AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288: H2547-H2549, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01221.2004
0363-6135/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S.
Right arrow Articles by David, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S.
Right arrow Articles by David, T. E.

EDITORIALS

Can statin therapy alter the natural history of bicuspid aortic valves?

Subodh Verma,1 Paul E. Szmitko,2 Paul W. M. Fedak,1 Lee Errett,1 David A. Latter,1 and Tirone E. David1

1Division of Cardiac Surgery, and 2Division of General Internal Medicine, Toronto General Hospital and St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

PATIENTS with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) malformations, the most common congenital cardiac abnormality, are at significantly higher lifetime risk of developing aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, aortic root dilatation, infective endocarditis, aortic aneurysm, and aortic dissection. Unfortunately, once these complications develop, cardiac surgical intervention is required in the vast majority of symptomatic patients. Despite a better understanding of the pathophysiology and complications of BAV malformations, there are currently no medical treatment options available to alter the natural history or halt the progression of BAV-related complications. However, a question that has probably crossed the minds of many is whether statins, by virtue of their powerful cholesterol-reducing and pleiotropic anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory effects can change the natural history of BAV disease if introduced early?

BAV is the most common congenital cardiac malformation, occurring in 1–2% of the population (7, 21). Although patients with a BAV may be asymptomatic and go undetected throughout their life, the majority of these patients will develop complications requiring surgical treatment. BAV disease is responsible for more deaths and morbidity than all other congenital heart defects combined.

BAVs arise from abnormal aortic cusp formation during valvulogenesis, resulting in the formation of one aberrant cusp that is larger than a single cusp but smaller than two normal cusps. The BAV is often accompanied by congenital abnormalities of the aorta. Thus the process underlying BAV formation involves more than just the inappropriate fusion of adjacent cusps and likely represents a genetic disease that affects the entire aortic root. Although not yet confirmed, abnormalities in components of the extracellular matrix, such as fibrillin-1, or aberrant vascular matrix remodeling may contribute to abnormal valvulogenesis and a structurally weakened aortic root (6). Abnormalities in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene may also be involved because mice with eNOS deficiency have a higher incidence of congenital BAV (10). These eNOS-deficient mice may potentially serve as an experimental in vivo BAV model. BAVs appear to be genetically inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion with reduced penetrance (4, 9). With the use of echocardiography to screen the family members of patients with a BAV, 36.7% of the screened families had more than one first-degree relative with a BAV (9), suggesting that echocardiographic screening of first-degree relatives may be valuable.

BAV malformations predispose to both valvular complications and complications involving the native aorta. Aortic stenosis by far is the most common complication of BAV. Approximately 50% of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement have a BAV, and aortic stenosis tends to present much earlier in this population, generally in the fourth and fifth decades of life (21). BAVs represents the commonest aetiology of aortic stenosis between the ages of 60 and 75 yr (21). Echocardiographic studies have demonstrated that sclerosis of the BAV begins as early as the second decade of life, with calcification becoming very prominent from the fourth decade onward (2).

Once considered a degenerative, age-related condition, calcification of the aortic valve is currently thought to resemble the process of atherogenesis. Histologically, calcified regions of aortic valves have features such as the presence of lipid, inflammatory cells, and neoangiogenesis that are associated with arterial atherosclerotic plaques (12). Furthermore, patients with dyslipidemia are at increased risk of developing BAV stenosis (3). Aortic regurgitation may occur in the presence of a BAV secondary to cusp prolapse, fibrotic changes, or dilatation of the sinotubular junction, requiring aortic valve repair or replacement. Also, endocarditis is a potentially devastating complication that tends to occur in BAV patients with regurgitant valves.

The vascular complications of BAV disease are related to progressive aortic root dilatation, aneurysm formation, and dissection. Among young patients with normally functioning BAVs, ≥50% have echocardiographic evidence of aortic dilatation, the precursor to aortic rupture and dissection, both potentially fatal events (14). BAV patients tend to have abnormalities within the aortic media, namely, matrix disruption and smooth muscle cell loss. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), endogenous enzymes that degrade matrix components, have been implicated in atherosclerotic aortic aneurysm formation (20) and appear to be elevated in the aorta of patients with BAVs (6). Currently, aortic dilatation is monitored serially by echocardiography and aortic root replacement is recommended once dilatation exceeds 4 cm (5).

Statins have emerged as a powerful and safe pharmacotherapy for both primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. In addition to their well-known effects on cholesterol metabolism, statins have a plethora of anti-inflammatory, vasculoprotective, and immune modulatory effects, which have been linked to their overall benefit. Indeed, these cholesterol-independent effects are credited for the benefit of statins noticed in diverse patient groups, including rheumatoid arthritis (11) and Alzheimer's disease (22).

With the better understanding of the pathophysiology of BAV complications, it becomes apparent that statins exhibit a pharmacological profile that may potentially alter the natural history of this disease. Statins may be able to directly modify the processes that contribute to the progression of aortic stenosis in patients with apparently normal functioning BAVs (see Fig. 1). First, statins by virtue of lowering LDL-cholesterol reduce an important risk factor for BAV disease progression. Second, statins, through their powerful anti-inflammatory actions, may limit the extent of aortic valve calcification, critical to the development of BAV stenosis. Third, statins may limit aortic dilatation by reducing the production of MMPs, which are critical to the aberrant aortic remodelling seen in BAV disease. If one assumes that patients with BAV disease have an abnormal endothelium (deficiencies in eNOS), abnormal vascular matrix turnover (increased MMPs), and abnormal metabolic responses (the metabolic syndrome), then statins could be expected to limit the deterioration of the BAV and the dilatation of the aorta by improving endothelial function, restoring MMP balance and combating the adverse effects of the metabolic syndrome. Indeed, in clinical studies, statin therapy has been demonstrated to reduce the progression of aortic stenosis (15), decrease native aortic valve calcium accumulation (19), and delay the degeneration of bioprosthetic aortic valves (1). However, these studies were not randomized, and no attempts were made to standardize the type, dose, or duration of statin treatment, and only patients with established aortic stenosis were studied. Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled studies assessing the effect of lipid-lowering therapy on aortic stenosis disease progression are required to definitively address this issue. Currently, there are two multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled studies being conducted to answer this question: the Canadian Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation: Measuring Effect of Rosuvastatin Study and the European Simvastatin and Ezetimide in Aortic Stenosis Study (16). The results of these studies are greatly anticipated.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The presence of a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac anomaly and predisposes to aortic stenosis, aortic root dilatation, aortic valve regurgitation, infective endocarditis, aortic aneurysm, and aortic dissection. These abnormalities often necessitate surgical intervention in patients within their prime years of life. Statins, by virtue of their anti-inflammatory, immune modulatory, and powerful cholesterol-lowering abilities, may impact on the natural progression of BAV-related complications, in part through reducing cusp calcification and stabilizing the aortic extracellular matrix (ECM).

 
Is it feasible to test the hypothesis that early statin therapy in patients with BAV may reduce BAV-associated complications? Would a positive result of such a trial be large enough to outweigh the risks of placing young, otherwise asymptomatic patients on life-long statin therapy? On the surface, the concept may sound trite, but understandably a trial of this nature raises numerous challenges. First, identification of asymptomatic BAV patients would require mass echocardiographic screening, something that is not routinely done. Widespread echocardiography to detect BAV in asymptomatic patients is unreasonable; however, because BAVs tend to occur in families, children of affected patients could be screened and serve as study participants. Such patients may be identified from cardiac surgical databases, although the ethics surrounding this would require careful consideration. Ideally, trial patients upon entry would have a BAV with an aortic valve area of >1.2 cm2, no calcification, an aortic root diameter measured at the sinotubular junction of <4 cm, no coronary or peripheral vascular disease, and normal lipids and would not otherwise be candidates for statin therapy. What would the outcome of a study like this be? Probably a composite of aortic valve area, transvalvular gradient, and other well-established complications of BAV disease, such as the development of clinically significant aortic stenosis, aortic calcification, aortic dilatation, or aneurysm formation. For argument purposes, if you were to anticipate that statins would reduce the composite of BAV complications by 15% over 5 yr, a sample size of ~4,000 would be needed to provide sufficient power (80%) to detect a significant difference between groups. Probably a more refined initial strategy would be to restrict the study to patients over the age of 45 yr with an incidental observation of BAV and evidence of asymptomatic mild aortic stenosis, randomized to statin versus placebo with a 5- to 7-yr followup. The type and dose of statin are other considerations, although we would propose the use of either simvastatin (40 mg) or atorvastatin (80 mg) in keeping with evidence from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (17), Heart Protection Study (8), and Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (13) trials. Although statins are well tolerated and safe, with a low frequency of adverse events, is it ethical to subject patients who are otherwise not dyslipidemic to statin pharmacotherapy? The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial provides a good example of a case where statin therapy was tested in patients at risk of cardiovascular events, but not deemed dyslipidemic, and reported to markedly reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity (18).

Clearly, it would be an attractive proposition to suggest that early intervention with a widely used and relatively safe pharmacological agent could alter the natural history of the most common congenital cardiac abnormality. We believe that the time has come for cardiac surgeons and cardiologists to evaluate this premise, initially in a small select group of patients, to test whether statin therapy will hold the same promise of disease modification in BAV as it has in the world of atherosclerosis. However, it is important to stress that there remains a lack of knowledge regarding the natural history of the disease. The notion that 1–2% of the population has a BAV is based on large autopsy database studies. Clinically, the problem is even more complicated because transthoracic echocardiography may not be sensitive enough to identify the presence or absence of a BAV. The time required for a competent and nonstenotic BAV to calcify is unknown.

FOOTNOTES


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Verma, 14 EN-215, 200 Elizabeth St., Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4 (E-mail: Subodh.Verma{at}Sympatico.ca)

REFERENCES

  1. Antonini-Canterin F, Zuppiroli A, Popescu BA, Granata G, Cervesato E, Piazza R, Pavan D, and Nicolosi GL. Effect of statins on the progression of bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration. Am J Cardiol 92: 1479–1482, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  2. Beppu S, Suzuki S, Matsuda H, Ohmori F, Nagata S, and Miyatake K. Rapidity of progression of aortic stenosis in patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 71: 322–327, 1993.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Chan KL, Ghani M, Woodend K, and Burwash IG. Case-controlled study to assess risk factors for aortic stenosis in congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 88: 690–693, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Cripe L, Andelfinger G, Martin LJ, Shooner K, and Benson DW. Bicuspid aortic valve is heritable. J Am Coll Cardiol 44: 138–143, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ergin MA, Spielvogel D, Apaydin A, Lansman SL, McCullough JN, Galla JD, and Griepp RB. Surgical treatment of the dilated ascending aorta: when and how? Ann Thorac Surg 67: 1834–1839, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Fedak PWM, de Sa MP, Verma S, Nili N, Kazemian P, Butany J, Strauss BH, Weisel RD, and David TE. Vascular matrix remodelling in patients with bicuspid aortic valve malformation: Implications for aortic dilatation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126: 797–806, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Fedak PWM, Verma S, David TE, Leask RL, Weisel RD, and Butany J. Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 106: 900–904, 2002.[Free Full Text]
  8. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (HPSCG). MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 360: 7–22, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Huntington K, Hunter AG, and Chan KL. A prospective study to assess the frequency of familial clustering of congenital bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol 30: 1809–1812, 1997.[Abstract]
  10. Lee TC, Zhao YD, Courtman DW, and Stewart DJ. Abnormal aortic valve development in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 101: 2345–2348, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. McCarey DW, McInnes IB, Madhok R, Hampson R, Scherbakov O, Ford I, Capell HA, and Sattar N. Trial of Atorvastatin in Rheumatoid Arthritis (TARA): double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 363: 2015–2021, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  12. Mohler ER. Are atherosclerotic processes involved in aortic valve calcification? Lancet 356: 524–525, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Brown BG, Ganz P, Vogel RA, Crowe T, Howard G, Cooper CJ, Brodie B, Grines CL, and DeMaria AN; REVERSAL Investigators. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291: 1071–1080, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Nistri S, Sorbo MD, Marin M, Palisi M, Scognamiglio R, and Thiene G. Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves. Heart 82: 19–22, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Novaro GM, Tiong IY, Pearce GL, Lauer MS, Sprecher DL, Griffin BP. Effect of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on the progression of calcific aortic stenosis. Circulation 104: 2205–2209, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rajamannan NM and Otto CM. Targeted therapy to prevent progression of calcific aortic stenosis. Circulation 110: 1180–1182, 2004.[Free Full Text]
  17. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 344: 1383–1389, 1994.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers G, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, O'Brien E; and Ostergren J; ASCOT Investigators. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361: 1149–1158, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  19. Shavelle DM, Takasu J, Budoff MJ, Mao S, Zhao XQ, and O'Brien KD. HMG CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) and aortic valve calcium. Lancet 359: 1125–1126, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  20. Thompson RW and Parks WC. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann NY Acad Sci 800: 157–174, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  21. Ward C. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 83: 81–85, 2000.[Free Full Text]
  22. Zamrini E, McGwin G, and Roseman JM. Association between statin use and Alzheimer's disease. Neuroepidemiology 23: 94–98, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
K. I. Paraskevas
Applications of statins in cardiothoracic surgery: more than just lipid-lowering
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 33(3): 377 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. F. Padera Jr. and F. J. Schoen
Pathology of Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 111 - 178.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S.
Right arrow Articles by David, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S.
Right arrow Articles by David, T. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.