|
|
||||||||
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom
Submitted 2 June 2003 ; accepted in final form 16 September 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
P2x receptors; P2y receptors; voltage clamp; sarcoplasmic reticulum; inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
Several pioneering studies characterizing P2 receptors, although not called so at the time, were carried out using vascular smooth muscle cells (1, 2). In these studies, P2 receptor stimulation was carried out by application of ATP (1, 2). ATP is an important regulator of vascular tone as it is released not only from sympathetic nerves along with norepinephrine but also from cells that are damaged during vascular injury (24). Furthermore, nucleotides may promote vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation (29), a key event during angiogenesis and atherosclerosis. Thus the understanding of Ca2+ homeostasis mediated by nucleotides seems of importance in arteries. Nonetheless, there are still substantial gaps in our knowledge regarding how P2 receptor activation regulates [Ca2+]i in these cells.
Among the seven P2X receptor subtypes cloned to date (28), P2X1 receptor subtypes are thought to be important in smooth muscle cells (41). The defining feature of the P2X1 receptor is its profound desensitization, a rapid decay of the current during the continuous presence of the drug (28). It follows that the direct responses caused by P2X1 receptor activation will be short lived. However, there are two possibilities whereby the brief P2X1 response still imposes substantial impact on the Ca2+ homeostasis in vascular smooth muscle cells. First, the P2X current that is partially carried by Ca2+ may trigger further Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, causing amplification of [Ca2+]i increase. P2X receptor-mediated, Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release has been suggested in some preparations (27) but not in others (4, 13, 25). Second, P2X responses may modulate the subsequent activation of the other P2 receptors, i.e., P2Y receptors (40).
In the current study, we sought to identify the role of P2X receptors in Ca2+ homeostasis of arterial smooth muscle cells. In particular, we are interested in the contribution of the sarcoplasmic reticulum during P2 receptor-mediated responses. Experiments were carried out using the combination of electrophysiology and microfluorimetry. This approach has been useful in providing unequivocal evidence for or against the hypothesis that L-type Ca2+ currents trigger further Ca2+ release (1820). We used rat superior cerebral artery smooth muscle cells because significant Ca2+ release was previously identified in this preparation when the L-type Ca2+ current was activated (20). Under our experimental conditions, the P2X-mediated Ca2+ entry did not trigger significant Ca2+ release. Rather, our results suggest that activation of the P2X receptor may modulate the subsequent P2Y receptor-mediated Ca2+ responses.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Current recordings. A conventional whole cell clamp technique (15) was used to record whole cell membrane currents. This configuration also permitted a membrane-impermeant form of the Ca2+-sensitive dye fura-2 to be dialyzed into the cell. The composition of the extracellular solution was the following (in mM): 134 NaCl, 14 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 3 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose (pH adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH). For most of the experiments, the pipette solution contained the following (in mM): 140 K aspartate, 15 NaCl, 10 HEPES, and 0.05 fura-2 pentapotassium salt (pH adjusted to 7.2 with KOH). This combination of extracellular and intracellular salt composition makes the equilibrium potentials for K+ and Cl to be around 60 mV. When Ca2+ transients were repeatedly triggered by caffeine application, the composition of the pipette solution was (in mM) 145 KCl, 3 MgCl2, 3 Na2ATP, 10 HEPES, and 0.05 fura-2 pentapotassium salt (pH adjusted to 7.2 with KOH). In most cases, the membrane potential was held at 60 mV during the experiments. Stock solutions of ryanodine and cADP-ribose were made using DSMO and water, respectively. The stock solutions were diluted with the intracellular solution by 1,000-fold and applied from the patch pipette. P2 agonists and caffeine were dissolved in the extracellular solution and applied using a U tube rapid-superfusion system (8). Briefly, the extracellular solution containing the drug was perfused through the U tube with a small hole in its apex. The experimental chamber was continuously perfused with the agonist-free extracellular solution. The U tube was placed downstream of the cell. The outflow of the U tube was fed through a solenoid valve before being finally discarded. The valve was normally kept open. The closure of the valve using pCLAMP software (version 7, Axon Instruments) triggers a rapid ejection of the test solution from the hole, producing a drug concentration jump in the vicinity of the cell. The commencement of valve closure was marked by prior membrane hyperpolarization by 2 mV for 40 ms. The cell is exposed to the drug solution as long as the valve remains closed. The time of the valve closure and hence of the drug application was 1.5 s. When the valve is reopened, the test solution resumes running through the U tube to the waste while the drug is washed out from the chamber. Membrane currents were amplified using an Axopatch 200B (Axon Instruments), filtered at 1 kHz, and sampled at 10 kHz in the case of P2X experiments and at 2 kHz in the case of P2Y experiments.
Ca2+ measurements. [Ca2+]i was measured using a deltaRAM (Photon Technology International) from voltage-clamped cells as previously described (22). A single cell was dialyzed with a fura-2-containing pipette solution and alternately illuminated for 10 ms with UV light at 340 and 380 nm (bandpass 8 nm). Emission signals were obtained at 510 nm (bandpass 40 nm). The dissociation constant for fura-2 under our experimental conditions was calculated as 180 nM from in vitro calibration. Minimum and maximum ratios (Rmin and Rmax, respectively) were also determined from in vitro measurements and reduced by 15% to adjust for viscosity (30). Background fluorescence was determined for each cell following formation of a gigaohm seal and subtracted from the measurements obtained during the experiments. Membrane voltage was also recorded by using one of the analog channels to mark valve closure and hence drug application. All experiments were carried out at room temperature.
Statistics. Where appropriate, results were shown as means ± SE of n cells. Significant difference was examined using either Student's unpaired t-test or one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05).
Drugs. Fura-2 pentapotassium salt was obtained from Molecular Probes, and papain was obtained from Worthington Biochemical. Ryanodine and cADP-ribose were purchased from Calbiochem. All other agents were purchased from Sigma or BDH.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|

-methylene ATP (
-MeATP) on the membrane current and Ca2+ transient. The desensitization, the decline of the current while the agonist was still present (see Fig. 1, bottom), strongly suggests the current is caused by the opening of P2X1 receptors for which 
-MeATP is a selective agonist (26). Application of 30 µM 
-MeATP triggered an inward current (Fig. 2A, bottom) and an increase in [Ca2+]i (Fig. 2A, top). Like the inward current evoked by ATP application, the current induced by 
-MeATP decayed before the termination of drug application (Fig. 2A, bottom). Unlike the Ca2+ transient triggered by ATP application, however, there was no secondary increase in [Ca2+]i when 
-MeATP was the agonist (Fig. 2A, top). Rather, raised [Ca2+]i declined while the drug was still present and more or less returned to the resting level (Fig. 2A, top). The secondary increase in [Ca2+]i was never seen when 
-MeATP was the agonist, suggesting that the delayed increase in [Ca2+]i seen with the application of ATP is not due to the P2X current-induced, loosely coupled Ca2+ release. We then sought to identify the cause of the secondary [Ca2+]i rise. Application of 100 µM UTP, a specific agonist for some P2Y receptors, evoked little current (Fig. 2B, bottom) and a Ca2+ transient that was slow in onset (Fig. 2B, top). When 30 µM 
-MeATP and 100 µM UTP were applied together, we detected an inward current (Fig. 2C, bottom) and a Ca2+ transient consisting of an initial small [Ca2+]i increase followed by a larger [Ca2+]i increase (Fig. 2C, top). Thus, as reported previously in rat aortic myocytes (29), rat superior cerebral artery smooth muscle cells express both P2X receptors and P2Y receptors. The activation of the former presumably corresponds to the first part of the ATP response, whereas the activation of the latter corresponds to the second part of the ATP response.
|
|
Relationship between current and Ca2+ transient evoked by P2X agonist. The observation that application of 
-MeATP does not produce the secondary increase in [Ca2+]i (Fig. 2A, top) suggests that the P2X current does not evoke loosely coupled, delayed Ca2+ release. However, it is still possible that Ca2+ influx through P2X receptors trigger tightly coupled Ca2+ release. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that the increase in [Ca2+]i noted during activation of the inward current is partially supplied by Ca2+ release. To do this, we employed a method previously used to examine whether or not the L-type Ca2+ current triggered significant Ca2+ release in smooth muscle cells (1820).
We first made the assumption that the inward current was carried exclusively by Ca2+. This assumption is incorrect because a part of the current will be carried by Na+. Nonetheless, this assumption allows us to quantitatively test the hypothesis that the activation of P2X receptors induces significant Ca2+ release. By assuming that P2X current is carried by Ca2+, we can calculate the expected increase in [Ca2+]i by using the equation
![]() | (1) |
I dt is the calculated charge entry obtained from time-integrated current, F is the Faraday constant, and V is the estimated cell volume (0.7 pl, 20). Because the holding potential is very close to the equilibrium potentials for K+ and Cl, we measured very little holding current (Fig. 3, top). Nevertheless, the inward current amplitude was corrected for the holding current measured before application of 
-MeATP. The result was expressed as a function of time (Fig. 3, bottom, dotted line). The actually measured increase in [Ca2+]i was obtained by subtracting the resting [Ca2+]i from the measured [Ca2+]i and shown also in Fig. 3 (bottom, solid line). The time courses of the measured increase in [Ca2+]i and expected increase in [Ca2+]i were initially similar (
0.2 s). However, as the inward current decayed and the expected increase in [Ca2+]i reached a plateau, the measured increase in [Ca2+]i started to decline (>0.2 s). The divergence of the time course of the measured increase in [Ca2+]i from that of the expected increase in [Ca2+]i may reflect changes in Ca2+ removal rates (20). We therefore restricted the analysis of the time-integrated inward current and increase in [Ca2+]i to the first 200 ms of the Ca2+ transient. Over this period, the measured increase in [Ca2+]i was plotted as a function of the expected increase in [Ca2+]i (summarized in Fig. 4A). The relationship was fitted with a linear regression. As previously described (18), the reciprocal of the slope of this fit yields a Ca2+-buffering power, an indicator that describes how many Ca2+ have to enter the cell to provide an increase of one free Ca2+. The Ca2+-buffering power was obtained from each linear fit for each cell and calculated as 4,752 ± 459 for the control experiments (Fig. 5). Next, to examine whether the 
-MeATP-activated current triggered further Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, similar experiments were performed in the presence of 30 µM ryanodine. Ryanodine is a standard inhibitor of the Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release. Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release conventionally refers to Ca2+ release that is triggered by L-type Ca2+ current and was first described in cardiac myocytes (9). However, its role in smooth muscle cells has been controversial (35). If the Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release contributes to [Ca2+]i elevation evoked by the application of 
-MeATP, its inhibition by ryanodine should reduce the Ca2+ transient produced by a given I. It follows that the buffering power of the ryanodine-treated cells should be larger than that of the control cells if Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release is important (20). Figure 4B summarizes the results obtained in the presence of ryanodine. The Ca2+-buffering power of the ryanodine-treated cells was calculated as 4,947 ± 845 (Fig. 5). This value was not significantly different from that of control cells when examined using one-way ANOVA. Thus 
-MeATP-evoked current did not trigger significant Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release in rat superior cerebral artery smooth muscle cells.
|
|
|
The inability of the P2X current to induce Ca2+ release in rat superior cerebral artery smooth muscle cells was interesting because significant Ca2+ release was previously detected in the same cell when the L-type Ca2+ current was the trigger (20). This led us to wonder whether or not it is possible to couple P2X receptors to Ca2+-releasing channels by using cADP-ribose. It has been suggested that cADP-ribose is an endogenous activator of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (10, but also see DISCUSSION). It is conceivable that inclusion of cADP-ribose may facilitate Ca2+ release that is triggered by the P2X current. If this is the case, the Ca2+-buffering power of the cADP-ribose-treated cells should be significantly smaller than that of the control cells. We chose a concentration of 1 µM that is higher than the maximum cADP-ribose level found in cells (42). The Ca2+-buffering power of cADP-ribose-treated cells was 3,996 ± 303, and one-way ANOVA did not detect significant difference (Fig. 5). Therefore, under our experimental conditions, cADP-ribose did not facilitate the Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release when the P2X current was the trigger.
Voltage and [Ca2+]i dependency of P2Y receptor-mediated Ca2+ transient. The results described above suggest that the increase in [Ca2+]i caused by P2X current is not amplified by further Ca2+ release. Thus we investigated the other possibility that rapidly desensitizing P2X current still impacts Ca2+ homeostasis by modulating subsequent P2Y responses. Activation of G protein-coupled P2Y receptors generates a second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P3]. Ins(1,4,5)P3, in turn, activates Ca2+-releasing channels in the sarco(endo) plasmic reticulum. There are two potential mechanisms by which P2X current may influence Ins(1,4,5)P3-mediated Ca2+ release. First, the P2X receptor-mediated initial elevation in [Ca2+]i facilitates the P2Y responses by priming Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptors. This mechanism has been suggested by Evans and co-workers in blood cells (40). Second, depolarization caused by the P2X current may promote the P2Y receptor-mediated Ca2+ transient. The hypothesis that depolarization enhances accumulation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 has been suggested by Ganitkevich and Isenberg (11, 12) using acetylcholine as the stimulant. We investigated these possibilities by applying UTP either in combination with 
-MeATP or with/without membrane depolarization.
We first examined more closely the recordings obtained by simultaneously applying UTP and 
-MeATP. The result shown in Fig. 2C appears to support the hypothesis that the P2X receptor-mediated elevation in [Ca2+]i facilitates the subsequent P2Y-induced response by priming Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptors. However, this may not be always the case. The [Ca2+]i dependency of the Ins(1,4,5)P3-gated channels is bell shaped, the maximum open probability occurring around a [Ca2+]i of 200 nM with sharp declines either side of this concentration (3). It follows that if the initial P2X receptor-mediated elevation in [Ca2+]i is sufficiently large, the subsequent P2Y response may be suppressed, rather than promoted. Figure 6A shows an example where P2X receptor-mediated [Ca2+]i increase corresponds to the descending limb of Ins(1,4,5)P3 [Ca2+]i dependency. The secondary [Ca2+]i increase was sluggish in this example, contrasting to the previous example where a robust secondary [Ca2+]i increase was noted following a smaller initial [Ca2+]i rise (Fig. 2C).
|
We next examined the effect of the membrane potential on the P2Y-mediated Ca2+ transient. Under our experimental conditions, the consequence of P2X receptor activation was a transient increase in [Ca2+]i. However, the P2X current should also cause membrane depolarization in vivo (36). Membrane depolarization may not only activate L-type Ca2+ channels, but also facilitate the accumulation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 (11). After the 40-ms hyperpolarization to 62 mV that precedes valve closure (see MATERIALS AND METHODS), the membrane potential was depolarized to +100 mV for 7.8 s. Depolarization to +100 mV did not, by itself, cause an increase in [Ca2+]i (data not shown, but see Fig. 6B). Presumably, this was because a membrane potential of +100 mV was virtually the Ca2+ equilibrium potential (ECa) at which no net Ca2+ influx occurs. It was important to hold membrane potential close to ECa because the Ca2+ influx through the L-type Ca2+ channels that occurs negative to ECa may facilitate P2Y-mediated Ca2+ responses. When combined with the depolarization to +100 mV, UTP application caused a robust increase in [Ca2+]i (Fig. 6B). This contrasts with the previous example in which UTP was applied while the membrane potential was held at 60 mV (Fig. 2B). These results appear to support the hypothesis that membrane depolarization facilitates the P2Y receptor-mediated [Ca2+]i increase.
We sought to quantify the observations described above to compare P2Y receptor-mediated responses under various conditions. One difficulty in examining the Ins(1,4,5)P3-mediated Ca2+ transient is that the response depends on the amount of Ca2+ stored in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. The filling state of the sarcoplasmic reticulum greatly varies among cells and is rather difficult to control. We therefore used the rate of [Ca2+]i increase, rather than the maximum amplitude of Ca2+ transient, to measure Ins(1,4,5)P3 responses. The rate of [Ca2+]i increase was obtained as the slope of the linear regression to the fast rising phase of the Ca2+ transient (12). Examples are shown in Fig. 7, A and B, the former obtained while the membrane potential was held at 60 mV and the latter at +100 mV. The dotted lines depict the linear fits. The mean rate of [Ca2+]i rise without depolarization was 1,584 ± 369 nM/s (n = 6), whereas that with depolarization was 5,342 ± 954 nM/s (n = 5) (Fig. 7C). In agreement with previous results obtained using acetylcholine as the agonist (12), these values were significantly different (P < 0.05, Student's unpaired t-test). The rate of [Ca2+]i increase was also used to quantify the results obtained by simultaneously applying UTP and 
-MeATP. In these experiments, membrane potential was held at 60 mV. The examples are presented in Fig. 8, AC, where the P2X receptor-mediated [Ca2+]i increase was small, medium, and large, respectively. The linear fit is depicted with the dotted line in each recording. (Note that the initial fast [Ca2+]i increase in Fig. 8C is caused by the P2X current, not by the P2Y receptor activation. During the recording that lasted over 40 s, secondary [Ca2+]i increase was virtually absent, suggesting inhibition of P2Y response by a large increase in [Ca2+]i.) Figure 8D is a summary of 10 such results, with rates of [Ca2+]i increase plotted as a function of highest [Ca2+]i reached during P2X receptor activation. The [Ca2+]i dependency of the P2Y receptor-mediated Ca2+ transient was bell-shaped, a result in agreement with previous observations (3). Thus our results suggest that both an increase in [Ca2+]i and depolarization evoked by P2X current may regulate the subsequent P2Y responses in rat superior cerebral artery smooth muscle cells.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a previous study, Ca2+ release that was triggered by a given whole cell L-type Ca2+ current was larger when the depolarization was smaller (20). As suggested in cardiac cells (43), this observation may be explained with the hypothesis that ryanodine-sensitive, Ca2+-releasing channels are colocalized with voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (see Ref. 6) and can sense the size of the unitary Ca2+ current. The single Ca2+ channel size will be larger when depolarization is smaller (20). The inability of the P2X receptor current to trigger Ca2+ release, therefore, may be because Ca2+ influx through P2X receptors is insufficient for the Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release. Therefore, we sought to estimate the size of the fractional unitary P2X current carried by Ca2+. When the L-type Ca2+ current was used to raise [Ca2+]i, the Ca2+-buffering power of ryanodine-treated cells was
250 (20). Voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels are highly selective to Ca2+. The Ca2+-buffering power of the current study where [Ca2+]i was raised by the P2X current was
4,800. This value was obtained assuming that all P2X currents were carried exclusively by Ca2+. Comparison of Ca2+-buffering power for L-type Ca2+ channels and P2X receptors allows us to calculate what proportion of the P2X current is carried by Ca2+. We estimate
5% of the P2X current is carried by Ca2+. This value is very similar to values previously reported (10%, 1; 6%, 2; 6.5%, 32; 6
7%, 36). Assuming the P2X unitary current is
0.5 pA at 60 mV (39), we estimate the fractional unitary current carried by Ca2+ to be
25 fA. On the other hand, the unitary L-type Ca2+ current will be
0.1 pA at 0 mV (with physiological Ca2+ as the charge carrier, see Ref. 34). Therefore, it is possible that the fractional unitary P2X current carried by Ca2+ may be too small to trigger Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum.
The observation that the P2X current did not trigger Ca2+ release while the L-type Ca2+ current did in the same preparation was intriguing. Use of cADP-ribose was an attempt to facilitate the coupling of Ca2+ influx through P2X receptors to the Ca2+ release. Since the first demonstration using sea urchin eggs (10), various studies examined the role of cADP-ribose as an endogenous modulator of cardiac ryanodine receptors. To date, evidence for and against the hypothesis that cADP-ribose promotes Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release in cardiac cells has been provided (14, 16, 37). The discrepancy among these studies may reflect differences in experimental conditions. In the present study, the inclusion of 1 µM cADP-ribose in the intracellular solution had no significant effect on the Ca2+-buffering power (Fig. 5). Thus significant Ca2+ release was not induced by the activation of P2X current in the presence of cADP-ribose under our experimental conditions.
We also investigated the hypothesis that the role of P2X receptors is to prime the subsequent P2X receptor-mediated Ca2+ release (40). Though this hypothesis seems indeed true in some cells (Fig. 2C), higher [Ca2+]i achieved in other cells during P2X activation was followed by a slow rise in [Ca2+]i (Fig. 6A). P2Y receptor stimulation presumably activates phospholipase C via Gq proteins (7). This, in turn, would lead to the production of diacylglycerol and Ins(1,4,5)P3. Of these, Ins(1,4,5)P3 seems more likely to be responsible for the P2Y receptor-mediated Ca2+ transient because the onset of the Ca2+ response seems too quick to be caused by a signal transduction cascade involving diacylglycerol (23). The time delay seen in the response to UTP (e.g., Fig. 2B) presumably reflects the time required by phospholipase C to cleave phosphatidylinositol 4,5-diphosphate to generate Ins(1,4,5)P3 (12). Like ryanodine-sensitive, Ca2+-releasing channels, Ins(1,4,5)P3-gated channels in the sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum are Ca2+ sensitive. [Ca2+]i dependency of the Ins(1,4,5)P3-gated channels is bell shaped (3), and this may be useful in providing positive feedback as well as negative feedback to the P2Y receptor-mediated Ca2+ release. Indeed, when the rate of [Ca2+]i increase was used to gauge the effect of [Ca2+]i elevation evoked by the P2X current, the relationship was bell shaped (Fig. 8D). Thus a small to medium-sized [Ca2+]i increase caused by the P2X current may promote the subsequent P2Y receptor-mediated Ca2+ transient to ensure sufficient increase in [Ca2+]i, whereas a large [Ca2+]i elevation induced by the P2X receptor activation may suppress the P2Y response to avoid [Ca2+]i reaching a dangerously high level.
Activation of P2X receptors not only results in transient elevation in [Ca2+]i but also depolarization (36). Under our experimental condition, depolarization to +100 mV did not cause an increase in [Ca2+]i by itself but seemed to facilitate the P2Y receptor-mediated Ca2+ transient (Fig. 6B). Indeed, the rate of [Ca2+]i increase was significantly different between cells clamped at 60 and +100 mV (Fig. 7). This result suggests that there is a voltage-dependent component in the UTP-induced increase in [Ca2+]i. This effect may be a result of direct coupling of plasma membrane to the sarcoplasmic reticulum, as shown in the skeletal muscle cells (38). Alternatively, the membrane depolarization may indirectly modulate Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (11, 12). To distinguish between these possibilities, we tested the voltage dependence of the caffeine-induced Ca2+ transient. Caffeine enhances Ca2+ sensitivity of the ryanodine receptors in the sarcoplasmic reticulum so that Ca2+ release occurs at the resting [Ca2+]i. The caffeine-induced Ca2+ transient does not require generation of second messengers. Therefore, if skeletal muscle-type direct coupling occurs, caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients should also be modulated by depolarization. Application of 20 mM caffeine was repeated in the same cell to examine the effect of membrane potential. Figure 9 shows one such example where the first and the third caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients were obtained at the holding potential of 60 mV, whereas the second caffeine-induced Ca2+ transient was obtained with depolarization to +100 mV (see also Ref. 11). In this cell, Ca2+ transients triggered by caffeine application were not altered by depolarization. Similar results were obtained on two other occasions suggesting that the caffeine-induced Ca2+ transient is voltage independent. Thus the sarcoplasmic reticulum seems not directly coupled with the cell membrane. Rather, as suggested in guinea pig coronary myocytes (11, 12), the facilitation of UTP-induced Ca2+ transient by depolarization may be due to enhanced accumulation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 (see also Ref. 17). Under our experimental conditions, a 160-mV depolarization (from 60 mV to +100 mV) facilitated the mean rate of [Ca2+]i increase by a factor of 3.4 (see also Ref. 12). Obviously, the magnitude of depolarization used in this study (160 mV) will never occur under physiological conditions. Nevertheless, this potential was chosen to ensure that there is no L-type Ca2+ current that may prime the P2Y receptor-mediated responses. Interestingly, Itoh et al. (17) have suggested that Ins(1,4,5)P3 production is inhibited by membrane hyperpolarization in the rabbit mesenteric artery. If this is the case in our preparation, the role of membrane depolarization caused by the P2X current may be to relieve tonic inhibition of Ins(1,4,5)P3 production.
|
The present study showed positive responses of rat superior cerebral artery smooth muscle cells to both P2X and P2Y agonists. Pharmacology of agonists permits further insight to the receptor subtypes. 
-MeATP is a selective agonist for receptors containing P2X1 or P2X3 subunits (28). During the continued presence of 30 µM 
-MeATP, membrane current rapidly decayed, showing profound receptor desensitization (Fig. 2, A and C). At this concentration of 
-MeATP,
was determined as 76.1 ± 5.4 ms (n = 20, see also Ref. 26). Moreover, under our experimental conditions, recovery from desensitization was virtually impossible, and therefore a second application of 
-MeATP triggered only a very small current and Ca2+ transient (data not shown). Taken together, these results show that P2X receptors of rat superior cerebral artery smooth muscle cells seem to bear the characteristics of P2X1 receptors (28). UTP, on the other hand, is a selective agonist for P2Y2,P2Y4, and P2Y6 receptors. It is unlikely that the delayed increase in [Ca2+]i is caused by the activation of P2Y6 receptors, to which ATP is ineffective. Therefore, P2Y receptors present in rat superior cerebral artery smooth muscle cells are likely to be P2Y2 or P2Y4 subtypes.
In summary, we have described P2 responses of rat superior cerebral artery smooth muscle cells. Under our experimental conditions, the increase in [Ca2+]i caused by the activation of P2X receptors was not amplified by further Ca2+ release. Application of cADP-ribose did not facilitate coupling of the P2X current and Ca2+ release. Furthermore, our results suggest that the membrane depolarization and [Ca2+]i increase induced by the P2X current may regulate subsequent P2Y responses. Results described here may shed light on the Ca2+ homeostasis of vascular smooth muscle cells during P2 stimulation.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
GRANTS
This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation (FS/2000001) and the Wellcome Trust (055506). T. Kamishima is a British Heart Foundation Intermediate Fellow.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Kamishima, T. Burdyga, J. A. Gallagher, and J. M. Quayle Caveolin-1 and caveolin-3 regulate Ca2+ homeostasis of single smooth muscle cells from rat cerebral resistance arteries Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H204 - H214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||