|
|
||||||||
-opioid receptor activation in pharmacological
preconditioning of swine
Departments of 1 Surgery and 2 Physiology and 3 Biomedical Engineering Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pharmacological
preconditioning with
-opioid receptor agonists is
proarrhythmic and exerts antipreconditioning effects in rats. In swine,
it is unknown whether
-opioid receptor stimulation plays a role in
pharmacological preconditioning. Swine were preconditioned with
1) saline (controls), 2)
[D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin
(DADLE), 3) morphine, 4) pentazocine,
5) norbinaltorphimine (nor-BNI), 6) DADLE + nor-BNI, 7) morphine + nor-BNI, or 8)
pentazocine + nor-BNI before occlusion (45 min) and reperfusion
(180 min) of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Infarct size to area at risk (IS), regional (systolic shortening) and global (pressures and flows) myocardial function, and arrhythmia occurrence were assessed. Only DADLE + nor-BNI preconditioning significantly decreased infarct size compared with controls (47 ± 13 vs.
65 ± 5%, P < 0.05); morphine preconditioning
was not cardioprotective with or without
-opioid receptor blockade
(nor-BNI). DADLE preconditioning significantly increased
ischemia-induced arrhythmias relative to controls, whereas
pentazocine-preconditioned animals (n = 2) experienced intractable ventricular fibrillation during
ischemia.
-Opioid receptor blockade with DADLE or
pentazocine preconditioning alleviated proarrhythmic effects. These
results suggest that
-opioid receptor activation during
pharmacological preconditioning is proarrhythmic in swine.
morphine; norbinaltorphimine; pentazocine
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING (IP) is a biological phenomenon whereby brief ischemic episodes followed by reperfusion protect tissue from a subsequent prolonged ischemic event (24). In the myocardium, IP has been shown to potentially be infarct limiting (24) and antiarrhythmic (17), although the latter of these effects has been disputed. It is also well established that endogenous opioid receptor activation participates in the myocardial IP (38, 40) and that preischemic administration of synthetic opioid agonists can mimic the benefits of IP in a variety of species (6, 37, 42), including isolated human atrial trabeculae (2). Although IP and opioid preconditioning share common signaling mechanisms, namely, activation of protein kinase C (PKC) (14, 19, 52), as well as other kinases (12, 13), and opening of mitochondrial ATP-dependent K+ channels (11, 27, 37, 39), species differences exist in the complex intracellular pathways that mediate preconditioning-induced cardioprotection (45): in rats and rabbits, inhibition of PKC abolished preconditioning-mediated cardioprotection (44); in swine, both PKC and tyrosine kinase must be inhibited (45).
Exogenous activation of the
-opioid receptor subtype by highly
specific agonists before ischemia has been shown to reduce infarct size in a number of species, including rats (36),
rabbits (6), and swine (42). Additionally,
administration of
- or µ-opioid receptor antagonists before IP did
not lessen the infarct-sparing benefits of IP in the rat myocardium
(36). However, the role of the
-opioid receptors
in preconditioning has been a subject of much controversy. It has
been reported that preischemic administration of selective
-agonists will reduce infarct size and ischemia-induced arrhythmias in the isolated rat heart (48). Conversely,
specific activation of the
-opioid receptor before ischemia
has also been shown to increase infarct size (1) and
arrhythmias (49) and induce an
"antipreconditioning"-like state in rats. More specifically, it has
been proposed that the
-opioid receptor agonists, specifically U-50488H, exert a biphasic effect on the myocardium, producing pro- and
antiarrhythmic effects in the rat (32, 53). Therefore, it
has been unclear whether selective or nonselective activation of the
-opioid receptor subtype is beneficial during preconditioning, and
although such conflicting information exists for the rat, the role of
opioid receptor subtypes in IP and pharmacological preconditioning in
other species is even more limited.
A recent study from our laboratory demonstrated that preconditioning of
swine with specific
-opioid receptor agonists
([D-Pen2,5]enkephalin and deltorphin-D)
significantly reduced infarct size but not ischemia-induced
arrhythmias (42). We also observed a significant increase
in ischemia-induced arrhythmias with DADLE preconditioning
compared with controls, and preliminary evidence suggested potential
involvement of
-opioid receptors in this arrhythmogenic response.
Furthermore, IP has been reported to be proarrhythmic in swine
(15, 25, 42), and preischemic administration of
naloxone failed to prevent ischemia-induced arrhythmias in this
species (3). Therefore, the role of opioid preconditioning
in preventing ischemia-induced arrhythmias in swine is unclear.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential
cardioprotective effects of pretreatment of swine with clinically relevant opioid agonists known to activate the
-opioid receptor, specifically, pentazocine (a
- and partial µ-opioid agonist) and morphine (a nonselective opioid agonist). Furthermore, we attempted to clarify the role of
-opioid receptor subtype
activation in cardioprotection, when preconditioning with DADLE,
morphine, or pentazocine, by administration of the specific
-opioid
antagonist norbinaltorphimine (nor-BNI) before preconditioning. Using a
swine acute coronary occlusion model, we determined the effects of
these opioid agonists and antagonists on myocardial infarct size,
regional and global myocardial functions, and the incidences of lethal and sublethal arrhythmias.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [Department of Health and Human Services Publication No. (NIH) 85-23, revised 1985], and the experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Minnesota.
Surgical preparation.
Yorkshire, non-Pietrian swine [37 ± 5 (SE) kg] were sedated
with midazolam (2 mg/kg im) and anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium
(20 mg/kg iv), and then anesthesia was maintained with a continuous
infusion (5-20
mg · kg
1 · h
1).
After endotracheal intubation, ventilation (2:1 air-oxygen) was
adjusted to maintain an arterial PCO2 of
40 ± 2 mmHg, and core temperature was maintained at 38 ± 0.5°C using convective air warming as needed (Bair Hugger, Augustine
Medical, Eden Prairie, MN). Two Mikro-Tip catheter transducers (5-Fr,
model MPC-500, Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) were placed via the
right carotid artery: one into the ascending aorta and the other into
the left ventricle. Bilateral femoral artery cannulas (superficial
femoral artery) were inserted for blood pressure monitoring and blood sampling (blood gas analysis, myocardial blood flow). A medial sternotomy was performed, exposing the heart and the major vessels. A
four-suture pericardial cradle was used to suspend the heart, and a
myocardial thermocouple probe was fixed between the epicardium and
pericardium. The left atrial appendage was cannulated for subsequent
microsphere and patent blue dye injections. The aortic and left
anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery flows were measured via flow
probes (Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY) placed on the ascending aorta
and on the LAD coronary artery distal to the planned occlusion site.
Two-millimeter ultrasound crystals (Sonometrics, London, ON, Canada)
were placed on the end points of the two major axes of the left
ventricles (4 crystals), which were used to determine left ventricular
volumes and pressure-volume relations. Preload recruitable stroke work
was assessed during temporary occlusion of the inferior vena cava.
Additionally, regional left ventricular function was estimated by
measuring systolic segmental shortening via crystals placed in a linear
manner along the anterior surface of the left ventricle, forming
four adjacent segments, ~1 cm apart, in the short axis. They
were positioned in an array so that the first segment was always
located in the center of the area at risk, and the most lateral segment
was consistently in the non-area at risk. All data were acquired with
Sonosoft software (Sonometrics), and postacquisition analysis was
performed using Cardiosoft software (Sonometrics).
1 · h
1).
Measurement of infarct size and risk area.
On completion of the reperfusion period, the LAD coronary artery was
reoccluded, and patent blue dye was injected via the left atrium to
differentiate the ischemic area (area at risk) from the
nonischemic area (non-area at risk). After being frozen at
20°C overnight, hearts were sliced into 4-mm transverse slices. The
slices were then incubated with 1% triphenyltetrazolium chloride in
phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 37°C for 10 min. Triphenyltetrazolium chloride forms a red formazan derivative on reaction with viable tissue, whereas necrotic tissue appears pale/white once the slices are
fixed in 10% formalin. Areas at risk, non-areas at risk, and infarct
sizes were assessed using computer-assisted planimetry (ImageTool
software, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX);
all areas were delineated by a trained individual who was blinded to
the treatment protocols.
Regional myocardial blood flow.
Regional myocardial blood flow (RMBF) to the area at risk and the
non-area at risk was assessed to determine collateral blood flow during
ischemia. Colored microspheres (15-µm-diameter blue ultraspheres; E-Z TRAC, Interactive Medical Technologies, Irvine, CA)
were injected into the left atrium while a reference blood sample was
simultaneously drawn to determine reference blood flow during 30 min of
ischemia. Subsequently, the number of microspheres was assessed
microscopically from the reference blood samples and the tissues from
the areas at risk and at the non-areas at risk. Reference blood flow
was calculated as the difference between syringe weights before and
after withdrawal, corrected for blood density (1.05 g/ml), and divided
by collection time. Routine tissue and blood processing was completed
(according to instructions of Interactive Medical Technologies). RMBF
was calculated using the following formula: RMBF =
b × Ct/Cb, where
b is reference blood flow, Ct is number
of microspheres in tissue normalized per gram of wet weight, and
Cb is number of microspheres of the blood reference sample
(47).
Arrhythmia assessment. A standard peripheral lead electrocardiogram was used to monitor arrhythmias on reperfusion, and analysis was completed using Ponemah Physiology Platform software (version 3.1, Gould Instrument Systems, Valley View, OH). The following modified scoring system was used to quantify arrhythmias by a trained individual who was blinded to the experimental protocol: 0 for <10 premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in 9 min, 1 for 10-50 PVCs in 9 min, 2 for >50 PVCs in 9 min, 3 for 1 episode of ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 9 min, 4 for 2-5 episodes of VF in 9 min, and 5 for >5 episodes of VF in 9 min (system modified from Refs. 9 and 11).
If and when VF occurred, it was treated by 50-J defibrillation shocks administered via internal paddles, and therapy was repeated until successful. If the animal did not recover a spontaneous atrioventricular rhythm after 1 min of continuous VF, it was considered intractable, and this animal was excluded from the study.Experimental protocol.
The experimental protocol is illustrated in Fig.
1. After completion of the surgery,
animals were allowed to stabilize for
20 min. The animals were
randomly assigned to the following eight groups, which differed only in
their preconditioning protocol (preconditioning phase). The control
group (n = 6) received an intravenous 0.9% saline
injection (10 ml) during the preconditioning phase. The DADLE group
(n = 6) received an intravenous injection of DADLE (1 mg/kg), an unspecific
-opioid agonist, administered over two periods
of 10 min (40 and 20 min before coronary occlusion). The morphine group
(n = 4) received an injection of morphine sulfate (1 mg/kg iv; Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL), which is considered a
nonselective opioid receptor agonist; the infusion protocol was the
same as that used for the DADLE group. The pentazocine group
(n = 2) received an injection of pentazocine lactate (5 mg/kg iv; Talwin, Abbott Laboratories), which is considered to be a
-opioid agonist and a partial µ-opioid agonist; the infusion protocol was the same as that used for the DADLE group. The nor-BNI group (n = 4) received an injection of nor-BNI
dihydrochloride (1.5 mg/kg iv). This specific
-opioid antagonist was
administered over a 10-min period, 120 min before saline
preconditioning (as described for the control group). The DADLE + nor-BNI group (n = 6) received a 10-min infusion of
nor-BNI (1.5 mg/kg iv) 120 min before DADLE (1 mg/kg) preconditioning
(as described above). The morphine + nor-BNI group
(n = 4) received a 10-min infusion of nor-BNI (1.5 mg/kg iv) 120 min before morphine (1 mg/kg) preconditioning (as
described above). The pentazocine + nor-BNI group
(n = 2) received a 10-min infusion of nor-BNI (1.5 mg/kg iv) 120 min before pentazocine (5 mg/kg) preconditioning (as
described above).
|
Data analysis and statistics. Values are means ± SE. Data from all groups were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and Fisher's protected least significant difference test as a post hoc test if significant time-dependent differences were detected within groups. Intragroup comparisons at specific time points and single measurements, such as infarct size, were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Fisher's protected least significant difference test. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statview 5.0.1 program (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thirty-seven swine were enrolled in the study; five animals (14%) were excluded because of intractable VF during ischemia (1 control animal and 1 DADLE-, 2 pentazocine-, and 1 morphine-treated animals). No significant differences between animal weights or myocardial temperatures (average myocardial temperature 38.0 ± 0.05°C), total pentobarbital doses, or total fluid administrations were detected between any of the experimental groups.
Infarct size.
Infarct size was significantly smaller in animals pretreated with
DADLE + nor-BNI than in control animals and animals pretreated with DADLE, morphine, and nor-BNI (P < 0.05; Fig.
2A). The average area at risk
of the left ventricle averaged 21.4 ± 0.8% (n = 32) and was not different between groups (Fig. 2B).
|
Hemodynamic findings.
Hemodynamic findings are summarized in Table
1. Baseline heart rates
were significantly greater in the nor-BNI group than in the control
group. However, heart rates before (117 ± 11 beats/min) and 5 min
after (120 ± 12 beats/min) nor-BNI infusion were not statistically different from respective control data. During early reperfusion, diastolic relaxation was significantly impaired (increased
) in the DADLE-treated animals relative to controls.
|
RMBF.
The average blood flow to the non-area at risk at 30 min of
ischemia for all animals (n = 32) was 1.4 ± 0.1 ml · min
1 · g
1,
and no significant differences were identified between groups. Additionally, no significant collateral blood flows were detected in
any of the animals; the average calculated transmural blood flow to the
area at risk during ischemia was <0.02
ml · min
1 · g
1
(n = 32).
Arrhythmia analysis.
One control animal (1 of 7) and one DADLE (1 of 7)-, one morphine (1 of
5)-, and both pentazocine (2 of 2)-preconditioned animals were excluded
because of intractable VF; it was not necessary to exclude any animals
in the nor-BNI, DADLE + nor-BNI, and morphine + nor-BNI
groups. The average cumulative arrhythmia scores during ischemia were significantly increased in the DADLE and nor-BNI groups compared with all other groups, except the morphine + nor-BNI group (Fig. 3). There were no
detectable differences in arrhythmia scores during reperfusion. The
incidence of ischemic PVCs was greatest in DADLE-preconditioned
animals (Fig. 4A), whereas the average ischemic episodes of VF were most prevalent in the
animals pretreated with nor-BNI alone (Fig. 4B).
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study provides evidence that, at analgesic doses,
preconditioning by the administration of morphine or pentazocine is not
cardioprotective in swine. More specifically, preconditioning with
pentazocine, a selective
- and partial µ-opioid agonist, exacerbated ischemia-induced arrhythmias, and animals
preconditioned with this agent elicited intractable VF within the first
10 min of ischemia. Interestingly, preincubation of
pentazocine-preconditioned animals with nor-BNI, a highly selective
-opioid antagonist, prevented the incidence of fatal arrhythmias
during ischemia. In a previous study from our laboratory, we
demonstrated that preconditioning with DADLE, a selective
-opioid
agonist, did not decrease infarct size and increased
ischemia-induced arrhythmias (42). As the
preliminary data from this previous study suggested, in the present
study,
-opioid receptor blockade with DADLE preconditioning decreased infarct size and attenuated the proarrhythmic effects of
DADLE. However, unspecific
-opioid receptor activation was not
considered responsible for the lack of cardioprotection seen with
morphine, because the coadministration of morphine and nor-BNI failed
to decrease infarct size. Moreover, nor-BNI administration alone
significantly increased heart rate and left ventricular systolic
pressure before ischemia and increased the incidence of
ischemia-induced arrhythmias.
Protocol limitations. The advantages and limitations of using the open-chest, anesthetized swine as a model of regional myocardial ischemia and reperfusion have been described previously (42, 46). One must be careful when extrapolating these results to humans, inasmuch as species differences exist in the opioid receptor subtype and intracellular mechanisms involved in pharmacological preconditioning (45). Additionally, there are fundamental differences in opioid receptor expression and functional binding affinities between species (21).
The dose and timing of nor-BNI administration were based on published observations in mice (5, 29) and from suggestions through personal communications (Dr. Philip Portoghese, University of Minnesota). An incubation period of 120 min was chosen because of the slow kinetics of nor-BNI binding to the
-opioid receptor (5,
29). Importantly, previous preconditioning studies utilizing nor-BNI have employed relatively short incubation periods (<15 min),
which may have influenced reported results. However, 1.5 mg/kg iv is
considered a relatively low dose of nor-BNI.
The dose of DADLE was based on published observations where it was
found that 1 mg/kg iv induced hypoxic tolerance in rats (11), dogs (7), and swine (41).
Although DADLE is considered a
-opioid agonist, it has been shown to
bind to
- and
-opioid receptors at micromolar concentrations and
to antagonize the
-opioid receptor at higher concentrations (>5
µM) (55). Additionally, the
-opioid-binding site is
believed to be nonselectively activated when exposed to high
concentrations of
- or µ-selective ligands (28).
Infarct size.
A significant reduction of infarct size relative to controls was
observed only in animals preconditioned with DADLE + nor-BNI. The
finding that neither morphine nor morphine + nor-BNI pretreatments elicited any infarct-limiting ability was unexpected. Previously, Aitchison et al. (1) demonstrated that administration of
micromolar concentrations of DADLE to isolated rat hearts increased
infarct size relative to lower doses (nanomolar) of DADLE and IP.
Additionally, they observed that coadministration of DADLE and the
-receptor antagonist naltrindole increased infarct size relative to
controls, whereas animals treated with DADLE + nor-BNI exhibited
decreased infarct size (1). In the same study,
preconditioning with bremazocine, a
-opioid agonist, increased
infarct size relative to controls (1). Similar to the
study of Aitchison et al., the present study suggests that nonselective
-opioid receptor activation exerts an
antipreconditioning-like effect in swine. However, in this
study, because of the early onset of fatal arrhythmias in animals
preconditioned with pentazocine, we are not able to discern whether
direct
-receptor activation has an effect on infarct size in this model.
- and
-opioid
receptor subtypes (10, 28). Morphine has been shown to
mimic preconditioning in isolated cardiomyocytes via opening of
K+-dependent ATP channels (18, 22). Morphine
preconditioning reduced infarct size in rabbits, but only when
supraclinical doses were used (3 mg/kg) (23). Yet, when
this same dose was administered to rats 10 min before permanent LAD
coronary artery occlusion, infarct size increased relative to controls
(20). Conversely, morphine preconditioning in rats at 0.3 mg/kg decreased infarct size (37). We speculated that this
discrepancy in the rat might be explained by activation of the
-opioid receptor at higher concentrations of morphine. On the basis
of this speculation and the positive results obtained with DADLE + nor-BNI, we hypothesized that the lack of cardioprotection found with
morphine in swine was due to nonselective activation of
-opioid
receptors. However, administration of morphine + nor-BNI was
unsuccessful in reducing infarct size in swine. Because it was
previously stated that a relatively low dose of nor-BNI was employed in
this study, we are investigating the potential effects of pretreating
morphine-preconditioned animals with a higher dose (5 mg/kg) of
nor-BNI.
Hemodynamic effects.
Although we previously demonstrated that preconditioning with specific
-opioid agonists significantly decreased infarct size in swine,
there was no difference in regional or global functional recovery
between opioid-preconditioned and control animals after 180 min of
reperfusion (42). Similarly, it was reported that swine
subjected to IP demonstrated significant differences in infarct size,
but not functional recovery, after regional ischemia and 90 min
of reperfusion (35). Furthermore, a significant difference in functional recovery between rabbits subjected to IP and control rabbits was only observed after 72 h of reperfusion
(8). Qiu et al. (34) reported a >50%
recovery of regional function (wall thickening) during early
reperfusion with IP in swine; however, it is unclear whether the unique
preconditioning protocol they used (10 episodes of 2 min of
ischemia followed by reperfusion) influenced these
results. Previous studies (26), along with the data
displayed in Table 1, suggest that neither IP nor pharmacological preconditioning prevents myocardial stunning after ischemia and reperfusion and that reperfusion-induced stunning may mask the functional benefits of preconditioning in acute coronary occlusion protocols.
Arrhythmias.
A biphasic cardiovascular response to exogenous
-opioid
administration has been previously described (30).
Specifically, in rats, U-50488H, a
-opioid agonist, was reported to
be proarrhythmic at a low dose (49) and antiarrhythmic at
a high dose (31). This phenomenon may be attributed to the
ability of micromolar concentrations of U-50488H to block cardiac
Na+ and/or K+ channels (30, 33)
and, hence, increase VF thresholds (31). It has been
proposed that the antiarrhythmic effects of IP may be due to a
decreased binding of endogenous
-opioid peptides, thereby increasing
the threshold for VF (50). However, higher doses of
-opioid agonists (40-50 µM) also induced arrhythmias in rats,
possibly via increased myocardial intracellular calcium concentrations
and oscillations (54). Nevertheless, although many of
these studies have examined the antiarrhythmic effects of
-opioid
agonists in rats, the electrophysiological response of rats to
antiarrhythmic therapies may differ from that of swine (3,
4).
-opioid peptides are released, thereby
inhibiting
-adrenoceptor stimulation, decreasing arrhythmias, and
increasing the threshold for VF (51, 54). We observed an
increase in mean arrhythmia scores in animals preconditioned with
nor-BNI, a
-opioid antagonist (Fig. 3), that was attributed to an
increase in the mean incidences of VF during ischemia (Fig. 4B). Therefore, it is possible that the proarrhythmic
effects of nor-BNI may be due to inhibition of endogenous
-peptide
binding and, hence, increased
-adrenergic stimulation during
ischemia, resulting in increased phase 1b arrhythmias and VF.
Finally, Wang et al. (48) suggested that
- and not
-opioids are involved in antiarrhythmic benefits of IP in rats. In the present study, we observed intractable VF in animals preconditioned with a
-opioid agonist (pentazocine), whereas animals treated with
nor-BNI + pentazocine before ischemia did not exhibit any episodes of VF (Fig. 4B). Additionally, inhibition of
-opioid receptor binding with DADLE preconditioning decreased
arrhythmia scores and total PVCs during ischemia (Fig.
4A), further suggesting a proarrhythmic role of exogenous
-opioids in swine.
In summary, this study demonstrated that neither pentazocine nor
morphine was cardioprotective in swine. Furthermore, an increase in
fatal arrhythmias was observed with pentazocine, and this proarrhythmic effect was abolished with
-opioid receptor blockade. Also important was the observation that blockade of endogenous
-opioid binding (with nor-BNI) was proarrhythmic during ischemia. Additionally, although nor-BNI administration decreased infarct size in
DADLE-preconditioned animals,
-opioid receptor activation was not
the explanation for the lack of cardioprotection observed with
morphine. Collectively, these results suggest that the exogenous
activation of
-opioid receptors before ischemia exerts an
antipreconditioning effect in swine. Finally, with a limited
availability of specific opioid receptor subtype agonists and the
potential nonselective coactivation of multiple opioid receptor
subtypes with commonly used opioid anesthetics (28), it is
important to continue to strive for better understanding and
delineation of the coactivation of multiple opioid receptor subtypes
and their roles in pharmacological preconditioning.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank Kristy Schaffer, Grant Beckstrand, Anna Lindlief, Charles Soule, and William Gallagher for technical support and Monica Mahre for editorial assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This research was supported by funding from the Lillehei Heart Institute and Medtronic.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. A. Iaizzo, Dept. of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 107 UMHC, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (E-mail: iaizz001{at}tc.umn.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published January 23, 2003;10.1152/ajpheart.00843.2002
Received 27 September 2002; accepted in final form 20 January 2003.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Aitchison, KA,
Baxter GF,
Awan MM,
Smith RM,
Yellon DM,
and
Opie LH.
Opposing effects on infarction of
- and
-opioid receptor activation in the isolated rat heart: implications for ischemic preconditioning.
Basic Res Cardiol
95:
1-11,
2000[Web of Science][Medline].
2.
Bell, SP,
Sack MN,
Patel A,
Opie LH,
and
Yellon DM.
-Opioid receptor stimulation mimics ischemic preconditioning in human heart muscle.
J Am Coll Cardiol
36:
2296-2302,
2000
3.
Bergey, JL,
and
Beil ME.
Antiarrhythmic evaluation of naloxone against acute coronary occlusion-induced arrhythmias in pigs.
Eur J Pharmacol
90:
427-431,
1983[Web of Science][Medline].
4.
Bergey, JL,
Nocella K,
and
McCallum JD.
Acute coronary artery occlusion-reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in rats, dogs and pigs: antiarrhythmic evaluation of quinidine, procainamide and lidocaine.
Eur J Pharmacol
81:
205-216,
1982[Web of Science][Medline].
5.
Birch, PJ,
Hayes AG,
Sheehan MJ,
and
Tyers MB.
Norbinaltorphimine: antagonist profile at
-opioid receptors.
Eur J Pharmacol
144:
405-408,
1987[Web of Science][Medline].
6.
Bolling, SF,
Badhwar V,
Schwartz CF,
Oeltgen PR,
Kilgore K,
and
Su TP.
Opioids confer myocardial tolerance to ischemia: interaction of
-opioid agonists and antagonists.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
122:
476-481,
2001
7.
Chien, S,
Oeltgen PR,
Diana JN,
Salley RK,
and
Su TP.
Extension of tissue survival time in multiorgan block preparation with a
-opioid, DADLE ([D-Ala2,D-Leu5]-enkephalin).
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
107:
964-967,
1994
8.
Cohen, MV,
Yang XM,
and
Downey JM.
Smaller infarct after preconditioning does not predict extent of early functional improvement of reperfused heart.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
277:
H1754-H1761,
1999
9.
Curtis, MJ,
and
Walker MJ.
Quantification of arrhythmias using scoring systems: an examination of seven scores in an in vivo model of regional myocardial ischaemia.
Cardiovasc Res
22:
656-665,
1988[Web of Science][Medline].
10.
Ela, C,
Barg J,
Vogel Z,
Hasin Y,
and
Eilam Y.
Distinct components of morphine effects on cardiac myocytes are mediated by the
- and
-opioid receptors.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
29:
711-720,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
11.
Fryer, RM,
Hsu AK,
Nagase H,
and
Gross GJ.
Opioid-induced cardioprotection against myocardial infarction and arrhythmias: mitochondrial vs. sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive potassium channels.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
294:
451-457,
2000
12.
Fryer, RM,
Patel HH,
Hsu AK,
and
Gross GJ.
Stress-activated protein kinase phosphorylation during cardioprotection in the ischemic myocardium.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
281:
H1184-H1192,
2001
13.
Fryer, RM,
Pratt PF,
Hsu AK,
and
Gross GJ.
Differential activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase isoforms in preconditioning and opioid-induced cardioprotection.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
296:
642-649,
2001
14.
Fryer, RM,
Wang Y,
Hsu AK,
and
Gross GJ.
Essential activation of PKC-
in opioid-initiated cardioprotection.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
280:
H1346-H1353,
2001
15.
Grund, F,
Sommerschild HT,
Kirkeboen KA,
and
Ilebekk A.
Proarrhythmic effects of ischemic preconditioning in anesthetized pigs.
Basic Res Cardiol
92:
417-425,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
16.
Janse, MJ,
and
Wit AL.
Electrophysiological mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias resulting from myocardial ischemia and infarction.
Physiol Rev
69:
1049-1169,
1989
17.
Lawson, CS,
Coltart DJ,
and
Hearse DJ.
"Dose"-dependency and temporal characteristics of protection by ischaemic preconditioning against ischaemia-induced arrhythmias in rat hearts.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
25:
1391-1402,
1993[Web of Science][Medline].
18.
Liang, BT,
and
Gross GJ.
Direct preconditioning of cardiac myocytes via opioid receptors and KATP channels.
Circ Res
84:
1396-1400,
1999
19.
Liu, Y,
Ytrehus K,
and
Downey JM.
Evidence that translocation of protein kinase C is a key event during ischemic preconditioning of rabbit myocardium.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
26:
661-668,
1994[Web of Science][Medline].
20.
Markiewicz, W,
Finberg JP,
and
Lichtig C.
Morphine increases myocardial infarction size in rats.
Anesth Analg
61:
843-846,
1982
21.
Martin, WR.
Pharmacology of opioids.
Pharmacol Rev
35:
283-323,
1983[Abstract].
22.
McPherson, BC,
and
Yao Z.
Morphine mimics preconditioning via free radical signals and mitochondrial KATP channels in myocytes.
Circulation
103:
290-295,
2001
23.
Miki, T,
Cohen MV,
and
Downey JM.
Opioid receptor contributes to ischemic preconditioning through protein kinase C activation in rabbits.
Mol Cell Biochem
186:
3-12,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
24.
Murry, CE,
Jennings RB,
and
Reimer KA.
Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium.
Circulation
74:
1124-1136,
1986
25.
Ovize, M,
Aupetit JF,
Rioufol G,
Loufoua J,
Andre-Fouet X,
Minaire Y,
and
Faucon G.
Preconditioning reduces infarct size but accelerates time to ventricular fibrillation in ischemic pig heart.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
269:
H72-H79,
1995
26.
Ovize, M,
Przyklenk K,
Hale SL,
and
Kloner RA.
Preconditioning does not attenuate myocardial stunning.
Circulation
85:
2247-2254,
1992
27.
Patel, HH,
Ludwig LM,
Fryer RM,
Hsu AK,
Warltier DC,
and
Gross GJ.
-Opioid agonists and volatile anesthetics facilitate cardioprotection via potentiation of KATP channel opening.
FASEB J
16:
1468-1470,
2002
28.
Paterson, SJ,
Robson LE,
and
Kosterlitz HW.
Classification of opioid receptors.
Br Med Bull
39:
31-36,
1983
29.
Portoghese, PS,
Lipkowski AW,
and
Takemori AE.
Binaltorphimine and nor-binaltorphimine, potent and selective
-opioid receptor antagonists.
Life Sci
40:
1287-1292,
1987[Web of Science][Medline].
30.
Pugsley, MK.
The diverse molecular mechanisms responsible for the actions of opioids on the cardiovascular system.
Pharmacol Ther
93:
51-75,
2002[Web of Science][Medline].
31.
Pugsley, MK,
Penz WP,
Walker MJ,
and
Wong TM.
Antiarrhythmic effects of U-50488H in rats subjected to coronary artery occlusion.
Eur J Pharmacol
212:
15-19,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
32.
Pugsley, MK,
Penz WP,
Walker MJ,
and
Wong TM.
Cardiovascular actions of the
-agonist, U-50488H, in the absence and presence of opioid receptor blockade.
Br J Pharmacol
105:
521-526,
1992[Web of Science][Medline].
33.
Pugsley, MK,
Yu EJ,
and
Goldin AL.
U-50488H, a
-opioid receptor agonist, is a more potent blocker of cardiac sodium channels than lidocaine.
Proc West Pharmacol Soc
43:
47-50,
2000[Medline].
34.
Qiu, Y,
Tang XL,
Park SW,
Sun JZ,
Kalya A,
and
Bolli R.
The early and late phases of ischemic preconditioning: a comparative analysis of their effects on infarct size, myocardial stunning, and arrhythmias in conscious pigs undergoing a 40-min coronary occlusion.
Circ Res
80:
730-742,
1997
35.
Schott, RJ,
Rohmann S,
Braun ER,
and
Schaper W.
Ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct size in swine myocardium.
Circ Res
66:
1133-1142,
1990
36.
Schultz, JE,
Hsu AK,
and
Gross GJ.
Ischemic preconditioning in the intact rat heart is mediated by
1- but not µ- or
-opioid receptors.
Circulation
97:
1282-1289,
1998
37.
Schultz, JE,
Hsu AK,
and
Gross GJ.
Morphine mimics the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning via a glibenclamide-sensitive mechanism in the rat heart.
Circ Res
78:
1100-1104,
1996
38.
Schultz, JE,
Rose E,
Yao Z,
and
Gross GJ.
Evidence for involvement of opioid receptors in ischemic preconditioning in rat hearts.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
268:
H2157-H2161,
1995
39.
Schultz, JEJ,
Hsu AK,
Nagase H,
and
Gross GJ.
TAN-67, a
1-opioid receptor agonist, reduces infarct size via activation of Gi/o proteins and KATP channels.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
274:
H909-H914,
1998
40.
Schulz, R,
Gres P,
and
Heusch G.
Role of endogenous opioids in ischemic preconditioning but not in short-term hibernation in pigs.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
280:
H2175-H2181,
2001
41.
Sigg, DC,
Coles JA,
Gallagher WJ,
Oeltgen PR,
and
Iaizzo PA.
Opioid preconditioning: myocardial function and energy metabolism.
Ann Thorac Surg
72:
1576-1582,
2001
42.
Sigg, DC,
Coles JA, Jr,
Oeltgen PR,
and
Iaizzo PA.
Role of
-opioid receptor agonists on infarct size reduction in swine.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
282:
H1953-H1960,
2002
43.
Smith, WT, 4th,
Fleet WF,
Johnson TA,
Engle CL,
and
Cascio WE.
The Ib phase of ventricular arrhythmias in ischemic in situ porcine heart is related to changes in cell-to-cell electrical coupling.
Circulation
92:
3051-3060,
1995
44.
Speechly-Dick, ME,
Mocanu MM,
and
Yellon DM.
Protein kinase C. Its role in ischemic preconditioning in the rat.
Circ Res
75:
586-590,
1994
45.
Vahlhaus, C,
Schulz R,
Post H,
Rose J,
and
Heusch G.
Prevention of ischemic preconditioning only by combined inhibition of protein kinase C and protein tyrosine kinase in pigs.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
30:
197-209,
1998[Web of Science][Medline].
46.
Verdouw, PD,
van den Doel MA,
de Zeeuw S,
and
Duncker DJ.
Animal models in the study of myocardial ischaemia and ischaemic syndromes.
Cardiovasc Res
39:
121-135,
1998
47.
Walter, B,
Bauer R,
Gaser E,
and
Zwiener U.
Validation of the multiple colored microsphere technique for regional blood flow measurements in newborn piglets.
Basic Res Cardiol
92:
191-200,
1997[Web of Science][Medline].
48.
Wang, GY,
Wu S,
Pei JM,
Yu XC,
and
Wong TM.
- but not
-opioid receptors mediate effects of ischemic preconditioning on both infarct and arrhythmia in rats.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
280:
H384-H391,
2001
49.
Wong, TM,
Lee AY,
and
Tai KK.
Effects of drugs interacting with opioid receptors during normal perfusion or ischemia and reperfusion in the isolated rat heart
an attempt to identify cardiac opioid receptor subtype(s) involved in arrhythmogenesis.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
22:
1167-1175,
1990[Web of Science][Medline].
50.
Xia, Q,
Zhang WM,
Shen YL,
and
Wong TM.
Decreased affinity of
-receptor binding during reperfusion following ischaemic preconditioning in the rat heart.
Life Sci
58:
1307-1313,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
51.
Xiao, RP,
Pepe S,
Spurgeon HA,
Capogrossi MC,
and
Lakatta EG.
Opioid peptide receptor stimulation reverses
-adrenergic effects in rat heart cells.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
272:
H797-H805,
1997
52.
Ytrehus, K,
Liu Y,
and
Downey JM.
Preconditioning protects ischemic rabbit heart by protein kinase C activation.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
266:
H1145-H1152,
1994
53.
Yu, X,
Zhang W,
Bian J,
and
Wong TM.
Pro- and anti-arrhythmic effects of a
-opioid receptor agonist: a model for the biphasic action of a local hormone in the heart.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol
26:
842-844,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
54.
Yu, XC,
Wang HX,
Pei JM,
and
Wong TM.
Anti-arrhythmic effect of
-opioid receptor stimulation in the perfused rat heart: involvement of a cAMP-dependent pathway.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
31:
1809-1819,
1999[Web of Science][Medline].
55.
Zhang, WM,
Jin WQ,
and
Wong TM.
Multiplicity of
-opioid receptor binding in the rat cardiac sarcolemma.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
28:
1547-1554,
1996[Web of Science][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-F. Xiao, D. C. Sigg, M. R. Ujhelyi, J. J. Wilhelm, E. S. Richardson, and P. A. Iaizzo Pericardial delivery of omega-3 fatty acid: a novel approach to reducing myocardial infarct sizes and arrhythmias Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H2212 - H2218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Zatta, H. Kin, D. Yoshishige, R. Jiang, N. Wang, J. G. Reeves, J. Mykytenko, R. A. Guyton, Z.-Q. Zhao, J. L. Caffrey, et al. Evidence that cardioprotection by postconditioning involves preservation of myocardial opioid content and selective opioid receptor activation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): H1444 - H1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |