Vol. 284, Issue 4, H1240-H1250, April 2003
An electrodiffusion model for effects of surface glycocalyx
layer on microvessel permeability
Bingmei M.
Fu1,2,
Bin
Chen1, and
Wenhao
Chen1
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering and
2 Cancer Institute, University of Nevada, Las Vegas,
Nevada 89154
 |
ABSTRACT |
To investigate
the charge effect of the endothelial surface glycocalyx on microvessel
permeability, we extended the three-dimensional model developed by Fu
et al. (J Biomech Eng 116: 502-513, 1994) for the
interendothelial cleft to include a negatively charged glycocalyx layer
at the entrance of the cleft. Both electrostatic and steric exclusions
on charged solutes were considered within the glycocalyx layer and at
the interfaces. Four charge-density profiles were assumed for the
glycocalyx layer. Our model indicates that the overall solute
permeability across the microvessel wall including the surface
glycocalyx layer and the cleft region is independent of the
charge-density profiles as long as they have the same maximum value and
the same total charge. On the basis of experimental data, this model
predicts that the charge density would be 25-35 meq/l in the
glycolcalyx of frog mesenteric capillaries. An intriguing prediction of
this model is that when the concentrations of cations and anions are
unequal in the lumen due to the presence of negatively charged
proteins, the negatively charged glycocalyx would provide more
resistance to positively charged solutes than to negatively charged ones.
model for charge effect of endothelial surface glycocalyx; microvessel permeability to charged molecules; interendothelial cleft
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE ENDOTHELIAL CELL
GLYCOCALYX is an extracellular matrix that is expressed on the
luminal surface of the endothelial cells forming the microvessel wall.
This matrix is believed to be composed primarily of proteoglycans,
glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans (14, 18, 19, 21).
Because of its distinct location in the transvascular pathway, in
conjunction with the intercellular junctions in the cleft between
adjacent endothelial cells, the surface glycocalyx is of great
importance in determining the microvessel permeability (P)
to water and solutes.
Adamson et al. (2) showed that for similar size globular
proteins,
-lactalbumin (molecular weight = 14,176) and
ribonuclease (molecular weight = 13,683), the permeability of the
frog mesenteric capillary to positively charged ribonuclease (net
charge = +3, including the charge effect from fluorescent probe
labeling; Pribonuclease = 4.3 × 10
6 cm/s) was twice that of negatively charged
-lactalbumin (net charge =
11, including the charge effect
from fluorescent probe labeling;
P
-lactalbumin = 2.1 × 10
6 cm/s). Their experiments suggested that the
microvessel wall contains negative charges, which enhance the transport
of positively charged molecules but retard that of negatively charged
molecules. With the use of a Donnan-type model (see below) for
electrostatic partitioning, they estimated that the charge density in
the microvessel wall was ~11.4 meq/l.
This charge effect of the microvessel wall has also been shown in other
experiments. Curry et al. (6) measured
Pribonuclease and
P
-lactalbumin in microvessels perfused with
orosomucoid in a Ringer-albumin perfusate. They found that
Pribonuclease was six times that of
P
-lactalbumin in the presence of orosomucoid.
In the presence of orosomucoid, P
-lactalbumin
was only about one-half of the value in the absence of orosomucoid. They suggested that these results could be accounted for if orosomucoid increased the net negative charge on microvessel walls in the frog
mesentery from 11.2 to 28 meq/l. Huxley and Curry (16) showed that the diffusive solute permeability to
-lactalbumin was
lower during exposure to plasma
[(P
-lactalbumin)plasma = 1.0 × 10
6 cm/s] than that during exposure to
bovine serum albumin (BSA)-Ringer solution
[(P
-lactalbumin)BSA = 5.0 × 10
6 cm/s]. Huxley et al. (17)
further showed that
(P
-lactalbumin)plasma/(P
-lactalbumin)BSA = 0.31, whereas there was no change in hydraulic conductivity (Lp). They concluded that the actions of plasma
were to confer charge selectivity for anionic solutes and modify the
porous pathways of the microvessel wall to a lesser extent. With the
use of the same model as in Refs. 2 and 6,
they predicted an increase in charge from 11.2 meq/l in the presence of
albumin to 34 meq/l in the presence of plasma.
In another line of investigation into the mechanism of decreasing
P
-lactalbumin by plasma protein, Adamson and
Clough (1) tried to test the hypothesis that plasma
protein may modulate surface glycocalyx structural properties. With the
use of cationized ferritin staining, they found that the total
glycocalyx thickness in the presence of plasma was twice the value of
that with BSA-Ringer perfusion. Their interpretation for this was that
the increase in the thickness of surface glycocalyx layer is the result
of a change in the orientation of surface glycoproteins to which
cationized ferritin binds.
Previously, a simple Donnan-type model was proposed to describe the
charge effect on microvessel permeability (2, 6, 16, 17).
It was based on a Donnan equilibrium distribution of ions, which exists
as a result of retention of negative charges on the capillary membrane.
It was suggested (8, 9) that the steric and electrostatic
exclusions be described in terms of an effective partition coefficient
(
eff)
|
(1)
|
Here,
steric is the steric partition coefficient
describing the size selectivity of the membrane,
E is the
effective Donnan electrical potential difference across the membrane,
Z is the charge on the solute, R is the universal
gas constant, F is Faraday's constant, and T is
temperature. RT/F is 25.2 mV at 20°C. 
is the dimensionless electrical potential difference and is equal to
EF/RT. With the use of this model, the fixed
negative charge in the transport pathway in the frog mesentery
(Cm) was estimated to be ~11 meq/l (2,
6, 17). Although this model described the steric and
electrostatic partition to a charged solute at the interface between
the membrane and the solution, it neglected the thickness of the
membrane and thus neglected the steric and electrostatic interactions
between the solutes and the membrane components within the membrane.
A more sophisticated model for steric and diffusion resistance to
solute transport in the fiber matrix was proposed by Weinbaum et al.
(22). With the use of this theory for the entrance fiber layer, Fu et al. (10-13) developed a
three-dimensional model for the interendothelial cleft to describe
solute exchange across the microvessel. Whereas this model could
successfully explain the size-restricted transport of a solute through
the surface glycocalyx and the interendothelial cleft, it did not
consider the electrical charge factors of the glycocalyx layer and the solute. Therefore, it can only be applied to describe the transvascular transport of electroneutral molecules. Recently, an electrochemical model was proposed by Stace and Damiano (7, 20) for the
transport of charged molecules through the capillary glycocalyx.
However, this model did not consider transport through the cleft region.
In the current study, we attempted to develop a two-dimensional model
incorporating both size and charge effects so that it will provide, for
the first time, a quantitative analysis of various experimental results
expected to be associated with negative charges in transvascular
pathways. Compared with the model in Fu et al. (13), this
model features two new characteristics: 1) the surface glycocalyx contains a negative electric charge, and 2) there
is an interface between the surface glycocalyx layer and the cleft entrance (15). This model will help to better understand
both the physical and electrochemical mechanisms of selectivity in the endothelial surface glycocalyx layer and therefore provide a new
method for controlling transport rates of charged or uncharged molecules in drug delivery.
 |
MODEL DESCRIPTION |
Model Geometry
The schematic of the new model geometry for the interendothelial
cleft is shown in Fig. 1.
Lf < x < 0 is the
surface glycocalyx layer represented by a periodic square array of
cylindrical fibers, where Lf is the thickness of
the entrance fiber matrix layer and x is the abscissa with
the origin at the cleft entrance (Fig. 1). The radius of the
fiber is a, and the gap spacing between the fibers is
.
Ljun is the junction strand thickness.
L1 and L3 are the depths
between the junction strand and the luminal and abluminal fronts.
L is the total length of the cleft. There are two types of
pores in the junction strand, as proposed in Fu et al.
(11-13), based on Adamson and Michel's observations
(3). One is an infrequent large break of width
2d and height 2B. The distance between the
adjacent large breaks is 2D; another is a continuous narrow
slit of width 2bs. The effect of a narrow slit is neglected because the solute considered in this study, the diameter
of which is 4.02 nm, cannot penetrate the slit of width 2bs, ~2 nm. The electric charge is assumed to
only exist in the surface glycocalyx layer, and the charge density
Cm(x) is assumed to have four
distribution profiles, as shown in Fig.
2: 1)
Cm(x) = constant = Cm0
(
Lf < x < 0),
2) Cm(x) = Cm0tanh(1 + x/Lf)/tanh(1) (
Lf < x < 0),
3) Cm(x) = Cm0tanh(
x/Lf)/tanh(1)
(
Lf < x < 0), and
4) Cm(x) = Cm0tanh(2 + 2x/Lf)/tanh(1)
(
Lf < x <
Lf/2);
Cm0tanh(
2x/Lf)/tanh(1) (
Lf/2 < x < 0). These four profiles are chosen so that when the concentrations of
cations (C+) and anions (C
) are equal in the
solution, case 1 has an electrical partition at both interfaces between the glycocalyx layer and the lumen
(x =
Lf)/cleft (x = 0), case 2 has a partition only at
x = 0, whereas case 3 has a partition at
x =
Lf, and case 4 has an electrical partition at none of the interfaces. Similar
assumptions in Ref. 8 are used in the glycocalyx layer:
1) all charged solutes [ribonuclease,
-lactalbumin, and
univalent cations (Na+ and anions, mainly
Cl
)] obey a modified Nernst-Planck flux expression;
2) overall electroneutrality is satisfied everywhere; and
3) Donnan equilibria exist at the interfaces of the fiber
layer between the vessel lumen (x =
Lf) and between the cleft entrance
(x = 0).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A: plane view of junction-orifice-fiber
entrance layer model of interendothelial cleft. Junction strands with
periodic openings lie parallel to the luminal front.
Ljun, junction strand thickness;
L1 and L3, distances
between the junctional strand and luminal and abluminal fronts,
respectively; 2D, spacing between adjacent breaks in the
junctional strand. At the entrance of cleft on the luminal side, the
surface glycocalyx is represented by a periodic square array of
cylindrical fibers. a, Radius of these fibers; , gap
spacing between fibers; Lf, thickness of the
glycocalyx layer. The charge density in the glycocalyx layer is
Cm(x).
C'i(x) and
Ci(x) (x = Lf, 0) are the concentrations of charged
ions/molecules from the fiber side and from the lumen/cleft side,
respectively, at the interfaces between the fiber layer and the
lumen/cleft entrance. E'(x) and
E(x) (x = Lf, 0) are the corresponding electrical
potentials at the interfaces. B: three-dimensional sketch of
single periodic unit of width 2D showing a large orifice of
width 2d and height 2B and a narrow slit of
height 2bs in the junction strand (revised from
Ref. 11).
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Hypothesized charge density profiles
Cm(x) in the surface glycocalyx
layer. The thickness of the glycocalyx layer under the normal condition
is Lf = 100 nm (1,
10-13).
|
|
Mathematical Model
Entrance fiber matrix layer.
As shown in Fig. 1, the glycocalyx (fiber matrix) layer lies in front
of the cleft and covers the entire endothelial surface. The solution in
the vessel lumen consists of monovalent cations (C+) and
monovalent anions (C
) as well as a small amount of
protein (e.g., albumin). The volume flux and flux of solute
i are denoted by Jv and
Ji, respectively. The concentrations of
solute i and the electrical potential within the fiber
matrix layer are denoted as
C'i(x) and
E'(x). At the interface of the vessel lumen and
the fiber layer, Ci(
Lf)
and E(
Lf) represent the
concentration and electrical potential at x =
Lf from the lumen side and
C'i(
Lf) and
E'(Lf) from the fiber side. At the
interface of the fiber layer and the cleft entrance,
Ci(0) and
E(0) represent the concentration and electrical
potential at x = 0 from the cleft side and
C'i(0) and
E'(0) from the fiber side.
With the assumptions described in the model geometry and steady-state
conditions, the governing equation for solute transport in the fiber
layer can be written as
|
(2)
|
or
|
(2a)
|
where
' = FE'/RT and is the
dimensionless electrical potential, R is the universal gas
constant, F is Faraday's constant, T is temperature,
E' is the electrical potential, A is an arbitrary constant, and C'i is the solute
concentration within fiber matrix.
Di,f is the effective diffusion
coefficient of solute i in the fiber matrix layer, which
includes both steric hindrance and diffusive resistance of fibers.
Zi is the molecular charge number of
species i, and Ki,f is
the hindrance factor or retardation coefficient of solute i
in convection transport. Equation 2a is a modified form of
the Nernst-Planck equation, with contributions to solute flux resulting
from diffusion, ion migration, and convection.
We defined Pe and Pecharge as Pe = Ki,fJvLf/Di,f
and Pecharge = Zi × d
'/dx × Lf. The
dimensionless parameter Pe is often called the Peclet number, which is
a measure of relative importance of convection and diffusion to the
transport of a solute. Analogously, the dimensionless parameter
Pecharge is a measure of the relative importance of ion
migration and diffusion to transport of a charged solute. Under the
experimental conditions for frog mesenteric capillaries (2,
10, 16, 17), the hydraulic conductivity (Lp) = 2.0 × 10
7
cm · s
1 · cmH2O
1,
the effective filtration pressure across the microvessel wall (
p) < 5 cmH2O, the total length of the cleft per
unit surface area of the microvessel (Ljt) = 2,000 cm/cm2, the cleft width 2B = 20 nm,
and the entrance fiber layer thickness (Lf) = 100 nm; Pe = Ki,fJvLf/Di,f = (Ki,fLp
p/Ljt2B) × Lf/Di,f < 0.05 for a solute of radius 2.01 nm in the fiber layer
(Ki,f = 0.65 and
Di,f = 0.025 × 10
6 cm2/s; Refs. 10 and 22). If
we neglect Pe, Eq. 2a can be rewritten as
|
(3)
|
The boundary conditions are
|
(3a)
|
|
(3b)
|
At the interface of the fiber layer and the cleft entrance
|
(3c)
|
In Eq. 3c,
C
(x,
y) is the solute concentration in region 1 of the
cleft. It is assumed that the resistance to transport at the
glycocalyx-solution interfaces (x =
Lf and x = 0) is much smaller
than that offered by the glycocalyx itself. Therefore, as shown in Ref.
8, there is a Donnan equilibrium relationship between the
solute concentration in the fiber layer [C
(x)] and that at the lumen or the cleft side [Ci(x)]
|
(4)
|
where
'(x) and
(x) are the
dimensionless electrical potentials inside and outside the fiber layer,
respectively. At the vessel lumen,
(
Lf) = 0, which is the reference potential.
By combining Eqs. 3, a and b,
and 4, the solution of Eq. 3, which satisfies
corresponding boundary conditions, is
|
(5)
|
Here CiL is the solute
concentration in the lumen, which is a constant.
Ci(0, y) is the solute concentration
at the cleft entrance x = 0, which can be obtained by
jointly solving the governing equation in the cleft region.
y is the vertical coordinate with the origin at the center line of a periodic unit of the cleft (Fig. 1). At the interface of the
fiber layer and the cleft entrance (x = 0), Eq. 3c becomes
|
(6)
|
For neutral solutes (Zi = 0), Eq. 6 reduces to the expression used in previous models for uncharged
molecules (11-13).
Cleft region.
Because there is no charge in cleft regions 1 and
3, and, in our case, Pe in the cleft [Pe = Ki,cJvL/Di,c = (Ki,cLp
p/Ljt2B) × L/Di,c] is in the
order of 10
2 [the retardation coefficient
(Ki,c) = 0.99, the diffusion
coefficient of the solute in the cleft
(Di,c) = 0.68 × 10
6 cm2/s, and the cleft depth
(L) = 400 nm; Refs. 10, 13,
and 22] for the solute of radius 2.01 nm, the governing
equation for solute transport in the cleft region can be approximated
by a steady two-dimensional diffusion equation averaged over the cleft
height (11-13)
|
(7)
|
C
, where
j = 1, 3, is the concentration in regions 1 and 3 of the cleft. Boundary conditions for Eq. 7
are
|
(7a)
|
|
(7b)
|
|
(7c)
|
|
(7d)
|
Equation 6 is the interface boundary condition, which
represents the conservation of mass from the fiber region to the cleft region. Boundary condition Eq. 7a shows the continuity
across the junction break, and Eq. 7b indicates the
impermeability of the rest part of the junction strand. Equation 7c indicates that concentration is a constant,
CiA, at the tissue side of the
cleft. Equation 7d is the symmetric boundary condition. To
obtain the solution of Eq. 7 with boundary conditions
Eq. 7, a-d, and interface condition
Eq. 6, we first found
(0) and

eZi
'(x)dx
in Eq. 6 by solving modified Nernst-Planck equations for
monovalent ion concentrations in the fiber layer. This process is shown
in the APPENDIX. A numerical method similar to that in Hu
and Weinbaum (15) was applied to solve for
C
(x, y)
in cleft regions 1 and 3. Finally, averaged
i(0) = 
Ci(0, y)/2D dy
was substituted into Eq. 5 for Ci(0,
y) to obtain C
(x) in
the fiber region. For the case presented in Hu and Weinbaum
(15), due to the high filtration pressure (43 cmH2O), the high plasma oncotic pressure (26 cmH2O), and larger molecule albumin (radius = 3.55 nm), Pe is highly nonuniform along the y direction behind
the surface fiber layer (x = 0). It can be as high as
the order of 1 over the break region ( y < d). Therefore, the contribution from filtration cannot be neglected in their case. However, in our case, the filtration pressure is <10 cmH2O, the plasma oncotic pressure is ~5
cmH2O (2, 10, 16, 17), and the largest Pe in
the junction break is only ~0.3 for a solute of radius 2.01 nm
(11). Neglecting the convection in our case is reasonable.
In another work, we will present the convection effect as well as the
charge effect when high filtration pressure occurs.
The diffusive permeability (P) of the microvessel to
a solute is defined as
|
(8)
|
Here, CiL and
CiA are concentrations in the lumen
and in the tissue space, Ljt is the total length
of the cleft per unit surface area of the microvessel, and
2D is the distance between the adjacent junction breaks.
Ljt/2D is the total number of the
breaks per unit surface area of the microvessel.
Q
is the solute mass flow rate through
one junction break period, which is
|
(9)
|
Parameter Values
Cleft and fiber layer geometry.
Figure 1 shows the three-dimensional model for the interendothelial
cleft and the charged surface fiber layer. Model parameters are
determined according to experimental data for frog mesenteric capillaries (1, 3), which are the same as those in Fu et al. (13). The total cleft length L = 400 nm. The junction strand is in the middle of the cleft and its
thickness, Ljun, which is in the order of 10 nm,
can be neglected compared with L. Therefore, L1 = L3 = L/2 = 200 nm. The cleft height 2B = 20 nm. The large junction break width 2d = 150 nm, and the
average spacing between the adjacent breaks is 2D = 2,640 nm. Because all of the charged solutes in the current study have
a diameter of 4.02 nm, which is larger than the width of the small slit
2bs ~ 2 nm, the small slit is impermeable
to these solutes. The total cleft length per unit area
(Ljt) = 2,000 cm/cm2. In the
entrance fiber matrix layer, both periodic and random fiber arrays were
examined. We used fiber radius a = 0.6 nm and gap
spacing
= 7 nm if periodic fiber arrays exist or volume fraction of fiber matrix Sf = 0.11 if random fiber
arrays exist. The values of
or Sf lead to a diffusion
coefficient of a solute with radius rs = 2.01 nm in the fiber matrix of
Di,f = 0.025 × 10
6 cm2/s (13, 22).
Properties of ions and charged solutes.
Two solutions were considered for ion concentration in the vessel
lumen. The first was Ringer solution, whose composition was (in mM) 111 NaCl, 2.4 KCl, 1.0 MgSO4, 1.1 CaCl2, 0.195 NaHCO3, 5.5 glucose, and 5.0 HEPES (pH = 7.4). Ringer
solution with 10 mg/ml BSA (molecular weight = 69,000) was the
perfusate in the experiment (2, 5, 10, 16). At pH 7.4, the
molecular charge of the albumin is about
19 (8). The
charge density of albumin is 0.144 mM × 19 = 2.7 meq/l,
which is negligible compared with the ion charge density (in the order
of 100 meq/l). Thus, in Ringer solution, the cation concentration is
taken as the same as that of anions: C+ = C
= 118 M.
Another solution was blood plasma. The concentration of plasma proteins
in the vessel lumen was 1 mM, and the valency was assumed to be
17
(4). A simplified plasma has cations (155 mM
Na+) and anions (138 mM Cl
) to satisfy
electrical neutrality. Therefore, C+ = 155 mM and
C
= 138 mM in plasma.
On the tissue side of the fiber layer at the cleft entrance, we assumed
a negligible concentration of proteins because the fiber layer behaves
as the molecular filter to proteins (22). To satisfy the
electrical neutrality, C+ should be identical to
C
on the tissue side of the fiber layer, whose values are
dependent on C+ and C
in the lumen as well as the charge density of the surface glycocalyx at the interface of the
cleft entrance. These values are calculated using Eq. A3 in
the APPENDIX at x = 0.
Because most of the cations are Na+ and most of the anions
are Cl
, we used the diffusion coefficients of
Na+ and Cl
as those for cations and anions,
respectively: D+ = 1.506 × 10
5 cm2/s and D
= 1.999 × 10
5 cm2/s. These values of
D+ and D
were
calculated for T = 20°C using the values for T = 37°C
given in Ref. 8. T of 20°C is the temperature in the
experiments for measuring the permeability of frog mesenteric microvessels.
Dfree = 1.07 × 10
6
cm2/s and is the free diffusion coefficient of a solute
with radius rs = 2.01 nm (both ribonuclease
and
-lactalbumin) at T = 20°C. The corresponding diffusion
coefficients in the cleft and in the fiber matrix layer are
Di,c = 0.68 ×10
6
cm2/s and Di,f = 0.025 × 10
6 cm2/s, respectively
(10, 22).
 |
RESULTS |
Electrical Potential Profiles
Figure 3 shows the electrical
potential profiles across the surface glycocalyx layer. When the
perfusate in the vessel lumen is Ringer solution, in which the cation
and anion concentrations C+ = C
= 118 mM, the results are shown in Fig. 3A. Figure
3B shows the results for the plasma as the perfusate in which C+ = 155 mM and C
= 138 mM.
The electrical potential is determined by the distribution of cations
C+ and anions C
and the charge density
Cm of the surface glycocalyx. In Fig.
3A, in both the lumen and cleft regions, C+ = C
= 118 mM. At the interface of the fiber layer
and the lumen (x =
Lf), for
case 1, when Cm = Cm0 = 25 meq/l, there is a step decrease in electrical potential from its initial value of
E(
Lf) = 0 to
E'(
Lf) =
2.7 mV. Because
Cm is constant across the fiber layer and
Jv = 0, there is no change in E'
within the fiber layer. At the interface of the fiber layer and the
cleft entrance, there is a step increase in electrical potential from
E'(0) =
2.7 mV to
E(0) = 0. For case 2 of
Cm(x) = Cm0 tanh (1 + x/Lf)/ tanh (1), where
Cm(
Lf) = 0, there
is no jump in E at x =
Lf, whereas E'(x) decreased from x =
Lf to 0 due
to changes in Cm(x). At the interface between the fiber layer and cleft entrance, there is a step increase in
electrical potential from E'(0) =
2.7 mV
to E(0) = 0. For case 3 of
Cm(x) = Cm0 tanh
(
x/Lf) tanh (1), the
change in the electrical potential is complementary to that of
case 2. In case 3, there is a step decrease at
x =
Lf, whereas
E'(x) increases from x =
Lf to 0. At the interface between the fiber
layer and cleft entrance, x = 0, there is no change in
E. In case 4, when Cm(x) = Cm0 tanh (2 + 2x/Lf)/ tanh (1)
(
Lf < x <
Lf/2),
Cm(x) = Cm0 tanh
(
2x/Lf)/ tanh (1)
(
Lf/2 < x < 0); there are no changes in E at both interfaces between the
fiber layer and lumen/cleft entrance due to
Cm(
Lf) = Cm(0) = 0 and
C+ = C
in the lumen and in the cleft.
E'(x) decreases first from x =
Lf to
Lf/2
and then increases from x =
Lf/2 to 0. At the interface of the fiber layer
and the cleft, it returns to its initial value E(0) = E(
Lf) = 0. The difference
between the maximum and the minimum in E, 2.7 mV, is the
same for all the cases.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Profiles of electrical potential
E(x) in the surface glycocalyx layer for the
corresponding charge density Cm(x) in
Fig. 2. Electrical potential at x = Lf from the lumen side
E( Lf) = 0 is the reference
point. Case 1 is when
Cm(x)/Cm0 = 1, case 2 is when
Cm(x)/Cm0 = tanh (1 + x/Lf)/ tanh
(1), case 3 is when
Cm(x)/Cm0 = tanh ( x/Lf)/tanh
(1), and case 4 is when
Cm(x)/Cm0 = tanh (2 + 2x/Lf)/ tanh
(1), Lf < x < Lf/2;
Cm(x)/Cm0 = tanh ( 2x/Lf)/
tanh(1), Lf/2 < x < 0. Cm0 = 25 meq/l for all cases. A: ion concentrations in the lumen
C+ = 118 mM and C = 118 mM;
B: C+ = 155 mM and C = 138 mM.
|
|
In Fig. 3B, the perfusate in the lumen is plasma, in which
C+ = 155 mM and C
= 138 mM. These
unequal ion concentrations induce a large difference in electrical
potential profiles, although the charge density distributions are the
same as those shown in Fig. 3A. For case 1 of
constant Cm = 25 meq/l, E
decreases suddenly from 0 to
0.7 mV at x =
Lf, does not change across the entire fiber
layer, and suddenly increases from
0.7 to 1.5 mV at x = 0. For case 2, in which
Cm(
Lf) = 0, there
is a sudden increase in E at x =
Lf from 0 to 1.5 mV; E then
decreases gradually across the fiber layer to
0.7 mV at the fiber
layer exit x = 0
and finally jumps to 1.5 mV at the entrance of the cleft x = 0+. For
case 3, in which
Cm(
Lf) = Cm0= 25 meq/l, there is a sudden decrease in E at x =
Lf from 0 to
0.7 mV; E then
gradually increases across the fiber layer to 1.5 mV at
x = 0. For case 4, in which Cm(
Lf) = 0, there
is a sudden increase in E from 0 to 1.5 mV at
x =
Lf; E then
gradually decreases to
0.7 mV at x =
Lf/2 and increases to 1.5 mV at
x = 0. The difference between the maximum and minimum
in E is the same again for all the cases due to the same
Cm0. However, the difference is 2.2 mV, when C+ = 155 mM and C
= 138 mM, instead of 2.7 mV, when C+ = 118 mM and
C
= 118 mM.
As shown earlier, charges can affect molecular transport in two
ways: 1) through the ion migration term in solute flux
expression (the second term in Eq. 2), and 2)
through electrostatic partitioning of charged solutes at interfaces
(Eq. 4). For case 1 of constant Cm, dE'/dx = 0 (or
d
'/dx = 0), the charge effect on the solute transport comes only from the electrostatic partition at two interfaces of the fiber layer (x =
Lf and
x = 0). This partition is the same at both interfaces
when C+ = C
= 118 mM, whereas the
partition is larger at x = 0 when C+ = 155 mM and C
= 138 mM in the lumen. For all cases of
Cm = Cm(x), dE'/dx
0 (or d
'/dx
0), the charge contributes to the
solute migration term in Eq. 2. Under the condition of
C+ = C
= 118 mM, there is no
partition at both interfaces for case 4, whereas there is a
partition at x =
Lf for
case 3 and a partition for case 2 at
x = 0. Under the conditions of C+ = 155 mM and C
= 138 mM, there is a partition at
x =
Lf for cases
3 and 4 and partitions at two interfaces for case
2.
Concentration Distributions of Solutes
The dimensionless concentration distributions of positively
charged ribonuclease (+3), negatively charged
-lactalbumin (
11), and a neutral solute (0) of same size are shown in Fig.
4. Figure 4A shows the cases
when C+ = C
= 118 mM, and Fig. 4B shows the cases when C+ = 155 mM and
C
= 138 mM. For a neutral solute that is not
affected by charge, its dimensionless concentration (dotted line)
decreased gradually from 1 in the lumen to 0.65 at the exit of the
fiber layer. This decrease is due to the size effect, e.g., the steric
hindrance and diffusion resistance of the fibers to the solute, and is
the same under various charge densities (Cm) for
the same size solute. Figure 4, top, shows the concentration
distributions when Cm = constant = 25 meq/l, in which case there is no charge effect within the fiber layer
(dE'/dx = 0). Under condition a,
the concentration of positively charged ribonuclease (solid line)
abruptly increased by electrical partition at x =
Lf, gradually decreased in the fiber layer due
to the size effect, and abruptly decreased further at x = 0 due to electrical partition. For negatively charged
-lactalbumin (dashed line), the electrical partitions at interfaces provide an
opposite effect from that for ribonuclease. Under condition b, due to unequal electrical potential differences at
x =
Lf and x = 0 (see Fig. 3B), the electrical partitions are different from those in condition a. For example, the concentration of
ribonuclease first increased from 1 to 1.08 at x =
Lf, gradually decreased to 0.76 across the
fiber layer, and had a step decrease from 0.76 to 0.59 at
x = 0. This value of 0.59 is even lower than the
concentration for the neutral solute at the same location, which was
0.65. In contrast, the concentration of negatively charged
-lactalbumin at x = 0 jumped from 0.32 to 0.83, which is higher than 0.65. This electrical partition
[
(0)
'(0) > 0; see Fig.
3B] favors the transport of negatively charged
-lactalbumin (Eq. 4). This induces an interesting effect
on total permeability of a microvessel to solutes with different
charges, which will be shown in Fig. 5B.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Dimensionless concentration distributions
C(x)/CLumen in the surface glycocalyx layer for
a positively charged molecule, ribonuclease (+3), a neutral solute
(0), and a negatively charged molecule, -lactalbumin
( 11) for the four charge density distributions
Cm(x) shown in Fig. 2.
Cm0 = 25 meq/l for all cases.
A: C+ = 118 mM and C = 118 mM; B: C+ = 155 mM and
C = 138 mM.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Ratio of microvessel permeability for charged molecules
(ribonuclease and -lactalbumin) to that for a neutral solute with
the same size (P/Pneutral) as a
function of charge density Cm0 in
the fiber matrix layer. Solid lines with circles and dashed lines with
triangles are P/Pneutral for constant
Cm. Dotted lines with squares and dashed-dotted
lines with diamonds are P/Pneutral
for varied Cm in the fiber layer, which are the
same for all three distributions of
Cm(x) shown in Fig. 2. A:
C+ = 118 mM and C = 118 mM;
B: C+ = 155 mM and C = 138 mM.
|
|
Figure 4, top middle, bottom middle, and
bottom, show the cases when Cm = Cm(x), corresponding to those in Fig.
2. In these cases, dE'/dx no longer equals to
zero, and there is a contribution from dE'/dx to
the transport of the charged solutes within the fiber layer in addition
to electrical partitions at the entrance and exit of the fiber layer.
In cases 2 and 4, where
Cm(
Lf) = 0, under
condition a, when C+ = C
= 118 mM, there was no electrical partition at x =
Lf; the concentration is the same as that in
the lumen for all solutes with and without charges. However, under
condition b, when C+ = 155 mM and
C
= 138 mM, the electrical partition at
x =
Lf favors the transport of
negatively charged
-lactalbumin instead of positively charged ribonuclease due to the positive jump in the electrical potential at
x =
Lf (Fig. 3B).
In cases 3 and 4, where
Cm(0) = 0, there was no
electrical partition at x = 0. Although concentration
profiles in the fiber layer are varied for various
Cm(x), the concentration at
x = 0, the exit of the fiber layer, or the entrance of
the cleft, is the same for all cases. Under condition a, the
exit concentration for ribonuclease is 0.69; for
-lactalbumin, it is
0.49. Under condition b, the exit concentration is 0.57 for ribonuclease but 0.96 for
-lactalbumin. The higher the exit
concentration, the lower the resistance of the fiber layer to a solute.
Because the resistance of the cleft region is the same for
ribonuclease,
-lactalbumin, and a neutral solute with the same size,
the total resistance or permeability of the microvessel wall to a
solute is the same for all Cm(x)
shown in Fig. 2.
Charge Effect of Surface Glycocalyx Layer on Permeability
Figure 5 shows the ratio of charged solute permeability
to neutral solute permeability of the same size as a function of the maximum value Cm0 in charge density
Cm shown in Fig. 2. Solid lines with circles are
the results for ribonuclease and the dashed lines with triangles are
the results for
-lactalbumin when Cm = constant = Cm0 (case
1 in Fig. 2). The dotted lines with squares are the results for
ribonuclease and the dashed-dotted lines with diamonds are the results
for
-lactalbumin when Cm is
Cm(x) (cases 2-4 in
Fig. 2). Figure 5A shows the condition of
C+ = C
= 118 mM, and Fig.
5B shows the conditions of C+ = 155 mM and
C
= 138 mM. As discussed above, the permeability of the microvessel wall to a charged solute is identical for the different
charge-density distributions Cm(x)
shown in Fig. 2. However, the permeability of the microvessel with
varied Cm = Cm(x) is different from that with
constant Cm, although the maximum value
Cm0 is the same. In general, the
permeability under the constant Cm case is
larger than that under varied Cm for positively charged ribonuclease but smaller for negatively charged
-lactalbumin. The reason for this is that the total charge of the
surface glycocalyx for constant Cm is larger
than that for varied Cm. The effect of varied
maximum value Cm0 but fixed total
charge is shown in Fig. 6.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Ratio of permeability of positively charged ribonuclease
to that of negatively charged -lactalbumin
(Pribonuclease/P -lactalbumin)
as a function of charge density Cm0
in the fiber layer. Solid lines with circles and dashed-dotted lines
with diamonds are
Pribonuclease/ P -lactalbumin
for constant Cm. The total charge is the same
for these lines, with Cm0 halved and
Lf doubled for dashed-dotted lines. Dotted lines
with triangles are
Pribonuclease/P -lactalbumin
for varied Cm, which are the same for all three
distributions of Cm(x) shown in Fig.
2. Dashed lines with squares are
Pribonuclease/P -lactalbumin
from a previous Donnan-type model. A: C+ = 118 mM and C = 118 mM; B:
C+ = 155 mM and C = 138 mM.
|
|
Comparison of Previous and Current Models
Figure 6 shows predictions of current and previous models for the
ratio of ribonuclease permeability
Pribonuclease to
-lactalbumin
permeability P
-lactalbumin. Figure
6A shows C+ = C
= 118 mM, and Fig. 6B shows C+ = 155 mM and
C
= 138 mM. The dashed lines with squares in Fig. 6,
A and B, are the results from the previous Donnan-type model (Eq. 1), which was used in Refs.
2, 6, 16, and 17. This
model neglected the thickness of the fiber layer and therefore
neglected the steric and electrostatic interactions between solutes and
the glycocalyx within the layer. The solid lines with circles,
dashed-dotted lines with diamonds, and dotted lines with triangles are
the current model results, when Cm = constant and Cm = Cm(x), correspondingly. The
difference between the solid lines and dashed-dotted lines is that
Cm0 in the dashed-dotted lines is
one-half of that in the solid lines, but fiber layer thickness
Lf is doubled to keep the same total charge. We
can see from Fig. 6 that with the same total charge and charge
distribution, the lower the maximum value
Cm0 and the larger the charge
effect. Figure 6 also shows that the previous model may overestimate
the charge effect of the surface glycocalyx layer by ignoring the layer thickness.
Combined Effect of Charge and Thickness of the Glycocalyx Layer
The ratio of varied
-lactalbumin permeability P to
its permeability under the condition of the zero-charge glycocalyx
layer with thickness Lf = 100 nm is shown
in Fig. 7, as a function of charge
density Cm0 and fiber layer
thickness Lf. Figure 7A shows C+ = C
= 118 mM, and Fig.
7B shows C+ = 155 mM and
C
= 138 mM. Obviously,
-lactalbumin permeability
P decreases with increasing fiber layer thickness
Lf. When Lf is increased
from 100 to 400 nm, the reduction in
P
-lactalbumin is always ~50-70% no
matter how much Cm0 is in both
conditions a and b. With increasing
Cm0, the relative decreasing effect
of Lf becomes larger.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Dimensionless permeability of -lactalbumin
(P/PLf = 100 nm, Cm0 = 0) as a function of fiber layer
thickness Lf and fiber charge density
Cm(x).
Cm(x) can be any one of three
distributions for varied Cm in Fig. 2.
A: C+ = 118 mM and C = 118 mM; B: C+ = 155 mM and
C = 138 mM.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The combined junction-orifice-fiber matrix model in Ref.
13 demonstrated previously that the endothelial surface
glycocalyx and the junction strands in the interendothelial cleft
provided significant size restriction to the diffusion of
intermediate-sized solutes across the walls of continuous microvessels
of the frog mesentery. The results of our current model demonstrate
that both solute charge and charge carried by the surface glycocalyx
also determine the selectivity of the microvessel wall. The model
predictions conform to the hypothesis that under previous experimental
conditions, the fixed negative charge within transcapillary pathways
for intermediate-sized proteins restricts the transport of negatively
charged solutes more, relative to positively charged solutes of the
same size. However, this effect is counteracted to some extent if the
solution on the luminal side contains negatively charged proteins that cannot enter the layer.
From Fig. 6A, to account for the twofold difference in
Pribonuclease and
P
-lactalbumin observed in Ref. 2
under Ringer-BSA perfusion, Cm0
would be ~25 meq/l for the case of charge density
Cm = constant (case 1 in Fig. 2)
and Cm0 would be ~35 meq/l for
cases of varied Cm = Cm(x) (cases 2-4 in
Fig. 2). These values are significantly larger than 11 meq/l, the
prediction from the previous electric partition-only model
(2). Under the condition of orosomucoid perfusion, the increased ratio of Pribonuclease to
P
-lactalbumin from two to six and the
decrease in P
-lactalbumin to 0.47 of
P
-lactalbumin under Ringer-BSA perfusion
(6) could be explained if
Cm0 increased from ~25 to ~55
meq/l for case 1 and from ~35 to ~75 meq/l for cases 2-4, a roughly twofold increase. The prediction
of the previous model was from 11 to 28 meq/l (6). The
change in P
-lactalbumin by plasma, to 0.31 of
P
-lactalbumin under Ringer-BSA perfusion,
observed in Huxley et al. (17) could be accounted for if
Cm0 increased from ~25 to ~60
meq/l for case 1 and from ~35 to ~80 meq/l for
cases 2-4. The previous model predicted that
Cm0 was increased from 11 to 34 meq/l. Because of the thickness of the glycocalyx layer was ignored,
the simple Donnan-type model used previously may overestimate the
charge effect of the fiber matrix.
Figure 4 shows the dimensionless concentration distribution in the
glycocalyx layer for ribonuclease with a net charge +3,
-lactalbumin
with a net charge
11, and a neutral solute with the same size. When
C+ = C
= 118 mM, for cases
1 and 3, there is a charge partition at the entrance of
the glycocalyx layer (x =
Lf),
which favors the passage of positively charged ribonuclease; there is
no charge partition for cases 2 and 4. When
C+ = 155 mM and C
= 138 mM, the
charge partition at the entrance of the glycocalyx layer still favors
the transport of ribonuclease in cases 1 and 3;
however, in cases 2 and 4, the partition favors
the negatively charged
-lactalbumin. The reason for this is that the
electrical potential E across the interface (x =
Lf or x = 0), which determines the charge partition, not only depends on charge
density Cm(x) of the glycocalyx layer
but also on the concentrations of cations C+ and anions
C
in the lumen and cleft (Fig. 3). This dependence of
E on Cm(x), as well as
C+ and C
, induces the dependence of the solute permeability P on the solute charge and the charge density Cm(x) of the glycocalyx, as well as
C+ and C
, which brings us the interesting
phenomenon shown in Fig. 5B.
Despite the various concentration distributions (Fig. 4) due to
different profiles of charge density
Cm(x) within the glycocalyx layer,
the concentrations of charged solutes are the same at the entrance of
the cleft behind the glycocalyx layer for cases 2-4, provided that these density profiles have the same maximum value Cm0 and the same total charge (Fig.
2). For this sake, the overall solute permeability across the
microvessel wall including the surface glycocalyx layer and the cleft
region is identical regardless of
Cm(x) profiles. If we keep the same
maximum value Cm0, the larger the
total charge of fibers, the larger the charge effect. In contrast, for
the same total charge, the larger the
Cm0, the smaller the charge effect.
These results are shown in Fig. 6.
Figure 5 shows the ratio of Pribonuclease to
Pneutral solute and the ratio of
P
-lactalbumin to
Pneutral solute as a function of
Cm0, the maximum value
of charge density in the glycocalyx layer. When proteins exist in the
plasma, there are unequal concentrations of cations (Na+)
and anions (Cl
) in the lumen, C+ = 155 mM and C
= 138 mM (4). Figure
5B shows that when
Cm0 < 35 meq/l for constant
Cm, and Cm0 < 55 meq/l for varied
Cm(x), the permeability P
of negatively charged
-lactalbumin is higher than that of positively
charged ribonuclease, although the surface glycocalyx carries negative charges. As discussed above, this phenomenon is due to the dependence of P not only on solute charge and charge density of the
fiber matrix Cm(x), but also on
C+ and C
. In particular, if
Cm0 is small, the negative charge in
the layer is not enough to overcome the favored electrical partition to
negatively charged
-lactalbumin due to the presence of negatively
charged proteins in the lumen. This prediction may be used in
controlled drug delivery by locally modulating
Cm(x), C+, and
C
for a certain drug with fixed charge.
In plasma perfusion compared with albumin perfusion, the thickness of
the glycocalyx is greatly increased (1). We tested the
combined effect of charge and thickness of the glycocalyx on
P
-lactalbumin in Fig. 7. When charge density
Cm0 is in the range of 25-35
meq/l, as predicted by our model during albumin perfusion, the twofold increase in fiber thickness Lf from 100 nm
(albumin perfusion) to 200 nm (plasma perfusion) (1) would
only decrease P
-lactalbumin by ~33%, not
enough to account for the ~70% decrease observed in Ref.
15. However, if we additionally increase
Cm0 by twofold, the combined effect
of increasing both charge density
Cm0 and the thickness
Lf would account for the 70% decrease in
P
-lactalbumin.
In summary, we developed a two-dimensional model incorporating the
charge effects of the endothelial surface glycocalyx so that it can
provide a more detailed quantitative analysis of various experimental
results expected to be associated with negative charge in transvascular
pathways. This will also help understand the physical mechanisms of
glycocalyx selectivity and provide a new method for controlling
transport rates of charged solutes in drug delivery. In the current
study, we only analyzed the case when the hydraulic conductivity
Lp of the microvessel and the pressure difference across the vessel wall
p are normal; the convection effect due to enhanced Lp and
p will be
discussed in our next study.
