AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287: H1682-H1688, 2004. First published June 17, 2004; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00358.2004
0363-6135/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
287/4/H1682    most recent
00358.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-K.
Right arrow Articles by O’Leary, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-K.
Right arrow Articles by O’Leary, D. S.

Heart failure alters the strength and mechanisms of arterial baroreflex pressor responses during dynamic exercise

Jong-Kyung Kim,1 Robert A. Augustyniak,1 Javier A. Sala-Mercado,1 Robert L. Hammond,1,2 Eric J. Ansorge,1 Noreen F. Rossi,3,4 and Donal S. O’Leary1

1Department of Physiology, 2Department of Surgery, and 3Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, and 4John D. Dingell Veterans Administration Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan 48201

Submitted 14 April 2004 ; accepted in final form 15 June 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Arterial baroreflex function is well preserved during dynamic exercise in normal subjects. In subjects with heart failure (HF), arterial baroreflex ability to regulate blood pressure is impaired at rest. However, whether exercise modifies the strength and mechanisms of baroreflex responses in HF is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the relative roles of cardiac output and peripheral vasoconstriction in eliciting the pressor response to bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) in conscious, chronically instrumented dogs at rest and during treadmill exercise ranging from mild to heavy workloads. Experiments were performed in the same animals before and after rapid ventricular pacing-induced HF. At rest, the pressor response to BCO was significantly attenuated in HF (33.3 ± 1.2 vs. 18.7 ± 2.7 mmHg), and this difference persisted during exercise in part due to lower cardiac output responses in HF. However, both before and after the induction of HF, the contribution of vasoconstriction in active skeletal muscle toward the pressor response became progressively greater as workload increased. We conclude that, although there is an impaired ability of the baroreflex to regulate arterial pressure at rest and during exercise in HF, vasoconstriction in active skeletal muscle becomes progressively more important in mediating the baroreflex pressor response as workload increases with a pattern similar to that observed in normal subjects.

carotid sinus hypotension; dog; regional vascular conductance; cardiac output; central venous pressure; pressor response


THE ARTERIAL BAROREFLEX is the primary short-term regulator of arterial pressure. Baroreflex regulation of systemic arterial pressure is accomplished through modulation of cardiac output (CO) and peripheral vascular conductance. Dynamic exercise simultaneously increases arterial pressure and heart rate (HR) in relation to the exercise intensity, indicating that the arterial baroreflex is modulated during exercise. This paradox has been explained by previous studies showing that the arterial baroreflex is reset to operate around the prevailing blood pressure generated during dynamic exercise (3, 11, 18, 19). This phenomenon allows the simultaneous increase in both HR and arterial pressure during dynamic exercise (21). Both central command and activation of skeletal muscle afferents have been proposed as the potential mechanisms responsible for resetting the arterial baroreflex during exercise (9, 21).

Several investigators have examined the mechanism contributing to carotid baroreflex-induced pressor response at rest and during mild to heavy dynamic exercise in animals and humans and reported that the pressor response during carotid sinus hypotension was mediated primarily via peripheral vasoconstriction (1, 6, 12). Previously, O’Leary et al. (15) showed that hindlimb vascular conductance (HVC) decreased at rest and during exercise in response to bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) in conscious dogs and the magnitude of the reduction in HVC during carotid sinus hypotension increased with increasing workloads. Furthermore, Collins et al. (1) quantified that as the workload increased, vasoconstriction within skeletal muscle contributed a progressively greater fraction of the pressor response to BCO. Together, the findings from these studies suggest that the relative role of vasoconstriction within skeletal muscle to the carotid baroreflex-mediated change in arterial pressure progressively increases from rest throughout mild to heavy exercise (1, 6, 12, 15).

Many investigators have documented a depression in arterial baroreflex function at rest in subjects with heart failure (HF) (17, 24, 25, 26). Whang et al. (24) found that during carotid sinus hypotension, mean arterial pressure (MAP) did not increase to the same extent in the HF group compared with the normal dogs due to the depressed baroreceptor sensitivity. Wilson et al. (26) and White (25) reported that the arterial baroreflex control of both HR and arterial blood pressure were impaired in heart failure. Olivier and Stephenson (17) also demonstrated that arterial baroreflex responses to carotid hypotension were significantly depressed in chronically instrumented dogs with HF at rest. However, no studies have investigated the mechanisms contributing to baroreflex-mediated pressor responses during dynamic exercise in subjects with HF.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the relative roles of CO and peripheral vasoconstriction in eliciting the pressor response to BCO in conscious dogs with pacing-induced HF. We tested the hypothesis that at rest and during dynamic exercise, the magnitude of the pressor response mediated by the arterial baroreflex will be smaller after the induction of HF compared with the control. In addition, we hypothesized that the mechanisms eliciting the pressor response will rely more on the component of peripheral vasoconstriction at rest and during dynamic exercise in HF compared with the control. Furthermore, CO will make a smaller contribution to the carotid baroreflex-mediated pressor response at rest and during dynamic exercise in HF, because our laboratory has previously identified depressed reflex control of CO during mild to moderate exercise in HF (4).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
All experiments were performed on six conscious dogs (20–25 kg) of either gender selected for their willingness to run on a motor-driven treadmill. Each dog was studied in the normal state and after the induction of HF. After several control experiments at rest and across workloads, the studies were repeated at rest and identical exercise workloads in HF. The protocols employed in the present study were reviewed and approved by the Wayne State University Animal Investigation Committee.

Surgical preparation. All animals were surgically instrumented in the same manner, allowing the same animal to be used for multiple studies. The surgical procedures were performed in a series of three sterile surgical sessions with at least 1 wk between surgeries and between the last surgery and the first experiment. Before all instrumentations, all animals were accustomed to human handling and trained to run freely on a treadmill. For all surgical procedures, the animals were anesthetized with intravenous pentothal sodium and maintained with isoflourane. In procedures involving both left thoracotomy and midventral abdominal surgeries, the animal was treated with a transdermal fentanyl patch (Duragesic, Janssen Pharmaceutica), which delivered at a dose of 125–150 µg/h for 3 days for analgesia. Immediately before and after each surgery, Cefazolin (500 mg iv) was given and then Cephalexin (30 mg/kg by mouth, 2 times/day) was given to avoid postoperative infection. During recovery from surgery, buprenorphine (0.015 mg/kg iv) and acepromazine (0.1 mg/kg im) were administered for pain control and sedation whenever deemed necessary.

In the first surgical session, a left thoracotomy was performed at the fourth intercostal space. The pericardium was opened, and a blood flow transducer (20 mm, Transonic Systems) was placed around the ascending aorta to monitor CO. For studies unrelated to the present investigation, a second blood flow transducer (3 mm) was placed around the left circumflex coronary artery, and two sonomicrometry crystals were implanted in the myocardium of the left ventricle. Three stainless steel ventricular pacing electrodes were sutured to the apex of the left ventricle for subsequent ventricular pacing. The pericardium was reapproximated loosely over the heart, and the chest was closed in layers.

In the second surgical session, through a midventral abdominal approach, blood flow probes (Transonic Systems) were placed on the terminal aorta (10 mm probe) and left renal artery (3 mm) to measure hindlimb blood flow (HLBF) and renal blood flow (RBF), respectively. A pneumatic vascular occluder (In Vivo Metrics) was placed on the terminal aorta just distal to the flow probe for separate studies. All side branches between the iliac arteries and the HLBF probe were ligated and severed. A catheter was placed in a side branch of the aorta proximal to the HLBF probe and occluder to measure systemic arterial pressure.

In the final surgical session, a catheter was introduced into the jugular vein and advanced to the arterial-caval junction to measure central venous pressure (CVP). Additionally, a pneumatic vascular occluder was placed around each common carotid artery to perform BCO. All cables, wires, occluder tubing, and catheters were tunneled subcutaneously and exteriorized between the scapulae.

HF induction. HF was induced by rapid left ventricular pacing at 225–250 beats/min for ~30 days using a fixed rate pacemaker built in our laboratory. Threshold values for pacing voltage and pulse width that were necessary for ventricular capture were determined by means of a pacing system analyzer (model 5311b, Medtronic). The pacemakers were adjusted to 1.5 times the threshold values. The presence of HF was determined from hemodynamic values, such as the increase in CVP, tachycardia, and decrease in MAP and CO.

Experimental design. All experiments were performed after the animals had fully recovered from the last surgery and were active, afebrile, and of good appetite. The arterial baroreflex was activated during rest, mild (3.2 km/h, 0% grade), moderate (6.4 km/h, 10% grade), and heavy (8 km/h, 15% grade) exercise via rapid 2-min occlusions of both common carotid arteries. Each dog finished several control experiments and at least one experiment after left ventricular pacing-induced HF across the workloads.

Data collection. The blood flow transducers were connected to the flowmeters (Transonic System). The MAP and CVP catheters were connected to pressure transducers (Transpac IV, Abbott Laboratories). All flow and pressure transducers were coupled to both a Gould recording system (model RS 3800) and a Sonometrics recording system. HR was monitored via a cardiotachometer triggered by the CO signal. A laboratory computer sampled all data at 1,000 Hz, and average values for each cardiac cycle were saved on hard disk for subsequent data analysis.

Experimental procedures. Each animal was transported to the laboratory, allowed to roam freely for 15–30 min, and then taken to the treadmill. All flow probes and catheters were connected. Baseline hemodynamic variables were collected at standing rest. Subsequently, both common carotid arteries were rapidly occluded by inflation of the hydraulic occluders for 2 min and rapidly deflated. For exercise protocols, the treadmill was accelerated to the selected speed and grade. After all data reached steady state (~5 min), the BCO was performed as at rest. The order of each experiment was selected randomly.

Data analysis. One-minute averages of all variables were taken during steady state immediately before BCO and the last 30-s averages of the hemodynamic responses during BCO. All data of each animal were averaged to produce mean responses at rest and at each exercise intensity. These mean values were again averaged across animals to yield mean responses for the experimental group. Each animal served as its own control and contributed only once to the mean response for all animals.

The average values of MAP, HR, CO, CVP, HLBF, HVC [i.e., HVC = HLBF/(MAP – CVP)], RBF, and renal vascular conductance [RVC = RBF/(MAP – CVP)] were collected before and in response to BCO. RBF and RVC values were doubled to account for the hemodynamic responses in both kidneys. Total vascular conductance (TVC) was calculated as CO/(MAP – CVP). The percent contribution of regional vasoconstriction and CO in mediating the pressor response to the baroreflex was calculated as described by Collins and co-workers (1). Briefly, the predicted change in MAP during BCO was calculated if only the individual changes in CO, HVC, or RVC occurred and all other variables remained at control levels, indicating the cardiac or regional peripheral vasoconstriction components of the pressor response. The following equations were used:

(1)
where MAPCO is the MAP response to BCO due to CO alone, COobs is the CO observed during BCO, and TVCavg control and MAPavg control are 1-min averaged baseline control values before BCO. The predicted change of MAPHVC was as follows:

(2)
where EVC = TVC – (HVC + RVC) and indicates vascular conductance elsewhere in the body besides the hindlimbs and kidneys. The predicted change of MAPRVC was as follows:

(3)

Statistical analysis. Data are expressed as means ± SE. With the use of the averaged responses for each animal, further statistical analyses were performed on the data with Systat software (Systat 8.0). An {alpha}-level of P < 0.05 was set to determine statistical significance. For hemodynamic data obtained at rest and during exercise before and during BCO, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used for comparison with respect to cardiac condition and workload. If significant interaction was found, a test for simple effects post hoc analysis was performed to determine significant group mean differences. A linear regression analysis was used to establish the relationship between the percent contribution of HVC, RVC, and CO to the pressor response mediated by BCO as workload and baseline HLBF increased (14, 15). Because of technical limitations, not all parameters could be measured in all animals in all conditions. Table 1 shows the number of animals we observed in each setting for each major cardiovascular parameter. In addition, after the induction of HF, two animals would not perform the highest workload for a sufficient amount of time to obtain steady-state and BCO data (~7 min total).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. The number of animals observed in each setting for each major cardiovascular parameter

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Baseline hemodynamics in control and HF states. Table 2 presents the average baseline hemodynamic data collected at standing rest for the control and HF states. HR and CVP were significantly higher in the HF state, whereas CO, MAP, RBF, HLBF, and RVC were significantly lower compared with the control state. Most of the HF dogs were characterized by clinical signs, such as lassitude and ascites. Exercise tolerance was also reduced.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Average baseline hemodynamic data collected at standing rest for the control and HF states

 
Hemodynamic responses to dynamic exercise. Figure 1 shows the hemodynamic responses at all workloads before BCO in the control and HF states. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA indicated a significant interactive effect (workloads x cardiac condition) in CO, HR, and CVP, implying that there was significant reduction in CO in HF compared with control values when exercise intensity increased from standing rest to the heavy exercise, whereas significant increases in HR (only rest and 3.2 km/h) and CVP occurred. Furthermore, although no interaction was observed, significant workload and cardiac condition effects in MAP and stroke volume (SV) occurred. As workloads increased in control runs, MAP and SV significantly increased in both conditions, but these variables were significantly depressed in HF compared with the control. These results indicate that in HF, although MAP and CO were progressively increased as workload increased, they were depressed significantly compared with the control.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Averaged hemodynamic values at rest and during exercise before bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) in both control (solid bars) and heart failure (HF; shaded bars) states. A: mean arterial pressure (MAP); B: cardiac output (CO); C: heart rate [HR; beats/min (bpm)]; D: stroke volume (SV); E: central venous pressure (CVP). *Between brackets are significantly different workload and cardiac condition effects, respectively (P < 0.05). *Significantly different from control (P < 0.05).

 
Hemodynamic responses to baroreflex activation at rest and during dynamic exercise. Figure 2 shows the absolute changes in MAP, CO, HR, and HVC in response to BCO at rest and during exercise in both control and HF conditions. A workload effect and a cardiac condition effect were observed for the changes in CO and HVC during BCO. Only a workload effect was seen for the reflex increases in HR. A cardiac condition effect was observed for the changes in SV and MAP, although the workload effect for MAP approached statistical significance (P = 0.08). In the control condition, at rest and during exercise, MAP rose significantly during BCO; however, the increase in MAP with baroreflex activation was reduced in HF. There was a significant difference in the CO response between the control and HF in response to arterial baroreflex activation. During BCO in the HF state, CO significantly decreased compared with a small increase or no change in normal dogs. In addition, with carotid sinus hypotension, a significant workload effect and cardiac condition effect on the decrease in HVC were observed. These results indicate that in both conditions a greater vasoconstrictor response in the hindlimb vascular bed occurred from rest throughout the heavy exercise. However, BCO resulted in greater reduction in HVC in HF.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Absolute change ({Delta}) in hemodynamic responses in response to BCO at rest and during exercise in both control (solid bars) and HF (shaded bars) states. A: change in MAP; B: change in CO; C: change in HR; D: change in SV; E: change in hindlimb vascular conductance (HVC). *Between brackets are workload and cardiac condition effects, respectively (P < 0.05).

 
Percent contributions of the various components to BCO-mediated pressor response. Figure 3 shows the relationship between the percent contributions of HVC, RVC, and CO to the pressor response during BCO and baseline HLBF in both control and HF states. Average values in each setting are shown in Table 3. Baseline HLBF was used because it was reported that HLBF values are closely related to exercise intensity (2, 10). Linear regression analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between the percent contribution of HVC to the pressor response and baseline HLBF in both control and HF states (r = 0.75, r = 0.50, respectively), and the slope was significantly different from zero in both settings (P = 0 < 0.001, P = 0.021, respectively). These findings (Fig. 3 and Table 3) indicate that decreases in HVC gradually become more important in mediating the pressor response during BCO as exercise intensity increases. Compared with the control, the carotid baroreflex-induced pressor response relies more on the reduction on HVC across increasing workloads in HF. In contrast, a negative correlation was observed between the percent contribution of RVC to the pressor response and baseline HLBF in both conditions (r = 0.54, r = 0.51, respectively), and the slope was significantly different from zero in both settings (P = 0.02, P = 0.039, respectively). These findings imply that reductions in RVC become less important in mediating the pressor response during BCO as exercise intensity increases. There was also negative correlation between the percent contribution of CO and baseline HLBF (r = 0.57) in the control state, and the slope was significantly different from zero (P = 0.007). The percent contribution of CO to the pressor response did not change with exercise intensity in HF. At rest and across all workloads, CO tended to decrease with BCO.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relationship between the percent contributions of HVC, renal vascular conductance (RVC), and CO to the pressor response during BCO and baseline hindlimb blood flow (HLBF) in both control (left) and HF (right) states.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Percent contribution of HVC, RVC, and CO to the pressor response during BCO at rest and during exercise in both control and HF states

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the relative contributions of CO and peripheral vasoconstriction in mediating the pressor response to BCO both at rest and during dynamic exercise in subjects before and after the induction of HF. Our new findings are that in conscious dogs with moderate HF, despite the inability to increase CO, the arterial baroreflex activation via BCO still produced a significant pressor response at rest and throughout mild to heavy exercise; however, these pressor responses were depressed compared with those observed in control experiments. Thus HF decreases the ability of the arterial baroreflex to increase systemic arterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise.

As in control experiments, in HF, despite little difference in the pressor response to BCO across workloads, vasoconstriction in the hindlimbs contributed to a progressively greater extent to the increase in pressure as exercise intensity increased. Indeed, the baroreflex induced reductions in HVC were significantly greater in HF, although this greater reduction in HVC caused a smaller increase in MAP due to the concomitant decrease in CO. Thus the primary mechanism mediating the pressor response during carotid sinus hypotension at rest and across workloads was peripheral vasoconstriction. The present study extends our previous observations (1) by quantifying the relative role of CO and peripheral vasoconstriction in mediating the pressor response to the arterial baroreflex activation in subjects with HF.

Arterial baroreflex-mediated pressor responses with HF. Previous studies found that the depressed pressor response to arterial baroreflex activation in chronic HF may be due to a decrease in baroreceptor discharge sensitivity, an altered central processing of baroreceptor activity, and/or poor end-organ responses (24, 25, 26). Thus our data observed at rest are in agreement with previous reports of attenuation in the pressor response mediated by the arterial baroreflex activation in HF (17, 25). The attenuated pressor response to BCO stems mainly from the decrease in CO, which is likely due to an increase in ventricular afterload sensitivity. Similar effects of HF were observed by Olivier and Stephenson (17) in conscious dogs at rest. They demonstrated that arterial baroreflex regulation of blood pressure was impaired in subjects with HF at rest compared with control and concluded that abnormal reflex regulation of blood pressure was due to a depression in cardiac responses, not the peripheral vasoconstriction component. The present study extends this previous observation by determining the pressor response mediated by the arterial baroreflex activation at rest and during exercise.

CO versus systemic vascular conductance. Similar to what was observed in our laboratory previously (1), the modulation in peripheral vasoconstriction plays the major role in mediating BCO-induced changes in arterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise in the HF state. During BCO in control experiments, we demonstrated that as exercise intensity increased, the significant contribution of CO observed at rest to the pressor response gradually decreased with the end result being no contribution of CO during heavy exercise, whereas the contribution of HVC becomes greater. Thus this study is in agreement with previous studies (1, 6, 12) demonstrating that the sympathetic control of vascular conductance plays an important role in regulation of blood pressure mediated by the arterial baroreflex activation at rest and during exercise, with little CO contribution. In contrast, CO response to arterial baroreflex activation was significantly reduced in HF at rest and across workloads. In this setting, CO does not contribute to the pressor response during carotid sinus hypotension but rather the pressor response due to peripheral vasoconstriction is partially offset by a fall in CO. This indicates differential baroreflex control of the heart versus peripheral vasculature as workload increases. Previous studies have shown that carotid sinus hypotension causes little change in HR and CO at rest and during exercise in normal subjects (1, 12, 22). The modest tachycardia observed at rest was virtually abolished at the highest workload (change of 2–5 beats/min from baseline values of >210 beats/min). Furthermore, other investigators reported that pacing-induced HF produced ventricular impairment (8). Taken together, these findings may explain that in HF, the CO response initiated by the arterial baroreflex activation would be depressed due to a fall in SV and little change in HR.

After the induction of HF, vasoconstriction in active skeletal muscle becomes progressively more important in mediating the baroreflex pressor response as workload increases with a pattern similar to that observed in normal subjects. Previously, O’Leary (13) reported that whether a given change in regional vascular conductance effectively contributes to blood pressure regulation relies on the magnitude of the change relative to the level of TVC. In other words, if a given regional vascular conductance constitutes a large fraction of TVC, then vasoconstriction within this regional vascular bed has a greater potential to increase systemic blood pressure. Because in the present investigation we simultaneously measured CO and regional blood flows, we were able to determine the relative contribution of HVC and RVC to the pressor response mediated by arterial baroreflex activation. We found that in HF, reductions in HVC during carotid sinus hypotension gradually provided a larger contribution to the pressor response with increasing workloads, indicating that active skeletal muscle is an increasingly important site for baroreflex-induced vasoconstriction. HVC constituted 17.6 ± 1.9% of TVC at rest and 38 ± 1.2% during heavy exercise in HF. Thus HVC comprises a large fraction of TVC and could make a larger contribution to BCO-induced blood pressure regulation during heavy exercise. The contribution of HVC to the pressor response during carotid sinus hypotension was increased from 18.1 ± 7.2% at rest to 37.9 ± 4.1% during heavy exercise. Thus the relative importance of decreases in HVC in mediating the pressor response to BCO increased in parallel with the fraction of TVC as exercise intensity rose. Therefore, the present study suggests that in HF arterial baroreflex regulation of blood pressure is only mediated by alterations in peripheral vasoconstriction at rest and during exercise.

The term "functional sympatholysis" (20) is that the accumulation of metabolites produced by the active skeletal muscle during exercise inhibits the vasoconstriction mediated by an increase in the sympathetic tone. There have been many arguments about whether or not an augmented sympathetic outflow overrides the metabolic vasodilation in active skeletal muscle during exercise. Several investigators have suggested that sympathetic vasoconstriction during exercise opposes local metabolic vasodilation in the active skeletal muscle (15, 16, 23). In contrast, other studies have reported that contraction-induced metabolic vasodilation reduces vasoconstriction response to sympathetic stimulation (5, 7). This controversy regarding vasomotor response may be due to differences in methods used to analyze muscle perfusion. O’Leary et al. (13) indicated that with different baseline state in blood flow, resistance, and conductance, opposite conclusions can be drawn depending on which index (resistance vs. conductance) is used in quantifying the magnitude of the vasoconstrictior response. For example, during a high flow state, the magnitude of vasoconstrictor response is small when the response is analyzed in terms of resistance and is much greater in terms of conductance. Our data showed that in HF experiments, the contribution of reductions in HVC to the pressor response during carotid sinus hypotension increased as exercise intensity increased to a greater extent compared with the control. These conclusions are independent of whether resistance or conductance is used in the equations (although the equations are simpler using conductance). Limitations inherent in this study include that we do not know whether BCO elicits a greater increase in sympathetic activity to active muscle as workload increases or whether this changes with HF. Furthermore, we compared the responses at the same absolute exercise intensities before and after the induction of HF, which likely reflects different relative workloads in the two settings (e.g., percent maximal exercise intensity).

In summary, our results indicate that in subjects with HF, the pressor response during BCO is significantly depressed at rest and during exercise and modulations of CO do not contribute to the carotid baroreflex-mediated increases in MAP. In this setting, the contribution of reduction in HVC had a progressively larger impact on MAP during BCO from rest through heavy exercise but that of RVC decreased. Although there is an abnormality in baroreflex function to regulate MAP at rest and during exercise in HF, our study strongly suggests that vasoconstriction in active skeletal muscle plays an important role in the pressor response to carotid baroreflex activation as workload increases with a pattern similar to that observed in normal subjects.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This research was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-55473 and a joint award from the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Sue Harris and Jaime Rodriguez for expert technical assistance and care of the animals and Dr. Heidi Collins for assistance with the surgery and experiments.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. S. O’Leary, Dept. of Physiology, Wayne State Univ. School of Medicine, 540 E. Canfield Ave., Detroit, MI 48201 (E-mail: doleary{at}med.wayne.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Collins HL, Augustyniak RA, Ansorge EJ, and O’Leary DS. Carotid baroreflex pressor responses at rest and during exercise: cardiac output vs. regional vasoconstriction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H642–H648, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Donald DE, Rowlands DJ, and Ferguson DA. Similarity of blood flow in the normal and sympathectomized dog hindlimb during graded exercise. Circ Res 26: 185–199, 1970.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Fadel PJ, Ogoh S, Watenpaugh DE, Wasmund W, Olivencia-Yurvati A, Smith ML, and Raven PB. Carotid baroreflex regulation of sympathetic nerve activity during dynamic exercise in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H1383–H1390, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hammond RL, Augustyniak RA, Rossi NF, Churchill PC, Lapanowski K, and O’Leary DS. Heart failure alters the strength and mechanisms of the muscle metaboreflex. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278: H818–H828, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hansen J, Thomas GD, Harris SA, Parsons WJ, and Victor RG. Differential sympathetic neural control of oxygenation in resting and exercising human skeletal muscle. J Clin Invest 98: 584–598, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Keller DM, Wasmund WL, Wary DW, Ogoh S, Fadel PJ, Smith ML, and Raven PB. Carotid baroreflex control of leg vascular conductance at rest and during exercise. J Appl Physiol 94: 542–548, 2002.
  7. Kjellmer I. On the competition between metabolic vasodilation and neurogenic vasoconstriction in skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 63: 450–459, 1965.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Lu L, Mei DF, Gu AG, Wang S, Lentzner B, Gutstein DE, Zwas D, Homma S, Yi GH, and Wang J. Exercise training normalizes altered calcium-handling proteins during development of heart failure. J Appl Physiol 92: 1524–1530, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Mcilveen SA, Hayes SG, and Kaufman MP. Both central command and exercise pressor reflex reset carotid sinus baroreflex. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H1454–H1463, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Musch TI, Friedman DB, Pitetti KH, Haidet GC, Stray GJ, Mitchell JH, and Ordway GA. Regional distribution of blood flow of dogs during graded dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol 63: 2269–2277, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Norton KH, Boushel R, Strange S, Saltin B, and Raven PB. Resetting of the carotid arterial baroreflex during dynamic exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol 87: 332–338, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ogoh S, Fadel PJ, Nissen P, Jans O, Selmer C, Secher NH, and Raven PB. Baroreflex-mediated changes in cardiac output and vascular conductance in response to alterations in carotid sinus pressure during exercise in humans. J Physiol 550: 317–324, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. O’Leary DS. Regional vascular resistance vs. conductance: which index for baroreflex responses? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 260: H632–H637, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. O’Leary DS and Johnson JM. Baroreflex control of the rat tail circulation in normothermia and hypothermia. J Appl Physiol 66: 1234–1241, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. O’Leary DS, Robinson ED, and Butler JL. Is active skeletal muscle functionally vasoconstricted during dynamic exercise in conscious dogs? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 272: R386–R391, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. O’Leary DS, Rowell LB, and Scher AM. Baroreflex-induced vasoconstriction in active skeletal muscle of conscious dogs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 260: H37–H41, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Olivier NB and Stephenson RB. Characterization of baroreflex impairment in conscious dogs with pacing-induced heart failure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 265: R1132–R1140, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Papelier Y, Escourrou P, Gauthier JP, and Rowel LB. Carotid baroreflex control of blood pressure and heart rate in men during dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol 77: 502–506, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Potts JT, Shi XR, and Raven PB. Carotid baroreflex responsivness during dynamic exercise in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 265: H1928–H1938, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Remensnyder JP, Mitchell JH, and Sarnoff SJ. Functional sympatholysis during muscular activity. Circ Res 11: 370–380, 1962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Rowell LB and O’Leary DS. Reflex control of the circulation during exercise: chemoreflexes and mechanoreflexes. J Appl Physiol 69: 407–418, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sagawa K. Baroreflex control of systemic arterial pressure and vascular beds. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Cardiovascular System. Peripheral Circulation and Organ Blood Flow. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1983, sect. 2, vol. III, pt. 2, chapt. 14, p. 453–496.
  23. Shoemaker JK, Pandey P, Herr MD, Silber DH, Yang QX, Smith MB, Gray K, and Sinoway LI. Augmented sympathetic tone alters muscle metabolism with exercise: lack of evidence for functional sympatholysis. J Appl Physiol 82: 1932–1938, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wang W, Chen JS, and Zucker IH. Carotid sinus baroreceptor reflex in dogs with experimental heart failure. Circ Res 68: 1294–1301, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. White CW. Abnormalities in baroreflex control of heart rate in canine failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 240: H793–H799, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wilson JR, Lanoce V, Frey MJ, and Ferraro N. Arterial baroreceptor control of peripheral vascular resistance in experimental heart failure. Am Heart J 119: 1122–1130, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. A. Sala-Mercado, M. Ichinose, R. L. Hammond, M. Coutsos, T. Ichinose, M. Pallante, F. Iellamo, and D. S. O'Leary
Spontaneous baroreflex control of heart rate versus cardiac output: altered coupling in heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): H1304 - H1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Ichinose, J. A. Sala-Mercado, D. S. O'Leary, R. L. Hammond, M. Coutsos, T. Ichinose, M. Pallante, and F. Iellamo
Spontaneous baroreflex control of cardiac output during dynamic exercise, muscle metaboreflex activation, and heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): H1310 - H1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
F. Iellamo, J. A. Sala-Mercado, M. Ichinose, R. L. Hammond, M. Pallante, T. Ichinose, L. W. Stephenson, and D. S. O'Leary
Spontaneous baroreflex control of heart rate during exercise and muscle metaboreflex activation in heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1929 - H1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. J. Joyner
Go with the flow: sympathetic control of blood flow during recovery from heart failure
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 3 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. A. Augustyniak, E. J. Ansorge, J.-K. Kim, J. A. Sala-Mercado, R. L. Hammond, N. F. Rossi, and D. S. O'Leary
Cardiovascular responses to exercise and muscle metaboreflex activation during the recovery from pacing-induced heart failure
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 14 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
D. S O'Leary
Altered reflex cardiovascular control during exercise in heart failure: animal studies
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 91(1): 73 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
S. A Smith, J. H Mitchell, and M. G Garry
The mammalian exercise pressor reflex in health and disease
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 91(1): 89 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J.-K. Kim, J. A. Sala-Mercado, R. L. Hammond, J. Rodriguez, T. J. Scislo, and D. S. O'Leary
Attenuated arterial baroreflex buffering of muscle metaboreflex in heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): H2416 - H2423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J.-K. Kim, J. A. Sala-Mercado, J. Rodriguez, T. J. Scislo, and D. S. O'Leary
Arterial baroreflex alters strength and mechanisms of muscle metaboreflex during dynamic exercise
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1374 - H1380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
287/4/H1682    most recent
00358.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-K.
Right arrow Articles by O’Leary, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-K.
Right arrow Articles by O’Leary, D. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.