|
|
||||||||
1-adrenergic
receptor transcription during the developmental
transition
Women and Infants' Hospital of Rhode Island, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island 02905-2499
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
1-adrenergic receptor
(
1AR) gene contains binding sites for myc/max proteins
within a glucocorticoid response element. Transcriptional activation of
the
1AR is the result of cooperative binding between
c-myc and the glucocorticoid receptor on the
1AR promoter. The transcriptional regulation of both
1AR and c-myc are developmentally regulated.
We used transcription rate assays of nuclei isolated from fetal hearts
to demonstrate a fivefold increase in the transcription rate of
1AR vs. postnatal hearts (P < 0.01).
This was associated with a fourfold increase in c-myc transcription. Transcription rate assays performed in a rat fibroblast cell line that overexpresses c-myc
(myc+/+) showed similarly increased
1AR expression compared with the wild-type cell line.
Transient transfection experiments in the myc+/+ cells demonstrated robust
expression of
1AR promoter constructs, which was
abrogated by mutation of the myc/max binding site or by
cotransfection with a c-myc antisense expression vector.
These results suggest that the regulation of cardiac
1AR
transcription and the expression of c-myc are tightly integrated.
transient transfection; antisense; cardiac growth
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
THE
-ADRENERGIC RECEPTORS (
ARs) are
members of the seven-transmembrane domain, G protein-coupled receptor
family. These include the receptors for a variety of neurotransmitters
and hormones as well as light, smell, taste, and chemotactic agents.
Members of this gene superfamily are coupled to different intracellular signal transduction mechanisms via interaction with heterotrimeric G
proteins. Three
AR subtypes,
1AR,
2AR,
and
3AR, have been characterized (9, 13,
19). The
2AR was the first of the
ARs cloned
and has been the most thoroughly studied (19). The regulatory sequences and the 5' flanking region of the
2ARs include a conventional TATA box and a number of
well-characterized functional elements (5, 6, 10). In
contrast, the
1AR promoter does not contain a TATA box,
an initiator element, or other common core promoter elements (36,
42).
We recently identified a novel transcription regulatory element in the
1AR promoter (46), which includes a
homeodomain region, an E-box for myc/max binding, and a
glucocorticoid response element (GRE). Coregulation of
1AR gene expression with glucocorticoids is a novel role
for c-myc. In the myocardium, where
1AR
expression is highest, c-myc is expressed throughout the
fetal period of cardiac development (20, 41). Several
genes are expressed selectively during this period of proliferative
cardiac growth including the
-isoform of the myosin heavy chain
(MHC), the major cardiac contractile protein, and atrial natriuretic
factor (ANF) (16, 25). The protooncogenes
c-myc, fos, and jun are also expressed during
this period of cardiac development.
We undertook these studies to examine temporal changes in cardiac
1AR gene expression. We used sensitive
transcription-rate assays in heart tissue obtained from fetal and
postnatal animals. We also examined the transcription rate of
c-myc in these tissues. In addition,
1AR
regulation was studied in cell culture models, which allowed
experimental manipulation of c-myc expression. Our results
demonstrate that
1AR gene expression is remarkably
elevated in the fetal and early neonatal period compared to later life. We also showed in cell culture systems that
1AR
transcription activity was directly correlated with c-myc
expression and blocked by disruption of c-myc binding sites
in the promoter or by c-myc antisense. Thus the striking
elevation in
1AR transcription rate in late fetal
cardiac development is due in part to concomitant changes in
c-myc expression.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nuclear preparation from cardiac tissue.
All studies involving the use of animals were conducted in conformity
with the "Guiding Principles for Research Involving Animals and Human
Beings" of the American Physiological Society. All studies
were reviewed in advance by the Institutional Advisory Committee for
the Care and Use of Animals. Sprague-Dawley rats, obtained from Charles
River Laboratory (Cambridge, MA), were used for cardiac tissue in all
experiments. After rats were killed, heart tissue was obtained from
proliferative, fetal rats of 19 days gestation (E19) and
postproliferative rats of postnatal day 7-15
(P7-15). After administration of maternal anesthesia with pentobarbital (50 mg/kg ip), the fetal animals were delivered by
laparotomy. The fetal rats were killed by decapitation and their hearts
were removed. The P7-15 animals were anesthetized before death.
The hearts were collected and transported in ice-cold PBS. Hearts were
processed immediately after collection. Heart tissue was minced into
tiny pieces for E19 hearts. For the P7-15 hearts, a single burst
of a Polytron was used at setting 4. Tissue was then
homogenized in buffer A (15 mM HEPES, 300 mM sucrose, 60 mM
KCl, 15 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 14 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.15 mM spermine, 0.5 mM spermidine, and 1 µl/ml of protease inhibitors). This was followed by centrifugation and removal of the supernatant. The
pellet was resuspended in buffer B, which contained 10 µl/ml of Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) in addition to all of the constituents of buffer A. This resuspended pellet was layered onto a
high-sucrose buffer (15 mM HEPES, 30% sucrose, 60 mM KCl, 15 mM NaCl,
2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 14 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.15 mM spermine, and
0.5 mM spermidine). Nuclei were then pelleted by centrifugation at
2,500 rpm in a hanging-bucket centrifuge (model RT6000B, Sorvall). The
DNA content of the nuclear preparation was measured by
spectrophotometry. The quality of nuclear preparations was assessed by
fluorescence microscopy using 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)
staining. Nuclei were stored for future use at
80°C in glycerol
storage buffer (20 mM Tris · HCl, 50% glycerol,
75 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 0.85 mM DTT).
Nuclear preparation from cell lines.
Wild-type (WT) rat fibroblasts and fibroblast cell lines engineered to
overexpress c-myc (myc+/+) were
used in transcription rate assays to assess the effects of alterations
in c-myc on
1AR expression. These cells have
been extensively used for studies of c-myc expression and
cell-cycle regulation (27, 28). Cells were grown to
75-80% confluence in high-glucose DMEM (GIBCO) with addition of
10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were scraped
after the plates were washed with PBS. Cells were centrifuged at 500 g for 10 min at 4°C. The cell pellet was then triturated
in 5 ml of NP-40 lysis buffer (10 mM Tris · HCl,
10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, and 0.5% NP-40). After 5 min on
ice, the solution was centrifuged at 300 g for 5 min. The
pellet was resuspended and stored in 100-µl aliquots of the glycerol
storage buffer. The DNA content of these preparations was measured by
spectrophotometry at 280 nm, and the samples were stored at
80°C
until transcription rate assays were performed.
Transcription rate assays.
These were performed using intact nuclear preparations from the rat
hearts and rat fibroblast cell lines. Nylon membranes (Nytran) with individual cDNA preparations immobilized by
slot blotting were used for hybridization with in vitro transcription products. We excised 1.5- to 2-kb cDNA fragments of
1AR
(13), c-myc, actin, and GAPDH from the
respective vectors. For transcription rate assays that involved
heart-tissue preparations, the cDNAs for
- and
-MHC were also
used. These fragments were prepared by PCR cloning according to the
description of Sanchez et al. (40). All cDNA fragments
were denatured with 1% NaOH for 30 min before slot blotting was
performed onto membranes. The DNA was then cross-linked to nylon
membrane by exposure to UV light for 3 min. Membranes were stored at
4°C for use in hybridization. For in vitro transcription, nuclear
preparations were incubated with NTPs including
[
-32P]UTP in transcription buffer
(39). The reactions were allowed to progress for
30 min. DNA was then digested with RNase-free DNase, which was followed
by extraction of newly formed RNA by TRIzol-chloroform. The resultant
RNA was pelleted with isopropranolol and washed with 70% ethanol.
These pellets were then dissolved in diethyl pyrocarbonate-water and
hybridized to membranes with cDNAs of interest that had been
prehybridized with Church buffer (1% BSA, 7% SDS, 0.5 M phosphate
buffer, and 1 mM EDTA). After 72 h of hybridization, these
membranes were washed in SSC-SDS solution and were then exposed to a
phosphor imager. Radioactivity for different genes was expressed in
light units per unit area and controlled for background intensity. The
amount of radioactive [32P]UTP incorporated over time is
directly proportional to the number of "nascent" transcripts: those
in which initiation had already begun in the intact, isolated nuclei
(39). This approach has been referred to as nuclear runon,
nuclear runoff, and/or transcription rate assays. The relative
expression of
1AR was then normalized to the expression
of GAPDH observed in each assay.
Transient transfection experiments.
A 2.3-kb fragment of the 5' flanking sequence of the ovine
1AR region was subcloned into a luciferase reporter
vector. This is the same construct used in prior studies (36, 45,
46). A 43-bp nucleotide that contained the glucocorticoid
regulatory unit (GRU) (46) and a construct with a mutant
E-box (
E-box) were cloned into the pGL3C vector. This vector
contains the simian virus (SV)-40 promoter and an SV-40 enhancer. These
constructs were used for transient transfection experiments. A
c-myc antisense expression vector was generated by using PCR
to amplify exon II of human c-myc and subcloning it in
antisense orientation into the pcDNA3 vector (7). Figure
1 shows a schematic of these constructs.
All constructs were verified by direct sequencing. Transfection
experiments to examine the effects of alterations in c-myc
on
1AR expression were carried out in
myc+/+ cell lines using Lipofectin
reagent (GIBCO). Cells were subcultured into 24-well plates at
~80,000 cells/well and transfected with an empty plasmid vector, the
43-bp GRU construct, or the
E-box. All experiments included
cotransfection of alternate wells with the empty vector for each
construct and were carried out in triplicate. Optimal transfection
efficiency was obtained by using 1 µg of DNA with 4 µl of
Lipofectin for each well. After transfection, the cells were allowed to
express for 18 h in reduced serum medium (Opti-MEM I; GIBCO). The
cells were then harvested in lysis buffer (0.1% SDS), and luciferase
activity was measured in a luminometer. The effects of the
c-myc antisense construct were also examined in
myc+/+ cells. These cells were
maintained and transfected as described. In these studies, variable
amounts of c-myc antisense and pcDNA3 vector were used to
keep the total DNA quantity equal to 1.0 µg of DNA/well in all of the
experiments. These cells were cotransfected with equal amounts of the
GRU construct. All experiments were conducted in quadruplicate.
|
1AR promoter (0.2 µg/well) and
c-myc antisense constructs or the pcDNA 3 vector. The ratio
of FuGENE to DNA transfected (5 µl/µg) was optimized in preliminary
studies (46).
Statistics. All data are shown as means ± SE. Significance of differences between age groups in the data from heart samples or between the different cell lines was compared by ANOVA. We accepted P < 0.05 as significant.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transcription rate assays.
Transcription rate assays were carried out on intact, isolated nuclei
from fetal hearts at E19 and from P7-15 animals. A representative blot from E19 and P15 is shown in Fig.
2A. As can be seen, the relative expression levels of both
1AR and
c-myc were substantially higher in E19 hearts compared with
postnatal (P15) hearts (P < 0.01). As expected, the
fetal
-MHC isoform was more highly expressed in the E19 samples,
whereas
-MHC, the adult isoform, had a higher transcription rate in
the P15 animals. GAPDH and
-actin were included as "housekeeping
genes" to normalize the relative level of gene expression in the
different age groups. Similar experiments were carried out on hearts
from four individual litters. For postproliferative hearts, experiments
were carried out on P7 and P15 hearts. The results from P7 and P15
hearts did not differ and thus were analyzed collectively. The results
for
1AR and c-myc were normalized for GAPDH
for each of the individual blots and expressed as the relative transcript level. There was a significantly higher level of both
1AR and c-myc expression in the hearts of
fetal animals compared with postnatal hearts (P < 0.01). Results are depicted in Fig. 2B. There were no
significant differences in
-actin or GAPDH between the fetal and
postnatal hearts (P > 0.1).
|
1AR and c-myc were compared
in WT and myc+/+ cells. As outlined
above,
-actin and GAPDH were included to normalize the relative
level of gene expression in the different cell lines. A representative
blot is shown in Fig. 3A. The
transcript level of
1AR was 6- to 10-fold higher in
myc+/+ cells compared with WT
cells. The transcription rates for
-actin and GAPDH were not
significantly different between the two cell lines. The results from
four experiments were pooled. The data are expressed as fold increases
in relative transcription rate, and the results are shown in Fig.
3B. On statistical analysis, the relative transcript level
of
1AR was significantly higher in
myc+/+ cells compared with WT cells
(P < 0.05). As expected, c-myc expression was also significantly higher in
myc+/+ cells compared with WT cells
(P < 0.05).
|
Transient transfection studies.
These results suggest that alterations in c-myc expression
between fetal and postnatal hearts or alterations in myc
expression in the two cell lines are closely correlated with
corresponding changes in
1AR expression. To verify the
role of c-myc in
1AR transcription
regulation, we examined the activity of various
1AR
promoter constructs after transient transfection into
myc+/+ cells. We compared the
activity of the 43-bp
1AR promoter, which contained an
intact GRU with an E-box for myc/max binding, with the
activity of a mutant construct in which the E-box had been mutated
(
E-box). The presence of an intact E-box in the GRU sequence resulted in threefold greater luciferase activity than for cells transfected with the empty pGL3C vector alone (Fig.
4A). By contrast, transfection
with the construct that contained the
E-box (in which the
myc binding site had been mutated) reduced expression to the
baseline level observed with the empty vector (P < 0.05).
|
1AR gene by examination of the effect
of a c-myc antisense construct on
1AR
expression. These experiments were also performed in
myc+/+ cells. Transfections were
carried out as described (see Transient transfection
experiments), and expression of the GRU alone or in combination
with the c-myc antisense constructs was compared. We
compared the effects of varying amounts of the c-myc
antisense DNA (0.1-0.5 µg/well) with a fixed amount of GRU (0.5 µg/well) on basal transcription (Fig. 4B). Basal
transcription of the GRU was significantly reduced by coexpression with
the c-myc antisense (P < 0.05).
Transfection experiments carried out in rat primary cardiomyocytes
showed that coexpression of the c-myc antisense constructs
in these cells also decreased the transcription of the
1AR promoter (Fig. 5).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These results demonstrate striking developmental regulation of
1AR transcription. The
1AR transcription
rate is fivefold higher in hearts of late fetal rats compared with
postnatal animals. The high level of
1AR transcription
is associated with a similar elevation in the transcription rate of
c-myc and is reduced along with reduced c-myc
expression at the later stage of development. In cells that are
genetically modified to demonstrate altered c-myc
expression, there was a direct correlation between
1AR and c-myc transcription rates. Mutagenesis of the
c-myc binding site or blockade of c-myc
expression by antisense blocked
1AR transcription. We
conclude that the developmental regulation of
1AR is at
least in part under the control of c-myc. This mode of
regulation occurs at a developmental stage when the cardiac expression
of
1AR is critical to physiological homeostasis. This may also be critical during an important stage of cardiogenesis and
regulation of cardiac growth (44).
Cardiomyocytes display two developmentally regulated modes of growth. During fetal and early neonatal life in rats, cardiomyocytes proliferate actively. The ability of cardiomyocytes to divide is subsequently lost as they exit the cell cycle (23). Cardiac growth subsequently occurs only by hypertrophy (29). The exact developmental stage at which mitotic activity is lost has been controversial. It was originally suggested that the change from hyperplasia to hypertrophy was a gradual transition that occurred during the third postnatal week in rats (2, 47). More recent evidence suggests that this occurs after postnatal day 4 or 5 in rats (23). The precise molecular mechanisms that control this switch are not understood.
During cardiac development, the switch from proliferative to hypertrophic growth of cardiomyocytes is temporally associated with a decrease in c-myc mRNA expression (41). Several investigations have shown c-myc to be expressed during the fetal and early neonatal periods (20, 41). One investigation suggested that c-myc expression was highest in E13 fetal heart and decreased continuously throughout the embryonic period (41). In another report, the highest levels of c-myc expression were seen in E12-E18 hearts and were similar at each stage (20). In both reports, c-myc expression decreased in newborn and adult hearts (20, 41). The expression of c-myc can be "reinitiated" in adult hearts following stimuli, which lead to hypertrophy (16, 20). C-myc has been implicated in the control of both proliferation and differentiation in various cell types (26). Transgenic mice that overexpress c-myc in the heart have an increase in cardiac mass that is secondary to an increase in cardiomyocyte number (17). This increase in cardiac myocytes is primarily observed during the fetal period of development. Despite enhanced early proliferative growth of the heart during fetal development in c-myc-overexpressing mice, there is also an accelerated switch to hypertrophic growth in the same animals (24). The mechanism for this precocious switch is not known.
The present results show that the switch from the proliferative to the
hypertrophic phase is associated with a change in the transcription
rate of
1AR. Although the
1AR gene is
transcribed at a high rate during the fetal period, this wanes
substantially during postnatal life. Our previous studies have
identified a myc/max binding sequence in the promoter region
of
1AR (46). Mutations that involve this
region abrogate the glucocorticoid-dependent expression of the
1AR promoter (46). The results shown in
Fig. 4A extend these studies in
myc+/+ cells by showing that the increased
expression of the
1AR promoter construct with an intact
E-box is abolished when the E-box is mutated. Similarly, coexpression
of a c-myc antisense construct abrogates
1AR
promoter activity in the same cells.
The
1AR is the predominant
-adrenergic receptor
subtype in the heart and has more important roles in cardiac
contractility and other cardiac functions compared with the
2AR subtype (8, 14, 15). Transgenic mice
with disruption of the
1AR gene have high embryonic
lethality (37, 38). We recently demonstrated significant
inhibition of cardiomyocyte proliferation by
AR blockade (44). Overexpression of
1AR is
characterized by a significant increase in cardiac cell number and
cardiac mass (11). The role of
AR agonists in the
regulation of cardiac mass in other models of pathological growth has
been studied extensively. Chronic infusion of subhypertensive doses of
norepinephrine induces cardiac hypertrophy (18, 21).
Sympathetic activation is observed in heart failure and is likewise
associated with cardiac hypertrophy (1, 3, 4, 12).
Hypertrophy-inducing stimuli, such as norepinephrine infusion into
isolated perfused working rat hearts, induces a transient and
sequential increase in the mRNA of c-fos and
c-myc (48). Other pathological growth stimuli,
such as glucocorticoid administration, result in cardiac hypertrophy,
which may or may not be the result of an increase in the
1AR transcription rate (30). The present
results add insight into the unique mechanisms that govern both cardiac
growth and catecholamine physiology during development. A high
production rate of catecholamines and a high degree of
AR ligand
occupancy characterize fetal and early neonatal life (34,
35). This is critical to physiological homeostasis in utero. We
suggest that the regulation of
1AR transcription is
integrated with the mechanism(s) that control cardiac growth during
this developmental period. These mechanisms are important for
physiological homeostasis, growth and development, and
postnatal adaptation.
Our study does have some limitations. Although we demonstrated striking
changes in the transcription rate of both
1AR and c-myc, we did not examine steady-state mRNA levels or the
stability of either transcript. However, other investigators have shown a decrease in c-myc mRNA levels that is synchronous with the
switch from proliferative to hypertrophic growth (41).
Coupled with the present results, changes in mRNA stability alone are
not likely to account for our findings. Our cell culture studies were
carried out in both primary cardiomyocytes and in
c-myc+/+-overexpressing cells. Both
sets of experiments suggest that
1AR gene expression is
regulated by c-myc, although a direct effect was not
demonstrated. An indirect mechanism that involves other proteins is
possible. Overexpression studies should be interpreted with caution,
because c-myc overexpression may lead to misregulation of
genes that are not physiological targets of c-myc
(32). However, this approach has also been used by many
investigators to begin identification of myc targets (28,
31). Of note, the expression in the
c-myc+/+ cells is only three- to
fourfold over that of WT cells (33).
We studied cardiac development only in fetal and newborn rats. Developing mice have a similar pattern of cardiac growth and development of the cardiac sympathetic axis to rats (25). In contrast, cardiac development in sheep and in particular, development of the cardiac sympathetic axis, occurs over a different developmental period (22). It has been suggested that the timing of human cardiac development more closely resembles that of sheep than rodents. Given the species differences in cardiac development, our results may not be directly generalized to other species. Nonetheless, although the timing of development of the cardiac sympathetic axis may differ, it is likely that our results offer important clues to the mechanism of regulation of cardiac growth and development.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank Drs. John Sedivy and Philip Gruppuso for providing the cells and cDNAs used in some of these experiments. The authors also thank Dr. Lewis Rubin for helpful discussions in refining the techniques for the transcription rate assays during this work.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant PO1 HD-11343 and a Child Health Research grant from the Charles H. Hood Foundation.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. F. Padbury, Dept. of Pediatrics, Women and Infants' Hospital of Rhode Island, 101 Dudley St., Providence, RI 02905-2499 (E-mail: jpadbury{at}wihri.org).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
10.1152/ajpheart.00929.2002
Received 28 October 2002; accepted in final form 14 February 2003.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Bristow, MR,
Ginsburg R,
Minobe W,
Cubicciotti RS,
Sageman WS,
Lurie K,
Billingham ME,
Harrison DC,
and
Stinson EB.
Decreased catecholamine sensitivity and
-adrenergic receptor density in failing human hearts.
N Engl J Med
307:
205-211,
1982[Abstract].
2.
Claycomb, WC.
Biochemical aspects of cardiac muscle differentiation. Deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis and nuclear and cytoplasmic deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase activity.
J Biol Chem
250:
3229-3235,
1975
3.
Cohn, JN.
Nervous system control mechanisms in heart failure.
Acta Med Scand Suppl
707:
15-20,
1986[Medline].
4.
Cohn, JN,
Levine TB,
Olivari MT,
Garberg V,
Lura D,
Francis GS,
Simon AB,
and
Rector T.
Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure.
N Engl J Med
311:
819-823,
1984[Abstract].
5.
Collins, S,
Altschmied J,
Herbsman O,
Caron MG,
Mellon PL,
and
Lefkowitz RJ.
A c-AMP response element in the
2-adrenergic receptor gene confers transcriptional autoregulation by c-AMP.
J Biol Chem
265:
19330-19335,
1990
6.
Cornett, LE,
Hiller FC,
Jacobi SE,
Cao W,
and
McGraw DW.
Identification of a glucocorticoid response element in the rat
2-adrenergic receptor gene.
Mol Pharmacol
54:
1016-1023,
1998
7.
Dalla-Favera, R,
Bregni M,
Erikson J,
Patterson D,
Gallo RC,
and
Croce CM.
Human c-myc oncogene is located on the region of chromosome 8 that is translocated in Burkitt lymphoma cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
79:
7824-7827,
1982
8.
Dzimri, N.
Regulation of
-adrenoceptor signaling in cardiac function and disease.
Pharmacol Rev
51:
465-501,
1999
9.
Emorine, LJ,
Marullo S,
Briend-Sutren MM,
Patey G,
Tate K,
Delavier-Klutchko C,
and
Strosberg AD.
Molecular characterization of the
3-adrenergic receptor.
Science
245:
1118-1121,
1989
10.
Emorine, LJ,
Marullo S,
Delavier-Klutchko C,
Kaveri SV,
Durieu-Trautmann O,
and
Strosberg AD.
Structure of the gene for human
2-adrenergic receptor: expression and promoter characterization.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
84:
6995-6999,
1987
11.
Englehart, S,
Hein L,
Wiesmann F,
and
Lohse MJ.
Progressive hypertrophy and heart failure in
1-adrenergic receptor transgenic mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:
7059-7064,
1999
12.
Francis, GS,
Goldsmith SR,
Ziesche SM,
and
Cohn JN.
Response of plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine to dynamic exercise in patients with congestive heart failure.
Am J Cardiol
49:
1152-1156,
1982[ISI][Medline].
13.
Frielle, T,
Collins S,
Daniel KW,
Caron MG,
Lefkowitz RJ,
and
Kobilka BK.
Cloning of the cDNA for the human
1-adrenergic receptor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
84:
7920-7924,
1987
14.
Habib, DM,
Padbury JF,
Martinez AM,
Chappell B,
Thio SL,
and
Burnell E.
Neonatal adaptation: cardiac adrenergic effector mechanisms after birth in newborn sheep.
Pediatr Res
29:
98-103,
1991[ISI][Medline].
15.
Hellgren, I,
Sylven C,
and
Magnusson Y.
Study of the
1 adrenergic receptor expression in human tissues: immunological approach.
Biol Pharm Bull
23:
700-703,
2000[ISI][Medline].
16.
Izumo, S,
Nadal-Ginard B,
and
Mahdavi V.
Protooncogene induction and reprogramming of cardiac gene expression produced by pressure overload.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
85:
339-343,
1988
17.
Jackson, T,
Allard MF,
Sreenan CM,
Doss LK,
Bishop SP,
and
Swain JL.
The c-myc proto-oncogene regulates cardiac development in transgenic mice.
Mol Cell Biol
10:
3709-3716,
1990
18.
King, BD,
Sack D,
Kichuk MR,
and
Hintze TH.
Absence of hypertension despite chronic marked elevations in plasma norepinephrine in conscious dogs.
Hypertension
9:
582-590,
1987
19.
Kobilka, BK,
Frielle T,
Dohlman HG,
Bolanowski MA,
Dixon RAF,
Keller P,
Caron MG,
and
Lefkowitz RJ.
Delineation of the intronless nature of the genes for the human and hamster
2-adrenergic receptor and their putative promoter regions.
J Biol Chem
262:
7321-7327,
1987
20.
Komuro, I,
Kurabayashi M,
Takaku F,
and
Yazaki Y.
Expression of cellular oncogenes in the myocardium during the developmental stage and pressure-overloaded hypertrophy of the rat heart.
Circ Res
62:
1075-1079,
1988
21.
Laks, MM,
Morady F,
and
Swan HJ.
Myocardial hypertrophy produced by chronic infusion of subhypertensive doses of norepinephrine in the dog.
Chest
64:
75-78,
1973
22.
Lebowitz, EA,
Novick JS,
and
Rudolph AM.
Development of myocardial sympathetic innervation in the fetal lamb.
Pediatr Res
6:
887-893,
1972[ISI][Medline].
23.
Li, F,
Wang X,
Capasso JM,
and
Gerdes MA.
Rapid transition of cardiac myocytes from hyperplasia to hypertrophy during postnatal development.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
28:
1737-1746,
1996[ISI][Medline].
24.
Machida, N,
Brissie N,
Sreenan C,
and
Bishop SP.
Inhibition of cardiac myocyte division in c-myc transgenic mice.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
29:
1895-1902,
1997[ISI][Medline].
25.
MacLellan, WR,
and
Schneider MD.
Genetic dissection of cardiac growth control pathways.
Annu Rev Physiol
62:
289-319,
2000[ISI][Medline].
26.
Marcu, KB.
Regulation of expression of the c-myc proto-oncogene.
Bioessays
6:
28-32,
1987[ISI][Medline].
27.
Mateyak, MK,
Obaya AJ,
Adachi S,
and
Sedivy JM.
Phenotypes of c-myc deficient rat fibroblasts isolated by targeted homologous recombination.
Cell Growth Differ
8:
1039-1048,
1997[Abstract].
28.
Menssen, A,
and
Hermeking H.
Characterization of the c-myc-regulated transcriptome by SAGE: identification and analysis of c-myc target genes.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
99:
6274-6279,
2002
29.
Morgan, HE,
Gordon EE,
Kira Y,
Chua HL,
Russo Peterson CJ LA,
McDermott PJ,
and
Watson PA.
Biochemical mechanisms of cardiac hypertrophy.
Annu Rev Physiol
49:
533-543,
1987[ISI][Medline].
30.
Muangmingsuk, S,
Ingram P,
Gupta MP,
Arcilla RA,
and
Gupta M.
Dexamethasone induced cardiac hypertrophy in newborn rats is accompanied by changes in myosin heavy chain phenotype and gene transcription.
Mol Cell Biochem
209:
165-174,
2000[ISI][Medline].
31.
Nesbit, CE,
Tersak JM,
Grove LE,
Drzal A,
Choi H,
and
Prochownik EV.
Genetic dissection of c-myc apoptotic pathways.
Oncogene
19:
3200-3212,
2000[ISI][Medline].
32.
Obaya, AJ,
Mateyak MK,
and
Sedivy JM.
Mysterious liaisons: the relationship between c-myc and the cell cycle.
Oncogene
18:
2934-2941,
1999[ISI][Medline].
33.
O'Connell BC, Cheung AF, Simkevich CP, Tam W, Ren X, Mateyak MK, and
Sedivy JM. A large-scale genetic analysis of c-myc
regulated gene expression patterns. J Biol Chem.
January 14, 2003; 10.1074/jbc.M210462200.
34.
Padbury, JF,
Ludlow JK,
Humme JA,
and
Agata Y.
Metabolic clearance and plasma appearance rates of catecholamines in preterm and fetal sheep.
Pediatr Res
20:
992-995,
1986[ISI][Medline].
35.
Padbury, JF,
and
Martinez AM.
Sympathoadrenal system activity at birth: integration of postnatal adaptation.
Semin Perinatol
12:
163-172,
1988[ISI][Medline].
36.
Padbury, JF,
Tseng YT,
and
Waschek JA.
Transcription initiation is localized to a TATAless region of the ovine
1-adrenergic receptor gene.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
211:
254-261,
1995[ISI][Medline].
37.
Rohrer, DK,
Chruscinki A,
Schaulbe EH,
Bernstein D,
and
Kobilka BK.
Cardiovascular and metabolic alterations in mice lacking both beta-1 and beta-2 adrenergic receptors.
J Biol Chem
274:
16701-16708,
1999
38.
Rohrer, DK,
Desai KH,
Jasper JR,
Stevens ME,
Regula DP,
Barsh GS,
Bernstein D,
and
Kobilka BK.
Targeted disruption of the mouse
1-adrenergic receptor gene: developmental and cardiovascular effects.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:
7375-7380,
1996
39.
Sambrook, J,
and
Russell DW.
Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001, p. 17.23-17.29.
40.
Sanchez, A,
Jones WK,
Gulick J,
Doetschman T,
and
Robbins J.
Myosin heavy chain gene expression in mouse embryoid bodies.
J Biol Chem
266:
22419-22426,
1991
41.
Schneider, MD,
Payne PA,
Ueno H,
Perryman MB,
and
Roberts R.
Dissociated expression of c-myc and a fos-related competence gene during cardiac myogenesis.
Mol Cell Biol
6:
4140-4143,
1986
42.
Searles, RP,
Midson CN,
Nipper VJ,
and
Machida CA.
Transcription of the rat
1-adrenergic receptor gene. Characterization of the transcript and identification of important sequences.
J Biol Chem
270:
157-162,
1995
43.
Toraason, M,
Luken ME,
Breitenstein M,
Krueger JA,
and
Biagini RE.
Comparative toxicity of allylamine and acrolein in cultured myocytes and fibroblasts from neonatal rat heart.
Toxicology
56:
107-117,
1989[ISI][Medline].
44.
Tseng, YT,
Kopel R,
Stabila JP,
McGonnigal BG,
Nguyen TT,
Gruppuso PA,
and
Padbury JF.
-Adrenergic receptors regulate cardiomyocyte proliferation during early postnatal life.
FASEB J
15:
1921-1926,
2001
45.
Tseng, YT,
Stabila J,
McGonnigal B,
Nguyen TT,
and
Padbury JF.
An inverted cAMP response element mediates the cAMP induction of the ovine
1-adrenergic receptor gene.
Biochem Mol Biol Int
46:
1127-1134,
1998[ISI][Medline].
46.
Tseng, YT,
Stabila JP,
Nguyen TT,
McGonnigal BG,
Waschek JA,
and
Padbury JF.
A novel glucocorticoid regulatory unit mediates the hormone responsiveness of the
1-adrenergic receptor gene.
Mol Cell Endocrinol
181:
165-178,
2001[ISI][Medline].
47.
Zak, R.
Cell proliferation during cardiac growth.
Am J Cardiol
31:
211-219,
1973[ISI][Medline].
48.
Zimmer, HG.
Catecholamine-induced cardiac hypertrophy: significance of proto-oncogene expression.
J Mol Med
75:
849-859,
1997[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. Sommer, A. J. Hume, J. M. Ciak, J. J. VanNostrand, M. Friggens, and M. K. Walker Early Developmental 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin Exposure Decreases Chick Embryo Heart Chronotropic Response to Isoproterenol but Not to Agents Affecting Signals Downstream of the Beta-Adrenergic Receptor Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2005; 83(2): 363 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |