|
|
||||||||
1 Institute of Pharmacology, University of Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg; 2 Institute for Biochemistry II, University of Frankfurt Medical School, D-60590 Frankfurt; 3 Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, University of Munich, D-80336 Munich, Germany; and 4 Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sustained activation of G protein-coupled receptors results in an attenuation of cellular responses, a phenomenon termed desensitization. Whereas mechanisms for rapid desensitization of ligand-receptor-G protein-effector systems are relatively well characterized, much less is known about long-term adaptation processes that occur in the continuous presence of an agonist. Here we have studied the fate of endogenously expressed bradykinin B2 receptors on human fibroblasts during prolonged agonist treatment. Stimulation with bradykinin for up to 24 h resulted in a 50% reduction of surface binding sites that was paralleled by a similar decrease of total B2 receptor protein followed by Western blotting using monoclonal antibodies to the B2 receptor. Whereas B2 receptor mRNA levels did not change during 24 h of agonist treatment, B2 receptor de novo synthesis was attenuated by 35-50%, indicating translational control of B2 receptor levels. Furthermore, the half-life of B2 receptor protein was shortened by 20-40% as shown by 35S-labeled pulse-chase and immunoprecipitation experiments. This study demonstrates that bradykinin B2 receptor expression during long-term agonist treatment is primarily regulated on the (post)translational level, i.e., by attenuation of de novo synthesis and by reduction of receptor stability.
G protein-coupled receptor; sequestration; monoclonal antibody
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTORS (GPCRs) are key components of the intercellular signaling networks tuning the homeostasis of multicellular organisms. The cellular action of GPCRs is tightly controlled on several levels of the signaling cascade. An initial agonist application often renders a cell insensitive to a second stimulus, a phenomenon termed desensitization or adaptation. Molecular studies have revealed multiple mechanisms contributing to the negative regulation of GPCR-derived signals (8, 22). First, synthesis and/or release of agonists are often restricted with respect to time and location. Once generated and competent to activate receptors, an agonist is often quickly removed from the extracellular space by endocytosis and/or degradation; these mechanisms ensure rapid signal attenuation at the prereceptor level (22). Second, receptor desensitization occurring during short-term (seconds to minutes) exposure of cell to agonists is mediated by uncoupling of activated receptors from G proteins, terminating signaling on the postreceptor level. Third, phosphorylation by second messenger-activated kinases such as protein kinases A and C, casein kinases, or specific G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and subsequent binding of arrestins mediate rapid silencing of GPCRs at the receptor level (8, 22, 28, 39). On the cellular level, receptor sequestration depletes the plasma membrane of high-affinity receptors following ligand stimulation, thereby contributing to both desensitization and resensitization of signaling cascades via receptor recycling (42).
Whereas GPCR phosphorylation and sequestration are well-studied events, much less is known about the mechanisms of receptor downregulation reflecting the loss of receptors from the plasma membrane due to long-term exposure of cells to agonists (hours to days). Reduction of the receptor count per cell is either a result of enhanced degradation and/or of reduced protein synthesis (22). The relative lack of knowledge about the mechanisms underlying receptor downregulation is largely due to experimental limitations. For instance, the overexpression of recombinant epitope-tagged GPCRs often used to study receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis often masks physiologically relevant downregulation mechanisms. Strong viral promoters of generic expression vectors do not allow for transcriptional regulation of receptor synthesis, and the resultant excessively high concentrations of receptor mRNA and protein may well exceed the capacity of the cellular degradation machinery. Therefore, studies on the downregulation of GPCRs need to be done in a native cellular environment; however, the amount of endogenous GPCRs present in primary cells is often too low to allow the detailed analysis of dynamics of receptor expression, location, turnover, and activity.
A prototypical GPCR expressed in reasonable copy numbers by native cells and desensitizing on prolonged ligand stimulation is the human bradykinin B2 receptor (B2R). Bradykinin is a proinflammatory hormone mediating hypotension, edema formation, pain sensation, smooth muscle contraction, and cell growth (4). Its cognate receptor, B2R, is well studied with respect to short-term desensitization resulting from ligand-induced receptor phosphorylation on serine and threonine residues in the COOH-terminal receptor domain (5, 7, 16). This posttranslational modification has also been shown to trigger endocytosis of B2R (31). Whether the receptor is "channeled" into a clathrin-dependent pathway or whether it translocates into caveolin-rich compartments appears to be dependent on the cell type (3, 23, 31). Even though there is evidence that B2R downregulation may occur, the mechanisms underlying such a phenomenon have not been studied in great detail (5, 35).
Here we have used specific mono- and polyclonal antibodies against the B2R to analyze receptor downregulation in native human foreskin fibroblasts endogenously expressing the B2R. Continuous stimulation with bradykinin decreased the number of specific binding sites and downregulated B2R protein. This reduction in B2R copy number was not due to transcriptional regulation because B2R mRNA levels remained largely unchanged. Rather, de novo protein synthesis and receptor stability were reduced, suggesting translational and posttranslational control of cellular B2R levels during prolonged agonist stimulation.
| |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
Reagents were obtained from the following manufacturers: Pro-mix
35S in vivo cell labeling mix (>1,000 Ci/mmol), Hybond
membranes and Megaprime DNA labeling kit from Amersham; sulfur-free
DMEM medium from Applichem; bradykinin from Bachem; affinity-purified and preabsorbed anti-rabbit/mouse-IgG-antibody fragment
[F(ab')2] coupled to horseradish peroxidase from
Biotrend; Nonidet P40 (NP-40) and Pansorbin from Calbiochem;
[
-32P]dATP (>4,000 Ci/mmol) from ICN; protein ladder
marker (10-200 kDa) from Life Technologies;
[2,3-prolyl-3,4-3H]bradykinin (spec act 98 Ci/mmol) from
NEN DuPont; aprotinin, Pefabloc SC, Rotiquant, and scintillation
cocktail Rotiszint Eco Plus from Roth; GF 52 glassfiber filters from
Schleicher & Schuell; leupeptin, pepstatin A and 1,10-phenanthroline
from SERVA; and polyethylenimine [50% (wt/wt) aqueous solution] from
Sigma. All other chemicals of analytic grade were from Applichem,
Merck, Sigma, or Roth.
Peptide synthesis and production of monoclonal antibodies.
A 36-amino acid peptide (dubbed CRS36) derived from the COOH terminally
located intracellular domain (ID4) of the B2R was synthesized by the solid phase method using fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chemistry. Peptide CRS36 was used in a nonconjugated form for immunization of six mice. Selection of positive clones, production of
ascites, and characterization of the antibodies were done according to
standard procedures (25). MBR1, a monoclonal antibody to the human bradykinin B2 receptor, was isotyped
IgG2b
. The production of antiserum
-CRS36 (AS346) to
peptide CRS36 of human B2R has been detailed elsewhere
(5, 6).
Radioligand binding studies. The binding activity of B2 receptors was assayed on adherent cells or membrane preparations using [3H]bradykinin as detailed in former studies (1). Dissociation constants (KD) for B2R were calculated by Scatchard analysis with radioligand concentrations ranging from 10 pM to 20 nM using membranes prepared from HF5 cells (25 µg protein/measurement). When cells were preincubated with bradykinin, bound peptide was removed with 200 mM acetic acid, 500 mM NaCl, and 0.1% BSA, pH 2.8, for 5 min at 4°C ("acid stripping"). Cells washed three times with DMEM were used for [3H]bradykinin binding experiments.
35S labeling and immunoprecipitation. HF-15 human foreskin fibroblasts cultured in DMEM with 10% FCS and used at passage 9-12 were grown on six-well dishes, washed twice with sulfur-free DMEM, and incubated for 30 min at 37°C in the same medium. For 35S-labeled pulse-chase experiments, cells were labeled for 60 min with 0.33 mCi/ml [35S]methionine-cysteine (Promix) in sulfur-free DMEM. Thereafter, radioactive medium was removed, and the cells were incubated with DMEM-10% FCS in the presence or absence of 1 µM bradykinin. To follow B2R protein synthesis, we applied 0.1 mCi/ml 35S-labeled Promix in sulfur-free DMEM in the absence or presence of 1 µM bradykinin. At the indicated time points, cells were washed three times with 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5 (TBS), lysed with 1% (mass/vol) NP-40, 0.5% (mass/vol) deoxycholate, and 0.1% (mass/vol) SDS in TBS, including protease inhibitors [1 mM Pefabloc and 10 µg/ml each of leupeptin, aprotinin, pepstatin A, and 1,10-phenanthroline (RIPA buffer)], and receptors were immunoprecipitated with 2.5 µl of antiserum AS346 (5). For control, preimmune serum or serum preabsorbed with peptide CRS36 was used. Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography using 15% (mass/vol) sodium salicylate as the fluorophor.
Western blotting. HEK293T cells stably transfected with hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged B2R or HF-15 cells were washed twice with TBS and lysed in RIPA buffer for 45 min at 4°C. B2R was immunoprecipitated with 2.5 µl of a antiserum AS346 (anti-B2R) or 4.5 µg of monoclonal antibody, and precipitates were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidine difluoride or nitrocellulose membranes by semidry blotting for 45 min at 1.5 mA/cm2 using 39 mM Tris, 48 mM glycine, and 1.3 mM SDS. Membranes were blocked either with 5% (mass/vol) fat-free milk powder in TBS with 0.1% (mass/vol) NP-40 or with 0.25% (wt/vol) gelatin in TBS, pH 7.5, including 5 mM EDTA and 0.05% (vol/vol) Triton-X 100 (blocking buffer). Membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies (0.1-2 µg/ml) diluted in corresponding blocking buffer for 2 h at room temperature. For protein visualization, an anti-mouse antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase was diluted 1:1,000-1:5,000 in blocking buffer, followed by chemiluminescence detection.
RNA isolation and Northern blotting.
Total RNA from HF-15 cells was isolated (13). Thirty
micrograms of RNA were separated by denaturating agarose gel
electrophoresis and transferred onto nylon membranes using 20× SSC
buffer (0.3 M sodium acetate, 3 M NaCl, pH 7.0) for 12 h
(34). RNA was fixed by 2 h incubation at 80°C;
staining of the 28S and 18S ribosomal RNA with 0.2% methylene blue in
0.2 M sodium acetate was used to monitor equal sample loading.
Hybridization of B2R mRNA was performed in 0.5 M sodium
phosphate, 7% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.0, for 12 h at 68°C with a
1.2-kb B2R cDNA generated from the full-length clone by
random priming with [
-32P]dATP using the Megaprime kit
of Amersham (18). Labeled RNA/DNA hybrids were analyzed by
a PhosphorImager, and corresponding intensities were normalized for
-actin controls.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Downregulation of bradykinin binding sites on HF-15 cells during
prolonged agonist treatment.
B2R endogenously expressed by human HF-15 foreskin
fibroblasts has been shown to inactivate by rapid desensitization
paralleled by phosphorylation of a Ser-Thr cluster in the COOH-terminal
receptor domain (5, 7). In a similar setting,
B2R-bradykinin complexes are rapidly internalized rendering
HF-15 cells resistant to further agonist stimulation for a limited
period of time (35). Therefore, we wondered whether the
number of cell surface-exposed B2R is progressively
downregulated during long-term treatment of HF-15 cells with
bradykinin. To this end we stimulated cells for up to 24 h with 1 µM bradykinin and followed the number of surface-exposed B2R by a radioligand binding assay. To avoid interference
with the radioligand, unlabeled bradykinin used to stimulate the cells was quantitatively removed by "acid stripping" before 5 nM
[3H]bradykinin was added for 90 min at 4°C. The amount
of cell-bound radioactivity was quantified in a
-counter and
compared with that of unstimulated cells, which had otherwise been
treated identically. Our experiments revealed that during the
first 6 h of agonist treatment the number of surface
B2R decreased only moderately to 75-80% of the
control (100% at t = 0) and dropped to about 50% of
control after 24 h (Fig.
1A).
|
2 nM), the
total number of binding sites decreased from 1,000 fmol/mg (control) to
350 fmol/mg on cells treated with bradykinin for 24 h (Fig. 1B). Combined, our radioligand assays indicate a loss of up
to 65% of the specific binding bradykinin binding sites of HF-15 cells
during bradykinin treatment for 24 h, indicative of downregulation of B2R.
Protein levels of B2 receptor during prolonged agonist
treatment.
Given the significant loss of bradykinin binding sites on HF-15 cells
permanently exposed to agonist, we wondered whether total levels of
B2R protein would also be decreased under these conditions.
Initially, we tried to detect B2R protein solubilized from
HF-15 cells by Western blotting with a polyclonal anti-B2R antibody, which had performed well in immunoprecipitation experiments (5, 7, 43). Not unexpectedly, this approach failed to detect B2R in HF-15 extracts, most likely because the
absolute amount of B2R applied per lane (up to 50 fmol
receptor in 50 µg of total protein loaded) is well below the
detection limit of our antiserum, previously judged to be
120 fmol
B2R protein (6). Alternatively, we employed a
commercially available monoclonal antipeptide antibody to human
B2R (from Signal Transduction Laboratories; herein refered
to as ST antibody). Using Sf9 or HEK293 cells highly overexpressing
human B2R, we were unable to find any specific bands in the
Western blots with the ST antibody (data not shown). To test the
capacity of the antibody for immunoprecipitation of B2R, we
applied ST to lysates from HEK293 cells massively overexpressing the HA-tagged human B2R (~9 pmol of receptor per
milligram of protein) but failed to produce specific bands (Fig.
2A). Under the same
conditions, polyclonal antibody AS346 ("anti-B2R") gave a major band of ~70 kDa, indicating that it efficiently
precipitated human B2R (Fig. 2A). This finding
was confirmed by the application of a specific anti-HA antibody, which
also precipitated the HA fusion protein with B2R.
|
Development of monoclonal antibodies to human B2
receptor.
To overcome the limitations with the available antibodies, we raised
monoclonal antibodies to human B2R. From multiple peptides covering various extra- and intracellular domains of human
B2R, peptide CRS36 corresponding to a continuous sequence
portion of 36 residues at the tail domain (ID4) of B2R
consistently yielded high-titered sera against the receptor (data not
shown). B cells of mice immunized with unconjugated CRS36 were
immortalized, and monoclonal antibody MBR1 (IgG2b
)
cross-reactive with human B2R was generated. MBR1 was
isolated from mouse ascites by affinity chromatography on protein
G-Sepharose, and the purified antibody was characterized by Western
blotting using lysates from Sf9 cells overexpressing human
B2R (6). Preliminary experiments indicated that MBR1 detected B2R protein in Western blots more
efficiently than any of our polyclonal antibodies. MBR1 also
precipitated HA-tagged B2R expressed in HEK293 cells,
though less efficiently than polyclonal antibody AS346
("anti-B2R") or monoclonal anti-HA antibody (Fig.
2A). Using AS346 for immunoprecipitation and MBR1 (at 0.5 µg/ml) for Western blotting, we succeeded in detecting B2R overexpressed in HEK293 cells (Fig. 2B) and
also endogenous B2R protein from HF-15 cells (Fig.
2C). HF-15 cell lysates gave the characteristic pattern for
human B2R, i.e., a major 68-kDa and a minor 52-kDa band
(5, 7), whereas preimmune serum or preabsorbed immune
serum failed to detect B2R (Fig. 2C). Using HA-tagged B2R, we observed a similar pattern for anti-HA,
confirming the specificity of our detection system (Fig.
2B). Thus reporter antibody MBR1 in combination with
precipitating antibody AS346 allowed us to detect even minute amounts
of B2R endogenously expressed by native cells, i.e., human
foreskin fibroblasts. Under otherwise identical conditions, the ST
antibody failed to produce specific bands with endogenous
B2R, even at significantly higher antibody concentrations
(2 µg/ml).
Analysis of B2 receptor mRNA levels by Northern
blotting.
One possible reason for the loss of binding sites and B2R
protein during long-term agonist exposure could be the attenuation of
B2R mRNA synthesis by transcriptional control mechanisms.
We followed B2R mRNA in HF-15 cells that were challenged
with bradykinin for up to 24 h (Fig.
3A). Because all mammalian
cells we have tested express low amounts of B2R mRNA, we
employed Sf9 insect cells for control. The unlabeled 1.2-kb
B2R cDNA fragment used to generate the radioactive probe
served as a positive control for hybridizations (not shown). Because
long-term treatment with bradykinin should not affect the
concentrations of actin mRNA, we used a
-actin probe as control and
normalized B2R mRNA levels to this reference. Over a 24-h
period of bradykinin treatment, B2R mRNA levels in HF-15
cells did not significantly change (Fig. 3A). Likewise, the
ratio of B2R mRNA versus
-actin mRNA remained constant
throughout the experiment (Fig. 3B). Therefore, the observed reduction of B2R protein levels in HF-15 cells appears not
to be due to reduced production or increased degradation of the
corresponding mRNA.
|
35S-labeled pulse-chase experiments to follow
B2 receptor degradation.
We next analyzed changes in B2R protein stability as a
potential cause for the reduced receptor count in the continuous
presence of agonist. To this end we performed 35S-labeled
pulse-chase experiments by labeling cellular proteins with a relatively
short pulse of [35S]methionine-cysteine for 60 min and a
subsequent chase for 24 h using 35S-free medium with
or without 1 µM bradykinin. We chose this method because of its
enhanced sensitivity over Western blotting, which readily detects
precursor (and possibly degradation) products of B2R only
in cells highly overexpressing the receptor. Immunoprecipitation of
B2R at the indicated time intervals allowed us to follow
the fate of the 35S-labeled receptor protein. SDS-PAGE of
extracts from HF-15 cells immediately after the pulse
(t = 0) showed a nonglycosylated 40-kDa B2R
precursor that is quantitatively converted into the glycosylated B2R forms of 52 and 68 kDa within 3 h (Fig.
4A). Treatment of HF-15 cells
with bradykinin for 3-24 h reduced the levels of
35S-labeled B2R by 20-40% as revealed by
quantitative analysis of the radiograph using a PhosphorImager. The
half-life of the "mature" B2R forms of 52 and 68 kDa,
which was ~9 h (range 8-10 h) in the absence of the ligand was
reduced to 5 h (range 4-6 h) in the continuous presence of 1 µM bradykinin (Fig. 4B). Because the total amount of
35S-labeled cellular protein did not differ in the absence
or presence of ligand (data not shown), an unspecific or toxic effect
of bradykinin treatment is unlikely to cause the observed loss of
receptor protein. Rather, our experiments suggest that downregulation
of B2R is at least partially due to a reduced stability of
B2R proteins in the continuous presence of high bradykinin
concentrations.
|
Effect of bradykinin treatment on B2 receptor
biosynthesis.
Because prolonged bradykinin exposure seems to affect B2R
stability on the protein level but not on the mRNA level, we wondered whether B2R protein synthesis was also affected by
long-term exposure to the agonist. To follow B2R de novo
protein synthesis, we modified the pulse experiment such that cells
were labeled with 35S-labeled amino acids for up to 24 h in the absence or continuous presence of 1 µM bradykinin.
Immunoprecipitation of radiolabeled B2R revealed that the
continuous presence of bradykinin attenuates B2R de novo
synthesis at all investigated time intervals (Fig. 5A). Quantitative evaluation
by PhosphorImager demonstrated that the amount of newly synthesized
B2R protein of treated fibroblasts is by 35-50% lower
than that of untreated cells over the entire incubation period (Fig.
5B). Again, unspecific or toxic effects of bradykinin appear
not to cause this phenomenon because incorporation of radioactive amino
acids into the total cellular protein pools was identical in the
presence or absence of the ligand (data not shown). Also enhanced
receptor degradation may contribute to the observed phenomenon,
although the increment due receptor proteolysis (~15% over 24 h) is much smaller than that contributed by the inhibition of de novo
synthesis (up to 50% over 24 h). Thus long-term agonist treatment
with bradykinin attenuates de novo synthesis of B2R,
suggesting a translational control of the B2R levels.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adaptation of GPCRs and their associated signaling systems to continuous agonist stimulation provides an important mechanism to protect cells from hyperresponsiveness to external signals. For instance many drugs targeted at GPCRs of neuronal cells are applied for weeks, months, or even for lifetime. Prototypes are serotonergic agonists such as buspiron used to relieve anxiety or dopaminergic effectors applied in Parkinson's disease. Amine uptake inhibitors commonly used for treatment of severe depressions increase serotonin and norepinephrine concentrations in synaptic clefts providing yet another example of sustained agonist exposure. Though the mechanisms of action of these drugs (and of some of their adverse effects) are not fully understood, it is well known that many, if not most, of them start showing their beneficial effects only after long-term application, i.e., after several days or even weeks. Thus adaptation and downregulation of corresponding GPCRs may be critically involved in the efficacy of these drugs (11, 17).
In the kininergic system, plasma kinin levels may significantly increase during antihypertensive therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Because of their blood-pressure lowering effects, accumulated kinins contribute to the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors, yet elevated kinin levels eventually lead to kinin receptor downregulation and reduced responsiveness to kinin peptides (40). Likewise, the use of long-lasting synthetic kinin agonists such as FR-190997 or RMP-7, which transiently open the blood-brain barrier and thereby facilitate the rapid diffusion of cytostatic drugs from the blood to brain tumors, may permanently stimulate and eventually downregulate their cognate receptors (2, 15). Also, small cell lung cancers can produce massive amounts of kinins stimulating the growth of cancer cells (37). Finally, hereditary forms of angioedema and the various forms of vasculitis (25) are characterized by the production of excessive amounts of kinins, which likely induce sustained downregulation of their receptors. Against this background, we considered studies with relatively high bradykinin concentrations (up to 1 µM) over a long period (up to 24 h) adequate to address the fate of kinin receptors during long-term agonist exposure of human foreskin fibroblasts. To counteract kinin degradation during prolonged incubation, e.g., due to cell-bound kininases, we added fresh bradykinin after every 6 h of incubation. Whereas we found that in vitro kinin generation, e.g., due to processing of FCS-borne kininogen, was almost negligible because most of the bovine kininogen was present in the kinin-free form (data not shown).
Our initial efforts focused on the development of a sensitive technique to detect B2R protein endogenously expressed by native cells. To this end we used a polyclonal antibody for immunoprecipitation and a monoclonal antibody for immunoprinting of B2R. Surprisingly, a commercial monoclonal antibody to B2R, which has been widely used by many laboratories (12, 21, 41), failed to immunoprecipitate human B2R and did not give specific signals in Western blots unless B2R was highly enriched by immunoprecipitation from lysates of HEK cells massively overexpressing the receptor. This problem was overcome by the development of a monoclonal antibody, MBR1, which allowed us to follow the downregulation of endogenous B2R protein. Long-term treatment with bradykinin decreased the number of specific binding sites as well as B2R protein levels in foreskin fibroblasts. The reduction in B2R count was not due to transcriptional regulation, because B2R mRNA levels remained unchanged. Rather, receptor protein half-life and de novo protein synthesis were reduced suggesting translational and posttranslational control of cellular B2R levels during chronic agonist stimulation.
An unanticipated finding of our studies was the apparent attenuation or even lack of B2R sequestration during the first hours of agonist stimulation. This observation is in contrast with previous reports from many laboratories, including our own, in which receptor sequestration had been judged from radioligand internalization (7, 30, 31, 33). The seemingly conflicting results may be reconciled by a scenario where recycling of the internalized receptor to the cell surface is much faster than the intracellular degradation of the dissociated radioligand. Likewise, Lamb and co-workers (29) observed an apparent discrepancy between ligand internalization and B2R sequestration. Thus radioligand internalization studies follow one-way dynamics of receptor trafficking, whereas our present studies address the actual amount of cell surface-exposed B2R, which is balanced by receptor endocytosis, recycling, de novo synthesis, and downregulation.
The role of sequestration for downregulation of GPCRs is still obscure.
Initial studies on the
2-adrenergic receptor have indicated that endocytosis is crucial for receptor degradation, whereas
a more recent report suggested downregulation to occur at the plasma
membrane (20, 24). For the B2R, sequestration has been studied using concanavalin A, an effective inhibitor of
internalization; however, long-term toxicity of the drug did not allow
to draw any firm conclusions from these experiments (data not shown).
We anticipate that mutant B2R with impaired internalization
and/or phosphorylation features (7, 31) may help unravel
the delicate role of these mechanisms for receptor targeting
(10). Also the molecular determinants directing GPCRs for
degradation or for recycling are largely unknown. First insights have
been gained for the
2-adrenergic receptor, where four
residues at its extreme COOH-terminus engage in PDZ domain-mediated
protein interactions that direct sequestrated receptors for recycling (19). Furthermore, a GPCR-associated sorting protein
(GASP) has been identified, which binds to
-opioid receptors prone
to endocytosis and subsequent degradation but not to rapidly recycling µ-opioid receptors spared from downregulation (44).
Disruption of receptor-GASP complex prevented
-opioid receptor
degradation and redirects it for recycling. Presently, the role of the
tail domain of B2R in orchestrating recycling and/or
downregulation of the receptor during long-term agonist stimulation is unknown.
Two other mechanisms may partake in the downregulation of GPCRs, which
are receptor ubiquitination and mRNA destabilization. Ubiquitination of
yeast GPCRs has been known for a while (34), and more
recently ubiquitination has been implicated in endocytosis and
downregulation of the
2-adrenergic receptor
(38). For B2R no systematic studies addressing
the role of ubiquitination in receptor downregulation are available.
Our present studies did not reveal the presence of high molecular
weight B2R conjugates that may indicate receptor
ubiquitination. Alternatively, GPCR can be downregulated by the
destabilization of their corresponding mRNAs. For the
2-adrenergic receptor it has been shown that protein kinase A and mRNA binding proteins are involved in this process (9, 22, 32). For the B2R, we did not find any
changes in mRNA levels during long-term agonist treatment; however, we
cannot exclude the possibility that even a modest change in mRNA
levels, which would escape our detection system, may have a profound
effect on receptor biosynthesis. Our 35S-labeling
experiments suggest that B2R biosynthesis may be reduced during continuous stimulation with agonist. Proteins such as ferritin and 15-lipoxygenase are prone to a gene-specific regulation of their
mRNA translation (14). Also the initiation of translation is controlled by kinase pathways downstream of B2R and
other GPCRs (27), and therefore sustained agonist exposure
may modulate B2R biosynthesis. Clearly, more in-depth
analyses are required to elucidate the translational and
posttranslational mechanisms mediating downregulation of bradykinin
receptors in the continuous presence of the ligand.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank B. Welsch and Dr. A. Maidhof (Mainz, Germany) for help with cell culture and production of antisera and monoclonal antibodies.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported in part by grants from of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (to W. Müller-Esterl).
The present address of A. Blaukat: Merck KGaA, Oncology Research Darmstadt, Global Preclinical R&D, A25/R501, Frankfurter Str. 250, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: W. Müller-Esterl, Institute for Biochemistry II, The Univ. of Frankfurt Medical School, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany (E-mail: wme{at}biochem2.de).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/ajpheart.00034.2003
Received 13 January 2003; accepted in final form 7 February 2003.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Abd Alla, S,
Buschko J,
Quitterer U,
Maidhof A,
Haasemann M,
Breipohl G,
Knolle J,
and
Müller-Esterl W.
Structural features of the human bradykinin B2 receptor probed by antagonists and anti-idiotypic antibodies.
J Biol Chem
268:
17277-17285,
1993
2.
Aramori, I,
Zenkoh J,
Morikawa N,
Asano M,
Hatori C,
Sawai H,
Kayakiri H,
Satoh S,
Inoue T,
Abe Y,
Sawada Y,
Mizutani T,
Inamura N,
Nakahara K,
Kojo H,
Oku T,
and
Notsu Y.
Nonpeptide mimic of bradykinin with long-acting properties at the bradykinin B2 receptor.
Mol Pharmacol
52:
16-20,
1997
3.
Benzing, T,
Fleming I,
Blaukat A,
Müller-Esterl W,
and
Busse R.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramiprilat interferes with the sequestration of the B2 kinin receptor within the plasma membrane of native endothelial cells.
Circulation
99:
2034-2040,
1999
4.
Bhoola, KD,
Figueroa CD,
and
Worthy K.
Bioregulation of kinins: kallikreins, kininogens, and kininases.
Pharmacol Rev
44:
1-80,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
5.
Blaukat, A,
Abd Alla S,
Lohse MJ,
and
Müller-Esterl W.
Ligand-induced phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of the endogenous bradykinin B2 receptor from human fibroblasts.
J Biol Chem
271:
32366-32374,
1996
6.
Blaukat, A,
Herzer K,
Schroeder C,
Bachmann M,
Nash N,
and
Müller-Esterl W.
Overexpression and functional characterization of kinin receptors reveal subtype-specific phosphorylation.
Biochemistry
38:
1300-1309,
1999[Medline].
7.
Blaukat, A,
Pizard A,
Breit A,
Wernstedt C,
Alhenc-Gelas F,
Müller-Esterl W,
and
Dikic I.
Determination of bradykinin B2 receptor in vivo phosphorylation sites and their role in receptor function.
J Biol Chem
276:
40431-40440,
2001
8.
Böhm, SK,
Grady EF,
and
Bunnett NW.
Regulatory mechanisms that modulate signalling by G-protein-coupled receptors.
Biochem J
322:
1-18,
1997.
9.
Bouvier, M,
Collins S,
O'Dowd BF,
Campbell PT,
de Blasi A,
Kobilka BK,
MacGregor C,
Irons GP,
Caron MG,
and
Lefkowitz RJ.
Two distinct pathways for cAMP-mediated down-regulation of the
2-adrenergic receptor. Phosphorylation of the receptor and regulation of its mRNA level.
J Biol Chem
264:
16786-16792,
1989
10.
Burd, AL,
El-Kouhen R,
Erickson LJ,
Loh HH,
and
Law PY.
Identification of serine 356 and serine 363 as the amino acids involved in etorphine-induced downregulation of the µ-opioid receptor.
J Biol Chem
273:
34488-34495,
1998
11.
Chase, TN.
Levodopa therapy: consequences of the nonphysiologic replacement of dopamine.
Neurology
50, Suppl 5:
S17-S25,
1998
12.
Chen, EY,
Emerich DF,
Bartus RT,
and
Kordower JH.
B2 bradykinin receptor immunoreactivity in rat brain.
J Comp Neurol
427:
1-18,
2000[Medline].
13.
Chomczynski, P,
and
Sacchi N.
Single-step method for RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem
162:
156-159,
1987[Web of Science][Medline].
14.
Dever, TE.
Gene-specific regulation by general translation factors.
Cell
108:
545-556,
2002[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Emerich, DF,
Dean RL,
Osborn C,
and
Bartus RT.
The development of the bradykinin agonist labradimil as a means to increase the permeability of the blood-brain barrier: from concept to clinical evaluation.
Clin Pharmacokinet
40:
105-123,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
16.
Fathy, DB,
Leeb T,
Mathis S,
and
Leeb-Lundberg LMF
Spontaneous human B2 bradykinin receptor activity determines the action of partial agonists as agonists or inverse agonists. Effect of basal desensitization.
J Biol Chem
274:
29603-29606,
1999
17.
Feighner, JP.
Mechanism of action of antidepressant medications.
J Clin Psychiatry
60:
4-11,
1999.
18.
Feinberg, A,
and
Vogelstein B.
A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity.
Anal Biochem
53:
6-13,
1983.
19.
Gage, RM,
Kim KA,
Cao TT,
and
von Zastrow M.
A transplantable sorting signal that is sufficient to mediate rapid recycling of G protein-coupled receptors.
J Biol Chem
276:
44712-44720,
2001
20.
Gagnon, AW,
Kallal L,
and
Benovic JL.
Role of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in agonist-induced down-regulation of the
2-adrenergic receptor.
J Biol Chem
273:
6976-6981,
1998
21.
Golser, R,
Gorren AC,
Leber A,
Andrew P,
Habisch HJ,
Werner ER,
Schmidt K,
Venema RC,
and
Mayer B.
Interaction of endothelial and neuronal nitric-oxide synthases with the bradykinin B2 receptor. Binding of an inhibitory peptide to the oxygenase domain blocks uncoupled NADPH oxidation.
J Biol Chem
275:
5291-5296,
2000
22.
Grady, EF,
Böhm SK,
and
Bunnett NW.
Turning off the signal: mechanisms that attenuate signaling by G protein-coupled receptors.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
273:
G586-G601,
1997
23.
Haasemann, M,
Cartaud J,
Müller-Esterl W,
and
Dunia I.
Agonist-induced redistribution of bradykinin B2 receptor in caveolae.
J Cell Sci
111:
917-928,
1998[Abstract].
24.
Jockers, R,
Angers S,
Da Silva A,
Benaroch P,
Strosberg AD,
Bouvier M,
and
Marullo S.
2-Adrenergic receptor down-regulation. Evidence for a pathway that does not require endocytosis.
J Biol Chem
274:
28900-28908,
1999
25.
Kahn, R,
Herwald H,
Müller-Esterl W,
Schmitt R,
Sjögren AC,
Truedsson L,
and
Karpman D.
Contact-system activation in children with vasculitis.
Lancet
360:
535-541,
2002[Web of Science][Medline].
26.
Kaufmann, J,
Haasemann M,
Modrow S,
and
Müller-Esterl W.
Structural dissection of the multi-domain kininogens Fine mapping of the target epitopes of antibodies interfering with their functional properties.
J Biol Chem
268:
9079-9091,
1993
27.
Kleijn, M,
Scheper GC,
Voorma HO,
and
Thomas AM.
Regulation of translation initiation factors by signal transduction.
Eur J Biochem
253:
531-544,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
28.
Krupnick, JG,
and
Benovic JL.
The role of receptor kinases and arrestins in G protein-coupled receptor regulation.
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol
38:
289-319,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
29.
Lamb, ME,
De Weerd WF,
and
Leeb-Lundberg LMF
Agonist-promoted trafficking of human bradykinin receptors: arrestin- and dynamin-independent sequestration of the B2 receptor and bradykinin in HEK293 cells.
Biochem J
355:
741-750,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
30.
Munoz, CM,
Cotecchia S,
and
Leeb-Lundberg LMF
B2 kinin receptor-mediated internalization of bradykinin in DDT1 MF-2 smooth muscle cells is paralleled by sequestration of the occupied receptors.
Arch Biochem Biophys
301:
336-344,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
31.
Pizard, A,
Blaukat A,
Müller-Esterl W,
Alhenc-Gelas F,
and
Rajerison RM.
Bradykinin-induced internalization of the human B2 receptor requires phosphorylation of three serine and two threonine residues at its carboxyl tail.
J Biol Chem
274:
12738-12747,
1999
32.
Port, JD,
Huang LY,
and
Malbon CC.
-Adrenergic agonists that down-regulate receptor mRNA up-regulate a M(r) 35,000 protein(s) that selectively binds to
-adrenergic receptor mRNAs.
J Biol Chem
267:
24103-24108,
1992
33.
Prado, GN,
Mierke DF,
Pellegrini M,
Taylor L,
and
Polgar P.
Motif mutation of bradykinin B2 receptor second intracellular loop and proximal C terminus is critical for signal transduction, internalization, and resensitization.
J Biol Chem
273:
33548-33555,
1998
34.
Riezman, H.
Down regulation of yeast G protein-coupled receptors.
Semin Cell Dev Biol
9:
129-134,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
35.
Roscher, AA,
Manganiello VC,
Jelsema CL,
and
Moss J.
Autoregulation of bradykinin receptors and bradykinin-induced prostacyclin formation in human fibroblasts.
J Clin Invest
74:
552-558,
1984[Web of Science][Medline].
36.
Sambrook, J,
Fritsch EF,
and
Maniatis T.
Molecular Cloning. A Laboratorial Manual (2nd ed.). New York: Cold Spring Harbor, 1989.
37.
Sethi, T,
Langdon S,
Smyth J,
and
Rozengurt E.
Growth of small cell lung cancer cells: stimulation by multiple neuropeptides and inhibition by broad spectrum antagonists in vitro and in vivo.
Cancer Res
52:
2737s-2742s,
1992
38.
Shenoy, SK,
McDonald PH,
Kohout TA,
and
Lefkowitz RJ.
Regulation of receptor fate by ubiquitination of activated
2-adrenergic receptor and
-arrestin.
Science
294:
1307-1313,
2001
39.
Tobin, AB.
Are we
-ARKing up the wrong tree? Casein kinase 1
provides an additional pathway for GPCR phosphorylation.
Trends Pharmacol Sci
23:
337-343,
2002[Medline].
40.
Tschöpe, C,
Schultheiss HP,
and
Walther T.
Multiple interactions between the renin-angiotensin and the kallikrein-kinin systems: role of ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
39:
478-487,
2002[Web of Science][Medline].
41.
Venema, VJ,
Ju H,
Sun J,
Eaton DC,
Marrero MB,
and
Venema RC.
Bradykinin stimulates the tyrosine phosphorylation and bradykinin B2 receptor association of phospholipase C-
1 in vascular endothelial cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
246:
70-75,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
42.
Von Zastrow, M.
Role of endocytosis in signaling and regulation of G-protein-coupled receptors.
Biochem Soc Trans
29:
500-504,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
43.
Willars, GB,
Müller-Esterl W,
and
Nahorski SR.
Receptor phosphorylation does not mediate cross talk between muscarinic M3 and bradykinin B2 receptors.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
277:
C859-C869,
1999
44.
Whistler, JL,
Enquist J,
Marley A,
Fong J,
Gladher F,
Tsuruda PR,
Murray S,
and
von Zastrow M.
Modulation of postendocytic sorting of G protein-coupled receptors.
Science
297:
615-620,
2002
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. S. Kang, K. Ryberg, M. Morgelin, and L. M. F. Leeb-Lundberg Spontaneous Formation of a Proteolytic B1 and B2 Bradykinin Receptor Complex with Enhanced Signaling Capacity J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 2004; 279(21): 22102 - 22107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Skidgel, F. Alhenc-Gelas, and W. B. Campbell Regulation of Cardiovascular Signaling by Kinins and Products of Similar Converting Enzyme Systems: Prologue: Kinins and related systems. New life for old discoveries Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): H1886 - H1891. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |