|
|
||||||||
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and 2Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033; and 3Lebanon Veterans Administration Medical Center, Lebanon, Pennsylvania 17042
Submitted 27 April 2004 ; accepted in final form 16 August 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
kidney; nervous system; sympathetic; vasoconstriction
Reduced exercise capacity and sympathoexcitation are cardinal features of congestive heart failure (HF). Primary mechanisms responsible for early fatigability during exercise in HF patients are thought to be due to diminished perfusion in active skeletal muscle due to reduced blood flow and/or to abnormal muscle metabolism in HF patients (12, 17, 30, 31). This mismatch between metabolic demand and muscle perfusion can engage the muscle reflex evoking sympathoexcitation (25).
Resting sympathetic activity is increased in HF patients (8). Although a wealth of information has been obtained regarding the sympathetic neural responses to exercise in HF, far fewer studies have been designed to determine the mechanisms responsible for sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction during exercise in this disease. Studies using a rhythmic handgrip (HG) protocol demonstrated increased BP (21, 27) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in HF patients due to increased metaboreflex activation. In contrast, Sterns et al. (29), using a static exercise paradigm, found attenuated metaboreflex-mediated increases in MSNA in HF. In the latter study, it was speculated that the metaboreflex was desensitized in HF. It was also suggested in this report that some other neural mechanism was preferentially engaged during exercise in HF so that the "overall" sympathetic response to exercise was preserved. Later, in a study utilizing limb congestion to preferentially engage mechanically sensitive muscle afferents, McClain et al. (14) documented that enhanced MSNA during static HG exercise could be caused by increased muscle mechanoreflex stimulation.
Two separate reports using different exercise paradigms found that renal blood flow falls to a greater extent in HF subjects than in controls (15, 23). Middlekauff et al. (15), using the positron emission tomography (PET) scan method, found that rhythmic HG led to a greater increase in renal vascular resistance (RVR) in HF than in controls. Because of the limited time resolution of this method, the investigators were unable to determine the neural mechanisms responsible for the greater vasoconstrictor response in HF. The lack of time resolution of the PET method prevents a careful evaluation of the time course of responses within the first few seconds after exercise is initiated. This is particularly important because central command and the muscle mechanoreflex become engaged within a few seconds of the onset and initiation of contraction (4, 9, 26). Middlekauff et al. (15) also found sustained increases in RVR in HF during a 2- to 3-min recovery period. The explanation for this finding was not clear, although activation of humoral systems could not be excluded.
Accordingly, we designed a study in which renal blood flow velocity (RBV) in HF subjects and controls was evaluated with the Doppler ultrasound technique (Duplex ultrasound). We reasoned that because of its excellent temporal resolution, this technique would allow us to examine the role of these putative neural mechanisms in controlling renal blood flow during exercise. This method allows subjects to perform multiple exercise paradigms on the same day (19). Because technically it is presently impossible to obtain direct measurements of renal sympathetic nerve activity in humans during exercise, RBV and RVR index (calculated) are used as surrogate for renal sympathetic nerve activity. The results of these studies suggest that renal blood flow falls to a greater degree during exercise in HF than in controls. Moreover, this effect is seen within the first few seconds of exercise. The results of these studies indicate that muscle mechanoreflex activity is augmented in congestive HF.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A group of 10 HF patients (7 men and 3 women, age 56 ± 4 yr, mean body mass index 27 ± 1 kg/m2) and 9 healthy volunteers (7 men and 2 women, age 56 ± 5 yr, mean body mass index 24 ± 1 kg/m2) were studied. Each subject signed an informed written consent, and a physical examination was performed. The study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. The healthy volunteers previously studied in this laboratory were age and sex matched to the HF patients. The healthy control volunteers were normotensive nonsmokers who were not receiving medications (18).
HF patients were recruited from the Cardiovascular Clinic at The Hershey Medical Center. Five were New York Heart Association class II, 4 were class III, and 1 was class IV. The causes of HF were either ischemic (n = 3) or idiopathic cardiomyopathy (n = 7). All HF patients were clinically stable. Medications include the following:
-blockers (n = 9), digoxin (n = 7), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 8), diuretics (n = 7), and nitrates (n = 3). Two of the HF patients had insulin-dependent diabetes. Medications were withheld on the morning of the study.
Renal Blood Flow Velocity
All subjects were studied in the post absorptive state. Duplex ultrasound (HDI 5000, ATL Ultrasound; Bothell, WA) was used to determine renal blood flow dynamics. The renal artery was scanned using the anterior abdominal approach while the subject was supine. A curved-array transducer (25 MHz) with a 2.5-MHz pulsed Doppler frequency was used. The probe insonation angle to the renal artery was <60° with the focal zone set at the renal artery depth. To obtain optimum velocity tracings, the transducer was held in a constant position, and the data were obtained in the same phase of the respiratory cycle of the respective subject. Care was taken to ensure that the subject did not perform Valsalva maneuvers during HG. The Doppler tracings were analyzed using ATL software (HDI 5000) to obtain mean velocity. Each velocity measurement was normalized to a time constant of 1 s. Subsequently, the RVR index was calculated by dividing mean arterial pressure by RBV (in cm/s). RVR is expressed in arbitrary units.
HR (electrocardiogram) and BP (Finapres, Ohmeda; Madison, WI) were also obtained continuously throughout the protocols. Resting BP was determined with an automated sphygmomanometer (Dinamap, Critikon; Tampa, FL).
Study Protocols
Protocol 1: fatiguing static exercise followed by post-HG circulatory arrest. The maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the nondominant arm was determined in each subject. Baseline HR, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and RBV were obtained over 5 min before each protocol. HG was performed at 40% MVC until fatigue. Immediately before the subject's point of fatigue, a forearm cuff was inflated to 250 mmHg for 2 min [post-HG circulatory arrest (PHG-CA)]. At the end of exercise, each subject rated their effort level as 20 (Borg scale) (1).
Protocol 2: static HG exercise at graded intensity. Five minutes of baseline HR, MAP, and RBV were collected. Each subject then performed 15 s bouts of static HG at 10%, 30%, 50%, and 70% MVC. The same sequence was maintained in all subjects with a 1-min period of rest between bouts.
Protocol 3: involuntary and voluntary biceps contraction.
Percutaneous electrical stimulation was utilized to induce involuntary biceps contraction. Electrical pads (5 x 5 cm2) were placed
3 cm apart, and the biceps muscle was electrically stimulated (200 V; phase duration, 0.3 ms; phase interval, 0.1 ms). Electrical biceps contraction evoked
1530% of MVC and was sustained for
15 s without eliciting pain. The subjects then performed 15 s of voluntary biceps contractions at the same tension that had been generated during involuntary contraction.
Data Analysis and Statistics
Values were averaged over a 5-min rest period before each paradigm.
In the fatiguing static HG protocol, variables were measured at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% (peak) of the respective subject's time to exhaustion. Data from the last 15 s of PHG-CA was used in the statistical analyses.
In the second protocol, data were analyzed in 5-s time periods. Statistical analyses were performed separately on each 5-s period (i.e., 15, 610, and 1115 s).
Data are presented as mean ± SE. Resting values in HF and controls were compared with unpaired t-tests. For the voluntary and involuntary biceps contraction protocol, repeated-measures one-way ANOVA models, having a first-order autoregressive variance-covariance structure to account for the within-subject correlation, were fit to the data to compare response variables to baseline in the HF group using Dunnett's test in the post hoc analysis to control type I error. Repeated-measures two-way ANOVA models, having a first-order autoregressive variance-covariance structure to account for the within-subject correlation, were fit to the data for each response variable to assess the two main effects of group (between HF and healthy subjects) and HG paradigm and the possible interaction of these two effects. A Bonferroni correction to control type I error for multiple comparisons was applied to the tests of simple effects at respective time periods during the contraction paradigms when HF was compared with healthy controls. P < 0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed with the SAS statistical software package (SAS Institute; Cary, NC).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The time to fatigue was not different in the two groups (HF, 103 ± 3 s, n = 10, vs. controls, 134 ± 12 s, n = 9; P = (NS). RBV fell more during fatiguing HG in the HF group than in the controls (group main effect, 0.037; Fig. 1A). The magnitude of increases in MAP tended to be smaller in HF than in controls. This effect seemed most pronounced toward the end of exercise (Table 2). Thus, despite a greater fall in RBV in HF, RVR was similar in the two groups (Table 2). During PHG-CA, resistances (paradigm effect, P < 0.002) and RBV responses were similar in the two groups (Table 3 and Fig. 1B).
|
|
The data for RVR, HR, and MAP are shown in Table 4. Increases in RVR were found in both HF (n = 10) and control (n = 9) groups during short bouts of hardgrip (Table 4). Larger RBV reductions were found in HF than in controls (Fig. 2). Although no group difference was observed in MAP responses, smaller MAP responses in HF were seen at the higher workloads during 05 and 1115 s of HG exercise (P < 0.05; Table 4).
|
|
Involuntary and voluntary biceps contraction evoked RVR responses in HF (n = 4, one-way ANOVA, P = 0.036). Increases in RVR were similar, 19 ± 5% and 25 ± 6% (P = NS), during involuntary and voluntary biceps contraction, respectively.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Resting RBV, RVR, and MAP were not different in the HF patients and control subjects. A prior report also suggests that baseline renal norepinephrine (NE) spillover is similar in HF and in control subjects (23). These findings are at odds with those of Middlekauff et al. (15), who found lower baseline renal blood flows in HF than in controls. Whether this reduced resting renal blood flow was related to the severity of HF in the patients studied is not clear. It must be emphasized that with the methods used in the present report, we were unable to measure renal artery diameter and therefore were unable to compare resting levels of flow in the two groups. Thus comparisons of resting flow and vascular resistance reported in this study must be viewed with some caution. However, because renal diameter does not change during renal vasoconstriction with pharmacological compounds (11), we believe statements regarding flow velocity changes from resting velocity are valid.
During short bouts of HG, renal blood flow fell more in HF patients than in controls. During fatiguing HG, we observed a group main effect (P < 0.04). Review of the data (Fig. 1) suggests that this effect was more prominent early in exercise than late in exercise, although a significant interaction was not noted. Similar observations were made by Langton et al. (6) using a doxorubicine-induced rabbit HF model. Compared with controls, HF rabbits had markedly reduced renal blood flows during submaximal exercise, whereas blood flow responses were similar in the two groups at the end of fatiguing exercise (6). In this report, the duration of HG to fatigue was not significantly different between groups. Because 9 of 10 HF subjects were receiving
-blocker treatment, the question may arise regarding the effects of
-blockers on exercise capacity in HF. Although
-blockers generally cause a reduction in exercise capacity in healthy subjects, their effects in HF are not consistent. Studies in HF patients have reported either no effect (3) or little improvement (5, 24) in exercise capacity with
-blocker treatment. Another important issue is the mode of exercise. In our report, all subjects performed isometric HG. Unlike dynamic exercise, blood flow to the contracting muscle becomes limited (7) during isometric exercise because muscle contraction itself occludes blood vessels. Thus we believe that the effects of
-blocker treatment on skeletal muscle blood flow would be far less important than if we had examined renal blood flow during rhythmic exercise in HF.
In the present study, it is unlikely that the muscle metaboreflex played an important role in eliciting the exaggerated renal vasoconstrictor response to exercise in HF. This is because the effect was seen early in exercise and the PHG-CA values for RBV reduction were not greater in HF patients than in controls. An argument can be made for greater central command in HF. However, if this had been the case, we would have expected a bigger HR response in HF patients than in controls. Moreover, voluntary and involuntary biceps contractions evoked similar increases in RVR in the HF patients and controls. If central command were an important mechanism responsible for renal vasoconstriction in humans, we would have expected no constrictor response during involuntary contraction. Thus these data suggest that the majority of the reduction in RBV during the initial periods of HG is due to augmented engagement of the muscle mechanoreflex in the HF patients.
It should be noted that Rundqvist and colleagues (23) demonstrated similar relative changes in renal NE spillover during supine bicycle exercise in HF and in controls even though renal blood flow fell to a greater degree in HF patients than in controls. Moreover, DiBona et al. (2), using graded renal nerve stimulation in a rat model of HF, demonstrated that reductions in renal blood flow were seen at lower stimulus frequency in HF than were observed in normal control rats. These results suggest that vascular sensitivity may be heightened in HF. We doubt that this explains our results because if this were the explanation, we would have expected to see a greater reduction in renal blood flow during PHG-CA in HF.
Clinical Implications
We speculate that exaggerated renal blood flow reduction observed in HF patients in the present study represents a compensatory mechanism that maintains blood flow to exercising muscle in the face of diminished levels of cardiac output. Our data further suggest that this renal blood flow response was predominantly due to local factors within contracting muscles and not to local renal factors (20). Prior animal studies have documented that the muscle mechanoreflex can be sensitized by metabolic byproducts of muscle contraction such as ATP (10) and lactic acid (22, 28), etc. Enhanced lactate production due to abnormal skeletal muscle metabolism is found in HF patients during exercise (13, 25). Furthermore, in this laboratory, pilot studies using an animal model of HF have observed increased ATP production in HF rats during muscle stretch (unpublished observation). Because the response was seen early in the present study, and central command did not appear to be a major factor, we conclude that the early large reduction in renal blood flow in HF was due to an accentuated muscle mechanoreflex response in HF patients.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Momen, J. Cui, P. McQuillan, and L. I. Sinoway Local prostaglandin blockade attenuates muscle mechanoreflex-mediated renal vasoconstriction during muscle stretch in humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H2184 - H2190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Koba, J. Xing, L. I. Sinoway, and J. Li Sympathetic nerve responses to muscle contraction and stretch in ischemic heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H311 - H321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Kindig, S. G. Hayes, and M. P. Kaufman Blockade of purinergic 2 receptors attenuates the mechanoreceptor component of the exercise pressor reflex Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2995 - H3000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xing, S. Koba, V. Kehoe, Z. Gao, K. Rice, N. King, L. Sinoway, and J. Li Interstitial norepinephrine concentrations in skeletal muscle of ischemic heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1190 - H1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. Middlekauff and L. I. Sinoway Point:Counterpoint: Increased mechanoreceptor/metaboreceptor stimulation explains the exaggerated exercise pressor reflex seen in heart failure J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2007; 102(1): 492 - 494. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Koba, Z. Gao, J. Xing, L. I. Sinoway, and J. Li Sympathetic responses to exercise in myocardial infarction rats: a role of central command Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H2735 - H2742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Momen, B. Handly, A. Kunselman, U. A. Leuenberger, and L. I. Sinoway Influence of sex and active muscle mass on renal vascular responses during static exercise Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H121 - H126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Koba, T. Yoshida, and N. Hayashi Renal sympathetic and circulatory responses to activation of the exercise pressor reflex in rats Exp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 91(1): 111 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hayashi, N. Someya, M. Y. Endo, A. Miura, and Y. Fukuba Vasoconstriction and blood flow responses in visceral arteries to mental task in humans Exp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 91(1): 215 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hayashi, S. Koba, and T. Yoshida Disuse atrophy increases the muscle mechanoreflex in rats J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1442 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Sinoway and J. Li A perspective on the muscle reflex: implications for congestive heart failure J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2005; 99(1): 5 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |