AJP - Heart Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287: H2138-H2146, 2004; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00112.2004
0363-6135/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Francis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Felder, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Francis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Felder, R. B.

Brain angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and autonomic regulation in heart failure

Joseph Francis,1 Shun-Guang Wei,1 Robert M. Weiss,1,2 and Robert B. Felder1,2

1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, and 2Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

Submitted 3 February 2004 ; accepted in final form 29 June 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Several recent studies suggest an important role for the brain renin-angiotensin system in the pathogenesis of heart failure. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity and binding of angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors, which mediate the central effects of ANG II, are increased in heart failure. The present study examined the relationship between brain ACE activity and the autonomic dysregulation characteristic of rats with congestive heart failure. Rats with heart failure (HF) induced by coronary artery ligation and sham-operated control (SHAM) rats were treated with chronic (28 days) third cerebral ventricle [intracerebroventricular (ICV)] or intraperitoneal (IP) infusion of a low dose of the ACE inhibitor enalaprilat (ENL) or vehicle (VEH). VEH-treated HF rats had increased sodium consumption, reduced urine sodium and urine volume, and increased sympathetic nerve activity with impaired baroreflex regulation. These responses were minimized or prevented by ICV ENL started 24 h after coronary ligation. IP ENL at the low dose used in these studies had no beneficial effects on HF rats. Neither IP nor ICV ENL had any substantial effect on the SHAM rats. The findings confirm a critically important contribution of the brain renin-angiotensin system to the pathophysiology of congestive heart failure.

cardiovascular; neurohumoral; volume regulation; sympathetic activity; forebrain


NEUROHUMORAL ACTIVATION is a cardinal manifestation of congestive heart failure (HF) (11, 13, 22, 3537, 45). The peripheral renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system are activated early in the course of ischemia-induced HF. These initial compensatory adjustments to a sudden reduction in cardiac function ultimately contribute to the adverse outcomes of decompensated HF, dysrhythmia, and death. The most effective treatment strategies have targeted the centrifugal consequences of neurohumoral excitation.

Recent experimental evidence (10, 14, 16, 17, 2325, 54, 55) suggests that the brain may facilitate the vicious cycle of volume accumulation, augmented sympathetic nerve activity, and declining heart function that characterizes end-stage HF. Prominent in this regard is the role of ANG II, a principal end-product of the peripheral renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Blood-borne ANG II, produced principally in the lungs by the action of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) on blood-borne angiotensin I (ANG I), acts up on angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors on neurons in the circumventricular organs of the brain (31) to stimulate sodium appetite and to increase sympathetic nerve activity (33). In addition, discrete regions of the brain are capable of producing ANG II locally (3). For example, very high concentrations of ACE are present in the circumventricular organs (7), particularly the subfornical organ (42, 46) and the area postrema (5), and lower but still significant concentrations are found in cardiovascular-related regions protected by the blood-brain barrier, such as the hypothalamus (7, 46) and the brain stem (5, 7). We previously reported that brain ACE activity supports baseline renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) in normal rats (52). Another laboratory recently reported that ACE activity, along with AT1 receptor binding, increases in the brains of rats with HF after myocardial infarction (47) and that transgenic rats deficient in brain angiotensinogen have less left ventricular (LV) remodeling and less impairment of sympathetic regulation than control Sprague-Dawley rats 8 wk after a myocardial infarction (51). These observations strongly suggest that the brain renin-angiotensin system plays a key role in the augmented neurohumoral drive in HF.

The present study was undertaken to examine the potential influence of central ACE on volume regulation and sympathetic drive in a rodent model of congestive HF. The results support the hypothesis that ACE activity in the brain contributes to the progression to heart failure after a large myocardial infarction in the rat.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

These studies were performed in accordance with the American Physiological Society’s "Guiding Principles for Research Involving Animals and Human Beings" (1). The experimental procedures were approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (3–4 mo old, 300–325 g body wt; Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were housed in temperature-controlled (23 ± 2°C) and light-controlled (lights on between 0700 and 1900) animal quarters; rat chow was provided ad libitum.

All rats were subjected to three or four survival surgeries and one echocardiography session. After each procedure, they recovered from anesthesia under observation in the laboratory before they were returned to their cages. Surgery was performed using sterile technique, and animals received buprenorphine for treatment of postoperative pain as indicated for each specific procedure.

General Experimental Protocol

Some rats underwent initial placement of a cannula into the third cerebral ventricle for central drug infusion. All rats then became acclimated over a 2-wk interval to metabolic cages in which they had access to water and a 1.8% NaCl solution. Baseline body weight, consumption of tap water and 1.8% NaCl, and urine volume and urine sodium excretion were measured near the end of this interval. All rats then underwent coronary artery ligation to induce congestive HF (HF rats) or a sham procedure (SHAM rats). At 24 h after coronary ligation, echocardiography was performed to confirm the condition of the LV, and animals were assigned to treatment groups. Immediately thereafter, osmotic minipumps were implanted for continuous intracerebroventricular (ICV) or intraperitoneal (IP) infusion of the ACE inhibitor enalaprilat (ENL). Repeated measurements of body weight, consumption of tap water and the NaCl solution, and urine volume and sodium content were made over the course of the 28-day protocol. The rats then underwent surgery for placement of renal nerve recording electrodes and arterial and venous cannulas, with subsequent conscious renal sympathetic nerve recording and baroreflex testing. At the conclusion of the study, animals were euthanized with an overdose of anesthesia.

Specific Methods

ICV cannula implantation. Rats were anesthetized with an Equithesin-like anesthetic cocktail (0.97 g pentobarbital sodium and 4.25 g of chloral hydrate per 100 ml of distilled water, 0.33 ml/100 g body wt), and a cannula for chronic drug infusion was implanted in the third cerebral ventricle and fixed to the cranium with use of dental acrylic and small screws, as described previously (15, 16). Stereotaxic coordinates used for cannula placement were 1.0 mm caudal to bregma, 1.5 mm lateral to midline, and 8.7 mm ventral to dura, with the cannula angled 10° toward the midline. Metal tubing (30 gauge) was used as an obturator to keep the cannula patent. Buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg sc) was administered immediately after surgery for management of postoperative pain.

Induction of HF or SHAM. HF was induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery, as previously described (1417). Briefly, animals under ketamine + xylazine (90 and 10 mg/kg ip, respectively) anesthesia were endotracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated, and the left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated between the pulmonary outflow tract and the left atrium. SHAM rats underwent the same surgery but did not undergo coronary ligation. The heart was returned to the chest cavity, the lungs were reinflated, and the chest incision was closed. Postsurgically, animals were given benzathine penicillin (30,000 U im) and buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg sc) immediately after surgery and 12 h later.

Echocardiographic assessment of LV function. At 24 h after coronary artery ligation, echocardiography was performed under ketamine (25 mg/kg ip) sedation, as previously described (1417), using an Acuson (Mountainview, CA) Sequoia model 256 clinical imager fitted with an 8-MHz sector-array probe, which generates two-dimensional images at a rate of ~100/s. Short- and long-axis images of the LV were analyzed. Ischemic zone was estimated by planimetry of the region of the LV endocardial silhouette that demonstrated akinesis or dyskinesis, expressed as a percentage of the whole (percent ischemic zone). The percent ischemic zone, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV mass, and LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) were reported. After completion of two-dimensional imaging, pulse-wave Doppler interrogation of mitral inflow was performed to determine heart rate (HR). Only animals with large infarctions (range 50.1–56.4% ischemic zone) were used in the study.

Implantation of osmotic minipumps. The procedure for preparation and implantation of the minipumps has been described previously (15, 16). For ICV infusion, the pumps were implanted subcutaneously at the back of the neck. The obturator was removed from the ICV cannula, and the free end of the silicone rubber tubing was connected to the cannula and secured using dental acrylic. For IP infusion, the pumps were implanted in the peritoneal cavity. The minor surgery required was performed under ketamine (100 mg/kg) anesthesia. Buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg sc) was administered immediately after surgery for management of postoperative pain.

Drug infusion. ENL (Baxter) was diluted in sterile water (Sigma) to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml. Alzet osmotic minipumps (model ML4, Alza, Palo Alto, CA) were filled with ENL or vehicle (VEH, sterile water) and attached to a flow moderator to obtain a continuous infusion of the drug. The pumps had an average flow rate of 2.5 µl/h, and the final dose of drug infused was 1.25 µg/h for 28 days. The infusion rates and final drug dose were the same regardless of the route (ICV or IP) of administration. In these studies, the rationale for IP infusion was to provide a control for effects of potential leakage of ENL from the cerebrospinal fluid into the systemic circulation during ICV infusion.

Conscious sympathetic nerve recording and baroreflex testing. Under pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg ip) anesthesia, animals were instrumented as previously described (14, 16, 17) for recording of integrated RSNA, arterial pressure, and HR and baroreflex testing in the conscious, freely mobile state. The rats were under anesthesia for ~1 h for the surgical procedure and recovered within the subsequent 1 h. Buprenorphine (0.06–0.08 mg/kg sc) was administered immediately after the surgery for management of postoperative pain. At 4–6 h after recovery from the anesthesia, at a time when the rats were alert and active in their cages, baseline measurements were obtained and baroreflex testing was performed using bolus intravenous injections of phenylephrine (2–10 µg/kg) and sodium nitroprusside (5–20 µg/kg). The data were analyzed using standard methods described previously (14, 16, 17).

Because of long-standing concerns regarding the effect that variability in multifiber nerve recordings may have on comparisons between groups of animals (6, 18, 21), we employed a pulse-triggered average of the integrated RSNA as an additional means of comparing baseline RSNA across treatment groups. The waveform average, triggered by the peak of the arterial pressure pulse, was derived from a 2-min recording interval while the animal was at rest. This method closely resembles in principle the "cycle activity" method described by Lundin et al. (26) to validate the increased sympathetic drive in the spontaneously hypertensive rat compared with the Wistar-Kyoto rat and subsequently employed by those investigators to demonstrate increased RSNA in HF after myocardial infarction vs. sham-operated controls (12). It provides a quantitative means of describing the nearly continuous nature of sympathetic discharge during all cardiac cycles in HF; i.e., those cardiac cycles with little or no sympathetic activity that create the typical waxing and waning of the renal nerve signal in the normal rat, characterized by Lundin et al. as "silent cycles," are rare or absent in the untreated rat with heart failure. We previously used this method, which is independent of differences in HR, to represent the typical pattern of unrestrained RSNA in HF rats (14, 17).

Metabolic cage assessment of fluid balance. Ingestion of water and 1.8% NaCl and urine volume and urinary sodium content were measured at baseline, daily after coronary artery ligation for 14 days, and then on days 21 and 28. Urine sodium was measured using a sodium and potassium analyzer (NOVA Biomedical, Waltham, MA). The rats were weighed at the end of weeks 1, 2, and 4.

