|
|
||||||||
EDITORIALS


*Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical School, New York;
IMPULSE Dynamics, Orangeburg, New York; and
Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
MAJOR ADVANCES in pharmacological treatments for chronic heart failure in the setting of reduced ejection fraction have been made over the past two decades. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (19),
-blockers (45a, 58, 60), angiotensin II receptor type 1 blockers (65), and aldosterone inhibitors (66, 67) have each been shown to significantly improve survival in these patients. In a majority of patients, however, these treatments delay disease progression and only rarely reverse it to any substantial degree. As evidence, the number of hospitalizations for heart failure exacerbations continues to increase (3, 9), and a majority of patients will ultimately die of complications related to heart failure (11, 45a). Lack of a cure for heart failure and the large number of patients at risk, especially with the aging population, has fueled an intensive ongoing effort to learn more about pathophysiological mechanisms that will lead to the development of new treatments.
The major advances in pharmacological treatments noted above came with the recognition that the progressive ventricular dilation and deterioration of ventricular pump function characteristic of heart failure secondary to underlying molecular, cellular, biochemical, metabolic, and extracellular matrix abnormalities (collectively referred to as ventricular remodeling) are due to the pathologically elevated mechanical stresses on the myocardium [i.e., increased preload and afterload (7)] and to sustained neurohormonal and cytokine activation (42, 43, 54, 56). Recent studies of human hearts and myocardium obtained from patients requiring prolonged left ventricular (LV) assist device support before orthotopic heart transplantation have implicated specific aspects of the remodeling processes as being primarily governed by either neurohormonal or mechanical factors (7, 40). Myocardial unloading can be achieved pharmacologically by diuretics and afterload reducers such as ACE inhibitors, but the degree of unloading is limited by the need to maintain adequate blood pressure and cardiac output. Randomized studies have shown that pharmacological blockade of the key neurohormonal pathways interrupts the vicious cycle, retards progression, and improves survival. However, results of several recent trials suggest that attempts to block additional neurohormonal or cytokine pathways may be detrimental (18, 21, 44). This has lead to the concept that we may have reached the limit to which neurohormonal and cytokine mechanisms can be blocked in heart failure (18, 20, 21, 44). If this is indeed the case, alternate approaches must be pursued. While the main targets for successful treatments have been the periphery, many investigators are revisiting strategies that directly improve ventricular pump function (25).
Early investigations of heart failure treatments explored direct pharmacological inotropic therapies. These approaches were shown to have an adverse effect on survival (26, 27, 55, 57, 59). The introduction of
-blockers, however, showed that the mechanism by which inotropy is achieved is important.
-Blockers, although negatively inotropic in the acute setting, induce positive inotropic actions when used chronically as evidenced by increases in ejection fraction and improved adrenergic responsiveness (10, 30). Although additional advances in pharmacological treatment for heart failure are anticipated, several device-based treatments intended to directly enhance ventricular function are in various stages of development.
CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (2, 4) is an important example of such a treatment. Twenty to forty percent of patients with heart failure have an abnormal electrical activation sequence (e.g., left bundle branch block), which causes dyssynchronous contraction of muscles in different parts of the ventricle. Dyssynchronous contraction, in turn, causes a reduction in LV pump function by up to 20% beyond that which exists as a consequence of intrinsic muscle dysfunction and chamber dilation (14, 52). This is because in the presence of dyssynchrony, the mass of muscle that is activated early contracts against neighboring muscle in a weak (preexcited) state; the early activated muscle shortens at the expense of lengthening of the neighboring muscle, which reduces force generation, thus reducing pressure generation (14, 24). CRT is a treatment in which the heart is simultaneously paced from one right ventricular endocardial site and one LV epicardial site; access to the LV epicardial site is achieved minimally invasively by a pacing lead inserted via the coronary sinus to a distal coronary vein, thus simultaneously activating the would-be early- and late-activated regions. When electrically synchronized in this manner, mechanical synchrony is improved, and there is an immediate increase in ventricular contractility (52). This increase in chamber pump strength is achieved with no significant increase in myocardial oxygen consumption for the amount of work performed, as detailed previously (14, 52). In brief, it has been proposed that a conduction defect reduces the effective mass of muscle contributing to pressure generation, although the ineffective mass still consumes oxygen at a rate equivalent to that consumed in a mechanically unloaded state by basal metabolism and due to calcium cycling. Thus a dyscoordinated contraction leads to a metabolically inefficient state. With restoration of synchrony, the previously ineffective muscle mass is now contributing to contraction with a relatively small increase in oxygen consumption due only to the added amount of work being performed (i.e., there is no increase in oxygen consumed for basal metabolism or calcium cycling).
The Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation trial (2) showed that compared with a placebo treatment in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV symptoms, ejection fraction
35%, and a QRS duration
130ms, CRT more frequently reduced NYHA class and improved quality of life (measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire) and exercise tolerance (measured by both the 6-min hall walk and by peak oxygen consumption measured during cardiopulmonary stress testing). More recently, the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure trial (12) showed in a similar patient population (NYHA class III or IV, ejection fraction
35%, QRS
120 ms, and a hospitalization for heart failure within 12 mo before enrollment) that this treatment reduces the combined risk of death from any cause or first hospitalization (12). Accordingly, CRT is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for NYHA class III and IV chronic heart failure patients with ejection fraction
35% and QRS duration
120 ms. With multiple studies showing that implanted cardiac defibrillators (ICD) improve survival in the same group of patients for which CRT is indicated (12), a majority of devices being implanted incorporate both CRT and ICD functions.
One limitation of CRT is that it has only been shown to be effective in patients with prolonged QRS duration, which account for less than half of patients with class III or IV symptoms. In fact, one study (5) showed significant improvements in patients with QRS durations
150 ms, whereas fewer improvements were seen with QRS durations between 120 and 150 ms. Availability of a treatment that would be as easily deployable as CRT and as effective in patients with normal QRS duration could have a substantial impact on heart failure treatment. Further consideration of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying contractile dysfunction in heart failure provided additional clues for the development of new approaches.
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF EXCITATION-CONTRACTION COUPLING AND DEFECTS IN HEART FAILURE
In cardiac muscle, calcium enters the cell during the plateau of the action potential through voltage-sensitive L-type calcium channels. This initial rise in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) induces the release of larger amounts of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR; calcium-induced calcium release) and itself mostly enters the SR to become available for release on subsequent excitations. Calcium is removed from the cytosol by SR ATP-dependent calcium pumps and by the sarcolemmal sodium/calcium exchanger (8).
One cellular defect that underlies myocardial contractile dysfunction in heart failure of all causes is a reduction in the peak and broadening of the time course of the intracellular calcium transient (33), which leads to systolic and diastolic contractile abnormalities. Except for cases of rare genetic abnormalities, these changes in calcium cycling are not primary causes of heart failure but reflect secondary changes in both expression of genes encoding calcium handling proteins (29) and posttranslational modification of these proteins, many of which result from the abnormalities of
-adrenergic signaling. Several of the commonly discussed abnormalities include downregulation of genes encoding for the sarco(endo)plasmic reticular ATPase-dependent calcium pump [sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase 2a (SERCA2a)] (32, 38, 48, 53), changes in expression and hypophosphorylation of phospholamban (31, 37, 48, 53, 71, 72), altered regulation of the sodium/calcium exchanger (39, 53, 74), and hyperphosphorylation of the ryanodine release channel (41, 45, 75). Although there are still controversies surrounding many aspects of these observations, there is general agreement that important changes in the regulation of the calcium transient occur in chronic heart failure and that these appear to result from the chronic neurohormonal stimulation present in heart failure discussed above. Indeed, some of the abnormalities noted are reversed during chronic
-blocker therapy (69). Accordingly, treatments aimed at improving the calcium transient in heart failure could be therapeutic (25).
Early studies of isolated cardiac muscle showed that use of voltage-clamp techniques to modulate the amplitude and duration of the action potential could modulate calcium entry and contractility in isolated papillary muscles (76). Increases in the duration of depolarization or the voltage during depolarization have each been associated with increases in the strength of cardiac muscle contraction. A relationship between action potential characteristics and calcium transients has been confirmed in myocardium from a rapid pacing heart failure model in dogs (53). However, because voltage clamping is not applicable to the intact heart, this type of approach was never thought of as a potential therapy for patients with heart failure. A conceptual breakthrough occurred with the recognition that similar effects could be achieved with extracellular field stimulation of myocardial tissue.
EXTRACELLULAR ELECTRIC SIGNALS CAN MODIFY THE STRENGTH OF CARDIAC CONTRACTION
Initial demonstration of this concept was obtained when square-wave current pulses were applied during the absolute refractory period in isolated, superfused, isometrically contracting rabbit papillary muscles. In this preparation, these signals were shown to significantly influence isometric contractile strength (Fig. 1A). Signals of negative amplitude (cathodic currents) were shown to reduce force, whereas positive amplitude (anodic currents) increased force. In either case, force of contraction was modified within one beat after introduction of signal application and reached a new steady-state level after approximately six to eight beats. The sequence was reversed after cessation of the signal. These signals have been referred to as cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals. CCM signals are referred to as nonexcitatory, because they are delivered during the refractory period and therefore do not elicit a new action potential.
|
|
As noted above, SR function is believed to be blunted in heart failure, raising the possibility that the CCM signal may not be as effective in improving contractile force in that setting. Trabeculae obtained from human hearts explanted from patients with severe heart failure at the time of cardiac transplantation were therefore studied in a similar manner as the rabbit papillary muscles described above (15). It was shown in these studies that CCM signals enhanced cardiac contractility in this preparation as well (Fig. 1B). On average, the CCM signal increased developed force by an average of
30% from its baseline value compared with that observed in normal rabbit myocardium with CCM signals having the same parameters. This finding may be compatible with recent studies of end-stage failing human myocardium showing that, although there is markedly downregulated SERCA2a expression (Northern blot analysis), the ability of SR vesicles to accumulate calcium is impaired by only about 25% (39). This degree of functional impairment is believed to be sufficient to result in the inability of the failing heart to increase contractile strength with increases in heart rate, i.e., the failing heart lacks a normal, positive force-frequency relationship (38). On the other hand, the degree of retained SR function appears sufficient to permit existence of the CCM effect.
CCM EFFECTS IN INTACT HEARTS
In vivo field stimulation of entire hearts of larger mammals is not feasible because of practical considerations related to power availability and nonspecific stimulation of other tissues in the field (e.g., nerves, skeletal muscles, etc.). It was next tested whether contractile strength of an entire heart could be enhanced by CCM application to a region of the hearts of anesthetized dogs. Studies were performed in different laboratories in normal animals (49) and in animals in which heart failure had been introduced by repeated coronary artery microembolizations (51, 70). These studies showed that there was a repeatable significant effect on pressure generation [Fig. 1C (51)], maximum first derivative of LV pressure (dP/dtmax), ejection fraction, and end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR), all indicative of an increase in ventricular contractility that dissipated when the CCM signal delivery was ceased.
One set of studies explored the effects of CCM signals on the ventricular ESPVR. Ventricular volume was measured using ultrasonic crystals placed at multiple sites on the heart; volumes were estimated from continuously tracked ventricular dimensions and assuming an ellipsoidal ventricular geometry (49). These studies showed the upward shift of the ESPVR indicative of the increase in global ventricular contractile strength. In these same experiments, regional myocardial function was assessed using these same crystals by constructing regional pressure-segment length loops. The results showed that contractile performance was enhanced only in the region near the site of stimulation, and there was an accompanying reduction in regional end-diastolic segment length. Remotely, there were subtle changes in the shape of the pressure-length segment loop but no effect on contractility. It was further shown that when CCM signals are delivered to two sites, the effects on global function were additive.
Interestingly, when applied acutely to hearts of dogs with chronic heart failure, CCM treatment has also been shown to be associated with no significant change in global myocardial oxygen consumption (70). This may reflect the fact that offsetting factors influencing metabolic demand are in effect. On the one hand, there is an increase in regional contractility, which would be expected to increase regional oxygen consumption, whereas on the other hand, there is a local reduction in end-diastolic segment length, which would tend to reduce regional oxygen consumption. Alternatively, it may be difficult to detect regional changes in myocardial oxygen consumption, particularly from the septal wall, for which a significant proportion of venous blood may drain directly into the right ventricle and not appear in the coronary sinus. Finally, therapies that switch metabolism from free fatty acid utilization to glucose utilization have also been associated with enhanced function without increased oxygen consumption (6, 16, 17, 23). Whether or not CCM signals influence metabolism in this manner is not known.
INITIAL CLINICAL STUDY OF CCM SIGNALS
The initial tests of the acute effects of CCM signals performed in isolated papillary muscles and intact hearts of larger animals noted above set the stage for studies in human subjects with heart failure. The initial study involved short-term (1030 min) CCM signal application using temporarily placed electrodes in patients with heart failure who had a clinical indication for an electrophysiology procedure (such as a CRT and/or ICD implantation or an electrophysiology study for evaluation of ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias) (6264). The findings showed the feasibility of delivering CCM treatment in humans and demonstrated that contractile performance could be enhanced (Fig. 1D). The signals were applied to patients with normal and prolonged QRS complexes, and similar acute effects were identified in both groups. In the patients with long QRS, CCM signals were also applied in addition to CRT; the effects on acute contractile performance as quantified by dP/dtmax of CRT and CCM were shown to be additive. Similar to the effects in dogs with heart failure, this increase in contractile performance was not associated with detectable changes in global myocardial oxygen consumption. The first chronic application of CCM signals in heart failure patients was performed in a small group of patients who enrolled into two multicenter studies designed mainly to test the functionality of an implantable device that automatically delivers CCM signals (the OPTIMIZER System) (61, 73). Although improvements in patient symptoms, ejection fraction, quality of life, and exercise were reported, these findings must be taken within the context that they derived from unblinded, uncontrolled, treatment-only studies in a small number of patients. Nevertheless, no overt safety concerns were revealed from these studies. Two multicenter, randomized, controlled studies of CCM are currently underway (one in Europe and one in the United States being performed under an investigational device exemption from the United States Food and Drug Administration) to definitively test the safety and efficacy of CCM as a treatment for heart failure.
FUTURE RESEARCH
Although a significant amount of work has been done over the past several years to investigate the mechanisms and effects of CCM, many questions remain. The basic studies noted above have explored only acute CCM signal applications, and only recently are new data becoming available on longer term effects. For example, results of preliminary studies in animals suggest that within 6 h of CCM signal delivery, there are significant changes in myocardial gene expression [including a reversal of several aspects of the fetal gene program expressed in heart failure (22, 28)] and improved expression and phosphorylation of the sodium/calcium exchanger, phospholamban, and connexin43 (3436, 46, 47, 68). Ongoing studies are aimed at further clarification of these and other effects of CCM when applied chronically in the setting of heart failure. As noted above, two clinical studies are underway to definitively test the safety and efficacy of CCM in patients with normal QRS durations who have NYHA class III or IV symptoms despite optimal medical therapy.
In summary, despite marked advances in pharmacotherapy, a growing number of patient have advanced heart failure with poor exercise tolerance and quality of life. With recognition that we may have reached a point where further blockade of the neurohormonal pathways responsible in large part for ventricular remodeling may not be possible, some investigators are beginning to refocus attention on means of directly improving pump function. Indeed, in a recent editorial, Dorn and Molkentin recently wrote (25) that "There is a strong and obvious rationale for inotropic therapy in heart failure. At the whole-organ level, the hallmark of dilated cardiomyopathy is diminished systolic ventricular function. At the cellular level, most studies have shown diminished cardiomyocyte contractility in heart failure. Indeed, at the biochemical level, abnormalities of
-adrenergic receptor signaling and SR calcium cycling appear to be the critical lesions. Clearly, then, therapy should be targeted at increasing cardiomyocyte and ventricular contractility by augmenting the
-adrenergic/SERCA axis." Additionally, prior adverse experiences with
-agonists and phosphodiesterase inhibitors should not be extrapolated to all forms treatment aimed at enhancing ventricular contractility. Experience with CRT indicates that such approaches can be safe and effective treatments for heart failure.
Although current studies are not definitive and the mechanisms of action in both acute and chronic settings require further elucidation, nonexcitatory CCM signals also appear to influence myocardial contraction via mechanisms different than
-agonists and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Also, being a site-specific device-based treatment, CCM lacks the peripheral effects of pharmacological agents and, as a further differentiating feature, can be turned on and off as desired. Clinical studies to define the risks associated with this form of treatment and the nature and magnitude of potential benefits are underway.
DISCLOSURES
D. Burkhoff is an employee and S. A. Ben Haim is cochairman of IMPULSE Dynamics, Incorporated, the developer of CCM treatment for heart failure.
FOOTNOTES
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Burkhoff, Div. of Cardiology, Columbia Univ., Black Bldg. 812, 650 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032 (E-mail: db59{at}columbia.edu)
REFERENCES
-Adrenergic receptor blockade in chronic heart failure. Circulation 101: 558569, 2000.
-Blocker therapy in heart failure: scientific review. JAMA 287: 883889, 2002.
-adrenergic pathway properties. J Am Coll Cardiol. In press.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Nagele, S. Behrens, and C. Eisermann Cardiac contractility modulation in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy Europace, December 1, 2008; 10(12): 1375 - 1380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Butter, S. Rastogi, H.-H. Minden, J. Meyhofer, D. Burkhoff, and H. N. Sabbah Cardiac contractility modulation electrical signals improve myocardial gene expression in patients with heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 6, 2008; 51(18): 1784 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Daubert Modulation of cardiac contractility. A potential treatment of heart failure? Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2008; 29(8): 961 - 963. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Borggrefe, T. Lawo, C. Butter, H. Schmidinger, M. Lunati, B. Pieske, A. R. Misier, A. Curnis, D. Bocker, A. Remppis, et al. Randomized, double blind study of non-excitatory, cardiac contractility modulation electrical impulses for symptomatic heart failure Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2008; 29(8): 1019 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |