|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Departments of 1 Physiology, 2 Pharmacology, and 4 Clinical Research Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7; Department of 3 Pharmacology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada J1H 5N4
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With the use
of in vitro receptor autoradiography, this study aims at determining
whether the higher level of kinin B2 receptor density in
the spinal cord of the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) is
secondary to arterial hypertension and whether chronic treatment with
angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) can regulate neuronal
B1 and B2 receptors. SHR received, from the age
of 4 wk, one of the two ACEI (lisinopril or zofenopril, 10 mg · kg
1 · day
1)
or for comparison, the selective AT1 antagonist (losartan,
20 mg · kg
1 · day
1)
in their drinking water for a period of 4, 12, and 20 wk. Age-matched untreated SHR and Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) were used as controls. B2 receptor binding sites in most laminae were higher in
SHR than in WKY from the age of 8 to 24 wk. Whereas B1
receptor binding sites were significantly present in young SHR and WKY,
they were barely detectable in adult rats. ACEI (16 and 24 wk) and
AT1 antagonist (24 wk) enhanced the number of
B2 without changing B1 receptor binding sites.
However, at 8 wk the three treatments significantly increased
B1 and decreased B2 receptors in lamina I. It
is concluded that 1) the higher density of B2
receptors in the spinal cord of SHR is not due to hypertension,
2) kinin receptors are regulated differently by ACEI in
neuronal and vascular tissues, and 3) aging may have a
profound impact on levels of B1 and B2
receptors in the rat spinal cord.
bradykinin; B1 receptor; B2 receptor; hypertension
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KININ-RELATED
PEPTIDES referring mainly to bradykinin (BK) and kallidin
(Lys-BK) were identified as neuromediators in the central control of
arterial blood pressure and nociceptive information (7,
8). Kinins act on two transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors
denoted as B1 and B2 receptors (38,
39). The widely distributed B2 receptor is
constitutive and mediates most of the biological effects of kinins.
Whereas the B1 receptor is absent or underexpressed under
physiological conditions, this receptor is induced and upregulated
during tissue injury or in the presence of cytokines (27).
The induction of B1 receptor by cytokines involves the
transcriptional nuclear factor
B and the mitogen-activated protein
kinase (35, 40, 46).
Kinins are metabolized by a group of carboxypeptidases named kininases I and II. Kininase I removes the COOH-terminal arginine from the parent molecules to yield the active metabolites des-Arg9-BK and des-Arg10-kallidine, which act as potent B1 receptor agonists (39). Kininase II, also known as angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE), is responsible for the inactivation of kinins and the generation of angiotensin II (14). Breakdown inhibition of vasoactive kinins is believed to contribute to the therapeutic effects of ACE inhibitors (ACEI) in the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases (21, 22). A recent study also reported an upregulation of B1 receptors at both mRNA and functional levels in vascular and renal tissues from normotensive rats and mice under chronic treatment with ramipril, an ACEI (29).
Recent work suggests a putative role for central kinin receptors in arterial hypertension. For instance, the increased number and expression of B2 receptors have been shown in the cardiovascular centers of the human medulla from hypertensive donors (12) and in the hypothalamus and cardiovascular medullary nuclei of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) (8, 36). Higher density of B2 receptor binding sites in the thoracic spinal cord, an important center of autonomic control of blood pressure, was correlated with a greater cardiovascular response to intrathecal injection of BK in 16-wk-old SHR (6). However, there is no evidence so far that the upregulation of B2 receptors in the spinal cord and brain of SHR is causal or secondary to arterial hypertension.
Therefore, the aims of this study were to determine whether 1) the higher density of spinal B2 receptors in SHR is secondary to arterial hypertension or is related to a genetic feature of the strain, and 2) ACEI can regulate the expression of B1 receptors in the thoracic spinal cord of SHR as observed in peripheral vascular and renal tissues. These issues were addressed by measuring the effects of three antihypertensive agents, including two unrelated classes of ACEI [lisinopril without sulfhydryl (SH) group and zofenopril with SH group] and one antagonist of angiotensin AT1 receptor (losartan), which is commonly used in the treatment of human hypertension (17), on the density of B1 and B2 receptor binding sites in the thoracic spinal cord (T9-T10) of SHR by in vitro autoradiography. The effects of ACEI and losartan on kinin receptor densities were evaluated in young SHR at the onset of hypertension (8 wk old, after 4 wk of treatment) and in adult SHR during the established phase of hypertension (16 and 24 wk old, after 12 and 20 wk of treatment). Data were compared with age-matched untreated SHR and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY), which also allowed the determination of the effect of aging on the level of receptor binding sites.
| |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemicals and materials. HPP-desArg10-HOE 140 (3-4 hydroxyphenyl-propionyl-desArg9-D-Arg[Hyp3,Thi5,D-Tic7,Oic8]-BK) and HPP-HOE 140 (3-4 hydroxyphenyl-propionyl-D-Arg[Hyp3,Thi5,D-Tic7,Oic8]-BK) were developed from the selective B1 receptor antagonist desArg10-HOE 140 (44) and the B2 receptor antagonist HOE 140 or Icatibant (18), respectively. They were synthesized in the laboratory of D. Regoli (Department of Pharmacology, Université de Sherbrooke). Autoradiographic 125I-labeled microscales (20 µm) and 3H Hyperfilm (single-coated, 24 × 30 cm) were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Canada. Losartan (Cozaar tablet), lisinopril, PIPES, 1,10-phenanthroline, dithiothreitol, bacitracin, captopril, and BSA (protease free) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Canada, and zofenopril was a gift from Menarini Ricerche Sireneze in Italy.
Peptide iodination.
Iodination of HPP-desArg10-HOE 140 and HPP-HOE 140 was
performed according to the chloramine T method (19).
Briefly, 5 µg of peptide were incubated in 0.05 M phosphate buffer
for 30 s in the presence of 0.5 mCi (18.5 MBq) of
125I-labeled Na and 220 nmol of chloramine T in a total
volume of 85 µl. The monoiodinated peptide was then immediately
purified by high pressure liquid chromatography on a C4 Vydac column
(0.4 × 250 mm) (The Separations Group, Hesperia, CA) with 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid and acetonitrile as mobile phases. The specific
activity of the iodinated peptides corresponds to 2,000 counts · min
1 · fmol
1
or 1,212 Ci/mmol.
Animal source and care. Male SHR (n = 48) and WKY (n = 12) were purchased from Charles River (St-Constant, Québec, Canada). They were individually housed in wire-bottom cages, in rooms under controlled temperature (23°C), humidity (50%), and lighting (12:12-h light-dark cycle) with food (Charles River Rodent) and tap water available ad libitum. All animal procedures were in strict compliance with the guiding principles for animal experimentation as enunciated by the Canadian Council on Animal Care and approved by the Animal Care Committee of our University.
Treatments of SHR.
SHR received from the age of 4 wk, one of the two ACEI, lisinopril or
zofenopril (10 mg · kg
1 · day
1),
or the selective AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan (20 mg · kg
1 · day
1),
in their drinking water for a period of 4, 12, and 20 wk. To ascertain
that the animals took the expected dose of the drug, the daily water
intake and body weight were taken into account and adjusted
accordingly. Control age-matched SHR and WKY had no treatment during
the same periods. Equiactive oral dose of zofenopril and lisinopril was
selected, based on an earlier study using ex vivo inhibition of tissue
ACE in SHR (9). The dose of losartan selected was found to
be effective in chronic studies in SHR (16, 42, 43).
Before euthanasia, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was measured in
awake animals at the age of 8, 16, and 24 wk with a catheter implanted
24 h earlier into the abdominal aorta through the femoral artery
and exteriorized at the back of the neck. The latter surgery
was made under anesthesia with pentobarbital sodium (65 mg/kg ip). Body
weight of animals was measured daily from the onset of treatments.
Tissue preparation for autoradiography.
Rats were euthanized at the age of 8, 16, and 24 wk by asphyxia by
respiratory CO2 inhalation and subjected to dorsal
laminectomy. Spinal cords (segments T8-T11) were immediately
removed after careful incision of the dura mater and frozen in
2-methylbutane cooled at
45 to
55°C with liquid nitrogen and then
stored at
80°C until use. Matched spinal cord segments (T9 to T10)
of the four rats from the same experimental group were mounted together in a gelatin block and serially cut into 20-µm-thick coronal sections with a cryostat fixed at temperatures varied between
11 and
13°C. Thus each section of the cryostat was from four spinal cords. A total
of eight sections per slide were then alternatively thaw-mounted on
0.2% gelatin-0.033% chromium potassium sulfate-coated slides. Three
slides were taken for the total binding and two slides (adjacent sections) for the nonspecific binding. A total of 50 slides (1,600 sections) were obtained for each group studied and kept at
80°C until use.
In vitro receptor autoradiography.
Sections were thawed, preincubated for 30 s in 25 mM PIPES buffer
(pH 7.4; 4°C), and incubated at room temperature for 90 min in the
same buffer containing 1 mM 1,10-phenanthroline, 1 mM dithiothreitol,
0.014% bacitracin, 0.1 mM captopril, 0.2% BSA (protease free), and
7.5 mM magnesium chloride in the presence of 150 pM
125I-labeled HPP-desArg10-HOE 140 ([125I]HPP-desArg10-HOE 140) (for
B1 receptor) or 200 pM 125I-labeled HPP-HOE 140 ([125I]HPP-HOE 140) (for B2 receptor). The
concentrations of radioligands chosen yielded maximal specific binding
(Bmax) on the saturation curves in the spinal dorsal horn
of SHR and WKY (6). The dissociation constant
(Kd) of [125I]HPP-HOE 140 was
identical in SHR and WKY (Kd = 30 pM),
whereas that of [125I]HPP-desArg10-HOE 140 was calculated at 27 pM in SHR. The nonspecific binding was determined
in the presence of 1 µM of unlabeled ligands
(HPP-desArg10-HOE 140 for B1 receptor and
HPP-HOE 140 for B2 receptor). To ascertain the specificity
of the labeled B2 radioligand, the same concentration of
unlabeled B1 ligand was added to the solution. Likewise,
the same concentration of the unlabeled B2 ligand was added
to the labeled B1 ligand solution. At the end of the
incubation period, slides were transferred sequentially through four
rinses of 4 min each in 25 mM PIPES (pH 7.4; 4°C), dipped for 15 s in distilled water (4°C) to remove the excess of salts, and then air-dried. 3H Hyperfilm was juxtaposed onto the slides in
the presence of 125I microscales and exposed at room
temperature for 3 days (B1 ligand) or 2 days
(B2 ligand). The films were developed in D-19 (Kodak developer) and fixed in Kodak Ektaflo. Autoradiograms were quantified by densitometry using an image analysis system (MCID Imaging Research; Ontario, Canada). Standard curve from 125I microscales was
used to convert density levels into fentomoles per milligram of tissue.
Specific binding was determined by subtracting superimposed digitalized
images of nonspecific labeling from total binding. The anatomic
structures with the corresponding nomenclature are depicted in Fig.
1 and adapted from the Atlas of Paxinos
and Watson (33).
|
Statistical analysis of data. Results represent the means ± SE of four animals per group. Quantification was performed on 400 sections for each spinal cord (T9-T10) on both sides. Statistical analysis of data was performed with the Graph-Pad Prism computer program, and the statistical significance between SHR and WKY was determined with a Student's t-test for unpaired samples. For multiple comparisons to the same control group (untreated SHR), a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the test of Dunnett was employed. A one-way ANOVA in conjunction with Bonferroni confidence intervals was used for multiple comparisons between WKY and SHR. Only P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Body weight and blood pressure.
Body weight and baseline MAP in SHR and WKY are shown in Fig.
2. At the onset of the treatment (4 wk)
and at 24 wk, no statistical difference was found in body weight
between SHR and WKY in all groups. However, the body weight of SHR at 8 and 16 wk was significantly higher than in age-matched WKY. Chronic
treatment with zofenopril and lisinopril (16 wk) prevented excessive
body weight gain in SHR. At 8 wk, the difference in body weight
between strains was no more significant with lisinopril.
|
B1 receptor binding sites.
Representative distribution of B1 receptor binding sites in
the lower thoracic spinal cord of 8-, 16-, and 24-wk-old WKY and SHR is
depicted in Fig. 3, and the corresponding
quantitative values are shown in Fig. 4.
Discrete distribution of
[125I]HPP-desArg10-HOE 140 labeling was
detected in the dorsal horn lamina I of which its density was
significantly higher at 8 wk in SHR (2 fmol/mg tissue) than in
age-matched WKY (1.14 fmol/mg tissue). The other structures of the
spinal cord gray matter of 8-wk-old SHR and WKY had lower specific
densities of B1 receptors (around 1.0 fmol/mg tissue) with
no statistical difference between strains (Fig. 4). The addition of 1 µM of unlabeled HPP-desArg10-HOE 140 to the incubation
medium completely eliminated the labeling in all laminae (Fig.
3). However, a background of very low specific labeling to
B1 receptor was found in all laminae (values
0.5 fmol/mg
tissue) in 16- and 24-wk-old WKY and SHR (data not shown).
|
|
B2 receptor binding sites.
The distribution of B2 receptor binding sites and their
relative densities in each lamina of the
spinal cord of 8-, 16-, and 24-wk-old WKY
and SHR are shown in Figs. 5 and 6 and Table
1. The labeling of
[125I]HPP-HOE 140 was observed all over the structures of
the gray matter, with discrete definition in the dorsal horn of all
studied animals. The addition of 1 µM of unlabeled HPP-HOE 140 to the incubation medium largely eliminated the total labeling.
|
|
|
Effects of long-term treatment with antihypertensive drugs.
Effects of chronic treatments with ACEI (zofenopril or lisinopril) and
a selective AT1 receptor antagonist (losartan) were assessed on the densities of both kinin receptors in the spinal cord of
SHR. The density of B1 receptors in lamina I was
significantly increased after 4 wk of treatment with lisinopril (+16%,
P < 0.01), losartan (+6%, P < 0.01),
and zofenopril (+36%, P < 0.01), yet no significant
changes were measured in the other laminae. In contrast, the density of
B2 receptors was markedly decreased in lamina I by the
three treatments (
57% to
65%, P < 0.01) (Figs. 5
and 6). B2 receptor binding values in other laminae (except lamina II) were too small to discriminate a real effect with the drugs,
and therefore they were not considered for the remainder of the study.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main findings of this study are 1) the greater density of B2 receptor binding sites in the thoracic spinal cord of SHR is unlikely secondary to arterial hypertension because it subsisted in SHR subjected to antihypertensive therapy with ACEI or losartan; 2) aging has an opposite effect on the level of B1 and B2 receptors densities in the spinal cord because adult SHR displayed greater density of B2 but scarce density of B1 receptor binding sites compared with young SHR, which displayed the highest density of B1 and the lowest density of B2 receptor binding sites; 3) ACEI enhanced the density of spinal B1 receptor binding sites as in vascular and renal organs, yet this occurred only after 4 wk of treatment in young SHR and not in adult SHR exposed to a longer period of antihypertensive therapy; 4) ACEI has an opposite influence on B1 and B2 receptors because B2 receptor binding sites were decreased after 4 wk of treatment in young SHR and increased after a longer period (8 and 16 wk) of antihypertensive therapy in adult SHR; and 5) the effect of ACEI on the expression of B2 receptors is not shared by losartan after 12 wk of treatment (16 wk old SHR), and therefore a dissociation could be established between the changes of receptors and the antihypertensive effect of ACEI.
Distribution and density of B1 receptors in the thoracic spinal cord of SHR and WKY. Aging had a profound influence on the density of [125I]HPP-desArg10-HOE 140 binding to B1 receptors in the spinal cord of WKY and SHR as it was present at 8 wk (SHR >> WKY) and severely decreased in both strains at the age of 16 and 24 wk. Notwithstanding, this limited life span of B1 receptors, a low but detectable density of specific binding sites persisted in all laminae in both strains, suggesting the presence of a basal expression of B1 receptors in the spinal cord of adult SHR and WKY. This finding is in agreement with the basal B1 receptor expression (mRNA) and its immunohistochemical detection in rat and human spinal cord dorsal horn (26, 45). The significance of the higher level of B1 receptor expression in young SHR (lamina I) and its decline in all laminae in adult is not understood at the present time, yet the present finding is congruent with an earlier study that concluded that B1 receptors are not involved in spinal cardiovascular regulation in adult SHR and WKY (6). Because B1 receptors are detectable only in young SHR, it is unlikely that they are responsible for the maintenance of high blood pressure in adult SHR.
Distribution and density of B2 receptors in the
thoracic spinal cord of SHR and WKY.
The distribution of [125I]HPP-HOE 140 binding sites in
the spinal cord of WKY and SHR is in agreement with previous
observations made in the rat, guinea pig, and sheep spinal cord with
[125I-Tyr8]BK or [125I]HPP-HOE
140 as the radioligand (24, 25, 31). The highest density of specific binding sites was found in superficial layers of
the dorsal horn, whereas moderate to lower specific B2
receptor binding sites were detected in other laminae with no evidence of labeling in the white matter. However, contrary to the Wistar rat,
which displayed the highest density of 125I-labeled
[Tyr8]BK binding in lamina II (substantia gelatinosa)
(24), the highest level of binding with
[125I]HPP-HOE 140 was located in lamina I in both SHR and
WKY. This discrepancy is likely due to the strain difference and not to the radioligand because the use of 125I-labeled HPP-HOE 140 confirms the highest concentration of B2 receptor binding
sites in lamina II in the Wistar rat (data not shown). This strain
difference remains unknown at this time but may indicate a differential
expression of B2 receptors on A
- and C-fiber primary
sensory neurons. B2 receptors are predominantly located on
terminals of capsaicin-sensitive primary sensory C-fibers and of
bulbospinal noradrenergic neurons in the spinal dorsal horn of Wistar
rats (24). Activation of these receptors on
sensory and noradrenergic terminals led to nociceptive and
antinociceptive responses, respectively, in the rat tail-flick test
(7, 20).
Effect of ACEI and AT1 receptor antagonist on spinal kinin receptors. Apart from their distinctive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic features, the therapeutic benefits of ACEI in the treatment of hypertension are thought to be class effects (41). Two major groups of ACEI have been documented: those containing a SH group as captopril and zofenopril and those without a SH group represented by lisinopril (4). Lisinopril and zofenopril can pass the blood-brain barrier to produce significant inhibition of brain ACE activity after oral administration in SHR (9, 37). However, in our study, while zofenopril normalized blood pressure and lisinopril caused hypotension, both ACEI produced similar changes in the density of B1 and B2 receptors in the spinal cord of SHR, suggesting that these changes are not associated with or without the presence of SH group of ACEI. Pharmacodynamic differences between zofenopril and lisinopril may however explain their distinct antihypertensive profile. Lisinopril was also more effective than zofenopril in reducing the body weight of overweight SHR. Because losartan was less effective in reducing body weight increase in SHR, the antiobesity effect of ACEI cannot be entirely ascribed to inhibition of the hypertrophic feature of angiotensin II. Thus a role for endogenous kinins cannot be excluded in this additional beneficial effect of ACEI on body weight.
In addition, pretreatment for 4 wk with ACEI or losartan, which prevented the development of hypertension in SHR, caused a further increase of B1 receptors in lamina I yet a decrease of B2 receptors. Upregulation of B2 receptors occurred only after a longer treatment with ACEI (16 and 24 wk) or losartan (24 wk). These changes of B1 and B2 receptor densities in SHR are unlikely attributable to the antihypertensive effect of the treatment, because the prevention of hypertension with losartan did not reproduce ACEI-induced B2 receptor upregulation at 16 wk. Although both ACEI and losartan reduced the number of B2 receptors in SHR after 4 wk of treatment (8 wk old), the levels of B2 receptors were still significantly higher in the dorsal horn of SHR compared with age-matched WKY. This evidence suggests that the higher densities of B2 receptor binding sites in most laminae in SHR are related to a genetic feature of the strain and not to hypertension. Whereas it is uncertain whether the greater number of B2 receptors found in the spinal cord of SHR, particularly between the age of 8 and 16 wk, contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension, the higher density of B2 receptor binding sites was ascribed as the likely mechanism to explain the hypersensitivity of the pressor response to BK injected in the spinal cord of awake SHR (6). Higher concentrations of kinins, kininogen, kallikrein, and kininase II (ACE) activity were also reported in the cerebrospinal fluid of adult SHR compared with their normotensive controls, suggesting a hyperactive kallikrein-kinin system in the brain and spinal cord of SHR (for a review, see Ref. 8). Because the activation of B2 receptors in the spinal cord leads to increases of blood pressure through the stimulation of the sympathoadrenal system and the peripheral release of catecholamines (23), increased sensitivity to the pressor action of BK along with increased number of receptors and endogenous ligands may contribute to the higher sympathetic tone generally reported in different models of hypertension, including SHR (10, 11). This hypothesis remains to be challenged with a prolonged infusion of the entire spinal cord with specific kinin receptor antagonists because acute blockade of B1 and B2 receptors at the T-9 spinal cord level in SHR was insufficient to alter baseline blood pressure (6). It is also possible that kinins act chiefly as neuromodulators and not as primary mediators of spinal autonomic functions (8).Reciprocal regulation of B1 and B2 receptors during aging and antihypertensive therapy. Interestingly, the downregulation of B1 receptors from 8 to 24 wk was accompanied by an upregulation of B2 receptors, suggesting an age-dependent regulation of kinin receptors in WKY and SHR. Moreover, the upregulation of B1 receptors induced by the two ACEI and losartan at 8 wk was accompanied by a downregulation of B2 receptors, suggesting again that these receptors are regulated in an opposite way by ACEI and losartan in SHR. This is in keeping with the phenomenon described previously where complete desensitization of B2 receptors in inflammatory models or its deletion in B2 receptor gene knockout mice led to overexpression of B1 receptors (5, 13, 29).
Conflicting data have been reported regarding the regulation of kinin receptors by ACEI. An early pharmacological study has reported an upregulation of B1 receptors in the rabbit vascular system both in vivo and in vitro following acute treatment (18 h) with ACEI (32). More recently, acute inhibition of ACE (48 h) failed to upregulate the B1 receptor (mRNA expression and function) in vascular and nonvascular peripheral organs of rabbits (28). However, a 6-wk treatment with ramipril is associated with functional induction of vascular and renal B1 receptor in normotensive rats, wild-type and B2 receptor gene knockout mice (29). Our results at 8 wk support an upregulation of B1 receptors after 4 wk of treatment with ACEI, although a longer period of treatment (12 and 20 wk) had no effect. It is therefore apparent that this phenomenon occurs within a specific time window, and different conclusions can be drawn depending on the duration of the treatment. It is also noteworthy that contrary to B1 receptors, vascular and renal B2 receptor mRNA was not affected by ACEI in rats (29), suggesting that kinin receptor expression is regulated differently in peripheral and central nervous tissues.Possible mechanisms underlying the effects of ACEI and losartan on kinin receptors. The mechanism of downregulation and upregulation of neuronal B2 receptors and upregulation of B1 receptors by ACEI is still unknown. We can exclude that the radioligand binds to ACE or to other proteins as captopril was present throughout the autoradiographic procedure in all experimental groups and B2 receptor binding sites seen with the same radioligand in the spinal cord of wild-type mice were gone in B2 receptor gene knockout mice (8).
Although ACEI do not act directly on B2 receptors (14), they can interfere with the sequestration and internalization of B2 receptors within the cellular membrane in native porcine aortic endothelial cells (3) and in Chinese hamster ovary cells (30). An interaction with the process of B2 receptor dimerization, which is directly involved in the endogenous and recycling of receptors, may represent another putative mechanism by which ACEI could affect B2 receptor binding (2). Also, the formation of stable heterodimers between B2 and AT1 receptors, which change the endocytotic pathway of both receptors and enhance G protein activation (1), may provide a possible mechanism by which losartan can affect the expression of B2 receptors in our paradigm. On the other hand, the B1 receptor is not subjected to internalization and resensitization; therefore, its regulation is more likely to occur at the transcriptional and mRNA levels (15, 46). Because B2 and B1 receptors are largely synthesized outside the spinal cord in dorsal root ganglia (24, 34, 45), one cannot exclude the possibility that the site of regulation of kinin receptors by ACEI and losartan is at the level of the cell body of primary sensory fibers.| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors acknowledge G. Lapalme (Clinical Research Institute of Montréal) for technical assistance in the iodination of ligands and Dr. Jean-Guy Chabot (Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Center, McGill University) for conceding the use of the Image Analysis System (MCID, Imaging Research, Ontario, Canada).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This project was supported by Grant-In-Aid Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-14379. B. Ongali holds a Studentship from the Republic of Gabon, and H. S. Buck was the recipient of a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paolo (São Paolo, Brazil).
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. Couture, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Paul-G.-Desmarais, 2960, Chemin de la Tour, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3T 1J4 (E-mail: couturer{at}physio.umontreal.ca).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published February 13, 2003;10.1152/ajpheart.01113.2002
Received 19 December 2002; accepted in final form 7 February 2003.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
AbdAlla, S,
Lother H,
and
Quitterer U.
AT1-receptor heterodimers show enhanced G-protein activation and altered receptor sequestration.
Nature
407:
94-98,
2000[Medline].
2.
AbdAlla, S,
Zaki E,
Lother H,
and
Quitterer U.
Involvement of the amino terminus of the B2 receptor in agonist-induced receptor dimerization.
J Biol Chem
274:
26079-26084,
1999
3.
Benzing, T,
Fleming I,
Blaukat A,
Müller-Esterl W,
and
Busse R.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramiprilat interferes with the sequestration of the B2 kinin receptor within the plasma membrane of native endothelial cells.
Circulation
99:
2034-2040,
1999
4.
Buikema, H,
Monnink SHJ,
Tio RA,
Crijns HJGM,
de Zeeuw D,
and
van Gilst WH.
Comparison of zofenopril and lisinopril to study the role of the sulfhydryl-group in improvement of endothelial dysfunction with ACE-inhibitors in experimental heart failure.
Br J Pharmacol
130:
1999-2007,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
5.
Campos, MM,
and
Calixto JB.
Involvement of B1 and B2 receptors in bradykinin-induced rat paw oedema.
Br J Pharmacol
114:
1005-1013,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
6.
Cloutier, F,
De Sousa Buck H,
Ongali B,
and
Couture R.
Pharmacologic and autoradiographic evidence for an up-regulation of kinin B2 receptors in the spinal cord of spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Br J Pharmacol
135:
1641-1654,
2002[Web of Science][Medline].
7.
Couture, R,
Harrisson M,
Vianna RM,
and
Cloutier F.
Kinin receptors in pain and inflammation.
Eur J Pharmacol
429:
161-176,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
8.
Couture, R,
and
Lindsey CJ.
Brain kallikrein-kinin system: from receptors to neural pathways and physiological functions.
In: Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. Peptide Receptors, edited by Quirion R,
Björklund A,
and Hökfelt T.. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 2000, part 1, vol. 16, p. 241-300.
9.
Cushman, DW,
Wang FL,
Fung WC,
Grover GJ,
Harvey CM,
Scalese RJ,
Mitch SL,
and
DeForrest JM.
Comparisons in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo of the actions of seven structurally diverse inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE).
Br J Clin Pharmacol
28:
115S-131S,
1989[Medline].
10.
De Champlain, J.
Participation du système nerveux autonome dans l'hypertension. artérielle.
Médecine Sciences
14, Suppl 2:
10-22,
1998.
11.
De Champlain, J.
Pre- and postsynaptic adrenergic dysfunctions in hypertension.
J Hypertens
8, Suppl 7:
S77-S85,
1990.
12.
De Sousa Buck, H,
Ongali B,
Thibault G,
Lindsey CJ,
and
Couture R.
Autoradiographic detection of kinin receptors in the human medulla of control, hypertensive, and diabetic donors.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
80:
249-257,
2002[Web of Science][Medline].
13.
Duka, I,
Kintsurashvili E,
Gavras I,
Johns C,
Bresnahan M,
and
Gavras H.
Vasoactive potential of the B1 bradykinin receptor in normotension and hypertension.
Circ Res
88:
275-281,
2001
14.
Erdös, EG,
and
Marcic BM.
Kinins, receptors, kininases and inhibitors-where did they lead us?
Biol Chem
382:
43-47,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
15.
Faussner, A,
Proud D,
Towns M,
and
Bathon JM.
Influence of the cytosolic carboxyl termini of human B1 and B2 kinin receptors on receptor sequestration, ligand internalization, and signal transduction.
J Biol Chem
273:
2617-2623,
1998
16.
Fortuno, MA,
Ravassa S,
Etayo JC,
and
Diez J.
Overexpression of Bax protein and enhanced apoptosis in the left ventricle of spontaneously hypertensive rats: effects of AT1 blockade with losartan.
Hypertension
32:
280-286,
1998
17.
Hernandez-Hernandez, R,
Sosa-Canache B,
Velasco M,
Armas-Hernandez MJ,
Armas-Padilla MC,
and
Cammarata R.
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists role in arterial hypertension.
J Hum Hypertens
16:
S93-S99,
2002[Medline].
18.
Hock, FJ,
Wirth K,
Albus U,
Linz W,
Gerhards HJ,
Wiemer G,
Henke St Breipohl G,
König W,
Knolle J,
and
Schölkens BA.
HOE 140 a new potent and long acting bradykinin-antagonist: in vitro studies.
Br J Pharmacol
102:
769-773,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
19.
Hunter, WM,
and
Greenwood FC.
Preparation of iodine-131 labelled human growth hormone of high specific activity.
Nature
194:
495-496,
1962[Medline].
20.
Laneuville, O,
Reader TA,
and
Couture R.
Intrathecal bradykinin acts presynaptically on spinal noradrenergic terminals to produce antinociception in the rat.
Eur J Pharmacol
159:
273-283,
1989[Web of Science][Medline].
21.
Linz, W,
Wiemer G,
Gohlke P,
Unger Th,
and
Scholkens BA.
Contribution of kinins to the cardiovascular actions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Pharmacol Rev
47:
25-49,
1995[Abstract].
22.
Linz, W,
Wohlfart P,
Schölkens BA,
Malinski T,
and
Wiemer G.
Interactions among ACE, kinins and NO.
Cardiovasc Res
43:
549-561,
1999
23.
Lopes, P,
and
Couture R.
Cardiovascular responses elicited by intrathecal kinins in the conscious rat.
Eur J Pharmacol
210:
137-147,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Lopes, P,
Kar S,
Chrétien L,
Regoli D,
Quirion R,
and
Couture R.
Quantitative autoradiographic localization of [125I-Tyr8]bradykinin receptor binding sites in the rat spinal cord: effects of neonatal capsaicin, noradrenergic deafferentation, dorsal rhizotomy and peripheral axotomy.
Neuroscience
68:
867-881,
1995[Web of Science][Medline].
25.
Lopes, P,
Kar S,
Tousignant C,
Regoli D,
Quirion R,
and
Couture R.
Autoradiographic localization of [125I-Tyr8]-bradykinin receptor binding sites in the guinea pig spinal cord.
Synapse
15:
48-57,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
26.
Ma, QP,
and
Heavens R.
Basal expression of bradykinin B1 receptor in the spinal cord in humans and rats.
Neuroreport
12:
2311-2314,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
27.
Marceau, F,
Hess JF,
and
Bachvarov DR.
The B1 receptors for kinins.
Pharmacol Rev
50:
357-386,
1998
28.
Marceau, F,
Larrivée JF,
Bouthillier J,
Bachvarova M,
Houle S,
and
Bachvarov DR.
Effect of endogenous kinins, prostanoids, and NO on kinin B1 and B2 receptor expression in the rabbit.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
277:
R1568-R1578,
1999
29.
Marin-Castaño, ME,
Schanstra JP,
Neau E,
Praddaude F,
Pecher C,
Ader JL,
Girolami JP,
and
Bascands JL.
Induction of functional bradykinin B1-receptors in normotensive rats and mice under chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment.
Circulation
105:
627-632,
2002
30.
Minshall, RD,
Tan F,
Nakamura F,
Rabito SF,
Becker RP,
Marcic B,
and
Erdös EG.
Potentiation of the actions of bradykinin by angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors. The role of expressed human bradykinin B2 receptors and angiotensin-converting enzyme in CHO cells.
Circ Res
81:
848-856,
1997
31.
Murone, C,
Paxinos G,
McKinley MJ,
Oldfield BJ,
Müller-Esterl W,
Mendelsohn FAO,
and
Chai SY.
Distribution of bradykinin B2 receptors in sheep brain and spinal cord visualized by in vitro autoradiography.
J Comp Neurol
381:
203-218,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
32.
Nwator, IA,
and
Whalley ET.
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and expression of des-Arg9-BK (kinin B1) receptors in vivo.
Eur J Pharmacol
160:
125-132,
1989[Web of Science][Medline].
33.
Paxinos, G,
and
Watson C.
The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (4th ed). San Diego, CA: Academic, 1998.
34.
Petersen, M,
Eckert AS,
Segond von Banchet G,
Heppelmann B,
Klusch A,
and
Kniffki KD
Plasticity in the expression of bradykinin binding sites in sensory neurons after mechanical nerve injury.
Neuroscience
83:
949-959,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
35.
Phagoo, SB,
Poole S,
and
Leeb-Lundberg LMF
Autoregulation of bradykinin receptors: agonists in the presence of interleukin-1beta shift the repertoire of receptor subtypes from B2 to B1 in human lung fibroblasts.
Mol Pharmacol
56:
325-333,
1999
36.
Qadri, F,
Häuser W,
Jöhren O,
and
Dominiak P.
Kinin B1 and B2 receptor mRNA expression in the hypothalamus of spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol
80:
258-263,
2002[Web of Science][Medline].
37.
Ranadive, SA,
Chen AX,
and
Serajuddin AT.
Relative lipophilicities and structural-pharmacological considerations of various angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
Pharmacol Res
9:
1480-1486,
1992.
38.
Regoli, D,
and
Barabé J.
Pharmacology of bradykinin and related kinins.
Pharmacol Rev
32:
1-46,
1980[Web of Science][Medline].
39.
Regoli, D,
Rizzi A,
Perron SI,
and
Gobeil F.
Classification of kinin receptors.
Biol Chem
382:
31-35,
2001[Web of Science][Medline].
40.
Schanstra, JP,
Bataillé E,
Marin-Castaño ME,
Barascud Y,
Hirtz C,
Pesquero JB,
Pecher C,
Gauthier F,
Girolami JP,
and
Bascands JL.
The B1-agonist [des-Arg10]-kallidin activates transcription Factor NF-kappa B and induces homologous upregulation of the bradykinin B1-receptor in cultured human lung fibroblasts.
J Clin Invest
101:
2080-2091,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
41.
Sica, DA.
Class effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Am J Manag Care
6:
S85-S108,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
42.
Varo, N,
Etayo JC,
Zalba G,
Beaumont J,
Iraburu MJ,
Montiel C,
Gil MJ,
Monreal I,
and
Diez J.
Losartan inhibits the post-transcriptional synthesis of collagen type I and reverses left ventricular fibrosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
J Hypertens
17:
107-114,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
43.
Wagner, J,
Drab M,
Bohlender J,
Amann K,
Wienen W,
and
Ganten D.
Effects of AT1 receptor blockade on blood pressure and the renin-angiotensin system in spontaneously hypertensive rats of the stroke prone strain.
Clin Exp Hypertens
20:
205-221,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
44.
Wirth, K,
Breipohl G,
Stechl J,
Knolle J,
Henke S,
and
Schölkens B.
DesArg9-D-Arg[Hyp3,Thi5,D-Tic7,Oic8]bradykinin (desArg10-[Hoe140]) is a potent bradykinin B1 receptor antagonist.
Eur J Pharmacol
205:
217-218,
1991[Web of Science][Medline].
45.
Wotherspoon, G,
and
Winter J.
Bradykinin B1 receptor is constitutively expressed in the rat sensory nervous system.
Neurosci Lett
294:
175-178,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
46.
Zhou, X,
Prado GN,
Taylor L,
Yang X,
and
Polgar P.
Regulation of inducible bradykinin B1 receptor gene expression through absence of internalization and resensitization.
J Cell Biochem
78:
351-362,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Skidgel, F. Alhenc-Gelas, and W. B. Campbell Regulation of Cardiovascular Signaling by Kinins and Products of Similar Converting Enzyme Systems: Prologue: Kinins and related systems. New life for old discoveries Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): H1886 - H1891. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |