|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3Heart Research Laboratory and 4Surgery, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
Submitted 20 December 2004 ; accepted in final form 25 February 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
fetus; polyhydramnios; amniochorion; intramembranous absorption
Production of amniotic fluid results from fetal urination and lung fluid secretion (5, 13, 16). There is good evidence that urine production and lung fluid flow do not serve to regulate amniotic fluid volume because neither lung fluid flow nor urine production properly respond to induced changes in volume (9, 11). Thus, although substances secreted in these fluids may affect volume regulation (14), whatever regulatory mechanism exists must modulate the rate of fluid elimination to adapt to changes in fluid production. Fluid elimination consists of swallowing by the fetus and of absorption of fluid by the amniochorion, the membrane that surrounds the amniotic cavity. Amniochorionic absorption of amniotic fluid ["intramembranous absorption" (7, 14)] proceeds by means of an as-yet-unresolved mechanism (7, 12). Whether swallowing serves a regulatory function is not settled (16). However, absorption by the amniochorion has been shown to serve a regulatory function because augmentation of inflow by means of experimental infusion of fluid into the amnion leads to increases in the amniochorionic absorption rate; it is also known that a large part of amniochorionic absorption occurs in the form of bulk flow (6, 11, 12).
There are numerous studies that show directly or indirectly that the regulation of amniotic fluid volume by amniochorionic absorption responds appropriately to various experimental interventions that have the potential to affect this volume (8, 11, 1315, 18). However, the power of this regulation is unknown. For this reason, the present experiments were designed to establish the relation between the volume of amniotic fluid present at any given time and the rate at which it is absorbed. The results to be presented supported our hypothesis that the volume of amniotic fluid is for a large part independent of the fluid production rate and that the amniochorionic membrane is capable of daily absorbing volumes that are many times larger than the amniotic fluid volume itself.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All surgical and experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Oregon Health and Sciences University. Seven time-bred pregnant ewes carrying singletons were sterilely operated at a gestational age of 120 days (range 118122 days); term is about 147 days. The ewes were premedicated with 7.5 mg atropine, 400 mg ketamine, and 10 mg diazepam intravenously, intubated, and continued on a mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide with sufficient halothane or isoflurane (about 11.5%) to maintain a surgical level of anesthesia in both the ewe and her fetus.
After exposure of the uterus, the uterine wall and amniochorion were incised at the location of the fetal head and sutured together with interrupted sutures to ensure the proper apposition of the fetal membranes at the time of closure. To permit the continuation of lung fluid production without allowing lung fluid to enter the amnion as well as to prevent swallowing, we connected the pulmonary end of the fetal trachea to the gastric end of the esophagus with a short length of polyvinyl tubing. The cranial ends of the trachea and esophagus were separately ligated. Indwelling catheters were placed in a fetal carotid artery and jugular vein. After closure of the fetal skin, a catheter of 2.5 mm internal diameter, ending in a 10-ml plastic screw top vial with multiple side holes, was attached to the skin. It served later to quickly drain all amniotic fluid for the purpose of measuring its volume, a technique adapted from the one published by Dickson and Harding (9). A smaller amniotic fluid catheter was attached also for the later measurement of amniotic fluid pressure.
After this first uterine incision had been closed with multiple interrupted sutures oversewn with a continuous suture, a similar incision was made over the fetal hindquarters. The fetal urachus was ligated. This stopped all inflow into the allantoic sac and led to the disappearance of the allantoic fluid, as described by Wlodek et al. (20). A polyvinyl catheter with a soft silicon rubber tip was placed into the fetal bladder. Intravascular catheters were placed in a tibial artery and saphenous vein, and two more large-bore drain catheters and two small amniotic fluid catheters were attached to the fetal skin at the abdomen and at a hind leg. After the fetal skin and the uterus had been closed as described, the catheters were routed underneath the maternal skin to the flank, where they emerged and were stored in a small pouch attached to the skin of the ewe. A single dose of 1 million units of penicillin G were injected into the amniotic fluid; no other antibiotics were routinely used. Vascular catheters were filled with a saline solution of 500 U heparin/ml. For 2 days after recovery from anesthesia, the ewes were given twice daily doses of 0.6 mg bupremorphine for pain prevention.
Experimental procedures. All animals were given 79 days for postoperative healing. For the experiments, the ewes were placed in stanchions with free access to water and food at all times. The bladder catheter was connected to a small bottle with electrodes. All urine drained into this bottle. A Gilson Minipuls-3 roller pump was used to keep the urine in the bottle at the level of the electrodes. Excess urine was pumped back into the amnion. By recording the activity of the roller pump, we obtained a record of the inflow of urine into the amnion over the entire duration of each experiment without affecting that inflow.
At the beginning of each 2-day period, all amniotic fluid was drained and replaced with 1 liter of isotonic lactated Ringer solution. At the end, all amniotic fluid was again drained, and its volume was measured and replaced with 1 liter of Ringer solution. Two protocols were used. In a "control period," urine inflow into the amnion was monitored but no interventions occurred. Because lung fluid inflow had been eliminated by the surgical procedure, the total inflow volume into the amnion consisted of the initial 1 liter of Ringer solution plus the volume of urine pumped back into the amnion over the 2-day period. The total volume absorbed, therefore, equaled this inflow volume, reduced by the volume of amniotic fluid retrieved at the end. The rate of removal of amniotic fluid was obtained by dividing the absorbed volume by the exact duration of the experiment. Because swallowing had also been eliminated, the rate of amniochorionic absorption was equal to the removal rate.
The second protocol ("infusion period") was identical with the exception that the inflow into the amnion was augmented by the infusion of isotonic Ringer solution into the amnion. These rates of infusion remained constant over the entire 2-day period. Rates from 86 to 238 ml/h (from 2,064 to 5,712 ml/day) with a mean of 164 ml/h were used in different infusion periods. Thus the total inflow in an infusion period was the sum of the initial 1 liter, the urine volume, and the volume of Ringer solution administered in this period. Five of the fetuses were tested at different infusion rates. The infusion periods were interspersed with additional control periods, during which time only the urine was infused. Thus a total of 14 control and 13 infusion experiments were performed. Control and infusion experiments were performed in no set order to randomize any effect the one might have on the other.
In addition to the measurements of amniotic fluid volume at the end of each experimental period, we measured fetal plasma renin activities, amniotic fluid pressures, fetal arterial and venous blood pressures, heart rates, arterial blood pH, PO2, PCO2, oxygen contents, hemoglobin concentrations, and hematocrits to monitor the well-being of the fetuses.
Materials and instrumentation. Hydrostatic pressures were measured with Abbott Transpac transducers and a Macintosh-based commercial recording system. The transducers were calibrated each day against a mercury manometer and zeroed before every measurement. Pressures are accurate to 0.5 mmHg. Intravascular pressures are reported with respect to amniotic fluid pressure. Heart rates were derived from arterial pressure pulsations.
Arterial blood pH, PCO2, PO2, hemoglobin concentrations, and oxygen contents were determined with an Instrumentation Laboratories IL306 and IL482 system. Plasma renin activities were analyzed as described by Binder and Anderson (4).
The Ringer solution was commercial Lactated Ringer USP with a stated composition of (in meq/l) 130 Na+, 4 K+, 110 Cl, 28 lactate, and 3 Ca2+, and an osmolality of 275 mosm/kg.
Statistical methods. All statistical analyses were done with the use of a Graph Pad Prism (Graph Pad Software; San Diego, CA) commercial software package. A level of P < 0.05 was required for statistical significance. Measures of dispersion are 1 SD.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Comparison of the results of control and infusion experiments. Because not every infusion period was immediately preceded by a control period to which its results could be compared, we averaged the control amniotic fluid volumes and control intramembranous absorption rates of a given animal and compared its individual infusion data with its average control. The results are shown in Fig. 1.
|
Urine production was not reduced and, therefore, played no regulatory role during the intraamniotic volume challenges with Ringer solution. To the contrary, urine production increased from 40.7 ± 13.4 to 52.7 ± 24.8 ml/h, although this increase was not statistically significant.
Figure 2 shows the relation between the increase in the amniochorionic absorption rate (above mean control rate) and the corresponding rate of infusion of Ringer solution. The slope of the least-squares linear regression is 0.75 (P < 0.001), and the zero infusion intercept is 27 ml/h (not significant). It highlights the precise response of the regulatory mechanism.
|
At the end of intra-amniotic infusions of Ringer solution, fetal plasma renin activities were lower than at the end of control periods, decreasing from a control value of 10.6 ± 3.4 ng·ml1·h1 to a post-Ringer solution infusion value of 4.2 ± 3.1 ng·ml1·h1. This decrease was highly significant (P < 0.001). Plasma renin activities correlated with the rates of infusion, but this correlation, although statistically significant (P < 0.02), was weak, with r being only 0.50.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As could be seen from the excellent blood gas values, momentarily draining all amniotic fluid as often as every 2 days had no discernable long-term deleterious effects on the fetus. In the past, we used drainage catheters with "wiffle" balls or plastic vials with large side holes at the end (2, 3). Occasionally, one of these preparations was lost because a small loop of the flaccid umbilical cord became incarcerated through one of the holes. The use of side holes no larger than 3 mm eliminated that problem.
Fate of the absorbed fluid. Some of the volumes infused into the amnion were very large compared with the volume of the amnion or the fetus, exceeding 10 liters over the period of 2 days. In the past, we acutely infused as much as 3 liters of Evans blue-stained saline into uteri from which all fluid had been drained into evacuated bottles, following it with an immediate autopsy. No leaks have ever been found. This may be because no more than one catheter is allowed to emerge from the uterus between each pair of sutures and because the individual sutures in the uterine wall are oversewn with a continuous suture. It is likely that an adequate time for postoperative healing is also beneficial.
Direct passage of amniotic fluid to and from the maternal circulation is only barely detectable and then only under the influence of extreme osmotic gradients; under the present circumstances, it could have been of the order of only few milliliters per day (2). It may be surmised, therefore, that the fluid was absorbed first into the fetal circulation and then cleared to the maternal circulation by way of the placenta. Because fetal fluid exchange with its mother appears to be controlled by the fetal renin-angiotensin system (1, 10), we expected the steep decrease in fetal plasma renin activity after the infusions of Ringer solution. The negligible changes in fetal blood hematocrit and hemoglobin concentration after intraamniotic infusions of Ringer solution attested to the adequacy of fetal fluid control.
Function curves of the amniochorion. To interpret the results shown in Fig. 1, we kept in mind that the volumes plotted on the abscissa are the volumes that existed at the end of each 2-day period, whereas the absorption rates on the ordinate are the average absorption rates during the 2 days of each period. Ideally, one would like to see the absorption rate that existed at the moment the volume was measured and one would like to measure the amniotic fluid volumes and the amniochorionic absorption rates only after a steady state has been achieved. To our knowledge, there is no presently available technique to make such measurements.
To evaluate how well the results shown in Fig. 1 represent the steady-state relations between absorption rate and volume, we considered the following. During the experimental periods, the volumes changed from the initial volume of 1 liter to the final volume depicted in Fig. 1. Thus for those cases where the final volume was about 1 liter or a little less, the volume was close to the volume shown in Fig. 1 during the entire experimental period. Thus, for the cases at the left side of Fig. 1, the average rate of absorption on the vertical axis and the volume on the horizontal axis are good approximations for the steady-state function curve.
For those cases in which the final volume was much larger than the initial volume of 1 liter, the volumes changed during the period of the experiment from the initial 1 liter to the volume shown in Fig. 1. Because the absorption rate increases with increasing volume, it is likely that the rate of absorption initially was less than the average rate of absorption and increased as volume increased so that the rate of absorption at the end of 2 days was higher than the average rate of absorption. If this reasoning is valid, it would mean that the steepness of the function curves on the right side of Fig. 1 underestimates the steepness of the steady-state function curves.
Thus the amniotic fluid function curves shown in Fig. 1 will be close to the average steady-state characteristics for the animals whose data belong in the top left half of Fig. 1 because of the multiple amniotic fluid half-lives covered by the 2-day test periods. For the data in the bottom right half of Fig. 1, the relevance to a steady state depends on how fast the absorption rate responds to an induced change in volume. If the stimulus of the absorptive process is primarily mechanical, depending, for instance, on the stretch of the amniochorion, the response could be quite rapid. The response could be much slower if the stimulus depends on a cascade of biochemical reactions within the amniotic fluid, a cascade that could well be concentration sensitive and, therefore, volume sensitive. It should be noted that a mechanical stimulus would cause the regulation of total intrauterine volume, including the fetus, whereas a chemical stimulus would regulate amniotic fluid volume per se, a vital distinction. Previous experiments performed in our laboratory (21) support the existence of a biochemical process because isovolumic replacement of amniotic fluid with artificial fluid caused an increase in amniotic fluid volume. However, a biochemically mediated control does not preclude the concurrent operation of a mechanical process.
The maximum rates of absorption observed in these experiments were greater than those we believed possible. The largest previously published rate known to us is about 1 l/day, although this was stated to be somewhat of an underestimate (17). Each of the present seven fetuses was shown to be capable of an amniochorionic absorption rate in excess of 4.5 l/day. It should be noted that these rates may not represent the maximal possible absorption rates because we did not attempt to measure the maximum rates.
Perspective. Figure 1 shows one animal (open circles) in which a further increase in absorption was associated with a decrease in amniotic fluid volume, and another animal (filled triangles) in which two different amniotic fluid volumes were associated with almost the same absorption rates. It is possible, therefore, that the function curves of the amniochorion are not unalterable but can be modulated by other, as-yet-unknown, factors. The nature of such factors would be of considerable practical interest. However, when operating on any given function curve, the amniochorionic absorption process is capable of large changes in the rate of absorption. We conclude, therefore, that the differences between animals in the naturally occurring (control) amniotic fluid volumes were more related to differences in the individual amniochorionic function curves than to differences in naturally occurring urine production rates. Whether this conclusion remains valid in surgically unmodified preparations remains to be determined.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Y. Cheung and R. A. Brace Unidirectional Transport Across Cultured Ovine Amniotic Epithelial Cell Monolayer Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2008; 15(10): 1054 - 1058. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |