AJP - Heart Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285: H1576-H1581, 2003. First published June 5, 2003; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00217.2003
0363-6135/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
285/4/H1576    most recent
00217.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Molenaar, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russell, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Molenaar, P.

Elevated plasma levels of human urotensin-II immunoreactivity in congestive heart failure

Fraser D. Russell,1 Deborah Meyers,2 Andrew J. Galbraith,2 Nick Bett,2 Istvan Toth,3 Philip Kearns,3 and Peter Molenaar1

Departments of 1Medicine and 2Cardiology, Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland 4032; and 3School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia

Submitted 10 March 2003 ; accepted in final form 3 June 2003


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 
Human urotensin-II (hU-II) is the most potent endogenous cardiostimulant identified to date. We therefore determined whether hU-II has a possible pathological role by investigating its levels in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Blood samples were obtained from the aortic root, femoral artery, femoral vein, and pulmonary artery from CHF patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and the aortic root from patients undergoing investigative angiography for chest pain who were not in heart failure. Immunoreactive hU-II (hU-II-ir) levels were determined with radioimmunoassay. hU-II-ir was elevated in the aortic root of CHF patients (230.9 ± 68.7 pg/ml, n = 21; P < 0.001) vs. patients with nonfailing hearts (22.7 ± 6.1 pg/ml, n = 18). This increase was attributed to cardiopulmonary production of hU-II-ir because levels were lower in the pulmonary artery (38.2 ± 6.1 pg/ml, n = 21; P < 0.001) than in the aortic root. hU-II-ir was elevated in the aortic root of CHF patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (142.1 ± 51.5 pg/ml, n = 10; P < 0.05) vs. patients with nonfailing hearts without coronary artery disease (27.3 ± 12.4 pg/ml, n = 7) and CHF patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (311.6 ± 120.4 pg/ml, n = 11; P < 0.001) vs. patients with nonfailing hearts and coronary artery disease (19.8 ± 6.6 pg/ml, n = 11). hU-II-ir was significantly higher in the aortic root than in the pulmonary artery and femoral vein, with a nonsignificant trend for higher levels in the aortic root than in the femoral artery. The findings indicated that hU-II-ir is elevated in the aortic root of CHF patients and that hU-II-ir is cleared at least in part from the microcirculation.

ischemic heart disease; dilated cardiomyopathy; circulating vasoactive agent

HUMAN UROTENSIN-II (hU-II) is the most potent endogenous cardiostimulatory peptide identified to date, causing increased contractile force in human atrium and ventricle (10) and increased contractile tone in human endothelial denuded coronary arteries at subnanomolar concentrations (6, 10). The identification of cardiostimulant effects (10), together with the detection of mRNA encoding both hU-II and its obligatory receptors (UT-II receptors) in heart (3), suggests a possible physiological role for the endogenous peptide.

Chronic activation of the UT-II receptor system ensuring cardiostimulation may also have a pathological role in cardiac disease, including a predicted increase in oxygen consumption in the face of energy deficit that is associated with heart failure. A hypertrophic phenotype was observed in cultured rat neonatal cardiac myocytes that were exposed to hU-II, with activation of fetal gene expression, incorporation of amino acids into proteins, and increased cell size and myofibril organization (17). hU-II also increased {alpha}1(I) and {alpha}1(III) procollagen gene expression in rat neonatal cardiac fibroblasts (14), and it may therefore contribute to increased collagen deposition and fibrosis. Both myocardial hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis are early stages in the progression of heart failure (5).

Studies examining the role of hU-II in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients reported decreased (16), unchanged (4), or increased (8, 9) levels of circulating hU-II peptide and either unchanged prepro-U-II mRNA expression (4) or upregulation of myocardial hU-II and UT-II receptor mRNA expression together with elevated levels of myocardial hU-II and UT-II receptor protein (3). In view of the potential pathophysiological role of hU-II in cardiac disease, we investigated immunoreactive hU-II (hU-II-ir) levels in plasma samples taken across the cardiopulmonary system in patients with CHF.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 
Patient population. Sample collection was approved by the human ethics committees of the Prince Charles Hospital (EC2109, EC2134, and EC9865) and the University of Queensland (H/348/MED/01/NHMRC and 2001002160), and the procedures followed were in accordance with institutional guidelines. Blood samples were obtained from patients who gave written informed consent and were undergoing cardiac catheterization. Eighteen patients had nonfailing hearts, eleven with coronary artery disease. Twenty-one patients had CHF, eleven with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ten with cardiomyopathy associated with nonischemic etiologies including idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 7) and alcoholic (n = 1), viral (n = 1), and hypertrophic obstructive (n = 1) cardiomyopathy. Drug treatment for the two cohorts is described in Table 1. Sites of clearance of hU-II-ir were determined with blood samples collected from the aortic root, femoral artery, femoral vein, and pulmonary artery from 10 patients with CHF (ischemic cardiomyopathy: n = 5; nonischemic cardiomyopathy: n = 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Drug treatment for patients with nonfailing hearts and congestive heart failure

 

Patients with nonfailing hearts had preserved left ventricular function [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 50%]. LVEF was not obtained for one patient with a nonfailing heart and normal coronary arteries because of catheter-induced ventricular tachycardia, although systolic function appeared normal by angiography. Severity of heart failure in the CHF cohort was assessed with the New York Heart Association functional classification [NYHA classes I–II (n = 7), II–III (n = 11), and III–IV (n = 3)]. All patients in the CHF cohort had evidence of structural heart disease, indicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF <= 40%). All patients with CHF secondary to ischemic heart disease had at least one previous myocardial infarction. Patients from the two cohorts were well matched for age (unpaired t-test), male-to-female ratio (Fisher's exact test), and body mass index (unpaired t-test) (P > 0.05; Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Hemodynamic data for patients with nonfailing hearts and congestive heart failure patients

 

Radioimmunoassay. Blood was collected in EDTA tubes to which aprotinin (0.6 trypsin inhibitor units/ml) was added. Samples were spun (1,600 g, 15 min, 4°C), plasma was extracted, and hU-II-ir levels were measured by radioimmunoassay according to the manufacturer's instructions (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals). In addition, cross-reactivity of the assay to a pro-hU-II fragment, endothelin-1 (ET-1), angiotensin II, and norepinephrine was tested. Briefly, plasma was acidified with 1% trifluoroacetic acid, spun (14,000 g, 20 min, 4°C), and loaded onto preequilibrated Sep-Columns containing 200 mg of C18. Samples were eluted with 60% acetonitrile in 1% trifluoroacetic acid and dried with a Speed Vac Concentrator (Savant). Dried plasma extracts, synthetic hU-II standards, a 25-amino acid carboxy-terminal sequence of the hU-II prohormone [containing the mature sequence (residues in italics): SHLLARIWKPYKKRETPDCFWKYCV], ET-1, angiotensin II, and l-norepinephrine were diluted with RIA buffer and incubated with primary antibody (17 h, 4°C), 125I-labeled hU-II (10,000 cpm/0.1 ml; 24 h, 4°C), and then goat anti-rabbit IgG and normal rabbit serum (1.5 h, 23°C). The experiment was terminated by addition of RIA buffer, samples were spun (1,700 g, 20 min, 4°C), and pellets were counted (LKB Wallac 1272 Clinigamma). Data were corrected for efficiency of peptide extraction (40.2%).

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Gradient high-performance liquid chromatography was used to analyze synthetic mature hU-II and plasma samples. Plasma was extracted (see Radioimmunoassay), reconstituted in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and chromatographed on an Agilent Zorbax 5-µm SBC-18 column (2.1 x 50 mm) at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min with solvent A (0.1% formic acid, 2 min), 100% solvent A ramping to 90% solvent B (0.1% formic acid, 90% acetonitrile in distilled water) until 10 min, held at 90% solvent B for 2 min, returned to 100% solvent A in 6 s, and washed with 100% solvent A for a further 6 min. Solvents for the binary gradient were delivered with Shimadzu LC10 AT VP liquid chromatography (LC) pumps that were controlled with a SCL10A VP Shimadzu system controller. Solvents were degassed with a DGU12A Shimadzu degasser. Samples were injected onto the mass spectrometer (MS) with an Agilent 1100 series auto injector. MS analyses were carried out with a PE Sciex API3000 LC-MS-MS system. Samples were ionized by positive-ion electrospray atmospheric pressure ionization. The ion spray, orifice (Or), and ring voltages were 5,200, 35, and 225 V, respectively. The quadrupole zero (Q0) voltage was –10 V, and the declustering potential was 45 V (Or – Q0).

Human atrial contraction studies. Tissue bath studies were carried out as previously described (10). Briefly, human right atrial trabeculae were obtained from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery and were set up in 50-ml baths containing modified Krebs solution at 37°C. Cumulative concentration response curves were carried out for mature synthetic hU-II (20 pM–20 nM) and pro-hU-II fragment (20 pM–20 nM) in the presence of 200 nM l-propranolol to block endogenous l-norepinephrine stimulation of {beta}1- and {beta}2-adrenoceptors. Mature synthetic hU-II (20 nM) was added to tissues that were exposed to the prohormone fragment. Maximal receptor-independent responses were determined by increasing the Ca2+ concentration to 9.25 mM, and curves were corrected for time-dependent fade with nonstimulated control tissues.

Statistics. Data were normalized by log transformation and analyzed with one-way ANOVA or Student's t-test. Data sets showing a significant difference by one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05) were examined with the Tukey multiple-comparisons test. Male-to-female ratios and drug therapies were compared with a Fisher's exact test. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to examine the association between hemodynamic variables and plasma hU-II-ir levels. Values are expressed as means ± SE.

Reagents. The hU-II radioimmunoassay kit and C18 Sep-Columns were from Phoenix Pharmaceuticals. ET-1, hU-II, and the pro-hU-II fragment were synthesized by Auspep (Parkville, Australia).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 
Elevated plasma hU-II-ir levels in human heart failure. Aortic root plasma hU-II-ir levels were markedly elevated in CHF patients compared with patients with nonfailing hearts (Fig. 1A; P < 0.001, 1-way ANOVA). This increase was attributed to cardiac and/or pulmonary production of the peptide, because concentrations were higher in the aortic root than the pulmonary artery in CHF patients (Fig. 1A; P < 0.001, 1-way ANOVA). LVEF determined in all patients was inversely correlated with hU-II-ir levels (Fig. 2, r = –0.61; P < 0.0001, Pearson's correlation coefficient) and was lower in the CHF cohort compared with patients with nonfailing hearts (Table 2; P < 0.0001, unpaired t-test). A correlation was not observed between hU-II-ir levels and pulmonary wedge pressure or cardiac index, although this was determined in the CHF cohort only because values for pulmonary wedge pressure and stroke volume were not obtained for patients with nonfailing hearts. Serum creatinine levels (P = 0.0003) and heart rate (P = 0.029) were higher in patients with CHF than in patients with nonfailing hearts (unpaired t-test; Table 2). A correlation was not observed between hU-II-ir levels and creatinine levels or heart rate (P > 0.05, Pearson's correlation coefficient). Plasma hU-II-ir levels were not correlated with NYHA class (P > 0.05, 1-way ANOVA).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Immunoreactive human urotensin-II (hU-II-ir) levels in patients with nonfailing hearts (n = 18) and patients with congestive heart failure (CHF; n = 21). A: plasma hU-II-ir levels in the aortic root (filled bars) and pulmonary artery (open bar) of patients with CHF and nonfailing hearts. B: plasma hU-II-ir levels in the aortic root (filled bars) and pulmonary artery (open bars) of patients with ischemic (n = 11) and nonischemic (n = 10) cardiomyopathy compared with patients with nonfailing hearts with (+CAD, n = 11) or without (–CAD; n = 7) coronary artery disease. C: plasma hU-II-ir levels in the aortic root, femoral artery, femoral vein, and pulmonary artery from patients with CHF (n = 10). Values are means ± SE. *P < 0.05, 1-way ANOVA on log-transformed data.

 


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Scattergram showing an inverse correlation between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and hU-II-ir levels in the aortic root for all patients in which LVEF was determined (n = 38).

 

Data obtained from CHF patients were separated according to ischemic or nonischemic etiology. Plasma hU-II-ir levels were higher in the aortic root of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy compared with patients with nonfailing hearts with coronary artery disease (P < 0.001, 1-way ANOVA) and in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy compared with patients with nonfailing hearts and normal coronary arteries (P < 0.05, 1-way ANOVA; Fig. 1B). A cardiopulmonary gradient for hU-II-ir was observed in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients (P < 0.01; 1-way ANOVA), with a nonsignificant trend observed in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. There was no difference between hU-II-ir levels in the aortic root of patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies or between patients with nonfailing hearts with or without coronary artery disease.

To investigate sites of clearance or degradation of hU-II-ir from the peripheral circulation, additional blood samples were taken from the femoral artery and femoral vein of patients with CHF. hU-II-ir levels were higher in the aortic root than in the femoral vein (P < 0.05) and pulmonary artery (P < 0.01) but were not different between the aortic root and femoral artery (P > 0.05, 1-way ANOVA; Fig. 1C).

Immunoreactive hU-II peptides. Experiments were carried out to verify the recognition of mature synthetic hU-II with radioimmunoassay. The antibody, which was raised against the mature hU-II sequence, recognized synthetic mature hU-II with a high sensitivity of detection (1–10 pg/ml). Although the antibody did not cross-react with ET-1 (100 nM), angiotensin II (124 pM), l-norepinephrine (14 nM) (this study; not shown) or C-type natriuretic peptide-22, CGRP, adrenomedullin, bradykinin, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)-45, BNP-32, proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20-peptide, or {alpha}-atrial natriuretic peptide-28 (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals data sheet), it exhibited 29.0 ± 11.7% (n = 4) cross-reactivity with the pro-hU-II fragment (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). This raised the possibility that the circulating peptide may be the prohormone rather than the mature peptide. Consistent with this hypothesis, no compound with the same characteristics as mature hU-II was detected in plasma samples by LC-MS. The sensitivity of detection of hU-II with this method was 64 pg.

Prohormone-converting enzyme activity is required for biological activity. Contractile studies were carried out to compare the cardiac effects of the pro-hU-II fragment and mature hU-II. Although hU-II (20 pM–20 nM) caused a concentration-dependent increase in force of contraction of human right atrial trabeculae from nonfailing hearts (pEC50 = 9.5 ± 0.02, maxima = 30.4 ± 1.6% of response to 9.25 mM Ca2+; n = 4 tissues/3 patients), tissues from the same patients were largely unresponsive to the pro-hU-II fragment (20 pM–20 nM; n = 5 tissues/3 patients) (Fig. 3). Tissues exposed to the pro-hU-II fragment were responsive to 20 nM mature hU-II when added at the completion of the concentration-response curve (maxima = 27.5 ± 3.6% of response to 9.25 mM Ca2+), demonstrating preserved muscle viability. These findings indicate that if pro-hU-II or a carboxy-terminal fragment that is >=25 amino acids in length is the circulating hormone in CHF patients, an active prohormone-converting enzyme would be required to produce a biologically active peptide.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Concentration-response curves to hU-II (n = 4 tissues from 3 patients, {blacksquare}) and prohormone fragment (see MATERIALS AND METHODS; n = 5 tissues from 3 patients, {circ}) in human right atrial trabeculae from nonfailing hearts.

 


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 
This study revealed markedly elevated plasma hU-II-ir levels in CHF patients with ischemic and nonischemic etiologies compared with patients with nonfailing hearts. This increase did not appear to be related to the presence of coronary artery disease because plasma hU-II-ir levels in patients with nonfailing hearts but with coronary artery disease were not elevated.

Plasma hU-II-ir levels in CHF patients were higher in the aortic root than in the pulmonary artery, consistent with cardiopulmonary production. The cardiopulmonary gradient for hU-II-ir observed in this study is in line with increased myocardial expression of hU-II peptide in left ventricle compared with right ventricle obtained from patients with CHF secondary to ischemic heart disease (3), and this may therefore represent a site of production for the hU-II-ir that was detected in the plasma. Although mRNA encoding the U-II precursor was absent in lung (1, 2), we cannot exclude the possibility that hU-II-ir is secreted from the lungs under pathophysiological conditions such as CHF. The increase in hU-II-ir in the aortic root is in line with other studies that showed increased hU-II-ir in the peripheral circulation of patients with CHF (8, 9). Interestingly, unlike the correlation observed for circulating ET-1 levels and NYHA function class (13), no correlation was observed for hU-II-ir and NYHA functional class in the CHF cohort (this study; Ref. 8).

Patients with renal dysfunction had elevated plasma hU-II levels, and this was attributed to reduced capacity for peptide excretion or increased hU-II production (11). However, the elevated hU-II-ir levels in CHF patients, of whom only 7 showed evidence of renal dysfunction (creatinine = 0.16 ± 0.01 mmol/l), cannot be explained by renal disease because elevated hU-II-ir levels were detected in the remaining 14 CHF patients (295.6 ± 97.8 pg/ml) who had normal renal function (creatinine = 0.10 ± 0.01 mmol/l). The cardiopulmonary gradient for hU-II-ir indicated an importance of the heart and/or lungs in hU-II-ir production rather than reduced renal excretion. Thus distinct mechanisms may be involved in elevating plasma concentrations of hU-II-ir in renal and cardiac disease.

hU-II-ir levels were associated with CHF, and although statistical analysis revealed no differences between ischemic and nonischemic etiologies, a larger sample population would be required for confirmation, or otherwise, of this finding. Patients with CHF were managed differently from patients with nonfailing hearts with respect to administration of angiotensinconverting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, cardiac glycosides, and diuretics and as indicated in Table 1. We therefore investigated the possibility that differences in patient management may contribute to the differences observed in plasma hU-II-ir levels determined in the aortic root samples. Plasma hU-II-ir levels in patients treated with ACE inhibitors and with nonfailing hearts (24.7 ± 7.7 pg/ml, n = 9) were different from those in patients treated with ACE inhibitors and with CHF (230.9 ± 68.7 pg/ml, n = 21; P < 0.0001). None of the patients with nonfailing hearts was treated with cardiac glycosides; however, no difference in hU-II-ir levels were observed for CHF patients treated with (190.0 ± 63.6 pg/ml, n = 10) or without (268.0 ± 120.0 pg/ml, n = 11; P = 0.89) cardiac glycosides. Only 1 patient with a nonfailing heart was treated with a diuretic compared with 20 patients with CHF. The plasma level of hU-II-ir in this patient (29 pg/ml) was within the range of levels determined in patients with nonfailing hearts (3.2–53.9 pg/ml). Therefore, although the management of patients with CHF was different from that of patients with nonfailing hearts, these differences were not associated with hU-II-ir levels in the aortic root.

It is not known whether the peptide contributes to the pathology of cardiac disease or whether it is a marker of the disease process. Although hU-II is predicted to produce transient benefits associated with improved cardiac output in CHF patients, long-term cardiostimulation would be detrimental if it increased oxygen consumption in the face of reduced myocardial energy efficiency that is associated with heart failure (15). U-II stimulated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (17) and {alpha}1(I) and {alpha}1(III) procollagen gene expression in fibroblasts (14) in rat neonatal cell cultures, and additional harmful effects may therefore be associated with a role of hU-II in myocardial hypertrophy and remodeling. Plasma levels of l-norepinephrine and ET-1 are also elevated in heart failure, indicating that CHF triggers events leading to secretion of multiple cardio-active agents into the circulation that in combination may contribute to the progression of cardiac disease.

Plasma levels of hU-II-ir were measured in the aortic root, femoral artery, femoral vein, and pulmonary artery to examine possible sites of peptide clearance. HU-II-ir levels were lower in the pulmonary artery and femoral vein than in the aortic root, with a nonsignificant trend toward a reduction in the femoral artery. The trend for decreased hU-II-ir levels in the femoral artery compared with the aortic root could indicate that the aorta contributes in part to the efficient clearance of hU-II-ir. The regional differences in hU-II-ir levels were similar to gradients reported for ET-1, where lower plasma ET-1 levels were detected in the femoral vein than in the aortic root and femoral artery (12, 13) and suggest a possible role of the microcirculation in hU-II-ir clearance.

Interestingly, the antibody used to detect mature hU-II also cross-reacted with a pro-hU-II fragment, raising the possibility that the prohormone could be the endogenous circulating peptide. Consistent with this, no compound with the same characteristics as synthetic mature hU-II was detected by mass spectrometry. Indeed, this may explain differences observed between our findings and a study by Dschietzig et al. (4), which showed no increase in hU-II levels in CHF patients. The high molecular weight of pro-hU-II (124- and 139-amino acid residue splice variants have been identified) confers low sensitivity of detection by MS, and although we speculate that pro-hU-II may be the circulating hormone, further investigation is required to prove this hypothesis. If the prohormone is secreted into the circulation in CHF patients, then the presence of an active urotensin-converting enzyme may be crucial for biological activity. Consistent with this hypothesis, tissue bath studies revealed that human atrium was largely unresponsive to the pro-hU-II fragment (20 pM–20 nM) whereas mature hU-II potently increased force of contraction.

In conclusion, this study provides evidence for elevated plasma hU-II-ir levels in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy compared with patients with nonfailing hearts with or without coronary artery disease. The increased levels of hU-II-ir are rapidly cleared from the circulation, suggesting local autocrine or paracrine effects of the peptide.


   DISCLOSURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
REFERENCES
 
The authors thank Dr. Miranda Mortlock (supported by an Australian Research Council Strategic Partnerships with Industry— Research and Training Grant C10024 [GenBank] 120) for statistical advice. This study was supported by a University of Queensland Start-Up Fund and an National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia New Investigator grant (F. D. Russell).


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank the surgeons and theater staff of the Prince Charles Hospital, Anne Carle for assistance in patient recruitment, and Dr. Allun Jones for assistance with mass spectrometry.


   FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F. D. Russell, Dept. of Medicine, Univ. of Queensland, Prince Charles Hospital, Rode Road, Chermside, Queensland 4032, Australia (E-mail: russell{at}medicine.uq.edu.au).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ames RS, Sarau HM, Chambers JK, Willette RN, Aiyar NV, Romanic AM, Louden CS, Foley JJ, Sauermelch CF, Coatney RW, Ao Z, Disa J, Holmes SD, Stadel JM, Martin JD, Liu W-S, Glover GI, Wilson S, McNulty DE, Ellis CE, Elshourbagy NA, Shabon U, Trill JJ, Hay DWP, Ohlstein EH, Bergsma DJ, and Douglas SA. Human urotensin-II is a potent vasoconstrictor and agonist for the orphan receptor GPR14. Nature 401: 282–286, 1999.[Medline]
  2. Coulouarn Y, Lihrmann I, Jegou S, Anouar Y, Tostivint H, Beauvillain JC, Conlon JM, Bern HA, and Vaudry H. Cloning of the cDNA encoding the urotensin II precursor in frog and human reveals intense expression of the urotensin II gene in motoneurons of the spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 15803–15808, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Douglas SA, Tayara L, Ohlstein EH, Halawa N, and Giaid A. Congestive heart failure and expression of myocardial urotensin II. Lancet 359: 1990–1997, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Dschietzig T, Bartsch C, Pregla R, Zurbrügg HR, Armbruster FP, Richter C, Laule M, Romeyke E, Neubert C, Voelter W, Baumann G, and Stangl K. Plasma levels and cardiovascular gene expression of urotensin-II in human heart failure. Regul Pept 110: 33–38, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, Cinquegrani MP, Feldmanmd AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Goldstein S, Gregoratos G, Jessup ML, Noble RJ, Packer M, Silver MA, Stevenson LW, Gibbons RJ, Antman EM, Alpert JS, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gregoratos G, Jacobs AK, Hiratzka LF, Russell RO, Smith SC Jr, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, and Heart Failure Society of America. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary. Circulation 104: 2996–3007, 2001.[Free Full Text]
  6. Maguire JJ, Kuc RE, and Davenport AP. Orphan-receptor ligand human urotensin II: receptor localization in human tissues and comparison of vasoconstrictor responses with endothelin-1. Br J Pharmacol 131: 441–446, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Nelson LD. Monitoring cardiac function and tissue perfusion. Crit Care Clin 12: 795–818, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Ng LL, Loke I, O'Brien RJ, Squire IB, and Davies JE. Plasma urotensin in human systolic heart failure. Circulation 106: 2877–2880, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Richards AM, Nicholls MG, Lainchbury JG, Fisher S, and Yandle TG. Plasma urotensin II in heart failure. Lancet 360: 545–546, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Russell FD, Molenaar P, and O'Brien D. Cardiostimulant effects of urotensin-II in human heart in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 132: 5–9, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Totsune K, Takahashi K, Arihara Z, Sone M, Satoh F, Ito S, Kimura Y, Sasano H, and Murakami O. Role of urotensin II in patients on dialysis. Lancet 358: 810–811, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Hisanaga T, Maeda K, Ohnishi M, Mabuchi N, Sawaki M, Hayashi M, Fujii M, and Kinoshita M. Relationship between endothelin-1 extraction in the peripheral circulation and systemic vascular resistance in patients with severe congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 33: 530–537, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Maeda K, Mabuchi N, Hayashi M, Tsutsui T, Ohnishi M, Sawaki M, Fujii M, Matsumoto T, Horie H, Sugimoto Y, and Kinoshita M. Transcardiac extraction of circulating endothelin-1 across the failing heart. Am J Cardiol 86: 524–528, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Tzanidis A, Hannan RD, Thomas WG, Onan D, See F, and Krum H. Urotensin II stimulates collagen synthesis by cardiac fibroblasts and hypertrophic signalling in cardiomyocytes via G(alpha)q- and Ras-dependent pathways (Abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol A37: 164, 2001.
  15. Wallhaus TR, Taylor M, DeGrado TR, Russell DC, Stanko P, Nickles RJ, and Stone CK. Myocardial free fatty acid and glucose use after carvedilol treatment in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 103: 2441–2446, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Zhong P, Li ZL, Wu HC, Tang CS, and Lu Q. Clinical study of changes of urotensin II in patients with congestive heart failure. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao 23: 121–123, 2003.[Medline]
  17. Zou Y, Nagai R, and Yamazaki T. Urotensin II induces hypertrophic responses in cultured cardiomyocytes from neonatal rats. FEBS Lett 508: 57–60, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Circ Heart FailHome page
M. P. Quaile, H. Kubo, C. L. Kimbrough, S. A. Douglas, and K. B. Margulies
Direct Inotropic Effects of Exogenous and Endogenous Urotensin-II: Divergent Actions in Failing and Nonfailing Human Myocardium
Circ Heart Fail, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 39 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
A. E. S. Abdel-Razik, R. J. Balment, and N. Ashton
Enhanced renal sensitivity of the spontaneously hypertensive rat to urotensin II
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F1239 - F1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
T. Watanabe, K. Nishio, T. Kanome, T.-a. Matsuyama, S. Koba, T. Sakai, K. Sato, S. Hongo, K. Nose, H. Ota, et al.
Impact of Salusin-{alpha} and -{beta} on Human Macrophage Foam Cell Formation and Coronary Atherosclerosis
Circulation, February 5, 2008; 117(5): 638 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HypertensionHome page
C. Zoccali, F. Mallamaci, F. A. Benedetto, G. Tripepi, P. Pizzini, S. Cutrupi, and L. Malatino
Urotensin II and Cardiomyopathy in End-Stage Renal Disease
Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 326 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y.-X. Wang, Y.-J. Ding, Y.-Z. Zhu, Y. Shi, T. Yao, and Y.-C. Zhu
Role of PKC in the novel synergistic action of urotensin II and angiotensin II and in urotensin II-induced vasoconstriction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H348 - H359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
M. Lim, S. Honisett, C. D. Sparkes, P. Komesaroff, A. Kompa, and H. Krum
Differential Effect of Urotensin II on Vascular Tone in Normal Subjects and Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
Circulation, March 16, 2004; 109(10): 1212 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
285/4/H1576    most recent
00217.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Molenaar, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russell, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Molenaar, P.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.