Verification of cannula placement and minipump function. At the end of the study, brains were removed to check the site of cannula implantation. The osmotic minipumps were also removed to check residual volume of the drug, if any, to ensure that the drugs were infused into the animals.

Statistical Analysis

Values are means ± SE. Differences between groups in body weight, consumption of water and 1.8% NaCl, urine volume, and urinary sodium were analyzed by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Fisher’s post hoc least significant difference test. A nonlinear regression program (SigmaPlot, Jandel Scientific) was used to analyze the components defining the individual sigmoidal curve fits of the baroreflex data, and these values were averaged to construct representative baroreflex curves for each group relating arterial pressure changes to HR and RSNA. The baseline values of RSNA, MAP, and HR and the range and maximal gain obtained from the baroreflex curve fits were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Student’s t-test, with differences considered significant at P < 0.05. Echocardiographic parameters were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s least-significant difference test.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Survival

Ten of 40 rats (25%) undergoing coronary artery ligation died within 24 h of surgery. All 24 rats undergoing sham coronary ligation survived the procedure. Among the rats assigned to ICV treatment groups, one ENL-treated and one VEH-treated HF rat and one SHAM rat died before the designated time point. Among the rats assigned to IP treatment groups, one ENL-treated and one VEH-treated HF rat died by the 2nd wk after ligation. Thus, over the time course of this study, ENL treatment had no apparent influence on survival.

Characteristics of Study Groups

HF rats had reduced LVEF and increased LVEDV compared with the SHAM rats (Table 1). However, percent infarct zone, LVEF, and LVEDV did not differ between HF rats assigned to either (IP or ICV) ENL treatment protocol. HR was higher in HF than in SHAM rats but did not differ between those animals assigned to treatment with VEH vs. ENL.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Echocardiographic measurements

 
Volume Regulation

Untreated HF rats exhibited an increased appetite for sodium compared with SHAM rats (Fig. 1), as previously reported in this model (14, 16, 17). Treatment with ICV ENL normalized sodium appetite in the HF rats within a few days (Fig. 1A), so that sodium ingestion in the HF + ENL rats was not different from that of SHAM + VEH and SHAM + ENL rats. IP ENL dramatically increased sodium appetite in the HF (HF + ENL) group and tended to increase it in the SHAM (SHAM + ENL) group as well compared with the VEH-treated controls (Fig. 1B). This general finding is consistent with the known effect of peripheral ACE inhibition to induce an increase in ANG I, which acts centrally to stimulate sodium appetite (49). The exaggerated effect of IP ENL on sodium consumption in the HF group could be consistent with an augmented ACE activity in the circumventricular organs (47) vs. an excessive increase in blood-borne ANG I.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effects of chronic third cerebral ventricle [intracerebroventricular (ICV)] or intraperitoneal (IP) infusion of enalaprilat (ENL) or vehicle (VEH) on consumption of 1.8% NaCl after coronary artery ligation (CL) to induce heart failure (HF) or after sham operation (SHAM). A: ingestion of NaCl increased over baseline (Pre) in HF + VEH rats, beginning 1 day after CL. ICV ENL blunted initial increase in sodium consumption, and by day 4 sodium intake in HF + ENL rats was not different from that in SHAM + VEH or SHAM + ENL rats. ICV ENL had no effect on SHAM rats. B: ingestion of NaCl increased dramatically over baseline (Pre) in HF + VEH rats beginning 1 day after CL (note change in y-axis scale compared with A). Sodium consumption increased dramatically in HF rats treated with IP ENL, a response opposite to that of treatment with ICV ENL (A). Sodium ingestion also tended to increase in SHAM rats treated with IP ENL. *P < 0.05, HF + ENL vs. SHAM + VEH. {dagger}P < 0.05, HF + VEH vs. HF + ENL. {delta}P < 0.05, SHAM + VEH vs. SHAM + ENL. Brackets indicate significant difference between all data points. Pre, baseline, before CL; days 1–28, 1–28 days after CL. Long arrow, CL; short arrow, start of ENL infusion.

 
Consumption of tap water decreased transiently (on day 1) after coronary ligation in the HF + VEH rats (Fig. 2). Otherwise, there were no significant changes in water ingestion in HF or SHAM rats treated with ICV ENL or VEH. Among the IP treatment groups, there were significant variations in water ingestion in the HF + VEH rats (Fig. 2A), and the HF + ENL rats experienced significant increases in water ingestion at multiple time points (Fig. 2B). There were no significant changes in water consumption in the SHAM groups over the course of the experimental protocol.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effects of ICV or IP infusion of ENL or VEH on consumption of tap water after CL to induce HF or after sham operation. A: a small initial decline in water consumption after myocardial infarction occurred in all ICV treatment groups but was significant only in HF + VEH rats. Subsequently, water ingestion in the HF rats treated with ICV VEH and in HF or SHAM rats treated with ENL was not different from that in SHAM + VEH rats. B: water ingestion was more variable in IP treatment groups, particularly in HF rats treated with IP ENL. At multiple time points, their water consumption exceeded baseline and water intake of SHAM + VEH rats. HF rats treated with IP VEH also experienced wide swings in water consumption, below and above SHAM + VEH rats. *P < 0.05 vs. baseline. {dagger}P < 0.05, HF + ENL vs. SHAM + VEH. {ddagger}P < 0.05, HF + VEH vs. SHAM + VEH.

 
Sodium excretion was reduced in HF rats (HF + VEH), as shown in Fig. 3 and as previously reported (14, 16, 17). Treatment of HF rats with ICV ENL normalized urinary sodium compared with SHAM + VEH and SHAM + ENL (Fig. 3A), but treatment with IP ENL had no effect on sodium excretion in the HF rat (Fig. 3B).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effects of ICV or IP infusion of ENL or VEH on sodium excretion after CL to induce HF or after sham operation. A: in HF rats treated with ICV VEH, sodium excretion decreased significantly from baseline beginning on the day after CL. ICV ENL treatment prevented the reduction in sodium excretion in HF rats but had no effect on sodium excretion in SHAM rats. B: in HF rats treated with IP VEH, sodium excretion decreased significantly from baseline beginning on the day after CL. IP ENL had no effect on sodium excretion in HF or SHAM rats. Brackets indicate significant difference between all data points. *P < 0.05, HF + VEH vs. SHAM + VEH. {dagger}P < 0.05, HF + VEH vs. HF + ENL.

 
Similarly, urine volume was reduced in HF rats (HF + VEH), as shown in Fig. 4 and as previously reported (14, 16, 17). Treatment of HF rats with ICV ENL normalized urine volume compared with SHAM + VEH and SHAM + ENL (Fig. 4A). In marked contrast, IP treatment of the HF rat with ENL (HF + ENL) dramatically increased urine volume (Fig. 4B). The mechanisms for the observed treatment effects on urine volume were not explored in this study. It is possible that IP ENL exerted local effects on renal blood flow and diuresis, perhaps mediated by the reduced breakdown of bradykinin (34). The remote effects of ICV ENL on renal reabsorption of water were likely mediated by a reduction in the central ANG II influences on RSNA (9) or by a reduction in ANG II-induced release of arginine vasopressin (28, 33).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effects of ICV or IP infusion of ENL or VEH on urine volume after CL to induce HF or after sham operation. A: in HF rats treated with ICV VEH, urine volume decreased significantly from baseline beginning on the day after CL. ICV ENL prevented the reduction in urine volume in HF rats but had no effect on this variable in SHAM rats. B: in HF rats treated with IP VEH, urine volume decreased significantly from baseline beginning on the day after CL (note y-axis scale different from Fig. 3A). IP ENL had no effect on urine volume in SHAM rats but dramatically increased urine volume in HF rats. Bracket indicates significant difference between all data points. *P < 0.05, HF + VEH vs. SHAM + VEH. {dagger}P < 0.05, HF + VEH vs. HF + ENL.

 
Consistent with our prior experience with this model (17), the HF rats did not gain weight; on the contrary, the HF rats had lower body weights than the comparably treated SHAM rats at most time points (Table 2). The HF rats treated with ICV VEH or ENL had significantly lower body weights than the comparably treated SHAM rats at all time points, and their weights had barely returned to baseline at the completion of the protocol. It is unclear why body weights of the IP-treated HF and IP-treated SHAM rats were similar at the conclusion of the protocol. As previously reported (17), HF rats consume less rat chow than SHAM rats. Although food consumption was not measured in this study, the weights of the HF animals likely reflect the balance between reduced food intake and volume retention. However, the HF rats do not show overt signs of volume retention, such as peripheral edema.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Body weight

 
Sympathetic Drive and Baroreflex Regulation

At 4 wk after coronary artery ligation, VEH-treated HF rats had higher HR and increased RSNA, measured as integrated voltage or as the pulse-triggered waveform average of the integrated voltage signal within the cardiac cycles over a 2-min sampling interval, than VEH-treated SHAM rats (Fig. 5). ICV ENL treatment of the SHAM rats had no effect on mean arterial pressure, HR, or RSNA. However, HF rats treated with ICV ENL had lower HR and a small but statistically significant reduction in RSNA compared with VEH-treated HF rats. These measurements were obtained from conscious rats 4–6 h after recovery from anesthesia. The stress of recent surgery likely increased baseline sympathetic drive and, therefore, may have minimized differences between the HF and SHAM rats. Nevertheless, clearly discernable and statistically significant differences in HR and RSNA were observed between HF and SHAM rats and between HF rats treated ICV with VEH and with ENL.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of ICV ENL or VEH on baseline mean arterial pressure (A, MAP), heart rate (B, HR), and renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) as integrated voltage (C) and as area under the curve (D) of the pulse-triggered waveform average of the integrated voltage signal, in SHAM and HF rats after CL. HF + ENL rats (n = 6) had lower HR and less RSNA than HF + VEH rats (n = 6). ENL had no effect on these variables in SHAM rats (n = 6) compared with SHAM + VEH rats (n = 5). *P < 0.05, VEH vs. ENL. {dagger}P < 0.05, HF + VEH vs. SHAM + VEH.

 
Chronic treatment of HF rats with ICV ENL also improved baroreflex regulation of HR and RSNA measured under these same conditions. In HF rats treated with ICV VEH, compared with VEH-treated SHAM rats, baroreflex function was impaired, as indicated by reduced range and maximum gain of baroreflex regulation of HR and RSNA (Fig. 6A). Chronic treatment of HF rats with ICV ENL improved both indexes of baroreflex function, indicating an overall improvement in sympathetic responses to hemodynamic stress. This improvement is illustrated by the logistic curve-fit data for HF rats treated with ICV ENL and ICV VEH (Fig. 6B). In contrast, IP ENL treatment of HF rats had no effect on resting mean arterial pressure, HR, or RSNA or on baroreflex function (Fig. 7).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Baroreflex regulation of HR and RSNA in HF and SHAM rats treated with ICV ENL or VEH. A: maximum gain and range of the baroreflex are blunted in HF + VEH rats (n = 6) compared with SHAM + VEH rats (n = 5). In HF + ENL rats (n = 6), baroreflex parameters are improved toward normal. ICV ENL had no effect on SHAM rats (n = 6). *P < 0.05, VEH vs. ENL. {dagger}P < 0.05, HF + VEH vs. SHAM + VEH. B: logistic curve fits to baroreflex data from 6 HF rats treated for 4 wk with ICV ENL or VEH. HR and RSNA responses to incremental changes in MAP are larger in ENL-treated rats. Insets: maximum gain as 1st derivative of baroreflex curve.

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Effects IP ENL (n = 6) or VEH (n = 6) on baseline hemodynamic variables (A) and indexes of baroreflex regulation (B) in HF rats. IP ENL had no effect on baseline HR, MAP, RSNA, or baroreflex regulation of HR or RSNA in these HF rats.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Recent reports (10, 14, 16, 17, 2325, 54, 55) suggest that altered neural mechanisms in the brain contribute substantially to the autonomic dysfunction in HF. Notable findings in HF animals that implicate the brain renin-angiotensin system include increased brain ACE activity (47), increased AT1 receptor binding densities in the brain (47, 53) with impressive responses to central AT1 receptor blockade (10), increased dipsogenic responses to ANG II (44), and reduced sympathetic dysfunction and cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction in transgenic rats that lack brain angiotensinogen (51). The present study provides striking new physiological evidence supporting the hypothesis that the brain renin-angiotensin system contributes importantly to the volume accumulation and sympathetic dysregulation that characterize established HF. In this model of ischemia-induced HF, chronic ICV infusion of an ACE inhibitor normalized sodium appetite and the renal handling of sodium and water and significantly improved sympathetic regulation. Peripheral administration of the same low dose of ACE inhibitor to control for effects that might be attributed to leakage from the cerebrospinal fluid into the circulation had no beneficial effects on these parameters.

Within the brain, ACE is normally present in two separate domains, defined by the blood-brain barrier. High concentrations, exceeding those found in the lungs, are present in circumventricular organs (7), such as the area postrema and the subfornical organ, where the blood-brain barrier is absent. Blood-borne ANG I has easy access to these regions, where ACE converts ANG I to ANG II, which can then act on AT1 receptors (30). This mechanism has been tapped for years by investigators interested in the role of angiotensin in thirst and sodium appetite, e.g., volume depletion with a diuretic combined with peripheral low-dose ACE inhibition induces a prominent increase in blood-borne ANG I, which is converted centrally to ANG II (50). High doses of ACE inhibitors, administered peripherally, can inhibit ACE activity in these circumventricular organs (32, 50).

ACE is present in lower but still significant concentrations inside the blood-brain barrier (5, 7), most notably in hypothalamic and brain stem regions involved in autonomic regulation. In these areas, which are impermeable to blood-borne peptides, the brain renin-angiotensin system (3, 29) is the source of ANG I. Recent work suggests that the brain renin-angiotensin system is overactive in HF (47, 51). Although the specific mechanisms that induce increased activity of the brain renin-angiotensin system are not known, blockade of ouabain-like activity was effective in reducing ACE and AT1 receptor affinity (47).

The present study deals specifically with the role of brain ACE activity as a contributing factor to the overactivity of the brain renin-angiotensin system in HF rats. It demonstrates that the typical manifestations of central AT1 receptor stimulation, increased sodium appetite, increased sympathetic activity with impaired baroreflex function, and increased renal retention of sodium and water can be prevented by selective treatment of ACE activity in the central nervous system. However, this striking influence of ACE inhibition does not permit us to localize the treatment effect to a particular site within the blood-brain barrier. It is conceivable that ENL administered into the third cerebral ventricle might act on ACE in the circumventricular organs. For example, ICV captopril prevents the dipsogenic response to systemically administered ANG I (40), and ICV administration of the AT1 receptor blocker losartan prevents the activation of neurons in circumventricular organs of the forebrain induced by intravenously administered ANG II (41). It is therefore quite conceivable that the beneficial effects we observed were, in large part, due to inhibition of ACE activity where it is most pronounced in the normal rat, that is, in the circumventricular organs. It is also conceivable that the beneficial effects of brain ACE inhibition may not reflect overactivity of ACE per se but, rather, overactivity of a downstream mediator of the ANG II effect, e.g., upregulation of AT1 receptors. ACE and AT1 receptors are increased in HF (47), and both may contribute to the effects we observed.

In practice, ACE inhibitors are taken orally. Although oral dosing of ACE inhibitors is directed primarily toward the peripheral outcome of vasodilation, these agents are effective in reducing sympathetic drive and improving baroreflex regulation in humans (19), benefits that can be attributed to their central nervous system effects. Animal studies suggest that dose may be critical in achieving these central nervous system effects. Thus, in normal rats, acute oral administration of an ACE inhibitor can substantially reduce ACE activity in the circumventricular organs (43); however, systemic administration of ACE inhibitors in lower doses that inhibit peripheral ACE activity and increase circulating ANG I but are insufficient to inhibit the higher concentrations of ACE in the circumventricular organs may have the paradoxical effect of stimulating the central production of ANG II and activating AT1 receptors in those regions (32, 50). Although this mechanism has not yet been examined in animals or humans with heart failure, there is clearly a theoretical basis for optimizing the dose of ACE inhibitors in a timely fashion.

Rats and humans have localized regions of ACE activity sequestered within the blood-brain barrier (48). Depending on their lipophilic properties and possibly on active membrane transport (39), chronically administered ACE inhibitors may also access these sites of ACE activity inside the blood-brain barrier (4). To what extent does ACE activity within these protected brain regions contribute to the autonomic dysregulation in human HF, and what benefits might be derived by specifically targeting ACE activity within the blood-brain barrier for therapeutic intervention? These are questions that demand further investigation.

Several limitations must be considered in the interpretation of the data from this study. First among these is the potential contribution of changes in LV function to the improvement in RSNA and baroreflex control. Prior work in rats has demonstrated that chronic central infusion of the ACE inhibitor captopril can reduce cardiac remodeling in HF (44). Because a posttreatment echocardiogram was not obtained at the conclusion of this protocol, we cannot exclude the possibility that the improvement in sympathetic regulation in HF rats treated with ICV ENL was linked to improved LV function; if so, both beneficial effects might be ascribed to inhibition of brain ACE activity. Second, the measurements of sympathetic nerve activity were obtained shortly after a surgical procedure, introducing the possibility that postoperative stress might have minimized the actual differences between groups in baseline sympathetic activity. Third, the mechanism for the beneficial effect of ICV ENL on renal function was not determined in this study. Although there is clear evidence that manipulations of the renin-angiotensin system within the brain can effect changes in kidney function (2, 8, 16, 20, 28, 38) via the renal sympathetic nerves (9, 38), the possibility that central ACE inhibition might have reduced circulating levels of arginine vasopressin must also be considered (27, 28, 33).

Finally, the "control" data from IP ENL, in the same low dose infused ICV, which was meant to validate the central origin of the ICV effects, unexpectedly induced a unique set of responses of their own. However, these results differ dramatically from the responses of the HF rats to ICV ENL and therefore support the interpretation that the ICV effects were centrally mediated. The augmentation of thirst and sodium appetite induced by IP ENL in the HF rats (vs. SHAM) may simply reflect blockade of a more active peripheral renin-angiotensin system, resulting in the higher blood levels of ANG I; alternatively, or in addition, the increase in brain ACE activity in this model of HF (47) may confer an enhanced sensitivity to this forebrain AT1 receptor-mediated behavioral response. The induction of increased urine volume is more difficult to explain but might be related to an enhanced dependence of renal vasoconstriction on circulating ANG II or possibly a vasodilatory effect of bradykinin as a by-product of ACE inhibition.

In summary, the present study provides compelling evidence that exaggerated activity of the brain renin-angiotensin system contributes substantially to the autonomic dyregulation observed in chronic HF. In fact, treatment of central ACE alone, with no other intervention, completely normalized indexes of volume regulation and substantially improved sympathetic regulation. Current clinical therapy with ACE inhibitors, directed toward the peripheral renin-angiotensin system, may not adequately treat the higher concentrations of ACE in the central nervous system; by increasing circulating ANG I, such treatment may actually exaggerate autonomic abnormalities in HF by providing substrate for the relatively untreated ACE in circumventricular organs of the brain. In experimental HF, ACE activity has been shown to be increased within the blood-brain barrier as well. It remains to be determined whether modifying ACE inhibitors to facilitate their access to these structures within the blood-brain barrier might improve outcomes in this devastating disease.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant RO1 HL-63915 (to R. B. Felder) and Cardiovascular Interdisciplinary Research Fellowship HL-07121 and American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant 0330191N (to J. Francis).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank K. Zimmerman (RDMS/RDCS) for diligent and expert assistance in the performance and interpretation of the echocardiograms.

Present address of J. Francis: Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. B. Felder, Univ. of Iowa College of Medicine, E318-GH, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA 52242 (E-mail: robert-felder{at}uiowa.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. American Physiological Society. Guiding principles for research involving animals and human beings. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283: R281–R283, 2002.[Free Full Text]
  2. Barbella Y, Cierco M, and Israel A. Effect of losartan, a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on drinking behavior and renal actions of centrally administered renin. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 202: 401–406, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Bunnemann B, Fuxe K, and Ganten D. The brain renin-angiotensin system: localization and general significance. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 19 Suppl 6: S51–S62, 1992.
  4. Chai SY, Zhuo J, and Mendelsohn FA. Localization of components of the renin-angiotensin system and site of action of inhibitors. Arzneimittelforschung 43: 214–221, 1993.[Medline]
  5. Chevillard C and Saavedra JM. Distribution of angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in specific areas of the rat brain stem. J Neurochem 38: 281–284, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Coote JH and Sato Y. Reflex regulation of sympathetic activity in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Circ Res 40: 571–577, 1977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Correa FM, Plunkett LM, and Saavedra JM. Quantitative distribution of angiotensin-converting enzyme (kininase II) in discrete areas of the rat brain by autoradiography with computerized microdensitometry. Brain Res 375: 259–266, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. De Arruda Camargo LA and Saad WA. Renal effects of angiotensin II receptor subtype 1- and 2-selective ligands injected into the paraventricular nucleus of conscious rats. Regul Pept 84: 91–96, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. DiBona GF. Nervous kidney. Interaction between renal sympathetic nerves and the renin-angiotensin system in the control of renal function. Hypertension 36: 1083–1088, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. DiBona GF, Jones SY, and Brooks VL. ANG II receptor blockade and arterial baroreflex regulation of renal nerve activity in cardiac failure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 269: R1189–R1196, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Esler M, Kaye D, Lambert G, Esler D, and Jennings G. Adrenergic nervous system in heart failure. Am J Cardiol 80: 7L–14L, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Feng QP, Carlsson S, Thoren P, and Hedner T. Characteristics of renal sympathetic nerve activity in experimental congestive heart failure in the rat. Acta Physiol Scand 150: 259–266, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Francis GS. Neurohumoral activation and progression of heart failure: hypothetical and clinical considerations. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 32: S16–S21, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Francis J, Wei SG, Weiss RM, Beltz T, Johnson AK, and Felder RB. Forebrain-mediated adaptations to myocardial infarction in the rat. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282: H1898–H1906, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Francis J, Weiss RM, Johnson AK, and Felder RB. Central mineralocorticoid receptor blockade decreases plasma TNF-{alpha} after coronary artery ligation in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 284: R328–R335, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Francis J, Weiss RM, Wei SG, Johnson AK, Beltz TG, Zimmerman K, and Felder RB. Central mineralocorticoid receptor blockade improves volume regulation and reduces sympathetic drive in heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H2241–H2251, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Francis J, Weiss RM, Wei SG, Johnson AK, and Felder RB. Progression of heart failure after myocardial infarction in the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 281: R1734–R1745, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Francisco LL, Sawin LL, and DiBona GF. Renal sympathetic nerve activity and the exaggerated natriuresis of the spontaneous hypertensive rat. Hypertension 3: 134–138, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Grassi G, Cattaneo BM, Seravalle G, Lanfranchi A, Pozzi M, Morganti A, Carugo S, and Mancia G. Effects of chronic ACE inhibition on sympathetic nerve traffic and baroreflex control of circulation in heart failure. Circulation 96: 1173–1179, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Huang C and Johns EJ. Role of brain angiotensin II on somatosensory-induced antinatriuresis in hypertensive rats. Hypertension 37: 1369–1374, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Judy WV, Watanabe AM, Murphy WR, Aprison BS, and Yu PL. Sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure in normotensive backcross rats genetically related to the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension 1: 598–604, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kjaer A and Hesse B. Heart failure and neuroendocrine activation: diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic perspectives. Clin Physiol 21: 661–672, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Leenen FH, Yuan B, and Huang BS. Brain "ouabain" and angiotensin II contribute to cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 277: H1786–H1792, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Li YF and Patel KP. Paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and elevated sympathetic activity in heart failure: the altered inhibitory mechanisms. Acta Physiol Scand 177: 17–26, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Lindley TE, Doobay MF, Sharma RV, and Davisson RL. Superoxide is involved in the central nervous system activation and sympathoexcitation of myocardial infarction-induced heart failure. Circ Res 95: 402–409, 2004.
  26. Lundin S, Ricksten SE, and Thoren P. Renal sympathetic activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats and normotensive controls, as studied by three different methods. Acta Physiol Scand 120: 265–272, 1984.[Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Martin PY and Schrier RW. Sodium and water retention in heart failure: pathogenesis and treatment. Kidney Int Suppl 59: S57–S61, 1997.[Medline]
  28. Mathai ML, Evered MD, and McKinley MJ. Central losartan blocks natriuretic, vasopressin, and pressor responses to central hypertonic NaCl in sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 275: R548–R554, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. McKinley MJ, Albiston AL, Allen AM, Mathai ML, May CN, McAllen RM, Oldfield BJ, Mendelsohn FA, and Chai SY. The brain renin-angiotensin system: location and physiological roles. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 35: 901–918, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. McKinley MJ, Allen AM, Burns P, Colvill LM, and Oldfield BJ. Interaction of circulating hormones with the brain: the roles of the subfornical organ and the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Suppl 25: S61–S67, 1998.[Medline]
  31. McKinley MJ, Allen AM, May CN, McAllen RM, Oldfield BJ, Sly D, and Mendelsohn FA. Neural pathways from the lamina terminalis influencing cardiovascular and body fluid homeostasis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 28: 990–992, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. McKinley MJ, Colvill LM, Giles ME, and Oldfield BJ. Distribution of Fos-immunoreactivity in rat brain following a dipsogenic dose of captopril and effects of angiotensin receptor blockade. Brain Res 747: 43–51, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  33. McKinley MJ, McAllen RM, Pennington GL, Smardencas A, Weisinger RS, and Oldfield BJ. Physiological actions of angiotensin II mediated by AT1 and AT2 receptors in the brain. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Suppl 3: S99–S104, 1996.[Medline]
  34. Mervaala E, Dehmel B, Gross V, Lippoldt A, Bohlender J, Milia AF, Ganten D, and Luft FC. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade modify the pressure-natriuresis relationship by additive mechanisms in rats with human renin and angiotensinogen genes. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 1669–1680, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Middlekauff HR and Mark AL. The treatment of heart failure: the role of neurohumoral activation. Intern Med 37: 112–122, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Packer M. Evolution of the neurohormonal hypothesis to explain the progression of chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 16: 4–6, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Parmley WW. Neuroendocrine changes in heart failure and their clinical relevance. Clin Cardiol 18: 440–445, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Rahmouni K, Barthelmebs M, Grima M, Imbs JL, and Wybren De J. Brain mineralocorticoid receptor control of blood pressure and kidney function in normotensive rats. Hypertension 33: 1201–1206, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ranadive SA, Chen AX, and Serajuddin AT. Relative lipophilicities and structural-pharmacological considerations of various angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Pharm Res 9: 1480–1486, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Robinson MM, McLennan GP, Thunhorst RL, and Johnson AK. Interactions of the systemic and brain renin-angiotensin systems in the control of drinking and the central mediation of pressor responses. Brain Res 842: 55–61, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Rowland NE, Li BH, Rozelle AK, Fregly MJ, Garcia M, and Smith GC. Localization of changes in immediate early genes in brain in relation to hydromineral balance: intravenous angiotensin II. Brain Res Bull 33: 427–436, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  42. Saavedra JM and Chevillard C. Angiotensin-converting enzyme is present in the subfornical organ and other circumventricular organs of the rat. Neurosci Lett 29: 123–127, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Sakaguchi K, Chai SY, Jackson B, Johnston CI, and Mendelsohn FA. Inhibition of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme. Quantitation by autoradiography. Hypertension 11: 230–238, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Sato T, Yoshimura R, Kawada T, Shishido T, Miyano H, Sugimachi M, and Sunagawa K. The brain is a possible target for an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in the treatment of chronic heart failure. J Card Fail 4: 139–144, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Sigurdsson A and Swedberg K. The role of neurohormonal activation in chronic heart failure and postmyocardial infarction. Am Heart J 132: 229–234, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  46. Strittmatter SM, Lo MM, Javitch JA, and Snyder SH. Autoradiographic visualization of angiotensin-converting enzyme in rat brain with [3H]captopril: localization to a striatonigral pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 1599–1603, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Tan J, Wang H, and Leenen FH. Increases in brain and cardiac AT1 receptor and ACE densities after myocardial infarct in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286: H1665–H1671, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Tani M. Angiotensin-converting enzyme in human brain: discrete localization and biochemical properties. Jpn Heart J 32: 189–201, 1991.[Medline]
  49. Thunhorst RL, Beltz TG, and Johnson AK. Effects of subfornical organ lesions on acutely induced thirst and salt appetite. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 277: R56–R65, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Thunhorst RL, Xu Z, Cicha MZ, Zardetto-Smith AM, and Johnson AK. Fos expression in rat brain during depletion-induced thirst and salt appetite. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 274: R1807–R1814, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Wang H, Huang BS, Ganten D, and Leenen FH. Prevention of sympathetic and cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction in transgenic rats deficient in brain angiotensinogen. Circ Res 94: 843, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Wei SG and Felder RB. Forebrain renin-angiotensin system has a tonic excitatory influence on renal sympathetic nerve activity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282: H890–H895, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Yoshimura R, Sato T, Kawada T, Shishido T, Inagaki M, Miyano H, Nakahara T, Miyashita H, Takaki H, Tatewaki T, Yanagiya Y, Sugimachi M, and Sunagawa K. Increased brain angiotensin receptor in rats with chronic high-output heart failure. J Card Fail 6: 66–72, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
  54. Zhang K, Li YF, and Patel KP. Reduced endogenous GABA-mediated inhibition in the PVN on renal nerve discharge in rats with heart failure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282: R1006–R1015, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Zhang W, Huang BS, and Leenen FH. Brain renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic hyperactivity in rats after myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H1608–H1615, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S.-G. Wei, Y. Yu, Z.-H. Zhang, R. M. Weiss, and R. B. Felder
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases Mediate Upregulation of Hypothalamic Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptors in Heart Failure Rats
Hypertension, October 1, 2008; 52(4): 679 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
Y.-M. Kang, Y. Ma, C. Elks, J.-P. Zheng, Z.-M. Yang, and J. Francis
Cross-talk between cytokines and renin-angiotensin in hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus in heart failure: role of nuclear factor-{kappa}B
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2008; 79(4): 671 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
D. Liu, L. Gao, S. K. Roy, K. G. Cornish, and I. H. Zucker
Role of Oxidant Stress on AT1 Receptor Expression in Neurons of Rabbits With Heart Failure and in Cultured Neurons
Circ. Res., July 18, 2008; 103(2): 186 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y.-M. Kang, Z.-H. Zhang, B. Xue, R. M. Weiss, and R. B. Felder
Inhibition of brain proinflammatory cytokine synthesis reduces hypothalamic excitation in rats with ischemia-induced heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): H227 - H236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. Yu, S.-G. Wei, Z.-H. Zhang, E. Gomez-Sanchez, R. M. Weiss, and R. B. Felder
Does Aldosterone Upregulate the Brain Renin-Angiotensin System in Rats With Heart Failure?
Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 727 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
N. Mariappan, R. N. Soorappan, M. Haque, S. Sriramula, and J. Francis
TNF-{alpha}-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress and cardiac dysfunction: restoration by superoxide dismutase mimetic Tempol
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2726 - H2737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
Y. Yu, Z.-H. Zhang, S.-G. Wei, Y. Chu, R. M. Weiss, D. D. Heistad, and R. B. Felder
Central Gene Transfer of Interleukin-10 Reduces Hypothalamic Inflammation and Evidence of Heart Failure in Rats After Myocardial Infarction
Circ. Res., August 3, 2007; 101(3): 304 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Guggilam, M. Haque, E. K. Kerut, E. McIlwain, P. Lucchesi, I. Seghal, and J. Francis
TNF-{alpha} blockade decreases oxidative stress in the paraventricular nucleus and attenuates sympathoexcitation in heart failure rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H599 - H609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
E. A. Jankowska, P. Ponikowski, M. F. Piepoli, W. Banasiak, S. D. Anker, and P. A. Poole-Wilson
Autonomic imbalance and immune activation in chronic heart failure - Pathophysiological links
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2006; 70(3): 434 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. Kaye and M. Esler
Sympathetic neuronal regulation of the heart in aging and heart failure
Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2005; 66(2): 256 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
B. S. Huang and F. H. H. Leenen
Blockade of brain mineralocorticoid receptors or Na+ channels prevents sympathetic hyperactivity and improves cardiac function in rats post-MI
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): H2491 - H2497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Francis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Felder, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Francis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Felder, R. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.