Vol. 284, Issue 5, H1858-H1864, May 2003
Fractal and periodic heart rate dynamics in fetal sheep:
comparison of conventional and new measures based on
fractal analysis
Takahiro
Koshino,
Yoshitaka
Kimura,
Yoshinobu
Kameyama,
Takeshi
Takahashi,
Tomoharu
Yasui,
Hiroshi
Chisaka,
Junichi
Sugawara, and
Kunihiro
Okamura
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku
University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan
 |
ABSTRACT |
The
physiological significance of spectral and fractal components of
spontaneous heart rate (HR) variability in the fetus remains unclear.
To examine the relationship between circadian rhythms in different
measures of HR variability, R-R interval time series obtained by fetal
ECGs were recorded continuously over 24 h in five pregnant sheep
at 116-125 days gestation. Conventional measures of short-term
(STV) and long-term variability (LTV), low-frequency (LF;
0.025-0.15 cycles/beat) and high-frequency (HF; 0.2-0.5
cycles/beat) spectral powers, the LF-to-HF ratio, and fractal dimension
values were calculated from 24-h ECG recordings and quantified every 60 min. STV, LTV, and LF and HF spectral powers were minimal during the
day but increased significantly to their highest values at night. We
found a significant positive correlation between these measures,
whereas the cosinor method showed significant similarity between their
circadian rhythm patterns. Fetal R-R intervals also exhibited fractal
structures. Fetal HR variability had a fractal structure, which was
similar between day and night. These results suggested that the
circadian rhythms exhibited by STV and LTV during the day were mainly
due to changes in frequency components rather than to fractal
components of fetal HR fluctuation.
circadian rhythm; fetal heart rate variability
 |
INTRODUCTION |
FETAL HEART RATE (HR)
variability is an important noninvasive index of cardiovascular
function that appears to be regulated largely by the autonomic nervous
system (23). In clinical settings, diminished beat-to-beat
variability is an ominous sign that may indicate a seriously
compromised fetus. Our previous study (16) on the spectral
analysis of R-R variability in fetal sheep found that decreased HR
variability, especially in the low-frequency (LF) area (0.025-0.15
cycles/beat), was associated with fetal hypoxemia and acidemia. Various
modalities, including spectral analysis, have been developed to analyze
fetal heartbeat variability and can be classified into three types:
1) time-domain analysis, which applies various methods in
quantifying the variance of the biosignal; 2)
frequency-domain analysis, which applies spectral analysis to determine
the periodic components of the signal; and 3) fractal
analysis, which applies the methods of nonlinear dynamics to quantify
the structured order in aperiodic signals and thereby attempts to
describe its complexity.
Decreased fetal HR variability, such as in short-term variability (STV)
as observed by time-domain measures, is often associated with fetal
acidemia (8) and is evidence of nutritional deprivation. Beat-to-beat variability is thought to result from a push-pull phenomenon between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems.
Indeed, power spectral densities of R-R intervals, obtained as
frequency-domain measures by spectral analytic methods, can be used as
an index of autonomic nervous activity. However, these statistical
measures provide only limited information on fetal HR behavior, because
nonlinear mechanisms can also be involved in HR dynamics. Accumulated
evidence in cardiac physiology indicates that the adult living body is
controlled by mechanisms that are nonlinear in nature
(11). Previous studies have also described the complexity
of fetal heartbeat fluctuation with respect to the central nervous
system (7), autonomic nervous systems (6), and changes in certain hormones and other maternal influences (18, 26).
We previously reported that the fractal structure imbedded in temporal
changes in the LF domain during spectral analysis of fetal heartbeat
fluctuation was maintained in fetal hypoxemia but collapsed in fetal
acidemia (17). This result suggested that analysis of
fractal dimensions (FDs) applied to fetal heartbeat variability could
be useful in quantifying the complexity of these time series. Chaffin
et al. (5) proposed a nonlinear analysis based on the FD
of R-R intervals in utero instead of more conventional stochastic
measurements. If such measurements are to become reliable clinical
tools in the assessment of fetal health, it is important to define the
range of normal variation and to understand the factors that might
influence that range.
Conventional STV, long-term variability (LTV), and LF powers in the
spectral component of fetal heartbeat intervals have been shown to have
24-h rhythms that correspond to the sleep-wake cycle. Changes in the
FDs of HR time series have also been found to have diurnal rhythms in
adults (22, 25, 27).
The purposes of this study were 1) to examine changes in
fetal cardiac interbeat interval dynamics over 24 h in healthy
subjects; and 2) to compare changes in conventional time-
and frequency-domain measures with changes in newly derived measures
based on fractal scaling.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Surgical preparation and experimental protocol.
This study was approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Tohoku
University School of Medicine in accordance with the guidelines on
Animal Care. Five mixed-breed pregnant ewes were surgically prepared at
116-125 days gestation (average term = 148 days). Sheep were
kept in a room with lighting on at 8 AM and off at 8 PM. Surgery was
carried out after the ewes were fasted for 24 h, with general
anesthesia induced by inhalation of a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen
oxide gasses supplemented with sevoflurane after tracheal intubation.
The uterus was then exposed through a midline abdominal incision, and
polyvinyl catheters were inserted aseptically into the fetal carotid
artery and jugular vein through a small incision over the fetal neck.
Tripolar cardioelectrodes were stitched subcutaneously to the chest of
the fetus, with one positioned on each side of the heart and the third
in the back of the fetus. The catheters and leads were brought out
through the flank of the ewe and stored in a small bag sutured to her back. On the day of the operation and each day thereafter, the ewe
received 1.5 g flomoxef sodium intramuscularly and another 0.5 g given to the fetus.
Experiments took place after a minimum recovery period of 48-72 h.
The fetal HR was monitored with a cardiotocogram (model 116, Corometrics) triggered by the cardioelectric signal. Fetal ECGs were
recorded continuously (24-48 h) starting from 8 AM in the morning
on a digital audio tape recorder (RD-130TE, TEAC; Osaka, Japan). Fetal
arterial blood samples were taken before the start of the recording and
every 12 h thereafter for blood gas analysis, which was performed
on a Corning 178 system with a temperature correction of 39.0°C.
HR variability measures.
Twenty-four-hour fetal ECG were recorded, and R-R interbeat interval
data were downloaded to a computer (NEC PC9801 RA; Tokyo, Japan) for
analysis. More than 24 h of ECG data, including >95% normal
sinus beats, were recorded for all subjects. ECG data were digitally
sampled at 1,000 Hz and transferred to a computer for analysis of HR
variability. Premature beats and artifacts were carefully eliminated
both automatically and manually. Measures of R-R interval dynamics were
calculated from each hour to study possible diurnal differences.
For time-domain analysis, we used a similar method to that used by
Dawes et al. (28). Briefly, STV was obtained by averaging fetal R-R intervals over periods of 1/16 min (3.75 s). LTV was calculated as the maximum
minimum of fetal R-R intervals over periods of 1/16 min (3.75 s) during 1 min. Hourly mean values of STV
and LTV were calculated for each time series over 24 h. An
autoregressive model was used to estimate power spectral densities of
HR variability for frequency-domain analysis. Spectral estimates were
made using an assumption of maximum entropy. This estimates the
spectrum of a maximally random series with the constraint that the
spectrum must be consistent with the recorded data. We used the model
of Brown et al. (2) to estimate the power spectral densities for R-R interval variability. In preparatory calculations, the nonstationary structure of fetal beat-to-beat fluctuations showed
only 24-cycle stationary. Autoregressive coefficients, necessary to
estimate power spectral densities, were calculated using Burg's
algorithm based on 24-cycle stationary (3). Power spectra
were quantified by measuring the area in two frequency bands:
0.025-0.15 cycles/beat (LF) and 0.20-0.50 cycles/beat [high frequency (HF)]. The ratio of these frequency components was also calculated.
FD analysis.
The methodological details for computing FDs have been published
elsewhere and will be described briefly (14). First, for a
given time series X(m) (m = 1, 2, 3... k), a new time series
m(k) is
constructed
where [ ] denotes Gauss' notation, m is the
initial time, and k is an interval of the time
series. Both k and m are integers. The
length of the curve is given by
such that the curve length for the time interval k is
the average value over the k set of
Lm(k) and is specified by
L(k)
.
The logarithm of the curve length [log
L(k)] calculated by the least-square method
provides the FD that is the absolute value of the slope of the line. FD
values were measured every 60 min, and the time series was measured
during 24 h. A straight line was fitted to the points of log
k vs. log L(k). When the correlation coefficient (r) of log k vs. log
L(k) was ~1 (r = 0.999), the time series was considered to have a fractal structure.
Statistical analysis.
Results are expressed as means ± SE. Linear regressions were
performed on the measures of HR variability, spectral powers, and FD.
We used two-tailed tests and a probability level of 0.05 for significance.
An off-line computer was used to calculate the three parameters from
the 24-h mean values for each subject. Daily periodicities were
evaluated by cosinor analysis. The three parameters were calculated
from the least-square fit of the data set to a cosinor function during
a period of 24 h and was evaluated with the following model
equation
where Yi is the ith (hourly)
value of the parameter of interest, M is the mesor or mean of a
rhythm-determined average around circadian oscillation, A is the
amplitude of the cosine from mesor to peak value,
Ti is the ith hour, and
is the
acrophase of the cosine function (in radians). The results of
the application of the model to the data are summarized as the mean
(±95% confidence interval). Correlations between actual time series
data and estimates derived from the best-fit cosine model were computed
to test the significance of the fit of the data to the model, with the
zero-amplitude hypothesis used to test for the significance of the
measurement's rhythm.
 |
RESULTS |
The mean gestational age at data collection was 121.4 ± 1.69 days (mean ± SE; average term = 148 days). Arterial blood
samples were obtained from five pregnancies during the study interval. All fetuses had pH values consistently >7.30 (mean pH 7.325 ± 0.016), PCO2 <40.0 mmHg (mean
PCO2 30.5 ± 2.444 mmHg), and
PO2 >20.0 mmHg (mean
PO2 23.62 ± 0.962 mmHg). These values
were within the normal ranges according to established standards for
fetal sheep.
Analysis of time series of fetal R-R intervals in an hour showed a
fractal structure (r = 0.9989 ± 0.0005, n = 5; Fig. 1). The daily
changes in hourly mean values for individual fetuses are depicted in
Fig. 2. STV, LTV, and LF and HF values
increased during the night (from 8 PM to 8 AM), whereas the FD and
LF-to-HF ratio values did not. While the FD values of the five fetuses ranged from 1.6763 to 1.8655, the values were almost constant over
24 h for each fetus. The mean value of FD in the daytime, 1.8033 ± 0.0154, was not significantly different from that at nighttime, 1.7934 ± 0.0147. The characteristics of the circadian periodicity in HR variability parameters for the five fetal sheep are
summarized in Table 1. A circadian rhythm
was evident for STV, LTV, and LF and HF values but not for FD and
LF-to-HF ratio values. Figures 3 and 4
show the correlation between HR
parameters. STV, LTV, and LF and HF values were all significantly and
positively correlated (P < 0.0001), whereas LF, HF,
and LF-to-HF values were significantly and negatively correlated
(P < 0.01). In contrast, no significant correlations
were found between the LF-to-HF ratio and STV or LTV values and between
FD and STV, LTV, and LF or HF values.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Time series of fetal R-R intervals over 1 h showing a fractal
structure. L(k) is the length of the time series,
which is coarse grained by measure index k. The logarithm of
curve length [log L(k)] for the time series is
expressed as a function of log k. The straight line is
fitted to points of log k vs. log
L(k) by the least-squares method. When the
correlation coefficient (R) of log k vs. log
L(k) was ~1, we determined that the time series
demonstrated fractality. The fractal dimension (FD) is measured as the
absolute value of the slope of the line.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Application of cosinor analysis to mean heart rate
parameters from 5 fetuses. The light-dark cycle in the colony is
indicated by the bar on the x-axis. STV, short-term
variability; LTV, long-term variability; LF, low frequency; HF, high
frequency.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1.
Characteristics of 24-h periodicity in parameters of fetal heart rate
variability determined by cosinor analysis
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Linear regression between the FD and heart rate
variability parameters such as STV, LTV, LF, and HF. In all graphs, the
abscissa express the values of FD.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our study confirmed the diurnal periodicity for STV, LTV, and
spectral LF and HF powers, with peak variability at night. We also
confirmed that fetal HR dynamics have a fractal-like temporal structure, with self-similar fluctuations over a wide time scale range.
While these are similar to previous findings on fetal HR variability,
we also found that the spectral LF-to-HF ratio and FD values of fetal
R-R intervals were similar between day and night. These results
suggested that the circadian rhythms in STV and LTV were mainly
contributed to by changes in frequency components rather than by
fractal components of fetal HR fluctuation.
Analysis of FDs is one method for studying the nonlinear nature of HR
time series. It attempts to examine exactly how the fetal HR is
determined under various circumstances, based on the assumption that HR
variation is more chaotic than random. The FD reflects the complexity
in HR time series and may give useful information on fetal conditions
hidden from conventional visual evaluations (5, 9, 13).
Chaffin and colleagues (5) demonstrated that fetal HR
variability was nonlinear in nature and exhibited chaotic behavior.
They analyzed the dimension of chaos using a box counting method in a
time series of fetal HR variability consisting of 5,000 R-R intervals
(~30 min) from fetal ECGs derived from scalp electrodes attached to
12 human fetuses. However, this box counting method can take a long
time to calculate FDs. Although Albert et al. (1)
questioned the validity of using established chaos in the analysis of
adult HR, Gough (12) justified the application of the
fractal measurement technique to fetal HR variability and examined the
FD in a time series of 2,500 fetal heartbeats sampled by ultrasound.
Analysis was performed according to Mandelbrot's method
(19), which allowed the FD to be determined without the
assumption of chaos. Higuchi's equation, which we introduced in this
study, was used to raise the accuracy and precision of Mandelbrot's
technique such that the fetal HR tracing was treated as a
one-dimensional Brownian line. Higuchi's method greatly reduced the
time required to calculate the exact fractal property of the time
series compared with the box counting method.
Most phenomena of nature, including the living body, appear to be
nonlinear, which satisfactorily explains the failure of statistical
descriptions of the world. Recent work in normal human adult systems
suggested that HR control was best described using nonlinear dynamics
with temporal fractal or chaotic structures (15, 29). The
FD quantifies the irregularity in the time series by measuring
randomness, such that a decrease in the FD reflects decreased
complexity in the HR-regulating system. Chaos theory suggests that
simple systems cannot respond with sufficient flexibility to
efficiently cope with various hemodynamic stresses. Indeed, a decreased
FD in HR has been noted in aging (21) and cardiac failure
(24), and its marked decrease may precede sudden cardiac death (10). On the basis of these reports, it is likely
that deterministic chaos or fractal structures underlying functions in
the living body play a crucial role in the maintenance of the inherent
biosystem in the absence of external perturbation.
There have been several reports concerning the circadian rhythmic
fractal scaling of HR variability in adults. Otsuka et al. (22) reported that the normal adult FD had a clear
circadian rhythm that peaked at night. Van Leeuwen et al.
(27) suggested that the lower daytime FD compared with
nighttime was a result of the synchronization of physiological
functions of the cardiovascular control system during the day. However,
there have been no reports on the circadian rhythms of FD values or
comparisons with conventional (time and frequency domain) analyses in
the fetus. Thus it remains unclear why the FD in the fetus had no
circadian rhythm. Before resolving this issue, there was also the
matter as to why STV, LTV, and LF and HF values did exhibit a circadian
rhythm, and whether this rhythm was the same rhythm as in adults. In
the fetus, both LF and HF properties increased during the night, which
is thought to be related to parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous activity. The activity of both nervous systems has been shown to
increase in the fetus at night. Indeed, it is well known that general
activity, including fetal breathing movement, increases at night, which
provides an explanation for the increased nocturnal LF and HF values
(26). Nevertheless, questions remain as to why both
nervous system activities increased at the same time and why the FD
values remained unchanged. Our findings suggested that changes in STV
and LTV participated in both the LF and HF components. Because STV,
LTV, and LF and HF values were all significantly and positively
correlated, all the measures showed significantly similar circadian
rhythm. However, the LF-to-HF ratio did not correlate with the other
parameters and did not exhibit circadian rhythm. In contrast, adult STV
(or HF) increases during the night and LTV (or LF) increases during the
day. The LF-to-HF ratio does exhibit a circadian rhythm in adults, with
a peak during the day. Also, it is indicated that parasympathetic
nervous system activity is mostly influenced by the circadian system,
whereas sympathetic nervous system activity is mostly influenced by the
sleep system in human adults (4). These findings indicated
that the circadian rhythms in adults and fetuses were due to different
mechanisms. It appears that fetal circadian rhythms do not result from
internal fetal cardiac dynamics but from external influences, such as
maternal hormone levels or uterine contractions.
Fetal cardiac internal dynamics were thought not to show a circadian
rhythm, whereas FDs were an index of the state of the internal
dynamics. Following the finding that the FD of the fetus did not show a
circadian rhythm, it was then thought to result from the internal
dynamics of the fetus, such as a lack of synchronization between
physiological functions, or the lack of flexibility of the
cardiovascular control system due to its immaturity. However, there
have been no reports on circadian rhythms of FDs or comparisons with
conventional (time and frequency domain) analyses in the fetus. Our
results showed that despite the relationship between STV, LTV, and LF
and HF values, LF-to-HF ratios showed no correlation with the other
parameters, nor conformed to a circadian rhythm. This suggested that
the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous activities
in the fetal cardiac interbeat is dynamically fixed. This is supported
by our previous work (16) in fetal sheep, and the finding
that fetal cardiac internal dynamics showed no circadian rhythm with
respect to the fractal component of HR variability, which remained
stable throughout the daytime and nighttime.
Fetal HR monitoring allows for noninvasive measurements by taking
advantage of the fact that beat-to-beat intervals can be recorded
continuously with no restraint for many hours (23). It is
usually carried out for clinical use for the evaluation of fetal HR
variability. Our study showed that there was periodical similarity
between STV, LTV, and the frequency components in fetal beat-to-beat
fluctuation. Frequency analysis, useful in the fetal autonomic nervous
system, is underdeveloped for midterm, when it is not in a normal
state, and for fields of fixed quantity (20). Also,
fractal analysis of R-R interval time series in the fetus, taking into
account influences from the mother, should be useful in fetal diagnosis
and therapy.
In conclusion, our study suggested that STV, LTV, and LF and HF values
were controlled by the same regulating system and could be expressed as
a rhythm of the HR, which appears to be maternally influenced. However,
the FD showed intrinsic cardiac dynamics and was consistent, without a
24-h rhythm. The dynamic measures of R-R interval variability provided
complementary information about HR behavior when used in concert with
traditional measures of time- and frequency-domain HR variability.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Okamura, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku Univ. Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryomachi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan
(E-mail: okamura{at}mail.cc.tohoku.ac.jp).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement"
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published January 9, 2003;10.1152/ajpheart.00268.2002
Received 28 March 2002; accepted in final form 31 December 2002.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Albert, DE.
Chaos and the ECG: fact and fiction.
J Electrocardiol
24, Suppl:
102-106,
1991.
2.
Brown, JS,
Gee H,
Olah KS,
Docker MF,
and
Taylor EW.
A new technique for the identification of respiratory sinus arrhythmia in utero.
J Biomed Eng
14:
263-267,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
3.
Burg, J.
The relationship between maximum entropy spectra and maximum likelihood spectra.
Geophysics
37:
375-376,
1972[Web of Science].
4.
Burgess, HJ,
Trinder J,
Kim Y,
and
Luke D.
Sleep and circadian influences on cardiac autonomic nervous system activity.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
273:
H1761-H1768,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5.
Chaffin, DG,
Goldberg CC,
and
Reed KL.
The dimension of chaos in the fetal heart rate.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
165:
1425-1429,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
6.
Dalton, KJ,
Dawes GS,
and
Patrick JE.
The autonomic nervous system and fetal heart rate variability.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
146:
456-462,
1983[Web of Science][Medline].
7.
Dawes, GS,
Fox HE,
Leduc BM,
Liggins GC,
and
Richards RT.
Respiratory movements and rapid eye movement sleep in the foetal lamb.
J Physiol
220:
119-143,
1972[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8.
Dawes, GS,
Moulden M,
and
Redman CWG
Short-term fetal heart rate variation, decelerations, and umbilical flow velocity waveforms before labor.
Obstet Gynecol
80:
673-678,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
9.
Di Renzo, GC,
Montani M,
Fioriti V,
Clerici G,
Branconi F,
Pardini A,
Indraccolo R,
and
Cosmi EV.
Fractal analysis: a new method for evaluating fetal heart rate variability.
J Perinat Med
24:
261-269,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
10.
Goldberger, AL,
Rigney DR,
Mietus J,
Antman EM,
and
Greenwald S.
Nonlinear dynamics in sudden cardiac death syndrome: heart rate oscillations and bifurcations.
Experientia
44:
983-987,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
11.
Goldberger, AL,
Rigney DR,
and
West BJ.
Chaos and fractals in human physiology.
Sci Am
262:
42-49,
1990[Medline].
12.
Gough, NAJ
Fractals, chaos, and fetal heart rate.
Lancet
339:
182-183,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
13.
Gough, NAJ
Fractal analysis of foetal heart rate variability.
Physiol Meas
14:
309-315,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
14.
Higuchi, T.
Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory.
Physica D
31:
277-283,
1988.
15.
Ivanov, PCh,
Amaral ALN,
Goldberger AL,
Havlin S,
Rosenblum MG,
Struzik ZR,
and
Stanley HE.
Multifractality in human heartbeat dynamics.
Nature
399:
461-465,
1999[Medline].
16.
Kimura, Y,
Okamura K,
Watanabe T,
Murotuski J,
Suzuki T,
Yano M,
and
Yajima A.
Power spectral analysis for autonomic influences in heart rate and blood pressure variability in fetal lambs.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
271:
H1333-H1339,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17.
Kimura, Y,
Okamura K,
Watanabe T,
Yaegashi N,
Uehara S,
and
Yajima A.
Time-frequency analysis of fetal heartbeat fluctuation using wavelet transform.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
275:
H1993-H1999,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.
Lunshof, S,
Boer K,
Wolf H,
Van Hoffem G,
Bayram N,
and
Mirmiran M.
Fetal and maternal diurnal rhythms during the third trimester of normal pregnancy: Outcomes of computerized analysis of continuos twenty-four-hour fetal heart rate recordings.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
178:
247-254,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Mandelbrot, BB.
The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: Freeman, 1981.
20.
Ohta, T,
Okamura K,
Kimura Y,
Suzuki T,
Watanabe T,
Yasui T,
Yaegashi N,
and
Yajima A.
Alteration in the low-frequency domain in power spectral analysis of fetal heart beat fluctuations.
Fetal Diagn Ther
14:
92-97,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Otsuka, K,
Cornelissen G,
and
Halberg F.
Age, gender and fractal scaling in heart rate variability.
Clin Sci (Lond)
93:
299-308,
1997[Medline].
22.
Otsuka, K,
Cornelissen G,
and
Halberg F.
Circadian rhythmic fractal scaling of heart rate variability in health and coronary artery disease.
Clin Cardiol
20:
631-638,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
23.
Paul, RH,
and
Hon EH.
Clinical fetal monitoring. VII. The evaluation and significance of intrapartum baseline FHR variability.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
123:
206-210,
1975[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Peng, CK,
Havlin S,
Hausdorff JM,
Mietus JE,
Stanley HE,
and
Goldberger AL.
Fractal mechanisms and heart rate dynamics: long-range correlation and their breakdown with disease.
J Electrocardiol
28, Suppl:
59-65,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
25.
Pikkujämsä, SM,
Mäkikallio TH,
Sourander LB,
Räihä IJ,
Puukka P,
Skyttä J,
Peng CK,
Goldberger AL,
and
Huikuri HV.
Cardiac interbeat dynamics from childhood to senescence.
Circulation
27:
393-399,
1999.
26.
Stark, RI,
Garland M,
Daniel SS,
Tropper P,
and
Myers MM.
Diurnal rhythms of fetal and maternal heart rate in the baboon.
Early Hum Dev
55:
195-209,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
27.
Van Leeuwen, P,
Bettermann H,
An der Heiden U,
and
Kümmell HC.
Circadian aspects of apparent correlation dimension in human heart rate dynamics.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
269:
H130-H134,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28.
Visser, GHA,
Dawes GS,
and
Redman CWG
Numerical analysis of the normal human antenatal fetal heart rate.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
88:
792-802,
1981[Web of Science][Medline].
29.
West, BJ,
Zhang R,
Sanders AW,
Miniyar S,
Zuckerman JH,
and
Levine BD.
Fractal fluctuations in cardiac time series.
Physica A
270:
552-556,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284(5):H1858-H1864
0363-6135/03 $5.00
Copyright © 2003 the American Physiological Society