|
|
||||||||
8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RESISTANCE ARTERIES
New Developments in Resistance Artery Research: From Molecular Biology to Bedside
1Institut d'Hématologie et d'Immunologie, Unité 143, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg; and 2Pharmacologie des Interactions Cellulaires et Moléculaires, UMR Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 7034, Université Louis Pasteur, Illkirch, France
Submitted 19 August 2004 ; accepted in final form 23 September 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
microvesicles; nitric oxide synthase; cyclooxygenase; inflammation; vascular diseases
| CHARACTERISTICS OF MICROPARTICLES: GENERATION, COMPOSITION, AND QUANTITY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are many good reviews regarding the composition of microparticles, the membranes of which consist mainly of lipids such as phosphatidylserine and several proteins (33). Indeed, on the surface, microvesicles bear antigens characteristic of the cell from which they originated and carry other membrane and cytoplasmic constituents. For example, functional adhesion complexes such as glycoprotein IIb-IIIa and P-selectin are harbored by microparticles from platelets (12). Microparticles of endothelial origin carry CD31 or CD146, whereas CD4, CD3, or CD8 is present at the surface membrane of leukocytic microparticles (18, 19).
These properties of microparticles are important, because they participate in the mechanisms by which they mediate the signals and in the differential consequences on the cell types that are activated. Thus microparticles can be viewed as a new pathway that can be used by cells to exchange information in addition to the transduction linked to the activation of classical known receptors or transporters.
Microparticles are present in blood from healthy individuals and patients (4). Thus they probably play a physiological and/or pathophysiological role. A recent review advances the hypothesis that microparticles should play a part in development, angiogenesis, wound healing, and, more generally, tissue remodeling, in the form of positive or negative gradients of information delivered to neighboring cells (10). Microparticles have been studied in various disease states, in which their number, cellular source, and composition are altered. Evidence is emerging that microparticles play an important role in coagulation, inflammation, and vascular dysfunction (for a review, see Ref. 10). However, their effects on vascular functions are unclear, and only a few studies have addressed this point.
The majority of in vivo circulating microparticles derive from platelets compared with microparticles from other circulating or vascular cells. Under several pathological situations, the number of total microparticles as well as the proportion of their different origins can change (33). Thus, in diseases such as atherosclerosis, congestive heart failure, diabetes, preeclampsia, and cancer, the level of circulating microparticles is considerably enhanced. It is difficult to determine the number of circulating microparticles in these diseases, because the methods used to quantify them are different (protein amount, procoagulant ability of phosphatidylserine exposed on their surface, and number of microparticles determined by flow cytometry) and need to be standardized, but circulating microparticles are increased in patients with the above-mentioned diseases compared with healthy patients, regardless of the method employed.
The phenotype of circulating microparticles is also different in different pathological states, and detection of its cellular origin may serve as a predictor or marker of the diseases (Fig. 1). Indeed, platelet microparticles are enhanced in myocardial infarction (18), hypertension (24), diabetes (22), and cancer (16), whereas endothelial microparticles are the most abundant in acute coronary syndromes (18) and Type 1 diabetes mellitus (26). In diabetic patients, the number of microparticles of leukocyte origin is threefold higher than in healthy donors (26). In addition, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients show elevated levels of microparticles bearing CD4 antigen (1). Elevated levels of microparticles from granulocytes and lymphocytes have been reported in preeclampsia (31). Also, in severe trauma, circulating levels of microparticles generated from activated leukocytes and harboring adhesion markers were enhanced (11). Only two reports mentioned that microparticles can be released by smooth muscle cells (28, 6), but these data suggest a potential role of smooth muscle cell microparticles in atherosclerosis and thrombus formation. Because of the variety of microparticles, it is plausible that they may exert pleiotropic effects on the vascular wall. Moreover, depending on the microparticle composition, one can speculate that different subpopulations of microparticles (from platelets, leukocytes, etc.) may serve as vectors of exchange of specific message in regulating vascular function and dysfunction.
|
| LONG-RANGE SIGNALING OF MICROPARTICLES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent data provide evidence that the microparticles, independent of their origin, can transfer biological information between cells, acting as veritable vectors of signal molecules. Even though microparticles can act on hematopoietic and circulating cells, most of the exchange of information from microparticles takes place at the level of the endothelium and contributes to the physiological and pathophysiological role of microparticles. Thus they can affect vasodilatation and antithrombotic and antiadhesive properties of the vascular wall. Also, microparticles may be involved in the regulation of vascular permeability and smooth muscle cell proliferation.
In addition to their role in the regulation of hemostasis and thrombosis, platelet microparticles evoke monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells by inducing adhesion molecule exposure, stimulate proliferation, survival, adhesion, and chemotaxis of hematopoietic cells and increase engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells (2, 13). Also, platelet microparticles induce angiogenesis in vitro (15), probably through activation of endothelial cells (3). Microparticles generated from endothelial cells bear molecules able to initiate coagulation, induce monocyte adhesion, activate neutrophils, and promote angiogenesis (29). The microparticles shed by leukocytes can stimulate endothelial cells (20), transfer tissue factor to platelets (25), and impair endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (19).
| MICROPARTICLE EFFECTS ON THE VASCULAR SYSTEM |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here, we attempt to summarize the effects of microparticles on vascular function at the level of endothelial and smooth muscle cells depending on their cellular origin (Fig. 2). To the best of our knowledge, very few reports address the effect of microparticles on resistance arteries.
|
An increased number of circulating endothelial microparticles has been observed in several pathologies reflecting endothelial cell damage and dysfunction. In addition, endothelial microparticles alone can aggravate endothelial dysfunction. Indeed, microparticles generated from endothelial cells impair endothelium-dependent relaxation and nitric oxide (NO) production in the rat aorta (7). It has also been shown that the effect induced by endothelial microparticles is related to an increase in superoxide anion production (7), which might reduce the bioavailability of NO.
Few studies have shown the role of microparticles shed from smooth muscle cells. Schecter et al. (28) suggested that active extracellular tissue factor found in the injured arterial wall and atherosclerotic plaques derives, in part, from smooth muscle cell microparticles. In another study, it was shown that the ability of apoptotic smooth muscle cell-generated microparticles to enhance thrombus formation correlates to the functional tissue factor harbored at their surface (6). Thus tissue factor-rich microparticles from smooth muscle cells might have the main role in generation and maintenance of atherosclerotic plaques.
As described above, under several pathological situations, the level of circulating microparticles generated from leukocytes is strongly enhanced. In this context, it appears relevant to explore the effects of this type of microparticles on vascular function, inasmuch as contact between lymphocytes and endothelial cells is a prerequisite for the recruitment of immune cells from blood at the sites of inflammation. Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated monocytes release microparticles bearing tissue factor and active adhesion complexes, disseminating a procoagulant potential (27). Also, microparticles shed from activated monocytes are a major secretory pathway for the rapid release of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1
(17). Thus monocytic microparticles could participate in development of the inflammatory response.
It has been established that microparticles from freshly isolated leukocytes behave as inflammatory mediators and initiate signal transduction in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (20). Among the activated pathways, leukocyte microparticles stimulate the secretion of interleukin-6 in endothelial cells through the phosphorylation of JNK1 without the involvement of NF-
B or the ERK pathway (21).
In vitro apoptotic T lymphocyte-derived microparticles, at concentrations that can be reached in circulating blood under immunological dysfunction (e.g., HIV), impair endothelium-dependent relaxation in conductance and small resistance arteries in response to agonist and shear stress, respectively (19). Interestingly, microparticle treatment affects NO- and PGI2- but not endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated dilatation. Although these effects are linked to the decrease in expression of endothelial NO synthase, COX-1 expression is not modified. The overexpression of caveolin-1 might enhance association of the transduction mechanism involved in lymphocyte microparticle-induced effects with endothelial NO synthase and, subsequently, impair translocation of the enzyme into the cytosol and its activation by Ca2+/calmodulin. In addition, the effects of microparticles generated in vitro from T lymphocytes are not mediated through their interaction with adhesion molecules such as leukocyte functional antigen-1. Furthermore, these effects are independent of Fas-Fas ligand interaction, because microparticles, lacking Fas or Fas ligand, generated after T lymphocyte activation and not apoptosis, evoke similar effects (i.e., reduction of endothelial NO synthase and overexpression of caveolin-1).
Also, T lymphocyte-derived microparticles can affect vascular contraction by acting directly on smooth muscle cells (Fig. 3) (30). These microparticles induce vascular hyporeactivity in response to vasoconstrictor agents in mouse aorta, in that they are reversed by NO synthase plus COX-2 inhibitors. The hyporeactivity induced by microparticles is associated with an increased production of NO and PGI2 resulting from upregulation of proinflammatory protein expression, inducible NO synthase, and COX-2. The mechanism involves an interaction of microparticles with smooth muscle cells through the Fas-Fas ligand pathway responsible for the activation of NF-
B, which in turn upregulates inducible NO synthase and COX-2 expression. These data provide a rationale to explain the paracrine role of microparticles as vectors of transcellular exchange of message in promoting vascular dysfunction during inflammatory diseases.
|
| EFFECTS OF MICROPARTICLES ON INFLAMMATORY DISEASES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the total number of circulating microparticles was unaltered in preeclampsia, the proportion of T lymphocytes and granulocyte microparticles is increased in preeclamptic women (31). Circulating microparticles from these patients abolish endothelium-dependent relaxation, in contrast to microparticles from healthy pregnant women (32). However, the mechanisms responsible for diminished endothelium-dependent relaxation after microparticle treatment have not been identified.
In another study, lymphocyte-derived microparticles from diabetic patients or in vivo circulating microparticles from diabetic or HIV-infected patients impaired endothelial NO synthase expression to the same extent as in vitro T lymphocyte-generated microparticles (19). Although circulating microparticles from diabetic patients are heterogeneous, they contain an elevated proportion of microparticles derived from T cells, which may explain the results. These data and those obtained from microparticles generated during acute myocardial infarction (5) and preeclampsia (32) indicate that, independent of their origin, microparticles alter NO metabolism and can participate in development of cardiovascular diseases.
On the other hand, circulating microparticles from diabetic patients significantly reduce the contractile response to agonists through the interaction of Fas ligand from microparticles with Fas from the vessel wall, leading to intracellular signaling. Furthermore, microparticles shed by the apoptotic lymphocytes of the same diabetic patients are able to induce vascular hyporeactivity (30). Microparticles induce hyporeactivity even in vessels with functional endothelium (30), in which they produce endothelial dysfunction (19). Thus the overall effect of microparticles was to reduce the response to vasoconstrictor agents. Similar observations were reported in inflammatory disorders such as cirrhosis, portal hypertension (8), and sepsis (9), in which vascular hyporesponsiveness to a vasoconstrictor and reduced endothelium-dependent relaxation have been reported. These results emphasize the role of microparticles as vectors of transcellular exchange of message in promoting vascular dysfunction accompanying inflammatory diseases.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
or interleukin-6), on the other. Second, would the knowledge of microparticle composition and constituents for a better understanding of the mechanism driven by the phenotype of microparticles involved be helpful in the search for therapeutic agents? Nevertheless, microparticles can be considered vectors of transcellular exchange of message in regulating vascular function at the same level as mediators acting on different receptor-mediated events.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
by microvesicle shedding. Immunity 8: 825835, 2001.
ur Vaiss 96: 1378, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Martinez and R. Andriantsitohaina Circulating Microparticles in Septic Shock Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2009; 180(1): 100 - 101. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Bonventre Microvesicles from Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Protect against Acute Kidney Injury J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2009; 20(5): 927 - 928. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dalli, L. V. Norling, D. Renshaw, D. Cooper, K.-Y. Leung, and M. Perretti Annexin 1 mediates the rapid anti-inflammatory effects of neutrophil-derived microparticles Blood, September 15, 2008; 112(6): 2512 - 2519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Heiss, N. Amabile, A. C. Lee, W. M. Real, S. F. Schick, D. Lao, M. L. Wong, S. Jahn, F. S. Angeli, P. Minasi, et al. Brief Secondhand Smoke Exposure Depresses Endothelial Progenitor Cells Activity and Endothelial Function: Sustained Vascular Injury and Blunted Nitric Oxide Production J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 6, 2008; 51(18): 1760 - 1771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Wakefield, D. D. Myers, and P. K. Henke Mechanisms of Venous Thrombosis and Resolution Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2008; 28(3): 387 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tesse, G. Al-Massarani, R. Wangensteen, S. Reitenbach, M. C. Martinez, and R. Andriantsitohaina Rosiglitazone, a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Agonist, Prevents Microparticle-Induced Vascular Hyporeactivity through the Regulation of Proinflammatory Proteins J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2008; 324(2): 539 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Yang, B. R. Mwaikambo, T. Zhu, C. Gagnon, J. Lafleur, S. Seshadri, P. Lachapelle, J.-C. Lavoie, S. Chemtob, and P. Hardy Lymphocytic microparticles inhibit angiogenesis by stimulating oxidative stress and negatively regulating VEGF-induced pathways Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R467 - R476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tesse, F. Meziani, E. David, N. Carusio, H. Kremer, F. Schneider, and R. Andriantsitohaina Microparticles from preeclamptic women induce vascular hyporeactivity in vessels from pregnant mice through an overproduction of NO Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H520 - H525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Othman, A. Labelle, I. Mazzetti, H. S. Elbatarny, and D. Lillicrap Adenovirus-induced thrombocytopenia: the role of von Willebrand factor and P-selectin in mediating accelerated platelet clearance Blood, April 1, 2007; 109(7): 2832 - 2839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Feletou and P. M. Vanhoutte Endothelial dysfunction: a multifaceted disorder (The Wiggers Award Lecture) Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): H985 - H1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Boulanger, N. Amabile, and A. Tedgui Circulating Microparticles: A Potential Prognostic Marker for Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Hypertension, August 1, 2006; 48(2): 180 - 186. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mineo, H. Deguchi, J. H. Griffin, and P. W. Shaul Endothelial and Antithrombotic Actions of HDL Circ. Res., June 9, 2006; 98(11): 1352 - 1364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mezentsev, R. M. H. Merks, E. O'Riordan, J. Chen, N. Mendelev, M. S. Goligorsky, and S. V. Brodsky Endothelial microparticles affect angiogenesis in vitro: role of oxidative stress Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H1106 - H1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |