|
|
||||||||
1-Adrenergic receptor responses in
1AB-AR knockout mouse hearts suggest the presence of
1D-AR
Departments of Medicine, Radiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco 94143; and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94121
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two functional
1-adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes (
1A
and
1B) have been identified in the mouse heart.
However, it is unclear whether the third known subtype,
1D-AR, is also present. To investigate this, we
determined whether there were
1-AR responses in hearts
from a novel mouse model lacking
1A- and
1B-ARs (double knockout) (ABKO). In Langendorff-perfused
hearts,
1-ARs were stimulated with phenylephrine. For
ABKO hearts, phenylephrine reduced left ventricular pressure and
coronary flow (to 87 ± 2% and 86 ± 4% of initial,
respectively, n = 11, P < 0.01). These effects were blocked by prazosin and
8-{2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-8-azaspirol[4,5]decane-7,9-dione} dihydrochloride, suggesting that
1D-AR-mediated responses were present. In
contrast, right ventricular trabeculae from ABKO hearts did not respond
to phenylephrine, suggesting that in ABKO perfused hearts, the effects
of phenylephrine were not mediated by direct actions on cardiomyocytes.
A novel finding was that
1-AR stimulation caused
positive inotropy in the wild-type mouse heart, in contrast to negative
inotropy observed in mouse cardiac muscle strips. We conclude that
mouse hearts lacking
1A- and
1B-ARs
retain functional
1-AR responses involving decreases of
coronary flow and ventricular pressure that reflect
1D-AR-mediated vasoconstriction. Furthermore,
1-AR inotropic responses depend critically on the experimental conditions.
Langendorff-perfused heart; phenylephrine; myocardial contractility; coronary arteries
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE MOUSE HEART
contains mRNA for three subtypes of the
1-adrenergic
receptor (AR):
1A,
1B, and
1D (1). However, protein has been detected
by binding or function for only two
1-AR subtypes,
1A and
1B (22). Therefore,
it is unknown whether the
1D-AR protein is present in
the heart and what its function might be.
Previous studies found that
1D-ARs were localized to
extracardiac blood vessels. In the rat,
1D-ARs mediate
contraction of blood vessels, including the aorta, mesenteric, and
femoral arteries (3, 5, 6, 18), and are involved in
regulating the pressor response to phenylephrine (24). In
the mouse,
1D-ARs also mediate contraction in the
thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, and mesenteric arteries (20,
21) and have recently been shown to be involved in regulating
systemic blood pressure (17).
The presence of mRNA for the
1D-AR in whole mouse heart
homogenate and the presence of
1D-ARs in the systemic
vasculature raise the possibility that
1D-ARs are
expressed in the mouse heart in the coronary vessels.
Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine whether there are
functional
1D-ARs in the mouse heart. Our approach used hearts from a novel mouse model lacking
1A-ARs and
1B-ARs, or
1A/
1B-AR double
knockout (ABKO) (T. D. O'Connell, S. Ishizaka, A. Nakamura,
P. M. Swigart, M. C. Rodrigo, S. Cotechia, D. G. Rokosh,
W. Grossman, E. Foster, P. C. Simpson, unpublished observations). Langendorff-perfused hearts were stimulated with
1-AR
agonists and antagonists to determine whether there was a residual
1-AR response in ABKO hearts that might reflect
1D-AR function. We found that
1-AR
stimulation of the ABKO mouse heart resulted in decreased
coronary flow and systolic pressure. These effects were blocked by the
1-AR antagonist prazosin and the
1D-AR subtype-selective antagonist
8-{2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-8-azaspirol[4,5]decane-7,9-dione} dihydrochloride (BMY-7378). Our results demonstrate that the ABKO mouse
heart has functional
1D-ARs and further suggest that
1D-ARs are involved in coronary vasoconstriction.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal methods.
All procedures were approved by the Animal Studies Subcommittee of the
San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. KO mice were generated
as recently described (T. D. O'Connell, S. Ishizaka, A. Nakamura,
P. M. Swigart, M. C. Rodrigo, S. Cotechia, D. G. Rokosh,
W. Grossman, E. Foster, P. C. Simpson, unpublished observations).
1B-AR KO mice (2) were mated with
1A-AR KO mice (13) to produce F1 generation
mice heterozygous for both KOs. F1 heterozygous mice were mated to
produce F2 wild-type (WT) and ABKO mice, and breeding pairs from these
lines produced offspring that were used for these experiments. WT and
ABKO (mixed C57BL/6, FVBN, and 129SvJ) adult mice of both sexes were
used (n = 47, average age 16 ± 1 wk, average wt
29.8 ± 0.7 g). Mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (1 mg/g, Abbott Laboratories; Chicago, IL), heparinized (2 U/g,
Elkins-Sinn; Cherry Hill, NJ), and the hearts were rapidly excised for
the studies using perfused hearts or trabeculae.
Isolated heart preparation. Excised hearts were placed in ice-cold arrest solution composed of (in mM) 120 NaCl, 30 KCl, and 0.1 CaCl2, and the aortic arch was dissected. The aorta was cannulated (20 gauge) and perfused with a modified Krebs-Henseleit solution composed of (in mM) 118 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 1.66 MgSO4, 1.18 KH2PO4, 0.5 sodium EDTA, 25 NaHCO3, 5.55 glucose, 5 sodium pyruvate, and 2.5 CaCl2, using the Langendorff technique. Perfusion was at constant pressure (70 mmHg). The perfusate was oxygenated and maintained at a pH of 7.4 by vigorous bubbling with 95% O2-5% CO2. The right atrium was trimmed and the sinoatrial node was crushed. Hearts were electrically stimulated at the atrioventricular junction with a coaxial stimulation electrode (Harvard Apparatus; Holliston, MA) connected to a square pulse stimulator (model SD9, Grass-Telefactor; West Warwick, RI). Hearts were paced at 6 Hz with square pulses (width 4 ms) and at supramaximal voltage.
Heart temperature was constantly monitored via a thermistor probe placed in the right ventricle and was maintained at 37°C. To ensure adequate oxygenation of the preparation, the apparatus (Constant Pressure Non-Circulating System, Radnoti Glass Technology; Monrovia, CA) was modified to include a recirculating shunt from the top of the aortic cannula to the bubbling reservoir. Transit time for the perfusate from the reservoir to the cannula was reduced to <10 s, regardless of coronary flow, thus limiting changes in perfusate gas composition during transit to the heart. The perfusate was passed through an in-line filter (5.0 µm) to remove particulate matter. Coronary flow was measured by collecting the coronary effluent for 1 min. In five hearts, we experimentally reduced coronary flow by clamping the aortic inflow without altering perfusion pressure. To monitor left ventricular pressure development a small fluid-filled balloon made of plastic wrap was attached to a short length of polyethylene-50 tubing and attached to a pressure transducer (model TRN050; Kent Scientific; Litchfield, CT). The balloon was inserted into the left ventricle via an opening in the left atrium. The balloon was filled with degassed water in 5-µl increments up to a final volume of 30-40 µl and adjusted to maintain the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure at 8-10 mmHg. The contribution of the balloon alone to measured pressure was negligible. Left ventricular pressure signals were digitized (0.2-1 kHz sampling) and stored on a laboratory computer. Data were analyzed to obtain pressure development and timing parameters.Inotropic responses.
Hearts were preincubated with the
-antagonist timolol (10 µM) and
then stimulated with the non-subtype-selective
1-agonist phenylephrine (PE; 10 µM). PE was delivered via an infusion pump at a
rate of 1% of coronary flow. In some experiments, hearts were also
preincubated with the non-subtype-selective
1-antagonist, prazosin (5 µM) or the subtype-selective
1D-antagonist BMY-7378 (500 nM). Stock solutions of PE,
timolol, and BMY-7378 were prepared in the perfusate. Prazosin was
dissolved in 100% ethanol and then diluted in perfusate to make a
stock solution. The final concentration of ethanol delivered was 0.4%.
Control experiments showed that infusion of the perfusate or the
ethanol-perfusate vehicle did not affect perfused heart function.
L-Phenylephrine hydrochloride, timolol (maleate salt), and
BMY-7378 dihydrochloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
MO). Prazosin-HCl was purchased from Research Biochemicals
International (Natick, MA). All chemicals were of analytic grade.
Right ventricular trabeculae. Excised hearts were perfused through the aorta with a modified Krebs-Henseleit solution composed of (in mM) 112 NaCl, 15 KCl, 1.2 MgCl2, 2.0 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3, 1.2 NaSO4, 10 glucose, 30 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM), and 1 CaCl2. The perfusate was oxygenated with 95% O2-5% CO2 to maintain a pH of 7.4 at 22°C. The right ventricle was opened, and a trabecula that was free-running between the right ventricular wall and the tricuspid valve was dissected out.
Trabeculae were placed in a muscle chamber and attached to the apparatus by mounting the ends on stainless steel pins (100 µm diameter) attached to a micromanipulator at one end to vary length and a force transducer (model AE-80, SensoNor) at the other end. Trabeculae were superfused at 22°C with Krebs-Henseleit solution (as above without BDM, with KCl 5 mM, and with CaCl2 2 mM). Sarcomere length was assessed by the diffraction of light by muscle sarcomeres and diastolic sarcomere length was set to 2.1 µm. Trabeculae were field stimulated using platinum wire electrodes at a frequency of 0.5 Hz and supramaximal voltage. Trabeculae were preincubated with timolol (10 µM), and
1ARs were stimulated with PE (10 µM) added to the superfusate.
Statistics. Results are presented as means ± SE. Student's t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and Student-Newman-Keuls test were used to determine differences between means. Values of P < 0.05 were considered to be significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Residual response to
1-AR stimulation in ABKO
perfused heart.
Examples of the effects of PE stimulation on contraction of WT and ABKO
perfused hearts are shown in Fig. 1.
Figure 1A shows a representative slow time-base recording of
left ventricular pressure of a WT perfused heart with addition of PE
indicated by the arrow. PE caused a complex contractile response
involving an early transient negative inotropic phase, followed by a
sustained positive inotropic phase. This finding was unexpected because previous studies from this laboratory and others (8-11, 14, 16) have demonstrated that muscle strips from mouse hearts
display a sustained negative inotropic response to PE.
|
|
No response to
1-AR stimulation in ABKO trabeculae.
To investigate whether the negative inotropic response to PE observed
in ABKO hearts was mediated by
1-ARs localized to
cardiomyocytes, we determined the effect of PE on contractions of
isolated muscle strips. Figure 2B shows a slow time-base
recording of peak twitch force of a right ventricular trabecula from an
ABKO heart. PE had no effect on trabecula contraction force, suggesting
that the cardiomyocytes in trabeculae from ABKO hearts do not contain
1-ARs. For all trabeculae studied, developed force was
99.4 ± 1.8% of control 10 min after PE stimulation and 106 ± 2.4% of control after 30 min of PE stimulation (n = 9). These values were not statistically different from those before PE
addition. In contrast, right ventricular trabeculae from WT littermates
demonstrated a marked negative inotropic response to PE (unpublished
data) consistent with previous studies of mouse myocardium by us and by
others (8-10, 14, 16).
Inotropic effects of PE in WT and ABKO hearts are mediated by
1-ARs.
To determine whether the negative inotropic response to PE in ABKO
hearts was mediated by
1-AR stimulation, we used the
non-subtype-selective
1-AR antagonist prazosin. Figure
3 shows that in the presence of prazosin,
PE stimulation did not elicit a contractile response in either WT or
ABKO hearts. Figure 4 summarizes the
effects of PE stimulation on all WT and ABKO hearts studied in the
absence and presence of prazosin. Data were normalized to the left
ventricular developed pressure before PE addition. Figure 4 shows that
the increase in developed pressure, caused by PE stimulation of WT hearts, was abolished by prazosin. Likewise, the fall of developed pressure caused by PE stimulation of ABKO hearts was also abolished by
prazosin. These findings indicate that the effects of PE on the
function of both WT and ABKO hearts were mediated by
1-ARs.
|
|
Negative inotropic effect of PE in ABKO heart is mediated by
1D-ARs.
Because ABKO myocardium does not contain
1A-ARs or
1B-ARs, the residual
1-AR response likely reflects
1D-ARs. To
more directly test for
1D-AR function, we used the
subtype-selective
1D-AR antagonist BMY-7378. Figure 4
shows that specific antagonism of
1D-ARs with BMY-7378
did not reduce the positive inotropic response of WT hearts to PE;
indeed the response of WT to PE tended to be greater in the presence of
BMY-7378 (although the difference did not reach statistical
significance, P > 0.05). This suggests that for WT
hearts, the positive inotropic response to PE was mediated by
1A-ARs and/or
1B-ARs, but not by
1D-ARs.
1D-ARs.
PE reduced coronary flow.
1-AR stimulation had no effect on ABKO trabeculae
suggesting an absence of
1-ARs on cardiomyocytes.
Therefore the negative inotropy observed with PE stimulation in ABKO
perfused hearts may involve
1-ARs that are not located
on cardiomyocytes. To investigate the possibility of
1-ARs localized to the coronary vasculature, coronary
flow was monitored during
1-AR stimulation with PE in
ABKO hearts. Figure 5A shows
the time course of effects on coronary flow due to PE addition and
washout for ABKO hearts. Data are shown as a percentage of the coronary
flow before PE addition. PE caused a decline in coronary flow to
78 ± 3% of control that was sustained over the period of PE
stimulation. The coronary flow recovered to control levels after PE
removal (30-min washout). To test whether PE effects on coronary flow
were mediated by
1-ARs, we used prazosin. For all
experiments, the effects of PE on coronary flow and the effects of
prazosin are summarized in Fig. 5B. Under basal conditions,
coronary flow was not different between WT and ABKO hearts (22.1 ± 1.2 vs. 23.3 ± 1.5 ml · min
1 · g
1,
respectively). In WT hearts, PE caused a reduction of coronary flow
that was statistically significant (85 ± 3% control,
P < 0.01); this decrease in coronary flow was
abolished with prazosin (99 ± 2% control). In ABKO hearts, PE
decreased coronary flow to 86 ± 4% control (P < 0.01), a decrease similar to that observed in WT hearts. Furthermore,
decreased coronary flow in ABKO hearts was also abolished by treatment
with prazosin (98 ± 6% control). This demonstrates that the
reductions of coronary flow in both WT and ABKO hearts were mediated by
1-AR stimulation.
|
1-AR stimulation were mediated by the
1D-AR subtype, we used BMY-7378. For both WT and ABKO
hearts, BMY-7378 abolished
1-AR-mediated decreases of
coronary flow (100 ± 4% control vs. 99 ± 2% control, respectively). This demonstrates that
1D-ARs mediate
decreased coronary flow with PE stimulation.
Reduced coronary flow and reduced developed pressure.
To investigate whether decreased coronary flow in ABKO hearts during PE
stimulation could be responsible for the observed decrease in left
ventricular developed pressure, in control experiments we reduced
coronary flow experimentally. Figure 6
shows that in WT hearts there was a close to linear relationship
between coronary flow and left ventricular developed pressure (fitted
regression was statistically significant: R = 0.871, n = 5, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, Fig.
6 shows that this regression relation overlapped the data for coronary
flow and developed pressure obtained with PE stimulation of ABKO hearts
(open circle). This overlap is consistent with PE stimulation of ABKO
hearts causing reduced coronary flow, which then leads to decreased
developed pressure.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There were three major findings in this study. First, ABKO mouse
hearts contain functional
1-ARs that mediate reductions in coronary flow and pressure development. Second, these
1-AR responses in ABKO hearts could be abolished by the
subtype-specific antagonist BMY-7378, suggesting they were caused by
1D-ARs. Third, in contrast to previous reports of
negative inotropy with
1-AR stimulation of mouse muscle
strips, we found a marked positive inotropy with
1-AR
stimulation of the Langendorff-perfused WT mouse heart.
1D-AR in heart.
In this study, we found that hearts lacking the
1A- and
1B-AR subtypes still responded to PE and that this
response was abolished by prazosin and BMY-7278. This demonstrates that
there are functional
1-ARs in ABKO hearts and that these
1-ARs are most likely
1D-ARs. In
contrast, trabeculae from ABKO hearts did not respond to PE. This
demonstrates that for trabeculae from ABKO hearts there are no
1-ARs on cardiomyocytes that influence contractility.
Together these findings suggest that the decreased pressure of ABKO
hearts with PE stimulation does not result from effects mediated by
1-ARs on cardiac myocytes. Instead, the findings suggest
that the response of ABKO hearts to PE was mediated by
1D-ARs localized to cells within the vasculature.