 |
APPENDIX |
This appendix shows the equations used to calculate the
electrical potential profiles in the surface glycocalyx layer
[
'(x)] and to find
'(0) and

eZi
'(x)dx
in Eq. 5. It was assumed that overall electroneutrality is
satisfied in the glycocalyx layer
|
(A1)
|
Here, C'i is concentration of
positive (i = +) and negative (i =
)
monovalent ions and charged macromolecules [i = test
solute (TS)] in the glycocalyx layer and Zi is
the corresponding electrical valence. Equation A1 indicates that the negative charge Cm(x)
carried by the fiber matrix must be balanced by an excess of mobile
positive ions. Usually, the concentration of charged macromolecules is
negligible compared with the concentrations of ions (see
Parameter Values), and Eq. A1 reduces to the
balance between monovalent cations (Z+ = +1) and the summation of monovalent anions
(Z
=
1) and negative charges of the
fiber matrix
|
(A2)
|
At the interface between the fiber layer and lumen
(x =
Lf in Fig. 1) and at that
between the fiber layer and cleft entrance (x = 0), the
Donnan equilibrium is satisfied. This gives Eq. 4 in the
main text, which is
Combining Eqs. 4 and A2 gives
|
(A3)
|
The condition for no electrical current flows across the
glycocalyx layer is
|
(A4)
|
Neglecting the current due to the macromolecules, Eq. A4 reduces to
|
(A5)
|
Under normal conditions in frog mesenteric capillaries,
Lp = 2.0 × 10
7
cm · s
1 · cmH2O
1,
p ~ 5 cmH2O, Ljt = 2,000 cm/cm2, 2B = 20 nm, and
Lf = 100 nm, so that Pe
=JvLf/Di,f = (Lp
p/Ljt2B) × Lf/Di,f
10
3 for both monovalent cations and anions.
Di,f
D+ for cations and
Di,f
D
for anions. The modified Nernst-Planck
equations written for positive and negative ions are
|
(A6)
|
|
(A7)
|
Here, f is the void volume of the fiber matrix; f = 0.98 in
our case (13, 22). The conditions of electroneutrality
(Eq. A2) and zero current flow (Eq. A5) can be
used to eliminate C'
and
J
from Eqs. A6 and A7 so
that
|
(A8)
|
|
(A9)
|
Equation A8 is solved for
C
(x) by numerical integration, with
initial values of C
at x =
Lf obtained from Eq. A3.
Substituting obtained C
(x) into Eq. A9 and
'(x) is solved by numerical integration with
'(
Lf) from Eqs. 4 and A3. An iterative procedure was used, with values of
J+ adjusted until the following relation was
satisfied by
where
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grant
R15-CA-86847-01 and University of Nevada (Las Vegas, NV) New
Investigator Awards and Applied Research Initiative grants.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence:
B. M. Fu, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Cancer
Institute, Univ. of Nevada, 4505 Maryland Pkwy., Box 454027, Las Vegas,
NV 89154 (E-mail: bmfu{at}nscee.edu).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published December 12, 2002;10.1152/ajpheart.00467.2002
Received 4 June 2002; accepted in final form 11 December 2002.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Adamson, RH,
and
Clough G.
Plasma proteins modify the endothelial cell glycocalyx of frog mesenteric microvessels.
J Physiol
445:
473-486,
1992[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.
Adamson, RH,
Huxley VH,
and
Curry FE.
Single capillary permeability to proteins having similar size but different charge.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
254:
H304-H312,
1988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3.
Adamson, RH,
and
Michel CC.
Pathways through the inter-cellular clefts of frog mesenteric capillaries.
J Physiol
466:
303-327,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4.
Curry, FE.
Mechanics and thermodynamics of transcapillary exchange.
In: Handbook of Physiology. The Cardiovascular System. Microcirculation. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc, 1984, sect. 2, vol. IV, pt. 1, chapt. 8, p. 309-374.
5.
Curry, FE.
Regulation of water and solute exchange in microvessel endothelium: studies in single perfused capillaries.
Microcirculation
1:
11-26,
1994[Medline].
6.
Curry, FE,
Rutledge JC,
and
Lenz JF.
Modulation of microvessel wall charge by plasma glycoprotein orosomucoid.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
257:
H1354-H1359,
1989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.
Damiano, ER,
and
Stace TM.
A mechano-electrochemical model of radial deformation of the capillary glycocalyx.
Biophys J
82:
1153-1175,
2002[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Deen, WM,
Behrooz S,
and
Jamieson JM.
Theoretical model for glomerular filtration of charged solutes.
Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol
238:
F126-F139,
1980[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9.
Friedman, MH.
Principles and Models of Biological Transport. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1986, chapt. 1, p. 1-19.
10.
Fu, BM,
Adamson RH,
and
Curry FE.
Test of a two pathway model for small solute exchange across the capillary wall.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
274:
H2062-H2073,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11.
Fu, BM,
Curry FE,
Adamson RH,
and
Weinbaum S.
A model for interpreting the tracer labeling of interendothelial clefts.
Ann Biomed Eng
25:
375-397,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
12.
Fu, BM,
Curry FE,
and
Weinbaum S.
A diffusion wake model for tracer ultrastructure-permeability studies in microvessels.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
269:
H2124-H2140,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13.
Fu, BM,
Weinbaum S,
Tsay RY,
and
Curry FE.
A junction-orifice-fiber entrance layer model for capillary permeability: application to frog mesenteric capillaries.
J Biomech Eng
116:
502-513,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
14.
Gingell, D.
Mammalian Cell Membranes, edited by Jamieson GA,
and Robinson DM.. Boston, MA: Butterworths, 1976, vol. 1, p. 198-223.
15.
Hu, X,
and
Weinbaum S.
A new view of Starling's hypothesis at the microstructural level.
Microvasc Res
58:
281-304,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
16.
Huxley, VH,
and
Curry FE.
Differential actions of albumin and plasma on capillary solute permeability.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
260:
H1645-H1654,
1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Huxley, VH,
Curry FE,
Powers MR,
and
Thipakorn B.
Differential action of plasma and albumin on transcapillary exchange of anionic solute.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
264:
H1428-H1437,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.
Schneeberger, EE,
and
Hamelin M.
Interaction of circulating proteins with pulmonary endothelial glycocalyx and its effect on endothelial permeability.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
247:
H206-H217,
1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19.
Simionescu, M,
Simionescu N,
Silbert JE,
and
Palade GE.
Differentiated microdomains on the luminal surface of the capillary endothelium: partial characterization of their anionic sites.
J Cell Biol
90:
614-621,
1981[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20.
Stace, TM,
and
Damiano ER.
An electrochemical model of the transport of charged molecules through the capillary glycocalyx.
Biophys J
80:
1670-1690,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Vink, H,
and
Duling BR.
Identification of distinct luminal domains for macromolecules, erythrocytes, and leukocytes within mammalian capillaries.
Circ Res
79:
581-589,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22.
Weinbaum, S,
Tsay R,
and
Curry FE.
A three-dimensional junction-pore-matrix model for capillary permeability.
Microvasc Res
44:
85-111,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284(4):H1240-H1250
0363-6135/03 $5.00
Copyright © 2003 the American Physiological Society