antiarrhythmic drug, on reentrant circuits causing ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation in a canine model of myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 12: 1025-1033, 2001[Web of Science][Medline].

29.   Shaw, RM, and Rudy Y. Electrophysiologic effects of acute myocardial ischemia: a theoretical study of altered cell excitability and action potential duration. Cardiovasc Res 35: 256-272, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30.   Shaw, RM, and Rudy Y. Ionic mechanisms of propagation in cardiac tissue. Roles of the sodium and L-type calcium currents during reduced excitability and decreased gap junction coupling. Circ Res 81: 727-741, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].

31.   Ursell, PC, Gardner PI, Albala A, Fenoglio JJ, and Wit AL. Structural and electrophysiological changes in the epicardial border zone of canine myocardial infarcts during infarct healing. Circ Res 56: 436-451, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].

32.   Varro, A, Balati B, Iost N, Takacs J, Virag L, Lathrop DA, Csaba L, Talosi L, and Papp JG. The role of the delayed rectifier component IKs in dog ventricular muscle and Purkinje fibre repolarization. J Physiol 523: 67-81, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33.   Weidmann, S. Electrical constants of trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. J Physiol 210: 1041-1054, 1970[Abstract/Free Full Text].

34.   Winslow, RL, Rice J, Jafri S, Marban E, and O'Rourke B. Mechanisms of altered excitation-contraction coupling in canine tachycardia-induced heart failure, II: model studies. Circ Res 84: 571-586, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284(1):H372-H384
0363-6135/03 $5.00 Copyright © 2003 the American Physiological Society



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. F. Decker, J. Heijman, J. R. Silva, T. J. Hund, and Y. Rudy
Properties and ionic mechanisms of action potential adaptation, restitution, and accommodation in canine epicardium
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): H1017 - H1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Cabo
Modulation of impulse propagation by fibroblasts
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H1992 - H1993.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
S. Nattel, A. Maguy, S. Le Bouter, and Y.-H. Yeh
Arrhythmogenic Ion-Channel Remodeling in the Heart: Heart Failure, Myocardial Infarction, and Atrial Fibrillation
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 425 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. A. Kondratyev, J. G. C. Ponard, A. Munteanu, S. Rohr, and J. P. Kucera
Dynamic changes of cardiac conduction during rapid pacing
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): H1796 - H1811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. M. Cherry and F. H. Fenton
A tale of two dogs: analyzing two models of canine ventricular electrophysiology
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H43 - H55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Cabo and P. A. Boyden
Heterogeneous gap junction remodeling stabilizes reentrant circuits in the epicardial border zone of the healing canine infarct: a computational study
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H2606 - H2616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. E. Pollard and R. C. Barr
Cardiac microimpedance measurement in two-dimensional models using multisite interstitial stimulation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): H1976 - H1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. Li, V. Nikolski, D. W. Wallick, I. R. Efimov, and Y. Cheng
Mechanisms of enhanced shock-induced arrhythmogenesis in the rabbit heart with healed myocardial infarction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H1054 - H1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
W. Dun and P. A. Boyden
Diverse phenotypes of outward currents in cells that have survived in the 5-day-infarcted heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): H667 - H673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. J. Hund and Y. Rudy
Rate Dependence and Regulation of Action Potential and Calcium Transient in a Canine Cardiac Ventricular Cell Model
Circulation, November 16, 2004; 110(20): 3168 - 3174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Z. Qu, H. S. Karagueuzian, A. Garfinkel, and J. N. Weiss
Effects of Na+ channel and cell coupling abnormalities on vulnerability to reentry: a simulation study
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2004; 286(4): H1310 - H1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
284/1/H372    most recent
00512.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cabo, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boyden, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cabo, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boyden, P. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online