Consistent with this, PE caused a decreased coronary flow in ABKO
hearts, suggesting that
1D-ARs in ABKO hearts are
localized to the coronary vasculature. These findings suggest that the
decreased pressure with PE stimulation of ABKO hearts arises
secondarily due to the reduced coronary flow. This suggestion is
supported by two findings. First, for ABKO hearts, decreases of left
ventricular pressure and coronary flow in response to PE were both
blocked in parallel by BMY-7378. Second, we found that reducing
coronary flow experimentally reproduced the decline in pressure
observed with PE. These findings are consistent with but not proof of a
causal relation between
1D-AR-mediated decreases of both
coronary flow and left ventricular pressure in ABKO hearts.
1D-AR in the mouse heart has been
uncertain. Receptor-binding studies of mouse heart homogenate detect no
1D-AR protein (19), although the mRNA for
this
1-AR subtype is present (1). The
present study provides functional evidence for
1D-ARs in
the heart. Because ABKO hearts lack
1A-ARs and
1B-ARs, we suggest that the
1-AR subtype
responsible for the residual
1-AR response is the
1D-AR. Furthermore, we suggest that
1D-ARs are located in the coronary vasculature and cause vasoconstriction. These suggestions are consistent with the role of
1D-ARs in regulating blood pressure (17)
and aortic contraction (20, 21) in the mouse.
Similar to the mouse heart, previous receptor binding and functional
studies of rat heart had reported very little or no
1D-AR protein present (3, 23). However,
more recent studies (15) using immunoreactive blotting
show that
1D-AR protein is present in the rat heart. We
attempted to use the same commercially available
1D-AR
antibody (based on the human
1D-AR) used by Shen et al. (15) (catalog no. SC-10721; lot no. A23, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) to immunohistochemically detect
1D-ARs in
Western blots and cryosections prepared from ABKO mouse hearts.
However, the results proved inconsistent both within and between
experiments suggesting insufficient specificity of antibody binding to
mouse
1D-ARs. Therefore, until it is possible to
specifically detect the mouse
1D-AR protein, the results
presented here represent a pharmacological and physiological approach
and provide evidence for a vascular localization for the
1D-AR in the mouse heart.
1-AR stimulation in WT heart.
The effect of
1-AR stimulation on myocardial
contractility has been controversial. Previous studies demonstrate that
1-AR inotropic effects show considerable variation
between different species and preparations. For example, in whole
hearts and muscle strips from the rat, rabbit, guinea pig, hamster, and
dog,
1-AR stimulation causes positive inotropy (for a
review, see Ref. 7). In contrast, recent studies of muscle
strips and isolated myocytes from mouse heart found
1-AR
stimulation caused negative inotropy (8-10, 14, 16).
1-AR
stimulation on pressure development in the isovolumic Langendorff mouse
heart. In contrast to the negative inotropy with
1-AR
stimulation in mouse cardiomyocytes and muscle strips, in the whole
heart we found that
1-AR stimulation caused a
significant positive inotropic response. It is unclear what causes the
contrasting responses to
1-AR stimulation for whole
mouse heart versus mouse muscle strips. Differences in experimental
conditions such as temperature and pacing rate may be important, or
there may be elements of the whole heart that are not reflected in the trabeculae.
Consistent with our results, a recent study (4) found PE
stimulation of the working mouse heart preparation caused a small but
not statistically significant increase in the rate of pressure development.
Similar to the ABKO heart, for the WT mouse heart,
1-AR
stimulation reduced coronary flow. Therefore, the positive inotropic response to
1-AR stimulation in the WT perfused heart
may have been underestimated due to the concurrent decrease in coronary flow, which could have inhibited pressure development. Consistent with
this, abolishing decreases of coronary flow with BMY-7378 tended to
increase the inotropic response of WT hearts to PE.
In summary, our findings suggest that there are functional
1-ARs in hearts lacking
1A- and
1B-ARs. We suggest that the
1-AR response
in hearts lacking
1A- and
1B-ARs arises
from
1D-ARs located in the coronary vasculature. We
suggest that these
1D-ARs act as coronary
vasoconstrictors. Finally, we suggest that myocardial responses to
1-AR stimulation depend critically on the experimental conditions.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Manoj Rodrigo, Marietta Paningbatan, and Gregory Simpson for expert technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants HL-56257 and P01 HL-68738 project 3 (to A. J. Baker), HL-54890 and HL-31113 (to P. C. Simpson), and postdoctoral fellowship HL-10422 (to D. T. McCloskey), and by a Grant-in-Aid from the American Heart Association, Western States Affiliate (to A. J. Baker). A. J. Baker is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. J. Baker, Univ. of California, San Francisco, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cardiology Div. 111C, 4150 Clement St., San Francisco, CA 94121 (E-mail: ajbaker{at}itsa.ucsf.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published December 5, 2002;10.1152/ajpheart.00441.2002
Received 24 May 2002; accepted in final form 25 November 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Alonso-Llamazares, A,
Zamanillo D,
Casanova E,
Ovalle S,
Calvo P,
and
Chinchetru MA.
Molecular cloning of
1D-adrenergic receptor and tissue distribution of three
1-adrenergic receptor subtypes in mouse.
J Neurochem
65:
2387-2392,
1995[ISI][Medline].
2.
Cavalli, A,
Lattion AL,
Hummler E,
Nenniger M,
Pedrazzini T,
Aubert JF,
Michel MC,
Yang M,
Lembo G,
Vecchione C,
Mostardini M,
Schmidt A,
Beermann F,
and
Cotecchia S.
Decreased blood pressure response in mice deficient of the
1b-adrenergic receptor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:
11589-11594,
1997
3.
Deng, X,
Chemtob S,
and
Varma D.
Characterization of the
1D-adrenoceptor subtype in rat myocardium, aorta and other tissues.
Br J Pharmacol
119:
269-276,
1996[ISI].
4.
Grupp, IL,
Lorenz JN,
Walsh RA,
Boivin GP,
and
Rindt H.
Overexpression of
1B-adrenergic receptor induces left ventricular dysfunction in the absence of hypertrophy.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
275:
H1338-H1350,
1998
5.
Hrometz, SL,
Edelmann SE,
McCune DF,
Olges JR,
Hadley RW,
Perez DM,
and
Piascik MT.
Expression of multiple
1-adrenoceptors on vascular smooth muscle: correlation with the regulation of contraction.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
290:
452-463,
1999
6.
Kenny, B,
Chalmers D,
Philpott P,
and
Naylor A.
Characterization of an
1D-adrenoceptor mediating the contractile response of rat aorta to noradrenaline.
Br J Pharmacol
115:
981-986,
1995[ISI].
7.
Li, K,
He H,
Li C,
Sirois P,
and
Rouleau JL.
Myocardial
1-adrenoceptor: inotropic effect and physiologic and pathologic implications.
Life Sci
60:
1305-1318,
1997[ISI][Medline].
8.
McCloskey, DT,
Rokosh DG,
O'Connell TD,
Keung EC,
Simpson PC,
and
Baker AJ.
1-adrenoceptor subtypes mediate negative inotropy in myocardium from
1A/C-knockout and wild type mice.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
34:
1007-1017,
2002[ISI][Medline].
9.
Montgomery, DE,
Wolska BM,
Pyle WG,
Roman BB,
Dowell JC,
Buttrick PM,
Koretsky AP,
Del Nido P,
and
Solaro RJ.
-Adrenergic response and myofilament activity in mouse hearts lacking PKC phosphorylation sites on cardiac TnI.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
282:
H2397-H2405,
2002
10.
Nishimaru, K,
Kobayashi M,
Matsuda T,
Tanaka Y,
Tanaka H,
and
Shigenobu K.
-Adrenoceptor stimulation-mediated negative inotropism and enhanced Na+/Ca2+ exchange in mouse ventricle.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
280:
H132-H141,
2001
11.
Nishimaru, K,
Sekine T,
Tanaka Y,
Tanaka H,
and
Shigenobu K.
Temperature sensitive effects of
-adrenergic stimulation in mouse ventricular myocardia.
Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol
104:
173-180,
1999[ISI][Medline].
13.
Rokosh, DG,
and
Simpson PC.
Knockout of the alpha 1A/C-adrenergic receptor subtype: the alpha 1A/C is expressed in resistance arteries and is required to maintain arterial blood pressure.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
99:
9474-9479,
2002
14.
Sakurai, K,
Norota I,
Tanaka H,
Kubota I,
Tomoika H,
and
Endoh M.
Negative inotropic effects of angiotensin II, endothelin1 and phenylephrine in indo-1 loaded adult mouse ventricular myocytes.
Life Sci
70:
1173-1184,
2002[ISI][Medline].
15.
Shen, H,
Peri K,
Deng X,
Chemtob S,
and
Varma D.
Distribution of
1-adrenoceptor subtype proteins in different tissues of neonatal and adult rats.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
78:
237-243,
2000[ISI][Medline].
16.
Tanaka, H,
Manita S,
Matsuda T,
Adachi M,
and
Shigenobu K.
Sustained negative inotropism mediated by
-adrenoceptors in adult mouse myocardia: developmental conversion from positive response in the neonate.
Br J Pharmacol
114:
673-677,
1995[ISI][Medline].
17.
Tanoue, A,
Nasa Y,
Koshimizu T,
Shinoura H,
Oshikawa S,
Kawai T,
Sunada S,
Takeo S,
and
Tsujimoto G.
The
1D-adrenergic receptor directly regulates arterial blood pressure via vasoconstriction.
J Clin Invest
109:
765-775,
2002[ISI][Medline].
18.
Testa, R,
Destefani C,
Guarneri L,
Poggesi E,
Simonazzi I,
Taddei C,
and
Leonardi A.
The
1d-adrenoceptor subtype is involved in the noradrenaline-induced contractions of rat aorta.
Life Sci
57:
PL159-PL163,
1995[ISI][Medline].
19.
Wang, BH,
Du XJ,
Autelitano DJ,
Milano CA,
and
Woodcock EA.
Adverse effects of constitutively active
1B-adrenergic receptors after pressure overload in mouse hearts.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
279:
H1079-H1086,
2000
20.
Yamamoto, Y,
and
Koike K.
1-Adrenoceptor subtypes in the mouse mesenteric artery and abdominal aorta.
Br J Pharmacol
134:
1045-1054,
2001[ISI].
21.
Yamamoto, Y,
and
Koike K.
Characterization of
1-adrenoceptor-mediated contraction in the mouse thoracic aorta.
Eur J Pharmacol
424:
131-140,
2001[ISI][Medline].
22.
Yang, M,
Reese J,
Cotecchia S,
and
Michel MC.
Murine
1-adrenoceptor subtypes. I. Radioligand binding studies.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
286:
841-847,
1998
23.
Yang, M,
Verfurth F,
Buscher R,
and
Michel M.
Is
1D-adrenoceptor protein detectable in rat tissues?
Naunyn Schied Arch Pharmacol
355:
438-446,
1997[ISI][Medline].
24.
Zhou, L,
and
Vargas HM.
Vascular
1D-adrenoceptors have a role in the pressor response to phenylephrine in the pithed rat.
Eur J Pharmacol
305:
173-176,
1996[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. T. McCloskey, S. Turcato, G.-Y. Wang, L. Turnbull, B.-Q. Zhu, T. Bambino, A. P. Nguyen, D. H. Lovett, R. A. Nissenson, J. S. Karliner, et al. Expression of a Gi-coupled receptor in the heart causes impaired Ca2+ handling, myofilament injury, and dilated cardiomyopathy Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H205 - H212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-Y. Wang, D. T. McCloskey, S. Turcato, P. M. Swigart, P. C. Simpson, and A. J. Baker Contrasting inotropic responses to {alpha}1-adrenergic receptor stimulation in left versus right ventricular myocardium Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H2013 - H2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Turnbull, H.-Z. Zhou, P. M. Swigart, S. Turcato, J. S. Karliner, B. R. Conklin, P. C. Simpson, and A. J. Baker Sustained preconditioning induced by cardiac transgenesis with the tetracycline transactivator Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): H1103 - H1109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. McCloskey, L. Turnbull, P. M. Swigart, A. C. Zambon, S. Turcato, S. Joho, W. Grossman, B. R. Conklin, P. C. Simpson, and A. J. Baker Cardiac transgenesis with the tetracycline transactivator changes myocardial function and gene expression Physiol Genomics, June 16, 2005; 22(1): 118 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Uberti, C. Hague, H. Oller, K. P. Minneman, and R. A. Hall Heterodimerization with {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptors Promotes Surface Expression and Functional Activity of {alpha}1D-Adrenergic Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2005; 313(1): 16 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-S. Jiang, W. Srisakuldee, F. Soulet, G. Bouche, and E. Kardami Non-angiogenic FGF-2 protects the ischemic heart from injury, in the presence or absence of reperfusion Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2004; 62(1): 154 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |